Quantcast
Channel:
Viewing all 594 articles
Browse latest View live

More Up dating

$
0
0

Gout almost gone, duck for tea, Mary very tired but manageda little.

Obituary
HOME»NEWS»OBITUARIES
Jane Bown – obituary
Jane Bown was a celebrated portrait photographer for the Observer who brought her camera to shoots in a shopping bag

Jane Bown in 1983 Photo: Observer / TopFoto
7:42PM GMT 21 Dec 20141 Comment
Jane Bown, who has died aged 89, was an outstanding portrait photographer who confounded the experts with the simplicity of her camera technique. She spent 65 years on the Observer, for whom she took several thousand pictures of politicians, bishops, actors, pop stars and other celebrities, as well as ordinary people – miners, hop-pickers and women at a holiday camp – whose faces captured her interest.
Nearly all her pictures were snatched on location during the 10 or 15 minutes she was allowed while a reporter was interviewing someone for the newspaper. A tiny, round-faced, unobtrusive woman, she would appear with only a shopping bag, in which her camera would often compete for space with vegetables for that night’s supper.
This unthreatening demeanour had the effect of defusing a subject’s initial hostility. Both the Beatles and the Rolling Stones took to her and allowed her to stay long after the time allocated by their minders. This resulted in famous portraits of Mick Jagger and John Lennon in particular; she found Paul McCartney “a bit pompous”.
Her much-admired picture of Samuel Beckett, showing his face as a cracked desert of lines protruding from a white polo-neck, was captured at the stage door at the Royal Court after he had declined to see her. A very determined character beneath a gentle, nervous manner, she obtained a memorable portrait of Richard Nixon by crawling through the legs of the crowd outside his hotel and shouting to him to look at her.
She worked only in black and white. She was asked to try colour for the Observer when it launched a colour magazine in the 1960s, but she didn’t like it and soon abandoned the experiment. She also used natural light; the only “equipment” she ever allowed herself was a table lamp, which she occasionally carried around to illuminate a face when the light was especially bad. She never used flash or an exposure meter.
Related Articles

Phil Stern 18 Dec 2014
Cornel Lucas 14 Nov 2012
David Redfern 25 Oct 2014
René Burri 31 Oct 2014
At first she used a Rolleiflex, moving on to a Pentax and finally to her beloved Olympus camera with an 85mm lens, always at a camera speed of 1/60th of a second and with the aperture at f2.8. The combination of wide aperture on a close-up lens produced a very thin depth of field. She focused on the subject’s head, especially the eyes, and caught their faces in a way that isolated them sharply against a hazy background.
Lord Snowdon said she was “a kind of English Cartier-Bresson” who produced “photography at its best. She doesn’t rely on tricks or gimmicks, just simple, honest recording, but with a shrewd and intellectual eye.”
Jane Hope Bown was born on March 13 1925 in Dorset. Her mother was a private nurse, working at Eastnor in Herefordshire, who fell inconveniently pregnant from a patient in her care. Jane never knew the name of her father, but gathered that he was “posh … his family had land.”

Jane Bown, on right holding camera, with Bette Davis (Getty / Hulton Archive)
She was farmed out to her mother’s five sisters in Devon and Dorset (all named after plants: Primrose, Daisy, Violet, Iris and Ivy), who passed her around between them. When she was 18, she joined the Wrens and worked as a chart-corrector for naval operations, including the D-Day landings. After the war she was given an education grant and chose to study photography at Guildford College, even though she had never held a camera before.
She took wedding photographs for a time until her former tutor, Ifor Thomas, having spotted her natural talent, put her in touch with Mechthild Nawiasky, the artist, who was working on the picture desk at the Observer. Nawiasky showed David Astor, the editor, Jane’s college portfolio, and he was so impressed, especially by her picture of the eye of a cow, that he commissioned her to photograph Bertrand Russell, the first of her great Observer portraits.
In 1954 she married Martin Moss, a fighter pilot in the war who became a senior retail executive and is credited with turning Knightsbridge into a prime shopping location. They had a house in Alton, Hampshire, and later moved to Alresford, into a Queen Anne house that had once been occupied by Jane Austen’s brother.
Jane Bown spoke often about her subjects, in her usual staccato sentences, especially if they were boring (Robert Redford was one of those) but rarely about her art. She said once: “The best pictures are uninvited. They are suddenly there in front of you. But they are there one minute and gone the next.”

Portrait of Samuel Beckett by Jane Bown (SODA PICTURES)
Bjork said of her: “She can look at a person and she knows, instinctively, straightaway, who they are.” Jane liked Gordon Brown and showed him laughing, but never caught Tony Blair. Asked about this, she said: “Oh, he was difficult. I just couldn’t get him. I’m not sure there was anything there.”
Her former editor, Donald Trelford, once accompanied her to interview Sir Anthony Blunt. The picture did not appear in the paper then, but it surfaced some years later when he was exposed as a Soviet spy. It showed him as sinister, half in light and half in shadow. Asked if she had sensed something sinister about him at the time, she said: “It wasn’t me. It was the camera. It saw something creepy in his face.”
She was appointed MBE in 1985, and CBE in 1995. When the Queen asked her what she did, she said was “a hack”. Later, when she took the official photograph for the Queen’s 80th birthday, Jane herself was 81.

Portrait of the Queen by Jane Bown (SODA PICTURES)
Although she was clearly one of the great photographers of the age, she only became widely known to the general public after the Guardian group bought the Observer in 1993 and put her archive of pictures online and produced a documentary film about her. She had two exhibitions at the National Portrait Gallery and received an honorary doctorate from Southampton University.
She published 11 collections of her pictures: The Gentle Eye (1980), Women of Consequence (1986), Men of Consequence (1987), The Singular Cat (1988), Pillars of the Church (1991), Observer (1996), Faces: The Creative Process Behind Great Portraits (2000), Rock 1963-2003 (2003), Unknown Bown 1947-1967 (2007) and Exposures (2009).
Her husband died in 2007 and she is survived by two sons and a daughter.
Jane Bown, born March 13 1925, died December 21 2014

Guardian


Snapshot … Karen Babayan with her mother and grandmother at Christmas in Iran in the mid-1960s.
Snapshot: Waiting for Father Christmas in Iran

This is a rather formal picture for a very happy occasion – this was the Christmas party at the Tehran Club, a club for British expats based in a grand old house set in large grounds in central Tehran. My mother Yolande (Lolo) and my grandmother Clara are in their fashionable best, in home-sewn outfits created by my grandmother, who was an amazing seamstress.

Calikmama (my pet name for my grandmother) is in her very on-trend Jackie Kennedy two-piece and, at 52, is only a year older than I am now. In the photo, I am aged around three. Until my fifth birthday, I was stuck like glue to my mother’s skirts, and would not go to anyone, not even long-suffering Calikmama, who subsequently became my greatest ally and best friend.

My dad, Roy Sowerby, who was into amateur theatricals, was always Father Christmas at these parties. His entrance was spectacular. Totally in character, his “ho ho hos” and handbell rang out while he rode a donkey through the gardens to the house, the children crowding around the big picture window, trembling with anticipation.

Until I left Iran with my family at the age of 16, I had led a sheltered life among the Armenian and expat British communities. Despite being the product of a mixed marriage, one of the very first of the Iranian/Armenian community between an aspiring middle-class, educated Armenian girl and a working-class, ex-pro English footballer, I felt well settled and loved by the family I had been born into and relatively unaffected by world politics.

The Armenians, a Christian community, were well respected by their Muslim hosts, having been part of the fabric of the country for more than 400 years. It was something of a shock, therefore, to discover that our world was not as stable as we thought, with the coming of the Ayatollah Khomeini and subsequent Islamic revolution.

After having lived in the vibrant capital city of Tehran for 16 years, I found myself fleeing the impending political tumult and going westward, to England and an estate in the northern suburbs of Leeds, eventually becoming a painter. Our family is now scattered across the globe and this experience of displacement had a profound effect on every aspect of my life and informed every mark and output during my professional career as an artist.

Karen Babayan

The article by Aditya Chakrabortty on the goings on at Barnet council (Outsourced and unaccountable: this is the future of local government, 16 December) could have been written, to a greater or lesser extent, about any major council in England. Those of us struggling to make local government work when central government has reduced its funding so massively are familiar with the “Barnet graph of doom”, which in 2012 predicted that we would collectively be staring at a financial black hole of around £19bn by 2020 unless things changed. Up and down the country in city, town and county halls, “commissioning” is seen as the salvation to our problems. It has its place; but only if councils retain the ability to monitor its results and bodies like the Care Quality Commission, for example, have enough teeth to make sure that firms and organisations deliver according to agreements.

Clearly, we need major reform both of local government finance and structures before we even consider devolving any more powers from Westminster. We could start by adding some bands at the top end of the council tax and repatriating the business rate. How about looking at local income tax or allowing local councils to retain a couple of percent of the income tax residents already pay to the Treasury? Then let’s scrap those county and district councils that still exist in England and replace them with unitary authorities, thus reducing at a stroke the number of officers needed and particularly the number of councillors, many of whom, from my experience, often sit on both councils anyway.

There’s no easy answer to the problem. It may just boil down to those of us who can afford it being prepared to pay a little more for the services that we value. I wouldn’t bet on that happening in a hurry.
Cllr John Marriott
Lincolnshire county council

• Aside from a feeling that Aditya Chakrabortty seems stuck on a vision of local government that harps back to the 1970s, I have three main issues with his piece. One is his binary view of commissioning, in-house or outsourced. In truth, we have a varied mix of providers, some in-house, some charities, some private-sector and some joint ventures. All are united by a clear definition of the service outcome and a drive to secure value for taxpayers.

Second is his failure to understand that by commissioning services we create contracts based on the quality of service residents receive. Capita’s response to losing some calls was to commission extra phone lines. It now answers more calls than ever, with a higher satisfaction rating than the in-house service.

Thirdly, Chakrabortty seems dismissive of saving of £1m a month. Every penny we save on human resources is money we have for social care or child protection. I know which Barnet residents want us to prioritise. This may be why 53% of residents were satisfied with the council in 2010 and 75% are now.
Cllr Daniel Thomas
Deputy leader, London borough of Barnet

• Due mention should also be made of Barnet’s obsession with increasing its population, although only with the right sort of people that consolidate the political structure of the borough. But for transport, the result is unsustainable congestion from more and more cars. The borough’s cabinet has a “roads, roads, roads and roads” transport policy, to match those aspirations. And Barnet has now granted the UK’s most remarkable planning consent, at Brent Cross on the North Circular Road.

Barnet expects over 29,000 extra cars a day in the Brent Cross area, and the shopping centre expects wealthy new shoppers arriving overwhelmingly by car, even though the transport assessment claims it will increasingly be by bus. That fiction will be obvious only after the shopping centre has opened and the developer has moved on.

All is not lost though, because the borough has a shortlist of new developers, and the cabinet accepted a report that the winner will be announced at a property exhibition in the south of France next spring. Apparently, this is the way that local government now works, the modern way.
John Cox
London

• The government’s attitude towards the impact of its further round of cuts to local government, which by the end of 2016 will have amounted to £4 in every £10 previously spent, is not only dismissive but insulting to everyone who will feel the consequences. It is of course those most in need of public services who lose the most.

The attitude appears to be that if local authorities have managed to survive despite four years of eye-watering austerity, they can easily cope with yet more deep reductions in spending. This reminds me of a Ukrainian tale of a man who sold his mule with a guarantee that it would continue working without having to be fed for at least a week. The mule was duly bought, worked for a week without food – and then dropped dead. When the buyer complained, the mule’s original owner pointed out that the guarantee had run out. If the coalition’s measures are not a sign of their ideological objection to sustaining public services, I do not know what is.
David Blunkett MP
Labour, Sheffield Brightside

• The true cost of outsourcing local authority services? Supply teaching is an interesting example. This £500m-a-year business is run almost exclusively by private companies like Capita and Hays. One of the last council-run supply services is in Sefton, Merseyside. Last financial year, schools spent £1.6m on this service and less than £58,000 in administration costs – less than 3.6% of total costs. A private supply agency will cream off anything between 30% and 50% of the fee for supply teachers paid by schools.

Sefton Supply Service pays the full national rate for all its teachers and enrols them into the teachers’ pension scheme. Private providers pay teachers up to £60 per day less than the national rate and do not enrol teachers into TPS. So where exactly does schools’ money go? Last year the chief executive of Capita earned £2.2m and that of Hays was granted a pension contribution of £199,000. Another supply-teaching provider, Teaching Personnel, made £7.5m in profits on an income of £50m. A recent survey by one of the teaching unions found that 69% of its supply teachers had seriously considered leaving teaching in the last year.
Richard Knights
Liverpool

• Now that Barnet council has 300, rather than 3,000 employees, may we assume that Barnet council will have 90% fewer councillors?
Ben Ross
Burgess Hill, West Sussex

• Aditya Chakrabortty’s article on the problems experienced by people in Barnet are minor compared with the problems that can be anticipated in the future. By outsourcing its procurement and legal departments, Barnet has, in effect, lost control. It appears to have no means of independently managing and monitoring its existing contracts. More importantly, how will it negotiate new contracts when the current ones expire. There will be no in-house expertise and costs will inevitably rise.
Alan Innes
Shoreham-by-Sea, West Sussex

• Until actual power is restored to local authorities to make decisions about their own futures, it will be difficult to attract strong political leaders with the necessary vision, creativity and energy to drive our cities forward. Being a cypher of Whitehall, acting to the diktat of Eric Pickles, is not an attractive career option. The bland prescriptions of Sir Bob Kerslake, expressed in modern civic-management speak, fail entirely to take account of the excessive centralisation and resource starvation that have crippled our cities over the past generation. It is a nonsense that a city of a million souls should have less control of its destiny than a French village. Birmingham can become great again, but first Whitehall must remove the shackles.
Roy Boffy
Walsall

• I suppose I should have known better, but I fully expected Saturday`s Guardian to include news of an angry reaction from Labour leaders to the announcement by the local government minister, Kris Hopkins, that the “latest round of multibillion-pound cuts” to local authorities’ funding was a “fair financial settlement” (Council leaders say breaking point is near, 19 December). What can possibly be “fair” about a settlement that sees over 90% of the councils facing cuts in their spending of up to 6.4% being under Labour control, whilst the ones receiving increases are over 90% in Tory hands? The situation is worsened, of course, by the fact that the figures are more likely to be nearer the 8.8% average, as suggested by the group representing local government heads, making a total of 40% cuts since the coalition took office.

Admittedly, Hilary Benn did accuse the government of cutting funding for “socially deprived cities in the north” disproportionately, but that barely merits the term “opposition”. Why can’t the Labour leadership realise that it is, above all else, unfairness that annoys and antagonises the British people, and that these cuts are just another example of the government’s discrimination. There can’t even be many Tories who honestly believe that rich areas like Wokingham should be getting a better deal than impoverished urban areas further north, but still Labour’s reaction is muted. Such stifled reaction goes some way to explain why Labour’s lead in the polls, after almost five years of unjust and prejudiced government, is only by a slender margin, rather than the double digit one it should be. Why aren’t Ed Miliband and company at least as angry as they were over a misguided tweet recently, or perhaps even more so? This is about people’s quality of life deteriorating, about inequality increasing, and children’s futures being jeopardised. Let’s see some anger and passion.
Bernie Evans
Liverpool

• Congratulations on your editorial (20 December) which, unusually for national media, digs deeper to explain just how iniquitous and absurd the system of council funding has become. Please carry on. Rarely does media coverage of council services seem to get much beyond Jeremy Paxman’s “councils are the people who empty your bins”. But in my experience canvassing on the doorstep, dull and perverse as it may seem to national journalists, many ordinary voters rate council services above national government services as the ones that matter more in their day to day lives.
Tim Bell
Nottingham

• The way the council tax has been run does indeed reveal a wider rot in the governance of Britain from which no political party can be exonerated. It seems to have been beyond the comprehension of law-makers that £72.40 a week jobseeker’s allowance is too low to tax. Much spin is devoted to raising the threshold for the payment of income tax while the robotic council computers are churning out summonses to the magistrates court adding up to £125 costs to inevitable council tax arrears making it even more difficult to collect; then the bailiffs are sent in. Tens of thousands of these Christmas cards will have been sent out last week ready for when the courts open on 5 January.

Supreme court judges commented on Haringey council’s 2012 consultation of benefit claimants about how they would like to be hit with the council tax in April 2013. “Their income was already at a basic level and the effect of Haringey’s proposed scheme would be to reduce it even below that level and thus in all likelihood to cause real hardship, while sparing its more prosperous residents from making any contribution to the shortfall in government funding.” Sooner rather than later the more prosperous residents, like MPs and councillors, must also wake up to the fact that taxing £72.40 is grotesquely unfair.
Rev Paul Nicolson
Taxpayers Against Poverty

• Eric Pickles’ decision to send in commissioners to run key functions in Tower Hamlets is a welcome move (Eric Pickles sends emergency takeover squad to Tower Hamlets, 18 December). What is needed in Tower Hamlets is honest and open government – something which has been in short supply in the borough in recent times, culminating in the shambles of May’s mayoral election, with allegations of electoral fraud and mismanagement.

There are those who seek to present government intervention in Tower Hamlets as an attack on local democracy. They are wrong.

For those of us who believe that the result of the mayoral election should be re-run, the intervention is the beginning of attempts to restore faith in local democracy and council decision-making.

In February next year an election court will decide whether the current mayor and the council’s returning officer have a case to answer over misconduct in May’s mayoral contest.

The future of democracy in our borough and across London is at stake. We are pleased that Eric Pickles recognises that what has gone on in Tower Hamlets is unacceptable and that intervention is the only cure.
Andy Erlam
Tower Hamlets Election Petition

It is wonderful how the establishment works. The truth of Mandy Rice-Davies’s allegations concerning Viscount Astor is questioned by her obituary writer Peter Stanford (20 December) – but without mentioning the fact that he was the ghostwriter for Astor’s widow, Bronwen Pugh. The Guardian reviewer of the book wrote that Stanford was “embarrassing” in his identification with Pugh and showed “partisan snobbery” in his attack on people like Rice-Davies. I always found Mandy to be truthful when tested against the files and testimony from other participants in the scandal.
Stephen Dorril
University of Huddersfield

• Geoffrey Robertson (Report, 20 December) says that the reason for the full documents relating to the trial of Stephen Ward not being released until 2046 is that the date would be 100 years after the birth of the youngest witness. Surely a more likely reason is that by that time anyone who might challenge the official version of events, who remembers or cares about the case or who might seek to arraign those who were responsible for the miscarriage of justice in the case of Stephen Ward, will be dead and so the case will quietly die with almost no publicity when the documents are released?
George Taylor
Kendal, Cumbria

• Without wishing to heap contumely on the memory of John Profumo, who followed his departure from politics with community work in the East End, I recall a ditty which was doing the rounds at the time: “What on earth have you done?” said Christine/“You have ruined the party machine./To lie in the nude/Is not at all rude,/But to lie in the House is obscene.”
Bob Watson
York

Your story (Mexico authorities knew about attack on students as it happened, 16 December) does not reflect the reality of the disappearance of 43 students in the Mexican state of Guerrero and the ongoing investigations around this event. Without any other source of information than a story published in a Mexican magazine – on which the attorney general’s office has already requested an appropriate rectification – the Guardian admits that it has not been able to verify not only the alleged leaked government documents but the magazine’s account.

The Mexican government is committed to a thorough transparent investigation, with the findings double-checked and assessed by different NGOs, independent groups and experts.
Diego Gomez Pickering
Ambassador of Mexico to the UK

It was heartbreaking to see the photographs of Kabul, where “life continues amid the violence” (The other Kabul, G2, 16 December). Life continues openly for men and boys, that is: the only woman or girl visible was shrouded, totally hidden by a burka, after all the years of our involvement there.
Liz Cope
Dorking, Surrey

• A couple of years ago I was having trouble putting my ferry ticket into the machine at Circular Quay in Sydney. As the queue built up behind me, a member of staff came to assist. An inspector shouted: “What’s the matter, Fred?” His reply was: “Senior.” “Oh,” said the inspector, no other explanation being necessary (Letters, 20 December).
Victoria Turner
Truro, Cornwall

• Chelsea are not the only football club to announce they are to pay the living wage to staff (Report, 12 December). Luton Town in League Two and on much less income than Chelsea have also agreed to do this. More, they have guaranteed admission prices will not rise as a result.
John Loosley
Weston-Super-Mare, Somerset

• Thank you for celebrating Sheffield’s local carol tradition (Report, 15 December). My husband’s seasonal playlist consists solely of traditional versions of While Shepherds Watched from Sheffield and further afield; it lasts for a very long car journey, and is aptly known as “Begin and never cease”.
Helen Albans
Sheffield

• Your front page story, Man learns to use camera (19 December), was almost as compelling as the one about Couple have baby. Twice.
Bob Hughes
Willoughby, Warwickshire

 

Independent

Your report “Two nations” (20 December) contrasts the gross indulgence of many Christmas shoppers on “Panic Saturday” with the fact that millions of Britons will be facing Christmas in poverty.
On a recent pre-Christmas visit to one of London’s top stores, we were astonished to see a child’s toy car on sale for £30,000, (of course it was gold-plated). What sort of person can spend that sort of money on a child’s toy when there is so much need in the world?

Mike Stroud
Swansea

Christmas this year comes in the wake of the launch by the Archbishop of Canterbury of the report about the scandal of hunger and food poverty in Britain, while trillions of pounds drift tax-free into overseas accounts.

The birth of a healthy boy to a healthy mother is to be celebrated. The mother was expected by a tyrannical regime to walk the 80 miles in the last weeks of her pregnancy from Nazareth to be registered in Bethlehem. Nazareth is located between the Mediterranean and the freshwater Sea of Galilee. Plenty of affordable oily fish, jaffa oranges, green vegetables, sheep and goats to provide excellent nutrition before conception and during her pregnancy.

Many mothers in Britain today cannot afford a healthy diet at the same time as utilities, council tax and transport on £57.35 a week (aged 18 to 25) and £72.40 a week (aged 25 or over). Since 1979 successive governments have allowed the value of adult unemployment benefits to crash, leading to poor maternal nutrition and a greater risk of low birth weight and poor mental and physical health for the lifetime of their babies. Three days’ food from a food bank will not cover a nine-month pregnancy.

Rev Paul Nicolson
Taxpayers Against Poverty
London N17

Your front-page “Two nations” report repeated the claim that 13 million Britons now live in “poverty”.

In Britain, you are said to be in “poverty” if you are on 60 per cent of the median income. As the median UK household income is currently about £23,000, you are in “poverty” if you’re on less than £14,000 a year. And all sorts of absurdities follow from this definition.

What would happen to “poverty” if we could somehow double every income or if all the world’s billionaires were to suddenly relocate to Britain? How could such “poverty” ever be eradicated? Must every income be identical? This ludicrous definition appeals to people who think serious problems will disappear if we just take huge sums of money from one group and hand them to another.

Keith Gilmour
Glasgow

At last, a sensible US policy on Cuba
During the Cuban missile crisis, in 1962, I and 15,000 other Americans were 25 miles off the Cuban coast in very large landing ships loaded with big guns and tanks and amazing air power waiting to invade the island. As in any army that trains for years to do just that, we were all eager to do our job. Thankfully, it did not happen.

Since that time, we have allowed 20-plus electoral votes in south Florida to prevent a peace process. Cuban expatriates have kept our policy in limbo until now.

President Obama in his last two years is accomplishing good things for America. After more than 50 years of having the wrong policy, our President has established diplomatic relations with a country 90 miles away that poses no threat to us and hasn’t for decades.

I can’t wait to see Cuba without landing on a beach as a target. Good work, Mr President.

Norm Stewart
Aventura, Florida, USA

Listening to Putin accuse the West of trying to “defang the Russian bear” (19 December), one couldn’t help but think that any man prepared to employ that metaphor in the year 2014 does indeed require muzzling.

As the economy crashes around his ears and Russia heads toward deep recession, the solution to his problems do not lie in grandiose conspiracy theories or fomenting mass paranoia. The cheap tactic of counter-blame will fail him as surely as it failed Castro, and sooner. He goes on to accuse the west of plotting to seize large tracts of Siberia’s natural resources. How is such a thing even geographically possible? Does Putin imagine it would be done by stealth?

Cuba has shown the good sense to consign the past to history and make the present a priority. How much more pining for the Soviet dark ages will it take before this guy figures out that it all ended in 1988?

Mike Galvin
Tewkesbury, Gloucestershire

Any relaxation in America’s aggressive and bullying stance against Cuba is welcome. However if Barack Obama wishes his initiative to be taken seriously then he must quit the US’s occupation of Guantanamo Bay, which is sovereign Cuban territory.

Roger Earp
Bexhill, East Sussex

Oxygen of publicity for Nigel Farage
Recent letters have expressed concern that The Independent has given Ukip rather more exposure than its poll ratings warrant, publishing Nigel Farage’s weekly column while not giving the same exposure to the Green Party, which enjoys a similar poll rating. Today’s Independent (13 December) seems to bear out this concern with coverage of Ukip-related items spreading over two pages.

The thing that makes The Independent such an attractive quality newspaper is it’s non-partisan approach to politics, as reflected in its name. I realise that Ukip represents a greater threat to the political status quo than the Green Party in the forthcoming general election, but by giving them so much exposure you risk compromising your reputation for impartiality.

Patrick Cleary
Honiton, Devon

In response to John Blenkinsopp’s comments (letter, 17 December) I, too, was more than surprised that The Independent gave space to a party which makes me, for the first time in my life, seriously afraid for the political future of the UK.

My solution has been never to have read the column. But it coincides very much with my thoughts related to the National Front in France. One way to deal with them is to give them enough rope, which should ensure that they hang themselves with it.

Terence Hollingworth
Blagnac, France

I was dumbfounded to see Channel 4 giving half an hour’s puff to Nigel Farage (“Steph and Dom meet Nigel Farage”). Shall we now see David Cameron on The X Factor or Ed Miliband on Strictly? Politics as entertainment?

Betty Rider
Lewes, East Sussex

Senior moment of catastrophe
Your article of 15 December on the most popular nomenclature for the growing population of over-85s fills me with dismay. In a few months I shall have the questionable honour of joining this cohort, and would feel like an object of ridicule if referred to as a “real senior”, as if not to be confused with an unreal one.

In the sincere hope of averting the catastrophe of this abomination’s acquiring currency, I suggest the following alternatives: golden oldies; super wrinklies; late developers or honourable lifers.

Ben Marshall
London N11

Those who reach the age of 85 should be known as “super seniors”.

Peter Fryer
Loughborough

Horror movie for children
Jeremy Redman (Letters, 19 December) thinks those of us who saw Bambi as small children but yet have matured into happy adults were not traumatised by this film. I most certainly was. I was extremely distressed, so much so that I have been careful never to see it again. And, now aged 70, I still would not.

It was truly terrible and I feel upset merely thinking about it.

Sara Neill
Tunbridge Wells, Kent

Who pays for the City watchdog?
Julia Holley (letters, 15 December) is not only spot on about struggling public servants getting no freebies, but the Financial Conduct Authority, which Janet Street-Porter (13 December) chose as her illustrative example, are not even public servants.

They are a very affluent body funded by fee-paying members of the finance industry and they are outside the public sector pay freeze or indeed any HM Treasury pay remit authority.

Neil March
London SE13

Brand at the barricades
I found Joseph Kynaston Reeves’s letter petty, individualistic and selfish (“Russell Brand and an RBS banker: whose side are you on?”, 18 December). It sums up the insular, self-centred, conservative mentality that makes this world the cesspit it is. I stand with Russell Brand. He wants change for the better. He’s on the right side of the barricades.

Sasha Simic
London N16

Times

If community budgets allowed cities and towns to manage the entire process of the welfare state we would have local knowledge managing families and individuals
Sir, Philip Collins (“Welfare in Britain isn’t fair, as Ukip knows,” Dec 19 ) misses the fundamentals of the welfare state.
Fundamental to Beveridge’s report was a partnership between the state and the individual. That partnership has over the years been completely eroded and now it is virtually non-existent.
New Zealand, Malta and the UK are the most centrally governed countries in the OECD. More than 30 government departments control 20 local authority departments on a one-size-fits-all basis. This results in a chaotic management of services, benefits and resultant costs with Whitehall management remote from the real issues of welfare. Government, local government and the third sector aren’t co-ordinated and compete with each other for control and funds.
If community budgets allowed cities and towns to manage the entire process of the welfare state we would have local knowledge managing families and individuals, as exemplified by Louise Casey’s troubled family unit which does so well with one person managing a family rather than 20 — as dictated by Whitehall. The benefits would be substantial.
The idea that the state knows everything has been proved to be incorrect, inefficient and highly wasteful yet ministers insist on hanging on to power.
SIR STUART LIPTON, London W1
Sir, We now have a welfare system that is understood by practically no one. Also, the present arrangement encourages idleness — an evil that Beveridge wanted to eliminate.
The whole system needs to be replaced with something that is more even-handed and easily understood. How about starting afresh with an untaxed flat rate citizens wage payable to all together with scrapping all the tax breaks on income.
This would also have the advantages of eliminating the very high rates of marginal tax for those on low incomes, and be simple to administer.
RICHARD GILL, Bourton-on-the-Water, Gloucs
Sir, Philip Collins correctly suggests that increasing contribution-based benefit would cost the state more — at a time when the size of the welfare bill is already under question. It would also further complicate a complex system which results in over- and under-payments, claimants’ stress and fraud. Benefits staff contradict each other regarding eligibility and awards.
As a Citizen Advice Bureau volunteer, I have had clients unfairly (in my view) refused contributions-based benefit because of anomalies in the complex rules, eg, because they hadn’t paid NI contributions last year (despite having paid them for 20 years before that); or had several part-time jobs (despite their adding up to 40 hours a week); or because they didn’t know to switch credited contributions from wife to house-husband; or had rogue employers who pocketed their contributions.
Eliminating contributions-based benefits (rolling NI into income tax) would have huge administrative savings.
JOHN WIDGER, Altrincham, Gtr Manchester
Sir, Philip Collins is right: the British system is out of step with our deeply felt instincts about fairness. A fair system must establish more rights by contributing more.
If you have contributed in the past, of course you should get a higher pension, or a more generous benefit than someone who hasn’t.
Fairness demands that if you have not contributed, you should receive a less valuable benefit than someone who has, and it should be tied to a condition that you enrol in some full-time, work-relevant activity so you are not enjoying more free time than they do. Those with strong contributions records should be exempted from such conditions.
PROFESSOR PETER SAUNDERS (Professorial Fellow, Civitas), Hastings, E Sussex

Sir, I have been wrestling with the problems caused by modern architects for years, and particularly the impossibility of finding one’s way around (or even into) modern office buildings (letter, Dec 20). Now at least I understand why these problems have arisen — the architects are copying the ideas of Mad King George.
Anthony Jennings
London WC1
A few days ago I sat by the bedside of a wounded sapper — a reservist — and heard the story of life in a signal-box on a branch line in the North of England. The man was dying. I think he knew it. But the zest of his everyday life was still strong in him. He told me that there were three trains each way in the day, and that on winter nights the last train was frequently very late. This meant a late supper, but his wife saw to it that everything was kept hot. Sometimes his wife came to the box to meet him if it was a dry night.
In the next bed there was a young Scotsman. He was a roadman, and we talked of his roads and the changes which had been wrought in them of late years by motor traffic. He recalled a great storm, during which the sea wall around a certain harbour was washed away and the highway rendered impassable. Then, rather diffidently, he confessed that he had lost a foot — “at Ypres” — and would be handicapped in his work.
At the far end of the ward there was a German who spoke a little English. His wife and children, he said, would miss him at Christmas. We spoke a long time on the subject of Christmas. I suppose by all the orthodox canons that this German should have told me that he was glad to be a prisoner, or else that the German Army would speedily carry everything before it to victory. But somehow he forgot to say these things and I forgot to ask him about them. They seemed far away in the quiet ward, even — and for this I beg forgiveness — grotesque and uninteresting.
By the touchstone of the men it has broken this war is judged, and the makers of this war. And more than ruined villages and desecrated churches these soldiers pronounce condemnation. They, who have given so much, are, in a sense, without joy or enthusiasm; rather they shun recollection. There is no zest in the killing of men. Their thoughts, especially at this season, are directed away from the dull, mechanic force which labours against its bonds across Europe, and dwell in the homes it has threatened. The war is revealed as a thing gross and dull-witted, a crime even against the ancient, chivalrous spirit of war.

Sir, I was amazed that your correspondent had found such difficulty buying a coffee in Havana (letter, Dec 20). My caffeine-addicted husband and I had no problems last month. However, as one can get an excellent, inexpensive mojito to sip, while watching the sun disappear beneath the Havana skyline, my question would be, “Who needs coffee?”
Havana certainly does not need Starbucks and McDonald’s.
Florence Mills
Leighton Buzzard, Beds

 

Telegraph

668 Comments
SIR – The 350 member churches, schools and communities of Citizens UK wish to praise The Sunday Telegraph’s Justice for the Elderly campaign.
How can we live in a society where our frail parents and grandparents are cared for by people with such little training and time, working for less than it costs to live?
People among our membership with dementia are facing the distress of a different care worker coming in every week, whom they are unable to get to know and trust, and the indignity of someone rushing in and out to help them eat and clean themselves.
Meanwhile, dedicated and kind care workers are not even being paid the minimum wage, since their travel time between visits is not properly remunerated.
Our campaign #icareaboutcare joins your paper in calling on care providers and commissioners to improve standards of pay, training and continuity. Politicians from all parties must make sure social care has the funding it needs to meet these basic standards.
Related Articles

Letters: The NHS needs a long-term plan to end crowding which compromises care 20 Dec 2014
Rev Paul Regan
Chair of Trustees, Citizens UK
London E1
SIR – You are right to say that “a civilised country has to care better for its elderly”. This requires properly trained and licensed care workers who know that they are valued.
Employers who fail to pay the minimum wage to their care workers must be identified and prosecuted.
Christopher Broome
Sheffield, West Yorkshire
SIR – As a coalition of over 75 charities campaigning for improved social care, we welcome your Justice for the Elderly initiative which seeks to ensure older and disabled people are treated with dignity and respect within the care sector.
We believe that the most important issue to be addressed is chronic underfunding, which has seen dramatic rationing of social care support for older and disabled people and their carers, excluding thousands from the support they desperately need.
This also has a knock-on effect as the health service is forced to pick up the pieces when people become isolated, can’t live on their own and slip into crisis.
More and more of us need care, but fewer of us are getting it. The Government needs to fund care, as well as the health system, properly. As health experts argue, anything else is a false economy.
Richard Hawkes
Chair, Care and Support Alliance
London N7
SIR – My father is 89 years old, registered blind and living in a charity-run residential home. I have been running a complaint against the home for two years about the standard and quantity of food, and general poor care, to little avail.
I would add “proper and adequate nutrition” to your campaign’s objectives, because food is of the utmost importance for health and wellbeing. It is too easy for homes to offer poor quality food in order to save money.
M D Edwards
Llandough, Glamorgan
SIR – Full marks to the Care Quality Commission (CQC) for shutting down the Merok Park nursing home.
The regulator lists 10 excellent reasons for the closure, but no mention is made of whether or not staff were kind and compassionate to the residents. This is because the CQC currently has no means of assessing this factor. On a visit to a home you can see the state of cleanliness, you can look at staffing rotas and training records, but you cannot be sure that staff are treating the residents well.
The CQC needs to encourage homes (and residents’ friends and relatives) to use cameras and sound recording devices to check up on staff. It should also place covert workers in suspect homes, as Panorama did with devastating effect at the Old Deanery care home in Braintree.
David Hogarth
London NW8
A tradition of military figures in schools
SIR – The headmaster of Box Hill School does not know his Hahn history.
Kurt Hahn shared with Goethe a high regard for military virtues. Gordonstoun School, which Hahn founded, always had former members of the Armed Forces on the staff in his time. After the war he ensured that at least four headmasters of his Salem school in Germany were retired officers rather than professional schoolmasters.
The founding head of his Atlantic College in Wales was a Rear Admiral who, at Hahn’s insistence, took early retirement in order to launch Britain’s first international sixth form college.
The Duke of Edinburgh Award was itself entrusted to that not unknown military personality, Sir John Hunt, in 1956.
David Sutcliffe
Lindfield, West Sussex
SIR – Brian Farmer writes that Ofsted has failed to deliver improvements to standards in schools. Ofsted was set up to inspect and report, not actively to improve.
Prior to Ofsted’s conception, schools were inspected rigorously by Her Majesty’s Inspectors of Schools, who were highly-qualified professionals. They would identify where a school’s weaknesses lay and then offer advice on how to improve. They also led their own courses for school staff to attend.
Ofsted offers no such advice and provides no such courses, so ineffective head teachers are left to their own devices.
Michael Sands
Frimley, Surrey
Brains over brawn

Andy Goode, the Wasps fly-half in action (Getty Images)
SIR – As a professional rugby player, it was brave of Andy Goode to speak out against modern coaches who train for brawn rather than traditional rugby skills. He is absolutely right.
Goode demonstrates every week how an amply framed fly-half with a proper feel for the game can glide through the smallest of gaps.
Coaches should take note, ease off on the gym work and start teaching their young players how to position themselves to give and take a pass at high speed.
Ken Cookes
Bath, Somerset
Regulating terror suspect interrogation
SIR – I was astounded to learn that British soldiers, under new guidelines, have been told not to yell at terrorist suspects.
I was regularly bawled at by drill instructors some years ago at the start of a two-year stint in the Armed Forces. A grim-faced drill instructor would stand nose-to-nose in front of each recruit on the parade ground and yell like thunder into each face. If you flinched during these tirades a drill instructor’s wrath knew no bounds.
Will instructors have to comply with these new regulations too? If so, trained combatants will struggle to cope when they come face-to-face with the enemy.
Ron Kirby
Dorchester, Dorset
SIR – Torture is abhorrent, but in gaining intelligence against a twisted ideology the West must not tie its hands completely. America and the CIA have nothing to feel guilty about.
B J Colby
Portishead, Somerset
SIR – If the West is to maintain the moral high ground in the war on terror it should remember that two wrongs do not make a right.
James Thacker
Tanworth-in-Arden, Warwickshire
Cost of going green
SIR – The costs of the Government’s energy and climate change policies are more than offset by the policies that provide energy efficiency savings. The report into energy costs that we published in November gave a complete picture of everything that affects final energy bills. Looking at the price of electricity alone doesn’t do this.
Our policies are keeping bills lower, keeping the lights on and cutting emissions.
Ed Davey MP (Lib Dem)
Energy and Climate Change Secretary
Safer London
SIR – Christopher Booker questions the value of Transport for London’s (TfL) investment in new digital speed cameras as a means of reducing deaths and serious injuries in the capital.
An average of three pedestrians a day are killed or seriously injured on London’s roads. Speed cameras are an important tool for reducing traffic speeds, which in turn makes our streets safer and benefits the environment, local economies and public health.
Investment by TfL to realise this ambition should be welcomed.
Tom Platt
Policy Manager, Living Streets
London E1
Illegal immigrants
SIR – You report the sad story of the death of an illegal immigrant who was crushed after clinging beneath a truck axle. He was only one of many who seek to smuggle themselves into the Britain in this way.
Would it really be that difficult to arrange for trucks boarding ferries bound for Britain to drive over an upward-facing television camera, positioned in a pit, in order to detect these illegal stowaways?
Dr Anselm Kuhn
Stevenage, Hertfordshire
Out on the street
SIR – As a country resident living far from London, I am interested to learn that the new Metropolitan Police Headquarters is considered too small.
Presumably those that arrive early for work will gain access, while those who turn up late will have to pound their beats. I feel sure that the public will be delighted to see them on the streets and may even be encouraged to call for further reduction in the size of their accommodation.
Lord Kenyon
Whitchurch, Shropshire
The decade pop music lost its small screen sparkle

Kylie Minogue performs ‘Santa Baby’ on Top of the Pops in 2000 (Alamy)
SIR – The low ratings for the inaugural BBC Music Awards programme earlier this month came as no surprise.
Music on TV has been in decline since the weekly Top of the Pops show was abandoned. There has never been a decent music show on television in America – even MTV, which was a brilliant idea when it started out, sadly failed to develop.
The BBC Music Awards show was actually excellent and, very importantly, the music that has been released this year has been terrific, too. Now is the time for someone with a bit of creative imagination to put together a great music on TV format for the modern day.
We need another Ronan O’Rahilly (who created the pirate radio station Radio Caroline in the Sixties) or Vicki Wickham (producer of the popular Sixties music television show Ready Steady Go!).
Jonathan King
Wyndham Yard
A worthy winner
SIR – The bad grace with which some people have greeted the Sports Personality of the Year result is astonishing.
The golfer Rory Mcllroy has achieved great feats. So has the winner, racing driver Lewis Hamilton, and his speech earlier in the night portrayed a personality replete with humility and patriotism.
I would have preferred to see third-placed Jo Pavey win following her unprecedented gold medal at 40 years of age, but to yield to calls by sportsmen and commentators to abandon the public vote would be a mistake. This is not European politics.
Tim Coles
Carlton, Bedfordshire
Heebie-jeebies
SIR – It is interesting that today’s youngsters are frightened by the “nasty lady” in the Paddington film.
Over 60 years ago I was scared out of my wits by the Wicked Witch of the West riding her bicycle across the sky when my mother took me to see The Wizard of Oz. My reaction has been recounted many times, with much jocularity, within the family over the years.
Gerald Fisher
Kettering, Northamptonshire
Dutch courage
SIR — Your report about the Utrecht man who toppled his crane while trying to reach his girlfriend’s window to propose made me wonder what it is about that part of the world that encourages these antics.
Back in the summer of 1972, my girlfriend and I were guests of Radio Hilversum in the Netherlands and had been put in separate lodgings by the rather strait-laced management.
Late one night I dropped quietly down from my window, sidled around the courtyard, and clambered up to my girlfriend’s balcony to propose, for the seventh time of asking. I suppose she was mildly impressed, as she replied: “Well, if it will shut you up, yes.”
We are still happily married.
Alex Abercrombie
Pembroke
Told you so
SIR – Dan Dare knew there was life on other planets over 50 years ago, but the only people who believed him were us schoolboys who bought the Eagle comic.
Jim Queally
Cork, Munster, Ireland

Irish Times

Sir, – Derek Byrne writes “There are some, mainly in the drinks industry, who claim education about alcohol abuse simply doesn’t work” (“Demon drink – the greatest public health issue of our age”, Opinion & Analysis, December 15th). This is simply not true. In fact the opposite is the case.
The drinks industry has been advocating education on the harmful effects of alcohol misuse for years. We have been the sole funders of the only significant programme designed to educate people on the dangers of alcohol misuse – drinkaware.ie. We have highlighted time and again the evidence that shows that the principal influencers on youth drinking are parents and peers and when the alcohol strategy was published over a year ago, we stated that “the omission of education measures that could positively impact a culture of alcohol misuse from this Bill [was] a glaring omission”.
The industry wants to work with the Government, policymakers, and other stakeholders to identify and implement effective measures which reduce alcohol misuse, which is causing significant damage to the reputation of an industry which supports 92,000 jobs throughout the country.
Earlier this year the various bodies representing pubs, restaurants, hotels and independent off-licences, as well as drinks suppliers, which I represent, collectively pledged to work with Government on the implementation of meaningful policy measures to combat alcohol misuse by addressing the sale of cheap alcohol, introducing a statutory ban on price-based advertising and introducing statutory codes to regulate the merchandising of alcohol.
When considering the problems with alcohol, it is important that we acknowledge the fact that alcohol consumption in this country has fallen by over 19 per cent since 2001, and our consumption levels are fast approaching European norms. The recent Department of Children and Youth Affairs State of the Nation’s Children report shows that the number of young people stating that they have never had an alcoholic drink has increased by 35 per cent in the past eight years. A Unicef report on 29 countries, published earlier this year, found the percentage of young people who reported having been drunk on more than two occasions has fallen in Ireland.
Irish consumption is falling, and youth consumption in particular is declining. However, what is becoming apparent is that how we consume alcohol, rather than how much alcohol is consumed is increasingly problematic, with people likely to drink in “binges”. Educating people on the dangers of drinking in a harmful manner is vital. We all need to work together in order to achieve this. We want to work with Government, and all relevant stakeholders, to address the important issue of alcohol misuse in an evidence based way. We want to be part of a society that is proud of its sociable cultural heritage, and where binge drinking or antisocial behaviour is not tolerated. We can only do this if we all work together. – Yours, etc,
KATHRYN D’ARCY,
Director,
Alcohol Beverage
Federation of Ireland,
Lower Baggot Street,
Dublin 2.

Sir, Patrick D Goggin (December 15th) says we hear a lot about the relatives of the 2,000 who “came out” for the 1916 Rising but very little about the relatives of the 200,000 who followed Redmond’s call to fight for Home Rule in the first World War. One wonders just where Mr Goggin has been the last three decades? Claims that the Irish State has displayed a national amnesia towards those Irish who fought in British uniform in the Great War are without basis.
In March 2011 former president Mary McAleese delivered a speech at Suvla Bay, site of the 1915 Battle of Gallipoli, commemorating those Irish in British uniform who died during the invasion of Turkey. This poignant commemoration and speech by our former president reflected the emotions of the Irish nation as we remembered with dignity all those who died in that dreadful imperial conflict. Also, in 1998, in an unprecedented act of political ecumenism at Messines Ridge in Belgium, President McAleese, alongside Queen Elizabeth II, dedicated a peace tower in memory of those from the entire island of Ireland who answered Redmond’s call and never returned from Flanders. The president spoke proudly of nationalists and unionists who fought side by side in the Great War. These commemorations and dedications were an acknowledgement by the Irish State of the sacrifices these men had made and relatives of these men were represented by the government and president.
For many years now Irish society in the South has been accused of failing to honour the memory of those who were slaughtered in the Great War. Can it be that Mr Goggin is unaware that since 1986, the Sunday nearest July 11th each year has been set aside to commemorate all Irish killed in war, including those who gave their lives in both world wars? The President, Taoiseach, leaders of the Opposition and religious leaders from all the main churches are invited to attend. This is truly a national commemoration to honour those Irish who died in all conflicts, with formidable respect and dignity, and it is entirely appropriate that this National Day of Commemoration be held. – Yours, etc,
TOM COOPER,
Templeogue,
Dublin 6W.

Sir, – The referendum on divorce was passed in November 1995 by 9,114 votes – the same number of students at a medium-sized college.
During the month of November 2014, the Union of Students in Ireland (USI) registered over 20,000 new student voters, the largest voter registration drive in recent years – proving students’ desire to engage with the issue of marriage equality.
Over 90 per cent of students are in favour of marriage equality – far higher than in the general population. If we’re serious about marriage equality, it’s crucial that we maximise student turnout for next year’s referendum.
USI has always advocated that April would be a more suitable time for students, because May is exam time for most. Friday, April 24th would, in our view, be an opportune time to hold the referendum and it would allow for a higher student turnout.
May 1st is also a Friday and would be far more preferable than later in May.
To hold this referendum any later would be an act of folly on the part of the Government – none of us want to be watching the votes coming in wishing that more people could have voted Yes – when it could so easily be facilitated. – Yours, etc,
LAURA HARMON,
President,
Union of Students in Ireland,
Portview House,

Sir, – I enjoyed your positive coverage of Limerick City of Culture but I would like to augment it, if I may, by paying tribute to a small group of Limerick-based readers who, on a very limited budget, programmed and delivered a highly successful series of literary events throughout the year.
Working long and thankless hours, Caroline Graham, Sheila Quealey, Vivienne McKechnie and James Lawlor brought Colin Barrett, Kevin Barry, Christine Dwyer Hickey, Paul Lynch, Paula Meehan, Claire Keegan and American poet Richard Blanco to Limerick, where those authors gave readings, workshops and talks in the city’s beautiful library, in different places throughout the county and at the University of Limerick.
These volunteers organised the venues, distributed the flyers, wrote press releases and adverts, set up the chairs, were the first to arrive and the last to leave, for no reason other than a passion for our literature and the belief that someone had to do it, otherwise it wouldn’t get done.
Colum McCann addressed a packed audience, including many local schoolchildren, at the college. Donal Ryan, our incoming Arts Council Writer in Residence, gave ceaselessly of his time and his talents. The contribution of these volunteers, writers and readers was immense. It establishes an important legacy that is already being built upon.
JP McManus’s educational trust funded a short story competition for Limerick schoolchildren and third-level students. Thousands of people in Limerick enjoyed cultural events of impressive range and ambition.
Were there imperfections? Yes. How could there not have been? But what happened this year in Limerick was amazing and inspiring and might serve as an example to the rest of the country – citizens taking charge, delivering excellence, destroying stereotypes. Local businesses getting involved. Third-level institutions reaching out. Local media promoting the arts as a source of dignity and pride.
Faced with the well-documented early adversities that were sometimes rather gleefully remarked upon by certain cosmopolitan geniuses based in the capital, Limerick City of Culture failed to get the memo and lie down to defeat.
Too often it used to be the case that everything cultural that happened outside the Pale was seen as unworthy except as a pretext for self-amused condescension. The volunteers who saved Limerick City of Culture and made it a success have played a hugely important part in consigning all of that to the rubbish heap where it always belonged. – Yours, etc,
JOSEPH O’CONNOR,
Professor and
Frank McCourt
Chair of Creative Writing,
School of Culture
and Communications,
University of Limerick.

Sir, – The great abundance of rural footpaths in England and much of Europe arises from patterns of settlement arising in medieval feudal society, and not from any action by government. Rural Ireland has very few footpaths because it lacks the thousands of medieval villages which dominate rural England, each served by a vast network of footpaths criss-crossing the countryside and which have been protected since time immemorial.
Many of the publicised long-distance tourist walking trails are essentially founded on a combination of these.
The fact that the National Trust is the largest land-owner with nearly 700,000 acres in the most scenic areas, including 20 per cent of the entire coastline, has also aided key additions to paths for tourists in England.
Another key factor in England has been strict planning policies to ensure that new rural houses are attached to villages, and not scattered across the landscape, as is the case here. This has enabled the preservation of marvellous scenery which attracts walking tourists, despite a heavily populated state.
It is hard to envisage any significant change in Ireland’s footpaths since Ireland benefits from none of these circumstances, and has the further disadvantage of highly fragmented land ownership; in England, just 6,800 farmers farm 70 per cent of the farmland. – Yours, etc,
BILL BAILEY,
Ballineen, Co Cork.
Sir, – What planet does Mr Sean MacCann live on (December 19th)? Contrary to his assertions walkers do not want, or need, to wander round other people’s back gardens and, while there may be a few rambler-vandals, I suspect that there are far fewer than in the general population; they are unlikely to be deterred by “keep out” signs or legal prohibitions.
No, most hill walkers would be happy with clearly defined paths through farmland into remote, open country (this would also be to landowners’ benefit by controlling the present free-for-all).
Such a legal right has been implemented long ago in every European country that I know of, and I know quite a few, without uproar from landowners. So, what’s so different about Ireland? – Yours, etc,
DAVID HERMAN,
Meadow Grove,
Dublin 16.

Sir, – On November 17th, 2010, Steve MacDonogh of Brandon Books died suddenly, leaving behind a small publishing house and some stunned writers. I had published with Steve since 1988 when he launched my first book To School Through the Fields and 15 books later we had developed a solid working relationship.
Steve’s secretary of long standing Maire Ní Dhalaig and I wondered about the future of Brandon Books. There were a few unsatisfactory overtures but then O’Brien Press appeared on the horizon and things took a positive turn. Michael and Ivan O’Brien went down to the Brandon base in Dingle and after a short time Maire rang to tell me in a relieved voice that “O’Brien Press are behaving very honourably”. I breathed a sigh of relief.
Honourable is a description that is highly desirable but seldom heard in today’s business world.
And so O’Brien Press rescued Brandon Books and now three publications later I agree with Maire that it is an honourable firm.
It has a good team who look after their writers and at this challenging time it is creating a future reading public by investing heavily in books for young people.
It seems incomprehensible that the Arts Council would so drastically withdraw support from a publishing house that is supporting so many Irish writers and engaging the minds of young readers.
Surely it is to everyone’s advantage that our Irish publishing houses be supported so that Irish writers can be published in Ireland and help sustain the Irish economy. – Yours, etc,
ALICE TAYLOR,
Innishannon,
Co Cork.

Sir, – One of the decisions many families make each year is what to prepare for the family dinner on 25th. Most choose to cook a turkey.
The typical supermarket turkey has been bred to reach market size in six to 16 weeks, housed for its short life in an indoor factory farm. It is selectively bred to have a large body and fragile bones, much like its cousin, the broiler chicken. Simply stated, it is a mass commodity product that has a miserable, short, unnatural life.
The most compassionate choice at Christmas is, clearly, a vegetarian one.
More and more ethically minded and health-conscious consumers are taking this route.
If you can’t get your head around that, the next best choice is organic, because if the bird is raised organically, there is a good chance it will have had a reasonably decent life.
It will cost you more, but then who is willing to put a price on compassion? – Yours, etc,
GERRY BOLAND,
Keadue,

Sir, – In light of the increasingly petulant and confrontational way in which the Dáil appears to conducts its parliamentary business these days , would it not be more appropriate if a few Dáil deputies were guillotined rather than proposed legislation? – Yours, etc,
ARTHUR BOLAND,
Dublin 2.

Sir, – I should be obliged if you would allow me to appeal to your readers for information on the life or career of W Hamilton Burns – a Belfast man, I think – who set to music Samuel K Cowan’s poem The Charge of the Ulster Division at Thiepval. This was published in sheet music form in 1916 by the publishing firm of Burns (probably related) of Belfast. Any information would be welcome, and could be sent to terry@pipers.ie or my postal address below. – Yours, etc,
TERRY MOYLAN,
71 Bluebell Road,
Dublin 12

Irish Independent

Dear Mr Kenny, I write to wish you and yours a very Happy Christmas. I am writing to inform you of a new category of class in our society – the Working Poor of Ireland (a label I had given myself some time ago, and which was confirmed by the recent ESRI report)

SHARE
GO TO
You see, Taoiseach, I am one of the so-called lucky ones. I have managed to re-secure employment after a horrendous five or six years. I, like many, suffered immensely due to the financial crash and not in terms of lost investments or the likes.

At the end of the day, I was just an ordinary working woman who had reared my kids single-handedly throughout the years. I am a divorcee in my 50s, with no family remaining, apart from my children. I always worked for my living, reared my children through difficulty times, but survived.

But the crash hit me badly because after 31 years, I found myself unemployed. I then lost my home as a consequence of losing my job. I also lost my long-standing excellent credit rating, lost my social standing, my self-esteem and hope for my future. I became a casualty of the crash.

However, Taoiseach, I should now be counting my blessings. I am working again and am no longer just a statistic. But, all is not quite as it seems.

Over the last four to five years, I tried and tried with all my might to find employment in a very difficult labour market. I got lots of jobs – all temporary, contract positions lasting between three and 12 months. I managed to keep my periods of “unemployment and signing on” to the very minimum. None of these positions were easily got or reachable. I had to travel to them all – some involved round trips of up to 300kms per day (from a city in the south-east to Dublin), so basically these jobs merely helped me regain some self-esteem, but were never financially beneficial. Indeed, without question, they cost me in travel and wear and tear on my car.

Presently, I am in another temporary contract position. It’s great to have a job to go to every day but, alas, that is about the entire positive I can say about it. You see, Taoiseach, I now travel 140kms a day to work, five days a week. The day is long, it’s a 12-hour day. Up at 6am, home at 7pm, with a 2.5-hour drive and eight-hour working day in between. Then it’s cook quick, eat quicker and then to bed to prepare to do it all over again the following day. My reward for my 12-hour day and pressured job, is €364 a week after tax, PRSI, USC. To those on long-term unemployment, that might seem pretty decent. But, just for fun, let’s break down my expenses.

Take home pay €364. Out of this, €85 for petrol weekly. I’m then left with €279. Then, like everyone else, I must pay my way – rent €100 a week (in a very damp house); food €50 a week; Credit Union debts €20 a week; €20 (for car tax/insurance/maintenance/NCT, etc); €8 a week cable TV (my only entertainment); €7 a week bin charges; €15 electric meter; and €20 for drum of heating oil a week. So I am left with the miserly sum of €39, for incidentals and crisis events.

As I write to you, Taoiseach, I am not full of festive cheer. I cannot afford Christmas (once again). There will be no elaborate Christmas day feast in my home. Taoiseach, you and your Government have won the battle, but lost the war and sustained huge numbers of casualties along the way.

But I will not be a humbug and will not be envious of how many will celebrate, spend, party and feast lavishly this Christmas. I will wish all of you in political office a Happy Christmas and a prosperous New Year, but I hope as you all celebrate, you will acknowledge how you have broken so many and created a new social class of citizen – The Working Poor of Ireland.

Name and address with Editor

Political reform still needed

I voted for Fine Gael for the first time in my life at the last general election, solely on the basis that they advocated meaningful electoral reform – which is essential for changing the way our country is governed.

Therefore, I was delighted to see Ivan Yates’s excellent article on this subject (December 18).

He stated that the dysfunctional multi-seat PR system only leads to local competition between candidates from the same party.

He is correct and I believe that this is a corrosive cancer which forces the candidates into the lowest form of clientelism and parish pump politics.

Irrespective of how well-meaning a candidate may be in their desire to put the well-being of the country first, if they do not give preference to the local issue above what is right for the country, their fellow candidate – very often from the same party – will do so. The consequence of doing what is right for the country as against what is popular can result in the loss of one’s seat at the next election.

What is required to get away from this system – which only creates political paralysis for genuine politicians – is a radical reform of the electoral system. What is needed is a 100-seat Dail with single-seat constituencies elected by proportional representation. County boundaries would be respected here, eg Leitrim would be one constituency or perhaps two. Counties with larger populations would have three or four constituencies, this would be worked out to concur with the present constitution requirement of electors per constituency. This requirement could also be reviewed as for being fit for purpose.

Paul Connolly

Co Kildare

Keane interest

I have no interest in any sport, but I always devoured the late Con Houlihan’s sports columns.

Now I read those columns of Billy Keane. And wasn’t I very glad that I do, especially when I read his account of the time spent with the last of the Dingle nuns. One to be treasured

Mattie Lennon,

Blessington, Co Wicklow

Post offices are out to lunch

Reading Billy Keane’s moving article about the transfer of their beloved Listowel Post Office reminds me of another annoying and unresolved issue. Why are post offices still closing for lunch? Why – at a time best suited to a large number of the public they purport to serve – do they lock their doors from 1pm to 2pm each day?

I know of no business – in any walk of life – which shuts their doors to their customers at times best suited to those they serve.

Liam Cassidy

Celbridge, Co Kildare

Don’t speak little of EU action

Funny how when you drink non-stop they call it an illness, but when you eat non-stop they call it greed. The truth is that they are both serious addictions.

Because you, dear reader, can stop at a half-pint of lager and a light salad, do not judge other people by your own fortunate standards.

Thank heavens, the EU are now bringing in some proper legislation to protect fatties in the workplace.

David Woosnam

Grimsby, Lincolnshire, England

In for the Count?

At last, I can (thanks to James Gleeson) confess to being an avid Count Curly Wee fan. Any more readers willing to stand up and be… counted?

Tom Gilsenan

Beaumont, Dublin 9

Optimism a vital elixir

What a fabulous letter from Benita Lennon (December 18). My friend, health, happiness, and long life to you. We deserve more people like you in this wonderful, but troubled world.

Sean Brannigan,

Dundalk, Co Louth

Irish Independent



Clinic

$
0
0

Clinic

Off to with Mary to the clinic not too bad thought it would be more crowded. Back in five weeks.

Obituary:

Billie Whitelaw – obituary

Billie Whitelaw was an actress and muse of the surrealist playwright Samuel Beckett who terrified as the hellish nanny in ‘The Omen’

 'Knock on any Door: The Ballad of Queenie Swann'   TV Billie Whitelaw as Queenie Swann
Billie Whitelaw as Queenie Swann in ITV drama The Ballad of Queenie Swann  Photo: ITV/REX

Billie Whitelaw, who has died aged 82, was one of the most intelligent and versatile actresses of her generation. She came to prominence in the post-war fashion for social realism, though she made her name in the surrealistic drama of Samuel Beckett, for whom she was the “perfect actress”. The role that propelled her to worldwide fame, however, was that of Mrs Baylock, the sinister nanny and protectress of the devil-child Damien in the blockbuster horror film The Omen (1976).

If she never reached the front rank of British cinema, her forthright personality and north country vitality made their mark alongside Albert Finney in such films as Charlie Bubbles and Gumshoe. In the 1950s and 1960s her face became fondly familiar in television drama – she was named actress of the year in 1961 and 1972.

On the stage, her acting achieved lasting status in the works of Beckett. The playwright was so deeply affected by her voice as the Second Woman in Play (Old Vic, 1964) that he resolved to write a piece for her: the 17-minute monologue Not I (Royal Court, 1973 and 1975).

When she had played that twice to immense acclaim he wrote another, Footfalls. Thus she came to be considered as the leading exponent of Beckett’s “minimalist” dramas; and under his supervision went on to play Winnie, the woman buried in sand, in Happy Days (Royal Court, 1979) and was appointed in 1993 Annenberg/Beckett Fellow at Reading University.

Not I was probably Billie Whitelaw’s most celebrated performance, because on an otherwise blacked-out stage only her mouth was visible. She compared the acting experience to “falling backwards into hell”.

When she first saw the script – the fragmented, breathless, babbling discourse of a crazed old Irish crone recalling her life and assorted experiences in the silent presence of a shadowy, cowled, father-confessor figure – the actress told the author: “You’ve finally done it. You’ve written the unlearnable and you’ve written the unplayable.” Later she asked Beckett whether the character – known as Mouth in the cast list – was meant to be dead or alive. He replied: “Let’s just say you’re not quite there.”

An intellectually unpretentious Yorkshirewoman who prided herself on plainness of speech, Billie Whitelaw confessed herself “very embarrassed” whenever she read in print that Samuel Beckett claimed to have had her voice in mind while writing this or that passage. His death, in 1989, affected her so acutely that she referred to it as “an amputation”. Though she would never perform his plays again, she kept his memory alive with a series of one-woman lecture tours to various American colleges – even if the stage fright that had often threatened to cripple her acting career never left her.

“I’ve never really felt like a proper actress,” she once told an interviewer. “I still feel like that six-year-old girl who was frightened when the bombs were raining down out of the sky in Coventry.” She was always happiest at her cottage in Suffolk, chosen specifically for its remoteness from London life.

WIth Gregory Peck as Robert Thorn in The Omen (REX)

Billie Honor Whitelaw was born in Coventry on June 6 1932 and educated at Thornton Grammar School, Bradford, after her family moved north to escape the German bombs. Her father, Perceval, died of lung cancer when she was 10 and Billie’s mother, Frances, encouraged the diffident child to join a drama group as a way of building her confidence and alleviating a nervous stutter.

After a stint as an assistant stage manager in repertory, where she hoped that one day she might become “a song and dance person”, she made her first acting appearance in Pink String and Sealing Wax (Prince’s, Bradford, 1950) and her London debut as Victoire in Feydeau’s Hotel Paradiso (Winter Garden, 1954), repeating the role at Oxford Playhouse two seasons later.

With Joan Littlewood’s Theatre Workshop at the Theatre Royal Stratford East, Billie came to critical attention as Mag Keenan, the Roman Catholic heroine of Alun Owen’s north country working-class comedy Progress to the Park, which transferred to the West End (Saville, 1961). After heading the Keith Waterhouse-Willis Hall revue England Our England (Princess Theatre, now Shaftesbury), she played Sara in Eugene O’Neill’s A Touch of the Poet, which toured to the Venice and Dublin theatre festivals in 1962.

Joining Laurence Olivier’s newly established National Theatre Company at the Old Vic in 1963, she acted the Second Woman in Beckett’s Play; Franceschina in the Jacobean drama The Dutch Courtesan at the Chichester festival, where she also played Desdemona to Olivier’s Othello; and at the Old Vic in 1965 she played Maggie to Michael Redgrave’s Hobson in Hobson’s Choice.

When the Royal Shakespeare Company’s Aldwych production of David Mercer’s After Haggerty moved into the West End (Criterion, 1971), Billie Whitelaw took over the role of Claire. Two years later Beckett wrote Not I for her.

As Mouth in ‘Not I’

After repeating the role of Mouth at the Royal Court two years later, she played the amiable, easy-going provincial newspaper librarian in Michael Frayn’s comedy Alphabetical Order (Hampstead and Mayfair) before interpreting another of Beckett’s anguished characters, May, again written for her, in Footfalls (Royal Court, 1976), spectrally communing with the ghost of her mother. Following a spell as the gin-soaked Moll in Simon Gray’s Molly (Comedy), a reworking of the Alma Rattenbury murder case of the 1930s, she returned to the Royal Court in 1979 as Winnie in a revival of Beckett’s Happy Days, with her waist – and, in the second half, her whole body – immersed in sand.

In John Barton’s adaptation for the RSC of The Greeks (Aldwych, 1980), Whitelaw played Andromache, Athena and the Chorus Woman; then it was back to Beckett in two short plays, Rockaby and Enough at the National Theatre (Cottesloe, 1982). The following year she was acclaimed for her role in Christopher Hampton’s Tales from Hollywood (Olivier, 1983).

Away from the theatre, she was best remembered for her role in Alfred Hitchcock’s penultimate feature film Frenzy (1972), and for her chilling performance in The Omen as Mrs Baylock, described by one critic as “hell’s version of Nurse Ratched”. The latter role won her an Evening Standard Award for Best Actress.

She brought the same sense of looming menace to the criminal matriarch Violet, serving biscuits and tea to violent gang members in Peter Medak’s acclaimed film The Krays.

With twins Gary and Martin Kemp in ‘The Krays’ (REX)

Though rarely out of work, Billie Whitelaw was generally better served on the smaller screen than by cinema, beginning as Martha the maid in an adaptation of Frances Hodgson Burnett’s The Secret Garden in 1952 and continuing in numerous mini-series and made-for-television films into the 21st century.

Her various performances in The Sextet (1972), an anthology of eight plays run across two months on the BBC and co-starring Denis Waterman, were recognised with a Bafta award for Best Actress. She was Josephine to Ian Holm’s Napoleon in Napoleon and Love (1974), and collaborated with her husband, the screenwriter Robert Muller, on the horror series Supernatural (1977), as the beautiful and enigmatic Countess Ilona.

In 2007 she made a late reappearance in cinemas with a gloriously eccentric performance as Joyce Cooper, the hotel owner with a dark double life (and a submachine gun) in Simon Pegg’s police drama spoof Hot Fuzz.

Yet the bulk of Billie Whitelaw’s time in later years was spent with family and in charitable endeavours. In spare moments she would tend her garden in Suffolk, often digging with her bare hands. “I’m not really interested in acting any more”, she confessed. “I always thought it was a bit of a flibbertigibbety occupation.”

She was appointed CBE in 1991.

Billie Whitelaw married, first, the actor Peter Vaughan; the marriage was dissolved in 1966, and she married, secondly, Robert Muller, who died in 1998; their son survives her.

Billie Whitelaw, born June 6 1932, died December 21 2014

Guardian:

Kim Jong-un inspects a submarine. Photograph: Kns/AFP/Getty Images
Kim Jong-un inspects a submarine. Photograph: Kns/AFP/Getty Images

Satire is a weapon to undermine power; there is no such thing as an innocent comedy depicting revolution in a real-life authoritarian state (US may put North Korea back on state terror list after Sony ‘cybervandalism’, 22 December). No surprise Sony hasn’t put out anything similar about China or Russia. Wrong to pull the film, yes; but crass to have made it in the first place.
Mark Lewinski
Swaffham Prior, Cambridgeshire

• Surely a call to assassinate a living head of state is tantamount to conspiracy to murder? If Hilary Mantel’s fictional story about the assassination of an already dead head of state caused such a controversy, surely calling for the assassination of Kim Jong-un is a much more egregious undertaking. Marina Hyde (Sony and the movie pitch we thought we’d never hear, 20 December) makes no mention of the supposedly leaked emails showing that Sony Entertainment chief executive Michael Lynton spoke with US department of state officials and North Korea specialist Bruce Bennett from the Rand Corporation to seek opinions on the film and potential threats posed by North Korea.

It has been claimed that several of these emails reveal that at least two US government officials gave a rough cut of the film their blessing. It has been suggested that the US thinks such a film could indeed inspire North Koreans to rise up against their leader. True or not, this surely needs examination?

Surely the call by George Clooney et al to withstand “terror” threats against the film in the name of artistic freedom, while correct in principle, are picking on an inappropriate target as far as attempted artistic censorship is concerned. The fundamentalist Christian lobby in the US would be a far more appropriate one.
John Green
London

• When Sasha Baron Cohen released Borat in 2006, he didn’t have to worry about reprisals from Kazakhstan because it was the attitudes of the citizens of the US that were mocked – and enough of them were prepared to laugh at themselves to make it a success. But how many bone-headed money-obsessed moguls did it take to decide The Interview was a good idea? How could Sony, whose company HQ is in Tokyo, think it was a good idea to release a limp comedy poking fun at an embattled and notoriously prickly dictatorship which has nuclear devices and ballistic missiles and is only about 1,000 kilometres away?
John Wallace
Liverpool

• Should I be  amused or surprised at President Barack Obama’s lack of knowledge of the American film industry’s history (Obama’s threat to North Korea over Sony hack, 20 December)? In the 1930s, to continue doing business in Germany after Hitler’s accession to power, Hollywood studios agreed not to make films that attacked the Nazis or condemned Germany’s persecution of Jews. This bargain involved the heads of every major Hollywood studio. The studios dealt directly with the German government’s representatives and, in particular, the German consul in Los Angeles. They would change or cancel movies according to his wishes. The whole story unravels in a remarkable book, The Collaboration, by Ben Urwand, published by Harvard University Press (Review, 19 October 2013).
Stanley Clingman
London

• On the same day your editorial points the finger at North Korea for using hack attacks to threaten the US’s freedom of expression you report that South Korea has outlawed the opposition party UPP because of its north-south reunification stance (Report, 20 December). The hack attack assertion emanates from flimsy US evidence. And the crackdown on the South Korean opposition is authenticated by Amnesty International’s statement of serious concern over freedom of expression and association.
Brian Strauss
Basingstoke

• We are not allowed to laugh at people for their religious beliefs or for being homosexual and must avoid misplaced humour proving us racist. Even if you do not want to include far eastern dictators in this list, it is just plain foolish to make fun of powerful people whose reactions you cannot predict.
Margaret Kettlewell
Bournemouth

•Some years ago (2005) Sony illegally introduced copy protection software into its digital media products without the knowledge of its unsuspecting customers. Karma?
Michael Pravica
New York

• From now on we can assume that many governments can access any information they choose. What this means for business, diplomacy and our security remains to be seen.
Gerald Wells
Congleton, Cheshire

Shaker Aamer protest
A recent protest calling for Shaker Aamer’s release. Photograph: Richard Norton-Taylor for the Guardian

Following the US Senate’s shocking report into the torture of prisoners by US staff, including medical personnel, we have urgently set up an all-party group for the immediate return of Shaker Aamer to his British wife and four children in London. Mr Aamer, an aid worker, was sold to the Americans 13 years ago in Afghanistan, where he was living with his family.

He was cleared for release in 2007 and again in 2009 by the most senior levels of US intelligence and military. Our prime minister has asked for his return to the UK. Successive foreign secretaries have assured his family and lawyers that they are doing everything to get him back. It is absolutely unacceptable that an innocent man who has suffered many of the forms of torture now made public by the Senate can continue to be held in Guantánamo Bay.

Our group has MPs from eight political parties, representing a broad section of UK public opinion, calling for Mr Aamer’s immediate release from a place where his torture continues. The group is committed to active engagement with the US authorities for Mr Aamer’s return home. His continued detention shames our society.
John McDonnell MP chair of the Shaker Aamer parliamentary group, Victoria Brittain, Jeremy Corbyn MP, Peter Bottomley MP, Norman Baker MP, Caroline Lucas MP, Katy Clark MP, Ann Clwyd MP, Elfyn Llwyd MP, Andrew Mitchell MP, Joan Ruddock MP, George Galloway MP, Mark Lazarowicz MP, Andrew Slaughter MP, Sir Bob Russell MP, Naomi Long MP, Joan Walley MP, Martin Caton MP, Nick Harvey MP, John Leech MP, Mark Durkan MP, Alistair Burt MP, Sir John Randall MP, Yasmin Qureshi MP, Gerald Kaufman MP, Diane Abbott MP, Sarah Teather MP, David Ward MP, Hywel Williams MP, John Hemming MP, Mike Wood MP, Roger Godsiff MP, Julian Huppert MP, Michael Connarty MP, Roger Godsiff MP, Andew Dismore London Assembly member, Gavin Shuker MP, Mike Weir MP, Simon Wright MP

A coal-fired power station: since 1992 annual emissions of carbon dioxide have increased by 60%. Pho

A coal-fired power station: since 1992 annual emissions of carbon dioxide have increased by 60%. Photograph: John Giles/PA

It is worth recalling that world leaders all agreed to prevent dangerous anthropogenic climate change as long ago as 1992 at the Earth summit in Rio (Poorer countries demand more from rich on climate change, 13 December). Anything agreed in Paris next year will not be implemented until 2020 at the earliest, and will probably be voluntary. There will be no independent monitoring, so countries can continue to emit carbon while their leaders pay lip service to the need to tackle global warming. Since 1992, annual emissions of carbon dioxide have increased by 60% globally, and the rate is accelerating.
Dr Robin Russell-Jones
Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire

It will be “nose-peg time again” (Letters, 12 December) here in Yorkshire if Labour forms a government with a weak response to the risks of fracking. Locals suffered the stench of escaping gas before Rathlin closed down its shale-gas exploration well at West Newton recently. We have just found out there was also a fire in the well. Despite strong opposition to fracking from local Labour and Green activists, national Labour policy continues to support regulation rather than an outright ban.
Val and Jon Mager
Beverley, Yorkshire

A propos the Belo Monte project in Brazil (Report, 16 December), it must be noted that none of the indigenous territories in the Belo Monte influence area will be flooded as a result of the project, nor will the indigenous population have to be resettled. The Belo Monte project is a result of a careful and thorough environmental impact assessment, which involved comprehensive open consultations with local communities and indigenous peoples.
Roberto Jaguaribe
Ambassador of Brazil to the UK

Fox, Downing Street
For fox sake, which entrance to Downing Street did the animal use? Photograph: Rex

Richard Dawkins is right that robotic machines have supplanted humanoids on other worlds (Little green aliens? Perhaps – or maybe ice creatures, 20 December). His wife, Lalla Ward, who played Romana opposite Tom Baker’s Doctor in Doctor Who, could have reminded him that the Cybermen and the Daleks annihilated the indigenous human beings on their home planets, to become the supreme beings in the universe. Exterminate and happy Christmas!
Frank Danes
Ely

• You note that, when Alan Rusbridger became Guardian editor in 1995, this was supported by a journalists’ poll (Guardian staff to vote in process of choosing next editor-in-chief, 20 December). The world of democratic consultation has moved on since then – witness the way the Labour leader is elected. Surely it is now time to let readers have a say too.
Keith Flett
London

• What a wonderful photograph of the rhinos enjoying their sprouts at Chessington World of Adventures (Eyewitness, 19 December). If anything shouts that we must save these animals, it was this terrific image. Mind you, I would not want to be in the immediate vicinity of the rhinos once those sprouts started to do their work.
Martin Johnson
Congleton, Cheshire

• Hope that fox used the Downing Street side gate ((Fox on the run, 18 December). Another inquiry might cost the earth.
John Hunter
Fulbourn, Cambridgeshire

• After recent front-page stories about a man using a camera and a couple having a baby (Letters, 22 December), I can’t wait for the spread on an elderly woman going to church later this week.
Bill Dixon
Crewe

Queues at border control at Heathrow airport. Photograph: Steve Parsons/PA
Queues at border control at Heathrow airport. Photograph: Steve Parsons/PA

It is incredible that 300,000 migrant overstayers can go missing in the UK (Report, 18 December) and even more incredible that the records on who has left the country have “significant inaccuracies”. Pursuit of these overstayers and the recording of data has been outsourced to Capita and its contract should be terminated. However, who would take over from Capita? Maybe, G4S. Or maybe not – as G4S is 15% owned by Investco, a US finance company, which also owns 23% of Capita. In fact, about 40% of the shares in the small number of outsourcing companies tendering for these contracts are owned by foreign, mainly US, financial institutions. Perhaps it would be more efficient to go back to having a properly functioning civil service of qualified bureaucrats.
Michael Gold
London

Snapshot ... Karen Babayan with her mother and grandmother at Christmas in Iran in the mid-1960s.
Snapshot … Karen Babayan with her mother and grandmother at Christmas in Iran in the mid-1960s.

Snapshot: Waiting for Father Christmas in Iran

This is a rather formal picture for a very happy occasion – this was the Christmas party at the Tehran Club, a club for British expats based in a grand old house set in large grounds in central Tehran. My mother Yolande (Lolo) and my grandmother Clara are in their fashionable best, in home-sewn outfits created by my grandmother, who was an amazing seamstress.

Calikmama (my pet name for my grandmother) is in her very on-trend Jackie Kennedy two-piece and, at 52, is only a year older than I am now. In the photo, I am aged around three. Until my fifth birthday, I was stuck like glue to my mother’s skirts, and would not go to anyone, not even long-suffering Calikmama, who subsequently became my greatest ally and best friend.

My dad, Roy Sowerby, who was into amateur theatricals, was always Father Christmas at these parties. His entrance was spectacular. Totally in character, his “ho ho hos” and handbell rang out while he rode a donkey through the gardens to the house, the children crowding around the big picture window, trembling with anticipation.

Until I left Iran with my family at the age of 16, I had led a sheltered life among the Armenian and expat British communities. Despite being the product of a mixed marriage, one of the very first of the Iranian/Armenian community between an aspiring middle-class, educated Armenian girl and a working-class, ex-pro English footballer, I felt well settled and loved by the family I had been born into and relatively unaffected by world politics.

The Armenians, a Christian community, were well respected by their Muslim hosts, having been part of the fabric of the country for more than 400 years. It was something of a shock, therefore, to discover that our world was not as stable as we thought, with the coming of the Ayatollah Khomeini and subsequent Islamic revolution.

After having lived in the vibrant capital city of Tehran for 16 years, I found myself fleeing the impending political tumult and going westward, to England and an estate in the northern suburbs of Leeds, eventually becoming a painter. Our family is now scattered across the globe and this experience of displacement had a profound effect on every aspect of my life and informed every mark and output during my professional career as an artist.

Karen Babayan

 

Independent:

 

Times:

The European Court of Justice may believe so, but many of our readers do not agree

Sir, As you state in your leader (“Substantially Wrong”, Dec 19), the labelling of obesity as a disability by the European Court of Justice is contrary to common-sense expectation and is likely to produce the opposite of the desired effect.

Disability is commonly defined as a physical or mental state which limits a person’s normal activities, mobility or senses resulting often from an illness or unnatural event over which one does not have any control. Except in rare instances of certain endocrine dysfunctions, obesity is caused by faulty lifestyle of overeating of the wrong kind of food and lack of exercise. Obesity related to type 2 diabetes is often the cause rather than the effect, the common factors being relative lack of insulin and insensitivity of the body tissues to insulin. In a significant number of cases, obesity-related type 2 diabetes can be reversed when the body mass is reduced to normality by dieting and exercise or surgery. Morbid obesity can debilitate but need not permanently disable a person.

Dr Sam Banik, FRC Path
London N10

Sir, Your report does not say whether, at his weight of 25st, Karsten Kaltoft could physically do his job of “minding” young children regardless of the adjustments made (“Obesity can be a disability, European court decides”, Dec 19) The role implies a need for a degree of agility as well as authority over the young. Young children are usually fit, agile, mischievous and lacking in sympathy for those less agile. They would be able to “run rings” around Mr Kaltoft.

If a person physically cannot do their job however many “adjustments” are made, is an employer required to employ two people to do one person’s job?

Richard Woosnam
Great Edstone, N Yorks

Sir, Obese people will not be employed by small businesses if it means additional expense on facilities. This will not be the reason given for not employing them but it will, nevertheless, be the reason.

Richard Northcote
Berkhamsted, Herts

Sir, I would not want a 25st childminder looking after my grandchildren. Size in itself would significantly reduce the ability to respond to urgent situations and to play outside with children. It would also impair the person’s ability to tie the children’s shoelaces.

Jeremy Preston
Croughton, Northants

Sir, One unintended consequence of classifying obesity as a disability is the resentment that it will cause. In order to qualify, a Body Mass Index (BMI) certificate presumably issued by the NHS will be required. The cost apart, if a BMI of, say, 30 is chosen to define disability, there will be an incentive for those at the margins to put on weight to qualify. The obese ‘disabled’ will also be entitled to disabled parking permits.

Bernard Kingston
Biddenden, Kent

Sir, It is a sad irony that, in the year in which I have read that obesity is now a symptom of poverty in the West, the EU Court of Justice has designated obesity as a disability. I only wonder if obesity was still a symptom reserved purely to the wealthy, as it has always been throughout history, up till now, if the Court of Justice would have made the same judgment.

Johnny Lyell
London W4

Sir, I was ten years old at the start of the Second World War and spent the next six years evacuated with my school in Devon. In that period there was no TV, virtually no cars, and food and sweets were severely rationed. I have kept over the years all the annual photographs of my school forms and, apart from one boy who apparently suffered from a glandular disorder, every one of us looks slim and fit. As our maths master would have said, “QED”.

Leslie Watmore
Beckenham, Kent

Sir, Now that obesity is legally a disability, perhaps the airlines will be obliged to provide decent seating space.

Simon F Fegen
Biddestone, Wilts

Sadly, Rosalind Franklin has to bear a share of the blame for her neglect

Sir, Roslyn Pine protests that James Watson is neither a genius nor a titan of 20th-century science, and charges him with ruthlessness in “harnessing” the work of others (letter, Dec 19). That is unfair. King’s was an old-fashioned place at that time, and female staff were not even allowed in the senior common room.

Nevertheless, Rosalind Franklin’s colleagues and also the group at the Cavendish did their best to engage her interest. Working in her self-imposed isolation, she recognised the helical form of DNA, but not the critical fact that the double chain was dependent upon the complementary nature of A with T and G with C. Crick and Watson’s model-building showed how DNA formed the hereditary material, and how every living thing on earth is related. It laid the foundations for molecular biology.

I did a doctorate at the zoology department of King’s shortly after Franklin left, and was married to one of the lecturers for more than 50 years. She told me of Rosalind’s defensive mien, different from the other workers in Randall’s lively department. Sadly, Franklin has to bear a share of the blame for her neglect.

Charles O’Neill

London SE19

There is a solution to the dilemma of ‘too easy’ practice papers: one national exam board only

Sir, Rival examination boards offering practice papers for maths that are too easy (report, Dec 22)? There is a solution: one exam board only. The case for multiple exam boards is really commercial rather than educational. It would also make the analysis of results between Carlisle and Chichester more meaningful.

Derek Axe

As the spouse of a knight the proper form of address for Mr David Furnish should be Lady John . . .

Sir, The news (Dec 22) that Sir Elton John and David Furnish have married is heartwarming, but it raises questions for the honours system. Conventional etiquette suggests that as the spouse of a knight the proper form of address for Mr Furnish should now be Lady John. Anything less might be seen as manifestly unequal and discriminatory.

Julian Peel Yates

Andover, Hants

Pooh was not the bearer of the burst balloon; his sad gift was the empty jar of honey

Sir, Oh dear, oh dear! Pooh was not the bearer of the burst balloon; his sad gift was the empty jar of honey (letter, Dec 20). Piglet was the unfortunate balloon person. But the two friends together did provide the perfect birthday present for Eeyore: a useful pot for putting things in, and a burst balloon to put in it.

Barrie Page

Piltdown, E Sussex

I enjoy shaking my head at grammatical errors in print. Please, Oliver Kamm, don’t spoil my fun…

Sir, If the Pedant (Dec 20) has his way, many spellings and sentence-constructions formerly recognised as inaccurate will become acceptable. This is an unhappy prospect for me, as at the moment I still find a quiet satisfaction in being able to shake my head at the numerous grammatical errors in, for example, our community newsletter. Oliver, why spoil my fun?

The Rev Claire Wilson

London NW3

Telegraph

British female troops share a joke as they wait for the 904 Expeditionary Air Wing's sunset flag lowering and end of mission ceremony at Kandahar airfield, Afghanistan
British female troops share a joke as they wait for the 904 Expeditionary Air Wing’s sunset flag lowering at Kandahar airfield, Afghanistan Photo: Matt Cardy/Getty Images

SIR – Women have been fighting in the Royal Artillery, the Royal Engineers and the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers corps for years. These units are as embroiled in the front line as the infantry and armoured regiments, and the women have had to pass physical tests to prove their capability of doing the job.

The current debate is about prejudice and historical perception. As full integration is inevitably implemented, the comments of some senior officers that only a handful of women applying for infantry and armour roles will make the grade are demeaning to the initiative from the outset.

Lt Col Charles Holden (retd)
Lymington, Hampshire

SIR – In the period 1999-2003 there were at least two female officers who assumed command of Royal Irish Home Service infantry platoons. These officers attended the necessary infantry command courses in Warminster and Brecon alongside their male peers, carrying the same weight and commanding platoons in public order situations and in the prevention of and aftermath of terrorist attacks.

The ability of an officer to command and control soldiers serving beneath them rests wholly upon their skill and professionalism, not their gender.

J D Brunton
Trim, Co Meath, Ireland

SIR – While I have no intrinsic objection to women serving in front-line combat roles, at a time when the British military is so strapped for cash it is worth questioning whether spending considerable sums on making this change, so that an estimated 34 women a year can qualify, is justifiable.

Peter D Harvey
Walton Highway, Norfolk

SIR – I am a nursing sister working for the Ministry of Defence in an army training regiment. Both young men and women are trained at this establishment and in the medical centre we see them all at their initial medicals and throughout their training, dealing with any illnesses or injuries.

The young women are as committed, gritty and feisty as their male counterparts and all are determined to do their very best. It is blindingly obvious, however, that no matter how fit and determined the girls are, they have nothing like the muscle strength and bulk of the lads. Many struggle to carry heavy packs and weights without risk of injury. I fail to see how they would cope in infantry or armoured regiments where sheer physical strength is the key to effectiveness and, ultimately, survival.

Karen McCleery
Kings Worthy, Hampshire

SIR – Mixing within the infantry could have some positive impact on a culture of chauvinism that can make it difficult for ex-soldiers to reintegrate in modern civilian social and family life.

It is interesting to consider what would happen if Britain found itself facing conscription again in the future. Would this new option for the few then become an obligation for the many?

John Riseley
Harrogate, North Yorkshire

SIR – Men and women do not compete against each other in professional sport. Is this an example of inequality or just an acceptance of physical differences?

Infantry combat is the ultimate challenge of muscular endurance and cardiovascular strength, and putting women in that position simply isn’t practical or fair.

Emilie Lamplough
Trowbridge, Wiltshire

SIR – Our infantry is not the place for social experimentation in gender equality. There is only one question to be asked: “Will the change improve our chances of winning in combat?”

The answer in this case is: “Probably not.”

P Richards
Lytchett Matravers, Dorset

Ailing border control

(Mark Salter/Alamy)

SIR – Keith Vaz, who chairs the Home Affairs Committee, describes the immigration service as being “in intensive care”. It would be more accurate to say it has been completely forgotten about and left on a trolley in a corridor.

Airlines are capable of tracking baggage that flies overseas and back. If it is possible to do this with inanimate objects, what excuse can the Home Office have for failing to track human beings with passports?

Jeremy M J Havard
London SW3

SIR – I am currently on holiday in Thailand. When I entered the country, I was photographed at border control and my passport was scanned and stamped. When I leave, my passport will be scanned again. If I were to overstay my visa, I would face a hefty fine at the very least.

Thai airports have had this system in place for over 20 years. If they can do it, why can’t Britain?

John Procter
Poole, Dorset

Humane slaughter

SIR – Proposals to require labels on meat informing the customer how the animal was slaughtered are to be welcomed.

Research by the independent scientific research charity the Humane Slaughter Association has consistently shown that stress hormones in meat from animals killed without being stunned are considerably higher than in meat from animals that have been stunned.

The labelling of meat should not be turned into a religious debate but should focus purely on animal welfare and science.

Kate Graeme-Cook
Blandford Forum, Dorset

Nursing experience

SIR – Prof Dame Jessica Corner quotes statistics that purport to demonstrate that an increase in the number of nurses with degrees has resulted in a decline in hospital patient mortality. Two events occurring together do not necessarily have a cause-and-effect relationship.

Britain is experiencing a serious nursing crisis with a major shortfall in the number of British-trained nurses available and an inevitable dependency upon the recruitment of nurses from abroad. Insisting on degree-level qualifications will deny many dedicated young people the opportunity to serve in this wonderful profession.

Completing more traditional training and gaining experience on a hospital ward establishes that the individual is truly committed to becoming a nurse.

Malcolm H Wheeler FRCS
Cardiff

Cornwall invaded

Porthis, or St Ives, in Cornwall (Alamy)

SIR – Porthia (St Ives) has been voted Britain’s most popular town in which to live.

Once upon a time the Cornish community would have agreed. Today the town is blighted by holiday lets and second homes. Its lanes are filled with expensive 4×4 vehicles at weekends, even though Porthia lies in the heart of deprived west Cornwall. House prices have soared, pushing Cornish families out and severely threatening the local community.

Timothy James
Botallack, Cornwall

Giving in to hackers sets a worrying precedent

SIR – Sony’s decision to pull The Interview – a film about the fictional assassination of the leader of North Korea, Kim Jong-un – sends the wrong signal to North Korea, who are suspected by the FBI of orchestrating the Sony hack attack.

Submitting to the hackers’ demand that the comedy not be distributed will lead them mistakenly to assume that they have leverage over the entertainment industry.

Siyoung Choi
Seoul, South Korea

SIR – If Sony were to decide not to take legal action against anyone making pirate copies of The Interview or posting it online, it would take the world by storm.

The hackers would then have scored an own goal.

Harry Leeming
Heysham, Lancashire

SIR – It is striking that Hilary Mantel’s book The Assassination of Margaret Thatcher – a book about the killing of a woman thrice democratically elected – occupies pride of place in many bookshop windows, yet a comedy film that kills off a dictator has elicited a reaction that has even a corporate giant like Sony running scared.

Philip Whittington
Elstree, Hertfordshire

SIR – A film depicting the assassination of a still-living person seems to be in appallingly bad taste.

David Allars
Foxton, Cambridgeshire

SIR – How would America have responded if North Korea had issued a film about the assassination of Barack Obama?

J H Graves
Rugby, Warwickshire

Look closely to see Britain in the driving seat

Shape-shifter: a map of the British Isles from Ptolemy’s Geographia (Bridgemanart.com)

SIR – Wingless dragon, bob-tailed dog or a lady throwing a pig; the map of Britain provides ample opportunity for those with vivid imaginations to identify all sorts of images.

I remember that, more than 50 years ago, advertisements for the British School of Motoring used the slogan “Teaches Britain to Drive”. In the accompanying illustration East Anglia filled the car seat, Scotland formed an attentive face, and the arms reaching out to the steering wheel were made up of the north and south peninsulas around Cardigan Bay.

The outstretched legs operating the pedals were represented by Devon and Cornwall.

Mike Siddle
Wragby, Lincolnshire

Up-to-date

SIR – I agree with David Spence as regards the use of “Twenty fifteen”.

Nobody refers to the start of the First World War as “Nineteen hundred and fourteen”.

Carol Chadwick
Wilmslow, Cheshire

Pickles in space

SIR – So, Mars is really an ancient landfill site (“Methane and the faintest whiff of life on Mars”).

Perhaps we could send Eric Pickles to investigate?

William T Nuttall
Rossendale, Lancashire

Flea-son’s greetings

SIR – To date my cat hasn’t received any Christmas cards, but last week he received a letter from his vet congratulating him on using a particular flea treatment.

I’m now worried that my charming post lady will think that my real name is Wonky Wilkinson.

Frank Wilkinson
Bolton, Lancashire

Globe and Mail

  (David Parkins for The Globe and Mail)

Zarqa Nawaz. (Mark Taylor for The Globe and Mail)

Zarqa Nawaz

Dear Kim Jong-un: Thanks for stealing the spotlight. Signed, The Muslims

Zarqa Nawaz is the author of Laughing All the Way to the Mosque and the creator of Little Mosque on the Prairie.

Dear Kim Jong-un,

Thanks to you, Christmas came early for Muslims this year. Just when we were starting to lament that all the wack-job megalomaniacs in the world belonged to us, you showed up. All eyes moved away from the Middle East and focused on wherever it is you are. So you get to carry the crazy-terrorist mantle for a few days at least.

And all because Hollywood made The Interview, a satirical film about two incompetent television producers coerced by the CIA into assassinating you. Why are you so upset about this film? I doubt anyone from Good Morning America has suddenly been inspired to book a flight to a heavily guarded military airbase in your country anytime soon.

My sense is this: You think the film makes you look like an idiot. You would have preferred a more dignified aura to surround your character, maybe even one explaining your grievances against the West (and the South, and pretty much the rest of the world). I have one word for you. Well, maybe twelve words. Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan. When Kazakhstan first learned that Sacha Baron Cohen was playing a dim-witted, misogynistic Kazakh who has a weakness for wearing a lime-coloured mankini, they considered having a fit and banning the film. But then cooler heads prevailed and the country decided to embrace the film instead. As result, tourism increased tenfold and brought cultural currency to a country that most people hadn’t heard of before. For sure, it was a troubling portrayal on many levels, but by not over-reacting, the film ended up being a useful tool in diplomacy.

At least you have Seth Rogan and James Franco in your film. Diplomacy aside, this film could have done one critical thing for you – humanized you at a time when you could use it. Your country is crippled by economic sanctions. Even your Axis-of-Evil buddies have seen the light. Iran is sending peaceful overtures to the United States and both it and Iraq are fighting the Islamic State, which you’ve managed to get off the front pages – which is not easy, so congratulations for that.

With Cuba patching up its differences with the States and moving on, the Axis of Evil may be just down to just you. North Korea is a little-known country that many feel is a bit weird and creepy. By hacking Sony and threatening Sept. 11-type violence against innocent theatregoers, you’re not helping change your image. In fact, you may just have given the United States reason to go after you. Iraq was attacked for having Weapons of Mass Destruction that never actually existed. Your WMD actually do exist.

In the immortal words of the late, great film critic Pauline Kael, “movies are so rarely great art, that if we cannot appreciate great trash, we have very little reason to be interested in them.” The Interview is not going to win an Oscar. It’s not even great trash, and would probably have had a quick death in the box office. But now, thanks to you, it’s going down in the history books.

So call off the cyber attacks, roll out the red carpet and invite Seth and James to Pyongyang for a proper North Korean premiere. Dennis Rodman can help soothe over frayed nerves. After all, it’s more important to have the world laugh with you than at you. Or, more importantly, blow you up.

 

Errol Mendes

How partisan Conservative ads undermine the rule of law

Errol Mendes is a professor of constitutional and international law at the University of Ottawa and editor-in-chief of the National Journal of Constitutional Law.

In what country does a government take tax revenues and use it to pump out continuous government propaganda that tries to brainwash the citizens with its performance, whether truthful or not? Many would suggest China, Russia or even Zimbabwe. Sadly, it is also true in the Canada governed by the Stephen Harper Conservatives.

More Related to this Story

The opposition parties have claimed that the Harper government has authorized more than $600-million in disguised partisan ads since coming into office. These include some earlier Economic Action Plan television ads, and the newest ones announcing the yet-to-be implemented family tax benefits package – outrageously partisan.

When these ads announce that it will fill the pockets of taxpayers with thousands of dollars, it’s a less-than-honest exhortation for viewers to vote Conservative in the upcoming 2015 election. There will, no doubt, be far more honest ads paid for by the Conservative Party with the same content once the election campaign starts and its spending will be restricted to far less than the millions that may be spent on it before the campaign actually starts.

Governments are allowed to advertise about services and programs that they are implementing, but when some of them are either untruthful, promote partisan positions or are not even authorised by Parliament, it becomes a vehicle to undermine the foundations of any democracy that values the spirit and letter of the rule of law.

Former Ontario premier Dalton McGuinty realized the democratic immorality of abusing public funds in such a manner and brought in key reforms to stop even his government from betraying the public trust by ensuring taxpayers do not fund disguised partisan ads. The McGuinty government brought in rules that requires all government ads to be reviewed and passed by the auditor-general. The holder of that office has the ability to stop clear partisan ads being funded by the taxpayer. The present national ads for the family benefits tax package would have been stopped dead in their tracks if we had a similar screening process of government ads at the federal level, especially given that they were not even passed by Parliament. Yet, it is reported that the Harper government may spend $100-million for these ads in the hope that it will give them another four years to continue abusing the public purse with similar ads after the 2015 election.

It may not be surprising that Mr. Harper has engaged in this unfair democratic subterfuge. Even back in 2000, while heading up the National Citizens Coalition, he launched court actions against the spending limits of third parties under the Canada Elections Act. With a challenge that seemed to ignore the need for ensuring electoral fairness, his conservative advocacy group used the argument of citizens’ freedom of speech to ask the courts to strike down limits on third-party funding beyond a $150,000 limit during the election campaign. He failed when the Supreme Court lectured him and his group that the law was needed for electoral fairness and a level playing field in order to prevent certain groups or individuals from dominating the media and the electoral process.

Now in government – and outside the electoral period – Mr. Harper has found a way for his government to flood the media with partisan propaganda to the tune of hundreds of millions of our dollars. If such democratic subterfuge has the same effect of unfairness before an election, then the Harper government is clearly undermining the spirit of the rule of law critical to fair elections. He has, in effect, made the government a third party that is allowed to spend potentially millions of dollars, making the actual limits in the election period illusory to some extent. This deserves a profound rebuke by Canadians.

KONRAD YAKABUSKI

Cuba: A legacy for Obama, or a curveball for Republicans?

If you’ve ever strolled Havana’s broken sidewalks, sucked in fumes from a Lada long overdue for the scrap heap or seen locals getting rations at a neighbourhood libreta store, a part of you probably dies at the thought of it all being overrun by Starbucks and American tourists.

Beyond the island resorts frequented by Canadians, the real Cuba is full of contradictions – a land of deprivation stuck in a time warp, with glimpses of the abundance and 21st century possibilities that a few connected or inventive Cubans already enjoy but almost all aspire to attain. Were it not for the brutality with which the Castros have enforced their dictatorship, the idealistic slogans on sun-faded billboards might seem like romantic notions worth pursuing.

More Related to this Story

That the same billboards could one day be advertising iPhones or Internet providers might kill the poet in you. But that’s a small price to pay if it means a better life for average Cubans.

The poets still have plenty of time to indulge themselves. Like all of President Barack Obama’s recent headline-grabbing moves, from his climate pact with China to his executive order on immigration, there is much less than meets the eye in his announcement that the United States will re-establish diplomatic relations with Communist Cuba. That does not mean it wasn’t a bold move, just that its practical implications are for now quite limited, perhaps even short-lived.

Mr. Obama promises to open an embassy in Havana, but Congress is unlikely to provide him with the money to run it or approve an ambassador. Nor can Mr. Obama lift the 51-year-old embargo on U.S. trade with Cuba without congressional approval – and there little possibility of that happening before he leaves office. There will be no rush of Americans to the beaches of Varadero or Cienfuegos or island invasion by U.S. retail chains.

For now, the biggest change is an increase in the amount of cash Cuban-Americans can send to relatives on the island. The cap on remittances will rise to $2,000 (U.S.) every three months, from $500. This will provide a major boost to the Cuban economy – and the Castros.

A Washington Post editorial called Mr. Obama’s move “an undeserved bailout” for the regime of 83-year-old President Raul Castro, who officially took over from the older and frailer Fidel Castro in 2008. It will “provide Havana with a fresh source of desperately needed hard currency and eliminate U.S. leverage for political reforms.”

So why reward the Castros, who have denied Cubans basic freedoms, executed countless dissidents and still imprison political opponents on a whim?

The short answer is: Why China and Vietnam and not Cuba? The United States deals with plenty of undemocratic regimes with horrendous human-rights records, so there is no longer a good reason to single out Cuba, beyond sheer obstinacy. It’s not like the embargo has been a success in snuffing out totalitarianism.

With a Republican-controlled Congress preventing him from leaving a further legislative legacy, Mr. Obama also intends to spend the rest of his term making bold-sounding but partial reforms that, if carried to fruition by his successor, will still have his name on them.

Besides, the Castros aren’t immortal, even if they’re doing their best to look that way. Any U.S. president must prepare for a post-Castro Cuba. Mr. Obama has just gotten some of the preliminaries out the way. Better to act now than to allow China and Russia, whose leaders both visited the island this year, to get any cozier with Havana.

Most important, Mr. Obama has also thrown a curveball at Republicans. They are beholden to fiercely anti-Castro older Cuban-Americans in Florida. But younger Cuban-Americans and non-Cuban Hispanics, for whom the Castros are geriatric paper tigers, now account for the majority of Florida’s Latinos.

Former Florida governor and likely 2016 Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush said Mr. Obama’s move will benefit “the heinous Castro brothers, who have oppressed the Cuban people.” But while such talk may still be needed to win a GOP nomination, it is clearly out of touch with public opinion.

Hillary Clinton knew that when, on leaving the State Department in 2012, she conveniently left behind a memo urging Mr. Obama to work to lift the embargo. If 2016 yields a Bush-Clinton matchup, Mr. Obama may just have tipped Florida’s critical scales for his former Democratic rival.

WHAT READERS THINK

Dec. 22: ‘Jim Prentice’s BFF’ – and other letters to the editor

Irish Times:

Sir, – I fully agree with the idea of opening up walking trails throughout rural Ireland. Both from the point of view of encouraging tourism and also to enable people to get out and enjoy their local area. However, I have worked for the farming community for the last 35 years and I have seen at first hand how farmers have suffered at the hands of sections of the non-farming community.

A large proportion of farmers who have land anywhere close to urban areas suffer from unbelievable amounts of rubbish being dumped on their land. They have to put up with trespassers of every age, from small children upwards, who come in with dogs, quad bikes, motor bikes, stolen cars and alcohol. They disturb and injure livestock, damage crops, tear down fences, leave gates open and can be abusive to the landowners. Even farmers who live away from urban areas are not immune. Some areas are popular haunts for men, who walk through farmland with packs of dogs, usually lurchers or terriers type, causing chaos. So while I would love to see the “keep out” signs disappearing, I fully understand why they are there. – Yours, etc,

BOB TWIGG,

Kilmeaden,

Co Waterford.

Sir, – Debate on important issues often (and increasingly) appears better teased out on this page than in Dáil Éireann, and the ongoing debate on walkers, cyclists and tourism bears this out. However, Robert Dowds’s contribution (December 20th) might have been better kept to the floor of the Dáil where it might garner him some kudos from fellow politicians, because it adds little to the real debate here.

As a long-time campaigner for tourism infrastructure, specifically for a linked network of trails that would attract the huge and growing market of Irish and foreign cyclists and long-distance walkers, I have always recognised that forcing this infrastructure through private property is not the answer. While the situation in the UK and elsewhere is very far ahead of here in terms of access and trails, there are differences that are important. Farms here are typically small, residential, and farmed by owners; many such landowners do not want open access and nobody should force it on them. Unwilling participants in any measure designed to boost economic activity in rural areas will create planned failure in any such initiative. It won’t work, because the landowners will ensure that it doesn’t.

The people who oppose such initiatives for reasons of naked greed need to be firmly dealt with, but ramming new access laws down their throats is not the answer. – Yours, etc,

JOHN MULLIGAN,

Boyle,

Co Roscommon.

A chara, – Your editorial (December 16th) and related letters presume an absence of trails giving access to the countryside. The true situation is very different. A nationwide network of walking trails has developed over the past 30 years (see irishtrails.ie, the website of the Irish Sports Council and the National Trails Office).

The site records hundreds of walking and cycling trails, including 44 medium-distance and long-distance walking trails, all marked and signposted, registered and subject to regular inspection. This is the result of the ongoing co-operation of landowners and initially the work of community and rural development bodies, supplemented more recently by local authorities, Fáilte Ireland funding, the work of Comhairle na Tuaithe and State initiatives such as the community employment schemes, rural social schemes, the walks scheme and the network of rural recreation officers, with technical and advisory back-up from the Irish Sports Council and the National Trails Office.

The trail with which I am most familiar is the Kerry Way, which circuits the Iveragh peninsula. The basic circuit is 190km in length, allowing for a good nine days of walking or hiking. Largely based on old highways, Mass paths and butter roads, it has been described as a walk through history.

And that’s only one example of unhindered access. Anyone wishing to know the true situation should refer to the Irish trails website. – Is mise,

SEÁN Ó SÚILLEABHÁIN,

Walk Trails Ireland,

Killorglin, Co Kerry.

Sir, – In response to Justin MacCarthy (December 20th), we have to say that he’s partly correct when he says that our “politicians have scant interest in either activity”. I’m aware that some TDs actually find the time to walk and cycle, such as Eric Byrne and Ruairí Quinn (Labour), Minister of State Jimmy Deenihan (Fine Gael) and none other than An Taoiseach.

You also published a letter from Robert Dowds TD, who mentions his Access to the Countryside Bill, which has been languishing in the Oireachtas environment committee for 18 months. Keep Ireland Open supports this Bill and we would ask TDs and Senators to nail their colours to the mast and publicly support this Bill. – Yours, etc,

ROGER GARLAND,

Keep Ireland Open,

Dublin 14.

Sir, – I was bemused to read (“Finance staff went home to find out what was in budget, banking inquiry told”, December 19th) of Rob Wright’s surprise at the limited number of economists in the Department of Finance and his reported comment that “Part of the problem was that skilled economists moved out to set up the National Treasury Management Agency and without the expertise the department did not have the capacity to seriously question some of the regulatory decisions being made”.

In case this goes by without challenge, I would like to make a few comments, as I was the chief executive of the NTMA from its establishment in December 1990 until December 2009.

A total of 25 people joined the NTMA from the Department of Finance when it began operations in late 1990/early 1991 and a handful of others joined over the years. Most were at that time in relatively junior to middle-ranking grades and, as far as I can recall, none had worked as economists in the department.

That all happened about 15 years before the crash – surely enough time to recover. Countries have recovered from the devastation of a world war more rapidly.

It was not as though the people in the NTMA had disappeared into the ether.

Up to the fundamental changes this week, the NTMA chief executive answered directly to the Minister for Finance and we were always available to give advice to the Minister of the day – indeed often whether wanted or not! – and also to any government or opposition TDs or Senators who wanted to talk to us.

An enormous range of additional functions were transferred to the NTMA over the years and it was not because politicians liked the colour of our eyes!

The problem was not lack of economists. Whatever about their number in the department, there were economists everywhere, in the Central Bank, the ESRI, the universities, the stockbrokers, the banks, etc, as well as the IMF, the OECD, the European Commission, the credit rating agencies, all making a good living from analysing and commenting on the Irish economy. In fact, I never hired an economist into the NTMA as I reckoned I could get any amount of economic advice free. The problem was, at its most basic, a lack of common sense.

Before we joined the single currency, we could deal with our excesses through resetting the clock, ie we devalued the Irish pound.

We then joined the German club, where we continued to play by our own rules. At times, we seemed to think we had discovered a new economic theory that applied to Ireland and allowed us to do things that others could not do.

Sometimes there may be an inevitability about a catastrophe. – Yours, etc,

MICHAEL SOMERS,

Donnybrook,

Dublin 4.

A chara, – In relation to the extraordinary attack on Sinn Féin by Ceann Comhairle Sean Barrett (“Ceann Comhairle Sean Barrett claims Sinn Féin used him as pawn”, December 20th), I wish to clarify the situation.

I have been writing to the Ceann Comhairle for a year now in relation to what I believe to be his failure to discharge his duties properly and impartially.

I have been actively seeking a meeting with Mr Barrett to discuss Sinn Féin’s concerns directly with him. He has not facilitated this.

Yet he clearly has no problem facilitating media interviews to attack Sinn Féin. Mr Barrett says he wasn’t occupying the chair for a section of a Dáil debate about which I complained. He deliberately misses the point.

The substance of my most recent communication with Mr Barrett, is for him, in his capacity as Ceann Comhairle, to deal with the serious issues I have raised.

Highly prejudicial comments against Sinn Féin TDs by members of the Government parties have now become a feature of Dáil debates. The Ceann Comhairle has allowed Sinn Féin TDs to be abused in the most disgraceful manner.

Sinn Féin will not accept a situation where our TDs are subjected to second-class treatment in the Dáil or where those who elected us are given second-class treatment.

Sean Barrett’s comments appear to be an attempt by him to salvage his reputation which has now become a political issue.

I urge the Ceann Comhairle to have the courage of his convictions and meet me to discuss and hopefully resolve these serious issues. – Is mise,

GERRY ADAMS, TD,

Teach Laighean,

Baile Átha Cliath 2.

Sir, – Noel Whelan (“2014: The year of recovery, or the year of the water uprising?”, Opinion & Analysis, December 19th) writes that historians, when they come to examine 2014, will find it “curious that the most intense Irish popular reaction to the recession came just as the recovery began to take hold”.

There is, however, no mystery in this for the historians. On the contrary, it conforms to the classic model of a “revolution of rising expectations”. Thus, Alexis de Tocqueville wrote of the French revolution that “it is not always by going from bad to worse that a society falls into a revolution. It happens most often that a people, which has supported without complaint, as if they were not felt, the most oppressive laws, violently throws them off as soon as their weight is lightened”.

In other words, the experience of things getting better and the demand for further improvements are important factors in provoking revolution.

Likewise, and closer to home, current scholarship (taking a cue from work such as James Donnelly’s magisterial The Land and People of Nineteenth-Century Cork) tends to interpret the Irish land wars of 1879–83 and 1886–90 as a “revolution of rising expectations” resulting from the determination of tenant farmers to preserve their material gains made since the Famine during challenging periods of agricultural crisis. The Civil Rights campaign in Northern Ireland in the late 1960s can also be seen in this light, namely as ignited by the modest reforms of the O’Neill era.

So we should not be surprised by the recent unrest in Ireland about water charges and other austerity measures. As conditions get better, we will increasingly chafe at the limits beyond which the easing of austerity cannot go.

Expectations of relief having been raised, nobody will be satisfied with necessarily limited progress.

History tells us that this is the moment of maximum danger, and it needs to be carefully handled. – Yours, etc,

FELIX M LARKIN,

Cabinteely,

Dublin 18.

Sir, – I write to you in full support of the need to improve the monitoring of care homes for the elderly and vulnerable people.

However, there is one sector involved in the provision of care that has absolutely no monitoring system in place – the private care agencies that provide care for the elderly and vulnerable in their own homes.

In recent years my family had occasion to use the services of two such agencies, to support me in my role as primary carer to my parents, both in their nineties, both of high dependency, one of whom had Alzheimer’s, one of whom had Parkinson’s.

One of these private care agencies we found extremely satisfactory, with well-trained, efficient carers, and a responsive management system. However, our experience with the other care agency was unsatisfactory in the extreme.

At the time I attempted to lodge a complaint with the Health Information and Quality Authority (Hiqa), to be told that private care agencies providing care in the home do not fall under its remit. I then went to the HSE, and met with the manager of disability services for the area in which my parents lived.

I stressed to this person that though we as a family were extremely distressed by our experiences with this care agency, we were also very concerned for those families who did not have a family member present to monitor the care provided to their loved ones, and that we were also aware that the agency in question was employed by the HSE as a provider of HSE healthcare packages.

The reply I finally got from the HSE was that because we had hired this care agency on a private basis, it was not their concern either.

It is vital that a satisfactory monitoring and supervision system be put in place for vulnerable and elderly people being cared for in their own homes.

My fear is that the experience of my family is not an isolated one. Many families do not have a family member as part of the team of carers, as I was, and are therefore not able to observe and monitor the work of the care agencies on the ground.

It is reckless in the extreme to allow this situation to continue. – Yours, etc,

ELEANOR LAMB,

Carndonagh,

Co Donegal.

Sir, – While I truly appreciate the sentiments expressed in Gerry Boland’s letter (December 22nd), namely that “the most compassionate choice at Christmas is, clearly, a vegetarian one”, I feel bound to state that it honestly wouldn’t be that compassionate toward me. – Yours, etc,

GEOFF SCARGILL,

Bray, Co Wicklow.

Sir, – I suspect Arthur Boland may be somewhat late in his suggestion that TDs be guillotined (December 22nd). Judging by the way so many Dáil members are unwilling to take a principled stand – and therefore race from one disaster to the next – I fear most of the chickens are already headless. – Yours, etc,

BRENDAN TREACY,

Drumree, Co Meath.

Sir, – Further to Mr Boland’s suggestion, might I suggest they also receive a strong lash from the whips? – Yours, etc,

CLARE BALFE,

Dublin 7.

Sir, – The Sony imbroglio – cyber attack, weird dictator, vendetta, blackmail, capitulation – has all the makings of a Hollywood movie. Is somebody making it? – Yours, etc,

Dr JOHN DOHERTY,

Vienna.

Irish Independent:

Christmas is not just a Christian festival, but one that is shared by secularists and atheists alike, having its origins in North-European pre-Christian rituals. Ritual and celebration are not the exclusive right of the churches.

The winter solstice celebrations, or Yule, that Christmas displaced, give thanks for the gift of light and for the return of the sun from its long winter sojourn. Echoing these sentiments, Christians speak of Christ as the light of the world.

In many ways we are moving towards a post-religious society where people feel free to express the beliefs they hold not out of obligation but from conviction. Many, including myself, feel more at ease with various forms of agnosticism, where answers to questions about belief are tinged with elements of not knowing.

For the Greek philosophers to know that you do not know was the ultimate wisdom.

Attempts to make sense of the notion of a loving god in the face of the suffering of the innocent, the cry of the poor, the pain of loneliness and the radical inequalities that characterise our world sometimes amount to explaining the unknown by the unintelligible. There is a tendency for many religious believers to make God up as they go along.

My atheist friends often seem to have a more compassionate view of what it is to be human, particularly about what it is to be human to one another. The loving of God sometimes occludes the more obvious need to love and forgive one another.

Christ did not come among us to start an institution, but a revolution in our conception of ourselves as dependent on one another. He set out to abolish religion as the worship of idols and the creation of mutually-antagonistic groups.

Christmas is a time for rekindling faith in one another, reinvigorating our humanity, and hoping for better things to come. Happy Christmas to all.

Philip O’Neill, Oxford, England

 

Thinking to some purpose

You know it’s Christmas when the ads come on warning you not to eat too much, or drink too much.

I would caution against thinking too much. Man’s thoughts are responsible for most of the world’s problems.

I personally have always taken great pleasure in the comforting sound of the east wind entering my right ear and whistling harmoniously out of my left. My head is an echo chamber.

I prefer to daydream or muse. Thoughts are dangerous concrete things people trip over.

But I do wonder. For instance, regarding all the new allowances and refunds offered by the government in relation to Irish Water, I was trying to figure out if it would be possible to get a rebate for all the tears I have shed on the issue. I now have my own constant supply.

Another source of befuddlement and discombobulation is the Universal Social Charge. Fair play I thought, our leaders have come up with a plan to tax me every time I am sociable.

The people in “the know” say there are only two certainties – death and taxes. Well, if that is the sum total of knowledge ’tis indeed folly to be wise.

When I was a little fella we learned a poem:

“There goes the village idiot,

He’s such a happy man.

I wish I was an idiot.

My God, perhaps

I am.”

Remember good people a thought is not just for Christmas…

TG Gavin, Killiney, Co Dublin

 

Rugby sportswomen

There is a song about “the boys who beat the Black and Tans”. Is it not time we had an equally rousing number to remember “the girls who tanned the great All Blacks”?

This came to mind when watching the replay on TG4 on solstice Sunday. For sheer determination, skill and fitness the Irish girls are an object lesson in how to play rugby.

Ted O’Keeffe, Ranelagh, Dublin 6

 

Adaption, not recovery needed

I refer to Mr Tom Molloy’s article “Man plans and then God decides” (December 22). Perhaps so, but it’s hardly surprising since most of man’s planning is of the past and entirely misses realities of the future.

Economics have changed utterly – from shortage to surplus, from growth to sufficiency and from work to automation. We can’t manage an entirely new economic situation with old outdated ideology, it’s like trying to drive an automobile with a whip.

We are obsessed with “recovery”. Why indeed should we need it as we live in the best economic time ever? Simply because we don’t manage our extraordinary success very well. Despite more availability of investment capital than ever before, growth, interest rate and inflation are at historically low levels all over Europe and the rest of the world.

The US “grows” by borrowing an additional $2.5bn (yes, billion) per day; the ECB is a proposing €375bn injection to get the eurozone “working again”, the UK Chancellor – shortly prior to an election – predicts the greatest deficit and service cuts ever. Ireland’s export performance appears to buck the trend but, in our favourable tax regime, how much is actually “made” here and how much is just “invoiced” here?

Despite intense conflict and instability in the Middle East, oil prices are falling. Is there a better indicator of just how stuck and stagnant world economics really are?

And why? Because ‘old’ economics of ‘growth’ and ‘working’ and ‘continually producing more’ are no longer adequate. Instead of “recovery” to the good old days of inability and shortage and toil, we need to adapt to the unprecedented economics of ability, abundance and automation.

John F Kennedy once said “change is the law of life and those who look only to the past and present are likely to miss the future”.

Padraic Neary, Tubbercurry, Co Sligo

 

Flagging North’s problems

With regard to the North, I am led to think about the problem of flag. It is one of the contentious issues in the negotiations in Belfast left in exasperation by the British Prime Minister and the Taoiseach last week. Is there a willingness among the Christian communities of the North to resolve it? And is there a possible compromise acceptable to all parties?

What are the possibilities?

1. The Union flag.

2. The Irish tricolour.

3. The provincial flag of Ulster.

4. The Irish harp, gold (or) on a blue (azure) field.

5. The Irish harp, gold (or) on a green (vert) field.

6. The flag of St Patrick.

Surely somewhere in this list is a way forward for all Irish men and women of goodwill in the season of goodwill.

I send greetings from the sunshine of Tenerife to the much maligned “dreary steeples of Fermanagh and Tyrone”.

Perhaps the light of God´s sun will shine on them at Christmas, not to say on the twin steeples of Armagh and Listowel and on many other steeples in the length and breadth of Ireland besides.

Churchill is not the final arbiter on these matters. After all, 4000 Irishmen followed his grand plan to their deaths in Gallipoli in 1915.

It is time for the Christians in Ireland, Roman Catholics, Church of Ireland, Presbyterians, Methodists and Quakers to face up to the reality of their common faith in the love of Christ.

Gerald Morgan, Chaucer Hub, Trinity College Dublin

Irish Independent


Jill

$
0
0

Jill

Off to the tip with 15 bags of leaves. Give Shanti her Christmas present, Co-op and Jill comes to call.

Obituary:

Alan Williams was a long-serving Labour MP whose chance of high office was blighted by his party’s years in the wilderness

Alan Williams, former Labour MP and Father of the House
Alan Williams, former Labour MP and Father of the House Photo: GETTY

Alan Williams, who has died aged 84, was Labour MP for Swansea West for 45 years, a minister in four departments and, at the close of his parliamentary career, Father of the House.

Moderate, sensible and never a hogger of the limelight, Williams was one of the generation denied the chance of higher office by Labour’s defeat in 1979 and the internecine strife that kept the party in opposition for 18 years. He was 49 and a minister of state when Margaret Thatcher pitched his party into the wilderness, and 67 and a senior backbencher by the time Tony Blair led it back to power in 1997.

Williams might not have made the top flight anyway, as he never won election to the shadow cabinet and shadowed a cabinet minister for only one year as shadow Welsh secretary. Yet his impact was felt; he demolished the economic case for retaining a Royal Yacht, and under his chairmanship the Liaison Committee of select committee chairmen gained the right to question the prime minister in public.

His highest profile moment came in June 2009, when as Father of the House he presided over the election of a new Speaker after Michael Martin’s forced resignation over his handling of the MPs’ expenses scandal, broken by The Daily Telegraph.

The election was the first held by ballot, the previous system of moving resolutions in favour of each candidate in turn having degenerated into a shambles when Martin was elected in 2000. The former Labour foreign secretary Margaret Beckett was favourite, but Labour MPs switched to the maverick Tory John Bercow, who defeated his fellow Conservative Sir George Young by 322 votes to 271.

Two years before, it had fallen to Williams in the same capacity to put the final question to Blair before he left the Chamber to resign as prime minister, and from the Commons. Williams told him that despite their differences, he could say that Blair had been “one of the outstanding prime ministers of my lifetime”.

His most important contribution to Labour was the robust line he took against the rampant Left in the early 1980s. When others on the Right of the party were defecting to the SDP, Williams stayed, urging Labour to purge itself before it was too late .

Alan John Williams was born on October 14 1930, the son of a miner. Educated at Cardiff High School, Cardiff College of Technology and University College, Oxford, he became a lecturer in Economics at the Welsh College of Advanced Technology and a regular broadcaster in Wales.

He joined the Labour Party as a student, and was a member of the National Union of Students’ delegation to Russia in 1954, as the Kremlin opened up after the death of Stalin.

Williams fought Poole in 1959, and five years later captured Swansea West from the Conservatives as Harold Wilson led Labour back to power. A promising member of a large, young Labour intake, he became after the 1966 election PPS to the Postmaster General, Edward Short.

The next year he was appointed parliamentary secretary in the Department for Economic Affairs . The Daily Telegraph’s sketchwriter reckoned him “far from the most dashing spokesman of a far from dashing ministry”, but he saw off Left-wing critics of the government’s economic policies.

When the DEA was wound up in October 1969, Williams moved to Tony Benn’s upgraded ministry of technology, with responsibility for economic issues and the nationalised industries. It fell to him to announce that pit ponies would be withdrawn from all but a handful of mines where machinery could not replace them, and defend an embarrassing shortage of smokeless fuel.

Within months, Edward Heath pulled off a surprise election victory. Williams now became opposition spokesman on consumer protection and small businesses . On Labour’s return to power in March 1974 he became minister of state in a new Department of Prices and Consumer Protection headed by a fellow-moderate, Shirley Williams.

Alan Williams had a role in perpetuating Labour’s controls and subsidies on the prices of basic foods, which Mrs Williams later conceded were economic nonsense. He brought in regulations obliging publicans to display the price of drinks, and rolled out a network of local consumer advice centres.

After James Callaghan succeeded Wilson in 1976, Williams moved sideways to the Department of Industry as deputy to Eric Varley, and at the end of the year was made a privy counsellor. He concentrated on shoring up Britain’s flagging manufacturing sector, including the workers’ co-operatives Benn had encouraged. He also took the heat for his department’s refusal to let Toyota open a car importing base in Bristol in an attempt to force the Japanese company to go to a development area.

The weeks in early 1979 before the Callaghan government’s defeat at the polls were difficult for Williams. He had to admit his efforts to boost British manufacturing had been undercut by the “Winter of Discontent”, which had cut production by 10 per cent and laid off 235,000 workers. He then had to bite his tongue as other Labour ministers campaigned for a “Yes” vote in the Welsh devolution referendum, a cause he then did not support. He was vindicated by the plan’s defeat, but in the ensuing election held his seat by only 401 votes.

Back in opposition, Callaghan made Williams a front-bench spokesman on Wales. When Michael Foot became Labour leader late in 1980, he appointed Williams shadow minister for the Civil Service. He condemned Mrs Thatcher for “vindictiveness” in deleting from the New Year’s honours civil servants who had struck over their pay.

After Labour’s devastating defeat in 1983, Neil Kinnock made him a trade and industry spokesman and campaigns co-ordinator. On his watch Mrs Thatcher floated British Telecom, a step Williams denounced as “the biggest giveaway in British commercial history – you can sell almost anything at half price”. In his dual role as deputy shadow Leader of the House he also turned up the heat over the Spycatcher affair.

In 1987 Kinnock made Williams shadow Welsh secretary for a year before demoting him to deputy shadow Leader of the House once again . He left the front bench in 1989.

Williams came into his own as a respected backbencher. In 1990 he rejoined the Public Accounts Committee, on which he had served in the 1960s, staying there for the rest of his career. He secured an investigation by the National Audit Office into the cost of royal travel, which revealed – as he intended it should – the true cost of the Royal Yacht Britannia and contributed to the eventual decision to pay her off.

Williams served on the Standards and Privileges Committee at the height of public concerns about parliamentary “sleaze”, and from 1997 on the Joint Committee on Privilege.

From 2001 he chaired the Liaison Committee, and in 2005 he succeeded Tam Dalyell as Father of the House. He retired in 2010.

Alan Williams married Mary Rees in 1957. She, their two sons and their daughter survive him.

Alan Williams, born October 14 1930, died December 21 2014

Guardian:

A serious omission from the science section of Bim Adewunmi’s list of female faces of the year (G2, 23 December) was the new head of Cern, Dr Fabiola Gianotti (Report, 4 November).
Dr Richard Carter
London

• A boycott of Amazon is not just for Christmas (Online report, 23 December). Find the Amazon-free shopping guide at amazonanonymous.org/better-than-amazon.
John Wicks
Reading

• Two special advisers have been forbidden by the Cabinet Office rules to take part in election campaigns (Home secretary’s special advisers removed from parliamentary list, 19 December). Surely the opposite should be the case: to work as an adviser, there should be an accompanying obligation to take part in parliamentary elections, and in the process come into contact with real voters on their doorsteps. It would beat cosy focus groups any day. The further from Westminster this takes place, the better.
Leslie Freitag
Harpenden, Hertfordshire

• Abiotic methanogensis on Mars based on deposits of the mineral olivine has been known about for many years, without previously triggering a debate on extra-terrestrial life (Report, 20 December). Don’t tell David Bowie, though.
Graham Charnock
London

• Corrections are always amusing but today’s (22 December) were a delight. Thank you for a good laugh.
Madge Pelling
Coddenham, Suffolk

• Humanists rejoice! 98% of our “Xmas” cards are secular – there is hope after all. As a Scot, I particularly enjoyed the absence of Wee Freakings.
James Herring
Dunbar, East Lothian


My late eldest sister, Kitty, was photographed by Jane Bown some time during the 1970s. She was a shop steward fighting for equal pay for sewing machinists. When my sister died two years ago, my daughter asked if she could have the photograph as she also lived in Alton. Not until I read that Jane Bown had died and looked at her work in the middle pages (22 December), did I realise why this photo was such a lovely image of my sister, and how lucky we are to have one of her photographs. I feel quite proud of her, as she was a typical lovely-looking Hoxton girl, who left school at 14 with no proper schooling because of the war. But she was a very feisty shop steward and I feel that Jane Bown could see this when she chose to photograph her.
Doris Barrett
London

I met Jane Bown briefly in May 1982 at Wembley Stadium, where Pope John Paul II was to celebrate mass on his visit to Britain. I was the photographer for a Catholic magazine. The press photographers had been corralled in an area roughly in the centre of the football pitch, facing the platform where mass was to be celebrated. There were dozens, all with step-ladders and long lenses. While we were waiting I got talking to a diminutive lady who introduced herself as Jane Bown from the Observer. She had an SLR camera with a lens that looked as though it might have been 135mm at most. After weighing up the situation she said: “This is hopeless. I’m not staying here. Keep an eye on my bag, will you?” And off she went. Shortly after the Pope had arrived she returned, picked up her bag and said goodbye. Next morning the Observer carried on its front page a striking picture of the white-clad Pope, alone against a dark background, a hand raised to acknowledge the crowd. And underneath: Photograph: Jane Bown.
Fr Michael Henesy
Middlesbrough

How very sad to hear the news of the death of Jane Bown. One of my favourite photographs is her portrait of Anthony Blunt taken (I think) in 1964, 15 years before he was exposed as a Soviet spy. At the time of the photograph, Blunt was surveyor of the Queen’s pictures and there is a government or crown document on his desk. However, if you look at Jane’s portrait with the benefit of hindsight, there is something dark, tense and secretive about it, characteristics somewhat atypical in Jane’s work. Assuming that she had not been told, this one portrait sums up her profound psychological astuteness.
Martin Pick
London

Russia Today

The control room of 24-hour international, multilingual Russian television network Russia Today (RT). Photograph: Dzhavakhadze Zurab/ Dzhavakhadze Zurab/ITAR-TASS Photo/Corbis

It is a bit late in the day for Peter Horrocks to complain about BBC World Service underfunding in the face of ratcheted-up competition from Moscow and Beijing (World Service fears losing information war as Russia Today turns up the pressure, 22 December). When he appeared before the Commons foreign affairs committee on 9 March 2011 to explain the new BBC licence fee-funded regime for the World Service, MPs repeatedly offered to mount a campaign to help him to ask for a better settlement for the World Service. Horrocks as repeatedly declined their offers of support, insisting the BBC as a whole must accept funding reductions. That looks like a strategic error, as does the earlier closure of direct broadcasting to Russia and central Europe on the grounds that pluralism of communication and information was now freely available in those countries.

There is a source of funding readily available to the World Service – the huge annual underspend in the international aid budget. This should be made available to the World Service, not because it is deemed to make a contribution to development but because it serves the essential needs of listeners for unbiased information. BBC World Service is a broadcaster, not an aid agency, and should be funded as such. The World Service was never an arm of the Foreign Office. It must not become a division of overseas aid.
John Tusa
Managing director, BBC World Service 1986-92

You compare the BBC’s international activities, funding and audiences with those of its Russian counterparts. You say that the BBC World Service’s current global reach is 191 million. That figure is based on recent representative, quantitative research in many countries around the world. You say Russian Today claims “it can reach 700 million”. That is like saying the Grauniad can reach 64 million people in the UK. Both sentences are equally meaningless.

The one thing I do know is that Russia’s international broadcasting activities have never been very successful anywhere. In the Soviet days, surveys carried out in most countries showed tiny audiences for Radio Moscow. I think the only places where we ever found audiences of any significant size for Radio Moscow were where it broadcast in a language that other international broadcasters were not using; examples I remember were in India and west Africa. But all those modestly successful services were closed during the 1990s, when all state-funded Russian international broadcasting began to put a heavy emphasis on English. I have seen no evidence from anywhere that this move has been successful in audience terms.

Radio Moscow, now the Voice of Russia, and its TV counterparts, unlike the BBC, do not carry out any kind of regular audience measurement. So they have no idea about the size, nature or whereabouts of their audiences. My guess is that they are very small, and almost certainly smaller than they were in communist days.
Graham Mytton
Head of audience research, BBC World Service 1982-98

Your report raises the familiar issue of the competing obligations to domestic and foreign constituencies. The World Service is a huge asset doing generally excellent work. But why should home licence fee payers meet the bill for the provision of an international public good and/or a foreign policy instrument?

This dilemma was an all too predictable result of the decision to fund the World Service out of the licence fee. It is all very well to say now that this will help the BBC to defend the very principle of the licence fee, but that will not solve the problem of long-term resourcing. The answer is for the government to grasp the nettle of the need to fund external broadcasting by hypothecating a given amount out of general taxation to be ring-fenced within the BBC’s budget, thus preserving both journalistic independence and the resources necessary to do the job – which are very small beer in relation to, say, the defence budget.
Christopher Hill
Professor of international relations, University of Cambridge

Every day, and three times each day, I take the news from Russia Today, the BBC, ITN and Sky. The best for world coverage and the avoidance of patronising “human-interest” leads is RT. Though it is true that it gives the Russian angle on many stories – on which Sky is equally US-biased – much of the reporting is factual, broader than all the other channels, and pro-US interviews, critical of the Russian government, are often broadcast from the US. Your article quotes ex-RT broadcasters with clear axes to grind; the truth is that the depth and balance of RT are in many ways superior to our own BBC, which is often lazy, with stereotypical and predictable vox pop interviews and the shallowest of comment. The best news programme of all, however, is Channel Four News.
Ian Flintoff
Oxford

I would not look to Russia Today to tell me what is going on in Russia, or to give a complete picture of what is going on in the wider world. Neither would I look to the BBC to tell me what is going on in this country or the wider world.

RT regularly gives information about important events that should be reported on the BBC but never are.
Brendan O’Brien
London

BELGIUM-EU-COMPETITION-VESTAGER
‘Margrethe Vestager has made clear that the commission is treating the LuxLeaks papers as ‘market information’ and is reviewing these tax rulings to decide whether or not they should be made the subject of further illegal state-aid cases.’ Photograph: Emmanuel Dunand/Getty

We deplore the decision by Luxembourg to bring criminal charges against someone they believe to be the whistleblower responsible for passing to the media confidential rulings awarded by the Luxembourg tax authorities (Report, 20 December). We believe these disclosures were manifestly in the public interest, helping to expose the industrial scale on which Luxembourg has sanctioned aggressive tax-avoidance schemes, draining huge sums from public coffers beyond its borders.

The so-called LuxLeaks papers have already forced senior Luxembourg politicians, past and present, to admit there is an urgent need to reform the way multinationals are taxed. The revelations have also transformed the international tax debate, prompting the finance ministers of France, Germany and Italy to write to the European commission calling for urgent action. In their words: “It is obvious that a turning point has been reached in the discussion on unfair tax competition … Since certain tax practices of countries and taxpayers have become public recently, the limits of permissible tax competition between member states have shifted. This development is irreversible.”

We believe this development is in large part thanks to the brave, public-spirited actions of an individual who ensured the contents of confidential tax rulings granted in Luxembourg became public. In contrast to his actions, Luxembourg has shown itself reluctant – up to this week – to disclose, even to the European commission, the criteria by which it offered businesses confidential tax rulings. Officials at the commission are tasked with ensuring such rulings do not constitute illegal state aid, and are already investigating whether Luxembourg rulings separately granted to subsidiaries of Amazon and Fiat violate state-aid laws.

Until last Thursday, Luxembourg had been firmly resisting what it told the European court of justice were speculative and disproportionate requests for information on its tax rulings from the commission. But now it has abruptly changed course and is complying with all requests. We believe this change is the result of the LuxLeaks scandal. Meanwhile, Margrethe Vestager, commissioner responsible for competition issues, has made clear that the commission is treating the LuxLeaks papers as “market information” and is actively reviewing these tax rulings to decide whether or not they should be made the subject of further illegal state-aid cases. While we understand and agree the rule of law must be observed, we note that Luxembourg prosecutors are required to have in mind whether or not the public interest is served by pursuing a criminal prosecution. We believe there is no public interest in prosecuting an individual suspected of bringing the LuxLeaks papers to the attention of the world.
Raymond Baker Global Financial Integrity
Jack A. Blum Tax Justice Network USA
José Bové French MEP (Green)
Franziska Brantner German MP (Green)
Richard Brooks Author
Prof A J Brown Griffith University
Terri Butler Australian MP (Labour)
John Christensen Tax Justice Network UK
Allison Christians McGill University
Frank Clemente Americans for Tax Fairness
Alex Cobham Centre for Global Development
Rosa L. DeLauro US Congresswoman (Democrat)
Karima Delli French MEP (Green)
Anneliese Dodds UK MEP (Labour)
Lloyd Doggett US Congressman (Democrat)
Rev Prof Andrew Dutney Uniting Church in Australia
Bas Eickhout Dutch MEP (Green)
Prof Peter Eigen Transparency International
Sven Giegold German MEP (Green)
Andrew Giles Australian MP (Labour)
Jesse Griffiths Eurodad
Gavin Hayman Global Witness
Nathaniel Heller Global Integrity
John Hilary War on Want
Martin Hojsik ActionAid International
Kelvin Hopkins UK MP (Labour)
Tim Hughes Involve
Yannick Jadot French MEP (Green)
Cathy James Public Concern at Work
Lord (Joel) Joffe UK member of upper house (Labour)
Eva Joly French MEP (Green)
Ged Kearney Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU)
Paul Kenny GMB union
Dr Sheila Killian University of Limerick
Philippe Lamberts Belgian MEP (Green)
Archie Law ActionAid Australia
Mauricio Lazala Business & Human Rights Resource Centre
Daniel Lebegue Transparency International
Eric LeCompte Jubilee USA
Laetitia Liebert Sherpa
Caroline Lucas UK MP (Green)
Benoît Majerus University of Luxembourg
Adrienne Margolis Lawyers for Better Business
Sorley McCaughey Christian Aid Ireland
Len McCluskey Unite the union
Porter McConnell Coallition for Financial Transparency
John McDonnell UK MP (Labour)
Katherine McFate Center for Effective Government
Michael Meacher UK MP (Labour)
Austin Mitchell UK MP (Labour)
Richard Murphy Tax Research UK
Melissa Parke Australian MP (Labour)
Cedric Perrin French senator (UMP)
Prof Sol Picciotto Lancaster University
Bernard Pinaud CCFD-Terre Solidaire
Prof Thomas Pogge Yale University
Marc Purcell Australian Council for International Development
David Quentin Tax Justice Network UK
Michèle Rivasi French MEP (Green)
Friederike Roder ONE
Prof Tulio Rosembuj University of Barcelona
Molly Scott Cato UK MEP (Green)
Mark Serwotka PCS union
Nick Shaxon Author
Prof Prem Sikka University of Essex
Nick Smith UK MP (Labour)
Jim Stewart Trinity College, Dublin
Lord (Ben) Stoneham UK member of the upper house (Lib Dem)
Dr Andy Storey University College Dublin
Ernest Urtasun Spanish MEP (Green)
Tom van der Lee Oxfam Novib
Denis Vienot Justice et Paiz
Duncan Wigan Copenhagen Business School
Rebecca Wilkins FACT Coalition
Dan Wootton Uniting Church in Australia
Dr Mark Zirnsak Tax Justice Network Australia

Independent:

So on “Panic Saturday” shoppers were expected to spend £1.2bn, this being contrasted with the 13 million Britons expected to spend Christmas in poverty (report, 20 December).

The growing gulf between haves and have-nots is also a big issue in many Western countries, such as in Germany where I am currently living, but we should recognise that the story does not stop there.  No, the goods bought with those £1.2bn are often sourced in ultra-low-cost countries where, in order to give consumers the lowest possible prices and to give importers/retailers the high margins they demand, goods are produced in sweat-shop conditions.

Then add to this the inherent cruelty in industrial meat production, energy requirements for production and transportation of goods, and endless, superfluous, plastic packaging and  you have a Christmas problem of proportions far beyond the issues covered in your report.

I don’t want to put a damper on Christmas, but surely the point of the whole celebration is to have a pleasant, reflective time with family and friends rather than to indulge in an orgy of consumption? And, unfortunately, no amount of tinsel will disguise the fact that excessive consumerism involves immoral, inhumane and damaging consequences.

Alan Mitcham
Cologne, Germany

 

Mike Stroud (letter,  22 December) contrasts the unmitigated greed shown by some people with those facing the Christmas festival in poverty, illustrating his point  by reference to a  gold-plated child’s car priced at £30,000.

Assuming his circumstances are similar to most people of average means, he can console himself that he doesn’t have to socialise with the truly awful types who would consider spending that amount of money on such trivial things.

Patrick Cleary
Honiton,  Devon

 

Keith Gilmour’s semantic objections to the current definition of “poverty” (letters, 22 December) centre on the peripheral, ignoring the benefits to social cohesion of understanding, and hopefully doing something about, the obscene gulf between rich and poor.

It matters not in the slightest whether the “poverty line” is set too high or too low, and even should one of his extreme examples come about (“if we could somehow double every income or if all the world’s billionaires were to suddenly relocate to Britain”) there would still be people in need, and in order to help, we would still need to know.

Eddie Dougall
Walsham le Willows, Suffolk

 

Keith Gilmour considers it “ludicrous” to believe that poverty will be reduced “if we just take huge sums of money from one group and hand them to another”.

Not half as ridiculous as the current regime of cutting welfare benefits and wages for the poor, presiding over an increase in zero-hours contracts, increasing indirect taxes (which disproportionately affect the least well-off) and continuing to allow multi-million pound bonuses and salaries in Britain’s corporate boardrooms and the City, while also cutting income tax for the super-rich. Could Mr Gilmour explain precisely how any of these policies will reduce poverty?

Pete Dorey
Bath

 

As a taxpayer I am really fed up with the benefit scroungers favoured by George Osborne.

Every business that does not pay a living wage is, and will continue to be, subsidised by our taxes, as long as Boy George keeps the minimum wage below the living wage.

He decries the deficit and insists on the need for austerity while seeing the only answer as a speedy return to the situation which led to the problem in the first place: excessive consumer credit, purchases and debt, fed by banks given free rein by ineffective regulation.

Malcolm MacIntyre-Read
Much Wenlock,  Shropshire

 

Give us buildings to delight the masses

As an academic who has spent much time in German universities dealing with the evolution of the modern urban environment and the place of architectural form within it, I must protest most strongly about the extremely intolerant and preconceived views expressed by architectural critics concerning the 10 geometric principles for urban design of the Prince of Wales (22 December).

I have long believed and taught that there have always existed certain natural aesthetic-cum-architectural formulations that rest more easily upon the eye of the human beholder than other more arbitrary concepts that have come about over the past 100 years. It really amazes me that so-called objective critics of our built surroundings are so obsessed with the status of Prince Charles that they seem oblivious to the fact that good urban design is not, and never has been, the absolute creature of governing elites. It is, rather, an intrinsic aspiration of the human condition and can be appreciated – if not always so easily achieved – by people with reasonable intelligence of every social degree.

If only the architectural and planning establishment in Great Britain would give up its narrow cultural prejudices about how it wants the future urban environment to unfold, and, as in Continental Europe, actually give the people of this country buildings and urban surroundings in which they could take a genuine delight. A more civilized lifestyle would be achieved for all.

John V N Soane
Bournemouth

 

Prince Charles is regularly mocked for his views on architecture; yet his 10 “geometric principles”, tabulated in your newspaper, are very similar to the strictures of the architectural historian Alec Clifton-Taylor, who visited 18 English towns on BBC television between 1977 and 1984. Among  other things, Clifton-Taylor urged the use of local stone in old English towns.

Many people feel alienated by modern buildings, and by the way towns have been made to conform to the needs of car users.

John Dakin
Toddington, Bedfordshire

 

The NHS is superb value for money

I think we should begin to wonder why the Tory party appears to be so keen to undermine the NHS. Why do they keep saying it is too expensive and wasteful?

The net expenditure for 2013/14 was £109bn (NHS Confederation Key Statistics). For a population of 64 million this works out at £1,714 per head per year. This is less than other advanced European countries such as Germany and France. In comparison with the healthcare systems of 10 other countries (Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland and the US) the NHS was found to be the most impressive overall by the Commonwealth Fund  in 2014.

There are savings which can be made. The NHS should not have to deal with the care of those elderly who are just frail. As a committed supporter of the NHS I feel that it should be paid for by ring-fenced increases in general taxation.

We should not despair or think that a great social experiment should be abolished. When we are sick, we are all equal.

Mary Leedham-Green
Woodford Green, Essex

 

Last week I had a urine infection, felt dizzy and passed out, somewhat foolishly, at the top of the stairs in my mother’s house. I woke up at the bottom, having broken her stairlift. She called the paramedics (as I’m deaf), who duly arrived and checked me over. I was then whisked off to Royal Derby hospital where I was treated with endless courtesy amid a battery of tests. Thankfully I had not broken or fractured any bones, but was detained overnight as a precaution.

The whole episode showed the NHS at its most professional and efficient, yet still caring. Do we really want to dismantle this for private profit predators whose smile is only as big as your wallet?

Paul Redfern
London N2

 

Due to a diligent GP, I was referred to A&E yesterday and spent six hours receiving a variety of tests and saw at first-hand that hard work and selfless attitude of NHS staff. The winter season is not yet in full swing but they coped well, as lack of staff and equipment seem major problems; there are masses of vacancies in London NHS. Those on duty last night were on 12-hour shifts. In a pressurised environment this is just  too much.

Reform can be a good thing if you take all interested parties with you. It will ultimately fail if you don’t. Therein lies the problem; government wants a failing service. We will never replicate A&E in a market-driven world – we will do well to remember that.

Gary Martin
London E17

 

Is Nigel Farage for real?

The Independent has an excellent history of creating fictitious columnists – Bridget Jones, Cooper Brown and Talbot Church spring to mind. Am I alone in realising the weekly column by Nigel Farage is another spoof? Or have I made a terrible mistake?

David Walker
Sittingbourne, Kent

 

Times:

Sir, If it is true, as you suggest (Leader, Dec 20), that (senior) civil servants are not good at “getting things done”, then the role, organisation and recruitment of civil servants needs a thorough examination, since “getting things done” for ministers is their job.

It is very true, as you say, that a good special adviser can be an asset, though it is not so difficult to “get things done” in Whitehall if one has the immediate ear and backing of a dynamic secretary of state. It may be even truer that things are generally better done if they are first critically examined by the people who will actually be responsible for doing them.

Many of the administrative messes of the past 30 years might have been avoided if the procedures had been more thorough, less dynamic, and less punctuated by backstairs chatter between political advisers and the press — accompanied, it must be said, by constant slander of the civil service.

John Rimington
London N5
Sir, Is Britain better governed as a result of the work of more than 100 special advisers to ministers? No one knows (“Special Forces”, leader, Dec 20). A rigorous independent study of their contribution to government is badly needed. That should be followed by cross-party agreement on an upper limit to their numbers and by the establishment of a simple and transparent set of criteria that they would need to meet before being considered for appointment. Allowing ministers to appoint whomsoever they wish is hardly a satisfactory basis for good government.

To complement the work of career civil servants, special advisers need a firm understanding of the policies of the political party whose interests they are helping their ministers to advance.

That is unlikely to be available to those whose political education has been derived principally from a lobbying or public relations organisation.

On the Tory side, many of the best special advisers have been graduates of the Conservative Research Department. It was there that both the current prime minister and chancellor served their apprenticeships. So too did Nick Timothy and Stephen Parkinson, whose work is highly valued by the home secretary (“Cameron approved removal of May’s aides from candidate list”, Dec 20).

Lord Lexden
(Deputy director, Conservative Research Department 1985-97)
House of Lords

Sir, I have no problem with Mr Cameron barring Mrs May’s aides from becoming Conservative parliamentary candidates.

I hope he will go further and legislate for all aides to be banned from standing, regardless of party, unless they have worked a minimum of five years outside the Westminster bubble between advising and standing. We need to change the parliamentary system and that will only start when we change the people.

Richard Bailey
Ryde, Isle of Wight

Sir, Michael Savage writes of today’s increasing use of “spads” by ministers (News, Dec 19) as “special advisers”. In my field, a “spad” is the acronym for “signal passed at danger”. How exquisitely appropriate.

Kevin Carleton-Reeves
(Safety consultant, railways)
London SE19

Sir, You conclude (Leader, Dec 23) that “Mr Clegg has put country before party”. Is this not the test which every voter should apply at next year’s election?
Peter Rossdale

Newmarket, Suffolk

Sir, At several restaurant celebrations this year, I have noticed the tendency for revellers to sport special Christmas jumpers. Should the collective noun be a “fright” of jumpers?
Anneke Berrill
London N1

Sir, Richard Crampton’s article “The bonds of marriage: no stronger than a strip of tinsel” (Dec 23) is very sad. It is interesting, though, to note that “tinsel” contains three Christian words, “Silent, Listen, Enlist”. If taken seriously, these could lead to a rethink by those people whose marriages are in trouble this Christmas time.
The Rev Allan Bowers
Sidmouth, Devon

Sir, Apropos the letter from Julian Peel Yates (Dec 23). I married the daughter of an earl who has the courtesy title of lady. If there were equality between the sexes I would be Lord Julia. Perhaps I will suffer the inequality.
Robert Hiscox
Marlborough, Wilts

Sir, Kaya Burgess is right (TMS, Dec 22). Each year “distinguished graduates” on the special University Challenge embarrass themselves with their seeming lack of knowledge. When you realise that many of the contestants have responsible posts in government and business, it is rather worrying.

Dennis Foster
Tockwith, N Yorks

Telegraph:

Halal meat in a butcher's window, London
Halal meat in a butcher’s window, London Photo: ALEX SEGRE/ALAMY

SIR – Jews have always labelled food (Shoppers will be told how their meat has been killed). Our strict system of supervision ensures that meat labelled kosher is kosher and meat labelled beef is in fact beef.

Shechita conforms entirely to the EU definition of stunning: “any intentional process that causes a loss of consciousness and sensibility without pain, including any process resulting in instantaneous death.” So labelling meat stunned or unstunned would be misleading.

What Huw Irranca-Davies, the shadow environment minister, suggests is fair and would be informative. Consumers should know whether their meat has been shot by a bolt, asphyxiated by gas, electrocuted by tongs or water or slaughtered by the Shechita or Zabiha methods.

Jews do not say a prayer when slaughtering an animal. Nor do we claim that Shechita “kills animals instantly”. Scientific evidence bears out that Shechita does what the law requires; that the animal is rendered insensible to pain without unnecessary suffering, something that the approved mechanical methods do not.

Henry Grunwald
Chairman, Shechita UK
London NW5

SIR – The British Veterinary Association is heartened by “the clearest signal yet” that the Government will introduce labelling to inform consumers about whether products come from animals that were “stunned” or “non-stunned” before slaughter.

But we emphasise that this is not a matter of “compulsory labelling of halal or kosher products”. The issue is animal welfare at slaughter, not religious practice or preference. Compulsory labelling of products as halal and kosher would do nothing to inform the public about animal welfare concerns, and could fuel prejudice.

The British Veterinary Association campaigns for all animals to be pre-stunned before slaughter to render them insensible to pain until death supervenes. But if non-stun slaughter is to continue we must have clearer labelling.

It is important that the issue of welfare at slaughter is not hijacked by other agendas and the clear, simple labelling being suggested by George Eustice, the environment minister, keeps the sole issue of animal welfare to the fore. We believe this is a step in the right direction for consumers who care about the welfare of animals when they purchase meat and fish.

John Blackwell
President, British Veterinary Association
London W1

SIR – If shoppers are to be informed as to how their meat is killed, will this include a note hung round a pheasant’s neck, “I was shot while fleeing for my life,” and a notice on supermarket fish counters: “Most of us were hauled out of the water and simply left to die slowly and painfully by asphyxiation”?

Martin Jarvis
Abingdon, Oxfordshire

North Korea’s fears

SIR – It is unlikely that the North Koreans care twopence what we think (Letters, December 21).

The most probable reason for the regime allegedly causing Sony to pull The Interview is that the North Korean people might find it funny, making them subversive.

Christopher Macy
Wellingore, Lincolnshire

SIR – The Sony imbroglio – cyber attack, weird dictator, vendetta, blackmail, capitulation – has all the makings of a Hollywood movie. Is somebody making it?

Dr John Doherty
Vienna, Austria

The Forces we need

Michael Fallon during a visit to soldiers from Army Reserves based in Wiltshire (Richard Watt/MoD)

SIR – Michael Fallon, the Defence Secretary, states: “Our Armed Forces should reflect the society they serve”. I was under the impression that they were there to protect the society they serve. Armed Forces that truly reflected our society would be somewhat less than effective.

John Kellie
Pyrford, Surrey

Hospital firefighting

SIR – Can an impending collapse of the overheated emergency admission system be avoided? Maybe, but imbalance between supply and demand is no longer seasonal. It is an all-year-round phenomenon, experienced by Trusts across England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

The annual “winter pressures” ritual fits a diversionary blame game, exaggerating British weather (rarely exceptional), invoking phantom flu epidemics and Norovirus (real but manageable), and rounded off by predictable pleas of insoluble staff shortages.

Crisis cash injections are then dissipated into high-cost, low-efficiency firefighting measures, with temporary beds, overpriced locums, agency nurses and a growing gravy train of interim managers.

Community services are typically commissioned with over-optimistic performance projections, but they far from compensate for the long-term reduction in beds at NHS acute hospitals.

Strategies to keep older patients out of hospital are well-intentioned but flawed. Elderly emergency admissions are characterised by complex multiple problems demanding humane, efficient, rapid access to skilled diagnostic and treatment facilities, followed by safe early discharge with appropriate integrated health and social care community support.

Too many older patients in the first 24 hours are frenetically shunted, three times or more, between different components of the excessively crowded emergency admission system. This adds disorientation to their distress and generates errors by a fragmentation of medical and nursing care.

The NHS could do without major reorganisation, but needs stability, intelligent implementation of healthy reform and wiser budgeting of its finite taxpayer funding.

Dr John J Turner
Blundellsands, Liverpool

SIR – In considering university degrees for nurses, it should be noted that accountancy became a graduate profession some decades ago but reverted to employing articled clerks (apprentices in Scotland) straight from school, as well as graduates – with no reported ill-effects.

John Birkett
St Andrews, Fife

Knight companion

SIR – Had Sir Elton John married a woman, she would have been accorded the courtesy title of “Lady John”. What, I wonder, is the male equivalent?

Diana Jones
London N12

Next year’s name

SIR – I agree with Carol Chadwick that, in normal conversation, no one refers to the year 1914 as “nineteen hundred and fourteen”. This is because the “hundred” is assumed in that context.

However, in no normal circumstance would the term “twenty hundred” be used. So the correct way to articulate the year 2015 is “two thousand and fifteen”.

Gerald Burnett
Richmond, North Yorkshire

Remote home

SIR – My wife keeps putting the remote control for the television on the television.

It would help me so much to know that I am not alone in this plight, because I don’t know how much more I can take.

David Watt
Oakley, Buckinghamshire

Facing Freeman

SIR – In your obituary of John Freeman you spoke of his power as an interviewer, and rightly so.

In his interview of John Huston, the director stayed my hand (as the vision mixer at the time) at inter-cutting and held a superb low, half-profile shot of Huston’s craggy face for eight minutes.

How many would dare to do so today, given the self-importance of so many interviewers?

John Allen
Irthlingborough, Northamptonshire

Silence by numbers

SIR – The elimination of phone coverage black spots on trains would be double-edged.

While I was travelling from London to Birmingham recently, a particularly loud passenger in the seat in front gave her phone number to the listener at the other end. I seized the opportunity, scribbled her number in the margin of my Telegraph and then texted her asking if she always shouted down the phone.

It all went very quiet after that and I was able to peruse my paper in peace.

Cormac Mac Crann
Cranbrook, Kent

Spruce up your health with a real Christmas tree

A ‘Christmas tree worm’ protruding from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia (Getty Images)

SIR – All types of natural Christmas tree – spruce, Noble, Nordman, pine – exude resins that enrich our environment.

They contain terpenes (natural antibacterials used for centuries to heal wounds) and propolis (a powerful antibiotic used by bees to protect their hives and coat their honeycombs).

A living tree, when it has served its purpose, takes just a few months to decompose. An artificial tree will take 22 million years.

Alan York
Sheffield, South Yorkshire

SIR – Clementines may have overtaken satsumas as the most popular Christmas fruit but what happened to the tangerine?

In both taste and smell it is far superior to the other two varieties.

Les Sharp
Hersham, Surrey

SIR – Why does chocolate money, a favourite stocking filler, no longer have the Queen’s head on it?

Marks & Spencer, for example, are selling chocolate euro coins.

Carolyn Martin
Winchester, Hampshire

SIR – Martin Moyes asks if there is anything that doesn’t count as “Christmassy”. In Superdrug last week I noticed that every item bore a placard describing it as “Festive” – including the toilet rolls.

Anne Osborne
Ringwood, Hampshire

SIR – A small Christmas cake my wife purchased has the following important serving instructions: “Remove ribbon. Place on a flat surface. Slice using a sharp long-bladed knife in a vertical direction. Repeat across cake. Turn cake 90 degrees and slice again in a vertical direction to create rectangular portions.”

Unfortunately they neglected to include instructions on how to eat the cake.

Geoffrey Aldridge
Wingrave, Buckinghamshire

SIR – I was both appalled and amused by the politically correct edition of God Rest Ye Merry Gentlemen printed in our church hymn book. It replaced “gentlemen” with “gentlefolk”.

Alice Roberts
Kineton, Warwickshire

SIR – As I have grown older I have noticed that the quality of the presents I receive from my children has improved.

Presumably they hope to inherit them.

John Griffin
Tewkesbury, Gloucestershire

Globe and Mail:   (Brian Gable/The Globe and Mail)

George Caron

As a prison warden, I learned that solitary is no solution

Irish Times:

Sinn Féin and the Ceann Comhairle

Sir, – I feel so sorry for Gerry Adams (December 23rd). Ever since Joan Burton asked him some embarrassingly personal questions he seems to have taken umbrage at the Ceann Comhairle’s lack of support. He could put a stop to this nonsense by choosing to answer questions without breaking into questions of his own – a tiresome stunt which doesn’t fool anyone, inside or outside the Dáil. – Yours, etc,

NIALL GINTY,

Killester,

Dublin 5.

Sir, – Gerry Adams and Sinn Fein seem to have a problem with the behaviour of the Ceann Comhairle on procedural issues. There are procedural issues within any democratic parliament, and you change them or abide by them. Mr Adams should not come come crying to The Irish Times every time someone runs away with the ball. – Yours, etc,

THOMAS J CLARKE,

Dublin 13.

Sir, – Many people in the last weeks have called for the introduction of cameras to ensure that what happened at Áras Attracta does not happen again. Newspaper reports suggest that the HSE is investigating the cost of this option. While this might seem an obvious way to prevent the kind of physical abuse we witnessed, it is yet another erosion of the human rights of these residents. Unless every corner of their home (and we should remember that this is someone’s home) is covered, it will not prevent recurrence. How many of us would allow CCTV in our bedrooms, our bathrooms?

There is a cultural change needed. The “service provider” mentality needs to change completely. The move from congregated settings to smaller units is meaningless without a complete change of thinking. People with disabilities are not commodities, to be moved from one setting to another to reflect current thinking. They are individuals, with the right to be supported according to their needs. There needs to be real choice about where to live, who to live with, how to spend time and how the funds allocated are spent.

This will only happen with full individualised funding. People who have a choice may not choose to spend all their days in a chair. The irony of choosing a person to lead the investigation who has a vested interest in the “service provider” system cannot be overstated.

We need closer links between vulnerable adults and their advocates, whether they are family members, friends or professional advocates. Advocacy services need to be strengthened, and to have a right to access vulnerable adults, rather than having to depend on the cooperation of the services.

People need to be supported to communicate, and to make as many choices as they can about their life. Speech and language therapy advice should be sought to set up supportive communication environments with alternative and augmentative communication where needed. Ensuring the absence of physical abuse is necessary, but in no way sufficient to allow people to thrive. A complete change of focus, rather than tinkering around the edges is needed. People who have lived in this type of environment, even without the physical and emotional abuse filmed, will require considerable rehabilitation to reach the point where choices can be made.

If you have been unable to decide even which chair you sit in, it is unrealistic to have someone come in and ask where or how you would like to live. Investment in advocacy services and speech and language therapy services focused on creating a positive, responsive communication environment will be essential. The absence of abuse is not enough.

A robust complaints system independent of the service is needed. Too many families are silent because they are afraid they will be asked to leave the service, and are unable to provide the 24-hour care needed at home. Every complaint needs to be taken seriously and investigated.

We welcome the steps taken towards strengthening advocacy and complaints systems in the last two weeks, but argue that they need to go much further. – Yours, etc,

GRÁINNE de PAOR,

NICOLA HART,

Speech and language

therapists and advocates,

Down Syndrome Ireland,

Citylink Business Park,

Old Naas Road, Dublin 12.

Sir, – Thank you for publishing Fintan O’Toole’s memory of his knitted circus (“When I close my eyes and think of Christmas”, Opinion & Analysis, December 23rd). I smiled as I read the wonderfully captured colour and magic of a child’s innocent delight; and then, as only a great writer can do, he rekindled my memory of a home-made cavalry fort complete with “millions” (probably hundreds) of cocktail sticks painstakingly glued around the external wall as logs. How many hours did my hard-working father spend up to his elbows in Evostick to produce that effect? The uniqueness of that toy made me feel very special and obviously someone that Santy held in high regard.

There’s a funny kind of sadness around Christmas. I treasure my own two daughters now, but wish they could have known their remarkable, gentle grandfather Paddy. So, thank you Irish Times, thank you Fintan and thanks Dad. – Yours, etc,

PHILIP MULLEN,

Fairview, Dublin 3.

Sir, – Further to the letter by David Herman (December 22nd), far from “asserting” that anyone “wanted” to trespass on suburban gardens, I was poking fun at the inconsistencies of those in leafy suburbs who see no contradiction between keeping people out of their gardens and tennis courts with dogs, cameras and alarms while loudly insisting on their “rights” to march over mostly peasant-owned land. The underlying principle appears to be a curiously socialist belief in compulsory sharing of privately owned amenities, secure in the knowledge that they will never be expected to reciprocate.

Ireland certainly is different from many other European countries – rightly or wrongly, we have much more one-off housing than most other countries. Aside from parts of a few counties such as Wicklow, Mayo, Kerry, etc, there simply aren’t the swathes of remote land that you find in many other countries. In many northern and midland counties in particular, go a few hundred yards in any direction and you’re on top of another house. This pattern of rural housing development and small farm sizes means that much of our land is unsuitable for rambling. It’s not the Scottish highlands; it’s not northern Sweden.

Further, the far bigger issue is the chronic political failure to designate more areas as national parkland. It’s startling that Yorkshire has more national parkland than the whole of Ireland put together (Northern Ireland has none). In this context, off-loading the amenity access issue to private landowners is a cop-out to excuse continuing Government inaction on the issue. But then again, you can’t be having too much parkland when there’s all that fracking to be done. – Yours, etc,

SEÁN MacCANN,

Trillick, Co Tyrone.

Sir, – I’m reminded of the farmer who put the the following notice on his gate, “Entry to field free but bull may charge later”. – Yours, etc,

TOM GILSENAN,

Beaumont, Dublin 9.

Sir, – I’ve enjoyed the debate on these pages about walking, cycling, tourism and property rights. It has certainly opened my eyes to the legitimate fears and gripes of farmers and the frustrations felt by ramblers who feel stymied by obdurate property owners. Whichever side of the debate we come down on, I hope we can all agree that there is nothing like a brisk walk to shed those extra Christmas pounds. – Yours, etc,

PATRICIA O’RIORDAN,

Dublin 8.

Sir, – I watched our distinguished Senators debate for many hours the water services Bill.

An inelegant display of showboating and pomposity by a number of them convinced me of the following: the Taoiseach was correct in seeking to have this assembly of privilege abolished; I should get out more often. – Yours, etc,

MARK BUCKLEY,

Bray,

Co Wicklow.

Sir, – A number of commentators have begun to question why the most striking Irish popular reaction to austerity has come against the relatively minor imposition of the Irish Water charges.

In his letter, Felix M Larkin (December 23rd) puts the public anger evident at demonstrations across the country in the context of a “revolution of rising expectations”.

In other words, an improving economy and the perception that things are getting better has actually provoked this mass revolt.

Might it be closer to the truth to suggest that the imposition of the Irish Water charges has simply come to many people as the final straw?

Granted, there were no public protests when the bankers were bailed out or the troika came to Dublin, nor following the imposition of the universal social charge or local property tax.

For many people, though, the sight of water meters being installed in their estates and neighbourhoods has resulted in a very visible indication of how austerity has impacted upon their lives. That, and the stories we have read about the bonuses being paid to Irish Water executives.

It’s not that the Irish Water charges are seen as any more unfair than the other austerity measures imposed over the past six years, but people had to reach breaking point in terms of paying for the sins of a tiny elite at some stage.

Strangely, at any of the Irish Water protests I have attended in recent months, I have yet to hear anyone express the opinion that the perception that things were improving had provoked them to revolution. – Yours, etc,

CIARAN TIERNEY,

Rahoon,

Galway.

Sir, – The old Irish phrase “uisce faoi thalamh” really came into its own this year. According to the sources, while it literally means “water under the ground”, it actually refers to a conspiracy! – Yours, etc,

OLIVER McGRANE,

Rathfarnham,

Dublin 16.

A chara, – Your columnist Laura Kennedy (“Why I’m searching for a sense of self at Al-Anon meetings”, December 18th) has done a great service to many families in the lead-up to Christmas. While a joyous time for many, it is difficult and challenging for others. However, Ms Kennedy explained in dignified fashion how she addresses her own family problems, through Al-Anon, and so how there is hope for many who are troubled by relatives with unacceptable behaviour. With great clarity and respect, she showed a way to manage a “sense of grief and disappointment”, to move to knowing unconditional love and self-worth. This was an exceptionally good article and provided great comfort for many. – Is mise,

Dr JOE MacDONAGH,

Rathgar, Dublin 6.

Sir, – The current misuse of the political label of “Independents” by the media and the general public is not only misleading but incorrect.

Apart from the facts that a high proportion of our “Independents” are people who have either been expelled or rejected by their mainstream political parties, the reality is that our electoral system does not permit the election of anyone under the label of Independent. Instead, aspiring politicians who have campaigned under such banners are, rather paradoxically, renamed as “non-party” when it comes to their identification on the ballot paper.

It is not only insulting to those who genuinely do not wish to be associated with current political parties to be labelled as “non-party”, it is also confusing for the electorate. – Yours, etc,

Dr VINCENT KENNY,

Knocklyon,

Dublin 16.

Sir, – Something is rotten in the state of Ireland. We’re well on the way to having a labour force comprised exclusively of IT geeks and financial bean counters.

While universities promote recruitment fairs for IT, science, engineering and business studies students, they do virtually nothing for their arts and humanities students.

With universities uninterested, is it any wonder that employers put so little value on an arts and humanities degree?

But what a loss this is to employers and to the country generally. Bright students can’t find work because employers are blinkered to the value of diversity and creativity that arts and humanities students can bring.

Once upon a time a general education was seen as a strength, but not anymore. We’re now living in the land of the one-trick pony! – Yours, etc,

MICHAEL McCABE,

Cabinteely,

Dublin 18.

Sir, – Further to the letter by Patrick Hastings (December 20th), I am also a dissatisfied prize bond customer and I suspect one of many.

I have been buying prize bonds in small amounts since 1987 and when I recently tried to reinvest a €50 prize using their cheque, I received a letter requesting various proofs and my PRSI number and quoting money-laundering legislation. I pointed out to it that the legislation does not require this in my case and that according to welfare.ie, it is not entitled to request my PRSI number.

After further correspondence, the matter is now with its “resolution team” and I await developments. – Yours, etc,

EAMONN BALFE,

Waterford.

Sir, – Lucille Redmond’s “An Irishwoman’s Diary” (December 9th) mentions CR Fletcher as joint author with Rudyard Kipling, of a history textbook which gave an unflattering portrait of the Irish population. The same CR Fletcher wrote an earlier (1907) Introduction to the History of England which was severely criticised by Mary Hayden for its biased treatment of Irish history.

Hayden was to become, in 1911, the first professor of modern Irish history in University College Dublin. Fletcher was a fellow of Magdalen College, Oxford. In a series of three articles published in the English magazine the Sphere, in August-September 1908, Hayden described Fletcher’s writing on Ireland as reckless, improbable and factually inaccurate, quoting Alice Stopford Green, and others such as Kuno Meyer, in refutation, and citing earlier sources including Spenser, Fynes Moryson and the Annals of the Four Masters. Hayden concluded her series, called “Irish history as she is written”, by questioning whether Fletcher’s representation of the Irish population as ignorant savages was either judicious or conducive to good feeling between the peoples of the two countries, in a work written for the future men and women of England. – Yours, etc,

JOYCE PADBURY,

Dublin.

Sir, – On November 29th I was part of a group from the Irish Vintage Radio and Sound Society that visited the decommissioned RTÉ Radio station in Athlone.

We were flabbergasted to see the full 1932 100kW Marconi transmitter in pristine condition and looking like it had just been switched off the day before. We believe that this is the only intact transmitter of its type still existing on its original site anywhere in the world. In Britain there were about 20 stations similar to the Athlone one but unfortunately none has been preserved. This is a very important part of the radio heritage of Ireland and is a true gem that must be cherished.

It was truly fantastic to discover what was hiding behind the “Athlone” on the radio dial. – Yours, etc,

RUDIE DORREPAAL,

Firhouse,

Dublin 24.

Sir, – Who on earth dreams up these Christmas television advertisements? Cue happy domestic scene. Cue anticipation of someone arriving, maybe even Santa Claus. Cue tinkling music.

Then cue snowflakes.

Why snow, for heaven’s sakes? Snow is cold, wet and miserable. People slip and fall on snow-covered footpaths. Snow causes traffic chaos.

Besides, it is very difficult to park a sleigh on a snow-covered roof. Let’s slay the snow, I say! – Yours, etc,

TONY CORCORAN,

Rathfarnham,

Dublin 14.

Irish Independent:

Simple message for Christmas is worth more than gifts

Letters to the Editor

Published 24/12/2014 | 02:30

Messages and cards in the doorway where Jonathan  Corrie died on Molesworth Street, Dublin. Photo: Frank Mc Grath

Messages and cards in the doorway where Jonathan Corrie died on Molesworth Street, Dublin. Photo: Frank Mc Grath

Tomorrow, Christmas Day, many people will exchange gifts, some doing so in the traditional manner, emulating the Three Wise Men who presented gifts of gold, frankincense and myrrh to the child in the manger. Others will do so for no particular reason other than it is what is done every year.

Totally overlooked, in a society that is no longer God-orientated, is the fact that over 2000 years ago, God sent a present, or gift, to all mankind in the form of his son, Jesus.

It can be said, without fear of contradiction, that this one person’s enormous impact on the world has never been equalled, or even slightly encroached upon by any other single person, regardless of their achievements.

All he did in the final three years of his life on Earth was to encourage us to be charitable to one another and by doing so reap the reward of eternal life after death. For bringing that message to humankind he was sentenced to death by a mob which had the freedom of choice – and chose the evil of Barabas.

Weak-minded humanity fails to recognise the fact that God, despite not making his presence visible, has always been active sending messages and gifts carried by every single baby that is born – and that includes you, dear reader.

A few of God’s gift-bearers have been John Logie Baird (inventor of television), Alexander Graham Bell (inventor of the telephone), Alexander Fleming (discovery of penicillin) and Karl Benz (the creator of the first automobile).

Some examples of message bearers are Nobel Peace Prize-winner Malala Yousafzai, who has called for the right of all children to a proper education; Wolfgang Borchert, a young German soldier/poet who wrote the powerful anti-war poem ‘No'; and someone we in Ireland should know, homeless man Jonathan Corrie (RIP) who had to die on a doorstep, just metres from Dail Eireann, to convey his message: ‘Every single person should be given a chance.’

Perhaps this Christmas Day, you could ponder on what message, or gift, you bear for humankind.

Patrick Murray

Dundrum, Dublin 14

A truce on Christmas Day

My dad made a ritual of carving the Christmas turkey. Usually, he’d have started on the first glass of wine after the presents were opened.

By the time the turkey came to the table, he was Caesar in the forum, wobbling, but full of confidence and authority. His own mother would give a running commentary on the quality of the tipsy butcher’s efforts. “Your father could cut slices as big as a hand. It looks like it’s shedding feathers, those whispy slices wouldn’t fill a tooth.”

She could keep it going. I’d notice the crimson colour rising over his shirt collar but somehow he kept calm. Then he once said this:

“I could get mad and then you would be sad. Or you could get mad and I’d be sad. Why not let us both be glad, for all we knew and all that we had.”

It made for a kind of Christmas truce. I did note from that Christmas on we always had goose.

T Gerard

Dalkey, Co Dublin

Home thoughts from abroad

I couldn’t agree more with Tara Monaghan’s letter to Enda Kenny (Irish Independent, Monday December 22).

I myself have just come home for the fourth Christmas through one of London’s airports. I am staying for two weeks but I too will see tears again in my mother’s eyes upon leaving and hopeful promises from my dad about the economy.

In permanent employment as a construction manager, a day doesn’t go by without a comment on my accent or pronunciation. I have just chosen to opt out of my company pension as I don’t know if I can withdraw it whenever I move home. I wonder too if I will ever get to move home.

I’m not prepared to move home for a few weeks’ work because, like Tara and so many others, getting set up away from home takes a lot of hard work and you end up leaving people behind that you have helped – and can help – in everyday life.

Eddie Kelly

London/Co Kilkenny

My wonderful life in care home

My name is Mary Fox and I live in the CASA (Caring and Sharing Association) Respite Home in Malahide, and because of the RTE Investigations Unit programme on ‘Bungalow 3′, I wanted to give my very positive experience of living in care to assure people that not all care centres function in such an awful, degrading fashion.

Since the programme – which was very upsetting to watch – institutional care is now being questioned, and rightly so for people with family members in care.

I just wanted to tell of my experience, the exact opposite to what we saw on our TV screens. My career was nursing. But I was diagnosed with MS in 1982 and have gradually, over the years, lost my ability to do things for myself. At this point I can do nothing with my hands or feet, but my mind remains as good as it ever was.

I can speak of my experience in the CASA house. I have PA care every day and am still in charge of my life; what I wear, where I want to go and what I want to eat. I experience only love and care in the house and I take full part in all meetings, outings and the entire goings on.

The CASA house is a respite home (a family-type set up and a home from home for people with disability).

The emphasis isn’t only on being care-givers and service users, but is very much based on friendships, love, care, sharing of our time, respect, dignity, fun and building genuine relationships. One of my fears when I was diagnosed with MS was that when I reached the point where I couldn’t do anything for myself that I would be left in the corner to wilt away. That, thankfully, has never happened to me. I, through the loving care I get in the CASA house and the love and care I give to others, am such a part of everything, just as everyone else is too. I have to say I am very, very happy.

Mary Fox

CASA Respite Home, Malahide,

Co Dublin

Your letters ‘tell the truth’

I have just read the letter of the day (The working poor of Ireland’, Irish Independent, December 22, 2014) and it was excellent. I am a big fan of the letters page because, well, speaking plainly, you have the guts to print the truth.

Michael Coffey

Harolds Cross, Dublin

Don’t forget to close the gate

Reading that it is a two-mile hike from the bottom gate to the front door of the main house on Castlemartin Estate, it occurred to me to be one helluva walk back if someone forgot to close the gate behind them.

Tom Gilsenan

Beaumont D9

Consigning hunts to the past

Tis the Season to be jolly – sadly not for the fox. This wild dog of the countryside gets such a raw deal at Christmas. Over the festive holiday, hunts will be out in force.

Even when I don’t see an actual hunt in action at this time of year, I do notice hunt scenes on hotel walls (murals or prints of old paintings), and on some Christmas cards and table mats. These display all the pomp and ceremony of the chase.

I have no problem with these depictions, because that is where foxhunting belongs – in pictures of our colourful and murky past.

John Fitzgerald

Callan, Co Kilkenny

Irish Independent


Christmas Eve

$
0
0

Not too bad today cold but no snow. Nonny rang Mary fine not eating much rabbit for tea. Another computer died.

Obituary

Arthur Butterworth
Arthur Butterworth Photo: Guzelian

Arthur Butterworth, the composer, who has died aged 91, took his inspiration from the open landscapes of the Yorkshire Dales, the rugged mountains of the Lake District and the melodic English music of the early 20th century.

A brass player by training, he was rarely in step with metropolitan musical fashions. Indeed, the only time his music was heard at the Proms was in 1958, when Sir John Barbirolli and the Hallé Orchestra performed his first symphony.

Although he studied at the Royal Manchester College of Music with Richard Hall – whose students included Peter Maxwell Davies and Harrison Birtwistle – only once did Butterworth humour his teacher with a 12-tone work: a trio for oboe, clarinet and bassoon. Instead, works such as The Path Across the Moors, describing a walk with his dog, The Quiet Tarn (Malham) and A Dales Suite indicate where his affinities lay.

There were other influences in his 100-plus works: a post-war spell in Germany led to an organ partita based on German church music; The Owl and the Pussycat (1978) emphasised his love of animals; and Sinfonia Borealis was inspired by the northern lights. The music of Sibelius also cast a long spell over Butterworth’s work. He was a prolific composer for brass bands, but was regarded with suspicion after voicing his doubts about their preoccupation with competitions in “A Cloth Cap Joke?”, an article published in 1970.

Arthur Eckersley Butterworth was born at New Moston, Manchester, on August 4 1923, the son of an electrical engineer. He was no relation to George Butterworth, the composer of A Shropshire Lad, although confusion often arose; the cover of one CD bears a sticker reading “Where George Butterworth appears, please read as Arthur Butterworth”.

Arthur was a choir boy, attended the Hallé’s concerts and learnt trombone, cornet and trumpet. He played with local bands before joining the prestigious Besses o’ th’ Barn band in 1939. At North Manchester Grammar School he had a supportive music teacher, but his family gradually became less enthusiastic about a musical career, even removing their piano. His father arranged for him to join a solicitor’s when he left school.

In 1942 he enlisted with the Royal Engineers, training near Lossiemouth, where he was inspired by the remoteness, and serving in North Africa. After demobilisation in 1947 he joined the Royal Manchester College of Music. He also took lessons privately with Vaughan Williams, who encouraged him to develop his own voice, regardless of the prevailing fashion.

Disillusioned with college, Butterworth left early to join the Scottish National Orchestra as a trumpeter, occasionally helping as a rehearsal conductor. He returned to Manchester in 1955, joining Barbirolli at the Hallé, where he stayed until 1962. He then taught brass in West Yorkshire schools until securing a post at Huddersfield School of Music, but found lecturing frustrating; he resigned in 1980.

However, he retained his connection with the area, serving as director of the Huddersfield Philharmonic Society (1964-93) and the Settle Orchestra, which he helped to establish in 1967. Despite his views on brass bands, Butterworth was guest conductor of the National Youth Brass Band from 1975 to 1984. He returned to conduct the Royal Scottish National Orchestra in 2008, which was now belatedly championing his music. The following year the sixth of his seven symphonies was premiered in St Petersburg.

Butterworth, who was appointed MBE in 1995, served as chairman of his local RSPCA. His house near Skipton was named Pohjola, a name from Finnish folklore used by Sibelius.

In 1957 he had dedicated his first symphony to his wife, Diana, whom he had married in 1952. After her death last year he wrote Elegy for Diana, which was premiered in March. “It now seems fitting that I pay this farewell tribute to her at the end of our long life together,” he told the Westmorland Gazette. They had two daughters.

Arthur Butterworth, born August 4 1923, died November 20 2014

 

Guardian

Times

Sir, The introduction of “drunk tanks” (News, Dec 22) is a depressing acceptance that getting “off your face” is socially acceptable. You quote Chris Hewitt as saying that, as a paramedic, he is expected “not to judge any patient”, but surely society has the right to “judge”. These “merrymakers” should not be wrapped in cotton wool. They deserve to be fined, named in the press and made to pay for the services they waste.
Leo McCormack
Sedgefield, Co Durham

Sir, My wife recently had to be taken to a London A&E. The ambulance crew was superb as were the hospital staff. However, ten of the 14 cubicles and three chairs were occupied by people — including a peer of the realm — with alcohol issues. Why isn’t the government focusing on this behaviour, which is clearly a cause of so many problems?
Geoff Codd
Osmington, Dorset

Sir, I congratulate Libby Purves for “Let the believers hold midnight Mass in peace” (Dec 22). It reminded me of a Christmas Eve many years ago when my wife and I were sidesmen at a midnight service that was disrupted by drunks. It took Nick Bury, our young vicar, to put things into perspective. He asked us: “Don’t you think there were any drunks in the inn at Bethlehem?” Nick later became dean of Gloucester cathedral.
David Rhodes
Lindford, Hants

Sir, Your story on Paul McCartney’s daughter’s charity work (Times2, Dec 18) stated that the death of Paul’s mother Mary led to him writing Let it Be. The real inspiration was my late father Malcolm “Mal” Evans, who was the Beatles’ road manager. In David Frost Salutes the Beatles, a TV movie made in 1975, my father explains to Frost that while in India, “Paul was meditating one day and I came to him in a vision and I was just standing there saying ‘let it be, let it be’ and this is where the song came from.”

Gary Evans

Camberley, Surrey

Sir, I am sure that Simon de Bruxelles was not inferring that Zulus armed with assegais were superior fighters to the 24th of Foot, although this is the impression that some may get (“Horror of Rorke’s Drift”, Dec 22). The blame, if any there is, must go to the British leadership; to Lord Chelmsford, for splitting his forces, but also to the officer in command at Isandlwana, Colonel Pullein, who scattered his troops, enabling the Zulus to infiltrate and attack the British from the rear. It did not help that their ammunition boxes were screwed down and there was only one screwdriver. Later, at the battle of Ulundi, the British, having learnt their lesson, formed themselves into a Waterloo-style square and it was the Zulus’ turn to be wiped out.
Christopher White
(ex 24th Foot)
Beaminster, Dorset

 

Telegraph

An NHS sign with Big Ben in the background in Westminster
Andy Brnham wrote to Jeremy Hunt, the Health Secretary, accusing him of treating Parliament with ‘contempt’ by keeping MPs in the dark over proposed changes to ambulance services Photo: PA

SIR – Accusations that Andy Burnham, the shadow health secretary, is playing politics with the ambulance service are hardly surprising, given that he has frequently accused the Coalition of privatising and generally mismanaging the NHS.

This is the same Andy Burnham who was health secretary and a minister in the last Labour government, which wasted billions on private finance initiative schemes, leaving many trusts struggling with horrendous debts; which presided over tick-box policies resulting in the horrors of Mid Staffs and other failing hospitals; and which negotiated the new contract for GPs, increasing doctors’ salaries for less work and leaving patients with no real cover after hours or over the weekend.

Michael Edwards
Haslemere, Surrey

SIR – Ed Miliband has proposed that it should be a criminal offence to undercut pay or conditions by exploiting migrant workers. He could start with the NHS. Thirty-five per cent of doctors and nurses in the NHS are immigrants from countries with far lower wage levels than Britain. The high number of immigrant employees has depressed the wage levels of medical staff trained in Britain and allowed working conditions to deteriorate.

It is not just pay. The quality and safety of NHS care have been put at risk by uncontrolled immigration from EU states with lower standards for qualification.

If the NHS is to be sustainable, then it has to be made an attractive place for professionals trained in Britain to work.

David James
Colby, Isle of Man

SIR – It’s worth noting that, in the majority of news reports showing A&E staff, they are doing paperwork, not treating patients. Members of my family working in that sector agree that they could easily meet government targets but for the fact that they have to treat patients between completing forms and information returns.

We have the staff at the front line, but most of them are being used as administrative assistants to an unnecessary level of middle management.

R P Draper
Burgess Hill, West Sussex

SIR – With all the recent controversy about the ambulance service and A&E departments, I would like to highlight my recent experience when my husband died suddenly and unexpectedly at Frimley Park Hospital in Surrey.

From the moment I called the ambulance, my husband and I received exemplary care. In a very busy department they never gave me the feeling that they were in a hurry to move me on.

At this time of grief and sorrow I am eternally grateful to the staff, knowing that everything was done to help. They are the model that all NHS workers should follow.

Andrea Thomas
Wokingham, Berkshire

Online child protection

(Getty)

SIR – The Prime Minister has unveiled new measures to crack down on internet child abuse.

Modern communications may help offenders to access indecent material, but it also enables law enforcement agencies to monitor and respond to evidence in ways that were never possible in the past, when grooming happened only by personal contact and pictures were sent by post.

The internet was designed to provide adaptable routing even after serious damage. This resilience, while helpful to us all, does make even well-intentioned censorship difficult. The protection of children from online exploitation and abuse is best achieved by parents following the excellent advice provided by GetSafeOnline and the Child Exploitation and Online Protection agency, and teaching their children to do the same.

There is no quick technical fix that will protect victims – the most effective approaches use education, responsible parenting and more resources for enforcing the law.

Professor Will Stewart
Institution of Engineering and Technology
London WC2

Cancer cash cuts

SIR – Jeremy Hunt, the Health Secretary, said in a speech about cancer survival in Britain that “cancer is a key priority for this Government“.

While we all welcome the better cancer survival outcomes, Mr Hunt’s fine words are belied by his specialist commissioners at NHS England. They propose to reduce payments to hospitals for the main cancer therapies by an average of 6 per cent next year.

Worse, they propose to cut the payment to hospitals for additional cancer treatments over a 2014-15 baseline by half.

Mr Hunt acknowledges that hospitals currently see “51 per cent more patients with suspected cancer than in 2010”. At that rate of increase, how does he propose that these new patients should be treated?

While hospitals accept the need for further efficiency savings where possible, the people who are going to suffer are cancer patients.

If this Government truly believes that cancer is a key priority, it should put its money where its mouth is.

Simon Oberst
Director of Clinical Development
The Cambridge Cancer Centre

Far from fine

SIR – I’ve just received two penalty charge notices for the same traffic transgression in Croydon, taken by two cameras 100 yards apart.

Hopefully Croydon council will use my fines to improve the road signs to assist drivers in an unfamiliar location at night.

Jenny Wood
Meopham, Kent

2015 and all that

SIR – If Gerald Burnett (Letters, December 23) calls 2015 “two thousand and fifteen”, does he say that the Battle of Hastings was fought in “one thousand and sixty-six”?

Mike Jones
Chingford, Essex

Calling card

SIR – I too, recently lost a camera memory card. It was found on the summit of Mount Whitney, California, by a resident of San Diego, who traced me via a picture of a lodge in South Africa, despite being confused by photographs, among others, of the Little Mermaid in Copenhagen and Kilimanjaro.

Tony Baker
Edinburgh

Cornish house-sellers pushed out local people

St Ives harbour –1,500 years after the outsider St Ia landed and gave it her name (Alamy)

SIR – Timothy James (Letters, December 22) blames outsiders for blighting St Ives, or Porthia. He states that Cornish families have been “pushed out” because house prices have soared.

In fact blame, if blame there is, lies exclusively with those families. No one has forced them to sell property to outsiders just because they offered to pay more than locals. The seller always controls the sale and is free to accept any offer he chooses, even a lower offer from a Cornishman rather than a higher offer from an outsider.

The conclusion must be that Porthians have brought higher prices on themselves by accepting offers that they considered to be in their best interests at the time, which has had the unfortunate effect of pricing other Cornish people out of the market.

Ken Rimmer
Chelmsford, Essex

In the black

SIR – When I was a young man living in Chelmsford in the Sixties, the street lights went out at 11 o’clock each night and, on the few occasions I was in the deserted town after midnight, I was stopped and questioned by the police.

Our village, like many others, has no street lighting, so I don’t have much sympathy with those who complain about their street lights being dimmed or turned off after midnight.

Mervyn Vallance
Maldon, Essex

SIR – It is difficult to comprehend the economics of reducing street-lighting hours, as most street lighting in Britain is controlled by photo-electric cells.

To reduce the hours requires installing some form of timing device. The capital cost of these devices and the labour costs of installing would surely take many years to recover.

Where is the saving?

Donald A Wroe
Ulverston, Lancashire

Judicious choice

SIR – Three cheers for Lauren Davidson promoting the correct use of the English language.

Among the glaring examples one encounters today are the frequent references to the “justice system”. When I was at school this was known as the judicial system.

Keith Haines
Belfast

Battle for control

SIR – It is possible that, by placing the remote control on the television, David Watt’s wife hopes that he will take more exercise (Letters, December 23).

My husband falls asleep holding the remote so that I am unable to either lower the volume, change to another station or switch off.

Stella Bowman
Prestwich, Lancashire

SIR – I have a solution for David Watt: buy a second remote, put it on a cord and hang it around your neck.

Ronnie Baker
Beaminster, Dorset

Does anyone still carve turkey at the table?

(Alamy)

SIR – Does anybody carve their turkey at the dinner-table these days, as in the picture with Xanthe Clay’s article?

Julian Andrew
Burton-on-Trent, Staffordshire

SIR – I received a note from the Royal Mail telling me that a small package awaited collection and that there was £1.20 to pay: £1 handling fee and 20p excess postage.

On collection, I found a Christmas card sold by Tesco – a delightful gingerbread man of felt stuck on to cardboard, too thick to qualify for normal postage. On checking at my local Tesco, I found no warning on the packaging of these cards, so I’d guess that every one posted incurred a penalty.

Jenni Beddington
Yatton, Somerset

SIR – Christmas is a charitable time, but are there too many charities?

Duplication and fragmentation risk wasting people’s generous giving.

Our daughter was greatly supported by charities until her death in September. They have continued to support our family and to use her story for their causes.

It would have been understandable if we had set up yet another charity in her memory. However, by working with existing, experienced charities we feel that money will be better used and our daughter’s voice more clearly heard.

Richard Luscombe
Flitwick, Bedfordshire

SIR – Some years ago an acquaintance phoned me just before Christmas. I told her the sad news that my husband and I had separated and would soon be divorced.

When her Christmas card arrived it was addressed to both of us but with my husband’s name scored out. I suppose she must have been on a tight budget.

K S Swanson
Blanefield, Kinross-shire

Globe and Mail

Irish Times

Irish Independent

Times

 

Globe and Mail

Carl Bildt

The international battle for Santa Claus’s house

Merry Christmas

Though Santa Claus has not commented on the matter, it is now clear that he could choose several passports when he travels the world on Christmas Eve. In 2007, a privately funded mini-submarine planted a Russian flag directly beneath his alleged home. And two weeks ago, Denmark, which has sovereignty over Greenland, staked its own territorial claim, also covering the North Pole.

By filing its claim with the United Nations Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, Denmark has joined our era’s “great game:” the contest for economic control over a large part of the Arctic. And Denmark’s claim is massive. Not only does it seek sovereignty over everything between Greenland and the North Pole; it is also extending its claim to nearly 900,000 square kilometres, all the way to the existing limits of the Russian economic zone on the other side of the Pole – an area 20 times Denmark’s size.

How to assess countries’ claims to Arctic territory hinges on the status of the Lomonosov Ridge, a vast formation that rises from the sea floor and stretches 1,800 kilometers from Greenland to the East Siberian continental shelf. Everyone agrees that it is a ridge. The key question is whether it is an extension of the Greenland shelf or an extension of the East Siberia shelf.

Denmark, together with the government of Greenland, now claims that it is the former, giving it the right to extend its economic zone across a huge area at the top of the world. Though nothing is yet known about the claim that Russia says it will present in the spring, there is no doubt that it will argue the opposite.

And what about Canadians and their claim? That remains to be seen, but there have been reports that Prime Minister Stephen Harper is dissatisfied that Canadian scientists are not being sufficiently aggressive in pressing the country’s case.

Nonetheless, for all the hype about a “race for the Arctic,” and despite the rather icy atmosphere among the claimants, there is little reason to fear conflict. Under the terms of the 2008 Ilulissat Declaration, all of the countries bordering the Arctic Ocean agree to resolve their claims peacefully and based on the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. According to settled procedure, a UN commission will first judge whether the claims have merit. If they are overlapping, which is highly probable, bilateral negotiations will be held.

Such talks, to put it mildly, could take time. Norway and Russia negotiated over a far smaller territorial delimitation for four decades.

Both Denmark and Russia have been devoting significant resources to exploring the Lomonosov Ridge. Denmark has hired Swedish icebreakers for repeated expeditions, and Russia has been deploying special submarines to obtain samples from the ridge and the ocean floor.

The Arctic region has always been strategically vital for Russia, accounting for roughly 85 per cent of Russia’s natural-gas production, which is based primarily in Western Siberia. The Kremlin has activated a new military command for the Arctic, and is busy reopening air bases and radar stations along its Arctic shoreline.

But it is a very long way from these new Russian bases to virtually everywhere. And, in addition to the vast distances, there is the harsh climate. A Canadian military commander, asked what he would do if foreign soldiers attacked his country’s Far North, calmly replied that he would dispatch an expedition to rescue them. Though Russia had hoped for a rapid increase in shipping along the Northern Sea Route, commercial traffic this year fell by 77 per cent.

Of course, the stakes are too high for Canada, Denmark, and Russia to allow the region’s remoteness and its hostile environment to influence how resolutely they press their claims. Boundaries like these are fixed once and forever, and no one knows what discoveries, technologies and opportunities the future might bring.

But for the time being, neither Santa Claus nor anyone else has reason to be worried. The nature of the Lomonosov Ridge will be debated for years to come, while his thoughts – and ours – are likely to be focused on more immediate issues.

  (Brian Gable/The Globe and Mail)

 

Dentistry has a far larger ‘boys’ club’ problem


Joan Rush, LLB, LLM (Health Law and Ethics) is a former adjunct professor in the faculties of law and dentistry at the University of British Columbia.

Why are we surprised to discover, through a scandal involving abusive Facebook posts, that discrimination and harassment are present at the Dalhousie University Faculty of Dentistry? Leadership of the dental profession and of Canadian dental education remains a white male bastion. The deans of all ten faculties of dentistry in Canada are men, and of the 18 directors of the Canadian Dental Association, only one is a woman. There are no people of colour on the CDA board, yet many dentists reacted angrily to a July 2013 online post in the Journal of the CDA by Dr. Ernest Lam calling for greater diversity in the leadership of the profession. One dentist argued that rather than worry about diversity, CDA leaders should limit the number of graduates to promote greater profitability for working dentists

Like all forms of discrimination, the misogyny and callousness at Dalhousie have been carefully taught. The CDA and the Deans Committee of the Association of Canadian Faculties of Dentistry should reflect on the message sent by their glaring lack of diversity and their failure to care about the growing number of Canadians who do not have access to essential dental treatment.

The “tone at the top” in the CDA and in dental faculties creates a sense of entitlement among dental students and encourages a lack of empathy for the many Canadians who need their care. Dental students receive no mandatory training in treating special-needs patients and are taught that, because dentistry is private, they can offer any service and charge any fee they wish. The result is a profession that does a great job providing cosmetic dentistry and Botox to wealthy Canadians while failing to provide essential dental treatment to Canadians who are poor, disabled, elderly or living in remote communities. The Canadian Institute for Health Information reported in November 2013 that, relative to the 34 countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Canada performed “poorly” in insuring equitable access to dental care.

The women of the Dalhousie dental faculty are within their rights to demand an appropriate response to the sexual harassment they experienced. In addition, Dalhousie must assure all Canadians that the university does not accept the culture of hatred and chauvinism that developed in some of its male dental students and faculty. Dalhousie can use the revelation of degrading and misogynistic behaviour as an impetus to change the culture of the dental faculty into one that places a priority on empathy and commitment to care.

The members of the Dalhousie dental “Gentlemen’s Club,” which was responsible for the offensive comments, could dedicate their first year of practice to working, under supervision, in hospitals, geriatric residences, not-for-profit clinics, and in remote areas of the province, to serve patients who desperately need dental treatment. The chauvinistic professor who showed his class a safety video featuring bikini-clad models could dedicate time to supervising the Gentlemen’s Club members during their year of service, as could Dr. Tom Boran, Dean of Dalhousie’s Faculty of Dentistry, who has so far remained silent about the culture that developed within his Faculty.

Canadians pay a lot for dentists to be trained. Tuition fees for dental school are shockingly expensive, but still represent less than a third of the real cost of training. Taxpayers make up the difference. It’s time that Canadian dental faculties ensure that their graduates are trained to be respectful and empathetic to each other and to all Canadians, so that dentistry can become the partner in health care that Canadians need it to be.

 

 

John Cook is President of Greenchip Financial Corp. Andrew Heintzman is President of Investeco Capital Corp.

Recently, the first Canadian university joined a growing global movement to divest endowments from fossil fuels. Concordia’s $5-million was largely symbolic; it still has $95-million invested in oil and gas companies. But its decision was another signal that the divestment movement is gaining momentum.

In fact, divestment is creating a significant new challenge for an oil industry that is already fighting hard to maintain its pre-eminence in the world of energy.

This year alone, over 800 organizations with more than $50-billion in assets have officially committed to divestment. These include the Rockefeller Brothers Foundation, the World Council of Churches, the University of Glasgow, Stanford University, and a pending vote at the University of California. In Canada, several faith-based organizations have signed up as well, including parts of the United Church. Their congregations are well versed in the issues and highly committed to pushing divestment from oil the way they did from tobacco 15 years ago.

On campuses throughout the Western world, students and faculty are forcing their governors to vote on divestment. Last week Dalhousie became the first university in Canada to vote. The result was 15 to 3 (with several abstentions) to keep its investment in oil stocks. George McLellan, the committee head, said afterwards: “If we turn our backs on a number of [big oil] companies, why would they put their money in here?”

Indeed, the arguments in Canada track those in America and Europe: a battle of philanthropic and research support versus moral, scientific and investment arguments. But votes are pending at the University of British Columbia, the University of Toronto and the University of Victoria; McGill, Trent and Simon Fraser University are all likely to vote in the next twelve months. The implications of the “no” vote at Dalhousie could go both ways, providing ammunition to university advancement teams, but also steeling the resolve of students and faculty.

The moral argument for divesting has taken on a new nuance. As University of Toronto student Ben Donato-Woodger recently said, “It is a structural injustice against young people to have people who won’t be paying the price make judgments that will harm the next generation. Failing to divest would be a clear act of not caring about their students.”

Simon Rockefeller admitted on a recent webcast that the $50-million of fossil fuel company shares his foundation planned to sell would quickly be picked up by other investors. But he also said that focusing on the money misses the point; it’s about leadership and awareness. Politicians will have to think carefully about ignoring the growing wave of engaged students, professors, church-goers and other voters.

They’re less patient and more organized than their forebears in the South African Apartheid divestment movement in the 1980s, who were told divestment was hopeless and would never work. They know that it eventually did.

It isn’t hurting their cause that the operating economics of the fossil industry are deteriorating as quickly as the price of oil is falling. Even over longer periods, the argument that investment returns would significantly suffer without oil doesn’t seem to bear out.

· In the past five years, the TSX with all its oil and gas constituents has significantly underperformed the TSX 60 excluding fossil companies.

· Over the past 10 years, the performance is almost identical with or without oil and gas in the index.

· According to the New York Times, U.S. universities hold an average of just 2.1 per cent of their assets in fossil investments. If this is so, it will be an even easier argument in the States that divesting won’t really affect investment returns.

Indeed, sector past performance and “investable universe” arguments are small potatoes. The real risk investors face sits on the balance sheets of the petro companies. As much as 80 per cent of fossil reserves may be worthless if the oil, gas and coal is kept in the ground by regulation or capital constraints.

Even Bank of England Governor Mark Carney told a recent World Bank seminar that the “vast majority of reserves are unburnable” if global temperature rises are to be limited to below 2C. But to stay within that 2 degree limit, we can only emit 565 more gigatons of carbon. Yet oil and gas companies have five times that amount frozen in their fossil fuel reserves.

Activism doesn’t come naturally to Canadians. But this battle has legs and divestment is finding its historic place in the transition to a more sustainable energy future.

A Christmas mystery

When I was a kid, it seemed as though Christmas came every five years or so. Now that I’m in my 60s, Christmas is here every three months or so.

What gives?

Peter Dielissen, Fredericton

………

Watch the skies

Re Rise Of The Drones (Dec. 23): As a private pilot, I applaud your editorial on drones, their dangers and your call for responsible use – with one objection. You say “yield to commercial aircraft.” That should be “yield to all aircraft!”

I fly a four-seat Cessna 170. If a 70-pound drone (or even a 10-pound one) hit my aircraft at my modest cruising speed of 100 knots (190 kilometres an hour), the effects could be catastrophic. If it came through the windshield at that speed, it could kill me or my passengers; strikes on prop, wings or tail could lead to loss of power, jammed controls or worse.

Besides staying well away from airports (including hospitals where helicopters may land), the guidelines long used by model-aircraft enthusiasts are proven to be safe: Keep it below 400 feet, always in the operator’s line of sight, preferably with a spotter to warn of any approaching aircraft.

The danger of these machines lies in the ability of the operator to “fly” it while watching the video screen rather than the sky. These things are being sold, often without adequate warnings, to people who have no idea of the dangers they can pose to aircraft.

Alan Salvin, Ottawa

………

Faith, ruled

Leah McLaren raises an important question: Is it possible to be a church and be free of doctrine? (Is It Church If There’s No God Or Dogma? – Dec. 18).

The early church developed concise summaries of belief called “ruled faith.” It was the difference between playing street hockey and being in the NHL. The church’s doctrines, or core convictions, are intended to shape its life. They are not the game itself, but they give shape to the game.

These core convictions guided Champlain as he engaged with First Nations people with respect. They shaped the civil rights movement of Martin Luther King. Far from stifling wonder, they have led to the creative work of Bach, Brubeck and Rembrandt.

The church’s doctrines are intended to nurture life, not stifle it.

Ray Harris, Winnipeg

………

ERs? Bring a book

It was a pleasure to briefly dream of a future in which simply changing the design and culture of an emergency department made everything right again (Organized Emergency – Life & Arts, Dec. 22).

Sadly, the utopian vision is just that. Emergency crowding is a reflection of hospital overcrowding. It almost never occurs when hospitals function at 85-per-cent capacity and practically always does when hospital bed occupancy rates hit 95 per cent. Most Canadian hospitals routinely face occupancy rates greater than 100 per cent.

Crowded emergency departments, with their cumulative misery shared by patients, their families and staff will not be solved by more space and verdant courtyards bathed in natural light. A more aggressive redesign of the health-care system with a view to improving bed availability in both the hospital and the community is required.

Regrettably, evidence of a shared vision is lacking from most governments in Canada today. Better bring a novel on your next visit to the ER.

Alan Drummond, Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, Ottawa

………

Expel them

It astounds me that the president of such a prestigious academic institution as Dalhousie University needs to circulate a questionnaire seeking remedies for dealing with a group of misogynist dental students (Dalhousie Measures Fallout From Misogynistic Comments – Dec. 22).

Expulsion is the obvious and only appropriate disciplinary action. We do not want this group of cretins practising dentistry in Canada.

Jon LeHeup, Rothesay, N.B.

………

Mind the language

We like to keep our home free of casual or gratuitous profanity. It’s a conscious choice we’ve made to maintain a dignified, uplifting and supportive environment for ourselves.

Of course, this is a constant struggle and I, too, am not entirely innocent. However the casual use of profanity or the creeping of profanity into our home is something we wish to avoid.

Your Broadsheet Music: A Year In Review (front page, Dec. 20) listed a band called “Fucked Up” in capital letters.

I know this is a group’s name, but I don’t want to be confronted with it on your pages. Its presence pollutes our sanctuary.

Michael Hahn, Grimsby, Ont.

………

Globe letter writer Catherine Johnson says that she could think of a stronger word than “pimp” to describe what the Wildrose defections did to democracy, but that The Globe wouldn’t print it (‘Jim Prentice’s BFF’ – Dec. 22).

Not only would you print it, you did. On the front page, and in capital letters, no less.

Tim Baikie, Toronto

………

Pols on the move

Re Manning Says Sorry For Urging Defection (Dec. 23): Heather Forsyth, the new interim Wildrose Leader, crossed the floor herself from the Progressive Conservatives in 2010? She is now replacing Danielle Smith, who defected from Wildrose to the PCs.

At the rate political defections are occurring in this country, I’m surprised the various legislatures haven’t installed leader boards and crossing guards to direct the pol traffic.

Robyn Murphy, St. John’s

………

If this is what advice from the head of the Manning Centre for Building Democracy looks like, I’d hate to see what advice from the head of the Centre for Tearing Down Democracy looks like.

Roger Huang, Calgary

………

Crossing the floor? Dozens of politicians have done it just since 2000. It’s increasingly common.

Remember Vancouver MP David Emerson? He crossed the floor less than three weeks after being elected. No wonder people don’t trust politicians.

Candidates should tell us before they are elected if this could be in their (dance) cards.

Will they, won’t they, will they, won’t they, will they join the dance?

Will your politicians take an unexpected stance?

Will they trip a light fantastic, make a sudden move

Will they cross the floor ignoring you who don’t approve?

Do they have a strategy that gives you lots of spin

And make you trust their program so you want to let them in?

And do they choose the music so you’re dancing to their tune

And leave you in the lurch when there’s a chance more opportune?

It used to be, but now it seems it’s never quite the same

That when you went to dances that you left with whom you came.

Anne Spencer, Victoria

Irish Times

 

Irish Independent

 


Christmas Day

$
0
0

A very quiet Christmas day, a nice bag from Sandy and a cat book for Mary

Brian Cashinella during his reporting days
Brian Cashinella during his reporting days Photo: Tony Marshall

Brian Cashinella, who has died aged 75, was an old-fashioned general reporter who produced shrewd, swift and vivid news stories on widely different subjects for three national papers.

On joining The Daily Telegraph in Manchester during the mid-1960s, he was sent to Northern Ireland where the Troubles were already brewing, and reported the horrific Moors murder trial.

During the 1966 general election he wrote that Labour leaders in Yorkshire “wore grins as broad as the Pennine valleys” while Tories confessed they were at “rock bottom”.

Transferred to London, he aided a police contribution to medical science by having blood taken from his ear, and his face and hands smothered with aftershave. This important research incontrovertibly showed that his bloodstream was untainted by alcohol – though his ear hurt. From then on Cashinella covered the dithering over whether to locate London’s third airport at Foulness in Essex, about which he wrote the book Promised to Land. He also satisfied the managing editor’s obsession with the failings of his train home to Burnham on Crouch in Essex.

On being lured to The Times, he was kept busy on the police beat, which led to another book, Anatomy of Crime in Britain Today, and witnessed the Bloody Sunday shootings in Northern Ireland. He did not think the killings were deliberate, though he later told the Saville inquiry that he had heard a senior officer shout “Go Paras and get ’em”.

Finally Cashinella joined the Daily Express, where his first story involved the train robber Ronnie Biggs, who was living in Brazil. For 16 years he was its head of investigations, and later assistant news editor. Once he led a journalists’ stoppage on the Sunday paper.

The son of a van driver, Brian Cashinella was born in Manchester on May 24 1939, and spent his early years playing cricket in bomb sites. He went to St Gregory’s School, Ardwick, where he showed academic promise but left at 15. He joined the Bury Times, where his first story was the ordination of a Roman Catholic priest who had been a “Bevin Boy” in the pits.

On being called up for National Service, Cashinella was posted to the Intelligence Corps in Malaya, where he played plenty of cricket and spent three weeks in the jungle with the Gurkhas. Two years later he completed his provincial experience on the Manchester Evening News and married Pat Taylor, a nurse, with whom he had four children.

Brian Cashinella with his wife Pat

On leaving the Express after 16 years, he worked in public relations and tried to sell a film script about Two-Gun Cohen, a Jewish lad from London’s East End who became a general in Sun Yat Sen’s army in China and retired to live with his sister in Manchester. Many producers were interested, but they feared the costs would be prohibitive.

“Cash” was a keen cricket fan proud to have kept wicket in the Central Lancashire League with and against Clive Lloyd and Sir Garfield Sobers.

He also remained devoted to a “session” in the pub long after a sniff of alcohol became virtually unknown in news rooms. On one occasion he was in the office filling out a passport application which required him to give his “occupation”. “Permanently pissed,” he wrote.

The Telegraph offered him “a chaotic workaholic experience”, he recalled; The Times was a gentleman’s club, where copy was never changed without permission; and the Express was a fine working newspaper.

Fleet Street in general was a great place: “I wouldn’t have changed it for the world.”

Brian Cashinella, born May 24 1939, died November 5 2014

Football, advertising
‘Self-regulation of alcohol advertising isn’t working when it allows drink brands to dominate sporting events.’ Photograph: Adrian Dennis/AFP/Getty Images

On Boxing Day millions of families will enjoy a full sporting calendar, either on TV or in person – a chance to spend quality time with family and friends. They will also see the countless alcohol marketing messages that go hand in hand with our national sports. In the UK, alcohol sponsorship is as commonplace as advertising for cereal or soap powder. Viewers of the World Cup this year, including millions of children and young people, saw one example of alcohol advertising for every minute of playing time. Shouldn’t our national sports be inspiring our children to lead healthy and positive lifestyles? It would be considered outrageous if high-profile teams such as Everton or Celtic were to become brand ambassadors for tobacco, and so why is it acceptable for alcohol?

Our children deserve a better future and we must take the opportunity to give it to them. Self-regulation of alcohol advertising isn’t working when it allows drink brands to dominate sporting events that attract children as well as adults, creating automatic associations between alcohol brands and sport that are cumulative, unconscious and built up over years. Evidence shows that exposure to alcohol advertising leads young people to drink more, and to drink at an earlier age.

Next year will be a year of change. The public supports restrictions on alcohol advertising and it’s time for the government to listen to the people rather than to big business. Let’s take action to protect our children by ensuring that the sports we watch promote healthy lifestyles and inspire participation, not a drinking culture. Let’s make alcohol sports sponsorship a thing of the past.
Professor Sir Ian Gilmore chair, Alcohol Health Alliance UK
Professor Jane Dacre president, Royal College of Physicians
Dr J-P van Besouw president, Royal College of Anaesthetists
Dr Peter Carter chief executive, Royal College of Nursing
Professor Colin Drummond chair of Addictions Faculty, Royal College of Psychiatrists
Dr Clifford Mann president, College of Emergency Medicine
Shirley Cramer chief executive, Royal Society for Public Health
Dr Adrian Boyle chair, College of Emergency Medicine quality committee
Professor Frank Murray president, Royal College of Physicians of Ireland
Professor Robin Touquet vice-chairman, Medical Council on Alcohol
Dr Peter Rice chair, Scottish Health Action on Alcohol Problems (SHAAP)
Eric Carlin director, Scottish Health Action on Alcohol Problems (SHAAP)
Katherine Brown director, Institute of Alcohol Studies
Professor John Ashton president, UK Faculty of Public Health
Professor Jonathan Shepherd director, Violence Research Group, Cardiff University
Colin Shevills, director, Balance
Diane Goslar, patient representative, Royal College of Psychiatrists
Dr Chris Record consultant hepatologist, Newcastle upon Tyne
Dr Mark Bellis alcohol lead, UK Faculty of Public Health
Dr Kieran Moriarty CBE British Society of Gastroenterology
Professor Nick Sheron Population hepatology, University of Southampton
Paul Lincoln OBE chief executive officer, UK Health Forum
Professor Marsha Morgan reader in medicine and honorary consultant physician, UCL
Mariann Skar secretary general, Eurocare
Dr Evelyn Gillan chief executive, Alcohol Focus Scotland
Professor Martin McKee CBE president, EUPHA (European Public Health Association)
Nichola Coates chief executive, Faculty of Occupational Medicine
Professor Gerard Hastings University of Stirling
Dr Zulfiquar Mirza College of Emergency Medicine
Professor Rob Poole co-director, Centre For Mental Health and Society, Bangor University
Suzanne Costello chief executive officer, Alcohol Action Ireland
Jackie Ballard chief executive, Alcohol Concern
Andrew Langford chief executive, British Liver Trust
Professor Linda Bauld deputy director, UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, and chair in behavioural research for cancer prevention, Cancer Research UK
Dr Andrew Fraser director of public health science, NHS Health Scotland
Professor Eileen Kaner director, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University

Downton abbey

Downton Abbey. ‘The drama possibly does not so much ‘implant falsely comforting memories of a better bygone era’ as, paradoxically, look forward to an age of genuine social liberalism,’ writes David Halpin

Julian Baggini’s suggestion (Opinion, 20 December) that consumerism, on which our economy depends, springs either from individual psychology or from the “system”, falls wide of the mark. This is because he appears to consider the “system” to be the economic structure, whereas the basis of “buy, buy, buy” is now deeply enshrined not only in our economy but at the very heart of our culture, our way of life, our values and beliefs. The market economy depends on us continuing to buy, so those wishing to sell us stuff have managed to convince us that, in order to be a successful member of the group, we need to look a certain way (we’ll then go out to buy cosmetics and the latest fashion), our houses should look a certain way (out with the old-fashioned kitchen and in with the new) and we should holiday in the most popular resorts (even hen and stag parties now have to be held in far-flung destinations). A massive media and advertising industry – using “celebrities” as examples of perfection – home in on two basic human instincts, the sex drive and the need to belong to the “group”, to keep us discontented and striving for perfection so that we continue to buy.

Unfortunately, Baggini’s solution that the answer is not to “buy less but buy better” also misses the mark and has just a hint of the ivory tower. True, fair trade is now much more mainstream and resistance to chains is growing, but buying “better” is a luxury only the rich can afford. Free-range chicken and shopping in independent stores is beyond the budget of most families and the fastest-growing supermarkets are the cheapest.
Eileen Peck
Benfleet, Essex

Polly Toynbee’s critique (What if Downton Abbey told the truth about Britain?, 23 December) is unoriginal and maybe a tad condescending. It has become almost a truism of conventional criticism that this period drama is anachronistic. But Polly shouldn’t think that, unlike her, most of those who view and enjoy it don’t realise this. Indeed, there is the strong likelihood that many viewers derive pleasure from the goings-on at Downton because they anticipate unconsciously the better world it portrays – one in which people of varying backgrounds and economic circumstances are able to get along with each other in pleasurable equanimity. To that extent, the drama possibly does not so much “implant falsely comforting memories of a better bygone era” as, paradoxically, look forward to an age of genuine social liberalism. The ways in which Downton’s messages are interpreted by those who regularly watch it may therefore be more intelligent and progressive than Polly thinks.
David Halpin
Bath

There were people as Polly describes, but by far the majority of the landed aristocracy were concerned for their servants and tenants, if paternalistic by today’s standards. Hard physical labour was a fact of domestic life at all levels of society until the 1950s. The attitudes Polly describes are more those of 2014 than 1924.
Jon Chamberlain
Faringdon, Oxfordshire

There is much sense in George Monbiot’s piece on the horrors of industrialised meat production (Eating meat is not a right, it’s a gift. Save it for Christmas, 17 December), but I feel he should revert to his subtler, Fairlie-inspired revision of meat as a “benign extravagance”. To abandon his intellectual equanimity, in the face of the industry’s predictably mendacious misrepresentation of his views, is to capitulate at a time when plural, smaller voices (led by organisations such as the Slow Food Movement, and Compassion in World Farming, and consumers of meat themselves) are harmonising demands for better, more compassionate, extensive farming, slaughtering and labelling of animals and meat products. And yes, he is damned right that greater awareness concerning the provenance and realities of meat production should be promoted – including the sort of farm and abattoir visits he recommends. Those of us who advocate the ethical production of meat are “outraged” (to use his word), not by exposure to such realities but, on the contrary, by parts of the food industry’s deliberate attempt to mislead, misinform and mislabel.

His current prognosis, which sees the direction of global, agricultural development as bleak and catastrophic, is limited in its persuasiveness by being too deterministic, polarising and alienating, and likely to repel consumers’ attention away from an understanding of the issues he advocates, not attract it.
Ian Rasmussen
University of Chester

I was glad to see Helen Albans’ letter (22 December) following your article (15 December) about the Sheffield area pub carol singing. In the early 70s, I bought a record featuring some of these carols, produced locally by Bradfield Choral Society in aid of the Richard Fund, which supported the then pioneering work of Dr Zachary and others at Sheffield Children’s Hospital in treating spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Included were two of the pieces mentioned in the article: The Christmas Tree, and the “sweet bells” chorus to While Shepherds Watched. Recently, I was looking into the genesis of this record, but could find no trace of it, nor of the Richard Fund or its successors. Should any of your readers have any clues, I’d be very glad to hear about them.
Malcolm Stringer
Nettleham, Lincoln

 

Offices

The Guardian and Observer offices. Photograph: Alicia Canter

Liz Forgan is right to say “the views of the staff are very important” (Guardian and Observer journalists to get vote on next editor-in-chief, 19 December). What plans are in place for a similar indicative ballot among readers? If nothing is yet planned, I’d suggest that each of the shortlisted candidates is required to write a letter to readers about how they would fulfil the role. These would then be published, anonymously, and readers invited to vote and/or comment. The Scott Trust would gather valuable feedback about how readers want the Guardian to develop; and the interview panel would be informed of readers’ priorities when making this vital appointment.
Richard Stainton
Whitstable, Kent

Keith Flett (Letters, 23 December) suggests readers might be given a say in the choice of Alan Rusbridger’s successor. While matters of experience and competence can largely be determined by perusal of CVs, the deal-breaker questions a great many readers would like to put to candidates are: did you support the paper’s endorsement of the Lib Dems at the last election?; and would you be likely to do the same?
Root Cartwright
Radlett, Hertfordshire

As Keith Flett helpfully suggests, voting for the position of editor of your newspaper might be more democratic if readers all had a vote, just as long as the votes were not to be allocated based upon the number of letters published in said paper by said correspondent.
Gareth Pritchard
Daventry, Northamptonshire

A wall chart of all the runners and riders would help readers to make an informed decision.
Alex May
Manchester

Your article, which purports to be a factual account of my remarks, is a travesty of what I actually said (Top Tory wants bigger role for private firms in NHS, 23 December). I was not talking about private firms, but about public-service mutuals, a programme begun under the Labour government, supported by Chris Ham of the King’s Fund and members of all the major political parties. All the healthcare mutuals that have spun out to form new organisations – including Inclusion Healthcare, to which the article refers – have chosen to be not-for-profit, so to describe them as “private firms” gives a misleading impression. These are social enterprises driven by a strong public-service ethos. It is an infantilisation of our political discourse to present my support for this cross-party programme as a “Tories privatising the NHS” story.
Francis Maude MP
Minister for the Cabinet Office

• In an article published in the Lancet on 24 January 1987, my husband, Mikael Grut, pointed out that there were then some 69,000 cold-related deaths a year in England and Wales. This amounted to 12% of all deaths – a much higher percentage than in countries with colder winters, such as Canada (4%) and the then Soviet Union (6%). The percentage is lower in England and Wales today, because of the spread of central heating, but it is still very high.

On Wednesday in prime minister’s questions, the MP Liz McKinnes mentioned a figure for cold-related deaths last year of more than 18,000 (actually 200 more) in England and Wales. Later the prime minister bragged about the £160bn set aside for armaments over the next 10 years, and said Britain had the largest arms budget in the EU and the second largest in Nato. Add that to the ring-fenced aid for use abroad, and one wonders when Britain will realise that it is no longer threatened by anything except terrorism, brought about by Bush and Blair. That needs a different form of fighting. Our money is needed on the home front to fight hunger and death here.
Marina Grut
London

In his appreciation of Billie Whitelaw (Billie Whitelaw, Beckett’s inspiration, dies at 82, 22 December), Michael Billington mentions her playing boy’s parts on the radio at the start of her career. I doubt if I am the only reader with fond memories of her performances in the Bunkle adventures on Children’s Hour in the 1940s, in which Billie played the hero. Memories which are evoked whenever I hear the signature music, Elgar’s Chanson de Matin.
David McBrien
Maidenhead, Berkshire

• When I was a student in Florence in 1971, I went to see Woodstock. The Italian version of the film had subtitles. As Joe Cocker was belting out “I get by with a little help from my friends”, the subtitles said (in Italian): “I’m so happy for the help I get from my mother” – which seemed to have lost something in translation (Obituary, 24 December).
Dr Ben Timmis
London

• Mark Lewinski claims (Letters, 23, December): “There is no such thing as an innocent comedy depicting revolution in a real-life authoritarian state.” Has he never seen Carry on Pimpernel?
Jeremy Muldowney
York

• What kind of newspaper has the Guardian become when its reporter says that a rural inn’s bedroom has “familiar flaws – UHT milk, packet biscuits, fixed-head shower?” (British boltholes, Travel 20 December). These items in a bedroom do not seem like flaws to me. Does Tony Naylor always expect a fridge, a jug of fresh milk and biscuits offered by a member of staff at his beck and call? Who is paying for his accommodation and travel?
Livia MacDonald
Morpeth, Northumberland

• I was fascinated to read (Obituary, 22 December) of Jane Bown’s method of lighting her photographs by “indirect sunlight from a north-facing widow”. Did she always take one with her? How did she get them to stand still long enough?
George Wolfe
Hope Valley, Derbyshire

• Methane on Mars (Why methane on Mars has reignited our quest for life on other planets, 20 December). Must be the Moon Pigs.
John Timmis
Barnstaple, Devon

A self-portrait taken in a mirror.
A self-portrait taken in a mirror. Photograph: Jane Bown

Peter Barnes writes: In 2009 the Open University awarded Jane Bown an honorary degree, and it was my privilege to present her for it. In my speech I noted that the OU was celebrating the 40th anniversary of its foundation in 1969, which in turn was the 20th anniversary of the appearance of Jane’s first photographic portrait in The Observer – that of Bertrand Russell, in 1949.

As Jane was unable to attend a regular degree congregation, the presentation took place in the living room of her home in Alton, Hampshire, in front of family and friends. In the early 19th century the house had been owned by the brother of Jane Austen, so the author herself would once have sat in that room. Jane on Jane: what a photograph that would have made.

Ken Thomson writes: When Jane Bown came in to Channel 4 to photograph one of our stars for The Observer, we were naturally interested in seeing her at work. She turned up carrying a shopping bag from which she extracted her camera. Her one request was for an Anglepoise lamp, which we found. Jane aimed it at the subject, put the top of her hand in the light, worked out the exposure and took the shot – no light meter, no assistants with strobe lights or silver umbrellas. She then popped her camera back into the bag and left. Of course, it was a brilliant photograph.

Times

Sir, Again we have the canard that girls’ voices are somehow different from — and therefore inferior to — boys’ voices in the context of church music, as referred to in the correspondence from Mrs CT Crowle (Letters, Dec 23). Surely the difference is entirely in the training.

Anyone familiar with the choral music scene in Cambridge in the late 1950s would be well aware that the boys of St John’s under George Guest made an entirely different, edgy, so-called “continental” sound to those of David Willcocks’s King’s choir who were trained to sound pure and “English”.

This difference was far greater — as was indeed the sound of continental boys’ choirs — than that now heard between separate boys’ and girls’ choirs.

Any difference would easily be erased by integrating boys and girls — of the same age range — within one single choir under one single trainer.

The reason this does not happen is, I suspect, far more down to cultural rather than musical considerations and does the church no credit at all.

Malcolm Bowden
Horringer, Suffolk

Sir, The letters on who has the purest voice — boys or girls — is for fanatics.

We have here in Salisbury the first cathedral girls’ choir in the country singing alternate days with the boys — except on special days when they sing antiphonally.

The sounds are indeed different, as are peaches and nectarines. Both are wonderful but just slightly different.

Purity in the sine wave sense does not come into it; both voices are
given their timbre or quality by the harmonics. A pure sine wave is a sorry and dull thing indeed, as is pure alcohol compared with a fine claret.

Dr JA Lack
Coombe Bissett, Wiltshire

Sir, Like Exeter, Salisbury has both a boys’ and a girls’ choir, with the same lay clerks for both; indeed, Salisbury was the first cathedral to do this, more than 20 years ago. If one cannot see the children, it is often impossible to tell which choir is singing on a particular day.

Earlier this year, I went on tour to France with both of the Salisbury choirs, which were, unusually, singing together. We sang Allegri’s Miserere in six concerts, with the top part being sung by a girl during each of the concerts.

I have been involved in cathedral music all my life, and whatever Mrs Crowle might assert, I have never heard the work sung better, or with more purity of sound.

The addition of girls’ voices has enriched the English choral tradition. It is the voice that matters, not the gender of its owner.

Crispin Morton
Salisbury
Sir, I disagree with Mrs Crowle. As a former treble I agree that there is an exceptional purity in boys’ voices, but one of the recordings I have of Allegri’s Miserere has women taking the high parts; it is also sublime.

Neil Jones
London SE24

Anyone elated at the prospect of the UK spending £6 billion to fix 18 million potholes should go to see how they manage elsewhere in Europe.

Driving through northern France we saw no sign anywhere of potholes needing repair. All the roads are well cambered and well surfaced, leaving nowhere for harsh winters to penetrate and break the surfaces apart.

They also have the good sense not to dig trenches in their roads to access the utility networks which instead are housed in accessible ducts built with the roads. The upheavals of the roads which are a daily feature of British life are unknown there.

The same applies in Germany, the Netherlands and elsewhere. If only we could learn from our neighbours who manage their roads so much better.

Christopher Daws
Malmesbury, Wilts

Sir, Why has it taken an approaching election to prompt action on a problem that has been a menace to all road users for most of this parliament? If damage to vehicles caused by potholes was added to annual road tax, then mine would be well over £1,500. I would rather that my tax had been used to maintain the roads, as it should have been.

Michael Hirst
Pangbourne, Berks

Sir, It may be true that the Christmas period sees half the usual number of passengers, but it is a fair assumption that their journeys are at least doubly important to them (“Cancelled trains, roadworks and weather bombs on way”, Dec 23).

A week of engineering works in the summer, announced well in advance, would inconvenience more people a lot less seriously.

They would also be significantly cheaper, with double the hours of daylight in which to accomplish them, and no need to pay double or triple time to staff working on national holidays.

Simon Boas
London NW6

Sir, The writers (letters, Dec 23) are mistaken. Obesity has not been found to be a disability by the European Court of Justice. Someone who is obese may be disabled as per the definition contained in the Equality Act 2010, but is not necessarily so. As with many conditions, it depends on the severity, the duration and the effect on day-to-day life. Furthermore, in my view, obesity should be an excluded condition in the same way that alcoholism is; both being self-inflicted.
Belinda Lester
Employment solicitor, London N10

Sir , What a different experience we had to Tim Bell (“Christmas with the Thatchers was no fun”, Dec 23). When my husband worked in the No 10 Policy Unit, we were invited to Boxing Day lunch as a family. The Thatchers could not have been more hospitable. Ian Gow’s wife played carols on the grand piano; each child was photographed in front of the tree, and my son Leo could not resist sliding on the polished floor, earning a rebuke from Mrs T. After lunch, Around the World in 80 Days was shown to the children while the adults enjoyed a tour of Chequers with a slightly tipsy Denis. On leaving we were given a small Chequers box. It is still thriving in our garden where a wren makes its nest every year.

Janet Duguid
London W12

Sir, Tim Bell’s description of Christmas at Chequers makes me very relieved that he is neither my friend nor my adviser.
edward macfetridge
Cubbington, Warwickshire

Globe and Mail

JEFFREY SIMPSON

Canada’s all about energy … to send elsewhere

 

 

Globe editorial

This Christmas, beware the rise of the drones

While Toronto struggles to raise the money to pay for much-needed transit upgrades, British Columbia and Metro Vancouver have officially come to terms on a novel way past the stew of nimbyism, political to-and-froing and generalized inertia that so often derails progress on this critical issue.

The answer is a referendum on a yes-or-no question to accept a sales tax of 0.5 per cent on most goods or services sold or delivered in Metro Vancouver. The province and the mayors agreed on the wording of the question last week. Ballots will be sent out on March 16 and must be returned by mail by May 29. The province is picking up the tab.

The estimated $250-million per year raised by a Metro Vancouver Congestion Improvement Tax, as it would be named, would help cover maintenance and improvements to roads, bridges, mass transit and pedestrian walkways throughout the region’s chronically clogged arteries.

This is a great plan, well worth emulating. The province and its largest urban area are co-operating on one of the most critical files for any city – that of providing a modern transit system that meets the needs of residents without choking either productivity or lungs. As a sales tax collected in Metro Vancouver, its payers would include tourists and anyone who commutes from outside the region for work or play, which is only fair.

Above all, by holding a referendum, the mayors and the province are letting voters choose their future. Early polling suggests they will vote yes. They should. If they don’t, the issue will remain a football in the hands of punt-happy politicians. You only have to look to Toronto’s paralysis to see where that leads.

Santa Claus leaves for his annual Christmas journey from the Santa Claus Village at the Arctic Circle in Rovaniemi, Finnish Lapland December 23, 2014.  REUTERS/Laura Haapamaki/Lehtikuva

Santa Claus leaves for his annual Christmas journey from the Santa Claus Village at the Arctic Circle in Rovaniemi, Finnish Lapland December 23, 2014. REUTERS/Laura Haapamaki/Lehtikuva

While I appreciate Philip O’Neill’s views on the place of organised religion at Christmas (Irish Independent, Letters, December 23), any attempt to remove the Christian belief from Christmas should be strongly resisted.

Of particular contention is Mr O’Neill’s assertion that Christmas is and should be something celebrated by the religious and non-religious alike, on the basis of the celebration of the winter solstice that preceded it.

The simple fact is that schools don’t close because of the winter solstice. The civil service does not shut down in awe of the longest night of the year. Cribs and mangers have not sprung up all over the country to celebrate the Sun swinging in its lowest arc in the sky. In fact, depending on the day that the winter solstice falls on in any given year, it may have no particular significance whatsoever.

The celebration of Christmas is because of the massive number of practising Christians in this country to whom December 25 is important, and, rightly or wrongly, the special place previously given to Christianity (specifically Catholicism) in our Constitution on the basis of that widespread devotion.

Generally, Newgrange and Stonehenge have precious little to do with it. In spite of that, if you do not believe in the divinity of the man whose death sparked the world’s largest religion, you are of course more than welcome to give gifts, eat turkey, take days off work and even sing a spiritually neutral carol or two.

But please do not do so while siphoning credit for the occasion and denying its true, religious significance in Ireland.

Killian Foley-Walsh, Kilkenny

 

Splurge is over for another year

Having ransacked the city to get my hands on the precious and irreplaceable items on which the happiness of our household depends this Christmas, I returned home a shell of my former being.

Of course, Santa would do his bit; but there was still enough to require two trips to town that sorely tested the hinges of the car boot as I strained to close it on top of the multi-coloured parcels.

Now, a day after the consumer carnival, I am invited to make my way into the fray to meet the challenge of the sales. I work through the items that now lie discarded across the living-room floor. They have already become a testament to the ghost of Christmas past.

Packaging and ribbons flow from the bin, and those gleaming sugar plum dreams that danced in all their heads have come true as far as possible. That’s the thing about all this Christmas stuff – still it was special to have everyone around again. It is of course a long way from ‘A dream born in a herdman’s stable, and the secret scripture of the poor.’

The splurge is over, and an unearned fortune has been expended on a guaranteed festive Christmas.

Please God, we’ll get to go again next year; and thank God we got a chance to do it this year.

C O’Brien, Greystones, Co Wicklow

 

Learning how to say ‘No’

I read Donna Hartnett’s piece on how difficult she finds it to budget at Christmas and I have the answer. It’s a word my mother taught me to say early in life and it goes like this: ‘No!’

It can be said ‘NO!!!’, or ‘no’ or in a million different ways. No child is entitled to have every shiny thing they see or to go to winter wonderlands that are clearly outside their parents’ budgets. Instead, there are libraries, parks and lots of other amazing places. Bear in mind the words ‘you can’t always get what you want’. The use of the word ‘No’ along with suitable addition and subtraction will keep Ms Hartnett’s budget in line.

SE Lydon, Wilton, Cork

 

Learning from Pope’s message

Pope Francis is the leader of over one billion Christians. In his Christmas address to the Vatican Curia of cardinals, bishops and priests who run the central administration of the Roman Catholic Church, he called on them “to improve and grow in communion, holiness and knowledge to fully realise its mission”.

The dangers of working too hard and succumbing to gossip can be found in every office, the Pope said, urging people to be more joyful, saying how much good a “dose of humour” would be.

Wouldn’t it be a wonderful new year’s resolution if ‘our curia’ – the Irish Government – had a get together, analysed Pope Francis’s address and saw how applicable and beneficial parts of its content could be for them? Terms like ‘improve’, ‘grow in communion’, ‘realise its mission’, ‘gossip’, ‘dose of good humour’ all come to mind.

James Gleeson, Thurles, Co Tipperary

 

Jesus told the Apostles to go and teach all nations. They did their best to carry out his orders, especially Paul, “the least (and best) of them all”.

However, in a relatively short time, their successors forgot his instructions and turned the Church into a replica of the Roman Empire, which it copied and replaced.

Pope Francis is the very first Church leader in history to question and challenge this arrangement. His recent straight-talking to the Church’s governing body implies that he sees the entire present system must be radically reformed, even to the point of moving it out of Rome.

The Church is bogged down in the Vatican. The thinking is still pedestrian and parochial. The Roman Catholic Church is a gross misnomer for Christ’s Church, which belongs, by his mission, to the whole human race. It has reached only one-sixth of the world’s population in 2000 years. And by the way, why, I wonder, has the Irish media in general met this astounding papal break from tradition with such deafening silence?

Name and address with editor

 

The great health debate

I refer to your article ‘Our greedy lifestyles are now cutting life expectancy gains’. (Irish Independent, December 19).

It is a salient point and a sobering thought as we venture through this festive season. I note that in the annual state of the nation report that while we live longer “the pace of improvement has slowed”. Many continue to have an unhealthy lifestyle punctuated by drinking and smoking. I feel nutrition needs to be at the forefront of medical research for all our major ailments – heart disease, cancer and other chronic diseases. It seems an understudied area in Ireland; a broader analysis of the holistic medical requirements of patients is needed.

Unfortunately, we have learnt that statins tend to reduce the enzyme CoQ10 while many other drugs deplete magnesium; magnesium is essential not just for the bones and teeth, but for the activation of several enzymes and for the functioning of the heart. CoQ10 functions as an antioxidant, tends to decrease with age and may be low already in many people with serious medical conditions, such as diabetes and heart problems.

Further studies are needed in Ireland in this area. It is plausible that many people who develop serious medical conditions survive longer with a greater holistic regard for the importance of nutrition and a balanced use of vitamins and minerals. While chemotherapy has saved many lives, it is a difficult treatment – especially for the elderly. A broader vision is needed. Debate is always welcome in many aspects of our lives. I would like to see the medical profession taking this into consideration more, as future generations will thank them.

Naomi Kloss, Coolballow, Wexford

Irish Independent


Boxing Day

$
0
0

A quiet Boxing day and after what seems ages I sell a book! Only 0.84p Profit! But at least its money.

Mary a little better. Rabbit for tea.

 

Obituary

Peter Underwood
Peter Underwood

Peter Underwood, who has died aged 91, was the author of some 50 books with titles such as Ghosts and How to See Them and Nights in Haunted Houses; Dame Jean Conan Doyle, daughter of the great author and a keen student of the supernatural, once described him as “the Sherlock Holmes of psychical research”.

During a life dedicated to investigating ghouls and spooks of all shapes and sizes, Underwood identified nine different varieties of ghost, namely elementals, poltergeists, historical ghosts, mental imprint manifestations, death-survival ghosts, apparitions, time slips, ghosts of the living, and haunted inanimate objects. He had something of a talent for categorisation; Where the Ghosts Walk, for example, published last year and described as a “definitive guide to the haunted places of Britain”, provided a digest of ghosts grouped by location – including Napoleon searching for somewhere to land his invasion along Lulworth Cove.

Underwood described ghosts as probably being “the surviving emotional memories of people who are no longer present” or “the result of some natural recording mechanism”. Of their existence, however, he had no doubt. “The evidence for appearances of dead and living people cannot be explained within our known laws [and] is quite overwhelming,” he claimed. In his book No Common Task: The Autobiography of a Ghost-Hunter (1983), Underwood suggested that 98 per cent of the reports of hauntings were likely to have rational explanations, but that he was most interested in the two per cent that could be genuine.

One of his best-known investigations concerned a famous haunting of the 1930s at Borley Rectory on the Essex/Suffolk border. The large Gothic-style house was said to have been haunted since it was built in the 1860s, but things took a more sinister turn in 1928 when the wife of a new rector who was cleaning out a cupboard came across a brown paper package containing the skull of a young woman.

Subsequently the family reported strange happenings, including the ringing of servant bells which had been disconnected, lights appearing in windows and unexplained footsteps. The family fled Borley the following year, but things only seemed to get worse after the arrival in 1930 of the Reverend Lionel Foyster, his wife Marianne and daughter Adelaide. In addition to bell-ringings, there were windows shattering, the throwing of stones and bottles, and mysterious messages on the walls. On one occasion Marianne claimed to have been physically thrown from her bed; on another Adelaide was attacked by “something horrible” and locked in a room with no key.

The building became known as “the most haunted house in England” after the celebrated psychic researcher Harry Price (who had lived at the rectory for a year in 1937-38) published a book about it in 1940. After Price’s death in 1948, however, members of the Society for Psychical Research investigated his claims and concluded that many of the phenomena he described had been faked, either by Price himself, or by Marianne Foyster (who later admitted that she had been having an affair with the lodger and had used paranormal excuses to cover up their trysts).

Over a period of years Underwood, a protégé of Price and executor of his estate, claimed to have traced and personally interviewed almost every living person connected with the rectory. He came to the conclusion that at least some of the phenomena were genuine, and fiercely defended Price against accusations of fraud.

Borley Rectory

If Underwood was not, perhaps, sufficiently doubting to satisfy the sceptics, he claimed to have a nose for charlatanry. On one occasion the writer Dennis Wheatley gave him a graphic description of a “psychometry” session hosted by Joan Grant, a writer famed for her “far memory” books, in which she would go into a trance and dictate scenes from her past lives to whichever of her three husbands happened to be around at the time. Wheatley described how a stark naked Joan began to talk in the person of an ancient Egyptian, “glistening and quivering in ecstasy… writhing and contorting her body sensually in tune with the administration of his hands”. Wheatley was convinced by the performance. Underwood was not.

In 1994, however, Underwood became caught up in some genuinely mysterious goings-on when police arrived to question Bill Bellars, a 75-year-old retired naval officer, Loch Ness monster expert and honorary treasurer of the Ghost Club of Britain (founded in 1862), of which Underwood had been president, following an anonymous tip-off that club members were really part of an IRA cell. Bellars had been planning to lead an all-night investigation at a haunted abbey in Hampshire, and it took him an afternoon to convince police officers that he was up to nothing more sinister than looking for 16th-century Cistercian monks.

The ghost hunt eventually went ahead as planned, but the mystery of the tipster’s identity was never solved. Nor did Bellars ever discover the source of abusive calls he claimed he had been getting at home. However, it was noted that the previous year Underwood had been ousted from the presidency after 33 years in the post by members who had allegedly become fed up with his “autocratic” ways and who accused him of using the club’s name to help sell his books. “He really ran it to suit his own commercial interests,” Bellars was quoted as saying.

Underwood denied any connection to the phone calls or the IRA incident, but Bellars’s description of the final showdown struck an appropriately supernatural note: “I said my piece, then he went purple in the face, just blew a top. Then he vanished.”

Peter Underwood was born on May 16 1923 at Letchworth Garden City into a family of Plymouth Brethren. He claimed to have had his first paranormal experience at the age of nine when he saw the ghost of his father, who had died earlier the same day, standing at the bottom of his bed. His interest in hauntings was further stimulated on visits to his grandparents’ supposedly haunted house in Herefordshire, and by Harry Price, whom he met through the Ghost Club.

After leaving school, Underwood joined the publishers J M Dent in Letchworth, which would publish many of his books. He continued to work for the firm during and after the Second World War – a serious chest ailment rendered him unfit for active service.

Peter Underwood’s ghost hunting kit

The departure of Underwood from the Ghost Club caused it to split in two, Bellars leading a rump “Ghost Club” with (at least according to Underwood) about 80 per cent of the membership leaving to form a Ghost Club Society with Underwood as life president. According to Underwood’s website, however, the society, too, seems to have run into trouble in recent years, and Underwood was reported to be “in the process of completely reforming the Ghost Club Society [with] a new Council and complete reorganisation”.

A fellow of the Royal Society of Arts, he also served as president of the Unitarian Society for Psychical Studies and was a life member of the Vampire Research Society.

As well as writing, Underwood broadcast extensively on television and radio and lectured around the world. His last book, Haunted London, was published last year.

Underwood’s wife, Joyce, died in 2003. He is survived by their son and daughter.

Peter Underwood, born May 16 1923, died November 26 2014

Guardian

Members of the Old Surrey Burstow
Members of the Old Surrey Burstow and West Kent Hunt on 26 December 2014. Since a ban stopped fox hunting with hounds, hunts continued with dogs chasing down a pre-laid scented trail instead of a fox. Photograph: Luke Macgregor/Reuters

Melissa Kite accuses her opponents of stereotyping those who hunt (Leave us ‘toffs’ to hunt legally in peace, 23 December) and implies objections to hunting were always about class war by people “unacquainted with the natural world in all its rugged vitality”. May I just challenge that equally stereotyped view. I grew up on a farm. My father bred beef cattle, which, unlike the cruelly treated animals Ms Kite refers to, grazed out all summer and in winter were kept warm in barns where they were fed (for some reason at 6am) the hay and turnips produced, by backbreaking work, from our stony little holding.

When ready for sale, the cattle were taken to be quickly and humanely slaughtered and were used as food, sold locally. When a fox tried to break into the hen house, my father shot it. Nothing romantic here, and an acceptance of both life and death in its raw reality. But, equally, a respect for the animals and the environment which never involved the pursuit or killing of any creature for sport and excitement.

I do not care what background hunt participants come from, or how wealthy they are. I simply condemn their need to stimulate themselves by terrorising animals. Sorry, Ms Kite, please do not presume to know my reasons for opposing your “sport”. They are simply as stated, and your claims of class war are just a self-deluding way to dismiss arguments you cannot directly refute.
Jill Wallis
Aston Clinton, Buckinghamshire

• May I make one or two observations in response to Melissa Kite’s piece? Firstly, the law is entirely ignored round here, and hunters hunt foxes with impunity, untroubled by any attention from the police. It might as well be repealed for what use it is, which is none at all. Secondly, it is a little rich to read complaints of class war, when that is exactly what Ms Kite’s government has been gleefully and sadistically waging against the poor for the past few years. Since many of the hunters I have encountered have been loutishly ill-mannered, unpleasant and, dare I say, ostentatiously uncivilised, you could argue that they make a very fitting class enemy. Or do Ms Kite and her sort prefer their wars to be entirely one-sided?
Michael Rosenthal
Banbury, Oxfordshire

• In her plea for fox-hunting to be made legal once more, Melissa Kite omits the one telling argument for her case: that, given the need to cull foxes, hunting is the most humane way of doing so. The fox is either dead or alive, not (as can happen if shot) wounded and left to die slowly and painfully. She also skates over the other aspect: riding to hounds is great fun, but it is rather expensive. These days, I imagine, keeping a horse at livery would cost someone the best part of £10,000 a year, and then on top of that would be the hunt subscription.
Robert Nowell
New Barnet, Hertfordshire

• Melissa Kite is wrong to bring class into the hunting debate – it is simply about cruelty. The chasing of a fox by a pack of hounds until it is almost dying from exhaustion and then to be torn apart by the hounds is not sport. The fox, vermin or not, has no chance once cornered by a baying pack. If this is sport and the enjoyment is gained from riding across the countryside on horseback, then why not chase a runner leaving a scent trail. The scent does not need to be a fox, as the hounds will chase any scent they have been trained to. If this is a class issue and hunting a sport, then why was dog fighting, bear-baiting, etc banned? For the simple reason: they are cruel.
Ian Hickinbottom
Montgomery, Powys

• Melissa Kite is entirely welcome, if she so wishes, to get up early, dress smartly, climb aboard a good horse and hurtle over hedges – on Boxing Day or any other day of the year. It is entirely feasible for her to do all these things without pursuing, terrifying and killing a sentient being in the process.
Pam Lunn
Kenilworth, Warwickshire

• With over 35 years of wildlife and countryside management experience, I feel I am allowed to ask why the RSPB is acting with dogmatic inconsistency on hen harriers. If a species is limited in its range and achieves a predetermined density in some areas, it is logical to relocate some individuals to low-density areas of suitable habitat. The RSPB has gained great experience in doing this work with other large raptors ie red kites and white-tailed sea eagles. It and other organisations are also involved with other species such as black grouse, grey partridges and red squirrels. Why has the RSPB got objections to using the relocation of hen harriers, as proposed in Defra’s plans for the bird, to improve its conservation status in England?

Instead of criticising gamekeepers and blocking this aspect of the hen harrier recovery plan, I hope the RSPB lets other qualified organisations get on and make a success of it.
Peter Giles
Clacton, Essex

The claim by community secretary Eric Pickles that a “phenomenal amount” of money is saved by switching off street lights (Report, 22 December) is fallacious. There is a demonstrable positive correlation between night accidents and street lighting. Research by the Road Research Laboratory showed that improvements in street lighting at 64 sites resulted in an average reduction of 30% in night accidents and a reduction of 45% in accidents involving personal injury. Cost-benefit accident savings from improved street lighting demonstrate annual savings greater than the cost of energy consumed. Savings are not direct credits to the lighting authorities, but are of benefit to the community as a whole, and to the NHS in having to treat fewer victims of road accidents.
Vivian Jones
Worcester

• Here in the Aggborough and Spennells ward of Kidderminster, we are a pilot area for a Conservative county council initiative that has seen a reduction in street lighting, with two out of three streetlights turned off after midnight. In October, this area experienced five cases of criminal damage (same month last year, none), eight instances of violent crime (last year, two) and six thefts from motor cars (last year, none). Residents drew their own conclusions at a subsequent noisy and frustrated Pact (Partners and Communities Together) meeting – a West Mercia police initiative. It’s most disturbing to read that the police are likely to face a yet further reduction in numbers.
David Collins
Kidderminster, Worcestershire

• The Campaign to Protect Rural England says we should reduce street lighting to better appreciate the lovely starry skies. That might be all very well in the countryside, but here in urban areas, while it is true there is a lot of light pollution, there is also a high crime rate.I’ll stick to astronomy picture of the day on my phone.
Roger Greatorex
London

Mandy Rice Davies could reasonably claim to be a friend of Mrs Thatcher. After all, Thatcherism was an extension of the kind of hypocrisy and self-seeking greed that the Profumo affair best summed up and temporarily ended (Report, 20 December). There were the victims, like Christine Keeler, a much more genuine ingenue than Rice-Davies, and Stephen Ward, who the state determined to break. Then there were the beneficiaries like Mandy Rice-Davies, who got the wealth and Belgravia address she wanted and, ultimately, Profumo himself, who was readmitted to the ranks of the great and good through his “charitable work”. Now we can see the affair as a short period when the curtain was lifted and we were allowed to see the greed, irresponsibility and sexual mores of a ruling class that still punished homosexuality, prostitution and unmarried mothers. And now through its media and narrowly based politics encourages us to hate people on benefits, immigrants, disabled people and anyone else with little power or money.
Professor Peter Beresford
Brunel University London


I am currently preparing a number of screenplays. One advocates violent jihad. Another is profoundly offensive towards every minority group known to woman. Another features a gang-rape of Her Majesty the Queen. And of course there is a fourth in which both Barack Obama and David Cameron suffer assassination. I take it I may hope for the loudly vocal support of the western media and the cinema-going public (Sony U-turn to allow Christmas screenings of The Interview, 24 December).
W Stephen Gilbert
Corsham, Wiltshire

The anti-Americanism in your letters has reached xenophobic levels. The most recent examples, in unanimous defence of poor, put-upon North Korea (23 December) finally infuriated me sufficiently to write to you. Poor, stupid Sony. Your correspondents, pre-war, would have found the appeasing tones of the Daily Mail more congenial. How “stupid” of Chaplin to make The Great Dictator. It might have offended Hitler.
Mike Elsam
Maidenhead, Berkshire

Has a Sony publicity wonk taken home a special Christmas bonus this year? It seems the entire world from President Obama down has been plugging this film, which no doubt will be fully released in due course and make a lot more money than it would otherwise have done.
Ian Troughton
St Albans, Hertfordshire


Sport promotes another drinking culture besides alcohol (Letters, 26 December), one directly involving and targeting children. So-called sports drinks and their marketing are central to football and other high-profile sports. Sports stars aren’t just paid to sup them on the pitch or wear branded clothing. They also grant exclusive interviews and content to the media in association with the manufacturers. These sugary drinks, often containing caffeine, are presented as essential for participation in physical activity and sport. They’re sold in all sports centres. As we’ve become more aware of the harms of too much sugar, manufacturers are rebranding soft drinks, advertising them with misleading health claims and bogus science. Sport has more than one drink problem.
Dr Alex May
Manchester

My thanks to John Loosley (Letters, 22 December) for mentioning Luton Town’s move to pay its staff a living wage. In fact, they were the first club to do so. Chelsea have come second. Hopefully, this will encourage more clubs to pay their staff a living wage, not just crazy money to the players. The time has now come for a full review of players’ salaries, especially in these days of austerity. Players seem to be totally unaffected by the crisis. Just to add more embarrassment to Premier League players, Luton Town also contributes to the local foodbank fund. Do the Chelsea players do that, I wonder?
Keith Cox
Marston Moretaine, Bedfordshire

What would the rugby Premiership landscape look like if the salary cap were abolished (Sport, 23 December)? Very like football’s Barclays Premier League, with but a handful of clubs “buying” all the honours and an ever rising tide of on-the-field “gamesmanship”.
Ben Ramsbottom
Beckermet, Cumbria

John O’Malley writes: In July 1966, Chris Holmes joined a small group of us on a study trip of workers’ control in what was then Yugoslavia. We travelled in an uncomfortable minibus, camping overnight. Not everything went to plan. We were deported from Yugoslavia, but only after playing cricket under Chris’s supervision in the police station car park, and ended up in southern Italy. Chris enchanted the girls in a childrens’ home in Alberabello, Puglia, by reciting one of Aesop’s fables in immaculate German.

On our return to the UK, Chris came to live in the house of the Notting Hill Community Workshop, west London, and combined his full-time job with John Laing with being a core member of the team that launched the Notting Hill Summer Project in 1967. Its activities included a massive housing survey carried out by volunteer students.

Chris moved to manage the TocH house in Notting Hill Gate for a couple of years, and found a place for the Notting Hill Community Press in the basement. Into the 1970s he was a significant figure in the Notting Hill community movement and helped establish a range of innovative programmes including the first Law Centre and activities under the elevated Westway.

 

Independent

Times

Sir, Peter Saunders (letter, Dec 22) suggests that our worries about the effect the proposed Stonehenge tunnel will have on the archaeology found at Blick Mead are “hyperbole”. We feel we have entirely reasonable archaeological concerns.

The biggest land take for the tunnel will be for the entrance and exit cuttings, as large extended areas either side of the tunnel entrances are needed for the emergency services and control, etc. The placing of the tunnel portals means that the cutting for the eastern entrance to the tunnel will be situated close to Blick Mead — probably no more than a hunter gatherer’s stone throw away from it.

In our view the changes caused to the water table by the draining required for the cutting, as well as by the 1.8mile tunnel, which in effect creates a concrete dam, are likely to degrade and destroy the organic artefacts at Blick Mead, which will be crucial for new dating and appreciation of the Stonehenge World Heritage landscape. As it is, the Blick Mead spring has a radio carbon date range of 7596-4695 BC, the longest continuous spread of Mesolithic dates in Europe, and with our latest discovery of the encampment dated to 4246BC, it also contains a unique snapshot of a transitional point between the Mesolithic and the Neolithic.

David Jacques
Senior research fellow, Humanities Research Institute, University of Buckingham

Sir, There is nothing unique about the Mesolithic site near Stonehenge (report, Dec 20, and letter, Dec 22) because there is a huge site all around the world-famous Star Carr in North Yorkshire. Environmental conditions there have preserved many aspects of Mesolithic life that are not normally found elsewhere. To many of us who know this area, it is every bit as exciting archaeologically as Salisbury Plain.

Dr Nicholas Riall
Calne, Wilts

Sir, Never mind the “tunnel to the Ice Age”. Learned disagreements between environmentalists and antiquarians have already delayed the provision of a proper road between London and the far southwest for half a century. They should be allowed to do so no longer, before west Cornwall, once a powerhouse of Britain’s industrial wealth, and now one of the poorest areas in Europe, finally decays into a mere theme park cum film set.

There should be a time limit of six months on these inter-intellectual discussions, and an assurance that bulldozers will be on site before next autumn. Let us get our priorities right before the last Cornishman is forced to leave his native land because there is nothing for him to earn and nowhere for him to live.

Richard Giles
Lympstone, Devon

Sir, I am an elderly person who has travelled on the A303 on numerous occasions — and hopefully will continue so to do. When driving down the slight incline towards Stonehenge from the direction of Andover, the biggest thrill for me, and anyone else on the A303, is the marvellous view of those proud stones standing majestically to the right of the road.

I have long been of the opinion that English Heritage only wants a tunnel in order that the likes of myself should be deprived of this view because we don’t pay their high entrance fees.

There is ample room for another carriageway either side of the A303 on the grass verge, which would be far less expensive than a tunnel.

Sheila A Duffin
Andover, Hants

Sir, I am surprised that in the heated debate about whether to build a bypass around or tunnel under Stonehenge no one has suggested the obvious solution: move the monument itself.

Salisbury Plain is huge and could easily accommodate Stonehenge elsewhere, in a location more easily accessible and with better visibility. Moving the stones would be quicker and cheaper than any compatible road scheme and would enable the A303 to be widened, thus removing the bottleneck. It would also facilitate a major archaeological investigation of the site and its environs.

Michael Brown
Highbridge, Somerset

Sir, As a former Conservative candidate in Sheffield Hallam in 2001, I wholeheartedly agree with your leader (“Clegg in Peril”, Dec 23). Nick Clegg has not only put country before party but has often brought a breath of sense to policy making, particularly on tax, civil liberties and Europe. His return as MP and the continuance of the coalition for another five years would not only be the best result for Hallam and the country but would save the Conservative party from the self-destruction on which some on its right seem intent.

John Harthman
Sheffield

Sir, The article by David Willetts (“May’s mean-spirited plan will damage Britain”, Opinion, Dec 23) outlines brilliantly the strange ambivalence of the UK’s attitude to overseas students. We need their money and, even more importantly, we need the academic quality and stimulus that they can bring. Yet for students whom I know in India, the process of gaining entry for further study in the UK is made as forbidding and unwelcoming as possible for many of the brightest and best, and poorest.

David Summerscale
London SW1

Sir, I was interested to read (Dec 22, and letters, Dec 24) that a £500,000 lorry has been provided in Bristol to treat binge drinkers. Your report includes: “We ask them where they live and who their friends and family are so we can get in touch with them and reassure them that they’re OK” and that “they are able to sleep off the alcohol, drink water and warm up before being collected by friends or relatives or being sober enough to safely make their way home”.

These are just the kind of services offered free by Street Pastors in towns across the UK. I note that in Bristol eight patients were helped on the Friday and six on the Saturday. Here in Cheltenham, Street Pastors have provided similar care to thousands of people in the past five years — all without the aid of a £500,000 truck.

Howard Bartlett
Secretary, Cheltenham Street Pastors

Sir, Perhaps we can now put to bed the myth that Mandy Rice-Davies (obituary, Dec 20) coined the phrase “Well, he would, wouldn’t he?”

My fellow pupils and I would regularly use this phrase, with slight variations (She, They) to suit the occasion in the girls’ school playground in the 1940s. We considered this to be a remarkably clever put-down; at least we can claim to be in good company.

Mavis Parsons
Hucknall, Notts

Sir, Derwent May needn’t go to northwest Britain to see pintail ducks in large numbers (Feather report, Dec 20). This most beautiful bird can be seen in abundance — there are up to 200 — on the Stour estuary from Mistley to Harwich. Indeed, at Copperas Bay, Wrabness, a week ago, my wife and I had the pleasure of watching a couple of dozen pairs of pintail cruising gently up and down about 20 yards from the water’s edge. There was a lovely mixture of pintail, widgeon, brent and Canada geese, with redshank and even a solitary curlew running along the mud.

Dr John Owen
Colchester, Essex

What, exactly, does QED stand for? The answer is not quite what you might think…

Sir, Leslie Watmore (letter, Dec 23) says that his maths master would have said “QED”. My maths master, who lost a leg fighting in the First World War, encouraged us to write QED at the end of our maths prep, preferably not because Quod Erat Demonstrandum but hopefully because “Quite Easily Done”.

Tim Mynott
Salisbury

I too share Phillip Collins’s wish for a glorified title — and have had some success to this end

Sir, In the same vein as Phillip Collins’s wish for a glorified title (Notebook, Dec 23), I successfully managed to get my daughters to call me “Dear Darling Daddy, Illustrious Sir, Your Majesty the Quing” for a while. I suggested that they get their children to address me as such, but it seems the best my grandchildren are prepared to call me is “Buppy”, a corruption of Grumpy. I trust the youngsters’ wisdom and am more than happy with it.
Nicholas Attwater
Epsom, Surrey

Wellington was losing until he was saved by the arrival of Field Marshal Blücher and the Prussians…

Sir, It was of course (as I’m sure you really know) not Wellington who won the battle of Waterloo (report, Dec 26). He was losing until saved by the arrival of Field Marshal Blücher and the Prussians. The highly inaccurate and somewhat tendentious reports that were sent at the time became solidified in British school history.

Maybe it is now time to correct that.

Professor Ferdinand Von Prondzynski

Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen

Given the pressure on police resources, why did it take eight officers to deal with one washed-up seal?

Sir, Senior police officers frequently remind us that their “resources” (ie, numbers of police officers) are fully stretched and no further cuts are possible without a serious effect on their ability to do their job. Your report on the seal washed up 17 miles from shore (Dec 23) shows that a shortage of “resources” has not yet affected the Merseyside force. There were at least eight officers pictured in your photograph, all watching as firefighters rescued the poor, lost seal. Or were they needed to protect the public from this dangerous animal?

Sir Patrick Cable-Alexander

Worthing, W Sussex

Public safety is likely to be compromised if security cameras are abandoned

Sir, You report that a police force which serves county and industrial towns and extensive rural areas has abandoned the use of surveillance cameras (Dec 22). At the time CCTV was being installed across the UK my research group took the opportunity to evaluate its effectiveness in tackling violence in UK towns and cities with and without these systems. The conclusions were clear: surveillance led to more offences being identified, faster and more frequent police intervention in arguments and fights, and fewer people injured in violence treated in accident and emergency departments.

Unfortunately, police records seriously underestimate violence, perpetuating errors from studies which rely on this poor measure of effectiveness. NHS injury records are also needed.

Not surprisingly, deploying scores of CCTV cameras in areas where the risk of violence is high increases the police detection of violence. This facilitates early intervention, which prevents incidents from escalating.

There may be opportunities to save money by limiting periods when CCTV cameras are monitored,but public safety is likely to be compromised, and NHS and compensation costs increased, if cameras are abandoned.

Professor Jonathan Shepherd

Cardiff University

Sir, I was interested to see Anthony Jenkins’ view of waymarking in new buildings (letter, Dec 22). As the former head of a national sign company, we fought many battles because so often sign requirements were underestimated by the architect when main contracts were drawn up.

Adequate circulation signs make buildings work — something that architects, in my experience, managed repeatedly to ignore.

Timothy Burnham
Ticehurst, E Sussex

 

Telegraph

Should those who eat too much and exercise too little be given special treatment?
Should those who eat too much and exercise too little be given special treatment?

SIR – The latest ruling by the European Court of Justice that obesity can constitute a disability must surely have persuaded any doubters that it is time we left the EU.

This ruling will cost British industry millions of pounds. There will always be a minority of people who are obese as a result of a medical condition, and through no fault of their own, who should be dealt with individually and sympathetically, but I fear they will lose out once again due to their being included with those whose condition is a result of excessive eating and insufficient exercise.

While this ruling will bring much more work to the legal profession and increase pressure on our courts, the taxpayer will have to pick up the bill.

Philip Gurr
King’s Lynn, Norfolk

SIR – How far will the EU go to test the patience of the British people and their collective common sense? The next edict is surely to register indolence as a disability, followed by ignorance, then apathy. Who knows where it might end after that?

Peter Gilmartin
Gloucester

SIR – I should have thought a better description might be “self-harming”, rather than “disabled”.

David J Hartshorn
Badby, Northamptonshire

SIR – When I was in the Royal Air Force, anyone who became sunburnt and thereby landed themselves in the sick bay unable to work was put on a charge and severely reprimanded.

Surely any individual unable to perform his or her duties at work as a result of obesity should be the one being sued.

Robert Ward
Loughborough, Leicestershire

SIR – Within any legal constraints, what employer is not going to do everything within his power to avoid employing an obese applicant?

Adrian Brown
Wellswood, Devon

SIR – When we have finished establishing rights for the obese, I wonder if a thought could be spared for the rights of the abnormally tall.

Legislation insisting that all door lintels should be at least 6ft 6in from the ground would be a good start.

C J Driver
Northiam, East Sussex

SIR – Is there a lawyer out there willing to take my case?

As a man measuring 6ft 5in with a BMI of 40-something, I have been unable to find any racing stable that will take me on as a flat-race jockey.

Discrimination, surely?

Robert Langford
Keresley, Warwickshire

Futile border controls

SIR – The notion that human beings can be treated at airports like inanimate objects, for purposes of immigration control, is laughable.

People move of their own volition, tell lies about their identity and don’t respond well to having to report their every move to the state. Nor do they respond favourably to queuing at immigration control, even for the simplest identity check, such as matching person to passport. Reliable technology is hard to find. Ask anyone who has tried to use the automated gates at Gatwick border control.

Successive governments have tinkered with border controls to ill effect. The likelihood of the introduction of exit controls by April is nil. Airports will not readily give up valuable retail estate to the Government for the operation of a control that is of no interest to them.

And when we did operate an embarkation check, its purpose was not the identification of UK citizens intent on jihad, but an increasingly futile attempt to count out those who had been counted in by the completion of entry and exit cards. Given the millions of journeys in and out of the UK, such a system, even electronic, is doomed to failure.

This Government is intent on reducing the size and cost of the state. Successful control can no longer be achieved by the hugely costly one-to-one interface. A targeted, intelligence-led approach, which picks out likely offenders, will inevitably look too much like the police state that no right-thinking person wants, overlaid as it would have to be with some pretty robust, and some might say unacceptable, deportation policies.

In other words, neither way will work. Let’s learn to live with it and stop kidding ourselves that we can have an effective border wall.

James Munro
Ashurst Wood, West Sussex

Fairway foul play

SIR – Princess Alexandra – later Edward VII’s queen – enjoyed her own version of golf. According to the courtier Sir Frederick Ponsonby, “she confused it with hockey, and was under the impression that one had to prevent the opponent putting the ball in the hole… She also thought that the person who got into the hole first, won it, and asked me to hurry up and run between the strokes.”

For us non-golfers, her ideas would certainly make the game more interesting.

Rupert Godfrey
Devizes, Wiltshire

Doctors being sued

SIR – As joint editors preparing the fifth edition of the legal textbook Clinical Negligence, we join the concern voiced about the Medical Innovation Bill.

Lord Woolf recently said in Parliament: “The progress of the Bill has been a remarkable example of this House at its very best.” The reality is different. The Bill’s purpose is to promote responsible medical innovation by protecting doctors from being sued for negligence. Lord Woolf wrote in the Telegraph on April 24: “What I do know about, from sitting as a judge, are the cases where doctors are sued for negligence because they have innovated.” What are these cases? We are not aware of such cases.

The Bill’s supporters have not provided any evidence that doctors are deterred from innovation by the threat of litigation. Parliamentary scrutiny requires solid evidence.

Dr Michael J Powers QC
Dr Anthony Barton

London WC2

Good beer, bad price

SIR – In many areas, there has been a growth in pubs serving excellent cask beers from small breweries. My local always has a hand-pumped ale from the Kite brewery in Llantrisant.

The problem is that, to make a living, the landlord of this pubco inn, because of its price controls, has to charge £3.40 a pint for beer of 4.2 per cent alcohol. The other day I was able to buy four 500ml bottles of my favourite bottle-conditioned beer, at 6.5 per cent alcohol, in my local supermarket for £5, or £1.42 a pint.

David Hawkridge
Ogmore-by-Sea, Glamorgan

Fewer cars in London

SIR – When London’s congestion charge was introduced in 2003, traffic and congestion had reached severe levels. In the last 11 years the charge has reduced vehicles entering the zone by 60,000 per day.

It has contributed to an unprecedented shift from car use to public and other forms of sustainable transport. The £1.2 billion net revenue has been invested straight into the capital’s transport infrastructure.

Leon Daniels
Managing Director, Surface Transport
Transport for London
London SW1

The reality of country life without enough buses

The Grade II listed bus shelter at Farmington, Gloucestershire, built in 1951 (Alamy)

SIR – I visit my mother when I can. She does not drive and lives alone, aged 84, in a small village in Warwickshire, about five miles from Stratford-upon-Avon.

The public transport consists of just two buses every week, running on Tuesdays and Fridays. The return leg allows for a maximum of two hours at Stratford, and the route does not go anywhere near the main supermarket. In practice this means that travellers get to spend just over an hour in the town. Weekly shopping is out of the question, and lunch is pie in the sky.

This is the truth of rural life, and perhaps the metropolitan elite concerned with travel and communications might like to pay heed.

Alan Kibblewhite
Blandford Forum, Dorset

SIR – The village of South Petherton in Somerset has had a bank since 1806. Despite its population of 3,500, and footfall declining at less than half the national rate, RBS has said it will close the NatWest branch – the only bank there – in January as its usage is in the “bottom 10 per cent”. RBS will enhance services at the post office in lieu, but this will not meet the needs of businesses nor of most customers. Six months ago, RBS closed the bank in nearby Martock, advising clients to use Petherton instead.

If a village or small town loses its bank, then its shops and businesses will lose trade, as customers are forced to travel to the nearest large town. The decision condemns the village to the fate of a dormitory serving Yeovil.

Vince Cable has spoken recently of the banks’ pledge to maintain “the last bank in town”. If the Coalition has any intention of supporting a thriving rural community, then now is the time to remind them of that.

Peter Kidner
South Petherton, Somerset

Dreaming of a return to the quiet carriage

SIR – I will pay good money to any company that can come up with a device that discreetly blocks the mobile signal of those passengers who assume that their phones will only work on public transport if spoken into loudly enough to be audible to the driver – or that the details of their ghastly lives are of the slightest interest to anyone else.

I exclude the old gentleman on the bus to Chesterfield the other day, who gave the assembled passengers “’Owart tha? Ashall sithee at thy owse” at a hundred decibels.

Thee, thou, thy – precious.

Victor Launert
Matlock Bath, Derbyshire

SIR – During a recent visit to Tynemouth Castle on the far Northumberland coast, I was amazed to find a full 4G phone signal. In Milton Keynes there is barely 3G.

Is O2 trying to tell us something?

Barrie Mellars
Oving, Buckinghamshire

You are here

SIR – I appreciate that this is the time of year when people tell tales of the vagaries of our postal system, but this card arrived for us; only one day later than standard first-class delivery.

Particularly impressive since our postcode actually begins with HR2.

Melanie Williams
Craswall, Herefordshire

Globe and Mail

MARGARET WENTE

The world’s a better place. Dare to toast your fortune

Irish Times

 

Irish Independent

The Salthill promenade

The Salthill promenade

As we celebrate the birth of Christ I wish to share my feeling of peace with all mankind.

My day started off volunteering with the COPE Galway Christmas day swim. It was my second year doing this. The morning started off a little overcast before the sun finally broke through illuminating all living things. People of all shapes and sizes from the very young to the elderly braved the cold Atlantic waters all in the aim of a little fun and to support a local charity. There was a brilliant atmosphere as people queued up to register and collect their souvenir T shirts. The Mayor of Galway even popped along and individually shook hands with all volunteers.

Later I drove along the Prom. At this stage the sun was spreading it’s golden light from a clear blue sky. There were scores of people perambulating along taking advantage of the break from the blustery drizzly days of late. There is no where on earth as beautiful as Salthill on a sunny day whatever the time of year.

In the evening after stuffing myself at a friend’s house I decided to go for a walk. It was the first time I had walked through Salthill in the evening on Christmas day since the day ” I wandered alone in a desolate city” as I wrote later of the time I spent Christmas day on my own many years previously. I thought of the feeling of peace I had and how this contrasted so starkly with that low point in my life.

As one year finishes and the days lengthen we should all remember that sometimes the only thing that might keep us going is hope. Nothing motivates us like that most basic life force. No matter how hopeless things may appear at a certain time, tomorrow is another day.

Tommy Roddy, Salthill

 

No goodwill in video games

I felt for the children who got their longed for Xboxes – let’s face it, Santa can’t give those to every boy and girl.

They took them out of their wrapping and plugged them in, only to discover that some nut-job with a gripe against the US most probably, has rendered them unplayable.

Messing with the dreams of a child is a pretty low kind of warfare.

But then again, what type of warfare is noble? And how life-affirming are those Playstation games? I’ve watched the kids exploding zombies and mowing down battalions for hours. It seems to me that our increasingly connected world is hard-wired for something other than peace and goodwill to all men.

R Connelley, Co Galway

 

Difficult decisions for doctors

Doctors in Ireland have had no problems practising good clinical decision -making in the 31 years since the Eighth Amendment was passed in 1983. Many would view that it is entirely consistent with their role in life to preserve life (though not at all costs) and relieve suffering. What doctors do have a problem with, though, is legislation which allows the termination of a life for psychosocial reasons (threat of suicide) and it is precisely this “Protection of Life” Bill for which Peter Boylan and his colleague Rhona Mahony argued so passionately at the Oireachtas hearing.

It is the socio-political interference inherent in this Bill (which all the major medical organisations voted strongly against despite the testimony given by Dr Boylan and Dr Mahony) which we can see is now undermining doctors’ confidence to make decisions based on good medicine (the recent failure to terminate life-support in a pregnant woman).

Since Dr Boylan was one of the most influential figures influencing politicians and the media during the debate on the Protection of Life Bill his coming out now to criticise the Eighth Amendment for this present situation is nothing short of astounding.

There will always be difficult decisions to be made in medicine and Dr Boylan’s role in bringing in a Bill which permits psychosocial grounds for the termination of life has served to make life much more difficult for doctors and their patients as we can see from this recent case.

Dr Therese Boyle, Dochas Centre, North Circular Rd, Dublin 7

 

A tragedy with no silver lining

Firstly, I would like to send my regards to the family. I am so sorry about this situation and so close to Christmas.

Secondly, there is something I don’t understand. The girl is brain dead and nothing can be done for her, but I do recall last year the case of a woman, 15 weeks pregnant and brain dead, in Hungary, that was artificially kept alive until week 27 to deliver a healthy baby. I don’t say that one life has more rights than another, the case here is that one life is definitely gone and there is a chance for another live to be born.

I am not an extremist pro-life or anything like that. But if there is the possibility of something good coming out of this tragedy, why not take the chance?

Lisa Brown, Balbriggan, Co Dublin

 

Cultures of conformity

Recent revelations have heightened our awareness of the vulnerability of people in care.

A number of psychological experiments have been designed to investigate what happens when people have power over others. For instance, in the Stanford Prison Experiment (1971), psychologically healthy volunteers were divided into “guards” and “inmates” in a mock prison. Scheduled to run for two weeks, the experiment had to be halted after 6 days as the “guards” became so abusive and sadistic and the “inmates” so craven and submissive.

In Milgram’s obedience experiments (1963) researchers could persuade volunteers to administer severe electric shocks to other volunteers who appeared to be failing a simple memory test (the shocks were actually fake and the recipients were actors).

In Asch’s conformity experiments (1952), about 30pc of volunteers changed their original opinion in order to conform to the majority view in a small group.

These results indicate that rather than being innate to the individual, the nature of our behaviour can be dramatically influenced by the conditions around us. In the absence of accountability, ordinary people can, and often do, behave in ways that they themselves are later shocked by.

Abuses of power in institutions such as the banks, the Church, care homes and the Gardai illustrate the predictable consequences of lack of accountability. We need robust systems that ensure oversight and transparency and that guarantee the protection of whistleblowers. These need to be embedded in organisational cultures that value respect, compassion, equity and integrity, perspectives that we can never afford to take for granted.

Maeve Halpin, 126 Ranelagh, Dublin 6

 

God help them

There used to be a street jingle: Christmas is coming The goose is getting fat please put a penny in the poor man’s hat. If you haven’t got a penny, a ha’penny will do. If you haven’t got a ha’penny, God help you.

Walking through Dublin over the Christmas I saw a lot of people who didn’t appear to have a ha’penny.

I thought it must make the work of people like Brother Kevin and Fr Peter McVerry all the more difficult, and all the more essential.

T G Gavin, Killiney, Co Dublin

Irish Independent

 

 


Snow

$
0
0

28 December 2014 Updating

I still have arthritis in my left toe but its nearly gone. Snow the first of the winter, very icy going to the post box.

Mary’s  much better today, breakfast weight down duck for tea.

Obituary:

David Mackay, architect
David Mackay

David Mackay, who has died aged 80, was a British architect who played a key role in transforming Barcelona from a provincial backwater with a run-down port into one of the best-designed cities in Europe.

Before Barcelona started planning for the 1992 Olympics, the city’s seafront was a shanty town full of barraques – slum-dwellings – with no beach and just a railway line used for nearby factories. The city council decided to try to use the Olympics to revolutionise the city.

A partner with the Barcelona-based practice Martorell, Bohigas, Mackay (MBM), Mackay not only designed the Olympic Village, at the same time he transformed the city’s seafront, sweeping away the rough industrial zone next to the Mediterranean and replacing it with three miles of upmarket beach front, along with parkland, a marina and seafront bars and restaurants. Much of the road traffic was taken into tunnels, largely paid for by the sale of flats and commercial units.

“The legacy was to put Barcelona on the map. Before it was a city no one knew,” recalled Mackay. “The mayor just told us to ‘take Barcelona to the sea’.”

Mackay defined the role of the architect as creating the conditions whereby “the undefined may take place within the defined”. The Barcelona Olympics represented only the beginning of the city’s revival, and in the years since 1992 it has attracted millions of tourists. In 1999 Mackay won the RIBA’s Royal Gold Medal for Architecture, and in the run-up to the 2012 London Olympics Lord Coe visited Barcelona several times, describing it as “a city of reference” for Olympic planners.

Mackay’s achievement led to his involvement in several large urban regeneration projects in Britain, most notably in Plymouth, whose then Tory administration hired him in 2003 to create a master plan to turn it into a “European City of the Sea”. His Vision for Plymouth, published in November 2003, centred on connecting the city with the seafront, celebrating its maritime heritage. Many of his ideas, notably a new city centre piazza, have come to fruition, but some, including the bulldozing of the 1980s Pavilions leisure development blocking the view to the waterfront, remain on the drawing board.

David John Mackay was born at Eastbourne on Christmas Day 1933 into a family with Irish roots. His father, originally from Co Cork, was a colonial civil servant who spent many years on the Gold Coast, while David, his mother and two older brothers stayed in England.

The Hotel Arts and the Mapfre Tower in Barcelona (ALAMY)

Educated at a series of boarding schools, Mackay developed an interest in architecture and studied the subject at the Northern Polytechnic in Holloway, north London. There he met, and in 1957 married, Roser Jarque, a Catalan woman who had left her native Barcelona to escape Francoist oppression.

After a period in poorly paid architectural work in London, Mackay persuaded Roser that they should move to her home city, where she had connections in the architectural field. Initially he taught English in the mornings while spending his afternoons working for a local firm, Martorell and Bohigas Arquitectes, which became Martorell Bohigas Mackay in 1963.

Until General Franco’s death in 1975 MBM kept things ticking over with private commissions while Mackay became involved in the anti-Franco movement, going on demonstrations and putting dissidents in touch with the foreign press.

After the dictator’s death, however, as Barcelona began its cultural renaissance, MBM was in the forefront of restoring the city’s identity, taking on large urban projects and building commissions.

The steel-framed Hotel Arts in Barcelona, built as part of the Olympic Village (ALAMY)

One of its most famous regeneration programmes was Barcelona’s “100 projects” of the early 1980s – a series of small-scale improvements to public spaces designed, as Mackay explained, to “give identity to neighbourhoods, so that people could begin to feel pride in where they lived”.

The Olympic Village project led to commissions around Europe, Mackay taking the lead in Britain, Ireland and the Netherlands.

As well as Plymouth, he worked on regeneration plans for the Lea Valley in east London and the south coast resorts of Hastings and Bexhill.

He remained cautiously optimistic about the future of British cities. “In the Victorian and Edwardian ages, public authorities and private patrons took pride and collective responsibility for their cities, with their grand city halls, squares, avenues and lighting standards,” he observed in 2002. “I think there is now a movement to recover this responsibility for public space, which has been lost. You don’t have to look to America or the Continent for inspiration; it’s here already.”

David Mackay published several books, including Modern Architecture in Barcelona (1985), A Life in Cities (2009) and On Life and Architecture (2013).

He is survived by his wife and their four daughters and two sons.

David Mackay, born December 25 1933, died November 12 2014

Guardian:

ed miliband ed balls
Labour’s message needs to be positive. Photograph: Christopher Thomond for the Observer

Andrew Rawnsley says the lesson of the Scottish referendum is that negative campaigning works and that the coming election will be “a long and fear-fuelled campaign” (“Lots of donkeys but no lions in a year of political trench warfare”, Comment).  There are certainly many indications that fear does indeed work, but it’s not the only effective approach and it promotes distrust of the political process and disengagement from it.  In the US Barack Obama won on positive and uplifting messages of hope and change. How might the emphasis be switched?  There is plenty of evidence showing that more equal societies are better for everyone, not just the poorest.  Many better-off people want to live in a fairer, more cohesive society, and others are open to be persuaded about the personal benefits of this if the case is put to them.  Surely it is time for Ed Miliband and Labour to return to the one-nation theme which they seem to have sidelined since it was first introduced?

Professor Ron Glatter 

Hemel Hempstead

Herts

Jane Bown’s terrific legacy

My late mother Teresa Tutt was photographed by Jane Bown at the Field of Remembrance in November 1984 and the photograph appeared on the front page of the Observer the next day. The photograph showed my mother, a war widow, framed by two Chelsea pensioners to the rear, looking in the opposite direction. My mother is wearing my father’s medals looking straight to camera. When I learned that Luke Dodd was working on the Jane Bown archive I contacted him and later that morning I received a telephone call from Jane herself enquiring after my mother, saying how well she remembered her. Jane has left a wonderful archive, not just of the rich and powerful; a gift to remember her by.

Rilba Jones

Sutton-on-Hull

Call for secular choral music

It’s all well and good that the BBC Radio 3 carol competition (“Gloria in excelsis deo: Britain tunes in to its spiritual side”, News) adds some nice new feel-good repertoire to the existing mountain of choral music available but I have spent a lifetime excluded from choral singing because that repertoire is almost exclusively religious; endless masses, passions, motets and the rest that proclaim beliefs and emotions that I cannot identify with or want to sustain.   Fact is, Carmina aside, there’s almost no serious secular repertoire that good amateur choirs and orchestras can tackle.  Here’s a challenge: let the BBC (and the Observer?) commission from the best poets and composers a prom of new secular work that is technically achievable by skilled amateur groups. This could kickstart a 21st-century legacy, opening choral singing to a new contemporary community of performers and audiences.

John Forster

Saltash

Cornwall

What makes people give

Tracy McVeigh is to be congratulated for her media first of “natural” disasters (“Natural disasters, not wars, prompt Brits to give to charity”, News). Forty years of UK research and publication have shown how, while hazards may be from natural origins, the disasters they trigger are created by actions and inactions, by others, of a vulnerable humankind – those in poverty being the principal victims of any country. After so many years of effort to break the “natural disaster” barrier, this was a treat to see.

James Lewis

Author: Development in Disaster-prone Places: Studies of Vulnerability

Marshfield

A truly great politician

In the New Review’s “Those we’ve lost” obituaries issue, you have made sure to honour some minor names including  TV actors and daughters and wives of rock stars, but decline to even mention the death in October of somebody that should be more of an Observer-type of figure we should be reading about – the late-20th century political icon Gough Whitlam. This giant of a politician single-handedly dragged Australia into the modern age, proving to politicians that once in power you don’t have to renege on all your promises, that you can have the courage of your convictions and change the political landscape of your country for the social good.

Andy Hall

London SE7

How could you possibly have failed to include Johnny Winter in your list? He is acknowledged to have been one of the first blues rock guitar virtuosos. A multi-instrumentalist, he produced three Grammy award-winning albums for blues singer and guitarist Muddy Waters and recorded several albums of his own which were Grammy-nominated. In 1988, he was inducted into the Blues Foundation Hall of Fame and, in 2003, he was ranked 63rd in Rolling Stone magazine’s list of the “100 Greatest Guitarists of All Time”.

Dave Hirons

Binley Woods

Warks

I was disappointed that you did not include the extraordinarily talented musician Christopher Hogwood.  His influence on music in the last 30 years has been profound.

Hester Doherty

Shrewsbury

 David Cameron with the Deputy Prime Minister, Liberal Democrat leader, Nick Clegg
Nick Clegg and David Cameron go into Number 10. Photograph: Andrew Parsons/EPA

Attempting to portray the Lib Dems as gallantly and selflessly holding rampant Toryism in check is by now the well-worn excuse offered for entering into coalition with the Tories, and just doesn’t wash (Ian Dickins, Letters. Their eager grasping for cabinet seats, big offices and limos had even party members appalled.

Had the offer of coalition been refused, the option for Cameron of calling another instant election was a non-starter, as having failed to secure the expected victory his position as leader was far from safe from his right-wing critics, leaving a minority administration as his best bet for saving his neck.

Without collusion by the Lib Dems, the manifesto pledge which ruled out “top-down reform” and piecemeal privatisation of the NHS could not have been attempted, along with the dilution of the welfare state by the privatisation of other public bodies: infinitely better than the alleged restraining influence exerted by the Lib Dems. Ian Dickins concludes: “Politics is the ‘art of the possible’, and the Lib Dems should be given credit for their achievements in government, not vilified for policies outside their control.” But what was “possible” for a party determined to preserve the life of the coalition was precious little. A coalition was better than a Tory government, but that’s a false choice: there was a superior, option.

Eddie Dougall

Bury St. Edmunds

Suffolk

Ian Dickins says: “The Lib Dems should be given credit for their achievements in government.” Credit for what? So the weak, vulnerable and poor are given a kicking with size eight boots instead of size 10? The bedroom tax, tuition fees, benefit sanctions? I used to respect some Lib Dems such as Vince Cable but I hope the British people will remember their broken promises at next year’s election.

Barry Norman

Drighlington

W Yorkshire

Ian Dickins argues that if the Lib Dems had not agreed to enter into coalition with the Conservatives in 2010 the UK would have, by default, had to suffer a majority Conservative right-wing government later in the year.  It is the same proposition that I’ve had robotically dictated to me by canvassers on my doorstep almost word for word: positing that no other “events” would have taken place, no other actors taken the stage, no changes in public attitudes to Brown, Miliband, Cameron; no attempts by MPs from all sides to behave in the public interest, nor even for Nick Clegg to have been given a boost in the ratings by holding to his principles, not taking the shilling, and proving himself above treachery to those that voted for him.

While it’s interesting to note that almost the entire Liberal Democrat party seem able to understand “what if” scenarios that fan out to infinity and beyond, they seem unable to grasp the relatively more simple mathematics of probability and chaos; the various formulae that make even predicting the weather in two weeks’ time a near impossibility, let alone establishing the behaviour of the entire country’s population, media and financial institutions. I suggest that the next time we on our doorsteps receive the Official Lib Dem Future Was Saved Warning we all point out the equally possible scenario of Bruce Willis failing to divert an asteroid hurtling toward the planet on an unstable orbit so that it collides with us with a bang on the twelfth of never.  This is speculative fantasy in the extreme .

Simon-Peter Trimarco

Kings Langley

Herts

Do the Lib Dem “achievements in government” include voting alongside the Tories to continue the bedroom tax which they and the Tories jointly introduced in 2013, despite now hypocritically claiming to oppose it? And if they regard the resulting £360 million annual cut in the housing benefit bill as indispensable, why did they vote for the Tories’ £3bn a year tax cut for top earners?  The Conservatives know perfectly well what they are doing by this series of measures; the pathetic Liberals are just dragged along behind them.

Phil Tate

Chester

Independent:

Share

Jane Merrick’s article (“Peer pressure”, 21 December) was the best argument yet for reform of the House Of Lords. It should be compulsory for Lords to hear all sides of a debate rather than relying on their own experience and view, and be there from start to finish of a debate.

Scrap the rule that says they have to be there from the start of a debate? No way Jane! Bring on a second elected chamber as soon as possible.

Jim Elliott

Norwich

It’s such a shame that the BBC Sports Personality of the Year has already been chosen (“Amir Khan condemns the Taliban”, 21 December). We could have had a really worthy winner instead of a tax exile driving a better, very expensive, racing car than everyone else.

Jan Wiczkowski

Prestwich, Manchester

I enjoyed the Walk of the Month, including the nice comments about Cromer (“The perfect start for a coastal odyssey”, 21 December). I am surprised that Mark Rowe did not notice the Pavilion Theatre in front of the lifeboat station, especially as it hosts the last end of the pier show in Europe!

Sheilagh McGowan

Cromer, Norfolk

In your article “Air passengers avoid London connections” (21 December) you say that “Heathrow remains the most popular hub for regional travellers only when flying to North America”.

I have been flying to Canada to visit relatives since the late 1970s when we actually had the luxury of a choice of carriers providing direct flights from Manchester. Since this option disappeared we had been using flights out of Heathrow, with the prospect of queues in the Flight Connections Centre and a bus trip between terminals, on one of which the bus (standing room only on a hot summer’s day) was stationary in a jam for 45 minutes.

This year we decided to try KLM via Amsterdam, despite the prospect of heading east rather than west for the first leg of the journey. No bus trips, nor change of terminal, and in our case a 15 minute walk to our next flight’s departure gate. It is unlikely that Heathrow will be considered for future trips.

One further factor which could explain avoidance of the London airports: there are no longer any flights from Manchester to Gatwick, so any international flight from there would require a train journey and possibly an overnight stay in a hotel. Or – horror of horrors – a flight to Heathrow and bus or train transfer to Gatwick. What a prospect!

Ray Jennings

Ormskirk, Lancashire

John Rentoul is right to criticise coalition austerity hypocrisy over the employment of special advisers in government, and right, too, to suggest they are needed (“Who needs special advisers? We all do”, 21 December). Running the country is a complex matter and if there is to be an appropriate balance between civil servants and elected politicians the latter need support. That said one does wonder if the 20 special advisors Nick Clegg has provide value for public money.

Keith Flett

London N17

Unlike John Rentoul, I don’t think we need a plethora of special advisers. For each Cabinet post holder and member of parliament has the back up support of people who helped to get him or her elected, individuals with the constituency knowledge needed in order to enable Westminster to function without being unduly biased towards one part of the country. Such men and women are voted in as local councillors up and down Britain, and will be glad to give their advice free of charge without adding to the nation’s payroll costs.

Councillor Tim Mickleburgh

Grimsby, Lincolnshire

Times:

Homer Simpson’s plan to become obese so he can work from home soon backfires Homer Simpson’s plan to become obese so he can work from home soon backfires (Matt Groening/Fox TV)

I WAS the kind of international student that Theresa May, the home secretary, is now seeking to ban from staying on to work in the UK after their studies (“May: I’ll kick out foreign graduates”, News, last week).

I came as a non-EU student in 2008 to do a master’s degree at University College London at a cost of nearly £15,000. I graduated in the first class and stayed on through a series of post-study visas at between £600 and £1,200 a go. I now work in the City and pay tax at the higher rate, as do my non-EU partner and most of our non-EU friends.

In my spare time I work at a pro bono clinic that serves a destitute (predominantly English) local community that has suffered swingeing cuts at the hands of this government. I am insulted at being portrayed as some sort of benefits-seeking parasite, apparently for the sake of improving May’s chances of a shot at the Tory leadership.

If May is so keen to curb net migration to this meritocratic, tolerant country, she might turn her attention to the Calais border or the backlog of 390,000 immigration cases identified by the Commons home affairs committee.
Sharon Shamir, London SE4

COMPETITIVE SPIRIT

Clamping down on bona fide international students would damage not only our universities but also our economy. International (non-EU) students make a £7bn annual contribution to the UK economy, and we have the second-largest share of the global market after America. If the UK is to remain internationally competitive, it should be looking to broaden, not limit, the opportunities.

According to recent ICM polling, the majority of British people (75%) are in favour of allowing international graduates to stay on and work for a period after they finish their degree. Among Tory voters, support rises to 81%.
Nicola Dandridge, Chief Executive, Universities UK, London WC1

PAYING THE RENT

Foreign students come here because they are attracted by the quality of our education and because we speak a global language. Like many others, I secure an income by renting properties to foreign students who are prepared to pay good prices to live somewhere decent. The proposal by May will damage Britain and in the long run her party. You cannot out-Ukip Ukip.
Phil Parry, Cardiff

UNDOING THE MATHS

Your article suggests that Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures show that of 121,000 non-EU students who entered the UK in the year to June, only 51,000 left. In fact the figures cannot be used to show this. The incoming and outgoing totals do not refer to the same individuals — they could not, as the definition used by the ONS of a long-term migrant is someone who stays in the country for 12 months or more.
Jay Lindop , Director, Population Statistics, Office for National Statistics

EU shows fat fingers in ruling on obese

THE absurd ruling by the European Court of Justice to treat obesity as a disability is an insult to the disabled (“Call it the Billy Bunter charter”, Camilla Cavendish, Comment, last week).

My own active and healthy lifestyle didn’t prevent me from developing a neurological condition that has severely limited my mobility. I applied nine months ago for a personal independence payment and have only just had an assessment.

Does this ruling mean obese people will be eligible to apply for state benefits? If you are fat, eat less and exercise more. It’s simple.
Lynda Turbet, Holt, Norfolk

BIG ISSUE

While I agree with the criticism, it is unfair of Cavendish to describe this as a “spectacular piece of EU meddling”. In the same edition you reported a “landmark” case — determined before the European Court of Justice ruling — in which a High Court judge had come to the same conclusion (“21-stone man wins job case”, News, last week).

As long as a silly decision is ours, it’s OK, but if there is any link — real or imagined — with the EU, it has to be bad. How can we have sensible debates about Europe when even your newspaper joins in this EU-bashing?
Trevor Field, Hexham, Northumberland

D’OH BOY

The article reminded me of a classic episode of The Simpsons in which Homer deliberately put on weight in order to be classified as disabled. Being obese soon proved to have drawbacks, and the plan was later shelved. I’m not sure if that will happen in real life.
Eliot Pollak, London NW4

A mean-spirited potshot at Strictly Come Dancing

CAMILLA LONG is clearly at odds with the majority of the population on Strictly Come Dancing and, I suspect, your readers (“Sorry, Strictly, it takes sex to tango”, News, last week). I must be part of the “gin- soaked, rabidly menopausal” group she suggests made up 90% of the audience. Once we’d got through the tedious early weeks, it was great viewing.
Dave Meneer, St Austell

THAT’S ENTERTAINMENT

Strictly is too easy a target. How lamentable that someone who has intellectual wit can take a cheap shot by parodying a show that 11m-plus people enjoyed. The participants gave much pleasure to viewers.
Pat Gander, East Preston, West Sussex

LIGHT RELIEF

Long completely misses the point of Strictly. It’s a joyful show of self-discovery that clearly has a profound impact on many of the contestants and stands out alongside much of the carping, sensationalised and depressing programmes on air.
Andy Jones, Guildford

MALE SHOT

I wonder what the reaction would have been if a male journalist had written: “But the more [Judy] Murray danced, the less shaggable she seemed.”
Peter Jones, Shrewsbury

SHOW US YOUR MOVES

It is very easy to snipe from the sidelines. Perhaps Long could put herself forward next year.
Martin Wilcock, Barlow, Derbyshire

NAUGHTY BUT NICE

As Craig Revel Horwood might have said: “Camilla Long’s summing up of the Strictly final was cynical, spiteful and wicked, and I loved it.”
Martin Henfield, Ramsbottom, Greater Manchester

WHISTLEBLOWERS MUST BE PROTECTED

Yet another whistleblower faces disciplinary action and the possible ruin of his career (“The NHS is allowing babies to be maimed”, News, last week). We are assured new laws have been introduced to protect those who expose dangerous practices, and yet people such as Dr Shiban Ahmed are hung out to dry for trying to keep us safe.
Martyn Beardsley, Nottingham

THE FREEDOM TO CHOOSE

Ahmed did a public service by drawing attention to the harm suffered by boys undergoing circumcision, but the spectacle of a wounded child locking himself in the toilet out of fear suggests that boys should be protected from circumcision until they can make their own choice as an adult.
John Dalton, Frizington, Cumbria

JOHN MAJOR WON POPULARITY VOTE

Adam Boulton (“The election is here, yet the parties are skulking away from free publicity”, Comment, last week) stated that the Conservatives have not had an overall majority “since John Major’s painfully fragile win in 1992”. True, Major had a majority of only 21 seats, but he secured what remains to this day the largest number of popular votes in British electoral history — 14,093,007.

Only the vagaries of the electoral boundaries deprived him of a larger majority in terms of seats. The same unfair discrepancy between votes cast and seats won may well determine the outcome in 2015. This would be both shameful in principle and probably catastrophic in practice because of the likely resulting unstable minority or coalition government.
David Levy, London N3

AUNTIE’S PARTY LINE

Boulton seems to have got himself confused. The BBC Trust has expressed no view whatsoever about which parties should or should not take part in any general election debates. We are, however, asking the public what they think about the BBC’s draft guidelines for the way its programmes cover the next election.
Richard Ayre, BBC Trustee

GOING THE EXTRA MILE

Shock, horror! I nearly choked on my croissant while reading “Join the Mile High Club for £12,500” (News, last week). Those of us who have joined this club know that membership is earned riskily with a frisson, not bought at a luxury price. The membership requisites are simply a plane ticket (class irrelevant) and a bucketful of spontaneity, lust, inventiveness and daredevilry. If organised in a “three-room luxury penthouse on a plane” and no longer illicit, membership will not be the real McCoy.
Francoise Lotery, Chelmsford

RULES OF ENGAGEMENT

I doubt very much whether Etihad Airways’ introduction of the Residence will greatly increase the membership of the Mile High Club. My wife and I both worked for Pan American World Airways in the 1960s, and the rules then were quite established. The “relationship” had to be with somebody new, not with the crew and not in the loo.
David Rogers, New South Wales

CHILD-FREE BENEFIT

Prince Charles refers to the terrifying prospect of 3bn more people on the planet by 2050 (“Charles tells architects to smell the roses”, News, last week). Rather than accepting such a prediction, governments should be rewarding those who choose to be childless rather than throwing money at those who opt to procreate massively and expect the taxpayer to pick up the tab. It would be a win-win situation in so many areas, not least in respect of climate change, congestion and pollution.
Anthony G Phillips, Salisbury

AID PROTOCOL

Could I add to Gordon Bridger’s letter (“Nothing new about budgetary aid misuse”, Letters, last week) that overseas aid should be made up of goods and services produced by British companies in the UK — for example, books, medicines, seeds, fertiliser and tractors. No cash should be changing hands. I know that this would not eliminate corruption but it should reduce it.
Chris Rockett, Lindfield, West Sussex

ISLAND HOPPING

Your article “Bristol taps away to be first smart city” (News, last week) tells me that in the smart city of the future my house might be wired up to inform my doctor about my eating and drinking habits — essential in a “Big Sister” society that will protect me from myself. The same edition announces that some islands can be purchased relatively cheaply (“Islands on sale for price of a car”, News, last week). Faced with a choice, I’ll take the island, with its privacy and risks of freedom.
Francis Beswick, Manchester

LOG ROLE

Your correspondent Simon Gladdish complains about the smoke and smell from his neighbours’ wood-burning stoves (“Smoke screen”, Letters, last week). These can be readily reduced by burning kiln-dried hardwood logs.
Graham Waller, Rochdale

NOEL FIRST

It was disappointing that the local official consulted over celebrities with links to Sutton seemed to be ignorant of the great Noël Coward’s links with the place (“UK’s most normal town reveals its wilder side”, News, last week). Coward spent part of his childhood in Sutton, attended his first school there and gave his first public performance in the Sutton Public Hall in 1907.

The cultural achievements of the former Sutton resident Tracey Ullman do not stand comparison with those of the great dramatist, actor and composer.
Richard Hughes, Banstead, Surrey

RECIPE FOR DISASTER

Thanks to Charles Clover for pointing out the appalling plight of our sea fish, especially bass, which are facing extinction (“Bye Bye Bass, a massacre ballad from Europe’s feeble fisheries ministers”, Comment, last week). Yet week after week you publish recipes for fish dishes — indeed one for sea bass last week.
Cynthia Harrod-Eagles, Northwood, London

FARE’S FAIR

It is about time that airlines started to show a reduction in fares as oil prices fall.
Sam Sproul, Denham, Buckinghamshire

Letters should arrive by midday on Thursday and include the full address and a daytime and an evening telephone number. Please quote date, section and page number. We may edit letters, which must be exclusive to The Sunday Times

Corrections and clarifications

Complaints about inaccuracies in all sections of The Sunday Times should be addressed to complaints@sunday-times.co.uk or Complaints, The Sunday Times, 1 London Bridge Street, London SE1 9GF. In addition, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (Ipso) will examine formal complaints about the editorial content of UK newspapers and magazines. Please go to our complaints section for full details of how to lodge a complaint.

Birthdays

Terry Butcher, footballer, 56; Richard Clayderman, pianist, 61; Sir Max Hastings, journalist and historian, 69; Lord Hattersley, Labour politician, 82; Nigel Kennedy, violinist, 58; Sienna Miller, actress, 31; Pat Rafter, tennis player, 42; Dame Maggie Smith, actress, 80; Denzel Washington, actor, 60

Anniversaries

1065 consecration of Westminster Abbey; 1612 Neptune is first observed, by Galileo, who lists it as a star; 1879 Tay Bridge near Dundee collapses as a train is passing over, killing all 59 people on board; 1895 Lumière brothers give first public screening of projected motion pictures; 1923 death of Gustave Eiffel, engineer

Telegraph:

Polling station in Eastleigh
Polling station in Eastleigh Photo: Getty Images

SIR – Philip Johnston notes that only in 1959 and 1983 has a party increased its support having been in power for more than two years. In both these elections, the Conservative share of the vote actually declined, yet the party gained more seats, due mainly to a divided opposition.

It is possible for the Conservatives to lose votes next May but to gain enough additional seats to secure a slim overall majority with only 35 per cent of the vote, if Labour similarly loses support from its position in 2010.

This scenario may seem unlikely four months before the election campaign commences, but four months before the 1992 election, most pundits and pollsters forecast a Labour victory, similarly overlooking the leadership’s shortcomings and lack of credibility on the economy.

There are also early indications that thousands of potential Ukip supporters will return to their natural Conservative home when faced with the prospect of Ed Balls as Chancellor and Yvette Cooper running the Home Office.

Philip Duly
Haslemere, Surrey

SIR – Philip Johnston discusses a possible leadership change in the Conservative Party, but does not say why it misses a true leader. A true leader not only wins elections but leads from the front, by proposing effective policies that may not always gain immediate favour.

The latest proposal from Theresa May is to make it obligatory for students from outside the EU to reapply for a visa once they have finished their degrees, should they wish to remain on British soil. Why on earth should a government make it so difficult for a well-qualified individual to contribute positively to this country?

Many of us will not vote Conservative at the election if the party does not give up its pathetic carbon-copying of Ukip.

Anthony M Ronalds
Dorchester-on-Thames, Oxfordshire

SIR – Well said, Peter Oborne. The Government led by David Cameron has done a marvellous job in very difficult circumstances. It inherited a real mess in the country’s finances, the welfare state and education, and in all cases the situation is much improved.

True, mistakes have been made (the demoting of Michael Gove to appease the Left-wing teaching unions was probably the worst). There have also been problems from being in coalition with the Lib Dems, who sometimes appear more Left-wing than Labour.

All in all, Mr Cameron and the Conservatives should be rewarded with the opportunity to carry on. The alternative is a Left-wing government of Lib Dems, SNP and a very confused Labour Party. The only thing they have in common is a complete failure to understand economics.

Geoffrey Wyartt
Newent, Gloucestershire

Christians driven out

SIR – George W Bush and Tony Blair often mentioned their Christian beliefs, but by invading Iraq it looks as if their achievement will be to have finally driven Christianity out of its original heartland in the Middle East.

Andrew J Rixon
Hertford

Fat lot of use

SIR – If the NHS is serious about tackling obesity, it should not rely on the ridiculous Body Mass Index for measuring it.

The BMI, which gives the same value of 25 for a 9 stone, 4 ft 11in women as for a 16 stone, 6ft 6in man, is only fit for categorising two-dimensional cardboard cut-outs not real, three-dimensional people.

I would not like to be in the shoes of a GP who tells the 18 stone, 6ft 7in England rugby international Courtney Lawes that he is on the edge of obesity.

Emeritus Professor Julian Wolfram
Falmouth, Cornwall

Easily foxed politicians

The Old Surrey Burstow and West Kent Hunt ride out for the Boxing Day hunt (REUTERS/Luke MacGregor)

SIR – Having wasted a great deal of time in banning foxhunting, politicians are now going to waste a great deal more time in permitting it.

Politicians do not appear to know whether they are coming or going, and, unlike the general public, they obviously don’t think that they have anything better to do.

They take time off work by awarding themselves extra holidays and then declare that they have no parliamentary time to debate important issues. All this while awarding themselves a pay rise five times bigger than the national average.

If we have to give them credit for anything, it is having the gall and brass neck to thumb their noses at the public and do just as they please.

Bill Thompson
Frankby, Wirral

SIR – The proposed repeal of the hunting ban will be seen by rural communities for exactly what it is: a desperate attempt to win back defectors to Ukip by aping their policies. What members of the Conservative Party seem unable to realise is that they, in general, and David Cameron, in particular, have lost the trust of their core supporters by a series of appalling misjudgments.

David Lane
Edgbaston, Birmingham

War after Christmas

SIR – After a century, can we not dispense with the idea that British people in 1914 thought that the war would be “over by Christmas”? In reality, estimates of the length of the war in its early months differed enormously: from three weeks to three years, “with every variety of intermediate estimate”, as one military correspondent noted.

Mark Bostridge
London NW3

Beastly letters

SIR – Frank Wilkinson’s cat (Letters, December 22) should count itself fortunate to receive from the vet a letter only about flea treatment. Our border terrier, named Dyson, received a letter from his vet beginning: “Dear Dyson…”

The gist of the letter was that, now he was all of six months old, he would be much happier without his testicles. It invited him to ask his owners to make an appointment.

John Ward
Great Bookham, Surrey

Cathedrals repainted

SIR – It is widely known that ancient temples, sculpture and cathedrals were coloured and that their original effects were not those encountered on the present weathered surfaces (Dominic Selwood, Comment, December 24).

Attempting to recover such unrecorded original appearances by painting no-longer original surfaces on the basis of insufficient evidence is not “restoration” but folly, self-indulgence, and adulteration.

Sometimes, in more recent buildings such as St Paul’s Cathedral, a plausible recovery of the original interior may be possible. It was known that Sir Christopher Wren had instructed the interior be unified and finished with three coats of oil paint. Sections of that warmly tinted original finish had survived behind book cases in the library. Its pigments and their binder had been established by technical analysis.

However, St Paul’s wished there to be “more light” – as much light as possible – not a recovery of the original, somewhat muted surfaces but the dazzling white interiors beloved by modernist architects. Accordingly, the last vestiges of the original painted interior surfaces were stripped and, to heighten the dazzle of chemically bared raw stone, the artificial lights were greatly increased – as has recently occurred with the 7,000 LED lights installed in the also chemically stripped interior of the Sistine Chapel.

What all of these so-called restorations have in common is the imposition of speculatively inauthentic appearances by the most expensive possible, sponsorship-harvesting programmes.

Michael Daley
Director, ArtWatch UK
Barnet, Hertfordshire

Remote wanderings

SIR – David Watt (Letters, December 23) is lucky. Our television remote is regularly to be found down the sofa, in the bedroom or (twice) in the fridge.

Dr Jim Finlayson
Beauly, Inverness-shire

How you say?

SIR – The Norman invaders at the Battle of Hastings may indeed have said the year was “one thousand and sixty-six” (Letters, December 24). The satnav on my German-made car speaks with no hint at all of a foreign accent, but she calls my local road “the B three thousand and forty seven”, rather than the more familiar B 3-O-4-7.

Henry Labram
Easton, Hampshire

Predator control can help nesting birds

Competitive predators: a crow in the act of buzzing a fox on a frozen lake. (Arterra Picture Library/Alamy)

SIR – David Gardner (Letters, December 17) is right to says that it is important to maintain a balanced eco-system. Our research shows that some vulnerable bird populations benefit from reduced predation pressure during crucial times such as the breeding season.

Most conservationists agree that the breeding success of curlew, golden plover and lapwing, for example, is improved by as much as three times when generalist predators such as foxes and crows are controlled during the breeding season.

The number of declining songbirds such as spotted flycatcher, yellowhammer and chaffinch doubled during periods of predator control in the nesting season on our research farm in Leicestershire, but declined once the control was stopped.

Professor Nick Sotherton
Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust
Fordingbridge, Hampshire

Jumping the gun on the Queen’s speech

SIR – I was annoyed that the theme and some content of the Queen’s Christmas broadcast was the first item on the BBC news bulletin at 7am on Christmas Day.

Speeches by the Queen should be reported after the event, not with a “the Queen will say”. Shame on the BBC anyway for spoiling the occasion.

Ian Maule
Ballasalla, Isle of Man

SIR – Where is the politician who can make so many good points so briefly and so clearly as the Queen did on Christmas afternoon? Wow!

William Naesmyth
Devizes, Wiltshire

SIR – Do those who gather at Sandringham every Christmas morning think that cheering the Royal family is the equivalent of attending a church service?

Susan Gow
Weymouth, Dorset

SIR – In the absence of a daily paper on Christmas morning, I switched on the BBC news channel. A cheery message greeted me – 20 minutes on the famous people who had died this year. This is normally an end-of-year item, and I can hardly say it was an uplifting Christmas greeting.

Carolyn Tansey
Porthcawl, Glamorgan

SIR – On Christmas Day, where I live, 700ft up in the Brecon Beacons, there were flowering in my garden Zantedeschia aethiopica (arum lily), nasturtium, geranium, fuchsia and aubretia.

Jeffrey Cook
Llanellen, Monmouthshire

SIR – I have just picked a vaseful of roses, alstroemeria and hebe. They look wonderful by the Christmas tree. I felt guilty disturbing a large bumble bee, though.

Heather Gosling
Corfe, Somerset

Globe and Mail

DOUG SAUNDERS

Lessons in giving from the wave that took all

Ten years ago today, I arrived at the remains of a beachside town in northeastern Sri Lanka. The first person I encountered there, standing blank and motionless outside an improvised shelter, was a woman who less than a day earlier had seen her two small children ripped from her arms by a tidal wave, as she tried desperately to hold them above water.

I could not think of anything to say to her. During the next two hours, I would meet at least a dozen parents who had endured exactly this horror, and hundreds more people who could not find their families. The beach was speckled with corpses, most of them children, and dotted with adults looking vainly into the ocean for their loved ones.

I’d had my Boxing Day in London interrupted by news of the Indian Ocean tsunami, and spent much of the next month along the coasts that had been devastated by the catastrophe; I would return several times over the next years, living with families in shelters and observing the changes, human and political, wrought by the disaster.

Not only was it one of the worst natural disasters in history, killing at least 230,000 people in a matter of hours and leaving millions homeless in a dozen countries, it also spurred the largest worldwide charitable, humanitarian and aid-agency response. History’s first Internet-driven, crowd-sourced disaster charity effort generated $5.4-billion in private donations on top of $8.4-billion in government spending.

It also provided an advanced course in helping damaged people back on their feet. Here, a decade later, are that catastrophe’s lessons in how to be charitable, and how not to be:

Helping can hurt.

It was three days before any aid arrived in this region – and the first aid trucks to reach this largely Muslim fishing village were from the Church of Scientology. Their assistance came with copies of Dianetics and overt conversion efforts, which were met with vacant stares. Christian and Muslim agencies were far more ethical and didn’t proselytize, but still sent the wrong message. Your religion probably preaches giving (most do), but getting your faith mixed up with your charity can cause people to lose hope.

Good intentions are a bad idea.

Within weeks, there were about 200 organizations operating in and around the village. Most were tiny. Some were devoted to single causes: water wells, sports training or marriage counselling. Some were vanity projects of celebrities. Even worse were the vanity projects of business people, who thought their product would be just the right thing. In the end, only the big United Nations bodies – Unicef and the High Commission for Refugees – and the Red Cross possessed the scale and organizational talent to help communities rebuild, and to keep the small groups out of everyone’s hair. Small charities may sound charming, but it’s better to give big.

Don’t go there.

One of the most extraordinary sights in the cities of Colombo and Jaffna were dozens of hotels entirely filled with doctors who’d arrived from North America and Japan, hoping to lend a hand. They weren’t needed. Even the tiniest villages each had three or four foreign medical teams, treating people who were largely healthy. (Decomposing human corpses do not cause disease outbreaks.) Never have very poor communities been so well treated for venereal disease and hernias. What was needed were framing crews, diesel mechanics and electrical technicians; the agencies scrambled to hire these locally. The doctors had simply assumed they would be needed, which was heartwarming – but they should have asked.

Don’t send stuff.

Most very poor people make their livings growing and selling food or fish or selling cheap goods to one another. A flood of free food, which was quick to arrive, was necessary at first, but it soon hurt the recovery: It’s hard for a poor rice farmer to compete with free dinners. Sending a planeload of toys, shoes or used clothing probably sounded like a good idea to people who’d seen a lot of forlorn kids playing in dust patches on television. Bringing these things to a faraway country and overseeing their distribution cost a fortune and tied up hundreds of people who could have been doing actual good (or buying those things from locals who needed the business).

Give, but don’t be specific.

This was the first of many recent disasters in which the charitable donations far exceeded the amount needed, often by hundreds of millions of dollars. That should have been a good thing: When aid agencies run a surplus, they can set up permanent stations in many countries so they can respond fast. But too much of the aid was given to “the tsunami” rather than Unicef, Oxfam or the Red Cross. Giving is a good idea, but keep it non-specific. Charity works best when combined with trust.

Carl Bildt

The international battle for Santa Claus’s house

Carl Bildt is a former prime minister and foreign minister of Sweden.

A couple of years ago, a Canadian cabinet minister proudly declared that Santa Claus is a citizen of Canada. After all, his home and toy factory are at the North Pole, which, according to the minister’s interpretation, belongs to Canada.

More Related to this Story

Though Santa Claus has not commented on the matter, it is now clear that he could choose several passports when he travels the world on Christmas Eve. In 2007, a privately funded mini-submarine planted a Russian flag directly beneath his alleged home. And two weeks ago, Denmark, which has sovereignty over Greenland, staked its own territorial claim, also covering the North Pole.

By filing its claim with the United Nations Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, Denmark has joined our era’s “great game:” the contest for economic control over a large part of the Arctic. And Denmark’s claim is massive. Not only does it seek sovereignty over everything between Greenland and the North Pole; it is also extending its claim to nearly 900,000 square kilometres, all the way to the existing limits of the Russian economic zone on the other side of the Pole – an area 20 times Denmark’s size.

How to assess countries’ claims to Arctic territory hinges on the status of the Lomonosov Ridge, a vast formation that rises from the sea floor and stretches 1,800 kilometers from Greenland to the East Siberian continental shelf. Everyone agrees that it is a ridge. The key question is whether it is an extension of the Greenland shelf or an extension of the East Siberia shelf.

Denmark, together with the government of Greenland, now claims that it is the former, giving it the right to extend its economic zone across a huge area at the top of the world. Though nothing is yet known about the claim that Russia says it will present in the spring, there is no doubt that it will argue the opposite.

And what about Canadians and their claim? That remains to be seen, but there have been reports that Prime Minister Stephen Harper is dissatisfied that Canadian scientists are not being sufficiently aggressive in pressing the country’s case.

Nonetheless, for all the hype about a “race for the Arctic,” and despite the rather icy atmosphere among the claimants, there is little reason to fear conflict. Under the terms of the 2008 Ilulissat Declaration, all of the countries bordering the Arctic Ocean agree to resolve their claims peacefully and based on the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. According to settled procedure, a UN commission will first judge whether the claims have merit. If they are overlapping, which is highly probable, bilateral negotiations will be held.

Such talks, to put it mildly, could take time. Norway and Russia negotiated over a far smaller territorial delimitation for four decades.

Both Denmark and Russia have been devoting significant resources to exploring the Lomonosov Ridge. Denmark has hired Swedish icebreakers for repeated expeditions, and Russia has been deploying special submarines to obtain samples from the ridge and the ocean floor.

The Arctic region has always been strategically vital for Russia, accounting for roughly 85 per cent of Russia’s natural-gas production, which is based primarily in Western Siberia. The Kremlin has activated a new military command for the Arctic, and is busy reopening air bases and radar stations along its Arctic shoreline.

But it is a very long way from these new Russian bases to virtually everywhere. And, in addition to the vast distances, there is the harsh climate. A Canadian military commander, asked what he would do if foreign soldiers attacked his country’s Far North, calmly replied that he would dispatch an expedition to rescue them. Though Russia had hoped for a rapid increase in shipping along the Northern Sea Route, commercial traffic this year fell by 77 per cent.

Of course, the stakes are too high for Canada, Denmark, and Russia to allow the region’s remoteness and its hostile environment to influence how resolutely they press their claims. Boundaries like these are fixed once and forever, and no one knows what discoveries, technologies and opportunities the future might bring.

But for the time being, neither Santa Claus nor anyone else has reason to be worried. The nature of the Lomonosov Ridge will be debated for years to come, while his thoughts – and ours – are likely to be focused on more immediate issues.

 

The warnings from Bank of Canada Governor Stephen Poloz that Canadian homes are 10- to 30-per-cent overvalued are indeed disturbing. If it’s correct that prices must revert to their historical relationship to incomes, I’ll have to abandon my comfortable Canadian pessimism about the future and get ready to embrace a brave new world of lower prices for meat, motor fuel and maple syrup (but only after stocking up on electronics, clothes and long-distance calling cards).

Teri Jane Bryant, associate professor, Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary

………

How irritating is that?

Re Top 10 Most Irritating Canadians 2014 (TV-Related) (Life & Arts, Dec. 22): I won a 50-cent bet with my wife that near the top of John Doyle’s list would be the “Pastor Mansbridge” title he regularly hangs on Peter Mansbridge. Most people we know think he’s a credit to Canada. We trust him to be honest with us. And no, I’m not a friend or a family member.

Larry Wulff, Toronto

………

Not fair! John Doyle can’t put himself on his own list of irritations. Where’s the fun in that for the rest of us?

Moira Pelletier, Montreal

………

‘Show me the money’

As it does not appear that there will be pipelines “a mari usque ad mare” in the near future, if at all, perhaps it’s time for a new motto for Canada.

In view of Immigration Minister Chris Alexander’s recent musings about easy access for millionaire investors, I’d like to suggest “Monstra mihi pecuniam” as a new, more apt motto for Canada. It will succinctly describe to both Canadian citizens and potential immigrants how we roll in Canada.

David Stone, Toronto

………

Show me the list

So it is those dratted Saudis who, by stubbornly refusing to cut production, are single-handedly driving the price of crude so low?

Perhaps The Globe and Mail could publish a list of countries that have voluntarily lowered production to boost the price.

You might also want to explain why low energy prices are bad for the global economy.

Marc Riehm, Toronto

Irish Times:

Irish Independent:

Letters to the Editor

Published 28/12/2014 | 02:30

Voice of protest: Michael Fitzmaurice, TD for Roscommon-South Leitrim

Voice of protest: Michael Fitzmaurice, TD for Roscommon-South Leitrim

Sir – John Drennan in his recent profile of Michael Fitzmaurice says that “this fellow, it struck us even then, was different,” when referring to his decision not to meet a deputation of protesting workers because he felt their proposals were not economically feasible.

He does appear to be cut from a different cloth from your average politician. He is not afraid to speak his mind.

While an endorsement from Luke “Ming” Flanagan obviously helped him get elected, people were referring to him as “Ming’s man”. But at the time he quietly pointed out that he was his own man.

Nowadays it seems to be the populist mantra for an independent politician to be opposed to water charges, as indeed Ming is, but Fitzmaurice in principle has no problem with the charges based on a conservation argument.

He seems to work from a very practical approach to solving problems. While many people arguing their case become entrenched in their views, possibly with one eye on upcoming elections, he shows a confidence in his beliefs and appears willing to take chances. The greatest leaders in the world have always been the ones who thought outside the box and put precedence on the end result even at the risk of self-destruction.

Elsewhere in the paper John Drennan profiles as many as 10 different groupings of independents. Not a recipe for success there surely if a plethora of them were elected. Could someone like Michael Fitzmaurice be a unifying force among them? Maybe a tad simplistic but sometimes the best solutions are the simplest and under our noses all along.

For a newbie he is certainly talking a lot of sense in my view and deserves to be taken seriously,

Tommy Roddy,

Galway

Why Sinn Fein are bullies

Sir – It will take more than the Mairia Cahill case (Sunday Independent, December 21) to make any serious dent in support for Sinn Fein.

The reality is, of course, that most Sinn Fein voters have already discounted the story as just one more attack on the party from a hostile press. If Jean McConville’s profoundly disturbing case cannot break the back of the Sinn Fein machine, then those who oppose Sinn Fein must see that nothing really can if it comes from that particular angle.

The hard men and women of Sinn Fein are proving attractive to some voters. But Gerry Adams told us at the time the news broke of his brother’s sexual abuse of his daughter, Aine Tyrell, about their father’s “sexual, emotional, physical and psychological” abuse over the course of their childhoods. So there really can be no basis for the aggressive coldness and provocative baiting of politicians in other parties who seem baffled by what Sinn Fein is up to.

Is their intent not ‘an Ireland of equals’ but ‘an Ireland of bullies’?

John O’Connell,

Derry

We treat animals badly

Sir – Fiona O’Connell has always been an advocate for the animals, a voice for those who cannot speak.  Her article, “Animals suffer a perpetual winter solstice,”  (Sunday Independent, 21 December) portrayed most vividly the plight of animals around the world.

Her description of the cows desperately sniffing for air through the slats on their way to be slaughtered must surely have troubled the conscience of anyone who cares for animals.

While their truck journey seals their fate within a matter of hours, how much worse is it for the cattle that are exported from our shores to North Africa and the Middle East.

Compassion in World Farming recently highlighted that animals who are sent to this part of the world often experience “brutal treatment” and “slow protracted deaths.”

Those who champion the cause of the animals are often subject to ridicule. Perhaps those who disregard such concerns should reflect on the words of philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer: “The assumption that animals are without rights and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity.”

Overall as a country our reputation in animal welfare is not one to be emulated or admired. Gandhi, Leonardo Di Vinci, Einstein, Martin Luther King, Abraham Lincoln and many other great minds all championed the cause of our fellow creatures.

The millions of animals who continue to suffer at the hands of us humans would concur with the sentiments expressed by writer William Inge. “We have enslaved the rest of animal creation and have treated our distant cousins in fur and feathers so badly that beyond doubt, if they were to formulate a religion, they would depict the Devil in human form.”

Margaret Fitzpatrick,

Glounthaune, Co Cork

Please don’t put your foot down

Sir – Some drivers are such fools and it takes no skill to put the foot down. Often it’s the innocent careful people who die, ending up on an expertly driven slow last journey. Let’s hope more young people especially think, and use their brains instead of their hoofs.

Kathleen Corrigan,

Cavan

Consider all angles on abortion

Sir – Dr Ciara Kelly in her article, ‘The grim litany of crisis pregnancies in Ireland goes on’, (Sunday Independent, 21 December), refers to the young pregnant woman on life support and suggests that the 8th Amendment should be removed to allow doctors and patients resolve all crisis pregnancies.

But Dr Kelly does not consider that such an action could result as is the case in Britain, in a liberal abortion regime with late terminations of viable unborn, something the majority of the Irish public do not want.

Hard cases may not make good law and I think most reasonable people will acknowledge that the unborn are due some consideration regarding their human rights particularly as they develop.

Frank Browne,

Templeogue,

Dublin 16

Anne produced the best read of all

Sir – I couldn’t agree more with all the sentiments expressed and compliments paid to retiring Sunday Independent Editor Anne Harris by columnist Eoghan Harris and letter writers Tom Carew and Niall Ginty, (Sunday Independent, 21 December).

I might describe her as a lamb in steel clothing, normally kind and sympathetic but unhesitant in letting sparks fly when crime or injustice raised its vicious, greedy head.

Being a student of the hard news tradition school of the Irish Press in the Tim Pat Coogan era, it was no surprise Anne launched into the tough investigative end of journalism where few flies had time to lodge. The murder of fellow journalist Veronica Guerrin incited in Anne Harris even a greater revulsion of all violence, criminal and political.

Gauging her thoughts and polices over the past three years through my contributions to the Letters page, I wouldn’t hesitate in saying her honesty and integrity left its brand on the Sunday Independent as the ‘best read in the land’.

James Gleeson,

Thurles,

Co Tipperary

Praise for Gene Kerrigan

Sir – Well done Gene Kerrigan on the piece he wrote last Sunday about Louise O’Keeffe.

I’ve been meaning to thank him for some time for the wonderful work he does in relation to exposing our corrupted Government.

Have a very happy Christmas and a peaceful new year.

Keep up the good work and thank you.

John Hickey,

Bishopstown,

Cork

Be alert to growing authoritarianism

Sir – The interview with Michael McDowell (Sunday Independent, 21 December) is a tribute to arguably one of the best political and legal minds of Ireland.

McDowell deserves praise for competence and toughness but also for his concern to protect the rights, freedoms and civil liberties of individual people; by this if nothing else he is distinct from certain more recent members of the government who seemed to perceive the likes of an independent judiciary or Seanad as a mere pesky nuisance which obstructed their grand plans for “reform”.

In 2011 the referendum to let the Oireachtas establish itself as, in effect, its own court was defeated. In 2013 so was the move to scrap the Seanad, as effective as that chamber might really be. Both of these decisions show how the Irish electorate knows of the need to keep such bodies independent and unfettered – though it is unfortunate that the move to allow lower judicial pay was passed because, firstly, our judiciary generally are excellent at their jobs and, secondly, in comparison to other parts of the public sector the judges are neither overpaid nor under productive.

It is hard to dispute that present circumstances need the likes of Michael McDowell to stay active and aware; authoritarianism never goes away and nearly always disguises itself as being for the greater good – it is important to shatter every effort it makes.

Christian Morris,

Howth,

Dublin 13

Classics are a good start for the young

Sir – I usually enjoy Declan Lynch’s articles in your paper. However I could not agree with his article on suitable reading for teens. I was introduced to reading via The Secret Seven and Famous Five – but especially the Biggles books. I later went on to the classics and studied English Literature in university

So I did get to read Fitzgerald, Dostoyevsky, Camus etc.

There’s a fair chance that were the writings of Camus etc, the only fare available in my teens, my love of reading would not have been as well established.

To be honest, nowadays, give me Ian Rankin any day.

Joe Heffernan,

Mallow, Co Cork

Was physical force really inevitable?

Sir – Tom McDonald quotes Dr. Ronan Fanning as saying that while the Home Rule Act 1914 was passed, “it was simultaneously suspended” and unlikely to be implemented “in the form in which it was enacted” (Sunday Independent, Letters, 21 December).

Tom McDonald also says that “it was likely also that Pearse and the IRB would stage a rebellion against a Redmond-led government”.

Why then did the world’s most powerful parliament, under Liberal PM Herbert Asquith, spend two years passing it?

If the “form in which it was enacted” was not right, why was it not amended when going through parliament?

When the Home Rule Act, giving self-rule to the whole of Ireland with a parliament in Dublin, was finally passed and signed into law by the monarch, Andrew Bonar Law (the leader of the Conservative opposition in the imperial parliament) had already committed treason by expressly backing Ulster Unionist threats of civil war against Irish Home Rule.

Nearly half a million unionists signed up to “use all means necessary” to prevent it being implemented.

In addition, an amendment to exclude four Ulster counties from the Home Rule Act had been proposed in parliament but was rejected by majority vote.

Despite these difficulties is it not true to say, therefore, that the form in which the Home Rule Act was enacted, giving self rule to all of Ireland, was the will of the imperial parliament, and that physical force was inevitable only when the most powerful parliament in the world did not implement its own act?

A Leavy,

Sutton, Dublin 13

We are a nation, not just a state

Sir – Reading Irish newspapers online, I am struck  by the constant reference to “the state” when referring to Ireland – in this context, the Republic of Ireland.  What happened to “country” or “nation” – or simply “government” if that’s what’s being referenced?

“State” conjures up the image of a heartless government and mindless bureaucracy: a thing that is dead; a thing that is controlled by robots and secret police; a thing that has power without accountability; a thing devoid of values or feelings, or humanity; without a pulse, all-powerful but no soul.

Who is responsible for this sci-fi description of Ireland?

Why is it that we never hear the people of Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Australia or other countries refer to their country as “the state.”

“Country” and “nation” immediately summon to mind a living, vibrant entity, a place of culture and history, of pride and belonging. Who can feel pride in “the state”? Who wants to belong to “the state”? We can easily see Stalin or Lenin refer to their monstrosity as “the State.” We can easily see North Korea being referred to as “the State.” Why? Because “state” dehumanises the place where we live. We associate “state” with communism and totalitarianism, not with democracy and freedom and enlightenment.

Is it because we are holding out for a united Ireland? Do we get the term “state” from the Irish Free State? Is that it? So, when we re-unite North and South, Ireland will become a “country,” ‘a nation once again’ as Thomas Davis lamented long ago? Well, that might be in 20 years or when Hell freezes over! Please, let’s not wait indefinitely. Let’s banish this very un-Irish word that so ill-suits the Irish personality, character and temperament.

So, Urgent Alert to the Irish government, Irish courts and the Irish media: We are Ireland, we are a country, we are a people, we are a nation.

But we are not “the state”.

Tom Gallagher ,

(formerly of Co Mayo and regular visitor to Ireland),

Las Vegas, USA

Sad fate of Kavanagh’s barn

Sir – “There’s a dance in Billy Brennan’s barn to-night” went a line written by Patrick Kavanagh in that wonderful poem Inniskeen Road: July Evening’.

Rumour has it that the same barn has been sold and is to be taken down stone by stone to be transported and re-erected in Winnipeg, Canada.

What sad feelings this news aroused in me, that this lovely landmark on the Inniskeen road should disappear from Ireland forever. Patrick Kavanagh captured the beautiful, quiet scene so eloquently 80 years ago, describing the bicycles going by in twos and threes, speaking their ‘half-talk code of mysteries and the wink-and-elbow language of delight’.

As for the future generations of poetry lovers, we can only apologise and ask if nothing is sacred.

James J Heslin,

Lucan, Co Dublin

Our President does us proud

Sir – My husband and I attended the Mooney Tunes Christmas Special at the Bord Gais Theatre. A wonderful night – with one dreadful exception. Just before the concert, Oliver Callan was beamed at us, via the big screens, with an insulting cameo of our esteemed President Higgins.

We are sick of this. President Higgins cannot do anything about his stature; he is a small man but a truly wonderful man. The important fact about our President is that he represents us magnificently on every occasion.

What did Oliver Callan’s rant have to do with the Christmas special? We thoroughly enjoyed our evening and salute our own local boy, Jack L. who was terrific, but the start of the concert left a very bad taste in our mouths.

Leave our President alone!

Happy Christmas to you and all your staff at the Sunday Independent.

Kay Lawler,

Athy, Co Kildare


Forms

$
0
0

29 December 2014 Updating

I tidy up and update some software, and fill in the terrible forms for Denplan. .

Mary’s back much better today, breakfast weight unnchanges, chicken for tea.

Obituary:

 

Jane Freilicher in her studio on Long Island Photo: GETTY

5:40PM GMT 28 Dec 2014

Comments

Jane Freilicher, who has died aged 90, was a painter who came to prominence with the New York School during the Fifties and later became Dustin Hoffman’s landlady.

In the mid-20th century her circle included painters such as Larry Rivers, Fairfield Porter and Joan Mitchell and the poets John Ashbery, Kenneth Koch and Frank O’Hara. It was a heady milieu. Manhattan at that time was a melting pot of contemporary avant-garde cultural movements: Pop artists and abstract expressionists, jazz musicians and experimental actors, novelists and film directors, socialised, collaborated, had affairs, marriages, fist fights and ideological spats. At the hub of all this was Jane Freilicher, quietly painting her still lives and landscapes.

A representational painter, she revisited her subjects over and over again, producing multiple versions of specific views – most notably those from her Manhattan penthouse and her Long Island retreat – and studies of flowers, in particular peonies and pansies. Her work, she said, was touched by a “softly brushed, meditative lyric”. The musical reference was apt: she eloped at the age of 17 with a jazz pianist, became the lover of a saxophonist-turned-painter, married (secondly) an eccentric dancer, and inspired several poets to rhapsodise about her in verse.

She was born Jane Niederhoffer in Brooklyn on November 29 1924 and brought up in Brighton Beach. Creative expression was a family trait. Her mother was a musician; her father, a Spanish language translator, boasted of memorising Don Quixote (in Spanish) while commuting on the New York subway. She later recalled that she was drawn to art at an early age, “not for fame or achievement, but out of a romantic inclination to beautiful things”.

At the age of 17, shortly after graduating from high school, she eloped with the pianist Jack Freilicher. They married in 1941 but the marriage was annulled after five years. However, the union introduced her to a world of artistes, including Larry Rivers, the saxophonist in her husband’s band who later took up painting. The pair became lovers. “She has more integrity than anyone I have ever known,” wrote Rivers in his memoirs.

In the late Forties she studied painting at Brooklyn College tutored by the German abstract expressionist Hans Hoffman. “He was the high priest of Modern art,” she recalled, “yet his studio was very democratic.’’ She graduated from Brooklyn in 1947 and received her master’s degree from Columbia University.

By the early 1950s she was a fixture in the city’s bohemian community. Jane Freilicher and friends such as de Kooning, Kline and O’Hara would convene at an apartment on East 8th Street, where “there would be Friday night discussions and harangues, followed by partying and dancing”. She became the subject of poems by Koch and O’Hara. “Far at sea I once more capture / men and cities and whales in rain / Yet can’t make serious with my rapture / slyly thoughtful, smiling Jane,’’ O’Hara wrote.

Jane Freilicher’s ‘Jar of Forsythia’ (1990)

She spotted her second husband, Joseph Hazan, in a film called The Dogwood Maiden. Hazan was a classically-trained dancer, artist’s model, friend of Tennessee Williams and heir to a large Jewish clothing business. On their first date he took along his pet monkey, Geno. “My days as a party girl ended,” recalled Jane Freilicher in later life. The couple married in 1957 and built a house at Water Mill on Long Island, where she set up a studio and painted the local marshes, bays and potato fields.

While her work was anchored in the real world – “Realism is the only way I can do it,” she once stated – it was a representation viewed through an idiosyncratic eye. She embraced a particularly bright, elemental palette of turquoises, lime greens, corncob yellow and summery blues. While her influences were distinctly French, in particular the canvasses of Pierre Bonnard and Henri Matisse created half a century earlier, her closest artistic touchstones were perhaps David Hockney’s Yorkshire views and the seascapes of the Scottish Colourists.

Jane Freilicher’s ‘Farm Scene’ (1963)

In the mid-1960s she contributed prints and drawings (of river views and floral studies) to The Paris Review, where editors judged that “the complex temperament of her painting prevents its being assigned to a single movement or group”. Such was her fate. Her subtle expressionism was not of its time. She was dismissed as “a domestic painter” while the art world lauded the abstraction of Willem de Kooning, Mark Rothko and Jackson Pollock. “I couldn’t find a kernel in that kind of painting to split open,” she said. Instead she persisted with her “lively blur” of colour and light, acknowledging that her paintings were “deviant enough to explain why I was not rising through the ranks”.

In addition to their Long Island home, the couple bought a large house in Greenwich Village where they rented out rooms. Their tenants included Angela Lansbury, Barbara Harris and Dustin Hoffman. In early 1970, unbeknown to the couple, members of the radical Left-wing organisation the Weather Underground had begun using the town house next door as a bomb-making factory. On March 6 that year the activists accidentally detonated one of their nail bombs, destroying the building and part of Freilicher’s house. At the time of the bombing Hoffman was living in an apartment in her home.

Jane Freilicher’s ‘Flowers on Blue’ (2003)

In 2005 Jane Freilicher was awarded a gold medal for painting by the American Academy of Arts and Letters. In October this year her longtime New York gallery, Tibor de Nagy, staged a retrospective of her prints and works on paper.

Although her work was often eclipsed by that of her contemporaries, Jane Freilicher remained upbeat: “I liked not having the demands made on me a big career would have made,” she said in later life. “It allowed me a certain freedom to fool around.”

Her husband died in 2012, and she is survived by their daughter, the painter Elizabeth Hazan.

Jane Freilicher, born November 29 1924, died December 9 2014

Guardian:

 

Delivery vans parked at a closed City Link depot, 26 December 2014. Photograph: Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images

One of the City Link subcontractors mentioned in your report (26 December) had been working for the company through an agency for the past three years. It’s unclear when reports mention “nearly 3,000 staff” whether these are employees or agency staff. If politicians really wonder why the productivity of UK workers is so poor, why crucial skills are in such short supply, and why income tax revenues are unexpectedly low, they should look at the practice of long-term employment of subcontractors through agencies. Workers have the overhead of agencies taking a minimum of 15% of their wages. They pay far lower tax than employees, but the employer is paying no sick pay, no benefits and provides no training. Agencies are taking the money that used to go to the exchequer, workers have their benefits eroded and employers find it cheaper to bring in workers from abroad than to train up local staff.

When the BBC talks about becoming more competitive by putting work out to tender, it is simply looking to replace trained staff by using companies that hire contractors for a particular role. No one will provide the training that has been the hallmark of the BBC. The same thing is happening in the NHS, and in schools and care homes up and down the country. Every second-rate humanities graduate is going into “recruitment” and the finances are normally concealed from both employers and employees. Labour and the unions should unite to fight the erosion of working conditions through agency working, to incentivise companies to employ and train staff directly, and to ensure an agency’s terms and conditions are clearly visible to all concerned.

David Vail

London

  • I object to you using the euphemism “letting staff go” when the proper term is sacked. “Letting people go” implies workers want to leave and the company are reluctant to see them depart. The Guardian should not use this language.

Philip Clayton

London

The persecution of Christians around the world in the name of religion is a reflection of the poor state of religious freedom in too many countries (Editorial, 26 December). A report this year showed that 60% of the world’s countries were experiencing a serious decline in religious freedom, where minorities endure violence and discrimination. The way of judging any civilisation is how it treats its minorities. We should heed the great political philosopher Karl Popper, who advocated “in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant”. Popper explained: “We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.”

Zaki Cooper

London

  • The 2003 Iraq invasion was indeed a disaster for Christians in the Middle East. Syria under Assad was, according to William Dalrymple’s From the Holy Mountain (1997), the safest place for Christians to practise their religion. This safety has virtually disappeared.

On a happier note, in Highgate, a predominantly Muslim area in Birmingham, at least 30 Muslims attended the midnight mass service in St Alban’s church and took part in wishing us a merry Christmas, some going up to the altar for a blessing. I pray that this fine gesture will become widespread.

David Craig

Bromsgrove, Worcestershire

  • If Herod, King of Judea, sent his soldiers to murder baby Jesus, then the Romans did not rule Judea and could not have been “threatened by Christmas” at the time (Loose canon, 27 December). The idea that later on a preacher too insignificant to come to the attention of a single Roman historian, who exhorted his followers to “render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s”, represented such a “threat to the stability of the state that the Romans executed him” is hardly any less absurd. Even the gospels are clear that Pilate, a Roman prefect who otherwise relentlessly persecuted the Jews, found no grounds for executing Jesus (John 18:38). “The Chinese” may well feel threatened by the festival the University in Xi’an described as “western kitsch” (Report, theguardian.com, 25 December) – but “Christmas” was no threat to the Romans.

Peter McKenna

Liverpool

  • Giles Fraser says: “Christianity is an aggressive religion that has long historical form in picking fights and toppling dictatorships”. Which ones, Giles?

David Rainbird

Wallasey, Wirral

  • Neither theologians, artists nor Christians seem to appreciate that there are various sorts of stable. Botticelli’s Mystic Nativity (Jesus was not born in a stable but in a family home, theologian says, 24 December) shows a stable as westerners think of it – a free-standing, roofed, rectangular structure above ground – whereas the spot claimed to be Jesus’s birthplace beneath the Church of the Nativity, Bethlehem, is in a scoop into solid limestone at the base of a cave.

This exists within a subterranean complex of caves and passages, now known from archaeological excavation to extend east and southeast of the church. This was an area of civil occupation before the first church was built; and some of the “family homes” that stood there would have had rock-cut cellars that could have had many uses, including being a stable. The Rev Ian Paul is therefore drawing a false dichotomy in claiming that, because Jesus was born in a “family home”, he could not have been born in a stable.

Pastoralists still struggling to survive in the hills south of Hebron live in traditional family homes carved out of rock, with accommodation characteristically consisting of a living area with open hearth, surrounded by sleeping quarters and, at the rear, storage cells and a cave-stable. The best one I saw had a hole in the roof at ground level, through which animal feed was dropped. Livestock are overwintered in such stables.

Peter Fowler

London

  • It is futile to try to locate the place (and time) of Jesus’s birth by referring to Biblical texts. It is quite clear that the New Testament writers either knew nothing about the circumstances of Jesus’ birth or thought they were irrelevant. Neither the earliest writers, Saint Paul and Saint Mark, nor Saint John mention them at all. Saint Matthew and Saint Luke used considerable and very different “poetic licence” in their efforts to have Jesus born in Bethlehem (City of David) in the face of the knowledge that he grew up in Nazareth. It is also evident that Luke’s original gospel began at what is now chapter three, and that he added the birth and infancy narratives of chapters one and two subsequently; perhaps after coming across Matthew’s gospel. The circumstances of his birth are irrelevant to Jesus’s good news.

Rev Dr Jeyan Anketell

Modern Church, Lichfield, Staffordshire

Labour’s idea to create “pop-up courts” in town halls and civic buildings (Report, 26 December) is a good one. Local justice has been destroyed in many areas, due to the closure of magistrates courts. The MP Simon Reevell recently pointed out that someone from Wensleydale trying to get to their nearest court in Northallerton for a morning hearing would not get there till after midday if they used the local bus service. Courts need to be nearer the communities they serve, and local control should be restored to them. Before 2003, when magistrates courts committees were abolished, magistrates controlled the administration of their local courts. Now it is centralised and neither magistrates, nor councillors, nor local people have any real say in how local justice is administered. If pop-up courts are to succeed, local people need to run local courts.

Penelope Gibbs

Director, Transform Justice

  • Earlier this year the Guardian printed my letter attacking the coalition government for suggesting pop–up courts so as to reduce the number of courts and undoubtedly sell the buildings off. Sadiq Khan has now stolen this idea. The idea is Kafkaesque, absurd and will remove the gravitas that emanates from the justice system. I suggest maybe the politicians try selling Westminster Palace, 10 Downing Street and other buildings used by the legislature, as the gravitas they are supposed to have has completely disappeared. The Commons, the Lords, the parliamentary committees and the cabinet could pop up in various places where they would not be remote from the people.

Besides, if Sadiq Khan and the Labour party were serious about removing the remoteness of the justice system, then they should abolish the fees in the employment tribunals and sort out the legal aid problem which is denying loads of innocent people access to the justice system.

Phil Cosgrove

London

After reading the letters (26 December) about Alan Rusbridger’s successor as editor-in-chief of the Guardian and allowing us to have a say, I think the point has been missed. We all want the Guardian to flourish, in which case the most important electorate would be potential new readers, not loyal ones. I believe the employees of the paper are probably most in touch and able to advise the Scott Trust, otherwise a hardcore of non-representative readers would steer the paper into a cul de sac, in the way our political parties are now detached from the wider electorate.

Martin Cooper

Bromley, Kent

  • Perhaps your new year resolution might be to temper your language. The topsplash headline “Labour faces Scotland bloodbath” (27 December) is sordidly attention-grabbing and inappropriate – and not becoming of any serious newspaper. “Resounding defeat” would be more appropriate. Sometimes there really are bloodbaths: what language would you use then?

Dr Susan Treagus

Manchester

  • My grandfather was a Liverpool corporation gas lamplighter throughout the austerity of the 1920s and 30s. Along with his sunset and sunrise duties, he was required to go out around midnight to turn lamps down or off to save gas, before going out again to turn them up before dawn to light the streets for those on their way to work. Plus ça change (Letters, 27 December)?

Gerard Morgan

London

  • Robert Nowell is incorrect to claim that if there is a need to cull foxes, hunting is the way to do it (Letters, 27 December). During foot and mouth disease in 2000-01, hunting completely stopped for 10 months and researchers found there was actually a slight decline in the fox population (Nature, Vol. 419, 5/9/02, p34).

Christopher Clayton

Chester, Cheshire

  • I was overjoyed to see that 36 – over a third – of the 100 bestselling books of 2014 were children’s books (24 December), including eight of the Top 10. Does this mean that children’s books will now be given the weekly review slots in the Guardian and Observer which they so richly deserve?

Teresa Heapy @theapy

Oxford

  • Despite the snowy scenes not so far away, winter’s not in Somerset; picked raspberries today.

Theresa Graham

Clevedon, Somerset

Syriza leader Alexis Tsipras at the Greek parliament in Athens, 23 December 2014. Photograph: Yannis Kolesidis/EPA

Owen Jones’s excellent article on the political situation in Greece was, sadly, too optimistic (Greece’s radical left could kill off austerity in the EU, 22 December). The prospect of the first “radical leftwing” government assuming power in the EU is, I fear, only a remote possibility, not because Syriza’s policies do not attract sufficient support in Greece but because austerity in Europe is now clearly judged to be much more important than democracy; the chances of an imminent general election taking place in Greece are remote. Only if Greek MPs fail to elect the government candidate as president will an election be called, and as the Greek prime minister equates this failure with “political turmoil”, everything possible is being done to ensure the candidate becomes the new head of state (Greek election uncertainty fuels concern over eurozone stability, 18 December).

Bribes of €2m-€3m are being offered to ensure votes are cast “correctly”; seven leaders of the neo-Nazi Golden Dawn party are being allowed to participate in the election, even though they have been imprisoned for using their fascist group “as a front to run a criminal organisation”; and, as Jones reported, veiled threats are being made, to Greek politicians and people, by the president of the European commission, Jean-Claude Juncker. The fact that the likely victor of the election is a party committed to ending austerity and to ruling Greece on behalf of its people, not its banks and financial interests, explains why, in Jones’s words, “a democratic challenge to economic madness” is being “strangled to death”.

Ironic, isn’t it, that when politicians attempt to justify their needless wars, the “threat to democracy” is viewed as having paramount importance, but when democracy in Europe is threatened because it could result in a national government favouring anti-austerity policies, no mainstream politician bats an eyelid?

Bernie Evans

Liverpool

Independent:

It was good to learn that the BBC’s head of religion and ethics, Aaqil Ahmed, believes that the BBC should do more for minority faiths, and that he defended his position by quoting the census showing 4.4 per cent of people affirming Islam as their religion (“BBC’s head of religion says more beliefs must be reflected”, 27 December).

However, he rejected the need for an atheist point of view, despite the census showing 25.7 per cent of people not claiming a religion. Most religions have opinions on ethical issues, and these opinions are often intrinsic to the religion. However, ethics is much bigger than that, and many of the 25.7 per cent have strong ethical views.

It is therefore time he changed his job title to just “head of religion” and left the ethical debates to someone else who can give a balanced point of view.

Steve Horsfield

Hoby, Leicestershire

Will the BBC’s head of religion and ethics live up to his job title by acting to end the ban on atheists and agnostics contributing to Radio 4’s Thought for the Day? This kind of broadcast apartheid might be justified if religious belief simply equated to virtue, but too much evidence – child massacres and murdered aid-workers – proves otherwise.

Peter Brooker

West Wickham, Kent

David Cameron again celebrates “our Christian values” in his Christmas message. But the values he clearly admires – tolerance, understanding, charity – should not be attached to one religious group, as they are almost universal and were aspired to many years before the birth of Christ.

And I am afraid our Christian values are not much in evidence when questions of immigration, gay marriage and treatment of the mentally ill arise. But for the PM I suppose any opportunity for an early election pitch has to be taken.

Professor Brian S Everitt

London SE19

Tories choose to destroy services

Danny Alexander says that “the Tory agenda to keep reducing public spending beyond what is necessary would result in the wilful destruction of important parts of our public services” (“Osborne savaged by his closest ally in the Coalition”, 24 December).

I’ve got news for you, Mr Alexander: it has already happened; you just need to get out more. It has always been an ideological choice of the Tories to do this. There were other options but the Tories decided that the weak, poor and vulnerable would suffer the most; and you, Mr Alexander, have gone along with this.

It is no use objecting now. Anyone would think there was an election due.

Barry Norman

Bradford, West Yorkshire

Now that Danny Alexander has so completely and so publicly rejected the Government’s entire economic strategy, I take it the Liberal Democrats will join Labour in pledging to vote down next March’s Finance Bill? Pretty please?

Ted Bruning

St Neots, Cambridgeshire

Your editorial, “Bad policy, good politics” (23 December) summarised the criticisms of the Government as “ritualistic booing” which will not make a difference. What will make a difference, however, if we all ask the candidates at the general election in May three questions:

How many people are sleeping rough in your constituency?

How many people are collecting food from food banks?

What are you going to do about the above?

All of us should put these questions to each candidate, by every means possible, such as local media and local meetings.

Your columns have made us face these issues. Let us make the politicians face them as well, in the glare of publicity.

William Robert Haines

Shrewsbury

There was a delicious juxtaposition in the recent anti-porn law protests outside the Palace of Westminster. While those protesting outside consented to face-sitting and aggressive whipping, those MP deficit-dominatrixes in the original House of Pain are gearing up to deliver another round of non-consensual and painful public spending cuts to prove which party is tough enough to deal with the deficit at the next election.

Ian McKenzie

Lincoln

Fight back against the gropers

Why wouldn’t Nigel Glover be angry at the suggestive approaches made to his daughters by “drunken louts” (letter, 27 December)? That men behave this way is disgusting. But they occasionally do.

The man grabbing his daughter’s crotch in Clapham should have been deterred with a swift knee in the gonads; the taxi driver’s number should have been taken and reported to his employers and the police; the deeply boring man in the bar should have been rebuffed whilst Mr Glover’s daughter joined her smoking friends, and finally, I suggest the carrot should have been snapped.

I’m at a loss to understand why Mr Glover feels his daughters’ education and erudition would have protected them from this sort of behaviour.  Time they “man up”, take control of their lives and stop moaning to Daddy.

Jennifer Towland

Oxfordshire

Nigel Glover rightly complains about the boorish and loutish sexualised behaviour of some men towards young women. While they are fortunately in the minority, men generally have lost the art of flirtation and of engaging in humorous verbal foreplay.

It is all too unsubtle and basic, and displays not only a lack of respect for women but a complete failure to understand that women appreciate compliments and courtship but not animal behaviour.

Roger L Davey

Winchester,

Hampshire

Quick, early death? Yes, please

Rosie Millard (27 December) raises the question of whether we should wag our fingers at those who are fat and suggests that the last social taboo, “the elephant in the room”, is obesity. But surely the real elephant in the room is death.

The decision was taken some years ago by the League of Friends of our local hospital that 10 defibrillators should be installed at various places in our community to ensure that if anyone dropped down with a coronary thrombosis they could be immediately resuscitated by a passer-by.

When I publicly suggested that those of us of a certain age, who might think that this was a good way to go and might not wish to be brought back to life, should be provided by the Friends with brass labels we could wear around our necks while out shopping with the words “Please do not resuscitate” there was outrage.

At least obesity shortens life, for the reasons that Rose Millard outlines. Hands up those who do not wish to end their days incontinent, arthritic and demented in an old people’s home.

Dr Nick Maurice

Marlborough,  Wiltshire

End this archaic honours nonsense

Having been put off my porridge by the image of David  Mellor and his partner on the front page (22 December) my mind turned to more seasonal themes such as meritocracy, egalitarianism, dinners at No 10 and New Year Honours lists.

Surely there is no real benefit to the common man from anyone getting a knighthood or peerage because they have supported some dodgy manifesto or have come from the “right” gene pool.

Has the time come to abolish our honours system and the Lords altogether? Countless other countries seem to do very well without such archaic nonsense.

I am sure that those who really do make a selfless contribution to healthcare, society, sport or innovation will be grown-up enough not to need a gong or an ermine robe plus expenses to keep doing what they do.

Marc Buffery

Upper Rissington, Gloucestershire

Finsbury Park train nightmare

If East Coast Trains had re-routed some services via Peterborough and Cambridge, customers could have changed to and from the London Underground at Seven Sisters and Tottenham Hale stations, thereby relieving the congestion at Finsbury Park on Saturday.

But to succeed, such an arrangement would require giving customers a constant stream of accurate, up-to-date information, which appears not to be the policy of East Coast Trains.

Francis Roads

London E18

Cruel charade of the hunting snobs

The hunting lobby’s Boxing Day charades (“The tradition that refuses to die”, 27 December) are a useful reminder to the rest of us that an election victory for David Cameron would mean the re-legalisation  of this cruelty to wild animals, conducted for  the sake of kicks and snobbery.

Christopher Clayton

Waverton, Cheshire

Times:

Sir, Standing on Finsbury Park station on Saturday afternoon it was clear that the disruption from the late-finishing engineering works, which had closed King’s Cross, was made far worse by the combined incompetence of Network Rail, East Coast trains and British Transport Police. Arriving at 2pm to meet an elderly relative travelling from the north of England, I managed to secure an official escort through the large crowds outside the station only to find the platforms deserted, a train for Inverness leaving only half full, and incoming services stacking up outside, not allowed to enter due to “overcrowding”, itself only resolvable by allowing these trains in to clear the backlog of waiting passengers. Eventually some form of system was put in place, but only after thousands had been needlessly delayed, standing outside in the cold or trapped on waiting trains for up to three hours.

If one thinks of the great events of this nation’s past, such as the mass evacuation of children from cities at the outbreak of war in 1939, or the onward despatch of troops returning from Dunkirk in 1940, in which the railways organised thousands of extra trains at a moment’s notice, one shudders to think what would happen if they were called upon to perform a similar role today with Network Rail in charge.

Harry Grayson

London W1

Sir, Multiple mistakes, not acts of God, led to the failure to reopen King’s Cross on Saturday and the consequent misery. However, Network Rail’s vacuous assertion that it had a recovery plan completely lacked credibility. Worse, the solution for passengers to travel to Finsbury Park was ridiculous, given that the station clearly lacked the capacity to handle the number of passengers involved.

That alone, in my view, justifies the dismissal of Network Rail’s chief executive, Mark Carne.

Patrick Allan

Southend-on-Sea

Sir, The scenes of misery and chaos at Finsbury Park station were avoidable. Across the road from King’s Cross is St Pancras, a main line that provides a viable connection to East Coast services north of Doncaster. Yet National Rail was deterring King’s Cross travellers from taking that option by stating that their tickets would not accepted.

The transport minister has a duty to inform us why train operating companies cannot pull together in times of adversity and get passengers to their destinations on the day that they booked to travel.

Charles M Wrigley

Leafield, Oxon

Sir, I despair of winter travel in the UK — and of this government’s wrongheaded view that reforming the state means shrinking its size rather than improving its utility.

My son, his wife and his seven- year-old daughter made the journey from Canada to Cumbria for Christmas. A perfect seven-hour flight from Toronto to Heathrow, followed by a delayed West Coast train journey that could only get them as far as Preston. They then had to be collected by car for the final leg of the journey to the South Lakes.

Being accustomed to Canadian winters, they could not believe news headlines here predicting travel chaos because of 4cm of snow. The return journey to London by hired car has taken them an hour longer than their seven-hour return flight.

The conclusion is that Christmas travel in the UK is too risky for a family with young children; the government is unwilling to invest sufficiently in transport infrastructure.

Mike Gibbons

Cartmel, Cumbria

Sir, Many years ago when I worked as a railwayman it was common for early-morning signalmen to oversleep. This caused train cancellations and delays, which were always blamed on “electrical failure”.

I would dearly like to know whether there has been any absenteeism at King’s Cross over the past few days.

Sir, I travelled from Edinburgh by train on Saturday and witnessed the chaos at Peterborough, where all the trains to King’s Cross terminated. A railwayman commented, “Why be surprised? It’s Christmas. These major works should not be scheduled at a time when nobody wants to work . . . ”

David Housden

Elton, Cambs

AJ Gerra

London W4

Sir, According to your poll (Dec 26), the BBC is struggling to make its case for the licence fee. As anyone who has ever complained to the BBC about its output will know, the corporation has an unchallengeable belief in both its high quality and unquestionable taste. Such an organisation can surely have no doubt therefore that if its fee was paid by user-subscription (via set-top box for example) there would be no significant loss of revenue.

Doug Clark

Currie, Midlothian

Sir, Paul Pensom (letter, Dec 26) understates the subtle complexity underlying the brief description of Grendel’s mother in Beowulf. Decades of debate have revolved around her description in the Old English manuscript as “ides aglæcwif”. Far from being merely “female” as Pensom states, this phrase has been interpreted as meaning anything ranging from an old hag, through a sea-monster, to a valkyrie-like fighting deity. Free translations by modern writers have ranged from the clumsily academic “ugly troll-lady” (Richard M Trask) to the sublimely poetic “monstrous hell bride” (Seamus Heaney).

Dr Christopher Goulding

Newcastle upon Tyne

Sir, Surely the real issue is not with girls’ or boys’ voices (letters, Dec 26) but with the next line down. No one in their right mind would choose a hooty counter-tenor over a mellifluous mezzo, but the one is authentic the other is not. If female voices are introduced counter-tenors will inevitably disappear. An ancient sound world will vanish.

Michael Stennett

Yoxford, Suffolk

Sir, It really does not matter one jot how anyone replies to an invitation as long as it is done promptly and with grace (report, Dec 26). An email, a note on the post, a phone call or any other appropriate method with a friendly message is all that is required. Why does anyone take any notice of this nonsense other than to show they belong to the “right” group of people?

Angela Patey

Bristol

Sir, Your identification (Dec 27) of Nigel Farage as Briton of the Year is extraordinary. He and his party have undoubtedly changed the political landscape and responded to electorate concerns in a way that none of the other parties have understood. However, the behaviours and attitudes of both he and the party he leads are often ill-informed and unpleasant.

I am proud to live in a country where people such as Mr Farage can express views with which many vehemently disagree. I would defend his right to hold these views.

I’m sure many readers would prefer an individual who embodies “British” qualities. My nomination would be William Pooley, the nurse who caught ebola in Sierra Leone, came home to recover and then went back. Real acts of bravery and selflessness as opposed to buffoonery and bigotry.

Melanie Bird

Modbury, Devon

Telegraph:

Concerns have been raised over the cost of running wind farms in Britain Photo: ALAMY

7:00AM GMT 28 Dec 2014

Comments

SIR – Ed Davey, the Energy and Climate Change Secretary, writes that his policies are “keeping bills lower, keeping the lights on and cutting emissions”.

Energy bills would be even lower if the energy efficiency savings he refers to weren’t being offset by the high cost of setting up and running the unreliable wind farms that he champions. In order to “keep the lights on”, thousands of operators with stand-by diesel generators are essentially being bribed to switch them on in order to avoid catastrophic blackouts across Britain when wind power fails.

In order to reduce global CO2 emissions dramatically, the West and developing nations will have to build hundreds of nuclear power stations, close down older fossil fuel-fired power stations and install hugely expensive carbon capture and storage facilities on those that remain in operation. The cost of doing this would be enormous.

In any case, whether CO2 emissions are, or are not, causing catastrophic global warming is still debatable.

Jim Allan

Fellow, Energy Institute (retd)

Hartlepool, Durham

SIR – Having spent my whole working life within the electricity supply industry, I found it hard to believe how little the author of the letter headlined “Cost of going green” seemed to understand of how an electricity supply system works.

All was explained when I saw that it was written by Ed Davey.

Bernard Longstaff

Cheddar, Somerset

SIR – Mr Davey’s assurances on energy costs remind me a little of “Comical Ali”, the former Iraqi minister of information, who assured journalists that the Americans had been driven back even as their tanks were entering Baghdad.

Rev Philip Foster

Hemingford Abbots, Huntingdonshire

SIR – The world’s population continues to rise; poorer nations are adopting energy-intensive Western lifestyles; and new coal-fired power stations are being built. Annual global greenhouse gas emissions continue to increase, more than two decades after we started to talk about cutting them.

Government promises to cut emissions are hollow. The lifestyle changes that would be required for nations to achieve adequate cuts in emissions are politically impossible for governments to implement. And we are not going to leave massive quantities of accessible fossil fuels in the ground.

We need to invest in carbon scrubbing, reforestation and research into artificial ways to cool the planet (geo-engineering). And we need to do it quickly, if we are to prevent crop failures, flooding, animal and plant extinctions and mass human migration.

Richard Mountford

Hildenborough, Kent

SIR – I find it extremely difficult to follow and comprehend arguments for or against the existence of global warming.

It seems the mountains of facts and figures can be used to prove the case for either side. The layman has little hope of being able to come to a definitive conclusion.

I M Williams

Four Oaks, Warwickshire

SIR – Either Ed Davey or Christopher Booker is deluded.

I know which one my money is on.

Robert Chatterton

Caythorpe, Lincolnshire

SIR – Why can’t the Government stop piling ever more green subsidies on to our already excessive electricity bills? While Britain is still so heavily in debt, why don’t we cut back on wasteful foreign aid? Why does nobody seem able do anything to stem the continuing flood of unskilled immigrants that is depressing wages, increasing unemployment and overwhelming our amenities and services?

If the main parties can find credible solutions to issues like these, their problems with Ukip will be over.

David Watt

Brentwood, Essex

Open discussion of living with dementia

(Alamy)

SIR – The Mental Health Foundation welcomes Joan Bakewell’s call (“Something to sing about for dementia sufferers”) for more discussion about dementia and for society as a whole to become more open and understanding about the condition.

However, in both her Telegraph column and on her Radio 4 programme Joan Bakewell refers to “dementia sufferers”. People with dementia prefer to be known as those “living with dementia”.

As the Dementia Engagement and Empowerment Project (DEEP) recently stated: “The language we use to talk about dementia influences how people with dementia are viewed and also how they feel about themselves. People with dementia prefer words and descriptions that are accurate, balanced and respectful.”

“Sufferers” was not one of those words.

Toby Williamson

Head of Later Life

The Mental Health Foundation

London SE1

SIR – Andrea Sutcliffe, from the Care Quality Commission, argues that Britain does not care enough about older people.

Any example of care that falls below standard is one too many, but we need to consider the best way to reward staff who are doing an extremely challenging and difficult job very well. Due to chronic underfunding of social care, many carers are not paid fairly and this makes it impossible to create a stable, professional, well-trained and motivated workforce.

Putting more resources into social care ultimately saves money for the NHS by keeping older people well and cared for in their own home or a care home and not in a costly hospital bed.

Mike Padgham

Chair, Independent Care Group

Eastfield, North Yorkshire

Supervising abortions

SIR – Max Pemberton is right to be concerned about the Supreme Court decision that denied two Glasgow midwives the right to exercise their freedom of conscience, which is enshrined in the 1967 Abortion Act, by opting out of supervising other members of staff caring for women who are undergoing abortions.

This case also casts doubt on the rights of doctors not to be involved in the referral process. Some advocates of abortion argue that doctors with conscientious objections should nevertheless refer women to doctors with no such objections. This suggests that the “right to choose” in fact means that doctors and other medical personnel should have no choice at all in the matter.

Ann Farmer

Woodford Green, Essex

Deadly friends

SIR – Nigel Henson highlights some of the absurd euphemisms used during war. Can there be anything more obscene and less appropriate than “killed by friendly fire”?

Gordon Macniven

London SW17

Lords spiritual

SIR – Since, as Cole Moreton points out, Roman Catholics constitute a roughly equal proportion of churchgoers in England to Anglican worshippers, why are there 26 Anglican bishops in the House of Lords but no Catholic ones?

The Church of England’s position as the established church may allow it certain privileges, but let us not forget that the former Chief Rabbi has been elevated to the peerage, so why not also the Archbishop of Westminster or his retired predecessor?

The Christian contingent of the Lords should be more representative of the churchgoing population.

Matt Showering

Bristol

Latest EU fishing regulations are simply wasteful

A fisherman throws cod caught in the English channel back into the sea (Alamy)

SIR – Having long been amazed at the inanity of the European Union fishing quotas, I was really pleased to catch part of a recent news bulletin that announced the end of the ridiculous obligation for fishermen to throw dead fish that are excess to quotas back into the sea.

Alas, I then read that fishermen now have to land all fish caught, but, incredibly, take any excess to landfill sites. Why not let the fishing industry land and sell all fish caught, and, if over quota, knock the excess off the following trip’s quota? Surely anything is better than simply throwing away perfectly good fish.

Allan Dockerty

Eccleston, Lancashire

SIR – When (not if) Britain leaves the European Union, fishing quotas will be a thing of the past and we will be able to reclaim our fishing ground, just as Iceland did.

We will then be able to rebuild our fishing industry, which will be worth billions of pounds and thousands of jobs. Britain will no longer be dependent on other countries for cod and other fish trawled in the North Sea.

Don Roberts

Prenton, Wirral

Unfair denial of winter fuel help to expats

SIR – I have paid income tax, National Insurance and various other levies the British government has asked of me over the years. I am now in receipt of a state pension.

However, I live in France, which seems to be sufficient grounds to prevent my receipt of the winter fuel allowance.

Is this fair? I thought I had bought this right by paying my way throughout my working life.

Mary-Louise Boardman

Olonzac, Hérault, France

SIR – I agree that expats living in hot climates that enjoy temperate winters shouldn’t get winter fuel allowance. However I have friends – one of whom is ex-RAF – who live in Brittany, where the winters are freezing. They live there because they can’t afford to live in Britain.

Bill Thompson

Frankby, Wirral

SIR – The issue of winter fuel payments being denied to British expats in France is also relevent to those of us resident in Cyprus.

During the summer Cyprus is sunny and very warm, but in the winter we experience months of cold, as well as heavy rain, wind, hail and snow. We all need heating in our homes.

Letters were sent to the British Department for Work and Pensions, pointing out the inadequacy of their assessments for this allowance. This correspondence received scant attention, if not dismissal.

A mistake has been made and it should be admitted and addressed.

Clive Turner

Paphos, Cyprus

Please hold the line

SIR – It is not just the HMRC helpline that is slow. When trying to follow up an application to open an account for a small company with Lloyds Bank, I found that it took an average of 23 minutes (five minutes longer than when calling the HMRC helpline) to get a reply.

I would eventually get through to someone, but on no occasion did anyone call back as agreed. In the end I gave up.

Michael Symons

Cheveley, Cambridgeshire

Knock, knock

SIR – Politicians frequently claim support for their views based on what they’re hearing “on the doorstep”. Whose doorsteps are these?

Around here, we have about as much chance of a visit from Lord Lucan or Elvis Presley as from a politician – unless they want our vote in an imminent election, of course.

Carolyn Kirby

Swansea, Glamorgan

Barred from the Bard

Roger Allam playing Falstaff in Henry IV part one at the Globe Theatre (Alastair Muir)

SIR – I eagerly await a European Union ruling on an actor failing to secure the part of Falstaff on the grounds that he is too thin (“EU court rules that fatness ‘can constitute a disability’”).

Robert Vincent

Wildhern, Hampshire

Dreamboat

SIR – The sexiest voice I’ve ever heard (“The women’s voices that make men feel all tingly – and why”) belongs to a lady working at Stornoway Coastguard, who renders live firing latitudes and longitudes unmissable, and makes one feel like going to south east Iceland just to see how rough it is.

Mark Prior

Cownhill, Plymouth

Globe and Mail:

Harper gears up to run against history

Jeffrey Simpson

 

Stephen Harper will enter 2015 fighting his political opponents, of course, but more important, he will be fighting history.

Since Louis St. Laurent took office in late 1948, prime ministers with majority governments have never lasted more than 11 years in office before defeat or resignation. Their average time in office: seven years.

If Mr. Harper sticks to his own election timing law, Canadians will vote in October, 2015, by which time the prime minister will have been in office for nine years, eight months.

Think of the prime ministers with majorities since 1968. Pierre Trudeau served 11 years (1968 to 1979) before being defeated. Brian Mulroney served a bit less than nine years before resigning. Jean Chrétien was prime minister for 10 years and a month before resigning.

By next fall, Mr. Harper will be around the cusp of when recent history suggests prime ministers leave office, either because the electorate boots them from office (Mr. Trudeau), because they sense they cannot win again (Mr. Mulroney), or because they cannot hold the party together (Mr. Chrétien).

Mr. Harper obviously senses he can win again, and he faces no internal party threat. What would remove him from office, therefore, would not be his sense of looming defeat or internal party strife – no, he would have to be defeated in an election. If history is any guide, defeat becomes more likely the longer a prime minister tempts fate, which this one is doing by asking for another mandate after almost a decade in office.

The most powerful anti-government sentiment in any democracy is the oldest adage in politics: “Time for a change.” The economy can be reasonably sound, the political alternative untried, even shaky, the government experienced and able, but when the largest parts of the public settle on the ill-defined but powerful notion that the time has come to change, there isn’t much the incumbents can do.

The tide comes in and those incumbents go out. It might be cruel and unjust, but it’s also democracy’s greatest safeguard against the arrogance of power.

Other democracies codify time in office: two four-year terms (the United States), one six-year term (Mexico), two five-year terms (France, Poland). British parliamentary systems let a prime minister carry on as long as he or she commands the confidence of the Commons, with elections every four or five years.

Without term limits, recent Canadian history suggests a kind of limit by convention. After a decade or so, the electorate arises, puts its hands in a “T” formation and says “Time’s up.”

In Mr. Harper’s case, about 60 per cent of the electorate made the “T” sign long ago, but he can win another majority under our first-past-the-post system with about 40 per cent of the vote. He did it in 2011. He obviously feels he can do it again, or quite likely he wouldn’t try.

He has an unshakable core vote of 30 to 32 per cent of the electorate. These people skew older, rural, male, western Canadian – and they vote. The Conservatives know how to mobilize them.

They have also identified minority groups – Jews, Tamils, Ukrainians – and tied Canadian foreign policy to the interests of these slices of the electorate. They have large amounts of government money in the form of tax cuts and government advertising to direct at other slices of the electorate: single-income families with stay-at-home mothers, parents with kids in athletic programs. And they have a large series of targeted spending announcements yet to be made, on top of the dozens and dozens already made.

In this, Canadians see an immense contradiction in the Harper government. The government cuts all kinds of government services, slices taxes (which costs the treasury), preaches the virtues of a smaller state and expresses determination to balance the budget – all while sending Mr. Harper and his ministers across the country announcing new spending programs and projects.

With all these advantages, and with many more attack ads yet to be unleashed against the Liberals and their leader, Justin Trudeau, can the Conservatives win again? They only need 40 per cent, remember, and beyond Quebec, the opposition is divided three ways: Liberals, New Democrats and Greens.

Quite likely, the Conservatives fear their opponents less than the rhythms of history.

Irish Times:

Sir, – Simon Carswell’s article on Shannon Airport and renditions (“Bush assured Irish State Shannon not used for rendition flights”, December 22nd) provides an important insight into the concerns that two former Irish ministers had in relation to the CIA’s torture and renditions programme.

Dermot Ahern was minister for foreign affairs and Michael McDowell was minister for justice when a report by Dick Marty for the parliamentary assembly of the Council of Europe identified Ireland and Shannon as a stopover point for rendition flights. Nonetheless the government failed to take decisive action, apart, it would seem, from asking the US government if it was taking prisoners through Shannon. The US government’s response to such questions can hardly have been a surprise to the ministers.

US officials or politicians were unlikely to divulge the extent of their illegal programme to another government, particularly if they were confident that their assurances would satisfy that government.

An even better outcome for US officials would be the opportunity to use an airport like Shannon unimpeded, confident in the knowledge that their aircraft would not be inspected.

This is exactly what happened, despite the minister for justice at the time being, in his own words, utterly hostile to the torture and abuse of people.

There were options that could have been employed apart from banning all American flights to Shannon, although if that was deemed necessary to stop the crime of torture then it should have been done.

The government could have sought to identify aircraft and operators that were linked to renditions and were using Shannon Airport. Indeed the government cannot have been unaware of the many landings by suspected rendition aircraft. In 2005 Amnesty International provided flight logs to it showing that six aircraft known to have been used by the CIA for renditions made some 800 flights in or out of European airspace, including 50 landings at Shannon. In 2006 a series of further reports emerged documenting the use of Shannon by CIA-operated aircraft, and highlighting the consequent risk that it was being used in rendition circuits.

From 2004 onwards local activists made repeated requests to the Garda to search suspected rendition aircraft that had landed or were expected to land at Shannon.

The government could have enacted legislation to permit random searches of these suspect aircraft. It could have improved the systems for collecting information on unscheduled civilian aircraft landings. And it could also have improved the oversight and control procedures so that aircraft operating as civilian aircraft but engaged in state activities were identified as such. None of this was done, and the CIA was allowed to continue to operate its brutal kidnapping and torture networks. – Yours, etc,

JOHN LANNON,

Ballyneety,

Co Limerick.

Sir, – A group of young people choosing to spend their Christmas holidays fundraising for worthy causes should be commended and not criticised, regardless of whether their school is fee-paying (“Is a school sleepout the best way to raise awareness of homelessness?”, Opinion, December 23rd).

Rosita Boland would be better served joining the students during the Belvedere College sleepout to shake a bucket than attempting to detract from the efforts of a charitable cause that has raised hundreds of thousands of euro during its 31 years. – Yours, etc,

Dr STEVEN MALONEY,

Rathmines,

Dublin 6.

Sir, – Rosita Boland’s article on the students from Dublin’s Belvedere College who hold an annual city centre sleepout to highlight homelessness and raise funds for the Peter McVerry Trust and other homeless charities brought back some memories.

I was lucky enough to be a part of the St Vincent de Paul (SVP) Society when I was a student in University College Dublin. UCD’s SVP Society is one of the most active and charitable groups I know, with the most passionate and selfless members. As part of UCD SVP, I participated in a sleepout held on campus outside the library. An amazing amount of people participated in this event for its first two years when I attended, and I believe that, not unlike the annual Belvedere College sleepout, it has grown year upon year.

Early in the evening, there was a party atmosphere. Groups of society members and their many friends recruited to take part were sitting around listening to music and chatting. One evening, there was a film screened at the sleepout area. While this entertainment made the experience in the evening more enjoyable, that was not its aim. The society was trying to entice as many students to take part in the sleepout in order to raise funds and awareness for those who live this experience day to day.

When night fell, however, the atmosphere changed. We, like the Belvedere students, had brought our own sleeping bags, mats and plenty of warm clothing. Despite our “comforts”, my night sleeping out was far from comfortable. The cold crept into your bones from the bitter concrete on which we lay. Though we were sheltered somewhat from the covered concourse under which we tried to sleep, the November wind still found its way into a sleeping bag. Constant foot traffic, even in the dead of night from students making their way home from nights out, made it impossible to catch some sleep. The whole experience made us realise that hardship, for some people, is life.

The UCD SVP sleepout has become an annual event, and includes buskers, clothing drives and fundraising. It has been successful in raising money, awareness and items such as food and clothing. It is run in conjunction with a number of other one-off or regular activities conducted by the society, such as soup-runs in the inner city, homework clubs for disadvantaged children and fundraising events at major holidays throughout the year such as Hallowe’en or St Valentine’s Day.

While the sleepout is the most high-profile event of the year, as no student can ignore hundreds of their peers sleeping outside the library on the main walkway through campus, the UCD SVP society never stops its tireless work for those in need. – Yours, etc,

SARAH DOHERTY,

Letterkenny,

Co Donegal.

Sir, – Minister of State for Disability Kathleen Lynch, the HSE and the Health Information and Quality Authority (Hiqa) have all expressed shock at the treatment of residents at a Mayo nursing home as revealed in an RTÉ documentary, and well they should as it is a shameful occurrence. We clearly need to take steps to ensure that such disgraceful activities do not take place elsewhere.

However, a degree of prudence and common sense needs to be applied to achieve this. Many HSE managers and Hiqa operatives are in their current posts because they disliked frontline patient contact, while enjoying attendance at meetings and obligatory bureaucratic box-ticking. Given this, there is a danger that the response to the current scandal will simply result in the transformation of well-run, homely environments to cold, institutionalised facilities that meet all of Hiqa’s new standards. – Yours, etc,

Prof TED DINAN,

Head of Psychiatry,

University College Cork.

Sir, – The Association of Freelance Editors, Proofreaders and Indexers was disappointed by the Arts Council’s decision to reduce its funding (by 84 per cent) to the long-established publisher the O’Brien Press. The O’Brien Press has an excellent reputation not only for publishing high-quality Irish writing and illustration but also for launching many new authors’ and illustrators’ careers, including Oisín McGann, Marita Conlon-McKenna and Alan Nolan, to name but a few.

In fact, the O’Brien Press first published our current Laureate na nÓg, Eoin Colfer, and the first Laureate na nÓg, Siobhán Parkinson. The company has published award-winning titles that have been used in schools and studied in universities throughout the country and that continue to be favourites in many households at home and abroad. Every year, it promotes Irish titles at the Frankfurt Book Fair and the Bologna Children’s Book Fair and sells foreign rights, including French, German, Spanish and Japanese.

As well as fostering the work of writers, illustrators, photographers, journalists, historians and researchers, the company has also employed people in the publishing industry as editors, proofreaders and indexers, both in-house and freelance, for 40 years.

It would not have been possible for the O’Brien Press to take so many risks on new, predominantly unknown, Irish authors and illustrators, nor to support the infrastructure that has made publication of their works possible, without funding from the Arts Council. For this reason, the 84 per cent cut to the O’Brien Press’s annual funding should be reversed. – Yours, etc,

AOIFE BARRETT,

DERMOTT BARRETT,

AMANDA BELL,

NEIL BURKEY,

PATRICIA CARROLL,

ISABELLE CARTWRIGHT,

SIMON COURY,

CAROLE DEVANEY,

EMMA DUNNE,

EIMEAR GALLAGHER,

KRISTIN JENSEN,

BRIDGET McAULIFFE,

MICHAEL McCANN,

MARY McCAULEY,

BRENDAN O’BRIEN,

BRENDA O’HANLON,

EILEEN O’NEILL,

CON O’ROURKE,

GILL PAVEY,

JANE ROGERS,

SÍNE QUINN,

ANTOINETTE WALKER,

LIZ HUDSON,

Association of Freelance

Editors, Proofreaders

and Indexers,

Rathfarnham,

Dublin 16.

Sir, – As foxhunts and coursing clubs subject wildlife to unspeakable abuse over the festive season, the Campaign for the Abolition of Cruel Sports is hopeful, for the first time in years, that a change in the political landscape in the coming months may signal the beginning of the end for these barbaric activities. With opinion polls showing a high level of support for Independents, we believe that the next Dáil will have a majority of TDs opposed to hare coursing and foxhunting, and that the vice-like grip that the bloodsport lobby has had on our politicians will at last be broken.

Already in the past year we have seen two more TDs elected, Paul Murphy and Ruth Coppinger, both of whom oppose hare coursing and foxhunting.

At present, the Animal Health and Welfare Act contains special exemptions for hare coursing and foxhunting, which specifically exempt these appalling practises from abolition. Instead of protecting wildlife, the Act effectively protects the rights and interests of the people who subject hares and foxes to indefensible cruelty.

But change is coming. We are confident that many of the politicians who support organised animal cruelty posing as “sport” will be swept away in the upcoming election, which could come at any time given the tense climate of political uncertainty and instability. – Yours, etc,

JOHN FITZGERALD,

Callan,

Co Kilkenny.

Sir, – I am moved to write in response to Claire Micks’s article “The parents’ dilemma: sick child versus expectant boss” (December 16th).

As a society how have we come to the point where the needs of employers take precedence over those of our small children? How can any woman’s job (or that of her partner’s, as he has equal responsibility here), regardless of how important or well paid, be felt to be more important than the needs of a child?

Like many stay-at-home mothers, I have sacrificed many things to be able to look after my children in their own home, well or sick.

Whatever I may have sacrificed financially or in terms of career I will never regret, as clearly the choice to work provides parents with choices which to me would be unendurable. The idea of dropping a feverish child in the early morning to a creche is unthinkable. How has this become the norm?

Our children are not a nuisance, they are not an inconvenience. The needs of the workplace should not take precedence over theirs. Happy, healthy, well-balanced children are the future of this country. Not multinationals, corporations or employers and not our own fulfilment. – Yours, etc,

JAN DORAN,

Gorey,

Co Wexford.

Sir, – A conservation report finds that our native curlews, whose cry filled the land in my young days, are down to 98 breeding pairs (“Another Life”, Michael Viney, December 13th).

Before weather forecasting broadcasts became widespread, country people believed that the plaintive cry of the bird was a sign that rain was coming. The silence of this brown wader of moor and heath is deafening largely because of intensification of farming. At stake is the environment. Let us manage portions of our land more sympathetically for our wildlife. There’s plenty of room for improvement.

As Michael Viney says, “Let’s not throw away what’s left of it”. – Yours, etc,

JOHN F FALLON,

Boyle,

Co Roscommon.

Sir, – CDC Armstrong (December 16th) finds it “still odder” that O’Brian should have chosen the surname “Palafox” for an 18th-century Irish Protestant in his early novel The Golden Ocean, pointing out that Palafox was an Aragonese name, rather than Irish. A clue may lie in the fact that Mr Palafox is characterised in the book as being from around Sligo, where his father was a Church of Ireland minister. Also in Sligo around that era were the Pollexfen family, prominent ship-owners and merchants, and familiar because of their connections with the Yeats family. In casting around for a name, O’Brian may have thought to himself “Pollexfen, Palafox”? Perhaps? – Yours, etc,

FERGUS CAHILL,

Dunboyne,

Co Meath.

Sir, – In welcoming the plans to redevelop the Boland’s Mill site in Dublin, let us hope that public access will be provided along the water’s edge like that on the other side of the road at Grand Canal Dock. A gated development without public access would be a lost opportunity to create a sense of community in this pleasantly developing area. – Yours, etc,

F McCREA,

Dalkey,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – To quote Steven Wright, “Everywhere is within walking distance if you have the time”. – Yours, etc,

KEVIN DEVITTE,

Westport, Co Mayo.

Irish Independent:

Tom Gilmartin arriving at the Mahon Tribunal at Dublin Castle in 2004

I am a man getting on in years, but I have always taken a keen interest in the affairs of the nation and country that I love.

  • Share

As a former public and civil servant I have been aghast at the levels of cronyism and patronage which I have observed over the years.

I have also been extremely concerned at the social and educational patterns and the injustices and lack of organisation which promoted divisions in our society.

I have recently read Dr Elaine Byrne’s ‘A Crooked Heart: Corruption in Ireland 1922-2010’, and about Tom Gilmartin and the account of his treatment at the hands of the inept and insensitive politicians and officials he was forced to deal with. The Desmond O’Malley memoir also gave an insightful account of politics and politicians. We have also witnessed the developments at the tribunals over many years, and wondered at the levels of accountability by those involved.

A number of politicians sat around Cabinet tables and displayed a seeming indifference to injustice. They never spoke out, but instead went along with the system.

All of these people have played a part in where we now are.

I believe that this history explains electoral patterns today, a public abhorrence of past stewardship. But it was not just the politicians. During this time there was a damning silence from many powerful institutions and people who also went along with what was happening.

Displays of extravagant wealth in public life should always be treated with suspicion. How many civil servants, soldiers, guards, nurses, doctors who serve the country throughout their lives get to live in Dublin 4?

Harry Mulhern,

Kilbarrack, Dublin 5

Known unknowns

Over my lifetime the economy has run in cycles – three or four good years followed by the equivalent in bad ones. But a problem arises when one unpredicted good or bad year comes in the midst of either cycle. This sets up doubt, throwing the economy into turbulence. In that case, the whole thing becomes like a roulette game.

Bloomberg has drawn attention to the fact that none of the 17 economists it polled in 2013 believed that oil prices would take such a drop in 2014. The same people also forecast a booming bond market and that share prices would slide. Three wrongs couldn’t make a right.

Who predicted, at Christmas 2013, that a strong reigning Government would descend into a year of complete instability and the country would become almost ungovernable? Did I believe this time last year that three of my closest neighbours and friends would now be dead?

Why are bookmakers such as Paddy Power and Ladbrokes among the most successful firms on the stock exchange? Simply because they are aware that people think they know everything, while really they know very little in the end. “The future’s not ours to see.”

My advice for success in 2015 is to work on gut instinct. Whatever your mind thought or project is, analyse it thoroughly. And, only when you are completely satisfied, stick with it and follow it through.

James Gleeson

Thurles, Co Tipperary

What is meant by racism?

I don’t know about all this clever stuff called “racism” by those who are miffed at someone else’s use of language and become outraged and offended – usually for others – when a choice of words become the latest “racist” attack on a person, usually African or Asian, but not exclusively.

It is my belief that it is impossible to describe one human being as being racist towards another of the same species. We are all of the same race – the human race.

It ought to be commonplace to call an offender “continent-ist” when disparaging language is employed to decry or accuse someone from another hemisphere. There are five of those which we generally call continents… with a few lesser lumps of land getting roped in, depending on who you are talking to.

If you want, use some other form of words to emphasise the perceived slight one uses when referring to another nationality. For example: “colourist” to describe verbal abuse of a white or black person – ‘Africa-ist; Asia-ist; Europe-ist; America-ist; and Australia-ist, covers most of the world where we see most action and life as we know it.

Why not outlaw the over-used term “racist” and “racism” altogether?

To anyone who feels this is an attack on their nationality, colour, or place of birth, be assured it cannot be said to be “racist”. I am one of you.

Robert Sullivan

Bantry, Co Cork

Bad signs for Leo Varadkar

For ages I have wondered how on Earth somebody like Enda Kenny got to run a multi-billion euro, multi-million person enterprise called Ireland. When he gave Leo Varadkar – his only remotely competent alternative – the shambolic department of health to run I realised that our leader was extremely cunning. We do not have a modern functional department of health. We have a badly organised, unnecessarily centralised, illness service. Thus, entirely logically, the population is getting sicker and sicker and the organisation simply cannot handle it. Mr Varadkar is doomed.

Richard Barton

Tinahely, Co Wicklow

The Pope’s criticism

Pope Francis recently delivered a long critical rant to his employees. He certainly listed a long catalogue of faults. Did he never read the parable about casting the first stone? Or, more pertinently, did he never recall the words of an eminent religious leader who, in a similar context, declared “Who am I to judge?”

Eric Conway

Navan, Co Meath

A second chance at housing

If I remember correctly, the obligation on house builders to provide social or less expensive units in each project did not relate solely to supply. An important second objective related to better social integration. Within any new development there was to be at least 20pc social housing.

That objective was frustrated by the willingness of local authorities to accept cash settlements from developers in lieu of such housing.

The Government’s new initiative offers a chance to revive this objective.

They must establish and publish conditions to be met in all new planning approvals to ensure that they contribute to social integration of housing.

Where projects involve private and social housing then building must proceed at the same pace on both aspects.

Otherwise, we’ll end up again with cash settlements so beloved by local authorities.

John F Jordan

Killiney, Co Dublin

Follow @Independent_ie



Dentist

$
0
0

30 December 2014 Dentist

Mary a bit better off to the dentist, alls well with her tooth and M&S and the bank.

Mary’s much better today, breakfast weight up pheasant for tea.

Obituary:

Sonia D'Artois in uniform
Sonia D’Artois in uniform

Sonia d’Artois, who has died aged 90, risked her life as an SOE agent in German-occupied France in the Second World War.

On the night of May 28 1944, nine days before D-Day, Sonia was dropped by parachute at La Cropte, south-east of Laval, in the Sarthe, north-west France. Code-named Blanche (and also Madeleine) and with identity papers in the name of Suzanne Bonvie, her job was to join the “Headmaster” circuit of Sydney Hudson, code-named Albin. Accompanying her were Raimond Glaesner, a native of Alsace, and Eugène Bec.

One of her jobs was to train the Maquis in the use of weapons and explosives. Initially, some of them objected to being instructed by a woman, but her professionalism quickly won their respect. Her other task was to act as courier and carry messages by bicycle or deliver money, wireless equipment and other vitally needed supplies.

She pedalled long distances and was in constant danger of being pulled in for questioning. Most of the other Resistance fighters in the area had been arrested by the Gestapo; a container with her clothes in it had been discovered by the Germans and she had to keep on the move.

Rarely spending two nights in the same place, she became accustomed to sleeping in barns and haystacks. In June, she was stopped at a roadblock and taken to the German HQ. There she was interrogated, locked in a cell, and her papers closely examined before she was released.

The forest of Charnie, about 25 miles west of Le Mans, was chosen as a base for the Maquis. They lived in tents or under tarpaulins, local villagers supplied them with food, and Sonia delivered arms and explosives. Shortly afterwards, the Gestapo struck. A member of the Resistance revealed under torture the location of the base and guided a company of German soldiers to a clearing in the forest where a party of the Maquis were preparing for a container drop. Some were arrested. Bec sacrificed his life to allow the others to scatter and escape.

The Germans discovered the signalling procedures used by the SOE and seized two planeloads of containers. In addition, the circuit lost three cars and a million francs. The disaster, Hudson said afterwards, was shattering but he was greatly encouraged by Sonia’s refusal to let it get her down.

On the way back to Le Mans, the two were riding on bicycles. There was a long, steep slope leading into the town. Sonia spotted a German sentry lounging in the road outside a property which the Germans had requisitioned. She put on speed, tore down the hill and made straight for the sentry, forcing him to leap out of the way to avoid being run down.

After D-Day, sabotage operations by the Maquis on trains and canals, bridges and enemy fuel dumps greatly increased as did attacks on German troops passing through the area on the way to reinforce the units in Normandy.

Sonia believed that there was no safety in keeping her head down and hoping to remain undetected. She therefore made a habit of eating in black market restaurants where she would strike up an acquaintance with the more approachable German officers and act in an open and friendly manner.

After the liberation of Le Mans, she was accused of being a collaborator. Young women suspected of consorting with the Germans were being marched through the streets with placards around their necks branding them as collaborators. Then, in the town square, they would be mocked by the crowd of onlookers, spat upon and roughed up before their heads were shaved.

Sonia’s practice of sharing her meals with German officers had not gone unnoticed and, had it not been for the timely intervention of her friends in the Maquis, she would have suffered the same humiliation.

Sonia Esmée Florence Butt was born at Eastchurch, Kent, on May 14 1924. Her father served as an officer with the RAF in the Second World War, but separated from Sonia’s mother soon after his daughter was born. Sonia was brought up by her mother in the south of France and educated locally.

After the Germans invaded France, she managed to get back to England and joined the WAAF. She did clerical work, which she found unexciting, and, after transferring to the First Aid Nursing Yeomanry (the FANYs), she was recruited for training with SOE F Section. During this period, she met fellow agents Violette Szabo and Nancy Wake and fell in love with, and married, Guy d’Artois, an officer in the Canadian army.

In August 1944, Sonia and Hudson helped intelligence officers in the US Third Army by gathering valuable information about the disposition of the enemy forces in German-occupied areas.

On one occasion, they were stopped at an enemy roadblock while driving a staff car painted in the Wehrmacht camouflage colours and with the French tricolor draped over the side. They explained that they were dedicated collaborators who had come to warn them of the approach of Allied units. On another, their excuse that they were visiting a grandmother barely held up and they were fortunate to suffer nothing worse than the confiscation of their vehicle.

As the German retreat from the Falaise pocket turned into a rout, the two were able to obtain documents – passes, permits and identity cards – which authorised them to ignore curfews, to travel virtually unimpeded in forbidden zones and even to carry weapons. They realised that if they were unmasked it was tantamount to a death sentence. At the end of the month, they set off to reconnoitre the area between the Seine and the Marne. On the way back, near Bar-sur-Seine, they found the bridge guarded by armed German soldiers and the SS.

Hudson put his foot down and crossed the bridge at high speed. The Germans opened fire, blowing out the rear window and wounding him in the shoulder. Seeing that they were hemmed in by roadblocks, they abandoned the car and set off across country.

Soon they were stopped by a German patrol and, having been turned back, walked into Bar-sur-Seine. The Germans were afraid of being attacked by the local Resistance and Hudson was held hostage in a café overnight. At dawn, an officer arrived. Hudson showed him his Gestapo-stamped identity card and was released.

He then went to the house of the family that had accommodated Sonia for the night. Sonia told him that she had gone back to the café the previous day to collect his coat which he had left there by mistake. Two German soldiers had searched her at gunpoint, she said, and had raped her. But they had not discovered the German passes.

At a checkpoint outside Bar-sur-Seine, an NCO examined their papers once more. His face, as Hudson said afterwards, was full of suspicion but he let them go. They walked for two days along deserted roads, crossed the Seine using the remains of a demolished bridge and were eventually picked up by an American jeep.

At Divisional HQ at Troyes, they were able to report to the intelligence officer that the Germans appeared to have made few preparations for the defence of the River Marne. In September Sonia was reunited with Captain Guy d’Artois who had commanded three battalions of the Maquis in Burgundy and was subsequently awarded a DSO and the Croix de Guerre. Hudson was awarded a DSO and Bar and the Croix de Guerre.

Sonia returned to England the following month. After the war, she went to Canada with Guy and set up home near Montreal. In 1945 she was appointed MBE (Military Division) and was also mentioned in dispatches. In 1948 Guy d’Artois was awarded a George Medal for his part in rescuing a badly injured missionary in the far north of Canada the previous year.

In the early 1960s her son was driving home with a friend after having had dinner together at Como, Quebec province, when they were pursued by three thugs in their own vehicle and forced to stop. The three ruffians jumped out of their car and began to intimidate the two young men.

By coincidence, this happened in front of a house where Sonia was having dinner. Hearing the commotion, she decided to take charge. She hit one of the men in the face, smashed the car door on to his leg and held the other two until the police arrived.

Sonia, known to her friends as Toni, married, in 1944, Guy d’Artois. He died in 1999 and she is survived by their three sons and three daughters. For the last seven years of her life, John Tozer was a devoted companion.

Sonia d’Artois, born May 14 1924, died December 21 2014

Guardian:

NHS out-of-hours care is out of cash, out of luck

Ambulance crew bring a patient to the A&E ward
‘As an insider, I can see under-resourced out-of-hours services having a knock-on effect on ambulances and hospitals,’ writes Dr Chris Smith. Photograph: Mike Goldwater/Alamy

My father started out as a single-handed GP, was on call 24/7 and would know all of his patients. Sleepless nights reduced to one in three as other doctors joined his surgery. Then two surgeries combined to share on-call duties between around 14 doctors, but they would still know most of the unwell patients. Across the UK, out-of-hours provision was provided by similar-sized GP co-operatives.

The 2004 GP contract did not provide GP surgeries with adequate funding for out-of-hours service provision. Consequently, this shifted to larger providers.

These days, in an attempt to create economies of scale, out-of-hours services cover even larger geographical areas, with contracts given to private providers. GPs, as shift-workers, visit patients who they have probably never met before and will never meet again.

Over Christmas I did several out-of-hours shifts in Hampshire. The waiting times for home visits were often in excess of 12 hours (the “target” is six). The majority of these patients were frail and elderly, vulnerable and often unable to speak out. In one tragic case I was greeted by the patient’s grieving son and daughter. She had called the out-of-hours service 12 hours previously, complaining of breathing problems; by the time I arrived, her body had already been taken to the undertakers.

Service pressures over the Christmas period are entirely predictable.As an insider, I can see under-resourced out-of-hours services having a knock-on effect on ambulances and hospitals. There is an urgent need for adequately funded, local and responsive out-of-hours services, run by GPs providing care for patients in their local area.
Dr Chris Smith
London

• Why does Francis Maude (Health mutuals are not private firms, Letter, 26 December) continue to deny a Tory agenda of NHS privatisation? In doing so, he contradicts his fellow Cabinet Office minister Oliver Letwin, who defines privatisation in his 1988 book, Privatising the World, as: outsourcing public sector services to private sector companies; deregulation of public sector monopolies; and “trade sales” into the private sector of public sector bodies deemed to be “failing”. Reform of the NHS so far satisfies all of Letwin’s privatisation criteria, so this should not be in any doubt.

More doubtful are the prospects for any of Maude’s envisioned “mutuals” in the non-free-market environment of NHS tendering. Maude should know better than most that social enterprises – which are companies, not public sector bodies – won’t last two shakes of a reindeer’s tail trying to compete with international healthcare giants looking for business in the UK. Social enterprises for community services – once taken out of the public sector – have already lost out in a big way to the likes of Virgin, resulting in another set of NHS services permanently lost to the public sector.

At this point in the argument, ministers tend to resort to claiming “it’s up to GP-led clinical commissioning groups to decide who gets awarded contracts”. Aggressive and expensive litigation by private providers claiming that they were unfairly denied NHS contracts, together with the stringencies of EU competition law, mean that CCGs’ hands are too tightly tied and it is the market that decides instead. There is no free market in health. The direction of travel is one-way, stepwise, towards privatisation under foreign healthcare giants who want into UK business.
Dr Nick Mann (GP)
London

• There is no need to spin off large chunks of the NHS into not-for-profit mutual firms. There is a long track record of mutuals being bought/taken over/converted into commercial firms, often fuelled by large debts. This has made a few individuals very rich while those who work in the ex-mutuals get poorer pay and pensions, and frequently redundancies. The ill now leave hospital not as patients but as clients whose continuity and coordination of care become difficult. It does not serve them well. Fragmentation of services is a result of political ideology and, frankly, a deceit. Mr Maude will surely remember the enthusiasm for the conversion of mutual building societies into plcs.
Dr James Chang
Cheadle Hulme, Cheshire

• Despite the mandatory mild scepticism, you are still taken in by the flashy big science and personalised medicine rhetoric of the “genomics revolution” (Editorial, 23 December). Some revolution: it’s been running 30 years, and the UK still has the worst common adult cancer outcomes among comparable countries, with no evidence of improvement relative to the others. Countless have died prematurely because we cannot deliver the same level of conventional care as Canada or Australia. How spending £300m on the luxury of the 100,000 genome project is practically going to help anyone isn’t easy to understand. It may uncover or refine diagnoses in the 70% of subjects with rare genetic conditions, but that’s of little consolation when we have only vague and distant potential of treatments (which are always a decade away). As to the dilemma, give £150m to cancer treatment now, the rest to fund more paramedics and ambulance personnel, and put the genomics revolution on hold until the NHS has stopped falling apart.
Dr David Levy
London

John Stuart Mill, photographed circa 1870
Liberal thinker: John Stuart Mill (1806-73), photographed circa 1870. Photograph: London Stereoscopic Company/Getty Images

The recent heated flurry of letters about Christianity and tolerance (29 December) understates the disastrous impact of Christianity upon the world. Voltaire and an array of sceptical philosophers pointed out the inconsistencies in the New Testament. The Gospels and Paul’s letters are a virtual diatribe against the Jews as Christ-killers. To the persecuted Jews, Christ is the traitor who has hunted them down for two millennia. Within Christianity, sects have turned on each other. Across continental Europe, Roman Catholicism was associated with pitiless royal absolutism and, eventually, with the brimstone of fascism. The Church of England, as the religious establishment, schemed to beat down for centuries the radical dissenters – Quakers, Baptists, and then Methodists.

There would simply be no compassionate, level-headed, moderate civilisation without the advent of liberalism as exemplified by John Stuart Mill, who loathed the monopolistic tendencies inherent in Anglicanism. Liberalism, under threat from unrepentant Tory critics, seems the guarantor of tolerance, of which Christianity has always been the enemy. Cool, calm liberalism should be described as the answer, while Christianity is the essence of conservatism at its most vindictive.
Zekria Ibrahimi
London

• Freedom to worship is the expression of wider rights: the freedoms of expression and of association. It is these that require upholding. The focus on religious worship is not only a distraction from those rights but also a weakening of inner spiritually and devotion. The first Christians met under the cover of the first day of the week, ie the day that followed the sabbath, when the Jews returned to work and business. Quiet and private Christian worship thus did not draw attention to itself and was the stronger for it. Let our lives speak.
Norma Laming
Ipswich

Birmingham Central Library

Under threat: Birmingham Central Library. Photograph: Alamy

Lucy Mangan’s article on the need for libraries to change to survive (Every trick in the books, 27 December) is correct, but it misses out a key factor on the attraction of a good library – the opportunity to handle and to read historic and rare books. Of course there are many vital items available online, but these offer neither the depth of the available material, nor the pleasure of actually handling the original books. At the Leeds Library – founded in 1768 – we find that we are attracting newer and younger members because we have on the shelves many rare books from the 18th century onwards, as well as the latest fiction and non-fiction.

Much of our early material is unique and invaluable to researchers and it coexists convivially with the readers of the newspapers, journals and current novels. Our experience is that modernisation and literary heritage must go hand in hand for libraries to flourish.
Michael Meadowcroft
Chair of trustees, The Leeds Library

Rio’s Oscar Niemeyer, Chicago’s Mies van der Rohe and London’s Ernö Goldfinger all have had their best mid-century buildings saved and used because they are valued as historically important examples of 20th-century architecture. Birmingham architect John Madin’s most iconic work, his Central Library, is to be demolished (Why we can’t leave Charles in charge, 27 December). Shame on you, Birmingham, and although there are some good things happening in places like the Jewellery Quarter and Digbeth, sadly the city planners want to turn the centre of what was once referred to as the City of a Thousand Trades into the City of a Thousand Costas. There seems to be an attempt to erase the city’s recent past and it will end up with Birmingham becoming a bland fudge of empty grade-A office buildings. Joseph Chamberlain must be turning in his grave at Key Hill cemetery at how the city he built – and its passion – is being dismantled by people who have no regard for its history or its future.
Darren Cannan
Birmingham

William Hague tucks into a bacon roll.
Rarely a good look: William Hague tucks into a bacon roll. Photograph: Murdo Macleod

I’m disappointed you used the picture of Ed Miliband eating a bacon roll (G2, 29 December). Wait beside anyone with a loaded camera and sooner or later they can be pictured losing their dignity; spluttering on a hot drink, picking their nose or appearing to make a rude gesture. Of all embarrassing photos, this one is constantly reproduced. It seems to me the reason is the antisemitic subliminal message: Ed Miliband is a Jew; he chokes on bacon.
Michael Hudson
Lincoln

• In his unnecessarily wordy thesis arguing that we have become passive consumers of the conflict in the Middle East (Click away now: how bloodshed in the desert lost its reality, 23 December), Will Self has conveniently forgotten about the largest protest march in British history in February 2003, which arguably played a key role 10 years later in halting the planned US-UK attack on Syria in August 2013.
Ian Sinclair
Author, The March That Shook Blair: An Oral History of 15 February 2003

• We need a serious discussion, one that includes HGV drivers, about lorry design (Report, 27 December): where the bin-men sit; where the dead-man’s handle is situated; how long it takes a runaway lorry to stop.
Godfrey Holmes
Withernsea, East Yorkshire

• Julian Baggini (Move your money from the high street and help to achieve a fairer society, 31 December 2013) stirred us into new year action. After 50 years we left one of the big banks for a mutual building society. The switch was easy. The original local, courteous and friendly staff has changed for another. Providers who are mutual, local, environmental and responsible encourage a fairer society. They are out there – still waiting for more of us to join in.
Sarah and Richard Titford
Sudbury, Suffolk

• May I make a plea for at least one Christmas quiz next year that all the family can do together, with a reasonable chance of getting most of the answers, without resorting to media devices. The quiz should also have a children’s section. Your quizzes seem more about the cleverness of the questioners rather than welcome entertainment that is not too taxing after drink and food. The Financial Times and the Spectator were also at fault, I thought.
Geoff Smith
Huddersfield

• Let’s hear it for the 11,000 workers who gave up their Christmases to work on improving the railways (Report, 29 December).
John Hurdley
Birmingham

Volunteers remove poppies from the moat of the Tower of London, 16 December 12014.
Volunteers remove poppies from the moat of the Tower of London, 16 December 2014. Photograph: John Stillwell/PA

You are right to highlight the remarkable creative achievement of Paul Cummins and Tom Piper in delivering Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red at the Tower of London (Simple twists of fate that brought ceramic poppies to the Tower, 29 December). It was indeed the defining image of the 2014-1914 commemorations. But none of it would have happened without the assistance of the skilled potters of Stoke-on-Trent. All of the 497,000kg of clay used for the project – a slightly sanded, red earthenware – was supplied or sourced by the Etruria-based Potclays company. Help with the firing regime, kiln space, slab rollers, and production came from a range of Potteries businesses.

Drawing on hundreds of years of ceramic skills, these world-class designers, technicians and manufacturers were honoured to work with Paul Cummins on his inspirational vision. It would be nice for this heroic contribution to the success of the Tower poppies to be acknowledged – and for Stoke-on-Trent now to work alongside Derby to bring the Weeping Window and Wave installations to the Midlands on their upcoming UK tour.
Tristram Hunt MP
Lab, Stoke-on-Trent Central

• Whatever your views about war and religion (Sorry, Rev Davies – John Lennon was right about religion, Deborah Orr, 27 December), I feel that the following quote from my father’s first world war diary provides a nice comment on the way war and religion interact: “The beer was passed around, we drank each other’s healths, then toasted absent friends, pictured for a few brief seconds the homeland … kindness and love, goodwill towards all men, returned with some dissatisfaction to our present surroundings, shook ourselves straight, and proceeded to gather what of fun we could from war on the birthday of the Prince of Peace.”
Philip Pendered
Tonbridge, Kent

Independent:

Great article by Howard Jacobson (27 December), and I share the same angst. I too have been conned, at Victoria railway station in London, by a seemingly very distressed, well-dressed lady who said she lived in Belgravia and had got locked out of her home.

If I had refused I would still be wondering two years later if I should have given her the money. I now know she was a con, as she did not return the money to my office address the next day, and the phone number and address she gave me did not exist – she was very clever.

But now I often give blunt refusals when asked for help as the embarrassment of being conned floods back. What to do?

Jenny Sykes
Upminster, Essex

 

Women on the front line

The opening of further frontline combat roles to women in the British Army is a welcome step forward against arbitrary discrimination.

The load which can be backpacked varies greatly from man to man and from woman to woman. Numerous conflicts have demonstrated that even a relatively low limit does not necessarily render a person militarily ineffective.

Mixing within the infantry may even have some impact on a culture of chauvinism which can make it difficult for ex-soldiers to reintegrate within modern civilian social and family life.

It is not unreasonable, however, to wonder what would happen if and when we again need mass mobilisation or even conscription; that is something which can be dismissed as impossible only until it actually happens.

Would this new option for the few then become an obligation for the many? Or will we be pushed back into gender stereotypes, with women again singing “We don’t want to lose you, but we think you ought to go”?

Some of the greatest progress towards gender equality was made in response to women’s contributions in each of two world wars; wars in which the burden of being killed or maimed in action continued to fall, overwhelmingly, upon men.

How long a period of equality would it take before men will no longer accept this as their natural lot?

John Riseley
Harrogate,  North Yorkshire

 

Is Emin’s ‘Bed’ just a bed?

A couple of years ago, in a gallery in Margate, I saw an indifferent black-and-white photo going for about £70. Next to it was an exact reproduction of the same photograph, signed on the border in marker pen by Tracey Emin (though it wasn’t taken by her); that was going for £1,500.

Should I worry about the suggestion that her My Bed might not be the original bed that she occupied?

Surely what’s important with such marketed artists is not the concept (we’ve known for some time that anything can be art), nor the skill involved (hmm!), nor the workmanship, (somebody else’s), but the connection to celebrity the piece affords. It’s like watching the Kardashians – you wonder why people pay to do it, but they do!

Rather than generate editorials like yours of 29 December, however tongue-in-cheek, we should be allowed quietly to enjoy the fact that someone would fork-out £2.55m for this bed, however authentic, or not. I’m sure Tracey laughs all the way to the bank.

In the meantime, I console myself with the fact that I have four possible Emin copies in my house – two of them doubles!

Robert Carlin
London W10

 

A way to repair the housing market

Although Philip Goldenberg (letter, 26 December) makes a good point that adding more bands to the current council tax system would be far simpler and more effective than Labour’s proposed mansion tax, neither will do anything to improve our dysfunctional housing market.

The central issue is how to increase supply in line with demand. This can best be addressed by introducing a land value tax (LVT) which would give those holding land with planning permission the choice of paying the tax (and thereby increasing government revenues) or increasing the supply of housing (and thereby reducing price inflation).

Only a government in league with large landowners and developers would see this as a bad idea.

Geoffrey Payne
London W5

 

When she was Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher put a lot of energy into enabling and persuading tenants to become home-owners. David Cameron has put that policy into reverse, making it almost impossible for workers to buy.

His government has built too few houses, forcing up prices and enabling private landlords to make fortunes through high rents. Many of the few new houses are being bought by foreigners and massive numbers of houses that are available for sale are being bought by the rich (or those with access to loans) in order to cash in on the vast difference between the returns on rents and alternative financial options.

House prices are beyond the reach of all but the highest paid; even those with good earnings are finding that the high rent levels are preventing them for saving enough for a deposit.

Not only is the Government destroying the prospect of so many buying their own home, it is impeding the recovery of the economy by allowing a vast proportion of earnings to be diverted from trade to private landlords.

A B Crews
Beckenham, Kent

 

Sex pests put to flight

I agree with Jennifer Towland (letter, 29 December) that Nigel Glover’s polite daughters need to toughen up their response to loutish males. Such men rely on a timid female reaction, and one way to discomfit them is to retaliate in kind.

To rude personal remarks, ignore the face and scrutinise the crotch, as if studying (inferior) goods for sale, then accompany various negative gestures – head-shaking, dismissive hand-flapping – with a loud “No chance. Not a hope.” I have seen apparently confident older men withdraw hastily from such treatment.

S Lawton
Kirtlington, Oxfordshire

 

Long-distance Morris dance

So the Chanctonbury Ring Morris Men came to visit us in Washington, Tyne and Wear (“A costume drama that rings a bell”, 27 December)?

It would have been nice of them to come so far for our entertainment, but I think it more likely they were at Washington near Steyning, West Sussex.

Jack Hale
Gateshead, Tyne and Wear

 

Why were rail passengers left stranded?

Your editorial of 29 December suggests that rail maintenance should not happen at Christmas, but you don’t suggest an alternative. Do you think it should be done during the working week, inconveniencing thousands of workers?

The real scandal of Saturday’s closure of King’s Cross station was the failure to suggest alternatives. People for Yorkshire and farther north should have been told to go to St Pancras and change at Derby. Only local passengers needed to go to Finsbury Park.

Network Rail needs to explain the lack of advice not the need to do repairs.

Rob Edwards
Harrogate, North Yorkshire

 

Your correspondent Francis Roads (letter, 29 December) wonders why East Coast Trains (EC) didn’t divert some of their trains via Cambridge to Tottenham to relieve the pressure at Finsbury Park. There are four reasons why this didn’t happen.

First, most of EC’s trains are electric, and the line from Peterborough to Ely has no overhead wires. EC has no diesel locos of its own, so would have had to hire one from a rail freight company (something not necessary under British Rail).

Second, it’s doubtful whether any of EC’s drivers have the required route knowledge, so EC would have had to hire a pilotman.

One consequence of privatisation has been that drivers now have much narrower route knowledge than was the case with BR, so there are many fewer diversions over alternative routes. Privatisation has made the rail system much less flexible.

Third, at least going to Finsbury Park the trains were on their normal train paths, but going via Cambridge they would have had to fit in with the normal services to Stansted airport and Liverpool Street, and would have disrupted those services.

Fourth, what would have happened to the East Coast trains when they got to Tottenham – back to Edinburgh?

Ian K Watson
Carlisle

 

I was surprised to read your editorial on the problems at King’s Cross and Paddington. Surely you are aware that Network Rail is a nationalised concern in all but name. Therefore government ministers have overall responsibilities for these problems – not that they will be in any hurry to admit this!

Simon Bryant
Stockport

Times:

We urgently need to address the causes of drug and equipment errors which kill or harm patients

Sir, Whether addressing the causes of drug or equipment errors which kill or harm patients (report, Dec 24), or road and aviation accidents, there are two principal lines of investigation. First, was the health professional, driver or pilot up to the job in performance terms; and second, was the task they were expected to undertake made overly difficult — beyond their ability to cope — because of poorly designed equipment or delivery systems?

What is known is that operator error is to blame in a high proportion of incidents, no matter the field of activity. And to try to improve performance both individually and across the board is a costly hit-and-miss affair. Professor Reid is right to focus on the need for co-operative redesign action by the NHS and its equipment and drugs suppliers; and, if necessary, the NHS should wield its considerable purchasing power.

If the NHS needs any persuasion it can look to the reduction in motor vehicle accidents that has occured largely as a result of better designed roads and safer cars.

With hospitals under pressure from increasing throughput and the consequent risk of error levels increasing, and with many patients self-administering drugs, it is of increasing importance that the operation of equipment and systems should adhere to a lowest common denominator approach, to reach a wide variety of “operatives”, if errors and deaths are to fall.

Morton Warner
Emeritus professor, University of South Wales

Sir, You suggest that the NHS has a lot to learn from airlines about avoiding unnecessary risk (“Safe as Planes”, leader, Dec 24). This is an analogy commonly used to berate NHS staff, carrying the implication that “many harms could be avoided if only the doctors and nurses were to follow sensible procedures”.

About ten years ago, when I was clinical director of the medical admissions’ unit in a medium-sized acute hospital, I was invited to a meeting organised by the Department of Health. The (then) chief medical officer lectured us on safety, taking the approach “what can we learn from the aviation industry?” The more he talked, the more it appeared that he did not know what it was like in a medical admissions’ unit, and that the things he advocated — although desirable — were totally impracticable. I was unwise enough to pursue the aviation analogy with him later. I explained that, whenever I’d been on a plane, the number of passengers was limited to the number of seats, and that the plane didn’t take off until the pilot thought it was ready to do so. I asked him if there was anything useful that the NHS could learn from this. He didn’t give an answer, and I haven’t been invited back since.

Dr John Firth
Consultant physician, Cambridge

Sir, The avoidance of unnecessary risk in hospitals must indeed be minimised. Your airline analogy is, though, perhaps unfortunate. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends that women with straightforward pregnancies should have babies at home because it is “generally safer”. But suppose you are on a flight. The intercom crackles to life and a voice says “Hello! I am Gordon Brown and I am your pilot today. I thought you would like to know that I have been fully trained except in the details of what to do if an engine fails or there is a major fuel leak. But I am pleased to say that my senior colleague, who does know how to deal with those, is waiting at the end of a telephone in case of an emergency.”

Would you happily take off? Change the words and ask yourself whether you would like your sister, wife or daughter to fly in a midwife-led unit. If we are to learn from airlines we must be consistent; the risk of an out-of-hospital birth may be small, but if the untoward occurs the result could be catastrophic.

Dr Andrew Bamji
Rye, E Sussex

Sir, The NHS is good at product innovation; adopting in new drugs and procedures, but process innovation is more challenging. It is much easier to innovate in applying new services. It is much more difficult to change practices.

By intention or oversight, the NHS practices “distraction management”, focusing on technological innovations while ignoring or neglecting the basic activity of improving the existing service — which is far more important.

Dr David Allen
Management tutor, School of Medicine, Manchester University

If we are going to point the finger, the government’s record on managing projects is a little shakey too…

Sir, We end the year as we started it, with the pot calling the kettle black. Presumably Sir Nicholas Soames’s demand for the dismissal of Network Rail senior management will also support the dismissal of all those senior civil servants who have consistently failed to bring in projects on time and under budget (“Call to sack rail chaos bosses”, Dec 29).

As for the responsibility of MPs who commission these projects, I suggest Sir Nicholas’s statement, “No other commercial organisation would set about the problem without a very clear idea of how they were going to do it, how long it would take, what it was they would use and what would be the finish time”, be a permanent poster in the cabinet room and the offices of all government ministers.

Anthony Lewis

Huntingdon, Cambs

The A303 is all very well if you want to see Stonehenge — but if it’s Cornwall you want try the M5

Sir, Why on earth would anyone want to drive from London to Cornwall using the A303, unless to enjoy the scenic route past Stonehenge (letter, Dec 27)? As a young Londoner in pre-motorway days I welcomed the construction of the A303 as a major improvement on the old A30. These days, although the way is a little longer, the M4 and M5 surely provide a far quicker route to the southwest.

Barry Richardson

Isham, Northants

Not all “key archives” are closed in Romania, as Michael Bourdeaux, of the Keston Institute, has discovered

Sir, Ben Macintyre’s article contains a welcome and long-overdue report on the political situation in Romania (“Christmas revolution has yet to run its course”, Dec 26).

However, not all “key archives” are closed. My colleague, Alina Urs, has recently been working in them and she located the file on the late Metropolitan Nicolae Corneanu (obituary, Dec 16), who betrayed his Church but later recanted the compromise he made with the Securitate. Its revelations shed devastating new light on Romanian Church history. She also found an account, written by my minder, of my visit to the Romanian Church in 1978.

Canon Dr Michael Bourdeaux

Keston Institute, Oxford

Sir, The real myth surrounding Waterloo (report, Dec 26) has nothing to do with Wellington or Blücher. The truth is that Napoleon was defeated by the Fourth Coalition led by Schwarzenberg using a strategy devised by Radetzky. This coalition won the Wars of Liberation of 1813-14, which liberated France, Germany and the Low Countries from the Corsican, who was forced to abdicate as emperor. The Congress of Vienna then settled the future shape of most of Europe by the time of Napoleon’s return. Waterloo was a postscript. If Napoleon had won, over 600,000 Austrians, Russians and others were already on their way to crush him as they had done before. So Waterloo may have drawn a line but Europe was already liberated and restructured.

Napoleon realised what had happened when he tried to commit suicide at the battle of Arcis sur l’Aube in 1814 when he was defeated by Schwarzenberg (Blücher had allowed him to escape). Unfortunately the Austrian contribution to his defeat is overlooked in Germany and Britain.
Alan Sked
Author of Radetzky: Imperial Victor and Military Genius and professor of international history, LSE

Sir, As I’m sure Professor Ferdinand von Prondzynski (letter, Dec 27) knows, Wellington only gave battle on June 18 because Blücher had promised to come to his aid.

The two had met before the battle of Ligny on June 16, and on the 17th, the day before Waterloo, Wellington told the Prussian General Gneisenau’s messengers that “he would accept a battle in the position of Mont St Jean, if the Field-Marshal [Blücher] were inclined to come to his assistance even with one corps only”.

That was the plan. In the event, of course, it was a damn close-run thing.
Richard Ellis

Tenby, Pembrokeshire

Telegraph:

The Essex Hunt gathers at Matching Green, Essex
The Essex Hunt gathers at Matching Green, Essex Photo: Andrew Parsons / i-Images

SIR – As a passionate Conservative supporter, I read with interest your article on the proposed repeal of the Hunting Act 2004 by a Conservative government.

The most important matter for this country’s economic survival is the election in May of a government with an overall Conservative majority.

The Tory party will risk losing votes by including any mention of hunting in the manifesto. There are a large number of far more important matters to address in that document that are of great concern to voters. The hunting community is prospering under the Hunting Act – the Conservatives would do well to leave this situation alone.

Christopher W Robson
Richmond, North Yorkshire

SIR – When hunting with hounds was legal, I used to attend the Boxing Day meet in Newbury Market Place, hoping that the hunt members would have a jolly good day out but that the fox would get away.

The pictures of this year’s meets suggest that, under the present law, this happy state of affairs pertains; so why don’t we just leave things as they are?

If the Conservatives are returned to power next May, they will have many more vital matters to deal with.

Roy Bailey
Hungerford, Berkshire

SIR – The media reports that a quarter of a million people turned out to support Boxing Day hunts. Providing that these are drag hunts and no animals are killed as a result, then I have no issue with people engaging in this activity. To get out in the fresh air in our countryside is something marvellous.

The Hunting Act is a workable piece of legislation. Problems only occur when it is not properly enforced. One of the main issues is hunts using trail hunting as a false alibi to avoid being prosecuted, and this needs to be addressed.

I am not for undermining rural pursuits, and do understand the excitement and spectacle of a ride across countryside. I just do not understand why this must include the slaughter of innocent wild animals for sport.

Julian Ware-Lane
Leigh-on-Sea, Essex

SIR – In the 17th century the Puritans disliked bear baiting, not because it gave pain to the bear, but because it gave pleasure to the spectators.

I believe the motivation of today’s hunting opponents is largely the same.

Silas Krendel
London NW3

SIR – Running about with tinsel wrapped round your head, jumping 6ft fences and no prospect of a pint at the end of it all: surely the horses deserve a vote next year, too.

Richard Wright
Newbury, Berkshire

Network Rail chaos

Travellers locked out of Finsbury Park station (Stefan Rousseau/PA)

SIR – Rail chaos caused by justified engineering works could be alleviated by moving the shutdown to August.

The days are longer and snow and ice would not interfere with the schedule. It is easier to tolerate alternative routes, long waits and other modes of transport in the warmer months than it is in the depths of winter. The main objection is the impact on commuters. Commuters pay the highest fares but they also enjoy the biggest taxpayer-funded subsidies. By contrast, people who only use the railways to visit loved ones over Christmas still contribute as much to a system that repeatedly lets them down at this special time of year.

A summer shutdown would be less painful and fairer.

Dr David Cottam
Dormansland, Surrey

The Assisted Dying Bill

SIR – This year significant progress has been made in the campaign to legalise assisted dying for terminally ill people.

In light of pressure from the Supreme Court, Lord Falconer’s Assisted Dying Bill unanimously passed its Second Reading in the House of Lords, and at committee stage the majority of peers engaged constructively, rather than seeking to block its progress. To that end, an amendment was agreed to include the additional safeguard of judicial oversight. If there is not enough time for the Bill to complete its stages before the general election then it is imperative that Parliament continues this important debate afterwards.

Currently one Briton a fortnight ends their life in the Dignitas clinic in Switzerland. For each person who travels abroad, 10 terminally ill people are taking their own lives in this country. The 2014 Reith lecturer, Dr Atul Gawande, has said that “we are heartless if we don’t recognise unbearable suffering and seek to alleviate it”. Most people in Britain support law change on assisted dying, and no one believes that someone should face a prison sentence of 14 years for compassionately assisting a loved one to die.

We are closer than ever to allowing dying people to have safeguarded choice in how they approach their deaths. Whoever forms the next government must allow time for Parliament to reach consensus on a safeguarded law.

Dr Aileen K Adams CBE
The Earl of Arran
Julian Barnes
Rt Hon Baroness Blackstone
Paul Blomfield MP
Jo Brand
Rosemary Brown OBE
Rt Rev & Rt Hon Lord Carey of Clifton
Sir Graeme Catto
Prof Dame Jill Macleod Clark
Dame June Clark
Lesley Close
Harriet Copperman OBE
Viscount Craigavon
Dr Jacky Davis
Rt Hon Lord Dholakia OBE
Joe Dunthorne
Sir Terence English
Barbara Follett
Anna Ford
Prof Godfrey Fowler OBE
Lady Celia Goodheart
Hugh Grant
Brenda Fricker
AC Grayling
Susan Hampshire OBE
Canon Rosie Harper
Sir Michael Holroyd CBE
Dame Elisabeth Hoodless
Eric Idle
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch
Prue Leith CBE
Bernard Lewis OBE
Lord Lipsey
Baroness Lister of Burtersett CBE
Caroline Lucas MP
Ian McEwan CBE
Prof Klim McPherson
Dr Elisabeth MacDonald
Dr Henry Marsh CBE
Lord May of Oxford OM
Baroness Meacher
Diana Melly
Sir Jonathan Miller CBE
Deborah Moggach
Sir Andrew Motion
Dr Michael O’Donnell
Rt Hon Sir Richard Ottaway MP
Sir Christopher Paine
Sophie Pandit
Lord Pannick QC
Heather Pratten
Baroness Ramsay of Cartvale
Sir Michael Rawlins
Lord Rees of Ludlow OM
Lady Kathleen Richardson OBE
Rabbi Dr Jonathan Romain MBE
Nick Ross
Rt Hon Dame Joan Ruddock MP
Ruth Silver
Sir Patrick Stewart
Dame Janet Suzman
Prof Ray Tallis
Lord Taverne
Lord Turnbull KCB CVO
Edward Turner
Frank Turner
Zoë Wannamaker CBE
Baroness Warnock DBE
Baroness Warwick of Undercliffe
Lewis Wolpert CBE
Sir Chris Woodhead
Matthew Wright
Dr Graham Winyard CBE

Secure vehicle

SIR – My late husband left everything in good order for me: lists of passwords, account numbers, and instructions on how to work the DVD player.

I had need to contact BT a few weeks ago and the lady who answered my call asked for the name of my first car as a security check. All at once the internet no longer knows me, and hours have been spent on the phone trying to crack the code. Of course it was his car, not mine, when the account was set up.

Should anyone remember Christopher Barlow at Sussex University in 1963 and recall his car, I would be hugely grateful. It’s eight digits, so the clapped-out Mini isn’t the answer.

Sarah Barlow
Newport, Pembrokeshire

Long-distance call

SIR – On a ferry six miles off the Norwegian coast close to the Russian border, I was able to receive an excellent 4G signal (Letters, December 26) from the local telecoms provider.

Chas Hockin
Reading, Berkshire

Thatcher’s achievement

Margaret Thatcher in 1987, waving to supporters from Conservative Party headquarters (AP)

SIR – Philip Duly (Letters, December 27) observes that in Margaret Thatcher’s historic second successive general election victory, her share of votes cast actually declined. So what? More important, her vote increased and she won, which was the objective.

If there are three or more substantial parties, it is more difficult for any one of them to secure more than 50 per cent. Margaret Thatcher’s achievement was that having secured 13,698,000 votes in 1979 and 13,012,000 in 1983, she increased her vote to 13,763,000 at her third successive victory in 1987. The contrast with the record of Tony Blair (“The Master”) is marked. His vote fell from 13.5 million in 1997 to 10.7 million in 2001 and then to just 9.5 million in 2005.

If David Cameron could command the level of support achieved by Margaret Thatcher, he would have no need to worry about percentages. He would win.

Lord Tebbit
London SW1

New speed cameras are essential to road safety

SIR – Your leader on December 27 expresses understandable concern that public bodies might employ digital speed cameras as “cash cows”. However, contrary to what many may feel, speed cameras are a proportionate and ethical means of dealing with speeding on our roads.

The overall number of speed cameras in this country is hardly changing at all. What is happening is that existing obsolete 35mm wet film cameras are being replaced by digital cameras, which operate more efficiently. It is worth repeating that speed cameras are only ever installed at collision hotspots, where there is a clear history of speed-related personal injury collisions over several years.

There is a national requirement that all speed cameras are painted yellow and are sited where they are clearly visible to motorists. People who speed through camera sites are not concentrating on the road or the local speed limit. The camera will only be activated by speeds well in excess of the local limit.

Speed really is a killer – the speed at which a vehicle is travelling largely determines the severity of any injury if an accident occurs.

Ian Kemp
Head of Metropolitan Police Traffic Criminal Justice Command 2005-13
Sutton, Surrey

SIR – The speed limit is not a target speed, but the absolute maximum allowable.

Any person who ignores this simple rule deserves to be fined.

David Burrett
Chichester, West Sussex

SIR – While exceeding a posted speed limit is deemed to be dangerous and therefore an offence, no attempt is made when an individual case comes to court to prove that exceeding the speed limit actually posed a risk to anyone.

It follows that every case that involves speeding should be prosecuted as dangerous driving.

Brian Worboys
Broomfield, Essex

My way or the fairway

SIR – Golf can never be made more interesting for spectators unless catapults and tackling are permitted (Letters, December 26).

However, the sliding tackle would need to be banned in order to protect the putting surface.

Philip Saunders
Bungay, Suffolk

The downtrodden Khans have the last laugh

Yes they Khan: Shobu Kapoor and Adil Ray star as the put-upon couple (BBC)

SIR – I was disappointed to read Rowan Pelling’s comments concerning the BBC comedy Citizen Khan. This light-hearted show does much to break down barriers. The timing is excellent, particularly that of Shobu Kapoor as Mrs Khan.

One does not have to inhabit a particular world to find a sitcom amusing. I enjoyed Dad’s Army and Porridge, and both were alien worlds to me. Just because I live in north Surrey it does not mean that the only comedy I can enjoy is Outnumbered, good though it may be. I was rooting for the downtrodden but proud Khans from episode one.

Linda Davis
Chessington, Surrey

Days ahead

SIR – In my twenties I would party all night long, and in my thirties we went to supper parties. When in my forties, dinner parties were enjoyed, and in my fifties I appreciated a long lunch with friends. Now in my sixties I have discovered the joy of a good breakfast out.

Can anyone tell me what comes next?

Squadron Leader T J W Leyland (retd)
London SW1

A fresh look

SIR – May I suggest that anyone who needs to shed a few pounds after Christmas acquires reading glasses.

The hours spent walking through the house trying to find them will see the excess weight fall away effortlessly.

Claire McCombie
Woodbridge, Suffolk

Globe and Mail:

DAVE SAWYER

Why Stephen Harper will move the climate needle in 2015

Irish Times:

Sir, – Rosita Boland (“Is a school sleepout the best way to raise awareness of homelessness?”, Opinion, December 23rd) makes some excellent points about the effectiveness of, as opposed to the sentiment behind, the annual “sleepout” by students in Dublin every Christmas. Perhaps it would be better if each student invited a homeless person to stay in their parents’ home for Christmas week, providing integration with a real family and taking pressure off health and social services at a critical time. – Yours, etc,

JUDITH GOLDBERGER,

Donnybrook, Dublin 4.

Sir, – The Belvedere College sleepout raises an extraordinary amount of money for a wonderful cause, and I have great admiration for the lads who choose to give up their time over the Christmas holidays to sleep out in the cold and the rain. It’s fully acknowledged, I think, that obviously the two days are in no way a comparison to the struggles of those sleeping rough in Dublin all through winter, and indeed, all year round. However, there is a huge problem with the dehumanisation of homeless people and what the lads do every year makes people think. I know that I personally was struck by my sympathy towards the students who had another night to go before heading home, and my instant realisation that there are people sleeping rough who don’t have that refuge to go to. I always considered myself aware of the plight of rough sleepers particularly in Dublin, but I (and all of us) can definitely use a change in perspective once in a while.

These guys choose to provide that change in perspective and help change the problematic view Irish society has of the homeless while raising money to improve facilities that will be extremely useful and are desperately needed.

For that, I think they deserve recognition, not criticism. – Yours, etc,

ELLA McLOUGHLIN,

Dublin 6.

Sir, – In reviewing the recent conflict between Israel and Hamas, Lara Marlowe leaves out some very obvious points that highlight Hamas’s culpability in starting and prolonging the conflict (“How the Gaza war changed perceptions”, December 27th). There was no mention of rockets that were continuously fired at Israel before the conflict escalated and continue to be fired to this day, contrary to the assertion that there was a 19-month ceasefire by Hamas. No mention of the well-documented tunnels that had been dug into Israel with the aim of capturing and/or killing Israelis. Hamas could have built schools and hospitals but they chose to use what building materials they had to foment yet more terror. Seemingly Ms Marlowe does see the connection between Israel stopping building material and the use to which they are put in Gaza.

Ms Marlowe omits to mention that there were several Egyptian-brokered ceasefire proposals which Israel, and even the Arab League, agreed to and Hamas refused. She also omits to mention that Egypt closed the Rafah crossing and any aid that got through came through the Israeli side. Even the Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas is on record in blaming Hamas for the slaughter.Israel draws enough short straws in the Irish media without pieces like this. – Yours, etc,

PAUL WILLIAMS,

Kilkee, Co Clare.

Sir, – It is interesting to note that while the Tánaiste urges USC assistance for the old, officials in the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform argue for cuts in State pensions (“Cuts to State pension must be considered, review finds”, December 29th).

State pensions are probably the only model of pension that will endure – the payment of entitlements from current expenditure rather than from funds built on years of growth in growing economies.

The penny or cent appears not to have dropped yet; economic growth on the scale needed to furnish lavish or even moderate pension funds is over. The world has reached a level of productive ability, including goods and services, which renders further substantial growth unnecessary and impossible. We have been extraordinarily successful in reaching an era of sufficiency; instead of growth we need planned restraint of our extraordinary unprecedented ability to produce made possible by the advent of computerisation.

Pension funds depend on market investment and substantial growth. Although at the moment markets appear to forge ahead they are built on very fragile foundations and virtual values that have little to do with tangible provision of goods and services for the world. If they collapse, as many reputable US economists predict, pension carnage will be horrendous.

This should not be a pessimistic outlook, however, as real wealth, which is the ability to provide goods and services and a good life in abundance for all, was never more powerful, secure or in better shape. There is more wealth created in the present world than at any previous time – more than adequate to give everybody, including the greedy, a decent share. The methods of distribution through employment and entitlements must, however, be reconstituted. It is impossible to manage economics of sufficiency and automation with an ideology of continual growth and working hard. If we persist there will be enormous casualties, with pensions one of the first. – Yours, etc,

PADRAIC NEARY,

Tubbercurry,

Co Sligo.

Sir, – Paddy Agnew reports from Rome on how important the “Francis Show” has become during 2014 and speculates that the Department of Foreign Affairs in Dublin might have reopened its embassy because it wants to be in on “one of the most fascinating shows not just in town but on the planet” (“Year of the Pope: No wonder Iveagh House wanted to get back in on the action”, December 27th).

Another reason why the Department of Foreign Affairs might want to get back on the Popemobile, Mr Agnew suggests, is because under Emma Madigan, the new Ambassador to the Holy See, “Ireland is far more likely to make common ground with Francis on issues such as combating poverty, reducing hunger and promoting sustainable development than it is on same-sex marriage, divorce and family planning”.

But do these reasons justify the expense of reopening an embassy to the Holy See in Rome? The Vatican, whose population consists primarily of celibate men, contributes little to Irish trade.

Are we keeping a house and staff in Rome for the sake of taking part in a “show”?

As for combating poverty, reducing hunger and promoting sustainable development, are we not doing so already, and might we not do so even better without the burden of running this unprofitable and unnecessary embassy?

What is hardest to understand is why the Irish people, many of whom have been hurt by the behaviour of this State’s officials, were not consulted in regard to the reopening of this embassy.

The embassy was closed once without any ill-effects to our nation. It can be closed again. Let’s not miss the opportunity. – Yours, etc,

DECLAN KELLY,

Rathfarnham,

Sir, – I am delighted to see an Irish internet service provider offer content filtering for Irish families (“UPC to enable blocking of internet content from March”, Mark Hilliard, December 27th).

Only the most technically aware Irish parent will be capable of adequately filtering all the internet access devices in the typical home. It requires skills across multiple technology platforms, pitting wits against the urges and skills of curious teenagers. Network-level filtering is the only effective tool to protect Irish children from disturbing and inappropriate content.

I look forward to more service providers following suit as soon as possible. – Yours, etc,

ULRIC KENNY,

Foxrock,

Dublin 18.

A chara, – I’ve been finding it a struggle to deal with the prize bond company’s requirements for payment of two cheques issued to my father. He died many years ago but the bonds were still in his name. On behalf of my mother, I did the necessary last August to show that she was the rightful inheritor, providing a copy of the death certificate and will, etc.

Now the company has asked for photo ID, proof of her PPS number and address. The latter was easy enough to provide, but she has no current photo ID and I have had to use my archaeological skills to go through the domestic disarray to find an official letter addressed to her that had her PPS number on it. I found one from 2009.

To substitute for lack of photo ID, the company asked my mother to write a letter saying that she has no photo ID!

The other two documents had to be certified copies, so I had to take the originals and the copies to the post office to have them certified. So, after several phone calls and exchanges of correspondence, the paperwork is done, and I await developments.

It takes all the fun out of winning a few bob. –Is mise,

AUDREY MacCREADY,

Artane, Dublin 5.

Sir, – You were right. I can confirm that fairies were indeed responsible for decorating the Christmas tree along the Sally Gap in Co Wicklow (“There’s every chance it was the fairies”, December 24th).

A total of 10 hardy biking fairies, with baubles adorning their wings, made the arduous journey from Dublin to a lonely tree along the Military Road. A support team met them at the top with mulled wine and good cheer. If you zoom in on the photo, you’ll see the names of all the people who donated money to the No Bucks Homeless Outreach Bus, an umbrella project established by the Tiglin Rehab Centre. Parked on Marlborough Street in Dublin every Thursday evening, volunteers offer tea, food, warmth and chat to those needing it. A total of €750 (and counting!) was raised on the Bikes and Baubles Cycle challenge. – Yours, etc,

CHARLOTTE BISHOP,

EMILY ARCHER,

Newtownmountkennedy,

Co Wicklow.

Sir, – Contrary to what is asserted in Michael J Donnelly’s letter (December 27th), there had been reform in Northern Ireland under Terence O’Neill prior to 1968.

From the very start of his premiership, O’Neill embarked on a modernisation programme – encouraging industrial investment, implementing infrastructural development and creating a second university in Northern Ireland. He also sought to bridge the sectarian divide, and he set out his objectives in this regard in an important speech at the Corrymeela Centre in Ballycastle in 1966. His government recognised the Northern Ireland Committee of the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, and the Nationalist Party became the official opposition in Stormont.

Most important of all were his meetings with Lemass in 1965, and with Jack Lynch in 1967 and 1968.

With hindsight, these may appear to represent modest progress.

They did not, however, seem so modest at the time and they raised expectations within the nationalist community and provoked a backlash from some elements of the unionist community.

This fuelled the atmosphere that gave rise to the civil rights movement, an unmistakeable instance of a “revolution of rising expectations”. – Yours, etc,

FELIX M LARKIN,

Cabinteely,

Dublin 18.

Sir, – The caption under a photograph in your online edition (“Abbey Theatre celebrates rich 110-year history in 110 moments”, December 27th) credits the Abbey Theatre with “the Irish premiere” of Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot in 1969 when in fact it had been produced at the Pike in 1955, where it ran for six months followed by a 10-week national tour and a later transfer to the Gate.

The recent television documentary on Brendan Behan failed to mention the first production of The Quare Fellow at the Pike in 1954, giving the erroneous impression that it was first staged by Joan Littlewood in London in 1956.

Alan Simpson directed both first Irish productions. – Yours, etc,

CHRISTOPHER

FITZ-SIMON,

Dún Laoghaire,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – After those passionate 15 indictments of the curia by Pope Francis (“Francis’s broadside leaves Roman curia shocked and awed”, December 23rd), will the curia go into confessional mode or plotting mode? – Yours, etc,

MICHAEL McCAFFERTY,

Derry

Sir, – Driving home on Christmas Night I happened upon a pedestrian, clearly the worse for wear, with no form of illumination, walking on a rural road and wearing dark clothing. This man was clearly a danger to himself and other road users. If an amendment to the Road Traffic Act were enacted that would see pedestrians on thoroughfares fined for not using a flashlight and florescent vest, it would go a long way to solve this worrisome problem. – Yours, etc,

DÓNAL CASEY,

Ballyheigue,

Co Kerry

Irish Independent:

Enda Kenny

Enda Kenny

Dublin Airport seemed so festive and seasonal before Christmas, when I collected two of the children who returned to spend it at home. Now, having waved them off again, it seems cold and forlorn. I know the Government is trying, but hundreds of thousands of our brightest and best have left. And will not be able to return, except for a few fleeting days. It’s time to do away with the nonsense of this being “the best little country in the world to do business” and other glib phrases from the “we are where we are” glossary.

This will not, nor can it be, a great country until we can offer jobs and homes to our young. Until they can earn a living wage without being hammered by punitive taxes that make it virtually impossible to have any reasonable standard of living.

The Taoiseach must surely realise that we have given enough. Sacrificing our children to give vulture capitalists their pound of flesh was never part of the plan.

Once upon a time there was a vision for Europe – and we felt part of it. But it is now abundantly clear that the bigger countries, led by Germany, set the agenda. The little guy must carry the hod and take the whipping at his master’s whim. Brussels or Frankfurt can promise and beguile but, make no mistake, we have been thrown to the wolves.

Both Mr Kenny and Minister for Finance Michael Noonan bought into the fiction that we would get retrospective help with our bank debt and that the people who obediently bore the biggest transfer of private debt to public citizens in the history of economics would eventually get a fair deal. Well, we have been had. Unless you do something about it Mr Kenny, you will pay dearly. So, are you prepared to fight for what was promised to us? Or would you prefer to bear the political price for being part of the problem?

E Toal

Co Galway

 

A message of light and hope

The longevity of the written word can be seen in the 1897 letter by American journalist Francis P Church in ‘The New York Sun’. In response to a child’s query “Is there really a Santa Claus?” he replied: “Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus. He exists as certainly as love and generosity and devotion exist…”

Many newspapers have printed it in full every Christmas for over 100 hundred years. More than 30 years before he penned that editorial Mr Church reported on the American Civil War. His experiences had not hardened him, and his warm-hearted letter stands the test of time.

There was an event in Dublin’s Christ Church Cathedral at Christmas to promote wellness for people. It is estimated that 450,000 people in Ireland experience depression in some form.

At the event a similarly nice letter from British actor Stephen Fry to a fan, Crystal Nunn, was read. Here are extracts from that 2006 letter.

“Dear Crystal,

“I am so sorry to hear that life is getting you down at the moment. Goodness knows, it can be so tough when nothing seems to fit and little seems fulfilling. I’m not sure there’s any specific advice I can give that will help bring life back its savour. Although they mean well, it’s sometimes quite galling to be reminded how much people love you, when you don’t love yourself that much.

“I’ve found that it’s of some help to think of one’s moods and feelings about the world as being similar to weather. Here are some obvious things about the weather: It’s real. You can’t change it by wishing it away. If it’s dark and rainy, it really is dark and rainy and you can’t alter it. It might be dark and rainy for two weeks in a row. BUT it will be sunny one day. It isn’t under one’s control as to when the sun comes out, but come out it will. One day.

“It really is the same with one’s moods I think… BUT they will pass, they really will.

“I don’t know if any of that is any use: It may not seem it, and if so, I’m sorry. I’d just thought I’d drop you a line to wish you well in your search to find a little more pleasure and purpose in life.

Very best wishes,

Stephen Fry.

I read Tommy Roddy’s Irish Independent’s Letter of the Day for December 27, 2014. Titled ‘Sharing my feeling of peace with all mankind’ it too was on the theme of sharing hope and goodwill to others. I’d like to wish Tommy and readers best wishes for the New Year.

Mary Sullivan

Cork

 

Imaginative thinking required

As the year ends I feel a certain elation; satisfaction that at last the message of changed economics is beginning to dawn on the elite of economic thinking.

For almost seven years I have written many times to this newspaper expressing the view that we misunderstand and are taking an entirely wrong approach to the great economic crisis of the early 21st century. I note, however, that David McWiliams is moving slightly towards my point of view; he has begun to mention “technology” in his recent economic columns. I put forward the theory that this is not a time of “recession”; it is, in fact, the best economic time ever experienced.

We are living through the greatest economic transformation the human race has ever experienced and the essential pillars of economic ideology have been changed forever.

On that basis, I suggest that instead of seeking “growth” (increasing production) and “recovery” the world must adapt to and restrain unprecedented ability to produce and deliver practically everything (goods and services) in great abundance, rendering “growth” unnecessary and impossible.

The power of modern technology is awesome. In the last two decades or so it has utterly transformed the whole economic situation.

Society, indeed civilization itself, desperately needs functioning business and employment for its very survival. We should thank our lucky stars for existing in such wonderful times. Rather than persisting with outdated, inappropriate economic ideology we should embrace our good fortune, adapt to much improved times and get on with living far better lives than our ancestors ever thought possible.

Happy New Year – and, with some imaginative economic thinking, it most certainly could be.

Padraic Neary

Tubbercurry, Co Sligo

 

No life after debt

Dear Mr Kenny as our current leader, and loyal subject of the EU and the European banks, I want you to know the effect your lack of resolve is having on me.

If only you were more interested in caring for the people of this nation than you are in caring for the balance sheets of some German banks and the investment gamblers, I’d be off doing something else.

To put things in the right context, I’ll tell you a little about myself first. I am not unemployed. I am not a mortgage holder. I am not a father to a young family. I am not disabled. I am not rich. I am not one of your quango buddies. I am not and never was one of your supporters.

Sounds pretty good so far, right? It gets better. Here’s what I am. I am working full time. I am earning (before tax) between 40k and 45k per annum. I am living cheap (I cycle to work. I bring my lunch to work. I don’t eat out a lot or go to the cinema every other night. ). I am, in spite of all of that, broke.

Most months I finish up just getting by or a little into my overdraft. This is not right. I am now making more money than I every have previously, but I come out with less. I now have the job I want, but it’s not doing any more for me than the job I had washing pots on minimum wage. “Why?” you might ask.

Well, the reasons are simple. When I should be in a very comfortable situation, with a good lifestyle and the ability to grow some savings, I am instead taxed to the hilt. I am left with no money after I pay for only my essentials and it’s to pay off someone else’s debt. Not my debt, Enda. I don’t have any debt.

Alan Morton

Address with Editor

Irish Independent


Better

$
0
0

31 December 2014 Better

Mary a bit better not keen on the Tesco mussels.

Mary’s much better today, breakfast weight up underdone pheasant for tea.

Obituary:

Luise Rainer and William Powell in 'The Great Ziegfeld' (1936)
Luise Rainer and William Powell in ‘The Great Ziegfeld’ (1936) Photo: REX

Luise Rainer, who has died aged 104, won Oscars for Best Actress in successive years, in 1936 and 1937, the first ever to do so, but six years later quit Hollywood in a huff and did not make another film for 54 years.

A tough negotiator with a reputation for being “difficult”, she made many enemies in the film industry. She scorned the saccharine parts in which MGM regularly cast her and would have no truck with studio boss Louis B Mayer’s preferred method of contract discussion — seated on his knee. She did not fit in pre-war Hollywood and made only eight movies there. When she left no tears were shed.

She was an ultra-emotional actress, a high priestess of the cult of smiling through tears. She won her first Academy Award for her virtuoso performance in The Great Ziegfeld (1936) as the impresario Florenz Ziegfeld’s first wife, Anna Held. The part was small and in later years would doubtless have been considered a supporting role. Mayer tried to dissuade her from appearing in it, but she insisted that there was one scene that she could turn into something memorable.

This was the so-called “telephone scene”, in which Anna congratulates Ziegfeld on his second marriage to Billie Burke, concealing her own misery behind a pose of jaunty insouciance. Only when she hangs up do the tears finally break through. Rainer claimed she wrote it herself, drawing on Cocteau’s La Voix Humaine.

The scene might have ended up on the cutting-room floor. When the finished film ran for four hours, Mayer’s first thought was to throw out a sequence that he considered was delaying the entry of the dancing girls. But the producer, Hunt Stromberg, argued strongly in its favour and, for once, Mayer was persuaded to change his mind.

Nobody expected her to take the Oscar, but, not for the first or last time, members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences let their hearts rule their heads. They did it again in 1937, when she was named Best Actress for her performance as a long-suffering Chinese peasant in The Good Earth (she would later use the statuette as a doorstop).

It was regarded as evidence of a remarkable range. Yet she never looked or sounded Chinese. She registered as what she was — a winsome European with saucer eyes, a moon face and an air of infinite endurance. Those whose hearts she touched melted in sympathy; others were content to dub her “the Viennese teardrop”. In fact, however, this was a misconception. She had been born in Germany, but as war in Europe grew ever more likely in the 1930s, MGM chose to soft-pedal her German birth and promote her as Austrian.

Luise Rainer in ‘The Good Earth’ (1937) (ALAMY)

MGM never found another movie that Luise Rainer considered worthy of her talents. And in this conviction she was egged on by her first husband, the playwright Clifford Odets, with whom she shared a stormy three-year marriage from 1937 to 1940.

Jealous of her career and friendships, he exercised a baleful influence on her, encouraging her self-destructive instincts. Without him she might have reached an accommodation with Hollywood instead of flouncing off into premature delusions of grandeur. Nearly eight decades later, her second Oscar-winning performance in The Good Earth has lasted less well than that of her defeated rival, Greta Garbo, in Camille.

Luise Rainer was a gifted actress with a limited range, but let nobody underestimate her charms. In youth she had features to make even the most hard-boiled tremble. Unfortunately, she became known too soon for a sense of her own importance, which her career had yet to confirm.

Luise Rainer, circa 1937 (GETTY)

It stayed with her all her days. In later life, in semi-retirement in London, she embarked on her memoirs, taking 200 pages to deal with her first 22 years — at the end of which she was still a starlet in the inter-war German cinema. To compile her magnum opus (later abandoned), Luise Rainer kept extensive records of everything that might eventually be relevant, including a master file headed “Persons who have corresponded with Luise Rainer”. They ranged from George Gershwin to Bertolt Brecht, Luchino Visconti to Tennessee Williams.

She insisted that talent, even if left fallow for many years, does not disappear. And in a sense she was right. When, in 1997, she was persuaded to come out of cinematic retirement and appear in a movie once more – Karoly Makk’s The Gambler, based on a story by Dostoevsky – she proved every bit the professional and the grande dame of yore. Aged 85 and portraying an old Russian aristocrat obsessed by gambling, she used every wrinkle, every dart of the eye, to bring the character to life and dominate the screen in the few scenes in which she appeared. By modern standards it was an over-the-top performance, but a jaw-dropping demonstration of what had once passed for great acting.

She was born, as she later admitted, not in Vienna but in Düsseldorf on January 12 1910 and brought up in Hamburg. Her background was well-to-do. Her father ran an import-export business in oil and soya beans and travelled extensively. During her childhood Luise Rainer changed school eight times.

While in Dallas, her father took American citizenship, which was later to save his life. Married to a Jew, he was arrested early in the war and sent to a concentration camp. Only the fact that he was technically an American secured his release. His daughter, by then a big Hollywood star, was given the status of honorary Aryan, but she still featured in the Encyclopaedia Judaica, the Nazi list of prominent Jewish artists.

Luise Rainer (left) in a scene from ‘Escapade’ (1935) (GETTY)

Luise’s father exercised a firm control over the family and disapproved strongly of her desire to become an actress – regarding it as tantamount to prostitution, he threw her out of the house, she claimed, when she was only 16 and she was forced to beg for apples and eggs. Corroborative evidence, however, has never been found, and much of her early history was recorded from interviews in her eighties at the time of her screen “comeback”.

Expelled from her father’s house, she went to live with her grandparents and presented herself at the Louise Dumont Theatre in Düsseldorf, asking for a job for the next season. This is how she liked to recall it: she was granted an audition, played a scene from Schiller’s Joan of Arc, was immediately signed up, and within months was starring in Frank Wedekind’s notorious sexual melodrama Spring Awakening.

In this part she was so striking that the great Max Reinhardt summoned her to Vienna, where she appeared in plays by Pirandello, Shakespeare and others. As she told it, it was like a fairy tale, and a carefully shaped one. She scored a big hit, too, with the playwright Ernst Toller, who was much smitten by her charms. Alas, he was but one of many. “Toller was nothing to me but a man,” she admitted. “I was in my teens and his fame didn’t mean anything to me. But I had no room for him because there were so many other men in love with me at the time.”

One of them, apparently, was especially gallant. When an MGM talent scout spotted her in Vienna and invited her for a screen test in London, she packed two left shoes in haste and did not discover the error until she was already halfway across the Channel. Since she was too poor to replace it, and would not accept a gift from strangers, a besotted Dutchman sailed straight back, retrieved the missing shoe and presented it to her in a basket. Cinderella could have asked for no more.

Between 1930 and 1933 she had appeared in a few German films, beginning with a short, Ja, der Himmel über Wien in 1930, followed by Sehnsuch, 202 (1932) and Heut’ kommt’s drauf an (1933), a musical with Hans Albers about a jazz contest. Her screen career took off, however, when she signed with MGM and transferred to Hollywood.

Her first American film, Escapade (1935), opposite William Powell, was a remake of an Austrian production, Maskerade, but was considered too slavish an imitation and was not successful. She got the part only when Myrna Loy, who was to have starred, pulled out. At first, Louis B Mayer was reluctant to give her star billing; but he eventually agreed under pressure from William Powell, an immensely popular actor with considerable clout at the time.

Escapade was followed by her two Oscar-winning roles . But thereafter MGM was at a loss to know how to cast her. Guessing that the Powell/Rainer combination was what the public wanted to see, it rushed them into a romantic spy melodrama, The Emperor’s Candlesticks, in 1937, but it proved a miscalculation. No better was Big City (her third film of 1937), in which she was the long-suffering wife of Spencer Tracy’s New York cabbie.

Luise Rainer and Spencer Tracy in ‘Big City’ (1937) (GETTY)

In 1938 Luise Rainer made three more films, of which only The Great Waltz – a fictionalised account of the life of Johann Strauss – suited her talents. She played Strauss’s dewy-eyed wife who loses him to a glamorous diva, played by Miliza Korjus (“rhymes with gorgeous”, as contemporary trailers had it). A cream cake of a movie, it was Luise Rainer’s only film to approach the ultra-sweet charm of The Great Ziegfeld.

Also in that year, she was miscast as a Southern belle in The Toy Wife, with Melvyn Douglas, and appeared in Dramatic School. After that she was granted six months’ leave of absence to try to patch up her failing marriage to Clifford Odets. There were rumours of early retirement, and MGM did not renew her contract.

In 1939 she appeared on the stage — first in London with a production of Behold the Bride, then on Broadway in a revival of A Kiss for Cinderella, which flopped. She returned to Hollywood, but no studio was interested in an MGM cast-off. It took her until 1943 to win another part, this time for Paramount, in Hostages. But it proved just another Resistance story that sank at the box office. After that, she dropped out of movies until 1997, except for a 28-minute short in 1988 made especially for video. Called A Dancer, it was a dramatic piece in which she played a dance teacher reunited with a lover she had not seen for 30 years.

Luise Rainer at her home in London in 1997 (REX)

Luise Rainer did not formally retire, but lived largely in seclusion in London with her second husband, Robert Knittel, a publisher with Jonathan Cape who later became editorial director for Collins. She made few professional appearances in London, turning up unexpectedly in two television productions in 1950, By Candlelight and The Seagull, and later in a BBC television play, The Stone Face. In 1978 an exhibition of her paintings was held at the Seale Gallery.

Sporadically she returned to the stage, achieving notable successes in 1952 in New York with The Lady from the Sea and in 1960 in Vienna with a revival of The Little Foxes. In 1981 and 1983 she scored a personal triumph with a one-woman touring performance of Tennyson’s 900-line poem Enoch Arden.

Luise Rainer’s life was so colourful it was sometimes hard to tell where reality ended and fable began. A casual meeting with Albert Einstein on Long Island Sound allegedly drove her jealous first husband Odets to snip the physicist’s face out of a photograph.

She also claimed that Brecht wrote The Caucasian Chalk Circle expressly for her but she turned it down; and when Federico Fellini pressed her to take a cameo role in La Dolce Vita in 1960, she turned him down, too, because he insisted that she must play a sex scene with Marcello Mastroianni.

Luise Rainer’s second husband Robert Knittel, with whom she had a daughter, died in 1989. For the last 25 years she had lived in relative seclusion in an elegant flat in Belgravia.

Luise Rainer, born January 12 1910, died December 30 2014

Guardian:

primary school children in running race
‘Children under six meant to be hyperactive! In the sense that they should be running around pretty much 12 hours a day.’ Photograph: Angela Hampton Picture Library/Alamy

Educational psychologists’ alarm about the over-prescribing of hyperactivity drugs to very young children (Report, 22 December) is welcome. But the underlying question remains: how it is that a “disorder” which scarcely existed in the UK in the 1980s, though widespread in the US, is apparently so prevalent that it is said to affect up to 5% of our nation’s children? Even the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines, to which your report refers, do not question that attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is a “real” brain disorder, rather than a convenient way of labelling a child who is boisterous and disruptive in class.

Ask paediatricians how often they saw children with “minimal brain dysfunction”, as ADHD was then known, in the 80s, and their answers range from one in 100 to one in 500. In the early 90s, Ritalin prescriptions were running at about 2,000 a year, although the drug had been available for years and was in massive use in the US. Today, the figure is over 600,000. Does the fault really lie inside our children’s brains, or is it a further – and dangerous – manifestation of a medicalising culture?
Steven Rose
Emeritus professor of biology (neuroscience), The Open University

• I was not surprised to read that “overstretched health workers go straight to medication rather than offering psychological interventions” to children with ADHD. Being a community paediatrician, I see the lion’s share of children who have neurodevelopmental disorders – at my clinic we see around three children under the age of six every week that are suspected to have ADHD.

Psychological interventions should always be prioritised (as per Nice guidance); however, as the burden of ADHD is grossly under-recognised and therefore underfunded, many community paediatric departments do not have a clinical psychologist in place. This makes providing psychological treatment much easier said than done.

If this postcode lottery does not end and these fragile young children fail to receive the appropriate help they so desperately need, they are, albeit unwittingly, being set on a slippery path – latest research suggests that children with undiagnosed or untreated mental health conditions are much more likely to struggle to achieve educational qualifications and are at much greater risk of committing crime, suffering alcoholism and abusing drugs later in life.

Investment in these vital support services is needed now to help guide these children to a safer future.
Dr Neel Kamal
Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

• Children under six are meant to be hyperactive! In the sense that they should be running around pretty much 12 hours a day. What they lack is opportunities for exercise, particularly outdoors. I see children being taken to and from infant school in buggies, when any normal child over 18 months should not be in a buggy at all. Too many young children are already obese; cooped up at home, in a car, or plonked in front of a TV, then won’t sleep at night.
Mary Smith
Upminster, Essex

• There is a danger of confusing the moral panic in relation to medication for ADHD with the reality of the nature of this condition. The result is to dismiss it as some sort of pseudo-scientific construct sponsored by pharmacological corporations. My own research and working practice shows, if anything, that ADHD is underdiagnosed and under-treated in at least some localities in the UK. Perhaps it would be helpful to dispense with the hyperbole and focus more on the statistical evidence regarding incidence and intervention rates.

Health and local authorities need precise information about the extent of the problem, and professionals and clinicians need actively to identify affected children and young people in order to provide adequate services. While “pills are not a substitute for skills”, the evidence clearly shows the efficacy of medication as part of a comprehensive treatment plan.

In approaching the issue I make no excuses in being biased in favour of scientific, egalitarian and humanistic values through seeking to bring some measure of objectivity to bear on the subject.
Henryk Holowenko
Deputy principal educational psychologist, London Borough of Tower Hamlets

• At YoungMinds, we have welcomed recent government announcements: the increased funding for eating disorder services; the ending of children being detained under the Mental Health Act in police cells; and the establishment of a taskforce to review children’s mental health services. However, we are deeply concerned that the announced cuts to local government funding will be a significant step backwards.

Funding for children’s mental health services comes from a variety of sources, not just the NHS. Local government plays a crucial role in many areas, especially for early intervention services, which the government itself recognises as vital in supporting children and young people, helping them before mental illness becomes entrenched. Earlier this year we revealed that almost two-thirds of councils had cut or frozen their budgets for children’s mental health services since 2010-11, with one making a cut of 94%. The 1.8% cut to local government funding is likely to further this trend.

If local government no longer has the financial capacity to support early intervention in children’s mental health services, it is essential that these services are provided elsewhere. If they are not, and early intervention services continue to be cut, we will see more children and young people needing more intensive and more expensive support for mental illness, a situation that will cost millions and cause extreme distress and pain to thousands of young people and their families across the country.
Lucie Russell
Director of campaigns, YoungMinds

• All the mental health charities you are supporting are doing excellent work, but your editorial (24 December) does not reflect the most recent thinking and practice.

The British Psychological Society’s report Understanding Psychosis and Schizophrenia, praised by your columnist Clare Allen (theguardian.com, 2 December), argues that “professionals should not insist that people accept any one particular framework of understanding, for example that their experiences are symptoms of an illness”. Diagnosis is helpful for some, but others, even those with what you describe as a “critical illness such as schizophrenia”, see their distress as an understandable response to life events and circumstances.

We all share your aim of reducing stigma and bringing mental health issues into the open. Biological views about chemical imbalances, faulty genes and so on are not only unproven but have been shown to increase fear and stigma. Avoiding uncritical use of the language of diagnosis and illness is an important step that the media can take towards changing attitudes.
Dr Lucy Johnstone
Consultant clinical psychologist, Bristol

‘I must have been ungrateful to my employers over a lifetime for not recognising that it was them, not me, who paid my PAYE,’ writes Ken Cordingley. Photograph: Cultura Creative/Alamy

Zoe Williams is quite right (Why we should all learn to love paying our taxes, 29 December). Given, as John Lanchester explains in his excellent book How to Speak Money, we have, by a process he calls “reversification”, turned the odious concept of debt into something respectable by calling it credit, why not start talking about the privilege of paying taxes rather than the burden? My father was very proud when his income rose high enough to have to pay income tax. As a teacher in the second part of last century, my income never rose high enough for me to qualify for the higher rate, but it would have been nice if it had.
Peter Wrigley
Birstall, West Yorkshire

• I am at the age when I start to benefit from the taxes I have paid over the years. I feel no guilt at receiving my pension and know that should I be ill the NHS is still there for me. I will no doubt be relying on local services for the elderly, paid for by my tax. My father said to me long ago: “Never worry about those who claim to be paying too much tax, you have to be earning the money to pay it.” I am sure there are many working long hours for low wages who wish they were wealthy enough to complain about their taxes.
David Watson
Nutley, East Sussex

• Speaking on the Today programme, Jon Moulton of Better Capital, owner of City Link, said: “City Link has paid a fortune into the exchequer on such things as PAYE.” I must have been ungrateful to my employers over a lifetime for not recognising that it was they, not I, who’d been paying my PAYE. He was not questioned about how many of the delivery personnel were self-employed and, therefore, paid no PAYE or had NI paid on their behalf. I worry about the influence the likes of Mr Moulton have on my daily life.
Ken Cordingley
Williton, Somerset

If schools taught sign language, deaf people would be less isolated. Photograph: Getty Images/Altren
If schools taught sign language, deaf people would be less isolated. Photograph: Getty Images/Altrendo

I am 17 and have recently started a campaign, Let Sign Shine, aimed at ending the isolation of the deaf in society. My aim is to get sign language taught in schools, with the same respect and importance as languages such as French and Spanish. I have started a paper and online petition to get sign language into schools and have 3,600 signatures since beginning the campaign six months ago.

My goal is to reach 10,000 signatories, so that it has a chance of being discussed in parliament. This is something that concerns me a great deal because my 11-year-old sister Laura is unable to speak: she is deaf and has verbal dyspraxia. Her only means of communication is through sign language.

Even going shopping is a major difficulty for her without the ability to talk to a cashier or sales assistant. The simple tasks of life, including going to the doctor and answering the door become impossible with this massive communication barrier.

Sign language was made an official language in 2003 but still is not taught in the majority of schools. Our society would benefit greatly if it was. It would enable a large group of people to be included in everyday life.

A bond between the deaf and hearing would be created. The mental wellbeing of the deaf would also improve, with fewer people feeling isolated. The hearing would find fulfilment in the knowledge they have gained.

I urge head teachers, governors and all others in the education system to get schools teaching sign language. I hope there is enough support for this idea to change society and end the isolation encountered by people like my sister Laura. The Let Sign Shine petition is on Facebook at www.facebook.com/letsignshine.co.uk.
Jade Chapman
Dereham, Norfolk

Why not use the old Midland mainline?

Ribblehead viaduct on the Settle and Carlisle line: worth an upgrade? Photograph: Denis Thorpe<br />
” width=”460″ height=”276″ /> <figcaption> <span class=Ribblehead viaduct on the Settle and Carlisle line: worth an upgrade? Photograph: Denis Thorpe for the Guardian

The chaos affecting both rail routes to the north of England and Scotland after Christmas only serves to underline the lack of alternative mainlines (Report, 27 December). It adds to the strange recent decision to give the Virgin-led consortium control of the east coast mainline to Scotland, when it is already running the west coast mainline, making a mockery of any idea that privatisation brings competition. To solve both of these problems, why not restart the Midland route – St Pancras to Glasgow – by bringing back the Thames-Clyde Express? The tracks are all there, and have been largely recently souped up at great expense. Suitable trains are there too – the Intercity 125s. Plus lucky travellers would traverse the incomparable Settle and Carlisle line, ridiculously under-utilised by merely local passenger services. All aboard!
Benedict le Vay (Author of Britain From the Rails)
London

• Ricky Tomlinson (Saturday interview, 27 December) says he was converted to the left by reading The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists. That book has never been out of print and has similarly influenced hundreds of thousands, including George Orwell. Will no one undertake to celebrate the centenary of its publication before the year is out?
Gerry Abbott
Manchester

• No matter how many times the European Space Agency refers to 67P as a comet (The Rosetta mission, 29 December), it does not enhance the cause of science – 67P is an asteroid. A comet is totally different, both in its composition and essentially in its orbit round the sun.
John Bowler
Cheltenham

• I’ve changed banks twice now but the “old” banks refuse to close my accounts (Letters, 30 December). My father died in 2008 but his bank refuses to close his account despite my having power of attorney and writing and phoning numerous times. What is it up to?
Mick Kusmidrowicz
Combe Martin, Devon

• Further to the passing of Mandy Rice-Davies (Letters, 26 December), may I recommend Fool Britannia, the sublime 1963 LP featuring Peter Sellers, Joan Collins and Anthony Newley, which lampoons Harold Macmillan and his government. It is a masterpiece of political satire.
Martin Barnett
Leominster, Herefordshire

Letter pic
Illustration: Gary Kempston

Bringing torturers to account

So, now the so-called revelations about US torture practices (19 December) are revealed. And now we all know they did it.

When Winston Smith in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four asks: “But what is it, what is it? How can I do it if I don’t know what it is?” he is predicting the more-modern dilemma that faced the prisoners held by the US during their war of terror. And the answer, obviously – and it has always been obvious – is what we want you to do.

What needs to be explored now is whether the current US instigated “investigation” is genuinely intended to identify those responsible and bring them to account, or whether it is deception intended to cover over the cracks in America’s reputation in the world.

Given its historical record, I would expect another scapegoat will be found. It has already got Putin as a possible. I wonder who will be the next person used to get the US off the hook?
Lavinia Moore
Aldgate, South Australia

• For those who can help, therapeutic support for those who have been tortured must be the first priority.

But surely, equally important is those who have tortured. Unless they are identified, and given the possibility of coming to confront their actions, aren’t they bound to replicate horrific patterns learned, and to find disturbing ways of escaping their own feelings and memories, whether at home or at work?

Isn’t this too the human legacy?
Fran Bradshaw
London, UK

Putin doesn’t need the west

The west’s attempt to use cheap oil and an economic embargo to bankrupt Russia is unlikely to succeed in the long run (Rouble fall leaves Russia cold, 12 December). Vladimir Putin has already turned to China, signing dozens of trade and economic cooperation agreements.

Russia has commenced building giant oil and gas pipelines to China. This is also beneficial to China because Russia is its next door neighbour and therefore will not have to depend on Middle East oil and attendant American geopolitical complexities. However, the west’s approach may cause bankruptcy to western oil companies and the Saudi economy. Moreover, the Brics group of countries has taken steps to bypass the US dollar and pay in one another’s domestic currencies. This is a blow to the US global financial hegemony.

As Putin explains, this is part of “a system of measures that would help prevent the harassment of countries that do not agree with some foreign policy decisions made by the United States and their allies”.
Bill Mathew
Melbourne, Australia

Abbott must speak out

I listened to our prime minister, Tony Abbott, after the Sydney hostage siege. I agree, our thoughts and sympathies must go to the friends and families of the victims. Mine do.

But with the media saturation, and the world looking on, could an Australian leader please acknowledge that leaders from the Muslim community also came together to deplore this lone act of violence? Remind us of this fact as you call for calm and thoughtful reflection, and remind us that the perpetrator’s actions were contrary to the teachings of the Islamic faith, and that a candlelight vigil for the hostages was held at the Lakemba mosque.

And when that leader thanks the police and emergency services, let them also thank people like Rachael Jacobs (#illridewithyou) who also responded with courage, initiative and leadership. Let them ask us to think about this example as we process these tragic events. If there ever was a silver lining this was it.

Please let that leader avoid tenuous and unnecessary links to Isis, and deplore the salacious, ill-informed media headlines. Ultimately, fear is the weapon and this kind of reporting aids, abets and sates the perpetrators. It is their goal.

And if that leader feels the need to say it was a politically motivated act, then please reinforce the knowledge that the perpetrator was also acting alone, and not as a sanctioned representative of any political party, religious group, state or country. Who will that leader be?
Ian Meggitt
Lewisham, NSW, Australia

Radical grammar rules

I was amused (or was it appalled?) by the word “radical”, as used in “students, from a radical rural teacher training college” (12 December). It’s always like this: on many issues, we see society running into walls at high speed and those who suggest a change of direction, even a small one, are deemed to be the radicals. As for the Mexican students who were slaughtered by local police or the drugs gang working for the police, and apparently working for the mayor, they were the ones referred to as radical. That’s an amusing irony, isn’t it?
Marc Jachym
Les Ulis, France

• The headline to Hugh Muir’s Comment is free In brief (Loaning the Elgin marbles to Russia is wrong, 12 December) is wrong. What happened to the word “lending”? Last century, “loan” was a noun. We lent to people – I lend, you lend, they lend – but you’re having a lend of us with this “loaning” business, a solecism Muir repeats in his piece. Has “lend” gone the way of “give”, where everything is “gifted” and nothing given?

When will this absurd nouning cease? With hope, in the Guardian.
Nicholas Tolhurst
Kew, Victoria, Australia

Commuting, Palestinian-style

Commuting offers “only minor frustrations”, according to Joe Moran’s book review (12 December). He should read the report of an Ecumenical Accompaniment Programme in Palestine and Israel published in the Quaker magazine the Friend two years ago, entitled How was your commute today? It describes observing and recording Palestinian workers passing through a checkpoint to work in Israel. At 4am “already there are as many as a dozen women and a hundred or so men squatting on the ground, silent or talking quietly, waiting for the gates to open”. Then, when they finally open 10 minutes late, “the crush of workers … on to the turnstiles is enormous”.

Every minute or so the turnstiles unlock “and another 80 men or so go through and take their places at the magnetic gate … Instantly, the space behind crams full of heaving crushed bodies.” Between 5am and 6am, the article states, “1,945 people go through: face after face”.

I could go on quoting this report with all its horrors, but enough said. Perhaps Iain Gately should add another chapter to his book.
Pat Stapleton
Beaumont du Ventoux, France

We are being cooked slowly

We human beings are so wired that in the event of imminent danger, the fight/ flight response kicks in and we respond by instant action (19 December). The other possible response to grave danger, is the lobster immersed in water, which is gradually getting hotter. He doesn’t respond and gets cooked.

In the case of immminent and potentially catastrophic climate change, the signs are visible everywhere but we don’t quite get it. We behave more like a lobster than someone faced with imminent catastrophe. There is only one small planet and imminent danger affects every living creature. The severity of our situation must be felt by us all including our governments who will represent us in Paris next year. A lukewarm response is not an option.
Titus Foster
Shoreham, UK

Briefly

• Regarding Kerry Smith, the Ukip candidate who resigned for making offensive remarks about gay people and foreigners while he was reportedly on sedatives (19 December): obviously the sedatives were not strong enough. Perhaps a truth tablet had been substituted. Double the dose next time Smith, then come and speak to us again.
Steven Clayton
Halifax, UK

• In We must take back the NHS (5 December), David Owen tells us that Michael Gove “claims that no privatisation of the NHS has taken place”. I’m pleased to know that our chief whip is so well informed.
Peter Martin
Huddersfield, UK

• Nicola Davison’s article (5 December) informs us that the Shanghai Tower, the world’s second-tallest building, will feature “sky gardens” in its “vertical city”, and that Suzhou in Jiangsu, a city “few people outside China have heard of”, will get the world’s third-tallest building. Suzhou also features gardens, centuries old, of the Chinese classical type. It has many canals and bridges, being known as the Venice of the east, and is a Unesco world heritage site.

Cruise ship passengers arriving in Shanghai are regularly offered excursions to Suzhou. Judging by their popularity, it would seem that a lot of people outside China know of Suzhou.
Anthony Walter
Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

 

 

 

Independent:

Share

Steve Richards (30 December) misses a key point in his suggestion that we pay more tax to cover the growing costs of our increasingly privatised health service.

As we have seen from the weekend railway shambles in London, running public services through privately owned companies results in highly paid management and prosperous shareholders, but abysmal services for punters.

There needs to be a plebiscite, not on finding more money to operate this dysfunctional system, but about the whole privatisation agenda and the extent to which we want our taxes to fund private businesses.

Julian Clover
Colchester

 

Forget the Ukip sideshow, what the British public needs before the general election is wise and intelligent counsel concerning the state of the health service. The politicians with the guts to give us the truth, like Andy Burnham and Norman Lamb, shoulod be gioven the opportunity to crack open this debate now without fear of being shut down by fiscal scaremongering.

Trust us, the people, to decide what we want and if we want a first class NHS and must pay more tax, be honest. Tell us in your manifestos whether you are prepared to tax more, and give us a real choice. But above all, stop treating us like fools .

Barbara McGoun
Horning, Norfolk

 

Your picture of a crowd of stranded rail passengers at the weekend (30 December) says everything about the state of our railways. An absolute disgrace.

On Boxing Day 1937, I was a young engine cleaner. We worked that day as normal, with no extra pay. And we ran a proper train service, with no enhanced payments. In those days, the travelling public had a guaranteed service.

Nowadays, passengers have to suffer what has become a badge of shame for privatised railways.

John Weston
Breedon on the Hill, Leicestershire

 

It is all very well us praising the railways for doubling the number of passengers since privatisation, but the simple lack of a seat gives us third-world conditions at excessive first-world prices.

I suggest denying the fat controllers their bonuses until someone addresses the current provision of absurdly short trains over much of the network.  Three-coach trains from Waterloo to Exeter on a day when Paddington was closed beggars belief.

Peter Jeffery
Eastborne

 

Perhaps Nicholas Lezard’s ‘lifestyle’ column (30 December) was not entirely serious, but is he aware that protein supplements are essentially nothing more than whey powder? That is, a dairy product left over from the manufacture of cheese? It’s hardly akin to injecting steroids.

What it does is speed up the repair of muscle fibres which get torn (on a microscopic scale) in the course of normal exercise. In doing this it also alleviates the muscle pain often felt in the following day or two, which as a runner I found quite useful.

Of course it shouldn’t be a substitute for proper meals but there’s nothing sinister (or special) about it. Just buy the cheapest unbranded stuff you can find, mix with chocolate milk and drink straight after exercise. No ‘ground-up worms’ required!

David Redford
Sheffield

 

Dennis Forbes Grattan writes (letter, 30 December) that problems with drunks in A&E are due to publicans and nightclubs.

The root problem is cheap and easy accessible alcohol in supermarkets and other retail outlets. Publicans and nightclubs are undercut, and struggle to make a living. Many people drink away from such places or preload beforehand. Little wonder that some publicans may not be as vigilant as in a previous age.

David Houlgate
Knaresborough

 

So Sean O’Grady (30 December) thinks revelations that Margaret Thatcher wanted to both acquire nerve gas and use troops against the miners show that she “was much more of a radical then her critics,and admirers, had previously given her credit for.” Surely however the word to describe her should be reactionary not radical?

Tim Mickleburgh
Grimsby, Lincolnshire

 

The Argentine Ambassador, Alicia Castro. thinks that a statue of the saviour of the Falkland Islands, Margaret Thatcher, is a celebration of war.(News Matrix 29th Dec)

I wonder if she would care to comment about the Pukara aeroplane, used by the Argentinians in the invasion of the Falklands, and placed on display in the centre of Buenos Aires.

Michael Chick
Rustington, West Sussex

 

I cannot believe that Ed Richards, departing Ofcom CE can be so naive as to state “vulgarities no longer upset the viewing public”.

If his conclusion is based on a fall in complaints, then the public have given up complaining as the “vulgarities” are now the norm and the only solution is to turn off! One of my favourite television programmes used to be “Have I got news for you”. “Vulgarity” in this originally very amusing show is now commonplace and so, off it goes.

At least i use asterisks when appropriate!

Andrew Walker
Fulletby, Lincolnshire

 

I couldn’t agree more with David Lister’s opinion of New Year’s Eve. The best I ever experienced was at the turn of the century. I wanted  to spend it on top of the world so a small group of friends and myself decided to walk up Moel Famau in North Wales.  It’s a small  mountain of just less then 2000 feet  close  to the Wirral Peninsula where we live.  To our  great surprise  approximately 1500 like minds  chose to do the same  thing. It was a wonderful experience as we quietly and orderly  ascended a narrow path in pitch blackness. At the top groups of people exchanged greetings then descended back to the real world. I don’t recall hearing a single  rendition of Auld Lang Syne or one party popper! Happy New Year to one and all.

Margaret Delaney
Wirral

Times:

Sir, At least the train ran to Adlestrop (letters, Dec 29).

glynne morgan

Guyzance, Northumberland

Sir, Your report (“Royal Mint makes £100 coin to bring in the new year”, Dec 29) reminded me of watching the 1954 Gregory Peck movie The Million Pound Note. After the film, I said that I would love to have one.

My father, who remembered the effects of hyperinflation in Germany in the 1920s said: “Son, if you ever find yourself holding a million pound note, leave the country.”
Richard Tweed
Croydon

Sir, The article (“Pilots fly into trouble over craze for cockpit snaps”, Dec 27) is interesting. Failure of normal, relaxed verbal communication between the pilots was part of the cause of the Papa India crash at Staines in June 1972. The potential tension of a “sterile cockpit” is real and the idea that professional airline pilots, any more than surgeons, would not be able to make appropriate judgment calls while talking at work is bizarre.
Dr Robert Bruce-Chwatt
(Forensic physician and former pilot)
Richmond, Surrey

Sir, The rise in negligence claims against the NHS reflects the success of “no win, no fee” cases largely replacing legal aid (news, Dec 26). Access to justice is free to all, at the point of need, according to the merits of the case.

It is a solution, not a problem. Payment by result means lawyers are only paid on successful cases with inbuilt incentives for commercial discipline and economic prudence.

It rewards competence.
Anthony Barton
Solicitor and medical practitioner
London N1

Telegraph:

Susan Lord, a supporter of the Bill seeking to legalise assisted dying,  outside Parliament
Susan Lord, a supporter of the Bill seeking to legalise assisted dying, outside Parliament Photo: Reuters

SIR – I am interested in the claim (Letters, December 29) by those writing in support of legalising the hastening of death that “an overwhelming majority” of the public supports such a change in the law.

I suspect that, given the choice, an overwhelming majority of the public would support many things, but acquiescing on the part of those who govern us is not the purpose of representative democracy, and even minority views still have legitimacy.

So, speaking as one who has supported a close relative through his last days and, while not acting to prolong that life (as this was not his wish), did not act to hasten death, which was finally and by any measure painless, I would like to record that I, for one, do not support the legislation that so many apparently advocate. I suspect I am not alone in that.

Peter D Harvey
Walton Highway, Norfolk

SIR – It is true that “currently, one Briton a fortnight ends their life” through an accompanied suicide in Switzerland. But many of them are not “terminally ill” (as defined in Lord Falconer’s draft Bill).

The enlightened Swiss are willing to help any competent adult suffering unbearably and irreversibly – they do not distinguish between “terminally ill”, “severely disabled” or “elderly”. The same is true in Belgium and the Netherlands.

In the past eight years, on different occasions, I have travelled with four Britons to Switzerland to witness their suicides – two were terminally ill, one was severely disabled and the fourth was an elderly friend whose life was increasingly restricted by severe osteoarthritis.

Of course, after the election, our new Parliament must properly discuss this issue. But, personally, I hope that we will follow the example of other Western European countries and not restrict any law to just the “terminally ill” – especially as many disabled individuals and elderly people can suffer much longer and more severely than those expected to die within six months.

Michael Irwin
Former Chairman, Voluntary Euthanasia Society
Cranleigh, Surrey

SIR – I wonder how long it would be before the elderly, disabled and children were pressurised into accepting assisted dying (which is murder by any other name). In spite of the so-called safeguards, on the Continent this is now occurring.

In the area of abortion, originally those opposed (often on religious grounds) were exempted by the law from being involved. However, a recent Supreme Court decision has decreed that irrespective of their beliefs, NHS staff have to undertake duties in the abortion process.

We fought a world war against such a totalitarian state. I hope law-makers realise the implications and desist.

Stephen Coltman
Bournemouth, Dorset

Ship fire rescue

The cargo container ship Siprit of Piraeus arrives at Bari with passengers evacuated from the Norman Atlantic (FILIPPO MONTEFORTE/AFP/Getty Images)

SIR – Almost exactly two years after the cruise ship Costa Concordia went aground and capsized, another Italian-registered vessel, the ro-ro ferry Norman Atlantic, found itself in trouble off the Italian coast with a serious fire on board.

Once again the Italian Marine Accident Investigation Authorities are faced with the formidable task of establishing what happened and why, and making recommendations to prevent it happening again.

Hopefully they will achieve this without being hampered by any compulsion to apportion blame.

They face main two issues; determining what caused the fire, and examining how successful or otherwise the rescue operation has been. Many searching questions need to be asked and the right, rather than the convenient, conclusions drawn.

This particular accident challenges many of the established conventions and wisdom on how a mass rescue should be conducted.

It has taken very much longer to execute than current emergency plans envisage and, as many mariners have been predicting for years, such events do not always happen in flat calm conditions with the sun shining and power available. The reality can be very different.

In this instance the rescue has had to contend with viciously cold weather, high winds, rough seas and pouring rain together with acrid smoke, visible flames, a very hot deck and no power. It would also seem that some of the on-board life-saving apparatus has not functioned as envisaged.

Add to this a tired crew, cold and understandably frightened passengers, restricted lift capacity of the helicopters, limited rescue facilities of other ships in the area and long hours of darkness, and you have the precise ingredients for complexity that many have long feared in such situations.

Rarely has the outcome of a comprehensive and thorough investigation been more important for improving safety at sea.

Rear Admiral John Lang
Former Chief Inspector of Marine Accidents.
Martyr Worthy, Hampshire

Darkest Warwickshire

SIR – I have no mobile reception at my Warwickshire home (Letters, December 29), but I spent four weeks in a remote hilltop town in Rwanda with five bars of signal.

Alice Roberts
Kineton, Warwickshire

Rumpelstiltscar

SIR – Sarah Barlow (Letters, December 29) wishes she knew the name of her late husband’s first car, which he used as an online password. It had eight letters. Could it have been the vehicle of the Fifties and Sixties used by our best security force, the police – a Wolseley? That was the make of my own car after I graduated in 1961.

Richard Hawkes
Winchester, Hampshire

SIR – Dolomite, Standard, Vanguard, Magnette, Somerset?

Christopher Lisle
Maidstone, Kent

Rail rage

The scene at Finsbury Park during network disruption (Paul Grover/The Telegraph)

SIR – I was one of thousands affected by the railway debacle, when my five-hour journey took nine hours.

Every such emergency brings the same complaint: “Why don’t they tell us what’s happening?” Information should have been the concern of railway management, after their primary responsibility of taking immediate remedial action.

This might not solve the problem but would certainly lessen the anger of those trapped in the mess seemingly caused by gross management inefficiency.

Patrick O’Connor
Elham, Kent

SIR – The over-running engineering works at the weekend led to demands for fines of Network Rail and cancellation of executive bonuses. The latter seems more sensible, as fines would only be paid by customers.

However, I wonder if the companies involved have begun to plan for over-runs by imposing ever longer closures. These inconvenience customers, yet because they are announced in advance they protect the management from criticism over delay.

We have seen long closures at Blackfriars station and on the London Underground at Bond Street. We now have a major planned disruption at London Bridge and the closure of the Central Line at Tottenham Court Road Underground station for virtually the whole of 2015.

Brian Gedalla
London N3

Speed cameras where few accidents occur

SIR – Ian Kemp (Letters, December 29) writes that “speed cameras are only ever installed” where there is “a clear history of speed-related personal injury collisions over several years”. When the new A4 bypass outside Bath was constructed, this lovely straight piece of dual-carriageway was given a 40mph limit protected by a speed camera. Had there been many accidents involving speeding construction vehicles while it was being built?

Phil Mobbs
Wantage, Oxfordshire

SIR – The part of the A5 (the old Watling Street) that joins the M6 to the M42 in Staffordshire, is flat and straight for 25 miles and has 32 speed cameras. I do not think they are all necessary for safety.

Robert Brown
Lichfield, Staffordshire

SIR – I have received a “Notice of intended prosecution” for driving at 35mph in a 30mph zone. To see proof of my exceeding the speed limit, I will have to attend court.

Why is the “proof” not attached to the notice? It would save time, and time is money, for both parties, one of which is the British taxpayer.

Christopher R Keeley
Reading, Berkshire

Too few hospital beds

SIR – Robert Colvile’s special report (December 29) makes for depressing reading. I suspect that the brand new Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, has been planned and built with significantly fewer beds than its predecessor.

As at other new hospitals, this will have been done on the presumption that care in the community will soak up the need. Until those involved with the NHS accept the folly of this policy of fewer and fewer inpatient beds to serve an ageing population, hospitals will continue in a permanent state of crisis.

Dr Robert Walker
Great Clifton, Cumbria

Three score years and a night out clubbing next

Funeral tea with ham: a first-century BC memorial stone from Gaul, with boar’s head (www.bridgemanart.com)

SIR – Squadron Leader T J W Leyland (Letters, December 29) writes that he has discovered in his sixties the joy of a good breakfast out and wonders what social events in life come next. Nightclubbing is an option.

In much of continental Europe nightclub-type venues are more family-orientated, with the young and young at heart alike enjoying themselves. British nightclubs might take note.

John Barstow
Pulborough, West Sussex

SIR – Cream teas. I have recently enjoyed one to celebrate a friend’s 80th birthday.

Jill Forrest
Bishop’s Waltham, Hampshire

SIR – In his seventies, I think Squadron Leader Leyland will find himself experimenting with the best alcoholic drink to make the tablets go down.

John Henesy
Maidenhead, Berkshire

SIR – The choice is between going for a mug of cocoa, then a hot-water bottle and bed at 9.30pm, or going round again, starting with the all-night parties from one’s twenties.

Clive Davidson
Manchester

SIR – Attendance at many funeral teas is what comes next.

Gerard Friel
Twickenham, Middlesex

Outmoded post codes

SIR – Living in a rural area, we have often found that carriers cannot find us to make a delivery because our postcode points them to a place a mile away.

The Post Office refuses to change our code. These days GPS and OS location devices can pin-point anything to within 10 yards, so why do we persist with postcodes?

If each time a delivery was made to a house, its GPS location was also noted, this could eliminate postcode use painlessly within a few years.

Dr Brian Wareing
Penyffordd, Flintshire, CH4 0EZ

 

Globe and Mail:

Daryl Copeland

Out of Afghanistan: The winners and losers after 13 years of combat

Former diplomat Daryl Copeland is an educator, analyst and consultant, the author of Guerrilla Diplomacy and a Research Fellow at the Canadian Defence and Foreign Affairs Institute. Tweets @GuerrillaDiplo.

Thirteen years after the campaign began, NATO’s International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) formally ended combat operations in Afghanistan on Dec. 28. A residual foreign military presence of about 18,000 troops, the Resolute Support Mission, will stay on for counter-terrorism purposes and provide training and logistical assistance to Afghan police and security forces.

With rising Afghan civilian and military casualties, and Taliban gains amidst generally deteriorating conditions, there was little to celebrate at the secret handover ceremony. That event received only passing media attention – surprising given the exceptional human and financial costs associated with this intervention.

As coalition members rush for the exits, there have been many attempts to explain what went wrong, which by my reckoning includes just about everything. That said, few in positions of authority are admitting failure. Clearly, among responsible senior officials, more than a few of whom managed to eke a promotion or two out of the war, there is no appetite for a searching retrospective.

While awaiting the attribution of some form of culpability for the wilful blindness which plagued the ISAF mission, it may be useful to look ahead with a view to identifying some of the main winners and losers.

Losers

The United States

America entered Afghanistan in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, using air power and special forces to assist the Northern Alliance in defeating the Taliban and ejecting al-Qaeda. Those strategic objectives were achieved by early 2003, yet instead of disengaging militarily and focussing instead on development and reconstruction, the war ground on fitfully, running for years as a sideshow eclipsed by the ill-starred imbroglio in Iraq (2004-2011). Over that period, the would-be liberators lost the battle for hearts and minds and came to be regarded as occupiers. The much-publicized abuse of detainees at the Bagram and Guantanamo Bay prisons, widespread collateral damage, Koran burnings and various other indignities contributed to the population’s alienation and accelerated the loss of U.S. prestige and influence globally. Afghanistan battered the American brand and hastened the end of the United States’ unipolar moment.

NATO and the ISAF coalition partners.

Casting about for a relevant post-Cold War role, NATO entered Afghanistan with a mandate from the UN Security Council, but without a carefully considered master plan or grand strategy. In more than a decade on the ground, vast resources were squandered while ISAF drifted, unable to deliver either security or prosperity to the country. That negligence and incompetence cannot reflect positively on NATO’s future. The U.K., Canada, Australia and other countries have also paid a high price, with little to show in the aftermath and few lessons learned.

The Afghan people.

For more than 2,000 years, from the days of Alexander the Great and Genghis Kahn, through episodes of British and Russian colonial aggression and right up to the present day, Afghanis have suffered at the hands of foreign occupiers. About 40 years ago it appeared that this debilitating pattern might finally be ending, but the USSR mounted a large-scale invasion in 1979. That act plunged the country into a spasm of violence from which it has yet to emerge. Following the USSR’s ignominious departure a decade later, Western support for the Mujahidin eventually blew back in the form of a rising tide of radical Islamism and al-Qaeda’s presence, which in turn led to the intervention by ISAF. Although precise numbers are impossible to come by, civilian casualties have been heavy. Today, with political gridlock in Kabul and the Taliban resurgent, both democracy and development remain elusive.

Winners

China and Russia

As the USA and its allies have become bogged down pursuing unsuccessful military adventures – not only in Afghanistan, but also in Iraq, Libya, and elsewhere under the aegis of the Global War on Terror – China has been busy engineering its “peaceful rise”. Diverse economic and security initiatives have been accompanied by more assertive behaviour in the East and South China Seas, a charm offensive in Latin America and major investments in Africa. America’s armed distractions have in other words expedited the advance of its principal strategic competitor. Russia, meanwhile, is moving to re-assert its influence in the formerly Soviet Central Asian “Stans”. Mismanagement of the Afghan file has largely dealt the West out of this round of the Great Game.

Illicit narcotics producers and organized criminals.

As Afghanistan struggles, national production of opium has reached record highs. The corrosive effect of that development is far-reaching, ranging from endemic corruption to festering social ills, both locally and in distant metropolitan centres. The Taliban, less inclined than ever to negotiate, are among the main beneficiaries.

Bottom line? For Canada, for NATO, and for much the world the war in Afghanistan has been an unmitigated disaster.

It’s long past time that this was recognized, with accountability assigned and remedial action taken accordingly.

Jan Hux

Blaming diabetes on poor eating habits has delayed real action

Irish Times:

Sir, – Since January 2002, I have sought compassionate treatment for the unviable unborn and its parents. In 2006 the then Fianna Fáil government defended its position on my action against Ireland in the European Court of Human Rights by stating that I had not exhausted domestic remedies (ie, taking an action against the State while pregnant).

It seems that the legislature wants to have pregnant women in court, dead or alive, so that it can adjudicate on their unviable unborn. Government after government has demonstrated that it does not trust our doctors.

In D v Ireland (European Court of Human Rights 2006), the State’s expert opinion suggested that “remorseless logic” would not be applied to Article 40.3.3 in relation to the “unborn” and that if, tested in court, the interpretation of “unborn” may not be applied to an unviable foetus that has no prospect of being “born”.

I now ask our politicians again, 13 years after being told my unborn had no prospect of life outside the womb, that women should not suffer the exponential sadness of being sent away to deliver early.

Successive governments have treated the issue as a gamble too far in the teeth of an election. It is high time the issue of termination for medical reasons in the case of fatal foetal abnormality was dissociated from politics.

If, by an unfortunate gestational anomaly, an incompatibility with life has occurred, and we have the medical technology to inform us, women should not be forced to continue incubating as human ventilators. We want to safely deliver and respectfully bury our unborn. Not have them sent home as ashes in the post, as has been the case for many parents.

Obstetricians differ from politicians; they are in the business of caring for mothers for the long haul, not relentlessly seeking re-election, power and position.

Where their expertise is engaged, it is the doctor over the politician who should, in conjunction with the parents, decide what is best.

For this reason, I urge the present Government to accede to the majority wish that the eighth amendment should be repealed on the next referendum day. The mother of a non-viable unborn should not have to be dead to receive respect, assistance and compassion. – Yours, etc,

DEIRDRE CONROY,

Dublin 14.

Sir, – I do not find Michael McDowell’s opinions in relation to doctors shirking their responsibilities to be argued “persuasively”, as described in your editorial in relation to matters surrounding the recent tragic case of maternal death (“End of family’s agonising ordeal”, December 29th).

All arguably ethical actions are not necessarily legal, and acting according to your ethical assessments and beliefs, or in your perception of the best interests of a patient, is not a defence in law if your actions are deemed to be prohibited by law.

What are doctors to do, particularly in non-urgent scenarios, but to hold off and seek legal advice and/or judicial determination if they are uncertain as to the legality of their proposed action in these very rare cases?

Lawyers can be wrong with impunity, but for doctors it is not so easy. If greater discretion is needed for doctors in these difficult cases, it should be provided in law. – Yours, etc,

Dr TOM HOGAN,

Castleknock,

Dublin 15.

A chara, – Wisdom, tempered with compassion, has prevailed and the court has ruled that the indignity this woman was enduring may come to an end, along with the ordeal her family was suffering. I hope they will be given the privacy they need to grieve their double loss.

Trying to find something positive in this whole grim situation, at least there is now some legal precedent to help prevent anything similar from occurring again. I sincerely pray it does not. – Is mise,

Rev PATRICK G BURKE,

Castlecomer,

Co Kilkenny.

Sir, – The recent sad case of the pregnant woman on life support has unleashed a tirade of criticism of the eight amendment, Article 40.3.3, including in the pages of your newspaper.

The article in question simply declares the equality before the law of mother and child, as far as is practicable, and the Constitution is just the place for such a declaration of principle.

As with any article of the Constitution, it must be supported by effective legislation that remains true to the purpose and spirit of the article, so that there isn’t constant recourse to the courts.

However, as with any article, no matter how carefully phrased, the issue may ultimately end up in court.

Even if the eighth amendment hadn’t existed, this case or a similar one may have ended up in the courts anyway, as we have seen with similar cases in other jurisdictions.

The amendment is one of the most explicit equality measures in the Constitution, and yet those who would normally champion equality remain silent, if they’re not actually attacking the measure. It is also one of the most explicit child protection measures, and those who would normally champion children’s rights are silent.

The principle declared in the amendment protects the unborn child from the excesses of abortion we have seen in other countries and if it is removed a whole group of the vulnerable will be under threat.

Do we really need to create another scandal that future generations will berate us for? – Yours, etc,

BRENDAN O’REGAN,

Arklow,

Co Wicklow.

Sir, – Constructive ambiguity may be justified to resolve political difficulties. It has no place in legal provisions concerning matters of life and death. – Yours, etc,

PATRICK WARD,

Kilkenny.

Sir, – Since it was introduced in 1983 the eighth amendment to the Constitution has caused havoc in the legal system and unimaginable distress and suffering to those affected by it. All of the cases concerning this amendment have highlighted the dangers of tinkering with the Constitution. This amendment, which was hailed by its supporters as double-bolting the door against the legalisation of abortion, achieved exactly the opposite.

It is time that the Irish electorate deleted it in full. – Yours, etc,

TIM BRACKEN,

Cork.

Sir, – Full credit to The Irish Times and Martin Wall for bringing to light the kind of official thinking that will leave older people aghast and fearful for their future security (“Cuts to State funding must be considered, review finds”, Front Page, December 29th).

It beggars belief that officials at the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform, who will reap the benefits of gold-plated pensions themselves, have the gall to suggest that the weakest and most vulnerable in society must pay for the privileges enjoyed by 300,000 public sector workers – privileges that include a degree of security that is non-existent in the real world.

We are all well aware that we are sitting on a pension time bomb and that demographic changes are pulling in the wrong direction, but pruning must begin in the areas where fruit has been most abundant. In the Republic of Ireland, that means rebalancing the scales so that the public and private sectors share equal reward and responsibility for the basic State pensions of those who are no longer able to work. – Yours, etc,

NIALL GINTY,

Killester,Dublin 5.

Sir, – In playing her good cop role, the Minister for Social Protection gave reassurances that the pension would not be cut and that the current rates would be “protected” (“State pension will not be cut, insists Joan Burton”, December 29th).

She failed to mention what measures were planned to restore the value of the pension given that it has not been increased in six years and persons in that group have suffered cuts in fringe supports and have had property tax, and soon water charges, extracted from their meagre incomes. – Yours, etc,

JIM O’SULLIVAN,

Rathedmond,

Sligo.

Sir, – I worked for 52 years, contributing all of that time toward my old-age pension. It has always struck me as wrong that those contributions were being spent by government as soon as collected and nothing put aside. To benefit from a full contributory pension I paid the higher social insurance rates over those years. It is interesting that the mandarins now making recommendations for its reduction have not borne the burdens of high social insurance payments historically (although that system has recently changed).

They have a cheek to be making such recommendations. Go to those people who do not contribute to society, face up to them and make them pay a fair share.

Attacking the elderly who have been compliant throughout their lives is a low policy. – Yours, etc,

HARRY MULHERN,

Millbrook Road,

Dublin 13.

Sir, – I refer to the terrible tragedy that has befallen the Greaney family in Cobh at the hands of Michael Greaney, who stabbed his wife to death, and one of his daughters almost to death, and then took his own life (“Father was cleared to return to Cobh home after psychiatric assessment”, December 30th).

Undoubtedly there is a complicated background leading up to this horrific and heart-breaking event, but according to the article Mr Greaney was assessed by a consultant psychiatrist and a multidisciplinary team last October. The outcome of this process was a decision that Mr Greaney posed no risk to his family and recommended that he be allowed back to the family home.

There is a need to acknowledge that psychiatric risk assessment for suicide and violence is of extremely limited value in general psychiatric practice.

This was the conclusion arrived at by one of the world’s foremost experts on risk assessment research, Prof George Szmukler, two years ago.

Prof Szmukler concluded that rare events, such as suicide or serious violence – no matter how tragic they are or how much our society wishes us to prevent them – are impossible to predict with a degree of accuracy that is clinically meaningful.

Society expects psychiatrists to fulfil the role of predicting these risks, but the evidence is very clear – it cannot be done.

There is a need for an open and honest debate about this whole subject to try to find new ways forward to reduce the likelihood of such catastrophes happening again in the future.

My heartfelt condolences to the Greaney family at this dreadful time. – Yours, etc,

Dr CIARÁN CRUMMEY,

Bawnboy,

Co Caval

Sir, – Paul Williams (December 30th), responding to Lara Marlowe’s “How the Gaza war changed perceptions” (December 27th), is right when he claims that “Israel draws enough short straws in the Irish media”. But does he really believe that killing 469 children and injuring 3,000 in Gaza was the best way to stop the rockets falling into Israel?

I often wonder what would have happened to this county had a hostile helicopter gunship crossed the Border in the early 1980s to provide a swift, brutal 30mm lesson to the people of Carrickmacross as to why violence was not the answer. – Yours, etc,

DERMOT O’ROURKE,

Lucan,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – Paul Williams writes, “In reviewing the recent conflict between Israel and Hamas, Lara Marlowe leaves out some very obvious points”.

Mr Williams airbrushes a raft of glaringly blatant Israeli-created facts on the ground such as the military occupation, dispossessions, expulsions, segregation, and the ongoing cruel blockading of Gaza; coupled to the vast discrepancy of power between the fourth most powerful military on the planet and a rag-tag of resistance equipped with “rockets” which seem to cause less actual damage to Israel than its own regularly repeated “mowing of the grass”. – Yours, etc,

D FLINTER,

Headford,

Co Galway.

Sir, – I cannot get my head around John Fitzgerald’s problem with foxhunting (December 29th).

If he considers hounds chasing a fox with the intent to kill as a barbaric activity, then how does he view the fox’s behaviour with regard to lambs and chickens? Both hounds and foxes are behaving in a manner that is natural to them.

I rather suspect that his real gripe is with the mounted followers who, in deference to the farmers whose land they cross, clean their horses and dress themselves appropriately to follow the chase.

If he feels that to be a spectator at such an event is barbaric, then I wonder what his views are on some of the wonderful nature programmes created by Sir David Attenborough that many of us watch on the television? Here again we are spectators, and often witness members of the large cat families hunting and killing other more vulnerable species.

But lastly, maybe John Fitzgerald gets all hot under the collar and writes to The Irish Times at this time every year because we call foxhunting a sport, rather than a way of life, or a pastime. – Yours, etc,

ANNE STRAHAN,

Ballynonty,

Co Tipperary.

Sir, – John Fitzgerald hopes that “the next Dáil will have a majority of TDs opposed to hare coursing and foxhunting, and that the vice-like grip that the bloodsport lobby has had on our politicians will at last be broken”.

I endorse such sentiments wholeheartedly. However, I wouldn’t be in the least surprised if the majority of the present crop of TDs are actually against bloodsports; but given the nature of our electoral system, some vulnerable and pusillanimous TDs will always seek to run with the hare and hunt with the hounds. – Yours, etc,

PAUL DELANEY,

Dalkey,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – Pope Francis delivers a long critical rant to his employees (December 23rd). He certainly lists a long catalogue of faults. Did he never read about casting the first stone? Or more pertinently, did he never recall the words of an eminent religious leader, who once declared “Who am I to judge?” – Yours, etc,

ERIC CONWAY,

Navan, Co Meath.

Sir, – Things may get curiaser and curiaser. – Yours, etc,

MICHELE SAVAGE,

Dublin 12.

A chara, – Contrary to Dr Vincent Kenny’s worries (December 24th), our Independents should revel in the label “non-party” on the ballot paper as this may attract those voters who didn’t party during the boom, or if they did, don’t intend to do so again. – Is mise,

LOMAN Ó LOINGSIGH,

Dublin 24.

Sir, – Thanks to the post-Christmas sales nearly every home in Ireland has a new “George Clooney”-type coffee machine, but will these end up like George Foreman’s steak grill, under the stairs? – Yours, etc,

KEN BUGGY,

Ballyduff Upper,

Co Waterford.

Irish Independent:

We have been conditioned to make resolutions each New Year

We have been conditioned to make resolutions each New Year

The New Year has arrived before we had a chance to fully acquaint ourselves with the old one.

It’s a bit like the first guest arriving before the table has been set or the potatoes taken out of the oven.

People will be thinking about changing – shedding the skin of the old self and re-emerging as a shiny, reconstructed superstar for 2015.

That, after all, is what you have been conditioned to do. You must emerge more youthful, happier, positive and successful. Well, good luck with that.

I can imagine no worse time to burden yourself with such a wish list – after you’ve eaten your own bodyweight in turkey and plum pudding, and drunk enough to restock the bar in Croke Park.

Happiness won’t come because you have finally shed a few pounds or have been given the key to the executive bathroom.

Looking outside your own skin for the fantasy formula for a new you is a gross violation of your true self.

Just like the seed that lies beneath the frozen soil, your soul carries all the strength and power you will ever need to shine in this world, and to be the best that you can.

That is the gift you already have within, so trust it and cherish it: be grateful for each second you are here. When you settle in your own skin – not some cosmetic plastic version – but the real you, the magnificence of the world will be yours and you will have the wisdom and compassion to see the magnificence of others.

E Fullam

Greystones, Co Wicklow

Thoughts for 2015

I would like to share a few personal thoughts for 2015:

1. For other people: try a smile – it will make them feel good.

2. For the mind: try to read more – it will encourage you to write more, which will mean more letters for the letters page.

3. For the soul: try to pray more – for nothing is impossible to God.

4. For peace – try to ignore the bullies of this world, they’re just very sad people.

5. For the future – try to leave the past behind, and live and enjoy, as the song says, one day at a time.

God bless, and a very happy New Year to you all.

Brian Mc Devitt

Glenties, Co Donegal

An alternative New Year’s Eve

I suspect many people dread New Year’s Eve for the same reasons that they dread Christmas.

People often feel pressurised into behaving in a certain way, whether they want to or not. There is an atmosphere of expectation about the event, and people can feel that even if they are doing something they enjoy, in some way it may compare unfavourably with all the “happy” people that come out of the woodwork at this time of year, people who may spend quite a large proportion of the following year complaining about just about everything under the sun.

For me, there are two times of the year when I just don’t like being on my own. One is Christmas Day and the other is New Year’s Eve.

My New Year’s Eve normally consists of meeting up with friends and heading out for the night. I know some of this is driven by pressures which I feel come from outside myself.

So this year for the first time ever I am abandoning my usual pursuits and spending New year’s Eve on a residential drumming workshop at the foot of Ben Bulben in Co Sligo in the company of around 40 other people, most of whom I don’t know.

We will drum our way into the New Year cut off from the outside world.

I won’t have to sit in a pub watching the countdown on TV and put up with people’s ‘ecstatic responses’ simply because a new year has started, or listen to a DJ do the same countdown and then shake hands and hug people, whether I want to or not.

While I have no idea how I’ll find this new experience, it cannot be any worse than the usual drunken spree I go on, all in the name of enjoyment.

While it is obviously too late at this stage for someone to book into an alternative weekend like this, it’s something they could bear in mind for next year.

Tommy Roddy

Salthill, Co Galway

Media hysteria at water charges

The media narrative against water charges is out of all proportion to their importance or cost, given the cuts to public expenditure and increases in taxation which have happened as a result of the post-boom collapse and the present, seriously over-borrowed, state of the country.

The seriousness of the national bankruptcy in 2010 – recovery from which is still not certain – is highlighted by the fact that we needed an €80bn bailout, €65bn of which was funded by foreigners.

The government statement, quoted in the media at that time, said that without this external support, the State would not be able to raise the funds required to pay for key public services for our citizens and to provide a functioning banking system to support economic activity.

The present coverage of the water charges issue contrasts starkly with some of the boom-time coverage of the public affairs of this country, when the decisions were being made which ended in national bankruptcy.

The euphoria of that time is reflected in the Irish media describing the German economy as being “a basket case” while in contrast “the Irish economy (was) the strongest in Europe”.

The fact that public spending rose more than 50pc over three years during the boom was labelled as responsible conduct.

As a result, the conclusion was that ‘every day and in every way things were getting better and better’ and there was virtually no downside.

Even the great battles on corruption and taxation were supposed to have been won.

The contrast between those positive pronouncements over a decade ago and the recent very negative row over water charges tells us how wrong media hype can be.

A Leavy

Sutton, Dublin 13

‘Pension cut’ story is just a ploy

With regard to the story that a cut to the state pension was being considered (Irish Independent, December 30), it is insulting to our intelligence when government ministers allow such negative information to filter through so that they can then debunk the story – it is downright cruel when the most vulnerable are at the centre of the ploy.

In playing her good cop role in this ‘good cop/bad cop’ ruse, Social Protection Minister Joan Burton gave reassurances that the pensions would not be cut and that the current rates would be “protected”.

However, she failed to mention what measures were planned to restore the value of the pension, given that it has not been increased in six years and pensioners have suffered cuts in fringe supports and must now pay property tax, and soon water charges, from their meagre incomes.

It must also be borne in mind that many thousands depending on the basic state pension, the “most vulnerable”, gain nothing from recent and proposed future income tax cuts.

If government ministers put as much effort into sharing more fairly the current burdens that we are forced to bear as they do into self-image building, both the cynicism and the ever-deepening despair that is gripping large swathes of the population might begin to ease.

Jim O’Sullivan

Rathedmond, Sligo

Christmas card plea

As it’s the time for New Year resolutions, may I suggest to your readers that when they send Christmas cards, they put a return address on the envelope.

As someone who has lost their address book, I’m in the difficult situation of not being able to return Christmas greetings to relatives and friends – it’s not a pleasant situation to be in at the start of a New Year.

Tony Moriarty

Harold’s Cross, Dublin 6

Irish Independent


Sharland

$
0
0

1 January 2015 Sharland

Mary a little better, Sharland and Steff come to call.

Obituary:

The 8th Duke of Wellington
The 8th Duke of Wellington Photo: CROWN COPYRIGHT

The 8th Duke of Wellington, who has died aged 99, led a level-headed and responsible life in the shadow of his great ancestor, the victor of Waterloo.

He earned a Military Cross in the Second World War, spoke up for the Army and rural communities in the House of Lords, and served as a Hampshire county councillor and as president, trustee, governor and member of a wide variety of bodies.

Well aware of the social changes that followed the Second World War, Wellington once remarked, tongue in cheek, at a meeting of the Zoological Society, that perhaps dukes should be made a protected species. He remained determined to protect his property, and took steps to secure his family’s interests in Britain, Spain and Belgium against threats posed by politicians and high taxation; he was not afraid to be seen backing causes in which he had a personal stake.

Above all, he kept a judicious eye on both the 1st Duke’s reputation and the battlefield of Waterloo, becoming exercised by the commercialisation of the site, where he felt that the predominant number of imperial eagles and other items bearing the initial “N” in the gift shop implied that Napoleon had really won.

In 1995, after seeing the “inglorious flag” of the European Union flying over the site, he wrote to The Daily Telegraph to protest against the “unnatural” celebrations of the battle’s 180th anniversary. “We British have a feeling and respect for the past, something that not all nations understand or share,” he explained; in addition he noted that Napoleon’s headquarters, which had once housed a small museum, was now a discotheque.Shortly before the letters column’s deadline, he rang back to add another line below “Duke of Wellington” at the bottom of the text: “Prince of Waterloo”.

Arthur Valerian Wellesley was born in Rome on July 2 1915, the centenary year of his great-great-grandfather’s victory over the French. His father was Lord Gerald Wellesley, the third son of the 4th Duke, an author and diplomat who later qualified as an architect and succeeded as the 7th Duke in 1943. Valerian’s mother was Dottie Ashton, a wealthy industrialist’s daughter and poet who married her husband in 1914 and published a volume of letters from the poet WB Yeats and another containing her letters to him after his death . When Valerian was seven, his parents’ marriage broke up, partly because of his mother’s drinking and her friendship with the writer Vita Sackville-West.

The Duke of Wellington’s house Stratfield Saye, between Reading and Basingstoke (REX)

At Eton he was a member of the shooting VIII. While serving in the corps, he fainted during a parade at Windsor, and when Queen Mary asked afterwards what had been wrong he said he thought he had measles — drawing the comment from George V (who believed such diseases should be experienced in childhood): “And high time, too.”

Although Valerian wanted to go straight into the Army, his father sent him to read History and Languages at New College, Oxford, where he was a member of the Bullingdon Club; at the same time he enjoyed London society, dancing with suitable girls at grand balls and less suitable ones in subterranean nightclubs. As a result he failed his finals and was sent to a London crammer, run by an attractive widow, and then to France to learn French. He was commissioned into the Royal Horse Guards, which taught him sword, lance and revolver drill, tent pegging and other cavalry exercises. Before embarking for Palestine in 1940, he paid an Indian at Liverpool docks to tattoo his regiment’s emblem on his left arm.

After being posted to Tulkarm with the 1st Household Cavalry, Wellesley made patrols through Arab villages, but was upset after a few months to be ordered to shoot 14 black horses, which had taken part in George VI’s coronation, when the regiment was mechanised.

He was then part of a column which advanced 500 miles into Iraq, where he found himself hunting, and being hunted by, the canny nationalist leader Fawzi al-Kawukji who, in league with the Vichy French in Syria, was harrying British supply lines.

A painting of the ‘Iron Duke’ at the Battle of Waterloo (GETTY)

On one patrol Wellesley found himself crawling at night through the ruins of the ancient city of Palmyra, outside which he found a French officer’s scarlet cloak; it would remain on the ducal bed for many years until the Duchess threw it out as moth-eaten. On another he was turned back by enemy armoured cars outside El Beida. “Apart from the above incidents,” the citation for his MC declared, “this officer’s conduct throughout the operations in Syria was exceptionally gallant and he was a magnificent example to all ranks of his squadron.”

While in Cairo he enjoyed the friendship of a Druze princess, who once hid him in her bedroom while she remonstrated with an enraged friend. He took part in the battle of Alamein before being wounded when a “brew-up” of tea exploded. It was in late 1943 that he learned that his cousin, the 6th Duke, his elder by three years, had been killed with the Commandos at Salerno. Wellesley’s father succeeded as the 7th Duke, and he began to use the courtesy title, Marquess of Douro.

On being posted to the staff in Jerusalem he met Diana McConnel, who worked in the office of her father, Major General Douglas McConnel, the GOC. Shortly before their marriage in January 1943 a bomb was discovered outside the Anglican cathedral; it had been due to go off on their wedding day. Nine weeks later Douro was sent to Italy where, in the course of the difficult advance, he was given a duck which, instead of eating, he kept with a pointer in his armoured car, which his men dubbed “The Dog and the Duck”.

The Duke and Duchess of Wellington at Stratfield Saye in 1974 (REX)

Posted to Germany after the war, he considered leaving the Army until King George VI asked him to stay on, saying: “I like to have people I know in the Household Cavalry.” The following year Douro stood guard for 22 periods at the King’s lying-in-state.

His next significant posting was as commanding officer of the Blues in Cyprus, where he always slept with a pistol under his pillow. He then commanded the Royal Armoured Corps in Germany before a final appointment as military attaché in Madrid — he was in the unusual position of being a diplomat in a country where he was heir to a title (Duke of Ciudad Rodrigo) and to 2,500 acres, which had been conferred on the 1st Duke.

On retiring from the Army in 1968 in the rank of brigadier, Douro turned his attention to the family estates. These were in an unsatisfactory state since his father had handed over the running of the main holdings to the government in the hope of preserving them. As a result these became a “parliamentary estate”, vested in the Prime Minister, the Speaker of the Commons and the Chancellor of the Exchequer, an arrangement with great disadvantages which was dissolved in 1972.

After succeeding as the 8th Duke in the same year, in order to meet estate duties he sold 1,135 acres at Silchester and 230 at Wellington, Somerset (from where the family had originated). Over the following years he sold paintings, drawings and a 120-piece Sèvres dessert service made for the Empress Josephine. When it was learned that the buyer of the Sèvres was the French government there was a storm of protest in Britain, and an export licence was delayed before it eventually went to the Victoria and Albert Museum for £450,000. The Iron Duke’s papers were dispatched to Southampton University as part of an agreement with the Treasury.

The Duke with his dog, Nutkin, in 1990 (REX)

A plan to modernise the Wellington estates included opening to the public Stratfield Saye, the 17th-century house with 7,500 acres between Reading and Basingstoke which had been given by the nation to the 1st Duke, and the creation of a 700-acre country park . In the course of 40 years, it was estimated that he planted more than one million trees.

The democratic age sometimes posed a threat to the Wellington properties abroad. In Spain, 500 farmworkers staged a sit-in on the ducal hunting estate near Granada . In Belgium in the 1970s and 1980s, two retired senators (one a descendant of a Napoleonic general) called the Duke’s right to an income of £20,000 a year from the 2,600 acres next to the battlefield of Waterloo a “feudal and medieval annuity”.

There were other irritations, such as the persistent press interest in his daughter Jane’s friendship with the Prince of Wales in the early 1970s; and he could be sure that, wherever he was in the world, nobody would miss the opportunity to serve him Beef Wellington.

In the House of Lords, the Duke was particularly critical of the cutting of the Army’s numbers after the fall of communism. (When the Blair government introduced its reforms of the Upper House, the dukes declined to put their names forward for election.)

In his later years the Duke visited Iraq (he was highly critical of the 2003 invasion) and made a pilgrimage to the 6th Duke’s grave near Salerno. He was proud when a grandson served in Afghanistan with the Blues and Royals.

The Duke’s many appointments included being the last Colonel-in-Chief of the Duke of Wellington’s Regiment; president of Game Conservancy; a director of Massey Ferguson; a trustee of the Royal Armouries; and a governor of Wellington College.

He was appointed LVO in 1952, OBE in 1957 and KG in 1990. He was also an officer of the French Legion of Honour, and a Knight Grand Cross of the Order of St Michael of the Wing in Portugal, and of the Order of Isabel the Catholic in Spain.

The Duke’s wife died in 2010. The heir to the peerages is the eldest of his four sons, Charles, Marquess of Douro, a former MEP, who was born in 1945 and married Princess Antonia von Preussen, a great-granddaughter of the last German Emperor.

The 8th Duke of Wellington, born July 2 1915, died December 31 2014

Guardian:

Alexis Tsipras, head of Greece's radical leftist Syriza party
Alexis Tsipras (left), head of Greece’s leftist Syriza party. The country is to hold a national election on 25 January. Photograph: Alkis Konstantinidis/Reuters

With the radical left Syriza coalition tipped to form the next government in Greece following the announcement of early elections in the new year (The future has begun, says leftist Tsipras as he scents power, 30 December), liberal democracy is under scrutiny as it has never been before in the very heart of Europe. Will the Greek people and their democratic constitution be respected and upheld by the European and US establishments which have committed billions to foreign interventions in the name of democracy and human rights, or is Europe poised to experience the overthrow of a democratically elected government within its union?

In connection with the possibility of Syriza forming the next government, one cannot help remembering US president Lyndon Johnson’s hubristic disregard for Greek democracy when he expressed himself with regard to the Greek ambassador’s concern with the US’s preferred solution on Cyprus: “Then listen to me, Mr Ambassador, fuck your parliament and your constitution. America is an elephant. Cyprus is a flea. If these two fleas continue itching the elephant, they may just get whacked by the elephant’s trunk, whacked good … We pay a lot of good American dollars to the Greeks, Mr Ambassador. If your prime minister gives me talk about democracy, parliament and constitutions, he, his parliament and his constitution may not last very long.”
Russell Caplan
London

• The size of the Greek economy being minuscule in comparison to the major economies in the EU, the only threat to world finance of a Syriza victory is political. It is a threat of the loss of grip on the narrative of the financial crisis, that the crisis is caused by the profligacy of the poor, in the hands of the plutocracy of global finance.

If Syriza is allowed to retain the euro on its own terms, people elsewhere might begin to question the benefit of continuing with the particular programme of poor-bashing austerity, even if they accept the need for austerity, preached by the union leaders, the troika, of this governing plutocracy. The governing classes ask for decades of sacrifice from citizens, holding out at best only the prospect of low-paying, insecure jobs.

If the received narrative comes into question, workers like those in Germany might begin to doubt their masters. Workers there have accepted low wages for decades without questioning the narrative of competitiveness ensuring their financial security. They would see that their sacrifice has, paradoxically, contributed to their economic insecurity by allowing for a glut of money in trade surpluses to be built up in a banking system that has developed innovative techniques of financial engineering which only reward the plutocracy in corporate boardrooms and banks, and contribute to the instability of the economic edifice that delivers jobs and prosperity to the masses.
SP Chakravarty
Bangor

• You state (Editorial, 30 December) that if the left-leaning Syriza wins the January election, it will ask the EU for debt forgiveness. Perhaps you should have pointed out that Germany too asked for such macroeconomic mercy after its defeat in the second world war, which was duly granted by the allies under the postwar London debt agreement, thereby paving the way for West Germany’s economic miracle.

A debt write-off for Greece, however, although affordable, will not please German voters, as they will have to bear its cost. But such a prescription, if agreed upon, will go a long way towards lessening the growth of extreme pathologies that invariably ensue from stagnating incomes and declining living standards.
Randhir Singh Bains
Gants Hill, Essex

• Syriza is being disingenuous in repeatedly declaring its intention of keeping Greece in the European economic and monetary union (Syriza can transform the EU from within – if Europe will let it, theguardian.com, 30 December). If you belong to a club, you have to play by the rules; which doesn’t include having your debt written off by the other member states. In order to avoid deceiving the electorate, Syriza should do the honourable thing and advocate Greece leaving the EU.
Stan Labovitch
Windsor, Berkshire

• The people of Greece now have a stark choice: more brutal austerity in return for EU and International Monetary Fund bailouts for the banks, or a rejection of austerity altogether. With the party of the radical left, Syriza, now topping the polls, it is clear which way Greeks are leaning. If the Greeks can vote to reject austerity, so can we – we need to break the pro-austerity consensus of the main parties. Let’s make 2015 the year we put people before profit and public service before corporate greed.
Jenny Sutton
Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition parliamentary candidate, Tottenham

Sign language
Sign language. Photograph: David Levene

My hearing daughter learned sign language to communicate with her school friends during silent assemblies at her Quaker school. I had no idea she had this skill until on an family outing we were forced to take shelter in a mountain hut during a blizzard. Sharing our table was a silent and rather sad-looking man. We were told by his companion that he was unable to speak, so my daughter started signing. I shall never forget the joy on his face as he realised he was able to communicate with us. I for one will be signing the Let Sign Shine petition (Letters, 31 December).
Sarah Noble
Kirkby Overblow, North Yorkshire

• We are now on an even split between men and women in the honours list (New year honours 2015: the full list, theguardian.com, 30 December). About time. Puzzling, then, that women who have no other title are still listed with indicators of their marital status. If relationship status is relevant to achievements warranting honours, then surely we should be given this information for the men too? To do otherwise would surely be illegal discrimination.
Naomi Standen
Birmingham

• The best aphorism in the Guardian of 2014 (Review of the year, G2, 30 December) was by Barney Ronay – he defined God Save the Queen (sung by England fans) as “a plea to an entity that doesn’t exist to preserve one that shouldn’t” (Sport, 20 November). Brilliant.
James Herring
Dunbar, East Lothian

• When I went into the central London branch of my old bank to close the last account, the cashier gave me £3.83, which emptied the account, but said I would need to make an appointment if I wished to close it (Letters, 31 December).
Angela Frampton
London

Ricky Tomlinson speaking at the Robert Tressell Festival, Hastings, Britain - 01 Jul 2007

Ricky Tomlinson speaking at the Robert Tressell festival in Hastings in 2007. Photograph: David McHugh/Rex Features

In response to Martin Kettle’s article on the People’s History Museum’s invitation to supporters to sponsor one of its 100 radical heroes (Right, left and centre: our debt to history’s radicals, 26 December), I wanted to let readers know that people can suggest and sponsor their own radical heroes – we welcome relevant additions to the list. We selected our 100 from the museum’s diverse collections from across the political spectrum – all of them appear somewhere in our museum. They are all radical men and women who believed in ideas worth fighting for and who changed history. The campaign was launched in November by Alan Johnson MP, who sponsored his own radical hero, Scottish activist Jimmy Reid, taking our list immediately to 101.
John Monks
Chair, People’s History Museum

Gerry Abbott asks (Letters, December 31) whether anyone will celebrate the centenary of the publication of Robert Tressell’s The Ragged-Trousered Philanthropists? Mugsborough itself did so. Hastings borough council, to its great credit, published a brilliant illustrated edition of the book in 2014 “as a public enterprise, not for private profit”, for the handsome price of £2.95. I bought mine from its seafront information office.
Jonathan Coe
Hastings, East Sussex

The centenary of The Ragged-Trousered Philanthropists was celebrated with a symposium at the Hastings campus of the University of Brighton in April, 100 years to the day after its publication. We also celebrated the arrival of the Robert Tressell family papers left to the university in Hastings, which we hope to have online by the end of 2015.
Dr Trevor Hopper
Lecturer in social history, University of Brighton in Hastings

Pickles comments

‘In ruling out an English revaluation, communities and local government minister Eric Pickles said it would put up to £320 on the average council tax bill for English households,’ writes Sue Campbell. Photograph: Anthony Devlin/PA

Your editorial on Britain’s broken council tax (20 December), calling for councils to be free to introduce new council tax bands, is welcome. In its report, Devolution in England: The Case for Local Government, published in July 2014, the communities and local government committee, which I chair, called for devolved areas – in the first instance, London or combined authority areas such as Manchester – to be given the power to introduce new council tax bands at the top end of the scale and to split existing ones.

This change needs to follow a revaluation. Council tax rates are based on 1991 valuations, and those in the highest-banded properties are limited to paying no more than three times the tax of those in the lowest. The pretext for deferring revaluation – that it would increase most people’s council tax – is erroneous if the revaluation is fiscally neutral overall locally. Therefore a revaluation of itself must not affect a council’s income. If nothing is done, there is a risk that the whole system will eventually collapse. The government has to legislate to revalue domestic properties every five years. With up-to-date valuations, devolved authorities can introduce a new band with the appropriate properties in it. Doing so would increase fairness in the distribution of the tax burden locally.

With the growing demand for the devolution of tax-raising powers to local authorities in England, the council tax should, in the next parliament, I hope, be overhauled and handed back to the control of local politicians.
Clive Betts MP
Chair, communities and local government committee

It is not only Scotland that has been used as a testing ground for government policies (Downing street files reveal how Letwin kept poll tax plans alive, 30 December). Properties in Wales were revalued in 2005, which led to 40% of properties being moved up one or two council tax bands and higher tax bills. Revaluation of English properties has never been implemented. In ruling out an English revaluation, communities and local government minister Eric Pickles said it would put up to £320 on the average council tax bill for English households. In this election year, no party would dare to even suggest, never mind implement, such a policy. One law for the English and another for the Welsh.
Sue Campbell
Cardiff

An Iraqi Christian woman sits inside a church in Telkaif near Mosul
An Iraqi Christian woman fleeing violence in the Iraqi city of Mosul, sits inside a church in Telkaif. ‘Iraq is another case where Muslims who fall foul of the Isis brand of Islam are just as savagely persecuted as Christians,’ writes the Rev Canon Andy Thompson. Photograph: Reuters

As the Anglican chaplain living in Abu Dhabi, a former chaplain in Kuwait and a canon of Bahrain Cathedral, I would like to address your editorial on Christian persecution (26 December). I appreciate the Guardian highlighting what has become a disturbingly widespread trend. However, as a resident in the Gulf, I felt the throwaway line presenting the Gulf as a front line in Christian persecution was misleading. While this would be true for Saudi Arabia, the reality in other Gulf countries is far more nuanced. Though there is a large domestic workforce consisting of Christians from the Philippines, India and Ethiopia, there is also a significant Christian minority who work in the professional sector, in education, health, tourism and the oil and gas industry – in other words, we are not all impoverished servants.

There is no persecution in the UAE, Bahrain or Oman. Living in Kuwait, I saw a lot of abuse of domestic workers, and sometimes that was related to religion, but mainly it was abuse of power rather than persecution. I have found that the ruling families have been unstintingly generous towards the church, especially in the UAE. At the recent G20 Interfaith Summit in Brisbane, as a representative of the Christian community in the UAE, I spoke about the UAE as an excellent example of religious freedom within an Islamic framework.

I think your editorial also needs to remind readers that some of the named countries are dysfunctional to the extent where all minorities and even the majority suffers (I think of North Korea especially). Iraq is another case where Muslims who fall foul of the Isis brand of Islam are just as savagely persecuted as Christians.

Yet Christian persecution is a reality and I thank you for raising awareness about the suffering of countless devout Christians. In the case of the Gulf, though, your editorial is an inadequate representation of the experience of the church.
Rev Canon Andy Thompson
Senior chaplain, St Andrew’s Church, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

John Freeman
John Freeman, newly appointed high commissioner to India, 1965. Photograph: Alamy

John Freeman’s years as British high commissioner to India, 1965-68, happily coincided with my own stay there, sponsored by the Ministry of Overseas Development, as a professor at Delhi’s Indian Institute of Technology and occasionally invited to High Commission events. Tall, well-built and handsome, with wavy, gingerish hair, Freeman (obituary, 29 December) was a combination of diplomatic charm and intimidating presence. Yet despite his determination to represent Britain’s Labour government as a new political and cultural presence, the high commissioner’s extensive private compound, with accompanying croquet lawn and equipment, did little to convey to both Indian and British guests that, as the writer Khushwant Singh observed, he was little different from a “pukka sahib”.

Independent:

You rightly observe that when disaster strikes our railway system, as during the Finsbury Park fiasco, government ministers “ooze sympathy for the public’s predicament, never forgetting to remind us that, alas, it is no longer the direct concern of the state” (editorial, 29 December). The same pattern is, of course, replicated whenever there is an outcry over the behaviour of privatised utility companies.

One of the issues in the forthcoming general election will be the desirability or not of reducing the size of government, an ambition which the Conservative Party is likely to embrace with enthusiasm. The railway scandal of recent days and the tendency of private gas, electricity and water providers to ill-treat their customers with impunity are a sobering reminder that “small government” in the UK today is another way of saying “You’re on your own.”

David Head

Navenby, Lincolnshire

 

Steve Richards (30 December)  has the wrong end of the stick if he thinks that those caught up in the rail chaos of 27 and 28 December had accepted it. Far from it. They were given no choice.

It was caused by at best lack of planning and at worst incompetence at Network Rail and, probably, acquiescence by the Department of Transport. The DoT’s statement on the 27th that they were “very disappointed” didn’t quite do it for most of the people affected.

You can imagine the conversation that took place before Christmas:

Network Rail: Sorry Minister but we think the engineering works might overrun.

Minister: Oh, never mind – it’s the weekend and only people outside London such as Northerners will be affected, so it’s not important.

Steve Richards shows the same London-centric view when he talks about a “starting point” for a journey in north London. What about those who started in Leeds (not to mention farther north) who eventually got to London after a seven-hour journey (normally three hours at most), re-routing from Peterborough on their own initiative as best they could, without any help from rail companies or Network Rail.

Steve is right that we need proper public debate – about a lot of things – but I don’t think we’ll get it while everyone in the capital thinks London is the UK.

Geoffrey Downs

Wilsden, West Yorkshire

 

The answer to Rob Edwards’s conundrum why passengers were not told to go to St Pancras (letter, 30 December) is simple. Services from St Pancras are run by a different company, which is a rival to those run from King’s Cross.

The same is now becoming increasingly true in the NHS, where neighbouring hospitals are in competition for patients and services, and experienced clinicians spend half their time writing business plans rather than seeing patients.

Such is the fate of once great public services under the last few governments.

Christopher Anton

Birmingham

 

Simon Bryant (letter, 30 December) reminds us that Network Rail is the responsibility of ministers. Unfortunately, someone invented “government agencies” to distance ministers from responsibility and provide much smoke and many mirrors. Who invented the agency, with it’s highly paid people that cannot be questioned in the House of Commons?

Simon Allen

London N2

 

I stood up to the sex pests

As the 22-year-old daughter of Nigel Glover, whose letter you published on 27 December, I felt deeply saddened to read Jennifer Towland’s response (29 December) to his anger in hearing the frequency of unwanted sexual attention I had recently received. I resent the advice to “man up”, take control of my life, and “stop running to daddy”.

In answer to Ms Towland, I did handle each situation myself, and I can assure you that I am more than capable of standing up for myself and my friends. However I feel Ms Towland has missed the point entirely, and I cannot understand why I deserve any criticism.

What I inferred from her letter is that I should have dealt with the situation and then shut up about it. How dare I speak to my father about this? How dare he express an opinion? Ms Towland insists that I should hold some responsibility for the situations I found myself in. Sadly this perpetuates the view that the person who has suffered sexual, physical or verbal harassment is somewhat to blame.

However I chose to act, or whomever I decided to tell, should be of no consequence. When will the blame for sexual harassment finally be landed solely on the perpetrator?

If Ms Towland feels the need to hand out advice in the future, perhaps it would best be aimed at the sexually aggressive instigator, rather than the victim.

Abi Glover

St Albans, Hertfordshire

 

Lord Mayor’s gong for Dame Fiona

It is probably unfair to criticise the award of a damehood to Fiona Woolf (who is clearly not a member of the Establishment) in the aftermath of her resignation as head of the child abuse inquiry. This award had nothing to do with that inquiry.

A knighthood or damehood is automatically given to every Lord Mayor of London on leaving office.  This happened to her immediate predecessors, Sir David Wootton and Sir Roger Gifford, and no doubt next year will happen to the current Lord Mayor, Alan Yarrow. It is therefore unfair to single out Dame Fiona for this.

However it does raise a wider question of whether it is right that, when someone achieves a certain office (for example in the Civil Service or the armed forces or as a long-serving backbench MP), an award is automatically handed to them. Surely achieving that position is in itself recognition of their eminence, and no gong or title needs to go with it.

There is clearly a case that the honours system is so archaic and arbitrary that it is beyond reform and should be swept away. However it will not be, as it is such a useful means of patronage to those who control it.

Gordon Elliot

Burford, Oxfordshire

 

Religious people do good deeds

Your correspondents are correct to assert that ethics are not always derived from religion (letters, 29 December). Atheists can behave in a perfectly ethical way, though often the roots of the ethics may be found in Biblical sources.

However, modern sociological research on British and American society shows us that people belonging to religious groups are more likely to act on their ethics. They are more likely to give charity, to visit the sick or elderly, or do someone a good turn. The data shows that religion, as measured by attendance at a place of worship, is the best indicator of altruism.

Zaki Cooper

Trustee, Council of Christians and Jews

London EC4

 

Gay scene in Doctor Who

Those who complained that scenes in Doctor Who were “promoting homosexuality” were mistaken. No “promotion” was taking place; the BBC was fulfilling its public-service commitment.

One valuable role of children’s television is to teach acceptance of difference. All non-abusive relationships are normal, and free expression of emotion is a human right. By making what was once pushed to the fringes now seem commonplace, we ensure that our children need never lead lives of exclusion, imprisoned by guilt and fear.

It seems that there are still a few dismal individuals who are only content when they see their prejudices being perpetuated down the generations for all time, despite such attitudes truly deserving to be locked firmly in the past.

Julian Self

Milton Keynes

 

Shot dead by a toddler

A two-year-old has killed his mother with her gun while she was shopping at a Walmart store in Idaho.

While it is well known that the gun lobby cowboys have complete power in the US, what they don’t seem to understand is that when the right to bear arms was enshrined in the US Constitution only strong adults would have the strength to fire a gun.

Now that they are making guns so easy to use that a two-year-old can do it, you would think they would get the message that something must be done to control gun ownership.

Malcolm Howard

Banstead, Surrey

 

Artists who weren’t there

Professor Martin Kemp tells me I should not take Tracey Emin’s My Bed too literally, because she may not have slept in it (“Why Tracey Emin’s bed looks too good to be true”, 29 December).

Should I then regard The Raft of the Medusa in the same way simply because Géricault was not actually on board?

Michael Elkin

Halifax, West Yorkshire

Times:

 

Sir, I couldn’t disagree more with Carol Midgley (“Call me love, but never bossy”, Dec 31). We usually praise assertive and outspoken women as role models but men with such traits are often seen as overbearing.
Michael Hussey
Newton Abbot, Devon

Sir, My grandchildren (letters Dec 29, Dec 31) call me “grandoc”.
Dr Robert Scholefield

Ledbury, Herefordshire

Sir, Given my love for champagne, I am known to my grandsons as “GFizz”.
Susan Craig
Richmond, Surrey

Sir, My wife and I are “GP” and “GM”.
Roger Gillham
Windsor, Berks

Sir, I’m “grandad”.
Brian Mackinney
Nottingham

Sir, The closure of King’s Cross provoked heavy criticism of Network Rail’s management (letters, Dec 28), but at no time was any mention made of the critical importance of completing these engineering projects safely and with full inspections before letting services resume.

Memories of the Clapham Junction disaster seem to have passed out of public memory. It is critical that these outcries should not affect the safe completion of projects. The risk of public persecution is a small price to pay for safe execution.
Sir Bob Reid
Former chairman, British Rail
St Andrews

Sir, I defend your selection for man of the year . Those who wrote to criticise the choice have totally missed the point (letters, Dec 30). It is Nigel Farage who has forced the Westminster village to address the concerns of the electorate.

Politicians have been made to listen to the views of the electorate, regardless of whether these views are justified or not, and act accordingly. They are after all the “employees” of the electorate not their party political machines. Such an achievement in itself warrants the accolade given by The Thunderer.
Paul Gilbert
Knowle, Solihull

Sir, There were 65 awards for the army in the New Year’s Honours List. Fifty six went to officers, 8 to warrant officers and one to a sergeant. Yet the reporting from Afghanistan praises in the highest terms the performance of junior ranks.

In the 1980 New Year’s Honour List, the Queen awarded the British Empire Medal to 62 soldiers (all staff sergeant or below), of whom 14 were corporals. This year she was asked to approve honours to just one soldier who would, under the old rules, have qualified for a BEM.

The record of the Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force is similarly poor. We can correct it.

Colonel (Ret’d) John Wilson
Former editor British Army Review
Salisbury

Telegraph:

Lord Mitchell spoke out during the debate on assisted suicide in the House of Lords
A vote on the issue of assisted dying is a matter of conscience Photo: Alamy

SIR – Your leading article finishes with a plea for the proponents of assisted dying to accept the outcome and not come back time and again until they get what they want.”

This is naive. No matter how many times the vote is against assisted dying – and it has been many times over the past couple of decades – its proponents will keep on coming back to the issue.

It is, I gather, a “conscience vote” in Parliament. One can only hope the Lords have the gumption to allow doctors a conscience clause, or we may have the spectacle of doctors being prosecuted for not killing their patients.

John Allen FRCS
Swindon, Wiltshire

SIR – Campaigners use selective quotation as the drunken man uses the lamppost: more for support than illumination.

The letter calling for a change in the law on assisted dying (December 29) quotes Dr Atul Gawande, this year’s Reith lecturer, as saying “we are heartless if we don’t recognise unbearable suffering and seek to alleviate it”.

Dr Gawande went on to point to the three- or fourfold rise in the number of people in the Netherlands choosing assisted suicide, noting that “the number one reason is no longer unbearable suffering, it’s become that people don’t want to be a burden on the family and the society any more. And that concerns me a great deal because we can put people in a position where they feel that they are just a burden.”

Neither the judicial nor the medical safeguards proposed thus far would relieve this insidious but powerful social pressure.

Don Brand
Staplehurst, Kent

SIR – At what stage did actors, comedians and prize-winning novelists acquire sufficient status and moral high ground to tell Parliament how to proceed on an issue as important as assisted dying?

Diana Jones
London N12

SIR – I accept that there are compassionate people on both sides of the assisted dying debate and that such a debate is needed in this country.

I do not, however, believe that it was a coincidence that both my beloved husband and mother were enabled to die peacefully and calmly in hospices.

Law-makers must listen carefully to the views of palliative care professionals and their patients before deciding on a law that would have an international impact. Many of the fledgling palliative care programmes around the world are based on the principles and practice of the modern hospice movement, pioneered in this country by Dame Cicely Saunders. Where we lead they are likely to follow.

Gail Featherstone
Sevenoaks, Kent

Hospital overcrowding

SIR – I was the Chairman of Birmingham City Council’s Health Scrutiny Committee from 2004 to 2012, while the new Queen Elizabeth Hospital was being planned and built.

On a number of occasions my committee questioned whether the number of beds planned was adequate. We were assured by health professionals that, because hospital stays are shorter these days, everything would be fine.

As your report (“Night one of our brightest and best hospitals was defeated by the dire state of the NHS”, report, December 29) shows, it is not. And with Birmingham’s population set to rise quite considerably over the coming years, the situation will surely only get worse. The number of on-site parking spaces is woefully inadequate, too – as a look around the clogged neighbouring roads will confirm.

Cllr Deirdre Alden (Con)
Edgbaston, Birmingham

Run out of puff

(WILL WINTERCROSS)

SIR – Over the weekend just gone, the coldest of the year so far, all 100-plus off-shore wind turbines along the North Wales coast were idling very slowly, all using grid power for de-icing and to power their hydraulic systems that keep the blades facing in the same direction.

Thanks to Ed Davey, the Energy and Climate Change Secretary, we will be subsidising these follies for the next 30 years. And then, if we continue to vote for technically naive green politicians, for further periods after that.

Brian Christley
Abergele, Conwy

Doggone it

SIR – Releasing a dog caught on wire, without injury to the rescuer, should simply involve throwing your Barbour over the dog’s head while you get on with the business. Failing that, a lead wrapped round the dog’s muzzle and tied not too tight is a trickier alternative.

Ear defenders (for the rescuer) are helpful but seldom available.

John Josephi
Lydney, Gloucestershire

Cut off in Cumbria

SIR – Alan Kibblewhite (Letters, December 26) is spot on when he writes about rural buses. In Cumbria, the only bus connecting Penrith and Kendal has been withdrawn due to the loss of the county council subsidy. The result is that several villages no longer have access to public transport. Some people have been forced to give up paid and voluntary employment, while others may even have to move house.

Eric Pickles is the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government. Perhaps he could explain why the council is spending vast sums of money on a new headquarters, while abolishing a subsidy for a service upon which so many people depended.

Patricia Jagger
Penrith, Cumbria

There’s no good time of year for rail repairs

SIR – Dr David Cottam (Letters, December 29) suggests that major rail engineering work should be carried out in August to avoid the effects of winter weather. This seems to be a good suggestion. Regrettably it’s not as easy as that.

For example, when I was track renewals contract manager for Railtrack, and then Network Rail in the North-West, mid-winter was the period of the year booked for routine track renewal works over Shap on the West Coast Main Line.

I was told that the train operating company, which Network Rail has to negotiate with to agree such blocks, would only permit this period as the summer was too busy.

However, this company was the first to complain when sub-zero conditions caused ballast to freeze solid in the wagons delivering it to the site, with a resultant delay in completing the job.

There is never a good time to renew track and undertake disruptive engineering works; the availability of diversionary routes is too limited in many areas.

I hope something positive comes out of discussions of the post-Christmas debacle.

John H Brook
Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire

SIR – If Network Rail were a private company, heads would roll and future contracts put in doubt. However, as it is a taxpayer-funded organisation, no one will be held responsible and our money will continue to fund it.

Ed Miliband has promised to ensure more of the rail franchises are nationalised, just like Network Rail.

Michael Edwards
Haslemere, Surrey

Speed cameras

SIR – Ian Kemp’s assertion that cameras are “only ever installed at collision hotspots” (Letters, December 29) does not stand up to analysis. On the contrary, cameras are primarily installed where they are most likely to catch motorists exceeding speed limits – limits that are often unrealistically low.

On December 7 2003, in an interview with The Sunday Telegraph, the then chief constable of Durham, Paul Garvin, said that “if you break down the 1,900 collisions we have each year, only 3 per cent involve cars that are exceeding the speed limit.”

The available evidence clearly shows that cameras are an extremely efficient revenue-raising system, but have a negligible effect on improving road safety.

Jimmy James
Stanwick, Northamptonshire

Car code cracking

SIR – I did not know the late Christopher Barlow (Letters, December 29), whose online password is the name of his first car. The car is likely to have been a Wartburg. Anyone would want to keep that a secret.

Adrian Love
Grafham, Cambridgeshire

SIR – Yesterday I placed inside the envelope for my son to open after my death, a list bearing my mother’s maiden name, the make of my first car, his nickname as a child and the name of my first dog – together with, by way of explanation, a copy of the letter from Sarah Barlow.

Christopher Horne
Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire

Replacing the tangerine with seedless impostors

Forbidden fruit: the tangerine takes its name from the Moroccan seaport of Tangier (Valentyn Volkov / Alamy)

SIR – As a retired greengrocer, I may have the answer to the scarcity of tangerines in the shops (Letters, December 23).

Original tangerines were absolutely packed with pips and, although flavoursome, were difficult to consume politely – what did one do with the pips?

They were replaced by a seedless version – satsumas – which are almost tasteless, so sales of these have dwindled.

Clementines are much tastier but not as good as the old tangerine which, incidentally, has a very short shelf-life – and is thus unattractive to supermarkets.

David Hughes
Llandudno, Conwy

SIR – I read the letter about the demise of the tangerine but there are many more candidates for their crown. Although I didn’t realise it at the time, the fruit I bought the other morning were clemenules.

Sue Cameron
Fulwood, Lancashire

Watching the waistline

SIR – Sqd Ldr T J W Leyland wonders what social events he can look forward to in his seventies (Letters, December 29). I suggest he visits Necker Island (report, December 29), where apparently he could eat sushi off the bare midriff of a young woman.

Anthony Coletta
Bournemouth, Dorset

SIR – Sqd Ldr Leyland has much to look forward to in his seventies, including someone like me supplying him with Meals on Wheels. He should brace himself.

Zara Pradyer
Chessington, Surrey

SIR – What comes next is a very long lie–in.

Nicholas Coates
London SW6

The fat of the land

SIR – Natasha Corrett advocates eating “as Mother Nature intended.

Looking at the list of ingredients in her recipes (from umeboshi plum purée to galangal), I can only conclude that Mother Nature never intended anyone to live in the British Isles.

Chris Wright
Ferndown, Dorset

Globe and Mail:

  (Brian Gable/The Globe and Mail)

Jeffrey Simpson

Here’s a resolution: Forget the polls

Lysiane Gagnon

It’s the question we push aside every Dec. 31


Christmas is for family, New Year’s Eve is for friends, or so it goes in many circles.

Christmas is tradition, New Year is innovation. On the 24th of December, you look back. On the 31st, you look ahead. Nostalgia gives way to hope.

At Christmas, the festivities are held along a makeshift table long enough to accommodate several generations. The meal must be a reminder of days gone by, thus the turkey, the homemade “tourtières” and the “bûche de Noël” – the Yule log cake kids and grandparents love.

At New Year’s Eve, the table is folded, the furniture pushed against the walls. It’s time for drinking and dancing and socializing: entertainment for adults, as the kids have gone to their own parties or are at their grandparents. Nobody spends the evening sitting down like we did at Christmas. Time to get on one’s feet, to waltz one’s way around the room to chat with everyone. There is no flirting at Christmas (who wants to seduce an uncle or a cousin?) but at New Year’s celebrations, especially around midnight, hugs may very well turn into more insistent embraces.

The required drink is champagne (or a good bubbly like Spain’s cava or Italy’s prosecco), and the food must be creative. After hours of research in trendy cook books, the home chef has prepared in advance fancy finger food or a stunning buffet. With her silky black dress and stilettos, the most she will do on New Year’s Eve itself is reheat the delicate puff pastries bought from a high-end caterer. At Christmas, people like to sport things like red pullovers and red socks – a reminder that the spirit of Père Noël is still alive and strong. But for New Year, they are in their finest: Women wear their sexiest outfits, some men even show up in a tux (minus the tie).

Christmas is a time for comfort and cuddling, as people marvel at their children’s joy and retreat into their own childhood memories. And presiding over these warm celebrations is the archetypal figure of Santa Claus, a symbol of kindness, protection and generosity. The New Year is something else: fleeting waves of worry run across the champagne-fuelled excitement. There is no reassuring symbol, no clear sign of what lies ahead. All you know is that another year is gone – which makes you think how fast time flies and realize that you’re one year older. “Here’s to happiness!” the guests exclaim while raising their glasses. Older guests insist on health: “If you have health, you’ve got everything!” they joyfully intone, knowing full well it’s false: You could be perfectly healthy and lose a child, a lover or your job, or face a dreadful car accident.

The future is foggy. We all know the world will not be a better place in the year to come – and if a pessimist ruefully predicts it will actually get far worse, nobody will dare contradict him, because the prediction is quite sensible. But as far as our own lives are concerned, what we’re left to contemplate is some kind of crazy game of Russian roulette. I could be lucky and slalom through potential tragedies, or I could unknowingly have drawn the bad number.

How will we feel next year on the same date? This is the insidious, disquieting question that arises amid the celebrations, but soon we push it away – as we should. Happy New Year to all readers!

 

BOB RAMSAY

Debate over police powers missing key voices: women and minorities


Bob Ramsay is a Toronto communications consultant and founder of RamsayTalks

The biggest story in America this year is that racism isn’t dead. Just ask any young black man who’s been ‘carded’ by the police. Or the families of those who were killed by police under murky circumstances. Or the families of police gunned down in revenge.

Almost as tragic as the deaths is the murderous rhetoric. Patrick Lynch, head of Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association of New York, claimed “There’s blood on many hands. [It]… starts on the steps of City Hall, in the office of the Mayor,” because Mayor Bill deBlasio didn’t support the NYPD wholeheartedly after Eric Garner was choked to death by an NYPD officer, after screaming 15 times: “I can’t breathe”.

Here in Canada, Toronto Police Association president Michael McCormack waded in against “irresponsible anti-police rhetoric,” then linked “the resulting hatred” to the deaths of the two NYPD officers.

We’ve come to expect union heads to call any criticism of their members’ actions ‘irresponsible’, and in this case ‘anti-police.’ It goes with the territory.

But across Canada it also goes with the gender, and maybe even the race.

Because what’s missing in our own national debates over the abuse of police powers are two voices: women, and especially policewomen, and non-whites, and especially non-white police officers.

This first clicked for me when I saw Pat Lynch ranting against New York’s mayor on TV last week. He was surrounded by five very large white men, his fellow executives at the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association. True, there is the Policewomen’s Endowment Association, which represents the 34 per cent of the NYPD’s 34,500 officers who are women. But they’re a networking and fellowship group, not a union like the men’s association.

Here in Canada, to say that police unions are boys’ clubs – and white boys’ clubs at that – understates just how glaring the absence of women and visible minorities is.

Let’s start with Toronto, “the world’s most diverse city.” Of the eight board members of the Toronto Police Association headed by Mr. McCormack, all eight are male and seven are white. This in a force of 7,650 members, in which 30 per cent are women and 23 per cent are visible minorities, who police a city where 51 per cent of the residents are women and almost the same percentage are members of a visible minority.

Canada’s second-largest city fares no better. The Montreal police union has six executive members. All are men and all are white.

Calgary? Of seven board members, all are men, one is non-white.

Ottawa: of eight members, all men, one non-white.

Halifax: five members, all men, all white.

Vancouver only lists its president (male, white) on its website, and Winnipeg doesn’t list any of its 13 board members.

RCMP officers are forbidden from forming a union. But Canada’s two largest provincial police unions mirror their city cousins: the Ontario Provincial Police Association has seven board members. Six are men and all are white. The Sûreté du Québec has six executive members and 12 board members. All are men, all are white.

But why does this matter? What’s the connection between lower levels of testosterone and less incendiary rhetoric? And not just rhetoric. When police line up outside the courtroom to defend one of their own accused of a crime, I don’t think I’ve ever seen a policewoman pushing the media away. And when the New York cops turned their backs on Mayor de Blasio outside the church last week where he was to speak at the funeral of Raphael Ramos, not a policewoman’s back was to be seen.

The connection, of course, is that women are less violent than men, certainly in deed and often in word as well. (in ‘thought’ we’ll never know). Women are more empathic than men. Women make more rational decisions than men, in everything from investing to … shooting. While women make up 20 per cent to 35 per cent of many police forces, the number of female police officers caught using excessive force ranges from tiny to non-existent.

So why can’t more policewomen and non-white officers get on the boards of their unions?

That’s a question Canada’s 70,000 police officers who want more respect from the public should ask their unions.

WHAT READERS THINK

Dec. 31: Failed sex-assault policy – plus other letters to the editor

Failed policy?

How can we expect universities to come up with viable, usable codes of conduct when two members of Parliament seem to have been accused and tried by their leader without legal recourse to tell their story (Legal Experts Say Universities Failing On Sex-Assault Policies – Dec. 30)? If a would-be leader of this country, Justin Trudeau, can trample rights like this, how can we demand better of lesser organizations?

Colin Wheeler Whitby, Ont.

………

As part of the face-to-face restorative justice meeting between the 13 Dalhousie University male dentistry students and the female classmates they targeted with misogynistic comments, I strongly urge that the offenders’ mothers and sisters also be present.

The male students’ offensive behaviour affects not only their classmates but all women.

J.D. Rothwell, Ottawa

………

Santa’s politics

Re Santa, Evicted (letters, Dec. 30): Suggesting that Santa is not a good fit with the Harper government fails to recognize the true nature of both.

Santa, clearly a very rich man, pays no taxes; his commitment to the North is more publicity stunt than real, as there is no evidence of a permanent establishment; his gift giving shows a clear bias to the rich, with the value of the gifts having an inverse relationship to need; he has an unabashed connection to Big Business, appearing regularly in its marketing.

And, like the Harper Economic Action Plan, Santa is a myth.

Cathy McRae, Thunder Bay, Ont.

………

Trial by innuendo

I agree with the opening statement of your editorial: I, too, am dismayed to see reputations and careers destroyed by public opinion before the courts weigh the evidence (The Year Justice Changed – Dec. 29). This is not right. However, that’s where my agreement stops.

It is hypocritical of The Globe to decry this rush to judgment as it plays the role of enabler to a scandal-addicted public. Every one of the accusations, every innuendo, and all of the arguments (sans defence) are supplied by media outlets, which then cluck their disapproval at the resultant lynching. Instead of trying to expiate the media’s guilt by pointing at the federal government and criminal justice system, perhaps a look at the media’s – and your own – critical role in this grave injustice and assault on our courts would be in order.

Robert Metcalfe, Toronto

………

Due process and the presumption of innocence are hallmarks of the Canadian criminal justice system but they have no place in the arena of public perception.

None of us function that way in everyday life. We constantly make decisions and come to conclusions based on information that would not support a civil burden of proof, never mind a criminal burden of proof. Rob Ford was subjected to constant pillorying in The Globe. Warranted or not, like all of us, your editorial staff didn’t wait for any involvement by the court system before commenting on his activities.

It is only a criminal court that can legally deprive one of their liberty. It makes sense to have safeguards in such a forum so that the innocent are not punished.

There hasn’t been a shift from a presumption of innocence to a tolerance of public shaming. All that is different now is the speed at which people get their information.

Michael O’Hara, Halifax

………

Working poor, too

Re Success Eludes Recent Migrants As Fort Mac Braces For TFW Fallout (Dec. 29): Your article hit a particularly sensitive nerve with me. As one of Canada’s working poor, my family subsists on what are basically minimum wages.

If fast food outlets were to offer decent wages to their employees, they’d have no shortage of capable, reliable workers. Businesses wax eloquent about the virtues of free markets, but they conveniently balk at improving wages in order to accommodate the labour market. The national minimum wage in Australia is about $16 per hour and the sky has not fallen; in Canada, it varies by province, ranging from $10 to $11.

Better wages for Canadian workers would put spending power into the hands of those who can use the money for everyday items. This would boost the manufacturing sector and create sustained economic growth. It is well past time for Canadians to take a hard look at where they are headed and make the necessary changes to put this country back on track for all who live here.

Basil Freeman, Vancouver

………

‘Source of Peace’

While a letter to the editor on the terrorist attack on a school in Peshawar had much merit, we were most surprised to read that the Ahmadiyah Muslim community is “the only Muslim group that readily stands for peace and lives by the true Islam” (Peshawar, Patience – Dec. 29).

We draw your attention to this point, as among Canadian media outlets, you are probably the most versed in the basic tenets of Islam and the diverse communities within our multicultural faith. Thus, we would have expected you to catch this quite inaccurate statement and obvious attempt at self-promotion.

We would humbly submit that 99.9 per cent of all Muslims, whether they be Sunni, Shia or Ahmadiyah, see Islam as a religion of peace and intellectual search. In fact, one of the 99 names of Allah is As-Salaam, the Source of Peace.

Iffat Salaam, Amir Karim, Montreal

………

Let’s talk death

Re The Year We Put Death Above Indignity (Dec. 23): André Picard notes that “the end-of-life conversation … finally worked its way into the mainstream media.” Let’s keep the conversation going.

Old people do not want to live forever, they are wise enough to opt for quality rather than quantity of life. Yet why is it considered tactless, unpleasant or politically incorrect to talk about death to an old person? Why are the children of seniors upset when a doctor says to grandfather, “At your age, why would you want another operation that won’t help you in the end?” And complain that the doctor is heartless to be so direct?

I propose that we all become more honest and acknowledge openly that we are aging, that we do not want increasing health costs to burden our children, and that we do not want unnecessary medical intervention just to buy some time of dubious quality.

Let the old people decide how much care they want. How dare I raise this issue? I dare because I will make necessary decisions in my life, and yes, I am old.

Dr. I.M. Wilm (ret’d.), Guelph, Ont.

………

Scratch that notion

Despite what Marsha Lederman was told, when she yelled “There are insects… in my hair,” she was absolutely right (Tackling The Creepy-Crawlies – Dec. 29). Head lice (Pediculus humanus) are actually insects with the standard six legs, and belong to the order Anoplura. Know thine enemy.

Bryce Kendrick, Sidney, B.C.

Irish Times:

 

Irish Independent:

Garth Brooks

Garth Brooks

In terms of Irish history, there are three new years every year.

We have the Celtic Samhain or Halloween, then there is the new light born of the solstice on December 21, and of course there is January 31. All are full of symbolism and meaning.

The New Year we celebrate today marks a fresh start, as the earth completes another 365-day marathon around the sun.

People and particularly the media have a tendency to look back as the cycle is completed.

Thus we’ll revisit the near revolution over Garth Brooks, the water charges and sundry other convulsions that this time next year will seem like so many tiny tempests in china tea cups.

You will also be bombarded with diets and fitness programmes on how to attain the body beautiful and a balanced life.

All are predicated on dissatisfaction with the way things were, are, or might be.

My belief is that we would all be a lot happier if we could accept who and where we are, and be thankful for what we have, while we have it. Everything is temporary, including trouble.

Certainly we can hope and trust that things can be better, but there is an old saying that one shouldn’t waste energy trying to push the river.

There is an ebb and flow in life, and if we can learn gratitude and acceptance in the certain knowledge that everything passes, and remember to enjoy the journey; then the space for us to overcome our difficulties will open up, and we can make the best of all our lots.

T O’Brien

Killiney, Co Dublin Hope for 2015: a real statesman

Ireland as a society is clearly on a journey to an undefined destination, and for many decades now our political leaders have, at best, functioned simply as effective ‘pot-hole fillers’ on this uncharted road.

Important issues like creating jobs, education, an effective health system, etc, are the potholes, and, like the poor, they may always be with us. But without an overarching vision indicating where the road is taking us, we can never hope to build a meaningful society.

My hope for 2015 is that we and our political system may begin the process of spawning a dynamic leader who is a real statesman (or woman). One who puts an agreed vision for a truly ethical and right-living society in Ireland before ego or power or personal wealth or party.

Maybe it’s time now for each of us, the voters, to consider the type of society we aspire to have; to demand higher ethical standards from our politicians, business executives, and religious leaders; to seek out remarkable and visionary leaders; and to constantly look for that trace of greatness in ourselves and others as we all work to make Ireland a right-living example to the world?

Aidan Devon

Glenageary, Co Dublin

Pro-life amendment saves lives

As a result of last week’s extremely sad right to life case, a number of commentators have attempted to use this tragedy to bad mouth those who dared to vote yes to the pro-life amendment in 1983, and to push further for an abortion regime in Ireland.

The facts are that, largely thanks to that amendment, Ireland has one of the lowest infant/maternal mortality rates in the world. Our rates are much lower than those in the US and UK, where abortion on demand has corrupted the entire medical profession.

Many would argue that last year’s infamous legislation is already a step too far. In fact, on a contrasting basis, those who voted in favour of the 1983 pro-life amendment have absolutely nothing to be ashamed of. Quite the contrary.

Eric Conway

Navan, Co Meath

Give out Cabinet jobs on merit

Our Taoiseach has let it be known during the past week that he would consider appointing senators to Government based on merit.

Why not take this a step further and set up an non-political, unpaid advisory body, whose task would be to draw up a list to be presented to the Taoiseach of candidates who would be capable of taking on the role of a minster in the Government.

This list of candidates should have a proven track record in their own fields of expertise, have excelled in management and demonstrated their ability in reaching certain goals within their area of work.

Even to be on this list would be recognised as an honour in itself.

Should the Taoiseach ignore this list and appoint his own 11 nominees to the Seanad and to Government, we will be in a better position to make a more considered evaluation of his judgment in making his appointments to Cabinet.

Paddy Fitzpatrick

Glanmire, Co Cork

A modern Robin Hood struggle

If there is one thing that we ought to be able to unite on, it is surely this: It is in all our interests to support both the arguments and the moderate approach of the Ballyhea protesters. We cannot possibly pay the debts of foreign bankers and it is foolish as well as cruel to try to do so. They are ruinous for Ireland and the Irish people.

It is an old struggle in modern economic form. To put it in English terms, it is the struggle between Robin Hood and the Sheriff of Nottingham.

Dr Gerald Morgan

The Chaucer Hub

Trinity College, Dublin 2

We must use our God-given gifts

Christmas day has gone for another year.

Many people will have exchanged gifts – some doing so in the traditional manner emulating the Three Wise Men who presented gifts of gold, frankincense and myrrh to the infant Jesus. Others will have done so for no other reason than it’s what’s done nearing the close of another year.

A New Year is upon us and resolutions will be made. Perhaps this is a good time for everyone in Ireland, and in particular those who have been elected to govern, to discover what gifts they carry from God and if those gifts are being delivered as intended by the sender?

Perhaps unfortunately, messengers and/or gift bearers, have also been gifted with free will and quite often they chose to serve mammon rather than God.

This is most obvious when we consider a cruel fact that the wealth of just 85 persons exceeds the total wealth of 3,500 million of the Earth’s poorest people.

Totally overlooked, in a society that is no longer God-orientated, is the fact that over 2,000 years ago God sent a present, or gift, to all humankind in the form of His Son, Jesus.

It can be said, without fear of contradiction, that this one person’s enormous impact on the world has never been equalled by any other person, regardless of their achievements.

All He did in the final three years of his life on Earth was to encourage us to be charitable to one another, perhaps by each working for the common good of all humankind and by doing so reaping the reward of eternal life after death.

For bringing that message to humankind He was sentenced to death by a mob.

Fortunately, we don’t all have to prematurely die to deliver our God-given gifts to humankind.

Humanity fails to recognise the fact that God, despite not making His presence visible, has always been active sending messages and gifts carried by every single baby that exists in a mother’s womb and is then born, and that includes you, dear reader.

Perhaps this New Year, whether you believe or disbelieve in God, you could ponder on what message, or gift, you bear for humankind and resolve to play your part to the full?

Patrick Murray

Dundrum, Dublin 14

Irish Independent


New Years Day

$
0
0

2 January 2015 New Years Day

Disastours change of diet for Mary, a quite New Years, no New years joggers.

Obituary:

Michael Kennedy receiving his CBE in 1997
Michael Kennedy receiving his CBE in 1997  Photo: BRIAN SMITH

Michael Kennedy, who has died aged 88, pursued a career as an erudite and highly-regarded music critic while working his way up the sub-editing tables of The Daily Telegraph in Manchester, where he was Northern Editor for 26 years.

His biographies of Vaughan Williams and Elgar led to major reappraisals of these quintessentially English composers, while his friendship with Sir John Barbirolli – who for 27 years directed the Hallé Orchestra – led to a definitive authorised biography of the conductor.

However, Kennedy – like Neville Cardus, the Manchester Guardian’s eminent music critic – was more than a mere wordsmith. He represented the old, proud civic traditions of provincial life, from a time when the term “provincial” was not used as an insult. Hard toil, good music and an occasional day watching cricket were his bread and butter. Manchester was a city that could rank proudly alongside any other, including London, and he was one of its standard bearers.

He would rail against critics of musical elitism, accusing them of failing to aspire to high standards. “I want things to be elitist,” he told Michael Henderson in 2001. “These days it seems that people don’t want to put any effort into understanding something. You go to Covent Garden and Glyndebourne, and it’s obvious that some people don’t know a thing about the operas they have paid a lot of money to see.”

The son of an Army officer who never settled long in a job after the First World War, George Michael Sinclair Kennedy was born on February 19 1926. His parents separated when he was 12 and he never saw his father again. At Berkhamsted School, where a sympathetic master (G A Coulson, who also worked as a codebreaker at Bletchley Park) introduced boys to recordings of Holst’s The Planets and Elgar’s Enigma Variations, he harboured an early ambition to become a journalist and left after School Certificate.

His first job was as a copyboy at the Telegraph’s Manchester office, where the tasks of making tea, taking pictures to the photoengravers and collecting galleys from the printers’ “stone” gave him unrivalled experience of how the paper worked. Since it functioned on a small staff under wartime constraints, he was able to write his first piece of music criticism before being called up at 18. Joining the Royal Navy, he was dispatched to the Pacific, where he saw at first hand the rubble of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

In Australia he met Cardus, who was working for the Sydney Morning Herald. On learning that Kennedy was from Manchester, Neville Cardus asked if he had heard of John Barbirolli, who had recently joined the Hallé. Kennedy had indeed, having experienced a Barbirolli concert in Manchester in June 1943 that he later described as “like a blinding revelation because of the wonderful sense of colour and the excitement of the music making”.

While still overseas, Kennedy wrote to Vaughan Williams, saying how much he liked his fifth symphony, and received back a letter in the composer’s spidery handwriting saying he hoped that they would meet. Kennedy was also bemused by Vaughan Williams’s mistaking the initials CDR (for coder) after his name and writing to him as “Commander”.

On returning to the Telegraph after the war, Kennedy joined the editorial staff, first as the night editor’s assistant; he eventually became chief sub-editor. At the same time he began reviewing regularly, going at 7pm to the Free Trade Hall before returning to the office at 10pm to write his notice, which he would cut in on the “stone” for publication in the third edition after midnight.

When Kennedy became Northern Editor in 1960 he found himself in charge of the Manchester edition, an operation that employed more than 50 staff covering northern news and sports as well as the arts. Since the typefaces used in London and Manchester were slightly different sizes, the northern subs processed the copy and also rewrote the headlines sent up from London. As their deadlines were half an hour later, the Manchester staff had some justification for believing that their edition was occasionally better than that of their colleagues in Fleet Street.

Michael Kennedy in his office at The Daily Telegraph

But it was clear that the future of the Manchester editions would be limited, because computer technology meant that pages could be transmitted electronically from London. The exasperation of the Manchester men was not assuaged by the contempt shown for them by the Batley-born managing editor, Peter Eastwood, who lured the best reporters south and waged an unrelenting campaign against Kennedy and all things Mancunian. When the exasperated northern sub-editors went on strike during the raging inflation of the mid-1970s, Kennedy produced the edition by himself more than a dozen times, subbing the copy and taking the London theatre reviews down by hand over the telephone. On one occasion, his men were so impressed that they sent him a telegram of congratulation afterwards.

When senior London executives came north to announce that Manchester would close, and invited the Northern Editor to join them on a dais overlooking his staff, Kennedy declined: “I’m a small ships’ man. I’ve got to live with them,” he said, sitting down in the midst of his staff.

As the Manchester edition wound down, Kennedy acted first as a northern-based chief music critic in tandem with Robert Henderson. After a few more years as sole senior critic, in 1989 he switched to The Sunday Telegraph, where he adapted with ease to the more reflective nature of a weekly publication.

After a brief history of the Hallé Orchestra – The Hallé Tradition (1960) – his first foray into biography came when Vaughan Williams, who died in 1958, declared in his will that his widow, Ursula, and Kennedy were jointly to undertake the work. The Works of Ralph Vaughan Williams appeared in 1964 and stands today as a definitive account of the composer’s oeuvre.

Kennedy was a regular dining companion of John and Evelyn Barbirolli, and his biography of the great conductor appeared in 1971, a year after his death.

His A Portrait of Elgar (1968) had also proved influential, and was a reappraisal of the Edwardian composer as an introverted West Country boy who was ill at ease in the metropolitan society to which his wife aspired.

Kennedy’s admiration for his subjects invariably inspired his readers, even if he was occasionally accused of glossing over his subjects’ failings. Indeed, he could be quick to fire off a letter to a rival newspaper if he felt that one of his heroes had been unfairly slighted. Kennedy also wrote lives of Richard Strauss (1976), Benjamin Britten (1981, in the Dent Master Musician series), Adrian Boult (1987) and William Walton (1989). Like his earlier works, they combine astute authority with liberal generosity. He also produced a charming history of the Buxton Festival in 2004 (with a foreword by Roy Hattersley), and edited The Oxford Dictionary of Music (1985), an authoritative reference book that remains widely used. Despite the serious title, it includes snippets of humour, such as the description of avant-garde scores as “often pictorially delightful if musically enigmatic”.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Manchester gradually grew too small for both Kennedy and Cardus. Their hitherto friendly rivalry erupted in 1971 in a feud over The Guardian man’s “damning with faint praise” review of Kennedy’s biography of Barbirolli, a misunderstanding fuelled by some unfortunate sub-editing. It was more than a year before the two men spoke again.

Kennedy was appointed OBE in 1981, and advanced to CBE in 1997. Manchester University awarded him an honorary doctorate in 2003. He was also on the board of the Royal Northern College of Music.

He was kind, self-effacing and always encouraging – “My biggest failing as a critic is that I like music too much,” he once said – while his contributions to the Telegraph’s obituary page were invaluable and always authoritative assessments of those whose music-making he had enjoyed.

During 2014 he was an energetic and active honorary patron of Strauss’s Voice, a series of concerts and talks in Manchester marking the 150th anniversary of the birth of Richard Strauss.

In 1947 Michael Kennedy married Eslyn Durdle, who developed multiple sclerosis. In 1976 he met Joyce Bourne, who worked on the Oxford Dictionary with him. An honourable man, he continued to care for his first wife, marrying Joyce, who survives him, only after Eslyn’s death in 1999.

Michael Kennedy, born February 19 1926, died December 31 2014

Guardian:

East Village In The Olympic Park
East Village in the Olympic Park, London. ‘There is no reason why all the Olympic Park sites could be given over for publicly owned rented housing,’ writes Bert Schouwenburg. Photograph: Dan Kitwood/Getty Images

Robert Booth’s article (Londoners miss out as homes built as ‘safe deposit boxes’ for foreign buyers, 27 December) demonstrates the economic and social absurdity of allowing international capitalism to construct London’s housing needs. I fear the £1m, one-bedroom flat will soon become commonplace – and in east London, traditionally the manufacturing and working-class hub. Hundreds of thousands of local people will simply not be able to afford to live in London, and thus work in London, if this nonsensical ideological trend continues.

One obvious solution is to build more council houses, controlled by local authorities, where rents are democratically set (not in some boardroom 6,000 miles away) at genuinely affordable levels, so that average earners can live, unsubsidised by the state. Currently, London private rents are too high, so are offset by housing benefit and tax credits, which are then sent directly to rich overseas owners. At least my unsubsidised, much cheaper, council rent of £120 per week stays in Tower Hamlets, to be eventually respent and circulated in Tower Hamlets, on the needs of the local community.
Frank Jacobs
London

• The takeover of large housing development sites by overseas buyers tells only part of the story. Flats in other large developments being built by UK-based companies, such as those we are seeing in Barnet, are marketed overseas to foreign investors, too. Mayor Boris Johnson’s only response has been his voluntary and unenforceable “concordat” with developers, who agree to market in London at the same time as they offer properties for sale overseas. But this is no answer, as far too many of these prospective new flats are sold “off plan”, which discriminates dramatically against Londoners in need of a home.

A far-eastern investor is happy to put up the cash for properties that might not be completed for a couple of years, in the confident expectation that the investment will deliver huge and secure dividends, given London house-price inflation. Most Londoners cannot afford to pay for two properties at once – having to pay for somewhere to live now while also having to put up the cash payments for an off-plan home that will not be available to occupy for years.

We must restrict these discriminatory off plan sales and give priority to local first-time buyers over overseas investors, who are fuelling property price inflation to the detriment of the many thousands of Londoners in desperate housing need.
Andrew Dismore
Labour parliamentary candidate for Hendon and Labour London assembly member for Barnet and Camden

• In 1947, in the face of the severe post-war housing crisis, the housing minister, Aneurin Bevan, decided to focus public investment in housing on building council houses across the country. The result was the large-scale production of high-quality and popular housing at relatively affordable rents. Bevan took this option because he felt that to only “let the market provide” would result in dwellings of variable quality being developed where it made sense to developers, rather than according to any plan to tackle the crisis. The private developer, he concluded, was not a “plannable instrument”. Public subsidy directed to private developers would simply assist in inflating their profits at the expense of meeting acute housing need.

Given the £2.1bn profits made by developers in 2014, in the midst of the current housing supply and affordability crisis, Bevan’s analysis needs to be urgently revisited, nearly 70 years on.
Ian Cole
Sheffield

• Permitting foreign investors to buy up large swaths of public land in London gives the lie to claims there are no brownfield sites available for social housing in the capital. There is no reason why the St John’s Wood barracks and Olympic Park sites could not be given over for publicly owned rented housing, managed by the appropriate local authorities. Not only would this meet a demand for good-quality accommodation in inner London, it would also guarantee an income stream for hard-pressed councils.
Bert Schouwenburg
London

• In England there are over 10 empty homes for each of the 60,940 homeless families. If these families could return to their former homes (paying lower rents or mortgages until their financial situation improves), then still over half a million homes would remain empty – amounting to a virtual ghost town of some 1.5 times the size of Birmingham. An absurd situation that Dickens would doubtlessly have relished satirising.
Katerina Teplá
Voorbur, The Netherlands

• A policy suggestion: let’s levy a 5% tax on the value of property where that property is owned by somebody who is not registered to pay tax in the UK. This would deal with both those buying houses as “safe deposit boxes” and British tax exiles keeping property here. For companies, the tax could be levied on all property but offset against corporation tax paid.
Henry Stewart
London

Painting of Lord George Gordon Byron (1788-1824) english poet
‘Standing among them, with them but not of them, in a shroud of thoughts which are not their thoughts.’ Lord George Gordon Byron painted by Richard Westall, 1813. Photograph: Apic/Getty Images

While she’s probably correct in everything she writes about next year’s election, Polly Toynbee’s analysis (Opinion, 30 December) leaves out two key influences which will determine the way I vote. First, the vile way in which the British establishment combined – as effectively as blood’s white corpuscles – to prevent a yes vote in the Scottish referendum showed me clearly that institutions I’d previously admired, or which I’d been willing to give the benefit of the doubt – the Labour party, the BBC and the Guardian – were, when it came to defending their vested interests, no different from the Tories, the crown and the Daily Mail. Second, having voted in every election for the past 50 years, no government has ever felt like “my” government. And I can count on the fingers of one hand the years when, with Polly’s peg on my nose, I have felt in any way able to identify with the government.

My democracy-gap cognitive dissonance has long passed. And although I still feel like a stranger here, I’m quite Byronic now: standing among them, with them but not of them, in a shroud of thoughts which are not their thoughts.
John Smith
Sheffield

• Polly Toynbee is right. It is ludicrous that 200,000 floating voters in marginal constituencies should determine our next government and the fate of the country, while the rest of us go through an empty voting charade. We need proportional representation: two votes, one for a party, one for a local candidate. The number of votes for parties determines the number of MPs from each party, while votes for local candidates determine which candidates, from each party, are selected to become MPs. Every vote counts. And the link between local MP and constituents is strengthened.
Nicholas Maxwell
Emeritus reader, University College London

Police use of bail and the miners’ strike

Don Mcphee
A protester is brought to the ground at Orgreave by police during the 1984 miners’ strike. Photograph: Don Mcphee

Your report on the widespread use by the police of bail to ban people from attending lawful demonstrations (26 December) echoes events 30 years ago. As the cabinet papers are released covering the last four months of the 1984-85 miners’ strike, we need to remind ourselves of the scale of police involvement in the strike and the extensive use of bail conditions to prevent miners picketing. The figures speak for themselves: 11,313 miners were arrested, 5,653 put on trial, 200 imprisoned and, as a result of convictions, 960 miners were sacked by the National Coal Board. Thirty years on, questions of the state’s involvement, fabricated police statements leading to dubious convictions and the aggressive policing at Orgreave on 18 June 1984 remain unanswered. We still need a full public inquiry into the policing of the strike.
Granville Williams
Editor, Settling Scores: The Media, the Police and the Miners’ Strike

• I was delighted to read your two pages of tributes (In praise of …, 31 December) and especially what Owen Jones wrote about my friend Mike Jackson, one of the founders of Lesbians and Gays Support the Miners during the 1984–85 strike. The tribute to Mike followed that by Giles Fraser to Richard Coles. Richard was also involved in LGSM. He and Jimmy Somerville starred as Bronski Beat at the LGSM benefit at Camden’s Electric Ballroom in December 1984 to raise money for the miners and their families.
Chris Birch
London

• Charles Powell and Bernard Ingham were way out of line from a neutral and non-party civil service (PM’s aides plotted against Heseltine, 30 December). And this was by no means the only example. Even more blatant was Ingham’s appearance at Thatcher’s side in November 1990, facilitating her access to the cameras during the Tory leadership battle. That was the last place a civil servant should have been. Needless to say the pair were subsequently honoured with a peerage and knighthood respectively.
Robin Wendt
Chester

I was enjoying Philippa Perry’s guide to the 12 roles of Christmas (G2, 23 December) and recognising friends and relatives in most of the descriptions. Then I came to the wise teenager who manages the day for her estranged parents “which is hard for her since her mother turned lesbian … and dad’s girlfriend is nearer her age than his”. I assume this is meant to paint a picture of the ultimate dysfunctional family. Isn’t it time to stop having a laugh at the lesbian mum? As one of those mums, I’d like to tell you that my very wise teen daughter and I don’t need to manage anything thanks – my partner and I welcomed her dad on Christmas morning (his partner is older than me, by the way). The world’s moved on and you reflect this in other parts of your paper – don’t let yourselves down with lazy stereotypes.
Sylvia Ashton
Sheffield

The Battle of Culloden, 1746, the last battle of the  Jacobite rising under Charles Edward Stuart
The Battle of Culloden, 1746, the last battle of the Jacobite rising under Charles Edward Stuart. Photograph: Universal History Archive/Getty Images

Working in my front garden before Christmas, I watched a seemingly neverending succession of vans, each from a different company, delivering parcels. It struck me as very inefficient and polluting. A much better way would be to have one van deliver all parcels once each day, maybe the vans could be red …
Mark Austin
Horsmonden, Kent

• Shouldn’t the queen be lending her private planes and cars to health workers travelling to Sierra Leone (Report, 30 December)? Their self-sacrifice would be acknowledged and materially supported. The health risk to those workers would be lessened and the public not put at any risk. As head of the Commonwealth she would be following words with deeds.
Quentin Deakin
Tywyn, Gwynedd

• You misunderstand the Jacobite uprisings of the 18th century (Fantasy fans’ pilgrimage to Outlander country, 1 January). They were not anti-English wars but dynastic struggles by the House of Stuart against the British state, which elicited considerable opposition among (particularly lowland) Scots as well as English anti-Jacobites. There was also some support for the Stuart cause among the English, for instance in Lancashire.
Colin McArthur
London

• So glad the enduring appeal of old technologies (In a virtual world we cling to what’s real, Opinion, 31 December) is helping to keep newsprint alive. Long may it maintain the Guardian letters page.
Austen Lynch
Garstang, Lancashire

• I foresee the Paris climate conference as 2015’s key event, and would like to lend a hand in making it a success. With a front page (30 December) containing three stories, all bad news related to air travel, who will join me in a new year resolve to give up flying?
Martin Davis 
Cheltenham, Gloucestershire

Independent:

Responding to your main story, “Faith and free schools ‘breed social and racial segregation’, ” (1 January) is always likely to be a tricky one, but several hard facts need to be discussed if the situation is ever to be resolved.

First, Muslim schools (singled out for comment) are always likely to be monocultural, since Muslims in the UK tend to run their lives in the same manner, using, wherever possible, companies run by Muslims, be it a petrol station, a car wash or a solicitor. Why are they going to want anything less for their children?

Free schools (it should be obvious) exist on the basis of segregation, being nothing more than a school paid for by the taxpayer to allow a bunch of middle- and upper-class chums to set up a school for their own kids (witness: your recent report of a free school opening with 17 pupils at a cost of £1m a pupil.)

Of wider concern is the comment that even with a good mix of pupils, staff still fail to “attend to the need to bring them together”. The reason for this latter point is obvious: league tables. Schools these days are almost solely obsessed with league table results and their relative standards. Standards which often ignore the social mix and situation of the school, a one size fits all “solution” which ignores every aspect of social issues and pupil capability.

The Tories of course have fostered much of this segregation, but scrapping league tables, free schools and academies and removing charitable status from private schools until they actually prove they are socially cohesive, will free up vast amounts of money which will enable greater investment in state schools, and develop a more consistent approach to education free of the need to push buttons and jump through governmental hoops.

Alan Gent

Cheadle, Cheshire

 

It is hardly surprising that faith schools hinder integration; but was it not the Blair government, which Matthew Taylor served as an adviser, which began the promotion of faith schools, which has been continued by the Coalition?

Surely what is wanted is a secular state education system which treats all pupils equally; why is no major political party, nor for that matter The Independent, arguing for this?

John Dakin

Toddington, Bedfordshire

 

Country in need of a change

The letter from Dr Emma Fox Wilson (31 December) was superb (apart from the ridiculous headline “Culture clash: Emin v Michelangelo”). Could she be our, the little people’s,  leader?

Like her, and I guess many, many others I see no possibility of anyone else in the current bunch of fools in charge of us, wanting to or be able to lead us out of the mess the country is in financially, politically and artistically.

We desperately need change which none of our political parties  including Ukip  can even offer never mind implement.

Joyce Morgan

London SW14

 

I hope Dr Emma Fox Wilson’s excellent letter will be followed by others which will give me some ideas about what I can do. I feel that I “woke up” quite some time ago, thanks, but I feel powerless. “Get involved”? In what, how, and to what end?

Ginetta Tym

Morpeth,  Northumberland

 

Gun law in America

I am a retired lawyer and have frequently reflected upon the American Supreme Court’s interpretation of the constitutional right to bear arms.

At the time that the constitution was drawn up the only firearms which a person could bear were muzzle-loaded pistols and muskets. It follows that this is what the founding fathers meant, because there was nothing else that they could mean. I like to think that if they had realised that modern weaponry lay not very far in the future there would have been a fairly tight definition of the arms which people could bear.

To extend the right to bear arms to automatic pistols and, even worse, assault rifles is something I have never been able to understand, and one can only suppose that the justices of the Supreme Court have been put under intense pressure by American commercial and political interests to make this sort of illogical decision.

The consequences, as we all know, are completely appalling, and it is a dreadful indictment of American society that, as revealed by this week’s fatal shooting in Idaho, a young mother thinks that she has to keep a loaded automatic pistol in her handbag when going to the shops.

Dudley Dean

Maresfield, East Sussex

 

The establishment judges itself

Lady Butler-Sloss’s remark, “You need someone who knows how to run things and if you get someone from an obscure background, with no background of establishment, they’ll find it very difficult and may not be able actually to produce the goods,” is somewhat disingenuous.

There is no problem with the chair of the inquiry into historic child sexual abuse having an “establishment background”, indeed, as the Baroness suggests, anyone without that background is unlikely to be equipped to chair such an inquiry.

The problem is with anyone from “the establishment” who has any personal links to anyone else in the establishment who may have had any involvement in the previous handling of child abuse cases.

This inevitably includes, as in her own case, the sister of the person who was the Attorney-General at the time of some of the accusations.  In the case of Dame Fiona Woolf, it was her personal friendship, however limited, with a Home Secretary who was given a dossier of evidence on child abuse cases, which subsequently disappeared.

Baroness Butler-Sloss’s remarks must be seen in this context and treated accordingly.

Julius Marstrand

Cheltenham

 

It is surely no coincidence that on the day that Baroness Butler-Sloss was invited to act as guest-editor of the Today programme on Radio 4 her fellow inquiry rejectee Fiona Woolf was anointed a Dame. Let no one cross the Establishment!

Among other nonsenses of our honours system it is interesting to note that running a bat-hospital merits an MBE, but doing the same for hedgehogs only gets you a BEM. The nuances of our class system are beyond simple comprehension.

Tom Simpson

Bristol

 

The Independent is usually refreshingly objective and fair-minded, and does not engage in personal attack in the way other newspapers do.

So why single out Fiona Woolf in your leader column (31 December) and make a subtle personal attack. You ignore the triumph of her brave and different mayoralty of the City of London; the undisputed fact that she chose four small charities that represent diversity, compassion, reform and welfare, and her public commitment and actions to promote women at all levels in the City.

I think The Independent’s judgment on this occasion is unfounded and not based on why Fiona Woolf deserved the honour bestowed on her.

Richard Evans

London SE26

 

Sky’s legal dispute with Ofcom

After eight years running Ofcom, Ed Richards could be forgiven for being a little demob happy as he reflects on his time as chief executive (29 January). However, his memory is mistaken if he feels “vindicated” in relation to the long-running legal case over Ofcom’s decision to force Sky to supply certain sports channels at prices set by the regulator.

At this time, the final outcome is yet to be determined and Ofcom’s core argument in favour of intervention has been found in court to be without foundation, the regulator having misinterpreted evidence to a significant extent. Contrary to what Mr Richards appears to suggest, that ruling has not been overturned in subsequent hearings.

While it may be “unhelpful” in his eyes for Ofcom decisions to be subject to appeal, it is hardly surprising that companies should seek independent judicial scrutiny when they believe, as Sky does in this case and as the court has confirmed, that the regulator has made serious mistakes.

Graham McWilliam

Group Director, Corporate Affairs, Sky

Isleworth,  Middlesex

 

Fatal impact of mobile phones

This year brings the 30th anniversary of the UK’s first mobile phone. Does anyone know how many fatal crashes there have been due to drivers using them while driving?

According to the Transport Research Laboratory, your reaction time is slowed by some 35 per cent; akin to that of a driver at twice the drink drive limit.

Allan Ramsay

Manchester

Times:

Sir, Dr Goulding (letter, Dec 29) is right to point out the range of interpretations of “ides aglæcwif”. What is overlooked is that “aglæc” also means “combatant” (Klaeber), which fits with the introduction of Grendel’s mother as “wrecend” (avenger) in Beowulf and her comparison with “wiggryre wifes” (war-horror of woman). A better rendering might be “woman, warrioress”. As beautiful as Seamus Heaney’s poetry is, his translation “monstrous hell-bride” takes a liberty.
Annaliese Griffiss
Richmond, Surrey

Sir, Annaliese Griffiss (letter, Jan 1) accuses Seamus Heaney of taking a liberty in describing Grendel’s mother as “monstrous hell-bride” (letter, Jan 1). It’s called poetic licence.
Tony Phillips
Chalfont St Giles, Bucks

Sir, In 1976 I bought a house in West Dulwich. Within two years the rates started to escalate. When I fled in 1981 they were £981.

I often wonder if critics of the Poll Tax have any notion of the flaws in the rates (“Poll Tax shows why unelected officials mustn’t wield power”, Dec 31) and the costs if you had the misfortune to live in a borough like Lambeth.

elizabeth balsom

London SW15

Sir, It is disingenuous for Sir Bob Reid (letter, Jan 1) to stress the importance of completing engineering contracts at the expense of other considerations. The equally critical component of any project is the scheduled delivery date. This was woefully missed. For him to say that memories of the Clapham Junction disaster should deter public complaint over blatant project mismanagement is simply indicative of the cavalier attitude shown by the various rail authorities to the people who pay their wages and their automatic results-ignoring bonuses.

martin morris

Shillington, Herts

Sir, David Aaronovitch (Abuse inquiry is now a fantasist’s playground”, Jan 1) asks “How did anyone know” that Fiona Woolf had lost the confidence of survivors?” I attended the meeting on October 31 (the day Woolf resigned) between members of the abuse inquiry panel and interested parties, including survivors, support charities, campaigners and lawyers.

The overwhelming consensus was that Woolf did not command confidence. If anything, her lack of experience in child abuse issues was even more important than the fact that she had dined with the Brittans.

There were specific and entirely justified reasons why both Baroness Butler Sloss and Fiona Woolf were not suitable to run the inquiry.

jonathan west

Wickford, Essex

 

Telegraph:

Prince with heart: Harry plays with Karabo, a blind girl, at a centre he established in Lesotho
Prince with heart: Harry plays with Karabo, a blind girl, at a centre he established in Lesotho Photo: Chris Jackson/Getty Images for Sentebale

SIR – It is with great humility that I write to congratulate the many people who have been recognised in the New Year’s honours with “services to the community” (report, December 31).

Throughout the length and breadth of our great country, these unsung people are making a vast contribution. I raise a glass of good cheer to them all and thank them for their considerable efforts.

Not long ago we ignored these people and instead honoured, if that is the right word, typists and secretaries working for the government.

Geoffrey Aldridge
Wingrave, Buckinghamshire

SIR – Why do the New Year’s honours consistently get handed out to actors? I’m sure pretending for a living, attending award ceremonies and fending off adulation is a challenging way to earn a fortune, but are there not other realms that are more deserving? Perhaps nurses, police or teachers?

Steve Baldock
Handcross, West Sussex

SIR – It is to the Daily Telegraph’s credit that it named Paul Cummins and Tom Piper, who created the display of poppies at the Tower of London, as Britons of the year (Features, December 30). What a fitting tribute to two men who make one as proud to be British today as we were in 1914-1918.

Mark Hudson
Smarden, Kent

SIR – Once again the New Year’s honours list contains names ranging from the bizarre to the loony. This is epitomised in the damehood given to the Poet Laureate. I don’t know how many poems she has written recently, but 2014 saw the end of a 13-year war in Afghanistan, and I suspect there are plenty of genuine unsung heroes out there who have not been recognised on any awards list.

Dr Martin Henry
Good Easter, Essex

(EPA)

SIR – I found your inclusion of Alex Salmond and Nigel Farage (Top 10 Britons of the year: Part 1”, Features, December 29), who appear to be determined to destroy the United Kingdom in the pursuit of their own political ambitions, to be, at best, laughable.

To place them higher than Prince Harry was an insult to a young man who has done much towards highlighting the problems faced by our injured service personnel.

R W Mansell
North Hykeham, Lincolnshire

SIR – It is outrageous that Jonny Wilkinson did not receive a knighthood in the New Year’s honours list. As usual, it’s the time-serving, pen-pushing civil servants who are handed the gongs.

Sandy Pratt
Dormansland, Surrey

SIR – Another honours list, and still no knighthood for Gareth Malone, who continues to give purpose and direction to people’s lives, and fosters community spirit, through helping them to discover in themselves the joy of music.

Rachel Mason
Seaton, Devon

SIR- Still no knighthood for Ken Dodd?

Michael Cattell
Mollington, Cheshire

SIR – Those who carp at the honouring of Fiona Woolf, the former Lord Mayor of London who stepped down as chair of a child abuse inquiry because of her links to Leon Brittan, are nasty, brutish and small-minded.

Alexander Hopkinson-Woolley
Bembridge, Isle of Wight

SIR – Can it be that not one of the volunteer medical workers treating and preventing the spread of the Ebola outbreak has been recognised on the New Year’s honours list?

Peter de Snoo
Truro, Cornwall

SIR – Am I the only person who wonders what, exactly, the worthy “Ms Clare Barnfather. Director (Grade 6), Stakeholder and Engagement Team and No 10 Relationship Manager – Marketing, Department for Business Innovation and Skills. (London)” has done to earn an MBE in the honours list?

Andrew Given
Cranborne, Dorset

SIR – I can see a time when everyone will have a degree and everyone will have an “honour”.

David Blackford
Seaview, Isle of Wight

Fake bonuses

SIR – Mark Carne, chief executive of Network Rail, has wisely decided not to take his bonus following the chaos on the railways (report, December 31).

Are there any circumstances today in which such bonuses would be withheld by an employer? The word bonus seems to have changed its meaning, at least in the public sector, from a reward for exceptional performance to just another way of paying part of the salary, perhaps to disguise the eye-watering amounts handed over to some executives of public bodies.

The money comes from our taxes. We should be told the details of these bonus arrangements.

Malcolm Benson
Beckenham, Kent

A name for lean times

SIR – Geoff Blackman (Letters, December 10) is right: we need a longer period of austerity. But the real problem lies not in the programme, but in the word. Austerity carries connotations of serious deprivation and grinding poverty, none of which really apply to Britain now.

We need another word or phrase to denote living within our means. “National prudence”? Sounds like a racehorse. In any case, when Gordon Brown tried it, he corrupted the word beyond meaning.

Any other suggestions?

John Grierson
Helston, Cornwall

Innocent as a fox

SIR – Is a fox really an innocent wild animal (Letters, December 29)?

I have, or had, a few lambs and chickens, not to mention my daughter’s guinea pig, that would have begged to differ.

Andrew Perrins
Upton-upon-Severn, Worcestershire

NHS hospital beds

SIR – Dr Robert Walker (Letters, December 30) describes the assumption which NHS planners have used for many years – that bed requirements will dwindle with time.

When I was a senior hospital consultant years ago, we received a visit from our regional NHS planners. During our discussion, they proudly produced a graph that showed bed usage against time up to that point, and then proceeded to extrapolate by drawing the line of the graph forward in time. Because bed usage had been progressively declining, the extrapolation showed that future bed requirements would eventually be zero.

Dr Christopher Birch
Grantham, Lincolnshire

Best possible outcome

(Getty Images)

SIR – As I reflect on the events of 2014, my greatest pleasure was seeing the face of Alex Salmond following the result of the September referendum.

However, given the way that he has bounced back and again threatens to destabilise the Government, perhaps it would have been better for him to have won, and now be faced with trying to run an independent Scotland with greatly reduced oil revenues. In that way, his preposterous claims regarding Scottish self-sufficiency would have been exposed even more quickly.

Lt Col John Landau (retd)
Cheltenham, Gloucestershire

This year

SIR – Anybody who insists on calling this year twenty-fifteen will leave many of us – especially members of the Armed Forces – confused. To us, twenty-fifteen is a quarter past eight in the evening.

Richard J C English
King’s Lynn, Norfolk

The risk of brave volunteers bringing back Ebola

The unit for Ebola patients at the Royal Free Hospital in London (Getty)

SIR – I wish the nurse Pauline Cafferkey (“Ebola nurse should have been kept at Heathrow, report, December 31) a swift recovery from the Ebola virus she contracted while doing very brave work in Sierra Leone. This does, however, bring into question comments by Professor Dame Sally Davies, the Chief Medical Officer, on the relatively small risk to the population in general.

The protective suit worn by Miss Cafferkey obviously did not give full protection from the virus. So are all the medical volunteers at more risk than they realise and consequently likely to bring the virus to Britain when they return?

At Heathrow, Miss Cafferkey was ineffectually screened, having had her temperature taken seven times and still being allowed to travel onwards.

I believe that there are no more doses of the drug used successfully to treat William Pooley left in this country. What would happen if a larger number of suspected victims arrived home simultaneously?

Christopher Darch
Keynsham, Somerset

SIR – The Government makes more effort in preventing rabies or foot and mouth disease entering the country than it is prepared to employ with the potential Ebola pandemic.

People coming from areas where Ebola is rife need quarantining for the incubation period. This raises questions of human rights and logistics, which politicians seem frightened to address.

It is worth remembering that the rate of spread of the Black Death across Europe in the mid 14th century was governed by the speed and range of sailing ships. They didn’t have aeroplanes then. We are sitting on a global time-bomb.

David Gray
Corfe Mullen, Dorset

There is nothing like a Dane – at a price

SIR – Judith Woods (Features, December 30) writes about the advantages of the Danish way of life. Their social security system does guarantee cover from the cradle to the grave, but at a cost. Taxes start at 50 per cent, and the cost of living is far higher than in Britain.

A Danish friend was recently diagnosed with throat cancer and successfully operated upon two days later. The British NHS is a bottomless pit, with our ever increasing population and drugs unknown a decade ago. If we want the sort of health service enjoyed by the Danes, we have to be prepared to pay for it with higher taxes.

Diana Goetz
Salisbury, Wiltshire

SIR – A century ago a Danish relative of mine left Jutland to live in the United States. He was 40 years old. Within a year of living there he was diagnosed with a terminal illness and elected to return to Denmark to die. Forty years later he was still alive.

Peter Bach
Llanfairfechan, Conwy

SIR – I visited Denmark in May. We flew back from Aalborg where a sign at Arrivals (pictured) sums up the happy Danes nicely.

Peter Boyd
Oakham, Rutland

Globe and Mail:

Alan Bernstein

Genomics will be at the centre of real health care innovation

Alan Bernstein is the president and CEO of CIFAR (the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research), and was the founding president of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

In June of last year, federal Minister of Health Rona Ambrose launched a new Advisory Panel on Healthcare Innovation. This important panel, chaired by Dr. David Naylor, is charged with advising government on areas of innovation that could bring the greatest value to Canada’s health care system.

Two months later, British Prime Minister David Cameron launched the 100,000 Genomes Project. Its goal is to sequence the complete genomes of 100,000 people with cancer or other diseases and ultimately relate these genetic changes to better diagnostics and treatments. This project is feasible because the cost and time required to sequence complete human genomes has fallen from $3-billion and four years, to about $1,000 and less than a week.

The information emerging from genomics heralds a new era of personalized or precision medicine. New ways of diagnosing, treating and preventing disease will be based on our rapidly emerging understanding of human health and disease.

Treating disease based on understanding seems intuitively obvious: how can you fix a car if you don’t know what’s wrong with it? But when I started out in cancer research in the 1970s, there were only vague hints of what lay behind the abnormal behavior of cancer cells. Consequently, there was no obvious path forward.

Today, we know that all cancers result from changes in our genes. And we now have the molecular and computational tools to scan the three billion bases of DNA that make up our genome, and identify the changes that are contributing to the cancer in any given patient.

From this new understanding is emerging entirely new ways of diagnosing and treating cancer. Other advances – including new diagnostic imaging modalities, immunotherapy, and stem cells – have created a rich and diverse palette of approaches to solving the challenge of human cancer.

Contrast this with schizophrenia, bipolar disease, and age-related dementia. Twenty per cent of Canadians will experience a mental illness sometime over their lifetimes. Despite their importance, this large and diverse group of brain disorders is poorly understood. As a result, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches are neither precise nor effective, nor do we have a clear path forward. But our experience cracking the cancer problem will soon transform how we diagnose, treat or prevent this complex set of human illnesses.

At a recent meeting of CIFAR’s program in genetic networks, CIFAR Fellows from the University of British Columbia, the University of Toronto and the Hospital for Sick Children presented groundbreaking research on new ways to analyze and understand genomic alterations involved in cancer, autism, spinal muscular atrophy and other diseases. This research is opening up new understanding of the consequences of these genetic alterations, and new ways of diagnosing disease, identifying at-risk individuals, and developing better drugs.

As the Naylor panel contemplates changes in health care delivery, there is a larger lesson to learn from this research: a modern, cost-effective health care system is not the old system plus genomics. It will be a new health care system, an entirely new paradigm for organizing and implementing care based on our emerging understanding of human biology and the complex interactions between our genetic inheritance and our life experiences. It is not nibbling around the edges of the health care system, tinkering with the odd change here or there. Rather, it will demand a new way of organizing health care, requiring new skills and new infrastructure.

I have two recommendations for the Naylor Committee: first, don’t focus on process and governance. That’s a uniquely Canadian pastime and an excuse for avoiding real change. Instead, focus on building a health system for the 21st centure, not the 20th. In partnership with the provinces, the federal government should launch a decade-long multimillion dollar initiative whose goals are threefold: first, to employ the new science of “omics” to understand the underlying biology of human health and disease and to integrate that understanding into rapid and precise clinical diagnostics; second, to harness that understanding to develop, in partnership with industry, precision therapies that are targeted to the molecular alterations responsible for disease; and third, to develop targeted prevention strategies based on our emerging ability to identify individuals at risk based on the interplay between our genetic inheritance and lifestyle.

The Naylor panel can chart a course for Canada’s health system based on the revolution in our understanding of the biology of human disease. Canada has the opportunity to lead the world in building a health system that takes full advantage of today’s science, and that stands ready to contribute to and benefit from tomorrow’s science. That would be true healthcare innovation.

 

Lysiane Gagnon

It’s the question we push aside every Dec. 31

Irish Times:

Sir, – Further to your editorial “A strong performance” (December 30th), while clearly welcoming the improvement in our national finances and the decline in unemployment, isn’t it time that we stopped using the very blunt instrument that is GDP as a measure of our success or failure, when it fails miserably to do so?

Measuring economic activity alone has already led us up a number of very costly cul-de-sacs. GDP includes economic activity caused by and dealing with many negative aspects of our society.

For example,on a domestic level we can expect to see an increase in GDP resulting from the rapid rise in obesity and the associated illnesses; a wide range of illnesses both mental and physical resulting from our unhealthy relationship with alcohol; increasing storm damage resulting from man-made climate change; the increasing technology and energy needed to make water drinkable; and the many societal impacts of increasing inequality.

On the global level, along with everyone else, Ireland is rapidly depleting the natural resources that we rely on entirely for our wellbeing – in the ridiculous expectation of an exponentially increasing GDP.

Since we live on a planet with finite resources, growth that surpasses the resources of a finite planet cannot be maintained and it is therefore a matter of “when” and not “if” the current model fails.

A model based on unrestricted economic growth that relies on the depletion of our natural capital and threatens our ecosystem services is just not sustainable. It is time to face up to this reality and to start measuring what we need to achieve for the wellbeing of this and future generations and for the health and stability of the natural environment on which our social and economic sustainability entirely depends. – Yours, etc,

MICHAEL EWING,

Boyle,

Co Roscommon.

Sir, – So long as our neighbours in Britain and continental Europe do not suffer an economic relapse then we should have cause for hope. We are not out of the woods yet. – Yours, etc,

PATRICIA O’RIORDAN,

Dublin 8.

Sir, – In discussing the health of the economy, journalists and economists frequently remind us of the difference between gross domestic product (GDP) and gross national product (GNP) to cool our jets when the former is invoked by politicians to fuel rumours of recovery.

Apparently even GNP is a distorted reflection of our economic strength – since the profits of “redomiciled plcs” are treated as part of GNP even though they mostly belong to shareholders outside the country.

Despite this, GDP and GNP data are still used to justify important decisions.

Could I suggest they put their heads together and come up with a formula that does accurately measure productivity?

I suggest it be called gross actual product – or GAP. – Yours, etc,

SUZANNE BYRNE,

Glenageary,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – During the first six months of 2014, some 200 rockets and mortars were fired from Gaza at villages in southern Israel. Israel’s low-key response had no effect on the attacks. Those, including Dermot O’Rourke and D Flinter (December 30th), who criticise its operations in the subsequent conflict as “disproportionate” need to recognise the frustration within Israel that the ongoing disruption to life in the south of the country caused by Gazan militants is considered a non-story internationally. The world only seems to take notice when meaningful action is taken. – Is mise ,

CIARÁN

Ó RAGHALLAIGH,

Cavan,

Co Cavan.

Sir, – When Dermot O’Rourke wonders if “killing 469 children and injuring 3,000 in Gaza is the best way to stop rockets falling in Israel”, and when D Flinter reinforces this line of questioning by asking if those rockets that actually landed seemed “to cause less actual damage than its own regularly repeated mowing of the grass”, it seems to imply that because Israel did not suffer mass casualties from Hamas’s rocket barrage that it was somehow ineffective.

This is not the case. Hamas launched nearly 4,000 missiles at Israel, which caused a wave of psychological terror, if not physical injuries throughout the country.

Moreover, the only reason Mr Flinter’s so-called “rag-tag resistance” did not kill scores of Israel civilians is the success of Israel’s Iron Dome defensive system.

If this rocket interception system had not worked, hundreds if not thousands of Israelis would have died. One then has to wonder if Israel is being castigated because it successfully protected its civilian population, and furthermore, if it had suffered mass casualties would it have been the focus of such a mass global condemnation? – Yours, etc,

Dr KEVIN McCARTHY,

Kinsale,

Co Cork.

A chara, – Recent correspondence on the letters page refers to a war in Gaza. I contend that the last military assault on Gaza cannot be rationally described as a war. The use of the word “war” conjures up images of two or more armies of more or less comparable strength, engaged in combat. This surely was not the case in Gaza.

One side possessed and used the most sophisticated and deadly weapons known to man, with the world’s only superpower on the sideline giving financial and moral support.

The other side possessed and used weapons that can only be described as militarily pathetic and had no other nation in the world willing to step up to the plate in its defence. – Is mise,

BARRY HAMILTON,

Swords,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – After reading Tim Pat Coogan’s description (“Commemorating 1916: We need to rekindle a spirit of idealism”, Opinion, December 29th) of the incompetence and corruption in independent Ireland, rampant not only in the State, but also in the dominant church (remember Ireland was a virtual theocracy for decades after independence), I’m surprised he did not come to the obvious conclusion. This is that maybe the Irish are not the best people to govern Ireland, and maybe, just maybe, Pearse and his pals, who had virtually no support from the Irish people at the time, might have been better advised to leave well enough alone. – Yours, etc,

DAVID HERMAN,

Dublin 16.

Sir, – The aims of the Irish Volunteers during the Easter Rising in 1916 should not be confused with tribal differences within Northern Ireland from 1969 onwards. We should be careful about the orientation of celebrations. We cannot afford to damage our new relations with the UK through a highjacking of historical commemorations by vested interests within Northern Ireland. Old rivalries on both sides will use such events to blow trumpets of intolerance in order to turn back the clock for the rest of Ireland and the UK. – Yours, etc,

BRIAN PATRICK

McARDLE,

Newbridge,

Co Kildare.

Sir, – While the Arts Council is cutting funding to the O’Brien Press (December 29th), it may come as a surprise to many that it continues to fund travelling circuses that exploit wild animals for human entertainment, an activity which is ethically dubious and has absolutely no artistic merit.

The ISPCA believes that the council has breached its own animal welfare policy as travelling circuses cannot provide a suitable environment for wild animals, such as tigers and lions, which spend up to 90 per cent of their time in small beast-wagons and are subjected to constant movement and noise which are well-known stressors for wild animals.

In a time of austerity, it is outrageous that the Irish taxpayer is subsidising wild animal circuses at the same time as many countries are banning them on animal welfare or ethical grounds.

The ISPCA will continue to call for a ban on the use of wild animals in travelling circuses and calls on the Arts Council to stop funding an activity which should be consigned to the history books. – Yours, etc,

Dr ANDREW KELLY,

Chief Executive Officer,

ISPCA,

National Animal Centre,

Derryglogher Lodge,

Keenagh, Co Longford.

Sir, – Ceann Comhairle Sean Barrett makes an important point in stating that the party whip does not do any good on matters of conscience, such as the right to life of the unborn (“Barrett calls for free vote on conscience issues”, December 30th).

Had Taoiseach Enda Kenny borne this in mind, he may not have lost TDs and potential voters that he will need in the next election.

I think most reasonable people would respect politicians who openly expressed a belief based on conscience, even if they disagreed with that view, and our political system would be all the better for it. – Yours, etc,

FRANK BROWNE,

Templeogue, Dublin 16.

Sir, – Well if Tom Lyons considers it appropriate to include Harry Crosbie in the “Losers” category for 2014 (“Winners outnumber losers as economy recovers”, December 30th), the Irish nation deserves equal standing.

Harry had the vision to deliver the Point and the wonderful Bord Gáis Theatre. Rather than retain the latter when it came under the control of Nama, the theatre was sold off for €28 million to John and Bernie Gallagher. Surely it won’t be long before we hear once again about proposals to relocate the Abbey Theatre; the last time George’s Dock was mentioned, the estimates were for a cost of up to €170 million. That’s what these projects cost.

And we sold Harry’s creation for €28 million!

Harry is not the loser here; the State is. – Yours, etc,

MARTIN SCULLY,

Blackrock,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – Further to Ulric Kenny’s letter (December 30th) on UPC’s decision to enable blocking of some internet content from March (News, December 27th), giving parents the option of filtering internet content for their children may sound like a good idea and certainly has its advantages when dealing with young children accessing explicit content.

However, as with most internet access issues, from piracy to censorship, technology is well ahead of the companies’ plans. With the installation of a simple and widely available TOR or VPN programme and not even UPC will know what is being accessed from a given computer. If TOR allows Chinese dissidents to avoid big brother, I am quite sure UPC will be of little concern.

Educating children around the issues involved with certain content would be of greater value. – Yours, etc,

GEARÓID Ó LOINGSIGH,

Bogotá,

Colombia.

Sir, – I am baffled by the present popularity enjoyed by non-party politicians. I can think of no truly independent TD and cannot think of a single policy ideal held by an independent which is not shared by one (or more) of the parties.

It is axiomatic that more is achieved as part of a team than by individuals pulling in all directions. We have seen unemployment drop, employment rise, the troika leave, sovereign debt rates plummet, etc.

It’s not a perfect record but nobody will argue that these successes would have happened with individual ambition being prioritised over teamwork. – Yours, etc,

TOM NEVILLE,

Leopardstown,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – On a drive to Dublin earlier this month, most petrol prices on the way were higher by up to 8 cents a litre than I could buy locally, and on Christmas Eve driving to the midlands the price was higher by 7 to 9 cent a litre in most outlets. This is a very significant variation.

The National Consumer Agency (NCA) in its report of December 2008 stated that, “Absolute fuel price competitiveness in Ireland would appear to be most significantly influenced by the effects of local competition. Areas with larger numbers of fuel retail outlets typically enjoy strong price competition, with the converse applying in sparsely serviced areas.”

This conclusion by the NCA may apply when petrol prices are rising, as petrol prices are adjusted upwards within hours of an oil price rise. The conclusion does not apply when prices are falling. One wonders why. – Yours, etc,

KEVIN TREACY,

New Ross,

Co Wexford.

Sir, – The requirements of the prize bonds company for ID (December 30th) are being reflected across a wide range of business activities. Recently I was asked to produce not one but two separate original utility bills for a particular application. The issue here is that all of the utility companies are pretty much forcing their customers to move to online, paperless billing. The Government is encouraging us to become an e-society. It’s time that it amended the anti-money laundering laws to facilitate this? – Yours, etc,

JOHN FAGAN,

Killiney,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – Despite the ineptitude of the Coalition’s handling of the water charge controversy, there are still some 18 months until the next general election, more than enough time for the Government to prove its mettle. It’s a given that if the Coalition were to implode before then, the Labour Party would be consigned to history.

If a week is a long time in politics then surely 72 or more weeks is sufficient for Enda Kenny and his best team to woo the electorate into giving this Government another term of at least three years to fulfil its original election promises.

The alternatives are far too dangerous to contemplate. – Yours, etc,

MICHAEL J LOWEY,

Foxrock,

Dublin 18.

Sir, – Good luck to anyone trying to quit in the new year. I know it’s not easy.

I thought for 40 years that I would never quit but the Government putting its hand further into my pocket at every budget finally convinced me. – Yours, etc,

NEIL HILL,

Oranmore,

Co Galway.

Sir, – Could somebody tell motorists that the fog of three weeks ago is gone, and to turn off their foglights! – Yours, etc,

RICHARD WEBSTER,

Malahide,

Co Dublin.

Irish Independent:

Stepaside Garda station being closed for the last time. Photo: Collins

Stepaside Garda station being closed for the last time. Photo: Collins

What an excellent article by David McWilliams (December 31) about the death of the small towns in Ireland.

  • Go To

He is absolutely correct in his analysis that economics is at the heart of this process and that every service or business lost has a multiplier effect on the wider community.

Thankfully, people are beginning to appreciate this fact. Recently, on a bitterly cold December day, over a thousand people from West Offaly protested in Ferbane about the plans by Ulster Bank to close that town’s only bank. Other communities are staging similar protests in an effort to retain post offices and Garda stations.

In the words of French writer Victor Hugo: “Nothing is as powerful as an idea whose time has come”.

Let 2015 be the year when all small communities take a stance on the loss of rural services and the damage being done to rural life.

Brian Flynn

Ferbane Co Offaly

Waterloo a European victory

This year marks the anniversary of Wellington’s victory over Napoleon at Waterloo. It is a year perhaps in which the British and Europeans can recognise their profound debt to Ireland.

Wellington, of course, was not English, but Irish. He was the son of the Professor of Music at Dublin University (TCD), born opposite Kildare House (now Leinster House) on May 1, 1769, when Ireland was still a nation independent of Britain (as it was to remain until 1800, when Wellington himself was in India).

Wellington’s army at Waterloo on June 18, 1815 was not the British Army of the Peninsula, although it was strengthened by British regiments hardened by the 1808-1814 liberation of Portugal and Spain from Napoleon.

Wellington’s army at Waterloo was an allied army. It contained, for example, some 17,000 Dutch troops under the Prince of Orange. The Duke of Brunswick died at the head of his gallant Brunswickers at Quatre Bras on June 16, 1815 (a day earlier he had attended the Duchess of Richmond’s ball). The King’s German Legion – a British army unit of expatriate German personnel – fought with the utmost gallantry at Hougoumont (along with Hanoverians and Dutch), La Haye Sainte and in the centre of Wellington’s line.

I do not have the space or time here for a history of the battle, but I appeal for historical truth to replace vested interest.

Waterloo was a united European victory against French tyranny. It ought to be celebrated as such in 2015.

Dr Gerald Morgan

The Chaucer Hub

Trinity College, Dublin 2

Fair weather friends

There has been some debate about the bias of our weather forecasters towards Munster.

I remember a time when Bord Failte had to have words with British television stations about their persistent ” rain coming in from Ireland” every time they forecast inclement weather to their audiences.

K Nolan

Carrick-on-Shannon, Co Leitrim

Famine sitcom a despicable idea

The news that Channel 4 has commissioned a comedy on the famine – an Gorta Mor – shows just how crass and shamefully shallow audiences have become.

I am sure Hugh Travers, who will write the series to be called ‘Hungry’, is a talented and able fellow .

I am also sure that while it is possible to make people laugh at agonising deprivation and despair, I am not sure whether one should want to.

I think the Jewish people would quite rightly find a comedy about the Holocaust to be offensive, and we know how the Muslim world was convulsed by a Scandinavian cartoon.

Controversialists will suggest we should get over ourselves, and pull our heads out of the past.

Channel 4 probably thinks Ireland has put all this behind it.

Where does the notion of a million people starving to death fit in a frothy cappuccino culture?

The thing about injustice is that it doesn’t go away.

People can come to terms with it, and get on with life, but the wrong remains a wrong. The famine defined the contours of Irish society. It gave us the diaspora, as a population was halved. It also gave us gombeen men, soupers and a legacy of submission and defeat that has taken 150 years to come to terms with.

Am I the only one to feel uncomfortable with the fact that all that pain and suffering should become a laughing matter?

TG Gavin

Killiney, Co Dublin

Reflections on technocracy

For a long time, I felt the same way as Paddy Fitzpatrick, who in his recent letter (January 1) called for the inclusion of unelected individuals in Government based on their proven ability in their ministerial area.

Technocracy seems like a terrific idea, and a way of guaranteeing the best, most capable people are those who get the (arguably) most important jobs in Ireland.

However, there is also a lot to be said for our current system of ministers being chosen from among the ranks of Leinster House politicians. This system, which trades expertise for accountability to the electorate, but which goes some way to bridging the gap left by that trade by providing departmental civil servants and advisors to attempt to help the ministers make as educated a decision as possible.

There is also a lot to be said for those who understand the nuances of politics, and who have the ability to rally people behind them and their ideas, which would likely be lacking in technocrats.

If the choice is between those who know what they’re doing but without deferral to the people, and those who broadly know what they’re doing but with every deferral, the deferrers should win out. Such is democracy.

Killian Foley-Walsh

Kilkenny city

In search of the impossible

Aidan Devon is looking for a “dynamic leader” who has no “ego or power” (Letters, January 1). I wish him well with that.

A Leavy

Sutton, Dublin 13

Government does not care

I read with interest Jim O’Sullivan’s letter “Pension cut story is just a ploy” (December 31). I agree in broad terms that this Government does not care about the poor or disadvantaged.

After the first Fine Gael budget I emailed every minister, stating that the whole strategy was an attack on the poor. Two months later, I got one reply. It was a simple dismissal.

Minister for Finance Michael Noonan states now that those on €70,000 are the “squeezed middle”. At the height of the boom I earned €70,000 and had never been so well off. I then lost my job. After a year on the dole I got another job on €22,000, and was delighted to have it.

Eventually though the wages proved too little to sustain the mortgage payments and I had to sell my house. I now rent and am able to draw breath again.

The point is that those at the trough have no idea about real life. Their wages are so over inflated that they probably never have to think about where the money is coming from. The system corrupts. The Dail is just a boys’ club for the specialist elite – and they are like Greek gods looking down on us mere mortals.

Neil Hill

Oranmore, Co Galway

Irish Independent


Dental hygienist

$
0
0

3 January 2015 Dental Hygenist

Mary a little better, but not well enough to go to the dental hygenist. She cleans my teeth to within an inch of my life.

Obituary:

Claude Frank performing Schubert in 2008
Claude Frank performing Schubert in 2008 Photo: Getty Images

Claude Frank, the pianist, who has died aged 89, was one of the great interpreters of Beethoven, giving ethereal performances of the composer’s music around the world for almost 70 years.

Frank was a student of Artur Schnabel, who could trace his pedagogical lineage through Theodor Leschetizky and Carl Czerny to Beethoven and who did much to increase the composer’s popularity in the first half of the 20th century. In 1970, the bicentenary of Beethoven’s birth, Frank recorded all 32 of the piano sonatas for RCA Victor and performed the entire cycle in several major cities around the world.

Nor was his interpretation of Beethoven limited to performance and recording. He had an affable sense of humour, on one occasion describing preparing to play the chromatic run in the opening movement of Beethoven’s First Piano Concerto as “like brushing one’s teeth, to put it politely”.

Claude Frank was born into a Jewish family in Nuremberg on Christmas Eve 1925; an older brother was a talented amateur violinist. With the rise of the Nazis in the 1930s his father had fled to Brussels, and Claude joined him there in 1937, moving shortly afterwards to Paris, where he studied at the Conservatoire. The advancing German occupation left him once more fearing for his life and he drove with his mother to the Pyrenees before they made their way on foot over the mountains, through Spain and on to Lisbon.

A music store allowed him to practise after trading hours, but his sublime playing was soon overheard, and he was invited to perform at a party thrown by the Brazilian ambassador. One of the guests, the American consul, was so impressed that he offered Frank his first “fee” – a visa to the United States. The ageing Schnabel – for whom Frank had played before the war in Europe – agreed to give him lessons, but Frank’s enthusiasm to take American citizenship meant that in 1944 his studies were interrupted by military service.

He resumed his studies with Schnabel and took lessons with Maria Curcio. He also studied theory with Paul Dessau at Columbia University and conducting with Serge Koussevitzky at Tanglewood in Massachusetts. His New York recital debut was in 1947, followed a year later by an appearance with the NBC Symphony Orchestra. For a time his career veered towards choral conducting; but he was a finalist in the 1954 Leventritt piano competition in New York, losing out to Van Cliburn, and appeared as a soloist with the New York Philharmonic in 1959 under Leonard Bernstein.

His first London appearance was at the Wigmore Hall in January 1950. He returned in 1957 to accompany the violinist Roman Totenberg in a recital by Beethoven and Brahms that one critic noted “really caused the listener to sit up and listen to each work as if with new ears”. There were also appearances and tours with the London Mozart Players under Harry Blech.

Frank’s repertoire remained largely of the classical era, performed with great depth and remarkable insight, eschewing any form of pianistic pyrotechnics.

He was on the juries of several competitions, claiming that he could spot if a competitor had the potential to be a winner from the manner in which he or she walked on stage, even before they started to play.

For many years Frank made chamber music with the Juilliard Quartet, among others, and taught at the Curtis Institute in Philadelphia and at Yale School of Music in Connecticut. Yet there were still solo performances, including in 2008 when he was one of a handful of pianists – including Lang Lang – who took part in the cultural programme for the Beijing Olympics.

Frank met his wife, Lilian Kallir, a pianist and fellow refugee from the Nazis, at Tanglewood in 1947, but it would be another 12 years before they married. They played duets together, often by Mozart, until her death in 2004. He is survived by their daughter Pamela Frank, the violinist.

Claude Frank, born December 24 1925, died December 27 2014

Guardian:

Tony Blair
‘Tony Blair should go back to doing what he does best – making Blair richer,’ says Sasha Simic. Photograph: Giuseppe Lami/EPA

The defence of Blairism by Anne McElvoy (Britain’s new generation of populists fail the Blair test, 31 December) was a timely reminder of the now very tired and tedious assumptions made by political commentators of her kind over the previous 20 years. One of the worst is her assertion that “business in Britain” is regarded by Labour as “little more than the setting for perfidious economic crimes”. This theme, that somehow Labour is anti-business, will, I suspect, be a major line of Tory attack in the coming months. The most effective response will be to point out that it is not anti-business to be against corruption, profiteering, exploitation of vulnerable workers, tax avoidance on an industrial scale and those corporate forces that aim to undermine the whole democratic process, all of which have been catalogued day by day by our financial media.

For those with Ms McElvoy’s mindset, however, these would, no doubt, be dismissed as “a few rotten apples” and the fundamental tenet that private business and the market rule supreme and must never be challenged will remain sacrosanct. Ed Miliband should take heart. If his tentative first steps into questioning the nature of current society have ruffled the feathers of Tony Blair and Ms McElvoy, he’s on to something.
Ted Woodgate
Billericay, Essex

• In her latest depressing rallying call to vote Labour (2015 will be a year of political thrills – and colossal dangers, 30 December), Polly Toynbee argues that this is essential under our “broken” electoral system in order to prevent “irreversible damage” under a Tory government and claims that, if Labour wins, “Cameron’s dangerous alternative will be forgotten.”

Surely the revelation of Thatcher’s ideas for removing schools from local authority control and the progressing of these plans under Cameron illustrates that the Tories will never forget their plans. What Toynbee seems to forget is the experience of the last Labour government, and the state of the Labour party today, in which any leftist alternative has been silenced.

The last Labour government, if it had tried, could have reversed many of Thatcher’s policies. Instead, it extended some of them. Judging by Labour’s declared intentions, we can confidently expect the same under Miliband – more austerity, more attacks on immigrants, more support for big business and multinational corporations, more ignoring the urgency of tackling climate change.

Changing the direction of travel won’t come without popular political action outside the Westminster bubble, but voting can help if people stop voting for a party with policies that will make things worse. Those are the wasted votes. Voting for the Green party or other candidates that oppose these attacks is unlikely to get them elected, but it’s our chance to show opposition, and the bigger that opposition, the better for our future.
Peter Whitworth
Surbiton, Surrey

• With polls indicating an SNP whitewash destroying the “new” Labour party presence in Scotland, the Guardian responds by saying: “few could have predicted, or did predict…” (Editorial, 27 December). Actually, many people did predict this meltdown. When Labour was taken over by a privileged elite with an entirely alien ideology, it was inevitable that a social base unable to get genuine democratic representation would attempt to reconstitute itself elsewhere. It’s a tragedy that there still is a real Labour social base that is now permanently dispersed – into the SNP, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, Left Unity, the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition and even some lost souls into Ukip – because it has no genuine Labour candidates for whom to vote.

The real question is why news outlets such as the Guardian did not criticise the entryist neoliberal coup d’état in the way they scrutinised Militant. The last Labour cabinet included two brothers and a married couple. Positions have since been found for the children of Kinnock, Prescott and Straw. Anyone who would have cared about these undemocratic stitch-ups has already left. Do they think parachuting Blairite Jim Murphy into the Scottish leadership position will help?
Gavin Lewis
Manchester

• Ed Balls says a future Labour government would “get the deficit down in a tough and balanced way” (George Osborne is at the margins – Labour is the centre ground, 2 January). Here in Haringey a Labour council has just announced plans to cut its budget by £74m over the next three years by measures that are tough mostly on people, such as my son, with severe learning disabilities and autism, and others with dementia and other complex needs (who will bear more than 40% of the proposed cuts). If Labour is so obsessed with balancing on the centre ground that it is incapable of standing up for the needs of the most vulnerable groups in society, what is the point of electing it, either nationally or locally?
Mary Langan
London

• With radical groups such as Syriza and Podemos poised for electoral success in mainland Europe, Tony Blair has appeared to warn the Labour party against being “too leftwing” (Blair doubts Labour will win next election, 31 January). Insisting “I am convinced the Labour party succeeds best when it’s in the centre ground,” he calls for “moderation”. To make his argument work, Blair is forced to overlook the achievements of Clement Attlee’s well-known “moderate” post-1945 government, which nationalised the commanding heights of the economy and built the welfare state and the NHS.

If the Labour party fails in May’s general election, it will be because it is not leftwing enough and will peddle a watered-down version of Tory austerity, rather than an alternative to it. Blair should go back to doing what he does best – making Blair richer.
Sasha Simic
London

• Blair owes everything he has to the Labour party. If he cannot bear to endorse Ed Miliband, because Ed’s success would show there was an alternative to the “third way” or whatever passed for policy under Blair, can’t he just keep his mouth shut? Whatever Neil Kinnock’s qualms might have been about the way Blair handled things, he would never have been so disloyal to the movement he loves. Blair, on the other hand, seems only ever to have seen the Labour party as a means to an end.
Margaret Squires
St Andrews, Fife

• Many political commentators have never understood that Ed Miliband’s election as leader of the Labour party was driven by a rejection of New Labour, of which his brother David was very much part. Labour would certainly not have won in 2010 under Blair and, I suspect, would have lost even more seats.
John Boaler
Calne, Wiltshire

• No solutions to the UK’s problems can be free from ideology, a set of beliefs that identifies what solutions might work. Blair’s genius was in presenting his chosen policies as a “middle way” of supposedly non-ideological, practical solutions, including support for the US in Iraq, or introducing PFI into the NHS. Nowadays, when someone talks about commonsense solutions, will we be wiser?
Gill Westcott
Exeter

• Thank you, Mr Blair. You have made it 100% certain that my vote will go to Ed Miliband. I hope your prediction has nothing to do with the proposed mansion tax.
Phil Jones
Eastington, Gloucestershire

• At last (Labour MP rails against leader’s ‘Hampstead’ politics, 24 December). Labour should find 20 more working-class MPs like Simon Danczuk and reduce the number of those recruited because they are “sycophants who cut their teeth as special advisers”, usually drawn from Oxbridge, it should be added. If so, I will return to campaigning for the party.
Bob Holman
Glasgow

• Tony Blair’s grasp of labour history was always poor – one suspected deliberately so – and seems to have grown worse since he left office. He may think that a traditional rightwing party will always beat a traditional leftwing one in an election, but that does rather raise the question of how Labour won the elections of 1945, 1950, 1964, 1966 and 1974 (twice).
Keith Flett
London

• Neal Lawson criticises Tony Blair (Dear Tony Blair, maybe it’s your fault if the electorate hasn’t shifted to the left, theguardian.com, 1 January): “You were only concerned about winning, not about reshaping society, so who are you to say Ed Miliband is too leftwing?”

Three responses (from me, not Blair):

First, the prime purpose of the Labour party is to continue in its existence (reshaping society is a bonus): “Its purpose is to organise and maintain in parliament and in the country a political Labour party” (clause 1, name and party).

Second, New Labour’s 1997 manifesto specifically declared a programme for a “new centre and centre-left politics”. The draft was supported by 95% of the membership; the rolling programme was endorsed three times by a comfortable majority of the national electorate.

Third, Ed Miliband was subsequently elected as leader on a platform that was distinctly to the left of New Labour.

So that’s where we were, and this is where we are now.

Remember, though, whatever the shortcomings of the New Labour project, it was undoubtedly one of absolute clarity, and one of total determination in delivery (the 10 key pledges were all well delivered).

Of course, no one doubts that the political centre of gravity can change. But, as with New Labour, Ed Miliband’s Labour must also demonstrate a clarity that is not only ideologically unequivocal but also specific and measurable in its practical aims.

As I am sure Neal Lawson would agree, a party that is quick to rubbish its own recent past achievements needs to be supremely confident about its present ability to predict and react to the challenges of the future.
Mike Allott
Eastleigh, Hampshire

• Anne McElvoy’s analysis of Labour is wholly enlightening, and a simple analogy may make things even clearer. Politics can perhaps best be understood in geological terms: there must be a firm foundation for what one might have to call the philosophy of a party. Above this are strata of elements, which may be mined or discarded as long as the core foundation remains firm. At the surface, or the ground or vegetation level, arrangements may be made to appeal on a temporary basis – pretty flowers, garden gnomes or juicy strawberries – as long as these are not mistaken for the necessary strong and supportive rocks below. If this bedrock is destroyed, the pretty fauna and the mined temporary materials will also start to slide and collapse. This can take time, but it is certain to occur. It remains to be seen whether or not New Labour was an ephemeral horticultural indulgence or if its gardeners – the Blair testers – accidentally toppled the whole geological entity. Let’s hope not.
Ian Flintoff
Oxford

• Why should anyone take any notice of Tony Blair? He was wrong about the euro and wrong about Iraq. He would have taken the NHS and other public services further in the direction of uncoordinated profit-seeking competition. He has shown no real concern about inequality, and still instinctively believes in discredited “trickle-down” capitalism. He has learnt nothing since the 2008 collapse, which destroyed not only a huge amount of wealth but also the foundations of free-market economics. New Labour is contrary to all that Labour has stood for since 1945, and offers no real difference from rational Conservatism. I believe the majority of the electorate knows this and has moved on – if not decisively this time, it certainly will after the next market meltdown.
Alan Bailey
London

stethoscope
GP surgery, London, December 2014. Photograph: Carl Court/Getty Images

Despite all the good points made by your correspondents (Letters, 30 December) about “mutualisation” and other not-for-profit configurations to fight off NHS privatisation, we should be worried about “social” enterprises. Consider the example of a social enterprise in West Yorkshire care – it made a profit a couple of years ago and redistributed it among its employees. A charming example of mutualism and co-operation, or a social enterprise becoming a private enterprise that gives out bonuses?

The other government practice that complements this is the notion of increased “local control” – ie devolving more functions to councils and then cutting their budgets so they reduce services as a result. Just as for care, the private companies are waiting in the wings.
Jonathan Hauxwell
Crosshills, North Yorkshire

• I think Dr Chang has a misapprehension about mutuals. If they are registered as community-interest companies there is a legal assets lock, tying these into some community benefit; if they are registered as mutuals then staff must be able to vote on any proposals for takeovers. I suppose I could make a similar generalisation about doctors all being fat cats, which would also be untrue.

Perhaps those organisations he was thinking of were not true mutuals or social enterprises. Or he is remembering the mutual building societies, which had no asset lock and whose members opted for a slice of the profits?
Don Macdonald
Community Training Partners

• Could these objections (Doctors attack plans for 24/7 health service, 2 January) be connected to consultants’ weekend working in the private sector? When I had my (private) bypass done, two of us were treated on a Sunday morning.
Stan Zetie
Birmingham

Polish airmen at a British RAF base in 1940
A group of Polish pilots on the wing of a Wellington bomber watch aircraft take off from a British RAF base in 1940. Photograph: AJ O’Brien/Getty

So 200 years ago the first Duke of Wellington led the British army that defeated Napoleon at Waterloo (Obituary, 2 January). Next you’ll be telling me that English public schoolboys won the Battle of Britain 75 years ago.
Bill Gabbett
London

• Barney Ronay has got it wrong (Letters, 1 January). God save the Queen is not a plea to God to save the Queen: it just expresses the hope that He will. The verb is subjunctive, not imperative.
Michael Bulley
Chalon-sur-Saône, France

• The snow melted here on the first day of the year and celandines are bravely in flower beside the river Greet.
Catriona Todd
Southwell, Nottinghamshire

 

 

Independent:

David Attenborough makes an important point about global leaders being in denial about climate change (report, 2 January). However it’s not only our leaders who are wilfully ignoring the scientific facts, it is those they represent: us.

The rate of change in our climate is sufficiently slow from a political viewpoint that it can safely be ignored until after the next election, and the evidence of low levels of savings and pension provision suggests that we share our leaders’ short-term view of life. I don’t believe our leaders are so stupid as to think climate change is not a reality, or powerless to make a difference if they chose to; it’s just not a priority.

Solutions to big problems often comprise many different elements, and some of these might be: continued and strengthened international political debate and agreeing of targets; more effective communication from the scientific community; and continued pressure from the likes of Greenpeace. In the end, though, I think we may have to rely on the fact that economics usually trumps politics and hope that investors recognise the economic consequences and opportunities of climate change and act accordingly.

David Wallis

Cirencester, Gloucestershire

 

Amol Rajan asks: “How can you get global co-operation on climate change when the economics of it are so unpredictable?” (Letter from the Editor, 27 December) The economics of energy supply will remain unpredictable for as long as we rely on internationally traded commodities (fossil fuels) which are subject to regional geopolitics and politically inspired decisions about supply and demand.

The situation is made even more uncertain by the fact that supplies are eventually going to run out, and may well be stranded in situ long before that if rapidly worsening climate change forces worldwide decarbonisation.

This should be compared with renewable sources of energy, where the price is predictable and the supply is inexhaustible, locally produced, and non-polluting. Maybe the question should be: “How can you hope to have economic stability until the issue of climate change is settled?”

Dr Robin Russell-Jones

Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire

 

Tom Bawden (1 January) is right to say that an emotional charge is urgently required if the issue of climate change is to be understood by the non-scientific community. Our natural scepticism is often encouraged by the short-termism of weak politicians who prefer to ignore the problem while they are in office. Surely it is absurd that we readily accept the views of scientists in vital areas such as medicine but scoff at them when climate change is up for discussion.

But who is capable of delivering this essential message in a palatable form which sceptics will be prepared to listen to? I would suggest that Bill Bryson, the author of The Short History of Nearly Everything, is the man for the job. In that book he managed to explain a great deal about complex fields of modern science to at least one ignoramus, whose view of the world has been changed as a result.

David Hindmarsh

Cambridge

 

Why anyone would drink protein shakes

Nicholas Lezard (“Why would anyone drink powdered protein?”, 30 December) makes snide comments about those who use gyms: in a country where average levels of physical activity fall well below those recommended, I would suggest that anyone who takes time to go to a gym should be praised, not condemned as “narcissistic”. The people I meet in my local council-owned leisure centre aren’t there for narcissism. They are trying to build up some fitness.

The use of protein shakes is based on solid scientific evidence that ingestion of additional protein in the half-hour or so following exercise enables the muscles to rebuild the losses incurred during exercise. Improving muscle strength is an integral part of becoming fit, and that doesn’t necessarily mean “body-building”.

As I approach 70 years, I know that like everyone else of my age, I am undergoing a progressive loss of muscle mass, and anything I can do to lessen this is likely to increase the duration of my independence in old age. Why is that a subject for derision?

And as to his absurd comments about protein shakes likely being made of “dried and ground-up worms”, let me assure Nicholas Lezard that the proprietary protein shake that I take after exercise is made of soy protein (fine for vegetarians) and is available in a range of flavours (banana and strawberry are my favourites) that make it truly delicious.

Keith Frayn

Emeritus Professor of Human Metabolism at the University of Oxford

 

Gallipoli: The British suffered most

John Walsh, writing about the anniversaries that fall this year (1 January), is peddling the old myth that Gallipoli was an exclusively Anzac (Australian and New Zealand Army Corps) operation.

Exact figures for casualties on the Allied side are difficult to come by, but the best estimates show that the Anzacs had about 11,000 dead and 24,000 injured. British casualties came in at about 34,000 dead and 80,000 injured. The French casualties were about equal to those the Anzacs suffered. This is not to decry the sacrifice made by Australia and New Zealand. In proportion to their populations at the time their casualties were huge.

If you get the chance to visit Gallipoli try to see some of the beaches at the south-western end, where British forces landed. In all probability no one else will be there. Visit V beach, where the Dublin and Munster Fusiliers lost so many troops in the landing that they were merged and nicknamed the Dubsters. There you will see a beach where blood really did “stain the sand and the water”.

Eamon Hamilton

Sutton Coldfield,  West Midlands

 

More high-speed lines, fewer local trains

The city of Tours in France, where I live, has had trains à grande vitesse (TGV) for many years. I was interested, therefore, to read John Lichfield’s article (27 December) concerning developments in the system.

The line which previously terminated at Tours is now being extended to Bordeaux, and, although it is a while before it comes into service, French railways (SNCF) are already giving us a grim foretaste of what we might expect.

The fastest services now bypass us, even though our urban population is about 400,000 and we are a hub of no fewer than seven railway lines. This has increased our journey time to Paris by 20 per cent and we have also lost our direct trains to Lille, with its simple connection for London.

However, it is not only the TGV service which has deteriorated. The massive investment in this system has led to much under-investment elsewhere. The classic route to Paris has fewer and fewer trains because ageing rolling stock is not replaced. Some other lines are restricted to 40kph; trains are replaced by buses or cancelled, sometimes at very short notice.

This may be due to the TGV, it may be due to general dysfunction in SNCF: I cannot draw conclusions. However, I do see a deteriorating railway with mounting frustration among travellers.

Once a great supporter of HS2, I now feel that, should it go ahead, it must never be at the expense of what railways can also do very well: taking local traffic off the roads.

John Neal

Tours, France

 

Ebola quarantine: a modest proposal

The wonderfully decent and heartwarming proposal from Clark Cross (letter, 31 December) that health professionals returning from “Ebola countries” should be placed in isolation units is a splendid idea. Especially if the US, EU and UK were to batten down the hatches and leave western Africa to its own fate. This would ensure that no more selfless doctors and nurses would travel to assist health services in these afflicted areas to try to contain and halt this horrific infection.

Perhaps Mr Cross would like to consider the apocalyptic words from a senior US health-official: “Ebola” and “Lagos”. Or perhaps he would rather we quarantine the entire continent?

Ronan Breslin

Glasgow

 

Her bed is nothing to my desk

I’m no professor or art student, but if an unmade bed can be sold for over £2.5m then my untidy desk is worth at least double. I like to think it is a parody of organisation, and contemporary art obviously.

Better still, although we’re no longer sure Tracey Emin really lay in her bed (letters, 31 December), I assure you that I’ve worked at my desk. I made it how it is and never will onlookers have seen such talent!

Emilie Lamplough

Trowbridge, Wiltshire

Times:

Sir, Judging by your piece on anniversaries (“2015: it’s going to be a year to remember”, Dec 30), it seems that CP Snow’s “Two Cultures” is alive and well.

This year will mark the 150th anniversary of the publication of A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field by Edinburgh-born James Clerk Maxwell. Among other things, Maxwell’s theory showed that visible light was a kind of “electromagnetic wave”. His was the first “field theory” — the kind of theory that now dominates modern physics, giving us, inter alia, the Higgs boson. His theory led to the discovery of radio waves, and so gave us radar, TV and mobile phones. Einstein was led to his relativity theory by thinking about the implications of Maxwell’s work, which also anticipated the quantum description of photons.

For those who care about the Union, Maxwell was a Scottish genius who was nurtured and thrived in the United Kingdom.
Professor Wilson Poon
University of Edinburgh

Sir, December 31 was the 500th anniversary of the birth of Andreas Vesalius, the renowned anatomist and doctor who wrote in 1543 De Humani Corporis Fabrica (On the Fabric of the Human Body). He was the first to disprove that man had one less rib than women. For those wishing to celebrate the great man’s birth it should be pointed out that in 1514 the Julian calendar was in use and the Gregorian calendar was not introduced until 1582. So Vesalius’s 500th anniversary is actually on January 10.
Dr John Firth
Consultant pathologist
London N9

Sir, The Norman church of St Alban in St Albans, a site of Christian worship since around AD300, celebrates the 900th anniversary of the consecration of the “new” Norman building this month. Throughout its history it has been variously an abbey and the leading Benedictine monastery in Europe. In 1877 it assumed its cathedral status.
It continues to thrive.
Alfred Hagerman
St Albans

Sir, I was disappointed not to see the 200th anniversary of the birth of George Boole (1815-1864) on your list of important anniversaries for 2015. Boole was a proud son of Lincoln and first professor of mathematics at the university in Cork, a post he obtained without the benefit of a university degree or secondary level education, being almost entirely self taught. He is the founder of pure mathematics and the father of computer science.
Desmond Machale
Emeritus professor of mathematics, University College Cork

Sir, In his celebration of English achievements in years ending with a 15 (“Happy new year Britain . . . and here’s why”, Dec 29), Matt Ridley lists some of the advantages we enjoy as a nation, including our climate, geography and democracy. However, he omits a key asset. English law and its development as the preferred choice of international business, lies at the heart of our success in attracting both talent and investment from all over the world. Of all the anniversaries Mr Ridley mentions, the 800th anniversary of Magna Carta is the most important.
Ep Greeno
Walton-on-Thames, Surrey

Sir, On reading your table of anniversaries in 2015, I was reminded of when our daughter took my technophobe husband to buy a mobile phone. On return she asked me to guess what four digit Pin he had chosen. “Battle of Agincourt of course”, I replied. She was astonished that I had guessed correctly. My explanation: what else would a historian choose? At least we knew he would never forget the Pin, even if he really did not know how to use it.
Pamela Hart
Watford, Herts

Sir, Matt Ridley’s aside “I presume the French do not celebrate Agincourt or Waterloo” (Dec 29) reminded me of a visit to the French Army Museum in Paris where Agincourt was described as “un échec — a setback!” My friend and I burst out laughing and heads turned disapprovingly. We both felt chastened. The English may have won but it was hardly their finest hour, marred as it was by the unchivalrous slaughter of French prisoners.
Tony Lawton
York

Sir, I am proud to be called “Grandude” by my grandchildren (letters, Dec 27, 29, 30 and 31).
Robin Miller

Sittingbourne, Kent

Sir, I was named and remain “Gary”.
Jan Wilcock
Leeds

Sir, Having been soundly thrashed playing Star Wars games by my grandchildren, I am now “Pap Vader”.
Brian Brayford
Penarth, Vale of Glamorgan

Sir, As early grandparents, we became “Marge and Parge”.
Philippa Hutchinson
London NW6

Sir, My parents were known as “Manda” and “Panda”.
Geoffrey Honeywell
Lichfield

Sir, Can I be the only “Grappa”?
John Julius Norwich
London W9

Sir, When my dad became a grandad he asked to be called “gaffer”, saying that it was a 16th-century term.
Sam Ashton

Hornby, Lancs

Sir, My grandson gives me an extra ten seconds before chasing me in a game of “it”. He calls me “fast grandma”.
Liz Gerrard

Burston, Norfolk

Sir, Am I the only “Grunge”?
Eithne Carus-Wilson

Malvern, Worcs

Sir, We settled on “Wise and Revered Grandfather” which was shortened to “Weird Grandfather”.
Dermod Malley

Halstead, Essex

Sir, My mother buys premium bonds for her five grandchildren. She is known as “Gambling Granny”.
Helen Savage

Chesham, Bucks

Sir, My granddaughter called me “gum”. Luckily, the name didn’t stick.
Mike Finlay

Barnet, Herts

Sir, My mother kept dogs. My children called her “Granny Woof”.
Richard Tucker

Stanton, Glos

Sir, I’m Farfar (father’s father)
Jeff Galatin

Monks Risborough, Bucks.

Sir, My grandson calls me “Normal Grandma” to differentiate me from his two great-grandmothers.
Sharon Cavendish

London, N2

Sir, I’m “Nanajac”.
Jacqui Tucker

London W8

Sir, I’m Grammx as my phone’s predictive text would not allow “Granny”.
Sue James
Pamber Green, Hants

Sir, My son wrote to his grandparents “Dear Gunpa and Groanma”. It was entirely appropriate.
Michael Gaine

Saffron Walden, Essex

Sir, To my great niece I am “Gup”, but my portly brother is “Gut”.
Paul Silver-Myer

London N20

Sir, I have just spent a fascinating hour perusing the front page of a 1938 edition of The Times, thanks to your archive offer.

The small ads are riveting. They reveal that recycling is not new; Guy’s hospital appealed for settees to furnish the nurses’ sitting room.

Clothes turning was offered — whereby suits and overcoats were dismantled, and reassembled with the fabric reversed, thus doubling their life. Ill-fitting garments were recut and repaired.

Maybe we can learn from that generation’s thrift; though the ad for unwanted artificial teeth is rather unappealing.

Sylvia Crookes
Wensleydale, N Yorks

Sir, Matthew Syed (“The slippery slope from halal meat to FGM”, Opinion, Jan 1) chooses selectively from inconclusive scientific evidence to support his view that religious slaughter is less humane than conventional mechanical methods of slaughter, neglecting the ample body of evidence that supports the opposite view that shechita, the Jewish, humane method of slaughtering animals for food, is humane and conforms to all the principles of animal welfare.

Mr Syed appears not to be familiar with the broad range of far more serious animal welfare problems such as the questionable mechanical stunning methods that include shooting by captive bolt stun gun, asphyxiation by noxious gas, electrocution by tongs or water. Neither does he seem to be familiar with issues related to handling and the woeful levels of mis-stunning that have been well reported in The Times. Instead, he has taken aim at the easy target — faith communities.

The government’s determination to protect the right of faith communities to practise religious slaughter is the result of honest, evidence-based debate.

Henry Grunwald QC
Chairman, Shechita UK

Sir, Matthew Syed’s article needed more research. First, FGM is done as a cultural practice in some Muslim communities and not because it is mandatory in Sharia. Second, kosher and halal procedures for slaughtering consider both animal and human welfare. The method of slaughtering ensures that all the blood is drained out of the carcass. Even the veterinary fraternity and the scientists now concur that consumption of excessive blood is harmful for humans.

Masood Khawaja
Director, Halal Consultations

Sir, Matthew Syed, while arguing logically, and correctly, that “animals should be slaughtered humanely” regrettably states that the practice of ritual slaughter is inhumane. Shechita, despite his protestations, actually stuns and kills at the same time.

There is ample evidence of failures when animals are “pre-stunned”, conveniently ignored by those who insist it to be the kindest method of ending an animal’s life.

He should be congratulated for combining ritual slaughter, FGM, forced marriage and gay couples in one article. He concludes with an appeal that we have the give and take of rational debate. Hasten the day.

Jack Lynes
Pinner, Middx

Sir, Matthew Syed’s article reminds me of an incident I heard from a rabbinical judge who was supervising the slaughter of animals. Next to him stood a veterinary surgeon who was slyly criticising the method throughout — which the rabbi chose to ignore.

After the session another slaughterer came in to stun animals pre-slaughter for a non-kosher batch. He was clumsy and rarely hit the correct spot on the head — with most of his animals writhing in agony before the actual slaughter. When the rabbi asked the surgeon why he had not found this second way crueller, he replied “Your method is inhumane, our method is not — this was just an exception”.

What should come before “rational debate” and “limits” on religious practices is a basic understanding of what they consist of.

Gavriel Cohn
London NW4

Sir, Ritual slaughter has no place in a compassionate society. However, the problem with Matthew Syed’s “secular liberalism” which he trumpets as “a positive, muscular and rather wonderful creed” is that, in spite of his compelling arguments, there is a danger that nothing will be done to change these inhumane practices.

If indeed the EU’s Farm Animal Welfare Council has condemned ritual slaughter, surely the government should be morally empowered to close down establishments where it is practised.

Bernard Kingston
Biddenden, Kent

Sir, Thank you for publishing such a splendid, direct and daring article by Matthew Syed. It is so refreshing to both see freedom of opinion in your newspaper and to admire a well constructed and well-written opinion with which I could not agree more.

Adrian L Bruder
Crawley, W Sussex

Sir, Dr Peter Green (letter, Dec 31) is correct. I gave such evidence to the Home Affairs committee in 1979 on a proposal to establish drying-out centres into which non-violent drunks would be diverted, away from the hazards to which they would be exposed in police cells. These centres would be staffed by personnel trained in the care of those with impaired consciousness and fully equipped with resuscitation apparatus.

The committee accepted the proposal, but it was never implemented, and subsequent calls for its implementation by the Police Complaints Authority and the Royal Society of Medicine went unheeded. Perhaps now, if it is recognised that the problem also endangers A&E services, there may be some action. Such centres could be adapted to accommodate violent drunks safely and give welcome relief to harassed A&E departments.

Dr Neville Davis
Hove, E Sussex

Sir, Ralph Lloyd Jones (letter, Dec 31) clearly has not read my biography of Radetzky, otherwise he could not describe him as a reactionary. His views on Europe after the fall of Napoleon are also misguided. Austrian Italy was the most progressive part of the peninsula till 1848 and Habsburg rule in Europe was far less despotic than Napoleon’s military dictatorship. The Habsburg Civil Code of 1812 was more progressive than Napoleon’s.

Professor Alan Sked
London School of Economics

 

Telegraph:

David Williams piloted the fault Virgin Atlantic 747 safely back to the ground
David Williams, right, piloted the fault Virgin Atlantic 747 safely back to the ground Photo: Enterprise

SIR – David Learmount (“Too many pilots can’t handle an emergency”, Comment, December 31) argues that an over-reliance on computers to fly aeroplanes has left pilots under-prepared. As a former test pilot, I, too, am concerned about the changes in training over the past 50 years.

The increasing use of “glass instruments”, whereby analogue or dial-based indicators are superseded by electronically operated displays, results in high dependence on the reliability of systems that may fail.

I was taught to fly by a maverick instructor who often distracted students with some minor problem while he turned the fuel off, mismanaged the propellers or other engine controls, fiddled with the flight trim controls or turned vital switches on or off. We then had to find a rapid way of getting ourselves out of trouble.

Much of the training today’s commercial pilot has is undertaken on a flight simulator rather than in a real aircraft, which does not prepare him or her to spot when indicators are supplying incorrect information. The Air France Airbus crash of 2009 was a classic example of this, where a very simple systems failure gave demonstrably wrong information not just to the pilot but to the whole flight crew.

There has to be a moment when a pilot has the experience and ability to conclude that he or she cannot depend on electronic instrument displays but must fly the aeroplane by hand.

If this approach to training is questioned, then one only has to look back a few days to the successful outcome of a tricky landing by a Boeing 747 at Gatwick (report, December 30) with only three-quarters of its main landing gear deployed. That was achieved by a “hands-on” approach.

Arthur W J G Ord-Hume
Guildford, Surrey

SIR – On the Airbus series of aircraft, the main controls are by side-stick controllers, which move independently. During an incident where the aircraft is being thrown around the sky, it may be that neither pilot is aware of the actions of the other and thus control is lost.

This seems to have been the case with the Air France aircraft lost over the Atlantic. The Boeing system has control yokes that are firmly fixed together and visible to either pilot, so each knows what the other is doing. As a retired pilot, I know which system I would rather use.

Richard Statham
Langport,Somerset

SIR – Captain David Williams’s superb landing at Gatwick brings to mind the return flight my wife and I made to Rhodesia once. On landing in Athens, the brakes jammed, causing large holes in the landing wheels. New tyres had to be sourced from Rome and, while we endured the necessary delay, as guests of the airline we made our first visit to the Acropolis and the Parthenon. A happy ending.

William H Hirst
Nottingham

Calculating tax

SIR – Following on from your recent article about the high levels of happiness in Denmark, where taxes start at 50 per cent, Diana Goetz (Letters, January 1) says that we have to be prepared for pay higher taxes to fund better public services in Britain.

In the UK, once an employee’s and employer’s National Insurance contributions are taken into account, basic rate tax payers are already paying the equivalent of 40 per cent, and higher rate earners are paying 49 per cent.

Maybe the difference in happiness levels can be accounted for by how much more of this revenue we waste, compared to the Danes. David Cameron repeatedly claims to have taken millions of working people “out of taxation altogether” when in reality they are paying 12 per cent on any earnings above £5,668.

It is time the Conservatives offered the electorate something radical that’s worth voting for.

Geoff Dees
Alford, Lincolnshire

Value of civil servants

SIR – Sandy Pratt (Letters, January 1) implies that “pen-pushing civil servants” do not deserve honours. Also in yesterday’s newspaper, you looked back on the 30 years of the mobile phone revolution.

For most of that time, I was a civil servant responsible for the negotiations, that opened up the radio frequency spectrum essential for that development. I personally negotiated with the Ministry of Defence to make more spectrum available to allow the two initial operators to grow rapidly and roll out nationally.

Later, I persuaded other European countries to open up a higher frequency band, which enabled additional operators to be introduced. More recently I was involved in the international negotiations that supported the successful switch-over to digital television and the release of yet more valuable spectrum for the mobile industry. I am proud of my time as a “pen-pushing civil servant”, my contribution to Britain’s leading role in the mobile phone revolution and my OBE.

Michael Goddard
New Haw, Surrey

Some bright spark

SIR – At the end of the broadcast of the giant New Year’s River Thames firework display, the BBC put up the caption: “This programme contains flashing images.” Well, I never.

Dave Alsop
Churchdown, Gloucester

Wrappy Christmas

SIR – Both my friend and I received scarves for Christmas. One was mistaken for a tablecloth, the other a bedspread. How on earth is one supposed to wear such a large piece of cloth? Like a sari?

Jan Denbury
Winsley, Wiltshire

Close-knit family


The Debonnaires in their Danish-style jumpers

SIR – One thing my wife copies from the Danes (Letters, January 1) is their knitting patterns. She has knitted about 40 jumpers for family members over the past two years (pictured) – and those not for family are sold for charity. She should be an inspiration to the younger generation to learn to knit.

Malcolm Debonnaire
Reading, Berkshire

Evening kick-off

SIR – Richard English (Letters, January 1) underestimates the reasoning capacity of members of the Armed Forces when it comes to the year twenty-fifteen. I don’t believe anyone thinks the First World War started at 7.14pm, or that the Second World War kicked off just before twenty to eight in the evening.

Jan Bardey
Kineton, Warwickshire

Nostalgia for East Germany’s finest automobile


Warts and all: a mother and child pass a Wartburg in Stendal, eastern Germany, in 2003

SIR – Adrian Love (Letters, December 31) claims that anyone who owned a Wartburg would wish to keep that secret.

Citizens of East Germany had two choices when it came to cars. Both had two-stroke engines, but while the tiny two-door Trabant was basically made of hardened linoleum, the roomier four-door Wartburg was made of steel and therefore was a far more prestigious item; the town of Eisenach (whence my father fled to Britain in the Fifties) was extremely proud of its cutting-edge product.

Both cars had waiting lists of 15 years or so, which certainly is a long time to wait to discover that at least Trabis couldn’t rust.

I have seen a few Trabis in Britain, but never a Wartburg, which makes me sad.

Victor Launert
Matlock Bath, Derbyshire

SIR – Who is to say that the password, relating to the name of the late Christopher Barlow’s first car (Letters, December 31) was the make?

I have friends who habitually give their cars names; I remember one was called Penelope.

Mike Laughton
Harrogate, West Yorkshire

100 years of jam, Jerusalem and so much more

SIR – In listing important centenaries in 2015, (Features, December 31), you omit the founding of the Women’s Institutes.

Never mind jam and Jerusalem, this fine organisation is responsible for many campaigns – “Keep Britain tidy”, “Time to talk about organ donation”, “SOS high streets and town centres”, “More midwives”, “Equal pay for equal work”, “SOS for honey bees”, “Breast screening”, “School meals for all”; need I go on?

Then there was the splendid work undertaken during the Second World War in bottling fruit, growing food, organising and caring for evacuees, and providing support for women in the community while their menfolk were at war.

The WI offers a place where women from all places in our society meet as equals. Our centenary year of 2015 will be filled with activities to mark the event, especially at our annual meeting at the Royal Albert Hall in June, where our speakers will be Dr Lucy Worsley, Dame Tanni Grey-Thompson and Helena Morrissey.

Rosie Harden-Vane
Holywell, Northumberland

Your toast

SIR – You report (December 31) that a person’s approach to toast reveals his or her personality.

I eat no toast and therefore, apparently, I have no personality – I am the invisible man consuming bacon, eggs, mushrooms, sausages, black pudding and baked beans.

Chris Watson
Lumut, Perak, Malaysia

Exactly one year ago, 100 dental professionals wrote a letter to you, raising serious concerns that the NHS dental system in England was unfit for purpose. Dentists have said that they cannot provide the best care while under pressure to meet the NHS’s “Unit of Dental Activity” targets.

The last year has only seen the situation worsen. For example, we had the largest ever NHS patient recall, when 22,000 patients of the dentist Desmond D’Mello were advised to be tested for HIV and hepatitis, after huge volume targets – commissioned and supervised by NHS management – compromised care and left no time to clean properly between patients.

Today, the new number one medical reason that any primary school child aged 10 or under is hospitalised in England is rotten teeth. This is 100 per cent preventable.

The Government continues to promise the public that all dental clinical health needs for the population of England are met under their NHS dentistry system, to the highest standards.

This is a lie. It is impossible for dental professionals to deliver this quality of service nationally with the current limitations. Nor is it likely to be possible under any political party in these times of austerity.

In the months before the general election, politicians must stop fostering unrealistic expectations, and should develop a national 20-year plan based around prevention. They must also recognise that dental professionals need to be allocated protected time to see each patient, not high-volume targets. Otherwise we will have learnt nothing from the NHS Mid-Staffordshire disaster.

Dr Tony Kilcoyne
Specialist in Prosthodontics
Dr A V Jacobs
Dentist and Founder GDPUK, dental forum
Dr Martin Mayhew
Specialist in Dental Public Health
Dr Joanne Birdsall
Specialist and Consultant Orthodontist

Dr Mal Meneaud

Dr Caroline Wilkins

Dr Adam Lane

Dr Suraj Patel

Dr Audoen Healy

Dr Timothy Hodges

Dr Andrew Bates

Dr Gopal Varma

Dr Carl Taylor

Dr Chas Lister

Dr Alif Moosajee

Dr Rob Dyas

Dr Paul Mandon-Gassman

Dr Shereena Ilyas

Dr Miles Grout

Dr Janet Speechley

Dr Jason Greenwood

Dr Zaki Kanaan

Dr Sarah Andrews

Dr Jamie Thind

Dr Rakhshi Qureshi

Dr Philip Friel

Dr Ian Wilson

Dr Ajay Mathur

Dr Bruce Mayhew

Dr Dipesh Patel

Dr Graham Porter

Dr Natasha Vadasz

Dr Simon Thackerey

Dr Graeme Fisher

Dr Durani Burani

Dr Nirmal Patel

Dr Teo Ruja

Dr Norman Bloom

Dr Michael Lavelle

Dr Jaina Shah

Dr Jay Ganatra

Dr Jane Brooks

Dr Hiten Patel

Dr Ray Steggles

Dr Arthur McGroarty

Dr Celia Burns

Dr Richard Carr

Dr Masood Jaffer

Dr Scott Aaron

Dr Chris Borne

Dr Keith Hayes

Dr Roy Damoney

Dr Claire Simpson

Dr John Bates

Dr Richard Evans

Dr Martin Bayne

Dr Danny Pretorius

Dr Peter Gould

Dr Simon Gallier

Dr Carla McCann

Dr Stephen Butler

Dr Paul Isaacs

Dr Robert Moxom

Dr Ruth Dening

Dr Iain Cambell

Dr Victoria Taylor

Dr Peter Costello

Dr Tim Pickering

Dr Don Sloss

Dr Vijay Vithani

Dr Tim Coates

Dr Graham Nicols

Dr Andrew Adey

Dr Huong Nguyen

Dr Diana Dumitriu

Dr Duncan Scorgie

Dr Dominic O’Hooley

Dr David Bevan

Dr Victoria Holden

Dr Shahir Shamsuddin

Dr Eurico Martins

Dr Anya Sieinska

Dr Lincoln Hirst

Dr Frederico Ferreira

Mhari Coxon

Bal Chana

Kelly Chambers

Helen Metcalf

Julie Mayers

Jeanette Grimley

Morag Powell

Racheal Thelma England

Miranda Steeples

Rosie King

Rikke Jacobsen

Debbie Hemington

Donna Schembri

Alun Reece

Alix Furness

Mike Day

Philip Dixon

Julia Parry-Jones

Lubna Hussain

Raquel Valentim

Barbara Jones

Sylvia Andrews

Paul Woodhouse

James Mehta

Paul Scott

Julian Thornton

Kevin Gibney

Globe and Mail:

  (BRIAN GABLE/THE GLOBE AND MAIL)

Tabatha Southey

Gentlemen, I’m here to mansplain Dickens … okay?

Irish Times:

Sir, – As Brendan O’Regan pointed out (December 31st), “the eighth amendment is one of the most explicit equality measures in the Constitution, and yet those who would normally champion equality remain silent, if they are not actually attacking the measure”. How can this be explained? Ireland, according to the World Health Organisation, has one of the safest records for maternal care, and safer than those countries where abortion is legalised, so where is the proof that this amendment should be removed? There will always be hard cases and, as is well known, these make poor law, but how can valuing equally the life of the mother and baby be objectionable? Our safety record is based on just that – seeking to ensure the life of both. At our peril we follow other countries, as pointed out by Mr O’Regan, in “the excesses of abortion” and, once again, it must be repeated that there is no such thing as limited abortion. Once it is legalised the efforts start immediately to extend the limits, as evidenced here in Ireland.

I appeal to The Irish Times to please have regard to that much-prized object nowadays – equality – and ensure that the debate is balanced. – Yours, etc,

MARY STEWART,

Donegal Town.

Sir, – I don’t wish to be pedantic, but I note that the neologism at the centre of the mangled syntax of the 1983 anti-abortion amendment is creeping into standard usage in the media. I refer to the quite ridiculous use of the word “unborn” as a noun, which until recently has usually cropped up in inverted commas or italics, pointing to its non-standard status. The attorney general, in correspondence with the taoiseach in 1983, rightly criticised the proposed insertion of the term into the Constitution, calling it “ambiguous and unclear”. It is still, in 2014, not defined as a noun in the most up-to-date edition of the unabridged Oxford English Dictionary.

This is to say nothing of the flat-out incorrect use of the word “mother” in the same amendment. Another neat ideological semantic trick, of course – anti-abortion campaigners naturally seek to make mothers of women against their will, including in their choice of words. – Yours, etc,

JOHN CALE,

Dublin 8.

Sir, – Article 40.3.3 of Bunreacht na hÉireann may be a patently flawed and nebulous amendment but it can’t be repealed without the consent of the people.

Is yet another divisive and factious referendum on the emotive issue of abortion now inevitable? The question is purely rhetorical. – Yours, etc,

PAUL DELANEY,

Dalkey,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – Ceann Comhairle Seán Barrett’s call for a “free vote” in the Dáil on “conscience issues” is one of those well-intentioned ideas that sound good but are impossible to implement (“Barrett calls for free vote on conscience issues”, December 30th). Let’s suppose, for the sake of argument, that a form of words could be agreed upon to define what was or was not a conscience issue, ie not to do with finance, taxation, foreign affairs, defence, etc.

We are then left with the question of what constitutes a “free vote”. The party whip aside, going publicly against the clearly expressed wishes of the party leader is probably not going to advance a TD’s political ambitions.

Pressure is brought to bear on TDs in other ways. The genuine fear of extremists over “conscience issues” is another factor.

The only possible form of free vote for TDs in the Dáil would necessarily be the same as for the general public in elections, a secret ballot. However, were the public to be prevented from knowing how their representatives were voting, there would be a clear argument that democracy was not being fulfilled.

Back to the drawing board, Ceann Comhairle! – Yours, etc,

JOHN THOMPSON,

Phibsboro, Dublin 7.

Sir, – Frank Browne (January 2nd) writes, “I think most reasonable people would respect politicians who openly expressed a belief based on conscience”. Why? I, and presumably most people, vote for politicians to represent their constituents rather than themselves. Shouldn’t a TD’s beliefs regarding matters of conscience be entirely irrelevant unless an explicit part of their election campaign? Otherwise “personal conscience” in the Dáil just looks like self-indulgence and political expediency, inviting cynicism in the electorate. We have quite enough of this already. – Yours, etc,

ASHLEY ALLSHIRE,

Coachford, Co Cork.

Sir, – Gerry Moriarty errs on the side of charity in his assessment of the late Ian Paisley’s last few years ( “Paisley took the road of redemption before the end”, December 31st). He mentions the late Lord Bannside’s acknowledgment that there had been discrimination against Catholics in Northern Ireland but he fails to refer to the former DUP leader’s repeated and brazen failure to withdraw his own venomous anti-Catholic statements.

In an interview with him on BBC Radio 4 in 2010, John Humphrys referred to Ian Paisley’s comments about Catholics breeding like rabbits. When Ian Paisley denied having ever said any such thing, John Humphrys told him that the remarks were on tape (indeed a recording was played during the broadcast); Ian Paisley’s only response was to make a trite comment about how “that was then and this is now”.

In the interviews earlier last year with Eamonn Mallie to which Mr Moriarty refers, Ian Paisley actually tried to justify his highly offensive comments about how the late queen mother and her younger daughter had committed “spiritual adultery and fornication” by visiting the pope – a statement which suggests that Ian Paisley’s monarchism was hardly sincere.

Mr Moriarty makes much of Ian Paisley’s close relationship with Martin McGuinness. He doesn’t tell us that when that redoubtable critic of the Provisional IRA Cardinal Daly died six years ago, Paisley had nothing to say. The truth about the Chuckle Brothers act is that extremists mix very well – all too well. – Yours, etc,

CDC ARMSTRONG,

Belfast.

Sir, – I join Ulric Kenny (December 30th) in welcoming the decision by UPC to introduce network-level content filtering. It is telling to compare the actions of the UK government with our Government over this important issue.

In the UK, the prime minister recognised the damage being done to children through access to inappropriate material, and the difficulties that parents have in attempting to install content filters in home computers and wireless devices. He demanded that the internet service providers introduce network-level content filtering, and they obliged. Consequently, in the UK, people have a choice – they can receive the normal, pornography-saturated internet, or they can receive an internet where most of the pornography is removed.

I have lobbied politicians here to take the same approach. However, there is a refusal at Government level to do so, with vague talk of tackling this problem with increased levels of education on this issue.

More education on the problem is necessary, but the response has to be multifaceted, and demanding that all internet service providers offer their customers the choice of network-level filtering should be a key part of any response.

It is irresponsible and untenable that our Government insists that it will not demand this of our service providers. All the research on this issue has proven that there are many serious consequences for young people who view age-inappropriate material.

The sooner we follow the UK lead on this issue the better. – Yours, etc,

SEAMUS LENNON,

Salthill,

Galway.

Sir, – I was interested to learn, through your Corrections & Clarifications section (December 27th), that Bishop John Buckley has “not at any time bowled in clerical garb”. I wonder whether your obituary writer (“Mick Barry, the modest monarch of Irish road bowling”, December 20th) was misled, as I was, by the photograph on page 184 of the coffee table book A Day in the Life of Ireland, appearing to show his grace in cassock, mid-bowl. The book claims he was playing Frank Nash, the lord mayor of Cork, that day (May 17th, 1991). – Yours, etc,

JOE STYNES, Cork.

Sir, – While mailing an international package to Dublin this afternoon, the clerk at Canada Post asked me if Dublin was part of either Northern Ireland, or, and I quote, “The normal Ireland”.

Trying to remain politically correct, I think “neither” was the most appropriate response. – Yours, etc,

GARY BOWEN,

Alberta,

Canada.

Sir, – According to the Gospels, Jesus never shirked his duty to admonish and correct those whom he knew to be failing in their duty towards God. Far from disapproving of Pope Francis’s “rant” (Eric Conway, December 31st), it is my opinion that the pope would be compromising his high office and the entire Roman Catholic Church and indeed all Christians were he to overlook the faults of the curia. Jesus certainly threw no stones but he did draw attention to the need for a change of heart. As his vicar on earth, Pope Francis can do no less. – Yours, etc,

GABRIEL MARTIN,

Maynooth,

Co Kildare.

Sir, – On arriving in Dublin from “the country”, many years ago, I was struck, among other things, by the range, variety and beauty of the front gardens that bedecked many areas of the city.

These provided beautiful spectacles of colour, especially in spring and autumn as splendid arrays of colour brightened up dark days!

Alas, no more! Like forests laid low by the mighty chainsaw, city gardens are disappearing at a rate of knots, as tarmac, concrete and cobble lock gradually replace every vestige of grass or greenery in the city.

Of course, not only is this a mistake from the point of view of aesthetics, it also has serious environmental consequences as increasingly regular flooding, exacerbated by lack of soil for soakage, clogs up our gutters and creates havoc for citizens.

When will somebody shout stop? Surely there is a way of incentivising people to keep their gardens for their own benefit and that of the wider community?

And many new houses include no green area whatsoever – surely someone in charge of planning can do something about this?

Wouldn’t it be a positive step if the new year brought about a new awareness of the beauty and importance of something as common or garden as the front garden? – Yours, etc,

SEOSAMH Ó MUIRÍ,

Dublin 9.

A chara, – Dónal Casey writes that pedestrians need to be better illuminated while walking on rural roads (December 30th). However all road users need proper lighting. Is it an offence to drive with only one functioning headlamp? It would appear not.

In just 30 minutes recently we counted 14 vehicles with faulty lights. These included a bus, a lorry and a taxi, as well as two cases of a missing rear-light.

On badly lit unmarked roads, pedestrians, even with flashlights, haven’t a chance when cars have insufficient headlamps to light the road ahead. Everyone has a duty to check their lights and not wait for NCT tests or Garda checkpoints to do so. – Is mise,

ÁINE UÍ­ EADHRA,

Rath Chairn,

Co na Mí.

A chara, – Anne Strahan (December 31st) makes a comparison between animals in the wild and foxhunting. It may be natural for hounds to chase and kill a fox but I don’t recall any species other than humans that makes it a spectator sport. – Is mise,

BARRY GAULE,

Waterford.

Sir, – My brother-in-law, a proud Longford man, now deceased, wept on hearing of the fire which gutted his beloved St Mel’s Cathedral.

How he would have wept with joy and pride had he lived to see the magnificence of the now rebuilt cathedral some five years on.

Allow me, through your newspaper, to thank everyone involved in this unbelievably amazing refurbishment. It was a triumphant finish to the year. – Yours, etc,

NORA SCOTT,

Churchtown, Dublin 14.

Irish Independent:

silhouettes of mother and son partly isolated over white

silhouettes of mother and son partly isolated over white

I watched the sad story of the tragic mother and baby who were on life support unfold with keen interest.

  • Go To

Only a few years ago, I had a life-threatening incident while pregnant. I was due to have my baby at the end of December and on October 10, after an incident in work, I was taken to hospital for a check-up, when my heart stopped.

Thanks to the quick thinking of the consultant present, they immediately delivered the baby and this enabled me to survive, though they did not know how she would do at the time. They also didn’t know how I would do, as I was in a coma for a while to aid my recovery. My daughter is now three years old and an utter ticket. She is the life and soul of the house. If she had not been delivered, my life would have been over there and then. There was no guarantee she would survive when they delivered her.

I asked my mother the other day what she would have done about me if it had been a similar situation to that of the poor lady in the recent incident, and she said she would have tried to save the baby. I have to say, I agreed with her 100pc. When there is a life to save, the best possible effort should be made to do so. This is not the first instance of something like this and won’t be the last.

I have to say, for me, death is death. In my instance, dignity would have had no place, as I knew nothing from the moment my heart stopped. (Where is the dignity for those killed in war or by sickness?) I was operated on with no anaesthetic of any kind and not in a theatre, as I was gone. Where was the dignity in that?

Dignity, as far as I am concerned, is only in the eyes of the living – the real dignity is to protect those around you and to save what you can.

I have given a lot of thought to this over the last three years since my survival, as really my daughter and I are a miracle, even though it has been very tough since from a familial and work perspective. I now ask where is the dignity in my life as it is. My husband has suffered a lot also, as he has not been able to gain full time employment since, as have my other children in their own way. I have one girl in particular – the one born before the daughter mentioned above – and she still asks me am I OK and tells me she loves me at every opportunity, as I was gone from her life for quite a while.

The recent heartbreaking case should not have been made public, as there were other children involved.

Sue Saidi

Address with Editor

Aircraft safety: false warnings

I began flying commercial jets in the early ’70s. The commercial jets of that time – the BAC 1-11 and the Boeing 707 and 747 – did have technical problems on a regular basis, but were adequately dealt with by the pilots. Failures on these aircraft, although frequent, were easily identifiable.

I have also flown the latest-generation Airbus A330, with its highly computerised flight deck. Here, the pilots are computer operators, monitoring the aircraft’s progress as it flies its pre-planned route,and checking when it is opportune to climb to a higher/more economical altitude, safety parameters allowing – as the aircraft burns approximately 5 tonnes of fuel per hour. Failures on this generation aircraft are very rare, but as in cases when planes are flying into hazardous weather, and the external airspeed sensors become blocked, can be misleading.

In relation to the recent accidents linked to hazardous weather, as described by David Learmont (Irish Independent, January 1), the basic principal is to avoid it, as it is clearly shown on weather radar systems. This may be achieved by either climbing, or turning left or right (if climb is not available, as in the AirAsia case.)

When these sensors become blocked, as in the Air France case in 2009, warning lights illuminate in the flight deck,and aural warnings sound, indicating that the aeroplane is being flown at too high a speed and is in danger of exceeding its manufacturer’s limits.(At high altitude, the maximum and minimum speeds can be within 20 kts of each other.) While this warning is false, the pilot reaction has been to slow the aircraft – hence in many of these cases the aircraft stalls, and falls from the sky.

These accidents highlight the need for the aircraft manufacturers to ensure that any warnings received by the pilots in the flight deck, accurately reflect the malfunction involved, thus leading to the correct action being taken.

Eugene Mc Carthy, Captain, Retired

Dalkey, Co Dublin

Famine is no laughing matter

I write to strongly condemn reports that British television station Channel 4 has commissioned a comedy show on the topic of the Irish Famine, called ‘Hungry’, by Dublin-based writer Hugh Travers.

The Famine directly affected over two million people, so this is nothing short of insulting to the memory of those people.

I am extremely saddened and angry that one of the most defining eras in Irish history will be the source for a new sitcom. I am not surprised that it is a British television outlet funding this venture. I do not believe an Irish station would commission this project, and I hope that RTE and TV3 will rule out supporting this programme.

In one of the most authoritative publications on the Irish Famine, ‘Altas Of The Great Irish Famine’, edited by John Crowley, William J Smyth and Mike Murphy in 2012, the preamble outlines the following: “The Great Irish Famine is probably the most pivotal event/experience in modern Irish history … In terms of mortality, it is now widely accepted that a million people perished between the years 1845-52 and at least one million and a quarter fled the country”.

In addition, Mr Travers’s suggestion that because 170 years have past it is now OK to look again at these events in a comedic light is totally ignorant of how this issue has been dogged by poor information, social stigma and lack of insight into this period of Irish history.

David McGuinness

Blanchardstown, Dublin 15

Gay marriage: for and against

I just heard that our Taoiseach will be prepared to debate publicly the gay marriage issue. This shows a courage that was always there but sometimes hidden.

We trust that he will also use this opportunity to present openly his support for gay adoption. For many of us, this is a more important question and it would be good to have the Taoiseach’s reassurance on the point.

John F Jordan

Killiney, Co Dublin

In a military engagement, a decoy is often used to dupe the enemy into defending the wrong position. This is exactly what has happened in the same-sex marriage debate. Catholics are defending the traditional Catholic/Christian view of marriage when it is not under attack – and cannot be. What is under attack is the meaning of ‘marriage’ itself. Marriage must have four elements to be a real marriage. A man, a woman, the possibility of the mutual procreation of children, and the mutual love and care of each other.

By definition, therefore, same-sex union cannot be described as a ‘marriage’, and certainly cannot be described as an ‘equality’ issue. Equality with what?

Out of genuine compassion, some well-meaning people might support the idea of changing the Constitution to call a same-sex union ‘marriage’ when such unions are already rightly recognised by the State.

If such a change were to take place, could we see a prosecution of a parish priest for refusing to perform such a ‘marriage’. Don’t let us sleepwalk into this referendum lulled by the ‘assurance’ that ‘this is all we want’.

I trust this complies with your rightful editorial call for a reasoned debate.

Pat Conneely

Dublin 11


Books

$
0
0

4 January 2015 Books

Mary a little better, I go to the Post Office and post three books.

Obituary:

Mario Cuomo, once regarded as a shoo-in for the Democratic presidential nomination
Mario Cuomo: he was once regarded as a shoo-in for the Democratic presidential nomination Photo: NEWSCOM

Mario Cuomo, who has died aged 82, was a long-serving Democratic Governor of New York State, regarded during the 1980s as the intellectual mentor of his party and its greatest communicator.

Revered by the young Bill Clinton and a whole generation of radical Democrats, Cuomo served a record three terms as governor, from 1982 to 1994, and with his eloquence, erudition and common touch was widely regarded as a shoo-in for the Democratic presidential nomination during that time. Instead he came to be known as the “Hamlet on the Hudson” due to his public agonising over whether he actually wanted the job.

In both 1988 and 1992 the nomination was his for the asking, but he dithered and finally declined. Why, he wondered aloud when he was considering whether to run against the incumbent President George HW Bush in 1992, had God been so good to St Paul? God had, Cuomo mused, “hit him in the tush with a little lightning” on the road to Damascus, and spared him the agony of having to make up his own mind. In the absence of Divine intervention, Cuomo, by contrast, went so far as to charter an aeroplane to take him from Albany, the state capital, to Washington to announce his candidacy — only to change his mind as the plane idled on the tarmac.

At 6ft 1in, Cuomo was a handsome, powerful man with large, expressive eyes and a warm smile. His national reputation rested both on his tenure as a reformist Governor of New York — the second biggest state in the country after California — and on a bravura performance at the Democratic National Convention of 1984, when he “gave the Democrats back their soul” with a rousing torrent of anti-Republican invective, as the forlorn supporters of Walter Mondale prepared the party for another thrashing at the hands of Ronald Reagan.

The performance confirmed Cuomo, in Democrat eyes, as their greatest orator. He followed up a few months later with a shameless piece of casuistry. In a speech at Notre Dame University, Indiana, he strove to reconcile Roman Catholic teaching, to which he claimed to be “privately” loyal, with his advocacy of public funds for abortion, on the grounds that the “pluralistic” nature of American society demanded that public servants should sometimes sacrifice their private beliefs for the general good.

The speech confirmed his reputation in the liberal American media as a great brain. “Cuomo is the first Catholic to pick a fight with a prelate,” noted the Washington Post approvingly, after he had admonished New York’s Cardinal O’Connor for saying he could not see “how a Catholic in good conscience can vote for a candidate who explicitly supports abortion”.

Cuomo’s crusading work for the poor and for Aids victims won him praise from all sides during his time as governor, but his record on the economy and law and order was abysmal. By the end of his three terms, New York State had become the outright winner in the crime stakes, with shanty towns of homeless, drug gangs, gun-toting ghetto children and a million people on welfare. It had also become notorious as the state with the highest taxes, the least efficient public services, and the biggest budget deficit.

Mario Cuomo with President Bill Clinton in 1994 (AP)

None the less, the Democratic Party appeared to believe that in Cuomo they still had a winner; and in the run-up to the 1994 gubernatorial elections they were confident that he would see off his Republican opponent, George Pataki, a virtual unknown when he entered the race. Their confidence increased when Rudolph Giuliani, the popular Republican Mayor of New York City, broke ranks and endorsed Cuomo for another term in the governor’s mansion.

But the voters were unimpressed. The Democratic vote in Cuomo’s stronghold of New York City was feeble. His grassroots supporters among the urban blacks, Jews and Roman Catholics simply did not bother to go to the polls and he went down to defeat.

Mario Matthew Cuomo was born on June 15 1932 in an apartment behind his family’s grocery shop in the Queens district of New York, the child of illiterate but hard-working Italian immigrants who had moved to America after the First World War. His father began as a drain-digger before opening his business.

After taking a degree in Latin American Studies, English and Philosophy at St John’s College, a Catholic university in Queens, Cuomo passed out equal top from the college’s Law department and began his career working for an Irish-American judge on the New York State Court of Appeals.

Subsequently he joined a legal partnership in Queens and became a formidable advocate for local communities threatened with displacement or rehousing by city planners and developers.

In 1972 the city’s Mayor John Lindsay asked Cuomo to sort out a row which pitted middle-class Italian-Americans against black welfare recipients, for whom a new housing project had been planned in the Forest Hills area. He succeeded so well, pacifying both sides, that in 1974 the state governor Hugh Carey made him New York Secretary of State. In this capacity he settled strikes, mediated a Mohawk Indian land claim, investigated abuses in state-run nursing homes and tackled a variety of civic quarrels.

Mario Cuomo campaigning in 1977 (REX)

In 1977 Cuomo ran for Mayor of New York City — but lost the Democratic nomination to Ed Koch. The next year he won the state’s lieutenant governorship, becoming New York’s ombudsman. In 1982 he won the governorship.

Cuomo’s name was never tainted with scandal. Despite his Italian-American origins, efforts to find links to the Mob got nowhere. Apart from his 1960s-style liberalism, his chief weakness was his thin skin. A New York Times reporter who had covered state politics for years described how, when offended, Cuomo would make “blistering phone calls where he ranted out of control. It was scary.” Meanwhile, some thought his self-indulgent bouts of public agonising about the presidency tended to divert public attention from more worthy Democratic candidates.

After leaving the governor’s mansion, Cuomo returned to his Manhattan law practice. He later hosted two New York radio shows and became a regular on the lecture circuit. He also published a book, Reason to Believe (1996), an attack on Newt Gingrich-style Republicanism.

In 1954 he married Matilda Raffa, with whom he had two sons and three daughters. His closest confidant and eldest son, Andrew, married (but later divorced) Robert Kennedy’s daughter Kerry and followed his father into politics. Andrew Cuomo stood for the Democratic nomination for Governor of New York against George Pataki in 2002, only to withdraw from the race on the eve of the state convention. In 2010, however, he won the nomination in an uncontested primary and beat his Republican opponent, Carl Paladino, in the general election. He was elected to a second term as governor last year.

Mario Cuomo is survived by his wife and children.

Mario Cuomo, born June 15 1932, died January 1 2015

Guardian:

british paratroopers kosovo
British paratroopers of the 1st Battalion, the Parachute Regiment, reveive flowers from a young ethnic Albanian Kosovar, while patrolling in Pristina, Kosovo, as part of the Nato peacekeeping force.(AP Photo/Paul Grover/MOD pool) Photograph: Paul Grover/AP

Will Hutton makes some good points in his piece on our recent military interventions but only looks at the ones he perceives to be failures: Iraq and Afghanistan (“Right-of-centre ideology has lost us a war and much more besides”, Comment). We should be proud of the action our forces took in Sierra Leone and Kosovo, which saved lives.

And while learning from the undoubted mistakes made in Afghanistan and Iraq we should also look at countries where perhaps the mistake was not to intervene. The million or so Syrian refugees would probably welcome the type of intervention Hutton condemns and not see it in the political terms he mentions but instead welcome it as a humanitarian response to their unfolding tragedy.

Peter Halsey

Radlett

Herts

Will Hutton’s appraisal of Britain’s failed military pretensions post 9/11 lacks one vital factor: any mention of the bizarre plan to replace Trident. There could not be anything more pretentious than a government subjecting its people to “austerity” measures, which generate real and growing poverty, while it seeks to wave its willy with unusable weapons of such extravagance.

In 1962, many of us went to Holy Loch to protest at the basing of US Polaris submarines there and Scottish CND came up with a very musical “Och! Och! There’s a monster in the loch” to rally opposition. If the SNP were to form a group after 7 May capable of blocking missile submarines in Scotland, there would be a powerful opposition to basing them in any Welsh or English cove or bay and perhaps even a Miliband government would be driven to cancelling the existing plans.

“Nay! Nay! No monster in the bay,” perhaps?

David Spilsbury

Birmingham

Now, now, do not naysay Nye

By suggesting that Nye Bevan made a “faux pas” when comparing Tories to vermin, Chris Mullin (Books) reveals himself to be a supporter of today’s middle-ground, middle-class politics. When parliament is inhabited by MPs who have more in common with each other than constituents, it is understandable that these careerists find it distasteful to be blunt when addressing other members of their “club”, even when their name might be Iain Duncan Smith.

Bevan was rough, tough and working class. He used blue-collar language and spoke from the heart. A similar comment today would be applauded by millions. Sadly, on the left, we no longer have politicians with the fire, passion, honesty and fearlessness to speak in the language of those they supposedly represent .

Bill Geddes

Worthing

West Sussex

Young can’t afford not to vote

Great news about the views of the 17 to 22 age group (“Optimistic and tolerant, our first-time voters give cause for hope”, leading article). If they wish to see the UK in Europe, the Human Rights Act maintained, the need to address climate change accepted and the level of privatisation in NHS kept very low, they must vote. Otherwise we over-65s will again be “bribed” to vote for a misremembered past and their futures will be ignored.

Janet Roberts

Saundersfoot

Pembrokeshire

And the cuts keep coming

While there is much to commend in Peter Bazalgette’s article (“Use the arts to boost the nation’s health”, Comment) I have to point out that Arts and Minds in Cambridgeshire has had to restrict its services due to lack of funding and its much appreciated services to mental health service users in Peterborough’s in-patient mental health unit have been curtailed due to lack of money.

Ian Arnott

Peterborough

A Bentley? That’s a bit rich

A minor correction to Polly Toynbee’s tribute to Jane Bown (New Review). David Astor never had a Bentley; he would have regarded that as an unpardonable extravagance. He used an office Volvo, which collected him from home in the morning and returned him there after work. During the day, as Polly found, it was available to the news desk to ferry reporters around. David was embarrassed by any display of wealth, so much so that his driver was once heard to say: “For a rich man, he doesn’t have a very good time.”

Donald Trelford

Majorca

Proud to be a Twirly bird

I don’t care for “real senior” at all (Katharine Whitehorn, Magazine). Even “unreal senior” would be preferable. However, many years ago, when I qualified for my bus pass, one of my daughters told me that her bus-driving friend from Liverpool told her that they referred to us as “Twirlies”. Think about it in Scouse language. “Can I get on this bus or am I too early”? Anyway, I’ve referred to myself as a Twirly ever since and I’m sticking with it whether it’s true or not. It is a very long time since I lived in Liverpool.

Elizabeth Hill

Guildford

 

An Accident and Emergency Unit sign at a UK hospital.. Image shot 09/2014. Exact date unknown.
The pressures on accident and emergency units are increasing, but does that mean certain categories of patients should be turned away? Photograph: Alamy

Who are the “more deserving” patients being prevented getting speedy access to A&E because of the undeserving drunks (“Arrest drunks who clog up A&E wards – medical chief”, News)? Are they the speeding motorist, the heart-attack victims who smoked 40 a day? I think it becomes problematic if we start making moralistic judgments about who deserves help and don’t just treat them regardless of the cause.

Drinking to excess is a problem, but there are multiple reasons why people drink. It might be partying, depression or a whole host of reasons. I recently saw a 70-year-old man who had been banned from local pubs for drinking to excess and was being treated for liver damage. His wife had died and he had few other places to find company. I think helping him with his grief and finding other places to be less lonely is a better solution to arresting in his case. Two possible solutions spring to mind:

1. Drink-awareness courses offered instead of arrest and paid for by the individual. They could be run by drug and alcohol services/charities and make people aware of the dangers of excess drinking and for those with more long-term problems be an access point to get help.

2. Increasing the price of alcohol. Smoking has decreased as its cost and the services to help quit have increased. We need the same two-pronged approach to alcohol.

Dr Chris Allen

Consultant clinical psychologist

Maidenhead

“Illness is neither an indulgence for which people have to pay, nor an offence for which they should be penalised, but a misfortune, the cost of which should be shared by the community,” said Nye Bevan in 1951.

I doubt very much that he would have seen an inexorable influx of the legless into A&E as the responsibility of his embryonic NHS, which Dr Cliff Mann rightly questions more than 60 years later.

Clearly it is debatable as to whether this amounts to a legal offence as he suggests but it does highlight the increasing demands of lifestyle illness on the NHS. The charity Alcohol Concern recently reported that in-patient admissions entirely attributable to alcohol cost the NHS £518m per annum and partly attributable cost £1.3bn.

Surely this money would be more appropriately spent reversing the cutback of nursing numbers or funding better care for chronic illnesses and for the elderly.

Patients’ rights and expectations are repeatedly sounded but perhaps there needs to be an equal emphasis on the public’s responsibility to look after their own health and to use the precious NHS resources judiciously. I, for one, would drink to that.

Dr John Trounce

Hove

East Sussex

While sympathising with Dr Cliff Mann there is little chance of police enthusiasm for his suggestion. A much more effective policy may lie with the enforcement of existing legislation that involves the removal of licences from premises serving alcohol to the intoxicated. As with the drink-driving laws – once somebody you know has spent a night in the cells and lost their licence the temptation to flout the law lessens considerably.

Perhaps those doctors so exercised by cigarette packaging could now turn their attentions to alcohol as I am still seeing advertisements for alcohol on television, one featuring the clean-cut Mr Beckham, who should know better.

Anna Farlow

London NW2

Dr Mann should be reminded that it is not the job of NHS staff to assert that one patient (or group of patients) is more deserving than another.

He would do better to join with other NHS workers and public servants, including police officers, in demanding that the government provides them with sufficient resources to do their respective jobs in the way that is most appropriate.

Francis Prideaux

London W9

Independent:

It was heartbreaking to read the findings of the Family Food report but heartening to see The Independent on Sunday give it such prominence (“Millions of Britons battle to feed themselves”, 28 December).

Among the 492,000 people who used a food bank between April and September 2014 is the mum forced to give up breastfeeding after four weeks due to poor calorie intake or the dad who lost three stone having forgone meals for several weeks to ensure his two boys could eat.

The issue of malnutrition is very real to people with names, faces and painful stories of their own. I hope politicians from across the spectrum are willing to prioritise the reduction of food poverty in the run-up to and beyond the general election.

Ewan Gurr

Scotland network manager

The Trussell Trust, Dundee

I have a great deal of sympathy with Fiona Sturges regarding the difficulties and dilemmas one faces when giving up drink (“I’m just as merry without a drink, thank you” 28 December). I have been drinking since the age of 16. I am now in my late forties and am considering giving it up for a variety of reasons, health being the principal one.

It isn’t until you contemplate such a radical course that you realise how deeply embedded alcohol is in our culture. It is particularly difficult when all your friends and most of your family drink. I aim to go alcohol-free for the whole of January and take it from there.

It is not my intention to lecture people and I am not on a moral crusade. However; it is your contemporaries and society that will now allow you to go quietly without interrogating you as if you were a terrorist suspect. Good luck to Fiona. You are going to need it !

Liam McParland

Huddersfield, West Yorkshire

David Kuo’s concerns about China’s growth rate are exaggerated (Investment insider, 28 December). If it falls to 7.0 per cent from 7.5 per cent, the amount added to GDP will be slightly higher this year than last. We should not be too hooked on the idea that every year needs to show a bigger increase than the one before; that rapidly becomes impossible.

Harvey Cole

Winchester, Hampshire

DJ Taylor writes a thoughtful article on cultural standards (“Good taste? It’s all a matter of timing…” 28 December) but he omits any discussion of language. It is a curious anomaly that society today is censorious towards sexist language and yet it tolerates the parading on television and radio of coarse and even obscene language much of which is sexist. The worst culprits are usually so-called comedians whose delight in obscenity takes the place of genuine humour.

Those who control the media and who licence this decline are terrified of being labelled prudes whereas, in fact, to make a stand demonstrates maturity and an awareness of what enhances human values.

Michael Meadowcroft

Leeds, West Yorkshire

Has Helen Grant never heard of rowing? (“Greatest year for women’s sport”, 28 December.) This is the sport in which not only did GB women achieve extraordinary success at the 2012 Olympics but in which one crew in particular has remained unbeaten ever since, culminating in winning the World Championships in August 2014 in a world record time. Short or selective memory, then? And it’s not just because I’m a proud uncle that I feel constrained to write!

David Stanning

Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire

The Environment Agency does not hold shares in any listed companies. Like many pension funds, the Environment Agency Pension Fund invests in a wide range of companies and these assets are completely separate from the Environment Agency.

The day-to-day management of the fund and selection of companies is delegated to external fund managers. The fund invests more than £600m in clean technologies, and is recognised as a global leader in responsible and sustainable investment.

John Varley

Times:

 

Telegraph:

NHS direct website
NHS Direct was set up in March 1998 in an attempt to relieve pressure on A & E departments Photo: Alamy

SIR – Charles Moore asks: “Should our leaders make an animal NHS their pet project? It might not be in the animals’ best interests.

The day after being discharged from hospital following surgery recently, I experienced acute urinary retention. On the advice of the hospital, my wife phoned our GP. It being a Saturday the surgery was closed (like all local GPs) until Monday. A recorded message said that “a doctor would ring back”. No phone call resulted.

She rang NHS Direct, which instructed her to dial 111. Another recorded message said that “This service is unavailable in your area”. By 9pm things were so desperate that she had to call an ambulance and I was taken to A&E.

Here I was seen promptly but neither of the two doctors who saw me was able to pass a catheter. It was not until 8.30am on Sunday that the surgeon who had carried out the original procedure came on duty. My problem was resolved in five minutes.

I have only praise for the care I received during my initial spell in hospital, but as a retired veterinary surgeon I feel the post-operative service provided by the NHS was abysmal. If I had failed to provide adequate out-of-hours cover for my animal patients, I would have been called before the RCVS disciplinary committee and struck off. Pets seem better served than their owners.

Paul Carwardine
Chelmsford, Essex

SIR – The most significant factor in the crisis in emergency care examined by Robert Colvile is the reduction in the number of beds available in NHS hospitals.

Between 2003 and 2014 the total fell by 27 per cent, from 183,826 to 134,709. This is the continuation of a trend since the inception of the NHS in 1948 when it inherited 544,000 beds – 11 beds per thousand of the population.

In 2012, the latest year for which full figures are available from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the NHS had 2.8 beds per thousand. In comparison Germany had 8.3 and France had 6.3. Only Chile, Mexico and Turkey had fewer than Britain.

Dr Max Gammon
London SE16

SIR – Dr John Turner (Letters, December 23) is right in his diagnosis of flawed thinking on keeping elderly patients out of hospital. Complex conditions require urgent access to pathology or blood tests (not available nearly quickly enough in primary care).

Well-intentioned “home-care support” is characterised by reported 15-minute rushed visits by carers. Until local government pays attention to funding social care for the elderly that problem will not be solved.

Until the NHS 111 telephone service is staffed again by people more qualified than call handlers, neither will that.

Linda Hughes
Newton Abbot, Devon

Not the ticket at all

(Getty Images)

SIR – I see from the report on January 1 that tickets for rail journeys can be cheaper if purchased from the ticket office rather than the ticket machine.

That approach is almost an impossibility in Ely as the ticket office is rarely open, due, we are told, to a shortage of staff.

Eileen Norton
Ely, Cambridgeshire

Enterprise hobbled

SIR – On January 27 2014 David Cameron made a speech to the Federation of Small Businesses, in which he promised to scrap or amend over 3,000 “needless regulations”.

On January 1 this year the Government brought in a new EU directive on VAT that will see thousands of small businesses close down, or face a huge additional administrative burden.

The new law requires sellers of digital services to identify sales to each EU country and charge the VAT applicable in that country. So a musician selling music on download or a budding author selling an e-book will now need to register for VAT and keep detailed records for 10 years, even if their turnover to EU countries is negligible. These traders could have been Britain’s success stories of the future, but the need to register for VAT from day one will simply stifle business enterprise.

Nigel Draper
Takeley, Essex

Round the houses

SIR – Dr Brian Wareing (Letters, December 30) should refer back to the introduction of postcodes in the Sixties before blaming them for leading his delivery drivers astray.

Postcodes were developed to speed up sorting in Royal Mail’s mail centres. It is a very comprehensive and robust system, but was never intended to assist with the location of addresses. Because it is so good, it was hijacked by the manufacturers of satellite navigation systems, who found it sufficiently accurate for their purposes and much cheaper than writing their own locating program.

Robin Platt
Wokingham, Berkshire

SIR – Postcodes are frequently a source of extreme irritation here. The Welsh counties were again reorganised (perhaps not the most apt description) almost 20 years ago, at considerable cost. The county of Clwyd disappeared and was, in this area, given the old name of Flintshire, but with different boundaries.

But when I try to buy goods online, the suppliers often have a database with only Clwyd available.

It’s easy to complain about modern technology – it seems to me that there are far too many dunderheads involved in setting it up.

Mary Fraser Burns
Buckley, Flintshire

Highway to heaven

SIR – The launch of the first Conservative Party poster of the election campaign featuring a “road” to a stronger economy raises an eyebrow.

Not a pothole in sight. Where exactly is this rural idyll?

Dr Alan Newlands
Haverhill, Suffolk

SIR – The Conservatives’ election poster promises miles of straight, empty road, without speed cameras or wind farms to blight the view. Count me in.

Vivian Bush
Hessle, East Yorkshire

Nato’s lost deterrence

SIR – Nato is in danger of forgetting what made it the most successful alliance in history for half a century of confrontation with Soviet Russia: its credible deterrent posture based on the collective security of Article 5 of its treaty. The Soviet Union was in no doubt that an attack on any Nato member would instantly involve it in a Third World War with all other members.

In order for any deterrent policy to be effective, the potential aggressor must be aware not only that the consequences of attacking will be unacceptable, but also that they will be unavoidable. For Nato this means that no country should be admitted to membership if there is little prospect of Article 5 being invoked on its behalf.

Before casually setting countries like Georgia and the Ukraine on the path to Nato membership, we must ask ourselves one key question: “Would we be prepared to start a Third World War if such proposed new members were invaded?” If the answer is “No”, as I believe it is, then admitting them to membership would undermine, at a stroke, the credibility of Article 5.

We would then be back in the uncertainties of the Thirties, when aggressors could pick off weak countries while gambling that their stronger friends would not intervene. This is the very scenario which Nato was set up to avoid, and we should be mad to return to it.

Dr Julian Lewis MP (Con)
London SW1

Flight of fancy

SIR – How can Lydd airport now be called London Ashford Airport (report, January 2)? It is nowhere near London and is not that close to Ashford.

On this basis, is Birmingham to be renamed London Birmingham Airport?

Steve Donovan
Fleet, Hampshire

Open sesame

SIR – I am happy to report that I have cracked the problem of my sister-in-law’s password based on her late husband’s first car (Letters, December 29). My late brother, Christopher Barlow, was most precise in all things and a search through some old photograph albums yielded the answer – which, for obvious security reasons, I cannot divulge.

A lesson learnt for me perhaps, as I am constantly trying (and failing) to remember which password applies to which account.

Robin Barlow
Torbryan, Devon

Tracing the Irish origins of the Iron Duke

The Duke of Wellington and his ally General Blücher bear down on an overweight Napoleon (www.bridgemanart.com)

SIR – Your obituary of the 8th Duke of Wellington suggests that the family originated in Somerset. There were indeed Wellesleys from Somerset, but the Iron Duke’s family were barely Wesley/Wellesley at all. They were Colley.

The Iron Duke’s paternal grandfather was born Richard Colley in County Meath, and inherited the nearby estate of Garret Wesley, a childless cousin-by-marriage, on condition he change his name. When Richard, the elder brother of Arthur, became Governor General of India, was given a peerage in 1797, he chose the title “Baron Wellesley of Wellesley in the County of Somerset,” the original family name of the cousin-by-marriage. Thus the Wesleys became the grander-sounding Wellesleys.

However, it was as Arthur Wesley that the Iron Duke, aged just 21, sat in the Irish Parliament as member for Trim in County Meath.

Members of the family remained notable in later Irish parliaments. George Colley was elected in 1944 for Fianna Fáil, the Republican Party. He became finance minister and deputy prime minister, and in the Sixties challenged Charles Haughey for the leadership. Nobody calls the Colleys “Anglo-Irish”.

Mary Ellen Synon
Brussels, Belgium

Cheap milk and a bleak future for dairy farmers

SIR – My brother-in-law Mark and his father Sam are dairy farmers on a tenant farm in Surrey, which has been in the family for the last 60 years. In total, they have about 90 head of adult cattle and around 150 calves.

I have always thought of Mark as the hardest working man I know. He’s up milking at 4.30am, every day of the year. He cannot and does not go on holidays as they do not have the funds to employ full-time help.

During dinner recently, Mark told us that he may have to hand in his notice on the farm in the spring. He is now losing 2.5 pence on every litre of milk that he produces with all that hard work. Six months ago, after years of fixing milk prices artificially low, prices per litre had “recovered” to the levels they were at when he married my sister in 1986, but it did not last long. Ironically, the British public have on the whole expressed their willingness to pay more for British milk.

Mark sees Tesco as the biggest culprit in the milk wars, but surely all supermarkets must, to some degree, be to blame for the crisis facing British dairy farmers. Rebuilding the farming industry once it is destroyed – and it is already being destroyed – will take generations.

I call upon the Government, the dairy cooperative Arla and the major supermarkets to act together to keep farmers like Mark working our beautiful countryside for a decent living.

Clare Mutsaars
Guildford, Surrey

Globe and Mail:

Jeffrey Simpson

Iran bashers display a dangerous lack of worldliness

The potentially most consequential negotiations in the world this year will centre on Iran’s nuclear program.

Until June, the five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany will continue negotiating with Iran a possible deal on preventing that country from building nuclear weapons in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions.

Negotiations were supposed to end in early December. But negotiators did not reach a deal, so they agreed to a six-month extension. Both sides declared that serious progress had been made, such that more talks were worthwhile.

A deal is there to be had, and the collapse of oil prices can only put even more pressure on the Iranians to be reasonable, given the double whammy their country faces with sanctions and low oil prices.

The devil for a deal lies in the politics of Iran and the United States, but also in important details such as how many centrifuges Iran would be allowed, what level of uranium enrichment would be permitted, how large would be the stockpiles and the time frame for Iran to turn its nuclear capability into a weapon – the so-called “breakout.”

Critics of the negotiations – led by Israel, of course, and the Harper government that follows Israel’s lead on all Middle East issues – insist Iran should be stripped of centrifuges and essentially of its entire capability ever to make a weapon. For the critics, it’s all or nothing, which is not how any successful negotiation ever ends.

The critics’ bottom line would mean, of course, no possible deal, which is presumably what Israel, the Israel lobby in Washington, the U.S. Republican Party and irrelevancies such as the Harper government want. Their short-term alternative is to apply even more economic sanctions on Iran, hoping that the country would bend under their weight, which is what would not at all happen.

Instead, some of the six negotiating partners (Russia and China for sure; France perhaps) would assume no deal and likely begin to make their own arrangements with Iran. Other countries (India, for example) would increase economic ties. Iran would continue without bothering with any international inspections to spin more centrifuges and move closer to the possibility of some day wielding a nuclear weapon which, in turn, would so frighten Saudi Arabia (and perhaps Turkey) that a nuclear race might begin in the world’s most volatile region.

No deal with Iran, coupled with phobias about the country elsewhere, would tempt Israelis and some Americans into a military option that could, at best, merely cripple the Iranian nuclear program but not prevent it from eventually unfolding. Such an attack would destroy the moderates (by Iranian standards) who won the 2013 presidential election and embolden the hardliners. It would also enjoin Iran to further support Hezbollah, Hamas and even the Syrian regime.

Professor Thomas Juneau at the University of Ottawa warns, quite wisely, in a recent paper for Middle East Policy of Iran’s “strategic loneliness.” By this, he means that Iran has no natural or historic partners in the region. All Iranian regimes, whatever their composition, will be prickly because the Iranians believe themselves surrounded by “threat and encirclement.”

Iran has been attacked, after all, by Iraq, which was supported in that war by the United States. Iran’s relations, as the world’s leading Shia country, with Sunni states such as Saudi Arabia are poor. Iran’s government was overthrown once by a U.S.-inspired coup. Around it, nuclear weapons are in the hands of China, Russia, Pakistan, India, Israel and the Western powers of the United States, France and Britain.

Given Prof. Juneau’s warnings about “strategic loneliness,” and Iran’s sense of its own history (and importance), no one should expect a nuclear deal would transform the country’s foreign policy. But it might, over time, lead to some thawing of relations with the United States, with which it has co-operated on such issues as the Taliban in Afghanistan and the Islamic State.

Iran is a very complicated place. It has a governmental system with elections but where ultimate power over internal and external security lies with the Supreme Ayatollah and the Revolutionary Guards, who own large chunks of the Iranian economy.

The middle-class and more educated Iranians – the kind of people who elected Hassan Rouhani as President – want to break free from the rigidities imposed by the regime and the sanctions imposed by the West.

To see Iran as a monolithic society with a monochromatic political system reflects a dangerous lack of sophistication and a failure to imagine possibilities.

Ian Buruma

What drives anti-immigrant sentiment?

Irish Times:

Irish Independent:

Focus Ireland has told us 40 families every month are becoming homeless in Dublin alone

Focus Ireland has told us 40 families every month are becoming homeless in Dublin alone

Sir – Has the country turned the full forgettable circle?

  • Go To

One Friday in December, I was making my way down the very fashionable Lesson Street in Dublin 2 when I stumbled across a private Christmas party in full swing.

At first glance there seemed to be many hundreds of people in attendance. Out of curiosity I made an attempt to enter the party – but was halted in my tracks by the door security who informed me that it was a private Christmas party . . . for a bank.

Now, as a recent victim of banking ruthlessness, I was extremely annoyed at the lack of empathy that this bank and I’m sure other banks have with the great unwashed (myself).

The night previously I had been out in sympathy with the family of the homeless man who died on the door step of our parliament. After that, to be presented with tasteless and provocative behaviour by members of the very fraternity that landed us in the financial nightmare of the last six years was quite sickening to me as I struggle every day to pay my way.

Mel Devlin, Navan, Co Meath

 

Learning to love yourself

Sir – Dr Ciara Kelly gives very good advice regarding New Year resolutions in her column, headlined ‘Accentuate the positive’ (Sunday Independent, December 28).

“Why not decide to do something you’ve always wanted to this year,” she says, and talks about “eliminating the negative”. The priest in my local church in his homily on Christmas Eve was singing from the same hymn sheet, and talked about looking at what was working in your life, nourishing this and getting rid of what wasn’t working.

All of which is very worthy advice. But I’d like to add a further important element: do not be too hard on yourself.

We all need a forgiving attitude to ourselves. Who among us hasn’t beaten themselves up because maybe they haven’t achieved some goal, or did something they regret?

Sometimes a more loving attitude to ourselves can translate into having a more human and compassionate life towards our fellow human beings. So my advice is definitely accentuate the positive, try and eliminate the negative, but don’t be too hard on ourselves in the process. That’s a win-win situation, irrespective of the outcome.

Tommy Roddy, Galway

 

Brendan manages all the elements

Sir – Brendan O’Connor`s article (Sunday Independent, 28 December) managed to weave all the elements underlying the public’s current despondency, into the most lucid commentary I`ve read anywhere on the government’s austerity policy. I may become a fan, I felt I could hear his sighs as he typed it.

Arthur O’Donnell, Dublin 17

 

Re-discovering the joy of giving

Sir – Ian Morris’s article (Make a commitment to your new furry friend in 2015) highlighted the heartlessness of some people towards their pets.

We could help. Today much charity is mediated through professional groups and we rarely get opportunities to experience face-to-face almsgiving. Adopting an abandoned pet is one sure way to rediscover the original joy of giving. A joy that will last.

Tom Collins, Dublin

 

Don’t put SF into government

Sir – No matter how dissatisfied we are with the present Government, we really must think and reflect before we cast our next vote. Our vote has great power, so, I implore all of us to be very careful how we use that power on voting day.

Do we really believe, in all honesty, we would be better off with Sinn Fein in Government? Please think and reflect about the dreadful treatment of the wonderfully brave lady, Mairia Cahill.

Of course, it would help if the three established parties of Fine Gael, Labour and Fianna Fail would start getting their act together immediately, because we will have much greater problems if Sinn Fein get anywhere near government.

This is a party with no realistic politics and an ambiguous point of view on the investigation of sexual abuse”

This is a party with no room for dissent – with dangerous leadership. Do the people who expressed a preference for Sinn Fein in the recent polls really believe that Gerry Adams is a future leader? Would they send him to Europe to discuss our economy with Angela Merkel?

Sinn Fein does not deserve to be anywhere near Government – end of story.

Brian Mc Devitt, Glenties, Co Donegal

 

SF focussed on grab for power

Sir – Looking back on the year to when Gerry Adams made his ‘guns in the Irish Independent building’ comment (while he was in the US, cadging money from gullible and ignorant Irish/Americans), it was lost on him and his audience, that no war has taken place in this Republic, since the foundation of the State in the early 1920s.

We’ll have no gunmen wrecking printing presses anywhere, Mr Adams. How dare anyone make such a link between what transpired almost 100 years ago in the fog of war, to the peaceful country we now know and love here in our free southern democracy.

Adams and his cohorts forget they agreed, along with the whole of Ireland, that we have no claims over Northern Ireland. But the ridiculous call for “unity” is still the main excuse given for Sinn Fein political belligerence, which we are expected to accept, or be called ‘partitionist’.

To listen to Adams and his motley crew , including elected ex-jailbirds and subversives, north and south of the Border, one would think that their violent madness conducted in Ulster, was on behalf of us all, despite we being quite well established in the democratic process even before Sinn Fein decided we need to be free under their very own tricolour on this side of the border.

Make no mistake, the grab for power, under all means at their disposal, is what the Provos are focused on. We heard from Gerry’s own lips that this is a period of “unarmed strategy,” though what the future holds when this phase is over, I shudder to contemplate.

In the North, nothing passes for “political activism” which the hard men do not sanction first. The same is true here in the south, and just because the ballot box is useful to Gerry and the lads at this time, be assured that nothing short of complete submission by the ‘Free State’ will be settled for.

I spoke with a prominent Fianna Fail member recently who naively told me that in the (un)likely scenario where FF went into coalition with SF, Fianna Fail would easily subsume the Provos and all would soon become normal politics, with the experience of the ‘Destiny Soldiers’ being dominant in the corridors of power.

When I pointed out to him that being shoved against a wall in a Dail corridor with a Glock muzzle put under his chin, he would soon change his tune, and it wouldn’t be Fianna Fail who would be in charge, he thought I was joking. No joke.

Some may think that voting for Independents is not good for a functioning democracy, but let me assure them that at this dangerous time in Ireland it is vital that we do (if now dissatisfied with the mainstream parties) so long as it weakens the sinister elements in SF/IRA, who only seek power for its own sake, and to be in a position to settle old and new scores and to act with impunity, generally.

Sinn Fein see themselves as living martyrs and are blinded by rhetorical sound-bites and the sabre-rattling of the likes of Gerry Adams and Bobby Storey in Northern Ireland who, in contradiction with what we know as normal politics here in the south, will always have their plan ‘B’ with which to continue their stupid “revolution.” Stop them at the ballot box, it just might make them see they have an intelligent electorate to deal with. If we do not, we will be very regretful.

Robert Sullivan, Bantry, Co Cork

 

Emotion will decide the election

Sir – Your editorial of December 28 tells us that we need “guidance from wiser souls” such as the three wise men in our present “uncharted political landscape”.

The evidence in this day and age that the Irish or any other electorate would listen to the three wise men does not stand up to scrutiny.

In modern times, when mass media has replaced religion as the most powerful influence, all electorates are at the mercy of the loudest and most emotional voices in the public arena.

The virtually unquestioned celebrity status of a small number of our most powerful citizens during the Celtic Tiger era here and its consequences is a sobering example.

The consequences of the coming to power of Hitler in Germany on the basis of high emotion generated by the use of mass media and mass rallies is an even more sobering example.

Even more sobering still is the fact that our day-to-day shopping is largely determined by what particular products and services multi-national corporations spend billions promoting.

The next government in this, and indeed every other country, will be determined more by the media-generated emotions of voters on the day than they will be by intelligent guidance by “wise men”

A Leavy, Sutton, Dublin 13

 

Of course we are a nation

Sir – Your correspondent, Tom Gallagher, formerly of Co Mayo but writing from Las Vegas, raises the important question of the distinction between nation and state.

Of course Ireland is a nation and has a settled existence as a nation for many centuries. The first Irish parliament, for example, took place at Castledermot, Co Kildare, in 1264, and the 750th anniversary was commemorated in Seanad Eireann earlier this year.

In 1707 there was a union of England, Scotland and Wales, and in 1800 a United Kingdom of Britain and Ireland.

The Union was never really accepted in Ireland, but the constitutional efforts for Irish Home Rule were thwarted undemocratically by the unelected House of Lords in 1910-1914 and by the threat of armed insurrection in Ireland in 1912.

Eventually the Irish nation was partitioned in 1921 by the British Government under the Welshman David Lloyd George.

None of the major Irish players of this tragic period, Redmond, Carson and De Valera, was in favour of the partition of their nation.

Partition of Ireland in 1921 inevitably led to the Civil War between treaty and anti-treaty forces. It has taken us in Ireland the best part of a century to emerge from this political division.

On these islands we have four great nations, not merely two or three.

Dr Gerald Morgan, Trinity College, Dublin 2

 

No more need for ‘Scrooge’

Sir – The winter solstice of 2014 was darkened further by a disturbing Sunday Independent front page message – “no light, but darkness visible” – alongside a depiction of prehistoric remembrance of human endeavour to enhance and create a better, more secure existence for all.

We live in the best time that ever existed. We have created a world of unimaginable abundance and achieved the power to overcome the great tyrants – inability, poverty, ill-health, pain, discomfort, shortage, ignorance, isolationism, boredom, and the great breaker of body and spirit throughout the ages: constant hard work.

But a great ‘Scrooge’ mentality appears to have usurped economic thinking; a determination to shout ‘humbug’ at the utter transformation of economic activity from shortage to surplus, from growth to sufficiency and from work to automation. Happy New Year.

Padraic Neary, 
Co Sligo

 

The ‘right-to-die’ case infuriates us

Sir, I wish to thank the Sunday Independent of December 28 for their coverage of the tragic ‘right-to-die’ court ordeal of a family of a young pregnant woman.

I am not a medical or legal person and so listening to the barrage of medical and legal arguments has left me saddened beyond words. I can’t help feeling that this country of ours has lost something very precious and almost intangible that is hard to articulate but strikes at the very core of our country.

Political correctness and the fear of being sued seems to have driven this case beyond the bounds of human decency. Not once did I hear a mention of the Hippocratic Oath. This is one of the oldest binding documents in history and is still held sacred by physicians. It calls on doctors to treat the ill to the best of one’s ability, to preserve a patient’s privacy, to teach the secrets of medicine to the next generation and so on.

Former attorney general Michael McDowell states that “the Constitution is very clear in its role ‘to promote the common good with due observance of Prudence, Justice and Charity so that the dignity and freedom of the individual may be assured’.” Its role is protector of the constitutional rights of the defenceless.

He states: “this makes it blindingly obvious that a grotesque scenario in which the Irish state took over the body of a brain-dead woman against the wishes of her grieving family with a view to using it for an extended period of months in the hope that an early-term foetus might develop to the point of viability, in whatever state of health or incapacity was never intended, still less mandated, by the Constitution.”

Dearbhail McDonald says that “the grotesque stranglehold over Irish women’s bodies and minds wielded by the Catholic Church” has somehow influenced this tragic case. She also paints a pathetic picture of the “three unfortunate doctors… sitting in a room with a copy of the Irish Constitution trying to figure out our the Eighth Amendment.” She concludes her article by stating: “When the HSE, an arm of the State, says that doctors need to trust their clinical judgement, the time for hiding behind the skirts of the Eighth Amendment has come to an end.”

Judge Kearns, the presiding judge, states that “it was a futile exercise which commenced only because of the fears held by the treating medical specialists of potential legal consequences.” My burning question is: If all those experts are so horrified by this appalling human tragedy, who are the people who authorised this action? It is not good enough for the citizens of this country who are forced to bear the cost of this multi-party litigation to be fobbed off by faceless institutions, medical terminology and legal waffle.

Eileen Davey, Laytown, Co Meath

 

Wilful waste and woeful want

Sir – It is said that wilful waste makes for woeful want. Hence, it never ceases to amaze me that politicians even attempt to defend their wilful wasting of taxpayers’ contributions.

Despite ridding ourselves of the previous cocky shower, we have replaced them with a self-proclaimed man of high political standards in Mr Kenny. Big mistake. This spotless leader is now defending his Government’s spending of €540m on water metering, despite being advised to the contrary.

Pray tell Mr Kenny, why in hell are we paying out millions of euro on salaries for advisers when you proceed to ignore their advice? Perhaps public anger wouldn’t turn into anarchy if people’s constitutional entitlements were protected, instead of being deliberately ignored by political bullies?

It’s hypocritical to be accusing others of fascist behaviour, while ramming water charges upon people against their will. All this could have been avoided if a greater level of economic awareness and common sense prevailed.

Although they have lost my trust, I hope all our politicians are enjoying their long Christmas/New Year break; and I look forward to an early opportunity to show my appreciation for their irresponsible behaviour at the polling booth in the New Year.

Matthew J Greville, Killucan, Co Westmeath

Sunday Independent


Childrens’s books

$
0
0

5 January 2015 Childrens books

Mary a little worse sore tummy and cake not mussels for lunch. I get a box of children’s books on Freecycle.

Obituary:

Lady Kennet was a writer and commentator whose founding of the Hawksmoor Committee saved Christ Church, Spitalfields, for the nation

Lady Kennet
Lady Kennet

Lady Kennet, who has died aged 91, was a poet and artist and a prolific commentator on architectural and defence matters; the survival of the great London churches of Nicholas Hawksmoor perhaps owes more to her than to any other single individual.

Elizabeth Kennet wrote seven books, some of them with her husband, Wayland Young, on matters ranging from London churches, Italy, nuclear weapons and arms control, and learned articles on a wide range of subjects.

Their book Old London Churches (1956) praised these buildings as “heroic, monumental, and unconstricted: utterly without meanness or gaudy pride; occasionally with a soaring certainty”, and Elizabeth was instrumental in setting up the Hawksmoor Committee, in response to a real threat to demolish Christ Church, Spitalfields. Having attracted influential sponsors, the purpose of this committee – which included John Betjeman, Ian Nairn and Hawksmoor’s biographer Kerry Downes – was “to bring the architecture of Nicholas Hawksmoor before the public eye, and to ensure that money will be found to secure the future of his two great Stepney churches, Christ Church, Spitalfields, and St Anne’s, Limehouse”; and, eventually, it was.

Arthur Koestler then invited her to found the Tibor Dery Committee, to promote the release of Hungarian writers following the Soviet invasion of Budapest.

Her military knowledge was inspired by her father, Captain Bryan Fullerton Adams, a naval expert with the disarmament section of the League of Nations in Geneva before the Second World War.

Lady Kennet was born Elizabeth Ann Adams in London on April 14 1923. She lived in Geneva and attended school there, becoming fluent in French, before going to Downe House and winning an exhibition to Somerville College, Oxford, where she read PPE.

In 1948 she married Wayland Young, later the 2nd Lord Kennet, who became a housing minister under Richard Crossman in the Wilson government of the late 1960s. Soon after her marriage Lady Kennet started writing, with an article for Vogue on the island of Giglio in 1950. She also covered arms control, disarmament and maritime matters. Old London Churches was John Betjeman’s Book of the Year, and her book on Northern Lazio, co-written with her husband, won the 1990 European Federation Tourist Press Book Prize. Her 1958 book of poems Time is as Time Does was chosen by Geoffrey Grigson as his Poetry Book of the Year.

Christ Church, Spitalfields

Lady Kennet was an active member of many boards and organisations, including the Advisory Board for Redundant Churches; the Advisory Committee for the Protection of the Sea; the Royal United Services Institution; the Royal Institute for International Affairs, Chatham House; and the International Institute for Strategic Studies. The former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger and the former foreign secretary Lord Owen were among her friends.

As a housing and local government minister, Lord Kennet played a leading role in saving St Pancras Station and in devising the new department for the environment, which encouraged the blue plaque scheme in London. So it is appropriate that there is a plaque on their house in Bayswater honouring a previous occupant, J M Barrie, who wrote Peter Pan there.

There is a proposal for another plaque on the house, honouring Lord Kennet’s half-brother Sir Peter Scott, the naturalist, artist, glider pilot and America’s Cup skipper – the first Lady Kennet’s first husband was Captain Scott of the Antarctic. Elizabeth Kennet also worked with Sir Peter Scott in the early days of the Severn Wildfowl Trust (later the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust), which he started at Slimbridge.

For many years Elizabeth Kennet was the guardian of the historic Barrie house, so close to the Peter Pan statue in Kensington Gardens. With her death, and steeply rising house prices in the area, there must be doubts about how it can be preserved for the nation.

Recently Lady Kennet was involved in saving Stonehenge as a World Heritage Site. At the time of her death she was at work on a new book, Preemptive Mourning.

Lord Kennet died in 2009. Lady Kennet is survived by her son, Thoby, and five daughters, Easter, Emily, Mopsa, Louisa and Zoe.

Lady Kennet, born April 14 1923, died November 30 2014

Guardian:

Lenny Henry, race, class and the media

Media Diversity
Lenny Henry, as guest editor of Radio 4’s the Today programme. ‘There aren’t many people of ethnic origin at the very top of broadcast journalism like Lenny Henry (factory worker father, secondary modern) from the working-class streets of Dudley.’ writes Catherine Pepinster. Photograph: Jeff Overs/BBC

As someone who is a regular visitor to the Today studio as a contributor to the Thought for the Day slot, I share Lenny Henry’s concerns about the production team being very white, male and middle class (We had one day of diversity on R4. Now for the other 364, 1 January).

However, when he repeats diversity campaigner Simon Albury’s comment that the only person of colour on Today was the one bringing the tea and coffee, he and Albury are not spotting the hope for the future. In my experience, if you talk to the runners who collect Today guests from reception and bring you coffee, you find that they are young graduates beginning their broadcasting careers and are starting on the production and/or journalism road, and I’ve undoubtedly met quite a few who are of minority ethnic origin. Some of them are women too. So the next generations of executives may well be more diverse.

The biggest current problem is class. There aren’t many people of minority ethnic origin at the very top of broadcast journalism like Lenny Henry (factory worker father, secondary modern) from the working-class streets of Dudley. The best tend to be like Mishal Husain (doctor father, private school, New Hall, Cambridge) and Rageh Omaar (wealthy businessman father, private school, New College, Oxford).
Catherine Pepinster
Editor, The Tablet

• While racism is experienced across all classes, our media’s class bias is overwhelming. Most British journalists went to private school. Radio 4 is dominated by cut-glass accents. While 6.5% of the UK school-age population attend public schools, 64% of the most influential people in the media industry were privately educated. Seven of the nine BBC employees on the Media Guardian 100 list were privately educated. Most prominent British comedians, come to that, seem to have attended public schools.

Recruitment from within the posh crew is all too often via dinner party and other personal connections. An emphasis on racism as personally rather than systemically constructed is in danger of feeding this: while transparent recruitment and selection policies would be better than accessing a posh BAME crew for now, in the long run we need to look to the class base – to economic democracy and the redistribution of wealth – in order to root out structural racism.
Peter McKenna
Liverpool

• I was distressed to read that Lenny Henry had been called “racist” for his choice of subject matter when he guest-edited the Today programme. Personally I found it refreshing and thought-provoking. I enjoyed listening to it, despite being a white woman in her 70s.

However, I had the privilege of working for the Greater London council, under the leadership of Ken Livingstone. I taught history and careers education in London schools to black, Asian and minority ethnic pupils. I learned as much – possibly more – from them as they learned from me.

As staff inspector for careers education, in the final days of the Inner London Education Authority, my team of schools industry liaison officers worked through the London compacts to develop the employability skills of pupils of all races and genders. These experiences made me aware how deeply entrenched racism is, in English society, along with the pernicious class system. Can we all make a new year’s resolution to eradicate racism and prejudice, wherever we find it – even in the BBC?
Anne Dart Taylor
Honeybourne, Worcestershire

• Lenny Henry admirably highlights the white male bias in the Today programme. His plea for more “black people, Asian and minority ethnics” may not include Gypsy and Traveller minorities. I have regularly acted as expert witness against anti-Gypsy racism.

Before the catastrophic Dale Farm eviction, I accepted an invitation to be on Today the next morning. Before ringing off, I naively asked for the presenters’ names. I commented that one had fronted a documentary where he argued that foreign migrants were imported for seasonal work in Wisbech solely because the locals were psychologically “lazy”. No recognition that, for decades, the work was all done by Gypsies before the 1994 legislation restricted travelling. Minutes later, the BBC representative rang back: my Today participation was cancelled. Seemingly, even a white female professor, also with a PPE degree, was too threatening if she dared critique a white male presenter.
Professor Judith Okely
Author, The Traveller-Gypsies

• To follow on from Lenny Henry’s version of Today (Henry’s Today takes on ‘devil’s avocados’, 31 December) presented by non-white people, could we have an experiment where the country is run by non-male people, just to see how it goes?
Mary Gildea
London

Monday demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany - 1989
Demonstrators form a human chain after a service in the Nikolaikirche, Leipzig, in 1989 to demand free elections and the right to travel. ‘A clear example of the church at the dangerous forefront of a historic battle against epic political injustice,’ writes John Summers. Photograph: Focus/Rex Features

Zekria Ibrahimi writes of the disastrous impact of Christianity on the world (Letters, 30 December). I am an atheist but cannot let this nonsense pass. For a start Christianity has given us some of the most exquisite art, architecture and music. The Bible is indeed full of inconsistencies, but it contains many valid exhortations to moral behaviour, such as “love thy neighbour”. Without the Bible our literature would be much the poorer.

Non-believers have drawn attention to the fact that Christianity and other religions are often best placed to respond to social need because they are so organised that they can respond quickly. Much that has been done in the name of Christ over the centuries is indeed deplorable, but that does not negate the positive contributions that this and other religions have made to today’s societies. It is the ultimate irony that Ibrahimi says liberalism is the guarantor of tolerance whereas his letter exhibits a lack of tolerance worthy of the late Rev Paisley in his heyday.
Joseph Cocker
Leominster

• David Rainbird (Letters, 29 December) asks which dictatorships Christianity has fought and toppled. One of last year’s most moving moments for me was spent sitting in the Nikolaikirche in Leipzig, listening to the stories of the part that that church and its pastor Christian Führer played in the collapse of the GDR in 1989. The critical mass of non-violent popular opposition to the totalitarian regime grew out of gatherings of worshippers at Führer’s weekly prayers for peace. Holding these and facilitating the associated gatherings was an astonishingly brave public stand. Stasi officers sent to spy on the services are said to have been won over to the pastor’s message of peace and understanding. Is this to say that the church alone toppled the GDR? Absolutely not. Is this to say that no other body (religious or otherwise) might have done similar? Absolutely not. But it is a clear example of the church at the dangerous forefront of a historic battle against epic political injustice. What a shame it would be if quiet stands like these were to be lost in the bombast of religious intolerance.
John Summers
Cambridge

• Your editorial about the persecution of Christians in the Middle East (26 December) contained the bizarre statement that “even Israel, which presents itself as a beacon of religious liberty, is a dreadful place to live for Christian Arabs, caught between an occupying army in the West Bank and Muslim fundamentalism in Gaza”. But Israel is the only place where Christian Arabs are safe from persecution. They would not be as safe in any surrounding Muslim area, including Gaza and the parts of the West Bank controlled by the PA. You might as well say that a lifeboat is a dreadful place because it is surrounded by deep water.
Sarah Lawson
London

***BESTPIX***  ESA Attempts To Land Probe On Comet

The surface of the 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko comet as seen from the Philae lander. ‘The ESA has access to expert astronomers, and might just know what it’s talking about,’ writes Professor Ian Stewart. Photograph: ESA/Getty Images

John Bowler (Letters, 31 December) is puzzled why the European Space Agency keeps saying that 67P is a comet. He claims it is an asteroid and objects to the ESA’s poor science.

A few clues. The ESA has access to expert astronomers, and might just know what it’s talking about. The name 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko is typical of comets; asteroid names have a different format. The P means “periodic comet”. It is listed as 67P/1969 R1 in the Planetary Data System Small Bodies Node table of comets. Asteroids are mostly rocky or metallic, comets are thought to be mainly ice. The Philae lander confirmed that 67P is icy: it looks like a rock because it is covered in dust. Most asteroid orbits are approximately circular; 67P ranges between 1.24 and 5.68 AU from the sun. When comets approach the sun, the ice turns to vapour, creating a haze (or “coma”) that sometimes develops into the characteristic tail. The main purpose of the Rosetta mission is to follow 67P as it undergoes this process. When discovered in 1969, 67P had a coma and a tail one arc-minute long. Its 1996 appearance showed a slightly larger coma. Although the best-known comets have highly eccentric long-period orbits, there are also many short-period comets that stay closer to the sun, and 67P is one of these.

Mr Bowler apparently can’t tell his comet from his asteroid.
Professor Ian Stewart
University of Warwick

Peter York (Point of view, Review, 3 January) correctly skewers multiple forms of “authenticity” as a modern form of salesmanship, trying to “add value” to otherwise indistinguishable products.

But he leaves out the biggest exploitation of the lot – in art. Even if art historians and other “experts” cannot differentiate originals from copies (“fakes”), establishing the “authenticity” of an art work, its provenance – that it was done by some now celebrated artist – adds millions to its value. Art dealers are the supreme sellers of “authenticity”.
Jack Winkler
London

Summer holiday … Bondi Beach in Sydney, Australia, on Christmas Day.
Antipodean summer holiday … Bondi Beach in Sydney, Australia, on Christmas Day. Photograph: Ross Hodgson/Rex Features

Sophie Heawood says she used to buy only academic year diaries as she thinks a new year should begin at the end of summer (Weekend, 3 December). She lives in the wrong hemisphere. In New Zealand academic and calendar years coincide. One winds down towards Christmas, goes on the summer holiday, then comes back refreshed some time into the new year.
Ian Dunbar
Warrington, Cheshire

• A picture with your piece on homelessness in Victorian London (3 January) allegedly shows “coffin beds”. A coffin bed was coffin-shaped (wider at the head end) so more could be fitted in by placing them alternately head to foot. Actual coffin beds can be seen at the Gressenhall Farm and Workhouse museum in Norfolk.
Felicity Randall
Fakenham, Norfolk

• Own goal? In the Tories’ poster (Conservatives fire starting gun for 2015 election, 3 January) I saw a beautiful, tranquil countryside rent asunder by a dark, dismal road/austerity. Perhaps they should have added them/us on either side.
Sally Holliday
Ledbury, Herefordshire

Why aren’t the black boxes on aircraft designed to float to the surface after an accident at sea (AirAsia plane may have sunk after sea landing, 2 January)?
Rob Watling
Radcliffe-on-Trent, Nottinghamshire 

• Spotted in my veg patch on 1 January: cabbage white caterpillars munching on the overwintering purple sprouting broccoli. Winter must be over now.
Margaret Fernandez
Llangrove, Herefordshire

• First sighting of hot cross buns in the local supermarket, 3 January.
Holly Anderson
Cambridge

Independent:

The death of Debbie Purdy (obituary, 31 December) has once again highlighted the tragic situation of people whose experience of life is so awful that they want it to end. Whatever we do leaves us with a feeling of loss; it is not as simple as a decision between right and wrong.

I have been involved twice in decisions like this. I was “buddy” to a friend dying of Aids whose situation was desperate. He felt horribly ill, had become little more than a skeleton and did not have the strength even to feed himself. He wanted to die and asked me to help. I had to say no, not because of the fear of legal proceedings but because, as a priest, I just did not feel able to do so.

The next day I went to his flat to see him and, as I expected, to call the doctor and undertaker. He had not died, though drugs he had taken had made his situation even worse. I found him on the floor. An ambulance was called and he lingered another week in hospital.

The second time concerned my mother. At 87 she was suffering from osteoporosis and was in great pain in hospital. She felt her life had run its course. The doctor suggested that she have morphine but warned that by so doing her life could be shortened. She and I agreed, and my mother died four days later without regaining consciousness.

In neither case was I left feeling I had done the right thing. Was I letting unimportant concerns about principles prevent the compassion my friend so desperately needed? Was I putting my own conscience before his need? Above all should I have talked of the Christian hope of resurrection and prepared him for his death? And with my mother, did she really hope that I would say no, and prove to her that I still cared and wanted her to stay alive?

There are no answers to these questions, and after thirty years in the case of my friend, and twenty in the case of my mother, I am still left with feelings of guilt.

Neil Dawson
London SE27

 

How refreshing it is that a medical expert has for once advised us on what to die of, rather than what not to die of (“Cancer is ‘best death’, so don’t try to cure it, says doctor”, 1 January). Whenever I am threatened by the health police or government that I shall die of this, that or the other unless I change my lifestyle, I want to respond: “What do you want me to die of, then?”

As it happens, I don’t want to die of cancer, but would rather die in my sleep, while still (in all other respects) in good health and of a sound mind. Can the experts advise me on how to change my lifestyle so as to make this the most likely outcome?

George Macdonald Ross
Leeds

 

We can welcome more refugees

Your editorial of 3 January rightly identifies the solution to the refugee crisis in the Middle East as a long-term political settlement. This, however, will be years ahead, and in the meantime, as you say, “hundreds of thousands of refugees have to subsist in the quiet squalor of border camps with inadequate shelter, food and water”.

I understand that our government has done more than most with regard to financial support, and has match-funded charitable contributions. It has, however, provided shelter here in the UK for only about 100 refugees. Surely our common humanity should dictate that this country offers shelter to more refugees, proportionate to our position in the family of nations. I am sure that with the assistance of charities, local authorities and volunteers, temporary accommodation and support could be found for more of these poor people.

The leaders of our political parties and churches should be at the forefront of demands for this country to shoulder its fair share of the refugee burden; instead we are met with a deafening silence.

Geoff Webber
Harrogate, North Yorkshire

 

The plight of more than 1,000 refugees abandoned in the Mediterranean sea on board the merchant ships Blue Sky M and Ezadeen is regrettably the tip of an enormous human tragedy that will continue to unfold for decades.

Regardless of the measures taken by governments to control EU immigration, I would suggest that a bigger, longer-term threat to Europe lies in developing countries. With an estimated 220 million women having no access to contraception, is it any wonder that the world’s population, having tripled since 1950, continues to grow by 240,000 a day?

Until this problem is comprehensively addressed the relentless growth of the world’s population will continue to be the driving force behind the mass immigration, as millions seek to escape a life of grinding poverty. Who would do otherwise?

Mike Wheeler
Gosport, Hampshire

 

Now to settle the West Lothian Question

The wiseacres have been busy with their New Year prophecies. However, one important question still remains to be answered: will 2015 be the year when Britain finally resolves its crisis of governance?

Ever since Tam Dalyell raised his West Lothian question we have been waiting for a workable answer. It must be full-blown federalism. By giving Wales and Scotland assemblies, Tony Blair, for understandable reasons, created a hybrid arrangement in place of the unitary constitution we had previously. We now need to finish the job. “English votes for English laws” would just be a stop-gap solution which  would lead to further complications.

Three things would seem to be needed: first, the creation of that till now elusive English parliament; second, a properly federal assembly on the lines of the American Congress or the German Bundestag; and last but certainly not least, a new, written constitution  to apportion to the different parliaments their appropriate roles and ensure even treatment of their respective electorates (which of course does not at present obtain). Clearly also the opportunity should be taken to address undemocratic anomalies such as the House of Lords.

The May election is unlikely in itself to solve our political discontents. Indeed it is likely merely to exacerbate them.

Andrew McLuskey
Staines, Surrey

 

The government’s proposals for “English votes for English laws” fall far short of what is needed to address the political crisis facing the UK as a result of greater devolution to Scotland and the disintegration of the two-party system. The way forward is to decide what should be devolved to Scotland and then to ensure that all regions of the UK have the same powers.

Any parliament should not be elected on the first-past-the-post system as this disenfranchises a large (and increasing) number of people. The way forward is to establish regional assemblies in England and for all devolved administrations to be represented in a Senate which would replace the House of Lords. Regional representation in a Senate should mean that future budgets have to adopt policies that reflect the economic diversity of the UK as a whole, not just London and the South.

The only way to resolve these issues is through a Constitutional Convention, as Labour proposes, but it must be wide-ranging and not focused on making the current system work. Perhaps a starting point would be to look at the German constitution. It seems to work for them.

Andrew Baker
Harrow, Middlesex

 

What Tracey Emin’s art tells us

Richard Charnley haughtily informs us (letter, 3 January) that great art tells you something about yourself and that Tracey Emin’s art fails this test as it only tells us about her. I think this is silly.

Emin is certainly part of a long artistic tradition in giving a personal response to the artist’s own experience.

It is not true that great art necessarily tells you something about yourself. Most people would consider Michelangelo’s David to be great art, and I do too, but apart from the trivial recognition that my own body suffers by comparison to David’s, I don’t really see that it tells me anything about myself.

The truth is that art can be great for all sorts of different reasons and in many different ways.

Jonathan Wallace
Newcastle upon Tyne

 

British Jews and Israel

John Dorken (letter, 27 December) is correct insofar as he attributes some anti-Semitism here to hostility to Israel’s Gaza actions. However his conclusion is outrageous:  “Surely then the solution lies in leaders of the Jewish community in Britain taking a more considered and independent line on Israel’s action.” In other words, if they don’t, they’ve asked for it.

Graham Everett
Watford, Hertfordshire

 

Benjamin Netanyahu is quite indignant about the Palestinians wanting to join the International Criminal Court, saying that it is the Palestinians who should fear war crimes prosecutions (report, 1 January). So you would expect him to encourage them to join. It’s interesting to consider why he doesn’t.

Fabian Acker
London SE22

 

Times:

 

Telegraph:

Letters: We must not allow the Nationalists to dictate Scotland’s future

The post-referendum relationship between Scotland and the Union; Catholic Bishops in the House of Lords; improving Britain’s care record; and disorientated buttonholes

A pro-independence poster is pictured with pro-union graffiti in a window in the town of Selkirk
A pro-independence poster is pictured with pro-union graffiti in a window in the town of Selkirk Photo: Lesley Martin/AFP/Getty Images

SIR – Bruce Anderson has a point when he says that there is no reason why, in a future referendum, Scottish areas which vote No to independence should not be allowed to stay in the Union.

In north-east Scotland, where there is a culture of canniness, hard work, enterprise and honesty, many feel they have little in common with fellow Scots in the Central Belt who espouse the Nationalist cause. This attitude was summed up by some graffiti spotted in the lavatories of an Aberdeen pub some years ago which proclaimed: “Home rule for Scotland, but not by Edinburgh lawyers and Glasgow crooks.”

Peter Myers
Oldmeldrum, Aberdeenshire

SIR – Mr Anderson highlights two changes that must be implemented should a second independence referendum take place.

I would add one more to this list: all people born in Scotland should be eligible to vote, irrespective of where they live. Surely these people have more right to vote than my grandson, who has no connection to Scotland other than the fact that he happens to attend Edinburgh University.

M G Bateman
Grayshott, Surrey

SIR – Mr Anderson’s insightful article on the Scottish referendum campaign points out how Nationalist-leaning citizens used intimidation to achieve their ends. They were, of course, reflecting the demagogic outpourings of Alex Salmond and his rabble-rousing crew.

In her Christmas address the Queen called for reconciliation, although it is difficult to see how that could happen in such a poisoned atmosphere.

Alec Ellis
Liverpool

SIR – I disagree with the suggestion that Scotland is being held back by those who would “run a mile” from a job offer. Even if it were true I fail to see how this sets it apart from the rest of the United Kingdom.

It is also important to note that not all Scots are “stalkers, ghillies and keepers”, rolling in the heather chasing grouse. Scotland has universities that are at the forefront of research, and some of the world’s best scientists, doctors, economists, artists, writers and musicians.

A failure to understand this is exactly the reason Scotland was almost lost in the referendum.

Angela Drennan
Dunfermline, Fife

SIR – Fifty-five per cent of those who cast their votes elected to remain in the United Kingdom in September, after hard campaigning by a large number of very loyal ordinary Scots. Comments like those made by Christopher Booker (“The insecure Scots have turned in on themselves – and against us”) encourage those who want to see the break-up of the Union.

Norman J Jack
Edinburgh

SIR – Some three months after the referendum, anti-English rhetoric is still evident from many Scots. The promised implementation of “English votes for English laws” has stalled. The outcome of the general election next year is impossible to predict and the emergence of another coalition government with the SNP holding the balance of power is a probability.

It is becoming more apparent by the day that it would have been better if Scotland had voted to separate.

Don Bailey
Helsby, Cheshire

SIR – There is a distinct air of uncertainty about the future organisation of Britain. To get a more rounded, unbiased view on the subject, we should assemble an assessment committee comprising not only British members but representatives from countries such as Canada, America, Australia and Germany, who have seen and operated federal systems and can assess the advantages, drawbacks and unintended consequences of ideas put forward for constitutional reform.

John Hannaford
Lymington, Hampshire

Catholic bishops have no place in the Lords

SIR – Matt Showering makes a no doubt well-intentioned call for improved Roman Catholic representation in the House of Lords by granting seats to Roman Catholic bishops. This would not be the way to go.

Over the Catholic Church’s long history, it has discovered that mixing clerical and legislative offices can lead to problems. There are many famous examples where the seduction of temporal power diminished and obscured the pastoral mission of ordained ministers, or where the Gospel suffered instrumentalisation at the hands of passing ideologies.

The Catholic Church instead challenges its laity to enter the public sphere and to work through a variety of political parties and structures to see Christ’s teaching reflected in public life. As Catholic politicians, we believe that is the right way to go.

Rob Flello MP (Lab)

Jonathan Evans MP (Con)

Mike Kane MP (Lab)

Stephen Pound MP (Lab)

Cllr Chris Whitehouse (Con)

Isle of Wight County Council

Lord Hylton (Crossbench)

Lord Balfe (Con)

Don’t cull; vaccinate

(PA)

SIR – Had the money wasted on badger culling (which gives no hope of a permanent solution) been invested in research and development, a TB vaccine for cattle would be available by now. Once vaccinated, all calves and imported livestock would be safe; in time the TB reservoir in wildlife would also diminish.

As vaccination of cattle against TB is presently prohibited by EU law, the issue could be added to the list of gripes for the forthcoming treaty negotiation.

Dr David Smith
Clyro, Radnorshire

Caring ought to be a vocation, not just a job

SIR – Thank you for highlighting the urgent need for more rigorous mandatory training for care workers, which is long overdue.

In light of present job shortages, people are being drawn to apply for care jobs simply because they need the money, however poorly paid the job may be, and not because they really want to undertake such work.

Caring is, and always has been, a vocation, not just a job. It is hard work and not always pleasant but, when carried out properly, brings its own rewards.

Ann Robertson
Tenterden, Kent

SIR – As a parent of a middle-aged, profoundly disabled daughter, I welcome your Justice for the Elderly campaign, which seeks to get better care for both the elderly and the disabled.

Richard Hawkes points to a lack of funding, which is of course a major issue, but he fails to mention that the charity Scope, of which he is CEO, is closing residential homes and evicting nearly 200 profoundly disabled people, many of whom have lived in these homes for years. Their communities will be broken up and they will be put in the care of the local authority. The cost to the state will increase, putting the care system under even greater pressure.

Frank Lindsell
Ely, Cambridgeshire

SIR – There have been so many negative reports of care for the sick and elderly that I feel compelled to report on my positive experience.

My husband suffered from dementia and heart problems for two years. During this time Positive Horizons home care, based in Derbyshire, provided excellent care. My husband always looked forward to their visits and the carers were cheerful and kind. When my husband died suddenly at home, the carer stayed with me while a senior carer took over her duties.

Having had this experience I intend to stay in my own home should I become incapacitated.

Zita Roscoe
Ashbourne, Derbyshire

SIR – My mother developed dementia in her seventies. In the early years of her illness she may have “lived with dementia”, but I can assure Toby Williamson that she suffered too. In later years dementia controlled her life and dominated that of her immediate family.

Mr Williamson’s criticism of Joan Bakewell for using the term “dementia sufferers” trivialises the suffering of those in the later stages of dementia.

Sheelagh A James
Lichfield, Staffordshire

Suffer the children

SIR – Andrew M Brown moans about noisy children in church. Not everyone has a retinue of staff to look after their offspring, as the Duchess of Cambridge has, and most churches are glad to get anyone through the door – especially children.

Penny Sedgwick
Springthorpe, Lincolnshire

Railway chaos

SIR – The debacle on Britain’s railways over the Christmas period was a sorry tale of appalling management.

Even sorrier are the calls for huge fines for Network Rail – not helpful because such fines remove potential funding for infrastructure investment – and calls for re-nationalisation of the railways. I commuted 65 miles to work by train for 28 years in the latter days of British Railways and through privatisation. The prospect of a return to a state-run system, controlled by trade unions and with zero focus on the customer, is appalling.

The Government needs to get a grip on Network Rail, give it sufficient funding and ensure the money is spent wisely.

Richard Holness
Herne Bay, Kent

Toil and trouble

SIR – The Great War (“Theatre can make the dead walk before you”) provided the backdrop for the best open-air production of Shakespeare I have ever seen – a version of Macbeth, by Heartbreak Productions, set in a rehabilitation hospital at the end of the First World War.

Shakespeare’s story of tyranny and abuse of power was used as a metaphor for the horrors encountered in the trenches. The carnage was interspersed with an exemplary choice of First World War songs and such clever touches as the witches emerging from a cloud of mustard gas wearing gas masks.

Jeremy Brien
Bristol

Party problems

SIR – The failings of the Labour Party go much deeper than simply having a lame-duck leader.

Labour’s record on the economy, immigration, education, the NHS and crime is woeful. When it comes to policies or personalities, Labour has neither.

Mick Ferrie
Mawnan Smith, Cornwall

The Queen speaks for Britain across the world

The Queen stands with the band of the Blues and Royals at Horse Guards Parade (Alamy)

SIR – Harry Mount is right to praise the Queen for her remarkable success in the “art of giving voice to a nation”.

The Queen was tutored from the age of 12 by her father to become monarch, which she did in 1952 aged just 23. She has never uttered a comment out of place which could be used controversially by the media. Consequently, she has so grown in stature and reputation that statesmen and women from the Commonwealth nations as well as countries further afield, know that they can say anything to her or seek her advice and it will never be repeated.

Who else would be both wise and discreet enough to fulfil this role? The current system may not please constitutional purists, but it works.

Of course the barometer of public opinion about the Royal family can swing positively and negatively. When the Prince of Wales succeeds the Queen, he will bring with him plenty of baggage arising from public comments on a wide range of matters.

John Lidstone
Sutton Scotney, Hampshire

SIR – In his excellent analysis of the Queen’s broadcast, Harry Mount did not mention her unwavering faith. She referred to Jesus Christ, “the Prince of peace”, as her strength and support. In seeking reconciliation, the Queen reflects the forgiveness that Jesus taught.

Morwena Williams
Pentraeth, Anglesey

Button it

SIR – On about half of my short-sleeved shirts the bottom buttonhole runs east-west instead of north-south like all the others. Is this a manufacturing aberration or is there a purpose, perhaps lost in antiquity, behind it?

Bruce Denness
Whitwell, Isle of Wight

Flying high

SIR – The sexiest voice, in my opinion, belonged to the Dutch lady who read out the airport weather reports for Dutch and southern UK airports. When I was a co-pilot the captain couldn’t understand why it took me so long to get the weather.

Capt Jim Passmore
Trebetherick, Cornwall

SIR – Apparently, the young lady at RAF Hullavington who used to man the navigational equipment was known as “The Angel of Hullavington”.

So alluring was her voice that pilots would divert miles off course to place themselves within range of her equipment, providing an excuse to call her for a navigational fix.

Neville Cullingford
Eastleigh, Hampshire

Globe and Mail:

Konrad Yakabuski

Can this captain right Quebec’s ship?

Irish Times:

Sir, – Further to “Lucinda Creighton unveils new party and calls for a ‘reboot’ of Ireland” (January 2nd), when did anyone under the age of 30, and without the word “administrator” as part of their job title, last “reboot” anything?

So much for a modern Ireland. – Yours, etc,

ULTAN Ó BROIN,

Dublin 8.

Sir, – May I suggest a name for Lucinda Creighton and Co’s proposed new political party – “Right On”? –Yours, etc,

JACK O’CONNELL,

Ballydehob,

Co Cork.

Sir, –In a democracy, one cannot be compelled to vote against one’s conscience on major moral issues, such as abortion, gay marriage or euthanasia. Enda Kenny should apologise to Lucinda Creighton, et al, and invite them back into the fold. He will need them. – Yours, etc,

JIM O’SULLIVAN,

Model Farm,

Cork.

Sir, –I was intrigued by the launch of Lucinda’s new party. It appears to be a case of “out with the old, and back in with the old”. It should make for amusing reading, if nothing else. – Yours, etc,

FRANCIS McNICHOLAS,

Kiltimagh,

Co Mayo.

Sir, – Lucinda Creighton referred on radio to our “toxic whip system”. Perhaps her new political party should be called “The Whippersnappers”? – Yours, etc,

OLIVER McGRANE,

Rathfarnham,

Dublin 16.

Sir, – I wish Lucinda Creighton well in her efforts to form a new political party, but my heart is full of trepidation when I think of the Greens and the PDs. – Yours, etc,

OLIVER DUFFY,

Bishopstown,

Cork.

Sir, – I am curious, as we seem to be on a journey in this country to replicate all the most undesirable aspects of American culture, as to whether tea was served at the launch of the “new” political party in Dublin last Friday. – Yours, etc,

JOHN KANE,

Limerick.

Sir, – Much of what Bill Bailey writes about footpaths in the UK is very true (December 22nd). There are, however, two quibbles with what he says.

By the end of the second World War, in the UK, under emergency orders thousands of paths had been closed, obstructed, or ploughed up, with little public protest. The government of the day became so concerned that in 1949 it passed the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act. This Act required each (then) county council, rural district council and parish council to compile and keep a definitive, up-to-date map of the paths in their areas. This is where the public began to guard seriously their access rights. A newer and definitive map was published under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. These Acts were a major factor in how rights of way are viewed in the two countries.

Most Irish country people of 70 years or so can clearly remember dozens of paths and laneways. These took the form of Mass paths, church paths, fishermen’s paths and well paths, now mostly gone. Our forefathers were not idiots and had no intention of walking five miles if they could use a path and do the journey in two. – Yours, etc,

KEN WARD,

Gorey,

Co Wexford.

Sir, – Michael J Donnelly (December 27th) claims Terence O’Neill, the prime minister of Northern Ireland during the nascent campaign for civil rights in the 1960s, initiated no reforms until after the second civil rights demonstration which took place in Derry on October 5th, 1968.

This is true but there were sinister forces at work at that time which prevented O’Neill from initiating reform. The Irish Times of January 15th, 1965, reported on the visit of taoiseach Sean Lemass to Belfast, who had been invited by O’Neill to Stormont for talks. Both Mr Lemass and O’Neill were confronted by the Rev Ian Paisley and some supporters who rejected any dealings with Dublin.

A further report by Fergus Pyle in The Irish Times of December 12th, 1967, notes taoiseach Jack Lynch, on a visit to Stormont for talks with O’Neill, suffered a similar fate when a mob led the Rev Paisley again denounced O’Neill’s attempts at cross-border talks.

Following the formation of the Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association in 1967, O’Neill, prepared to consider mild legislative change, looked favourably on the introduction of more moderate policies which included “one man one vote” for all in local elections. This political accommodation of Catholics was regarded as appeasement to civil rights demands and enraged the virulently anti-Catholic shadowy figures in loyalism.

Calls were made for O’Neill to resign.

Although not yet prepared to fall on his own sword, sinister forces within loyalism were about to apply the final push. If political pressure alone would not force O’Neill to stand aside, then a few strategically placed bombs might, especially if republicans were believed to be responsible.

A decision was taken by a coalition of loyalist organisations to attack Belfast’s electricity and water supplies in an attempt to cause maximum political damage to O’Neill, who would be unlikely to survive the consequences if these bombings were shown to be the work of republicans.

The first target was Castlereagh electricity substation, which was bombed by members of the UVF and the Ulster Protestant Volunteers.

The following day Rev Ian Paisley’s newspaper the Protestant Telegraph reported, “This is the first act of sabotage perpetrated by the IRA since the murderous campaign of 1956 . . . the sheer professionalism of the act indicates the work of the well-equipped IRA. This latest act of terrorism is an ominous indication of what lies ahead for Ulster . . . Loyalists must now appreciate the struggle that lies ahead and the supreme sacrifice that will have to be made in order that Ulster will remain Protestant”.

Four days later the loyalist co-conspirators changed targets and, confident that the IRA was the primary suspect, bombed Belfast’s main water supply at Dunadry and two weeks later another explosion destroyed the pipeline between the Silent Valley reservoir in the Mourne Mountains and Belfast.

A further four explosions on pipelines carrying water supplies from Lough Neagh to Belfast quickly followed, all reportedly carried out by the IRA.

O’Neill knew he could no longer survive and resigned just days later. O’Neill later said the explosions “blew me out of office”.

The deaths, injuries and appalling suffering inflicted on thousands of innocent people in the following decades could have been prevented if O’Neill had been supported by moderate unionism. – Yours, etc,

TOM COOPER,

Templeogue,

Dublin 16.

Sir, – 2015 is the centenary of the Armenian genocide that cost the lives of up to a million Armenian men, women and children.

What makes the Armenian genocide so important is that because it was so “successful” from an Ottoman Turk point of view it became a sort of blueprint for further acts of genocide in the 20th century. Infamously, Adolf Hitler is reported to have said: “Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?”

The relative success of the Armenian genocide encouraged others, including Hitler, Idi Amin, Pol Pot, and the Rwandan government to carry out further acts of genocide.

Acknowledgement and recognition by the international community that the atrocities committed against the Armenian people between 1915 and 1922 amounted to genocide is vital in order to ensure justice and accountability for the Armenian people, and to strengthen global jurisprudence toward preventing further acts of genocide.

France, Russia, the US congress and the European Parliament have already recognised the Armenian genocide but many other countries, including Ireland and the UK, have yet to do so.

The present Turkish government must be pressurised by the international community into accepting that its predecessors perpetrated genocide against the Armenian people. Turkey has aspirations to membership of the European Union, and Europe needs Turkey as a positive bridge toward the Middle East and toward Islamic communities.

The European Union should make it clear that recognition of the Armenian genocide must be a prerequisite for EU membership, and perhaps lead to EU membership for both Turkey and Armenia. – Yours, etc,

Dr EDWARD HORGAN,

Castletroy,

Limerick.

Sir, – The psychologist Stephen Hart, a world authority on risk assessment tools and the co-developer of a number of the main risk assessment tools in current use, regularly reiterated the fact that these tools can only estimate risk; they cannot predict specific events and do not claim to do so.

I have contributed to the early introduction of risk assessments in both prisons and mental health settings through the clinical administration of formal, structured, risk assessment measures. One clear but often unacknowledged benefit in general mental health settings is that such structured measures can help to give a more accurate and often a lower estimate of a service user’s risk; thus in a number of cases it has supported long-term service users having greater periods (and/or degrees) of independent living than they had previously enjoyed.

Had such measures existed in the 1960s, they would have contributed significantly to lower numbers of people being assessed to needless detention in psychiatric institutions at a time when we had one of the highest rates of institutionalisation in the world.

This State could benefit by going in the direction that Northern Ireland has by introducing forensic psychiatric community teams to areas throughout the country as the focus should be on building upon current local risk-management strategies that would benefit from more accessible, integrated specialist knowledge and resources. The introduction of such teams would go some way in helping reduce the frequency of violent incidences perpetrated by the small minority of mental health service users who engage in violence at a level that may lead to very significant harm. Unfortunately there are no (and may never be) “crystal balls” to predict or “magic wands” to prevent a number of terrible events; such extreme violence as seen in Cobh will still occasionally occur, with devastating consequences for those affected. I send my condolences to the Greaney family at this very sad time. – Yours, etc,

EMMET MURRAY,

Forensic Clinical

Psychologist,

Letterkenny, Co Donegal.

Sir, – May I remind your readers that in 2005 Israel withdrew all its military and civilians from Gaza. Israel’s border with Gaza was such that many Gazans crossed over into Israel to work on a daily basis.

Then several years later the terrorist group Hamas took over Gaza. The Hamas charter calls for the worldwide destruction of Jews.

Since 2005 over 13,000 rockets have been fired into Israel, together with many Hamas terrorists infiltrating Israel.

As a result, Israel closed its borders with Gaza, only allowing humanitarian aid in and people with medical emergencies out so that they can be hospitalised in Israel. Israel has no control over Gaza’s border with Egypt. Egypt could have provided all Gaza’s needs but it also has chosen to close its border most of the time to protect its citizens.

Your correspondents, Dermot O’Rourke and D Flinter (December 31st), offer no suggestions as to how Israel should respond.

So I ask them and your other readers, what would the Republic of Ireland do if it were subject to thousands of rockets requiring its citizens to seek shelter often with only 15 seconds warning; and what would they do to prevent terrorists infiltrating their homeland? – Yours, etc,

RAYMOND SOLOMON,

Manchester,

England.

Sir, – Your correspondent Anne Strahan (December 31st) cannot get her head around John Fitzgerald’s problem with foxhunting (December 29th). I suspect that the vast majority of people, by the same token, cannot get their heads around the fact that some human beings think it’s okay to hound and kill wild animals for “sport”, even if they do, as she says, “clean their horses and dress themselves appropriately”.

She says that the fox is a pest that kills lambs and chickens, and that hounds are behaving naturally in pursuing them and tearing them apart, but in fact they are trained by the hunters to hunt and kill as a pack, and are “blooded” during the cub-hunting season on young and inexperienced fox cubs.

Statistics available on fox predation belie claims by hunters that the fox is a pest. A pilot study undertaken by the Department of Agriculture’s veterinary lab (1992) showed predation (including all kinds of predators) and misadventure (accidents, drownings, etc) combined accounted for 5 per cent of all lamb mortalities, while the British ministry of agriculture found much the same, citing predation at a mere 1 per cent, adding that it did not consider foxes to be a significant factor in lamb mortality.

Meanwhile, eminent zoologistDr James Fairley (NUI Galway), author of An Irish Beast Book, states: “A great deal of the many allegations of lamb killing are based on insufficient or even non-existent evidence. When interviewing farmers, I found that in some cases, a dead, unwounded animal or the mere disappearance of a lamb were attributed to the work of the fox.”

The fox is under constant persecution, much of it utterly cruel and barbaric, based on scant or little evidence of its threat to farm livestock, as the statistics show, but like every myth, it continues to be perpetuated, mostly by recreational hunters in whose interest it is to demonise the fox. Foxhunting has been outlawed for the past 10 years by our neighbours in England, Scotland and Wales, while hare coursing has also been banned in these jurisdictions and in Northern Ireland, leaving Ireland as a last outpost for barbarism, thanks to successive governments that have consistently turned a blind eye to the cruelty. – Yours, etc,

AIDEEN YOURELL,

Irish Council Against

Blood Sports,

PO Box 88,

Mullingar, Co Westmeath.

Sir, – The falling price of petrol and diesel is to be welcomed. However the mechanics as to how, why and when these reductions occur is often the subject of justifiable complaint and debate, not only in this newspaper but many other media outlets.

The disconnect between a reduction of the barrel price and the price at the pump is the stuff of mystery. On New Year’s Eve, I passed my local petrol station and noted another welcome decline of some three cent per litre. This morning in passing the same station the price had risen again by two cent.

Somehow in the passing hours through the new year the fuel held in the tanks under the forecourt had acquired a new cost and value which just had to be passed on to the public.

Perhaps some kind gentleman from the fuel industry might explain this miracle of economics. – Yours, etc,

DEREK MacHUGH,

Foxrock,

Sir, – Further to “Jack’s the lad, while Sophie is top girl in Irish Times baby names chart” (Front Page, January 2nd), whatever happened to Jill? – Yours, etc,

JOHN O’BYRNE,

Harold’s Cross, Dublin 6W.

Sir, – I see the “Francis effect” has yet to create a wave of Franks and Frankies. But it’s still early days. – Yours, etc,

PATRICIA O’RIORDAN,

Dublin 8.

Irish Independent:

Letters to the Editor

Published 05/01/2015 | 02:30

  • 0 Comments
The Famine Memorial on the north quay in Dublin. Niall Carson/PA

The Famine Memorial on the north quay in Dublin. Niall Carson/PA

I agree with David McGuinness’s disgust at the report that British TV station Channel 4 has commissioned a sitcom on the topic of the Great Famine (‘Famine is no laughing matter’, Letters, Irish Independent January 3).

  • Go To

Defending its decision to commission this show, a Channel 4 spokesperson said that “brilliant humour can come out of times of terrible hardship.”

If this proposed comedy on the starvation and forced emigration in coffin ships of more that two million peasant Irish people draws sufficient audiences to please advertisers, perhaps Channel 4 might consider doing a trilogy of comedies on related themes.

Suggested topics to be considered might include the Holocaust, in which six million Jews were incinerated, or one on Aids.

Think of the laughs to be had on the Aids epidemic, in which almost 78 million people have been infected with the HIV virus and about 39 million people have died. Globally, 35 million people were living with HIV at the end of 2013.

Indeed, why not one on a current topic, say the Ebola outbreak? Just think of the “brilliant humour” that could be engendered by live interviews with Ebola victims on their deathbeds.

Tom Cooper

Templeogue, Dublin 6

Scraping the barrel in ratings war

The response of the British Government of the day to the great 19th century Famine in Ireland was so shamefully inadequate that no words can ever appropriately cover its grotesque and cynical nature.

That a British broadcaster, Channel 4, is now developing a sitcom set during that horrific, anti-Irish travesty and calling it ‘Hunger’ is both racially insensitive and extremely insulting. The Famine is no more suitable sitcom material than the Holocaust – this project should be nipped in the bud.

Is there no low to which some broadcasters are prepared to stoop in their ratings wars? Imagine a German broadcaster developing a sitcom called ‘Gas’ and basing it on the Nazi death camps.

No matter how harmless sounding the justification, it won’t deflect one iota from the fact that this proposed Famine sitcom, ‘Hunger’, is just about as a sick as it gets.

Eugene Cassidy

Co Cavan

Hold a poll on compulsory Irish

Ian O Doherty’s article on the Irish language (Irish Independent, January 1) reflects the thoughts of many citizens of the Republic over the years.

The Language Freedom Movement of the 1960s, a leading member of which was the playwright John B Keane, were holding a meeting in the Mansion House when Gaeilgeoirs came running in and pulled the Tricolor off the speaker’s table.

The message was that if you are not in favour of compulsory Irish, you are not truly Irish.

Over the years I have spoken to some members of the major parties, with the exception of Sinn Fein, who said they would like to see a change on the issue from compulsion to consent. However, they say such a proposal would cost their parties seats in certain constituencies.

Therefore, it seems to me that we should take the issue away from party politics and let it go to the people by way of a referendum. If the majority wants the status quo to remain, I, for one, will accept that decision and stay chiuin (silent) from then on.

Tony Moriarty

Harold’s Cross, Dublin 6

Lucinda has missed the boat

I can’t help but wonder if Lucinda Creighton has missed the boat in her decision to launch a new political party within the next eight weeks – or was that the launch, I’m not too sure?

It reminds me a little of the launch on New Year’s Day of UTV Ireland. After a five-minute promotional video, we were treated to an hour-long episode of a programme set on a Yorkshire farm. UTV Ireland won’t be in top gear for a few months when some of its new programmes commence, seemingly a bit like Lucinda’s as yet unnamed party.

Last year when I attended the “monster rally” in the RDS there was an undoubted air of anticipation and energy in the hall that something exciting was afoot. However, since then we have had the local elections and the marked increase in support for Independents and Sinn Fein.

While large numbers of people have turned away from the large parties such as Fianna Fail and Fine Gael, they now consider Independents to be a viable alternative.

The present support for Independents will not necessarily move to a new party unless they are offering something very radical which people can identify with. So far I don’t see much evidence of this with Lucinda’s new party. I believe there was a definite appetite for a new party this time last year but things have moved on since then.

I assume RTE and TV3 aren’t worried by UTV Ireland yet. Similarly, I suspect that the current politicians of whatever hue aren’t too worried about Lucinda’s new party. Let’s hope we get something more substantial in eight weeks’ time, otherwise I, for one, will be waving goodbye to this particular boat.

Tommy Roddy

Salthill, Co Galway

The tide went out long ago, Lucinda Creighton, and you have been left adrift without a paddle. The people have no interest in another blustering political party which would deliver more of the same, but with perhaps a softer voice.

The time has come and gone when the electorate naively depended on self-serving politicians to do the right things for them. We’re all broke now, and to have more boring, flashy political rhetoric shoved down our throats by the well-suited and booted, is to add insult to injury.

Robert Sullivan

Bantry, Co Cork

Those looking for a name for Lucinda Creighton’s new party should note, as Enda Kenny may ruefully reflect, that the name of the former FG junior minister contains letters which spell out “Chagrin Uncoiled”.

Dr John Doherty

Gaoth Dobhair, Co Donegal

Solar power is the future

A nuclear power station is one of Energy Minister Alex White’s suggested clean energy solutions for little Ireland (Irish Independent December 31). In mid 2005, a similar proposition was put forward to combat increasing energy costs. The idea is as regressive and repulsive today as it was then.

For over 40 years, communities living near the east coast were in constant dread of leakages or sabotage at Sellafield, a nuclear plant not even on this island.

Despite dozens of huge wind turbines and pylons erected, efforts on marine energy, bio-fuel crops and extensions to National Grid, how have we fared in reaching our energy targets over the past 10 years?

Of all energy sources, from fossil to renewable, solar is the most sustainable, inexhaustible, pure and consistent means of power.

The sun will perpetually bombard us with 9,000 times more power than is needed to run every car, heat all homes and energise every electrical gadget and factory on this planet.

All Europe’s requirements could be provided by lining just 0.2pc of the Sahara Desert with concentrated solar power technology – costing, maybe, €50bn – according to Professor Anthony Patt (Irish Independent, September 24, 2009).

This is not a colossal sum compared to the €14bn the Irish Wind Energy Association (IWEA) is prepared to spend, just to meet 40pc of all electricity needs for renewable sources by 2020!

Rather than saddling each country with targets, a European Union Solar Energy Company should be established to administer the development of and operate an inter-Euro Grid supplying power to all members at a fixed price.

We cannot afford another Irish Water fiasco; time, money and creation of jobs are precious – our educated youth are leaving in their thousands!

James Gleeson

Thurles, Co Tipperary



Sharland

$
0
0

6 January 2015 Childrens books

Mary a little better mussels for lunch. Sharland comes to call.

Obituary:

Alla Sizova was a Soviet ballerina who danced with Nureyev just before he defected and was part of a golden generation at the Kirov

Alla Sizova as Princess Aurora in Sleeping Beauty by Tchaikovsky
Alla Sizova as Princess Aurora in Sleeping Beauty by Tchaikovsky  Photo: alamy

Alla Sizova, the Soviet ballerina, who has died in St Petersburg aged 75, sprang to instant fame at the age of 18 when performing with her classmate Rudolf Nureyev in a school graduation film . Performing the Le Corsaire duet, the teenage Nureyev prowled and leapt like a hungry panther and Sizova was dubbed “the flying Sizova” as she soared into jumps that seemed to hover mid-air. The two prodigies were immediately hired into the Kirov Ballet as soloists, skipping the usual corps de ballet start.

Paradoxically, Nureyev thoroughly disliked his partner, dismissing her as “cold and dull”. When the Kirov administration allocated them an apartment together, he declared that if it was an attempt to marry him off to her, it would fail. Both dancers moved family members into the two rooms with them, to ensure that they did not cross paths too often when they were off-duty, even as their on-stage miracles of lightness, grace and athletic dynamism together were assumed to reflect a mutual respect.

Nureyev’s low opinion of his partner was not shared by the British, when Alla Sizova and her remarkable generation at the Kirov were first unveiled in the West on their celebrated tour in 1961. On June 16 that year, as the company flew on to London from their opening venue, Paris, Nureyev – who was being sent home for antisocial behaviour – had defected.

Alla Sizova, like Nureyev’s colleagues, had no idea what had happened, but as his partner she found herself under suspicion. Back in St Petersburg her mother was confronted by KGB officers and put in such fear for her daughter that the experience resulted in her spending weeks in a psychiatric hospital.

However, the young ballerina, although having to make her debut in The Sleeping Beauty on the Covent Garden stage, in which she should have been partnered by Nureyev, conquered her anxieties to give a glowing performance. The eminent critic Clive Barnes wrote that the joyful 21-year-old was “rather more to the English taste than her colleagues”, and showed “all the incipient nobility of a coming prima ballerina. Her extensions seemed to travel up to infinity and beyond in a curiously poetic and non-athletic manner… I find it difficult to envisage a more remarkable debut in the greatest ballerina role of the classic repertory.”


Alla Sizova with Nureyev in in Le Corsaire, Leningrad, circa 1958

On return to the USSR, Sizova was asked to condemn Nureyev, but stated that on the contrary she admired his “strength of will and fearlessness” in pursuing “his artistic growth”, though she could not understand what he would find in the West with its inferior ballet training. She went on to become one of the nation’s quartet of superstar ballerinas, alongside Irina Kolpakova, Alla Osipenko and Natalia Makarova, her captivating charm and virtuosic brilliance being soon enriched with a touching expressiveness that would be noted approvingly on subsequent Kirov tours to London in the 1970s.

Sizova suffered long treatment for a spinal injury, reportedly linked to her landings from spectacular jumps, which caused her to miss the 1966 tour to London. Having lost Nureyev as her partner (his name was erased from records at the time), she created an equally famous pairing with the brilliant Yuri Soloviev, whose jumps were more refined than the forceful Nureyev’s. It was said that Soloviev and Sizova showed the ultimate possible in the Kirov’s classical training, a fusion of natural gifts and stylistic polish.

Sizova suffered no jealousy from her peers: Makarova, her contemporary, praised her “enticing radiance”, and the older Kolpakova, regarded as the leading classical stylist of this golden group, once told an American interviewer that when someone had told her he preferred Sizova in a role to her, “that hurt. It made me want to do better.”

Alla Ivanovna Sizova was born in Moscow on September 22 1939. Her family moved to Leningrad and she studied at the prestigious Vaganova ballet school, where according to another of her classmates, Valery Panov, the young girl was known as the “ugly duckling”, an “anaemic-looking complainer with red eyes and a voice that nagged whenever she stopped crying”. Panov would acknowledge that she was “a striking example of the caterpillar who becomes a ballerina butterfly”.

Regardless of the good opinion of the boys in her class, Sizova sped into the Kirov Ballet, performing 14 major roles in her first three years. Her lightness, musicality and Kirov delicacy made her a supreme Giselle as well as Masha in Vasily Vainonen’s traditional The Nutcracker, and with her growing talent for showing vulnerability she also became a touching Juliet, Katerina in The Stone Flower and Maria in The Fountain of Bakhchisarai. The Kirov’s choreographers showered her with new roles, ranging from the leading part in Igor Belsky’s powerful tribute to Russian wartime suffering set to Shostakovich’s Leningrad Symphony, to story heroines such as Konstantin Sergeyev’s Cinderella and Ophelia in his Hamlet, and Princess Rose in Oleg Vinogradov’s The Prince of the Pagodas (using Britten’s score), among other creations, many not seen in the West.

As well as her legendary partnerships with Nureyev and Soloviev, she also brought all her technical brilliance and gaiety to performances with the marvellous young Mikhail Baryshnikov in Don Quixote that are still said to have set the Kirov’s standard in that ballet.

In 1983 Alla Sizova was awarded the top Soviet honour, People’s Artist of the USSR. She last performed in the Kirov’s version of Les Sylphides (called Chopiniana) at the age of 53, but latterly her life became unhappier. Her husband, the television sports producer Mikhail Serebrennikov, had died while covering the Moscow Olympics of 1980, leaving her with their only son.

In 1991 she moved with the son to the US to work alongside her Kirov colleague Oleg Vinogradov at his new Kirov Academy, Washington, where she was a much-loved teacher of American ballerinas. But in 2004 she returned to Russia after her son unexpectedly died while fishing.

Alla Sizova, born September 22 1939, died November 23 2014

Guardian:

Detail from The Judgement of Adam and Eve by William Blake, from his illustrations for John Milton's
‘It is Blake’s anger, at injustice, at cruelty, at abuse of power, that we in Albion need’ … detail from The Judgement of Adam and Eve by William Blake. Photograph: Barney Burstein/Burstein Collection/Corbis

Martin Kettle (English radicalism needs to recapture the spirit of Blake, 2 January) is so right that progressive politics is these days instrumentalist and lacking in vision – if anyone was in any doubt about the truth of this, they just needed to read the adjacent article by Ed Balls (Osborne is at the margins, Labour is the centre ground, 2 January). Where can we look for such a progressive vision? Kettle suggests that for William Blake politics is a form of religious faith, and it is instructive to hear Justin Welby, in his new year message, talk of sacrifice and self-giving, turning outwards and bringing hope to the poor and suffering of the world, arguably plagiarised from Jesus’s own words in Luke (4:18-19). How might this vision play out in practical politics? Can I suggest raising taxes on the better off and diverting resources to the poor, ill and needy of this country and the wider world? Some of this of course Ed Balls was suggesting as Labour policy, and perhaps all Labour needs to do is to marry policy with the proclamation of a vision – and so engage both the soul and brain of the electorate.
David Wyatt
London

• Martin Kettle’s point that William Blake was not someone you’d want running today’s railways or NHS is sound. Yet from 1976 to 1983, Blake was helping to run British Rail. It was during these years that BR’s chairman, Sir Peter Parker, maintained his long-standing devotion to Blake’s poetry and painting. From 1997 until his death in 2002, Parker was president of the Blake Society. A radio documentary on the life of Blake scholar Kathleen Raine said Parker “won’t go near the negotiating table without a copy [of Blake’s work] close at hand”. Might this add weight to Kettle’s suggestion that, through Blake’s vision, the realms of the practical and the imagination might come together in a “progressive organism”?
Stephen Batty
Poole, Dorset

• How moving for Martin Kettle to remind us of the power and importance of political imagination and vision in these immensely unstable times. Had he chosen a later period to look at the emergence of “politics as a form of religious faith”, he might have alighted on the Independent Labour party. Among the many names who come to mind here are Keir Hardie and Philip Snowden (whatever his later failings at the Treasury), the first a Scot who for many years was MP for a Welsh constituency, the second a Yorkshireman. You could also include the middle-class Katherine Bruce Glasier, whose speeches profoundly moved her audiences. Or the working-class Hannah Mitchell, suffrage campaigner and Manchester councillor, who had only two weeks’ schooling. They all embodied vision and ethics in their politics.

Any progressive politics today would be enriched if, among other sources, it draws from this rich ILP tradition.
Barry Winter
Leeds

• It was as a student, reading Bronowski’s A Man Without a Mask, that I met William Blake, and he has been my companion for the last 60 years. Blake not merely had an imagination and was a dreamer, as Martin Kettle says; he also possessed a blazing anger. And it is that anger, at injustice, at cruelty, at abuse of power, that we in Albion need. As his contemporary Francisco Goya put it: “Divine Justice, do not spare them!” It is the voice of anger that needs to speak for Britain.
Lionel Burman
West Kirby, Wirral

• As EP Thompson noted, William Blake belonged to a “long popular tradition” which was not just visionary but also concerned with opposing the monarchy and organised religion. Martin Kettle may well have a point that reclaiming Blake is one way to forge anew a genuine English radical tradition, but it would be one considerably to the left of what passes for official politics in 2015.
Keith Flett
London

• Imagination and vision are essential, as Martin Kettle says. But to describe the current state of Scottish political thinking as one that broadly reflects the view that Scotland’s problems will be solved by throwing off the English yoke is wrong. I voted for a “progressive” Labour party in UK elections for 50 years, but am unlikely to do so again. This in part because of its stance on the referendum, but mainly because it appears unable or unwilling to articulate an economic vision based on something other than global capitalism as currently practised. People see wages falling in real terms and their conditions of employment being reduced by employers drawing on the larger EU pool of labour. Some misleadingly translate this into a question of immigration or EU membership, rather than face up to the downside of globalisation and ensure that the global market works for the many not the few. In an independent Scotland the case for radical alternatives would be argued against a backdrop free from the needs of London as a global financial centre, from “special relationships” and from an unrealistic view of our place in the world.
Roderick McCallum
Annan, Dumfries and Galloway

Some of the hundreds of Syrian people rescued by the Italian navy after being abandoned on the Ezade
Some of the hundreds of Syrian people rescued after the Ezadeen was abandoned off Italy’s south coast, 3 January 2015. Photograph: Reuters

Isn’t it time we stopped using the word “migrant” to describe people risking their lives to flee a war that has killed 200,000 Syrians, wounded millions (physically and mentally), and made millions more homeless (Vessel abandoned with 450 migrants on board, 3 January)? Surely they are refugees and/or asylum seekers. Defining them otherwise turns them into cannon fodder for our own economic, political and racial xenophobes.
Ivan Rendall
Kings Green, Worcestershire

• Ian Bostridge’s reflections on “crossovers” between classical and popular performance (Cold comfort, Review, 2 January) remind me of the surprising example in Richard Whorf’s film It Happened in Brooklyn: Sinatra singing an English version of Don Giovanni’s Là Ci Darem la Mano. Quirky, but not at all unpleasant.
Martin Brady
London

• Bill Gabbett (Letters, 3 December) refers to English public school boys who (some people think) “won the Battle of Britain”. Just for the record, of the 3,000 fighter pilots recorded as having flown sorties in that encounter, 600 (20%) were known to have attended a public school.
John Prance
Preston

• Young independent filmmakers Shut Out The Light have produced a powerful short film Still Ragged: 100 Years of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists (Letters, 1 January), which they have been touring and is available via their website.
Dr Nicola Wilson
University of Reading

• Mary Gildea calls for an experiment where the country is run by non-male people (Letters, 5 January). We ran that experiment – we called it Thatcherism – and we’re still paying for it now.
PA Chalmers
Southwick, West Sussex

• A few years ago I passed a sign outside a church in Bradford: “Prayer – the original Wi-Fi” (Lloyd Webber calls for Wi-Fi for all churches, 5 January).
John Comino-James
Kingston Stert, Oxfordshire

'Coriolanus' film photocall at the 61st Berlinale Film Festival, Berlin, Germany - 14 Feb 2011
Admirable British citizen: actor Vanessa Redgrave turned down an ‘Empire honour’. Photograph: Action Pres/Rex Features

Reading the lists of “honours refuseniks” (Editorial, 3 January) I am struck by how admirable they are: some of our best painters, novelists and playwrights, to name but a few. They deserve to be honoured, and perhaps refusal is honour enough. But how about an honour that does not come from the establishment, let alone the British empire or royal family? The ABC (Admirable British Citizen) should be offered to all refuseniks. Those who accept would vote for a nomination committee from among their number. Those who have already accepted empire honours should have the opportunity to be considered for an ABC. The committee would consider nominations from anyone. It would be elected, by the body of ABCs, every two years. One small but significant step towards a British democracy.
Ray Brown
Leeds

Alun Jones, the first male head of the Girls' Schools Association, and headmaster at St Gabriel's sc

Alun Jones, the first male head of the Girls’ Schools Association, and headmaster at St Gabriel’s school, Newbury. Photograph: Felix Clay for the Guardian

Alun Jones’s comments (Labour accused of class war by top private school head, 31 December) about the sacrifices that parents make to send their children to fee-paying schools would have carried more weight had the article included the cost of sending a child to his school, St Gabriel’s in Newbury, for their entire school career. According to the school’s website this would cost more than £170,000 per child – putting the average cost (£21,000) that other relatively well-to-do parents might incur moving into a catchment area into perspective.

It is revealing, as the rich line up to protest about being asked to make their contribution to society through independent schools sharing their resources, or those living in the most expensive houses in the country paying a new mansion tax.

The suggestion that most people, through sacrifice, can afford a privileged education for their children is ridiculous – the majority have no choice about where their children are schooled and the privileged don’t even want to share a portion of the advantages handed to them on a silver tray. “We’re not all in it together” might have been a better headline for the article.
Diana McAuley
Whitstable

You report that the new president of the Girls’ Schools Association, Alun Jones, has accused Labour of class war because of its plans to limit tax breaks for independent schools. Why is it relatively common to find the term “class war” in statements made by the rich and privileged attacking leftwing ideas and policies, while it is rare to find the phrase used about rightwing policies and ideas? Surely it is stating the obvious to say that the current government is waging class war on the poorest members of our society through unremitting cuts to public services? This asymmetry demonstrates clearly where power lies in Britain.
Jennifer Coates
Emeritus professor of English language and linguistics, University of Roehampton

The people conducting a class war via the education system are the Letwins, the Maudes and co, all of them privately educated, and Alun Jones, who believes that free Latin lessons and occasional access to his playing fields will resolve the problems created by the educational divide. Let them play croquet.
Alan Shelston
Bowdon, Cheshire

Of course! It’s so obvious when it’s pointed out. Private schools are clearly the victims in a class war. Thank you, Alun Jones. A further benefit of that splendid headline and copy is that it reminded me of my favourite Guardian letter (published on 20 June 2008), incidentally illustrating the importance of Mr Jones’s Latin classes. The correspondent referred to a local private school sending out a request for payment of fees, asking for “£X be paid per anum”, and one parent writing back that he would prefer to pay through the nose as usual.
John Airs
Liverpool

So, a “top” headmaster who runs an elitist school for the children of the rich is participating in yet another attempt by the wealthy to dodge their share of taxes. Private schools are very successful businesses and they should be stripped of their charity status and taxed as fairly as possible, because they can afford to pay. Let’s hope Labour is ready to face the challenges and deliver on this one.
Prebendary Neil Richardson
Braintree, Essex

So the Guardian considers the remarks of the president of the Girls’ School Association to be front-page news. I would have thought the immortal words of the late, lamented Mandy Rice-Davies were an appropriate and sufficient response.
John Wilson
London

Computer generated image of a DNA strand

‘Genetic testing is very important in cancer prevention as it identifies individuals at high risk because they have inherited a gene mutation.’ Photograph: Zoonar GmbH/Alamy

As a clinician with over 17 years’ experience in medical genetics I disagree with Dr David Levy’s assertion that funding the 100,000 genomes project is not worthwhile (Letters, 30 December). In fact the genomics revolution is already upon us. For example, 10 years ago it took over 12 months and cost over £1,000 to analyse BRCA1 and BRCA2 (the two most important genes for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer), but today we can do this as an NHS service for less than half the cost in a matter of weeks. This type of genetic testing is very important in cancer prevention as it identifies individuals at high risk because they have inherited a gene mutation. Moreover, a targeted drug for BRCA1/BRCA2-related cancers has just been authorised by the European Medicines Agency, 20 years after the discovery of these genes. We are rapidly moving beyond single-gene analysis for complex genetic conditions and we now have the ability to simultaneously analyse 4,300 disease-causing genes for less than £1,000. The 100,000 genomes project will accelerate this process and provide much-needed data that will allow better clinical interpretation of the genetic code. Equally important, it will engage the public in an area of medicine where many technological hurdles are fast being overcome, but where significant ethical and societal challenges remain.
Dr Marc Tischkowitz
Department of medical genetics, University of Cambridge

Professor Bert Vogelstein of Johns Hopkins University asserts: “All cancers are caused by a combination of bad luck, the environment and heredity” (Report, 2 January). His thesis appears to hold that cancers that he cannot attribute to a cause must therefore be down to no cause – ie “bad luck”. I suggest that the professor might not actually know all there is to know about the causes of cancer.
Kevin Bannon
London

Mother helping daughter with her home schooling homework in kitchen.

Home schooling: ‘British law places children’s education as a parental responsibility.’ Photograph: Brownstock Inc./Alamy

You report that Westminster council in London wants to impose annual visits on home schooling families to “ensure welfare of children” (We don’t need no education inspectors, insist home educators, 1 January).

British law places children’s education as a parental responsibility, with the state providing schools for those that choose them. Local authorities, repeatedly, find this concept difficult.

Calls to regulate home educationin the different British jurisdictions in recent years have all failed due to protection afforded to families by the Human Rights Act, which enshrines the “right to respect for private and family life”. Parents rightly fear local authorities for the bad decisions they make about the children they gain access to.

The Westminster education committee inquired into home education in 2012. It found no child protection issue. The chair, Graham Stuart MP, recently wrote that “the conflation of home education with a child safeguarding risk amounts to a serious stigma against parents” and that he had never seen either “any credible evidence that home education is a risk factor … nor … evidence that home education effectively hid abuse from the authorities”.

Only the Isle of Man requires children not in state schools to be entered on a database. This achieves nothing for children but has the consequence of damaging relations between parents and the education authority due to failures of bureaucracy.

Home-educating families may face bullying by prejudiced local authority officials. This feeds into the wider community, creating frustration and tension for families trying their level best for their children.
Tristram C Llewellyn Jones
Ramsey, Isle of Man

It is easy to sympathise with parents who educate their own children feeling their rights are being infringed by local authority monitoring. However, the rights of children must also be upheld, and the UN convention on the rights of the child defines an education as the child’s right (articles 28 and 29), and restricts the rights of parents over a child in light of the evolving capacities of the child (article 5) and the right of the child to express their views and have them given due weight (article 12). While parents may legitimately campaign to ensure inspectors limit their activity, the state has a duty to promote children’s rights, perhaps especially where they may conflict with what parents see as their own rights.
Roy Grimwood
Market Drayton, Shropshire

Jane Bown's self-portrait taken in a mirror in the 1980s.

Jane Bown’s self-portrait taken in a mirror in the 1980s. Photograph: Jane Bow

I met Jane Bown in the 1990s when she opened her studio in Alton, Hampshire, for charity. As a fan of her photographs in the Observer from the mid 50s, I decided I must not miss it. Jane showed me a series of her photographs with stories of when and how they had come about. I decided that I would like a copy of her photograph of Harold Macmillan and Lady Diana Cooper, and she said she would find the negative and send me the picture. We had a correspondence about my photograph, largely about how delighted she had been to find the negative. She wrote on postcards of her photograph of Nye Bevan and Hugh Gaitskell walking together in Brighton, taken in 1957. A wonderful day, and her last note to me invited me to come again. She was kindness itself.

 

Independent:

Times:

Sir, Ross Clark fails to recognise the evidence linking the removal of lead from petrol with the fall in violent crime (“Murders are down and we don’t know why”, Jan 3). Lead burden is most dangerous in utero and infancy, so high levels of exposure can be expected to manifest themselves in dysfunctional behaviour among teenagers and young adults 20 years later. In the US, lead was removed from petrol in the late Seventies and violent crime fell dramatically in the Nineties. In the UK lead was removed between 1985 and 1995 and we are seeing the benefits two decades later.
Dr Robin Russell-Jones FRCP FRCPath
Former chairman, Campaign for Lead Free Air

 

 

 

Telegraph:

Letters: Air crash investigations are hindered by out-of-date black box technology

Training pilots and tracing aircraft; commuters paying the price; in defence of Horrible History; and Tom Jones’s kind of motor

A flight data recorder (L) and a cockpit voice recorder (R) Photo: NTSB/GETTY

SIR – The limitations of black box flight recorder technology, which dates back to the Sixties, are all too evident when aircraft are lost at sea. This has been demonstrated by the Air France flight 447 in 2009, the Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 in 2014 and AirAsia flight QZ8501 at the end of last year.

The potential of satellite technology has long since rendered these flight recorders obsolete. The US Navy has used ejectable recorders, which transmit position, since 1993. An upgrade of airliner flight recorders seems long overdue.

Doug Landau
St Albans, Hertfordshire

SIR – Initial investigations into the AirAsia crash suggest that the pilot “ascended sharply to avoid a storm”. As a retired Boeing 747-400 captain, I have to question the wisdom of this decision.

Storm clouds can extend to above 50,000ft in equatorial latitudes; most modern passenger jets can’t climb that high. Extreme levels of turbulence may render the aircraft out of control and the only option would be descent. Autopilots may well disengage or command a descent that the crew did not demand. Confusion and panic can result in a complete loss of spatial awareness as the aircraft starts to descend into the very weather that was being avoided.

Bad weather should always be avoided laterally, not vertically. We should never try to out-climb Mother Nature.

Christopher Adams
Wappenham, Northamptonshire

SIR – With all due respect to Mr Ord-Hume for his profound knowledge of aircraft design and great contribution to aviation, I cannot help feeling that he is dwelling on the past.

Training pilots in today’s full motion simulators exposes them to the complete range of conceivable emergencies and malfunctions. Inevitably, there will be those who become complacent and rely too heavily on automated systems – but these are the types who will benefit most from simulator training.

David Warren
Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire

SIR – I had the good fortune to serve in the Royal Air Force during the early days of the jet era. Many hours in the air were spent practising for technical failures, fires and deteriorating weather conditions. The result was an instinctive ability to fly the aeroplane manually and without all the technical advantages that pilots expect to enjoy today.

Many airlines now offer cut-price fares. I believe they can only do this at the expense of pilot training. The airlines have a moral responsibility to ensure that their crews have the innate ability to revert to flying by basic principles. Flight safety cannot be sacrificed for commercial expediency.

J J Mudford
Plaistow, West Sussex

Public-sector pay-outs

SIR – The Tories’ proposal to cap public-sector severance packages is long overdue. MPs should also review their own termination packages, especially for those who resign under dubious circumstances and then pick up a handsome pay-off, courtesy of the taxpayer.

Ken Smith
Wokingham, Berkshire

SIR – In the interests of fairness, bonuses paid to bankers and CEOs should be similarly capped. We are all paying in austerity measures for casino banking, and shareholders are paying the lucrative packages of CEOs.

Valerie Crews
Beckenham, Kent

Cost of commuting

SIR – Patrick McLoughlin, the Transport Secretary, says that if people choose to commute by rail they have to accept the fares charged (report, January 3).

Most people do not choose to commute; they have no option because they can’t get houses near where they work and they can’t get jobs near where they live.

Les Sharp
Hersham, Surrey

SIR – Does Mr McLoughlin really think that anyone chooses to spend a significant part of their life crammed into overcrowded transport as a lifestyle option? Does he also not understand that commuters are part of the taxpaying public who fund the railway systems?

Lynne M Collins
Hadleigh, Essex

It’s time Britain placed more value on its milk

(Dave Thompson/PA)

SIR – We have seen two of our local dairy farmers give up in the past two years, so we no longer get our thrice-weekly delivery in glass bottles.

Milk is part of the mainstay of our daily diet. Why is it so undervalued and the producer so downtrodden?

Our beautiful countryside will soon be covered with yet more houses, while meadows full of grazing cows will be a distant memory.

Rebecca Cook
Cranfield, Bedfordshire

SIR – Tesco is not the only culprit. Asda is currently selling a container of four pints of semi-skimmed milk for just 89 pence.

Carolyn Melville-Smith
Cheltenham, Gloucestershire

SIR – I now pay Dairycrest 95 pence for a pint of organic milk delivered to my door. Something is very wrong with this.

Nola Armstrong
Shalford, Surrey

SIR – Most shoppers would have little idea what they pay per litre of milk. Retail prices could easily be increased by three to four pence per litre, and few would notice or care. This would be more acceptable to the producer yet still represent fantastic value for the consumer.

As retail price maintenance has long been illegal, it is only the supermarkets that can rescue this dire situation.

Bob Kingsland
Brownshill, Gloucestershire

SIR – A few years ago, bread was simply a cheap, white-sliced basket-filler, but it has undergone a marketing revolution to become a high-quality, high-priced nutritious food.

We need to take a fresh look at milk and transform the perception of it from cheap white liquid into wholesome staple food. And we need to act fast, or fresh British milk might become a thing of the past.

Colin Leggat
Hollingbourne, Kent

Out in the cold

SIR – Your report “ ’Now or never’ to save HMS Victory” (January 3) is a timely wake-up call to the nation.

I have never understood how the most iconic naval vessel in the world is still parked outdoors at the mercy of the elements. Surely, in this age of glass and steel, a suitable structure can be crafted to bring Victory in from the rain.

Gerard Somers
Atherstone, Warwickshire

Not-so-horrible history

SIR – I have to disagree with Robert Peal, who says that the Horrible Histories series has “turned study of the past into a joke”. The Birmingham Stage Company has been producing Horrible Histories live on stage for 10 years, regularly sending children out of the theatre buzzing with questions about the history they’ve seen. Families who write to us are astonished at how fascinated their children have become by the subject. Our touring shows are two hours long, debunking the growing myth that children can’t concentrate.

The fact that Terry Deary’s books have made history a medium for entertainment should be welcomed as the perfect vehicle for getting children to love the story of how we got here and who we are.

Neal Foster
Manager, Birmingham Stage Company
London W1

SIR – Horrible Histories are not textbooks to be “studied”. Students read these books of their own free will and anyone who accuses the franchise of “dumbing-down” history is, frankly, a snob.

Deary presents history in a quicker and more enjoyable way than Robert Peal’s beloved Seventies schoolbooks. Volumes such as The Groovy Greeks and The Slimy Stuarts aren’t supposed to be academic, but interesting for children to read.

Emilie Lamplough
Trowbridge, Wiltshire

SIR – Our two privately educated daughters, both with 2:1 degrees, disagreed with my assertion that history is now only narrowly taught and is dumbed down.

I challenged them with “Who was Joan of Arc?” The reply of “Noah’s wife” left me feeling I had won a hollow victory.

Richard Will
Middleton, Hampshire

For Benson’s Lucia, a Bentley simply wouldn’t do

Georgie Pillson strolls with Mapp and Lucia in the BBC television adaptation (BBC / Nick Briggs )

SIR – No matter how splendid the BBC’s television adaptation of E F Benson’s great Mapp and Lucia novels, in one respect it is defective.

In the programme, Lucia has a Bentley motor car, of the sporting sort made by W O Bentley before Rolls-Royce took over his firm in 1931. This is completely wrong – Lucia would never have had such a brutal, “masculine” machine.

Indeed, in Mapp and Lucia, Benson states explicitly three times that Lucia had a Rolls-Royce. For example, in Chapter Two: “ ’We must ask where the house is,’ said Lucia, leaning out of the window of her Rolls-Royce.”

Those of us who drive Rolls-Royces need the record to be put straight.

Francis Bown
London E3

War and Peace

SIR – I enjoyed the BBC radio broadcast of War and Peace. When I first read the book, aged 16, I struggled with the Russian names, so I was pleased to hear them correctly pronounced. The characters became real for me as I listened and followed them through their struggles.

In a year when we will be remembering all those who died in the Napoleonic wars, culminating in the Battle of Waterloo 200 years ago, I thought the broadcast was a very courageous step for the BBC to take.

Sue Woolliscroft
Alsager, Cheshire

SIR – January 1 was not the most convenient day to listen to the complete reading of War and Peace. My telephone rang so many times with friends wishing me a Happy New Year that the exercise had to be abandoned.

Margaret Clark
Linton, Cambridgeshire

Good things come in…

SIR – I recently received a cardboard box from a well-known retailer stuffed with three bags of protective padding. The box measured 648 cubic inches and contained a camera memory card measuring 1/8 cubic inch.

Is this a record for wasted space?

Madeleine Page
Southwater, West Sussex

Express bathtime

SIR – Upon acquiring a new washing machine recently I was intrigued to see that it boasted a “Baby Cycle”.

As the drum holds a 9kg load, presumably it could accommodate a fairly large infant.

Ann Brooke-Smith
Letchworth Garden City, Hertfordshire

My, my, my car

SIR – Our car came with the registration YYY 41M and was immediately christened Delilah.

Frank McCallum
Westerton, Dunbartonshire

Globe and Mail:

Lackenbauer and Lajeunesse

More ships in the Northwest Passage will boost our Arctic claim

P. Whitney Lackenbauer is a fellow of the Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute and associate professor and chair of the department of history at St. Jerome’s University; Adam Lajeunesse is a postdoctoral fellow at St. Jerome’s University and a research associate of the Centre for Military and Strategic Studies at the University of Calgary

In October, 2013, the Danish bulk carrier Nordic Orion completed the first ever commercial transit of the Northwest Passage. After decades of melt, the once impenetrable Northwest Passage seemed to be on the verge of becoming a viable sea-route. This prospect resurrected longstanding fears of what heightened shipping activity could mean for Canadian sovereignty. Would a navigable passage encourage other countries or shipping companies to challenge Canada’s position on our Arctic internal waters?

Behind sensationalist headlines and some over-zealous punditry, the reality of Arctic shipping is far less dramatic. There were no commercial transits of the passage in 2014. Heavy ice effectively cancelled the shipping season.

Variability from year to year, and even from day to day, will continue to make scheduling a transit through the Canadian Arctic both difficult and dangerous. International shipping is a business built on tight schedules, and schedules are hard to keep when a ship’s speed and route cannot be predicted with a high degree of certainty.

In spite of nearly seventy years of modern exploration and mapping, Canada’s Arctic sea-routes are still dangerously uncharted. At present, only 12 per cent of the region is mapped to modern standards – a deficiency starkly demonstrated by the 2010 grounding of the cruise ship Clipper Adventure in Coronation Gulf, about 100 km east of Kugluktuk, Nunavut.

These factors, along with high insurance costs, limited navigational aids, and a complete lack of salvage and repair infrastructure, make regular shipping through the Canadian Arctic an uncertain proposition. Although there will be more Nordic Orions in the years to come, they are likely to be niche voyages and government-supported operations, not the uncontrollable flood of transarctic shipping that still dominates popular imagery.

The future of Arctic shipping is likely to remain destinational traffic, made up of resource carriers, resupply ships, and cruise liners moving in and out of – not through – Canada’s Arctic waters. Rather than undermining Canadian sovereignty, these vessels confirm it.

Canada considers the Northwest Passage as historic internal waters, a position in law that requires the acquiescence of foreign entities interested in the region. While this recognition has been hard to win from foreign states, it will be easier to secure from private corporations operating in Canada’s waters. Why, after all, would any company with business interests in Canada risk challenging sovereignty and precipitating popular and political backlash?

Rather than fixating on the political ramifications of Arctic shipping through a sovereignty lens, the government can better serve Canadians by focusing on the practical requirements of developing and maintaining safe sea routes. There remains much to be done in hydrographic surveying, building marine infrastructure, and enhancing search and rescue capabilities.

Investments in these areas will help to ensure that future shipping is safe and beneficial for Inuit, whose traditional hunting-grounds and highways will have to double as transit routes for resource carriers and cruise liners. These priorities lay at the heart of Canada’s chairmanship of the Arctic Council and its Northern Strategy. They are also priorities for Inuit, as the Inuit Circumpolar Council has documented in recent studies like The Sea Ice is Our Highway (2009) and The Sea Ice Never Stops (2014).

It is important to note that Inuit, despite their concerns about the human and environmental impacts of shipping, generally look forward to the prospect of increased maritime activity. More shipping will reduce the costs of supplies and improve standards of living in a region where limited resupply options have led to $7 litres of milk and $40 packs of diapers. Alleviating Canada’s highest levels of unemployment is equally important, and good paying jobs in the resource sector are predicated on cost-effective access to these resources and an ability to carry them to market. The risks inherent in Arctic shipping must therefore be considered alongside these new opportunities as well.

When it comes to the prospect of shipping activity in the Canadian Arctic, safety and security – not defence or sovereignty – should be primary areas of focus. The long-standing questions of sovereignty and jurisdiction are well managed and, as counterintuitive as it may seem, more activity is only likely to strengthen Canada’s position.

While the Northwest Passage is unlikely to emerge as a new international sea route, Canada will have to prepare for increased destinational traffic. As such, new investments in marine infrastructure and monitoring will be necessary to mitigate many of the dangers inherent in Arctic operations. However, if managed properly, this shipping could be a powerful enabler for northern development and all the regional benefits that would flow from it.

DAVID MCLAUGHLIN

Memo to Harper: A five-point plan to attract more voters

Irish Times:

Sir, – Lucinda Creighton and her band of merry men are even more out of touch with reality than the current ruling elite. She should spend more time worrying about her own fragile chances of re-election than trying to offer a backward, conservative vision of a country no one wants to see exist. – Yours, etc,

HUGH O’DONNELL,

Sandymount,

Dublin 4.

Sir, – John Leahy of Reboot Ireland says “This new movement will embrace the views of rural Ireland” (“Lucinda Creighton joined by Eddie Hobbs in new party”, January 2nd). That’s great. As an atheistic, socialist supporter of a woman’s right to choose and living in rural Ireland, I look forward to seeing my views reflected in the party’s manifesto. – Yours, etc,

DOMINIC CARROLL,

Ardfield,

Co Cork.

Sir, – If this new party is to adhere to its aversion to the whip system, the formulation of policies is unnecessary. Each member of the party who is elected to the Oireachtas will be guided by his or her own view on any proposed legislation, with the interesting exception of Finance Bills. For instance, one member may be convinced that nuclear power is desirable, another may abhor such a notion; another member may strongly believe in the unselfish patriotism of small business people and that they should be afforded every opportunity to flourish, while another may regard them as money-grubbing chancers.

If there is then to be a free vote in order to respect the opposing views of such members, why bother with policies at all?

As to the Finance Bills, I am quite bewildered that such proposed legislation, which impinges so directly on our well-being, is not deemed to be a matter of individual conscience. – Yours, etc,

PETER KENNY,

Dublin 14.

Sir, – We now know that Lucinda Creighton and others are setting up a new political party that wants to make Ireland “a great place to innovate, to grow, to build and expand a small business”.

This sounds very like Enda Kenny’s Fine Gael, which wants to make Ireland “the best little country in the world in which to do business”.

I am sure these are worthy, if similar, aspirations but I look in vain for a political party that wants to make Ireland the best little country in the world to be born in, the best little country in the world to be sick in, the best little country in the world to be disabled in, the best little country in the world to grow old in, the best little country in the world to be educated in, the best little country in the world to be an immigrant in, the best little country in the world for equality, the best society in the world.

It is clear that these reasonable aspirations are beyond the imaginations of Lucinda Creighton, Enda Kenny, Joan Burton, Gerry Adams, Micheál Martin and most, if not all, of their colleagues in Leinster House. – Yours, etc,

BRENDAN LYNCH,

Dublin 7.

Sir, – A nameless new party ranging about for members and supporters, with a Corkman, Eddie Hobbs, at the top table. What better working title than the Nemocratic Rangers? – Yours, etc,

DENIS O’DONOGHUE,

Killarney,

Co Kerry.

Sir, – Lucinda Creighton has announced that a new political party will be launched “within eight weeks”. The new party does not yet have a name. Based on what Ms Creighton has said to date, may I suggest that the party be called “Profit before People”? – Yours, etc,

MARTIN MELAUGH,

Coleraine,

Co Derry.

Sir, – Reboot. Start PDs/Libertas 2.0. Press the usual buttons to continue. – Yours, etc,

SIMON COMER,

Galway.

Sir, – So Lucinda Creighton has finally made her move to establish a new party. While I cannot see anything new in her position on economic matters which distinguishes her from the other right-of-centre parties in this State, I do wholeheartedly agree with the new party’s focus on political reform.

Ms Creighton is now in position to push for the most practical way to make a serious start at this reform in a way she could hardly have done as an Independent. This is to change radically the Irish electoral system. It is the current PR-STV system that is delivering the localist and clientelist politics that even after the disasters that have befallen this country after 2008 is continuing to do so much damage.

And things are going to get worse. If successive opinion polls as well as the local and recent byelections are any indication, the current system is going to produce such a high number of Independents in the next Dáil that forming a stable government may only become possible if local interests are privileged even more over the common good.

There are excellent alternative systems on offer, perhaps the best a mixed system of first past the post and party lists (also known as additional members system or personalised proportional representation), which Scotland, New Zealand and Québec all introduced over the last 10 years and Germany has had since 1949.

One consequence of a new system along these lines would be the likely elimination of Independent candidates at national level, which in my view would be one of its most beneficial side-effects as it would force all those intelligent and competent voices among the Independents into parties, into negotiations and compromises, and into national responsibility. I trust this ambition also underlies Ms Creighton’s venture.

Coupled with real meaningful decentralisation and devolution of power to local authorities, the new electoral system will actually deliver what it is currently only pretending to deliver, national politicians for national politics and local politicians for local politics.

I sincerely hope Ms Creighton will aim to make a real difference to the way politics is conducted in this country and give the issue of electoral reform the focus it deserves in the run-up to the next general election.

Or is it really the immutable law of Irish politics that disaster has to strike first before politicians and citizens wake up? – Yours, etc,

JOACHIM FISCHER,

Ballina, Co Tipperary.

Sir, – A terrible rebooty is born. – Yours, etc,

CONAN DOYLE,

Pococke Lower,

Kilkenny.

Sir, – My enjoyment of the opening part of the Haughey story was diminished by the necessity of identifying politicians by their hairstyles. Myself and my wife spent more time arguing about who was who than following the storyline. For the opening instalment, could the makers not have briefly provided the characters’ names with a small strapline or subtitle? – Yours, etc,

A JONES,

Mullagh, Co Cavan.

Sir, – I enjoyed the Charlie drama thoroughly and commend all those involved, particularly the actors and writer, for their efforts. The fact that I enjoyed the show is all the more remarkable in that I had forgotten what a depressing dump this country was in the 1980s. – Yours, etc,

PAT O’RIORDAN,

Bray, Co Wicklow.

Sir, – Well that’s my nominee for best wig sorted. Joking aside, Aidan Gillen was excellent. – Yours, etc,

JAMES O’KEEFE,

Crumlin,

Dublin 12.

Sir, – Prof Ronan Fanning’s lucid opinion piece (“Why should we mark 100 years since the Rising?”, Opinion & Analysis, January 3rd) reminds me of an exchange of correspondence which I had with the late Dr Garret FitzGerald in the Letters column of this newspaper in 2006, on the occasion of the 90th anniversary of the Rising. We discussed precisely the point that Prof Fanning has highlighted, viz, that in Dr FitzGerald’s opinion, we got out from under the clutches of the British proto-welfare state just in time, else we would have been seduced by such as a proper health service, social welfare provision, decent public infrastructure, investment in education, mitigation of clerical domination, and so forth.

It brings into focus the fundamental question as to what the purpose of independence was – and, indeed, is. If it was to achieve the greatest happiness of the greatest number, then it was, by virtually any measure, a spectacular failure. Ireland was amongst the top European nations in terms of relative prosperity in the early 1900s. Half a century later, despite avoiding direct involvement in the second World War, we had slipped badly back relative to other countries. Again, if the purpose of independence was to achieve political “freedom” and the dawning of a new polity, then it could be argued that we merely swapped a British-run centralised Dublin Castle administration for an even more centralised Irish-run one – one which, moreover, enthusiastically used the machinery of the previous regime.

Perhaps we rather enjoyed the warm glow of being screwed by native politicians rather than by foreign ones.

Our so-called sovereignty was always, and still is, an illusion. As soon as we achieved it, we began surrendering it. A most important illustration of this was the failure to establish our own independent currency policy until 1979, when the link with sterling was broken. We then promptly exchanged oversight by the treasury in London for that by our gallant allies in Europe. A cultural and social abjection to Rome from the 1920s was followed by a similar subservience to the US and colonisation by its multinationals.

Latterly, we have become no more than a province of the EU and the ECB, not Ireland “secure in its perception of its sovereignty”, as Prof Fanning claims, and bailouts that Dr FitzGerald seemed to think would have subverted our pure desire for “freedom” in the first place. – Yours, etc,

IAN d’ALTON,

Naas,

Co Kildare.

Sir, – Prof Ronan Fanning’s piece on the centenary of 1916 is shot through with contradictions. He begins by complaining about the “self-indulgent whatiffery” of the commemoration last year of the centenary of the Home Rule Bill and asserts that recognising the historical reality of the violence that accompanied the Irish revolution is not to approve of it. True enough, but he then seeks to justify that violence, citing Dr Garret FitzGerald’s argument that without it Ireland would not have become sovereign and independent as soon as it did and might well have ended up like Northern Ireland or rejected early membership of the EU. If that is not “whatiffery” then I don’t know what is.

The problem is that not everyone agrees – nor did they at the time – with the violent secessionism that led to Irish independence or that its consequences were as benign as Prof Fanning suggests. There are plenty of people who believe, as I do, that there was a peaceful, democratic and constitutional alternative in 1916, just as there was in Northern Ireland throughout the Troubles of the 1960s-1990s.

Unlike Prof Fanning, the Irish Government seems intent on an even-handed commemoration of 1916 that will recognise and respect different points of view. This is not the “politically correct mania for inclusiveness” derided by Prof Fanning but essential for the pluralistic society that is contemporary Ireland. – Yours, etc,

Prof GEOFFREY

ROBERTS,

School of History,

University College Cork.

Sir, – Stephen Collins seems to be consumed with fear at the prospect of a surge in support for Independents, Sinn Féin and smaller parties at the next general election (“New party will fuel narrative that all is to change – utterly”, Opinion & Analysis, January 3rd). He believes voters who consider the consequences of such a result may come to their senses and “pull back from the brink”, instead of landing the country in apparent “political chaos”.

Mr Collins obviously has not given thought to the view advanced by one Minister in an article in the same paper, “Varadkar sees splintering of support”. Mr Varadkar predicts the fragmentation of Irish politics at the next election, similar to the situation which exists in the Benelux and Nordic countries, where no party has anything close to an overall majority. However, even a country like Belgium, which went five months without a government last year, did not experience the “political chaos” to which Mr Collins refers.

Mr Collins needs to stop giving the impression that such a vast chasm exists between the views of our main political parties. Is he not aware that Sinn Féin has just agreed a deal in the North which will result in the privatisation of many public assets and a mass layoff of public servants? Despite many of the party’s slogans, Mr Collins must accept that Sinn Féin’s populist appeal is put to one side once government beckons.

What Mr Collins fails to address is the constraints which the EU will impose on any future government, between the deficit break, the debt-to-GDP ratio and the proposed banking union. On closer inspection, the choices available to voters in this country at the next election do not offer any real alternative. Those who really pull the strings over in Brussels have the eventualities covered. – Yours, etc,

SEÁN Ó DEORÁIN,

Clondalkin, Dublin 22.

Sir, – Further to your editorial “Dereliction and decay” (January 3rd), it is not just in central Dublin that the problem of derelict buildings exists. Within 300 metres of where I live there are three abandoned and derelict dwellings. The centre of this otherwise picturesque village is blighted by the burned-out remains of a hotel.

I have been in contact with Dr Tom Cavanagh of Irish Business against Litter (IBAL), who has taken an interest in the problem of derelict buildings nationally, and I understand that he has been in contact with the Department of the Environment about the matter.

What’s wrong with Irish consciousness? Do we as a people want to live continuously in the presence of squalor? – Yours, etc,

BRENDAN F LOGUE,

Julianstown,

Co Meath.

Sir, – To start in the teaching profession and become registered with the Teaching Council, the aspiring teacher pays out a €90 registration fee, a €200 teacher education qualification assessment and €100 for one curricular subject assessment. Additional assessments are optional at a fee of €100 per subject, yet many teachers at a postprimary level teach more than one subject. Translation costs for documents, foreign police vetting, postage, etc, are all borne by the unemployed aspiring teacher. All in all the aspiring teacher can pay over €400 in his or her quest for registration. Féilte, the Teaching Council’s festival (where no expense was spared), was in stark contrast to the misery and stress in the lives of young aspiring teachers in their tortuous quest to become registered. And after all this, where are the jobs? – Yours, etc,

GERALDINE

FitzGERALD,

Blackrock,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – Tom Neville (January 2nd) states that he can think of “no truly independent TD and cannot think of a single policy ideal held by an independent which is not shared by one (or more) of the parties”.

Really? How about Luke “Ming” Flanagan, Michael Fitzmaurice and Stephen Donnelly? What parties were they affiliated with?

What about Ming’s support for cannabis legalisation, or the opposition to the needlessly restrictive party whip systems that the major parties use? I don’t recall any of the parties getting behind those positions. – Yours, etc,

TOMÁS M CREAMER,

Ballinamore,

Co Leitrim.

An Irishman’s Diary: Jack Harte on William Meredith’s pilgrimage to Yeats’s Sligo

‘I am 87, and I am in Ireland. I am a happy man’

Jack Harte and former poet laureate of the United States William MeredithJack Harte and former poet laureate of the United States William Meredith

He was an icon of world literature. Former poet laureate of the United States, winner of the Pulitzer Prize, the National Book Award, and just about every other accolade worth acquiring. Intimate friend and confidante of Robert Frost and WH Auden. John Berryman dedicated one of his “Dream Songs” to him.

His friendship and interaction with the other major American poets of the 20th century was legendary, including Richard Wilbur, Robert Lowell, James Merrill and many many more.

And he was sitting across the room from me at a writers’ conference in Sofia in 2005. He had a special relationship with Bulgaria, having visited that country many times during the cold war, and having introduced many Bulgarian poets to the US public both in person and through the translation of their work.

William Meredith had a gift for friendship. And he radiated what I can describe only as an aura of humanity. He was in a wheelchair, having had to claw his way back to some mobility and some command of his speech after an extremely severe stroke 22 years earlier. Yet he attended every session of the conference, and also joined in the informal sessions in the lounge of the hotel every evening.

And one of those evenings I was sitting beside him. For want of a better opener, I asked him if he had ever been to Ireland. I was surprised not only by the answer but also by the emotion that welled up in his eyes.

“No”, he said, “and I have always intended to visit Ireland. Yeats was my favourite poet.”

“What age are you now, William?” I asked.

He laughed. “I am 86.”

“Don’t you think it is time you made the trip?” I joked.

He laughed too.

“I am from Co Sligo,” I said. “So if you come, I will give you the guided tour of Yeats’s country.”

I thought no more of it. Such invitations are cheap currency at writers’ conferences. However, shortly after the conference, I had an email from Richard Harteis, William’s life-long partner and fellow poet. Richard had been heroic in carrying William through the trauma of the stroke, and through his rehab. And he was still ensuring that William led a full and happy life.

“If we could take you up on the invitation to visit Ireland,” he said, “it really would be the fulfilment of a life’s dream for William.”

I organised invitations for them to give readings at the Irish Writers’ Centre in Dublin and at the Yeats Memorial Building in Sligo. That enabled Richard to secure sponsorship from the US state department for the visit. And in the summer of 2006 they arrived.

William was beaming. Every time I looked at him, his face lit up, and he said over and over: “I am 87, and I am in Ireland. I am a happy man.”

After the reading in the Writers’ Centre we headed west where I hosted them in my little cottage near Easkey. And from there we explored all the places associated with Yeats – the Lake Isle of Innisfree, Glencar Waterfall, Lissadell, etc.

But I also wanted him to see the place where Yeats watched the “Wild Swans at Coole”. William had written his own poem about Yeats and the swans, noting that if they flew off lover by lover, there was one left out – the 59th. It was a wet windy day that we took the trip to Coole. The lake is quite a distance from the site of Lady Gregory’s house and there is a nice walkway to it. However for a wheelchair pushing through oozy mud, it was a challenge.

But we were determined to reach it even if we had to carry William on our backs, and William delighted in the visceral determination to reach the place he had already visited in his imagination. We got there. The swan count was three, but William was nevertheless a happy man.

The following summer I was to join William on a reading tour in Connecticut. However he was now in hospital, and, tragically, my visit to New London was to say farewell. He died a few days after I returned to Ireland.

A documentary film that was compiled to celebrate his lifetime achievement ended with a beautiful photo of William sitting inside the window of Thoor Ballylee, with a beaming smile, and I could see what was on his lips. “I am 87, and I am in Ireland. I am a happy man.”

Irish Independent:

How Charlie Haughey made my father’s day

Let me tell you about the day I visited Charlie Haughey in his house, Abbeville in Kinsealy, Co Dublin.

My father was about to turn 80 years of age. As usual, I had my head wrecked with trying to think of something different for him as a present. I had gone through the ties, shirts, jumpers, technology stuff and just wanted something different for him. I knew over the years he had been a great supporter of Fianna Fail so I decided to write to Charlie Haughey and see would he meet my father for his 80th birthday.

My colleagues laughed at me in my place of work in the HSE in Thomas Street and said that could never happen. I had a gut feeling that it could.

So I wrote and told Charlie about my father’s support of him and the Fianna Fail party and I registered it just to be sure he got it.

A few days later I got a call to the office from Charlie’s secretary, inviting my father, my father’s friend, my son and myself to meet him in his beautiful house.

In the meantime, I phoned Rom Massey undertakers in the Coombe and told them where I was going, and I asked them for a limo to drive my father to Kinsealy. Well, as true Dubs they pulled out all the stops, and threw in a chauffeur as well, all for a meagre sum. I was amazed at their generosity. As the Lord says “Ask and you shall receive”!

Of course, this was a surprise. As we drove towards Kinsealy, he thought we were visiting my sister in Malahide. When ever we were passing Charlie’s house my father always said: “Let’s call in to Charlie for a cuppa”. I dearly hoped he would say it on that day. Well, true to form, he did. The surprise and shock that was on his face when we drove down Kinsealy Lane was second to none. I had, of course, tipped the driver to turn.

Charlie came down the steps to welcome us when we arrived. It certainly was a treat. He welcomed us into his vast mansion, which was replete with antiques. He was so kind to my father and to all of us, regaling us with stories about Dublin, Sean Lemass and Eamon de Valera. He had us in stitches.

We took many photos of him and my father and I treasured them.

Ms Terry Healy

Kill, Co Kildare

The people have had enough

In trying to further discredit participants who have taken part in the wave of recent protests across the country the government have tried to label them as members of Sinn Fein.

In fact very few, if any, of the protests have been organised by Sinn Fein.

This is because Sinn Fein seem to be happy to observe from the wings without any real involvement, and appear to be reaping the political benefits created by others.

It is my experience that the vast majority of the protesters range from middle-age to elderly pensioners, really genuine decent people who have had enough of being downtrodden and talked down to by the political elite while they and their children are expected to live on the crumbs from the masters’ table while the golden circles and the cosseted elite continue to be catered for.

Many of the people that the Government are now trying to discredit are the very people who put their trust in the promises made by Enda Kenny at the last election, but alas, they were misled.

They are people who certainly could not be labelled as fascists, unless Enda wishes to label past Fine Gael supporters as fascists.

They are a people who see their Government pandering to bankers, bond holders and the wealthy elite.

They see a country where the cost of balancing the books is being disproportionally borne by the lower to middle-income levels of society.

This is being done through cuts in benefits and services and regressive taxes and charges, without any regard for the resultant social consequences involved.

They see a country where the minimum wage has become the new standard, while those dictating the laws are on super-star salaries and benefits along with guaranteed gold-plated pensions.

They see a country where its people are saddled with an odious banking debt not of their making, but created by the greed of self-serving politicians and others.

They see a country where the traditional parties have betrayed its people down the years so that those politicians can continue to stay on the political gravy train and the government jet.

The reality is that this Government expects the ordinary people to not live, but to barely exist.

The government promised a political revolution involving change and openness. They can blame themselves for the present situation.

Christy Kelly

Templeglantine, Co Limerick

Famine sitcom plans

Critics of plans to develop a sitcom based on the tragedy of the Great Famine should see the hilarious 1968 film ‘The Producers’, written and directed by Mel Brooks, about an attempt to stage a play called ‘Springtime for Hitler: A Gay Romp with Adolf and Eva at Berchtesgaden’.

Mel Brooks, who is Jewish, won an Oscar for Best Original Screenplay.

As Lord Byron observed in ‘Don Juan': “And if I laugh at any mortal thing, ‘Tis that I may not weep.”

Dr John Doherty

Gaoth Dobhair, Co Dhun na nGall

No thanks, Lucinda and co

It seems the “re-boot” is to be put into Ireland, again, by yet another right-wing, conservative movement. Perhaps Lucinda Creighton’s group should adopt the slogan “times are a-changin-back” as her party’s rallying call. There would seem to be two evident foundation principles.

First, the Creighton doctrine, which suggests that elected members of parliament should have a free conscience on private morality, so long as it’s a right wing and conservative one. Second, the Hobbs doctrine, that we didn’t do enough damage to the country by giving the free market Progressive Democrats several years of placing rapacious capitalism at the heart of public policy – leave this floating voter cold. No thanks, Lucinda Creighton. No thanks, Eddies Hobbs.

Please go and join any one of the number of established right-wing political movements here. May I suggest Fine Gael, Fianna Fail, or the so-called Labour Party, as entirely suitable homes for your political and social outlook? And, please, put your egos away before they explode and do even more damage to our country.

Declan Doyle

Lisdowney, Kilkenny

Alligator warning

With reference to your editorial (January 2) ‘Realism needed in relation to pay’ could I just say in the words of the old adage “It’s all very well trying to remember that we first set out to drain the swamp, but right now we are up to our arses in alligators”.

Mike J Moore

Kingscourt, Co Cavan

Gay marriage referendum

The people of Ireland are being asked to vote on gay marriage this May. The vast majority of Irish people are not gay, and the outcome of this referendum has no effect on their lives. I fear people will not turn out to vote, but I urge them to make the small effort.

There is a high risk of gay marriage being rejected. Not because the Irish people are against it, but because of low voter turnout. A ‘No’ vote will be a huge knock to the gay people and families of Ireland who deserve this basic civil right in their own country. Let’s do it for them.

Please Ireland, commit now to casting your vote in the May referendum.

Donal O Conghaile

Boyle, Co Roscommon

Irish Independent


Out

$
0
0

7 January 2015 Out

Mary a little better though she could not manage to get up fot breakfast. Out to tip, Tesco’s and the Co op.

Obituary:

Professor Martin Brasier in 2009
Professor Martin Brasier in 2009 Photo: Andrew Cowie / Retna Pictures

Professor Martin Brasier, who has died in a car accident aged 67, was a palaeobiologist and expert in “microfossils” – cell-like structures found in ancient rocks which are thought to represent the earliest forms of life.

Earth formed about 4.5 billion years ago, but no one knows when life arose and the search for fossils that would help to answer this question has been a highly contentious field, both because of the difficulties of proving fossil-like structures are truly biological in origin, and because of the scientific glory at stake.

By 2002 the honour of having found the most ancient microfossil had been held for several years by J W Schopf, a palaeobiologist at the University of California, Los Angeles. In 1993 Schopf reported his discovery of microscopic worm-like structures in the Apex chert, a 3.465 billion year-old rocky outcrop in Pilbara, Western Australia. Schopf described the structures as microfossils of 11 species of photosynthetic microbes similar to cyanobacteria, and sent them to the Natural History Museum in London as examples of the Earth’s oldest fossils.

When Brasier, a scientist from Oxford, visited the museum in 1999 to photograph the specimens for a textbook, however, he was stunned to see, besides the cell-like structures that Schopf described, complex branching and folding structures very unlike microbial forms.

Brasier collected samples of his own from the Apex chert and spent hours tracing the structures inside the rocks with his son Alexander, a geology student at the University of Edinburgh. “We began to see that the ‘microfossils’ were part of a wide spectrum of odd-looking structures, most of which were far too chaotic to be called fossils,” Brasier recalled. Rather than being relics of early life, he concluded, the structures were mineral artefacts and the “shells” of the supposed microfossils were probably volcanic glass, ejected from a hydrothermal vent .

In 2002 Brasier launched an attack on Schopf’s Apex chart fossils in the journal Nature in which he concluded that the “purported microfossil-like structures” were mere “secondary artifacts formed from amorphous graphite”.

In his book, Genesis: The Scientific Quest for Life’s Origin (2005), Robert Hazen reported a bizarre face-off between the two men in April 2002 at a scientific symposium, where they shared a stage. As Brasier spoke, Hazen wrote, “an agitated Schopf stood up and began to pace distractingly a dozen feet behind the podium. Back and forth he walked, hunched over, hands clasped firmly behind his back – a tense backdrop to Brasier’s staid delivery…

“As Brasier calmly outlined his arguments, the scene on stage shifted from awkwardly tense to utterly bizarre. We watched amazed as Schopf paced forward to a position just a few feet to the right of the speaker’s podium. He leaned sharply toward Brasier and seemed to glare, his eyes boring holes in the unperturbed speaker.”

Luckily that was as far as it went, but in 2011 when Brasier himself published a paper in Nature Geoscience (co-authored with David Wacey ), claiming to have found microfossils in rocks 3.4 billion years old – 20 miles away from Schopf’s discovery – he and his co-author were at pains to provide chapter and verse to prove their biological rather than mineral origins.

The Wacey/Brasier microfossils were found in sandstone deposits bracketed by layers of volcanic rock in an arid region known as the Strelley Pool Formation, dating from the early, oxygen-starved era known as the Archean. The microfossils, the researchers suggested, were the remains of ancient microbes similar to bacteria which exist today in places like hydrothermal vents and which live off and metabolise sulphur rather than oxygen for energy.

Microscopic plankton shells (foraminifera), found in Tanzania, dating from the Eocene – Oligocene boundary (REUTERS)

To rule out natural geologic processes, the scientists subjected their samples to a battery of tests, using the latest spectographic and electron microscopic equipment. They concluded that they satisfied three crucial tests of biological origin: they were precise cell-like structures all of a similar size; the cells were clustered in groups, attached to sand grains; and the chemical make-up was consistent with a sulphur-based metabolism.

The most convincing evidence was the discovery of tiny deposits of the iron-sulphur compound pyrite, known as “fool’s gold”, near, and in some cases on top of, the microfossils. Brasier and Wacey surmised that the ancient organisms had probably lived on pyrite and belched hydrogen sulphide – which smells of rotten eggs.

The Nature Geoscience article did not claim discovery of the earth’s oldest microfossils (though the claim was made in a press release by the University of Oxford). Schopf, meanwhile, maintained a dignified silence, though a colleague explained that he “very strongly defends his original claim, and is working to validate it”.

Martin David Brasier was born at Wimbledon, London, on April 12 1947 and educated at Oxford University and London University, where he took a PhD.

His interest in the fossil record developed during a year spent as ship’s scientist aboard the naval survey ship Fawn in the Caribbean in 1970. “From this,” he recalled, “I could see that it is the analysis of interconnections between and within systems that may provide a valuable key for decoding the early history of life.”

From then on he focused on the investigation of big transitions in the fossil record, pushing his researches ever deeper in geological time.

After posts as a lecturer at Reading and Hull universities, in 1988 he returned to Oxford as a lecturer in Geology at the university’s Life Sciences department, with a tutorial fellowship at St Edmund Hall. In 1996 he was appointed reader in earth sciences and, in 2002, professor of palaeobiology.

Brasier, whose other interests included music, archaeology and the history of science, was a popular lecturer and tutor, many of whose graduate students have gone on to faculty and research positions in leading universities around the world. His influence was celebrated last year with a gathering of his colleagues, organised by his recent graduate students.

Brasier served on numerous international bodies, including Nasa panels on life on Mars. Last year he won the Geological Society of London’s Lyell Medal for his research on early life.

He published more than 200 articles and papers in scientific journals and his books include Darwin’s Lost World: The Hidden History of Animal Life, published in 2009 as part of the Charles Darwin centenary celebrations.

He is survived by his wife, Cecilia, and by their daughter and two sons.

Professor Martin Brasier, born April 12 1947, died December 16 2014

Guardian:

James Dyson, wearing glasses
‘Voters across the political spectrum believe [like James Dyson, above] that student migration benefits Britain.’ Photograph: Adrian Sherratt/Rex Features

The home secretary’s continued defence of her proposal to make international students leave immediately at the end of their university course and apply for a UK work visa from their country of origin is seriously misjudged – politically and economically (May defends plan to expel non-EU students, 6 January).

The general public are against unfair immigration, not immigration per se. Most people believe fairness is about making sure people who work hard and contribute are suitably rewarded. International students contribute enormously to this country, adding an estimated £8bn annually to the UK economy.

Little wonder most people – including an overwhelming majority of Conservative voters – believe we should not be reducing international students and should be encouraging them to stay and work in this country after their studies.

International graduates already face rules which are tougher than comparable countries: they have four months after their studies to find a “graduate” job of at least £20,300 per annum to stay in the UK. The home secretary’s latest proposal will make it even more burdensome for foreign students to stay in the UK. We risk losing talent that will enrich this country. Time to take students out of the government’s net migration target, ensuring that they become a priority for UK business and education rather than a Home Office fixated on lowering the number of immigrants whatever the costs.
Ryan Shorthouse (@RyanShorthouse)
Director, Bright Blue

• In his challenge to Theresa May’s plan to make sure foreign students leave the UK when they graduate, James Dyson needlessly conceded that this could be a “short-term vote winner” while arguing that it “leads to long-term economic decline” (No, Theresa May, we need those foreign graduates, 5 January).

In fact, the attitudes evidence clearly suggests this proposal would be a rather unpopular form of political populism, which fails to reflect the nuances in public attitudes towards immigration.

British Future’s detailed study found that voters across the political spectrum believe that student migration benefits Britain. Indeed, Conservative voters prove particularly supportive. Overall, only a fifth of voters believe it makes sense to count students in the immigration statistics at all. Three-quarters are in favour of graduates being allowed to stay in the UK after they graduate, at least for a period of time.

Most people think it’s good when Chinese and Indian graduates stay here to help British firms win business, rather than taking their skills back home to help international competitors. As Conservative MP Mark Field has said, “a welcoming approach to international students can clearly be seen to reflect British public opinion, rather to challenge it”.
Sunder Katwala (@sundersays)
Director, British Future

• I find James Dyson’s beliefs to be unbelievably selfish. He suggests we train foreign youngsters and then keep them employed here otherwise they may go home and create competition overseas. I have recently travelled through eastern Europe and heard the same thing said by every adult – “the brain drain of our youngsters to the UK and the US is killing our countries. No one will invest in us if we don’t keep our next generation of graduates.”

We should be proud that our education system is sought after by so many – but let’s train those who want it and then actively encourage them to go home and help develop their own countries. At the same time we need to work out just why we are so short of “home-grown” scientists and engineers and try to sort that out.
Gill Young
Houghton, Hampshire

• James Dyson makes informed and detailed criticisms of Theresa May’s plan to expel international students on graduation, and make them apply for a new visa from overseas. But the situation is actually much worse than that described by Dyson. Theresa May’s plan assumes that overseas UK visa units are efficient and competent in issuing visas. This is not my experience with the UK visa unit located in the Beijing embassy. Rather, I would rate it as lazy and incompetent. Its decisions are actively hindering high-level UK-China scientific collaborations.

Here is an example from 2013. A highly qualified Chinese scientist with a recent PhD from the UK wishes to visit the University of Manchester at her own expense for two or three weeks to complete research started here. The research is deemed to be of world-class importance by the two UK funding agencies which support it. But her visa application is rejected by the Beijing visa unit.

Their reasons were not based on the facts of the case, but on false guesses and erroneous speculations. The facts were easily obtainable from me. Probably there are many other similar examples.
Professor emeritus Jonathan Connor
University of Manchester

• How refreshing to read James Dyson’s views on the government’s misguided attempts to curtail student visas in an attempt to limit immigration. As a member of HOST, for many years I’ve welcomed international students into my home, and very often we keep in touch after graduation. What impresses me is the huge amounts of money they contribute to UK universities. After their degrees some have gone home, but others have stayed here, using their expertise, knowledge and language skills to contribute to the success of British companies in international markets. How can we put the government in touch with the reality that limiting student visas is only harming the British economy?
Viv Scott
Belper, Derbyshire

Independent:

So the election campaign has started with lies, damned lies and statistics. The main parties wonder why the electorate is so removed from the whole process when they manipulate figures, are less than honest, and use data and research so selectively.

This government appears to believe the only way forward is “cut, cut and more cut”.

Surely the reason why we still have a huge deficit is because they are not able to understand that, as with a household budget, there needs to be income maximisation.

There may be more people in work but many of those are on minimum wage, low incomes and zero-hours contracts so there is no increase in taxes. For many it also means help is needed with housing and council tax.

The freezing and reduction of incomes in real terms, particularly in the public sector, means that there is less spending power and as a consequence less income from VAT.

Let us hope that, in the run-up to election day, one party is prepared to be honest about how they will balance the public and private sectors, support those who genuinely need it, and have a fair society and not one which is run for the powerful and vested interests.

Graham Jarvis
Leeds

 

So the first casualty of the election campaign is truth. Thank you, George Osborne, for setting the tone. It’s going to be nasty.

David Penn
Kendal, Cumbria

 

The opening Conservative poster for the 2015 election reminded me that the greatest confidence trick I have encountered in the past 35 years is the claim that taxation is far lower when the Tories are in power. The opposite is true; the only tax they have reduced is income tax; all other forms of taxation have been raised.

In April 1979, when the last Labour government was in power (New Labour was in effect a Conservative government), the standard rate of income tax was 34 per cent, but VAT was only 8 per cent, a great deal lower than the current 20 per cent. Rents, council tax, utility bills and rail fares were only allowed to rise in line with the rate of inflation, and when we had pay restraint utility prices did not increase at all.

For several years now we have suffered price increases in all these services at well above the rate of inflation. The reality is that overall taxation levels are not much different; all that has happened is that poor people have had to pay more to finance tax concessions for the wealthy.

Malcolm Howard
Banstead, Surrey

 

Sarah Forster is spot on with “Road to Nowhere” (letters, 6 January); the Tory campaign poster reminds me of the film The Wizard of Oz. You can assign the characters to taste, but a Tin Man without a heart, a cowardly “Lion” looking for courage, and red shoes all look promising.

Professor Guy Woolley
Nottingham

 

After Evans rape case, yes can mean no

The Ched Evans affair is undoubtedly a sordid one and nobody emerges from it with any credit. However, the legal consequences of his guilty verdict must be of wider concern.

This is what was decided. A person can drink copious quantities of alcohol (an amount that would floor most of us) and then pick up a sexual partner and accompany that person to a hotel and engage in consensual sex with that person and another. This can be considered rape if one of the parties decides retrospectively that it has been. There need be no accusation of “getting someone drunk”, or administering a date rape drug. There need be no coercion or violence.

This means that not only does no mean no, yes means no as well. Regardless of the gender of the participants, in future everyone should be required to sign a “consent to sex” form in case they forget that they had consented. Of course it might be a good idea for people not to drink so much that they cannot remember what they were doing, but to suggest that now seems to imply interference with human rights.

Those who argue that rape convictions are too low should be aware that this is the legal territory that is now being debated, and the introduction of a consent form is not a flippant response.

Nigel Scott
London N22

 

As a grandmother of a football-playing granddaughter I should like to explain why I believe no footballer convicted of rape should ever be allowed to play with a club again.

My granddaughter is 12 years old and has spent time at Shrewsbury Town Football Club workshops for juniors. Any thought of a convicted rapist at the same club would be abhorrent, so Ched Evans needs to be kept away from all football clubs, especially those with junior departments.

Pippa McNickle
St Albans, Hertfordshire

 

I do want to see someone ask Ched Evans this to his face: if he gets legless and wakes up to find he’s been shagged by a guy he’s never met, would he be fine with that? Because he did that to this woman, and maintains it wasn’t rape.

Merlin Reader
London SE13

 

When HMRC was helpful and efficient

I am sorry that Janet Street-Porter (3 January) sees the problems at HMRC as an issue of the public sector versus business. Customer service at HMRC has not always been this poor.

In 2006 both my parents died within months of each other. HMRC, as well other public bodies such as the DWP and the local council, were always easily contactable and very helpful to me as executor in the rather complex administration of their overlapping estates.

By contrast, many private-sector organisations, such as solicitors, financial institutions and utility companies, were hopeless, causing great stress at this difficult time. Some made so many mistakes that I dubbed them “systemically incompetent”. It was no surprise to me that the worst disappeared, or had to be bailed out in the 2008 crisis, and others still regularly feature in the problem pages of your Money section.

What has changed since that time is that the Coalition Government has waged a war on public services, cutting numbers and reducing pay and benefits. This has reduced the numbers of staff available to answer queries and also resulted in some  of the most talented leaving. It is therefore not surprising that customer service is worse.

One might think that this would be a particularly perverse policy in that it damages the department responsible for bringing in the taxes that might help reduce the deficit. Perhaps, however, there is a cunning plan behind it to ensure that the damage done to HMRC will result in ministers’ rich cronies not being held to account for taxes they owe?

Nigel Long
Bristol

 

A fair selection of candidates

Your report “Labour shuns black and Asian candidates in winnable seats” (31 December) raises once again the thorny question of positive discrimination.

The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 makes it lawful to have women-only shortlists. The Labour Party does make use of this legislation, which is due to expire in 2015, under a sunset clause, unless Parliament approves an extension. If there is a genuine desire among all parties to ensure that Parliament is representative of the population as a whole, then it is difficult to resist the argument that ethnic minorities and those with disabilities should be entitled to the same degree of positive discrimination.

There should be a cross-party debate about this. I have always wondered whether the Labour Party practice of imposing all-women shortlists might not indirectly discriminate against black and minority ethnic (BME) male potential candidates. This, of course, would be outweighed if there had been a significant number of BME women elected to Parliament; it would be interesting to know how many have been included on all-women shortlists.

I have always opposed positive discrimination, but I have reluctantly come to the view that political parties will only select fairly if they are forced to do so. But that must apply to BME and disabled candidates as well as to women.

John Orton
Bristol

 

Compassion for terminal patients

Neil Dawson (letter, 5 January) asks whether, in declining to help with assisted dying, he was letting unimportant concerns about principles prevent the compassion his friend so desperately needed. I can help him here. Yes, he was. Another example of the stupidity and heartlessness of religious belief.

Jim Bowman
South Harrow, Middlesex

 

Seriously great headline

The Independent is a wise and balanced newspaper. However, it can take itself a little too seriously on occasion. So it was wonderful to see the headline writers enjoying their time “in the sun” with “Decline of the herd reich” (6 January). Excellent.

Debbie Jones
Newcastle upon Tyne

 

Times:

 

Telegraph:

Despite bitterness on both sides, the future of Britain’s energy supply is one of the few issues that must transcend narrow political considerations - This energy debate threatens to tear the Coalition apart<br />
” width=”620″ height=”388″ /></p>
<div class=
Four months to go until the general election, and the campaigning has already begun Photo: Getty Images

SIR – The election campaign has started far too soon. Four months of boredom ought to ensure the lowest turnout ever.

There is plenty of unfinished business the Government could be concentrating on – notably “English votes for English laws”. Let us stick to the traditional three-week campaign. This is not America.

Elizabeth Spooner
Wokingham, Berkshire

SIR – Three weeks should be plenty of time for the parties to communicate their manifestos to the electorate.

I will vote for the first major party that pledges to repeal the Fixed-term Parliaments Act.

Nicholas Moate
Flushing, Cornwall

SIR – Pantomime politics is back in full swing. Will the Tories destroy the NHS? Will Labour destroy the economy? Will Ukip destroy the EU? Will the Lib Dems destroy everything?

Britain deserves better than the same old negative sniping of insular politicians going through repetitive pre-election

dust-ups.

Peter Kyle
Letcombe Regis, Berkshire

SIR – We are to be force-fed dubious facts and figures for months from politicians. I wish I could hibernate until May.

I do worry about the economy, which is delicate and at least has improved in the past five years. One thing is sure: a Labour government has never left the economy in a good state.

Phyllis Jones
Oakley, Bedfordshire

SIR – I think David Cameron came across very well on The Andrew Marr Show on Sunday morning. He gave assurances that the NHS was in good hands under a Tory government and I believed him.

Doug Fowler
Clevedon, Somerset

SIR – A Conservative Party spokesman has commented on Labour’s “chaos of unfunded spending promises”. What do the Tories propose to do about the largest unfunded promise of all – the unfunded public-sector pensions that are kept off the balance sheet?

Bill Parish
Hayes, Kent

SIR – David Cameron’s wish to bring forward the in-out EU referendum will appeal to a huge number of voters. But to insist that Eurosceptic ministers toe the government line and campaign to stay within a reformed EU before anyone has the faintest idea what reforms will be achievable undermines his credibility.

Gabriel Jaffe
Bournemouth, Dorset

SIR – I think I can trust Mr Cameron to promise to do something about the EU.

Graham Smith
Marlow, Buckinghamshire

Recruiting teachers

SIR – Charlie Taylor, the chief executive of the National College for Teaching, should not underestimate the discouraging effect various factors have upon teacher recruitment in Britain. These include the low standard of state education, the lack of discipline in schools, acceptance of disruptive pupils in classrooms, putting children of all abilities in the same classes, inadequate and useless subject matter and the egalitarian attitude of many teachers and administrators, who refuse to advocate competition or excellence in anything.

These problems should be addressed before any improvement in the numbers or quality of recruitment can be expected.

Peter Wedderburn-Ogilvy
Froxfield, Hampshire

Dumbed-down history

Terry Deary’s ‘Horrible Histories’ series is popular with children

SIR – I was glad that Robert Peal expressed his concerns about Terry Deary’s Horrible Histories series.

Dumbing down history to the extent that this series does is neither necessary nor justifiable. For those pupils who are likely to take an intelligent interest in history, the approach is patronising and presents a barrier to a rounded study of a subject which has been presented both accurately and attractively by other authors.

Chris Corrin
Sevenoaks, Kent

Emergency landing

SIR – The “non-standard landing” at Gatwick Airport last week revealed the folly of closing Manston Airport. The Virgin Atlantic flight could have landed on one of the longest and widest runways in the country, just 65 miles away, avoiding the closure of the world’s busiest single-runway airport for over three hours.

I K Simcock
East Grinstead, West Sussex

SIR – Steve Donovan notes that Lydd Airport has been renamed “London Ashford”. Kidlington Airport, which is 62 miles from London, was renamed “London Oxford” in 2009.

David Alexander
Towcester, Northamptonshire

SIR – Robin Hood Airport in Doncaster is nowhere near Sherwood Forest, the supposed home of the legendary law-breaker, and not even in the same county.

Ted Shorter
Hildenborough, Kent

Prince’s friendship

SIR – Why did the Duke of York visit Jeffrey Epstein, the American multi-millionaire and convicted sex offender, knowing that the connection would look bad?

Peter Cresswell
Enniskillen, Co Fermanagh

SIR – We must give the Royal family our collective support in times of difficulty.

The media should spend its time scrutinising politicians and show the Royal family deference as unifiers of country and Commonwealth.

John Barstow
Fittleworth, West Sussex

The NHS is in a mess after Labour’s blunders

SIR – Ed Miliband tells us that only the Labour Party can save the NHS. He appears to have forgotten the last Labour government’s record.

It allowed the NHS to squander millions of pounds on a computer system that did not work. It oversaw the expansion of an inefficient NHS bureaucracy, whose fat-cat leaders flit from NHS trust to NHS trust hoovering up taxpayers’ money in pay-outs and pay-offs on the way.

It virtually doubled the pay of GPs without extracting the necessary extra efficiencies from them, hence the current chaos in A&E departments.

It mismanaged the recruitment and training of nurses, forcing the NHS to recruit staff abroad to make up the shortfall.

The NHS cannot afford another Labour government.

Alan Moss
Cheadle, Staffordshire

SIR – I wonder just how much of the current NHS budget is used to repay the debt loaded on to it by Gordon Brown with his shifty Private Finance Initiative.

Ian Bruce
Solihull, Warwickshire

Earning their honours

SIR – The “pen-pushing civil servant” Michael Goddard no doubt did good work for his country on radio frequencies for mobile phones. No doubt he drew an equally good, state-funded salary for his excellent work and received an even better state-funded pension.

I wonder if any of this work was done in his own time, on a voluntary basis. All the people I know who have received the OBE have earned it by volunteering to help those less fortunate or less able than themselves.

Don Riseley
Gawsworth, Cheshire

SIR – Apparently Geoffrey Boycott’s suspended sentence precluded him from obtaining the much-deserved honour of a knighthood.

It seems ironic, then, that we are still required to use the title “Lord” for various criminals who have actually been to prison.

Adrian Waller
Woodsetts, South Yorkshire

Wartburgs and all

SIR – My father was the very proud owner of a Wartburg model 311, purchased in 1965. He owned many cars during his lifetime but this was the only one he could ever afford to buy brand new. It was his pride and joy, despite being somewhat unreliable.

He became an expert at changing the cylinder-head gasket (he always travelled with a spare in the boot).

Judy Hart
Warrington, Cheshire

SIR – I took a test drive in a Wartburg in Northampton in the late Sixties. I remember the puzzled expression on the face of the young salesman when he first experienced the free-wheel feature of the car when he decelerated.

It was a very quiet car, in spite of the two-cylinder two-stroke engine, but the body was heavy, so performance and handling were horrible. I bought a Mark 1 Vauxhall Viva instead.

Richard Gould
Sutton St Nicholas, Herefordshire

SIR – If Mr Launert had been in St Helens in the Sixties he would have spotted a Wartburg Knight saloon trundling around town. It was a boring faded beige colour and seemed to be a cross between an old Volvo and a rusty tank.

Allan Dockerty
St Helens, Lancashire

Darkest Surrey: a postcode lost in the woods

Historic round, octagonal and fluted pillar boxes at a Royal Mail depot (Alamy)

SIR – We recently moved house. The next day it became apparent that any delivery driver using satnav could not find us using the given postcode.

It transpired that, because our road was divided halfway along by woods through which it becomes a bridle path, satnav systems were sending drivers to the other end only. The postman said it had been a problem for years.

We asked the council to email us a change-of-address form enabling us to change our postcode to that of an adjoining road. We have added the name of this road to our address, and people can now find us.

Mary Pannell
Banstead, Surrey

SIR – It has been possible for about 25 years to pinpoint (to within one metre) every letter box in the country with a 12-digit grid reference and to describe this location uniquely with a two-digit extension to the postcode. This is useful for the delivery of goods and also for the emergency services.

In 1990 I consulted the Post Office national HQ and began to create a database for my local authority area. A few months later a senior officer of the Ordnance Survey paid me a visit and a national project began.

We soon ran into the problem of who “owns” an address description – the local authority rates department, the street-naming department or the local historians who clung to ancient county names?

I gave up after 10 years.

Isabel Page
Oldmeldrum, Aberdeenshire

Double bubble

SIR – The “Baby Cycle” on Anne Brooke-Smith’s new washing machine allows for a 9kg load.

This is clearly designed to assist after multiple births, for which one used to require a twin tub.

Keith Macpherson
Houston, Renfrewshire

 

 

Globe and Mail:

Hassan and Stark

Phones are more private than houses – so shouldn’t be easier to search

Irish Times:

Sir, – Those looking for a name for Lucinda Creighton’s new party should note, as Enda Kenny may ruefully reflect, that the name of the former Fine Gael junior minister contains the letters which spell out “Chagrin Uncoiled”. – Yours, etc,

Dr JOHN DOHERTY,

Gaoth Dobhair,

Co Donegal.

Sir, – I can’t help but wonder if Lucinda Creighton has missed the boat in her decision to launch a new political party. It reminds me a little of the launch on January 1st of UTV Ireland. After a five-minute promotional video, we were treated to an hour-long episode of a programme set on a Yorkshire farm.

UTV Ireland won’t be in top gear for a few months until some of its new programmes start, seemingly a bit like Lucinda’s as yet unnamed party.

Last year when I attended the “monster rally” in the RDS, there was an undoubted air of anticipation and energy in the hall that something exciting was afoot. Since then, however, we have had the local elections and the marked increase in support for Independents and Sinn Féin.

While large numbers of people have turned away from the heretofore large parties such as Fianna Fail and Fine Gael, they now consider Independents to be a viable alternative. People such as Shane Ross and Michael Fitzmaurice talk about forming an alliance of Independents as opposed to a new party.

The present supporters of Independents will not necessarily move to a new party unless they are offering something very radical which people can identify with. So far I don’t see much evidence of this with Lucinda’s new party.

Let’s hope we get something more substantial soon, otherwise I for one will be waving goodbye to this particular boat. – Yours, etc,

TOMMY RODDY,

Galway.

Sir, – Lucinda Creighton is quoted as saying, in the context of the pre-launch of her new political party, that the party wants to make Ireland “a great place to innovate, to grow, to build and expand a small business, to employ people, to work and to be a consumer”.

The choice of the word consumer, as opposed to citizen, is revealing. As a citizen of this republic, I will not be marching behind the flag of the new party, which already suggests a prioritisation of business over people and a preference for an economy rather than a society.

The much-heralded party promises much of the same, I’m afraid. – Yours, etc,

NESSAN VAUGHAN,

Baldoyle,

Dublin 13.

Sir, – Rehash(tag)? – Yours, etc,

DES SHAW,

Templeogue,

Dublin 6W.

Sir, – Reboot Ireland. Control? Alternative? Delete. – Yours, etc,

MICHAEL O’LEARY,

Monkstown,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – A “new” political party is being set up to “reboot” the old system, which in computing terms simply means restarting the old system as it is. If this new party was genuinely about reform shouldn’t it be called “Upgrade”?

Ms Creighton loyally voted in favour of every single cutback imposed by this Government on the most vulnerable in society and not once in her entire career as a Fine Gael TD did she do a single thing to affect the removal of even one of the many allowances and tax reliefs that allow the well-off to minimise the amount of tax they pay. – Yours, etc,

DESMOND FitzGERALD,

Canary Wharf,

London.

Sir, – How about the Pip (pig in a poke) Party? – Yours, etc,

TOM KELLY,

Malahide,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – Old-style politics prevails; the new party has not even been named and we have promises to reduce or eliminate USC already tabled. What the electorate wants is real and sustainable change to both the way the Government and the Civil Service is managed.

This is what we were promised at the last election and one has only to look back at 2014 to see a chaotic Government, stumbling from crisis to crisis, with absolutely no change of any significance. I say to the new party, take care, great care, and be aware that the electorate is demanding change and will no longer be fooled by promises of largesse. – Yours, etc,

PAUL KEENAN,

Killiney,

Co Dublin.

A chara, – The provision of accommodation to the homeless in Dublin shows what can be done when the political will exists. The lack of a similar response for the most vulnerable in our healthcare system is appalling (“Number of patients on hospital trolleys at record high”, January 6th).

It is a failure of successive governments and ministers for health that they are still trying to manage “an emergency” now ongoing for a decade. – Is mise,

Dr CATHAL NUGENT,

Loughrea, Co Galway.

Sir, – Could someone who knows about these things explain what they do better in smaller European countries that don’t have a trolley crisis? Could we adopt some of their more successful strategies rather than annually agonise over ours? – Yours, etc,

JOHN COLLINS,

Skeaghvasteen,

Co Kilkenny.

Sir, – How many more years of this new year hospital bed crisis will have to happen before it dawns on people. You cannot have your Christmas pudding and eat it. Our hospital services slow down from mid-December to early January.

People continue to become ill during this period. Not to mention the countless people stuck on waiting lists. The usual conveyor belt of clinical assessment combined with diagnostic imaging and laboratory tests slows down. Then there is the slowing down of effective physiotherapy and occupational therapy services to minimise hospital stays. The usual multidisciplinary meetings do not take place, and therefore discharges do not take place at the usual rate.

Unless we look at the Christmas holiday as a shorter period, we will always have this January problem. So, no more surprises then. – Yours, etc,

JOAN BARRY,

Glasnevin,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – Perhaps the Minister for Health is in A&E himself with a score throat? I say this due to the deafening silence from the normally very vocal Leo Varadkar. – Yours, etc,

MARGARET TREANOR,

Sutton,

Dublin 13.

Sir, – In his analysis, Mark Weiss warns of “brinkmanship on both sides” (“Israelis and Palestinians play risky game”, January 5th). How is attempting to hold Israel to account through the International Criminal Court “brinkmanship”? How is using multilateral mechanisms such as the UN Security Council to end the occupation of Palestine “brinkmanship”? How is calling for Israel to take full responsibility, as the occupying power, for the people it controls under a brutal military occupation “brinkmanship”?

Mr Weiss’s “dangerous scenario” of “a diplomatic vacuum” is a direct result of Ireland and the EU failing to fulfil their obligations under international law and the UN charter. Shamefully, the EU and Ireland (and the US, of course) have also failed to impose any kind of meaningful economic sanctions on Israel. Ireland and the EU must do everything possible to ensure that the Palestinian people attain their full human rights to self-determination, justice and freedom. Without significant external pressure, Israel’s occupation of Palestine will not end, Palestinian refugees will never return home, and we will have been complicit in one of the most terrible injustices the world has ever seen. – Yours, etc,

HILARY MINCH,

Dublin 2.

Sir, – I read with some dismay of the seemingly unstoppable advance of JD Wetherspoon pubs in Ireland (Una Mullally, “Protect the uniqueness of Irish pubs from JD Wetherspoon’s inexorable advance”, Opinion & Analysis, January 5th).

While I have to admit that the attraction of cheaper pints has a certain obvious appeal, having visited a few Wetherspoon pubs in the UK, I have to say that the word average could have been invented for them. Average in every way, exceptional in none.

If the arrival of this chain results in the loss of many traditional pubs, community hubs which have evolved over generations, then that will be very expensive cheap drink indeed.

The jobs argument holds no water either if every Wetherspoon pub that opens costs the jobs of those who work in every old-school pub that closes as a result. – Yours, etc,

VINCENT HEARNE,

Nabinaud,

France.

Sir, – Maybe the Weatherspoon pubs are revenge for all the similar-looking Irish pubs all over the world. – Yours, etc,

BRIAN HODKINSON,

Reboge,

Limerick.

Sir, – I believe that Charles Haughey instituted the style of always sitting beside the driver when in State cars, thus letting the populace know that he was essentially just one of us. Since then, not one government minister has had the courage to sit in the back! – Yours, etc,

PADRAIG J O’CONNOR,

Rathfarnham, Dublin 14 .

Sir, – One thing is certain. Charles J Haughey will not have his many good deeds listed in the pages of The Irish Times, nor will its snooty readers acknowledge that, as leaders go, Mr Haughey was good for Ireland, despite all the old and new muck raked up. – Yours, etc,

ROBERT SULLIVAN,

Bantry, Co Cork.

Sir, – May I dissent, in one respect only, from the unqualified praise for Aiden Gillen’s portrayal of the titular character in the RTÉ drama Charlie? The actor reincarnated “The Boss” for his TV audience in looks, hooded eyes, walk, etc. CJH’s vocal quality was wonderfully conveyed by Gillen, except that the register wasn’t deep enough.

In Olivier’s preparation for Othello on stage (1964), he managed to lower his natural tenor register by a whole octave to perform the Moor. Similar vocal weight was needed for the “black prince of Irish politics”. – Yours, etc,

OLIVER McGRANE,

Rathfarnham, Dublin 16.

Sir, – Is the withdrawal of medical cards from vulnerable people to maintain pay levels for medical professionals not a conscience issue? What about increasing taxation on market-variable contributory private pensions to fund guaranteed public pensions?

People vote for parties rather than individuals because they believe a collective working together consistently is more effective. Questions are debated and policy agreed within the party. Opinions within the group may vary, but that is beside the point. With “free voting”, there is no collective, and thus no point in voting for a party.The hypocrisy of taking advantage of a party’s supporters when it comes to getting elected, only to take an opposing position when difficult decisions need to be made is glaring. The members who canvassed in all weathers, put up posters, distributed leaflets, helped write speeches, organised public appearances, maintained websites, prepared press releases and social media updates, and who ferried voters from their homes to the polling booth on election day are cast aside in favour of the sudden appearance of a “conscience” once the candidate is safely in office.

The last notable point is the total silence of Sinn Féin in the debate. As it stands, the party line is held so tight that its members do not appear to be permitted even the free expression of their individual views. That they would have a free vote in accordance with their individual consciences is obviously out of the question. – Yours, etc,

JOHN THOMPSON,

Phibsboro, Dublin 7.

Sir, – The report “Road Safety Authority says 42% of those killed in vehicles not wearing seat belts” (January 2nd) is numerically inaccurate and misleading.

What your reporter seems to have done is to add the percentage of drivers not wearing seat belts (16 per cent) to the percentage of passengers not wearing seat belts (26 per cent) to get 42 per cent. Basic arithmetic would say that you should add the numbers in each category to get 23/118 or 19 per cent, a less dramatic figure but a true representation of the percentage of vehicle fatalities not wearing seat belts.

What you published is equivalent to saying if 50 per cent of men read The Irish Times and 50 per cent of women also read The Irish Times, then 100 per cent of the total population read it. – Yours, etc,

TOM FULLER,

Glasnevin,

Dublin.

Sir, – One of Fintan O’Toole’s cultural lows of 2014 was the “Government’s malign neglect of the arts and culture: not a red cent extra in the budget” (December 27th). At 0.46 per cent of the national budget, the percentage of Irish government spending on the arts is one of the lowest in Europe, and less than a third of the European average. Let’s hope that 2015 will bring real recognition of the crucial role the arts play in our society. – Yours, etc,

JIM CULLETON,

Dublin 7.

Sir, – Now that Christmas is well and truly over, how many penalty points will be issued to those people caught driving with antlers and red noses attached to their cars? – Yours, etc,

BRIAN QUIGLEY,

Bettystown,

Co Meath.

Irish Independent:

A&E departments are now experiencing record levels of overcrowding

A&E departments are now experiencing record levels of overcrowding

I returned home from the States for Christmas and on December 31st, my father, an 86-year-old man, was rushed to St Vincent’s Hospital after suffering from what appears to have been a stroke/seizure.

  • Go To

I have to commend every healthcare worker I came in contact with. Their concern, friendliness and approachability were reassuring in a time of stress. From ambulance workers to receptionists and porters, the catering staff, nurses and resident doctors, all went about their jobs with quiet resolve and concern.

Yes, it was disheartening to see the A&E area resemble a M*A*S*H unit at full capacity rather than a hospital on a regular day.

I know that if the same were to happen in the US there would be hell to pay. There is only one way to change the system – get the politicians involved. Make it an issue in the upcoming election and vote.

So, before we chastise health workers who are doing a great job in difficult circumstances, let’s remind those who can influence the system that it is their responsibility to seek the welfare of their fellow countrymen.

James Houton

Address with editor

 

Haughey – ‘flawed’ but still good

Charles J Haughey was a man who was a politician, and he was much more of a man than many who come to the fore yet again to dance on his grave.

He was not a monster who cared for nobody but himself, yet the real truth is not in the interests of writers and film-makers, who pretend it is only themselves who have special insight and the inner track on the story of Mr Haughey.

He was once accused by Garret FitzGerald of having a “flawed pedigree” in the cut and thrust of party politics, yet it later came to light this could have meant he’d got a large bank debt written off, as did Mr FitzGerald around the same time.

One thing is certain.

Mr Haughey will not have his many good deeds listed. But he was good for Ireland, despite all the old – and new -muck raked up to sling at his close family.

Remember them?

Robert Sullivan,

Bantry, Co Cork

 

Lowering the tone in ‘Charlie’

May I dissent, in one respect only, from the unqualified praise for Aidan Gillen’s portrayal of the titular character in the RTE drama, ‘Charlie’?

The actor reincarnated ‘The Boss’ for his TV audience in looks, hooded eyes, walk, etc. CJH’s vocal quality was wonderfully conveyed by Gillen, except that the register wasn’t deep enough (‘Scrap Saturday’ in the 1990s did it better).

In Olivier’s preparation for ‘Othello’ on stage (1964), he managed to lower his natural tenor register by a whole octave to perform the Moor. Similar vocal weight was needed for the “black prince of Irish politics”.

Oliver McGrane

Rathfarnham, Dublin 16

 

In the name of God . . .

Having had more than my usual amount of socialising during the Christmas season, one realisation dawned on me: how so many people use the word ‘God’ in every second exclamation they make. Otherwise, the favourite is ‘you know like …’

“Oh my God, isn’t her dress a show?; “Oh God, I’m late.”; “Oh God, he’s drunk.”

Few people can explain the word ‘God’. Long ago, in Ireland, there was respect for the name of God but nowadays there is a growing disrespect and an absurd feeling that it is somehow clever and glib to refuse to bow to the omnipotent creator.

None can explain the mystery and awesome concept behind the word.

When they try to argue about the existence of God, many become lost in a plethora of pseudo-intellectual nonsense.

Because no one else understands the mystery either, it usually happens that the one with the most elaborate words wins.

Of course, for many people, the exclamation ‘Oh God’ has become utterly unintentional now. Yet, with some thought, we could educate ourselves.

Can we not humbly accept our limitations vis-a-vis the existence of a superior reality which is beyond our own comprehension?

At least, let’s stop disgracing ourselves, by denigrating the sacred with our ignorant misuse of the word ‘God’.

Even the meaningless exclamation ‘Wow’ is more according to our worldly nature.

Angela Mac Namara

Churchtown, Dublin 14

 

Famine and ‘The Producers’

Dr John Doherty (Letters, Irish Independent, January 6) draws a false analogy between the Mel Brooks movie ‘The Producers’ and the proposed TV sitcom set during the Famine.

‘The Producers’ is an hilarious movie that uses the rise of Hitler in a totally mocking way, coupled with the aim of making the play become a complete and almost instant flop to defraud the play’s investors.

One of the climactic jokes is the stunned reaction of the audience to being unexpectedly presented with a play about Hitler’s rise to power and his plans to conquer the world.

There are no jokes aimed at the persecution of Jews.

In complete contrast, the reality of the Famine will be the central context for the proposed “comedy”, and not simply the events of the years leading up to it.

Had ‘The Producers’ been located in an extermination camp it would never have been released, let alone “produced”.

Ivor Shorts

Rathfarnham, Dublin 16

 

Rhyming couplet

Inda and Lucinda …kinda rhymes?

Tom Gilsenan

Beaumont, Dublin 9

 

Crippling cost of childcare

Since Charlie McCreevy introduced tax individualisation in 2000, staying at home to take care of the children has been effectively penalised by the state. Professional childcare now, on average, absorbs a salary of around €30,000 for just two children.

The question of whether the Government (by which I mean the taxpayer) will now be tapped to subsidise the divestment of responsibility for raising one’s own children is the stuff of which socialist dystopias are made. Cut out the middle men: raise your own children.

Mark Hickey

Sandymount, Dublin 4

 

All’s fair in classroom wars

As a teacher of some 41 years I would like to see myself as being as fair and unbiased as the next.

If it should come to grading the following groups I feel I may be already hotwired towards favouring them: my own immediate and extended family; the children of friends and colleagues; children experiencing adolescent wobbles; children experiencing trauma or bereavement; children from dysfunctional backgrounds; children of families with severe financial problems; children who feel low or depressed; witty and chirpy guys; guys who try hard but never quite get it; gifted athletes; gifted musicians; academically gifted children and the children of the local mechanic who would never see a neighbour stuck.

Gearoid O Ciarain

Dublin 12

Irish Independent


Pottering

$
0
0

8 January 2015 Pottering

Mary a little better though she could manage to get up fot breakfast. Potter around childrens books on Amazon, sweep some leaves tidy up’

Obituary:

Cabu was a cartoonist described by the film-maker Jean-Luc Godard as ‘the best journalist in France’

Cabu with his cartoon  character Le Grand Duduche
Cabu with his cartoon character Le Grand Duduche Photo: LYDIE/SIPA/REX

Jean Cabut, who has been killed in Paris aged 76, was better known as “Cabu”, a cartoonist who earned the wrath of Muslim fundamentalists with a depiction of the Prophet Mohammed, which became the subject of a court case in 2007; the film-maker Jean-Luc Godard one called him “the best journalist in France”.

In its issue of February 8 2006, Charlie Hebdo, the French satirical weekly in which Cabu was a shareholder, republished 12 drawings that had appeared the previous year in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, some of them representing Mohammed. Their original publication in September 2005 had provoked an outcry in the Muslim world and sparked violent protests in several countries, resulting in the deaths of at least 50 people.

On the cover of its reprint, Charlie Hebdo also published an original drawing by Cabu depicting a sobbing Mohammed with his head in his hands, saying, “It’s hard to be loved by idiots’’ under the caption “Mohammed overwhelmed by fundamentalists”.

Charlie Hebdo published the cartoons in solidarity with the Danish newspaper and to make a point about freedom of expression in France, which has the largest Muslim population in Europe. The previous week the republication of the Danish cartoons by the French daily France Soir had led to the dismissal of its editor, Jacques Lefranc.

Following the publication of the offending issue of the magazine the Paris Grand Mosque and the Union of Islamic Organisations of France sued its editor Philippe Val, arguing that the Cabu cartoon and two of the Danish images drew an offensive link between Islam and terrorism. They accused Val of “publicly abusing a group of people because of their religion’’ and requested €30,000 in damages. The charges could have resulted in a six-month prison term.

However, in March 2007, following hearings seen as a test case of freedom of expression, Val was acquitted by a Paris court. The ruling was hailed as a victory for freedom of speech, but it put Charlie Hebdo in the sights of radical Muslims. Journalists on the magazine reported threatening telephone calls and in November 2011 its offices were firebombed after it published a special edition featuring the Prophet Mohammed as a “guest editor”.

Yesterday gunmen armed with Kalashnikovs and a rocket-launcher opened fire in the offices, killing 12 people, including Cabu. Witnesses have claimed that they heard the gunmen shouting “we have avenged the Prophet Mohammed”.

Cabu at work (STARFACE/EYEVINE)

The son of a schoolmaster, Jean Cabut was born at Chalons-en-Champagne on January 13 1938. After studying Art at the École Estienne in Paris he began producing drawings for a local newspaper.

Conscripted into the French Army for two years during the war in Algeria, Cabu produced cartoons for the army magazine and also for Paris Match. But his experiences in Algeria turned him into a virulent anti-militarist and he remained a relentless campaigner for non-violence and critic of the French political establishment.

In 1960 he became one of the founders of Hara-Kiri, a satirical magazine which, after it was banned by president Charles de Gaulle in 1970, simply changed its name to Charlie Hebdo and appeared with the same cover the following week. Cabu also produced political cartoons for its rival Le Canard enchaîné and other magazines.

His best known characters were Mon Beauf (“My brother-in-law”), an incarnation of bovine French provincial complacency. On one occasion the notorious Gaullist mayor of Nice, Jacques Médecin (to whom the character bore a physical resemblance), sued Cabu for libel. (Médecin was later tried and convicted for corruption.)

Another popular character, Le Grand Duduche, was the eternal awkward adolescent, in love with the headmaster’s daughter and a naive observer of the law of the jungle that rules school life – and the grown-up world of politics.

Cabu’s work, which also featured in books and album covers, was the subject of a major exhibition in 2006-7 at Paris’s Hotel de Ville.

In the 1960s Cabu had a son with the Isabelle Monin, co-founder of the ecology magazine, La Gueule. The boy became better known in France as the punk singer-songwriter Mano Solo, who died of Aids in 2010.

Jean Cabut, born January 13 1938, died January 7 2015

Guardian:

The A&E crisis is an inevitable consequence of ideological cuts

uk ambulence service images. Emergency service reportarge.. Image shot 2009. Exact date unknown.
‘The crisis in A&E departments is a ‘dead canary in the coal mine’ for our public services,’ writes Andrew Judge. Photograph: John Sanders/Alamy

“Rationing by payment may offend tradition, but rationing by chaos is cruel,” says Simon Jenkins (The NHS can’t survive without payment for frontline treatments, 6 January). SImon Jenkins needs to consider some important questions. Why is it kinder to ration by pricing rather than a lottery? Is that because restricting some healthcare randomly potentially affects everyone, including the rich and powerful, making the problem more visible? Has Simon Jenkins taken into account the fact that charges mean additional costs in management, thus causing a further reduction in the resources available to actually deliver services ?

Perhaps Jenkins could also try to explain why the NHS is rated the most efficient health service across 11 major developed nations as assessed by the Commonwealth Fund. “The UK ranks first overall, scoring highest on quality, access and efficiency,” states the report. The US, despite the massive costs of its health system, ranks bottom. The Commonwealth Fund is Washington-based and respected around the world for its analysis of the performance of different countries’ health systems.

Of the 11 countries assessed, only New Zealand spends less per head of population than the UK, yet the NHS provides the best service. It’s obvious that the NHS model works well despite the lack of investment. The difficulties of the NHS are due not to the model of healthcare, but the lack of funding. The obsession with reorganisations and marketisation is what damages the NHS.
Ian Reissmann
Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire

• Simon Jenkins, in advocating co-payments for core NHS care, has resurrected what is referred to in health systems research as the classic zombie policy. The arguments against it are overwhelming: costing more to collect than it raises, deterring those in real need, and creating boundless perverse incentives, so that it has, quite rightly, repeatedly been killed off. Yet, like a zombie, there is always someone to bring it back to life. Clearly, the mass of evidence that many researchers consider to be the stake through the heart of this discredited policy is not yet adequately understood.
Professor Martin McKee
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

• The crisis in A&E departments is a “dead canary in the coal mine” for our public services (Report, 7 January). Not only is it evidence that the NHS is indeed broken, with money wasted on costly reorganisation and GP appointments increasingly difficult to obtain, it also suggests government-imposed cuts to local council social care services are leading to vulnerable people becoming unwell. Yet we haven’t seen half the cuts they intend yet. There is a harshness to Tory plans that requires public spending to be slashed unnecessarily by £27bn in pursuit of an ideological agenda. Labour plans to eliminate the deficit in revenue spending over a realistic period, but the Tories want to go much further to undermine public services and change the nature of government. The fabric of our society would be damaged for ever. The country now faces a vital electoral choice.
Andrew Judge
Labour parliamentary candidate for Wimbledon

• The coalition never mentions that it has presided over 30%-plus cuts to local authority social care, meaning frail elderly ill patients admitted to A&E and hospital beds cannot be discharged because the government has stripped community care back to the bone. No matter how much Mr Hunt tries to blame GPs or other parts of the NHS, there is no getting away from the fact that this is a crisis of his making and the electorate must be made aware of this gross political failure with our most vital public service.
Dr David Wrigley
Carnforth, Lancashire

• Though Britain desperately needs significantly higher levels of capital investment, I don’t know what Peter Hain MP was doing for 13 wasted years (A smaller state? It’s what got us into trouble to begin with, 6 January). During its time in government, New Labour failed to tax as much in terms of GDP as even conservative-led Germany, let alone France and Scandinavian countries. Between 2004 and 2012 this tax gap averaged 2·8% compared to Germany, according to Eurostat.

While in 2012, eurozone countries spent 10·7% of their national income on public and private medicine, the UK only spent 9·4% of our GPD on health, compared to a truly unsustainable 17·9% in the US, according to the World Bank. Clearly the NHS needs more taxation and not yet more untaxed PFI contracts of which Gordon Brown was so fond, when honours for tax exiles set the tone.

When it comes to crude Tory comparisons with socialist France, Labour can’t even talk their way out of a wet paper bag and explain that President Hollande inherited an economic mess from his rightwing predecessors.
RA Nowell
New Barnet, Hertfordshire

• Surely radical solutions are required for the ongoing A&E crisis to affect both supply and demand. So what about a small charge for those non-critical cases at A&E who are not on benefits or pensions, coupled with an additional ringfenced tax on alcohol to fund more care beds?
Don Macdonald
Social enterprise consultant, London

• You quote (Report, 6 January) the chief executive of Macmillan Cancer Support’s opinion that progress in cancer treatment is “a double-edged sword” with which “as numbers surge, the NHS will soon be unable to cope”. Would this be the same Macmillan which, as reported in File on 4 recently, made an £867,000 contribution to support the controversial £1.2bn Staffordshire outsourcing tender? This is not the kind of support most of us wish charities to offer the NHS; we do not contribute to them to swell the profits of private companies. Many of us have reason to be grateful for excellent cancer treatment from the NHS, and there are better ways of expanding NHS capacity than those insinuated and followed by Macmillan.
Dr Anne Summers
London

• There has been much criticism of the NHS, and especially A&E, over the last few days. There are, however, some excellent examples of their extreme proficiency. In November, by husband slipped out walking and fell 20ft on to rocks. Alerted by my screams, a passer-by called the emergency services. The first paramedic arrived within four minutes, assessed the situation was serious and within minutes help was on the way. We ended up with 21 emergency service personnel, including three doctors, an ambulance, a fire engine, mountain rescue services and a helicopter. My husband was taken by helicopter to Southmead hospital, Bristol. As a family, we have nothing but praise for all the rescue services and all the staff at the hospital. We must keep the NHS alive, otherwise we are going to suffer.
Margaret Kinsey
Chepstow, Monmouthshire

• In the week before Christmas 2013, A&E treated 390,000 people in under four hours. In the same week in 2014 they treated 6,000 more in under four hours. It was the same pattern in the week after Christmas: 4,000 more than the year before treated in less than four hours. They deserve congratulation but your headlines reads “Cameron defends NHS in worst week for A&E”.
John O’Brien
LondonUnited Nations Undersecretary-General fo

UN secretary-general for humanitarian affairs Valerie Amos will step down in March. Photograph: Fabrice Coffrini/Getty Images

Your editorial draws welcome attention to the process of selecting the next UN secretary-general (1 January). You also chide David Cameron for nominating Andrew Lansley to succeed Valerie Amos as the UN’s humanitarian chief. But, alongside questions about Andrew Lansley’s suitability for the job, there is another consideration that should persuade Mr Cameron to withdraw this nomination. Just as the UN secretary-general has never been a national of one of the five permanent members of the security council (China, France, Russia, UK and US), so it was recognised that emergency relief coordinators could also not be drawn from those countries.

In 2007, however, secretary-general Ban Ki-moon appointed British diplomat John Holmes to the post, and in 2010 Holmes was succeeded by Lady Amos. While both Holmes and Amos have shown great energy and commitment, it is widely acknowledged that the appointment of British officials has politicised the role and made it more difficult for the UN’s humanitarian work to be seen as impartial. The UN has appealed for more than £10bn for relief operations in 2015, the largest sum ever requested. The millions of people caught up in disasters deserve to know that the person charged with leading international efforts to assist them inspires the confidence of governments and humanitarian organisations everywhere.

The British government can rise above narrow national interests and embrace the idea of the best person for the job. In doing so, the government will earn credit far beyond the musty halls of the UN secretariat.
Martin Barber
London

• Cameron’s nomination of Lansley, a man who has failed to deliver the NHS reform he was appointed to deliver, is one of a long list of incompetents nominated by UN member states. You alluded to the rotation of the top post of secretary-general across continents rather than concentrating on competence. Rotation is not the core problem. Rather, it is that the candidate has to be agreed by all the permanent members of the security council. This means the selection of an individual who is unlikely to upset the interests of the major nations, including the US, China, Russia, France or the UK. The pool of talent has to be expanded from politicians and diplomats to those with significant and successful careers in business and the professions such as project management, engineering and accounting.
Jeremy Ross
Ashtead, Surrey

• Your proposed “more serious” approach to the appointment of the UN secretary-general fails to address the veto power of the five permanent members of the UN security council. It has 15 members, and each member has one vote. Yet the security council is a creature of the five permanent members.
Dr Alex May
Manchester

• The Commonwealth will be choosing its sixth secretary-general this November. Similar issues to those in your editorial have been raised about the selection. For a voluntary Commonwealth, required to prove its relevance to member states every few years, the stakes are high. Experience shows that only an active secretary-general, backed by a range of governments, can make a difference. Since 2003 two states have left, complaining at Commonwealth enthusiasm for human rights, and Canada has pulled out of funding the Commonwealth Fund for Technical Cooperation, in protest at permitting Sri Lanka’s president to chair the association – ie that the Commonwealth was insufficiently serious about rights. In the 1990s, Commonwealth ambassadors at Unesco successfully led a campaign to insist on a job specification and interviews prior to the appointment of its director-general. It is not too late to do something similar for the Commonwealth itself.
Richard Bourne
Senior research fellow, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London

The Magna Carta on display at Bodelian Library in Oxford
Magna Carta on display at the Bodelian Library in Oxford. Photograph: Alamy

David Carpenter (Magna Carta, 800 years on, Review, 3 January) writes that in 1215 Magna Carta was “a divided and divisive document, often reflecting the interests of a baronial elite a few hundred strong in a population of several millions”. Our constitution still does not accord equal treatment to all. Power is massively over-concentrated and is in the hands of an elite few – our politics is dominated by wealthy, middle-aged, middle-class men, most of whom have followed a very similar education and career path. This lack of diversity is a major factor in a growing and widespread disengagement with politics.

David Carpenter is right to note that human rights are still trampled on in many parts of the world. But we must also recognise that the UK’s own reputation as a defender and promoter of human rights is under threat – the Conservative party’s proposals to repeal the Human Rights Act would have profound effects for our international reputation and would call into question our continuing commitment to the effective protection of human rights. I, too, hope that Magna Carta will be celebrated 100 years from now. It was a landmark in constitutional history, the foundation of the concept of rule of law and of limited government. But celebrating an 800-year-old document is no longer enough. We must also think about our present and our future. We need a new Magna Carta, fit for our modern democracy. We need a written document to set out the rules of the political game and the framework for the exercise of power.
Graham Allen MP
Labour, Nottingham North

• A sharp wake-up call for the Labour leadership from Timothy Garton Ash (What is Britain? The right answer could win the next election, Opinion, 5 January). Garton Ash’s highlighting of the practical, positive and radical proposal by Lord Salisbury to save the union partially via reform to a quasi-federal UK, with the Commons as the English parliament, and an elected upper chamber for the UK residual functions, mainly overcomes the major flaw in ideas from party leaders. None of those in office have a clue about the current second chamber. (I did not, when in 1980 I moved a 10-minute-rule bill to abolish it.) I have yet to hear a party leader address any issue other than composition, when all serious commentators realise the powers and functions have to addressed first. Lord Salisbury does have the advantage over current leaders, in that he has served in both Houses. Linking the union issue with reform at the centre is a masterstroke. We could end up with fewer politicians at Westminster and serious modern democracy. All the better coming from a Tory dynastic source to get a wagon rolling.
Jeff Rooker
Labour, House of Lords

James Dyson (No Theresa May, we need those foreign graduates, 5 January) rightly says that Theresa May’s proposal to train up then kick out brilliant foreign students would be a major barrier to progress. The home secretary’s proposal must be the first deliberate attempt by a mainstream UK politician to stop the brain drain operating in our favour. The creative sector would sustain particular damage were this proposal to go ahead. UK universities train a very high proportion of the world’s best graduates in creative disciplines. From film to fine art, design to fashion, the creative industries depend on international networks of practitioners and businesses. These industries now form one of the biggest sectors in the UK economy.

As James Dyson, himself an art-school graduate, argues in relation to science and technology, our borders must remain open to the world’s best to attract, train and retain highly skilled professionals and to protect our creative industries.
Nigel Carrington Vice-chancellor, University of the Arts London, Dr Paul Thompson Rector, Royal College of Art, Patrick Loughrey Warden, Goldsmiths, University of London, Professor John Last Vice-chancellor, Norwich University of the Arts

Price of oil shown on board above New York Stock Exchange
The price of oil is shown on board above New York Stock Exchange. Economists predict that ‘falling oil prices will be a shot in the arm for the global economy, unless they aren’t’. Photograph: Richard Drew/AP

The essence of democracy is the ability to speak freely without the fear of persecution (Paris terror attack: Huge manhunt under way after gunmen kill 12, 7 January, theguardian.com). This is an attack on the freedom of speech and on all freedom-loving people. It must be condemned in the strongest possible terms and the perpetrators must be punished.
Dr Michael Pravica
Henderson, Nevada, USA

• Nothing highlights more clearly the irrelevance of economics as a profession than the range of forecasts in your story about oil prices (Report, 7 January). Past forecasts of 2015 oil prices by economists range from $20 to $85 a barrel, as random as rolling dice and multiplying the result by 10. And the wisdom of economists is leading to definite forecasts that falling oil prices will be a shot in the arm for the global economy, unless they aren’t. Time to put them in the same category as astrologers and their views relegated to the back pages of the tabloids?
Karl Sabbagh
Newbold on Stour, Warkwickshire

• John Smith writes that the British establishment prevented a yes vote in the Scottish referendum (Letters, 2 January). I formed the impression Scots voters had rather more to do with the result.
Colin Armstrong
Belfast

• My granddaughter, 19, has gone from a zero-hours contract to a six-hour weekly contract, and is pleased. Is this is what George means by things are looking up? Expect nothing from the Tories and that is what you will get.
Doris Rose
London

• It was heartening to hear how community action has kept footpaths open (Country diary, 2 January), using the Rights of Way Act 1990. However, a change in the law due to come in in 2026 will prohibit access to paths not specifically designated as public rights of way. Who has proposed this, and how has it been accepted with no public outcry?
Nicola Grove
Horningsham, Wiltshire

• Stuart Jeffries writes in his Foyles War review that “the London on screen looked nothing like it” (G2, 5 January). That’s because it was filmed in the lovely city of Liverpool.
Alan Musa
Amersham, Buckinghamshire

Jim Hillier and his colleagues had to carry on at the BFI when they had no official manage

Jim Hillier played a pivotal role in ensuring the British Film Institute education department stayed on the track that it had been started on during the creative and dynamic headship of Paddy Whannel in the 1960s. Jim also made a substantial contribution to the development of a collective management style in arts educational organisations.

In 1971 a change of policy led to Whannel and his deputy, Alan Lovell, resigning from their posts. This left Jim and the other members of the education department, including Colin McArthur and myself, with no official manager, but we nonetheless set about maintaining the existing approach. The way Jim combined its main features – attention to practical detail, rigorous pursuit of ideas and their aesthetic implications, equal focus on popular and experimental forms, and responsiveness to educational needs – was our lodestone.

Independent:

 

Times:

Sir, Your leader “Hospital Pass” (Jan 6) misses one of the main problems affecting our NHS, which is that no politician will admit that the present system of commissioning and procuring services is hugely expensive and wasteful.

Healthcare, just like defence, needs to be planned and not left to market forces. There are good ideas in the NHS England five-year forward view, including the integration of health and social care, but these do not sit comfortably with the business culture which is responsible for some of the unsatisfactory attitudes and behaviour of staff.

Competition between health providers is accepted by most politicians, journalists and health economists as the best way to motivate people in the NHS and improve efficiency. It does not — and is hugely costly.
Professor Robert Elkeles
Northwood, Middx

Sir, Artificial targets that distort clinical priorities have beset the NHS since the Blair government. Instead of treating the sickest patients first, in line with hippocratic principles, staff are diverted to deal with patients whose need may be low or nonexistent, simply to fulfil artificial objectives. Nowhere is this more telling than in A&Es, where 20 to 30 per cent of attendees don’t need to be there. The quickest fix for the current crisis is to abandon a damaging target to see 95 per cent of patients within four hours. Patients attending A&E should be seen strictly according to clinical priority, with those who are not ill being told to expect a very long wait.
Adam P Fitzpatrick
Consultant cardiologist & electrophysiologist
Mottram-St-Andrew, Cheshire

Sir, Both Professor Suzanne Mason (Jan 7), who is quoted as saying “GPs . . . don’t have to open”, and your leader (Jan 3), which stated that GPs shut at 5pm, are misinformed. GP practices are contractually obliged to be open from 8am till 6.30pm on weekdays, and many offer extended hours. Furthermore, every part of the country has a GP out-of-hours service, although one recent report found that more than a quarter of the public did not know such services existed.
Dr Emma Rowley-Conwy
Chairwoman, South East London Doctors on Call

Sir, Katherine Murphy and Mike Smith from the Patients Association (letter, Jan 6) ignore the many out-of-hours GP provider organisations nationally that give good care to patients. They are safe, caring, effective, responsive and well led; not my words, but those of Professor Steve Field of the Care Quality Commission.
Dr Simon Abrams

Chairman, Urgent Health UK

Sir, Two ways to help the NHS are to contract all new doctors to work full time for a minimum of five years (this will help staff retention, stop new doctors working abroad straight after qualification, and repay the taxpayers whose money has trained them) and to give A&Es a financial incentive to direct inappropriate patients back to their GP or out-of-hours service.
Dr Stephen Brown
Beaconsfield, Bucks

Sir, The flooding of A&Es with unnecessary referrals from NHS 111 was widely predicted (News, Jan 7). Even experienced GPs find telephone triage challenging. These help lines are a huge waste of scarce NHS resources. There was never any evidence that these services would improve patient care — but this is what happens when patients are given what they want, rather than what they need.
Dr Bob Bury
Leeds

Sir, NHS 111 was piloted in my area of practice and was recognised by all clinicians to be unfit for purpose. Nevertheless, it was declared a success by the primary care trust overseeing the pilot. Its worthlessness is now plain for all to see.
Dr Edward Staines
Spennymoor, Co Durham

Sir, The ludicrous (but powerful) quasi-religious attitude towards the NHS crushes anyone who dares to say it is not perfect. Other countries have much better levels of health care and most are based on some sort of insurance or payment system. Try saying that and you will be shouted down and told you are evil. So the present shambles will go on, costing more and getting worse. It is the British way.
Francis Bown
London E3

Sir, While gardening, I got grit in my eye. My surgery said no one could help straight away and booked me to see a doctor. Within five minutes, a doctor rang to say the surgery didn’t have “the right equipment” and to go to A&E. A couple of hours later a doctor removed the grit with the “equipment to remove foreign objects in eyes”, aka a cotton bud. I saw five NHS staff, all to wield one cotton bud. What a waste of NHS money.
Dennis Clement
Barnham, W Sussex

Sir, Many of us who rely on the NHS — I have type 1 diabetes — do not enjoy witnessing its politicisation. The service seems to lack long-term strategic planning probably because the political parties tend to plan in blocks of five years or less. Knowing that the bubble caused by the postwar baby boom would have such a big effect, why did politicians reduce the number of district nurses by 10,000? The result is much greater bed blocking by elderly people because they cannot be treated at home.
Julian Rivers
Earls Barton, Northants
Sir, Prime minister David Cameron has said that part of the solution to A&E problems is to “get the elderly back into the community”. One way of doing this would be to reopen or re-create the “old-fashioned” cottage hospitals to act as staging posts and a buffer for the absorption back into the community.

These could be staffed by the many highly-trained but non-degree nurses who left the NHS when the use of “degree nurses” became the norm — and proper nursing went out of the window.
Dr JD Baines
Penpillick, Cornwall

Sir, Bertrand Duplat, cofounder of the company responsible for the new smart belt (News, Jan 6), claims that “the belt experience hasn’t changed in centuries”. I must inform M Duplat that there are now, and have only ever been, two belt experiences: No 1: your trousers stay up; No 2: your trousers fall down.
Ian Ferguson
Upper Quinton, Warks

Sir, I agree with Boris Johnson’s comments on migrants to the UK speaking English (“Boris attacks ‘multi-culti Balkanisation’ ”, Jan 7), but I trust he holds the same view on the estimated 800,000 Brits living in Spain speaking Spanish.
Jay Sanghrajka
Northwood, Middx

Sir, Channel 4 is not a “taxpayer-funded” organisation (Business, Jan 5) and never has been. It is publicly owned but entirely commercially funded. Revenues raised from advertising are spent on £600 million of high quality programmes each year. This investment, primarily with the UK’s world-class independent production sector, is a catalyst for innovation and helps to drive the UK’s fast-growing export earnings from programme and format sales.
Dan Brooke
Channel 4

Sir, A normal business invests in plant to produce more of a product for an anticipated rising market share. It does not campaign to persuade its customers to use less of its product. While asking energy firms to invest in generation and fracking (News, Jan 7), George Osborne is demanding that they pass on lower supply costs while assisting customers to use less of their product. Better energy policies are needed, not inappropriate demands.
John Busby
Lawshall, Suffolk

Sir, British citizens resident in the Irish Republic do have the vote just as Irish citizens, like myself, have in Britain (News, Jan 5). But this is not about reciprocity, it is the Tory right aping the tactics of the Republican party in seeking to disenfranchise groups unlikely to vote for them. I’d recommend one idea which the Republican right is fond of: “No taxation without representation.” If you want to disenfranchise me, I’d like a refund please.
Gerry Gaughan
Eastrington, East Riding

Sir, As historians, scholars and photographers we wish to express our concern about the effect of proposed cuts to the Library of Birmingham’s photography collections and axing of its staff. The library’s holdings, built since the 19th century, are of international importance, and contain major collections from pioneers of photography as well as the archives of contemporary British photographers.

In recent decades the collection has attracted more than £1 million in sponsorship in order to mount major exhibitions and undertake vital conservation. At a time when the government is encouraging such funding partnerships, we believe that the collections should be protected and used for the social, cultural and educational benefit of all.

The fait accompli abandonment of the collection is unwarranted. If Birmingham City Council feels unable to properly fund its internationally important collections then the government must step in.

Professor Elizabeth Edwards, Photographic History Research Centre, De Montfort University, Leicester

Dr Michael Pritchard, Director-General, The Royal Photographic Society, Bath

Martin Barnes, Senior curator, photographs, Victoria and Albert Museum

Colin Ford CBE, Founding Director, National Media Museum

Professor Amanda Hopkinson, School of Arts, City University, London

Anne M Lyden, International Photography Curator, National Galleries of Scotland

Magnum Photos, London

Dr Brian H May CBE, photo-historian and musician

Dr Christopher Morton, University of Oxford

Professor Darren Newbury, University of Brighton

Phillip Prodger, Head of Photographs, National Portrait Gallery

Jo Quinton-Tulloch, Director, National Media Museum, Bradford

Brett Rogers, OBE, Director of The Photographer’s Gallery, London

Matthew Butson, Vice President, Hulton Archive, Getty Images, London

Dr Patrizia di Bello, lecturer, Birkbeck, University of London

Duncan Forbes, co-director, Fotomuseum Winterthur, Switzerland

Chris Harper, Chief Executive, British Institute of Professional Photography

Paul Herrmann, Director of Redeye, the Photography Network

Professor Francis Hodgson, University of Brighton

Sir, My 7-year-old grandson muddled my name. From now on I shall be Gandalf (letters, Dec and Jan 3).
Alan Millard
Lee-on-the-Solent, Hants

Telegraph:

Hospital waiting times; fixed-term parliaments; anonymity in rape trials; war on grey squirrels; a fair supermarket deal for dairy farmers, and boozy breakfasts

Just two of Scotland's 31 A&E departments managed to hit four-hour target every month in 2012/13
Accident and Emergency departments have had their worst performance in a decade according to new official figures Photo: ALAMY

SIR – You call on doctors to make surgeries more “user-friendly” and accessible in the evenings and weekends, thus making it unnecessary for people to turn up at A&E.

Why not use the GP out-of-hours service, which is available the whole time surgeries are closed?

Those who attend A&E with non-urgent problems should think before wasting resources and increasing the wait for others who might have a genuine emergency.

Stop encouraging the demand for immediate non-urgent attention and the services might be able to cope better.

Rosie MacRae
Harwich, Essex

SIR – When I heard on the radio that NHS waiting times were the worst for 10 years, I thought things must be pretty bad. In fact, instead of a 95 per cent response target being achieved, the actual rate was 92.6 per cent. The population has increased in the past decade. I am sure most people would think the doctors and nurses in the NHS should be congratulated on doing such an amazing job in the face of such adversity.

Dean Yorwerth
Stockport, Cheshire

SIR – The main problem in A&E departments is the existence of targets such as waiting times. In the good old days, we just got on with our work with professional pride. We worked long hours and put the patients first.

We did not waste time chasing targets. Get rid of targets, managers and the increasing mound of bureaucracy so that beleaguered medical staff are not hampered by trying to fit into the boxes which must be ticked; just let them look after patients, exercising sound common sense.

If there are no meaningless target figures, then no one can fail to achieve them, and so morale, and consequently patient care, will improve.

Kate Mash
Salisbury, Wiltshire

SIR – Labour has promised to hire – not train – 36,000 medical staff to “save” the NHS (Letters, January 6). Which Third World country will be deprived of its valuable resource?

Alistair Bishop
Northwood, Middlesex

SIR – If, as seems likely, the increase of 20,000 patients a week visiting hard‑pressed A&E departments is an unintended consequence of the introduction of the 111 service, this helpline should be scrapped immediately.

Michael Stanford
London SE23

SIR – As a newly appointed consultant in 1981, I was both irritated and amused at politicians trying to impress voters by spending public money to make very modest savings in NHS expenditure when there was an enormous deficit.

The idea that £150 million can be saved by pharmacists policing patients’ entitlement to free care is redolent of this practice. Is this an attempt to distract attention from the enormous sums of money awarded in pay and bonuses to NHS executives?

Angus McPherson
Findon, West Sussex

Fixed-term parliaments

SIR – My case against the Fixed-term Parliaments Act is not levelled against its effects on this current Parliament; indeed, a measure of contractual security has worked as a way of cementing the Coalition. My concerns are for the future.

Philip Johnston believes Parliament itself should be able to respond to a vote of no confidence in one government by replacing it with another without calling an election. This is a recipe for increased public disfranchisement.

In my view, all parties should step back from early electioneering and repeal the Fixed-term Parliaments Act with effect from May 8. It is only by restoring the prime minister’s right to call an election that we can re-establish a tidy process for refreshing an electoral mandate. Otherwise, we could see years of internecine political jostling and unpopular coalition horse trading.

Unlike Mr Johnston, I think the ability to ask the voters to decide at any given moment is an essential power of the office of prime minister.

Sir Alan Duncan MP (Con)
London SW1

Squirrel feeders

(Bertie Gregory/2020VISION / Rex Features)

SIR – It’s about time we had a programme to control grey squirrels. Apart from the damage they do, these pests also interfere with wild birds in domestic gardens. They steal great quantities of bird food and, ultimately, destroy the feeders intended for birds.

Peter Wickison
Huntingdon

SIR – Each year we have to replace nets that squirrels have holed in order to get at our strawberries. Recently we were without broadband for a week after one chewed through our phone line. They also eat unripe apples and pears and dig up bulbs: but their most distressing activity is destroying the nests of garden birds and killing the chicks.

Malcolm F Symonds
Ashtead, Surrey

Anonymity and rape

SIR – The decision to take no further action in the Mark Pritchard MP case builds evidence in favour of reforming the law back to the 1988 position where both accuser and defendant had equal rights to anonymity.

I have recently spoken with a number of other high-profile individuals who confronted allegations over several weeks to a year before their case was dropped. In the meantime, their names are plastered across national and international media, ensuring the trauma, stress and stigma associated with such allegations are amplified to an unfathomable degree.

In some cases, the person does not work, costing them tens of thousands of pounds.

The publicity of the allegation in itself is a particularly sinister punishment meted out to the accused, which only dissipates on no further action with lingering consequences. The accuser rightly remains anonymous.

Once there is a charge, the name of the accused is made public. This then could lead to more people coming forward.

There might also be a new procedure whereby the police have the opportunity to go to a judge and request publicity prior to charge because they believe in this case the evidence is such to persuade them that more people will come forward.

What is simply not fair is that the current cruel default system continues to vilify and persecute people who are then told no further action will be taken. There is scant recognition that the process has a damaging and distressing impact on the accused.

The time has come for this experiment in lopsided judicial procedure to be reversed.

Nigel Evans MP (Con)
London SW1

The Prince of Wales

SIR – Clarence House has not been cooperating with the makers of the proposed programme “Reinventing the Royals” (Comment, January 5), and the Prince of Wales has not been involved in its development. The programme is not Panorama. Neither the BBC nor the programme makers revealed until December 19 that it was to be called “Reinventing the Royals”.

Clarence House has also and importantly neither blocked nor attempted to block the proposed programme.

The decision to broadcast – and when – is that of the BBC alone. Clarence House is solely interested in receiving assurances regarding fairness, accuracy and tone in accordance with the principles of editorial fairness and obligations under the BBC Editorial Guidelines and the Ofcom Broadcasting Code.

Kristina Kyriacou
Communications Secretary to HRH The Prince of Wales and The Duchess of Cornwall
London SW1

Preserving Nelson’s flagship for the long term

In need of a bail-out: emblazoned leather buckets on board HMS Victory in Portsmouth (Alamy)

SIR – As a boy I made several tours of HMS Victory in Portsmouth (report, January 3) and subsequently returned on a number of occasions during the Eighties and Nineties to dine on board and for private, more extensive tours.

The later visits were memorable for one specific reason: the gloomy prognostications about the condition of this magnificent vessel. With the nearby Mary Rose being so well housed, I often wonder why, if the progressively worsening state of Nelson’s flagship has been known for decades, no long-term preservation strategy of that sort has been implemented.

Maybe the potential short-term drop in tourist revenue if the latter were to be closed for some time has influenced the decision-making process?

Jeremy C N Price
Cromarty

Booze at breakfast

SIR – The healthy attributes of a bowl of porridge are again in the news.

After 60 years of testing, I’ve found the ultimate topping is prunes stewed in a quality red wine, honey and cinnamon.

Christopher Allen
Siddington, Cheshire

A fair supermarket deal for British dairy farmers

(PA)

SIR – I am disappointed to note that Clare Mutsaars (Letters, January 3) suggests that Tesco pays its dairy farmers below the production price for fresh milk; in fact, we pay them above the market average.

We offer our farmers stability and confidence in a volatile market. Over the past seven years we’ve worked in partnership with our dairy farmers, and have used an independent consultant, to deliver a fair price for their milk that is guaranteed to cover the cost of production.

I would like to assure customers that our farmers are paid that same fair price, whatever the competitive pricing in store.

Tom Hind
Director of Agriculture, Tesco
Cheshunt, Hertfordshire

SIR – I can’t understand why milk produced by British farmers is not sold under the Fair Trade label, something that the National Farmers’ Union should be pushing for.

I for one would be willing to pay an extra 10 pence per litre if it were sold under the Fair Trade scheme and I could be sure that this money was going directly to the farmer.

David Pattenden
Beverley, East Yorkshire

SIR – I suggest that the time will shortly come when all dairy products will come from the Continent. This will then place those overseas producers in a position of strength when negotiating wholesale prices with our domestic retailers, who in effect could be held to ransom.

While I would love to see supermarkets whipped into submission, I would far rather see a prosperous British dairy business – not only for the delights of fresh, locally produced milk but also for the pleasure of seeing meadows with cows grazing, rather than further urban sprawl.

Nicholas Fowle
Neatishead, Norfolk

None of your business

SIR – I recently purchased a new electrical appliance from a company, which invited me to complete a form for the guarantee.

It is not unreasonable that they require my name, address and the date of purchase: but can anyone give me a sensible reason why they need my marital status, my partner’s name and age, our dates of birth, number and ages of children and their dates of birth? They also ask for employment status, our total household income, whether we rent or own, the number of bedrooms, insurance and credit card details and details of our activities.

Brian Herbert
Yarmouth, Isle of Wight

 

Globe and Mail:

Nahrain Al-Mousawi

In the Mideast, as in France, satire is a weapon against extremists

Nahrain Al-Mousawi is a writer and academic based in Rabat, Morocco.

In the wake of the deadly attacks on the Paris satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, some are portraying the current showdown as one between Western free speech versus an angry and intolerant Islamic world. In fact, it is the Islamic countries of the Middle East that have led the way in attacking the extremists of groups such as Islamic State using the instruments of satire. The use of mockery and caricature as a way of mocking Islamic extremism is, in fact, in some ways far more pronounced in the Middle Eastern media than it is in Europe.

Islamic State (also known as ISIS and ISIL) has slaughtered hundreds of Iraqi civilians and soldiers, raped and enslaved hundreds of women, held public crucifixions and stonings in Syria, and staged the executions of U.S. journalists and British aid workers. The group is revolting, abhorrent, and terrifying. But the region on which Islamic State has unleashed its sadistic campaign has responded producing a surprising volume of satire.

On Iraqi state TV, a satirical soap opera dedicated to mocking Islamic State, State of Myth, depicts the gruesome yet absurd “contributions” ISIS fighters and ideology unleash on a fictional town in Iraq, such as a green-energy car-bombing factory– cost-effective, reasonably priced, environment-friendly, and export-ready! All this information is provided by an IS engineer in a TV interview, where the female news announcer has resorted to wearing a sheet while asking questions.

While some claim humor is a way of taking back power – the power to name, to shame – on an uneven playing field, the show appears to be making fun of not only IS’s crude, fumbling, and sadistic methods to gain power, but also the strategic powerlessness of Iraqis trying to play along with, manipulate, and knowingly skirt the cruelty of that blundering power.

On another episode, the host of an Iraqi game show titled “Who Wants To Butcher a Million” asks an IS jihadi contestant what country will be the site of all this destruction and placatingly provides random, unrelated words in rhyme: “Daesh [Islamic State’s name for itself], Baesh, Maesh, Jaesh. The show offers not just an ironic treatment of IS, and thus the subversion of its authority; it also communicates to other Iraqis the recurring predicament in which they are yet again facing another form of tyranny (Saddam, foreign occupation, IS) and attempting to thwart its weightiness with humor.

Less astute in social criticism, but still aimed at the absurdity of ISIS fighters, is a musical parody video broadcast in October by Iraqi Kurdish KurdSat TV, featuring a group of goofy bearded men jerkily playing air guitar on rifles, pretending to sword-fight and fumbling with skulls, while belting out lyrics like: “We are ISIS. We are ISIS. / We milk the goat even if it is male. / Our music is without rhythm. And our leader is called Qaqa. / Our pockets are full of Qatari money. Our language is bullets and cutting.”

TV shows across the Middle East have dedicated a sketch or two to the group’s hypocrisies in adopting modern methods, such as Twitter and Facebook campaigns, to demand the return of medieval Islam. The popular Lebanese show Ktir Salbe showed a skit where a taxi driver picks up an Islamic State fighter who asks that the radio be turned off because this technology did not exist in the early days of Islam. When the driver suggests turning off the air conditioning because it did not exist in the early days of Islam, the fighter refuses and then starts talking on his cell phone, at which point the driver kicks him out and tells him to wait for a camel instead.

Even IS’s practice of gunning down innocents is apparently not off limits for comedic fodder: Palestine’s Al-Falastiniya TV broadcast a skit featuring three Islamic State fighters who reminisce about partying with Beirut’s beautiful women before shooting a Lebanese driver for not answering correctly a trick question about the number of times to kneel during prayers and upon entering a mosque.

Since then, a Jordanian play satirizing IS has been successfully touring theaters, while an Iranian animation mocking the foibles of IS is soon set to be released. Using satire to neutralize the threat of IS is not only the realm of network television, but social media, where the Twitter hashtag #ISISMovies played with popular film titles to mock the militants. Lebanese satirist Karl Sharro tweeted his own take on a news report claiming to outline the “anatomy of ISIS” – a haphazard napkin sketch of a chart mocking the group’s leadership and hierarchy: “the committee for oppressing women,” “the video guy,” “the Twitter fanboys body,” etc.

Although there is a tendency to dismiss the impact of social media, not to mention the role of humor, it is worth noting that this is where the networked Muslim majority might do the most damage in discrediting Islamic State – considering the Internet appears to be one of IS’s main battlegrounds (the group uses social media and YouTube for propaganda and recruitment efforts).

While the efforts highlighted above are organic, based on a shared community, other efforts appear to be more technocratically orchestrated. A recent article noted that Mr. Sharro’s satirical chart was widely shared, including by the U.S. State Department’s Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications. The CSCC has exhibited its own type of muted mockery in a video countering IS recruitment efforts. The integration of humor in U.S. counter-terrorism strategies has been ramped up since the development of social media and its snarky style of communication. A State Department program calling itself Viral Peace confronts and undermines online currents of extremism with “logic, humor, satire,” in its creator’s words.

But a government-backed effort does not necessarily make for an effective means of striking back (and can often be perceived as intrusive, stilted or awkward). After all, satire’s subversiveness can be an ill-fitting mask worn by government institutions, distinct from more organic efforts, produced in times of crisis by a shared, discursive community – at least, when that community itself is threatened. Still, if laughing in the face of the absurd reveals an ability to “dwell with the incomprehensible without dying from fear or going mad,” then that may be the first step in striking back – by having the last laugh.

Lysiane Gagnon

Will Couillard survive the cuts?

 

WHAT READERS THINK

Jan. 7: Total lack of judgment, and other letters to the editor


Lack of judgment

Margaret Wente defends the members of the Class of DDS 2015 Gentlemen as hapless pawns of “young male group behaviour” who have now fallen prey to a “witch hunt” (Dalhousie’s Dental Hysteria – Jan. 6). Spare me. They made their own decisions and they were bad enough ones to potentially end their dental careers.

I understand the university’s attempts at mitigating the suicide risk, but extending the process only slows the progress of the rest of the class through their own final year of school – already overwhelmingly stressful. Anyone, of any demographic, who spews forth violent hatred toward any other group has no place in a profession that requires dentistry’s level of caring and trustworthiness. Their futures are not necessarily “destroyed” – they’ll just be different.

Anita Jain, DDS, Vancouver

…….

As a mother of two university-age men, I think I can speak to that particular demographic. Absolutely, some of them can behave in ways that are juvenile. This should in no way be a defence – it has the ring of the old “Boys will be boys” defence of days past.

The young men, and they are young men, of the Dalhousie “gentlemen’s club” behaved grossly out of step with the collective conversations that are happening all around them in society.

I will agree with Ms. Wente to a point. When you are a juvenile and you engage in juvenile behaviour, you need to be corrected and guided. But university-age men are no longer juveniles and therefore should not be treated as such. Whatever their fate, I remain completely baffled at their total lack of judgment.

Paige Cowan, Toronto

……..

Ms. Wente concludes that “Despite all that misogyny, women seem to be doing just fine.” I would worry less about such men’s colleagues and more about their patients.

Surdas Mohit, Gatineau, Que.

……..

Congested

André Picard’s point about extending the hours of primary-care practices in order to divert people from emergency rooms (Don’t Blame Flu For ER Congestion – Jan. 6) is common sense, in times of flu or otherwise.

As a registered nurse in a family practice setting, I perform “telephone triage” through multiple daily calls to my patients. This results in keeping the majority of patients at home with expert advice on treating their symptoms (including red flags) and assessing which patients need to be seen urgently.

This nursing service provides continuity of care to patients, it fosters confidence that they can care for themselves at home and it frees up the ER.

Jane McLeod, Toronto

…….

Back in the 1950s, when I was undergoing my medical training in London, we used to moan about never having time off at Christmas. Our superiors told us, rather unsympathetically, that if we couldn’t take it, we shouldn’t have joined. We came to understand that a medical career involved service as well as making a living.

David Amies, Lethbridge, Alta.

…….

Green silks

I was disappointed to read that one of your best reporters and writers, Adam Radwanski, will be wasting his talents covering the horse race of federal politics. He should be writing about significant issues of public policy. The nuts and bolts of electioneering is way too much “inside baseball,” and in the big picture, of little importance to engaged voters.

But if we have to live it, why leave out the Green Party (Readiness For The Writ – Jan. 3)? If nothing else, including it would help legitimize its status as a viable political contender.

Brian Green, Thunder Bay

…….

Never simple

Thank you for Sandra Martin’s column (Let’s Talk About Death – Jan. 2) targeted at all the death-denying folks who instead prefer to refer to “passing” instead of “dying.” You did omit one of my favourite, or should I say most annoying, namely “She lost her husband,” to which I feel like replying, “Would you like me to help you find him?”

You have made me wonder what I would like said in my own obituary. Probably something like “Patricia died on this date. She is grateful to everyone who enriched her life while on this beautiful Earth. She hopes you will take good care of it. She loved and was loved by many wonderful people. If you wish to remember her, please be kind to someone who needs it.”

Patricia Houston, Victoria

…….

Ms. Martin says we’re “prudish” in the way we talk about death and then goes on to say we’re all misguided for continuing to talk about it in language that’s even mildly poetic.

When we grieve, we do not want to be reminded of the physicality of the loved one’s death. We are well aware that they have biologically expired. Poetic language, invoking comforting memories of the deceased, is a way we honour them. The words to describe this go far beyond what can be conveyed by frank language.

When my mother died last year, so did a part of me. But she remains alive in me, and the language I use to talk about that is deep from my heart. The words are never simple.

Paul Salvatori, Toronto

…….

Other rights

Humans and animals have rights, but not all the same rights (I, Orangutan – letters, Jan. 6). This reminds me of a debate after the 1972 publication of a collection of forestry articles, edited by Christopher Stone, titled Should Trees Have Standing.

Trees do have standing – legal standing, that is. Many municipalities have tree protection bylaws. Old-growth forests and other unique environments may also have legal standing to protect them.

Reiner Jaakson, Oakville, Ont.

…….

Bemused and irritated by Stanley Cunningham’s letter, I turned to a later page, where I found a picture of a group of men beating each other with sticks. Ecce Homo!

A.L. Doyle, Toronto

Irish Times:

Sir, – The situation at the A&E departments of the country’s main public hospitals is intolerable. But there is no such problem in the country’s private hospitals.

The obvious solution is for the State to requisition private hospitals for public use. At the same time, investment in step-down infrastructure needs to be accelerated.

There will be much squealing, of course, but the common good has to take priority over the private property rights of individual billionaire owners and investors.

Since the private pension funds of ordinary citizens have been dipped into by the State to pay for socialised bank debt, the private property taboo has been well and truly broken. It’s just a matter of focus and scale – and impudence.

The Mater private and St Vincent’s private are beautifully positioned on the sites of two major public hospitals that are experiencing overcrowding. They would be a very good place to start. – Yours, etc,

Dr GERRY BURKE,

Department of

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,

Graduate Entry

Medical School,

University of Limerick.

Sir, – Can I take it that the people of Ireland are going to sit back and watch underpaid and overworked nurses bear the burden of protesting against the scandalous situation in our hospitals? Are people who found their revolutionary fervour quickly enough when their pockets were being hit by water charges indifferent to the suffering and, I have no doubt, deaths that will occur until this situation is rectified?

If ever there was a time for the barricades to be built has it not arrived? If we sit quietly under this scandal then we should not dare to commemorate those who went out nearly 100 years ago to build an Ireland that “cherished all the children of the nation equally”. – Yours, etc,

MÁIRÍN de BURCA,

Dublin 3.

Sir, – It is shocking and unacceptable that in this day and age, elderly patients are kept waiting in chairs in A&E wards for lengths of time that are equivalent to multiple working days.

The fear, anguish and lack of dignity afforded to those who have given much to this country can only be imagined. That nursing staff stoically carry out their duties under such difficult and stressful working conditions is a credit to them. But this is not a problem that crept up on us. It was foreseen that with an ageing population and a lack of community care that this situation was inevitable.

As usual, we end up trying to solve problems rather than prevent them. – Yours, etc,

JOHN BELLEW,

Dunleer,

Co Louth.

Sir, – Older people in hospitals are often inappropriately the exclusive focus of the bed crises . While not majority occupants, younger trauma patients, for example, or younger chronic disease patients in need of rehabilitation, are rarely the focus of emergency discharge initiatives, even though they are less likely to have the complex co-morbidities or the predispisition to acute crises requiring the technology and interdisciplinary expertise of an acute hospital. Similarly many of our acute assessment initiatives favour fitter and younger patients to the exclusion of frail older people left on trollies to await an admission into the main hospital.

 Perhaps when discussing our hospital bed crises we might start with those who most need to be there and who are least likely to need an acute hospital bed on admission and discharge. – Yours, etc,

RONAN COLLINS, MD

Consultant Physician

in Geriatric Medicine,

Rathgar,

Dublin 14.

Sir, – Merely increasing beds and staff in hospitals will be costly and may not resolve the problem in the long term. The real question to explore is how many patients in hospital are delayed discharges and how can they be supported at home or moved to nursing home care in a timely manner.

While families and community-based services need to work proactively with hospitals in the discharge plans for all those who for a variety of reasons can not return home, prioritising available funding to primary care teams with a requirement to case-manage the most vulnerable in our community, both to prevent hospital admissions and effect timely discharges, may be the key response. – Yours, etc,

FRANK BROWNE,

Templeogue,

Dublin 16.

Sir, – Once again the annual outcry about people waiting on hospital trollies erupts and it’s all put down to funding problems and austerity.

We continue to ignore the fact that every single night 2,000 of our total 11,000 hospital beds are occupied by people with alcohol-related illness.

If our political and health leaders prioritised the public health issues of reducing our alcohol-soaked culture and provided effective alcohol treatment services, people would not have to wait on trollies. – Yours, etc,

CAROL MOORE,

Dublin 6W.

Sir, – Having worked in our hospitals for a number of years, and having also worked abroad, I have no doubt that this annual “winter surge” is primarily due to a lack of spare capacity within the hospital system.

However, it is worth pointing out that this annual problem follows the Christmas holiday period; a period of two weeks, during which our hospitals are run on a skeleton staff. I have attempted to contact staff in different hospital departments over the last few weeks, only to be told the department was either closed or staff were on holidays.

We all want a modern healthcare system. We cannot expect to run effectively our hospitals on a skeleton service for two weeks each December and not expect repercussions each January. – Yours, etc,

Dr IAN Mag FHEARRAIGH,

Dublin 7.

Sir, – The screening of RTÉ’s biopic of Charles J Haughey has provoked comment, once again, with the same old chestnuts about his flaws, covetousness and personal imperfections, which we’ve heard interminably regarding Haughey since light was publicly shone on these shortcomings over two decades ago.

For example, Kathy Sheridan’s piece (“Charlie’s devils: how Haughey era’s poisonous culture lives on”, Opinion & Analysis, January 7th) refers to Haughey’s “poisonous” culture and legacy and proceeded down the same well-worn path of clichéd criticism and invective.

If it wasn’t Charles Haughey it would have been someone else. It seems to have been practically in Fianna Fáil’s genetic make up, not to mention in politics in general (and not just in Ireland). The tendency to venality in the Irish body politic started as far back as the 1930s when Eamon de Valera used the Irish Press newspaper which he’d set up himself to con shareholders investing in the company at a time when Haughey was still in short trousers!

As with many of Haughey’s critics, Ms Sheridan refers to Desmond O’ Malley and his Progressive Democrats as a kind of counterbalance; a force for good set against Haughey’s malevolent Medici prince. I would argue that Mr O’Malley and his party’s neo-liberal economic ethos and legacy have done far greater damage to the fabric of Irish society than Charles Haughey ever did and, furthermore, this agenda and its deleterious effects still persist.

The other constant plank of criticism among many commentators relates to Haughey’s personal style and aspirations and describing his penchant for handmade shirts and a “big house” lifestyle in sneering terms. Apart from this being a classic example of the begrudging attitude that the Irish do so well, this particular form of snobbery implies that some in society are entitled to present themselves in this way whereas for others it only makes them look cheap and tasteless. Essentially, what this says is that Haughey was from a relatively modest, working-class background, therefore why would he crave and aspire to trappings considered luxurious? On the other hand, had he hailed from Dublin 4, Blackrock or Carrickmines, would we have heard this same scornful dismissal of his choice of apparel? I think not.

The other issue is the complete absence of balance in all this. What of Charles Haughey’s many and significant political achievements?

I am convinced that, at some point in the future, the Haughey era and his political career will come to be judged less harshly – in the same way that another taoiseach, voted the most popular in that role only about a decade ago, has surely found that status significantly revised! – Yours, etc,

JD MANGAN,

Stillorgan, Co Dublin.

Sir, – The RTÉ drama on the political life of Charles Haughey should come with a post-broadcast warning that anyone affected by the issues portrayed can call a counselling helpline. Personally, I couldn’t stick anymore than a few minutes of it. I didn’t need to watch it. I was there the first time round, when his rise to, and rapacious abuse of power, was played out in technicolour with full surround sound.

Charles Haughey’s sole legacy was that he encouraged a generation of acolytes in politics and public administration to reduce public administration to a tawdry racket, designed to enrich insiders and insulate them from any kind of accountability. All the rubbish about him “giving” anything to anyone is manipulative lying. Haughey was paid very well to administer legitimately the public purse. He cannot and should never have been thanked for doing the job he was paid to do.

What he was not paid to do was to seek every opportunity his elevated position of responsibility gave him to seek payments from businessmen, and to threaten those that opposed him, such as the behaviour he exhibited toward the AIB bank when it attempted to call in his debts.

There is only one thing I loathe more than Charles Haughey’s political and social legacy, and that is the degree to which some journalists at the time sat on their hands and consciences, when the heart and soul was ripped out of this nation by the godfather of Irish political corruption. – Yours, etc,

DECLAN DOYLE,

Lisdowney,

Kilkenny.

Sir, – There is no mystery about it. The new party is, quite simply, a Christian Democrat party. What is different is the personnel. This party is being set up by people who stood up for their principles, when many of their colleagues allowed themselves to be bullied into submission. In my book, that is a very good start. – Yours, etc,

JIM STACK,

Lismore,

Co Waterford.

Sir, – For a country with a proud history of producing great leaders on the sporting field, the lack of real leaders on the political stage is a profound worry, particularly in the context of an inexplicable rise in support for Sinn Féin.

I have no idea whether Lucinda Creighton is a real leader, but she is to be greatly admired for her willingness to give this her best shot. Fintan O’Toole, on the other hand, is happy to roll out his depressingly familiar condescending tone in his latest missive from the sidelines (“Reboot and be damned: a temporary little arrangement?”, Opinion & Analysis, January 6th).

If memory serves, having threatened to change the world before the 2011 election and enter the political fray, he quickly decided on the comfort and safety of his ivory tower. The great pity is that in deciding not to put up, he unfortunately chose not to shut up too.

It would be lovely, mind you, to see him focus on some more of his Christmas memories (“When I close my eyes and think of Christmas”, December 23rd). #RebootOToole. – Yours, etc,

ALAN KEALY,

Blackrock,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – Fintan O’Toole is quick to put the boot into Lucinda Creighton’s new party, but is factually wrong on one point at least, that of Ms Creighton’s supposed appeasement approach to trade unions. Ms Creighton is on record as saying unions need to be faced down, and that she had objected to Fine Gael going into coalition with Labour on the basis that this would compromise the Government’s ability to challenge unions and pursue a reform agenda. She cited the creation of the HSE and Irish Water as instances in which governments had capitulated to union demands, to the detriment of the State. – Yours, etc,

JOHN THOMPSON,

Phibsboro,

Dublin 7.

Sir, – If Lucinda reboots does that mean she will then be on an election footing? – Yours, etc,

MICHAEL O’DONNELL,

Dublin 9.

Sir, – Chris Johns’s “single transferable answer – more spending for me, higher taxes for you” can be applied far beyond his immediate concern with the unsustainability of taxpayer-funded pensions (“State faces stark arithmetic over future of pensions”, Business Opinion, January 5th). Since a general election is on the horizon it is probably expecting too much to hope that our politicians might do what is right for the country rather than what is most likely to get them elected. But the vast majority of us who are not politicians would do well to remember that spending increases and tax cuts – the staple of election promises – can be paid for only from one or more of additional taxation, spending cuts or additional borrowing.

The exchequer returns tell us that in 2014 we spent €8.4 billion in excess of our income. Apparently this is great news and is leading to calls – and promises – to restore the cuts made to public sector pay, to reduce or abolish the USC (which, by the way, is no longer “universal”) and to throw the usual additional billion or so at our health “service”. We must hope that print, radio and television journalists will up their game and insist that politicians tell us exactly how their promises are to be paid for. The old reliables of revenue buoyancy and efficiencies in the public sector should be given a very wide berth. – Yours, etc,

PAT O’BRIEN,

Rathmines,

Dublin 6.

Sir, – Further to reports of plans for the setting up of a new “Independent alliance” ( “TDs Shane Ross and Michael Fitzmaurice to form alliance”, January 6th), how is the extent of cooperation within such an alliance to be manifested? Presumably only one candidate from the alliance would be run per constituency, so a voting transfer pact between candidates would not apply.

It is very likely that the views among “participating candidates” (as opposed to “members”) would be starkly divergent. One candidate’s idea of an essential reform agenda could be totally incompatible with another alliance candidate’s viewpoint. If one set of elected TDs who are centre-right in mindset clashes with another set of elected TDs with a left-wing stance on a given policy, who would win out within the alliance?

General support given by the electorate to an incongruent hybrid grouping, presented under a gimmicky banner of convenience, could in practice lead to a significant element of instability in the event that such an alliance held the balance of power. Voters should always bear in mind that an incorporation of instability brings its own effective economic levies, given how dependent the perception of international markets of Ireland’s fiscal reputation is derived from the immediate cohesive level of domestic governance. – Yours, etc,

JOHN KENNEDY,

Goatstown,

Dublin 14.

Sir, – What a brave and insightful piece by Laura Kennedy (“The Yes Woman: I return to Mass and the room reminds me of a closed fist”, January 1st). I had virtually the same experience going to Mass this Christmas. And what a tragedy that the heart of the Christian message (and also the heart of all religions) has been hijacked by religious organisations. True religion should be a personal journey of discovery, certainly not anything dogmatic. – Yours, etc,

COLM STANLEY,

Castleknock,

Dublin 15

Sir, – Further to “Paul Howard’s 44 life lessons” (January 6th), may I add one of my late father’s? If you find a hobby you enjoy, don’t be afraid to spend money on it. – Yours, etc,

BRENDAN CROWE,

Skerries,

Co Dublin.

Irish Independent:

The crowded waiting room in Dublin’s Beaumont Hospital.

The crowded waiting room in Dublin’s Beaumont Hospital.

It would appear that, despite public hospitals including the word ‘University’ in their titles, the services provided have deteriorated significantly and are now nowhere near ‘university’ standard.

  • Go To

A university is described as ‘an institution of higher education and research’, so it is misleading, and inaccurate to apply such a word to the dysfunctional medical services being managed by the HSE.

When the professional nursing staff who provide 24/7 patient care are screaming for changes to hospital conditions, then it’s time for everyone to take notice.

It has become clear that the Government health policies, as provided by the HSE, are far from effective. The current systems have not worked for some time, despite additional resources being applied.

The HSE has proven to be an inefficient organisation and appears to spend a large amount of time and resources defending its position in the courts, which leaves it seriously short of any real credibility. Assuming that the Government will not be able to find a large amount of additional resources in the short term, perhaps it’s now time to consider adopting the Ryanair approach to our health services – ie provide a safe, low-cost service that achieves its objectives in the majority of cases and leaves no room for customers to be left on trolleys.

If hospitals have to include the name ‘university’ perhaps the HSE should give way and have the Higher Education Authority take over its responsibilities.

As the Department of Health and the Minister for Health also appear to wish to distance themselves from the day-to-day provision of health services, perhaps now is the time to ask what function they are paid to perform? And how are their results measured? Keeping a Government department close to budget is meaningless if it does not provide the basic public services required.

Owen Davin

Rockshire Road, Waterford

 

Patients pay price for holidays

As another January arrives, we encounter another overcrowding crisis in our country’s emergency departments.

The Irish Nurses and Midwives Organisation recently announced that the number of patients waiting on trolleys had surpassed 600 for the first time.

Having worked in our hospitals for a number of years, and having also worked abroad, I have no doubt that this annual “winter surge” is primarily due to a lack of spare capacity in the hospital system.

However, it is worth pointing out that this annual problem follows the Christmas holiday period; a period of two weeks during which our hospitals are run by a skeleton staff.

Over the last few weeks I have attempted to contact staff in different hospital departments, only to be told the department was either closed or staff were on holidays.

We all want a modern healthcare system. We cannot expect to effectively run our hospitals on a skeleton service for two weeks each December, and not expect repercussions each January.

Dr Ian MagFhearraigh

Arbour Hill, Dublin 7

 

Haughey and FitzGerald

In response to Robert Sullivan’s letter (January 7) I would like to point out that the “flawed pedigree” comment from the late Garret FitzGerald had nothing to do with Mr Haughey’s financial history. The comment was made in 1979 in the context of how Mr Haughey came to be elected leader of Fianna Fail.

Garret FitzGerald pointed out that his authority as leader of that party could legitimately be questioned because he got the position through a flawed process of threats, intimidation and bullying. The hallmarks of the thug he was and of the thugs he surrounded himself with.

Mr Sullivan is also factually incorrect to infer that the debt arrangements of Mr FitzGerald were in any way comparable to Mr Haughey.

Mr Haughey was in receipt of cash donations from various businesspeople for decades in return for which he shaped Irish government policy to meet their needs at the expense of the needs of the Irish public.

On the other hand Garret FitzGerald was stupid enough to place his entire life savings and money he borrowed into a single high-risk investment, which of course went bust. As a result he lost every penny and felt honour bound to sell his only asset, the family home, to repay as much of his debts as he could. There were no secret investments, offshore accounts or other assets and Garret never owned a property again for the rest of his life.

The reason AIB wrote-off the remaining debt was not because of some secret deal, it was because there was nothing left for AIB to take. Yes, it could have forced him into bankruptcy, but even then that wouldn’t have magically produced any more money.

Desmond FitzGerald

Canary Wharf, London

 

Foresight needed in health care

It is shocking and unacceptable that in this day and age, elderly patients are kept waiting in chairs in A&E wards for days.

The fear, anguish and lack of dignity afforded to those who have given so much to this country can only be imagined. That nursing staff stoically carry out their duties under such difficult and stressful working conditions is a credit to them.

But this is not a problem that crept up on us. It was foreseen that with an aging population and a lack of community care that this situation was inevitable. As usual, we end up trying to solve problems rather than preventing them.

John Bellew

Dunleer, Co Louth

 

Licence fee must be reformed

Colette Browne states that RTE is in need of reform (“Broadcasting charge is wrong – what’s needed is reform of RTE”, Irish Independent, January 6).

As has been recognised by a number of independent reviews, RTE has reformed and transformed itself radically over the past few years: operating costs have reduced by over 30pc (€130m) since 2008; staff numbers have fallen by over 500; remuneration to top-paid presenters has reduced by over 30pc.

And yet RTE has maintained over 25 public services, from orchestras to children’s channels to Irish-language services.

RTE continues to invest in the type of home-produced content that commercial competitors simply will not touch; important investigations such as the recent ‘Inside Bungalow 3′ or ‘The Torture Files’ programmes, high-quality Irish drama such as ‘Love/Hate’, ‘Amber’ and the ‘Charlie’ series, and factual programming such as David Brophy’s ‘High Hopes Choir’ series, are just a few recent examples.

RTE is dual-funded because in 2013 it cost €330m to run the full range of its public services; licence fee income accounted for only €186m.

At 17pc Ireland has one of the highest licence fee evasion rates in Western Europe. RTE has achieved substantial reforms over the past five years, and that process of change continues. It is now time for the licence fee to be reformed, too.

Brian Dalton

Managing Director,

Corporate Development, RTE


Ankle

$
0
0

9 January 2015 Ankle

Mary a little better though she could manage to get up for breakfast. Right foot very sore arthritis!

Obituary:

John Chancellor
John Chancellor

John Chancellor, who has died aged 87, was a publisher, author and bibliophile, winning a reputation as a considerable scholar and eccentric in the literary world and among a wide circle of friends. He became better known in later life as the father of the actress Anna Chancellor.

Friends often said that he loved his books too much and might have enjoyed more financial success as an antiquarian book dealer if he had achieved a more rapid turnover. The truth is that he was a better collector than salesman, a luxury he could ill afford. Once he had acquired a treasured tome, he was reluctant to let go of it.

In his extensive and esoteric travels in Europe and North America he picked up an astonishing variety of literary works and did not know where to put them – as his younger brother Alexander Chancellor, formerly editor of The Spectator and now of The Oldie, learnt to his cost.

When Alexander was Washington correspondent of The Independent in the late 1980s, John filled a whole room of his house there with his volumes. More recently, when John rented a converted stable near Alexander’s house in Northamptonshire, a garage became chock-a-block with books. Last summer there was a successful sale in which about 3,000 were sold, releasing some space.

John Chancellor was born in London on July 1 1927, shortly before his parents moved to China, where his father, Sir Christopher Chancellor, was general manager of Reuters before the war and afterwards. Sent to board at a prep school in England (which he hated), John was separated from his parents for four years; and, although he was well looked after by his grandparents, some say this may have contributed to his anxieties and insecurities in later life.

He went to Eton and then to Trinity College, Cambridge, which he enjoyed. He did National Service at the end of the war with the 60th Rifles but was relentlessly teased as an effete toff. He once awoke to find colleagues urinating on his face, but swore at his assailants with such colourful barrack-room language that he immediately established credibility and authority. No one knew where it had come from, however.

After the war Chancellor tried a job in insurance but this soon bored him. He then started work with Purnell’s, the publishers, which produced part-work encyclopedias sold in instalments and assembled in binders. An edition called Knowledge sold 400,000 copies. There were also volumes on Discovering Art and The Masters.

After this he joined the publishers Sidgwick & Jackson, where he earned the distinction of being sacked by the chairman, Lord Longford. Chancellor set up his own business, Kew Books, because he happened to be living in Kew Green near the botanical gardens at the time. It specialised in botanical matters.

He married Alice Jolliffe, sister of the Liberal Democrat peer Lord Hylton and the writer John Jolliffe . After his marriage broke up, he moved to North America, first to New York state and later to Puerto Rico and Santa Domingo, where he enjoyed the sun and an exotic lifestyle.

“He was an enfant terrible who loved to make himself shudder,” said his sister Susanna, who is hoping to publish a book about him based on the huge supply of letters he wrote. “He loved making tactless, embarrassing speeches, such as the one he made on my 40th wedding anniversary when he said I’d have married the first man who came along. He could be formal and haughty, but he was hugely lovable, affectionate and scholarly. He wrote books on Wagner and Edward II. He could read in four languages and was especially fond of German and French literature.”

Chancellor and his wife had three daughters, Isabel, Katie (who married the writer Will Self, then the restaurateur Rowley Leigh) and Anna, and one son, Eddie (who is married to Martin Amis’s former wife Antonia).

On the night before he died Chancellor, who suffered from Parkinson’s disease, went across to his brother Alexander’s house for champagne and mince pies while watching his daughter Anna on television in Mapp and Lucia. He then went to bed and was found dead the next morning.

John Chancellor, born July 1 1927, died December 31 2014

Guardian:

Charlie Hebdo
Flowers and candles outside the office of Charlie Hebdo in Paris. Why does ‘the killing of 12 journalists in a conflict which has killed thousands of ‘other people’, mostly Muslims, commands shock and fuss out of all proportion to its importance?’ asks Edward Pearce. Photograph: Francois Mori/AP

The way in which liberal-left political satire is practised in France and Britain has long given the lie to the smug stereotype of Britain being brave and France cowardly in opposing fascism (An assault on democracy, 8 January). The tendency here, as epitomised most egregiously by Mark Steel and Jeremy Hardy, is to pick on soft targets, pandering to a “groupthink” audience of the so-called liberal left, laughing uproariously on cue, in what Howard Jacobson once identified as an “avidity of like-mindedness”. The endless recycling of Blair as the soft target fox to these “brave” hunters is a good example.

The self-righteous rant can so often in Britain pass for the true satire, based firmly in an authentic left, which Charlie Hebdo so courageously exemplifies in France. Even Steve Bell, who has spoken very movingly of his French colleagues, slaughtered by fascist thugs, has been circumspect about his targets; and Rory Bremner left satire behind when he chose to exclude religious extremists from his chosen objects of ridicule – and then wondered why he did not get “enough grief” over his output.

True satire is not just posturing, in a cosily collusive middle-class milieu, as “anti-establishment”. It is freedom laughing in the face of tyranny. That takes courage of an order demonstrated by the assassinated journalists at Charlie Hebdo, whose slain editor simply stated that he would rather die than “live like a rat”.
Hugh Hetherington
Sandwich, Kent

• As a Muslim, I strongly condemn the attack on Charlie Hebdo and those behind it. These terrorists do not represent me nor do they represent Islam. Their wicked ideology is an existential threat to Islam itself. Part of the problem is that these extremists and Islamophobes – responsible for burning mosques and attacking women wearing the hijab – need each other to exist. We, the majority of ordinary people of every faith, race and colour, should stand together to these extremists and say enough is enough.
Mohammed Samaana
Belfast

• What is the matter with journalists that the killing of 12 other journalists in a conflict which has killed thousands of “other people”, mostly Muslims, commands shock and fuss out of all proportion to its importance? The government of Israel recently responded to the deaths of three Israelis with almost 3,000 Palestinian deaths. Journalists noticed that event, clicked tongues and talked about the general problem. The staff of Charlie Hebdo gave gross affront and knew about extremist groups who kill. We all do. They knew that Muslims venerate the prophet and that extreme Muslims will die and kill for him. The Parisian journalists produced a smart, Muhammad-mocking cartoon and now witter on (like your columnists) about rights, liberty, eternal freedom of eternal expression and other abstractions. They should consider that the little lad who used a stick with a horses-head handle to poke a lion got eaten.
Edward Pearce
York

• In the aftermath of this tragic attack, many people, mainly journalists and politicians, have robustly and self-righteously defended “free speech”. Free speech is held up as a cornerstone of democracy even when some of those who have exercised it have been imprisoned or exiled and when, at the same time, it can be divisive, foment prejudice and hatred, feed anger, bitterness and otherness. Those who call for some restraint and respect in the media are labelled censorious.

Surely in any democracy the exercise of restraint and respect for others is imperative. Defenders of free speech suggest that anything goes, in which case it should be acceptable to call someone with learning difficulties a “retard”, or a person of Pakistani origin a “Paki” and so on. It is not acceptable to use such speech and it should not be acceptable to denigrate religion – even when one holds a superior intellectual position – where it is known to give offence. Mockery, even when dressed up as satire, is a poor substitute for honest debate. Let’s have more respect and less hypocrisy.
Susan Robinson
Ormskirk, Lancashire

• Guardian commentators – along with the rest of the media – have been as one in their framing of the French terrorist atrocities as a narrative of ‘“free speech v evil doers”. In this context, some dissenting opinion from secular liberals would not go amiss. At what point does the “right to offend” slide into Muslim-baiting and just plain old-fashioned racism? For example, I fail to see equivalence between the intelligent irreligious cartoon “Jesus and Mo”, which attacks the absurdities of belief, and pornographic portrayals of the prophet Muhammad.

Readers might want to check out the Charlie Hebdo cartoon “the Koran is shit” and reflect on how this compares with the lurid depictions of Jews in Der Sturmer in 1930s Germany. Given France’s anti-Islamic colonialist past we should be very wary of how it continues to inform present discourse on Islam in the guise of liberty.
Steven Garside
Manchester

• Freedom is always a dilemma. For me to be free to do anything I want, no one else can be free. We therefore have agreed to limit individual freedom to get a balance for us all to have some freedom. For freedom of speech, the same thing works. Should I be free to express all I think and feel even if it insults, hurts, degrades other people and their most precious beliefs? Freedom of speech only works if we show respect for other people. Disrespecting other people, their religion or foreign heads of state, and justifying it as free speech, should also be unacceptable. This does not stop rational argument or criticism, just abuse.
Jeffrey Butcher
Morecambe, Lancashire

• Free speech comes at a price; it even costs human lives. The bottom line for an open and free democracy seems to me to be that I have to accept that someone, somewhere, sooner or later, will say something that offends me. But I have to live with my feelings, and not assuage them in any violent way at all. In fact, we can all have a “right” to cause offence, if we do not also demand the “right” to take offence too. It is likely that some of those who reject this principle, whatever their religion, or lack of it, will continue to make martyrs of those who practise it.
Fr Alec Mitchell
Manchester

• Natalie Nougayréde (Report, 8 January) is quoted as saying that “the crucial task now is to defend the right to offend”. Why is such a right more important than the responsibility to resist the urge to abuse the treasured right to free speech simply to prove a point? What purpose is served?
Sierra Hutton-Wilson
Evercreech, Somerset

Charlie Hebdo: A crime by individuals not a community

Italy, tribute to the victims of a shooting at the French magazine Charlie Hebdo
A man pays tribute to the victims of the Charlie Hebdo shooting at French consulate in Milan. ‘What has happened since is that the Muslim community as a whole is being charged with ­collective guilt by association,’ writes Sasha Simic. Photograph: Michela Nava/EPA

The brutal slaughter at the Charlie Hebdo office was nothing but base criminality. But it was committed by three men NOT a community – still less a religion. What has happened since is that the Muslim community as a whole is being charged with collective guilt by association.

I do not recall white Norwegians being asked by the media to scrutinise their “values” and beliefs in the same way in 2011 following the murderous rampage by the neonazi Anders Behring Breivik, in which he murdered 77 people. Such an argument would have been absurd. It is equally absurd to condemn millions of people because they happen to be the co-religionists of three brutal murderers.
Sasha Simic
London

Yourtrenchant editorial against the criminal terrorism committed in Paris (8 January) asserts the “adjectives are simply not there to capture the horror unleashed by weapons of war in a civilian office”. Maybe not for the Paris outrage. However, we should not forget Nato – on our behalf – has twice unleashed just such weapons when it bombed media headquarters in its invasions of Serbia and Afghanistan respectively. The then prime minister Tony Blair described the attack on the Serbian state television headquarters in Belgrade, killing 13 members of the media, as “entirely legitimate”. But the then general secretary of the National Union of Journalists described the attack as “barbarity”, adding that “killing journalists does not stop censorship, it only brings more repression”. In 2001, just before the Northern Alliance marched into Kabul on 12 November, the US, acting for Nato, dropped a bomb on the studios of the Arab satellite TV station al-Jazeera, also damaging nearby offices of the BBC and the Associated Press. Colonel Rick Thomas, in an unconvincing apologia to CBS News for the US Central Command, insisted that the building was “a known al Qaida facility in central Kabul … We had no indications this or any nearby facility was used by al-Jazeera”. By chance, nobody was hurt, as the building was not occupied at the time by any of the 10 al-Jazeera journalists and technicians based there.

It is never right to attack journalists, even if you disagree with the editorial position of their media outlet, print or broadcast. We should uphold this defence of freedom, not apply it selectively.
Dr David Lowry
Stoneleigh, Surrey

• The last surviving British veteran of the first world war, Harry Patch, claimed rightly that war is organised murder. So-called terrorism is merely organised murder usually by non-state actors. There is no one method of killing or motive for killing that is always present in terrorism and never present in war. But even the Guardian does not seem to realise this, referring to the sanguinary wars waged by the west in recent times as “misadventures” and the sanguinary actions of the non-state actors at the offices of Charlie Hebdo as “murder”. Both are to be utterly condemned. To condemn the one and not the other is intellectually and morally dishonest.
Malcolm Pittock
Bolton, Greater Manchester

• This is a terrible tragedy for the families of the murdered journalists and their co-workers. Our condolences must go out to them. Amid the outrage about this act, there is anger about the offence against free speech and the question is asked “How can they do such a thing?” Which, of course, no one attempts to answer. From the point of view of the killers, they were merely attacking part of the propaganda apparatus of their enemies – perhaps considering it akin to the allies execution of Lord Haw-Haw after the second world war. But before the howls of whataboutery and the sanctity about free speech start, perhaps some people in the western media should ask themselves whether they raised sufficient concerns when the Americans killed an al-Jazeera journalist in 2003? This was far from being an isolated case as the US killing of ITN’s Terry Lloyd – described as a war crime by the National Union of Journalists – demonstrated. More recently, how many western news outlets are acknowledging that it is the US that is funding the Egyptian military that is imprisoning journalists on trumped-up charges?

Of course we could ignore the unequal power dynamic that is at work and fail to reflect on the forces that construct this conflict. The atrocity would then be used as an excuse to continue to kill more of them who in turn would enjoy greater recruitment to kill more of us.
Dr Gavin Lewis
Manchester

• We are continuing to pay a stiff price for Charlie Wilson’s war and arming Afghani tribesmen with Stinger missiles to down Soviet helicopters. It would have been as well to let the communists build infrastructure, sort out land ownership and secularise Afghanistan instead of the US continuing its decades-long jihad against communism. The Muslim jihadis are a byproduct of a superstitious holy war against the secular philosophy of communism.
DBC Reed
Thorplands, Northamptonshire

• Kidnapping, torture, rendition, illegal invasion, bombing, assassination, suspension of habeas corpus. Hundreds of thousands of non-combatants dead, men, women and children. How then shall we now with conviction resist the pernicious, toxic metaphysical ideology that left 12 tragically dead in a Paris office? Those who break the law cannot rely on its protection. To honour Charlie Hebdo we must live up to andby the fundamental principles it has taken us 2,000 years to embed in our democratic way of life. No exceptions. Or we will lose.
Keith Farman
St Albans, Hertfordshire

• I have always thought we were wrong to involve ourselves in Middle Eastern conflicts. However, the assassination of 12 cartoonists and journalists in their workplace is unforgivable. Our society and culture is based in the ability to rib and ridicule the pillars that hold us up, this is our check and balance, this is what keeps our people in power in their place. This extends to our god. I now fear that as a result of Wednesday’s events our journalists and cartoonists will still their pens for fear of retribution in the form of an AK47. If so, we have lost everything.
Jake Ridley
Saul, Gloucestershire

In the spirit of “Je suis Charlie”, I believe a suitable gesture of solidarity would be for the Guardian to publish one or more of the controversial Charlie Hebdo cartoons on the front page. If the paper feels unable to do this, the readers should be able to at least expect a personal statement from the editor as to why, and as to whether fear of violence from jihadist groups is part or all of the reason.
Andrew Dawson
Crowthorne, Berkshire

• Interviewed on BBC Radio on the evening of the Paris attack, cartoonist Martin Rowson said the cartoon he wanted to draw was one of the prophet Muhammad wearing a T-shirt bearing the message “Not in my name”. If we are not permitted to see images some hold sacred, your cartoon page should include descriptions of cartoons that an oversensitive and violent minority prevent us from seeing. We will have to use our imagination.
Dominic Rayner
Leeds

• One response to the despicable attack in Paris would be for newspapers throughout the world to come together and publish cartoons that gently poke fun at all religions – and none, including humanism. If we are cowed into not using our freedoms, including the freedom of the press to satirically challenge our beliefs, then we deserve to lose them.
Bob Scott
Glasgow

• I’m a cartoonist, author and one-time Guardian features contributor who had a book of cartoons on religions around the world, The Good God Guide, published in 2002. It included a handful of gentle, I felt not especially controversial, cartoons about Islam and was introduced by Spike Milligan, shortly before his death. The book merited a whole-page feature in the Times and a few of the cartoons appeared together in the Guardian. Some time after, the book was politely “disappeared” and years of work were wasted, with the publisher telling me it feared Islamic threats. My artistic endeavour was silenced. The widening Islamist attack on free speech and democratic values across the world – and not least one’s being able to enjoy a sense of humour, even a wildly satirical one – must be defied.
John Pepper
Lancaster

The killings in Paris were an affront to humanity and freedom. So was the picture you printed on your front page (An assault on democracy, 8 January). The last moment of a helpless person about to be shot should not be published, out of respect for that person and their relatives and friends, by a responsible newspaper. Freedom comes with restraints that are defined by humanity and ethics, as well as by legality. I believe you made a mistake publishing that photograph.
John Gaskin
Driffield, East Yorkshire

• The killing of journalists and police officers in Paris is utterly deplorable. The atmosphere in Brussels is one of deep sadness along with heartfelt sympathy for the families and friends affected. However, it is deeply regrettable that some groups and individuals, including some in the European parliament, are using the tragic events opportunistically to forward their own personal and political agendas. Fanning the flames of division in Europe at such a time is completely unacceptable. Now is the moment to promote, celebrate and unite around Europe’s great qualities of free speech and tolerance.
Molly Scott Cato MEP
Green, South-West England

• Some people take life and their beliefs seriously. You can make fun of them, but must understand there may be a reaction – and you have a choice whether to do so or not. But did the police officers ordered to protect the journalists at Charlie Hebdo have a choice? Shot like animals that were in the way, I hope they are equally mourned. We should remember them when we exercise our right to criticise those who protect us and our liberties.
Chris Hardy
London

• Protestors raised pens in the air in Paris as a symbol of freedom of speech. My Penguin Classic edition of The Qur’an (1974, pages 61-63) has a chapter entitled The Pen, which begins: “By the Pen, and what they write, you are not mad.” Without the pen there would have been no Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen in 1789, and no Qur’an.
Ivor Morgan
Lincoln

• John Mortimer once said causing offence is important and beneficial to humanity. People should be offended three times a week and twice on Sundays.
Malachy Pakenham
St Albans, Hertfordshire

 

 

Yourtrenchant editorial against the criminal terrorism committed in Paris (8 January) asserts the “adjectives are simply not there to capture the horror unleashed by weapons of war in a civilian office”. Maybe not for the Paris outrage. However, we should not forget Nato – on our behalf – has twice unleashed just such weapons when it bombed media headquarters in its invasions of Serbia and Afghanistan respectively. The then prime minister Tony Blair described the attack on the Serbian state television headquarters in Belgrade, killing 13 members of the media, as “entirely legitimate”. But the then general secretary of the National Union of Journalists described the attack as “barbarity”, adding that “killing journalists does not stop censorship, it only brings more repression”. In 2001, just before the Northern Alliance marched into Kabul on 12 November, the US, acting for Nato, dropped a bomb on the studios of the Arab satellite TV station al-Jazeera, also damaging nearby offices of the BBC and the Associated Press. Colonel Rick Thomas, in an unconvincing apologia to CBS News for the US Central Command, insisted that the building was “a known al Qaida facility in central Kabul … We had no indications this or any nearby facility was used by al-Jazeera”. By chance, nobody was hurt, as the building was not occupied at the time by any of the 10 al-Jazeera journalists and technicians based there.

It is never right to attack journalists, even if you disagree with the editorial position of their media outlet, print or broadcast. We should uphold this defence of freedom, not apply it selectively.
Dr David Lowry
Stoneleigh, Surrey

• The last surviving British veteran of the first world war, Harry Patch, claimed rightly that war is organised murder. So-called terrorism is merely organised murder usually by non-state actors. There is no one method of killing or motive for killing that is always present in terrorism and never present in war. But even the Guardian does not seem to realise this, referring to the sanguinary wars waged by the west in recent times as “misadventures” and the sanguinary actions of the non-state actors at the offices of Charlie Hebdo as “murder”. Both are to be utterly condemned. To condemn the one and not the other is intellectually and morally dishonest.
Malcolm Pittock
Bolton, Greater Manchester

• This is a terrible tragedy for the families of the murdered journalists and their co-workers. Our condolences must go out to them. Amid the outrage about this act, there is anger about the offence against free speech and the question is asked “How can they do such a thing?” Which, of course, no one attempts to answer. From the point of view of the killers, they were merely attacking part of the propaganda apparatus of their enemies – perhaps considering it akin to the allies execution of Lord Haw-Haw after the second world war. But before the howls of whataboutery and the sanctity about free speech start, perhaps some people in the western media should ask themselves whether they raised sufficient concerns when the Americans killed an al-Jazeera journalist in 2003? This was far from being an isolated case as the US killing of ITN’s Terry Lloyd – described as a war crime by the National Union of Journalists – demonstrated. More recently, how many western news outlets are acknowledging that it is the US that is funding the Egyptian military that is imprisoning journalists on trumped-up charges?

Of course we could ignore the unequal power dynamic that is at work and fail to reflect on the forces that construct this conflict. The atrocity would then be used as an excuse to continue to kill more of them who in turn would enjoy greater recruitment to kill more of us.
Dr Gavin Lewis
Manchester

• We are continuing to pay a stiff price for Charlie Wilson’s war and arming Afghani tribesmen with Stinger missiles to down Soviet helicopters. It would have been as well to let the communists build infrastructure, sort out land ownership and secularise Afghanistan instead of the US continuing its decades-long jihad against communism. The Muslim jihadis are a byproduct of a superstitious holy war against the secular philosophy of communism.
DBC Reed
Thorplands, Northamptonshire

• Kidnapping, torture, rendition, illegal invasion, bombing, assassination, suspension of habeas corpus. Hundreds of thousands of non-combatants dead, men, women and children. How then shall we now with conviction resist the pernicious, toxic metaphysical ideology that left 12 tragically dead in a Paris office? Those who break the law cannot rely on its protection. To honour Charlie Hebdo we must live up to andby the fundamental principles it has taken us 2,000 years to embed in our democratic way of life. No exceptions. Or we will lose.
Keith Farman
St Albans, Hertfordshire

• I have always thought we were wrong to involve ourselves in Middle Eastern conflicts. However, the assassination of 12 cartoonists and journalists in their workplace is unforgivable. Our society and culture is based in the ability to rib and ridicule the pillars that hold us up, this is our check and balance, this is what keeps our people in power in their place. This extends to our god. I now fear that as a result of Wednesday’s events our journalists and cartoonists will still their pens for fear of retribution in the form of an AK47. If so, we have lost everything.
Jake Ridley
Saul, Gloucestershire

Independent:

Share

The Independent shows a confused response to the atrocity in Paris. Your 8 January editorial states that “all organs of the media must resist” this assault on free speech. Kim Sengupta claims that “self censorship cannot be the rule in a pluralistic, democratic society”.

Yet your publication has again proven to be at the heart of the problem and not the solution by refusing to print any of the cartoons that Charlie Hebdo produced. The British press has a lot to learn from Stéphane Charbonnier, the murdered editor of Charlie Hebdo who “would rather die standing than live on my knees”. If only our journalistic elite had the same concerns about standing up for what is right.

Jonathan Glass
London N2

 

Congratulations to Dave Brown and to the editorial decision to put his cartoon as a sole, unadorned front page (8 January). I do not remember anything with such punch since Zec’s wartime cartoon of a shipwrecked merchant sailor adrift, clinging to a piece of wreckage, with the caption: “‘The price of petrol has been increased by one penny’ – Official.” That one nearly got the Mirror shut down. Best  of luck.

P Hicks
London SW6

 

As a Muslim, I strongly condemn the attack on Charlie Hebdo and those behind it. These terrorists do not represent me nor do they represent Islam. Their wicked ideology is an existential threat to Islam itself. Part of the problem is that these extremists and Islamophobes – responsible for burning mosques and attacking women wearing hijab – need each other in order to exist. We, the majority of ordinary people of every faith, race and colour, should stand together to these extremists and say enough is enough.

Mohammed Samaana
Belfast

 

In the wake of the atrocity in Paris we are hearing a lot about freedom of speech, which strikes me as one of the Western world’s enduring myths. We have never had to be more careful about what we say, rightly or wrongly, and mindful of ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, disability, colour, social background and belief. We all know the drill.

George Sharpley
Gloucester

 

The media have almost without exception framed the French terrorist atrocities as a narrative of free speech vs evil doers. In this context some dissenting opinion from secular liberals would not go amiss.

At what point does the “right to offend” slide into Muslim-baiting and old-fashioned racism? For example, I fail to see equivalence between the intelligent, irreligious cartoon Jesus and Mo, which attacks the absurdities of belief, and pornographic portrayals of the Prophet Mohamed. Readers might want to check out the Charlie Hebdo cartoon “The Koran is shit” and reflect on how this compares with the lurid depictions of Judaism in Der Sturmer in 1930s Germany.

Given France’s anti-Islamic colonialist past, we should be very wary of how it continues to inform present discourse on Islam in the guise of liberty.

Steven Garside
Manchester

 

Yet again we see the total insanity of Muslim terrorists in our Western civilisation, and we have to insist that our own press make a firm stand and show these fanatics that we simply do not accept their Stone Age ideas and actions. One way to do this is to just poke fun and generally ridicule them on a grand scale.

Every newspaper in the UK and Europe should agree on a date on which to publish cartoons ridiculing the three main religious groups, Muslims, Jews and Christians, with a banner heading saying: “If you live in the Western world you accept Western freedoms… these include the right to be critical of all religions without fear of reprisal. If you cannot accept this, then you should not live in Western society.”

Dave Simms Davies
Marlow

 

Kidnapping, torture, rendition, illegal invasion, bombing, assassination, suspension of habeas corpus. Hundreds of thousands dead including non-combatant men, women and children.

How then shall we now with honour and conviction resist the pernicious, toxic ideology that left 12 people tragically dead in a Paris office?

Those who break the law cannot rely on its protection. To honour Charlie Hebdo we must live up to and by the fundamental principles it has taken us 2,000 years to embed in our democratic way of life. No exceptions. Or we will lose.

Keith Farman
St Albans, Hertfordshire

 

The murders in Paris are inexcusable. However, these writers should have known better than to insult Islam in the way that they did. In a world increasingly divided by religious extremism, with Islamophobia and disaffected Muslim youth going off to fight in the Middle East, we need to build bridges, not destroy them.

Daniel Emlyn-Jones
Oxford

 

The Paris murderers were indeed cowardly and motivated by their perceived highest authority – Allah. The torturers in Guantanamo Bay and the safely ensconced directors of US killer drones were also cowardly and motivated by their perceived highest authority – god and country. This should remind us of the terrors that are unleashed when, instead of our moral sense being grounded in humanity and fellow-feeling, we understand it as determined by an all-powerful authority – be it god, the state or even the free market.

Peter Cave
London W1

 

All attention seems to be focused on the Charlie Hebdo staff who were victims of yesterday’s shocking atrocity in Paris.

Spare a thought for the families of the two policemen who were collateral damage from the needless clash of two fundamentalisms.

David Maughan Brown
York

 

The A&E crisis we could all see coming

Charlie Cooper’s “Why are we experiencing an A&E crisis now?” (7 January) identifies many of the salient roots of the growing A&E crisis. However, I find it baffling that there is no mention of Andrew Lansley’s disastrous 2012 NHS “reforms”. During a period of enormous financial strain on the NHS (Tory “efficiency savings” ), Lansley chose to introduce an intensely complex and costly (£3bn) reorganisation. The resulting chaos has been an increased burden on the NHS, and further demoralised already stretched nurses and doctors.

Whether or not one agrees with Lansley’s reforms is immaterial. David Nicholson (then the NHS’s chief executive) described the 2012 NHS reorganisation as being “so large it is visible from space”. To ignore its salience to the current A&E crisis seems remiss.

Jamie Register
London E17

 

I noticed that an article I was reading in an online South American newspaper this morning had been “sponsored” by the British National Health Service. Were I to be feeling depressed, I should contact them without delay. I was surprised to find that the NHS currently considers itself to be so short of business that it needs to tout for more.

Iain Salisbury
Birmingham

 

Why is everyone so unprepared for what is happening in the NHS? For ages we have known that people are living longer and, consequently, more hospital beds would be required.

Perhaps, when our MPs are old, they will be able to see what they should have done to avoid the present situation (I suggest scrapping Trident and building more hospitals). But, sadly, by then it will be too late.

Sarah Pegg
Seaford, East Sussex

 

Truly regional television

On Monday evening I enjoyed watching Broadchurch on television, set as it was by the golden west Dorset cliffs. What a surprise to find that Ellen E Jones (TV review, 6 January) must have seen a different version, which had “crumbling white cliffs”. Was hers perhaps filmed in Sussex? Are there other regional versions?

Alan Langley
Market Harborough, Leicestershire

 

The litter louts among us

Unfortunately, the littering habit observed by Rosy Curtis (Letters, 6 January) is not confined to her local cinema. Littering on trains appears to be increasingly common, not only in the form of discarded freesheets and other newspapers, but also cans, cups, and even banana skins and apple cores, which are particularly unpleasant for cleaners and for other travellers.

Probably the worst example I have seen was a used teabag being discarded on the floor of a train. Would these (middle-aged, professional) people do this at home?

John Armstrong
Southampton

 

Rosy Curtis is quite right to feel aggrieved by the litter left after a children’s screening of Paddington. But to say “I don’t know what the world is coming to” raises the question: did she not suffer from adults smoking in the cinema in the old days?

Peter Jones
St Albans, Hertfordshire

Times:

Sir, It is clear from the attacks in Paris (reports, Jan 8) that Britain needs to adopt a far more assertive and structured stance against militant Islamism in the UK. The home secretary’s recent courageous measures to counter British “jihadists” need to be applauded and espoused as the national minimum in our legal armoury.

For their part, British Islamic institutions are still woefully complacent, offering at best no more than rhetoric and well-rehearsed bouts of condemnation. They need to do much better in countering the pernicious ideology of radical Islamism, reinforcing to young impressionable Muslim minds that the security of this country is paramount, as well as instilling unmitigated pride in our British values and national institutions.
Dr Lu’ayy Minwer Al Rimawi

(Former visiting fellow, Harvard Law School, Islamic legal studies programme) Peterborough

Sir, As a Muslim I strongly condemn the attack on the staff of Charlie Hebdo and those behind it. These terrorists do not represent me or Islam. Their wicked ideology is an existential threat to Islam itself. Part of the problem is that Islamic extremists and Islamophobes need each other in order to exist. We, the majority of ordinary people of every faith, race and colour, should stand together and say: enough is enough.
Mohammed Samaana

Belfast

Sir, David Aaronovitch (“Our cowardice helped to allow this attack”, Opinion, Jan 8) speaks for the many of us who share his beliefs (but lack the journalistic skill and the platform to express them) when he says: “This is the deal for living together. The same tolerance that allows Muslims or Methodists freedom to practise and espouse their religion is the same tolerance that allows their religion or any aspect of it to be depicted, criticised or even ridiculed.” Those who indoctrinate Islamic terrorists are fond of stating that the West will never understand them. But we understand them all too well. Extremism is not new. It flourishes wherever reason is suppressed and freedom of thought discouraged. It will always wither under the spotlight of intelligent interrogation, which of course is exactly why it invariably attempts violently to suppress it.
Robert Sutton

Markham, Notts

Sir, David Aaronovitch is quite right that the need for mutual respect means the possibility of expressing a diversity of views. So I look forward to a long series of cartoons and articles mocking the intellectual pomposity and moral emptiness of atheism.
The Rev Christopher Green
London N10

Sir, The journalists at Charlie Hebdo knew that they were under personal threat and they knew what they were standing up for. Many of us share that commitment to the ideals of liberty and freedom, and it is easy to tweet and post our support online. However, I wonder how many of us really would stand up and say “je suis Charlie” if our own personal security was directly at risk? It is an uncomfortable question to ask oneself and demonstrates the courage of those who were murdered in Paris. The foundations of democracy in Europe seem a little less robust with their passing.
Nicholas Allan
Tunbridge Wells, Kent

Sir, The universal condemnation of the shootings in Paris is taking little account of causal factors. Under the cover of free speech, secularising societies such as France sanction the persistent antagonism of the faithful of many religions. To acknowledge violence as the inevitable consequence is not to condone it but it is to understand that effects have causes and that freedoms need to be asserted empathically.
Roger Homan
Professor emeritus of religious studies, University of Brighton

Sir, Je (ne) suis pas Charlie. The outrage in Paris can be neither excused nor forgiven. Nor must be it be forgotten, but it can be explained. Those who say, act or cartoon in the name of free speech often find it convenient to omit the attendant qualification — which is that while speech should be free it should also be responsible. It is a cliché that we do not have the right to yell “Fire! Fire!” in a packed theatre even if there is a fire, as orderly exits save more lives than mad panics.

In exercising freely what we may regard as our God-given right to insult people in our way, the risk is run that they will freely exercise their God-given right to retort in their way. Those who play with fire do undertake a certain risk; as we have learnt yet again, it can be terminally naive to assume otherwise.
Tim Flinn

Garvald, East Lothian

Sir, The attack on the staff of Charlie Hebdo is utterly abhorrent. However, is extreme mockery always appropriate? In France the law of laïcité is ruthlessly applied, as in the banning of wearing the veil in workplaces and school, and where, in Paris itself, segregation rather than integration is overtly apparent. Are liberté, égalité and fraternité only the prerogative of the born and bred Français de souche rather than of all citizens who try hard to embrace French culture while retaining their own religious beliefs?

As a past and occasional current reader of both Le Canard Enchainé and Charlie Hebdo, I enjoy satirical cartoons, which enable us to take a long hard look at ourselves. However, extreme satire may risk repercussions from disaffected, angry members of a sometimes xenophobic society which, at times, alienates rather than welcomes. A lethal recipe, perhaps.
Sarah Martinelli

(French teacher)
Letchworth, Herts

Sir, Violence against freedom of speech is nothing new. In 1559 the Vatican promulgated the first “Index librorum prohibitorum”. In 1632, Galileo was prohibited from publishing his support for Copernicus’s theory that the Earth goes round the Sun rather than being at the centre of the universe. He was handed over to the tender mercies of the Inquisition and forced to recant. The Vatican finally got round to abolishing the Index in 1966.
Peter Hassell

Budleigh Salterton, Devon

Sir, The order of service at a wedding I attended last week contained a version of the Lord’s Prayer which I had not seen before. It read: “Lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from email.” Amen to that.
Andrew Body
Ludlow, Shropshire

Sir, With regard to recognising ranks(letter, Jan 7), I was at Sandhurst for my son’s graduation and didn’t receive a single salute from the clearly bemused soldiers. We also confuse the public. Why is an air vice-marshal
(2 star) equivalent to a rear admiral when a vice-admiral is 3 star? Why do squadron leaders command flights, wing commanders squadrons and group captains stations?
Air Vice-Marshal Barry Higgs (rtd)
Cambridge

Sir, Tam Fry of the National Obesity Forum says (News, Jan 1) that the simplest advice to lose weight is “to take control of yourself”. Food firms spend millions of pounds to influence our associations. Dairy Milk is “joy”, Coca-Cola is “happiness” and McDonald’s is the backdrop to every meaningful moment. I would have more optimism about the UK’s diet if Mr Fry took every weapon in the battle for our minds more seriously.
Clare Dimond
Marlborough, Wilts

Sir, Melanie Phillips is correct (Opinion, Jan 5). By distorting the historical record (The Imitation Game being a case in point) the arts world is seriously misleading the public. Films often become fact simply because Hollywood says it is so. The BBC is as guilty. Its Castles in the Skypurported to tell the story of British radar. Like the Turing farrago it too had a spurious love interest and a spy. More importantly, Robert Watson-Watt was no “weatherman” nor was any member of his team. They were either from the radio research station at Slough or were engineers and physicists.
Dr Brian Austin
West Kirby, Wirral

Sir, Your leader (“Fortune Favours the Brave”, Jan 6) rightly applauds the beneficial effect of film tax reliefs while drawing attention to the absence of sufficient sustainable British film businesses supported by British investment. Investment is not the only factor. We have a wealth of creative talent — directors, writers, producers and actors — and potentially a large audience that wants to enjoy films that are different to those from US studios. The challenge, to connect the two, is one that we must work to resolve.
Andrew Chowns
Chief executive, Directors UK

Sir, The film 47 Ronin might have lost at the box office but the tax breaks ensured that 1,630 musician hours were spent on the film in the UK. In recent years, The Hobbit, Batman and the Harry Potter films have benefited from British musical talent. Tax breaks are working.
Peter Thoms
Sessions official, Musicians’ Union

Telegraph:

NHS, doctor, junior doctor
There is a mismatch between the number of able students willing to train in medicine and the number of university places available Photo: ALAMY

SIR – With a clearly overstretched National Health Service, surely it is time to look at the resources assigned to training doctors. There is a mismatch between the number of able students willing to work within this field and the number of places available.

My 17-year-old daughter is currently going through the admissions process, and it has been illuminating to discover how difficult it is for top students to gain places. University of Bristol received 5,500 applications for just 232 places this year.

In recent years the demand for medical services has increased and will no doubt continue to do so. It is therefore high time to look at expanding the availability of relevant university courses.

Louise Mayo
London W11

SIR – Some accident and emergency departments in hospitals have had to declare a critical incident in order to deal with serious over-crowding. This is partly the result of the inability of the NHS, and particularly acute trusts, to work with social care providers.

The care-home sector has enormous potential to deliver support services that will reduce hospital admissions, enable appropriate discharge and offer a better experience for the patient, as well as better value for the taxpayer.

There is another way in which we can deliver better outcomes and more efficiency in the system, and that requires that money be apportioned differently in order to sustain our existing services.

I call on the Government and the NHS to make all the rhetoric about integration real.

Professor Martin Green
Chief Executive, Care England
London E1

SIR – The service the public values the most, our nurses, seems to be the service the NHS hierarchy values the least, which is reflected in the pay structure. We are regularly informed of the executives receiving generous salaries plus bonuses. Common sense dictates that we should reduce these salaries and give the amount deducted, and the bonus, as pay to the nurses instead. The funds are obviously there, but are simply being channelled incorrectly. This way a nurses’ strike may be avoided.

John Batty
Middle Assendon, Oxfordshire

SIR – The easiest way to fix the current NHS problems is to make it mandatory for all ministers, MPs and peers to use the NHS exclusively.

Roger Hiscock
Hayling Island, Hampshire

SIR – The text function on my new smart phone is so intelligent that it automatically knew I was an NHS surgeon. When I tapped in the word “case”, it immediately predicted the next word as “cancelled”.

Richard Bickerton FRCS
Warwick

Terror in Paris

Francois Hollande (centre left) flanked by French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve (right) outside the Charlie Hebdo office (Remy De La Mauviniere/AP)

SIR – Western leaders have condemned the Islamist terrorists’ attack on the Paris offices of the magazine Charlie Hebdo.

Well done. That’ll have the terrorists quaking in their boots.

Stuart Buxton
Haverfordwest, Pembrokeshire

SIR – Islam means “peace, purity, submission and obedience”. The perpetrators of the outrage in Paris have broken each of those.

David J Beck
Hinckley, Leicestershire

Defence funding

SIR – On The Andrew Marr Show on BBC One last Sunday, David Cameron announced that Britain was to purchase 80-90 F‑35B aircraft for HMS Queen Elizabeth and Prince of Wales, and that both carriers would be operational with air wings.

Previous talk had been of only enough aircraft being purchased to equip one air wing for HMS Queen Elizabeth, no role having been decided for HMS Prince of Wales. As the estimated fly-away cost for each F-35B in 2013 was $220 million, the increase from previous estimated costs during the 2015-20 Parliament would be at least $9 billion. Due to the Government’s cuts in the Royal Navy, it would be hard-pressed to find enough support ships for one carrier task force, let alone two.

Perhaps Mr Cameron will make clear how he is going to make up the extra £15‑20 billion in funding for the second carrier task force. I hope it won’t all be from reductions in welfare benefits.

George D Lewis
Brackley, Northamptonshire

Earned bonuses

SIR – Valerie Crews (Letters, January 5) seems to misunderstand how CEO reward packages are set. In a public company the directors are appointed by shareholders to run the company with the sole intention of creating shareholder value.

Reward packages for the CEO have to be agreed by the shareholders in order for the incumbent to be suitably motivated to increase shareholder value. What would be the incentive for a CEO to create value for the shareholders if they were not rewarded for doing so? Capping CEO bonuses would inflate base salaries, resulting in shareholders paying huge sums regardless of performance.

The real problem is that targets are based on short-term performance. This approach created the greed culture in banking where it is all about maximising profit now with little thought for the future. What’s more, the major shareholders in public companies are banks and pension funds, which are not going to vote for a package that “rocks the boat” as their own packages would have to change as well.

The financial system is a closed one, and until it is broken open to new entrants who can make a difference, the status quo will remain.

Andrew Holgate
Woodley, Cheshire

Recipes for a happy morning and a long life

Get your oats: a study from Harvard University has detailed the health benefits of porridge (Alamy)

SIR – Should one make one’s daily bowl of porridge with water, milk or cream to achieve longevity?

Sandra Miles-Taylor
St Albans, Hertfordshire

SIR – Three tablespoons of porridge oats combined with milk, preferably goat’s: cook for three minutes, then add a tablespoon of syrup with three tablespoons of mixed cereals.

David Le Clercq
Bournemouth, Hampshire

SIR – My late father-in-law, a dairy farmer, always poured a healthy serving of Jamaican rum on his porridge after milking the cows on a cold winter morning.

Donald Bradshaw
Banbury, Oxfordshire

SIR – Having previously experimented with various chopped fruits, I can find nothing finer than a few glugs of Baileys liqueur on my porridge. It makes mornings so worthwhile.

Alan Belk
Leatherhead, Surrey

Change of address

SIR – We live in High Wycombe, yet a weird boundary (Letters, January 6) imposed by BT means that our road cannot receive a High Wycombe telephone directory. We are given the Slough, Windsor and Maidenhead edition, which is not even from the same county.

BT says the boundary is at their discretion and will not enter into a discussion about a possible error. We may, however, purchase a High Wycombe directory for £10. The only form of protest I have been able to make is to change my telephone provider.

Linda Lancaster
High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire

Off on a walk

SIR – While in no way belittling the achievement of Levison Wood, who has walked the length of the Nile, we might consider that of Ewart Grogan, who walked from Cape Town to Cairo, taking two and a half years, between 1898 and 1900.

Unlike Mr Wood, he lacked television sponsorship, a film crew or any other backup. Grogan’s beloved Gertrude had been refused to him by her parents in view of his somewhat dissolute lifestyle, but he won her hand after his achievement. She is still remembered in the chain of Gertrude’s Children’s Hospitals in Kenya.

Peter Innes
Winchester, Hampshire

How’s it going?

SIR – As the former director of international news for an American TV news network, I was only ever addressed as “Bro” by one employee: our Afghan producer in Kabul, who invariably began his emails to me that way. I didn’t like to ask why.

Personally, I prefer to be called “Dude”.

Chris Hampson
Chesham, Buckinghamshire

All the fun of the fair

SIR – Boris Johnson makes the case for yet another underground line; but this will be too little too late. What is needed is a radical solution based on new technology.

We might consider an above-ground light railway, like the one in Sydney, Australia, or perhaps an ultra-light railway based on fairground ride engineering; passenger pods would soar above and through the city. Such a system would be cheaper, relatively quick to install, and much more exciting than rushing through the ground.

Brian Farmer
Chelmsford, Essex

Saucy school lessons in French courtesy of HP

(Alamy)

SIR – I read with nostalgia your report on the potential demise of HP brown sauce.

This condiment was my introduction to learning French, since in the Fifties the label on the back of the bottle was, for some strange reason, in French and read: Cette sauce de premier choix possède les plus hautes qualités digestives. C’est un assortiment de fruits d’Orient, d’épices et de vinaigre de ‘Malt’ pur. Elle est absolument pure, appétissante et délicieuse avec les viandes chaudes ou froides.

It was removed in 1980, prompting many sad letters at the loss of a French tutor to young schoolboys.

David R Grice
London SW14

SIR – Brown sauce was not launched by HP in 1903. The original recipe was devised by Frederick Gibson Garton, a Nottingham grocer, in the 1890s and was produced and sold at his shop in Sandon Street, New Basford.

Indeed, the 1891 census shows his occupation as a “pickle manufacturer”, rather than a grocer. After hearing that this sauce was popular in the Houses of Parliament dining rooms, he registered the name HP Sauce in 1895.

Garton was perhaps not the best businessman, however, and he settled his debts with the recipe for HP Sauce, which was taken back to Birmingham and relaunched by the Midlands Vinegar Company in 1903.

Sadly, this icon of Britishness is now produced in the Netherlands.

Brian Binns
Loughborough, Leicestershire

Testing Granny

SIR – Scientists have used mice to prove Granny was right to tell us to wear a scarf.

She also told us to tuck our vests into our knickers. How do you use mice to prove that?

Elizabeth Ross
Isle of Arran, North Ayrshire

Globe and Mail:

Timothy Garton Ash

Europe’s media must unite and stand against the assassin’s veto

Irish Times:

Sir, – The principles of liberté, égalité and fraternité which guide France and, in essence, the societies of all civilised nations cannot, and do not, exist in a vacuum.

They must be assiduously guarded and fought for when and where necessary.

Religious or ideological fanaticism either egregiously condones or actively perpetrates terrorist attacks.

Such fanatics all the while lambast the societies in which they live for lack of tolerance, understanding and acceptance of ideas and practices which trample on the cherished and hard-won rights and freedoms of most western countries. Such double standards must be identified again and again and be vigorously and consistently repudiated in word and action by politics and civil society at all levels.

Intolerance cannot be countered with tolerance.

All the wishful thinking, handwringing and misguided Kumbaya sentiment will not change this simple fact. – Yours, etc,

PATRICIA MULKEEN,

Ballinfull,

Sligo.

Sir, – The horrific murders in Paris must be roundly condemned. It should be possible to criticise and satirise both public figures and ideology without such actions from young men, alienated and angry as they may be.

It is equally important that the response to the attacks does not lead either to an increase in future terrorist attacks or a rise in attacks on Muslims.

Hatred and revenge are not the answer to the grief that the relatives of the victims are experiencing.

The French government could lead effectively in calming the widespread public anger and grief by reflecting on its own dubious foreign policy, which along with that of other western powers has fostered instability, sectarianism, oppression and hundreds of thousands of Muslims killed and injured, all of which has ultimately led to a rise in terrorism. We should remember that the response of the French government to the brutal suppression by Tunisian dictator Ben Ali to the calls for democracy by peaceful protesters was to offer to send 300 French paratroopers.

Serious reflection and positive actions on foreign policy by the French government would be the best response at this tragic time. – Yours, etc,

JIM ROCHE,

Irish Anti-War Movement,

PO Box 9260,

Dublin 1.

Sir, – I have little doubt that the horrific murder of Charlie Hebdo staff and the two police officers will leave a small but deranged number of Islamists rubbing their hands in delight. But let us take a deep breath before falling into their trap, where hatred, not love, dominates their souls.

The overwhelming majority of Muslims are ordinary decent people who just want to get on with their lives.

Like the Irish living in Britain during the IRA bombing campaign, undoubtedly they too feel under threat and suspicion.

Ironically, it may be Marine Le Pen’s far-right National Front that benefits from this atrocity. Who knows, perhaps that was one of the terrorists’ objectives – to drive a large wedge between ordinary Muslims and the wider community. There will always be terrorism in the world, but to minimise the threat of Islamic terrorism, both Muslims and wider society need to pull together towards the common good by fighting radicalisation. – Yours, etc,

JOHN BELLEW,

Dunleer,

Co Louth.

Sir, – Can we please have no self-hating apologies for the people who committed this act? The journalists who work for the magazine are entitled to poke fun at, ridicule and insult whomever they want. The hard-won freedoms which we wish to continue to enjoy are dependant on press freedom and the scrutiny of even the most satirical wags.

We must not fall victim to sham moral equivalency. An anti-enlightenment death cult has little to do with Islam but reflects a fascistic desire to undermine and destroy democracy. It cannot be appeased. – Yours, etc,

MACK LENNON,

Sutton,

Dublin 13.

Sir , – Yesterday’s cartoon by Martyn Turner demonstrated how all cartoonists must be free to bring a smile or a thought to our lives despite such horrendous intimidation from extremist groups. – Yours, etc,

MICHAEL STOREY,

Glencar,

Sligo.

Sir, – As a Muslim, I strongly condemn the attack on the French magazine Charlie Hebdo and those who perpetrated it.

These terrorists do not represent me nor do they represent Islam. Their wicked ideology is an existential threat to Islam itself.

Part of the problem is that these extremists and Islamophobes – responsible for burning mosques and attacking women wearing hijab – need each other in order to exist. We, the majority of ordinary people of every faith, race and colour, should stand together to these extremists and say enough is enough. – Yours, etc,

MOHAMMED SAMAANA,

Belfast.

Sir, – Almost every media organisation in the world will roundly condemn the Paris massacre and rant on about “free speech” but very few will take any action to negate the terrorists’ goals. All media organisations should immediately start publishing the “offending” cartoons. Otherwise the terrorists will win. – Yours, etc,

DICK KEANE,

Glenageary,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – Two crucial values for the future of the French republic were attacked. First, our freedom of speech as enshrined since 1789 in our Declaration of Human Rights.

According to article 11, “Free communication of thoughts and opinions is the most precious human right”.

It is interesting to see the debates that have arisen about the definition of “freedom of speech”, what it allows, what should or should not be said. Many people consider that decency, kindness or respect should be the limitations to freedom of speech.

To me, this makes no sense. These are extremely subjective values. The offence of blasphemy was abolished in 1791 in France. There must be no qualification of freedom of speech except by law.

Once we enter the debate of respect and decency, we curtail and chip away at this fundamental right. Whatever opinion or belief French law does not ban is allowed to be expressed no matter whether it is provocative, unpopular or offensive to a majority or a minority.

If you do not approve of this opinion, if it makes you uncomfortable, you have the choice to reply, express your own opinion or ignore the newspaper with which you disagree. This is freedom, freedom of expression, freedom to debate.

The 12 people who died on January 7th died for this freedom.

The second value that was attacked yesterday is that of fraternity, the idea that Muslim and non-Muslim French citizens can live together. France is at a dangerous crossroads. It is on the brink of choking on its fears of “the other” as manipulated by fundamentalists rather than sticking by its republican values and standing strong.

Politicians sensed the immense danger yesterday. President François Hollande and former Nicolas Sarkozy were exemplary in their condemnation of the barbaric act and their appeal to calm and cohesion, while not mentioning once the name of Islam so as not to stigmatise it.

Now is not the time to call for a reinstatement of death penalty, as Marine Le Pen is doing. Now is not the time to fuel fear, anger and hatred. The French republic needs to remain strong on its values of fraternity, solidarity, freedom and acceptance while engaging in an open and intellectually honest debate on the place of Islam in the republic.

The temptation to amalgamate Muslims and Islamic fundamentalists is very strong among French people. The climate of Islamophobia has never been more palpable.

And it is spreading across Europe. Look at Germany and the anti-Islam demonstrations taking place on a weekly basis in Dresden. Look at Sweden and the attacks against four mosques since October 2014. Fear of Islam and how it fits in our western societies cannot be denied.

This is enhanced by xenophobic and inward-looking political parties that play with our fears for their political benefit. Our duty as republicans is to answer those fears in a respectful, inclusive and democratic way. Democracy is genuinely at stake.

If we do not fight for our values of freedom and fraternity, we might as well have killed those journalists ourselves. – Yours, etc,

Dr EMMANUELLE

SCHÖN-QUINLIVAN,

Department of Government,

University College Cork.

Crisis in emergency departments

A chara, – Leo Varadkar will now spend the next few weeks being distracted by the media and politically misguided Opposition leaders firing a tirade of abuse at him for legacy issues.

Perhaps now might be the time for all the naysayers to start helping collectively with a view to sorting out the health service once and for all instead of playing the blame game. – Yours, etc,

JONATHAN WORMALD,

Sutton,

Dublin 13.

Sir, – Leo Varadkar wants consultants to do twice daily ward rounds, including at weekends. Such focus on inpatient care might lead to greater throughput of admissions and fewer patients on trolleys for a while but it would also mean fewer outpatient and day clinics, fewer procedures, less supervision, less teaching and training, less administrative input, less time for paperwork and audit, less communication with other aspects of the health service and less preventive medicine. Inevitably this would increase demand for emergency inpatient services while more broadly increasing the risk of adverse health outcomes. And when that risk is realised who will be to blame?

It is not the Minister’s fault, but many entrenched managers in the HSE view requests from staff for appropriate resourcing of patient care as hassle. Many do not see the provision of appropriate healthcare as their responsibility, rather they will exhaust all other possibilities before accepting that something might be their remit. I am familiar with a recent case of a young adult in which the primary problem was intellectual disability and it took 16 months, including eight in an acute hospital inpatient bed, for the disability services to accept her (they still haven’t actually seen her). So much time and effort is wasted, so much responsibility is avoided.

One gets a sense from the HSE that as long as some staff are in place it feels it is covered, even if there is gross understaffing or deficits in service provision. Many health professionals leave the country for better pay and conditions and the HSE does not attempt to keep them here but then bemoans the fact that positions cannot be filled and higher agency rates have to be paid. Those who make decisions on resources are too far removed from the patients these decisions affect. They should really have their own twice daily clinics for facetime with patients and staff alike. – Yours, etc,

DANIEL QUINN,

Killiney, Co Dublin.

Sir, – Is it not a fact that all the problems in the health services in this country have been signalled as far back as anyone can remember? It must have been a real kick in the teeth to those working at the coalface of this well-flagged disaster to listen to Leo Varadkar asking everyone working in the health services to put their shoulders to the wheel to solve this debacle, a debacle created by deliberate policy of Government since it came into office and the unmentionable government that came before it. This Government doesn’t care as long as the books are balanced and all social services will have to grin and bear it. The people don’t matter; it’s as simple as that. – Yours, etc,

KEVIN BYRNE,

Bantry,

Cork.

Sir, – So Minister for Health Leo Varadkar says that he predicted the overcrowding crisis (“Hospitals issue to be addressed, says Varadkar”, January 8th). He called a meeting on December 23rd and then went on holiday! His first act on his return was to brief the media on his foresight, his ingenuity in getting another €3 million of taxpayers’ funds and his posture of impatience with progress. If he and the Cabinet do not regard this as a cynical exercise in passing the buck then I fear for the future of the health service and the integrity of this Government. Meetings, announcements and media briefings are a poor substitute for action. We elect politicians to act, not to posture. – Yours, etc,

MICHAEL ANDERSON,

Baldoyle,

Dublin 13.

Derelict historic buildings

Sir, – You note that the problem of “dereliction and decay of historic buildings constitutes a serious problem of neglect, mainly by private landlords” (Editorial, January 3rd). It is a problem which is not restricted to Dublin nor just to historic buildings. Tolerating such a mindset of wilful abandonment is more than just a matter of aesthetics and civic pride, it also takes its toll on the cost of doing business, finding affordable accommodation, lost tax revenues and a missed opportunity to expand the construction industry.

In every town and village there are many private dwellings, offices and shops, and fine publicly owned buildings (unused or underused town halls, civic offices, court houses) standing vacant and idle for years. And without tenants these fall into dilapidation – lowering the volume and standard of the national buildings, monuments and housing stock. The crux of the problem (also as outlined in the editorial) being that responsibility is spread thinly among public bodies without consensus on what needs or can be done.

Within article 43, there is a constitutional imperative to regulate property for the common good, and therefore it would be perfectly appropriate to introduce an application of a progressive penal property tax (ie increasing by 25 per cent for every six months of dereliction or vacancy) on both historic properties and properties which were once used for dwelling or commercial purposes. This would encourage both public and private owners to renovate and renew properties, and then either sell them or put them on the rental market. This again would increase the market volume of usable properties, give employment to the construction industry, put downward pressure on rental prices and reduce the cost to taxpayers of subsidising rents.

If such a charge can be levied on water with the general aim of creating a conservation culture, there is no reason nor excuse as to why something similar could not be set against derelict and vacant property. – Yours, etc,

CIARAN WALSH,

Donard, Co Wicklow.

Sir, – An infant patient of mine is due to travel to the UK for a bone marrow transplant under the E112 scheme. This procedure could be carried out at Crumlin children’s hospital if a transplant physician were employed as all other necessary facilities and expertise are already in place. Instead, this child’s family will be disrupted and his siblings will be without their parents for months on end. The employment of a transplant physician at Crumlin hospital would lead to savings to the Irish taxpayer and would significantly lessen the burden for numerous families every year. – Yours, etc,

Dr ELLEN CRUSHELL,

Metabolic Paediatrician,

National Centre for

Inherited Metabolic

Disorders,

Temple Street Children’s

University Hospital,

Dublin 1.

Sir, – Further to “Paul Howard’s 44 life lessons” (January 6th), the elderly father of a one-time colleague had a maxim which I have recalled many times since first hearing it. “Work as if you’ll live forever and live as if you’ll die tomorrow.” A wise man indeed. – Yours, etc,

PADRAIG O’ROURKE,

Merrion Road, Dublin 4.

Sir, – Is it a reboot in the whole of the country or just in pockets of affluence? – Yours, etc,

BRIAN AHERN,

Clonsilla, Dublin 15.

Sir, – The Democratic Progressives? – Yours, etc,

BRIAN HODKINSON,

Reboge, Limerick.

Sir, – I thought that UTV Ireland was a new and additional station in Ireland rather than a replacement for UTV. Apparently not to UPC customers or Irish Times readers. – Yours, etc,

COLIN ROGAN,

Terenure, Dublin 6W.

Irish Independent:

  • 0 Comments
A child holds a poster at a service in Derry for those murdered at the Charlie Hebdo magazine offices in Paris

A child holds a poster at a service in Derry for those murdered at the Charlie Hebdo magazine offices in Paris

I am a Frenchman living in Ireland and I received some very kind and touching emails from Irish colleagues expressing their sympathy regarding the tragedy which took place in Paris yesterday.

However, I feel that the question of nationality is irrelevant on this matter. We should send these commiserating emails to ourselves who are supporting the democratic ideal, because when one kills the editorial team of a magazine it is the concept of democracy as we see it in the Western World that one attempts to kill.

This morning – along with the victims and their families – my sympathies go with the “Muslims of Europe” (an expression which I view as ridiculous considering the fact that if someone called me a “Christian of Europe”, I would feel like drawing his/her caricature).

In France, the majority of people who have Islam as their religion are French citizens, so were their parents and, in many cases, even their grand-parents. Still, some ignorant idiots continue to qualify them as “migrants”.

It is true that I am upset this morning, and I suppose this is one of the reasons why I am sending this email, as a form of catharsis.

The other reason is that it is time to react and, as Sartre stated, saying nothing is also acting. The victims included a well-known economist and four great cartoonists. I loved their work. I loved their irreverence. I loved their courage. I loved them. They taught me far more about life that all novelists or academics put together. Cartoons are revered in France; it is considered an art.

I listened to a cartoonist yesterday morning on RTE Radio 1 who said Wednesday’s event would stop him expressing himself on certain topics, because he has four kids. His four French colleagues also had families. However, despite the fact they had been under constant threats for the last eight years, they had not changed their satirical expressions regarding all social topics (the gods, the politicians, the average Frenchman and woman).

By limiting the choice of his topics because of an understandable and legitimate fear, this Irish cartoonist will lose his identity as an artist and will become a ‘drawing maker’.

These guys in ‘Charlie Hebdo’ did not take themselves or their work seriously. They knew the vital importance of laughs (cf. Freud).

Like most French people under the age of 60 I grew up laughing at the cartoons of two of the victims, who were superstars in France.

Cabu was a 77-year-old teenager, the epitome of gentleness and goodness, who also used to draw for children. Wolinsky – a 80-year-old spoilt, but bright child – was a ‘romantic pervert’. A few years ago a journalist asked him about his funeral plans. He replied using the traditional subtle and refined French humour. “I wish to be cremated; then I would like my wife to pour my ashes in the toilet, so as I can continue to admire her ass,” he said.

Could there be a better declaration of love? We should all have a word with our partners today on the matter.

Political correctness is another serious threat to the democratic ideal.

Gael Le Roux

Clontarf, Dublin 3

Islam is a religion of peace

Reports in the media are saying that what happened at the offices of the ‘Charlie Hebdo’ magazine in Paris yesterday was carried out by Islamic extremists, Islamic fundamentalists, religious fanatics…

I am writing because I feel I need to voice my opinion; as an Irish person and as a Muslim but, first and foremost, as a human being.

I am by no means a perfect Muslim, but I am a Muslim. I am also by no means a perfect Irish person, but I am an Irish person. Not a perfect woman, or wife or daughter or mother or sister or friend… (in no particular order). So, before your readers begin picking apart what I am about to write. I want that to be clear and, I want it to be clear that I know it. Also, I am not an Islamic scholar and in this letter I do not try to presume to speak on behalf of Muslims. I do however, want to take the time to make a few relevant and important points to all who read this: non-Muslims and Muslims alike.

Firstly, and most importantly, I condemn acts of violence against any defenceless person of any colour, race or creed. I abhor what took place at the offices of the ‘Charlie Hebdo’ magazine yesterday.

Islam is a religion of peace. Peace with Allah / God (Subhana Wa Ta’ a la, all glory be to him), peace with yourself, peace with those around you and your community and, peace in wider society. True followers of Islam do not carry out attacks like this. True followers of any religion do not carry out attacks like this.

Too often we ‘other’ people. By this, I mean we focus on what divides us or is different from us. By doing this we create barriers and distances. We miss out on all kinds of relationships. We miss out on knowing a person as a person. We miss out on understanding them: their lives, what they value and love, who they value and love, what are their disappointments, their struggles, their goals, their dreams…

However, we all, Muslims and non-Muslims, have more in common as human beings than we do differences. There is more that unites us than divides. Much, much more. Too often we forget that. All of us, too often and too easily. ‘Othering’ means we miss out on a chance of getting to know people and to understand them but, they too miss out on a chance of getting to know and understand us.

I urge all of your readers not to ‘other’ one another. Not to relate to or identify with one side and not the other because, what happened in Paris happened to human beings. It was done by human beings to human beings. People who are just like you and just like me. The whys and hows are not things I can even begin to understand. But I do know this; as long as we continue to find differences in one another and continue to separate ourselves from each other, then there is no hope that we can build relationships or know and understand each other.

And no hope that acts of violence like yesterday at the offices of the ‘Charlie Hebdo’ magazine in Paris won’t continue to happen.

Sarah Ryan

Co Cork

Moderates must unite

I have little doubt that the horrific murder of ‘Charlie Hebdo’ staff and three French policemen will have delighted a small but deranged number of Islamists.

But let us take a deep breath before falling into their trap. The overwhelming majority of Muslims are ordinary decent people who just want to get on with their lives. Like the Irish living in Britain during the IRA bombing campaign, undoubtedly they too feel under threat and suspicion.

Ironically, it may be Marine Le Pen’s far-right National Front that benefits from this atrocity. Who knows, perhaps that was one of the terrorists’ objectives; to drive a large wedge between ordinary Muslims and the wider community.

There will always be terrorism in the world, but to minimise the threat of Islamic terrorism, both Muslims and wider society need to pull together towards the common good by fighting radicalisation.

John Bellew

Dunleer, Co Louth


Cleaning

$
0
0

10 January 2015 Cleaning

Mary a little better though she could manage to get up for breakfast. Clear out cupboards in kitchen annex.

Obituary:

Lance Percival – obituary

Lance Percival was an actor and revue performer known for his ‘instant calypso’ on TW3 and appearances in British comic films

Lance Percival, actor
Lance Percival in an episode of ‘Jason King’ Photo: REX

Lance Percival, the comedian and singer who has died aged 81, was a regular cast member of Britain’s first topical satire show, That Was The Week That Was, and a stalwart over many years of British comedy caper movies.

TW3’s deviser Ned Sherrin plucked Percival from playing guitar at the Blue Angel Club in Mayfair, and during the show’s brief but hugely successful outing on the BBC in 1962-63, Percival featured in political sketches and performed a regular “instant calypso” inspired by the week’s events — in the manner of the West Indian singer Cy Grant.

Gangly, with an expressive, snaggle-toothed face and a good line in funny voices, Percival was the Tory leader Sir Alec Douglas-Home to Willy Rushton’s Harold Macmillan. He was also memorable as a civil servant detecting sexual innuendoes in bureaucratese in a 1963 sketch spoofing the controversy over the junior minister Tam Galbraith beginning a letter to the mandarin John Vassall (whose homosexuality had been used to blackmail him into spying for the Soviet Union) with the words “My Dear Vassall”.

In his calypso slot Percival would ask audience members to suggest possible subjects and would then launch into improvised topical calypsos, of which one, Shame and Scandal in the Family, an updated version of a calypso standard, reached No 37 in the charts in 1965.

Percival recorded several other novelty songs with George Martin at Parlophone, including The Beetroot Song (“If you like beetroot I’ll be true to you”, 1963) and The Maharajah of Brum (1967).

After TW3’s demise, two of the show’s writers, Peter Tinniswood and David Nobbs, created an unsuccessful television sitcom for Percival, Lance at Large (1964). More successfully, The Lance Percival Show, a sketch-variety format, ran for two series on BBC One (1965-66).

But Percival mainly became known as a jobbing actor on television and in film comedies such as Carry On Cruising (1962), into which he was drafted at the last moment to play a bilious ship’s cook by its penny-pinching producer, Peter Rogers, after Carry On regular Charles Hawtrey had the temerity to ask for a pay rise. Later Percival appeared in the Frankie Howerd vehicles Up Pompeii! (1971), Up the Chastity Belt (1971) and Up the Front (1972).

Lance Percival (second from right) and other members of the TW3 line-up in 1963 (GETTY/HULTON ARCHIVE)

John Lancelot Blades Percival was born at Sevenoaks, Kent, on July 26 1933. His parents sent him to Sherborne, where he became interested in music. He entered show business with a calypso group, and by the 1950s was performing in London clubs and on television shows. In 1960 he starred with Kenneth Williams and Sheila Hancock in Peter Cook’s stage revue One Over the Eight (for which he was understudied by Ken Loach).

He had made his (uncredited) screen debut in Three Men in a Boat in 1956, and went on to appear in more than 30 films. He had cameo roles in The V.I.P.s in 1963 and The Yellow Rolls-Royce (1964). In 1970 he appeared alongside Julie Andrews in the musical film Darling Lili and in There’s a Girl in My Soup, starring Peter Sellers and Goldie Hawn.

Lance Percival (left) with Kenneth Williams and Kenneth Connor in Carry On Cruising (REX)

He provided the voice of both Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr in the 1965 television cartoon series The Beatles, and that of the character “Old Fred” in the Beatles’ animated film Yellow Submarine (1968).

In late 1970, however, Percival was involved in a bad car accident in which he nearly lost his sight in one eye. Despite this, he appeared in several more films, including the Up Pompeii! series and similar British comedies of the period, among them Our Miss Fred (1972) with Danny La Rue, and Confessions from a Holiday Camp (1977).

He made a variety of television appearances both as an actor and personality, including in the series Up the Workers (1974-76); The Kenneth Williams Show (1976); and Noel’s House Party in the 1990s. On Radio 4 he was a regular panellist on Ian Messiter’s Many a Slip in the 1960s, and on Just a Minute in the 1980s. He also published two books of verse, Well-Versed Dogs (1985) Well-Versed Cats (1986).

Throughout his career, Percival also worked as a scriptwriter, contributing more than 100 episodes to the 1970s Thames Television game show Whodunnit.

Lance Percival (right) and Lord Montagu of Beaulieu (centre) on the London to Brighton Car Run, 1969 (REX)

In later life he launched a new career as an after-dinner speaker and a writer of humorous speeches for executives. “They always come back for more,” he told a friend. “They have to maintain their reputation as wits.”

Lance Percival was married but divorced, and is survived by a son.

Lance Percival, born July 26 1933, died January 6 2015

Guardian:

Accident And Emergency Figures Show Worst Performance In 10 Years
Outside the A&E department at St Thomas’ hospital London. ‘The NHS is too vital an institution to be left either to the binary war-rhetoric of politicians, or to the profit-driven private sector,’ writes Pen Keyte. Photograph: Dan Kitwood/Getty

You report (Cameron defends NHS in worst week for A&E, 7 January) the current intense difficulties in the NHS and the statement from the King’s Fund chief executive that “the NHS is fundamentally broken”. Earlier, Rowena Mason (Report, 1 January) highlighted the impact of the smaller political parties (Ukip, SNP, Greens) on the outcome of this May’s general election. She did not mention the National Health Action party (NHA), which is a national response to the long-term political failures that have inflicted this chaos and damage on the NHS.

We and many others vigorously back this newcomer to electoral politics, which brings these failures into focus: the waste, mismanagement and dishonesty of the major political parties. The NHS tops the political agenda in the minds of many voters. In order to attract votes, the big parties pay lip-service to its importance while simultaneously allowing it to be crushed by privatisation, ruinous private finance initiatives, harmful marketisation and dangerous fragmentation. The Tories and Lib Dems are clearly disingenuous in their claims to treasure the NHS, having effectively abolished it with the Health and Social Care Act. While the Labour party is focusing its campaign on the NHS, their track record is not reassuring.

The NHA is not just about the NHS in isolation. To pay for our medical care we need a strong, balanced and stable economy. Our health depends on social justice and a healthy environment and lifestyle. The NHS is badly served by the current big party system. It would flourish better in a healthier democracy, with proportional representation and more parties with focused agendas, among which the NHA has a vital role to play.

In Oxford West and Abingdon (Conservative majority: 176) there is a winnable seat and an excellent NHA candidate, who joins 11 NHA party candidates standing in other constituencies. These provide a unique opportunity to secure the presence of one or more MPs in parliament whose election would be symbolic of the public’s desire for a better political system and the need to truly protect the NHS, as a priceless national asset, from careless politicians and corporate predators. This is part of the current wider developments in new and alternative forms of progressive political expression. For the first time in decades, we and others can vote for a party that really matters to everyone.
Prof Chris Redman Emeritus professor of obstetric medicine, Iain Chalmers Health services researcher, Prof Klim Mcpherson Emeritus professor of epidemiology, Prof John S Yudkin Emeritus professor of medicine, Dr Oliver Ormerod Consultant cardiologist, Dr Peggy Frith Retired consultant opthalmologist, Dr David McCoy Senior lecturer in primary care and public health

• As is shown by the coincidence of the moving account of 24 hours in an A&E doctor’s life, with the withdrawal of Circle from its contract to manage Hinchingbrooke hospital (the guardian.com, 9 January), the NHS is too vital an institution to be left either to the binary war-rhetoric of politicians, or to the profit-driven private sector. Dr Clive Peedell, co-leader of the National Health Action party, flagged as long ago as 2013 that Circle would be likely to walk away from Hinchingbrooke once it had put £5m of its own money in. Once again, he predicted, the NHS would pick up the pieces, and local people would suffer.
Pen Keyte
Oxford

• NHS staff are working flat out to cope with unprecedented demands for care. More staff and A&E facilities in the NHS are not the only solution. Improving the “flow” of people into and out of A&E can potentially provide a more sustainable long-term solution, at no extra cost. All too often A&E has been looked at in isolation rather than exploring the root causes of A&E delays. By “flow” we are referring to approaches used widely by other sectors – such as airports – that manage high customer throughputs and have to coordinate multiple processes to get people to the right destination.

The Health Foundation has supported a programme at both South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust and Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, examining flow and resulting in steps being taken to address the inefficiencies preventing patients from getting care promptly. This work has helped to keep waits for patients down, improve quality of care and reduce length of stay in hospital. Yet these “flow” techniques are not used widely across the NHS – in A&E or in general practices that are also experiencing high demands. They should now be. One way forward is simple training for frontline staff in “flow” techniques, and support from management to implement them.
Dr Jennifer Dixon
Chief executive, The Health Foundation

• You fail to mention the shortage of hospital beds in England (Editorial, 8 January). EU figures for hospital beds per 1,000 population for all specialities are: Germany 8.2, France 6.6, EU average 4.9 and the UK 3.3. Within the UK England has 2.7, which is only 55% of the EU average. No wonder hospitals are bursting at the seams. Beds may be a four-letter word, but it needs to be shouted out aloud.
Morris Bernadt
London

• As Richard Adams piece shows (Report, 9 January), there is a great demand from students wishing to study medicine and a shortage of suitably qualified British doctors, due in part to emigration. So we import doctors for A&E from Spain while exporting them to Australia. Demoralised doctors seeing increasing pressures put on them do not apply for A&E jobs or for partnerships in general practice, where bureaucracy prevents them from concentrating on patients. In addition, newly qualified doctors will shortly be faced with student debts of £45,000 for tuition and a similar amount for maintenance during their five-year course.

I hear on the grapevine that some students are planning to emigrate in the hope of avoiding repayments, since it is difficult to trace those who have no UK income. This could be avoided if there were to be an incentive scheme, rescinding part of the debt for, say, each of the first five years that a newly qualified doctor works for the NHS. The army have run this type of scheme for many years with great success.
Dr Margaret Safranek
London

• Professor Willett, NHS England’s current director of acute care, is quoted as saying that “We now have a ‘right now’ society; a population that expects to have immediate or very rapid solutions to their queries” (A&E crisis: experts diagnose the cause, 7 January). The point the professor is either missing or ignoring is that things used to be just that; if you felt ill a generation ago you could visit the GP, during surgery hours, wait a while, then be seen. Now, you have to call for an appointment – the end of next week if you’re lucky, or a couple of days if it’s urgent. That’s one of the main reasons for the current problems in A&E; yet if a top bureaucrat is unable to see that, there’s little hope of a solution anytime soon.
Charles Sawyer
London

Your editorial (5 January) shows a complete misunderstanding of the issues surrounding powering the country. In 2010, we inherited a legacy of underinvestment in the energy sector, with a number of power stations due to close by 2020 and ageing network infrastructure, a legacy that put our energy security at risk. To safeguard our energy supplies, we are implementing a long-term plan, though you appear to be totally unaware of this. Our radical reforms have stimulated more than £45bn of investment, mostly in renewable electricity.

You dismiss our capacity market, yet this has been extremely successful in securing electricity supply at the lowest cost for consumers, as fierce competition in our auction drove costs significantly below predicted levels. As well as unlocking new investment in flexible plants, we are getting the best out of our existing power stations, which provide reliable and cost-effective capacity, as always planned. We are also determined to make homes warmer and more energy-efficient. Average electricity consumption per person is down 10% from five years ago, largely down to schemes like the Green Deal and other regulations making household devices more energy-efficient. Bizarrely, your editorial ends by calling for more state intervention. You clearly do not understand that our reforms of electricity markets, both for clean energy and for securing supply, are significant state interventions in the free market.
Ed Davey MP
Energy and climate change secretary

• Re your article on the fall in oil prices (7 January), one possibility is the opportunity to painlessly raise extra revenue to reduce the deficit or provide additional funding to the health service etc. For the last few years the chancellor has frozen planned rises in fuel tax but now that we are paying 25p less per litre of petrol than we were six months ago, surely no one will notice or mind a 3p rise if the money raised is used effectively.
Brian Westcott
Chester

As a producer who has often taken part in “Classic Album Sundays” (on Nick Drake, Fairport Convention LPs etc), I was pleased to read John Harris’s excellent piece (Vinyl is enjoying an unexpected renaissance, 7 January). I have been boring friends for decades with rants about how analogue sound is so much better than digital, so it is gratifying to witness the surge in appreciation of the black stuff. One problem which Harris addresses only obliquely is that most disc-mastering is now from digital sources. Not only are many master tapes either lost or deteriorated, but most cutting lathes pass the sound through a digital device for adjusting the pitch of the spiral before the signal reaches the stylus. The enthusiasm of the recently converted masks the fact that current LPs – of both new recordings and back catalogue – effectively emit a digital signal, albeit often one of higher quality than that of a CD and certainly far higher than most downloads.

It is tragic that major labels failed to keep metal parts along with master tapes. If anyone found a treasure trove of matrices for classic albums and pressed vinyl from those, that really would be something to celebrate – and to pay those outrageous prices for.
Joe Boyd
Producer, and author, White Bicycles: making music in the 1960s

To the revival of vinyl LPs, along with other so-called out-dated technologies (In a virtual world we cling to what’s real, 31 December 2014), one could add the high-end valve amplifiers that hi-fi buffs so revere, also the valve guitar amps that many guitarists from all genres now use. The overall sound and tone of analogue sound reproduction is so much preferable to that of solid-state amps and the somewhat clinical results of digital processing.
Paul Freeman
Braintree, Essex

Timothy Garton Ash (5 January) asks: “What is Britain”? Any answer should take account of the US postal service, which has just returned to sender in California a parcel inscribed “England – no such country. Please specify a country”. Parcels to Scotland did not suffer this fate.
Roderick Floud
Haddenham, Buckinghamshire

• You report (Puppy Love, 8 January) that ITV’s debut of The Wonder of Britain had been viewed by 1.7m eyeballs. Could you clarify this? Was the programme watched by 850,00 people using both eyes or by 1.7 million people using just one eye?
Francis McCahill
Fraserburgh, Aberdeenshire

• When we have the new Magna Carta that Graham Allen MP calls for (Letters, 8 January) will there be a referendum?
Don Selway
Portsmouth

Independent:

As a French citizen and Charlie Hebdo frequent reader, I would like to congratulate M. Brown for his cartoon (front page, 8 January). It’s one of the few cartoons that succeeded in expressing all the horror of the situation while being faithful to the spirit of Charb, Cabu and the others. Man, you got it just right.

Thanks again, Dave!

Thomas Hautesserres
Massy, France

 

Four of France’s greatest living cartoonists, Cabu and Wolinski included, and their editor, have all been murdered in cold blood, for the purported crime of entertaining the people with satirical drawings. Unlike the gunmen, these cartoonists never hid their faces when they expressed their opinions, and this “bravery” means they are now dead. Should we really have to call it bravery, however? Should you have to be brave to publish a satirical drawing? Only,  it seems, when they are about religion.

Unfortunately, this is the inevitable consequence of our unwillingness to confront these attacks on freedom of speech. It entered the public eye with the kickback against Salman Rushdie, and continued with the scandal of the Danish cartoons, where many popular figures stood up and defended the violent protests against them because they attacked the so-called hallowed ground of religion.

For too long we have refused to condemn outrageous acts of attempted censorship, across a variety of countries, simply because their would-be censors claimed the right on religious grounds. It is time we ended that, which is why I call on the press to republish Charlie Hebdo’s cartoons; stand up for Charlie, and show that we will not be silenced by fear.

Benedict Nicholson
London SW14

 

Mark Steel (“If the gunmen were Geordies, would we want an apology from Newcastle?”, 9 January) forgets all the criticism that Catholics, the Catholic church, and the Catholic hierarchy came in for during the height of the Troubles. In those days commentators like himself thought the church able to control extremism, just by condemning the atrocities carried out by the IRA.

Ron Bird
Pinner, Greater London

 

The cry of “Allahu Akbar!” that the killers raised as they stormed the building is the same cry that extremists have been shouting as they behead Christians and Yazidi in Iraq, bomb churches in Nigeria and separate out and kill those who can’t say a Muslim prayer in parts of Kenya.

Of course extremism can be found in any religion, and Muslims can be on the receiving end of that too. But the stark reality is that in the report released yesterday by Open Doors, which tracks trends, scale and causes of persecution against Christians globally, 40 out of the worst 50 countries show Islamic extremism as the main driver of persecution – the vast majority of it going unnoticed by the media.

Something closer to home, like the atrocity in Paris, is particularly shocking. But we can expect more of it unless we fight extremism as an international community much more intentionally than we are now doing. It’s rising fast and affects all of us – those of no faith, those with a different faith, and ordinary Muslims who are as appalled by the attacks as everyone else. Surely we must recognise we are in extraordinary days and act accordingly?

Lisa Pearce
CEO of Open Doors UK & Ireland, Oxfordshire

 

Why is it that ridiculous religious extremists of all types believe that their own particular deity will be offended or perturbed by a little gentle (or not so gentle) mocking by journalists, cartoonists and others? Surely any deity worth believing in would have a sense of humour, in particular, a sense of humour about his, her  or its self?

Professor Brian S Everitt
Professor Emeritus
King’s College London

 

When Islamic migrants arrive we bend over backwards to make them feel at home but we also create a sense of entitlement which implies that they need not conform to our ways of life. Muslims insist we behave respectfully in their countries but do not reciprocate: in the West, for example, hiding one’s identity in a public place is not admirable – it is rude.

As a Christian cleric I believe the correct reaction to the Parisian outrage is for every Western newspaper to produce cartoons satirising all major religions, including Christianity and Islam.

Rev Dr John Cameron
St Andrews

 

Being afraid to cause offence makes our values toothless. Free speech is never frightened speech.

Collin Rossini
Dovercourt, Essex

 

There’s no way to avoid ‘booking fees’

I was pleased to see in Radar (3 January) that The Independent will continue its campaign against booking and other fees charged by performing arts venues.

Recently a band I follow performed in my town in a municipally run venue, but when I went to buy tickets, 10 per cent was added to the ticket price, even though I was at the box office tendering cash. When I asked if there was a way of not paying the surcharge I was told that that was possible by using a charge card I hadn’t heard of, which one preloads with money. Pointing out that my cash was preloaded with money didn’t help, and I walked away in anger.

Pretty well the whole of the retail trade manages to sell items at the marked price without adding a retail, handling or stocking fee, or a “voluntary” charitable donation. I know I would attend more live events if I did not have to traverse the surge of anger I experience on seeing added fees, and it is a shame that artists don’t do more to exercise pressure against this practice which is alienating their audiences.

Dennis Leachman
Reading

 

Woeful careers advice for the young

Given that young people are receiving inadequate careers advice, it is no surprise that we are seeing the number of people undertaking Government-backed apprenticeships fall (“MPs attack rise of ‘ill-equipped’ careers advisers in schools”, 8 January). The worrying evidence that has emerged of schools being forced to train receptionists as careers advisers is supported by research we commissioned from YouGov. It found that nearly two-thirds of 18-24-year olds at secondary school or college have not received careers advice on paid apprenticeships.

To reverse this worrying trend, we need a full commitment from the Government for schools to be required to build stronger links with businesses that can offer young people career advice.

It is logical that the future employers of teenagers have a role in signalling to young people where future opportunities might lie. Ultimately, offering the future workforce good careers advice is an essential component of a dynamic, successful economy.

Jackie Bedford
Chief Executive, Step Ahead
London EC1

 

In 1970 I was a 16-year-old in my last year of school and we had a half-hour lesson once a week entitled Careers. This was useful and explored various options and gave an outline of various jobs. We also had several visits to various workplaces to see at first-hand what work was like. Just after Easter we were interviewed individually by the careers master and someone from Youth Employment Services to try to ensure that we were placed in jobs in line with our abilities and preferences. Looking back, this was a good service.

However, the best piece of careers advice we received came from our English teacher who had been a bricklayer before becoming a teacher. He told us that life outside the school gates was hard and that we should be in no hurry to leave. I for one very quickly found out that he was right about that!

Jim Allen
Sheffield

 

Will Labour ditch tuition fees?

Sadiq Khan (5 January) is correct that young people are neglected by politicians and is right to want the voting age lowered to 16. But he does not go far enough. Politics needs to be a mandatory subject in secondary schools.

Furthermore, he needs to explain to those young people he so desperately wants to reach out to why his party introduced university tuition fees. He also needs to explain why, if Ed Miliband’s party is so different to Tony Blair’s (as he so claims), they don’t ditch the policy.

Forgive me if I don’t hold my breath.

Ben Saunders
Mitcham, Surrey

 

Hard-working rhetoric

As you rightly say in your editorial of 6 January, all political parties tend to claim to be the true defenders of “hard-working families”.

However, I for one have already decided not to vote for any party that makes this claim, not because I’ve anything against families, even hard-working ones, but because I don’t believe that any party that trots out this tired, tiresome, self-serving cliché deserves support. Whether this will leave me anyone to vote for remains to be seen.

Duncan Howarth
Maidstone, Ken

 

Times:

Sir, Has Peter Franklin visited Grosvenor Farms’ dairy (“Cows that never see light”, Thunderer, Jan 5), or any other dairy farm? Unlike hens, cows do not fall into categories such as free-range, barn or caged. Some farmers keep cows outside, some inside, and in between a spectrum of dairy farming is guided by weather, soil, farm layout and the market for milk.

Is outside optimum? Not always. Cows don’t like wind, wet feet or flies; they go hungry if it’s raining hard as they won’t eat, and at temperatures over 20C they can suffer heat stress. Is inside wrong? Not necessarily. Given the option in trials, many cows choose to be inside and prefer eating from a “canteen”. Virtually no cows have fresh grass year-round and modern housing is open to light, air and sun. The main reason supermarkets don’t label by production system is because there are no defined systems.
Amy Jackson
Nuffield scholar, Can We Learn to Love the Megadairy?, Witney, Oxon
Sir, Peter Franklin is right to highlight the welfare issues associated with factory farming, but it is also important to talk about broader impacts, including the damage caused by the massive concentration of nutrients in a small area and the waste of good vegetable protein that could be consumed by humans.
Natalie Bennett
Leader, Green Party of England and Wales

Sir, In a few months most dairy farmers will let their cows back on the fields after five months indoors. That on this first release these “old girls” run, jump and kick their back legs in the air speaks volumes.
Iain Davidson
Cumnock, Ayrshire

Sir, The time has come for the media to stop presenting atrocities (reports, Jan 8 & 9) with blurred pictures of wounded victims being shot; and failing to show the beheadings and aftermath of bombings, the bodies and body parts, the blood and the maimed. All of this should be seen in its horrible awfulness, uncensored.

By all means provide warnings, but until the public are exposed to the hellish horrors they will regard these as they did the images of the Boston marathon bombing last year — nothing more than a run interrupted by a bang and cloud of smoke.

Alongside this must be the uncensored images of the dead in the rubble of collateral bombing rather than just ruined buildings.

Only when the whole horror is presented in its graphic raw truth will there be an informed public to insist that governments and leaders bring these horrors to an end, now.
Douglas Martyn
Sandilands, Lanarkshire

Sir, David Aaronovitch’s assertion (Opinion, Jan 8) that “for the first time since the defeat of fascism a group of citizens were massacred because of what they had drawn, said or published” betrays a selective memory. On April 23, 1999, Nato — on our behalf — bombed the Belgrade HQ of RTS, Serbian State Broadcasting, killing 13 members of the media.

This attack was condemned by journalists’ organisations but the prime minister, Tony Blair, and Nato described RTS as an “entirely legitimate target”. It is never right to attack journalists, even if you disagree with the editorial position of their media outlet. We should uphold this defence of freedom, not apply it selectively.
Dr David Lowry
Stoneleigh, Surrey

Sir, David Aaronovitch said that those who don’t like the “deal for living together” should “go somewhere else”. Such a view, aside from being incendiary in tone, is proliferating the murderous ignorance that we are all trying to fight. Defending free speech means defending the rights of even those who say that such a freedom should not exist. Suggesting that people who think differently should effectively be exiled is an illogical intellectual tyranny.
Nabil Hanafi
London N1

Sir, In the wake of the Paris murders, David Cameron stated that Britain must stand up “against this threat to our values — free speech, the rule of law, democracy”.

Stirring words, but there is more than a whiff of hypocrisy when, less than two months ago, his home secretary, Theresa May, banned Julien Blanc, the so-called pick-up artist, from entering Britain on the grounds that it would not be “conducive to the public good.”

Britain is a mature democracy, with a deep-rooted tradition of satire. Surely we are robust enough to handle the scarcely threatening Julien Blanc and others who say things we don’t like. Mr Blanc’s exclusion is one of many examples of UK governments ducking the awkward question on free speech.
John Hesketh
Sheffield

Sir, Those politicians now blithely championing the “right to offend” may care to look at the Public Order Act 1986 which makes it a crime to use “insulting” words to alarm or distress someone, and the Offensive Behaviour at Football Matches Act 2012 which makes it a crime to be offensive at football matches in Scotland.

An apposite response to the Charlie Hebdo attack would be to repeal these antediluvian measures and restore free speech and the right to offend.
Roger Harris
Barrister, London EC4

Sir, Haras Rafiq of Quilliam (Opinion, Jan 9) states the case very clearly for theological reform within Islam. But such difficult processes demand extraordinary courage, and they often require external leadership. Voltaire was prepared to take that role for European Christianity. When will somebody of equivalent stature emerge to help deliver Islam from the dark ages?
Tom Foulkes
Fleet, Hants

Sir, Surely the decisions by BBC Newsnight and Channel 4 News not to air the Charlie Hebdo cartoon is a reflection of acting with responsibility rather than being cowardly. Should we not be more proud that as a nation we try to avoid flaming the sparks of discontent?
Simon Milton
London SW12

Sir, Elements of our press, exalting in their democratic freedoms, treat immigrants by our own standards and publish smug cartoons insulting all they have, which is what they believe in. I do not take sides but we asked for trouble and we are getting it. If Jesus was portrayed in the way of these cartoons I would hate it but I can take it. They can’t.
Lord Temple-Morris
House of Lords

Sir, Hardly a day goes by without my feelings being deeply hurt, but that’s the price I’m willing to pay for freedom of speech. There can be no serious discussion on any subject if we must restrain ourselves from offending anybody. The media could do a lot to restore sanity.
stephen vizinczey
London SW5

Sir, Had these terrorists been caught alive, they ought to have been jailed and allowed no books except Hobbes and Pascal. They might just have learnt something.
William Sibree
Chart Sutton, Kent

Sir, The Rev Christopher Green (letter, Jan 9) might call for cartoons that mock atheism, but we atheists will just laugh along with him. That is the difference.
Jim McAllister
Dubai

Sir, Islam teaches us to obey the law of the land. The Muslim cleric Anjem Choudary and others like him should be kicked out of Britain as they are destroying our beautiful religion. But at the same time we should realise that these jihadists have been created by America’s actions. We in the West should stop interfering in Islamic countries.
Dr Junaid Rafi
Ipswich

Sir, As a Parachute Regiment student at Fort Benning in the US in the Sixties, I wore British jungle greens, my beret and silver cap badge. As a colour sergeant I was surprised to be continually saluted (letters, Jan 7 & 9). Apparently, from 20 paces my cap badge resembled the US rank badge of “bird colonel”. I always returned the salutes.
Colin J Butcher
Llanfaes, Powys

Sir, I notice that Wallander is back on BBC4 (Viewing guide, Jan 3), with its white subtitles, a problem that it shares with Inspector Montalbano. Older viewers — and there are more of them these days, many with failing sight — much prefer subtitles in black print on a white or yellow background.
Emrys Rees
Luton

Sir, Like Sir Winston Churchill, in 1944, aged 2, I also had a siren suit (“Winnie and the birth of the onesie”, Jan 8). Mine was made by my mother from material unpicked from cast-off clothing in line with the wartime slogan of Make Do and Mend.
Lyn Baily
Bognor Regis

Sir, I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that copies of Churchill’s siren suit might be called the Winsie, or even the Win Winsie.
Michael Warshaw
Lond

Sir, Has Peter Franklin visited Grosvenor Farms’ dairy (“Cows that never see light”, Thunderer, Jan 5), or any other dairy farm? Unlike hens, cows do not fall into categories such as free-range, barn or caged. Some farmers keep cows outside, some inside, and in between a spectrum of dairy farming is guided by weather, soil, farm layout and the market for milk.

Is outside optimum? Not always. Cows don’t like wind, wet feet or flies; they go hungry if it’s raining hard as they won’t eat, and at temperatures over 20C they can suffer heat stress. Is inside wrong? Not necessarily. Given the option in trials, many cows choose to be inside and prefer eating from a “canteen”. Virtually no cows have fresh grass year-round and modern housing is open to light, air and sun. The main reason supermarkets don’t label by production system is because there are no defined systems.
Amy Jackson
Nuffield scholar, Can We Learn to Love the Megadairy?, Witney, Oxon
Sir, Peter Franklin is right to highlight the welfare issues associated with factory farming, but it is also important to talk about broader impacts, including the damage caused by the massive concentration of nutrients in a small area and the waste of good vegetable protein that could be consumed by humans.
Natalie Bennett
Leader, Green Party of England and Wales

Sir, In a few months most dairy farmers will let their cows back on the fields after five months indoors. That on this first release these “old girls” run, jump and kick their back legs in the air speaks volumes.
Iain Davidson
Cumnock, Ayrshire

 

on NW8

 

Telegraph:

Black ribbons bind flags at the Elysée Palace in Paris for Thursday’s day of mourning
Black ribbons bind flags at the Elysée Palace in Paris for Thursday’s day of mourning  Photo: AFP/Getty Images

SIR – Not only was the carnage in Paris a brutal attack on freedom of expression in France, it was also an attack against our fundamental democratic values in Britain. Indeed, we are all Parisians today in standing firm and steadfast.

The military-like precision, weaponry deployed and the targeting of pre-selected victims (with the terrorists apparently knowing of the editorial meeting at Charlie Hebdo) are alarmingly ominous.

This makes it necessary for us in Britain to adopt a far more assertively structured stance against militant Islamism here. The Home Secretary’s recent courageous measures to counter British “jihadists” need to be applauded and espoused as the national minimum in our legal armoury.

For their part, British Islamic institutions are still woefully complacent, offering at best no more than rhetoric and well-rehearsed bouts of condemnation. They need to do much better in countering the pernicious ideology of radical Islamism, by reinforcing to young impressionable Muslim minds that the security of this country is paramount and equally by instilling unmitigated pride in British values and national institutions.

Dr Lu’ayy Minwer Al Rimawi
Peterborough

SIR – The latest atrocity by “Islamist” terrorists, this time in Paris, invites us to look at the concept of jihad. It means struggle, fighting. Argument goes on about its two applications – whether within the mind of the believer against sin, or, far more usually in the history of Islam, as armed struggle against the “unbelievers”, which in turn means those refusing “submission or surrender” (Islam) to Allah, the Muslim concept of God.

Jihad, however defined, is a duty of Muslims. Since Western secular democracy is “submission” to the will of the people, it should be obvious that the two views cannot be reconciled, since such secular democratic ideals can only be seen by Islam as blasphemous.

Only when both sides wake up to this can there be any way forward, which, also on both sides, entails overcoming political correctness. Jihad means that a believer cannot be “moderate”. It demands all.

Roger Payne
London NW3

SIR – The attack on Charlie Hebdo could never have happened in Britain. The editors would long ago have been prosecuted under Section 5 of the 1986 Public Order Act on the grounds of publishing material that was likely to cause distress to others.

Professor Martyn Rady
Ramsgate, Kent

SIR – Bestial as the attack on Charlie Hebdo was, the response of the “international community” bears the hallmarks of both public and media selectivity.

How much can the French really value the editorial independence of a weekly magazine that sells fewer than 50,000 copies an issue?

Why weren’t Huw Edwards or James Naughtie despatched by the BBC to Amsterdam when the Dutch film director Theo van Gogh was murdered by a home-grown Muslim extremist?

With Germany’s chancellor and our own Prime Minister telling us that Islamic terrorism has nothing to do with Islam, we shouldn’t be surprised at anything.

Tony Stone

Oxted, Surrey

SIR – Freedom of expression, respect for the rule of law and religious tolerance are cornerstones of a free society, requiring vigilant defence against the perils of totalitarianism, censorship and terrorism.

The publication of material that insults groups or individuals of any faith or none must remain permissible in a free society. That does not, however, mean that such gratuitous behaviour should not be condemned as wholly disrespectful, offensive and provocative.

If such satire is designed to be humorous, I readily confess that I comprehensively fail to understand how.

Philip Duly
Haslemere, Surrey

SIR – The killing in cold blood of 12 people is a heinous crime; and clearly freedom of speech is an important part of democratic life in western Europe. But, as you indicate (Leading article, January 8), some of us avoid publishing things that would cause unnecessary offence to those who have firmly held religious beliefs.

We seem to be living in a society where destructive attacks, often disguised as humour, on anything that hitherto held society together and was the foundation of so much that is good, are becoming more and more prevalent.

But free speech is not just a right; it is a responsibility. Terrorism aims to destroy society from the outside, but, provided we are bold, we can have every hope it will not succeed. However, if we do not regard free speech as a responsibility, we may see our society destroyed from within.

Michael Sparrow
Marple, Cheshire

SIR – They say that the crime was an attack on free speech, but what is free speech?

The Oxford Dictionary says it is: “The right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint.”

English law allows free speech provided it’s not threatening, abusive or insulting, likely to cause harassment, alarm, distress, anxiety or a breach of the peace. That it isn’t racist, indecent, grossly offensive or defamatory. That it doesn’t incite racial, sexual or religious hatred, or glorify or incite terrorism. That it doesn’t contain obscenity, corrupt public morals, outrage public decency or break court restrictions.

We don’t have free speech. We never have done.

David Welch
Margate, Kent

SIR – At what point does freedom of speech become “Islamophobia”?

John Fisher
Cheadle Hulme, Cheshire

SIR – I do not condone what happened in Paris. I wholly support the concept of free speech. But surely it should be tempered by consideration of the consequences and common sense.

Cador Roberts
Woodford Halse, Northamptonshire

SIR – Tomorrow, journalists who dare not re-publish the Charlie Hebdo cartoons will be lecturing Israel on trusting Hamas.

Martin Sewell
Gravesend, Kent

SIR – The start to my day is always made brighter by Matt, but I did wonder how he would address the atrocity in Paris. I was not disappointed. His cartoon yesterday was not only amusing but clearly demonstrated how to stand up to terrorist extremists without fear or favour, as others of his profession around the world have done.

Frazer Walker
Tern Hill, Shropshire

SIR – Expressions of support for freedom of speech by our main political parties are resoundingly hollow. Public discourse in Britain is now entirely governed by what is deemed “acceptable” or “unacceptable” by the liberal-Left mainstream.

Miles Wynn Cato
Ludlow, Shropshire

SIR – David Cameron condemned the Charlie Hebdo murders as an attack on free speech. Is this the same David Cameron, who, a few months ago, advocated bridling the British press?

Nicholas T Oakden
Norwich

Paying for milk
SIR – As Tom Hind, director of agriculture at Tesco (“A fair supermarket deal for British dairy farmers”, Letters, January 7), is well aware, his employer’s promise to pay farmers “a fair price for their milk that is guaranteed to cover the cost of production” only applies to fresh milk sold in Tesco.

On many occasions Mr Hind himself, while working for the National Farmers’ Union, tried to persuade Tesco that this should also apply to milk for all dairy products, for example butter and cheese.

Until all the supermarkets stop driving down the price of milk with own-label imported products, the British dairy industry will struggle.

Derek Lomax
Kendal, Cumbria

Granny’s lore

SIR – My wife’s mother told our daughters: “If you run round the orchard too many times, you will end up with a crab apple.”

Richard Walford
Knowle, Devon

Too Silent Witness

Olivia Colman and David Tennant star in Broadchurch Photo: ITV

SIR – It is not only Broadchurch that I find impossible to follow (report, January 7). This week I watched an episode of Silent Witness and although I turned up the volume, I still could not hear distinctly. Next I watched Lucy Worsley’s history programme Fit to Rule and, although it was on a much lower volume, I didn’t miss a single word uttered by her or her interviewees.

I no longer blame my hearing for not being able to enjoy modern television drama.

David Statham
Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire

Wild oats

SIR – The cereal aisle in my local Sainsbury’s has a subsection flagged “Adult Cereals”. Does this mean that we discover what that Scotsman wears under his kilt or is it that bran and oats (jumbo or otherwise) come in fairly plain packaging?

Eleanor Saunders
Chessington, Surrey


The public treatment of Ched Evans

SIR – The footballer Ched Evans was found guilty of rape, sentenced and served his time in prison (Sport, January 6).

Now he seeks to return to his gainful employment but his team has been bullied into declining his services.

Are we as a society saying that no convicted criminal can ever work again? Or is it just footballers, or perhaps just rapists?

Once a judge has handed down a sentence, that is the end of it: we cannot continue to persecute past offenders.

R T Britnell
Canterbury, Kent

SIR – Ched Evans and Geoffrey Boycott have both been tried, convicted and punished for the abuse of women, although both maintain their innocence.

One remains universally vilified and unable to ply his trade, while the other is feted by many, with demands that he be knighted.

The two crimes have many similarities but the gulf in public attitude towards them is considerable.

Roger Page
Peterborough

The high cost of sending criminals to court

SIR – I read with interest that Richard Monkhouse, chairman of the Magistrates’ Association, was concerned that police were giving too many offenders a “slap on the wrist” instead of sending them to court (report, January 7).

Since courts are now so reluctant to imprison people, especially for first offences, he evidently thinks it is the court’s duty to administer the slap on the wrist. But this incurs all the associated court costs and legal fees paid from the public purse solely for the benefit of those employed in the closed shop of our judicial system.

The result for the offender is likely to be the same, but at hundreds of times the cost to the taxpayer.

Andrew Vaughan
Ventnor, Isle of Wight

 

Globe and Mail:

  (Brian Gable/The Globe and Mail)

John Allemang

Satire is often nasty, harmful and grotesquely abusive

Irish Times:

‘Charlie Hebdo’ shootings and terror attacks in France

Sir, – The ambassadors to the US of the 28 EU member states and the EU delegation issued a joint statement condemning the attack on the staff of Charlie Hebdo. The statement reads in part: “Freedom of expression and freedom of the press are essential elements of any democratic and open society. Each is protected, on both sides of the Atlantic”. Did the Irish Ambassador or delegation struggle with the wording given that the type of expression engaged in by Charlie Hebdo is not protected in Ireland, since it would likely fall foul of section 36 of the Defamation Act 2009, which covers the offence of “publication or utterance of blasphemous matter”? I hope that the Act can be amended to align with our Ambassador’s view. – Yours, etc,

PADRAIC HENEGHAN,

Carpentersville,

Illinois.

Sir, – A culture of extreme and unjustified violence, combined with discrimination and racism, seems to be increasing in societies in the Middle East, the West, and in eastern Europe. The atrocities committed in France are the most recent example. There has been a significant increase in anti-Semitism and Islamophobia across Europe, as well as anti-Christian attacks and persecution associated with conflicts in several Middle Eastern states. In eastern Europe anti-Russian feeling is being fanned by the conflict in Ukraine and by western propaganda.

The right to freedom of speech is being cited as justification for the publication of materials that are deemed offensive to people of certain cultures. All rights and all aspects of freedom carry responsibilities, and it is essential that responsibility is exercised by all societies and by political leaders and media outlets, to avoid inflaming racism and discrimination.

The Huffington Post, in an article entitled “In wake of Charlie Hebdo attack, some media self-censor cartoons”, criticises such self-censorship. Responsible editing and common sense sensitivity to the feelings of others should not be labelled as unacceptable censorship. It is unduly offensive to Jewish people, and to most other people, to make jokes about the Holocaust. Similar sensitivity should be applied to all communities internationally.

It is essential that we should all do our utmost to improve relationships, and to promote peace rather than conflicts, between societies and communities both internationally and within our own countries. Racism and violence are two sides of the same coin. – Yours, etc,

EDWARD HORGAN,

Castletroy,

Limerick.

Sir, – It’s worth remembering that those champions of free speech, who paid the ultimate price for their art this week at the hands of fundamentalist wretches, would have been potentially subject to a fine of €25,000 for every one of their “blasphemous” cartoons from 2009 to today had they been operating in Ireland.

By voting to remove this restriction against the practice of free speech, the Irish public can show that our support for the brave voices at Charlie Hebdo extends beyond hashtags and that we truly believe in the principles of liberty, equality and fraternity. – Yours, etc,

JOHN HOGAN

Ballyneety,

Co Limerick.

Sir, – The dreadful killings in Paris bring to mind the words of Blaise Pascal that “men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it out of religious conviction”. There is implicit in these words a call for responsibility and moderation to the leaders of all world religions. Indeed the events in Paris remind us of the danger inherent in all kinds of absolutism. – Yours, etc,

DECLAN MORIARTY,

Finglas,

Dublin 11.

Sir, – Your report containing the words of Dr Ali Selim of the Islamic Cultural Centre of Ireland (“Dublin based cleric warns of legal action over religious depictions”, January 8th), to the effect that he would be prepared to pursue a legal action under blasphemy legislation if “an Irish media organisation or social media carried a depiction of Muhammad, an act which Muslims find offensive”, constitutes the best argument so far for the repeal of this ridiculous legislation.

Even the fact that such a thing can be contemplated here, in the light of the appalling attack on freedom of expression in Paris, a nursery of democratic republicanism, is calculated to earn Ireland the opprobrium of the rest of the developed world, and deservedly so. – Yours, etc,

SEAMUS McKENNA,

Windy Arbour,

Dublin 14.

Sir, – I was surprised that Pakistan should join the list of countries that have condemned the murder of 12 people at the Charlie Hebdo offices in Paris on Wednesday. Pakistan currently has about 13 people on death row for committing “blasphemy”, including Asia Noreen Bibi, a Christian mother of three. She was working as a farm labourer in the Punjab in June 2009 when she was wrongly accused of insulting Muhammad. She has been held in prison in appalling conditions ever since. Sean Kenny TD is the only politician to have even mentioned her case in the Houses of the Oireachtas. – Yours, etc,

KARL MARTIN,

Bayside,

Dublin 13.

Sir, – I commend The Irish Times for showing solidarity with Charlie Hebdo. In your editorial (January 8th) you characterised the attack as “not only a barbarous act of terrorism but an assault on freedom of expression, one of the fundamental human rights”.

Is it possible, however, to express true solidarity in Ireland, as your newsroom staff did, with the phrase “Je suis Charlie” when the publication of material satirising any religious beliefs is open to prosecution under our blasphemy law? It is a law that criminalises freedom of expression by giving preference to religious beliefs.

I agree with you that it is “one thing to argue about whether particular expressions of satire are appropriate or tasteful but quite another to claim a right not to be offended”. That is why the offense of blasphemy needs to be taken out of our constitution.

We need to be able to say “Je suis Charlie” and mean it. – Yours, etc,

GERARD GREGORY,

Stillorgan,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – The members of Al-Mustafa Islamic Cultural Centre Ireland wish to extend their deepest sympathy and condolences to the families of the victims and the people of France .

The killing of journalists in Paris on Wednesday was not only an attack on France but also an assault on Islam and the very freedoms that allow 30 million Muslims to prosper in the West.

Unfortunately there is a problem of extremism and radicalisation among a minority of Muslim youth in western countries. It is the responsibility of Islamic leaders to highlight the peaceful and just message of Islam in which there is no space for extremism. – Yours, etc,

Dr MUHAMMAD

UMAR AL-QADRI,

Al-Mustafa Islamic

Educational

and Cultural Centre,

Ireland

Blanchardstown, Dublin 15.

Sir, – The murder of the cartoonists in Paris brings to mind Lord Byron’s observation in Don Juan: “And if I laugh at any mortal thing, ’Tis that I may not weep.” – Yours, etc,

Dr JOHN DOHERTY,

Gaoth Dobhair,

Co Dhun na nGall.

Sir, – Irish PEN joins PEN International and 47 PEN centres worldwide, including French PEN, PEN Canada, English PEN and PEN American Centre, in condemning the unprecedented attack on the office of the French publication Charlie Hebdo in Paris in which 12 people died and seven were injured.

We were sickened and shocked by this savage attack and we extend our heartfelt sympathies to the families of the victims and all affected.

As PEN International states, in the face of such violence it is incumbent on all governments and religious leaders to strengthen their commitment to press freedom and to safeguard freedom of expression as a fundamental human right.

PEN stands for the principle of unhampered transmission of thought within each nation and between all nations. Irish PEN is part of PEN’s global community of writers, spanning more than 100 countries, which stands together to oppose any form of suppression of freedom of expression. – Yours, etc,

VANESSA

FOX O’LOUGHLIN,

Chairwoman,

Irish PEN,

c/o United Arts Club,

Upper Fitzwilliam Street

Dublin 2.

Sir, – Dr Fergal Hickey makes an eloquent case for more accident and emergency funding by citing the situation in Australia (“Australian emergency care the State’s best template”, Opinion & Analysis, January 8th).

What he doesn’t say is that Australia has invested heavily in primary care with GPs resourced to deal with much of the work that Dr Hickey and his colleagues currently see in their departments. Every A&E department that has been extended and better resourced here in Ireland is too small and too busy within 18 months because of a culture of attending A&E in our cities and consequent lack of development of out of hours care in the community. Dr Hickey is making a good case for emergency care for trauma such as serious road traffic accidents and acute cardiac and respiratory illnesses. These are relatively uncommon situations. Indeed to deal with such urgent cases we don’t need all our A&E departments. Our improved road access and increasingly professionalised ambulance service now makes this reduction possible with very sick patients having much better outcomes with such a specialized service. What rightly upsets Dr Hickey and his colleagues are the vast numbers attending A&E that could be dealt with by general practitioners. This is now happening nationally with GP co-operatives seeing over a million patients out of hours last year. I know of one long-established co-op that sees twice as many patients as does its local A&E department and another new co-op that sees nearly 30 per cent of the numbers seen at its local adult A&E. In an experiment in St James’s Hospital in Dublin some years ago, employing GPs in A&E meant far fewer patients were referred into the hospital system when compared with the usual care. The decision-making ability of the more experienced GPs led to more patients being discharged back to their own doctor for further care. A&E as it is currently functioning has senior staff trained to deal with trauma and very sick patients. The majority of patients don’t need that level of care. Our A&E departments are currently functioning as primary care facilities but with access to diagnostic and inpatient facilities denied to GPs. This puts GPs at a clinical disadvantage in terms of resources and in providing an appropriate level of care to patients. The country cannot afford more of the same in A&E departments which will never solve the problem. It needs to rationalise our existing A&E departments into a few well-placed trauma centres. But most of all the system needs to strengthen primary care to let Dr Hickey and his colleagues do what they have been trained to do in a few well-placed specialised centres. – Yours, etc,

TOM O’DOWD, MD

Professor of

General Practice,

Trinity College Dublin.

Sir, – Planning for emergencies should be done in advance. The annual crisis in our hospitals takes place each winter and planning should begin at least six months beforehand and all contingencies should be factored into the plan to be implemented as and when appropriate. When next winter arrives, as it will, perhaps Minister for Health Leo Varadkar and his handlers , advisers (special and otherwise), civil servants, etc, will be prepared? Probably not. – Yours, etc,

HUGH PIERCE,

Celbridge, Co Kildare.

Sir, – In future when our Defence Forces deploy overseas, will they be bringing field hospitals with them or will portable corridors suffice? – Yours, etc,

HUGH T HYNES,

Limerick.

Sir, – Reading Frank McNally’s “An Irishman’s Diary about Alan Turing and crossword-solving” (January 9th), I suggest even the Enigma codebreakers would be challenged by the Crosaire crossword. – Yours, etc,

BOB BARRY,

Ashbourne, Co Meath.

Of rubbers and robbers – An Irishman’s Diary about Victor Noir and James Joyce

‘Noir’s grave has been a shrine, although not just to press freedom’

Grave of French journalist Victor Noir (1848-1870)  at Père Lachaise Cemetery in Paris. Photograph: Joel Saget/AFP/Getty ImagesGrave of French journalist Victor Noir (1848-1870) at Père Lachaise Cemetery in Paris. Photograph: Joel Saget/AFP/Getty Images

Sat, Jan 10, 2015, 01:01

During quieter times in Paris, a few years ago, I visited the grave of a man called Victor Noir, who in his own way, like the victims of the Charlie Hebdo massacre, was a martyr for free speech.

Born Yves Salmon, he adopted the pseudonym when joining La Marseillaise, a newspaper opposed to the Second Empire regime of Napoleon III, in the late 1860s. And it was that paper’s publisher, Henri Rochefort, who provoked the homicidal wrath of the emperor’s cousin, Prince Bonaparte. But Noir was the one caught in the crossfire.

In the fashion of the era, the prince wrote to Rochefort inquiring, provocatively, “whether your inkpot is guaranteed by your breast”. This was a challenge to a duel, towards which end the letter also included Bonaparte’s Paris address, where the publisher was urged to present himself.

In the event, it was the 21-year-old Noir and a colleague who were dispatched there, as seconds, to arrange the duel. And the insult of having to deal with “underlings” only added to the prince’s ire. Details were subsequently disputed, with Bonaparte claiming Noir assaulted him. In any case, he shot the young newspaper man dead.

The killing became a cause célèbre for republicans, 100,000 of whom attended the funeral at Neuilly. Years later, in a post-imperial France, Noir was promoted to a more prestigious cemetery, Père Lachaise.

And ever since, his grave there has been a shrine, although not just to press freedom. For more mysterious reasons, possibly relating to the French sense of humour, which can be very earthy, the horizontal life-sized bronze sculpture of Noir, portrayed as he lay after the shooting, also became the focus of a fertility cult.

The idea is that touching his effigy in a certain place ensures good luck in procreative endeavours. So, as the sculpture’s conspicuously shiny crotch testifies, Père Lachaise may be the only cemetery ever to have had a problem with grave rubbers.

They tried fencing it off some years ago for decency’s sake. But even that was considered an infringement on free expression. The obstacle was removed eventually. As far as I could see, the rubbing continues.

These are troubled days in Paris, again. And among the many journalists covering events there this week, I noticed, was a Reuters reporter one called John Irish. It could almost be another pseudonym, but it’s not, apparently. Just to confuse the issue, according to his Twitter account, Irish is “French-English despite the name”.

I’m reminded of the mildly notorious plaque on one of James Joyce’s former Paris addresses, 71 Rue Cardinal Lemoine, which annoys at least some tourists by calling Joyce an “écrivain brittanique, d’origine irlandaise”.

Even allowing that Joyce was born under the empire, and that he carried a British passport, this seems wrong. It contrasts with – for example – George Bernard Shaw, who unlike Joyce spent most of his career in Britain but is an “écrivain irlandais” on his Paris plaque.

It’s a minor offence, I know. But on foot of mentioning it here some time ago, I received an interesting letter from London-based Brian O’Shea, who back in the 1990s co-authored a tourist guide to The Paris of Joyce & Beckett.

While compiling this, naturally, he wanted to include mention of the Cardinal Lemoine address, where Joyce completed Ulysses. So he wrote to the modern residents of No 71 (an apartment block) seeking permission. He was disappointed to receive a return letter from the “Le Propiétaire” urging him not to mention the building’s Joycean connection, in case it would attract burglars. There had been a series of “cambriolages” already, the person wrote.

And although taken aback, the publishers would have respected the residents’ wishes. But in a follow-up letter, O’Shea felt compelled to suggest that the incidence of burglary was very low among literary tourists.

Whereupon he received a further missive from No 71, this time from the “Président du Conseil Syndical”, who assured him that the residents would be delighted to have their address mentioned, and who was mystified as to the identity of the burglary-fearing imposter who had replied previously.

Who knows – maybe the phantom objector was himself a burglar who had intercepted the letter and wanted to deter tourists? In any case, the address was eventually included in the book, controversial inscription and all.

Whatever about robbers, it may be rubbers – Père Lachaise-style – that No 71 needs. In the meantime, I’m told the guide is still available from selected bookshops, or direct from the publishers, London Irish Literary Travel, The Busworks, North Road, London N7 9DP.

@FrankmcnallyIT

Irish Independent:

Author Salman Rushdie was the subject of a fatwa because his 1988 book ‘The Satanic Verses’ was considered blasphemous. Photo: PA

Author Salman Rushdie was the subject of a fatwa because his 1988 book ‘The Satanic Verses’ was considered blasphemous. Photo: PA

I refer to Dr Ali Selim’s threatening of the Irish media with legal action if they publish the Charlie Hebdo cartoon he finds offensive and which others found so offensive that they killed 12 people (‘Islamic cleric threatens Irish publications with legal action if they publish offending cartoon’, January 8).

  • Go To

First, how nice of Dr Selim to assure us that lives will not be in danger. It is reassuring that lives will not be in danger if a humorous cartoon is published in a democratic republic which upholds those essentials of democracy, freedom of expression and freedom of speech.

But, the reality is that people would have grounds to be worried if they were to publish the cartoon. We have been here before with the Danish cartoons, which were followed by hundreds of deaths and attacks on Christians, churches and European diplomatic missions.

When have also been here with the fatwa against Salman Rushdie in 1989, when the head of Iran’s hardline theocracy backed the murder of a foreign national. Why? Because he considered the writer’s work of fiction offensive. The book’s Japanese translator was stabbed to death in 1991. Its Italian translator was seriously injured in a stabbing in Milan in 1991. Its Norway publisher was shot three times in an attempted assassination in Oslo in October 1993. The book’s Turkish translator was the intended target in the events which led to the Sivas massacre in 1993, which caused the deaths of 37 people.

You reported that Dr Selim “insisted that he believed in freedom of expression and speech. However, he said that the image was offensive to equality”. An explanation of how the cartoon is offensive to equality is not proffered. Perhaps Dr Selim might enlighten us.

This brings us to the related issue of blasphemy. Dr Ali Selim previously argued in your newspaper against the abolition of the offence of blasphemy from our Constitution (‘Blasphemy offence is vital to our peaceful co-existence’, February 10, 2014).

Dr Selim said that blasphemy laws are “abused” in other countries. It would be more accurate to say that blasphemy laws are not abused – but enforced – in other countries. In Egypt, insulting Islam and Muhammad has resulted in the death penalty.

Do we really want to live in a country where being involved in the likes of a humorous cartoon, ‘Fr Ted’ or ‘The Life of Brian’ could result in a fine of up to €25,000?

The law against blasphemy is an anachronism and should be removed.

Rob Sadlier

Rathfarnham, Dublin 16

Aftermath of Paris attacks

The events at ‘Charlie Hebdo’ were shocking. Journalists and members of the public have showed solidarity with the journalists of ‘Charlie Hebdo’ by holding up “Je suis Charlie” placards. The sheer volume of people taking part in these acts of solidarity has been tremendous.

The deaths in Paris take place at a time when some divisions in society are increasing – yes, between peoples of different faiths (and none), but also between richer and poorer, between the older and the younger, between indigenous populations and newer migrants composed of a variety of colours, languages and creeds.

Europe finds itself in a tinderbox – the last week has seen demonstrations by the German far-right group Pegida, killings by people claiming to act for Islam, bombings and burning of mosques, and much else.

The principles of the French Republic are summarised in the slogan – Liberta, Egalite, Fraternite. There has been much talk about the first two, but what Europe and the wider world needs now is an emphasis on the third; we must as humans show humanity, and rise to be worthy of the acclaim we have granted ourselves.

We have been asked to show solidarity with those who died this week. Let us extend this idea further – let us show solidarity, and with it benevolence and restraint, to all participants of society.

Society can become stronger, but it will be tested before it becomes so. For it to become stronger, effort is needed. Or we can allow society to erode and fracture; and that requires good people to do nothing at all.

There will be a clamour from some portions of society to show ‘strength’ and solidarity in a particular way – by publishing offensive imagery and cartoons. I urge journalists and editors to not do so.

There is no doubt that we live in a society in which there is freedom of expression, but freedom of expression does not entail that there is a necessity of expression. We are already in a cycle of despair and hatred; we do not need to accelerate it. For those journalists and editors who are inclined to publish cartoons (of any subject matter), I urge them to engage in dialogue with those whom publishing will affect, and understand what the effects of doing so are.

Of course, dialogue requires a common language, hence those with whom such a dialogue will be undertaken need to be sought out – not the roughnecks, but the calm, quiet voices of wisdom which exist in every community.

Fraternite implies that we see others as having moral value; not that we see them as inferior, as the Other.

Dr Mobasher Choudhary

Northamptonshire, Britain

Following the threat issued to the Irish media by the Islamic scholar Dr Ali Selim of the Islamic Cultural Centre of Ireland – that the ‘Charlie Hebdo’ cartoons must not be republished – the Irish Government must immediately repeal the bizarre blasphemy law inexplicably foisted upon this state by Dermot Ahern and the Fianna Fail administration in 2009.

Bernard Guinan

Claremorris, Co Mayo

A culture of extreme and unjustified violence, combined with discrimination and racism, seems to be increasing in societies in the Middle East, the West, and in Eastern Europe. The atrocities committed in France are the most recent example.

There has been a significant increase in anti-Semitism and Islamophobia across Europe, as well as anti-Christian attacks and persecution associated with conflicts in several Middle Eastern states. In Eastern Europe, anti-Russian feeling is being fanned by the conflict in Ukraine and by Western propaganda.

The right to freedom of speech is being cited as justification for the publication of materials that are deemed offensive to people of certain cultures. All rights and all aspects of freedom carry responsibilities, and it is essential that responsibility is exercised by all societies, and by political leaders and media outlets, to avoid inflaming racism and discrimination.

‘The Huffington Post’ in an article entitled ‘In Wake Of Charlie Hebdo Attack, Some Media Self-Censor Cartoons’ criticises such self-censorship. Responsible editing and common sense sensitivity to the feelings of others should not be labelled as unacceptable censorship. It is unduly offensive to Jewish people, and to most other people, to make jokes about the Holocaust. Similar sensitivity should be applied to all communities internationally.

It is essential that we should all do our utmost to improve relationships, and to promote peace rather than conflicts, between societies and communities both internationally. It is essential that we should all do our utmost to improve relationships, and to promote peace rather than conflicts, between societies and communities both internationally and within our own countries. Racism and violence are two sides of the same coin.

Edward Horgan

Castletroy, Limerick

Irish Independent


Viewing all 594 articles
Browse latest View live