Quantcast
Channel:
Viewing all 594 articles
Browse latest View live

Liz

$
0
0

29 March 2014 Liz

I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again.They have an inspection by the admiral. Priceless

Cold slightly better Mary very under the weather visit her take Liz

No Scrabbletoday Perhaps Iwill win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Bruce Robertson , who has died aged 79, was managing director of the book design and artwork partnership Diagram and founder of the Diagram Prize for the Oddest Book Title, an award presented annually by The Bookseller magazine.

Robertson and his business partner Trevor Bounford dreamed up the award in 1978 to avoid boredom at the annual Frankfurt Book Fair. The first award went to Proceedings Of The Second International Workshop On Nude Mice. Other winners over the years have included How to Avoid Huge Ships; Goblinproofing One’s Chicken Coop; and Managing a Dental Practice the Genghis Khan Way.

The Diagram Prize (which earns the winner a passable bottle of claret and — possibly — a boost in sales) is unique in that spotters and judges do not actually have to read the books in question. Indeed, they are actively discouraged from doing so, in case a close knowledge of the subject leads them to conclude that the titles are less odd than they first appear.

The prize grabbed the imagination of the Press and, indeed, became so high-profile that in 2004 the organisers complained that some publishers were self-consciously choosing titles with a view to winning it, “presumably in a bid to emulate the 2003 champion, Big Book of Lesbian Horse Stories”. There have also been moments of nail-biting controversy. In 1999, for example, Male Genitalia of Butterflies of the Balkan Peninsula, with a Checklist, was a favourite to win — until it was rejected for being deliberately boring.

The competition was initially decided by a panel of judges, but since 2000 the winner has been chosen by a public vote on The Bookseller’s website — a development that has led to complaints of dumbing down and vulgarity (as seen in the controversial winner of the 2007 award, If You Want Closure In Your Relationship, Start With Your Legs). However, it should perhaps be noted that the 2011 winner, Cooking with Poo, is, in fact, a manual about how to create Thai dishes with crab.

With his shaggy beard, Union flag ties and black beret, Robertson cut a colourful figure on the book fair scene. His company, which specialises in book packaging and graphics, had little opportunity to enter the competition in its own right. However, Robertson was particularly proud to have been involved in the publication of a Japanese edition of Woman’s Body: An Owner’s Manual — in Braille complete with charts, “thus enabling blind Japanese women to know what goes on in their bodies”, as he put it.

Bruce Robertson was born in Sunderland, then part of Co Durham (now Tyne and Wear) on December 8 1934. His father, Fred, was the manager of a Co-Op store and his mother, Ivy, a cook in a local school.

After Hylton Road School and Sunderland Technical College for Boys, Bruce took up an apprenticeship at a local architectural practice. He proved so skilled at drawing that the owner of the practice suggested to his parents that he attend art school. Eventually, after two years’ National Service in the Army, he took up a scholarship to the Royal College of Art in London.

Having graduated, Robertson worked for several publishing houses, including Penguin and Aldus Books, doing graphic and book jacket design. He then held a teaching post at Chelsea School of Art and in 1960, with Bob Chapman, founded Diagram. Over the next 50 years the company grew to be a successful book packager, providing graphic and other material for some 270 publishers around the world.

The most recent Diagram Prize, the 36th, was, by coincidence, presented on the day of Robertson’s death. Continuing to mine a well-worn scatological seam, the prize went to How to Poo on a Date, by Mats and Enzo, a manual for dealing with calls of nature during romantic nights out.

Bruce Robertson is survived by his wife, Patricia, whom he married in 1959, and by their two sons and two daughters,

Bruce Robertson, born December 8 1934, died March 21 2014

Guardian:

In 1968 I was a young journalist on Business Management. For an article about management practices I interviewed Tony Benn, then minister of technology, on the “brain drain”. I was given the prize possession of our office – the tape-recorder. Apart from the on/off switch, I had no idea how it worked, but it was a better bet than my unreadable shorthand. I waited nervously on the 11th floor of Millbank Tower. He greeted me warmly, holding his trademark pint-sized mug of tea, and patiently answered my questions. Half-way through, the tape-recorder whirred and stopped. I sat helplessly. Benn smiled and asked politely if he could help. We spent 20 minutes sitting on the floor while he repaired it. The article appeared with a great picture of him. I remember his kindness to a young female journalist, whose career could have come to an abrupt end, with huge gratitude.
Lesley Bernstein
London

• Following the laying to rest of Tony Benn, it would be a fitting tribute for the Labour party to organise an annual memorial lecture, both in his honour and to keep radical alternative socialist views alive within the party. Perhaps Ken Loach could deliver the first one (Labour is part of the problem, not the solution, 28 March). If ever we need an echo of the principled, values-driven vision characterised by Benn within the Labour party it is now.
Gary Nethercott
Woodbridge, Suffolk

•  Suzanne Moore makes two misleading claims (I’m all for ‘weird’ Ed Miliband if it means a genuine alternative, G2, 27 March). First, she states that my selection as the prospective parliamentary candidate for Aberavon was the result of me somehow being “shunted” into the selection process by the party. Nothing could be further from the truth. Labour parliamentary selections are contested on the basis of one member one vote. Like all the other candidates in the Aberavon selection, I spent months meeting and speaking with hundreds of our members across the constituency, knocking on doors, making phone calls and engaging in debate about local, national and global issues. Ms Moore is welcome to her conspiracy theories about “patronage”, but the fact is that the Aberavon parliamentary selection was proof of Labour’s commitment to localism and democracy.

Second, Ms Moore claims that my domestic arrangements will prevent me from spending time in the constituency. As I made clear throughout the selection process, I am fully committed to being an active local campaigning candidate and MP. As such I will be establishing my home and a fully staffed office in the constituency and look forward to working hard in, and for, the community.
Stephen Kinnock
London

Having retired from teaching in recent years, I am so appreciative of our public services and now have time to write and sing their praises. Everything I’ve encountered today, as I write, was thanks to our fantastic, publicly funded amenities, so often unfairly criticised by politicians. This morning I benefited from a local authority-subsidised adult education class, meeting other keen and sociable learners. This centre is buzzing and a lifeline for older students who cannot get out much. Later I called in at one of Bristol’s local libraries, where staff really go out of their way to find the books I want, or reserve them – and all for free. They had just organised a public talk and signing by the acclaimed local writer and recent Costa award winner, Nathan Filer.

To give a bit back to the community, I spend an afternoon a week in a primary school listening to young children reading. I am so impressed and inspired by the commitment and hard work of the teachers and classroom assistants who take so much care and time to organise the education of 30-plus youngsters in their classes. And everywhere was reached by public transport, using my bus pass. When I arrived home, I had a phone call from my doctor following up a hospital visit, to pass on a prescription that I might need in the future. Of course there are also gyms, sport centres and university talks and concerts to take care of our physical and mental wellbeing.

Our public services have taken years to set up, develop and improve, and we are so fortunate in this country to benefit from such a variety of excellent facilities and their employees. So we must fight like hell to stop any government taking them away. I urge everyone not to let this government denigrate the NHS, our education service, our local libraries etc. Instead we must celebrate how much they enhance the quality of our lives and allow us to participate as active and independent members of our communities.
Ann Thomas
Bristol

It is right that there is a clear distinction between giving medical care to someone previously subject to female genital mutilation, such as stitches after childbirth to control bleeding, and committing an offence (FGM charge hides the real issues, Letters, 28 March).

The law is clear that no offence of female genital mutilation is committed by an approved person who performs a surgical operation which is necessary for the patient’s physical or mental health, or for the purposes connected with the labour or birth. This was, of course, considered in this case.

The full facts of this case are yet to be heard in court and commentary which misunderstands the facts is unhelpful in this very important area of the law. It is also extremely important that nothing prejudices the upcoming trial.
Alison Saunders
Director of public prosecutions

With the first same-sex marriage taking place in Britain – in Brighton today (Report, 28 March) – is it not the time either to pass legislation permitting civil partnerships between heterosexual couples or to repeal the legislation recognising civil partnerships?
Peter Cave
London

• Contrast the “noiseless” 2014 Grand Prix racing engines (Sport, 26 March) with the glorious sounds of the V12, V8 and V16 power units of the past. Stirling Moss, John Surtees and Derek Warwick are right to complain. Grands Prix should be the pinnacle of motorsport, yet computers and modern technology have stripped it of all the drama, passion and emotion when Moss, Mike Hawthorn and others had to drive by the seat of their pants. That’s what made the crowds feel that these legends were gladiators and not robots.  Not for them, a boffin in the pits telling him to slow down and switch off his engine to save it for the next race.
Paul Foxall
Collingbourne Ducis, Wiltshire

• You remind us (Codebreaker who secretly read Hitler’s mail dies at 93, 27 March) that Raymond “Gerry” Roberts, one of the founding members of the Bletchley Park decipherers, helped to save millions of lives and shorten the second world war by an estimated two years. That more than 60 years later, in extreme old age, Roberts received a lowly MBE for his great  services to the UK and far beyond, offers another disquieting reminder that our honours system is far from honourable and lacks any set of true moral values.
Nicholas de Jongh
London

• Is this “control freak” Jeremy Hunt (Report, 28 March) the same minister who had no idea what his political aide Adam Smith was doing during the BSkyB take over bid?
Chris Kedge
Rainhill, Merseyside

• Your letter about mushy peas (25 March) reminds me of a lunch with friends at a pub in Northamptonshire. After we had selected our meals we were asked if we wanted northern or southern peas. Perhaps they couldn’t bring themselves to use the word mushy with its northern connotations.
Chris Jones
Bewdley, Worcestershire

• All these crazy place names (Letters, 28 March) are driving me to Witts End, Bedfordshire.
Brian Golby
Harlington, Bedfordshire

Robert Shore (Let’s hear it for the Midlands, G2, 27 March), writing about the contribution the Midlands have made to Britain’s culture and industry, curiously made no mention of Burton upon Trent, which in the late 19th century was the most important brewing town in the world. Due to the remarkable waters of the Trent Valley, which are rich in natural sulphates, brewers in Burton were able to perfect the first pale beers in the shape of pale ale and its strong export version, India pale ale (IPA).

Before Burton, beers – including lager beer from central Europe – were dark. The Burton brewers harnessed the new technologies of the industrial revolution to make pale rather than dark malt and added Trent Valley water that drew out the full flavours of malt and hops.

Burton pale ale transformed brewing on a world scale. Brewers from Austria and Germany hurried to the town in the East Midlands to see how pale ale was made and returned home to fashion the first golden lager beers.

As a result of corporate greed and stupidity, most of the famous names in Burton brewing, such as Bass and Ind Coope, have gone. But Marston’s, with its Pedigree pale ale, remains a major figure in British brewing and it’s been joined by a clutch of new craft brewers in the town. One of Burton’s great brewers of yesteryear, William Worthington, is commemorated in a small brewery named in his honour at the National Brewery Centre that celebrates Burton’s great contribution to brewing.
Roger Protz
St Albans, Hertfordshire

• Robert Shore rightly reminds us of the importance of Birmingham and mentions the cities of the East Midlands, but what about further west into Shropshire? The iconic Ironbridge, now a World Heritage site, is shown, but there should be mention of nearby Coalbrookdale as an important centre of industry. In the county town of Shrewsbury lived some of the pioneers of the use of wrought iron in the building industry, as can be seen in one of the earliest iron-framed buildings, the Flax Mill. This technique proved to be the inspiration for the building of skyscrapers.

Shrewsbury, not far from the ruins of Wroxeter, the fourth most important town in Roman Britain, has connections with many famous people: Charles 1 visited, Charles Darwin was born here, Charles Dickens stayed here, Disraeli was its MP in 1841, the war poet Wilfred Owen lived here, as did the writer, Mary Webb. The reference to “blue remembered hills” in AE Housman’s A Shropshire Lad is an apt description of the land stretching into Wales.

Built above a loop in the River Severn, Shrewsbury has almost 600 listed buildings, narrow medieval streets, a castle, an abbey, of Brother Cadfael fame, many churches, a new theatre and a famous annual flower show.
Helen Wilson
Shrewsbury, Shropshire

• Devotees of heavy riffing and high volume will have noticed a glaring omission. No mention of the region’s status as the birthplace and spiritual homeland of heavy metal. Black Sabbath started it all, of course, but consider a lineage which includes Judas Priest, Napalm Death, Godflesh and Iron Monkey (among countless others). It’s no wonder that there was sufficient interest and material for Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery to host an exhibition called Home of Metal in 2011. Surely a piece which found room for comedy singer Robbie Williams could have also given due credit to Black Sabbath’s Geezer Butler, Tony Iommi, Ozzy Osbourne and Bill Ward?
Olly Thomas
Brighton, East Sussex

• Why no mention of the greatest Midlander of all time, Robin Hood? He is in much need at the present time to ensure that the rich are robbed to give to the poor. Our contemporary sheriffs in Westminster seek to undermine this principle of social and economic justice, but Robin always had popular support.
Canon David Jennings
Market Bosworth, Leicestershire

• I was surprised that you failed to mention Charles Darwin. Shrewsbury, his birthplace, is nearer the centre of the region than the eastern outpost that is Grantham, home to Isaac Newton.
Paul Pascoe
Shrewsbury, Shropshire

• No wonder the Midlands are so often subsumed into the north. In the letter calling for HS2 to be speeded through parliament (28 March), the signatories describe themselves as leaders of eight major “northern” cities, yet the group includes Derby and Nottingham.
Dr Alex May
Manchester

Independent:

Where is this “real world” that Graham Hinitt (letter, 27 March) inhabited? It is entirely unclear why he believes that his role in financial services, which entailed, inter alia, long hours of record-keeping, was more real than that of teachers, or whether he believes that teachers should be doing more paperwork or should stop moaning about what they already do. 

Although my days as a teacher did involve increasing amounts of record-keeping and, obviously, teaching, they also required me to deal with the baggage that the pupils brought to school with them.

Over the years, this baggage included: acrimoniously divorcing parents who used the child as a stick to beat each other; eating disorders; abuse of drugs and/or alcohol; pupils with suicidal feelings; those who were being physically, sexually or emotionally abused at home; acute anxiety over academic performance; unwanted pregnancy; and those struggling with their sexuality.

I’m afraid Mr Hinitt is suffering from the delusion that because teachers are not engaged in wealth creation they are not living in the real world.

I can assure him that it was uncomfortably real to those pupils and often to the teachers who tried to support them.

Kathy Moyse, Cobham, Surrey

The trouble with some financial services managers, such as Graham Hinitt, is that even when they leave school they never actually work in the real world. They don’t understand how tough it is in the teaching profession, having only seen it from the point of view of the pupil.

Before my retirement I worked at one time in a secondary school – not as a teacher but in admin. Having previously worked in the “real world”, I gained a new respect for the teaching profession.

The hours were long  and much time was spent on record-keeping, as  well as actually in the classroom. Not possible to get a coffee whenever you feel the need – not with a class of pupils requiring your undivided attention the whole time.

Many teachers have worked in business before taking up teaching and they certainly would not consider it to be a soft option.

I suggest that Mr Hinitt spends some time volunteering in a school, I am sure his expertise would be much appreciated and he would gain useful knowledge.

Jill O’Kelly, Horringer, Suffolk

In the late 19th century, my grandmother taught classes of about 50 children and regularly fell asleep over a pile of marking in the evening – long hours and hard work. Yet she inspired generations of my family to follow her, because teaching is a joyous and rewarding experience.

The line of teachers has survived unbroken until now, but it is about to come to an end with the resignations of two members of my family,  one from the primary and one from the secondary sector, both consistently rated “outstanding” throughout their long careers.

It’s nothing to do with hard work and long hours; it’s because of frustration at not being able to do the job as it should be done.

Alison Sutherland (letter, 28 March) says it all: “daft organisational and curriculum ideas” imposed by people who have no idea of the implications. Teaching and learning are no longer a joyous experience for anyone.

My grandmother would be very sad indeed.

Christina Jones, Retford, Nottinghamshire

Why Crimea is so important to Putin

Mary Dejevsky (27 March) recommends bold action to negotiate and resolve our problems with Russia, but I don’t think she addresses the main reason why Russia wants to secure Crimea – which is the link Crimea provides with its naval base in Syria, preserving its ability to support its clients, mainly Assad, and its general ability to influence events in the Middle East.

This is also the reason why the West, pungently represented by the US’s Victoria Nuland, whose scorn for her European Union partners was so memorably recorded, gave so much power to the elbow of the anti-Russian streetfighters  in Kiev.

A secure pro-Western Ukrainian government intending to winkle the Russians out of Sevastopol would have been extremely helpful.

Russia is acting ruthlessly, but not from sheer weakness, as Barack Obama claims, rather from a determination to preserve, for good or ill, what power over the world’s most vital region remains to it.

The problem that needs to be resolved is not so much those that Mary Dejevsky explicitly mentions but the Israel/Palestine problem, which is spreading poison through all the world’s veins

Martin Hughes, Wokingham, Berkshire

Vladimir Putin’s colonialist occupation of Crimea offers Islamic jihadis a pool of potential recruits among the peninsula’s 300,000 Muslim Tatars, and a new Black Sea coastal forward base for terrorism only 200km from the EU’s eastern border.

The Crimean Tatars have no love for Russia which, in the 1940s, ethnically cleansed their grandparents from their ancestral homeland to Central Asia, from where they have been returning since the 1980s to a territory safely outside Russia since 1954.

Faced with new threats to their security and ethnic identity, the more embittered Tatars will be natural allies for Chechen separatists to the east of the Black Sea, battle-hardened by two wars with Russia and now fighting in Syria against Russia’s ally President Assad, and other regional activists.

A saner strategist than Putin might have considered that the last thing the world needs is any more disaffected Muslims – especially ones with a genuine grievance against the occupation of their country. We should not, therefore, be surprised when we see TV footage of Russians again reeling from Chechen-style bombing campaigns, orchestrated from a Black Sea arc with easy access to the whole Middle East.

The pity is that jihadis, once indoctrinated, don’t tend to feel geographically restricted from turning their wrath against other targets.

David Crawford, Bromley, Kent

Privatised power has run out of steam

When the largest gas supplier threatens us all with the lights going out, we surely know that the experiment with privatised power generation and supply has failed.

It is time for the public sector to re-establish control over our power supplies. We deserve a cheaper, sustainable, more reliable alternative. We would never put our national security at risk by selling our military defences to the private sector to be subsequently sold to foreign institutions, yet our energy supplies are essential to our daily security.

Lee Dalton

Weymouth, Dorset

With the CEO of Centrica threatening blackouts, has it occurred to anyone else that the privatisation of our national energy was the worst legislation in Parliamentary history? I know who I will  be burning in effigy on  5 November.

David Monkman

Ramsey St Mary’s, Cambridgeshire

end this sex discrimination

With the first same-sex marriage taking place in Britain today, is not the time ripe either to pass legislation permitting civil partnerships between heterosexual couples or to repeal the legislation recognising same-sex civil partnerships? Until such legislation is passed, is not unjustified discrimination being manifested?

Peter Cave

London W1

cow fodder  vs the gadfly

I am happy to enlighten Dave Keeley (letter, 28 March) on the origins of the word Farage. Obviously, it comes from the Latin farrago which my Shorter Oxford English Dictionary tells me meant “mixed fodder for cattle, hence fig, a medley, a confused group, a hotchpotch”.

As for the word Clegg, it seems to have Old Norse origins from “kleggi: a gadfly”, now meaning figuratively “one who torments and worries another” and “an irresistible impulse”. I leave you to draw your own conclusions.

Patrick Walsh

Eastbourne

I have long believed that the world would be a jollier place if we were allowed to pronounce two names in British politics in a slightly different way.

Farage should surely rhyme with the south London garage of my youth, ie “farridge”, while Gove must, in all conscience, rhyme either with “move”  or “shove”. See? You’re smiling already.

Steve Clarke

Portree, Isle of Skye

Farage vs Clegg was like two donkeys going round Aintree.

Amanda Baker

Morpeth,  Northumberland

how many mothers  are you buying for?

Is there any special significance in one town-centre card shop offering “Mother’s Day cards: five for a pound!”?

Godfrey H Holmes

Times:

Sir, Neil Jones (letter, Mar 27) is entertainingly provocative about BBC radio audiences. The Radio Joint Audience Research figures for the three months to December 2013 show that Radio 4 was listened to by just over 11 million people, and Radio 3 by just below 2 million. Neither figure is insignificant, and both contradict his suggestions that few people listen to Radio 4 and “hardly anyone has ever listened to Radio 3”.

Richard Doubleday

Bath

Sir, In answer to the letter from Mr Jones, I expect you will be bombarded with letters from people like me, still well under 50, who regularly listen to Radio 4 and have done for many years.

Robert Duddridge

Woodford Green, Essex

Sir, Elitist is the one thing Radio 3 and Radio 4 are not. They are available to all, free of charge — no TV licence is required to listen. They enable anyone, including the poorest in society, to listen to the greatest thinkers, artists and intellectuals of our time.

Stephen Follows

London W14

Sir, On March 16 the sun was shining and vast numbers of people under 50 (and many under 50 in spirit) were enjoying themselves on the South Bank to the soundtrack of not Radio 1, but Radio 3 at the start of its residence at the Southbank Centre. There were no clamouring voices demanding the music be changed. This is but one small example of the enjoyment and fulfilment that Radio 3 and 4 provide to their listeners. They engage, educate, provoke and transform, and allow communal experience without demanding physical presence, which for many would be impossible. They offer a wealth of knowledge and debate otherwise out of reach of many, and permit exploration of the most pressing topics, the farthest lands, the most astounding music and human endeavours.

These all seem to be excellent purposes. Perhaps Mr Jones should close his eyes and listen with more open ears.

Joanna Williams (aged 29)

London SW19

Sir, Even if it were true that no one under 50 listens to Radio 4, that would still give a potential audience of some 20 million. Is there not a wider point behind the call to get rid of BBC Radio? If its informal role of guardian (and definer) of what it means to “educate, entertain and inform” must now be given to the market to decide then, logically, we must also disband all other institutions that help us distinguish quality from mere popularity.

Without the foundation stone of “this is better than that because . . .”, all that will remain of our cultural life will be the sciences (where “truth” is testable and provisional) and the marketing of popular entertainment. However much we may disagree with others about what is good in culture, life without the debate — and someone to insist that there is a debate to be had — would be very much shallower.

David Boorer

Llandovery, Carmarthenshire

Sir, No one listens to the radio? Does Mr Jones not know any painters, bricklayers, mechanics, plumbers, electricians, scaffolders and kitchen fitters?

John Smart

Taverham, Norfolk

More than 60 leading physicians and medical scientists call for an urgent response to climate change

Sir, On Monday the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) publishes its latest report on the current and projected impact of global warming and climate change. The report will add substantially to the existing evidence that climate change represents, as The Lancet put it, “the greatest threat to human health in the 21st century”.

Leaked drafts of the report describe how human health and social stability will suffer. Altered patterns of disease, extreme weather events, food and water scarcity, human migration and violent conflict will affect hundreds of millions of people within our lifetimes and those of our children. These impacts are already affecting populations worldwide.

The IPCC is not alone in its conclusions. The American Association for the Advancement of Science confirms that “the wellbeing of people of all nations [is] at risk” and that there is now a “real chance of abrupt, unpredictable and potentially irreversible changes with highly damaging impacts” on people around the globe.

As medical professionals, we call for immediate preventative action through a drastic reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and rapid transition to a zero-carbon world, at a pace far beyond that which is already planned. This will require transformative and radical change to energy policies, patterns of consumption, and transport systems, among other things. Such change may be considered disruptive and difficult, but such actions are necessary and can bring enormous benefits to human health and wellbeing both in the short term and in the years and decades to come.

Never before have we known so much and done so little. Failing to act decisively and quickly will inevitably cause great suffering and have potentially catastrophic consequences.

Sir Richard Thompson

Royal College of Physicians

Sir Sabaratnam Arulkumaran

British Medical Association

Professor Terence Stephenson

Nuffield Professor of Child Health

Professor Norman S Williams

Royal College of Surgeons of England

Dame Julie Moore

University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust

Professor David Haslam

NICE

Professor Hugh Montgomery,

UCL Institute for Human Health and Performance

Dr Fiona Godlee

Editor, British Medical Journal

Dr David Pencheon

Sustainable Development Unit

Dr Robin Stott

Climate and Health Council

A reader recalls finding a souvenir of the Great War in his garden – was it lost or did someone throw it away?

Sir, Apropos Bob Smethurst, the former dustman who rescued Great War memorabilia from bins (report, Mar 17), it reminds me that many years ago when digging in my garden my fork struck a metal object. It was a bronze plaque, 4¾ inches in diameter, inscribed “He died for freedom and honour” around the circumference with the name Norman Alfred Lee next to Britannia and a lion. It turned out to be a next-of-kin memorial plaque (or “death penny”); over one million were issued to the next-of-kin of those who fell in the war. I always wonder if it was buried on purpose or thrown away during a house move.

Richard F. A. Strother

Southampton

Responses to the proposal to concentrate NHS resources on the young because they are more valuable to society

Sir, Sir Andrew Dillon’s assertion that saving the lives of the elderly is less valuable to society than saving younger people (“Young must come before elderly, NHS adviser says”, Mar 27) is nonsense. A person’s value to society can vary from very positive to very negative. A much better and acceptable explanation of Sir Andrew’s proposal, which has merit, is that the benefit applies to the person and not to society.

Brian Parker

Dartmouth

Sir, If we are to consider a patient’s contribution to society when allocating healthcare resources then surely we should prioritise those who have contributed more? The elderly have given a lifetime to society, and a healthcare system that recognises this and cares for our elderly and terminally ill is of much greater importance to society than Sir Andrew Dillon’s opinions.

Dr Ian Coyle-Gilchrist

Neurology Registrar, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge

Dr Lorraine Peck

Haematology Registrar, Royal Free Hospital, London

The nonsense about prisoners not being allowed books is not confined to a single inhumane prison

Sir, The ban on receiving books in prison (letter, Mar 27) already exists at HMP Albany on the Isle of Wight. I support a prisoner transferred from HMP Wandsworth — a tough regime where he could not receive books by post, directly or via Amazon, though I could bring them in personally for him. At HMP Albany I cannot even bring in or post anything at all for him. Can the prison regime get more inhumane than this?

Peter Flower

New Malden, Surrey

Telegraph:

SIR – Each year, as we approach the fourth Sunday of Lent, we are bombarded with an increasing number of advertisements and inaccurate references to “Mother’s Day”, an American invention that seems to have eaten into our retail soul.

The correct name for Mother’s Day in Britain is Mothering Sunday, and its origins are very British. In Victorian times, it was a day when children, mainly daughters, who had gone to work as domestic servants were given a day off to visit their mothers and families. Although the sentiments are similar, Mother’s Day in America has distinctly different beginnings.

If we are to preserve any semblance of our national identity, perhaps some of our more prestigious institutions and trading outlets, such as the National Trust and Marks & Spencer, could lead by stemming the tide of this historical erosion.

Julian Stapleton
Ash, Somerset

SIR – It is not surprising that consumers do not switch suppliers all that often (“Millions paying too much for energy”).

The procedure is complicated. I am in the process of changing now. It is taking several weeks and it is still not done. At present, I am committed to two direct debits, which is stupid but unavoidable.

Keith Moore
Yoxford, Suffolk

SIR – Individual consumers do not need to know what part of the bill is down to green taxes, and the power companies should be allowed to keep their billing as simple as possible. If the Government feels the need to impose green taxes, it should do so exclusively on power company profits.

It’s no wonder power companies are reluctant to make long-term investments in new plant when politicians of all parties are playing Russian roulette with the energy markets.

Don Edwards
Manningtree, Essex

SIR – SSE has made its offer of freezing prices in the expectation, I suspect, of gas prices falling (most likely as America becomes more energy efficient).

This offer has been made in order to seek commercial advantage in the marketplace. Perversely, a Government-mandated price freeze could, in fact, result in locking consumers in to prices higher than necessary, as global energy prices fall, inflating the profits of energy companies.

Steve Willis
Olney, Buckinghamshire

Prisoners’ books

SIR – I work as a prison librarian. Our library is well stocked with books of every genre. It is well attended and appreciated by the prisoners who often claim that it is a lifeline for them. It gives me tremendous job satisfaction to be in a position to help the prisoners and encourage them to read.

However, some prisoners are incarcerated for sex offences, paedophilia and kidnap. These prisoners attempt to access material to satisfy their perversions in every way possible. If a prisoner requests a book that we do not stock, we apply for the book from an outside library. It is not always possible to assess the content until the book arrives. Occasionally, the books contain unsuitable material. It is due to this problem that restrictions have to be put in place.

Angela Lord
Exeter, Devon

Uphill work

SIR – In your report “Most workers fail to catch the cycling bug”, about which cities and towns are showing growth or decline in cycling, one important factor was missed.

A big advantage enjoyed by Cambridge (where 290 in every 1,000 cycle to work) is that it is one of the flattest cities in the country.

In Merthyr Tydfil, you report, three in 1,000 people cycle to work. I would guess that steep hills might be a disincentive for cyclists.

T H Brown
Bathgate, West Lothian

Valuable coins

SIR – Why not mint the new pound coin with four holes in it? This way, future generations could use them as buttons, which is soon all they will be worth.

Jane Cullinan
Padstow, Cornwall

Suicide for the disabled

SIR – Scope, the disability charity, strongly welcomes the Prime Minister’s oppositionto legalising assisted suicide. The law as it stands provides crucial protection to people who feel under pressure to end their life.

This issue tells us a lot about public attitudes towards disabled people. Why is it that when people who are not disabled want to commit suicide, we try to talk them out of it, but when a disabled person wants to commit suicide, we focus on how we can make that possible?

The ban on assisted suicide sends a powerful message countering the view that if you’re disabled it’s not worth being alive.

There are loud, well-organised and influential voices calling for the legalisation of assisted suicide for terminally ill adults.

But a lot of disabled people have been left feeling very concerned by suggestions that a change could be one step closer.

We hope, therefore, that politicians will follow David Cameron and decide against changing a law that works.

Richard Hawkes
Chief Executive, Scope
London N7

SIR – Your leading article reiterates the cry of many medical professionals that one of their most important principles is to “do no harm”.

But how does one define harm? Can anyone argue that a doctor who assists a terminally ill person to avoid fear, distress, pain and indignity by hastening death has “caused harm”? I believe the doctor is providing a welcome and humane service.

Arthur Bayley
Tyldesley, Lancashire

SIR – On legalising assisted suicide, you are right: it may add to the pressure for the aged or ill to see themselves as a “burden”. But it is ironic that in the following leading article – supporting a cap on the annual welfare budget – you fail to acknowledge the danger that this could reinforce negative public perceptions of benefit claimants. Demonising people as a “burden” or “scroungers” isn’t helpful.

Dr Alex May
Manchester

Toeing the fashion line

SIR – I read in the fashion pages that socks should now be worn with sandals. This will come as a great relief, although perhaps not as a surprise, to the thousands of Englishmen at present planning their holiday wardrobes.

Liz Wheeldon
Seaton, Devon

iWatch: how to keep time in the modern world

SIR – No one has a watch any more. They all get the time from their mobiles.

Tallulah Johnson
London SW5

SIR – I noticed that Vladimir Putin was wearing his watch on his right wrist when signing, with his right hand, the paperwork for the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

Did he do this to advertise a brand of Russian-made watch?

Richard Colley
Skipton, North Yorkshire

SIR – I never wear a watch and I am never late. There are clocks everywhere: town halls, churches, cars, shop windows, other people’s wrists. Failing those, one becomes adept at estimating the time accurately.

Geoff Brokenbrow
Okehampton, Devon

SIR – I wear my watch on my left wrist, and upside down – ie 12 o’clock is at the 6 o’clock position, and vice versa – in order to improve my lateral-thinking skills.

Jim Ryan
Dublin

SIR – Nick Clegg’s statement that only about 7 per cent of British legislation is imposed by the European Union is typical of the deception with which defenders of membership of the EU present their case.

In 2010, the House of Commons library concluded that “it is possible to justify any measure between 15 per cent and 50 per cent or thereabouts”.

Sometimes a figure of 70 per cent is used; this is the percentage of laws that the politicians we elect to the European Parliament have as much say on as our national Parliament.

A figure of 85 per cent is based on an analysis provided by the German government in 2005.

Dr Max Gammon
London SE16

SIR – Considering the proportion of laws that come from the EU, perhaps the time has come for a “conscious uncoupling”.

Michael McGough
Loughton, Essex

SIR – You report that “Britain has 100 per cent failure rate when trying to block EU legislation”. It is also notable that Britain has been ready to vote in favour of almost 95 per cent of the total number of proposals in the Council of Ministers since 1996.

Only in 55 cases has it voted No. All of these proposals were unsuccessfully opposed.

The solution lies in the unanimous report of November 2013 by Parliament’s all-party European Scrutiny Committee. There we argued for two things: a veto on European legislation in the pipeline and the disapplication unilaterally by Westminster of existing European legislation, where Parliament regards that as being in the national interest.

Bill Cash MP (Con)
London, SW1

SIR – If the debate really was a victory for Ukip over the Liberal Democrats, surely those most “bubbly” outside London will be the SNP. What “Little England” (Nigel Farage’s ideal as described by Nick Clegg) represents is anathema to a Scot of any persuasion: see Mr Farage’s reception on his last visit north of the border.

The Salmond and the Sturgeon must feel that the tide is beginning to turn for them.

Philip Schofield
Zeals, Wiltshire

SIR – LBC is to be applauded for at last igniting the debate on our membership of the EU. It highlights the failure of the BBC to allow this 40-year-old sore point to be debated openly.

This raises serious questions over the morality of the licence fee.

Philip Wyness
Esher, Surrey

SIR – The best television I’ve seen for a long time: W1A followed by Nick Clegg and Nigel Farage.

Brian Hill

Irish Times:

Sir, – On Monday, all four of the Dublin’s local authorities will have voted on whether or not to hold a plebiscite, the wording of which they do not know and for which the heads of a Bill of the enabling legislation have not even been discussed.

The subject of that plebiscite is the establishment of the office of a “Democratically Elected Mayor (‘DEM’) for Dublin”. The manner in which this question is being put to the elected members of those four councils means that the critical link between deciding to hold a local referendum and the wording of that referendum is broken, an extraordinary situation.

That Minister Hogan and his advisers think that in a modern democracy this procedure is acceptable illustrates the extent to which, since the foundation of the State, successive national governments have deprived local government of any real decision-making powers.

I have been a public representative for 13 years, and a member of the Labour Party’s working group on local government reform, and know something of how this will play out. I was also a representative on the forum set up by the minister to examine this issue. I know from that experience what this minister is likely to do if given a blank cheque to draft the terms of the plebiscite himself – which is what voting Yes on Monday would give him.

One only has to look at his track record. There was virtually nothing about devolving central government powers to local government in the new Reform of Local Government Act. These powers are absolutely central if the role of a DEM is to mean anything. The plain fact is that this minister is not going to devolve those powers to a DEM.

I don’t buy the “suck it and see” approach. The consequence of this will be less local democracy not more, within those four local council areas, and a handicapped directly elected mayor for the metropolitan area. Proponents of a Yes vote on Monday are prepared to wait years or even decades for the evolution of those DEM powers, if such an office is created, but are nor prepared to wait until we get the legislative basis for the office right in the first place without damaging local democracy in the four existing councils in the interim.

If the people of Fingal re-elect me in May (that’s local democracy in action), I don’t intend to stop working when this minister leaves the stage for the EU (as seems likely) and I look forward to working with someone else who is serious about local government reform and giving councillors and voters real choices in a plebiscite.

Yours, etc,

CLLR CIARAN BYRNE,

Fingal County Council,

Swords,

Co Dublin

Sir, – David Walsh (Letters, March 28th) seeks to debunk the “cliche” that oppressive gender roles are one reason why women seem to avoid politics. He rightly claims that many people view politics as an arena that involves unsocial hours, weekend working and a lack of a private life. What he fails to acknowledge is that both men and women are concerned with those unsocial hours and lack of private life yet it is disproportionately (and consistently so) women who are dissuaded by them. Perhaps he would say that “they” clearly have other priorities or more competing demands on their time than men. If that is so, David Beatty’s “oppressive gender roles” (Letters, March 26th) stand up to scrutiny.

And if the problem with gender quotas is indeed that they tend to generate demands for more I suppose we should be careful. Before we know it they’ll be looking for the vote, the right to stay in work, equal pay …

Yours, etc,

SEÁN Ó SIOCHRÚ,

Glenbeigh,

Co Kerry

Sir, – I disagree that a call by the National Women’s Council for a 40 per cent representation for women at Cabinet is arrogant (David Walsh, Letters March 28th) although I certainly think that it’s unrealistic. However his primary objection to the request seems to be that the NWC made no mention of merit or experience. It would be wonderful to think that every man in a Cabinet post is there due to merit or experience, but I’m sure that support for the party leader, as well as quotas to satisfy a coalition government trump merit or experience every time. Yours, etc,

SHEILA O’FLANAGAN,

Copeland Grove,

Clontarf,

Dublin 3

Sir, — As a firm supporter of politically correct nonsense cooked up by self-interested ideologues, I demand to live in a society where my concerns as a voter are ignored by politicians of both genders on an equal basis. The next time I see the interests of my country being subordinated to the interests of international financiers, oil companies, tax-dodging corporations or other states, I want to at least have the comfort of knowing that Irish democracy was devalued in a gender-balanced manner. Yours, etc,

EMMET MOOREHOUSE ,

Barnwall Court,

Balbriggan,

Co Dublin

Sir, – It is inconceivable in a client service business that an urgent letter dated March 10th would be left undealt with until March 24th pending the return of the director responsible from a business trip. All senior client-facing people are now equipped with mobile devices and are available 24/7 to avoid such eventualities. This policy, inter alia, greatly reduces the risk of a client fast becoming an ex-client.

Is it credible that the Justice Department did not send a scanned copy of the Attorney General’s letter to Mr Shatter when was abroad? Is it conceivable that Mr Shatter was not in telephone or email contact with his officials for almost two weeks, or if he was in contact that this vital issue was not raised? Hardly!

Others can argue the politics of the situation better than I but on a practical level, if Government departments are managed in the manner suggested by Mr Shatter similar situations will recur in the future. Yours, etc,

KIERAN McHUGH,

Woodcliff,

Howth,

Dublin 13

Sir, — I have difficulty with an assertion in Tom O’Malley’s article (“Nightmare scenario may render convictions unsafe”, Opinion & Analysis, March 27th).  He declares that “Many who have found themselves in [Garda custody] have later stated that they would have been willing to confess to anything just in order to regain their liberty”. To me, this smacks of sensationalism.  What relevance does it have to the general point of the constitutional right to privacy in communication with one’s solicitor? Yours, etc,

MARTIN KAY,

Lough Gur,

Co Limerick

Sir, – RTÉ is charged with reporting on national news in a fair and unbiased manner, thus allowing the listener/viewer to make up his or her mind. Since the now-retired Commissioner Callinan’s “disgusting” remarks in Leinster House, certain elements in the TV newsroom in particular have shown a distinct bias in their coverage that has been favourable to the “official” side and decidedly cool to the legitimate claims of the two Garda whistleblowers. Can this be because RTÉ TV news depends so much for its daily feed of news on the Garda Press Office? Thank goodness for newspapers. Yours, etc,

FM RUSSELL,

Lisdoonvarna,

Co Clare.

A chara, – In Miriam Lord’s column (“Twin egos once joined at the hip threaten Coalition”, March 26th) she wrote: “The intervention of Minister for Transport Leo Varadkar (who was being quietly congratulated by the likes of Róisín Shortall and Peter Mathews ) escalated the situation.” Can you please explain what she is trying to convey by writing “the likes of …” in relation to individuals? What are we to understand? Is she suggesting that it wasn’t actually Róisín Shortall or Peter Matthews themselves who were having a chat but some equivalents, some entities of which they, Shortall and Matthews are but iterations? The Irish Times is far from alone in its enthusiastic adopting of this term, rending individuals into equivalencies. It’s just that when one reads the likes of Miriam Lord adopting it, one loses faith in a worthwhile publication, the likes of The Irish Times , for example. Is mise,

MARY COLETTE

SHEEHAN,

Castlelyons,

Co Cork

Sir, – Regarding the comprehensive profiling of movers and shakers in the implementation of the smoking ban compiled by Patrick Freyne (March 22nd), the omission of the one person without whom none of it would have been possible was regrettable.

Most of the parties mentioned came in at a time when a glimmer of reputation or career enhancement was becoming possible through supporting the change. In contrast, the prime mover, Brian Timmons, had to fight much opposition and ridicule. He was probably risking his reputation and career when he devised, and acted on, the original idea, based on effects on his own health and additional research about damage from smoking in general.

As a civil servant in lower management in 1991/1992, he got the crucial igniting motion to introduce a voluntary code of non-smoking in civil service offices, passed through his union, the PSEU (Public Service Executive Union). This was the first step of the journey described. Only after that point did the idea catch on elsewhere.

Where completion of the public record in respect of this topic is concerned, it would be a pity for the heroic pivotal contribution of Brian Timmons to the roll-out of the smoking ban to go unacknowledged. Yours etc,

CAROLINE HURLEY,

Ashfield Rise,

Balbriggan,

Co Dublin

Sir, – May I assure Clíona Saidléar that it is not accent that upsets native speakers. What is grating to their ears is the disregard by many foghlaimeoirí for three basic elements necessary for the correct speaking of any language, namely syntax, grammar and pronunciation (gutturals, broad and slender consonants, etc). There are many different accents in every country and also within the Gaeltachts and they are readily and mutually accepted. I am speaking from my personal experience of living among speakers of English, French and Spanish. Yours, etc,

EOGHAN Ó LOINGSIGH,

Caisleán Ghriaire

Co Chiarraí

Sir, – I was almost reaching for my calendar to check for the beginning of April when I read of the rebranding of the “University of Dublin, Trinity College” to “Trinity College, the University of Dublin”. While this is not the first name change for my august alma mater it is most certainly Pythonesque, bringing to mind the People’s Front of Judea versus the Judean People’s Front! Yours, etc,

THEO RYAN,

Sitric Place,

Stoneybatter,

Dublin 7

Sir, – Students, taxpayers, society, the economy … would all be better served if the authorities in Ireland’s education establishments focused more of their attention on achieving high academic standards and less on the names of the institutions. Yours, etc,

ERIC O’BRIEN,

(former lecturer at

CRTC/CIT/“MTU”),

The Avenue,

Douglas,

Cork

Sir, – Paddy Wordworth (Opinion & Analysis, March 27th) is right when he states that our bogs contribute much more than turf to the Irish nation.

From his list of those undoubted benefits he omits however the traditional use that some members of the community have found for bogholes as cheap and convenient repositories for old TVs, refrigerators, couches and general household waste.

Yours, etc,

CHRIS GARVEY,

Lindsay Road,

Glasnevin,

Dublin 9

Sir, – Dick Ahlstrom’s article on “smart cities” (Mar 27th) rightly points out that it is giant technology companies who are mainly pushing this agenda; a case in point is Dublin City Council, which on the one hand wishes to install Wi-Fi in our public parks, while on the other it has removed all our badly needed public toilets. How smart is that? Of greater concern is that the computer giants are keen to push their products into schools – even primary schools.

Experienced teachers are despairing at the drop in our educational standards, a drop that is mainly due to pupils shortened attention spans, shortened by an over-reliance on technology.

Regrettably research skills have been dumbed down to “cut and paste” while, more worryingly, students have sub-contracted their learning, creativity and memory to their iPads and phones.

The majority of research studies have found that deep learning and creative thinking are achieved via a combination of good teachers, books and pupil interaction – not through computer screens. Unfortunately, unproven electronic gadgetry is being pushed (sometimes for free) on schools where they act only as a distraction and hindrance to learning in the classroom.

It is ironic that in Silicon Valley, home of this “technological wizardry’, the top primary schools have banned computers from the learning process. They know, as every experienced teacher knows, the best way young children learn is via a teacher, chalk, books and pupil interaction. Yours, etc.

JOHN DEVLIN

Erne Terrace,

Dublin 2

Irish Independent:

* When I was of age, my class and I were each given a communion book that was given a designated amount of time each day as we neared communion day.

Also in this section

In the interests of justice, Shatter must resign

Perfect opportunity for real garda reform

Shatter has decimated An Garda Siochana

I never questioned it because I was seven years of age and didn’t have the capacity. I looked up and every other boy and girl had a book, and we would all write down our feelings toward making our communion. My mind couldn’t comprehend that Mary or Joe’s families might not share the same beliefs as one another.

I can’t remember any of my classmates not partaking in this communion crash course, but I suspect numbers might have been diminished in different circumstances.

There should be a separation between religion generally and education in this country. There is nothing wrong with teaching children about respect and common moral values, but intertwining that with the staples of a religion is wrong and unnecessary.

If Mary’s parents want her to grow up within the Catholic Church, they can make that decision themselves, and take her to Mass and lead her into her communion, confirmation, etc.

If they don’t want to do that, they can just refrain from doing so without having to contact a principal for them to say Mary will have to sit out when the communion is mentioned.

So, if the making of communion was wholly a private decision and action taken within a family, how many of a class of 30 would there be receiving the sacrament on the day? There would be fewer frills and pink Hummers, let’s just put it that way.

JUSTIN KELLY

EDENDERRY, CO OFFALY

NOT ENOUGH WORK

* Wonderful news about Intel‘s $5bn (€3.6bn) spend in Ireland. But there is a profound sting in the “tale” we must get to grips with. Not very long ago, $5bn investment would have meant tens of thousands of additional long-term jobs. Not any more!

We’ll be lucky if the $5bn retains present employment levels. Multinationals like Intel must automate to stay in business.

Automation means more product with less work. We have achieved technological genius of making everything we need or want without working so hard any more. The big difficulty is figuring out a way of maintaining employment.

The impediment is in the ideology; we need 21st-Century thinking on work and jobs; a strategy of creating a lot more jobs from a lot less work.

An easy answer might be moving towards shorter hours, longer holidays and earlier retirement; more people working less.

We have been doing it for 100 years but need to accelerate the process. Automation can pay for it; it creates more wealth without work than all the work in the world could.

But we are still locked into old thinking of “earn your bread by the sweat of your brow”.

It does not cut mustard anymore; automation ensures there simply is not enough work to keep everyone working hard.

It’s the biggest problem facing economics and society but nobody will talk about it; nobody will even mention it.

It is what newspaper editorials should be writing about.

PADRAIC NEARY

TUBBERCURRY, CO SLIGO

HONOURABLE MEN

* The first item on the agenda of the incoming Garda Commissioner should be the promotion of officers John Wilson and Maurice McCabe.

However, as the former has retired, may I suggest that they join either Fianna Fail, Fine Gael or Labour. Only then will we be assured of two honourable politicians in the Dail.

IMELDA MULCAHY

AVE DE FLANDRE, WEXFORD

‘DISGUSTING’ DISASTER

* At a time when Russian forces have invaded Crimea, 239 people are still missing from a “disappeared” flight and an incurable Eboli killer disease has hit Guinea, we Irish have our own serious disaster: use of the word ‘disgusting’.

The whole sorry saga is actually disgusting.

The Garda Commissioner has now resigned/pushed because he would not apologise for using this ‘disgusting’ word, even though he claimed he wished to say sorry.

We are all totally confused as to who said/meant what.

I am reminded of the witty words of the satirist Samuel Butler, who died over 110 years ago: “I believe that he was really sorry, that people would not believe he was sorry, that he was not more sorry.”

As relevant today as it was back then!

SEAN KELLY

NEWTOWN HILL, TRAMORE, WATERFORD

WELL DONE, ELAYNA

* Congratulations to a wonderful student Elayna Keller from Our Lady’s College Drogheda (Irish Independent, March 28), who won top prize at the NNI Press Awards. She wrote a piece entitled ‘Kids can be cruel’ after her own experience of being bullied when she was younger.

In your article were the following few honest and wise comments from one so young: “My social skills were really stunted afterwards. I had no idea how to talk to people . . . writing is my way of getting my feelings out.”

I can relate so much to these comments after my dreadful experiences of school life in the 1960s, of which I have written about many times.

I have no doubt we will see more of Elayna’s writing abilities in the years to come.

BRIAN MCDEVITT

GLENTIES, CO DONEGAL

EXTRAORDINARY EMOTION

* Your online edition (Irish Independent, March 28) carried a video showing the extraordinary emotions of a lady who, having been deaf since birth, was enabled to hear for the very first time by using modern technology. She was so overwhelmed with emotion that she uncontrollably burst into tears on several occasions as a nurse called out the days of the week to her.

It was impossible not to be affected by her emotions as I contemplated all the things that we take for granted yet show little appreciation for.

JOHN BELLEW

PAUGHANSTOWN, DUNLEER, CO LOUTH

ACT OF SOLIDARITY

* Having been recently released from jail, I would like to thank all those who really overwhelmed the prison with their support.

The shock and disgust of the supporters was evident, at the “laissez faire” attitude, denial and ultimate complicity of the Government; allowing Shannon civilian airport to be abused by the US military.

For three months, the continuous vigils, pickets, the collection of signatures, press statements, and radio and television coverage was a tsunami of support from all over the world.

This cannot be ignored as it is a collective act of solidarity.

MARGARETTA D’ARCY



Sharland

$
0
0

30 March 2014 Sharland

I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again.They have an party for the admiral. Priceless

Cold slightly better Mary very under the weather visit her Sharland too

No Scrabbletoday Perhaps Iwill win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Lord Kimball – obituary

Lord Kimball was a Conservative MP who made it his mission to champion country life and fly the flag for foxhunting

Lord Kimball inspecting one of his fishing flies

Lord Kimball inspecting one of his fishing flies Photo: GUGLIELMO GALVIN

6:19PM GMT 28 Mar 2014

Comments13 Comments

Lord Kimball, who has died aged 85, was Conservative MP for Gainsborough from 1956 to 1983 and the last of the Commons’ great country gentlemen. Ruddy of cheek, he was described by a friend as “straight out of an 18th-century hunting field… Looks as if he has port for breakfast, a very good guy who pours proper drinks.”

Marcus Kimball headed a formidable unofficial whipping operation that blocked Bills to outlaw hunting and hare coursing for several decades. Even when facing a mountainous Labour majority after 1997, Kimball, who was deputy president of the Countryside Alliance, managed to head off a ban on hunting for almost two Parliaments.

Though a diligent parliamentarian and loyal Conservative, partisan issues were of less concern to Kimball than the rural way of life. A benevolent patrician, he regarded his constituents as he did the tenants of his estates near Market Harborough and at Altnaharra in Sutherland.

Marcus Kimball in 1970

He felt there should be a sense of proportion over constituency matters, advising aspiring Tory MPs: “If you go after a seat, don’t spoil them by promising to hold surgeries; I never did. And don’t promise to live in the constituency until you’ve found out whether there is a good hunt. You can only get to know a constituency well if you ride over it .”

By the age of six Kimball had been blooded with the Cottesmore; he became joint Master of the Fitzwilliam from 1950 to 1952, and of the Cottesmore from 1956 to 1958. He hunted on 1,182 days during his 27 years as an MP, eventually quitting the field at 68.

His real foes were less on the Opposition benches than in the League Against Cruel Sports and among elements of the RSPCA (of which he was a controversial member). Opponents of hunting attacked his knighthood in 1981 as “deeply offensive”, and booed him for fighting their campaign to replace foxhunting with drag hunting. “Drag hunting,” he told them, “is no substitute for foxhunting. It merely leaves foxes to be indiscriminately butchered, and presupposes that hunting is more cruel than trapping or shooting. People are against it not because it is cruel but because others enjoy it.”

In 1965 he told the RSPCA that it was “becoming the tool of a town versus country campaign based on ignorance”; attempts were twice made to expel him over his support for coursing.

As president of the British Field Sports Society (BFSS) from 1966 to 1982, Kimball offered the RSPCA a deal: if it agreed to talks and to withdraw references to shooting and fishing from its annual report, he could promise the support of BFSS members who belonged to both societies.

At the BFSS, he sought to work with animal welfare groups to promote conservation. He pressed for limits to otter hunting, and in 1971 recommended that coursed hares be given an extra 20 yards’ start. Yet he criticised peers for deciding that curlew and redshank should be protected, saying: “It is a very dangerous precedent to say that because a bird is charming and pretty and makes a nice noise, you should not shoot it.”

Created a life peer in 1985, Kimball deployed his parliamentary skills to continue to frustrate anti-hunting legislation. Prior to the 1997 election he predicted — correctly — that if Labour were elected, a Bill to ban hunting would be promoted at once; he voiced surprise that the rest of the hunting fraternity could not see it coming.

When in 2000 the former Treasury mandarin Lord Burns conducted his inquiry into hunting for a government that privately wished the issue would go away, Kimball told him he could live with “no-go areas” and limits on the number of days hunted. To keep foxhunting alive, he was even prepared to concede the loss of coursing and deer hunting; the Countryside Alliance insisted that he was acting in a personal capacity.

Kimball hoped that the Burns Report would lead to the “survival of well-regulated and reliable hunts” and “a reduction in the impact of some hunts who go too often to their good country”. He added: “There are some very weak hunts hanging on who are not good for the sport.”

Lord Kimball with his daughter Sophie in a plaster cast on her wedding day in 1982

When curbs on shotguns were proposed in 1977, he said it would be better to act against crossbows, a “lethal poacher’s weapon”. But he was a keen advocate of responsible gun ownership, and for five years from 1989 he served on the Firearms Consultative Committee, reviewing the workings of the Firearms Acts; after the Dunblane massacre in 1996 he noted that some guns used by Thomas Hamilton would not have been available to him had the government implemented the panel’s recommendations in full.

Kimball also campaigned for protection for sites of special scientific interest, promoting a Bill in 1964. But in 1991 he claimed £3 million in compensation for not exploiting 35,000 acres of SSSIs on his Sutherland estate. When he did not receive it, he put Altnaharra up for sale.

Kimball was quick to see the threat to rural social life from the introduction of the breathalyser. He urged that magistrates should be given discretion over disqualification for drivers just over the limit whom they considered fit to drive; but his attempt in 1967 to amend the law failed after Labour ministers called for it to receive “the contempt it deserves”.

On social issues he was generally conservative. When separate taxation of married women was proposed in 1978, Kimball said there was “no great demand”, adding: “In my experience, most women faced with a tax demand shove it across to their husband.”

Kimball suffered heavy losses at Lloyds when Syndicate 553 collapsed in 1988, and again when a second syndicate hit the rocks two years later. He accepted his lot with characteristic aplomb: “Insurance underwriting is only sophisticated bookmaking. If the book goes wrong, then you lose. You always pay your bookmaker. Underwriting is the same. You pay up and shut up.”

Marcus Richard Kimball was born on October 18 1928, the son of Major Laurence Kimball, Conservative MP for Loughborough , and educated at Eton and Trinity College, Cambridge; he was Master of the Beagles at Eton and of the Drag at Cambridge. After National Service as a subaltern with the Royal Horse Guards, he farmed near Oakham, and chaired the East Midlands Young Conservatives .

In 1955 Kimball was elected to Rutland county council and fought Derby South in the general election. In February the next year he narrowly held Gainsborough in the by-election caused by the elevation of Capt Harry Crookshank to the peerage. At Westminster, he voted to retain the death penalty; sided with dissidents who feared the Suez adventure would do lasting harm to relations with America; and proved himself one of the best shots in the parliamentary team.

Lord Kimball (centre) at the Peterborough Festival of Hunting in 2010

With Labour in power, he led the resistance to backbench Bills to abolish coursing. When Eric Heffer promoted one in 1967, Kimball told him the screaming of hares when killed was a “chorus of nature”. Harold Wilson gave his backing, and Kimball accused him of “surrender to emotional and ill-informed criticism against a legitimate and traditional country sport”. The Bill passed its Second Reading, but when too few Labour MPs turned up for it to progress further, Kimball declared it “a good day’s sport”.

He left the Commons in 1983. In the Lords he presciently attacked Kenneth Clarke’s Dangerous Dogs Bill as “not properly thought out”, but reserved his strongest criticism for Lord Young’s attempt in 1989 to reorganise England’s breweries and pubs. As the grandson of a brewer, Kimball found it “quite unacceptable” that a Tory government should propose the dissolution of the Brewers’ Society by regulation and interference.

Kimball was at various times president of the National Light Horse Breeding Society and of the Olympia International Show Jumping Championship ; and chairman of the Cambridge University Veterinary School Trust, the British Greyhound Racing Fund and the Museum of Hunting.

He was appointed Deputy Lieutenant for Leicestershire in 1984.

Marcus Kimball married, in 1956, June Fenwick, with whom he had two daughters.

Lord Kimball, born October 18 1928, died March 26 2014

Guardian:

Contrary to Joanna Blythman’s call for a rethink on national dietary guidelines about saturated fats, a major guidance change at this point would be premature (“Why almost everything you’ve been told about unhealthy foods is wrong“, In Focus).

The study she highlights was indeed funded by the British Heart Foundation and its finding – that there was no association between the types of fat we eat and our risk of heart disease – was surprising.

But this study alone is not enough to give the green light to eating as much saturated fat as you like. There is a wealth of evidence showing that eating too much saturated fat raises our cholesterol levels, which we know increases our risk of having a heart attack or stroke.

This new research doesn’t change that, even though it clearly shows there is more for us to find out about how the fat we eat affects our risk of cardiovascular disease.

In the meantime, we will continue to advise people not to focus on any single nutrient in their diet but their diet as a whole. We recommend a Mediterranean-style diet, which has been associated with reduced risk of coronary heart disease, obesity and type 2 diabetes.  This represents a whole diet approach with fats mainly from unsaturated sources as well as more fruit and vegetables, fish and fewer sugary and fatty treats.

Our advice is carefully considered and regularly reviewed; it is based on the evidence of robust research, funded by us and others.

These new findings in isolation aren’t enough to change that. But there’s genuine uncertainty in the field and we’d welcome further studies to improve our understanding and help us continue to give the public the best advice possible, based on robust research.

Professor Jeremy Pearson

British Heart Foundation

London NW1

So stuff that is grown naturally, and might be found in the diet of our ancestors, is good for us. Bizarre concoctions such as margarine are bad for us. Sugar, which we cannot find in such abundance in our natural diet, is bad for us.

I guess the adage that you shouldn’t eat anything that your grandmother would not recognise as food should be amended to something that your great grandmother would not recognise as food, with the codicil that we now know that greens are good for us.

“Doraseile”

Online contribution

The recent focus on sugars rather than calories as a cause of obesity and overweight doesn’t help people to understand that balance is key – not only in the diet but also in balancing calories taken in with calories expended during physical activity. The simple healthy lifestyle message is becoming lost.

Food and Drink Federation members remain focused on working through the Responsibility Deal to play their part in tackling obesity. The calorie reduction pledge, which 11 FDF members have already signed, is directly supporting consumers to reduce their calorie intake, in some case by also reducing sugar.

Reformulating recipes is just one strand of industry action on health; companies are also creating new, healthier options and investing in consumer education. Calls for new structures are a distraction from the good work that is already underway, but, more worryingly, they are confusing public health messaging.

Individuals have access to clear and consistent nutrition information, which includes total sugar content, and which, in the vast majority of products, is also provided on the front of packets.

The labelling of added sugars, as suggested by the chief medical officer in her annual report, is not permissible under European legislation. In addition to the nutrition label, the different sources of sugars used in products will be listed in the ingredients list.

Terry Jones

Food and Drink Federation

London WC2

Will Hutton argues against the new pensions freedoms that have been given to savers on the basis that we all benefit from “risk-pooling” when we buy an annuity (“Osborne’s pensions ‘freedom’ will be a long-term social disaster“, Comment). But he seems to ignore the fact that compulsory annuities are, in effect, a tax on the poor.

Under the current system, most people hand over their pension to an insurance company that promises in return to pay an income for life. The people who do best are the ones who live the longest.

But there is a strong correlation between deprivation and life expectancy. Put crudely, on average, rich people live a long time and poor people die young. So the great winners in the annuity pool are those who have already done well out of life, paid for by those who are at the bottom of the pile. Under the new system, individuals will be free to take the whole of their pension pot as cash. Individuals with a low life expectancy will be able to guarantee that they (or their heirs) get the full benefit from their pension pot, supported by the new, free face-to-face “guidance guarantee” that we are putting in place.

Furthermore, people at the top with large pension pots already have considerable flexibility when it comes to annuities. Those with relatively small pots could find that they couldn’t cash them in but that their pension provider offered them only a lousy rate, with no realistic options for shopping around.

In principle, risk pooling is a good thing. But a system that redistributes from poor to rich does not seem to me to be a part of the fairer society that both Will Hutton and I want to see.

Steve Webb MP

Minister of State for Pensions

Free internet access for all

Michelle Obama suggests that internet access is one of the universal rights (“Internet access a right, says US first lady“, News). If it is to be a universal right then access should be universal, which means that the internet should be treated as a free core service by public libraries. This is something that the independent report on the public library service recently commissioned by the culture minister should be recommending.

Andrew Hudson

Ulverston

Charter won’t end free press

Catherine Bennett is mistaken when she asserts that the royal charter on press self-regulation is “state control” and means “the end of the free press”, that it was cooked up late at night over pizza and that papers that don’t sign up will face punitive damages (“The week when Jagger found the true cost of fame“, Comment).

The charter is the fruit of a year-long, judge-led public inquiry of exemplary fairness, followed by months of effort by politicians to accommodate the wishes of editors who still refuse to face up to the harm caused by their papers’ unethical and illegal conduct.

Every party in parliament endorsed the final document, which closely follows the Leveson recommendations. So did victims of press abuse. So does the public, as polls show, and so do the many eminent people with impeccable free-speech credentials who signed a declaration supporting the charter last week.

Bennett did not mention the substantial advantages of the charter system for the press. It provides the means of winning back public trust; it delivers unprecedented safeguards against political interference; it liberates editors for the first time from the “chilling” effect of litigation by wealthy people and institutions. For the public, in stark contrast with the past, the charter promises fair treatment and access to justice. No wonder so many people support it.

Brian Cathcart

Director, Hacked Off

The beingness of being

Andrew Anthony says to Mary Midgley, possibly taking on the role of devil’s advocate, that gravity or electromagnetic waves “exist –unlike poetry or music – regardless of the human landscape” (“Late stand for a thinker with soul“, New Review). But has anybody ever encountered gravity or electromagnetic waves, or, indeed, any other thing for that matter, independently of human consciousness? Consciousness is the be all and end all, the ground of being. Science may therefore be seen as one part of this consciousness making a model of another part, which is probably why it’s so successful. As Mary Midgley rightly points out, everything has to “go through oneself”.

Ian Cunliffe

Henfield

West Sussex

Ditch the dye, darlings

Eva Wiseman questions our sanity in injecting poison into our faces to appear younger (Magazine,). One day, we may also look back, incredulous, at it being considered “normal” to colour hair and not wear the wisdom of grey locks with pride.

Sue Jones

Independent:

The Crimean referendum may have been ‘illegal’ in terms of international law  but the result  was obviously quite genuine

Gavin Turner

Gunton, Norfolk

Heat pumps are not quite as “game changing” as Ed Davey is reported to believe (“Renewable energy from rivers and lakes could replace gas in homes”, 23 March). Typically 1 kilowatt (kW) of electricity is required to produce 3 to 4kW of useable heat from a heat pump. However, electricity can cost three or four times the price of gas per kilowatt-hour (kWh), so the running costs are not necessarily “relatively low”. This is broadly the case whether the electricity to run the heat pump is generated from renewable sources or fossil fuels, as in the case of electricity generated from renewables, there is a lost opportunity cost.

In addition, if the electricity to run the heat pump is generated in a fossil-fuel (eg gas-fired) power station, which may only produce 1kWh of electricity for every 2 to 2.5kWh of natural gas consumed, the overall energy gain is not as large as one might at first suppose.

Heat pumps certainly have their place in a coherent UK energy strategy, but they are not as revolutionary as you suggest in your article.

Dr John Coppendale

Stapleford, Cambridge

The installation of a district heating scheme supplied by heat pumps is very welcome. However, it should be noted that district heating, along with heat pumps, has rarely been found economic in the UK. In countries where district heating is widely used there is a cultural and regulatory environment that supports and encourages their use, and we don’t have this yet. We are seeing one small step, and should not confuse this with a giant leap.

David Wallis

Cirencester, Gloucestershire

Well  knock me down! The Energy Secretary has just discovered heat pumps. It only takes a crisis in the Ukraine for HMG to re-invent the wheel. I am 80 and clearly remember that in the 1950s the Festival Hall was heated by the Thames and a heat-pump system. That was a time when Croydon Council ran all its vehicles on methane gas recycled by its sewage works.

C Moorey

via email

Tony Brenton is a lone voice of reason (“Crimea is lost, but there is a deal waiting to be done” 23 March). The Crimean referendum may have been “illegal” in terms of international law, but the result was obviously quite genuine. If we cannot see that Russia has gone through a much more sudden and traumatic loss of empire than we did, we are very blind to 20th-century history.

By all means plan gradually to make western Europe free of its dependence on Russian oil and gas, which will ultimately make the Russian economy even more of a basket case and help to bring them to compromise with us; but, meanwhile, we should stop posturing and threatening, and try to get round the table with Putin anyway. The alternative of escalating conflict is far too serious for any of us to contemplate.

Gavin Turner

Gunton, Norfolk

The shadow Work and Pensions Secretary is right to say that “the problem with the Budget was that there was nothing for people who can’t afford to save” (23 March). Which doesn’t surprise me as the Chancellor was trying to play to the gallery of core Tory voters whom the party are afraid might turn to Ukip at the next general election.

Tim Mickleburgh

Grimsby, Lincolnshire

D  J Taylor almost but not quite nails the impact of Old Etonians in British society when he notes that, politics aside, David Cameron seems a more assured performer than Ed Miliband (23 March). The products of Eton are to be found on the left as well as the right, and some are very astute. That however is not what Eton has taught them. That is rather a sense of self-belief and self-confidence that was not imparted, for example, at my north London comprehensive school. So we find with the current Prime Minister that he is a mostly plausible public performer, but anyone looking to him for deep thinking about the problems facing our society is likely to be disappointed.

Keith Flett

London N17

Times:

Cash injection needed to boost NHS treatments

DOCTORS often take the attitude that any illness has a simple explanation as a first principle (“Revealed: how NHS betrays cancer patients” and “How did they miss our son’s tumour?”, News, last week). So patients go through a process of elimination before full diagnostic action is taken. This wastes time but saves money in the short term. Britain has some painful decisions to make but we cannot take proper care of people without paying for good treatment.
Hazel Richards, Manchester

Under pressure
While I fully support the Sunday Times cancer campaign, I was disappointed you did not mention that the UK has fewer doctors per head and spends less on health than comparable countries. The pressure on primary care is immense: consultations are up from 300m to 340m in three years, with no increase in full-time-equivalent GP numbers. Only 8% of the NHS budget is spent on primary care, compared with 10% five years ago. A colleague recently said of the NHS: “Quality. Cheap. Access. Pick two out of three.” How true.
Stewart McMenemin, Glasgow

Nothing but praise
Thank you for publishing Dr Tom Goodfellow’s explanation of why people are kept waiting past the six-week deadline for scans (“Scan delays fail to reveal true picture”, Letters, last week). Suffering from advanced prostate cancer myself, I have signed up for your campaign and have nothing but praise for the NHS. I will not survive but I have, through marvellous treatment developments, enjoyed an extension.
Rodney Hooker, Godmanchester, Cambridgeshire

Pancreatic cancer watch
Although not mentioned in your reports, pancreatic cancer has the lowest survival rate of the 21 most common cancers: five-year survival is less than 4% across the UK, a figure virtually unchanged for 40 years.

We are particularly supportive of the first two aims of your campaign: earlier diagnosis and faster access to treatment. At the moment 50% of pancreatic cancer diagnoses are made through emergency admissions. We also know 40% of pancreatic cancer patients visit their GP three times or more before being referred — a higher figure than for many other cancer patients.
Alex Ford, Chief Executive, Pancreatic Cancer UK

Camilla ready
Camilla Cavendish (“Dr Skype is waiting to save your life”, News, last week) is correct when she says that the NHS is “a world away” from being joined-up. So far only one hospital in north Staffordshire has committed to video technology; the rest of us have to go through a process invented in Victorian times.
Tony Kane, Cheadle, Greater Manchester

Support care law reforms
In 2011 the government assigned the Law Commission the task of undertaking a fundamental review of the laws governing the regulation of healthcare professionals in the UK. Ministers recognised that we were hamstrung by laws that were outdated, complex, highly prescriptive and difficult to change. Too often we knew what was wrong, but legal structures designed for a different era made it impossible for us to put things right quickly and efficiently.

The Law Commission was given the task of creating a single, streamlined legal structure covering all nine regulators that would enable us to provide better protection for patients, to be more responsive, to reduce the burden of regulation and to drive down costs. We remain committed to these aims.

The recommendations of Robert Francis QC after events at the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust highlighted
the importance of regulation focused on promoting safe, compassionate care rather than intervening only after patients have suffered harm.

That is why we are calling on the government and all political parties to support the publication and urgent parliamentary consideration of the bill proposed by the Law Commission, which is due to be published on April 2, 2014. This will be a once-in-a-generation opportunity to bring about long-awaited reform.
Mark Addison, Chairman, Nursing and Midwifery Council, Professor Sir Peter Rubin, Chairman, General Medical Council

Sending out a message in fight against slavery

THERE is a simple answer to the question Cosmo Landesman poses about 12 Years a Slave’s failure to stir us to fight modern- day slavery (“Not a single leg iron smashed by 12 Years a Slave”, Comment, last week). The film, while having hugely important lessons for today, is, as Landesman says, anchored in history.

If we are going to hold out hope for the 29.8m people in slavery in the world today, then we need a contemporary message that engages individuals, governments, civil society organisations and companies to fight contemporary slavery in all its forms, and particularly in company supply chains. While slavery operates in many forms across this country, most of it is “offshored” in the supply chains of imported products.

The one person who has worldwide appeal is the Pope. His recently announced Global Freedom Network initiative, through which the Catholic Church will work with the Church of England, Islamic leaders and the Walk Free Foundation, aims to deliver co-ordinated worldwide action to ensure that ours is the last generation that has to fight the trade in human lives.
Frank Field MP, Chairman, Joint Select Committee on the Draft Modern Slavery Bill, House of Commons

Charity case
Landesman comments that the film has not generated the expected upsurge in support for anti-slavery organisations. No one has asked me to donate to such a charity, although there are people asking for money for other good causes every week.
David Harris, London SW13

Long shot hits the target

HAVING just read Camilla Long’s review of Jonathan Glazer’s ghastly Under the Skin (“Much ado about nothing”, Culture, March 16), we write to thank her profusely for being the only critic who has not been taken in by “the emperor’s new lingerie” (brilliantly pithy of Long) starring Scarlett Johansson. Despite Joss Ackland’s criticism of Long’s past reviews (“Film reviewer flunks her screen test”, Letters, last week), we agreed with every word she wrote and are perplexed that other, usually perceptive critics have been so bamboozled. That some have compared this very poor movie to the work of geniuses such as Stanley Kubrick and Nicolas Roeg is worrying. It would be interesting to know what Michel Faber thinks about this adaptation of his book.
Michael Walker and Genevieve Allenbury, London W4

PC brigade wrong on sharia wills

YOUR article on sharia-compliant wills (“Law body’s guide to sharia ‘backs discrimination’”, News, last week) included a hysterical overreaction by the Lawyers’ Secular Society to Law Society guidance on their drafting.

English law permits people to draft wills according to their own desires. If they want to give less to daughters than sons, they are allowed to do so. If they want to bequeath money to only persons of a specific religion, whether Muslim, Mormon or Methodist, they are entitled to do so, in the same way as they have the right to cut a child out of the will for any reason they wish.

Many relatives disagree with a will, but that is the decision of the person making the will. The job of a lawyer is to draft a will that reflects the client’s wishes. It is not their job to draft a will that “shows respect for diversity”: the Equality Act does not extend to the dead — yet.
Neil Addison, Barrister, New Bailey Chambers, Corn Exchange, Liverpool

Wrong call

I have just read the article “Jihadists urged to attack Queen at sports events” (News, last week). Then just a few pages later there was the story “School’s ‘£70,000 for prayer hailers’”, which alleges that Park View School in Birmingham has installed loudhailers in the playground to call pupils to Islamic prayer. The grovelling to the politically correct is truly at epidemic proportions.
Brian Watson, Purley, London

Points

Forced disclosure
It is telling and frightening that the Department of Health issued a ban on burning aborted and miscarried babies (“Thousands of foetuses burnt as ward waste”, News, last week) as clinical waste — and in some cases in furnaces used to generate energy for powering hospitals — only after a media investigation was about to reveal this evil practice to the public.
John Reid, Sunningdale, Berkshire

Need for speed
In his correspondence “Hitting the buffers” (Letters, last week) Gordon Vinell suggested that the UK is not large enough to justify having a high-speed railway line. Countries smaller than ours and with a greater density of population, such as Belgium and Holland, have established high-speed train services. In Taiwan such a line links the capital, Taipei, with the second city, Kaohsiung, a distance of 214 miles — about the same as London to Preston. The line carries more than 100,000 passengers a day. Here the main routes will soon reach full capacity, and rebuilding existing lines while they are fully operational is not feasible. Also there are regeneration benefits that a new railway line will bring to the regions.
John Chapman, Hythe, Kent

Opening doors
With reference to the reported state school antipathy to Oxford and Cambridge (“Anti-Oxbridge teachers hold state pupils back”, Letters, last week), there is nothing new under the sun. In the 1950s a headmaster at a north of England grammar school told a pupil, “If Leeds was good enough for me, it’s good enough for you.” That situation was dealt with by letters to various Cambridge colleges, one of which accepted the pupil.

My own route to Cambridge was orthodox, but with only two women’s colleges it was a steep hill to climb. The pupil and I met and married, but our youngest child faced her own hurdles before becoming the first woman to go to sea in a Royal Navy vessel. Her route involved saying “Why not?” several times. Things can, and do, change. Some doors need a firm hand to push them open.
Ann Franklin, Rugby, Warwickshire

Marriage counselling
Tanya Gold (“Cor blimey, Mary Poppins, you make William and Kate look radical”, last week) suggested that Norland nannies were “married to the job”, and that “there is always something suspect about an unmarried woman, something needing to be explained”. Being one of these unclaimed treasures myself, I am shocked Gold thought that this remark was worthy of a good journalist.
Angela Fowlis, St Andrews, Fife

Wish they were here
I was interested in the snapshot of Nottingham given in the Best Places to Live in Britain supplement (last week). You referred to “the big, open Old Market Square, lined with cafes and restaurants . . .” There is not a single cafe or restaurant in the square, nor has there been in many years. There are two large pubs and a coffee chain outlet in a corner. There is certainly nowhere that could even remotely be classed as suitable to go for an evening meal.
Cliff Billington, Nottingham

Bang out of order
Regarding how the universe was born (“The biggest bang”, News Review, last week), will this knowledge stop wars, house the homeless, feed the hungry or teach the illiterate to read? Thought not.
Terry Slater, Harlow, Essex

Corrections and clarifications

Newport Girls’ High School was listed as being located in Newport, Gwent, in our Best Places to Live in Britain supplement (last week). It is actually in Newport, Shropshire. We apologise for the error.

Complaints about inaccuracies in all sections of The Sunday Times, including online, should be addressed to editor@sunday-times.co.uk or The Editor, The Sunday Times, 3 Thomas More Square, London E98 1ST. In addition, the Press Complaints Commission (complaints@pcc.org.uk or 020 7831 0022) examines formal complaints about the editorial content of UK newspapers and magazines (and their websites)

Birthdays

Warren Beatty, actor, 77; Eric Clapton, guitarist, 69; Robbie Coltrane, actor, 66; Celine Dion, singer, 46; Astrud Gilberto, singer, 74; MC Hammer, rapper, 52; Norah Jones, singer, 35; Eddie Jordan, former F1 team boss, 66; Ingvar Kamprad, founder of Ikea, 88; Lord (Mervyn) King, former governor of the Bank of England, 66

Anniversaries

1842 ether used as an anaesthetic for the first time, by US surgeon Crawford Long; 1856 Treaty of Paris is signed, ending the Crimean War; 1979 Tory MP Airey Neave is killed by an INLA car bomb; 1981 President Ronald Reagan is shot by John Hinckley Jr; 2002 death of Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother at the age of 101

Telegraph:

Time: Vincent Van Gogh’s ‘Prisoners Exercising’, 1890, after an engraving by Gustave Doré Photo: Bridgeman Art Library

6:58AM GMT 29 Mar 2014

Comments81 Comments

SIR – As the mother of a prisoner who has a long sentence, I am aware that most people feel that a person is in prison for punishment and shouldn’t be allowed books or other “luxuries”. What most do not understand is that the lack of freedom is, in itself, a huge punishment.

Since Chris Grayling has been Justice Secretary, my son’s prison does not allow books, has closed the art and music rooms, and allows prisoners outside for half an hour only at meal times so they must choose either to eat or to go outside.

At weekends, the outside time is only at breakfast which, in the winter, is when it is dark. Education courses are only allowed for prisoners who will shortly be released and not for long-term inmates. My son is bored and says that he would be happier breaking up stones with a pickaxe every day – at least then he would get some exercise and fresh air.

What are we trying to achieve with those in custody?

Gay Crampton
Kingsbridge, Devon

SIR – I would like to know on what basis the Prime Minister claims that voters “were happy to wait for a say on Britain’s place in the EU until after the general election”.

Over the last few years, opinion polls have consistently shown that the majority of the electorate wants a referendum now, in order to settle the question once and for all. A growing number are in favour of leaving the EU.

David Cameron’s statement underlines how out-of-touch our politicians are when it comes to the views of the public.

David Samuel-Camps
Eastleigh, Hampshire

SIR – For many years I have represented small food businesses in Britain in consultations about new food regulations with the European Commission and European Parliament.

In every case, I have been listened to, and changes have been made to proposals in response to rational argument. In every case, too, I have been the only person from Britain at these meetings.

We have had some notable achievements when impractical proposals have either been dropped or successfully modified.

Sadly, I cannot afford to continue as no one contributes to my expenses.

It is wrong to think that the Commission and the Parliament ignore our views. If we do not express them rationally at the right time, we get what we deserve.

Bob Salmon
Food Solutions
Greetham, Rutland

SIR – In the vote for independence in Scotland, 51 per cent will carry the day.

In the event of a referendum on Europe, will a similar percentage count? Or will we be told that we need a higher percentage to trigger a decision to leave the EU?

Peter Thompson
Sutton, Surrey

Unequal partners

SIR – Alice Arnold writes: “From today same-sex couples will be able to get married, not civilly partnered, but married. We will

have exactly the same rights as everybody else.”

That is misleading. Same-sex couples may choose between marriage and civil partnership, but heterosexual couples are excluded from the provisions of the Civil Partnership Act.

Tim Clarke
Calbourne, Isle of Wight

Four pairs bad

SIR – Researchers at Toronto University need not be concerned that children “attribute human behaviours and emotions to animals”; they have always had a realistic view and we should not patronise them.

As an occasional assistant librarian, I used to ask children if they had enjoyed the book they were returning. One day, I was solemnly informed by a little girl that it was a “silly book”. She went on to explain that “spiders don’t wear shoes”.

Edward Cartner
Plymstock, Devon

SIR – Do concerns about giving animals human attributes extend to George Orwell’s Animal Farm?

Bruce Cochrane
Bridge of Allan, Stirlingshire

SIR – I was brought up on Winnie the Pooh and Rupert Bear. It hasn’t done me any harm. I have discussed this with my dog, and he agrees with me.

Chrissy Catchpole
Forest Row, East Sussex

Plumb apprenticeships

SIR – The continuing fall in unemployment is welcome news: the latest figures show 63,000 fewer jobless people in the last quarter. But too many young people are still out of work and risk becoming trapped on benefits. We need to get young people off the dole and set up for life.

One way to do this would be to divert Job Seeker’s Allowance (JSA) cash – about £3,000 per year, per person – to small businesses to pay for apprenticeships. If a suitable apprenticeship were offered to a young JSA claimant, but he or she turned down or quit the position, he or she would lose the unemployment benefits.

It makes no sense to have young people going nowhere on benefits when they could be learning a trade that would give them purpose and a career for life.

If we could get half of Britain’s 314,430 young JSA claimants off benefits and into apprenticeships, it would free up millions of pounds to fund these opportunities.

Andrew Boff
Member, London Assembly (Con)
Charlie Mullins
CEO, Pimlico Plumbers
London SE1

Breaking Saudi ties

SIR – Saudi Arabia’s Sunni regime is destabilising the Middle East by playing the sectarian card against “apostate” Shias. It would have the West go to war with Iran. It promotes the export of Wahhabism, which has spawned jihadists behind al-Qaeda.

It’s time the West distanced itself from the Saudi ruling family. The arms lobbies will complain about export losses, but they should be ignored. The so-called Saudi oil weapon is bluff: the regime needs oil revenues to placate its subjects.

Yugo Kovach
Winterborne Houghton, Dorset

Time on your hands

SIR – It is possible to own too much. A person with one watch knows what time it is. A person with two is never quite sure.

Sue Owen
Colwyn Bay, Clwyd

This little piggy

SIR – My mantra for socks and sandals is “knees and toes”. Either both or neither visible at any time.

Peter Humphreys
Bebington, Wirral

Museum workers solve First World War mystery

SIR – Petersfield has a small museum, which has put on a special display of artefacts from the First World War. My husband lost two uncles during the war and has loaned the museum some interesting items relating to these two brave men for display.

One uncle was a pilot in 204 Squadron of the RAF and died on October 27 1918. After the war, the Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC) confirmed on three occasions in writing that neither had a known grave.

However, two young museum workers organising the exhibition did some research and found that, in fact, the original information held by the CWGC was incorrect, and that Lt Philip Frederick Cormack did, indeed, have a grave, in a French cemetery in Belgium.

An English researcher visited the cemetery in 2009, found a grave with the name Cormack on a cross, and realised that the name was English and he should not have been there. The French confirmed that they had no record of a Cormack being killed. It seems that, shortly after being shot down in 1918, he was found by the Belgians, who mistook him for a Frenchman, and he was buried in the Machelen cemetery 25 miles from Ghent.

The mistake was rectified 95 years later, when the CWGC replaced the French cross with a British headstone last December.

Patricia Cormack
Petersfield, Hampshire

SIR – Those in charge of the nation’s health want us all to be obliged to ingest fluoride with our drinking water, ostensibly to protect our teeth.

What if we have no teeth? My mouth is full of dentures. Why, simply because parents can’t be bothered to stop their children eating too many sweets, should I be made to swallow unnecessary chemicals ?

If folk wish to use fluoride to protect their teeth, they can use fluoridated toothpaste. In fact it is difficult to find a toothpaste that isn’t fluoridated.

To use drinking water to introduce medication is a dangerous precedent – what next, slimming drugs to counteract obesity and contraceptives to keep down the population?

John H D Gibson
Malvern, Worcestershire

SIR – Philip Johnston (Comment, March 26) correctly identifies water fluoridation as a controversial issue, but it is one that politicians must grasp. Dentists still treat far too many children suffering from severe tooth decay which, it should be remembered, remains an entirely preventable condition. In Britain it is probably the earliest and clearest indicator of health inequalities. Water fluoridation probably represents the single most cost-effective way to reduce tooth decay in large parts of the population.

None the less, the British Dental Association remains clear that, however effective water fluoridation may be, it is no substitute for an integrated oral health strategy that includes improved oral hygiene and reduced sugar consumption.

The review of water fluoridation by Public Health England may help extend water fluoridation to those communities that would benefit most from it. If that potential is not realised, too many young children will continue to have teeth extracted in hospital. That’s a tragedy that can be avoided by grasping the political nettle. So the BDA supports the introduction of water fluoridation as one part of an integrated oral health strategy.

Graham Stokes
British Dental Association
London W1

SIR – In Lancet Neurology this month, the paediatrician Philip J Landrigan and Professor Philippe Grandjean of Harvard School of Public Health write that, after looking at 27 studies, they now classify fluoride as a “developmental neurotoxin”, which can harm children’s brains.

The biggest falls in tooth decay are in Sweden, Holland, Finland and Denmark, which don’t fluoridate their water.

Ann Wills
Ruislip, Middlesex

SIR – Since 97 per cent of mains water is used for other purposes than drinking, dosing the community with fluoride in this way is the least effective action imaginable.

Tony Jones
London SW7

Irish Times:

Irish Independent:

Madam – In last week’s Sunday Independent Allison Pearson in an article entitled “You can’t help but think, ‘what a waste’” speculates on why L’Wren Scott, Mick Jagger‘s girlfriend, took her own life. As she states, “suicide is always a chilling mystery, a desolating act, and often an accusation”.

Also in this section

Think the unthinkable

Separating religion and education

In the interests of justice, Shatter must resign

Suicide is always a tragedy and can leave surviving friends/relatives with many questions. This is especially true when the person who does this act is young and from an outside perspective appears to have so much to live for.

It is not so much a desire to end their lives but a desire to end whatever pain the person is enduring that is paramount in the person’s mind. Human emotions are powerful entities. They have the ability to give us profound periods of ecstasy such as the love we may feel for someone, but equally they can bring us to the edge and beyond in despair. Each of us is different and reacts to various situations in a variety of ways. This has to do with personality as well as previous traumas experienced. Unless the feelings associated with what life throws at us are expressed at the time, they build up and manifest in different ways. If you don’t speak them out you will act them out.

Young people need to be educated on the importance of expressing their feelings and having them validated. It is never too early to start this. In this way they gain confidence in themselves and their abilities to deal with life’s stresses in adulthood are much greater and have a more solid foundation.

It is not so much the hand of cards you are dealt with in life, but what you do with them that is more important. Greater openness and acceptance in the fact that we are emotional beings will lead to a greater chance of people having the confidence to express their feelings and not act them out in destructive ways such as suicide.

Hopefully we won’t have the need to speculate after the event what emotional triggers brought the person to commit the ultimate act of self destruction. The person will be attuned to their own emotional well-being and have the confidence to seek help and hopefully resolve whatever turmoil they are in.

Thomas Roddy,

Galway

COMMISSIONER AN HONOURABLE MAN

Madam – It was with deep regret that I learned of the resignation of my former colleague, Martin Callinan, a decent and brave man who sacrificed his career to satisfy the howling mob, yet rightly did not fully accede to all their demands.

Martin was always a decent and honourable man who believed in doing right. When the mob have finished with Alan Shatter, where will they turn their eyes next – the CRC, the HSE, the church, the legal profession? And are we now to forget about the kind of discretion that might have been exercised by a humane garda in the past? Maybe some of those who are loudest in the mob today, might some day have need of that discretion.

John Barry,

Malahide, Co Dublin

TIME FOR APOLOGY TO CALLINAN

Madam – Garda chief Martin Callinan resigns. It is time that the entire Irish media and many politicians in Dail Eireann, who for the most part do not have a creative solution to the problems facing this nation, apologise to Mr Callinan and the Irish public for creating an environment that not only brought discredit on Mr Callinan, and by extension 13,000 members of the Garda Siochana, but also caused the resignation of an outstanding leader.

No citizen should be pressured into resigning nor should consideration be given to firing such an individual for the use of a single word. Surely the Irish citizen is sufficiently educated to live with and accept or reject a single word used by a man in a position of power and influence and accept or reject his explanation without concluding that the punishment for such an expression of opinion is resignation or firing? This whole affair indicates we have a very immature republic/ democracy.

Vincent J Lavery,

Irish Free Speech Movement,

Dalkey, Co Dublin

GOOD LUCK WITH ‘NEW POLITICS’

Madam – Maurice O’Connell’s letter (Sunday Independent, March 23, 2014) made interesting and novel reading. Ireland needs and deserves a ‘new politics’ for the very obvious reason that the old ones have been a catastrophic failure, at least for the majority of the ‘plain’ people. It is perfectly understandable that he “‘can see no coherent and potentially politically effective group in Leinster House’, likely to effect the necessary change”.

After all, why should they surrender their hard-won privileges? Patriotism, like everything else, has its limits. In any case it would mean admitting to a colossal lie perpetrated on the people for almost a century, and they in turn would have to admit to being duped to such an extent. There’s the rub, as Shakespeare put it.

Your noble endeavours deserve every success on ‘the long, hard road to such a new politics’.

William Barrett,

Surrey, UK

QUOTA FOR FEMALE TDs IS FARCICAL

Madam – A Leavy (Sunday Independent, March 23, 2014), appears to be under the illusion that only a ‘token’ percentage of women are allowed stand for election to Dail Eireann; as if they need permission to raise their numbers.

He struggles with the notion that there must be some sinister reason why many more women do not put themselves forward for election. Quite simply, if they aren’t in, they can’t win. The daft idea of there being a 50 per cent quota of female TDs elected, is a farcical scenario to attempt.

What is the answer if strictly half of those going forward are women but only 10-20 per cent win?

Should a hefty portion of the successful male candidates be forced to give up their seats?

Why not scrap elections for women altogether and just proceed with a selection of Dail female TDs who are acceptable in political circles and stick them into Leinster House seats, while the men can fight it out among themselves in the current fashion? This would be much easier than “forcing” us to vote for women, especially if they are not our choice of candidate.

Robert Sullivan,

Bantry, Co Cork

MEN ALSO AFFECTED BY PATRONAGE

Madam – Further to Sheila O’Flanagan’s and A Leavy’s letters (Sunday Independent, March 23, 2014), Ms O’Flanagan may appear to make a persuasive case for all-female quotas but things are not as simple and one-sided as she and A Leavy imply.

Ms O’Flanagan asks: “How many male politicians have achieved office because they are part of a political dynasty rather than because they have done anything noteworthy?”

It’s a valid question but the same could be asked in relation to some female politicians.

She also asks: “How many businessmen found themselves moving up the ladder because of the school they went to?”

Again, it’s a valid question but it’s not just women who are adversely affected: throughout history, men of superior ability have been, and, we can be sure, continue to be, passed over in favour of lesser men for appointment to office because they have not belonged to the right cliques or been in favour with relevant powers-that-be.

Hugh Gibney,

Athboy, Co Meath

GIVE NO MERCY TO VIOLENT CRIMINALS

Madam – In response to Jim Cusack’s article (Sunday Independent, March 23, 2014) on the recent burial service of a known criminal; as a practising Catholic it galls me to witness the Catholic Church allowing this practice to continue when the person or persons are known criminals. The celebrant who officiated at the service stated that “gangs had lost any sense of mercy”. Should a protector of known extortionists, money launderers and drug dealers be afforded a Christian burial? What mercy have these criminals shown to the young vulnerable people who have had their lives destroyed? Pope Francis referenced the Mafia – he warned them “that they will go to hell” for their criminal activities.

Haven’t we our own Mafia here? The words of scripture come to mind, “All who draw the sword will die by the sword” – Matthew 26. I rest my case.

Journalists have risked their lives in an effort to expose and shame these criminals – why not the churches?

Name and address with Editor

CALCULATE COST OF SPORTS INJURIES

Madam – Eoghan Harris asks: “Can any classic field game such as hurling or rugby be completely safe?”

The answer is no. The HSE informs us that every taxpayer in Ireland is paying €3,313 every year because of alcohol abuse.

How much are sports injuries costing us?

Mattie Lennon,

Blessington, Co Wicklow

PUT UP YOUR FEET, MARGARETTA

Madam – I refer to the news (Sunday Independent, March 23, 2014), that Margaretta D’Arcy had been released from prison. At the risk of being unkind to an elderly, unwell lady, I must protest at her promise to continue her protest at Shannon Airport. Does she not take into account what a great friend to Ireland the US has been – both commercially and in helping to attain a peace in the North? Has America no right to defend itself against terrorism? At best her behaviour is laughable and at worst it takes up valuable garda time. My advice to “The Margaretta” is “go home m’dear, put up your feet and relax”.

Dan O’Connell,

Cork city

CALL STATE BY ITS PROPER NAME

Madam – John McClung (Letters, March 23, 2014) tells us he is sick of Northern Ireland being referred to as ‘the North’. In return could he ask the people there to respect Ireland by calling it Ireland. Not ‘the South’, ‘the Republic’ or ‘the Republic of Ireland’. Ireland is the official name. The Republic of Ireland is its descriptive name. Perhaps he would like to contact the media there and ask them to exercise their right to ‘edit where necessary’ also?

John Brady,

Phibsborough, Dublin 7

PRIORITISE BRAIN-INJURY HEALTHCARE

Madam – As well as wholly agreeing with Mary Farrell’s point that “We can’t trust shambolic HSE to run disability sector” (Sunday Independent, March 16, 2014), I think it is sadly conspicuous that the State has no means to audit the effectiveness or value of the mixed-performing disability service contractors to which the HSE has “passed the buck” (in all senses, of course).

In the brain injury sector – with adult services being non-existent in Co Meath, she says, (as in many elsewheres too) – the level of HSE contracting-out, buck-passing, is far greater in Ireland than in any other European country, I believe.

However, we share a similar prevalence of brain injuries: two per cent of all our populations, that’s one in 50 among us, have a daily-living disability from brain injuries, resulting from head injuries, strokes and also tumours, aneurysms and other causes.

That’s practically 100,000 people in Ireland. A multiple of that number are closely concerned, with families and friends.

Being so important, individually and in public health numbers, anybody with their wits about them among our health “leaders” would prioritise this challenge, not just pass the buck for even more of eternity.

By the way, those who have had brain injuries would be very much better re-enabled to take part and contribute to all our lives (maybe rather well) if there were adequate rehab and disability care systems.

That would be a boost for everybody.

There are also fantastic savings available from smaller ongoing health care costs (by saving people from worse health), let alone lightening (emotional and financial) burdens on carers.

Roll on better, independent, insightful analysis and advocacy in this area.

Paul Barrett,

Nenagh, Co Tipperary

COWARDLY MURDER

Madam – No murder in the history of the Troubles can evoke more emotion than the murder of Jean McConville in 1972. That her body was also given special treatment and ‘disappeared’ in order that her family suffer more is even more sickening.

That 10 children were left without a mother didn’t seem to matter. Their father had already died, and so they became orphans.

Her surviving 10 children got no dispensation from the IRA, only the occasional threat to keep quiet – even though Gerry Adams, the republican leader in Belfast at that time, came from a family of 10 surviving children himself.

There was no empathy in their hearts, no honesty in their deliberations, no thought of what might happen to her children.

They lied about her keeping an army radio, passing on information and even coming to the aid of a dying soldier – as if she should be afraid to do this.

They tell us how Bloody Sunday, also in 1972, showed us what the British are really like. The murder of Jean McConville reveals a lot about egomaniacal cowards consumed with a perceived power over those who had no guns. Such are the origins of evil.

John O‘Connell,

Derry

WE ARE NOT ALL AMERICANISED

Madam – I read today in the (Sunday Independent, March 16, 2014) that Jim Culloty’s home had been ‘burglarised’ when he was at Cheltenham.

No it wasn’t, it was burgled. Since when did your newspaper become American?

I have also read articles by Irish reporters saying that they have ‘gotten’ something.

Is this the influence of some of your staff having spent their ‘gap year’ in America?

Carole Molloy,

Foxrock, Dublin 18

Sunday Independent


Mary

$
0
0

31March 2014 Mary

I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again.They have an party for the admiral, Mrs Povey tries to get promotion for Henry. Priceless

Cold slightly better Mary very under the weather visit her

No Scrabbletoday Perhaps Iwill win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Kate O’Mara – obituary

Kate O’Mara was an actress who delighted ‘Dynasty’ audiences with her glowering showdowns with Joan Collins

Kate O'Mara with her Dynasty co-stars John Forsythe and Christopher Cazenove

Kate O’Mara with her Dynasty co-stars John Forsythe and Christopher Cazenove  Photo: REX

8:24PM BST 30 Mar 2014

Comments6 Comments

Kate O’Mara, who has died aged 74, was an actress whose cliff-high cheek bones, brooding glare and nifty line in tough talk fuelled a successful international television career. She first came to prominence in cult British series, such as Dr Who and Triangle, but found international fame as Joan Collins’s catty sister in the hugely popular American television show Dynasty. However, her onscreen persona — granite graced with lace — was often at odds with the more placid elements of her personality. “Recently I did The Graham Norton Show, which was very alarming,” she said in 2008. “He was being crude and I’m not very good with crude. I like sophistication and elegance.”

As Cassandra “Caress” Morrell — the revenge-obsessed sybling of Collins’s Alexis Colby — O’Mara excelled in bouts of verbal sparring with her British co-star over the course of 19 episodes in the mid-1980s. Cassandra is a jailbird with payback on her mind. Having been released from a Venezuelan prison — where she was incarcerated over an incident involving Alexis — she arrives in Denver, Colorado, under the name Caress. Her plan is to make a fortune by writing a searing exposé on her sister’s dark, salacious past.

Kate O’Mara at home in 2008 (REX)

Alexis discovers the ploy, however, covertly buys up the publishing company and pulps the project. “I’ve come to ask you for your autograph, congratulations sister dearest, it’s a wonderful piece of fiction,” sneers Alexis. “Of course I’ve read it. It doesn’t take very long. It’s like a comic book without the pictures.”

“We had a tremendous bitchy tension between us,” recalled O’Mara. “My character Caress was like an annoying little mosquito who just kept coming back and biting her.” The performance was a masterclass in melodrama — delivering a rollercoaster ride of fictional success and trauma that was matched by her own life story. “I’m part of six generations of a theatrical family,” she wrote in her memoirs, Vamp Until Ready: A Life Laid Bare (2003). “For over 40 years I’ve done everything from Shakespeare to Hollywood soaps, from Restoration Comedy to Cult Television Drama, from Westerns to Pantomime. I have been nothing if not diverse! My personal life, however, has been a disaster area. Rape, desertion, adoption, divorce and numerous relationships with very much younger men. And this for someone who sees herself as an intellectual and can’t be doing with sex at all… Oh well, the show must go on!”

Kate O’Mara with her Dynasty co-stars, Christopher Cazenove, John Forsythe and Joan Collins

Kate O’Mara was born in Leicester on August 10 1939, the daughter of John F. Carroll, an RAF flying instructor, and actress Hazel Bainbridge. After boarding school she studied at art school before becoming a full-time actress (her younger sister, Belinda, followed suit). Her early television appearances during the 1960s included roles in series such as The Saint, The Champions, The Avengers and Z-Cars.

In the early Seventies she made a more selacious name for herself as the voluptuous figure of desire in erotic horror B-movies such as The Vampire Lovers (1970). Equally dubious was Triangle, an early-Eighties soap opera in which she starred. Set on a North Sea ferry running a route between Felixstowe and Gothenberg it has often been cited as one of the worst pieces of television ever produced (although retrospectively it drew admirers).

Kate O’Mara in The Saint in 1967

The move to America for Dynasty came with its own problems for a country girl from England. “I had a five-year contract on Dynasty and after two months I was thinking, goodness, how am I going to stand it out here?” she recalled. “It’s just relentless sunshine. It’s a desert at the end of the day. I love the seasons, I love winter and autumn and rain. The people were very charming but I did find that it wasn’t terribly good for my soul.” She was let go after a series. “The studio said: ‘Joan thinks it’s not a good idea to have another brunette on the show,’” recalled O’Mara. “I was quite relieved. I’d been asked to appear in King Lear back in Britain, and they said: ‘Oh you go back and do your little play,’ which I thought was hilarious.”

If Triangle had been Crossroads-on-sea then her role as a cut-throat businesswoman in thee sailing soap opera Howard’s Way in 1990 at least saw her play up-stream with the regatta set. O’Mara also had a recurring role playing the renegade Time Lord “The Rani” in the cult Doctor Who series. Appearing opposite both the Colin Baker and Sylvester McCoy incarnations of the Doctor, her scientifically-minded devilish character enslaved planets to experiment on their subjects (during last year’s 50th anniversary celebrations of the series she expressed a wish to come back to the role as an older woman).

Kate O’Mara, alongside Shirley Bassey and Joan Collins, meeting the Queen at the Royal Academy in 2012

In later years she returned to familiar territory playing another character with a difficult sister — this time playing second sibling to Joanna Lumley’s Patsy in Absolutely Fabulous. During the Ninties she followed her Joan Collins lead and turned her hand to writing, publishing two novels (When She Was Bad, 1995, and Good Time Girl, 1993) and two autobiographical volumes (Vamp Until Ready, 2003, and Game Plan: A Woman’s Survival Kit, 1990).

In 2012, her son, Dickon Young — formerly a stage manager for the Royal Shakespeare Company — was found hanged at the family home. He had had a history of mental illness. Late in life she talked how she had overcome her own bouts of depression : “particularly during my first marriage break-up 31 years ago. But I’ve since learnt a cure for depression: listening to J.S. Bach and reading P.G. Wodehouse. This got me through the break-up of my second marriage 17 years ago. The great thing about Wodehouse is that his books are full of romantic problems and yet so hilarious that it puts things in perspective.” The quiet country life in occassional retirement in Somerset suited her. “I’m not frightened of dying, but I love the countryside so much and I’m going to miss it. I’d like to be out in the wind and the trees for ever.”

Kate O’Mara married twice. First to Jeremy Young in 1961 (dissolved in 1976) and, secondly, in 1993, to Richard Willis (dissolved 1996). Her son, from a separate relationship, predeceased her.

She is survived by her sister.

Kate O’Mara, born August 10 1939, died March 30 2014

Guardian:

The Ministry of Justice ban on families and friends sending books to prisoners is petty and mean-spirited (‘It is the most bonkers thing I’ve ever heard’, 29 March). It is argued that, should a prisoner be of good behaviour, their earnings will be at a higher rate and they will be able to buy books through the earned privileges scheme. The latter offers “basic”, “standard” and “enhanced” regimes, though a more austere one below “basic” was recently introduced for all new prisoners. Prisoners are unlikely to be able to afford books until they reach the “enhanced” level, which some never do. In over 30 years as a prison governor, I never knew of one prisoner who was badly behaved when they had their head inside a book.

For some nine years after retiring, I was a trustee of the estimable charity Prisoners Abroad. One small comfort that could be offered to British nationals jailed in some of the harshest punitive regimes imaginable was to post books to them. Well done, Mr Grayling. In this respect you have proved yourself more callously restrictive than some of the world’s most backward dictatorships.
Peter Quinn
Helperby, North Yorkshire

• No need to employ somebody to check the parcels – Chris Grayling and Joanna Trollope, please note (Thoroughly modern Jo, 29 March). Books pose no threat if sent to prisons directly from a major supplier, as recommended by the excellent website sendbookstoprisoners.co.uk. Yet the Secret Footballer books that I bought from Amazon for my son languish unopened in one of our young offender institutions. They could only have had a positive impact, so I was surprised when they were kept from him. He was told that the subject matter was unsuitable. Now I know the truth, and I’m appalled. Appalled too that it’s taken four months for news of the ban to reach the general public. The government’s action is unspeakable, though understandable – the last thing they want is well-read people leaving our prisons armed with inquiring minds and the ability to question and rebel.
Katie Farnworth
Warmington, Northamptonshire

Labour is the only realistic option to win the next general election and counter the punitive policies inflicted on the least affluent people in the UK. My heart sinks at Ken Loach‘s attempts to sell Left Unity as a viable alternative (Labour is not the solution, 28 March). Look at our electoral system – no party other than Labour has a realistic chance of getting a majority and, whatever its faults, it offers the best and quickest way of getting rid of the current lot of small-minded, nasty, scapegoating politicians.

The “left” of UK politics has a history of splitting into smaller groups who are passionate about their beliefs but who will not get a majority at an election to implement those beliefs – people who would rather be “right” than in government. That partly explains why Thatcher was able to win on a minority of the votes of the electorate. I don’t need an impassioned argument about the purity of Labour’s policies – I’ll stay in the Labour party and try to influence from within. I do need to have a Labour government in 2015 rather than the lot we have now – that’s the choice.
Jan Hill
London

•  Ken Loach is absolutely right to say that “Labour is part of the problem, not the solution” to the question “Where is our political fightback [against austerity]?” At the forthcoming local council elections the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC), co-founded by Bob Crow and, since 2012, officially backed by the RMT union, is organising the biggest left-of-Labour challenge in such elections since the immediate aftermath of the second world war. We already have 400 candidates in place, with more coming forward each day. The recently founded Left Unity group has been invited to participate in this election coalition, joining the anti-bedroom tax campaigners, trade union activists, and members of a number of different socialist organisations who will be standing under the TUSC umbrella in May. Possibly, together, we can reach the broadcasting authorities’ threshold for “fair coverage” during the election period. This would be a breakthrough for the anti-austerity socialist message, which I’m sure Ken would support.
Clive Heemskerk
TUSC national election agent

•  Ken Loach is wrong to be so dismissive of the Green party. Most of the policies he lists at the end of his article are supported by the Greens, and his call for a assertion of the public good accords with the Green party slogan “for the common good”. Furthermore, the Green party has a social justice agenda and the infrastructure and volunteer activists to deliver it.
John Prior
Reading

•  I can’t help thinking Ken Loach is a little out of touch. He clearly feels the Labour manifesto of 1945 is a good starting point for political change in the 21st century. He goes on to say that the Labour government of ’45 “chose not to realise that ambition” and that the task today “is to turn the words of the manifesto into reality”. If the postwar government – with its enormous majority, a relatively large and homogeneous working class behind it and a powerful trade union movement – couldn’t implement socialist ideals, what chance has Left Unity? The country was indebted to a large conscripted army and needed a co-operative manufacturing workforce. None of these factors exist now. The conditions for socialism were never more right than they were in 1945, and they are certainly not right today. You may not like the social and economic reality, Ken, but, as Marx might have said, it’s got to be your starting point.
Arthur Gould
Loughborough, Leicestershire

•  Ken Loach must realise the futility of trying to form a new party of the left at this stage of the electoral cycle. The crucial thing is to get the Tories out as soon as possible, and Labour, however feeble, is the only credible opposition we have. To attempt to divide it would be fatal. We have to persuade as many people as possible to use their vote to get a Labour majority. Then we must work to get a leader and cabinet who’ll legislate to curb the activities of big business, the banks, landlords, the aristocracy and money-grubbers everywhere as ruthlessly as Thatcher did to get rid of the miners, the steelworkers, the shipbuilders and the rest of the politically active workers. Goodness knows there are so many people damaged by the effects of the Tory policies Ken mentions that they only need a credible promise to make things better for them to vote to get rid of every Tory MP outside of Kensington and Chelsea.
Tony Cheney
Ipswich, Suffolk

• The Labour thinktanks’ call for a strategic change in direction towards more devolution of power (Letters, 24 March) is welcome, but it is only a start. If your report of Jon Cruddas’s speech to Progress is accurate (25 March) – “a Labour government from 2015-20 has to be about redistributing power and not resources, he argues, because austerity makes cash handouts impossible and power becomes the new money” – there is still a long way to go. Power without resources is a contradiction in terms. And the attempt to justify this on the grounds of austerity, given the present degree of inequality in our society, is absurd. Labour must stand for the redistribution of resources, and therefore power, from large corporations to consumers, workers and local communities, and from central to local government. That would indeed be new politics.
Pat Devine
Manchester

•  There is an easier way for Labour supporters to get behind an opposition party that represents their values than writing letters to a newspaper or using comment pieces to urge their leader to be more radical in policy (Polly Toynbee, 25 March) and bolder in approach (Diane Abbott, 26 March). They could simply join the Green party, which is already calling for the policies listed by Labour’s thinktanks and others as offering a radical, progressive approach: introducing a national living wage; bringing the railways back into public ownership; and launching a major programme of investment to build more affordable homes. And, if you don’t like any of our policies, we offer a far more democratic route to changing them than penning open letters: become a member and vote on policies at conference. Join us for a fairer and more progressive kind of politics.
Natalie Bennett
Leader, Green party of England and Wales

Gay couples, according to the house of bishops, can be prayed for but the B-word – blessings – is out (Bishop praises couple on eve of first gay weddings, 29 March). The day after the bishops made this decision I got an invitation to the opening of a new dairy at our local agricultural college. The ceremony included a blessing of the dairy herd by the bishop of Carlisle diocese. Now, our bishop is a good man, but there’s no better illustration of the hypocritical position in which the church now finds itself. Perhaps if my partner and I turn up at church dressed as pantomime cows we can solve the problem?
Stephen Wright
Mungrisdale, Cumbria

• One G2 reader complains that she had to look up “plushophilia” (Letters, 25 March) and suddenly “anthropomorphic” has an explanatory footnote (30 Minutes with… Kermit the Frog, G2, 27 March). Honestly! We’re not all jobbernowls, you know.
John Cranston
Norwich

• If you see Sid, tell him we woz done (Miliband calls for new curbs on energy bills, 28 March).
Joan Langrognat
Harrow, Middlesex

• I thought that “conscious uncoupling” (Pass notes, 27 March) meant throwing a bucket of water over a couple of dogs.
Brian Davies
London

• As in life, so in Yorkshire – it’s only a short distance from Booze to Bedlam (Letters, 29 March).
Angus MacIntosh
Burley-in-Wharfedale, West Yorkshire

Independent:

Times:

‘We can only serve the needs of victims [of domestic violence] by approaching this in an integrated multi-agency way’

Sir, There is considerable frustration in the police service regarding the Inspectorate report on the police handling of domestic abuse (Mar 27).

Cases of domestic abuse invariably include a far wider range of social issues, indeed only about 30 per cent of cases result in a recorded crime. Many victims refuse to make a complaint against their abuser or later withdraw the allegation because they don’t see that the criminal justice system can make their lives better.

There is a significant overlap between domestic abuse and complex dependency issues and with those involved in gangs and organised crime. Even if police can remove an abuser from a victim’s life the victim may well live in a community where they will face pressure from their families or criminal networks.

We can only truly serve the needs of victims by approaching this in an integrated multi-agency way which links up all the issues of complex dependency, as we are doing in Greater Manchester. We cannot have a system which relies so much on the victim in an abusive relationship having the courage to go to court when it is in the very nature of an abusive relationship that their self-confidence is destroyed.

My officers deal with an average of 170 domestic abuse incidents every day and become weary that the wider system is not dealing with the underlying issues or that society is not taking this more seriously.

To that end I would like to see the creation of full-item specialist magistrates able to impose a range of conditions for the protection of victims and the control of offenders, to which the police could take all high risk cases within 24 hours whether or not the victim wishes to make a complaint. This would create the space for the full range of agencies to put in a comprehensive solution.

The police can always do better but it has to be acknowledged that there are fundamental flaws in the way the wider system safeguards vulnerable victims.

Sir Peter Fahy

Chief Constable

Greater Manchester Police

Sir, It really is time that the Government called a halt to the public “bashing” of those in front-line public services, in the misguided belief that this is in the interests of so-called transparency. The effect on morale is devastating and counterproductive. My daughter police constable rang me tonight almost in tears at the lack of balance shown in this report. She is one of the vast majority of police officers who are dedicated to bringing violent partners to justice. They face overwhelming odds. I have watched over the years as she has expended much time and emotional energy in dealing with these cases. It is difficult and dangerous work. The violent partner at the scene will often turn on the policeman or policewoman. The victims, despite all the protection and assurances provided, will frequently retract their evidence at the last minute, squandering the efforts of many and unsurprisingly making the hard pressed CPS less than enthusiastic about bringing every case to court. Using the police as scapegoats for society’s ills in this way is unfair; this group of dedicated professionals deserve much better support and balanced judgment from those who are tasked with leading them.

Denis Wilkins

Pengover, Cornwall

Mr Clegg and Mr Farage do not properly represent the opposing views about Europe — Britain needs a proper debate

Sir, Britain needs a proper debate about Europe. Mr Clegg and Mr Farage (Mar 26) do not properly represent the opposing views on the issue. Mr Farage, who appears on one programme after another, does not have a single MP but rides on the coat-tails of those Conservative backbenchers who, since the Maastricht Treaty, have turned opinion within the party and in opinion polls. All he can do therefore is to undermine Conservatives, many of whom hold similar views. However, by defeating them in the marginals he guarantees not only to defeat them and the Conservative Party but also his own objectives, which they share, of returning self-government to the UK Parliament.

Bill Cash, MP

House of Commons

As the Allies fought their way across Europe it became easier if still dangerous for PoWs to escape and return to the UK

Sir, Max Lines (Mar 27) may be reassured; a significant number of other ranks PoWs escaped from work camps in the Reich during the Second World War. The opportunity to do so presented itself particularly to those taken each day to their place of work, where inattention by the guards gave those with pluck and the desire to slip away their opportunity.

As the Red Army and the Western Allies forces fought their way into Poland and Germany it became easier, though still very dangerous, for such PoWs to escape and return to the UK. The understandable attention given since the end of the war to the ingenuity and heroism of escapers from Colditz and Stalag Luft III (Sagan) has masked not just the bravery and resolve of those other ranks who did escape, but also the appalling conditions under which many other ranks PoWs were housed, fed and worked. It has also obscured the fact that some of those escapes were aided by local civilians, even, remarkably, in Dresden after the fire-bombing in February 1945.

Dr P. R. Gregory

Mark, Somerset

‘Too many young people are out of work and risk becoming trapped on benefits — we need to get them set up for life’

Sir, Too many young people are still out of work and risk becoming trapped on benefits. With a bit of creative thinking, we can get them off the dole and set up for life.

One idea is to divert young people’s job seeker’s allowance (JSA) cash to small businesses for apprenticeships. So, if a suitable apprenticeship is offered to a JSA claimant who turns it down or quits it, they would lose their unemployment benefits. The JSA cash which is freed up by moving the job seeker into paid training — about £3,000 per year, per person — would be given to small businesses to help them take on more apprentices. We think it is reasonable to impose benefit sanctions if someone turns down or drops out of paid training. It makes no sense to have young people going nowhere on benefits when they could be learning a trade.

If we get half of the UK’s 314,430 JSA claimants off benefits and into apprenticeships, it would free millions of pounds to fund these opportunities.

Andrew Boff

GLA Conservatives

Charlie Mullins

Pimlico Plumbers

Future research at the Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew is vital to resolve looming ecological or agricultural crises

Sir, The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew is first and foremost a scientific institution. Kew’s research is essential to address looming ecological and agricultural crises. Recent cuts in the science budget (Mar 28) threaten to undermine this. I trust that, after the proposed restructuring, Kew’s director will prioritise science. If it is to provide a credible voice on issues such as food security and biodiversity, Kew must be able to perform research of the highest quality.

Dr Samuel Brockington

Department of Plant Sciences University of Cambridge

Now the government has abolished the IPP sentence, it’s time to return to a sensible system of fairness and just deserts

Sir, Now the government has abolished the IPP (imprisonment for public protection) sentence, it’s time to return to a sensible system of fairness, proportionality and just deserts (Mar 25). There is already provision in the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act for a release test which would make the State responsible for producing evidence to prove that someone still presents a significant risk. Improvements should be made to sentence planning for IPP prisoners including better use of the open estate and the well planned use of release on temporary licence. Unacceptable Parole Board delays must be eradicated. This is a hard sentence to unwind but, to restore public confidence and legitimacy, the government should finish the job it started and eradicate a stain on our justice system.

Juliet Lyon

Prison Reform Trust

Telegraph:

SIR – As Barbara Woodhouse’s daughter, I am sure my mother would have thought that training dogs in a simply “positive” or “negative” way was too inflexible.

My mother was always firm but kind to dogs. I have never heard of any dog being traumatised by her. It was the reverse. As soon as she took a dog from its owner, its tail went up and it looked at her with adoration. My mother advocated giving treats to dogs when they deserved extra praise.

She trained more than 20,000 dogs and was in the Guinness Book of Records for the most dogs ever trained by anyone.

She was just as popular in America and did numerous television programmes, including Barbara Woodhouse in Beverley Hills. All the Hollywood stars whose dogs she worked with agreed that her training methods were excellent.

I was very pleased that Cesar Millan, the “Dog Whisperer”, supported my mother’s methods, and that Roger Mugford, the animal psychologist, has said that relying on positive training could lead to spoilt and badly behaved pets, which I heartily agree with.

Judith Walpole
Heath and Reach, Bedfordshire

SIR – William Hague is right to say that Europe must stand up to Russia.

He also points out that corruption and the absence of the rule of law or independent institutions have damaged Ukraine. This gives me deep misgivings about the EU’s intention to develop deeper ties with Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia. Do we wish to be associated with countries that are undemocratic, and are we prepared for military action in their defence? If not, then provoking Russia in this way is hardly wise.

Cdr Malcolm Williams
Southsea, Hampshire

SIR – The Crimea situation reveals first that the EU is not, and never will be, a military power to be reckoned with, that Britain is no longer a world power and should recognise this and that America is sick and tired of involvement in wars in far off countries.

This being the case, the governments and peoples of Russia, Ukraine and Crimea should be left to sort out their own problems, hopefully without bloody wars. The West has blood on its hands and should stop interfering in the affairs of other countries. Vladimir Putin is well aware of this and cannot be in the least concerned about the huffing and puffing of the West.

Don Roberts
Birkenhead, Wirral

Planning Inspectorate

SIR – While I can understand Alan Overton’s negative opinion of the Planning Inspectorate, one also has to consider the situation when local planning committees override the recommendation made by the case officer when applications come before them.

In many cases, appeals to the Planning Inspectorate come about because planning committee members are inexperienced in planning matters, and are often more concerned about appeasing their electorate by refusing to consent to a contentious application than making a balanced judgment based upon the local plan and Town and Country Planning Legislation.

Monty Taylor
Henley on Thames, Oxfordshire

Assisted dying Bill

SIR – Ray Cantrell is concerned that the legalisation of assisted dying may be abused and lead to “persuaded suicide” or “mercy killing”.

We know that assisted dying already takes place, and that the legal system is (rightly) reluctant to prosecute those who help a terminally ill loved one who wishes to end their own life.

However, because this assistance is still illegal, people do it secretly. Others who wish to speed up the death of a dying relative against that relative’s will may well be able to disguise their behaviour in a similar fashion.

Lord Falconer’s Bill would prevent this abuse, by bringing things out into the open. It would only allow assisted dying for terminally ill adults, who are declaring a well-informed, persistent and voluntary wish to end their own life early, as assessed by two independent doctors. The Bill would therefore protect the wishes of terminally ill people who wish to live on until their illness kills them, as well as those who wish to end their lives at a time of their choosing.

Richard Mountford
Hildenborough, Kent

Wall charter

SIR – David Thomas’ New Magna Carta was a masterpiece. It summed up everything I would like to see happen to Britain.

I have cut it out and framed it.

Mike Hardwick
Great Somerford, Wiltshire

Stay-at-home mothers are being penalised

SIR – Mother’s Day is an opportunity to celebrate the indispensable role mothers play in the home. But, as the recent Budget made clear, policy-makers only value mothers when they are doing paid work outside the home. Families with a mother or father at home full-time are penalised heavily in the tax system, often paying at least half as much tax again as dual- earner families.

Supporting paid work over unpaid care for children will not encourage mothers back to work. In a 2013 Department of Education survey, 71 per cent of parents at home said they were there by choice; only 13 per cent cited cost of childcare.

But choice has been removed from poorer families who can’t afford to survive on one income. The only viable option is for both parents to work. It is not choice if the only option is to do paid work. We call for real choice to be introduced through a fair taxation system which doesn’t penalise single and low-income families but rather recognises family responsibilities.

Claire Paye
Mothers at Home Matter
Caversham, Berkshire

SIR – It is unacceptable that any religious group’s laws should be promoted above others. The same law should apply to everyone.

This is the thin end of a very dangerous wedge. If you allow one religious group to apply its own laws, then you open up the possibility of extending the same principle to other groups.

Tony Newberry
Liss, Hampshire

SIR – As a retired solicitor, I was appalled to read of the Law Society’s intention to “promote” the recognition of wills made under sharia. I feel ashamed to have been a member of the society for 40 years. Which of its members consider this to be a sensible course of action?

Our laws against racial, religious and sexual discrimination have been built up over a long time and our legal system is respected throughout the civilised world. Why encourage a minority group to change that for its sole benefit?

Disputes over sharia wills and their enforceability under English law will become rife – no doubt creating more work for the lawyers.

Jeremy Davenport
Leigh-on-Sea, Essex

SIR – The Law Society exists to guide and police the conduct of our legal representatives in the application of British law, not to promote the inclusion of the laws of another culture.

For its president to say that its guidance would promote “good practice in applying Islamic principles in the British legal system” took my breath away. He admits that sharia principles could potentially overrule British practices in some disputes which may need to be tested in court.

Previous immigrants to this country (Huguenots, Jews, West Indians, etc.) have enjoyed the freedom to practise their own religion but have also had to accept our laws.

Claire Bushby
East Horsley, Surrey

SIR – We read that the Law Society has decided that its members should support sharia in Britain, presumably for financial reasons.

Should it not be for Parliament to decide upon such important matters, not a trade union?

Bernard Vass
Tunbridge Wells, Kent

SIR – So keen are some people to pander to “inclusiveness” that they are willing to throw overboard Magna Carta and the 800 years it took to enshrine the principle of one law for all.

Enough is enough.

Andrew Dakyns
Eastbourne, East Sussex

SIR – We have a legal system which recognises equality regardless of sex, ethnicity or religion. Religion should not be part of our law and we should uphold this principle of equality.

Why some people insist on treating women as inferior I cannot imagine.

Richard Dugdale
Clitheroe, Lancashire

SIR – If Islamic law were to be enshrined in our legal system, we would have two legal systems running in parallel. This is patently absurd. It would be like having one law for the rich and one for the poor. This is this the slow drip of the tap – the erosion of the British way of life by the minority.

R J Russell
Denver, Norfolk

SIR – It is enshrined in English law that you may leave your estate to anyone you like. If you choose to divide it between your favourite nephew and a cats’ home, then that is your right. The exception is when you have a title, and that may only be passed to your eldest son. Can someone explain to me why it is any different to leave your estate in line with your religious beliefs?

I strongly dislike much of sharia, but if there is an unqualified British right that one may dispose of one’s estate as one wishes, then everyone is entitled to that right.

Jenny Furness
Doncaster, West Yorkshire

SIR – Apart from the fact that these wills would be extremely prejudicial to women at a time when the implications of feminism for Muslim women are increasingly under discussion, why is it that the perceived rights of a population of about three million people trump the rights of the other 60 million or so people in this country?

Muslims are a minority in Britain, and their views should not be allowed to impinge on the majority. This favouritism should be stamped out.

Margaret Robinson
London SE9

SIR – It is time we stopped being afraid of upholding our hard-won democratic values for fear of offending newcomers.

Alison Smith
Birmingham

SIR – Lawyers have much to be ashamed of: the culture of blame and compensation, European human rights and now this. The profession is a disgrace.

Nick Farmer
Leicester

SIR – In light of 529 citizens being sentenced to death in Egypt and many Muslim countries being embroiled in extremism, misery and mayhem, it is difficult to understand why the Law Society should wish to integrate sharia guidance into our own tried and tested system of law; unless perhaps, to fill the pockets of its lawyers.

Bill Newham
Worsley, Lancashire

SIR – I am not a Muslim, but a member of the Institute of Professional Willwriters. As I understand it, in Islam there is a hadith (tradition) that says, “It is the duty of a Muslim who has anything to bequeath not to let two nights pass without writing a will about it.”

I have been aware for many years that English intestacy laws and sharia succession are not compatible and I know how to draft a will for a Muslim who wishes to pass on his estate according to sharia.

What the Law Society has done is just remind solicitors that care needs to be taken in writing a sharia-compliant will and it has given an outline of how to do it. If a sharia-compliant will is not drafted correctly, an estate may pay a larger amount of inheritance tax than need be, because full use of the spouse’s exemption has not been made.

The Law Society is not suggesting that solicitors do anything against UK law (or introduce sharia to UK law).

Derek Lindsey
Ilford, Essex

SIR – What about non-religious groups with particular views on society that they would like to have recognised?

We must have one set of laws for all, otherwise it just becomes a “pick and mix” depending on whether you personally agree with that law or not.

Vince Settle
Lytham St Annes, Lancashire

SIR – Your front page (March 23) encapsulates several horrors: England now has sharia, the EU demands that migrants should be able to take my money and the money-grubbing Blairs appear in a picture looking like saints.

I look forward to my death.

Nicholas Coates
London SW6

SIR – In Britain, people often talk about how the EU needs reform, but do not recognise the reforms that have already been made, which stem from much hard work by Conservative MEPs and a Conservative government.

A few days ago, we completed a major agreement on how to change international laws for failing banks. The United Kingdom achieved three important victories.

First, future bank collapses will not result in taxpayer bail-outs but in large creditor bail-ins, with ordinary people’s deposits protected. Secondly, eurozone bank failures will not undermine the rest of Europe’s economy and create the uncertainty of recent years, thanks to a common fund for resolving their difficulties, managed at an EU level. And thirdly, Britain has been protected by a firewall from having to pay towards bank failures in a currency we chose not to join.

All this was achieved because we sat at the table and promoted this reformist agenda. That includes the final 16-hour all‑night negotiations with EU ministers.

This shows that not only is reform of the EU possible, but that we are delivering it already. We can only build on these successes if we have MEPs willing to sit around the table and fight Britain’s corner.

Vicky Ford MEP (Con)
Hardwick, Cambridgeshire

SIR – Fraser Nelson (Comment, March 28) is perceptive in his analysis of the evolving direction of Europe. Sometimes the further one looks back, the further one can look forward. It is indeed in the major chancelleries of Europe that hard realities are determined, not in televised debates.

In 1878, Disraeli and Bismarck negotiated a treaty at the Congress of Berlin that secured the critical interests of Britain and Germany in the Europe of those days.

The hand of history is similarly on their successors, David Cameron and Angela Merkel, to secure the interests of their countries in the context of today.

John Barstow
Pulborough, West Sussex

SIR – Isn’t it time that the British people were given a referendum on whether they want an EU referendum?

Dr Alan B Thomas
Great Sankey, Cheshire

Illiterate lags

SIR – It is a tragedy that so many prisoners are unable to read and write (Letters, March 29). Surely the best thing would be to enable them to do so, rather than just let them watch television.

For all concerned, I just hope that they can be sent books.

My life on a desert island would be impossible without a book.

Deirdre Lay
Peaslake, Surrey

Towns with clowns

SIR – Happy to say that the Sandow clowns are doing very nicely, appearing at provincial theatres around the North (“Tears of the clowns who are out of a job”, report, March 29). We provide good old clean slapstick that the children still love.

Tom Sandow
Bridlington, East Yorkshire

Happy Easters

SIR – Welcome into the world the wonderfully named Elektra Esmeralda Easter (Births, March 28) and congratulations to her and her siblings Dorothy, Wulfstan and Cleopatra on having such delightfully imaginative parents.

Guy Thurlow
Tunbridge Wells, Kent

Causes of death in hospital

SIR – The sharp rise in the coding of deaths in hospital as “palliative” is very troubling (“Hospital fiddling death-rate figures,” report, March 28). The code is only supposed to be used when a patient’s death in hospital is an inevitable consequence of their condition – such as that from a terminal illness. Death certification is often not done well and is in need of urgent reform.

Understanding the cause of death is vitally important to our understanding of disease, its prevalence and, longer term, how we find ways to prevent or treat illness.

The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 introduced a role of independent medical examiner to look into the circumstances of apparently natural deaths to ensure that cause of death is correctly recorded.

This new role would also be a conduit for any relatives with concerns about the cause of their loved one’s death.

Pilots where independent medical examiners scrutinised death certification show that almost a fifth of death certificates had a different underlying cause of death. This suggests that analysis by the medical examiner of information about the cause of death would improve understanding of the conditions that led to the death.

The scandal at Mid Staffordshire exposed how it is possible to miss causes of death that would reveal poor care.

We call for the introduction of this valuable new medical role with no further delays.

Dr Archie Prentice
President, Royal College of Pathologists
London SW1

TB cull for cats

SIR – Now that domestic cats have been identified as a reservoir of tuberculosis, should not Defra institute a cull similar to that recently directed against badgers?

Dr John H F Smith
Eyam, Derbyshire

SIR – Cat owners should be reassured that their pets are extremely unlikely to have tuberculosis and even less likely to pass the disease on to them.

TB in cats is very rare. It is believed that the small numbers of cats that do become infected have been hunting small wild rodents.

By far the greatest TB risk to people is spending time with infected people. Keeping a cat is far more likely to improve the well-being of its owner than cause any health problem.

Caroline Reay
Blue Cross Animal Hospital
London SW19

Police singled out for blame on domestic violence

SIR – HM Inspectorate of Constabulary last week issued a report into the performance of police forces in relation to domestic violence. It is a massive, complex problem, with which the police cannot deal alone.

Many publicly funded bodies have a responsibility to deal with this, yet now (as so often) society seeks to place the blame for everything at the door of the police.

Police do take resolute and direct action when faced with such circumstances, but they then have to struggle within a system that seems to stack up against them.

I have yet to see a senior Crown Prosecutor called to account at a press conference after an offender walked free after a poorly presented bail application or a decision to discontinue a prosecution, which led to a tragedy.

Social services have a 24-hour responsibility to keep the vulnerable safe, yet police officers face an uphill battle in getting much out of them after 5pm.

It is also incredible that the one person who seems to escape criticism is the actual offender. Short of putting a police officer outside the home of every vulnerable person, it is almost impossible to stop all those intent on an act of violence.

We accept there is a chance to improve, but those joining the current feeding frenzy should look at the whole picture.

One final question – we are far from perfect, but which one of all the police services in the world you would swap us with if you had the opportunity?

Ian Hanson
Chairman, Greater Manchester Police Federation
Stockport, Cheshire

Irish Times:

Sir, – I refer to Breda O’Brien’s column (Opinion & Analysis, March 23rd). Surrogates have been referred to as gestational carriers for the past 20 years. It is the legal term that was used by the first court to distinguish traditional surrogates, who relinquished their own genetic child, from women who were merely carrying the child of another. The term is the proper one in the US, and the only type of surrogacy that is permitted in most US states.

She is accurate in saying surrogates earn on average $30,000 for their services over the three months of IVF treatment and nine months of gestation (equal to approximately $2 per hour), and that the overall cost for intended parents is between $100,000 and $150,000. These numbers are clearly expressed on our website and cost sheets.

However, contrary to the assertion that when it comes to the final cost, surrogates are getting the short end of the stick, most of the remaining funds are not for the agency, but paid for the IVF, lawyers, travel and medical expenses/insurance for the surrogate and the child. The agency fees are actually less than the amount the surrogate earns.

Ms O’Brien states: “You do not find wealthy women acting as surrogates.” Our surrogates come from an array of socioeconomic backgrounds, a good percentage of whom are nurses making six-figure salaries. The majority of Circle’s surrogates are middle class, educated, and, most important, financially secure women.

It was also disappointing to see the “women are being exploited” argument surface again. Within this misconception is the notion that women are too ignorant or ill-advised to make an informed decision about becoming surrogates. This couldn’t be further from the truth. Our surrogate screening team spends on average six weeks per candidate to ensure that Circle’s surrogates are fully educated on the process and aware of what surrogacy asks of them.

Ms O’Brien looks to Germany (rather than England, which permits reasonable compensation to surrogates) as a moral compass. However, Germany, despite its law banning compensated surrogacy, regularly permits intended parents to return from the United States with children born through gestational surrogacy, and to get German citizenship for those children. There is a process established for this return, which is all Ireland is looking to do as well.

What Ms O’Brien is missing most of all is the great joy that surrogacy provides to everyone involved.

At the end of the day, it’s the child’s welfare and best interests that are at the heart of every surrogacy arrangement at Circle Surrogacy. Our relationship-building between intended parents and surrogates has meant that every child born through our programme knows from where they came. – Yours, etc,

DEAN HUTCHISON,

Director of Legal Services,

Circle Surrogacy,

High Street,

Boston,

Massachusetts

First published: Mon, Mar 31, 2014, 02:00

Sir, – The Taoiseach, Enda Kenny, continues to insist that Mr Callinan made his own decision to resign – and he is technically correct. However, the fact of the matter is that Mr Callinan had no real choice given the actions of the Taoiseach in the lead-up to his decision.

It is obvious that Mr Kenny made a calculation that in order to retrieve anything from the awful treatment of the whistleblowers at least one of two had to go. He had previously invested so much emotional and political capital in Alan Shatter that he could not safely give him the chop. So there was only one doll still sitting on the wall and he had to be bounced.

By sending a very senior emissary to Mr Callinan’s home late on Monday evening last with the dire news that the Government was in a lather over the phone taping and that the Taoiseach was particularly upset (“this is terribly, terribly – and I mean terribly – serious, Martin”) he took any decision away from the retirement-aged commissioner.

Notwithstanding this, Mr Callinan still double-checked the following morning to ascertain if there had been any reduction in temperature, only to be told by the same official that “nothing has changed” – roughly translatable by anyone with a brain as “you know what you have to do”.

It is very important to maintain a firm grasp of reality so that “spin” does not ultimately replace it. Yours, etc,

LIAM MEADE,

Bellewood,

Ballyneety,

Co Limerick

Sir, – What would now be the chances that in maintaining intact his loyalty to Mr Shatter the Taoiseach will reinstate Meryvn Taylor’s old job of Minister for Equality and Law Reform in the upcoming cabinet reshuffle?

Mr Shatter would thereby be kept at the Cabinet table and would be able to concentrate on what he seems to do best while the operational issues he has spectacularly failed to master are subsumed into one of his colleagues’ portfolios. Yours, etc,

THOMAS O’CONNOR,

Caherush,

Quilty ,

Co Clare

A chara, It doesn’t hugely matter whether Alan Shatter knew on March 10th or on March 24th what was going on. If he knew on March 10th and did nothing, it is not good enough; and if he runs his department in such a way that it knew on March 10th and he wasn’t informed until March 24th, it isn’t good enough either. Is mise,

REVD PATRICK G BURKE

Castlecomer,

Co Kilkenny

Sir, – The University of Dublin may very well be right to remove the Bible from its crest and replace it with an “open book”. The step is no doubt intended to be more “inclusive”. But the college’s description of the removal of the Bible as a “forward-facing” step is not without its own semiotics. Would it not then be equally appropriate to leave behind the uniquely Christian appellation “Trinity” in the same “backward” periods of the university’s history as the Bible? Yours, etc,

FERGUS A RYAN,

Station Road,

Portmarnock,

Co Dublin

Sir, – I see that Trinity College has opted to blow “religious symbolism out of the college’s ancient crest” (March 29th). Whether this is motivated by an ecumenical heart or plummeting rankings is open to question. I do note that repenting of religious symbolism hasn’t extended to the ancient and, from a marketing perspective, more significant name. To avoid their rattling around for eternity in hollowed-out hypocrisy might I suggest TCD employ the following answer to the obvious question: “Why, pounds, shillings and pence!” Your, etc,

IAN HICKEY,

Lauderdale Terrace,

Bray,

Co Wicklow

Sir, – As a chronicler of the Irish in British construction ( The Men Who Built Britain , published in 2001), I am often asked acerbically “what about the women?” I am delighted therefore that the President will on his state visit to Britain honour the contribution of Irish women to Britain’s national health service. While Irish women worked in a great many occupations the NHS is probably the one sector which is most readily identified with Irish women emigrants in the second half of the twentieth century – a time when that institution stood for selfless service to the common good.

In the same era the construction industry was the largest single employer of Irish male migrant labour in Britain.

The indispensability of the Irish, and their colossal contribution to the building of modern Britain, were warmly acknowledged in Scottish contractor Sir William McAlpine’s 1998 remark to me that “The contribution of the Irish to the success of this industry has been immeasurable.”

The President’s awareness of this achievement has been expressed many times in his UK speeches so further public acknowledgment on this occasion might seem superfluous.

However the very inclusion of the NHS event in this itinerary points up the uniquely symbolic nature of all such gestures made on British soil in the course of a state visit by an Irish president. We cannot know which actions originate with the British and which with the Irish governments but undoubtedly they are agreed by both.

For that reason I very much hope that this visit will not be allowed to pass without some gesture or statement from the President acknowledging the contribution of generations of Irish construction workers, past and present, to the material wellbeing of both countries. Such a statement ought to clearly convey not only Irish recognition, but also British acknowledgment, of these men’s worth. They and their families deserve no less. Yours, etc,

ULTAN COWLEY,

The Potter’s Yard,

Duncormick,

Co Wexford

Sir , – What must rank as one of the fastest U-turns in modern times has been the decision of World Vision US, a Christian humanitarian organisation with an annual budget of about $1 billion , to reverse its policy after two days on hiring employees in same-sex marriages.

Last Monday it announced that it was changing its employment policy to allow the hiring of such employees. By Wednesday, after pressure from evangelical and pentecostal Christian organisations throughout the US, it reversed its decision. A major pentecostal denomination, The Assemblies of God, had urged its members to boycott World Vision and instead support evangelical organisations which followed biblical teachings .

In its message last Wednesday addressed to its “Dear Friends”, the president of World Vision US, Richard Stearns, said that that the organisation now realised it had made a mistake and was choosing to “revert to our longstanding conduct policy requiring sexual abstinence for all single employees and faithfulness within the Biblical covenant of marriage between a man and a woman. We have listened to you and want to say thank you and to humbly ask for your forgiveness. We are brokenhearted over the pain and confusion we have caused many of our friends who saw this decision as a reversal of our strong commitment to Biblical authority.”

The incident shows the power of the US fundamentalist Christian movement to successfully oppose any recognition of the human right to marriage equality. Yours , etc,

BRENDAN BUTLER,

The Moorings,

Malahide,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – Today while standing in a queue at the checkout in our local supermarket I saw two separate incidents of mothers struggling valiantly to resist their children’s demands to buy them sweets displayed beside the counter. I was surprised, because I thought the cynical practice of placing sweets beside the checkout had been abandoned some years ago. At a time when the country is struggling with the tragic effects of widespread childhood obesity it is reasonable to ask supermarkets to stop putting this rubbish on display where parents are blackmailed into buying. Apart from the fact that frequent consumption of sweets is bad for children, it encourages the idea of eating whenever one is bored. The world is sometimes boring but it is better for children to learn to develop patience. Yours, etc,

CARLA KING,

Shillelagh,

Co Wicklow

Sir, – When told the reason for daylight saving time the Old Indian said: “Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket.” Yours, etc,

KEVIN DEVITTE,

Mill Street,

Westport,

Co Mayo

Sir, – Only one headline could have further enhanced the uplifting photo of Barack Obama and the pope on your front page (March 28th), and that would have been your large headline on page 9 of the same paper: “Slight chill in air as Obama meets pope”. An excerpt from Paddy Agnew’s Rome report there – referring to the photo session – states that “the president was all smiles but his interlocutor remained sombre, serious and impassive”. Well … as they say … he could have fooled me!

Yours etc,

PADRAIG J O’CONNOR,

Lower Dodder Road,

Rathfarnham,

Dublin 14

Irish Independent

* Six months ago, I had a chance meeting in a pub with an Australian and an American. The Australian, who has lived in Dublin for many years, was visiting the area to show his visiting American friend some of the well-known tourist sights. He said: “It’s good to get out of the city. In the city sometimes it’s hard to see the horizon.”

Also in this section

Think the unthinkable

Speak about feelings

Separating religion and education

At the time, that remark resonated with me. I live in the countryside. I see the horizon every day from my home. I tried to imagine living in my home and not being able to see the horizon, it was difficult at the time.

Not any more. Since then I have discovered that my home is directly in the path of a proposed pylon corridor that is part of the planned EirGrid gridlink project.

The plan to erect 45m-high pylons carrying 440kV power lines from Cork to Kildare will mutilate the horizon and the landscape of this country forever.

It will change not just for me and all the other so-called NIMBYs but for everybody in this country and for future generations. It is an issue that is too big to ignore.

Now when I look at the horizon, this is what I think. The countryside is not a vacuous space that the Government and its vested interests can carve up and exploit at the expense of many.

The countryside is alive and well, living and breathing. It belongs to all of the people of Ireland and it is up to us, the people, to be proactive in protecting it for future generations.

MAURA MURPHY

TALLOW, CO WATERFORD

MORE WORK FOR TEACHERS

* I’m amused at the suggestion by DCU president Brian MacCraith that one way to get around teachers objecting to correcting their own students in the new Junior Certificate is for an online system that would have teachers anonymously correcting students from other schools.

Basically he wants me to do unpaid work previously paid for by the SEC because essentially it is how the present Junior Cert operates. Teachers don’t know the students they are correcting in July.

I wonder how motivated I and others might be in such a system? I have had pay cuts of plus-15pc, been told I no longer have a reasonable chance at promotion, barely get a chance to actually teach as another initiative lands on my desk, and had suggestions from the minister that CCTV cameras might be installed in my classroom. Not to monitor the kids, you understand – but me!

So excuse me if I would not be enthusiastic for such an idea. At least now those correcting are given payment. However, my union colleagues will probably be ballot-whipped into this eventually and told it’s “the only deal in town”. I despair.

BARRY HAZEL

ASTI CEC, BRAY, CO WICKLOW

AIRLINE INEQUALITY

* The news that the boss of Aer Lingus, Christoph Mueller, was paid €1.5m last year while he expects his workers to endure further cuts smacks of inequity and injustice.

Given that his workers are facing the prospect of a 20pc cut to their pensions and the imposition of coordination to their defined benefit scheme, the increase in the contribution rate from 25pc to 40pc to the chief executive’s pension pot must really stick in the craw of those workers.

Unions are often accused of bellyaching but they won’t take this lying down and they can’t be blamed either. The Government needs to sit up and pay attention. A third marginal rate of tax, or “rich” tax, should be introduced and the raising of corporation tax explored.

The Transport Minister should also step in before this gets out of hand and a summer of travel chaos ensues.

KILLIAN BRENNAN

MALAHIDE ROAD, DUBLIN 17

TARGETED HEALTHCARE

* Thankfully, I rarely see cancer in my under-six population. I more often detect something of concern in my older patients and early diagnosis can make a huge difference.

The Government has decided that all under-sixes should get free GP care irrespective of need but has raised the income threshold for medical cards for the over-70s and some are losing them as a result.

Healthcare must be targeted to those for whom there is proven need and benefit from improved access to their family doctor.

DR ELUNED LAWLOR

LOUGHBOY MEDICAL CENTRE, KILKENNY

FAIR TREATMENT

* Darragh Roche, chairperson of University of Limerick’s Clubs and Societies’ Council (C&SC), justifies (Letters, March 27) the vote rejecting the Life Society, claiming there were “several objections and legitimate questions . . . not answered adequately”. However, not a single objection, nor any inadequately answered questions, were identified to UL Life Society before (or after) the vote by C&SC delegates.

In fact, according to C&SC’s own rules, approval of new societies is on the basis of satisfying the conditions in their guidelines for new societies.

That UL Life Soc did satisfy these conditions was explicitly stated to council before the vote by the C&S Development Officer with responsibility for this.

These conditions include membership being open to all UL students, as per C&SC’s common constitution for all societies.

This specific membership fact was also explicitly restated by myself in the information and Q&A session before the vote.

To give the impression now that we would be “vetting” potential members is simply wrong.

Our reasonable expectation is to be shown the same fair treatment as any other club or society in UL, in accordance with the “policy of inclusion” mentioned by Mr Roche.

MANUEL KUHS

UL LIFE SOCIETY CHAIRPERSON,

UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK

GARDA CRISIS

* The most disgusting part of our recent political shambles is not the precise meaning of each word uttered by various ministers, the commissioner and the Taoiseach, but their part in blatant obstruction of finding the truth.

This political positioning protecting their own at the expense of justice and what is right has been shown to the public in broad daylight.

Fortunately, no amount of forced and belated withdrawals of what has been said can hide this underlying political dishonesty – and contempt for finding the truth.

This is disgusting politics. All those who stand by Mr Shatter and his contempt for whistleblowers and GSOC have no place in Dail Eireann.

NICK CRAWFORD

NEWCASTLE, CO WICKLOW

* Whistleblower, beware. On March 10, by notifying his boss regarding the existence of some tapes, Martin Callinan became perhaps one of the highest level whistleblowers in state history; 15 days later he was retired.

JOHNNY WATTERS

KEVINSFORT, SLIGO

* One of the main qualities the next garda commissioner will need is to be shatterproof.

TOM FARRELL

SWORDS, CO DUBLIN

Irish Independent


Mary Home

$
0
0

1April2014 Mary

I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again.They have an party for the admiral, Mrs Povey tries to get promotion for Henry. Priceless

Bring Mary Home

No Scrabbletoday Perhaps Iwill win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Professor Margaret Spufford – obituary

Professor Margaret Spufford was a historian who overcame personal tragedy to write illuminating appreciations of the English peasant

Margaret Spufford in 1990

Margaret Spufford in 1990

6:45PM BST 31 Mar 2014

Comments1 Comment

Professor Margaret Spufford, who has died aged 78, was a historian of the 16th and 17th centuries whose “ground up” studies of life in rural England shed light on the intellectual life of peasant communities, challenging the view that they were passive recipients of ideas emanating from pulpit and manor house .

Margaret Spufford combined a high level of scholarship with a lightness of touch, and the great strength of her approach to the intellectual world of the ordinary English villager lay in the fact that her social history was firmly rooted in a hard-headed analysis of differences of wealth, agricultural systems and patterns of communication.

Her Contrasting Communities, which came out in 1974, examined three villages from the fenland, clay and chalk regions of Cambridgeshire, from 1525 to 1700, and in addition to examining their patterns of land tenure, discussed the educational opportunities open to peasant communities and the disturbance in their traditional devotional practices occasioned by the Reformation.

During her researches Margaret Spufford came across numerous examples of grass-roots literacy, including references to “little books” being sold by itinerant pedlars. Convinced that fellow historians were being conservative in their estimates of reading ability, she examined the spread of chapbooks (an early type of popular printed literature) which became available in the 17th century at prices within reach of a day labourer.

In Small Books and Pleasant Histories: Popular fiction and its readership in 17th century England (1981), she showed that elementary schooling was much more widely available than previously thought, generating a mass readership for what one publisher touted as “Small Godly Books, Small Merry Books, Double Books and History”. Among other things her examination of courtship dialogues from such works as Cupid’s Solicitor of Love and The Lover’s Academy led her to challenge the view put forward by Lawrence Stone that the basis for marriage in this period was financial rather than romantic. Despite demographic conditions that might suggest otherwise, she wrote, “this, reflected in its own twopenny literature, was not a world in which people married for economic interest rather than inclination”.

She went on to write The Great Reclothing of Rural England: Petty Chapman and Their Wares in the Seventeenth Century (1984). This was a pioneering history of popular consumption in which Margaret Spufford focused on the itinerant pedlars who brought reading matter to the people — as well as clothes and haberdashery – showing where and when they were active, their ranks and their typical careers, the variety of wares they sold and the often hostile attitude of the authorities towards them.

All Margaret Spufford’s writings contained unforgettable portraits of individual men and women, from Sister Sneesby, an elderly, deaf Cambridgeshire widow working as a casual labourer whose baptist faith had been shaken by her reading Quaker books; to the young Oxfordshire shepherd (who could read but not write) who gave a lame young man one of his two sheep “to teach me to make the letters and joyn them together”; or the shipwrecked sailor selling “pictures, ballads, and other paper wares” bought on credit.

But to those who knew her well it was not so much her achievements as a historian that marked Margaret Spufford out as the fact that she accomplished her work in the shadow of her own chronic ill-health and that of her daughter, Bridget, who was born with a serious genetic disorder and died at the age of 22.

Honor Margaret Clark was born in Cheshire on December 10 1935 to parents who were both scientists. Her father was head of research at ICI Alkali and, before her marriage, her mother had been a fellow of Newnham College, Cambridge.

Margaret was home-educated for much of her childhood by her mother, who taught her to read using headlines in The Daily Telegraph. When she was just 10, however, her mother had a devastating stroke. Possibly as a consequence, Margaret suffered from nervous illnesses for much of her early life, which led her to drop out of Newnham. None the less she went on to take an MA in local history at Leicester University, with distinction, followed by a PhD, after which she launched herself on her academic career.

After four years as a research fellow at Lucy Cavendish College, Cambridge, she became a lecturer at Keele University. She returned to Cambridge in 1979 as a senior research associate at the History faculty and a fellow of Newnham College. Although the university never gave her a properly paid job, over the next 15 years she assembled and nurtured one of the most important groupings of young early modern English social and cultural historians, known as “the Spuffordians”, with whom she produced The World of Rural Dissenters (1995), an influential collective work on patterns of religious dissent in England.

In 1994 she was appointed Research Professor in Social and Local History at the Roehampton Institute (then part of the University of London, and now Roehampton University). While she was there, she began the British Academy Hearth Tax Project, which launched a series of edited texts, with critical introductions, of the hearth tax records of late 17th century England. Eight large county volumes had been published by the time of her death, and a two-volume edition for the hearth tax of London and Middlesex, is at the press.

In 1962 Margaret had married Peter Spufford, who would become a leading medieval monetary historian at Cambridge and with whom she formed a close and formidable academic partnership. But while pregnant with their first child, Francis, now a successful author and broadcaster, Margaret developed excruciating pains in her back and foot. Three years after her son’s birth, a daughter, Bridget, was born, and the pain returned. Eventually Margaret was diagnosed with a rare and severe form of osteoporosis and for the rest of her life she suffered back and limb pain of increasing and disabling intensity.

Worse still, a few months after her birth, Bridget became ill. One of her kidneys failed and the other was found to be malfunctioning. Doctors diagnosed a very rare genetic disorder called cystinosis and gave her between seven and 14 years to live. Terrible and invasive treatments followed, including two kidney transplants. Some of Contrasting Communities was written while Margaret Spufford was flat on her back helped by a machine which enabled her to read her sources and write her text. The book was completed during months spent in Great Ormond Street hospital with Bridget.

In 1996 Margaret Spufford was appointed OBE for services to Social History and to disabled students. After Bridget died in 1989 she established a trust to support a hostel for severely disabled students in Cambridge, enabling young people to study and live independently as Bridget had not. The hostel flourished for 12 years from 1991 to 2003.

In a deeply moving, book, Celebration (1989), Margaret Spufford wrote of how, as a Christian and a mother, she dealt with, though never fully came to terms with, the sufferings of her child. She described the trauma of living on the frontiers of medical knowledge, torn between doctors wanting to try the latest hi-tech medical intervention and the feeling that the most humane option would be to let nature take its course.

Throughout her ordeals, Margaret Spufford was sustained by the deep faith that led her to become an Anglican Benedictine oblate. But she admitted: “If those theologians who assert that God is in total control of His creation are right, I cannot worship Him. Integrity demands that I do hand in my ticket. For I still cannot cope with the endemic nature of pain. And integrity has to come higher than anything else at all, even God, or at least my present perception of Him.”

Margaret Spufford was elected a fellow of the British Academy in 1995. At the time she became too ill to continue her work she was serving as an adviser to a group of Japanese historians carrying out research into local communities in early-modern Japan and had almost completed The Clothing of the Common Sort, which is being prepared for publication by her last research student.

She is survived by her husband Peter, Emeritus Professor of European History in the University of Cambridge, and her son.

Professor Margaret Spufford, born December 10 1935, died March 6 2014

Guardian:

My daughter and I were at a convent in southern Tanzania. After our meal (Pay as you throw, foraging and biogas: how the globe tackles food waste, 29 March) we scraped our leftovers on to one plate, to be given to the pigs. But the sisters took the plate back, and rearranged the scraps “for the builders” working on the site. Then they ground down the inedible rinds and shells “for the fish” in the pond.
Bridget Gubbins
Morpeth, Northumberland

•  Sandi Toksvig says: “Today, the Marriage (Same-Sex Couples) Act comes into force and now every citizen is free to get married” (Family, 29 March). Unfortunately it’s not quite everybody. If you have a civil partnership you are unable to get married until the government works out how it could be done. It’s suggested it may be the end of this year, but until then we are not all equal.
Kate Gwynfyd-Sidford
Pontrhydfendigaid, Ceredigion

• Your article (Kate Bush and couscous: the VIP concert, G2, 31 March) sums up the London-centric view of the world. In discussing corporate hospitality packages, you tell us that the singer recently announced a 15-date tour. Well, excuse me, since when did a “tour” involve going to a single London venue and playing all the dates at that single venue?
Tony Fletcher
Neath

•  Down in the soft south, where people apologise if you tread on their foot, buses may well proclaim “Sorry, I’m not in service” (Letters, 27 March), but here in the plain-spoken north we make do with “Not in service” without the apology and the anthropomorphic pronoun.
Harry Watson
Edinburgh

• Perhaps it was the same monoglot Brit (Letters, 27 March) that I met some years ago frantically ringing the bell outside the Hôtel de Ville in Les Sables-d’Olonne, France. I was able to point out a real hotel and tell him the opening hours of the town hall.
Paul Tattam
Teignmouth

• Getting bored with funny place names (Letters, 31 March), although Durham’s Pity Me seems appropriate.
Margaret Davis
London

l/Getty Images

Chris Huhne’s observations on Ukip voters in the wake of the Farage-Clegg debate (Comment, 31 March) show exactly why some prefer Ukip to the mainstream parties. What arrogance and insensitivity. So Ukip voters are old, fearful, anxious and poorly educated? Has Huhne considered that they might just be thoroughly fed up with the failure of other parties to represent their interests?

Huhne refers to the recent mayoral win by the Front National at Hénin-Beaumont in France as an example of how the far right appeals to the “threatened working class”. In fact, it’s a good example of what can happen when a mainstream party messes up. The seat was targeted by the Front National after a Socialist mayor resigned following a financial scandal that emptied the mayoral coffers.

I live in the Tory heartland of Kent, as dissimilar to Huhne’s caricature Ukip constituency as one can get. At a recent council byelection, a local independent beat the Conservative into second place (by 323 votes to 240), while Ukip won 97 votes compared with the Liberal Democrats‘ 13. I don’t believe this pattern of support reflects in any way the level of education, age or psychological state of local voters, but rather a genuine attempt by people to choose someone that best represents their – and their community’s – interests.
Mary Braithwaite
Wye, Kent

•  Chris Huhne’s position is, in effect, that the uneducated plebs will vote for Farage because they are irrational, but eventually they will recognise that their masters and betters have got their interests at heart, and will return to the fold when “better times [prick] Farage’s bubble”. There are many reasons for the growth in working-class support for Ukip, but one that stands out is disgust with the kind of patrician contempt that allows Huhne to dismiss the fear of poverty and insecurity as “a vision of a better yesterday”. National chauvinism as represented by Ukip is no answer to the threats working-class communities face, but nor was it an answer when the same card was played by Labour, the Lib Dems or the Tories. Still, at least Huhne can be happy with the better class of voters who have benefited from “higher education” when they turn out in single figures for the Lib Dems.
Nick Moss
London

•  As a frequent Guardian reader, I am probably untypical of Ukip supporters, but I am motivated by the hope that I may find convincing rational arguments to counter my political prejudices, rather than have them reinforced elsewhere. Chris Huhne’s article was clearly written to reinforce the prejudices of his fellow travellers rather than address the real issues at stake. His insults ranged at Ukip supporters – that they are stupid smokers, insecure and authoritarian similar to American Tea Partyists, creationists, global-warming deniers and heirs to the views of some obscure French wartime collaborator – may resonate with some but don’t square with his appeal for a concentration on the facts.

At the heart of Ukip’s appeal, and courageously put by Nigel Farage, is the overwhelming suspicion that within the EU we are losing our hard-won ability to elect and hold accountable those who claim the right to govern us.
Mike Gomersall
Airton, North Yorkshire

•  The EU has been “poking the Russian bear with a stick”, “feeding Ukraine with an entirely unrealistic dream of a future as an EU member state”, and “deepening Syria’s civil war by giving false hope to forces hoping to topple Assad”. The good news is that at last we have a prominent figure in this country’s political life voicing these views; the bad news is that it is Farage (Report, 28 March).

Polly Toynbee urges us to “forget tactics” and “stand up and rally against the Ukip vision” (Comment, 28 March), and provides a useful catalogue of reasons for repudiating Ukip’s obnoxious policies. She omits, however, any mention of the one point that illustrates so clearly that if a liberal current of opinion fails to take a lead in opposing unjust policies, then a reactionary one will exploit the opportunity for its own demagogic purposes.
Hugh Goodacre
University of Westminster and University College London

• When is someone going to talk in favour of our EU membership with as much passion as Farage argues against it (Voters give credit to Farage in head-to-head with Clegg, 27 March)? Have several decades of rightwing anti-European propaganda browbeaten everyone else into submission? The fact is that if Britain were to leave the EU, all our pretensions to world influence would be over; whatever freedom we have left over our own national destiny in this age of giant trading blocks and multinational companies would be gone; and we would resume the national decline that began after the second world war (although some would say it started long before that).

The only sensible course of action for this smallish island nation is to engage as fully as possible with the EU, and become a leading and powerful member within it. We can influence decisions to our own benefit. We can sway opinion to swing laws, rules and regulations our way. We can make life better for ourselves and for the other members of the EU. All we have to do is recognise that we would be mad to leave the EU, and declare it with as much passion as Farage argues against it.

And please, for those who have forgotten what it used to be like in Europe before the EU, just observe Russia’s casual annexation of Crimea.
Steve Moran
East Grinstead, West Sussex

•  European membership is more than a question of economic benefits to the UK and has to be seen in a wider world context. Farage and Clegg both trivialised the debate and failed to create either a sense of vision or address the need for reform within the EU that can offer real hope for those in the UK who fear they are being disadvantaged by EU membership.

Although I am culturally English, my passport tells me I am British, but I went to college in England, Scotland and France, married a Dane and have an Anglo-Danish son. I think I am typical of a generation of British-born people for whom integration has already happened and Europe is seen as a continent of opportunities and friendships not to be feared. I am also old enough to remember the second world war and recognise that the EU has brought peace and prosperity to the older democracies and hope to the newer countries that have emerged from years of dictatorship including Portugal, Spain, Greece, East Germany, the old Yugoslavia, Albania etc.

We need statesmen to lead us, not self-serving politicians trading dubious statistics. Angela Merkel seem to be the only European leader with that sense of vision and statesmanship, but then she speaks from the experience of growing up in the totalitarian regime of East Germany.
Ian Haywood
London

The one thing lacking in your otherwise excellent coverage of the latest devastating IPCC report on the likely impacts of climate change was a sense of urgency. Your editorial (31 March) suggests that the report represents a “careful, nuanced attempt to wake people up”.  But these very same alarm bells have been sounding ever louder since the first IPCC report was published nearly 25 years ago, yet over that same period annual global greenhouse gas emissions have risen by 60%.

As a result, an increasing number of experts agree that we will need to leave around 80% of known fossil fuel reserves in the ground if we’re to have any chance of avoiding 2 degrees warming.

Yet just a few weeks ago, the chancellor gave yet more tax breaks to oil and gas companies, boasting that the government intends to get “every last drop” of oil from the North Sea, while fracking company Cuadrilla’s boss, John Browne – former chair of BP – has promised to invest “whatever it takes” to get more fossil fuels out of the ground.

But the stone age didn’t end because we ran out of stone. It ended because we found smarter ways of doing things – and there are huge numbers of smarter ways of generating energy.

In Balcombe, for example, which last summer saw unprecedented protests against the prospect of fracking, a new clean energy co-op has been set up, which aims to build enough community-owned solar power to match the electricity needs of every home in the village. Profits from the scheme will go back into the village, funding more solar installations, and energy-saving measures for homes and communities.

These positive stories are the best way to engage people with the need for urgent change. As the alarm bells on the climate crisis ring ever more loudly, we can only hope that this government removes its earplugs very soon.
Caroline Lucas MP
Green party, Brighton Pavilion

•  Today, the world’s top scientists published a devastating report on the impacts of climate change. Climate change is already making it harder for millions to feed their families. Wild weather and unpredictable seasons are causing chaos for farmers. Food prices are going up. Food quality is going down.

Oxfam calculates that climate change could put the fight against hunger back by decades. If we continue to let greenhouse gas emissions and temperatures rise we will hit a threshold – in our own lifetimes – beyond which the chance of ending hunger worldwide may be lost for ever.

We will not stand by and watch this happen. People all over the world are doing their bit to tackle climate change. Now governments and big business need to step up and play their part: reducing harmful greenhouse gas emissions, helping farmers adapt to changing weather and ensuring there’s enough good food for everyone.

If we act together, and if we act now, we can stop climate change causing hunger and ensure our children and our grandchildren will always have enough to eat.
Raymond Blanc Chef, Helena Christensen Photographer, Livia Firth Activist, Anna Friel Actor, Sheherazade Goldsmith Designer, Angelique Kidjo Musician, Baaba Maal Musician, Claus Meyer Chef, Dave Myers Chef, Richard Oliver Chef, Simon Pegg Comedian, Vivienne Westwood Designer, Thom Yorke Musician

Independent:

As principals of the 12 sixth form colleges in London, we are writing to express our dismay at the Government’s plan to spend £45m on the Harris Westminster Sixth Form (“The most expensive free school in Britain?”, 29 March).

Our colleges have experienced three budget cuts in three years, and we expect the Government to attempt to make a fourth cut to our funding later this year. As The Independent reported in February, this has led some institutions to cut courses and increase class sizes. In January, the Government said it could not introduce a VAT refund scheme for the sixth form college sector (to mirror the arrangements in place for free school sixth forms) as the £30m cost was unaffordable.

So it is entirely unjust that £45m has been found to establish an institution that will educate less than a fifth of the number of students currently enrolled at some of the existing sixth form colleges in London. The total capital budget for all 93 sixth form colleges in England last year was less than £60m.

Michael Gove is establishing institutions like the Harris Westminster Sixth Form to break down what he has described as the “Berlin Wall” between the state and independent sectors. He has only succeeded in creating a new divide – between new, generously funded and often highly selective free school sixth forms and the very successful network of state sixth form colleges they are modelled on.

The sixth form colleges in London have an excellent record of supporting young people from disadvantaged backgrounds to progress to top universities, including Oxford and Cambridge, and we do so without highly selective admissions policies. It does not make educational or economic sense to divert scarce resources away from the 20,000 16- to 18-year-olds currently studying at a sixth form college in London to benefit 500 young people at a highly selective institution in a very expensive part of the city.

We urge the Secretary of State to rethink his decision to spend £45m on this new institution, and ask that he redirect the investment to address the growing crisis in sixth form college funding.

Ken Warman, BSix Brooke House Sixth Form College

Eddie Playfair, Newham Sixth Form College

Jane Overbury, Christ the King Sixth Form College

Paul O’Shea, Saint Charles Catholic Sixth Form College

Brett Freeman, Coulsdon Sixth Form College

Andrew Parkin, Saint Dominic’s Sixth Form College

Paul Wakeling, Havering Sixth Form College

Stella Flannery, Saint Francis Xavier Sixth Form College

Tim Eyton-Jones, John Ruskin College

Paolo Ramella,  Sir George Monoux Sixth Form College

Kevin Watson, Leyton Sixth Form College

John Rubinstein, Woodhouse College

Your story “The most expensive free school in Britain?” contained inaccuracies and did not present a complete picture.

Westminster Sixth Form is an exciting and innovative project focused on the poorest in society that has never been tried before. At full capacity it will offer 300 places in each year group, giving hundreds of children from low-income families the kind of top-quality sixth form previously reserved for the better off. Westminster Sixth Form was assessed for value for money using standard Treasury tests and it passed precisely because it will open up opportunities to disadvantaged young people and their families.

Free schools offer good value for money and are opening at a fraction of the cost of previous programmes – new schools are now being built around 40 per cent cheaper than under the former government’s Building Schools for the Future programme. So far we have opened 174 free schools for 80,000 pupils, with the vast majority in areas facing a shortage of school places or in deprived communities.

It is also wrong and irresponsible to say that “there is expected to be a shortage of 240,000 primary school places by 2015”. We are giving councils £5bn to spend on new school places over this parliament – double the amount allocated by the previous government over a comparable period. This has already created 260,000 new school places, and many more are due to be delivered by 2015.

Lord Nash, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Schools, Department for Education

Black box that would stay afloat

The “black box” of the missing Malaysian airliner has not yet been recovered. We are told that it emits a locating signal once the aircraft crashes, but that it is difficult to detect if the aircraft has sunk into deep water, and furthermore is only emitted for about 30 days while the batteries contain sufficient charge.

Would it not be possible to incorporate an additional device into aircraft that would be designed to break free and float in the event of the plane landing in the sea? Such a device would emit a locating “ping” detectable from satellites and could incorporate a solar charger in order to maintain battery power indefinitely until the device is retrieved. Surely this is within the capabilities of aviation engineers.

Jonathan Wallace, Newcastle upon Tyne

We need more Tories like Tapsell

I wish a very happy retirement to Sir Peter Tapsell MP, who is standing down at the next election, but it will be a great shame to see him go.

He has been a Keynesian and pro-Commonwealth opponent of the Euro-federalist project from the start. He was scathingly anti-Thatcherite, to the point that, in 1981, he became the first Conservative to vote against a Conservative Budget since Harold Macmillan in the 1930s.

He has consistently opposed the neo-conservative wars all the way back to Kosovo, and only in the last fortnight he was asking on the floor of the House why, if Scotland could have a referendum on dissolving constitutional arrangements that went all the way back to 1707, Crimea could not have one on those which dated only from 1954.

He has called for a return to the division between retail banking and investment banking.

He has identified, in their seasons, the money markets, the media moguls and the intelligence agencies as the heirs of the nabobs and of the Whig magnates whom past generations of Tories had made it their defining cause to cut down to size and to subject to the sovereignty of Parliament.

Regardless of party, some other such figure must be elected in 2015. But who?

David Lindsay, Lanchester, Co Durham

Crimea: dangerous precedents

President Putin should bear in mind the adage about people who live in glass houses. The Russian Federation is a patchwork of nationalities and ethnic minorities whose disgruntled separatist elements must have learned something from the Crimea situation. Former Soviet allies may now see their Russian connections and Russian communities as potential pretexts for Anschluss and persuade them to seek better protection.

Hamid Elyassi, London E14

The UN has set a dangerous precedent in declaring the referendum in Crimea illegal. It was a secret ballot, and with 96 per cent voting in favour with an 80 per cent turnout, the result must be democratically safe.

If the argument is that the whole of Ukraine should have voted, then we need a referendum to establish whether Northern Ireland should remain part of the UK or become part of a united Ireland, with the whole of Ireland voting.

Malcolm Howard, Banstead, Surrey

Russia has annexed Crimea illegally but in accordance with the wishes of the majority of the people who live there. Israel annexed East Jerusalem illegally and contrary to the wishes of the majority of the people who live there.

Why are we applying sanctions against Russia but not Israel?

Gordon Broadbent, London SW15

Where is our pension compensation?

While Osborne may have decided to change the rules about how people coming up to retirement can use their “pension pot”, he was carefully silent about the millions of us who were constrained by the previous regime. If it is true that pensioners have lost out on the purchase of their annuities, should there not be some form of redress similar to the repayment of PPI. Perhaps it is time to refund some of the excessive fees and review the parsimonious interest rates that have condemned so many of us to a “baked beans” old age.

Simon Piney, Stroud, Gloucestershire

Reasons to boycott robot checkouts

All those readers who find automated checkouts distressing should note that the evidence of many studies suggests that the process of using one is also slower than using a manned till. Their sole purpose is to save on staff salaries, thus putting people out of work. If we all refused to use them (as I do) and insisted on using manned tills not only would they disappear, but the time we spend in queues and at the checkout would be diminished.

Michael O’Hare, Northwood, Middlesex

Times:

Sir, Oliver Kamm’s assertion that secular values, not religion, have made us a tolerant society (Thunderer, Mar 29) lacks intellectual rigour. It could be argued that the reason we have a modern, civilised democratic society in Britain is because of our Christian heritage, not despite it. Why else do modern democracies exist almost entirely in Western countries with a Christian heritage?

Kamm’s article implies that advances in civilisation and liberal democracy have taken place only in recent times, during which religious adherence has declined. This is not the case: it has been a long, slow process over decades, and even centuries, during which Christianity, with its emphasis on love of one’s neighbour, has prevailed as the norm. One has only to think of William Wilberforce’s fight to end the slave trade or the predominantly Christian founders of the modern Labour Party to find evidence of religion’s positive influence in creating a fairer society. On the other hand, one need look no further than Stalinist or Maoist Communism to find evidence of what aggressively secular, anti-religious thinking is capable of.

Hugh Rawson
London SW17

Sir, Oliver Kamm applauds Ian McEwan (Mar 28) for arguing that, “the secular mind is better equipped than religion to reach reasoned and compassionate judgments”. Tellingly, Kamm does not credit “religion” with a mind, although it is debatable whether the modern “enlightened” Western mind would have evolved without the input of Christianity. That aside, the allegation that faith is inherently lethal is itself a harmful misrepresentation which secularists indiscriminately employ to marginalise religion in the public sphere. Religion and for that matter secular belief systems are powerful because they motivate — for good or evil. They may indeed be dangerous, but that is likely to be when they are used to justify actions which their proponents take on grounds that contradict the core tenets of the religion they profess to follow. The rational response to the abuse of religion is to take theology seriously and to direct the force of faith to the compassion that is found in all the major world religions and is central to Christianity.

David Harte
Winchester

Sir, Oliver Kamm contrasts slaveowner Thomas Jefferson’s secular values with freedom fighter Jephthah’s rash promise. Comparing the best secular values with the worst religious ones doesn’t do justice to either. To compare the outcome of secular values with religious ones, it would be better to compare either best with best or worst with worst.

Tony Harrop
Reading, Berks

Sir, The book of Judges has as one of its main themes the lament that “in those days . . . everyone did as he saw fit”. The horrific sacrifice of Jephthah’s daughter that Oliver Kamm cites is one such example. Yet Judges is immediately followed by the book of Ruth, a story of self-sacrificial love and loyalty, and featuring a kinsman redeemer who is surely a foreshadow of Christ.

Kamm writes that religion “is more frequently a source of confusion rather than light”. Sadly that is more true of his own article.

Paul Harrod
Bristol

We agree that apprenticeships are central to developing the skilled workforce of the future…

Sir,

The Government recently announced further investment for apprenticeships.

We agree that apprenticeships are central to developing the skilled workforce of the future and it is encouraging to see cross-party support for them. However, we are concerned that by 2017 GCSEs will be the only way to meet maths and English requirements for apprenticeships.

Apprenticeships are about learning hands-on skills and gaining experience in the workplace. It makes sense that maths and English requirements for apprenticeships should be contextualised and practical too; this is not the case with GCSEs, which are primarily academic in focus.

Students know that maths and English are important. The City & Guilds Group’s research shows that 69% of young people believe maths can help them succeed, but also that 27% cannot see its relevance to their career goals. 54% of 16-18 year-olds think maths should involve more real-life scenarios. With National Numeracy reporting that poor adult maths skills could cost our economy £20 billion a year we should not let this problem persist.

The Government recently announced plans for a core maths qualification as a contextualised alternative for students who do not take A-level maths. Why not offer a similar option at GCSE level for students after 16? The Government can call it a GCSE if it wants to; as long as the qualification is practical, contextualised and rigorous.

Our economic future depends on a workforce that is not afraid of numbers and can apply maths, and indeed English, in the real world. GCSEs in their current form aren’t the only solution; the sooner the Government addresses this, the better.

Sir John Armitt CBE FREng FCGI, Chairman, City & Guilds and the Olympic Delivery Authority
Chris Jones, Chief Executive, The City & Guilds Group
Professor Dame Julia Higgins DBE FRS FREng FCGI, Vice-President, City & Guilds
Richard Sermon MBE HonFCGI, Vice-Chairman, City & Guilds
Sir Mike Tomlinson CBE HonFCGI, former HM Chief Inspector of Schools and Head of OFSTED
Valerie Bayliss CB FCGI, Former Vice-Chairman of City & Guilds
Steven Beharrell
Ian Billyard, Principal, Leeds College of Building
David Blake JP, Masons’ Company
Mary Crowley OBE, President, International Federation for Parenting Education
Air Commodore Peter Drissell FCGI, Director, Aviation Security, Civil Aviation Authority
Dame Jackie Fisher DBE FCGI, CEO, Barnfield Federation
Dr Paul Golby CBE FREng FCGI, Chairman, Engineering UK
Professor Brenda Gourley FCGI, former Vice-Chancellor, Open University
Professor Alison Halstead FCGI, Pro-Vice-Chancellor, Aston University
Professor Chris Hankin FCGI, Director, Institute for Security Science & Technology, Imperial College
Vikki Heywood CBE, Chairman of Council, Royal Society of Arts
Professor Sir Deian Hopkin FCGI, President, National Library of Wales
Michael Howell HonFCGI, Clothworkers’ Company and former Chairman, City & Guilds
David Illingworth, Past President, ICAEW
Blane Judd FCGI, Executive Consultant
Dame Asha Khemka, DBE, Principal and Chief Executive, West Nottinghamshire College
Michael Laurie, Saddlers’ Company
Mike Lee, Needlemakers’ Company
Marie-Therese McGivern, Principal, Belfast Metropolitan College
Peter McKee, Former President, TRL Technology
Andrew Morgan, Fishmongers’ Company
Toni Pearce, President, National Union of Students
John Randall FCGI, Independent Chair, Police Negotiating Board
Dr Maggie Semple OBE FCGI, Chief Executive, The Experience Corps
Iain Smith, CEO, Network for Skills Ltd
Andy Smyth, Accredited Programmes Development Manager, TUI UK
Daniel Stewart-Roberts, Grocers’ Company
Pat Stringfellow MBE HonFCGI, Managing Director, Human Resource Solutions
Peter Taylor, Director, Goldsmiths’ Centre
Dr Yvonne Thompson CBE, Managing Director, Asap Communications
Dr The Hon Sandy Todd, Salters’ Company
Clive Turrell, Joiners & Ceilers’ Company
Dawn Ward OBE FCGI, Chief Executive and Principal, Burton & South Derbyshire College
Jacquie Wathen, Mercers’ Company
Simon Wethered, Consultant, Charles Russell Solicitors
Dr David Wilbraham FCGI, Treasurer, City & Guilds
Tom Wilson, Director, unionlearn

How can Laura Craik write about stylish fedora-wearing without mentioning the charming and twinkling Leonard Cohen?

Sir, How can Laura Craik write about stylish fedora-wearing without mentioning Leonard Cohen (Magazine, Mar 29)? At 79 he is the embodiment of wise, twinkling, self-deprecating charm. While on tour last August he came down to breakfast at the Grand in Brighton in the suit and fedora he had worn for his breath-taking concert the evening before. Typically, he waited his turn to be shown to a table. As he walked through the dining room, he responded with grace and warmth to the numerous fans. Stopping at the end of the room before entering the main section of the restaurant, he lifted the fedora, smiled broadly and thanked us, his friends, for everything. If you’re looking for “brilliantly louche”, not to mention warm, funny and wise, Leonard is your man.

Jane Duffield-Bish
Hethersett, Norwich

The judgments of many teachers will be suspect given the lack of central guidance, particularly in the first few years…

Sir, Libby Purves underplays the difficulties facing schools by testing all children at the age of 4 (Opinion, Mar 31). With the demise of national curriculum levels and descriptors, teachers are left with devising “age-related expectations of performance” as they attempt to gauge progress. The judgments of many teachers will be highly suspect given the lack of central guidance, particularly in the first few years of any new system. In other words, they’ll default to comparing a child’s progress to some ill-defined expectation of an “average” child, based on his or her performance in a very narrow range of measures as they start formal schooling — actually a test of parents rather than teachers. Yet the wonder of children is that they all develop differently, and not one of the country’s 14 million children could ever be called “average”.

Neil Roskilly
Independent Schools Association

The ongoing decline in legal aid funding for experts is driving many highly skilled professionals out of the courts

Sir, Robert Buckland’s plan to make deliberate harm of a child’s physical, intellectual, emotional, social or behavioural development a crime is to be welcomed (report, Mar 31). However, many of the prosecutions that will arise will have to be undertaken without the expert advice that Mr Buckland has suggested will be required. This is because the ongoing decline in legal aid funding for experts is driving many highly skilled professionals out of the courts. It is to be hoped that the Government will seek to reverse this decline.

Dr Peter Green
London SW12

To qualify for this reduction, prisoners must also submit a grammatically sound, legible essay on each title

Sir, Rather than preventing prisoners from receiving books, Chris Grayling should adopt the Brazilian “redemption through reading” programme. Through reading works of literature, philosophy and science, prisoners in Brazil can reduce their sentences by up to 48 days a year. To qualify for this reduction, prisoners must also submit a grammatically sound, legible essay on each title.

This approach would not only reduce overcrowding in prisons in Britain but would improve educational standards within prisons.

Andrew Copeman
London SW18

Telegraph:

SIR – On the A10 between Cambridge and Ely a large rookery on either side of the road stretches for at least a mile.

I have noticed that while some trees have two or three nests in, others have at least eight, 10, or more.

Do rooks have “family” trees?

Susan Spencer
Cambridge

SIR – The real problem with woodpigeons is that they don’t just eat the food on the bird-table – they fill their crops with it for later.

Thus two of the beasts can, in minutes, clear the table of what was intended to keep a whole squadron of smaller birds happy all day.

They also make a mess that necessitates frequent scrubbing of the bird table with boiling water.

Huw Walton
Chepstow, Monmouthshire

SIR – LikeBrian Sewell I am homosexual and not comfortable with the word gay, which is a cop-out, a dilution of the true state of homosexuality.

I too am opposed to “gay marriage”. Talk of equality is baffling, since heterosexual couples cannot enter civil partnerships while same-sex partners can also marry. Nor is it valid to equate what has just been made legal with all the modifications to marriage through the ages. They involved marriage with members of the opposite sex. No comparison lies down that road.

Mr Sewell gets to the heart of the matter in pointing out the uniqueness of marriage and why it should have stayed as it was. The union of a man and a woman has the potential, even if not the result, of producing children. Union between two people of the same sex never can. The institution of marriage was established to manage such procreation.

The issue has encouraged gesture politics, including the Prime Minister’s posturing assertion: “I am for gay marriage not despite being a Conservative but because I am a Conservative.”

Mr Sewell finally points out that the battle should be against prejudice. Will those who continue to be prejudiced against people like him and me be won over by this new law, especially in light of a fifth of the population or more not wanting to accept an invitation to a ceremony now covered by it?

Edward Thomas
Eastbourne, East Sussex

SIR – Brian Sewell writes: “Most of us are content with what we have.” I, for one, am extremely pleased that, for the first time in my 46 years, I am now equal under the law.

After serving 10 years in the military and then being ejected for reasons of sexual orientation, I will not tolerate sub-standard treatment by society because of whom I choose to have relationships with.

It could be argued that it is precisely because of those like Mr Sewell, with his willingness to tolerate discrimination, that gay members of society have had to suffer inequalities as prescribed by Parliament since the Labouchere Amendment of 1885.

This decision by the Coalition government may cost them votes at the next election but I heartily congratulate it.

Andrew Tuckwell
Plymouth, Devon

SIR – To paint the Mona Lisa required Leonardo and his subject, Lisa Gherardini. If his studio had held two artists, or two Lisas, the crowd in the Louvre would have a blank wall to look at. Marriage is about a couple complementing each other in every way, not just in mutual satisfaction. It exists that we might be fruitful.

As a lifelong scientist, I fail to see how gay marriage can ever fulfil its name. Even in an age that widely wants to believe the opposite, I am evidently far from alone. I never will be; and science, like common sense, operates by logic, not prejudice.

George B Hill
Sandbach, Cheshire

Irish Times:

Sir, – Una Mullaly argues that citizens are disappointed by the lack of progress of “reform” since the 2011 general election (Opinion, March 31st).

While I share her appetite for a changed society, the media analysis on this issue is increasingly trite and too focused on the failures of politicians.

While many in the media regularly express disappointment at Government inaction on reform, I’m not so sure that many Irish citizens necessarily feel the same way.

For example, close to 50 per cent of the population still voted for the conservative parties of Fine Gael and Fianna Fail in the “radical election” of 2011. The Irish people voted to keep the clapped-out Seanad and rejected a proposal to strengthen Oireachtas committees. Only a minority of our citizens bothered to vote and put children’s rights in the Constitution in 2012.

Next year the Government will hold a referendum on same-sex marriage. I have no doubt that the usual forces of apathy and conservatism will resist this, as happens every time a Government feels brave enough to put its ahead above the parapet and propose a social reform to the Constitution. To succeed, the campaign will need to be hard fought by civil society and individual citizens alike. Politicians alone, it seems, simply cannot win the argument.

Given the record of recent referendums, you can hardly blame politicians for being reluctant to spend their political capital on reforms towards which the population seem at best apathetic.

Rather than another critique of the failure of top-down reform, I’d prefer to see a wider discussion of why our citizenry has become so apathetic and uninterested in how our society is governed. Yours, etc,

IAN O’MARA,

Haddington Road,

Dublin 4

Sir, – Finding an individual to lead the Garda Síochána in the 21st century is not going to be easy. The recent problems it has encountered and the difficulties it has endured are a wake-up call to policy-makers in the Republic to realign the priorities of its police and reintegrate them into the body politic of the nation.

The police do not operate in a vacuum. They are answerable to the law, accountable to the public they serve and are quite correctly subject to the forensic scrutiny of an investigative media.

Their practices and procedures should be transparent and articulated to the public in a coherent and unambiguous way. But who is to bell this cat, An Garda Síochána?

The next commissioner should not, under any circumstances be appointed from the existing management team at Phoenix Park. This has too much of a “Buggin’s turn” flavour about it and existing senior officers are carrying far too much baggage.

No, the next officer-in-command should be appointed from a reservoir of proven talent in industry, the professions and science.

Those charged with the responsibility of appointing the next chief should do so expeditiously – and yet with caution. The person selected has an overflowing in-tray to tackle. Good luck to whoever gets that poison chalice. He or she will need it.

Yours, etc,

FRANK GREANEY,

Lonsdale Road,

Formby,

Liverpool

Sir, – If institutional Ireland were a stick of rock, the words “loyalty is prized above honesty” would run through it. The Irish authorities always choose loyalty. Yours, etc,

JEANETTE F HUBER,

Ard na Lir,

Scilly,

Kinsale,

Co Cork

Sir, – Your report (March 28th) on the plans of BW Energy and the Rethink Pylons group for a pylon-free alternative to Grid25 raises important issues of national significance, as access to a reliable, affordable and clean energy supply is vital for our national well-being. The case for co-firing biomass at Moneypoint instead of increasing our use of wind-led renewables looks compelling on the grounds of cost, energy security and reliability.

Even more compelling is the argument for replacing Moneypoint with small nuclear reactors. For example, the proposed biomass option has an estimated fuel cost of around €75 per MWh while the small nuclear option has a fuel cost of only €8 per MWh. A nuclear plant at Moneypoint would also reduce emissions cheaply and safely while requiring no new pylons or overhead lines.

The primary advantage of biomass over nuclear is that biomass is classified as renewable while nuclear is not. However, both are low-carbon options and it is the low-carbon aspect that will be most important beyond 2020. In the post-2020 world, the economics of small reactors will be vital in helping us reduce our emissions in a cost-effective manner.

Perhaps a useful compromise would be to convert the peat stations to burn more biomass while replacing Moneypoint with small nuclear plant when it closes in 2025? This would satisfy our renewables mandate and reduce emissions while keeping the cost of low-carbon energy affordable.

If the Rethink Pylons report does nothing more than stimulate a much needed rational analysis of all our electricity supply options for the coming decades it will have been well worthwhile.

Such analysis has been lacking to date and the consequences for our economy and our citizens could be far-reaching. As Solomon once said: “Without foresight, the people perish.” – Yours, etc,

DENIS DUFF,

Burnaby Woods,

Greystones,

Co Wicklow

Sir, – At a time when Trinity College ought to be eagerly promoting its status as one of the seven premier ancient universities of these islands as its most potent weapon in an ever decreasing armoury of internationally recognised competitive advantages, the board of the college seems to have embarked on a fundamentally misguided campaign of destructive self-effacement (“Is nothing sacred? Trinity drops the Bible”, March 29th).

Leaving aside the aesthetic shortcomings of the new “corporate identity” (numerous as they are) and the fact that the college cannot unilaterally change its arms without making application for a new grant of arms to the relevant heraldic authority, when the board of a university is concerned that the institution may be associated with the alleged cut-price tawdriness of Ikea and Ryanair, it says more about lack of confidence in the brand of the university than it does about its visual identity.

One does not see the University of Cambridge concerned that it may be identified with the values McDonald’s nor the University of Oxford concerned that it may be associated with those of Lidl. In such challenging times of necessary change, the board of Trinity College would be well advised to take better care of its stock of existing selling points and avoid throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

Yours, etc,

KYLE LEYDEN,

Pall Mall,

London

Sir, – With regard to the proposed changes to the logo of Trinity College and the reasons/excuses being offered for these changes, is one allowed to ask just how far this political correctness (read madness) will be allowed to go? I am quite sure that when a prospective student considers a number of universities, the institution’s logo, or its perceived “inclusiveness”, must be well down on the list. Surely what makes a university inclusive in fact is how it treats its students. One might also ask if the political correctness behind this decision is to be extended to any crests that might be embedded in the college’s masonry.

In an era of harsh economic reality, where funding for education should be used to draw out its optimum value, it beggars belief that such time, energy and resources should be devoted to a process which resulted in such an extraordinary decision. Yours, etc,

ANGELA CURRIE,

Garland Hill,

Sir, – In the media the Minister for Health, Dr James Reilly continues to state that GPs in Ireland are among the highest-earning doctors in Europe and that having 1,000 medical card patients on one’s books is worth €250 000 per annum to a GP practice.

As a former GP and also a former president of the Irish Medical Organisation, the Minister knows this to be obtusely untrue.

Dr Reilly is clearly spinning stories for the benefit of his Oireachtas colleagues and attempting to manipulate the opinion of the general public on this matter.

I would like to respectfully ask the Minister to desist from this unhelpful and mischievous propaganda and I challenge him to produce the documentation to support either of his claims.

General practice is now failing and sadly most of the destruction is at the hands of this Minister.

Dr Reilly’s only legacy will be that of dismantling the one part of the health service that actually worked, the one part that had no waiting lists, the one part of the health service that was value for money and the one part of the health service that consistently delivered the highest satisfaction rate among patients.

If he continues down this path of destruction it could take decades to recover what he has done in three short years.

The Minister has the foundations of a first-class health system at his fingertips. We have the best-trained doctors in the world and we are the envy of Europe with regard to our practising doctors.

For the sake of our families, our friends and our future the Minister must stop the systematic devastation of family medicine in Ireland, he must follow the lead of his colleagues in Europe and the rest of the world, invest in general practice and build a health service we can be proud of, not one of which we are ashamed. Yours, etc,

CHRIS GOODEY,

Chief Executive Officer,

National Association

of General Practitioners,

Kildare Street,

Dublin 2

Sir, – Regarding Dr Muiris Houston’s “Medical Matters” column (March 25th) I think the heading’s suggestion that “summer time can be fraught with danger” gives a misleading impression, for though the actual time changes at the end of March and in October have been shown to be associated with an increase in accidents, summer time itself is surely of benefit to society as a whole.

Many, I know, greet the arrival of summer time with relief and dread the early advent of darkness in autumn. Personally, like Muiris, I would love to see the reintroduction of double summer time, remembering it nostalgically from my youth.

Failing that why not change to be on a par with Spain and other EU countries. I know Senator Feargal Quinn and others would favour this.

Surely our longer daylight hours would benefit the economy, tourism, energy conservation, the elderly like me, those suffering from SADS and those needing exercise and outdoor activities for medical and social reasons.

Yours, etc,

HENDY JOYCE,

Dublin Road,

Arklow

Sir, – As usual at this time of the year, when the clocks change from Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) to British Summer Time (BST), there is a clamour to scrap the change and move permanently to BST. If we have BST all year long then in midwinter it will remain dark until about 9.15am. Some of your readers will recall a three-year experiment in the late 1960s when the clocks did not change to GMT. The idea was abandoned due to a sharp rise in the deaths of schoolchildren on the roads in the early morning. Yours, etc,

TIM BRACKEN,

Blarney St,

Cork

Sir, – I find myself in total agreement with John Devlin’s argument (Letters, March 29th) that the “best way young children learn is via a teacher, chalk, books and pupil interaction” .

It is really a no-brainer to follow the way of Silicon Valley, where “the top primary schools have banned computers from the learning process ”.

Take a look at what the developmental psychologist Jean Piaget says: “Each time one prematurely teaches a child something he could have discovered himself, that child is kept from inventing it and consequently from understanding it completely.”

Overdependence on screens for information stunts oral expression and calculation. Ask most people when will Easter fall this year and they will generally take out their screens to answer!

Written communication also suffers from the use of screens. Being involved in primary education and communication I come acrross the increasing poverty of the written and oral word every day of my life. I believe I am not alone in this observation. DH Lawrence advised us: “Be still when you have nothing to say; when genuine passion moves you, say what you have to say and say it hot.” – Yours, etc,

BRENDA MORGAN,

Asgard Park,

Howth,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – Donald Clarke’s article (“Clubs where women aren’t welcome to join”, March 29th) is fine as far as it goes, but this subject has been discussed so many times before and one of the points clearly established is that both men and women are entitled to join clubs catering for their own sexes (and indeed do so). When Mr Clarke attacks men-only clubs as “reactionary” but ignores women-only clubs (of whose existence he must also surely be aware) he just ends up sounding reactionary himself.

As Mr Justice O’Higgins famously said in the course of the High Court case involving Portmarnock Golf Club in 2005: “it is permissible to have – exclusively – a bridge club for Bulgarians, a chess club for Catholics, a wine club for women and a golf club for gentlemen”. Perhaps it is Mr Clarke rather than the clubs who needs to be dragged “kicking and screaming into the 19th century”? Yours, etc,

WILLIAM MONGEY,

Ard Haven,

Waterford

Sir, – Perhaps not many of your readers are great users of public transport. Let me therefore point out a rather disconcerting phenomenon now frequently observed on Dublin buses, namely the application of make-up (by ladies). We hear much of health and safety. Is there not a danger that an errant mascara wand could deliver a nasty poke in the eye were a bus to brake suddenly. Then there’s the question of propriety. What next? Nail clipping on the 15B? A little light depilation on the 46A. — Yours, etc,

FRANK BYRNE,

Cormac Terrace,

Terenure,

Dublin 6W

Sir, – I write in response to Vincent Browne’s column (“Big Issues ignored as Callinan resigns”, March 26th). It is untrue to assert that deference to status or wealth is the motivation behind the assistance of the Catholic Communications Office at certain Catholic funerals.

Among the services offered by the CCO, one is to assist a parish as it responds to the demands of media queries and/or media presence at a particular local funeral. The CCO enables media personnel to access accurate information regarding the funeral liturgy. Feedback indicates that this is viewed as a useful service. Yours, etc,

MARTIN LONG,

Catholic Communications

Office,

Maynooth,

Co Kildare

Sir, – Your heading above Chris Garvey’s letter (“Uses for Ireland’s boglands”, March 29th) tickled my funny bone. I expected to read of development proposals for the barren terrain bounded by Merrion Street to the east and Kildare Street to the west, where the living dead stumble into fetid drowning pools, strange animals roam, vultures swoop, and no birds sing!

Yours, etc,

OLIVER McGRANE,

Marley Avenue,

Rathfarnham,

Dublin 16

Sir, – The most recent political poll suggests that a sizeable percentage of us are not satisfied with the manner in which the Government is administering the justice system and we are opting for Sinn Féin as an alternative. Hmm. Yours, etc,

CON WOODS,

Newmarket on Fergus,

Co Clare

Irish Independent:

Also in this section

Pylons will mutilate our beautiful countryside

Think the unthinkable

Speak about feelings

The Lord Mayor and the burghers in Cork City Hall have decided in their expansive wisdom and generosity that President Michael D Higgins should shortly be given the Freedom of the City.

No great harm in that, you might say – the only problem is that we, the ordinary people of Cork, will, as usual, end up footing the rather expensive bill through our rates, property and other taxes.

Conversely, there is no money for those citizens who are crippled with negative equity and unsustainable and crucifying debts, no money for the many children daily going hungry to school, no money for the homeless, the aged and the disabled or the thousands who are jobless and in despair.

No money to bring home the thousands of our young and not so young who have been forced to emigrate. No money for our struggling small businesses or to fix our potholed and broken roads.

Miraculously, however, we have plenty of money for a meaningless shindig in the present economic climate and in the throes of a raging recession.

It is, of course, in microcosm, another measure of the disdain and disconnect that those in positions of power and influence have for the lives and travails of ordinary citizens who have been force fed on debilitating austerity for the last six years.

No doubt the people of Cork and elsewhere will express their feelings on this and other matters next May.

JOHN HEALY

BISHOPSTOWN ROAD, CORK

HEARTWARMING STORY

* Reading the Irish Independent on March 24, a beautiful photograph on page 14 caught my attention; surgeon Pat Kiely and formerly conjoined twins Hussein and Hassan Benhaffaf from Cork.

Speaking as a co-founder of charity Straight Ahead (which I confess I was unaware of), Dr Kiely referred to problems caused by delays in carrying out spinal surgery on children at Crumlin and Tallaght hospitals.

Dr Kiely and his fellow surgeons have already given up their free time to operate on 26 children at no cost to the parents.

The twins’ mother, Angie, was quoted as saying “their generosity moves me . . . what they do is life changing”.

It was heartening to hear of such dedication and generosity at a time when we have been bombarded with stories of the obscenely high executive salaries/pensions in organisations like CRC, Rehab, etc – some even having the nerve to tell us they should be earning more and are entitled to bonuses but have (generously) not taken them for four years!

Do these people realise or care about the enormous damage being done to the whole charity sector?

Well done to Dr Kiely and fellow surgeons for the wonderful work you do.

JOHN O’DONOGHUE

MOHILL, CO LEITRIM

HELPING CHILDREN

* I write regarding Sinead Moriarty’s comment piece entitled ‘We’re too busy being paranoid to help a child in distress’ (Irish Independent, March 28).

About three years ago, I noticed two small children playing on a narrow path outside a newsagent’s beside a very busy roundabout in south Co Dublin. I advised the older one, a five-year-old boy, to please be very careful as it was just at dusk and traffic was heavy.

They were still there when I came out and I asked if their mother was in the shop. They said, ‘No, she’s gone to work’. It transpired that the five-year-old was ‘looking after’ his three-year-old sister. I took them to the far side of the road where the path was much wider and safer, and decided I should wait with them until a parent arrived to collect them.

Around 20 minutes later, I asked the boy if he knew where his house was and he pointed to the far side of the roundabout. It seems he had navigated this roundabout safely earlier!

We began to walk, me hoping we were going the right way, and the children chatting away happily. We reached their house about 10 minutes later to find people running around frantically looking for them, including their father who had just fallen asleep in the chair and was horrified to know they had gone so far from home.

I was very glad that I was the person who found them, but the thing is it never crossed my mind to call the police or that my motives might be suspect to anyone. I just wanted to know that they got safely home.

As a mother of four adult children, I would always be very aware of a child with apparently no adult accompanying them.

LILIAN CHAMBERS

BLACKROCK, DUBLIN

TIME FOR THE UNSELFIE

* The so-called selfie in our brave new world serves as the ultimate distraction. One’s self.

This, if I may say so, to use a word of some disputation currently, is little short of being “disgusting”.

Great hardship is being endured by men, women and children in this country and in countries across the world, and to propagate the concept that the self or narcissistic preoccupation should prevail is to veer dangerously close to fascism.

It is a time not for the selfie but for the antithesis of the selfie.

The unselfie.

JOHN KELLY

MULLINGAR, CO WESTMEATH

21ST-CENTURY THINKING

* There is need for far fresher ideas than those implemented by Government (Editorial, Irish Independent, March 31) to overcome the unemployment problems that are accumulating in an entirely unprecedented work situation.

Work is being eliminated on a truly massive scale by rampant automation and much more than stopgap programmes for a few is needed.

There is need on a world basis, or at least a large trading bloc such as the EU or US, to move to much shorter hours, longer holidays and earlier retirement for all.

The maths are simple; more people working less or fewer people working more.

There is also need for Government to generate much more public service employment. Private enterprise will require fewer people even working shorter hours as technology advances.

Employment change is the most urgent crisis we face; greater even than climate change. If employment escalates out of control, as it will without drastic action, and society breaks down, climate change will matter only to the birds.

We need 21st-century thinking for 21st-century employment. There seems little sign of any yet.

PADRAIC NEARY

TUBBERCURRY, CO SLIGO


Mary Home

$
0
0

2 April 2014 Mary home
I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. They have to search for a stolen yacht Priceless
Mary Home, Peter mr Sorenson we are both very tired
No Scrabble today, too tired Perhaps I will win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Sir Robin Dunn – obituary
Sir Robin Dunn was a Lord Justice of Appeal who was decorated in war then dealt with film stars and traitors in peace

Sir Robin Dunn
6:50PM BST 31 Mar 2014
8 Comments
Sir Robin Dunn, the former Lord Justice of Appeal, who has died aged 96, was among the more engaging and colourful members of the bench; he was also awarded an MC in the Second World War .
Dunn’s often lengthy divorce cases made him a fierce critic of their cost to the taxpayer. His bench also became a platform for outspoken social commentary, including, most notoriously, his 1974 remark about the differences between wives north and south of the border.
In the North, said Dunn, wives did not mind their husbands beating them but drew the line at adultery; in the South, the opposite was the case. He withdrew his observations the next day, and apologised to the angry women of the North.
But despite the odd maverick outburst, Dunn was widely liked and respected, and was being tipped as a likely candidate to take over as president of the Family Division shortly before his promotion to the Court of Appeal in 1980.
As a committee member of the Devon and Somerset Staghounds, he was at the forefront of its legal battle with the League Against Cruel Sports in the mid-1980s, after the hunt fenced in the League’s so-called “sanctuaries” which it owned on Exmoor.
Related Articles
Sir Michael Kerr
23 Apr 2002
Sir Roger Parker
23 May 2011
Sir Brian Dillon
02 Jul 2003
Sir David Hirst
16 Jan 2012

Sir Robin Dunn at the Bristol Assizes in 1970
Dunn was also unusual in the ranks of the judiciary in having served as a regular Army officer for 10 years; in 1980 he was made Honorary Colonel Commandant, the highest honour that the Royal Artillery can bestow on a non-serving officer.
The son of a Royal Artillery brigadier, Robin Horace Walford Dunn was born on January 16 1918 and educated at Wellington and the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich, where he won the Sword of Honour. He joined the RA in 1938, and fought during the Second World War in France, Belgium and North Africa. He was thrice wounded, mentioned in despatches and awarded a Military Cross in 1944.
On July 8 of that year, Major Dunn, as he then was, was Battery Commander and Commanding Officer’s representative with 1st Battalion the Royal Norfolk Regiment during an attack on Lébisey wood, near Caen, accompanying the CO on foot with his signallers carrying the wireless sets.
During the whole period of the attack he was under heavy shell and mortar fire, but never failed to maintain communications with the regiment. In the later stages of the assault he organised a fresh fire plan to assist the infantry, who were being held down by an enemy post in the south-west corner of the wood.
The citation for his MC stated: “It was largely due to his efforts that the infantry were enabled to clear the wood with comparatively few casualties. Towards the end of the action Major Dunn was wounded in the head, but refused to go for treatment until ordered by the CO of the Norfolks. During the whole operation Major Dunn, under heavy fire, exhibited a calm and resolute bearing which was an example to both his own party and the infantry.”

Robin Dunn with Field Marshal Montgomery
After the war, Dunn attended Staff College but left the Army as an honorary major in 1948, the same year that he was called to the Bar by Inner Temple. He soon established himself as an eloquent and persuasive advocate, frequently appearing for the rich and famous. While still a junior, he represented Vivien Leigh (in her successful divorce action against Laurence Olivier), and the publisher George Weidenfeld, who was granted a divorce after his wife’s adultery with the writer Cyril Connolly.
Another client was the Russian-born marathon walker Barbara Moore, who alleged she had been defamed by a series of advertisements for shoes, bananas and oranges which surrounded coverage in the Daily Mail of her walk from John O’Groats to Land’s End. She said the advertisements implied that she had undertaken the walk for financial gain rather than to prove the capabilities of a 55-year-old woman on a vegetarian diet.
“Some people may think she’s a crank,” said Dunn, “but most great causes have been started by single-minded people who some consider to be cranks.”
From 1959 to 1962, Dunn was Western Circuit junior counsel to the Registrar of Restrictive Trading Practices. In 1961 he represented the Attorney General at the election petition over whether Viscount Stansgate (Tony Benn) should be allowed to take his place in the Commons following his Bristol South-East by-election victory.
Dunn took Silk in 1962, and as a QC his clients included the former MP Patricia Fisher, injured when a bottle of jewellery cleaner she had bought at Harrods exploded in her hand; the racehorse trainer Florence Nagle, to whom the Jockey Club refused to issue a licence because she was a woman; and the “spoilt” wife of the Swiss film producer Robert Velaise, himself described by Dunn as “a debonair international playboy, expert skier and water-skier, the dashing Don Juan with women”.
One of the highlights of Dunn’s career was the Vassal Tribunal in 1968, at which he represented The Daily and Sunday Telegraph. The inquiry concerned the activities of the homosexual Admiralty spy in Moscow, John Vassal, but an important side issue was whether journalists should disclose their sources.
Dunn was appointed a Judge of the High Court, Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division (later Family Division) in 1969.
He was soon ordering the pop singer Gene Vincent to pay maintenance arrears to his former wife or go to prison; granting a divorce to a young wife who objected to her husband’s dressing up in drag; and refusing to believe a petitioner who claimed that his wife charged him half-a-crown for sex.
As presiding judge on the Western Circuit from 1974 to 1978, Dunn proved a tough sentencer. In 1977 he jailed stately home robber Denis Morley — who went in for fast cars, beautiful women and gambling — to 15 years. The trial was the longest in Exeter Crown Court’s history, involving 170 witnesses and more than 700 exhibits. He also gave mandatory life terms to several murderers .
Probably Dunn’s best-known judgment on appeal was in the Sidaway case in 1984. Mrs Sidaway was suing Bethlem Royal Hospital over damage to her spinal cord. She said she was not told of the possibility of such damage before she consented to an operation. But Dunn agreed with the then Master of the Rolls, Sir John Donaldson, that a doctor (or surgeon) fulfilled his duty to inform a patient if he acted in accordance with a practice rightly accepted as proper by a body of skilled and experienced medical men.
Because the surgeon had assessed the risk of damage to the spinal cord at only one to two per cent, he had considered it too remote a risk to form the basis of Mrs Sidaway’s decision on whether or not to consent to the operation. The judges held this to be reasonable after listening to other expert witnesses.
The decision — later upheld by the Law Lords — was welcomed by medics, but criticised by others as legitimising the idea of passive patients and authoritarian doctors. Some went so far as to claim a professional conspiracy, with lawyers closing ranks behind the doctors.
Dunn was among the judges who ruled that a wife’s once-a-week sex ration was fair, and who turned down the Moonies’ request for a retrial following their failed libel action against the Daily Mail.
He warned divorced parents not to try to take revenge on their former husbands or wives by refusing them access to their children. “These courts have said over and over again, that although you can dissolve marriages, you cannot dissolve parenthood,” Dunn observed. He also warned divorced mothers not to expect that custody of their children would automatically be granted to them.
Dunn retired from the Court of Appeal in 1984. He was, variously, treasurer of the Bar Council (1967-69); deputy chairman of Somerset Quarter Sessions (1965-71); and a member of the Lord Chancellor’s Committee on Legal Education (1968-69). He was knighted in 1969 and sworn of the Privy Council in 1980.
In 1994 he published Sword and Wig: The Memoirs of a Lord Justice. He later wrote a book about stag hunting on Exmoor, one of his passions. He was a fierce opponent of the National Trust’s decision to ban stag hunting on their land.
Robin Dunn married, in 1941, Judith Pilcher, who died in 1995; they had a son and two daughters, and one daughter survives him with his second wife, Joan (née Stafford-King-Harman), whom he married in 1997.
Sir Robin Dunn, born January 16 1918, died March 5 2014
Guardian:
When Kingsley Amis was a young man, he was one of many authors swindled by RA Caton, the unsavoury proprietor of the Fortune Press. He took his revenge by incuding in each of his novels an unpleasant, and often unlucky, minor character with Caton’s name. I suggest to the writers who have rallied to protest at the cruel ban on books for prisoners (‘It’s the most bonkers thing I’ve ever heard’, 29 March) that the name Christopher Grayling has a certain cracked ring to it. I can see him as an incompetent potboy getting a kicking from Thomas Cromwell, or a bumbling spy caught in a Le Carré double-cross; indeed, the possibilities are endless.
Peter Grant
Oxford
• Ha! The solar panels on the roof in the artist’s impression of the proposed England-Scotland spiral interchange show this is the Guardian’s April Fool spoof (Scotland plans to move to right after independence, 1 April): a cost-benefit analysis would show that there is not enough sunshine in the frozen north of the UK to make it viable.
Lyn Summers
Lancaster
• Most aspects of the plan to revise the road infrastructure in Scotland are perfectly feasible and overdue. However, as a Scottish resident, I disapprove of the cost to the taxpayer of the spiral interchange at the Scottish-English border. Surely the best place to make the change would be when the motorist goes through immigration and visits duty-free, which will be unavoidable without the Schengen agreement.
Matthew Williamson
Isle of Bute
• Great April Fools’ Day story this year (England cap shambolic winter with humiliating defeat by the Netherlands, 1 April).
Geoff Dobson
London
• Anthropomorphic buses are but a later manifestation of what the Romans did for us (Letters, 1 April). A recently discovered fragment of a casket from Caistor is inscribed: “Cunobarrus fecit vivas (Cunobarrus made me, may you live happily).”
Jane Lawson
London
• When I lived in Bishop Auckland 60-odd years ago, there were two outlying so-called villages, Seldom Seen and Never Seen (Letters, 1 April). I went to the former, once. I never saw the latter.
John Abbott
London
The kite flown by a rightwing thinktank that everyone should have to pay for access to healthcare (£10 each can save the NHS, 31 March) marks a crucial turning point in switching towards a fully paid-for health service. This process has been long planned. First Blair encouraged and then pressured NHS hospitals into becoming independent foundation trusts, self-standing suppliers within a competitive market. Cameron took this much further by ruling that all NHS functions would be open to tender by any qualified provider. The Lansley health and social care bill, hatched in deepest secrecy before the 2010 election with not a word about it in the Tory manifesto so that it had no electoral mandate, opened the floodgates for full-scale privatisation of the NHS. But always the mantra was repeated that the NHS would remain “free at the point of service”. Now that assurance is being kicked away.
The thinktank authors decry the NHS as “an outdated, cosseted and unaffordable healthcare system”. They don’t mention that the Tory government has deliberately imposed a £20bn cut in NHS funding over the current five-year period to put it under intolerable strain and maybe breakdown in order to pave the way for a gradual switch to a fully paid-for private service, which has always been their secret aim, just like before 1948. Nor do they mention that the NHS, at a cost of 8% of GDP, is the most cost-efficient in the world, half the comparative cost of the private US healthcare system.
We now see why the Tories have been so keen to demean the NHS on every occasion over the past few months. Cue the need to junk the old, failing NHS and announce the dawn of a brand-new, burnished private healthcare system – and at a bargain price of £10 a month. But remember tuition fees: capped at £3,000, then trebled. If every UK adult paid £10 a month, this new tax would raise £5.4bn. Treble that, or more, and we’re talking serious money for the healthcare privateers.
Michael Meacher MP
Labour, Oldham West and Royton
• How dare Norman Warner and Jack O’Sullivan denigrate the NHS in such strident terms? I refer them to the carefully documented report in August 2013 by Dr Don Berwick, who was commissioned to investigate patient safety in the NHS. Berwick recognised that healthcare is political and that the current sustained denigration of the NHS is an ideological campaign which smears “a world-leading example of commitment to health and healthcare as a human right” that should be emulated, and that although the NHS does have patient safety problems, so “does every other healthcare system in the world”. Noting that big changes are needed, Berwick also says the achievements of the NHS are enormous and suggests that “drama, accusations and overstatement” are best avoided.
Reform, which published Warner and O’Sullivan’s report, believes that “by liberalising the public sector, breaking monopoly and extending choice”, high-quality services can be made available to everyone. Recent experiences with private providers to the NHS in Cornwall and Suffolk, for instance, indicate otherwise. Reform was set up by a Conservative MP and a Tory strategist. The membership of Reform’s advisory board shows that it is funded by private companies, with chief executives, chairmen and directors of major pharmaceutical companies, global investment banks, and accountancy firms constituting the majority of board members. Could there be an ideological or possibly even some other agenda here?
Gwen Parr
Pulborough, West Sussex
• It is extremely misleading to describe the thinktank Reform as “independent”. In 2012, its top six funders included Prudential Insurance, KMPG (consultants involved with the NHS), McKesson (a pharmaceutical distributor and healthcare information company), Baxter (a private healthcare company) and BMI (which runs 66 hospitals and treatment centres in the country). These organisations all have a vested interest in the tendering out and privatisation (“reform”) of the NHS and in reports that support the idea of charging for NHS services.
Sean de Podesta
Brighton
• It would have been good if the Guardian had mentioned Norman Warner’s and Reform’s vested interest in criticising the NHS. Warner is an advisory board member of Synlab, a German firm involved in NHS privatisation, while Reform is funded by BMI Healthcare, Serco and Sodexo – organisations that have much to gain from the break-up of the heath service (hat-tip to @SolHughesWriter on Twitter for this information).
Ian Sinclair
London
• The suggestion of an NHS membership fee is the latest example of weird and unsocial reasoning. People apparently won’t put up with tax rises to help the NHS; so let’s complicate matters by charging fees. How does that help – unless the motive is to exclude those unable to pay the fee from NHS services? The denigration of tax leads to lower taxes, leading to reductions in public services, which leads to the wealthy paying for private medicine, private education and, one day no doubt, private street lighting and refuse collections, leaving the dispossessed with ever-dwindling services.
Peter Cave
London
• Alternatively, Warner and O’Sullivan could propose a 0.05% rise in income tax, to raise roughly the same amount, but with no extra collection charges, unlike their scheme, which, if it is anything like road tax, would lose over half the amount collected in administration.
Rod Parfitt
Cleeve, Somerset
• I read with interest your article on a potential £10 per month membership for the NHS. As a surgeon in the NHS, one of the major issues I face with planned and emergency surgery is obesity. Most obese patients are aware of the health consequences of their obesity; however, they don’t seem to know of the hazards they face for abdominal surgery. Simply moving them on and off an operating tables can be hazardous for the staff alone. The risks of surgery and post-operative complications can lead to a prolonged recovery with a risk of major disability. Perhaps there should be an increased membership fee in line with BMI?
Kathryn McCarthy
Consultant surgeon, Bristol
• Nice juxtaposition of headlines on page 2 on Monday: “Pay £10 a month to use the NHS” and “Poorest homes face £120 council tax rise as safety net goes”.
Jeanne Warren
Garsington, Oxfordshire
• The health sector regulator Monitor is committed to parity of esteem for physical and mental health services, and is not recommending that funding for mental health services should be cut by 20% more than for acute hospitals (Mental health services need targeted investment, not even more cuts, 26 March). Under the NHS payment system, national prices are not set for mental health services. Pricing decisions for mental health services are made at local level by commissioners and providers, who are expected to have regard to the national rules but can make their own price adjustments where there are good reasons to do so.
Professor Ric Marshall
Director of pricing, Monitor

Your editorial (29 March) argues that the Byles bill now before parliament, which, for the first time, allows peers to resign, could lead to aspirant politicians using the Lords as a springboard into Commons seats, thus diluting its independence. Though understandable, such fears turn out on examination to be insubstantial.
It is not likely that many people would get peerages under the existing arrangements, then resign and then move on to the Commons. This would clearly be an abuse of the system, which intends lords to remain in the house as working peers. It would not be appealing for a party leader to appoint someone so motivated, as they would be heavily criticised for doing so. The Lords appointments commission, which has to approve political appointments, would be unlikely to support many such people. Constituency parties would be unlikely to choose them as candidates, as their opponents would highlight their ruthlessly self-seeking behaviour.
If it did it happen on any scale, the law could be changed to prevent it; then any politician on the make who had sought to use this route might be left stranded in the Lords. Moreover, anyone going down this route would, under the terms of the bill, be barred for ever from Lords membership, from which so many ex-members of the Commons have obtained a valuable opportunity to serve in their later years.
If the bill was amended in the Lords to prevent ex-members standing for the Commons, however, that would be the end of the current bill. No more private members’ days remain in the Commons this session to consider Lords amendments. The government has made it clear that, so far as it is concerned, unless the bill clears the Lords intact, that will be the end of it. And if the Byles bill fails it will be a major negative for those who argue that piecemeal reform of the Lords rather than a big bang is the right way forward. If as limited and simple a measure as the Byles bill cannot get through, what prospect is there for further piecemeal change in the future?
David Lipsey
Labour, House of Lords
Last night Nick Clegg and Nigel Farage held their second debate (Voters give credit to Farage in head-to-head with Clegg, 27 March). In the first debate, Clegg clearly triumphed on facts and statistics. But the European issue is a complicated one, as much based on emotions, historical attitudes and nostalgia as on detailed knowledge. It may seem astonishing that we Britons debate a possible exit from the EU in the year of the centenary of the first world war.
There have been no new or deadly battles between any EU members since Britain decided to stay in the EEC in 1975. Almost all the countries that were once Soviet satellites have been EU members, bound to democracy and the rule of law by the Copenhagen principles, a far more successful soft-power strategy than all the west’s military interventions put together. It would be sheer lunacy to abandon a European future for a backward-looking, isolated and diminished role.
Shirley Williams
Liberal Democrat, House of Lords
In a conventional share flotation, the price shares will fetch is an important issue for the seller, which needs to balance the interests of existing owners in raising cash against the dilution of ownership involved in expanding the share base. Hence the need for expert advice, underwriting etc. In the Royal Mail case (Undervaluing Royal Mail cost taxpayer £750m in one day, 1 April), the institution was going to be sold/privatised no matter what and the appropriate objective was to raise as much cash as possible for the public purse. The obvious way to proceed would have been through an auction based on sealed bids. Shares could then simply have been allocated to willing buyers, in order of price bid. The full volume would have been allocated and revenue to the owners of the institution – the taxpayer – would have been maximised.
The shares would have ended up with those who valued them highest, just as now, but without the intermediary profit. This would also have saved us the cost of the advice of the experts who valued the shares so inaccurately.
Chris Perry
Instow, Devon
• Vince Cable believes what he did was right: “achieving the highest price … was never the aim of the sale”. That’s just the point, Mr Cable: the Tories’ aim was to flog it off regardless. A failed sale would not have been a disaster.
We are witnessing the disaster that all privatisations have engendered, with soaring energy prices, water bills, rail fares, bus fares and on and on, as the new companies, now mostly foreign-owned, try to keep their greedy managers and shareholders happy, while their services decline. And soon Royal Mail services will show the same trend. Perhaps it was just bad timing, but over the weekend I and most other people in north-west London received a flyer from Royal Mail’s operations director telling us that TNT Post UK may be delivering some of our mail, when they feel like it, so our Royal Mail postman “may no longer be wholly responsible for your postal service”. But it doesn’t tell us who to complain to when a letter fails to arrive.
David Reed
London
• Perhaps Vince Cable would care to visit Mid Devon to see some of the benefits he claims were the reason behind the dramatic undervaluing of the Royal Mail share offering. Within two months we received a letter informing us that due to implementing efficiency measures our post was to be rescheduled and may be later. It now arrives between 3pm and 4pm. Royal Mail said it was contractually entitled to deliver mail up to 4pm. The result? A long-established business renting office accommodation in our converted barn has given in its notice because, being mail-order driven, it is unable to cope with such a service.
Andrew Dale-Harris
Oakford, Devon
• There are few business people who manage to cost their organisation £750m with one decision and even fewer who do that and remain in their job. You itemise some of the ways this sum could have been spent, but I find it equally depressing that Vince Cable doesn’t even show any remorse. In the current austerity climate, it is surely vital that every available pound is both collected and spent on the correct priorities.
Pete Radcliffe
Warrington, Cheshire

Your coverage on the situation in Ukraine has dealt almost exclusively with Vladimir Putin and Russian intentions. This is unfortunate. While the events regarding Crimea are serious, focusing mainly on them misses the major problems facing Ukraine: poverty and corruption. These have stifled Ukrainian progress, causing severe economic hardships for the population. Thousands of Ukraine’s young and talented have left the country to work abroad. The diaspora continues.
Ukrainians need to look in the mirror. They have had full independence since 1991 and are ostensibly a democracy. Their “orange revolution” failed because of corruption and their new government under Viktor Yanukovych failed because of corruption and his government’s failure to address the real problems in the country.
Ukrainians need to stop blaming Russia, communism and Stalin and start enacting major reforms. The power to do this is in their hands. The Maidan demonstrators in Kiev represented a good start. There were progressive forces among the demonstrators that signalled the direction in which Ukraine should move. Ukrainians must hold the government accountable and ensure that meaningful reforms are enacted.
Robert Milan
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
• Your report of the US and EU reaction to the Crimean situation is depressing (21 March). The US will always do and say whatever it likes, and there’s no changing that. It is worrying that the EU has decided to take action, however limited, against Russia, as it has the potential to lead to an economic cold war directly affecting all EU citizens. But it is completely outrageous that the UK government should take such an active stance against Russia and Putin. As a British citizen, I am incensed that it should act in this way.
For many years successive British governments have refused to even talk to Argentina about a change of ownership of the Falklands, stating that the will of the inhabitants is paramount. Nobody can possibly be in any doubt as to the will of the vast majority of the Crimean inhabitants, even if there were legal or technical problems surrounding the recent referendum. So for the British government to condemn Russia and Putin and to threaten and take economic action against them for acceding to the will of the Crimean inhabitants is nothing short of 24-carat-gold-plated hypocrisy.
Alan Williams-Key
Madrid, Spain
• Many commentators have seen fit to draw an analogy between the annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation and the aggressive expansionism of the Nazi government of Germany that precipitated the second world war. But perhaps the more relevant analogy is the war that preceded it.
The leaders of the great European powers in 1914 did not plan to lead their nations into years of terrible destruction, but they did, through a combination of ambition, ignorance, miscalculation and pride. Let us hope that our leaders are not so foolish, because the potential consequences are not the destruction of a first world war or a second world war, but the nuclear destruction of a third world war.
Alex Gill
Ottawa, Canada
Seems it’s OK for the US and some of its allies, including Israel, to thumb their noses at “international law and order” by invading and occupying other people’s territories when they feel their national self-interest is threatened. When Russia does the same, however, these defenders of the “free world” pretend to be outraged. Double standard indeed!
Ron Date
Victoria, British Columbia,
Canada
Chasing the grey vote
I live in a benighted country that unlike most countries in the democratic world has compulsory voting at all levels of government and am often berated that such compulsion is an infringement of my democratic freedoms. However, I have always been conscious of the fact that with compulsory voting the elected politicians can never totally ignore some or even most sections of society and concentrate only on that part of society that votes. The article Osborne targets grey vote (28 March) reminds me of the strength of a compulsory voting system. When politicians “woo actual voters and sod the rest” democracy suffers and long term the society suffers as well.
The advantage of compulsory voting is that politicians must at least pay lip service to the whole of the society because everyone votes and this advantage far outweighs any infringement on my freedom.
Edwin Carter
Blackburn, Victoria, Australia
Property and generosity
Peter Johnston’s letter (Reply, 21 March) on the apparent discrepancy in the availability of homes in the UK overlooks the elephant in the housing complex: property as a long-term investment. Everywhere in the developed world the demand for the expansion of housing and the consequent erosion of irreplaceable agricultural, recreational and environmentally sensitive land is seemingly irresistible.
While greedy developers and those who depend on construction for their living are partly to blame, the underlying problem is multiple home ownership, accompanied by favourable taxation treatment and the publicly subsidised costs of development. It is in the interest of most investors in residential property to promote the myth of scarcity, as well as frequently maintaining vacancies, to enhance the capital appreciation on which they rely, rather than accepting a reasonable income from rental or leasing.
There is a strong parallel with food production and distribution. It is accepted that there is adequate food produced world-wide to feed the current population, though not at the excessive and wasteful level of first-world nations. Those who control the production and distribution of these essential resources look to the wealthier nations for their profits, rather than satisfying the needs of the wider population.
The injunctions of Pope Francis to the wealthy to “help, respect and promote the poor” will fall on deaf ears, as long as he and other spiritual leaders fail to address the underlying causes of inequality and rely instead on the trickle-down effect – and earning a place in heaven – to motivate them to be a bit more generous to the needy. The world has never worked that way and probably never will.
Noel Bird
Boreen Point, Queensland, Australia
Syria’s fight to the finish
It’s become clear that the Syrian struggle now is not Assad’s government against the rest – but rather Assad’s Alawites and the Shias and Christians and others against Sunni Islam (including al-Qaida) – ie minorities of all shades against the Sunni majority (Iran-controlled militia calls on Iraqis to shed blood for Assad, 21 March).
This is the struggle the Middle East is now engaged in. The Alawites face extinction or permanent subjugation by a Sunni majority that they have dominated for too long. That’s why, in fear of extinction, they will not compromise or admit defeat. The outlook is bleak – a fight to the finish.
Alaisdair Raynham
Truro, UK
Briefly
• I was delighted to see Tim Entwisle’s commentary in support of taxonomists (21 March). Many people call us bean-counters, but they miss the point. Far from being an arcane branch of biology, taxonomy underlies the study of the world’s biodiversity, and its distribution and evolution.
Species have varied and often astounding strategies for making a living here on Earth. It takes time to develop expertise in a group of organisms, but we now live in an academic world that is too impatient to invest in that time, saying that we are somehow not “productive” enough.
Sandra L Brantley
Albuquerque, New Mexico, US
• The apparent demise of the ice-cream cone (Shortcuts, 21 March) reminds me that as a child we had wafers. These were either wrapped or, as was the case with my uncle in his small shop in Defynnog, prepared on demand. A rectangular wafer was placed in a hand held device which was filled with his own ice-cream another wafer placed on the top and the whole pushed up to be held gently and licked from the sides. Like the wafer the shop is long gone.
Steve Thomas
Yarralumla, ACT, Australia
• Re Oliver Burkeman’s columns, as I don’t necessarily want to change my life, would it be possible to offer an edition of the Guardian Weekly without this headline on one of its pages please?
Adrian Betham
London, UK
Independent:

Students from state schools are more likely to achieve top-grade degrees than those from the independent sector (report, 28 March), and there is a call for leading universities to place more emphasis on applicants’ backgrounds when offering places to study. Great, so all graduates will be on a level playing field in the jobs market, right? Wrong!
Too many employers are unforgiving in the requirements for their graduate jobs. As well as a minimum of a 2:1, they also require 300 or more Ucas points (BBB or higher at A-level). For jobs in IT, to take an example, TARGETjobs lists employers requiring 300 Ucas points or more including: Accenture, CHP Consulting, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Ocado, PA Consulting, SunGuard, Tessella, and TPP.
Many employers have exceptions for those with illness or family circumstances, or for those who are exceptional in sporting or similar achievements, but the barrier still remains for many. Forget how brilliant you are in your chosen subject: what did you do when you were 18? This question might more accurately be framed as “Which school did you attend when you were 18?”, because three times as many private school pupils gain three A grades at A-level as those in state schools.
Leading employers visit universities’ careers fairs but, while almost all will attend Russell Group universities, the number of employers attending universities in the lower half of the “university league tables”  dwindles.
Some employers are coming round to the idea that recruiting graduates from Russell Group universities and with 300-plus Ucas points does not lead to a very diverse intake, and diversity is essential for success in the global markets. Some employers visit universities outside the Russell Group. Some are more open-minded about your past life: TARGETjobs lists AVEVA and Hewlett Packard as employers who do not have a minimum Ucas points cut-off for IT jobs. In accounting and finance, the professional services firm PwC has recently relaxed its graduate  intake requirements for audit and assurance so that if you obtain a first-class degree, the Ucas points requirements drop to 240 (CCC).
As well as universities levelling the applications playing field, employers also need to play their part. I am teaching some fantastic accounting and finance students. Are there any enlightened employers out there who would like to offer summer internships to the highest achieving students? Many do not have the academic requirements you stipulate and may not have the strongest CVs in terms of relevant work experience or volunteering but they are intelligent, diligent, sometimes brilliant.
Dr Maria Gee, Senior Lecturer in Accounting, University of Winchester
I was concerned by your editorial on tuition fees (1 April), which questioned the fairness of making those who do not go to university “stump up” for those  who do.
Applied more generally, this principle would remove the argument for collective, public provision of any service. Why should the healthy “stump up” for the sick to be treated, those without children for others’ education, or those with cars for public transport?
Taken to its logical conclusion, this argument would destroy the civilised basis of our national life and create the situation found in the USA where those who can pay for services will do so and those who can’t are excluded and marginalised.
Alan Brown, Bromborough, Wirral
Plainly, the right language matters
Your article on Plain English (28 March) reminded me of the start of my Probation Service career in Barnsley in the early 1960s, where to know the difference between a shovel and a spade was a matter of civic pride.
For a social worker to use the term “sibling” in court invited a broadside below a career water-line. When once asked by a chairman what the term meant, his clerk advised: “I think it’s something to do with chickens, sir.”
One day a “gentleman of the road” appeared, brought off the street for some minor matter which couldn’t be dealt with on the spot. As if speaking to a simpleton, the chairman slowly and deliberately explained to the defendant, to the accompaniment of a nodding clerk, “Your case is being adjourned sine die. Do you understand?”
“Yes, Your Majesty,” came the reply.
It seems judgements on plain English can depend on who is dishing it out.
Roy Spilsbury, Penmaenmawr, Conwy
Simplicity and clarity can go too far, even in official communications. I was once told of a major group in dispute with the Revenue. Top accountants were involved, top solicitors engaged. The issue was referred to leading counsel. They drew up a long, closely-argued case.
The Revenue’s reply arrived by return of post: “Thank you for your letter. I do not agree.”
Robert Davies, London E3
Books for prisoners
The issue of prisoners receiving parcels containing books is not straightforward.
Having taught in prisons for many years, I need no convincing of the value of books in that environment. I came across many prisoners who, for the first time in their lives, were reading and enjoying a variety of books. However, I have some sympathy with prison governors whose perpetual security nightmare is maintaining some degree of control over contraband entering prison. Drugs are easily concealed and screening is neither cheap nor quick (most prisons have to buy in the service of sniffer dogs, for example).
I do wonder how many parcels sent to prisons contained books. Not as many as the literary establishment likes to think I imagine; items of clothing are likely to be higher on the list. Be that as it may, governors know their prisons and it should be left to their discretion to decide what is and isn’t manageable rather than politicians making rulings calculated to appeal to the “give them nothing” brigade.
Sue Turner, Lowdham, Nottinghamshire
April Fools at the wicket
At first glance it seemed obvious that Scottish/UN peacekeeping story was your April Fool spoof (“Peacekeeping plan drawn up by UN in event of a Scottish Yes vote”, 1 April) but then I reached the sports section to read some nonsense about Holland beating England at cricket. How ridiculous! Did you really think we’d fall for that?
Michael O’Hare, Northwood, Middlesex
Loved the item about the UN’s proposed post-independence referendum peacekeeping force; “Avril Prime” was a gem. I’ve already booked the last remaining room from which to watch the manoeuvres. BMW’s ad was a surprise, though.
John Crocker, Cheltenham
Hey, you had me going there!  That lead story on the front page (1 April) about the Royal Mail flotation. Apparently Vince Cable’s City chums agreed to buy RM shares and promised to hold on to them. But then it’s said they went and sold them straight away at a vast profit.
I mean, honestly, how believable is that? Wasn’t born yesterday y’know!
Ed Sharkey, Barton-under-Needwood, Staffordshire
Texting in the street
Apple’s pedestrian-avoidance plan for the terminally phone-struck (“Text-and-walk plan for those trying to do two things at once”, 31 March) is  one more blow in the drive to render normal human behaviour redundant.
The massive surge in numbers of those who “walk and talk” has become one of the most annoying features of the urban landscape. It’s bad enough coping with the ear-plug barkers shouting into thin air, but ten times worse with those who simply stare at their phones while veering randomly into fellow pedestrians.
The moment you step out of that door it is essential to have your mobile amulet to hand, ready to combat the hideous dangers of actually observing the world around you. Now, combine that, as some already do, with a bicycle …
Christopher Dawes, London W11
Financial community rumbled again
What arrant nonsense is this clamour for the head of Martin Wheatley, Chief Executive of the Financial Conduct Authority. The plunge in insurance company share prices was due to the financial community fearing that they had been rumbled, again, and with just cause. The pity is that the inquiry is not going to be as wide-ranging as at first suggested.
Peter English, Rhewl, Denbighshire
Is this contract really a job?
I am reassured that the Chancellor has signed up to a full employment pledge, or perhaps aspiration. However I am unclear if a zero-hours contract is a job, as it appears to involve a firm commitment neither to work nor to wages, or am I just an economic illiterate?
Lee Dalton BSc Econ, Weymouth, Dorset
Times:
Rising fees seem not to deter many students but interest on their debt is worse
Sir, Fees of £6,000 may end up as a credible position but it is deeply worrying that Labour sees this as its starting point rather than the result of calculations based on a well-designed student finance and university funding system (“Reducing fees would mean fewer students”, Mar 31).
Before you go near the headline- grabbing sticker price of fee levels, there are bigger questions around how students should be supported while they study, how universities should be funded, what the balance of contribution should be and what a well-designed graduate loan system looks like (not like the current one, that is for sure).
We hope to offer some clear thinking and simple steps to improve the loan design, bring down the massive subsidy on loans from the government and re-balance the contribution between the state and individual to higher education. This is less complicated than it sounds. You may end up with fees at £6,000 in some parts of the system, but it is strange to know the answer before you’ve done your sums.
Libby Hackett
University Alliance
Sir, The 45 per cent estimate (leader, Mar 31) means about 9 out of 20 graduates will not repay their loans. The other 11, who not only repay their loans but will continue paying in taxes a lot more than the 9 for the rest of their working lives, might be forgiven for wondering if they are all in this together.
Paul Murgatroyd
Norwich
Sir, You argue that students should pay more for their education. You oppose transferring costs to taxpayers. When I had my hip replaced by the NHS, two of the junior doctors involved turned out to be former students of mine. They told me that my education benefited them. I clearly benefited from their education, as will all the patients they treat until they retire. Those patients will contribute benefit to the community.
It is arguable that each student benefits from their education more than any other single person does. However, if you aggregate all the benefits gained by all beneficiaries, the overwhelming share of the total benefit goes not to the individual student, but to society as a whole. That is why we support education from general taxation.
Philip Burgess
Inchcoonans, Perthshire
Sir, The latest figures show that applicants to university are at their highest level, so graduating with about £40,000 of student debt has not so far been a deterrent to those seeking to benefit from a degree.
However, I wonder how many are aware of the small print. Since 2012 the student loan debt book is finance lent at RPI plus 3 per cent: this is from date of payment not from graduation. But there is minimal information on this: a student logging into his student loan account on the SLC website will not be able to see this, and googling it produces a similar vacuum of data. My son’s loan, currently about £13k, appears to be accruing interest at over £800 per annum. Next year there will be interest on interest and so on until repayment.
Our young people deserve transparency as to the terms and conditions of their indenture. Only a minority will repay their loans, and their repayments will have to carry the write-offs of all the others.
Emma Mackinnon
Fareham, Hants

Don’t blame the witnessess, the solution must start with a co-ordinated community response
Sir, The Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, Sir Peter Fahy, is frustrated by the HMIC report about domestic violence (letter, Mar 31)?
A victim who spends years being physically and psychologically tortured in her own home (and it is usually a woman) is unlikely to be able to deal with the criminal justice system. The answer is the coordinated community response, practised in the UK since 1997.
My former employer, Standing Together Against Domestic Violence, can give him some guidance if he genuinely wants to find out how to respond effectively in partnership, to domestic violence. Specialist domestic violence courts were also set up to deal with this issue and were successful until government and community leaders lost interest.
Why does the State not take responsibility for prosecution rather than relying on the victim’s evidence? Why does a prosecution for a domestic murder rarely fail despite the lack of a live witness? Why is not more said about the perpetrator and the importance of holding them to account while supporting the victim? These are primary functions for police leadership. Sir Peter Fahy may be frustrated, but I am furious that he and others blame the victim for not being in a position to be a prime witness. The statutory sector must stop making excuses and work in a way that fundamentally changes the whole response and delivers justice.
Anthony Wills
Iver, Bucks

Alliance may be the last surviving British wartime sub, but there is a German U-boat too, now acting as a memorial museum
Sir, You report that HMS Alliance is “the only surviving submarine from the Second World War” (“Sailors tell tales of heroism, love and war”; Mar 31). While she may be the only surviving British submarine, the German U995 has stood as a museum in front of the Kriegsmarine memorial at Laboe (Kiel Fjord), since 1972. She was commissioned in 1944 and saw service off north Norway attacking allied convoys, sinking two merchantmen and two Soviet patrol craft. From the end of the war until 1965 she served in the Norwegian navy after which she was sold back to Germany and refitted ready for her current role.
Stephen J. Lockwood
Glan Conwy, Colwyn Bay

 

Superstition and religious faith do not necessarily go together, in fact researchers tend to find the opposite
Sir, Melanie Phillips (Opinion, Mar 31) asks why the large numbers who believe in telepathy, astrology and other paranormal phenomena do not believe in God. And she performs some interesting mental gymnastics to answer her own question — it’s because those who believe in the supernatural resent the moral constraints implicit in religion and prefer “morality-free magic”.
That would be an intriguing explanation, if there were anything in her premise, but paranormal “faith” and religious faith are not mutually exclusive. The One Poll survey that she quotes does not say that they are and nor does a half-century of empirical research. Social scientists have sometimes found a weak negative relationship between the two sets of beliefs, but most studies show either no relationship at all or a mild positive one. In other words, believers in the paranormal are just as likely to believe in God as anyone else.
Stephen Miller
Emeritus Professor of Social Research, City University London
The recent England T20 squad had no players from the winning T20 county sides – what is cricket coming to?
Sir, Those who follow county cricket are told regularly that its main aim is to provide players for England, who then attract large sums of money to be ploughed back into the domestic game. But if the purpose of county cricket is to hone skills and match-winning attitudes, why is it that not one player from the last four teams to win the domestic T20 was included in England’s recent T20 squad? Whatever the reason(s), the selections (including three replacements) were not exactly “spot on” were they?
dr dave allen
Hon Archivist, Hampshire Cricket

 

Telegraph:

 

How Dylan and Caitlin pronounced their names
“Dullan” or “Dillan”, “Kaytlin” or “Kathleen”?

Dylan Thomas (1914-53) with his wife Caitlin (1913-94), whom he married in 1937  Photo: BRIDGEMAN ART LIBRARY
6:58AM BST 01 Apr 2014
29 Comments
SIR – As we approach the 100th anniversary of his birth, can we have some definitive rulings on how to pronounce the Dylan in Dylan Thomas? And for that matter, the Caitlin in Caitlin Thomas?
I know the Welsh say “Dullan”, but I have heard that the poet preferred, and used, “Dillan”. I gather his friends called him something entirely otherwise and much more coprological.
Similarly, Augustus John always insisted that Caitlin was “Kathleen”, not “Kaytlin”.
Any discussion of the poet and his wife has now become a self-conscious matter of style between those who parade their knowledge of Welsh and those who claim artistic kinship with Bohemian London by insisting on different pronunciations of the first names. Does anyone know how they called each other?
Nigel Thomas
Elham, Kent
SIR – After conducting my first wedding as an Anglican priest, on Saturday, I sat down to read that day’s Daily Telegraph.
Two contributions relating to marriage struck me. One was a report on a course of action urged by the bishop in charge of the area in which I lived as a lay person. He is a man for whom I have immense respect and someone whom I regard as a friend.
The second was an opinion piece by a self-confessed homosexual art critic, whom I have never met, but whose comments in his specialist field I have always enjoyed.
I might have expected to find myself in agreement with the bishop and at variance with the art critic. To my great surprise, it was the other way round.
Rt Rev Alan Wilson, Bishop of Buckingham, and seven unnamed retired bishops, had apparently urged homosexual clergy to follow their conscience and defy the Church of England’s restrictions on same-sex marriage. The comment article was by Brian Sewell: “Why I’m no convert to gay marriage”.
Related Articles
How Dylan and Caitlin pronounced their names
01 Apr 2014
Local champions opposing ugly developments fight with their hands tied
01 Apr 2014
Mr Sewell wrote: “Civil partnerships seemed the final necessary reform, giving homosexuals the right to inherit each other’s property, just as may a man and his wife, and if they want a family, there is now no barrier to them adopting children.”
I had hoped that Church of England liturgy would come to include provisions for church blessing of civil partnerships. I fear that the precipitate and profoundly undemocratic way in which the Marriage Bill was hustled into law has set obstacles in the way of persuasive change. The Church of England will now have extreme difficulty in relating to the law on marriage.
Rev John M Overton
Buxton, Derbyshire
SIR – Philip Hammond, the Defence Secretary, says that Tories against gay marriage must move on. I have. I no longer vote Tory.
Oliver Pickstone
York
Going up in the air
SIR – New Royal Mail prices contain large hidden rises, especially for airmail. The 10g, 40g and 80g rates are abolished, so one must pay the 20g, 60g and 100g rates instead. What used to cost 88p, £1.88 and £3.08 now cost £1.28, £2.15 and £3.48.
Dr Bernard Lamb
London SW14
BSTeething trouble
SIR – I hear people complaining of being over-tired due to the loss of an hour’s sleep. I know the arguments about British Summer Time reducing accidents. But does research show peaks in the accident rate immediately following the change?
Nigel Parsons
Cardiff
Migrant moths
SIR – My wife and I were astonished to see a hummingbird hawk moth on a daffodil on Saturday. Do they succeed in over-wintering here or have south-easterly winds brought them from the Continent?
John Rieley
Lindfield, West Sussex
Black Death awoken
SIR – Earlier this year scientists assured us that an ancient virus dormant in the permafrost posed no threat to humans as it only ever affected single-celled organisms.
How dormant is the Black Death virus disturbed in the Crossrail excavations?
Roger Gentry
Sutton at Hone, Kent
Cinderella law
SIR – Robert Buckland MP is helpfully working towards legislation to make the emotional abuse of children a criminal act. He was asked yesterday morning how emotional abuse would be identified, and he said that expert witnesses could assist.
Expert mental health clinicians have reported to the Family Courts for several years on emotional abuse. This abuse is easy to obscure and difficult to identify. The work requires highly experienced clinicians who are allowed sufficient time to interview children and parents.
This Government has cut the number of expert reports. They argue that social workers can identify mental health problems and also that judges will make decisions based on “common sense”.
But social workers are not trained in mental health. And establishing the presence of emotional abuse will not be reached by the exercise of common sense alone. The Government has driven many senior expert witnesses away from the work by severe financial cuts. Those who remain are no longer allowed sufficient time to interview troubled families.
We hope that Mr Buckland will include in the legislation provision for sufficient funding of expert mental health clinicians to do the work that is required.
Dr Judith Freedman
Convenor of the Consortium of Expert Witnesses to the Family Court
London NW3
Kilt conundrum
SIR – Peter Humphreys says of knees and toes that either both or neither should be visible at any time.
As a habitual kilt-wearer, whose wife has forbidden him from wearing sandals when wearing a kilt, what should I do?
James Willis
Glasgow
Prince in peril
SIR – While Prince George looks very nice with Lupo, you should never put a child’s face that close to a dog.
Leslie Watson
Swansea, Glamorgan
SIR – My mother-in-law advised me not to have my children’s names visible on their clothes as a stranger could address them and make them think he knows them.
Prince George is supervised all the time but other children could be in danger.
Anne Weber
Thorpe End, Norfolk
Where have all the Captain Mainwarings gone?
SIR – You report that George Osborne, the Chancellor, wants the return of the “Captain Mainwaring” type of bank manager. Sadly, this particular individual disappeared some time ago, with most of his staff. Apart from counter services, branch matters nowadays appear to be dealt with by call centres.
For several weeks now, I have been trying to contact a branch of my bank without success. In my day, I would have rung the manager concerned and sorted everything out within five minutes.
Now, letters addressed to “The Manager, X Bank, Y Branch” go straight to a call centre and even when addressed to a manager by name, they are often redirected. A bank manager used to have many years of experience, with knowledge of his patch and his customers.
Now one must deal with young “relationship managers” or “lending managers”. Targets seem to be the order of the day, despite having cost the banks millions in reparation payments after customers were sold the wrong services because of them.
Alan Hayhurst
Timperley, Cheshire
SIR – I wonder what Captain Mainwaring would have thought of quantitative easing.
William Rusbridge
Tregony, Cornwall

43 Comments
SIR – Christopher Hope reports that an independent review by Sir Terry Farrell recommends that every community should have a “champion” to fight unsightly development. Communities already have such champions; they are called district councillors.
I am a district councillor and I continually fight battles on behalf of my constituents in relation to proposed inappropriate developments. The problem is not the lack of people willing to fight and raise issues.
The problem is that the Government has introduced policies, in particular the National Planning Policy Framework, that have as a starting point a “presumption” in favour of development.
Factor in to this situation the government inspectors who decide appeals, then add the threat of costs being awarded against an authority, and it is easy to see how poor development is being allowed.
Why create another layer of involvement in the planning process? Let those of us who were elected to represent the people have a stronger voice in order to make a stand against poor design and bad planning decisions.
Cllr Jenny Roach (Liberal)
Exeter, Devon
SIR – The articles by Rupert Christiansen on the proposed new architectural horror in Edinburgh, and Jonathan Glancey on homes fit for people, both point to what has done so much to wreck our towns and cities.
Since the Fifties and Sixties, an ever more tired and soulless late modernism has become a dogma amongst architects and planners. There are steel, glass – always vast areas of glass – and concrete, with nowhere any suggestion of a human scale and character, no decoration, just soulless engineering triumphs. London has suffered especially badly.
When someone such as the Prince of Wales speaks out against this blight of soulless dullness, he is mocked. Town planners and local authorities seem all too ready to give assent to dreariness that brings in money.
One can only hope that some day soon the tide will begin to turn, so we can have new buildings of dignity and character, which do not turn their backs on human scale.
Roger Payne
London NW3
SIR – Why should local authorities not be made legally liable for damage to property arising from their having given planning permission for development on land known to be liable to flooding?
This might cause them to take a more responsible attitude to granting such permissions and make them less susceptible to greedy developers’ often dubious means of persuasion.
Sir Charles Wolseley Bt
Stafford
Irish Times:
Sir, – Phil Hogan, through the offices of a handful of councillors in Fingal, has given Dubliners a massive April Fool’s this year. Whereas 84 per cent of all Dublin’s councillors and 78 per cent of all Dubliners have indicated a will to have a democratically elected mayor, Swords County Hall has set the process back, probably for years.
The Fingal councillors in question should remember that most of their constituents are in Blanchardstown, part of the built-up west of Dublin, and see themselves as Dubliners. Blanchardstown is within the area defined by the CSO as “Dublin city and suburbs” and should remain so.
Swords County Hall has held Dublin transport back for years, calling for an underground metro to serve an outlying town, when a very good bus service will do. Now this self-centred vote brings into question Fingal councillors’ understanding of the concept of being part of a city.
Mr Hogan should now redraw the boundaries so that Swords and Fingal can continue to do the very good job they do of running a mainly rural part of Co Dublin.
That would leave the city of Dublin, including Blanchardstown and the airport, to get on with being the great European capital city its people deserve. Yours, etc,
DAVID O’CONNOR,
Dublin Institute
of Technology,
Bolton Street,
ODRAN REID,
Social, Economic and Planning Consultant,
Willow Park Grove,
Dublin 11,
PADRAIG YEATS
Sir, – When I first came to live in Santry, over 40 years ago, the city/county boundary ran between the sitting room and the hallway of my very modest house. Since then the boundary has been moved a number of times, with very little regard for the social consequences of the changes. The result has been the completely chaotic state of the northern fringe area of Dublin city. Every morning the radio informs us of the traffic build-up on the Drumcondra road between Whitehall Church and the city.
Do Fingal councillors never listen to the radio and if they do, do they wonder where all those commuters are coming from? Are they not aware of how they and their constituents are dependent on the services provided by the city? Have they got their own hospitals, third level colleges or cultural institutions?
Can they not accept that some overall authority will have to be agreed to resolve the problems that are unique to the greater Dublin area? Yours, etc,
LOUIS O’FLAHERTY,
Lorcan Drive,
Santry,
Dublin 9
Sir, – I hope that the good councillors of Fingal have the decency to include their voting record in their decision to prevent Dublin having a directly elected mayor on their posters and flyers for the upcoming local elections. In that way the people can decide if Dublin and democracy have been served by their decision. Yours, etc,
RORY J WHELAN,
Roschoill,
Drogheda,
Co Louth
Sir, Could it be that the Fine Gael councillors on Fingal County Council were influenced by a bigger animal up the food chain, to quote a phrase from the TV series House of Cards , in their No vote against a directly elected mayor for Dublin? Yours, etc,
BRIAN AHERN,
Meadow Copse,
Clonsilla,
Dublin 15.
Sir, – I got up early and ate a healthy breakfast to ensure I would be fully awake before picking up today’s edition of The Irish Times . Opening it with some trepidation, I was determined that I would not be caught out by any prank stories celebrating April Fool’s Day. This year your front page seems to have taken this tradition just a bit too far. The top “story” informs us that the Garda has been keeping thousands of possibly illegally made secret telephone recordings for years. Your next “story” describes how a mere 16 councillors from Fingal appear to have perverted the course of democracy in Dublin by denying its ordinary citizens of the right to vote for our mayor.
But really, your last “story” was just too much! “Politicians win respect of randomly chosen citizens”. Seriously? Just how gullible do you think we all are? Really, you are going to have to try harder on this next year. Yours, etc,
VICTORIA MULLEN,
Old Bawn Road,
Tallaght,
Dublin 24
Sir, – Acres of newsprint have been devoted to the conflict in Ukraine and the Russian takeover of the Crimean peninsula, with Russia being portrayed as the arch-villain of the piece. It is only now that we find a rare voice pointing out that the proposed eastward expansionism of the EU and with it Nato is a well-grounded cause of concern for Russia. Derek Scally, writing from Berlin (March 29th), quotes former German chancellor Helmut Schmidt describing Russia’s annexation of Crimea as “completely understandable”. (One is not claiming his approval thereof.)
There is widespread ignorance in the West of the history of Crimea vis a vis Russia. How many people for example, know that it is only 23 years since Crimea became part of Ukraine? Under Catherine the Great in the early 18th century the Crimean peninsula was absorbed into the Russian empire. It was strategically significant for Russia to have a naval base on the Black Sea, and the Russian navy has been in the Crimea for almost 200 years. (Incidentally, Gibraltar was “acquired” by the British empire later in the same century, also for strategic reasons. Thus did big powers protect their own interests.) Crimea then remained an independent region of the Russian Federation. Its population, language and culture were predominantly Russian.
In 1954, Nikita Khrushchev, then head of the Soviet Union, himself a Ukrainian and former leader of the Communist Party there, did an extraordinary thing (of which he could not have foreseen the political consequences). With a stroke of the pen he assigned Crimea to the Ukraine “to further brotherly love between Russians and Ukrainians”.
One wonders how he had the power to do this. However, since the Crimea and Ukraine were still part of the Soviet Union, the political change had no effect on people’s lives. It was in 1991, only 23 years ago, on the collapse of the Soviet Union, that Crimea, with its majority Russian population, found itself overnight part of a new Ukraine, a different country. Colloquially, Crimeans said they had been handed over “like a sack of potatoes”.
According as Ukraine’s new nationalism expressed itself ever more forcefully, Crimeans resented restrictions they felt demeaned them, for example the downgrading of the Russian language. They wanted Russian to remain (with Ukrainian) an official language. Given their loyalty to Russia,the result of the recent referendum was a foregone conclusion. The result was derided by Western governments and media. Crimeans however who, strange as it may seem to Western observers, do not want to join the EU, are grateful to Putin who enabled them, after a 23-year “exile” to return to the Russian motherland. Yours, etc,
MARIE C O’BYRNE,
Louisville,
Monaghan

Sir, – Is it not somewhat ironic that the Fianna Fáil spokesperson on justice is complaining that the former Garda commissioner was apparently sacrificed in order to protect the Minister for Justice when, in 2005, a former secretary-general of the Department of Health and Children was sacrificed in a blatant attempt to protect the political standing of the now Fianna Fáil leader, Mr Martin.
Indeed, in relation to Fianna Fáil’s call for the resignation of Mr Shatter – before the various inquiries and the commission of investigation into the penalty points and phone recording issues are completed and reported upon – it is worthwhile to recall that back in 2005 in relation to the Travers report on nursing home charges, RTÉ reported Mr Martin as saying that the opposition’s attacks on him on this matter had no credibility, because they called for his resignation before the report was published. As the seanfhocail goes, “what’s sauce for the goose …” Yours, etc,
JOHN GILLEN,
Downside Park,
Skerries,
Co Dublin
Sir, – There is a lot of noise being made about appointing a new commissioner. Surely the establishment of the Garda Reserve included a reserve commissioner — can we not just have that one? Yours, etc,
DECLAN KEANE,
Prosperous,
Co Kildare
Sir, – Anyone following media coverage of the Garda commissioner’s retirement could be forgiven for thinking that he cannot have had any operational responsibility for illegal phone taping. Paradoxically, many of those media commentators now bemoaning his apparent martyrdom are the very ones who had previously been most vociferous in calling for his head. Yours, etc,
PETER MOLLOY,
Haddington Park,
Glenageary,
Co Dublin
Sir, – Sources close to me are fed up listening to sources close to the former Garda commissioner. Yours, etc,
GERRY O’DONNELL,
Castleknock Meadows,
Dublin 15
Sir, – According to Frances Ruane and Emer Smyth, the ESRI Post Primary Longitudinal Study demonstrates that “the current Junior Cycle is not providing an engaging and challenging experience for young people”. The reason promulgated for its inadequacies is the fact that a considerable amount of the current teaching cycle is devoted to “preparing for the Junior Certificate examination, spending extra time on study and grinds, and increased class time on ‘practising’ exam questions”.
This being so, the central issue is surely the nature of the methods used to assess the learning rather than the quality of that learning or the teaching behind it. It is worrying therefore that the new Junior Cycle that will be taught from September is currently without an agreed or even suggested framework of how exactly it will be assessed.
As a teacher of English who has undergone all the currently available in-service training – a one day seminar – I have major concerns about the way in which the Department of Education has gone about its reform of the Junior Cycle. While I welcome many aspects of the new curriculum, I suspect that those behind it have not fully considered the rationale behind much of it. We have been informed that the new methods of assessment are still being determined while Ruairí Quinn is simultaneously asserting that the ship has sailed. Is it not foolhardy to set sail without knowing one’s destination, or that the new destination is going to be an improvement on the old? Yours, etc,
CAROL McGUIRE,
Clogher Road,
Dublin 12
Sir, – Tom Arnold, chairperson of the Constitutional Convention, and indeed of the Irish Times Trust, wrote (April 1st ) of the apparent success and inclusiveness of the convention.
Perhaps it was a success. Perhaps too, next time, it might include some representation from the just under 1,000 elected local government politicians who have an equal – but different – mandate from TDs and a greater mandate in this Republic than the appointed Senators and Northern Ireland representatives who were so included. The involvement of other citizens was a welcome development. Given the specific recognition of local government in the Constitution that exclusion was not. This point was made to the convention while it was sitting — we still await a reply. Yours, etc,
Cllr DERMOT LACEY,
66 Beech Hill Drive,
Donnybrook,
Dublin 4

Sir, – With regard to Chris Goodey’s comment (Letters, April 1st) that the Minister for Health’s statement that GPs in Ireland are among the highest- earning doctors in Europe is “obtusely untrue”, I remember reading a survey many years ago that medical card patients were worth, on average, around €90,000 a year to a GP practice. So many years later, €250,000 a year seems to me to be probably just about right. Considering that patients without medical cards, a big percentage now, pay on average €50 for a visit, I think the dogs in the street know that most of the doctors in general practice in this country are very highly paid. Yours, etc,
BRIAN McDEVITT,
Ardconnaill,
Glenties,
Co Donegal

Sir,  – I was pleasantly surprised that you published the letter from Jim Stack regarding the lack of media coverage of the views of “50 per cent of those who actually vote”.   I cannot understand how it is acceptable that these views are consistently ignored in our national media.   While grateful for this first step in acknowledging this imbalance, may I look forward to it being redressed in the future by The Irish Times ?
Yours, etc,
MARY STEWART,
Ardeskin,
Donegal Town

Sir, – I couldn’t agree more with Frank Byrne (Letters, April 1st) regarding women applying make-up on the bus. I had the misfortune recently to be seated beside a young lady who had the audacity to embellish her eyelashes with mascara while I was eating a box of chips and chicken nuggets. Mascara doesn’t go too well with salt and vinegar, or indeed sweet and sour sauce! There was a time when such behaviour wouldn’t have been tolerated. Yours, etc,
PAUL DELANEY,
Beacon Hill,
Dalkey,
Co Dublin

 
Irish Independent:
Also in this section
Coming back from the mother of all mistakes
Pylons will mutilate our beautiful countryside
Think the unthinkable
The Lord Mayor and the burghers in Cork City Hall have decided in their expansive wisdom and generosity that President Michael D Higgins should shortly be given the Freedom of the City.
No great harm in that, you might say – the only problem is that we, the ordinary people of Cork, will, as usual, end up footing the rather expensive bill through our rates, property and other taxes.
Conversely, there is no money for those citizens who are crippled with negative equity and unsustainable and crucifying debts, no money for the many children daily going hungry to school, no money for the homeless, the aged and the disabled or the thousands who are jobless and in despair.
No money to bring home the thousands of our young and not so young who have been forced to emigrate. No money for our struggling small businesses or to fix our potholed and broken roads.
Miraculously, however, we have plenty of money for a meaningless shindig in the present economic climate and in the throes of a raging recession.
It is, of course, in microcosm, another measure of the disdain and disconnect that those in positions of power and influence have for the lives and travails of ordinary citizens who have been force fed on debilitating austerity for the last six years.
No doubt the people of Cork and elsewhere will express their feelings on this and other matters next May.
JOHN HEALY
BISHOPSTOWN ROAD, CORK
HEARTWARMING STORY
* Reading the Irish Independent on March 24, a beautiful photograph on page 14 caught my attention; surgeon Pat Kiely and formerly conjoined twins Hussein and Hassan Benhaffaf from Cork.
Speaking as a co-founder of charity Straight Ahead (which I confess I was unaware of), Dr Kiely referred to problems caused by delays in carrying out spinal surgery on children at Crumlin and Tallaght hospitals.
Dr Kiely and his fellow surgeons have already given up their free time to operate on 26 children at no cost to the parents.
The twins’ mother, Angie, was quoted as saying “their generosity moves me . . . what they do is life changing”.
It was heartening to hear of such dedication and generosity at a time when we have been bombarded with stories of the obscenely high executive salaries/pensions in organisations like CRC, Rehab, etc – some even having the nerve to tell us they should be earning more and are entitled to bonuses but have (generously) not taken them for four years!
Do these people realise or care about the enormous damage being done to the whole charity sector?
Well done to Dr Kiely and fellow surgeons for the wonderful work you do.
JOHN O’DONOGHUE
MOHILL, CO LEITRIM
HELPING CHILDREN
* I write regarding Sinead Moriarty’s comment piece entitled ‘We’re too busy being paranoid to help a child in distress’ (Irish Independent, March 28).
About three years ago, I noticed two small children playing on a narrow path outside a newsagent’s beside a very busy roundabout in south Co Dublin. I advised the older one, a five-year-old boy, to please be very careful as it was just at dusk and traffic was heavy.
They were still there when I came out and I asked if their mother was in the shop. They said, ‘No, she’s gone to work’. It transpired that the five-year-old was ‘looking after’ his three-year-old sister. I took them to the far side of the road where the path was much wider and safer, and decided I should wait with them until a parent arrived to collect them.
Around 20 minutes later, I asked the boy if he knew where his house was and he pointed to the far side of the roundabout. It seems he had navigated this roundabout safely earlier!
We began to walk, me hoping we were going the right way, and the children chatting away happily. We reached their house about 10 minutes later to find people running around frantically looking for them, including their father who had just fallen asleep in the chair and was horrified to know they had gone so far from home.
I was very glad that I was the person who found them, but the thing is it never crossed my mind to call the police or that my motives might be suspect to anyone. I just wanted to know that they got safely home.
As a mother of four adult children, I would always be very aware of a child with apparently no adult accompanying them.
LILIAN CHAMBERS
BLACKROCK, DUBLIN
TIME FOR THE UNSELFIE
* The so-called selfie in our brave new world serves as the ultimate distraction. One’s self.
This, if I may say so, to use a word of some disputation currently, is little short of being “disgusting”.
Great hardship is being endured by men, women and children in this country and in countries across the world, and to propagate the concept that the self or narcissistic preoccupation should prevail is to veer dangerously close to fascism.
It is a time not for the selfie but for the antithesis of the selfie.
The unselfie.
JOHN KELLY
MULLINGAR, CO WESTMEATH
21ST-CENTURY THINKING
* There is need for far fresher ideas than those implemented by Government (Editorial, Irish Independent, March 31) to overcome the unemployment problems that are accumulating in an entirely unprecedented work situation.
Work is being eliminated on a truly massive scale by rampant automation and much more than stopgap programmes for a few is needed.
There is need on a world basis, or at least a large trading bloc such as the EU or US, to move to much shorter hours, longer holidays and earlier retirement for all.
The maths are simple; more people working less or fewer people working more.
There is also need for Government to generate much more public service employment. Private enterprise will require fewer people even working shorter hours as technology advances.
Employment change is the most urgent crisis we face; greater even than climate change. If employment escalates out of control, as it will without drastic action, and society breaks down, climate change will matter only to the birds.
We need 21st-century thinking for 21st-century employment. There seems little sign of any yet.
PADRAIC NEARY
TUBBERCURRY, CO SLIGO
Irish Independent

 


Quiet day

$
0
0

3April 2014 Quiet day
I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. They have to tach Navigation Priceless
Mary better potter around
Scrabble today, I win by three points, Perhaps Mary will win tomorrow.

Obituary:

 

Captain Harry Beckingham – obituary
Captain Harry Beckingham was a bomb disposal officer who dealt with lethal butterflies in Hull and survived gas poisoning in Ilford

Captain Harry Beckingham
6:17PM BST 02 Apr 2014
4 Comments
Captain Harry Beckingham, who has died on his 94th birthday, was a bomb disposal officer in the Second World War.
On the outbreak of war, Beckingham, a draughtsman fresh from technical college, was posted to 35 Bomb Disposal Section, which was subsequently incorporated into 5 Bomb Disposal (BD) Company RE.
He was given a day’s training at Sheffield, at the end of which, as he said afterwards: “We were given a drawing which showed how to deal with an unexploded bomb.” This depicted a wall being constructed around the bomb with corrugated metal and sandbags, with an area left so that a man could crawl inside and place a charge.
After the start of the Blitz, Beckingham worked on unexploded bombs first in the north of London and then – after moving to the Duke of York Barracks – in the West End, Fulham and Victoria.
One day his section was called out to the centre of Ilford to dig for a bomb when “out of the blue a German plane swooped down on us, machine guns blazing as he roared past”. Beckingham dived for cover, while the rest of his squad took shelter in nearby shop doorways.
Related Articles
Lieutenant-Colonel Eric Wakeling
18 Nov 2013
Emlyn Jones
23 Feb 2014
George Carroll
05 Jun 2012
The next thing he knew, he was waking up in hospital. It turned out that he had fallen into a concealed camouflet – a chamber filled with odourless carbon dioxide created when a bomb exploded underground.
Such accidents almost invariably proved fatal. The bottom of the hole could be 30ft deep, and there was often no way of knowing that the bomb had already exploded. Rescue attempts were forbidden because they usually only added to the casualties.
Fortunately for Beckingham, a policeman had seen his head suddenly disappear, and his colleagues had rushed over and pulled him out — although not before he had breathed several lungfuls of the deadly gas.
Henry William Beckingham was born at Ludlow, Shropshire, on February 28 1920 and educated locally. He was commissioned in 1943 and posted to 12 BD Company RE in Leeds. That summer he was kept busy clearing butterfly bombs from the hedges and ditches around Hull. He had to use straw, set alight, to burn off the thick undergrowth so that he did not miss any of these lethal devices.
In September 1944 he was posted to Task Force 135, which had assembled at Plymouth for the liberation of the Channel Islands. He was involved in clearing British minefields in the Weymouth and Penzance areas until May 1945, when he embarked for Jersey as commander of a detachment of 24 BD Platoon.
He went to the Pomme d’Or Hotel on the esplanade and took prisoner the head of the German civil administration on the island. The hotel was to be used for the Task Force’s commander, and he checked the place for booby traps.
Beckingham took his unit to Guernsey at the end of the month and was involved in clearing mines and bombs along the coasts of the Channel Islands until May 1946, when he was demobilised in the rank of captain.
After the war he worked for the building division of English China Clay at St Austell, Cornwall, and subsequently as a consultant at Ilkley, Yorkshire. Settled in retirement at a village in Cumbria, he enjoyed sailing, gardening, and travelling.
Beckingham published Living with Danger: Memoirs of a Bomb Disposal Officer (1997) and Achtung! Minen! Guernsey (2005).
Harry Beckingham married first, in 1945, Joan Walker, who predeceased him. He married, secondly, in 1990, Mavis Hayward, who survives him with a son and a daughter from his first marriage.
Captain Harry Beckingham, born February 28 1920, died February 28 2014
Guardian:
Once again we can applaud the UK government and its partners for taking a global lead on the rights of women and girls (Jolie steps up campaign to eradicate use of mass rape as weapon of war, 31 March). The London summit in June will bring unprecedented focus to sexual violence in conflict and, for that, Angelina Jolie and William Hague deserve great credit.
As the Guardian points out, the challenge will be to translate public attention into lasting change. In that mission, I believe one thing is particularly crucial: engaging youth. Let’s make sure that young women – and men – are given the platform in June so that they are not passive victims but agents of change. Ms Jolie and Mr Hague have, with others, led the way. Now, to ensure a future free from sexual violence in conflict, the experiences and recommendations of young people affected by these horrific crimes must shape the summit’s outcome.
Tanya Barron
Chief executive, Plan UK
Shirley Williams asserts (Letters, 2 April) that ex-Soviet satellite members of the EU are “bound to democracy and the rule of law”. Would that include the laws in Estonia and Latvia that deprive native-born residents of citizenship rights on the basis of ethnicity?
Ian Sutherland
Bury, Lancashire
• The gift of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s eminently re-readable short novel One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich (What book would you send to a prisoner?, 1 April) would encourage any prisoner, like Shukhov in the gulag, to develop a personal code of survival under the regime inside while purposefully preparing for release into a much harsher environment outside.
Dr Mark Stroud
Llantrisant, Glamorgan
• Experience suggests that, for some prisoners, Jane Austen is just what they’re waiting for. One of our reading groups at a women’s prison reported a lively session with Pride and Prejudice. “That first scene, guy walks in and says no one here worth dancing with – all been there, haven’t we?”
Professor Jenny Hartley
Prison reading groups, University of Roehampton
• Dangling participle alert (Evans tells jury of ‘absolute hell’ of sex allegations, 1 April): “While giving explicit details of how he and the young man performed sex acts, the judge stepped in to halt the questioning by Evans’s barrister.”
John Sibbald
Whitley Bay, Tyne and Wear
• Surely conscious uncoupling (Letters, 31 March) is what the railwayman does between the engine and the carriages?
Stuart Waterworth
Tavistock, Devon
• Flintshire has the Devil’s Village (Letters, 28 March), but we are the only place in the world to have the place names Purgatory and Paradise just a few miles apart. We’ll be walking this route next All Souls’ Day as part of the Laurie Lee festival: cordial and indulgent invitations to all.
Stuart Butler
Stroud, Gloucestershire
• And when in grumpy mood, we’ve been known to take a seaside break at Buggerru in south-west Sardinia.
Tony Scull
Ilkley, West Yorkshire
Your report (Scotland plans to move to right after independence, 1 April) reminded me of a similar decision, back in the 1970s, by an ex-colonial country, determined to throw off the shackles. To smooth the transition, it was suggested that cars should make the switch first, followed by buses and trucks a week later.
Barry Wendt
Ambleside, Cumbria
• I presume there is a Möbius strip inside the traffic interchange towers shown in your illustrations of Scottish plans for the road system after independence? Without such a geometric device, the traffic would emerge on the same side of the road.
David Reed
London
• 1 April. Page 3: a recommended diet, consisting almost entirely of green vegetables and warning of the dangers posed by dried figs. Page 5: Scotland, after independence, would adopt driving on the right and introduce vast spiral interchanges on its borders. Page 6: Phyllida Barlow’s latest sculpture, Dock, which appeared to be the contents of a colossal builder’s skip emptied into a room at Tate Britain. Which was the spoof?
James Hornsby
Abington, Northampton
• Every 1 April, Guardian readers need to beware of the spoof story. This year it was just too easy to spot: “Osborne vows to create full employment.”
Anthony Matthew
Leicester
• Two fools in the news on 1 April: the first sells off a 300-year-old national asset at nearly half price; the second lauds the deviousness, low cunning and total untrustworthiness of President Putin. I really do believe that the average market trader and person in the street would apply more intelligence and common sense to their analysis than this prize pair put together.
Mike Saunders
Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire

ms/Demotix/Corbis
Ken Loach’s article (Labour is not the solution, 28 March) has received a fantastic response – 250 people joined Left Unity over the weekend, when we held our first national conference.
But Labour supporters would rather see us pack up our things and go home. They tell us not to rock the boat for fear of letting the Tories in next year. New Labour was founded on the assumption that Labour could tack as far as it liked to the right and still count on the left vote for lack of an alternative. And tack right it did. Now we have a Labour party signed up to Conservative spending plans, privatisation and a benefits cap that will hit disabled people hard and push 345,000 children into poverty. And whatever you do, don’t mention the (Iraq) war.
Left Unity’s conference in Manchester on Saturday agreed to campaign against austerity and war, to introduce a 35-hour week and a mandatory living wage, and to renationalise the rail and energy companies. These are policies that the vast majority of British people support but Labour, ever in the pockets of big business, will not even consider them. What does this say about the Labour party today? What does it say about the state of British democracy? This is exactly why we need Left Unity.
Salman Shaheen
Principal speaker, Left Unity
• As every year passes, the influence of the left in the Labour party diminishes; it’s almost non-existent now. In 1994, Ralph Miliband wrote in Socialism for a Sceptical Age: “The emergence of new socialist parties in many countries is one of the notable features of the present time … their growth is essential if the left is to prosper.”
The parties Ralph Miliband was referring to have developed into the Party of the European Left, an alliance of left parties in European countries. Opinion polls indicate that those parties, which have a clear policy of opposing austerity and privatisation, and which support the re-founding of Europe on a socialist basis, will get increased support in the forthcoming European elections. Syriza in Greece has 23.9% support, Izquierda Unida in Spain 14.1%, Front de Gauche in France 9% and Die Link in Germany 8%.
In Britain we have no opportunity of voting for such a party. Left Unity’s conference agreed to support the Party of the European Left’s call for a refounding of Europe on a socialist basis. For socialists in the Labour party there is an alternative – Left Unity.
David Melvin
Ashton-under-Lyne, Greater Manchester
• In threatening to split Unite from Labour (Back workers or lose election, Miliband told, 2 April), my friend Len McCluskey would be sadly destined to repeat history. Small splinter left parties in Britain have never succeeded, only played into the hands of the Tories by dividing their opponents and undermining the ability of Labour – the only party capable of forming an alternative government – to win. Far too many of my constituents, like many others, are being devastated by this Tory-Lib Dem government and are desperate to defeat them.
Peter Hain MP
Lab, Neath
• Deborah Orr wrote a very interesting article (Workers are treated with contempt in Britain. This should be Labour’s focus, 29 March), which, if I read her right, called for what at one time was described as a “middle way” between adherence to the state and reliance on the market. Leave aside the fact that her knock at New Labour may well have been misplaced (I do not believe for a moment that the Brown government was defeated in 2010 because it was New Labour), and it is possible to see that the critique she offers has been debated for the past 30 years. The battle lines of the 1980s were about a throwback to Friedrich Hayek and the “liberated individual” of Margaret Thatcher’s free-market values, and old Labour with its paternalistic, top-down approach to solving genuine problems.
The question that Orr did not answer is how you mobilise the power of people in their own lives with the influence of the state to tackle vested interests, from wherever they come, and to unite people against such vested interests across national boundaries in a rapidly developing global power struggle. The truism that all of us have to address in politics is: “Those who have power are those most likely to be in power.”
David Blunkett MP
Lab, Sheffield Brightside and Hillsborough
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report makes it clear that the future of world agriculture is precarious (UN warning over world’s food supplies, 31 March). The international mechanisms to address the complex challenges remain weak, and the UK must, as it has done in energy policy, show leadership. We need to re-engineer the UK’s food and farming system, not only because we can no longer look to global markets for a safe, secure food future, but also because we need that system to play its full part in adapting to, and reducing the severity of, climate change.
As a priority, less food must be wasted from field to fork: producing more is pointless when so much energy, effort and land is squandered through waste. Decarbonising food supply across the supply chain to cut greenhouse gas emissions is essential, but we also need to give farmers incentives to manage land in ways that store carbon to cut emissions further. Last, we need to reappraise the supply of farmland as a long-term productive resource: in a world of falling crop yields, volatile markets and unpredictable weather, farmland cannot for much longer be regarded as simply ripe for “development”.
Graeme Willis
Campaign to Protect Rural England
• If most of those working on an ageing aeroplane warned the owners there was more than a 50% chance of it crashing, then the plane would be grounded. As most climate scientists now say there is a more than 75% chance of average global temperatures exceeding a 4% rise by the end of this century, if not sooner, we surely want to take drastic action as soon as possible. The costs of not reducing greenhouse gases will far outweigh the cost of investment in alternative sources of energy. Governments, transnational corporations and others need to act now to prevent catastrophic global warming.
But they need us to tell them so – now. As well as emphasising the urgency for action, we also need to work on building up the resilience of local communities to adapt. Local communities as well as nations need to come together to work on local projects to respond creatively to climate change. Green or environmental groups, such as Transition Towns, that are already doing this need greater local and national support. We need to work together for the common good, for example, to promote local food, and we cannot afford to wait to do this until an emergency happens, such as the floods on the Somerset Levels.
Rev Timothy Fox
Lancaster
• The letters from Raymond Blanc et al and Caroline Lucas MP (1 April) call for action to combat climate change, but their suggestions will not achieve what is needed. Caroline Lucas rightly says that “80% of known fossil fuel reserves” will have to stay in the ground if we are to tackle the problem by cutting emissions. However, as China, India, Brazil and others continue to expand their energy use massively, it is now beyond all reasonable doubt that nothing like 80% will stay unburnt, even in the unlikely event that countries such as the UK were to reduce their usage to zero.
Environmentalists, businesses, governments and the UN now need to accept that the only feasible solutions are to remove greenhouse gas emissions from the atmosphere by means of reforestation and carbon scrubbing, and to cool the planet artificially by means of geo-engineering.
Richard Mountford
Tonbridge, Kent
• The latest pre-election trial balloon from David Cameron (Tories plan new attack on windfarms, 2 April) reflects a party that is not seeking a sensible energy policy for Britain. Instead it is clear that the Conservative party has adopted a strategy of chasing after Ukip, seeking to be more extreme. It seems that the fanatical opposition to windfarms from some on the right might soon prompt David “hug a husky” Cameron to be pictured instead taking an axe to a wind turbine, because the floated policy suggests that the Tories want to see existing turbines pulled down.
Britain trails nearly all the European Union in providing renewable energy – we can boast of being ahead only of those global giants Malta and Luxembourg – meanwhile, states such as the US and China are surging ahead with renewables. The refusal to provide a secure, supportive investment environment for renewables in the UK risks losing opportunities for jobs and businesses.
Natalie Bennett
Leader, Green party
• The septennial report of the IPPC adds further weight, if any was needed, to the assessment of risks posed by climate change, not only globally but to the UK economy, environment and society, not in some distant era but in the near future with potentially damaging effects on future generations. The first obligation on politicians of whatever hue is the protection of their citizens. In reality, whatever consensus existed in the UK has effectively dissipated and decisive action seems as far away as ever. We have the European elections pending and the general election in 12 months . Who would bet that the global climate and the coming storm will register on the electoral radar? To continue to dissemble and prevaricate in the face of risks to national security and wellbeing of this magnitude would surely be a criminal abrogation of political responsibility.
I call on government, together with all the parties, to initiate, facilitate and fund a sustained national debate on the risks and options, conducted in regional venues and across the web, between business, civil society and the scientific community between now and May 2015.
Neil Blackshaw
Little Easton, Essex
• Is it too much to hope that the catastrophic effects predicted for climate change later this century will feature in party manifestos next year? Or will this generation of political leaders go down in what remains of human history as those who lacked the courage and honesty to face the world’s greatest crisis?
Rev Neil Richardson
Ludlow, Shropshire
• One thing missing from the climate change debate is any suggestion that we might address world population growth. Surely it must be obvious that this crisis would be easier to cope with if population was stable or declining. But no one mentions this. Why?
Roger Plenty
Stroud, Gloucestershire

Tony Benn always tried to argue a case through reason rather than endlessly repeated slogans. His approach to political discourse was rooted deeply in his sense of history, as in the campaign against the banning of Peter Wright’s controversial book Spycatcher. At a protest event at Speakers’ Corner in ‘Hyde Park, London, in August 1987 we each took it in turns to read aloud some of the more explosive extracts from the book in defiance of government injunctions preventing publication of any part of it, with its extraordinary revelations about alleged illegality by the intelligence services.
Tony’s presence probably deterred the police, who could be seen nervously consulting with their superiors on their walkie-talkies over whether to arrest us. In a fine piece of oratory he inveighed against state censorship, invoking article one of the bill of rights of 1689. He said he was speaking out as a citizen, as an MP, as a privy counsellor and “as a member of the committee of privileges of the House of Commons to warn that we cannot, and should not accept this restriction on our liberty”.

Independent:
Your editorial of 2 April is absolutely right to say that “science is not opinion” and to identify the climate change deniers as coming from the political right.
The reason the BBC cannot find experts in climate change to argue against the phenomenon is that no scientist worthy of the name would do so. What we are seeing is a new variation on the science-versus-religion debate: the god of the new dogma is the free-market.
The deniers are nearly always very comfortably off, or supported by billionaires such as the Koch brothers. In their arguments they are wrong about almost every detail except the truth which really haunts them. It is that their free-market model, based on unfettered pillaging of our planet’s resources, has to end if climate change is to be checked.
If not, we are headed for the greatest extinction of species (including our own) since the Permian era. However, like all religious fanatics, the deniers would no doubt consider that a small price to pay to protect the sanctity of their dogma.
Steve Edwards, Wivelsfield Green, East Sussex
Kate O’Mara’s theatre rescue
We at the Kings Theatre in Southsea are deeply saddened at the death of Kate O’Mara (Obituary, 1 April). Kate spent much of her youth at the Kings, which was built by her great grandfather in 1907 and later run by her actor/manager grandparents.
She loved theatre generally, and the Kings in particular. She performed here many times. We particularly remember her outstanding performances in The Taming of the Shrew and An Ideal Husband.
When the theatre was in its direst need – in danger of being converted into a theme pub or, worse, demolished – Kate became a supporter of Akter (Action for Kings Theatre Restoration) and, later, a patron of the rescued and rejuvenated theatre.
I know Kate was delighted that her beloved theatre is going from strength to strength. We will miss her passion and enthusiasm.
Paddy Drew, Southsea, Hampshire
Seven a day? Who can afford it?
We hear that if we eat seven portions of  fruit and veg a day we will live longer. Well, I’m afraid that all but the wealthy are going to die before their time.
The government recommendation of five a day was bad enough, and the poorer in our society could not have managed that. Has anyone who makes these recommendations ever thought where the money is going to come from? Anyone who actually goes shopping will realise that five a day for a family of four for seven days will cost more than their budget for an entire week’s groceries. We are now seeing fruit sold at prices per item instead of per weight.
They should think before making silly recommendations that are beyond so many people’s reach.
Dave Croucher, Doncaster
Public health doctors appear to have been taken in by the report regarding the benefits of eating 10 portions of fruit and vegetables a day.
Only a moment’s reflection is needed to realise that those eating larger amounts of fresh fruit and veg are likely to be people who understand the benefit of a healthy lifestyle and can afford to pay for it. So they are probably, also, doing the other things that are part of a healthy lifestyle, such as taking exercise, not smoking, and drinking alcohol in moderation; in addition, they are likely to have the knowledge to seek medical advice for early intervention for any health problems.
By increasing the quantity of fresh fruit and veg consumed from one portion a day to seven or more, you may improve your health and therefore reduce your risk of dying, but until all the other factors have been excluded you cannot know by how much. It’s misleading to suggest that we only have to change our diet to reduce our risk of dying by  42 per cent.
Michael Charvonia, Southgate, Middlesex
Two of the top 20 charities, receiving £100m-plus, are Cancer UK and the British Heart Foundation. I assume people hope these research charities will find the answer to these endemic ills. Yet how upset and angry people get when told we are eating junk and that eating healthily may well help us avoid suffering these diseases.
I suppose the real answer is that people want to go on eating a high meat, sugar, fat, salt, alcohol, soda-pop and refined-grain diet and do as little exercise as possible. They give to these medical charities in the hope they will come up with a pill, potion or procedure that allows them not to change their unhealthy lifestyle.
Sara Starkey, Tonbridge, Kent
Squash is not just for toffs
Squash may be “too brutal” for Roger Federer, but Lalit Bhadresha (letter, 26 March) makes a good case for bringing this sport into the Olympics. Sadly, here in Britain squash has the reputation of being a game for toffs and is little played by teenagers in the state education system.
But squash is easy to learn, can be played all year round, develops agility as well as stamina, and unlike contact sports can be enjoyed throughout our working lives and beyond. It would be relatively inexpensive to incorporate a couple of squash courts whenever a new school is built, and this would be a very cost-effective way of developing physical fitness in young people.
David Hewitt, London N1
Childless marriage is still marriage
Commenting on gay marriage, Kevin O’Donnell (letter, 31 March) defines marriage as the potential for children. That is a dangerous path. We struggled with infertility for several years. If it had been proved that one of us was infertile and therefore lacked the potential to have children, would we have been less married or not married by this definition? Infertility is a big enough cross to carry without adding this idea to it.
Brian Dalton, Sheffield
England’s share of humiliation
I think the performance of the cricket team this winter has finally sent Stephen Brenkley over the edge (2 April). Waitrose may or may not regret sponsoring the England cricket team, but they won’t be bothered about the share price as they are part of the employee-owned John Lewis Partnership.
Rob Edwards, Harrogate, North Yorkshire
Every student’s education benefits us all
I am shocked that you should defend tuition fees (editorial, 1 April).
Who, among those who support tuition fees, would like to live in a society without education – a society without architects, engineers or doctors? Who can imagine what such a society would be like?
There would be much less informed discourse, more superstition, no scientific medical care or ways of fighting disease, no safely designed buildings and none of the fruits of technological progress that make the life we know possible. Who wants to step into a lift built by an unqualified engineer?
It would be a return to the jungle. We all need education, whether we take it personally or not. When we visit a doctor, switch on a light, flush a toilet, take a ship, a plane or any vehicle we are benefiting from education.
Everybody who takes an education is benefiting us all and we should all be grateful; we all need educated people. It is those who do not take an education who should be penalised.
What sense is there in making education obligatory until a certain age and then obliging people to pay to continue?
The goal of education should be simple – to nurture everyone according to their ability. The better we do that the better our society will be. Education is the best and most important investment we can make.
Dennis Leachman, Reading
You ask “How can it possibly be fair for those without a university degree to stump up for the income-boosting education of those who do?” (editorial, 1 April). That is entirely reasonable.
But should you not also ask “How can it possibly be fair for those graduates who repay their debt to society by doing comparatively low-paid work in nursing, teaching or social work to stump up for the income-boosting education of highly-paid graduates in banking or hedge fund management?”
The answer to both questions is the same. The fair way to pay for higher education is to use the income tax system to ensure that the more a graduate is paid, the more they pay towards the HE costs of all graduates, while non-graduates are left with nothing to pay towards HE costs at all.
What is blatantly unfair is to charge all graduates the same £9,000 per year, regardless of how much financial benefit they gain from their graduate status.
David Rendel, (Higher education spokesperson for the Liberal Democrats, 2003-2005), Upper Bucklebury, West Berkshire

Times:
Sat-nav is marvellous when it works, but when it stops we have to fall back on old tech
Sir, Maps are not just a means of getting from A to B; they are a source of interest and pleasure (report, Mar 31; letters, Apr 1 & 2). Perusing a map, one can discover lanes and byways, remote villages, churches, monuments and much more. We live in a county with very many little lanes, and our map-reading friends arrive on time while our sat-nav friends get lost.
Joan Westall
Newton Ferrers, Devon
Sir, It’s not just roadworks which are not recognised by sat-nav. En route to a meeting in Burton on Trent last week I was held up by a lorry fire on the A38 near Sutton Coldfield. As the diversion signs were deficient, I switched on the sat-nav.
How I wished afterwards that I had stopped for just a few minutes to consult the map. The satnav did not know where the accident was, nor even that one may not turn right across a major dual carriageway. By contrast, the map showed a simple detour.
Sat-navs certainly have their place, but the humble map, though several years out of date, is still a worthwhile travelling companion.
Howard Lamb
Wargrave, Berks
Sir, I am curious how Bernard Kingston (letter, Apr 1) with his memorised road map could outwit the sat-navs of his fellow guests travelling through “numerous” roadworks to a central London location. This would require memorising a broad swathe of the road map along the route. Some months ago I was travelling north on the A34 from Winchester to Oxford only to be confronted by a sign on the approach to the M4 warning me that the A34 was closed north of the M4. The resultant diversion was over 30 miles long and I was more than glad not to stop to consult maps but let the sat-nav take over.
Roger Porter
Whaddon, Bucks
Sir, I can assure Bernard Kingston that endeavouring to read an inverted A-Z by the feeble interior car light when trying to navigate in the pouring rain to a house-warming party did not promote any euphoric feelings of spatial awareness in my breast.
Passing the same garage for the second time I was about to abandon the whole expedition when I remembered the much maligned
sat-nav in the boot. Typing in the post code I was immediately greeting by an encouraging dulcet female voice suggesting that I “perform a U-turn, when possible” and was then seamlessly directed to the front door of the location, where I arrived neither hot nor bothered.
Kay Bagon
Radlett, Herts
Sir, Mr Kingston drove to a social engagement in “central London”. Where the hell did he park?
Graham Steel
Dover, Kent
Sir, My recent experiences in the narrow streets of Willesden Green, North London, suggest that throwing away one’s A-Z might be premature. In one week I twice met gigantic lorries advised by their
sat-navs to head for a particular road in NW2 which isn’t wide enough to swing a cat, let alone manoeuvre a juggernaut.
Both drivers very much appreciated my offer to guide them to the other Chandos Road, which is in NW10.
Hefty Employment Tribunal fees have wiped out 80 per cent of claims — good news for unscrupulous employers
Sir, The Government’s own figures showed that its introduction of Employment Tribunal fees of between £390 and £1,200 in July 2013 have wiped out 80 per cent of claims. Most of the claims that have gone were brought by employees alone and without lawyers.
The shop assistant whose boss didn’t pay him the minimum wage, the pregnant woman underpaid for maternity leave, the factory worker denied proper holiday pay, the transport worker sacked for raising a safety concern, the abused migrant worker — they are just not bringing their claims. The effect on women has been to reduce sex discrimination claims by 77 per cent and the effect on other minority groups such as the disabled has been almost as severe.
Should business rejoice at the lower costs in not fighting claims? Not the many good employers I work for. The cowboys are now waking up to a new Victorian landscape where they can strip employees of statutory rights and discriminate, hire and fire at will safe in the knowledge that justice has been locked up behind a pay wall unaffordable to four out of five members of their staff.
I call on the Government to review the effect of fees urgently. The facts now show that tribunal fees are bad for business, bad for hard-working families and have destroyed access to employment justice in England, Wales and Scotland.
Caspar Glyn, QC
Chair, The Industrial Law Society
The National Childbirth Trust rejects the accusation that it is oldfashioned or locked into outdated ways
Sir, Your report “Inside the Bump Class” (Apr 1) gives an outdated view of NCT — we have changed a great deal since the 1950s. We aim to help all parents to be informed about their choices, and we offer information to cover all eventualities that expectant and new parents face: caesarean sections, other interventions and pain relief, as well as straightforward births and home births.
And because not all parents can afford antenatal classes, we provide courses at a discounted rate and many free classes commissioned by the NHS.
Belinda Phipps
NCT
Rebels don’t have big causes like the rebels of the past — but each generation finds something to get heated about
Sir, “Today’s rebels have been left without a cause”, says Hugo Rifkind (Opinion, Apr 1). This was echoed not only by Marlon Brando in The Wild One (1953) but Jimmy Porter in John Osborne’s Look Back in Anger (1956), when he observed: “People of our generation aren’t able to die for good causes any longer. We had all that done for us, in the Thirties and Forties . . . There aren’t any good brave causes left.”
However, it does seem that each new generation finds itself a cause — even if it’s only climate change.
m. g. sherlock
Colwyn Bay, North Wales
The energy market shambles stems from weak regulation by bodies who put suppliers’ interests ahead of customers’ needs
Sir, The shambles in the energy market stems mainly from weak regulation but also from a succession of inadequate and badly run consumer bodies. Energywatch never found direction and Consumer Focus had too broad a remit to even begin to understand the energy market. They were out of their depth even on some basic issues.
Ofgem has lacked firm leadership since the tenure of Sir James McKinnon in the 1990s and instead of steering the industry in the right direction it consulted and consulted, and nothing got done.
In my own area of interest I am appalled that Ofgem has not stood up for consumers on billing accuracy. Smart meters will cost consumers £12 billion but they will not address any of the billing errors in gas. This is not a minor issue that can be ignored as some gas users could be paying 10 per cent more for the same level of usage.
So what should be done until the Competition and Markets Authority completes it investigation?
Appoint Richard Lloyd of Which? to guide Ofgem on consumer issues. It would be a culture shock, but it is badly needed. Set up a consumer body solely for energy users with staff who are committed to consumers and also understand the market.
Ray Cope
(former director, Gas Consumers Council), Langford, Beds
Telegraph:

 

State of the history of art will change Civilisation
History of art, as a discipline, has changed. This will be reflected in the new version of Civilisation.

Kenneth Clark presented ‘Civilisation’ in 1969, covering 1,000 years of art and philosophy  Photo: BBC
6:58AM BST 02 Apr 2014
37 Comments
SIR – Those of us who enjoyed Kenneth Clark’s style and learnt so much from his assured presentation of Civilisation 40 years ago, must realise that a revolution has taken place in the teaching and scope of the history of art.
No longer is a linear account of the history of (mainly) Western European art a sufficient account. The place of the art connoisseur – of which Clark, who studied with Bernard Berenson, was such an informed exponent – has been discredited and effectively disregarded by the art establishment; since the Seventies, the “new art history” has triumphed.
Additionally, with the growth of university places in the subject, the old order of discourse within art history has become almost taboo. Thus, the use of terms Clark would have been familiar with, such as style, attribution, beauty, genius and quality, has been replaced by less subjective methodology – ideology, class, and feminist and Marxist readings – to the extent that a new vocabulary is inherently a part of the discipline.
The choice of a suitably informed presenter for the new series is, indeed, daunting. Clark was exactly the right man for his time. I hope that the new programme “for the digital age” will prove as informative and memorable. One thing is clear: it will be quite different.
Hugh McIlveen
Wigginton, Oxfordshire

SIR – A remake of Civilisation calls for Lord Hall, director-general of the BBC, to remind the producers of the tremendous impact Neil MacGregor made with A History of the World in 100 Objects – and all we heard was his voice.
David Blake
Bexley, Kent

SIR – The Campaign to Protect Rural England welcomes the findings of the Farrell Review. It is only through intelligent, proactive planning that our housing problems can be solved. We know that more, and affordable, homes are needed but they must be well located, well designed and built to excellent environmental standards.
An important finding of the review was that our current planning system has become too reactive and reliant on development control rather than forward planning. This echoes the findings of the CPRE’s recent report, which found that the current planning system is undermining local democracy and handing power to major developers.
The balance of power should be restored, with local government and communities having more say in what is built, how it is designed and where it is located.
John Rowley
Planning Officer, Campaign to Protect Rural England
London SE1
Related Articles
The Cinderella Law could undermine the family and parental authority
02 Apr 2014
State of the history of art will change Civilisation
02 Apr 2014
SIR – On the edge of the London Green Belt, there are well-advanced plans by The Jockey Club to build 1,500 homes and a number of commercial units on their Kempton Park estate.
Neighbouring communities face not only the power and wealth of The Jockey Club and their multifarious planning consultants, but also the legal powers of the local council, which sees such a development as the solution to the cap on council tax and rapidly decreasing income flows from central government.
The response of Nick Boles, the planning minister, to this is to raise his hands defensively and say that it is up to local councils to decide whether to build on Green Belt land or not.
Alan Doyle
Sunbury, Middlesex
Climate change report
SIR – The latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says that no one on the planet will be untouched by the damaging effects of global warming in coming decades.
I wonder if these effects will be as damaging as the policies of governments in response to previous IPCC reports.
Simon Malcolm
Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire
SIR – The “climatic reality” is that world temperatures are not presently increasing.
IPCC members, whose jobs or status depend on climate change, forecast what might happen rather than extrapolate what is happening, or rather not happening.
Michael Tyce
Waterstock, Oxfordshire
Dillan or Dullan?
SIR – Dylan Thomas, whom I saw through a painful tooth crisis in Iowa, responded to “Dillon”. That’s what John Berryman, Robert Lowell, Ruthven Todd and others who knew him shortly before his death in New York, also called him.
Keith Botsford
London SW18
Fool team
SIR – I note that the £90 England World Cup replica shirts “contain innovative performance technologies”.
Is this an April Fool? If not, perhaps the England cricket team could get some.
James McBroom
Pangbourne, Berkshire
Reforming the Lords
SIR – At a time when the opinion of all MEPs is to be assessed, during the European Parliament elections next month, and a critically important decision is to be made by the Scottish electorate over the 307-year union with England, Labour and Liberal Democrat MPs are bent on “completing unfinished business” by, once again, attacking the constitution of the House of Lords.
Whereas Tony Blair initiated his premiership with a guaranteed “easy win” and seemingly popular Act to remove the majority of hereditary peers, Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg are wasting parliamentary time and public funds if they feel that House of Lords reform is a priority in the mind of the public.
Lord Clifford of Chudleigh
London SW1
Judging the police
SIR – Boris Johnson writes: “Beneath the hullabaloo the police are doing an outstanding job.”
Late last Wednesday night, an officer left my house after my wife reported a burglary. Early on Thursday morning, she received an email from the police saying: “It has been concluded at this time unfortunately there is insufficient information to proceed, and that the specific investigation into your crime will now be closed.” Neither a door knocked nor a neighbour questioned, and 12 hours later: case closed. Surely there should be a tiny bit of a hullabaloo.
Chris Boffey
London N8
SIR – Political correctness, health and safety and increasing regulation have altered the manner in which police officers go about their duties. They have become more inclined to self-protection, which can isolate them from their community.
I remember when the local police got involved in youth club or school activities and had sports teams that competed with other community teams.
Ron Starkey
Kendal, Cumberland
Distinguishing traits
SIR – Can anyone explain why such a high proportion of Members of Parliament, themselves a tiny proportion of the British population, turn out to be stupid, incompetent, criminal or unfit to hold public office?
Jeremy Nicholas
Great Bardfield, Essex
If we double our fruit and veg, what will we get?
SIR – You report that consuming 10 portions of fruit and vegetables per day will allow us to live longer. How can that be proven? How does one know if one has lived longer?
Dr E S Garbett
Sheffield, South Yorkshire
SIR – Faced with 10 portions of fruit and vegetables every day, I’m not at all sure that I would want to live any longer.
Martyn Pitt
Hardwicke, Gloucestershire
SIR – There will be precious little time left to do any work if I have to double the time I devote to eating my meals after switching to a 10-portions-a-day fruit and vegetable regime.
Ron Kirby
Dorchester
SIR – Eat 10 portions, live longer, and end up being neglected or mistreated in an old people’s care home.
Keith Moore
Yoxford, Suffolk

SIR – To legislate on the “emotional, social and behavioural well-being” of children is to introduce the worst kind of nannying. Parental cruelty to children is covered by existing legislation.
While all children deserve love, who is to decide how much love is sufficient? The needs of different children vary hugely and some become hard to handle after puberty, if not before. An excess of affection can sometimes be the root of children’s problems and therefore precisely what is not needed.
Well-meaning legislation, brought in at the behest of pressure groups, is often flawed. Parents must be allowed to bring up their children as they think best. While there will be victims in every society, this kind of well-intentioned law may not reach them and it may have the unintended consequence of further undermining the family and parental authority.
Gregory Shenkman
London W8
SIR – Compelling parents to provide emotional input to their children represents not only the height of naivety but also typifies the current trend to manipulate us socially via legislation.
How can an Act of Parliament force a second-rate parent to love his or her child?
Peter Mahaffey
Cardington, Bedfordshire
SIR – The Government is considering making emotional cruelty to children a criminal offence, and yet the same Government is encouraging young mothers to go out to work while penalising those who stay at home.
Peter Seccombe
Bodenham, Herefordshire
SIR – Many children or teenagers go through a stage in which parents appear to be the enemy. What vindictive fun some would have with the Cinderella Law.
We still read of dreadful cases of uncared-for children dying unnecessarily, despite the services in place. Time and money should be spent on securing what is already in place.
Joy Watkins
London SW11
SIR – Legislation to criminalise the parental neglect of children’s “intellectual, emotional, social or behavioural development” could, in the hands of liberal totalitarians and case-hungry lawyers, provide a “politically correct” instrument to outlaw religious education, gender differentiation, unfashionable discipline, sexual restraint and even patriotism.
David Ashton
Sheringham, Norfolk
SIR – If children will be able to sue their parents when dissatisfied with their upbringing, will parents have equal rights to sue offspring who have not lived up to their expectations?
Dennis Peirson
Ventnor, Isle of Wight
Irish Times:

 

Sir, – Averil Power highlights some of the problems that attend increasing women’s representation in the Dáil (Opinion and Analysis, April 2nd). It is very unusual for a member of a political party to write an article for the media criticising that party’s action or lack of action. So congratulations to her for her honesty.
She should realise, however, that the recent introduction of the condition that political parties have a minimum quota of women candidates in the next general election, before they qualify for full public funding, has not only focused the debate but it has also started a bitter struggle.
Now, when there is a chance that the more than 50 per cent of the electorate that are women might get more of their kind on the ballot paper the insiders and the incumbents will fight tooth and nail to undermine that effort. As a practising woman politician Ms Power is in a better position than most to see this.
Getting women onto the ballot paper, difficult and all as it is, is only the first step. Getting them elected is not going to be easy. Ms Power is wrong when she says that women candidates have the same chance as men. That was true for the 2011 election, when the average woman candidate polled as well as the average man. But that was the first time this was the case and the result was influenced by the fact that a large number of male independents stood in that contest and got very low votes. In previous elections women candidates attracted fewer votes than men.
Increasing the number of women in the Dáil is not going to be easy and the effort is by no means guaranteed to succeed. Yours, etc,
ANTHONY LEAVY,
Shielmartin Drive,
Sutton,
Dublin 13
Sir , – Averil Power’s contention that Countess Markievicz would be horrified that the party she helped establish hasn’t a single female TD may well be true. However, I think the countess might feel a greater sense of horror at the devastation left in wake of 15 years of Fianna Fáil-led government. I am not sure what would motivate any woman with a memory of the last 15 years to stand for Fianna Fáil – regardless of the supports they may put in place to encourage our participation. Yours, etc,
SANDRA ADAMS,
Parkvale,
Baldoyle,
Dublin 13

Sir, – I have been living in Dublin since 2005 and think it is a wonderful city. Concerning its governance though, I could and still cannot not grasp the low level of decision-making power that elected politicians can exercise vis-a-vis unelected officials at the helm of local government. Dublin is a metropolitan region that is the economic engine for the country. Geographically, it has outgrown its administrative boundaries and people’s concept of the city is not defined by signposts demarcating the city limits. Dublin does compete with other European regions for business. Reassessing the responsibility for the governance of the metropolitan region should not be left in the hands of a small group of politicians in Fingal, who do not seem to see the wider implications of their decision. The development of a democratic governance structure for a city region like Dublin should not be held to ransom by the outcome of the Fingal vote. Maybe the process that allowed a predominantly rural area to determine the future of the city should be revisited. The call on the Minister responsible, Phil Hogan, to reassess the boundaries of the city seems appropriate. Yours, etc,
MATTHIAS BORSCHEID,
Buckingham Street Lower,
Dublin 1
Sir, – The people of Dublin have been denied the opportunity to participate in important decision-making by the rejection by Fingal councillors of the proposed plebiscite on a directly elected major for Dublin. I hope the people of Fingal will send a clear message to these councillors in May and give these so-called public representatives a lesson in democracy. What a missed opportunity for an international capital city! Yours, etc,
DAVID MOORE,
Carrs Mill,
Donabate,
Co Dublin

 

Sir, – Jacky Jones is right to raise the important issue of the lack of individual care plans for people using mental health services (“Second Opinion”, April 2nd). Individualised, person-centred, recovery-orientated plans are a basic requirement of a good quality mental health service.
In 2013, Mental Health Reform worked with our member organisations to define five components of a recovery-focused mental health service: hope, listening, partnership, choice and social inclusion. Working in partnership with individuals who use mental health services and, where appropriate, their family supporters, in a hopeful process of listening and engagement is vital if services are to be effective in supporting a person’s recovery.
In simple terms, people recover better when they are given hope, involved in decisions about their own treatment, offered a range of therapeutic options, and are supported to live a full live in the community.
While we were disappointed that the HSE’s Operational Plan for mental health services for 2014 did not commit to ensuring that every mental health service user would have an individual care/recovery plan, there is now an opportunity for the National Director of Mental Health to drive such an improvement across the country. The implementation of this basic reform could have wide-reaching effects in the system and would benefit everyone who seeks support from the HSE’s mental health services. Yours, etc,
SHARI McDAID,
Director,
Mental Health Reform,
Coleraine Street,
Dublin 7
Sir, – Jacky Jones misses the real point in her criticism of mental health services not providing a care plan for every individual. As a social worker in a multidisciplinary mental health team, I, like others, work with patients with a variety of needs, from the most complex, such as severe and enduring mental disorders, with dual diagnosis of addiction and intellectual disabilities and with limited family support to deal with significant life stressors, to less complex cases where patients can be managed by one worker or be relatively quickly referred back to their GP.
Providing a quality, efficient and effective service entails focusing in on those with the greatest needs, having transparent, screening processes in place to ensure meaningful care plans with a responsible key worker to co-ordinate the plan rather than a superficial one size fits all care plan, merely to tick the box. Yours, etc,
FRANK BROWNE,
Ballyroan Park,
Templeogue,
Sir, — It is not often that, where a controversy arises such as the recent one concerning Trinity’s change of logo, an elegant and simple solution should lie so close to hand.
Why not replace the Bible, not with a blank book but with an image of the Book of Kells (which is of course housed in Trinity)? Those who wish to see the Bible retained could find in the Book of Kells the iconic referencing they would prefer; while those opposed to the retention of the Bible would surely be reconciled to an image of what is, after all, a major Irish cultural achievement, and, more to the point, a striking reminder of a longstanding Irish tradition of learning and scholarship.
Thus the Book of Kells would prove equally acceptable to both parties: the saints and the scholars, the former doubtless less numerous than they were of old but both still, happily, so vocal in our insular home. Yours, etc.,
BRIAN COSGROVE,
Cornelscourt Hill,
Foxrock,
Dublin 18
Sir, – President Michael D Higgins was right to argue (Opinion & Analysis, April 2nd) that “we now have a generational opportunity to ask probing questions about the type of society we wish to build together, and the type of public world we wish to share with one another and with future generations”.
His ethics initiative, aiming to place citizens at the centre of the debate about the future of our society is both topical, timely and welcome. For the development model Ireland chose during the Celtic Tiger era has been shown to be fundamentally flawed – yet to date no alternative vision for a fair and sustainable future for our country has emerged.
Our recent history has shown that Ireland’s problems cannot be solved through a “laissez-faire” approach to public policy, and it has also highlighted the fact that our future is intrinsically linked to decisions (or non-decisions, as the case may be) of the wider international community. But we have yet to develop a plan on how to manage the challenges arising from this new awareness.
The President’s call for a conversation about our values as a nation could not be more timely. Our citizens feel less empowered than ever before, and our public goods have been damaged by greed, breach of trust and by global forces of enormous strength. It is not a good time in which to be rudderless.
Realising this, our colleagues at the United Nations have spent much of the last two years asking every country to undertake discussions about national values and national priorities. It has asked citizens, companies and governments to come up with visions of “the world we want”, to help set the agenda for the global community in the coming decades.
On the back of global UN summits of the past decade, the member countries of the UN – including Ireland – have decided to develop a set of global goals to address the world’s most pressing issues in the coming 15 years, goals that will set the framework for national and international decisions on education, equality, democracy, jobs and the environment and which could end up becoming a sort of second-level constitution for our country.
If we seize the opportunity that the President is offering us to rethink who we are and what our values as a nation are, and ought to be, then we will be all the stronger for it, and all the better able to cope with the challenges associated with being a small country in such an interdependent and volatile world. Yours, etc,
HANS ZOMER,
Director,
Dóchas,
Baggot Court,
Dublin 2

Sir, – I strongly disagree with Frank Byrne’s views (Letters, April 1st) on the practice of women applying their makeup on public transport.
The application of makeup is an intimate and private moment for women in which they construct their daily mask. The public application of makeup is fascinating, and very modern. To watch a woman apply makeup is profoundly erotic (in the post-Freudian sense).
To suffer these small darts of Eros at a time of day when one is moving into the profoundly mundane space of most white collar work is a privilege. Yours, etc,
LEON SHARKEY,
Ryebridge Lawns,
Kilcock
Sir, – I once witnessed a middle-aged lady cut her male partner’s hair on the upper deck of a bus I was travelling on. The episode was punctuated by squeals of delight from the stylist and some loud resistance from her man. Yours, etc,
JOHN O’BYRNE,
Mount Argus Court,
Harold’s Cross ,
Dublin 6W

Sir, – Regarding Hendy Joyce’s suggestion (Letters, April 1st) that summer time augments the hours of daylight (refuted the day before by Kevin Devitte) and the suggestion that Ireland might change to be on a par with Spain and other European countries, he might be surprised to know that there is a movement to return Spain to GMT, the time zone the country geographically falls under and from which it switched during the early days of the Franco dictatorship as a sign of subservience to Hitler’s Germany.
This return is being urged as part of a return to a more Anglo-Saxon timetable, which would help Spaniards get sufficient sleep (they sleep an hour less than most Europeans) and eliminate the huge lunch gap in the middle of the day (few have the luxury of working close enough to home for a siesta). Opposition is coming from the Canary Islands, already on GMT, because it might eliminate the mention they get on the radio every hour. It seems the grass is always greener on the other side of the time zone. Yours, etc,
DAVID O’BRIEN,
Calle Dormitaleria,
Pamplona,
Sir, – The fact that the Taoiseach appointed a justice minister who did not have the powers of time-travelling, clairvoyance and omnipresence seems to disturb Fintan O’Toole, but every cloud has a silver lining and at least the current crisis has enable him to find his faith again. Meanwhile, the only way Mr Shatter will be able to satisfy the perfect is to gallop through Dublin on Shergar, playing O’Carolan’s harp and wearing the Irish crown jewels. Yours, etc,
EUGENE TANNAM,
Monalea Park,
Firhouse,
Dublin 24
Sir, – Marie C O’Byrne’s potted history of Crimea makes it seem entirely logical for the region to be part of the Russian Federation and not Ukraine, and she’s probably right. The problem is, however, not what the people of Crimea want but the fact that the region was effectively annexed by Russia without any diplomatic avenues being explored. This is what makes a lot of countries generally, and Russia’s neighbours in particular, very nervous. Yours, etc,
NORMAN DAVIES,
Belton Terrace,
Bray,
Co Wicklow
Sir, – With European sanctions showing no signs of encouraging Russia to leave Crimea I think stronger action may now be needed. Can I suggest that the threat of a permanent exclusion from the Eurovision Song Contest might help get things moving? Yours, etc,
MARK LEADEN,
College Park Close,
Ballinteer,
Dublin 16

Sir, – Perhaps it is worth reminding Jim Stack, Mary Stewart and others bemoaning the lack of acknowledgement of the views of so-called “family values” voters that their views were, for decades, fully acknowledged and acted upon by successive governments, to the detriment of other excluded groups and individuals. Little concern was recorded at that time by the “family values” populace over the failure to include or acknowledge those who did not conform to an Ireland of conservative Catholicism and patriarchal norms. They cannot expect a huge degree of sympath now that the shoe is (inaccurately) perceived to be on the other foot. Yours, etc,
EDWARD COLLINS,
Niall Street,
Stoneybatter,
Dublin 7

 

Irish Independent:
The GAA decision to give certain championship matches to Sky is a slap in the face to the real GAA supporter.
Also in this section
Coming back from the mother of all mistakes
Taxpayers left to foot the bill yet again
Pylons will mutilate our beautiful countryside
The real supporters are the people who travel and pay to attend regularly at their club and county games when at all possible.
They will not be like elected officials of county boards, provincial or other councils who seldom have to put their hands in their pockets to attend.
Even when they are stuck, they will always get a few from part of a golden circle of sponsored tickets.
The same could be asked of the full-time paid officials of the GAA, how many games do they actually pay into?
It is very easy to scoff at the cost this Sky deal will burden the real supporter with, if one attends these games free or with sponsored tickets. There are many people who will only be seen attending games when they do not have to pay to attend.
While I agree with the efforts to generate a wider exposure to our games worldwide, I am not blind to how this also results in junkets for our paid officials.
When asked on the news programme on TV whether the topic should have been brought before the GAA annual congress for approval, the general secretary appeared to me to think those who made the decision were a higher authority.
I would have no great problem with the deal if another channel was allowed cover the game(s) on a free-to-view delayed showing.
I wonder did this thought enter the minds of those negotiating the deal – but then again, why would it?
They will hardly be affected by it.
TONY FAGAN
BELLEFIELD ROAD, ENNISCORTHY, CO WEXFORD

STRUGGLING SUPPORTERS
Croke Park is debt-free. GAA fans are struggling enough as it is – just because a certain number of the population have Sky membership, it does not mean they all have Sky Sports.
MARY COYLE
KILL, CO KILDARE

TIME TO LANCE THE BOIL
The absence of a timely apology has taken out one player and the flames are licking the posteriors of a few more.
Time to lance the boil in this debacle and come clean. Each time the heat threatens Alan Shatter, a grave-faced Enda Kenny informs us of another debacle.
The Gardai, now the Prison Service, and previously GSOC have been dragged into an unholy mess. To each, Mr Shatter has ordered inquiry after inquiry. The problem is this, though: he is the problem.
The Attorney General, the Secretary General of Justice and the head of prisons need to consider their positions. Information on their desks ought to reach the minister in a timely fashion. That this failed to happen is the minister’s fault. He seems to have a poor grip on his minions. So let him lead by example and step down. Then let the trio do what they must do and follow suit.
Ireland’s legal and moral authority is at stake here, not the careers of a handful of highly paid public servants. Mr Kenny needs to lance this boil, otherwise he might be engulfed too.
JOHN CUFFE
MEATH

SPARKING AIR RAGE
Considering the fact that Ryanair carries so many British passengers and has around 15 bases in the UK and Northern Ireland, one would imagine Michael O’Leary would not make such an offensive comment about their queen.
Has Ryanair made enough money and doesn’t need the UK for revenue?
B FITZPATRICK
CASTLEKNOCK, DUBLIN

JOIN THE PEACE WALK
April 2014 is a very special time for the Irish people, but particularly the people of Clontarf, as it is the celebration of the 1,000th anniversary of the Battle of Clontarf.
One of the events in Clontarf is an Ecumenical Camino Peace Walk. The various Christian churches are supporting this peace walk.
The walk will be held on Sunday, April 13, Palm Sunday, starting at 2.30pm at the corner of the Howth Road and Clontarf Road. The route will move to St Anthony’s Roman Catholic Church, then to the Methodist Church on the Clontarf Road, then St John’s Church of Ireland on Seafield Road, on to St John’s Catholic Church, Clontarf Road, and finish at St Gabriel’s Catholic Church, Dollymount.
Clontarf passports will be issued and stamped at each church and a certificate given to those who complete the walk. Those who cannot make the full walk are welcome to make a partial walk or call to a church.
On behalf of the organisers and the people of Clontarf, we say: “All are welcome in this place.”
BRYAN HOEY
CLONTARF, DUBLIN 3

PENALTY POINTS
Louise McBride wrote on March 30: “If you have four penalty points, you could pay between 20 and 25pc more for your insurance than someone who has none, and many insurers will refuse to pay out if you haven’t been upfront with them, according to Conor Faughnan, director of consumer affairs with AA Ireland.”
Mr Faughnan has written in the past about the enforcement of incorrect low speed limits, which leads to many of the penalty points issued in Ireland and results in a 25pc increase in insurance premiums.
In the US, penalty points are not issued for speeding offences unless the driver is stopped by a police officer as it is often not possible to identify the driver.
There are more penalty points issued in Ireland for speeding than the combined number of penalty points for all other motoring offences and this has done little to eliminate road traffic accidents.
FRANK CULLINANE
GLASNEVIN PARK, DUBLIN 11

SINKING SHIP
A short while ago, Leo Varadkar seemingly put his neck on the line and praised the whistleblowers. This was the right thing to do and he received plaudits. I even went to the bother of wasting my time and penned some praise for him.
The reason I say I wasted my time is because he has since come out to bat in defence for Mr Shatter. He accused the opposition of playing “old politics” and pointed to the former garda commissioner not informing the minister about the tapes. He completely ignored the fact that the Attorney General had been informed.
Meanwhile, the Justice Minister resembled Captain Smith of Titanic fame: big on reputation yet in charge of a sinking ship.
DERMOT RYAN
ATTYMON, ATHENRY, CO GALWAY

LOGO LOGIC
Trinity College has reduced its logo colours to two: blue and white. This choice totally ignores the sensitivities of feminist groups who no doubt will eventually register objections over the choice of the prominent blue background (for boys); and anti-racist groups who will certainly not be happy with the white, or indeed with the total absence of black.
To cap it all, anti-Israel activists will have to be be reminded when they pass by the college on one of their protest marches that the blue-and-white flag contains the colours of the Israeli flag. How could the college have spent over €100,000 on this rebranding exercise?
IVOR SHORTS
HERMITAGE CLOSE,
RATHFARNHAM, DUBLIN 16
Irish Independent

 


Under the Weather

$
0
0

4 April2014 Under the Weather

I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again.They have to transport a diplomatPriceless

Mary under the weather

Scrabbletoday, I win , Perhaps Marywill win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Richard Vaughan – obituary

Richard Vaughan was a medieval historian and ornithologist who studied bird life from Europe to the wilds of the Arctic

Richard Vaughan

Richard Vaughan

6:04PM BST 03 Apr 2014

Comments5 Comments

Richard Vaughan, who has died aged 86, had the distinction of being both a much-respected academic historian and an ornithologist of international repute.

As an expert on the Middle Ages and an accomplished linguist, he was a university professor in three different countries. As a man gripped by a lifelong passion for observing and photographing birds, he published hundreds of papers and articles in journals and magazines; these were widely respected – his writings on the birds of the Arctic were particularly admired in Russia.

Richard Vaughan

Richard Vaughan was born at Maidenhead on July 9 1927, the son of a Colonial Service lawyer who eventually became Chief Justice of Fiji. As a 15-year-old pupil at Eastbourne College during its wartime evacuation to Radley, his skill at catching in his hand food regurgitated by nesting swifts provided such valuable new evidence on their diet that he was acknowledged (as “a schoolboy near Oxford”) in David Lack’s classic Swifts in a Tower.

His precocious expertise soon led him to be invited on field trips by many other leading ornithologists of the day, including James Fisher, WB Alexander, HN Southern and BW Tucker. While still in his teens he contributed to Country Life the first of what would eventually be nearly 100 articles on birds, illustrated with his own photographs.

On National Service after the war, stationed on Salisbury Plain as an Education Corps librarian, his reading of all 400 books which were standard issue to Army libraries led him to aspire to become a professional historian. At Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, he was awarded a double First, and in 1953 became a college Fellow. Fluent in Italian (he would eventually become conversant with 13 languages), he spent one summer wandering around parts of the Abruzzi so remote that each valley still had its own distinct dialect.

In 1955, according to legend, he proposed to his future wife Margaret Morris only on condition that she could identify each species of duck in St James’s Park. In 1958 he published what became the standard work on the 13th-century chronicler Matthew Paris, who was also an artist (a talented painter himself, Vaughan created Christmas cards meticulously illuminated in medieval style).

Richard Vaughan observing bird life

Between 1962 and 1976 he completed his major work, a four-volume account of the pivotal part played in late-medieval Europe by the Duchy of Burgundy, having in 1965 become professor of history at Hull. As his family grew to include six children, he took them on camping holidays across Europe, where they could swim while he photographed birds — notably for his pioneering study of the rare Eleanora’s falcon, which nests in colonies on unoccupied Mediterranean islands, feeding its young on migrating birds.

Unaware of his reputation as an ornithologist, the Hull history department was bemused when three star-struck young birdwatchers turned up to ask whether its professor was “the Eleanora’s falcon Vaughan”.

So immersed was he in the Middle Ages that he was known to observe that “history stopped in 1492”. But in the late 1970s he leapt forward to the modern age, producing in 1978 a revealingly original account, based on key documents, of the origins of the European Community. In 1981 he became professor of medieval history at the Dutch university of Groningen, where he also became chairman of its Arctic Centre.

Vaughan’s interest in the Arctic had been sparked by a spell in Hull hospital, where a fellow-patient had been a retired whaler. The whaler’s stories led Vaughan to take an expert interest in both the history and birds of the Arctic. His many subsequent visits to the northern parts of Norway, Greenland, Russia and Canada inspired more books in addition to several he had already published on British seabirds. They included his monumental In Search of Arctic Birds (1992) and The Arctic: A History (1994)

After a year at the University of Central Michigan, he retired to a cottage on the North York Moors and then, in 1996, to Porlock in Somerset. Although this saw an end, after 50 years, to his inimitable contributions to Country Life, under such titles as “The Choughs of Grindelwald”, “Tragedy of the Ebro Delta” and “Amorous Lapwings”, his knowledge of bird life across Europe was so comprehensive that, when a friend asked him whether it was possible that birds of prey he had seen circling high above the Gorge du Tarn in southern France could have been Egyptian vultures, he immediately replied: “There were 21 of them, weren’t there? They were introduced there a few years ago.”

In 2005, with his daughter Nancy, an academic naturalist, he published the definitive monograph on the rare stone curlew, a bird he had loved since first observing it on Salisbury Plain 60 years earlier. In 2010 his last book, Rings and Wings, gave a delightful account of the four 19th-century pioneers of bird-ringing, at which Vaughan himself had become expert in his early teens, setting traps round the Devon garden where he spent his wartime holidays.

Richard Vaughan is survived by Margaret, who acted as his field assistant for five decades, and by their two sons and four daughters.

Richard Vaughan, born July 9 1927, died March 4 2014

Guardian:

• We agree with every word written by Robert Shore (Let’s hear it for the Midlands, G2, 26 March), especially the claim that the “Mercian supremacy” laid the foundations for a “unified” England. To remind the sceptical: Mercia was once so important in the continental context that London was perhaps seen as its sea port.

We have constructed a walking/ studying Mercia project to cross Mercia on foot, constructing a modern walkers’ Spaghetti Junction with the existing Mercian Trail in Staffordshire, Derbyshire and Leicestershire. Our routes use towpaths (canals represent the Mercian contribution to the industrial revolution) to link Wessex from the Thames Path to the Pictish/Scottish kingdoms via the Pennine Way. Our “low speed 1″ could be constructed at a fraction of the cost of HS2. Studying follows walking: exploring the evolution of the Mercian landscape, places and language. Mercian explorers are welcome to contact us by email at mercia.project@yahoo.co.uk.
Christopher Gowers, Malcolm Southan
Oxford (Outer Mercia)

The failed asylum claim by Yashika Bageerathi and her family and the deportation of the 19-year-old back to Mauritius exposes the inflexibility of our immigration and asylum system (Report, 3 April). Especially at a time of heightened rhetoric and the public demonisation of immigrants who come to the UK, there is little scope for discretion. The definition of a refugee is an artificial construct developed to deal with displaced persons in Europe after the second world war. It was also a cold war tool, elevating issues likely to advantage those fleeing political oppression, while ignoring equally valid but differing claims of economic harm. To come within the definition, you need to flee state persecution because of your “race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion (the definition has been expanded to include your sex or sexual orientation). It does not take heed of those facing starvation nor, as in the case of Yashika, the threat of violence from a family member. Those claimants are destined to become “failed asylum seekers” or “economic migrants”.

Yashika’s case is not exceptional. The family would have been expected to have moved to another area, or to have looked for protection from the state. Far more difficult claims for asylum are refused on a regular basis. Her excellent school results and the potential for her to become an asset to the UK are not relevant to the decision. There are many unaccompanied minors who are similarly deported upon their 18th birthdays, regardless of the reception they will face upon return. Hopefully this difficult case and the outcry it has caused will start a debate about the system as a whole: about who should be allowed to stay and about whether there should be discretion in these cases.
Dana Carli

Polly Toynbee is over-generous to George Osborne (Comment, 1 April). VAT inspectors’ salaries are £35,000 only in London – in the rest of the UK the starting salary is £22,000 and, due to the chancellor’s policy of no annual increments for the civil service, this is where you stay. Also, she underestimates the benefit we achieve for the country; I have identified additional VAT 20 times my salary this year. She is, however, correct in her overall analysis of what seems to be the chancellor’s dogmatic ideology in cutting HMRC staff even if the result is failure to collect all the tax that is due.
Ian Arnott (VAT officer)
Peterborough, Cambridgeshire

• In his review of Dirty Rotten Scoundrels (3 April), Michael Billington claims that it is actually based on a 1988 movie starring Michael Caine and Steve Martin. That particular film was a remake of a 1964 movie called Bedtime Story, starring Marlon Brando and David Niven.
Noel Hannon
London

• Re the famous Shrewsbury flower show (Letters, 29 March). It is so important that Shrewsbury Town’s opening fixture of the 1985-86 season against Crystal Palace was postponed to avoid a clash with the festival. I remember because I nearly set out from Manchester to watch the mighty Palace on the wrong day.
Michael Cunningham
Wolverhampton

• Not far from Holmfirth, in West Yorkshire, Upperthong and Netherthong are well worth popping into (Letters, passim).
Fr Alec Mitchell
Manchester

• If your readers get a bit peckish seeking out these weirdly named places they can always call in at Chipshop in Cornwall.
Rob Parrish
Starcross, Devon

• I agree with the suspiciously aptly named Roger Plenty (Letters, 3 April). Overpopulation is a problem, but can be alleviated by tackling its root cause, unconscious coupling.
Marcus Weeks
Hastings, East Sussex

The death sentence handed down to 529 protesters by an Egyptian court (Report, 24 March) should have produced much more than mumbled regret from the British government. This was a political show trial in which less than half the defendants were present in court. Their defence lawyers were not in the court either. The trial has been condemned by Amnesty International. The protesters were not, as reports have routinely claimed, all supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood and revulsion at the verdict stretches across the political spectrum to include all but the most determined supporters of Field Marshall El Sisi. All this takes place against the background of the outright banning of Egypt‘s largest opposition group, which followed the shooting by the Egyptian army of thousands of Muslim Brotherhood supporters last year. The British government should call in the Egyptian ambassador and demand that this judgment is withdrawn with immediate effect.
Mark Serwotka General secretary, Public and Commercial Services Union
Steve Turner Assistant general secretary, Unite the Union
Ken Loach Film director
Helena Kennedy QC
Alaa Mohamed Chair, British Egyptians 4 Democracy
Basma Muhammad Co-ordinator, International Anti-Coup Pro-Democracy Alliance
Andrew Murray Chief of staff, Unite the Union
John Rees Co-founder, Stop the War Coalition
Mohammad Soudan UK representative, Freedom and Justice Party
Louise Christian Human rights lawyer
Bernard Regan Chair, Sertuc international committee
Caryl Churchill Playwright
Peter Oborne Chief political commentator, Daily Telegraph
Lindsey German Convenor, Stop the War Coalition
Carl Arrindell Head of current affairs, Islam Channel
Paul Mackney Former general secretary Natfhe/UCU
Chris Nineham National secretary, Counterfire
Steve Bell Treasurer, Stop the War Coalition
Kate Hudson
Cherry Sewell Officer, Greek Solidarity Campaign

Maryam al-Khawaja’s claim that having Formula One in Bahrain causes human-rights violations (Report, 28 March) is little more than attention-seeking from an unrepresentative voice. Not only is there no evidence whatsoever to back this claim up, why on earth would the overwhelming majority of people – including the main opposition parties, such as Al Wefaq – support the hosting of the race if that were to be the case?

The independent inquiry in 2011 – led by one of the world’s leading human rights experts, Cherif Bassiouni – resulted in a comprehensive report and a series of recommendations for extensive reform, which was fully accepted by the government. At no stage did this report find any links whatsoever between human rights violations and Formula One, with over 9,000 testimonies taken into account. Bahrain welcomes and celebrates in the joy of Formula One, with attendance at the race representing almost 10% of the total population of the kingdom. It benefits the whole country, irrespective of religion and political affiliation and our upcoming race will be a true testament to that.
Alice Samaan
Ambassador of Bahrain

• Once again we hear pronouncements from Michael Wilshaw, head of Ofsted (Report, 3 March), who reveals his lack of understanding of what constitutes high-quality early years education. The purpose is not to prepare children for school but rather to give them opportunities where they can learn about the world and those in it in through their explorations of what interests them. Supported by adults who pay close attention to what they are doing, they are encouraged to express and share their developing ideas and feelings and to feel confident about what they already know and can do rather than experience failure at the start of their journey as lifelong learners. All children, from all backgrounds, will learn when what and how they learn is respected.

Wilshaw should know that evidence from neuroscience shows that we continue to be learners throughout our lives – and this tells us that learning is not a race to predetermined goals but a continuing search for meaning. He could take some time to read what people like Vygotsky and Bruner, Malaguzzi and Trevarthen have said about early learning. Do we really want our young children to be introduced to formal learning before they have had opportunities to develop the skills they need for this through everyday exploration of situations that make human sense to them? Do we really want to have our two-year-olds learning, by rote, to count and chant the sounds of our non-phonetic language? Do we really want to prepare our thinking and competent young children to be able to do no more than meet a series of meaningless targets measuring little that matters?

By all means provide funding for all schools to set up nursery classes. But if this is a serious attempt to improve early childhood education in this country, look to the funding, the philosophy and the knowledge base.
Sandra Smidt
Early years consultant and author, London

• Quite how we got to the point where one person decides what is a good school beats me, but now Michael Wilshaw is deciding what is a good pre-school education.

Too many children lack basic language and counting skills when they start school, says the chief inspector, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds. The cure once again is to improve the quality of teaching, when all the research points to child poverty, poor diet, housing, healthcare, parenting and environment as the major factors associated with under-achievement. Improve those and you improve achievement.

However, Wilshaw is not one to refer to the evidence, let alone understand research findings. We know his grasp of statistics is shaky with his reference to “one in five children leaving primary schools not reaching average”. A good pre-school experience is well documented, but in the face of all the evidence Michael Wilshaw focuses on a weak vision of quality: teaching and learning as a sterile process by which pre-school children acquire skills.
Dr Robin Richmond
Bromyard, Herefordshire

• Can Michael Wilshaw, who called for childminders to teach toddlers to hold a pen, actually read? Childminders do exactly what it says on the tin
Malcolm Severn
Belper, Derbyshire

Nigel Farage‘s task was relatively easy (Clegg tactics fail as Farage romps home in EU debate, 3 April). Brusque, good-humoured bigotry supported by bluster will always seem to beat thoughtful well-informed analysis. And Nick Clegg did not seem able to think on his feet. There is a difference in kind between “law” and “regulation”. The EU has contributed to 7% of our laws but to over 50% of our regulations. These regulations, worked on by the small committees which Ukip MEPs spurn, have resulted in, for example: cleaner air, cleaner beaches and rivers, the banning of harmful food additives, smoke-free workplaces, improved child and animal welfare, cross border policing, some control over human trafficking, support for democracy and human rights – and much more. And most strikingly we have had peace in what for centuries had been a war-torn Europe. In spite of the “knock out” which Ukip supporters have claimed for Clegg, I shall be changing my allegiance from Labour to the Lib Dems.
John Saunders
Oxford

• In 1975, I voted no in the referendum. Bear in mind the question was should we remain in the EU? Forty years on and we are part of a very different organisation. Whereas the EU In 1975 was without a doubt a free-trade organisation, the current EU is still free trade but now also supports a strong social policy aimed at ensuring that workers in one EU country cannot be exploited to take advantage of the free trade policy. Why didn’t Mr Clegg make this point during the debate? Could it be that he does not support strong rights for “hardworking people”?
Richard Bull
Woodbridge, Suffolk

• Ian Traynor (Report, 3 April) says that Nigel Farage’s military superpower is an EU that does not exist. Let me remind him of the billions being spent on the Eurofighter Typhoon – the world’s most advanced swing-role combat aircraft, offering agile performance, interoperability and unrivalled flexibility. A lot of money just for airshows.
John Daramy
Chesterfield, Derbyshire

• Watching the televised debate, I realised why Nick Clegg has difficulty with a 70-year-old like me who grew up in Hackney in the 1950s. There the local population lived contentedly enough in a monocultural society in a cockney setting reflected by Broadway market round the corner, cinemas in Mare Street and a straightforward English way of life.

Mr Clegg made great play of how he wants us to live in the present rather than the past. The problem is that the elements he cited in his wish were all foisted on us. We never asked for mass immigration. We never asked for multiculturalism. We never asked for diversity. We never asked for political union with 27 other countries of Europe. Mr Clegg therefore necessarily begins from the weakest psychological stance in expecting people to accept situations which were forced on them.

That is why his views carried little weight with me on Wednesday. I make no bones about it. I do not want mass immigration. I do not want multiculturalism. I do not want diversity. I do not want political union with 27 other countries of Europe. Rather, I wish to be allowed to continue to live my life immersed in my own culture, with all its foibles and its faults as well as its joys, and not immersed in a melting pot of other people’s cultures, no matter how beneficial that is perceived to be for my own culture.
Edward Thomas
Eastbourne

• Your coverage includes a brief expose on Nigel farage using a private company to avoid taxes. People use private companies for many reasons, sometimes for tax reasons, often because the contracting party will only deal with a company and not an individual. Farage is dangerous and his view offensive, but a petty and half-baked article about his tax affairs isn’t going to help people focus on the real reasons why we should be concerned about the rising profile of him and his party.
Tim Maynard
Castle Hedingham, Essex

• “Farage romps home in EU debate”. I expect it of the Mail or Express but does the Guardian need to present politics as a reality show. The ownly losers will be ordinary people and the poor if either of them “wins”.
Michael McLoughlin
London

• Top marks to Nick Clegg for taking on Farage. My revulsion for the Ukip leader went through the ceiling.
Bridget Wright
Malltraeth, Anglesey

• Ukip if you want to, I’m staying awake and aware.
Rev June Freshney
Grantham, Lincolnshire

Naomi Wayne writes: As a 17-year-old first-year law student at the LSE in 1968, I dropped in on a lunchtime meeting addressed by Tony Benn. Well to the left of the then centrist minister, I was at odds with his views, and said so. Ten minutes later, the meeting ended and when Benn emerged he made a beeline for me and launched into a passionate defence of his position. We spent several minutes disagreeing with each other. I was hugely impressed, not with his arguments but with his desire to engage on an equal footing with a young and obscure student and with his total lack of self-importance. Deference was dying in 1968 but for Benn it had never existed.

Hugh Kerr writes: When I was selected as the Labour candidate for the European parliamentary seat of Essex West and Hertfordshire East in 1994, the Labour party was a little doubtful, since I was a known leftwing socialist. However, since all seven Westminster seats that made up the constituency were Tory-held, the party didn’t believe I would win, so let me run. My brief was: “No money, staff or speakers, just keep the Tories busy!” I invited Tony Benn to head up my opening rally but, knowing his strong anti-EU views, not to speak about Europe. He gave a wonderful half-hour speech on socialism to 500 people, we raised £5,000, and I was elected three weeks later.

Barbara Hall writes: During the 1960s, I worked at the National Economic Development Office. One day I arrived back at Millbank Tower after lunch, before a council meeting was due to start. As I reached the door, a number of so-called captains of industry, newly arrived in their chauffeur-driven limousines, swept past me, allowing the door to slam in my face. Then came Tony Benn: he opened the door for me, stood aside to let me pass, walked to the lift with me and pressed the button for my floor, chatting amiably the while. His old-fashioned courtesy and respect for a complete stranger provided a stark contrast to the behaviour of those who had gone before.

Colin Thomas writes: Tony Benn was regarded with great affection in Bristol and, when he left the city to become the MP for Chesterfield in 1984, there was a farewell party for him at which I was asked to sing the Ballad of Joe Hill, but after the lines “Says Joe: ‘What they can never kill, Went on to organise’”, I forgot the words. Tony Benn saved me from embarrassment by joining in the last verse: “From San Diego up to Maine, In every mine and mill, Where workers strike and organise, It’s there you’ll find Joe Hill, It’s there you’ll find Joe Hill.” And it’s there we’ll continue to find Tony Benn, too.

Independent:

What is all this about winning or losing the debate between Nigel Farage and Nick Clegg? Either you agreed with the one or the other. I doubt if many changed their minds: neither deployed any new arguments. Clegg used logic, Farage emotion.

The use of this debate was twofold. It exposed the arguments, and the “exit poll” gave an idea of how people would vote if there were a referendum today.

The good news for the “ins” like myself is that only about a sixth of the population needs to be convinced. The problem is how the ins are going to speak to the feelings of those who are not convinced by logic.

Venetia Caine, Glastonbury, Somerset

Save at the very end, nobody mentioned the word “war” in the Farage-Clegg debate on the EU. Both Farage and Clegg are too young to have experienced war in Europe.

For over 500 years nations in post-medieval Europe waged war against one another. In the last century two world wars shattered Europe. My mother had her eldest brother killed in the First World War (Ypres) and her youngest brother killed in the Second (Crete). I was born in 1938 and my father, having survived Dunkirk, was absent on active service from 1940 to 1945, so that I did not recognise him when he returned home.

My mother, sister and I slept in the cellar of our house in south-east London for the duration of the war. A good job too because the house opposite us was bombed flat in 1944 by a V2 rocket.

A united Europe (whatever its faults) is far preferable to antagonistic separate nations, and the Ukip isolation policy is simply a false dream based on outdated 19th-century notions.

David Ashton, Shipbourne, Kent

Listening to the televised debate on Wednesday evening, I realised why Nick Clegg has difficulty with a 70-year-old like me who grew up in Hackney in the 1950s. There the local population lived contentedly enough in a monocultural society in a London Cockney setting reflected by the Broadway Market round the corner, a series of cinemas in Mare Street and a straightforward English way of life.

Mr Clegg made great play of how he wants us to live in the present rather than the past. The problem is that the elements he cited were all foisted on us. We never asked for mass immigration. We never asked for multiculturalism. We never asked for diversity. We never asked for political union with 27 other countries of Europe. Mr Clegg necessarily begins from the weakest psychological stance in expecting people to accept situations which were forced on them. That is why his views carried little weight with me.

Edward Thomas, Eastbourne, East Sussex

Cinderella law: will social workers cope?

Frank Furedi (“The Cinderella law: emotional correctness gone mad”, 2 April) points out that every mother or father is  at risk of being labelled an abuser under the proposed “Cinderella law”.

The Government has proposed this new law just when the NSPCC reports that the threshold for intervening in a child’s life is actually being raised because of record reporting of child abuse. But a huge amount of this reporting is already needless. Department for Education figures for 2012-2013 show that, in England, there were 145,700 needless referrals to children’s social services in one year. Child protection is about a child “suffering, or likely to suffer, significant harm”. When so many children are needlessly reported, this does indicate that people already overreact.

So why does the Government want to broaden the definition of child abuse even further, thus creating more cases for an overloaded system? Sixteen children known to Birmingham social services died in a five-year period. A report severely criticised Birmingham social services over the poor quality of referrals, leading to a surge in demand that could not be met.

Detecting child abuse in the community is akin to finding a needle in a haystack for overstretched social workers. So why make the haystack even bigger by creating more cases that will need assessment?

Tristram C Llewellyn Jones, Ramsey, Isle of Man

Consistent, loving care is critical in building the human brain, so it certainly is time that our child-protection laws reflect the long-term mental and physical damage caused by the emotional neglect and abuse of children. The announcement that the Government intends to make the emotional abuse of children a criminal offence is an important step.

Understanding the critical importance of the emotional well-being of children is vital to the well-being of society. There is a raft of evidence to show that when infants receive warm, responsive, consistent, attuned, loving care their brains develop well. They are then able to grow into adults with the capacity for empathy and the facility to become good, caring parents themselves.

Lydia Keyte, Chair, What About The Children? Newbold on Stour, Warwickshire

Frank Furedi claims our Sutton Trust report “Baby Bonds” is driven by “an authoritarian impulse whose main consequence is to diminish parental authority”. In fact, the report is driven by an egalitarian impulse, whose intended consequence is for public policy to better support parents, precisely in order to generate, as Furedi puts it, “more opportunities for children, and indeed parents, to realise their potential.”

Furedi offers no evidence to counter our empirical finding – from a review of over 100 academic studies – that a secure emotional relationship with a parent can have an important influence on children’s life chances, particularly for the most disadvantaged.

Sophie Moullin, Princeton University, Professor Jane Waldfogel, Columbia University, Dr Liz Washbrook, Bristol University

Nasty Party kicks out A-level student

What a PR disaster the removal of the 19-year-old student Yashika Bhageerathi has proved to be! It shows Theresa May in her true colours as a member of the “Nasty Party” who, having failed to meet her targets for immigration, attempts to keep her numbers up by picking on a young, vulnerable girl who came here to avoid abuse. The removal of her alone, without her mother, and a failed attempt to remove her on Mothering Sunday, only added to the disaster.

The Home Office showed a complete lack of common sense and compassion in this case. What difference would it have made if Yashika had been allowed a further six weeks here so she could take her A-levels and return home with a qualification? Instead Britain is once again portrayed as an uncaring nation instead of a just and caring society.

The only people who deserve credit in this sad situation are the head, staff and pupils of the Oasis Academy Hadley in Enfield – they may have failed but they are heroes in my book.

Ken Smith, Hinderclay, Suffolk

Why no auction for Royal Mail?

You conclude (editorial, 2 April) that “Mr Cable was still right to be cautious” over the privatisation of the Royal Mail, on the grounds that privatisations cannot be guaranteed to be successful, and that “the effects of hindsight and ‘froth’ are impossible to judge”.

Maybe so, but it is hard to understand why the Department for Business did not, apparently, even consider the use of a properly designed sealed-bid auction, instead of the conventional book-building exercise. Nor, apparently, did the National Audit Office consider this as  an option.

The Treasury uses such auctions to sell government bonds, Google was floated using one, so why not for the Post Office? At least then everyone would have had a chance at getting some shares, and the selling price would have been more likely to settle at the market clearing price, providing that the auction process was properly designed.

David Harvey, Tynemouth, Tyne & Wear

Abuse of women becomes fashion

Oh dear, here we go again. The editor of Italian Vogue, Franca Sozzani, thinks she is campaigning in some way against the abuse of women by actually showing nicely arranged “fashion” images of pretend victims (The Big Read, 3 April).

This happens again and again in film and media. You are not reflecting the horrors of society, you idiots, you are simply joining in and adding  to them.

Sue Nicholas, Cranleigh, Surrey

The battle of Richard’s bones

If there is doubt (“Car park bones disputed”, 28 March) as to whether the Leicester Greyfriars burial is indeed that of Richard III, or of a contemporary similarly slain in battle, perhaps they should be honourably interred as the Unknown Warrior of the Wars of the Roses.

Peter Forster, London N4

Times:

Sir, You report that the Commons Science and Technology Committee, chaired by Andrew Miller, wishes to censor those who question their position on climate change (“Crackdown ordered on climate-change sceptics”, Apr 2). No one can rationally argue that the climate does not change, it always has. What does require uninhibited debate is whether human activity significantly influences the global climate and, assuming that it does, the efficacy of measures proposed to reduce that influence and the manner in which such measures would be globally enforced.

Rob Harris

Farndon, Cheshire

Sir, Scientific theories can be corrected, often at no greater cost than wounded pride. Should our economic competitiveness and future living standards be ruined by unnecessary green policies, the damage will prove much more difficult to correct.

Mr Miller should welcome the critics for attempting to hold the science to account and for raising public interest in the subject, rather than trying to gag them. Where huge decisions are to be made, it is important that rigorous public debate takes place.

Mark Franklin

Bromyard, Herefordshire

Sir, Your report is a timely reminder that climate change is not wholly man-made and that this should be reflected in climate related policies.

Indeed, the IPCC has stated that up to half of the steep rise in global temperature that occurred in the second half of the last century was due to natural causes. Accordingly, it would seem sensible to reallocate some of the funds earmarked for carbon reduction such as subsidising renewable energy, to fund adaptation to the effects of climate change, especially as the UK emits only 1.5 per cent of global carbon. This rebalancing of expenditure would include upgrading of flood defences, including the Thames barrier. Such a change in climate related policy makes economic sense and would surely be welcomed by the majority of tax payers.

James Snook

Bowdon, Cheshire

Sir, I read with some concern the proposal that BBC editors should seek clearance to give air time to climate change sceptics. This subject is most difficult to understand, and we can only do so by the most rigorous application of the scientific method.

This must involve vigorous questioning of all research by those who may discern an alternative explanation. Indeed, such scrutiny can sometimes lead to new penetrating insights. While the sceptic camp does seem to contain its share of the loony Right, there are also honourable men and women who should not be censored.

H. J. Wyatt

Harrow, Middx

Sir, In seeking to gag climate change sceptics, the chairman of the Commons Science and Technology Committee is inviting ridicule.

Since when have arguments been won by stifling debate? To attack the BBC for airing Lord Lawson’s view is crass. The BBC is a routine proselytiser for the “warmists” and largely ignores those who question its orthodoxy. Perhaps Mr Miller has difficulty explaining why global temperatures have not shifted in the past 16 years while CO2 levels have rocketed, and why near-record levels of ice persist in the Antarctic.

Let’s have answers, not gags.

Peter Pallot

London, W6

Published at 12:01AM, April 4 2014

The decimation of the criminal bar will deprive us of an important layer of protection against corrupt police

Sir, We acted for the acquitted lead defendant in the Daniel Morgan murder trial, and the revelations from the Ellison Review (“Met will always have corrupt officers, says chief”, Mar 28) do not surprise us.

The trial process revealed that a “supergrass” had implicated a very senior policeman in corruption. Junior officers had reported this but no evidence of their report could be found in the files of the Metropolitan Police. No senior officer had any recollection of being told anything about it. The tape of the “supergrass” interview could not be found. That there was a tape was revealed only because the junior officers kept a copy of the tape for their own protection.

The point of this anecdote is that it was only thanks to the hard work of defence counsel and the integrity of prosecution counsel that this was revealed.

So, people would do well to reflect on the loss of combative lawyers who are prepared take on the state on their behalf, before it is too late. The cuts that Mr Grayling proposes to VHCC (Very High Cost) cases will decimate the criminal bar and neuter the defence in particular.

The Morgan murder occurred in 1987 and is unique in telling us how the fee income of barristers has been reduced in the intervening 25 years. The lead defendant was first charged in 1989 (the case was later dropped). In 1989 junior counsel would have been paid £100 per hour for a case of this type. In 2008, 19 years later, a QC would have been paid just £94.50 and a junior £61 per hour respectively. In 2014, after the latest cuts, a QC will be paid just £63.70 per hour and a junior just £42.70 per hour.

These are turnover figures and for the most difficult cases; there is no holiday pay, no pension entitlement and expenses of about one third of turnover need to be deducted from these figures.

The Bar only asks for a pay freeze and a pause to reflect on the potential destruction of a world class system. Sadly it is the juniors who will suffer most as it is the income of those at the top of the profession that helps support those at the bottom under the chambers system. No profession can survive this attrition.

Richard Christie, QC

Jonathan Lennon

EC4

Commercial bus fares are rising fast, and free passes are a growing drain on cash-strapped local authorities

Sir, The Labour Party may be right to pledge a freeze on rail fares (Apr 2), but there is an even more urgent need to freeze bus fares.

Outside London there are no controls on commercial bus fares. In many places fares are rising faster than inflation. The result is that, on many routes, seniors using their free passes outnumber fare-payers.

Worse still, the reimbursement to bus operators for carrying seniors is (usually) based on a percentage of the average fare charged. If fares go up, the bills to local authorities go up automatically. The expenditure on free bus travel is one over which cash-strapped authorities have no control. In a bid to save public expenditure Parliament should legislate an immediate freeze on bus fares.

Dr Roger Sexton

Nottingham

A former donor explains why she was compelled to refuse to allow her embryos to be used by another woman

Sir, As a former egg donor, I know that embryos are destroyed (“Three-parent baby law will lose votes, Cameron warned”, Mar 22). However, it is not because they are seen as a disposable commodity. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (Hefa) doesn’t give the full story.

I was approached about embryos from my donated eggs as the recipient had completed her family. I asked if one could be given to my younger sister (who had suffered an early menopause) as this would mean her child would be related by DNA. This was not permissible as she was not on the clinic’s waiting list.

In addition, had I let the embryos be used, I would have had to surrender my anonymity, potentially giving a stranger rights to my estate when I die. I hated refusing permission for re-use, but I also had to protect my own son’s future interests. I doubt I am the only former donor who feels this way.

Mrs J. Pilsworth

Willingham, Cambs

The Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Schools announces that a London school has found itself some premises

Sir, Your report “Homeless free schools cause chaos” (Mar 31) said Marylebone Boys School may not open due to problems finding a site. I can now confirm that the school has secured a permanent site for 2016 and will therefore open this September.

Lord Nash

Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Schools

Telegraph:

SIR – “The erosion of childhood” is becoming a theme of concern to citizens across the political spectrum.

The latest salvo in this “paradigm war” for the heart of childhood has been discharged by the head of Ofsted, Sir Michael Wilshaw. In a letter to all early-years inspectors, he instructs them to judge nurseries mainly in terms of preparation for school. They must “teach children the early stages of mathematics and reading”.

This utilitarian shift from experience to content betrays an abject (and even wilful) misunderstanding of the nature of early childhood experience. The determination to dragoon England’s young children into unconscionably early quasi-formal learning is catastrophic for their well-being, and is setting up many for failure at a very young age.

England’s early years education and care is safe in the hands neither of Sir Michael Wilshaw nor of the current incumbents at the Department for Education. We urge Sir Michael and the DfE to stop digging in their current “schoolifying” hole, and step back from this misguided drive to over-formalise England’s early-years sphere.

The alternative might be that these policy-makers end up precipitating the first wave of professional “principled non-compliance” with government policy that our education system has known in living memory. Any government that underestimates the strength of feeling on this issue, and the resolve to resist it, does so at its peril.

Dr Richard House
University of Winchester

Jess Edwards
Coordinator, Charter for Primary Education

Philip Pullman

Neil Leitch
CEO, Pre-School Learning Alliance

John Coe
National Association of Primary Education

Christine Blower
General Secretary, National Union of Teachers

Professor Penelope Leach
Birkbeck College, University of London

Michael Rosen

Christopher Clouder
Co-founder, Alliance for Childhood

Sue Gerhardt

Sue Cowley
Co-Chair, Stanton Drew and Pensford Preschool

Philipa Harvey
Senior Vice President Elect, NUT

Kevin Courtney
Deputy General Secretary, National Union of Teachers

Dr Dennis Atkinson
Professor Emeritus, Goldsmiths, University of London

Emeritus Professor Michael Bassey

Emeritus Professor Ron Best
University of Roehampton

Professor Joyce Canaan
Birmingham City University

Nancy Carlsson-Paige
Professor Emerita, Lesley University, Cambridge, MA

Michael Fielding
Emeritus Professor, Institute of Education, University of London

Emeritus Professor Philip Gammage

Tobin Hart
Professor of Psychology, University of West Georgia

Professor Dave Hill
Anglia Ruskin University

Barry J Hymer
Professor of Psychology in Education, University of Cumbria in Lancaster

Professor David Ingleby
University of Amsterdam

Professor Del Loewenthal
Director, Research Centre for Therapeutic Education, University of Roehampton

Professor Emerita Janet Moyles

Professor Jayne Osgood

Carl Parsons
Visiting Professor of Social Inclusion Studies, University of Greenwich

Professor Michael Patte
Co-Editor, The International Journal of Play

Professor Heather Piper

Professor Andrew Samuels

Brian Thorne
Emeritus Professor, University of East Anglia

Dr Terry Wrigley
Visiting Professor, Leeds Metropolitan University
Honorary Senior Research Fellow, University of Ballarat, Australia

Dr Jonathan Barnes
Senior Lecturer in Primary Education

Dr Teresa Belton
Visiting Fellow, School of Education and Lifelong Learning, University of East Anglia

Dr Jon Berry
Professional Doctorate (EdD) Programme Tutor, University of Hertfordshire

Simon Boxley
Programme Leader, Undergraduate Education Studies, University of Winchester

Diane Boyd

Shirley Brooks
Senior Lecturer, Early Years Care & Education, University of Winchester

Sue Callan

Dr Julia Cayne

Hatice Choli
Senior Lecturer, School of Education, University of Greenwich

Dr Alison Clark
Senior Lecturer in Childhood Studies, Open University

Sue Cox
Senior Lecturer, School of Education and Lifelong Learning, University of East Anglia

Dr Gail Edwards
Lecturer in Education, Newcastle University

Judith Flynn
Senior Lecturer, Manchester Metropolitan University

Dr Linda Hammersley-Fletcher
Reader in Educational Leadership and Management, Metropolitan University

Jill Harrison
University of Greenwich

Dr Gordon Ingram
Lecturer in Developmental Psychology, Bath Spa University

Christine Ivory
Early Years Programme Coordinator, Faculty of Education, Liverpool John Moores University

Sarah Jacques

Dr Paulette A Luff

Dr Gee Macrory
Principle lecturer in education, Manchester Metropolitan University

Alpesh Maisuria
Senior Lecturer, University of East London

Dr Jennifer Patterson
Senior Lecturer in Education, Greenwich University

Gillian Reid

Dr Kathy Ring
Senior Lecturer, York St John University

Dr Leena Robertson
Middlesex University, London

Jenny Rust

Dr Sebastian Suggate
University of Regensburg

Dr Judith Suissa
Reader in Philosophy of Education, Institute of Education, London

Peter Tallant

Chris Watkins
Reader in Education, University of London Institute of Education

Vanessa Young
Principal Lecturer Education, Canterbury Christ Church University

Pat Adams

Oona Alexander

Anna Alston

Helen Ard

Catherine Armstrong

Richard Brinton

Jodie Brooke Aujla

Kevin Avison

D. Babouris

Peter Barlow

Jane Barnard

Susan Barnicoat

Catherine Beaumont

Victoria Benson-Coakes

Kerri Bishop

Safa Bowskill

Dr Gail Bradbrook

Jenny Brain

Caroline Brooks

Laura Brown

Sarah Bryant

Tabitha Burgess

Geralyn Bywater McLaughlin

Emma Callow

Elizabeth Carlson

Paula Champion

Bridget Chapman

Marie Charlton

Regine Charriere

Anna Chesner

Ruth Cohen-Rose

Anna Colgan

Lucy Cox

Amy Crane

Gill Crawshaw

Louise Crook

Nancy Crookes

Kirsty Curtis

Amy Dadachanji

Hazel Danson

Lynne Davies

Margaret Dobbs

Polly Donnison

Louise Doublet

Susan Dovbenko

Ellie Dowthwaite

Mary Jane Drummond

Robin Duckett

Jon Duveen

Dr Andrew Evans

Andy Evans

Rachel Ford Blanchard

Irène François

Ian Gilbert

Dr Melanie Gill

Lavinia Gomez

Nick Grant

Debra Greatorex

Sam Greshoff

Fleur Griffiths

Jane Hallman

Philippe Harari

Martin Hardiman

Gemma Hawkins

Jutta Hepworth

Felicity Higginson

Isla Hill

Julie Hill

Grethe Hooper Hansen

Ann Hedley

Rosemary Hope

Saira Horner

Peter Humphreys

Nina Hurst

Kate Irvine

Lesley Jackson

Ruth James

Kate Jangra

Agnes Javor

Alice Jenkinson

Marianne Johansen

Katie Jordan

Amerjit Kambo

Beverly Keenan

Tracy King

Rupert Kingfisher

Keith Kinsella

Janet Klaar

Sarka Kubschova

Martin Larger

Trisha Lee

Mary M Leue

Kai Yee Low

Sophie McCook

Kevin McQuaid

Dorothy Marlen

Richard Masters

Alys Mendus

Christine Merrick

Gabriel Millar

Eleanor Milligan

Philippa Mitchell

Doug Morgan

Ben Morris

Winny Mossman

Julie Mountain

Dr Ursula Nerre

Vincent Nolan

Kathryn Norgrove

Daniel North

Nicola Nugent

Simon O’Hara

Kate O’Keefe

Marjorie Ouvry

Sara Paiola

Sandra Palmer

Justelene Papacosma

Emily Pardoe-Williams

Matthew Pardoe-Williams

Lynn Parker

Marie Peacock

Linda Pound

Matt Purkis

Carolyn Purser

Patty Ramirez

Natasha Ramm

Dr Bronwen Rees

Jane Roberts

Stefan Richter

Karen Ripper

Jill Robinson

Joyce Lillie Robinson

Maria Rodrigues

Louise Rogers

Anthea Rose

Victoria Sadler

David Seagrave

Dorothy Shirley

Simon Small

Ralf Smits

Susie Steel

Vicki Stinchcombe

Rosemary Stocks

Rebecca Stubbs

Dr Terry Sullivan

Elizabeth L. Swann

Jonathan W. Swann

Inbar Tamari

Laura Taylor

Pippa Taylors

Helen Thomas

Julie Thomson

Sara Tomlinson

Sarah-Jane Tucker

Anna Tuhey

Kiri Tunk

Rev Dr Chris Walton

Rachel Ward

Theresa Waterhouse

Penny Webb

Graham White

Jan White

Rosanne White

Vicki Wilcox

Francine Williams

Mervyn Wilson

Ros Wilson

Julia Wilton

Courtney Winstone

Charlotte Wright

SIR – In convicting a gambling addict for stealing some £13,000 worth of luggage from trains in the Devon area (report, March 29), the judge commented that the layout of luggage storage may have facilitated the crimes.

These crimes were almost certainly committed on trains operated by First Great Western (FGW) and Crosscountry, both of which have made life easier for such criminals. This is in spite of the constant exhortations on platforms and trains to keep a good eye on luggage.

When FGW rebuilt its High Speed Trains, in order to increase passenger capacity, it removed almost all the tables from standard class. Previously it had been possible to store a case between two back-to-back seats. All that is left is the inadequate space at the end of the carriage.

Crosscountry inherited a fleet of Voyager and Super Voyager trains that were always poorly served for luggage space, with atrocious overhead racks. In refitting their trains, it removed mid-carriage luggage racks and converted the refreshment area into a luggage storage space, making it impossible for passengers to follow the instruction to watch their luggage.

David Muir
Stoke Gifford, Gloucestershire

Stay-at-home mothers

SIR – This country has completely lost the plot. A Cinderella law is being proposed to stop emotional child abuse. But this abuse begins when mothers go to work while their children are young. There are babies of three months old in crèches, and many others with child minders, all of which costs a lot of money.

Would it not be better for women to nurture their own children at least until school age? Benefits for child care should instead go to mothers to look after their children. Poor parenting is the root of the huge problems we have with the youth of this country.

Lady Bull
Arkesden, Essex

Brighter name

SIR – There is no doubt that the correct pronunciation of Dylan Thomas’s name is “Dullan” as the y in Welsh is invariably pronounced this way. However, my understanding is that his mother insisted on his being called “Dillan” in order to avoid the possible nickname “Dull One” being used.

Howard Thomas
Newent, Gloucestershire

Knot our problem

SIR – Japanese knotweed is indeed a scourge. Our city council has issued information leaflets about the issue.

However, despite reporting to the council several outbreaks of the stuff near our home, we are just told that nothing can be done about it, because the plant is growing on private property.

Michele Platman
Birmingham

Boiling on the blower

SIR – I have been receiving endless nuisance calls in the form of a recorded message telling me that I am entitled to a government-funded new boiler. As they come from overseas, the Telephone Preference Service will not take any action.

It is amounting to harassment. Does no authority in this country have powers to stop such annoying cold calls?

Hilda Gaddum
Macclesfield, Cheshire

Order with your order

SIR – Among many other signs of reaching middle age is increasing irritation in restaurants at being ordered to “Enjoy!” Is there an appropriate response?

His Honour Judge Patrick
Wood Green Crown Court
London N22

Virtues of the Mainwaring type of bank manager

SIR – My father was a Mainwaring-type bank manager and I have the notes he made prior to speaking to his local Rotary club in the Fifties. The notes are on 18 sheets of small pink notepaper, obviously obtained from my mother – not for him the crime of using bank notepaper for private correspondence.

“I have been variously described by my friends as the man who will always lend you an umbrella when the sun is shining, or lend you money provided that you can prove that you don’t need it.” Then, a little further on, “To the customer, the manager is an amalgam of accountant, solicitor, tax expert, financial adviser and a sort of financial father confessor.”

“He carries a further responsibility, that of example to the younger generation whom, he hopes, will earn his pension.”

Shirley Browning
Kingston, Dorset

SIR – Forty years ago, I would ring my local branch and fix an appointment with the manager. In his office, an assistant would produce the relevant ledgers, while his secretary provided coffee and custard creams. The manager would peruse my accounts, and ask what I wanted the loan for. When I told him a sports car, he replied, “Silly bugger – but you are only young once, and we are well insured.”

Patrick Tracey
Carlisle, Cumberland

Japanese whaling ban is an international victory

The efficacy of the International Court of Justice

Getting its own back: smashing a whalers’ boat in a 19th-century French oil painting  Photo: BRIDGEMAN ART LIBRARY

6:58AM BST 03 Apr 2014

Comments48 Comments

SIR – The International Court of Justice’s judgment ordering a temporary halt to Japan’s cull of whales in the Southern Ocean is a victory for international law, diplomacy and international relations.

That two modern states can bring to court a dispute over the fate of whales is a mark of man’s sophistication and the state of development of the international legal order. The decision wisely leaves room for Japan to revamp its whaling programme to meet the international whaling treaty’s requirements for scientific whaling.

The ICJ has lived up to its reputation as the world’s court by demonstrating its willingness to resolve all forms of international disputes that may be brought to its attention by UN member states.

Dr Gbenga Oduntan
Kent Law School
Canterbury, Kent

SIR – Evan Davis’s Mind the Gap series suggests to me, a retired architect, that Britain needs a North East-West City.

The NEWC would not be some half-baked Liverchester or Manpool, but a linear city of the North, pulling together the hubs of Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds and Hull.

Our Victorian forefathers had the vision to create the Leeds and Liverpool Canal and the Manchester Ship Canal. Along their banks planning restrictions should be relaxed to let market forces develop them.

There is already the M62 corridor, which could be widened to an eight-lane super highway. The proposed HS2 would only need to go to Manchester to link up with a rapid East-West network.

After all, London is only a city made up of conjoined towns and villages. Why should Liverpool not become the West End, Manchester the Square Mile, Leeds the Oxford Street and Hull the Felixstowe of the North? National Park areas between would equate to Hampstead Heath and the Royal Parks.

Let us all be bold. If the BBC can see the economic sense in coming up North to Media City, Salford, then this could and should happen for others.

Coulton Booth
Garstang, Lancashire

SIR – Jenny Roach, a Liberal councillor, says that councillors fight destructive planning applications on behalf of their constituents. But what if a councillor approves of a scheme?

Here in Oxford, councillors frequently ignore public opinion and approve projects that are destructive to the historic character of the city. Institutional interests (the University) often seem to trump environmental concerns.

An independent planning champion, as suggested by Sir Terry Farrell would have advantages. But an architect should not be appointed to this role. I recall the former architects’ panels in historic cities. It was impossible to find any architect who would criticise the work of another architect. Professional solidarity proved an insurmountable barrier.

Paul Hornby
Oxford

SIR – Sir Simon Jenkins is right about government planning policies threatening the countryside, but they have already damaged towns and cities. Councils allow unsuitable developments knowing refusal will only lead to another successful appeal by a developer to a compliant minister.

Labour has put forward no vision of what a planning system should do. Its Town and Country Planning Act 1947 had protected the countryside but allowed appropriate housing and industrial development. Conservatives largely adopted this policy. It did not limit growth in the following two decades, which saw an unparalleled boom.

I do not know if this issue will cost the Conservatives votes, but it deserves to wreck their chances.

Roger Backhouse
Ilford, Essex

Irish Times:

Sir, – The Government’s white paper on Universal Health Insurance (UHI), published this week is fundamentally flawed.

It will place an immediate financial burden on families, and the only consultation process open to the public is restricted to deliberating on what this “competing insurers” model will look like. Meanwhile, there is no consultation of any kind taking place on any other options, such as those recommended in Dr Jane Pillinger’s 2012 report The Future of Healthcare in Ireland .

That report recommended that the competing insurers model, as proposed by the Minister, should not be adopted before all the options have been evaluated in terms of quality, equity, access to services and medium and long term value for money. The report was ignored by the Minister.

Families will be required by law to have health insurance, but there is a real risk that this will be an impossible financial burden from the very start, particularly for the growing number of people without health insurance who don’t qualify for a medical card.

This group will be required to purchase health insurance for every member of their family. While the Dutch insurance model provided the Minister with his initial inspiration for this UHI scheme, it should be noted that children are actually insured for free under the Dutch model.

The question of cost remains, but it appears that no evaluation of any other funding model has been undertaken. We have been trying to get the message across to the Minister that other options need to be considered, such as the “single-payer” social insurance model used in France, Germany and Nordic countries.

Apart from a cursory late briefing on the day of publication, where questions were not invited from trade unions or patient groups, there has been no engagement with the Minister on these issues.

The experience in other jurisdictions which have similar models of competing insurers, has been a continuing rise in the price of compulsory insurance, coupled with increasing restrictions on the health services covered. They have also experienced rising readmission rates as more people experience complications after they’ve been discharged. This can be attributed to the financial incentives to discharge patients early.

The Minister’s estimate of €900 per individual seems almost optimistic, but if this model is established, the costs are likely to continue to rise. The Minister has also boasted that the scheme will ensure no additional cost burden to the State, which will mean that the only means of raising extra revenue will be through individual insurance premiums.

Finally, if we really want to get the measure of where this scheme is going, it is telling that the €100 charge for emergency departments will remain in place. Yours, etc,

LOUISE O’DONNELL,

National secretary,

Health & Welfare division

IMPACT,

Nerney’s Court,

Dublin 1

Sir, – At present everyone in the State is entitled to free treatment in a public hospital paid for by our taxes.

Under the new proposal, it seems, everyone will be entitled to free treatment in a public hospital but we must pay for private health insurance as well as paying our taxes to fund it. The difference will be that there will be no option for some to go to private hospitals as happens at present, so the whole population will use the public system, which is unable to cope with the numbers currently using it. Sounds like a lose-lose situation to me. Yours, etc,

AVRIL HEDDERMAN,

Priory Grove,

Stillorgan,

Co Dublin

Sir, – Brian McDevitt (Letters, April 2nd) is using out of date and inaccurate figures in his comments on GP incomes. As a general practitioner, I get on average €85.80 per year for a medical card patient under the age of 70.

For this sum, I provide medical cover to my patients for 24 hours a day and 365 days a year. This is before tax, and before paying staff, premises, equipment and computer costs and what is required to ensure out of hours cover etc.

For years my private patients have been subsidising my medical card practice and sustaining the standard of practice that we are trying to provide. This situation has been exacerbated by the 35 per cent cut in medical card fees unilaterally imposed by the Government in the last three years.

The recently appointed professor of general practice in UCC, who has come from the United Kingdom, has been quoted as describing the GP service in this country as “gold dust”. Under current Government proposals it may well become just dust. Yours, etc,

DR EAMONN FALLER,

Crescent Medical Centre,

The Crescent,

Galway

Sir, – Brian McDevitt’s letter reflects the success of the Health Service Executive and the Department of Health in convincing the general public that global payments to a GP practice reflect the remuneration of the doctors involved.

By this logic, the situation is indeed even worse than Mr McDevitt imagines it to be since I can reveal that a certain Dr J Reilly received €13 billion in payments last year, which does seem excessive.

In Dr Reilly’s defence it should be said that this money is used to fund the health service. On a micro level the payments are the global payments to practices which fund nurses, secretaries, heat, light and medical supplies among other things. As these fees have been cut successively in recent years, the private fees that Mr McDevitt refers to are increasingly used to support the provision of services to medical card patients. Although the State has the responsibility to provide services to this group, it does not appear to be willing to adequately fund it. Yours, etc,

SÉAMUS McMENAMIN,

Family Doctor,

Baile Átha Luimnigh,

An Uaimh,

Co Na Mhí

Sir, – Your Irish language columnist Caoimhe Ní Laighin misleadingly states in her article(“Cinniúint na Catalóine”, April 2nd) that there are “77,000 cainteoir ag an nGaeilge”. This is not correct. The number of Irish speakers who claim to use Irish daily “outside the educational system only” should not be equated with the total number of Irish speakers, as your columnist has done. Many Irish speakers living outside Irish-speaking communities do not easily get opportunities on a daily basis to use Irish but they are still Irish-speakers.

In my opinion a better measure of the number of active Irish-speakers is the number of people who claim in census returns to use the language at least weekly outside education. This figure, according to the 2011 census is 188,000 for the 26 counties.

The 2011 census taken in Northern Ireland showed that there were 64,847 people who claimed to be able to understand, read, write and speak Irish. Unfortunately we don’t have figures for daily and weekly users but I would suggest a figure of approximately 16,000 would not be an exaggeration, giving a figure of a little more than 200,000 for the number of people who use Irish on a regular basis within the island of Ireland.

DONNCHA

Ó hÉALLAITHE,

Gaeltaighde,

Indreabhán,

Co na Gaillimhe

Sir, – In response to Brenda Morgan’s argument (Letters, April 1st) about computers and their negative effects on the learning process, it has to be stated that digital literacy is an integral part of the Irish curriculum, supporting children’s learning in a positive way.

Piaget’s constructivist theory would indicate that computers support children’s learning in design and construction of projects and contribute to the cognitive development of the child. The teacher facilitates this through the correct use of such ICT tools such as laptops, iPads and interactive whiteboards.

Such technology supports inclusion, from the less able to the more able child, thus ensuring that every student actively participates in the learning process. As educators, we have a responsibility to ensure children have the skills and knowledge necessary to be at the cutting edge of the digital economy we live in.

Young learners are fast becoming fluent in computer coding as they are educated in becoming the innovators of tomorrow. As an educator, I strongly believe that a balanced approach counteracts overdependence on screens. Oral expression and writing remain a vital part of this well of rich learning experiences that are nurtured within the curriculum. — Yours, etc,

AINGEAL Ní MHURCHÚ

CREAGH,

Baltimore,

Co Cork

Sir, – Recently cosmologists have detected ripples that they claim were triggered by the expansion of the universe after the Big Bang, which occurred approximately 13.7 billion years ago. (Actually the Big Bang was a soundless phenomenon. It was more silent than the keys tapping this computer.) Most scientists agree that 13.7 billion years ago space-time was created and that prior to that there was a void.

In contradiction to the “beginning” theory, I hold that the multiverse, which contains countless universes, has always existed. Most cosmologists claim that in it new, similar and dissimilar universes to ours are constantly evolving and disintegrating.

Void is indestructible and unchangeable. Despite the claim by the religious that “God is all powerful”, he would be incapable of destroying void. (God is habitually referred to as he and hardly ever as she, they or it.) The religious also assert that “the creator of all things” is eternal and that there was only “null and void” before he created the universe, in effect before he created the Big Bang. If he is eternal and the universe had a beginning, the question presents itself: before creation how did he occupy himself? Since he was existing in a void he could not do anything, because there was nothing to do. He could not think, because there was nothing to think about. He could not see, because there was nothing to see. He could not hear as there was no medium for transmitting sound. The religious will dismiss this with a “mysteries which we cannot understand” response.

Of course the real mystery, which it seems we are destined never to find answers to, is the mystery of life. There appears to be a mental block preventing us from resolving it. Yet while we cannot make sense of life, if there was no life it would not make sense either. Yours, etc,

FRANK COLUMB,

Carriglea Drive,

Firhouse,

Sir, – It was with increasing frustration that I read the contribution of President Higgins (“Time for citizens to forge a better future for our country”, April 2nd).

In vain I looked for a reference to the farmers, fishermen and foresters who harness our natural resources. Where was mention of the doctors, nurses and educators who nurture our human resources? I saw no recognition either of the scientists, the engineers and the entrepreneurs who discover and develop the resources we will use tomorrow.

While I commend the President’s call to rethink the ethics and philosophy of tomorrow’s Ireland I am disappointed that he has failed to recognise what is being achieved by these citizens today. Without physics, chemistry and biology, along with the technology to make the sciences concrete, the President would be left discussing and philosophising in the dark shadows of Plato’s cave. Yours, etc,

EDWARD FLAHAVAN,

Fews,

Kilmacthomas,

Co Waterford

Sir, – The President’s article in yesterday’s Irish Times prompts a question: why are the views of philosophers, theologians and sociologists on our society not given the same prominence as those of economists? Yours, etc,

DAVID NELSON,

Growtown,

Dunshaughlin,

Co Meath

Sir, – Munster coach Rob Penney’s rant against refereeing standards was an indication of the problems faced by professional rugby in this area but not, I suggest, in the way he meant it.

Yes, I think referees are inconsistent and, in some cases, even sub-standard. However one of the reasons that this state of affairs is allowed to continue is the partisan nature of rugby. Mr Penney was not complaining about poor decisions made by the referee but only about those which adversely affected his team.

In this respect he is the same as all participants in rugby, whether players, management or supporters. Consequently, every decision made by a referee in a rugby match, whether correct or incorrect, will have the support of half the people and anger the other half.

Mr Penney and his counterparts are in the best position to influence any attempts to improve refereeing standards, but until they start looking at this area of the game impartially they will, correctly, be seen merely as moaning because they lost the game. Yours, etc,

DAVE ROBBIE,

Seafield Crescent,

Booterstown,

Sir, – In rebranding itself, Trinity College Dublin has announced that it will update what it calls its “logo”. But the logo is actually a grant of arms, recognised in 1901 by the Ulster Kings of Arms (now the Chief Herald).

Has anyone at the college actually contacted the Chief Herald’s Office (attached to the National Library) to seek permission to change the coat of arms? Seems a bit of an oversight if not! Yours, etc,

STEVEN C SMYRL

FIGRS, MAPGI,

Sydenham Terrace,

Rathgar,

Dublin 6

Sir, – Your correspondent Denis Duff from Greystones (April 1st) suggests that Ireland needs a nuclear power station at Moneypoint.

But with the prevailing Atlantic winds, the west coast is the worst option for such an installation. It would surely make much more sense to put it on the east coast to disperse the whatever radiation might be leaked after the almost inevitable accident or leak or attack or “minor incident”.

Somewhere around Greystones perhaps, with the sea in front and reasonably empty mountains behind would be ideal, with the waste stored nearby. Yours, etc,

FRANK NEENAN,

Tullow Road,

Carlow

Sir, – A propos Sylvia Thompson’s piece on the pursuit of happiness (Life Science, April 3rd), might I suggest that there is much we can learn from philosophers on that topic.

Having reached something of a crisis in his own life, John Stuart Mill tells us in his Autobiography that the key to finding happiness is to realise that it is a mistake to seek it directly.

To achieve happiness we should rather immerse ourselves in a life that is packed with a diverse range of activities from which we derive satisfaction.

Reflecting on such a life will reveal to us that it is a happy one.

Yours etc

HARRY McCAULEY,

Maynooth Park,

Maynooth

Co Kildare

Sir, – Will the GAA be celebrating its bicentennial with hurling having become a major international sport? Yours, etc,

JOSEPH MACKEY,

Glasson,

Athlone,

Co Westmeath

Irish Independent:

* The elation of the Irish electorate in March 2011 quickly turned to deflation and angst.

Also in this section

Sky deal is a slap in the face for GAA fans

Coming back from the mother of all mistakes

Taxpayers left to foot the bill yet again

Three years on, the words of Pat Rabbitte ring in their ears about pledges to get elected; the electorate feels totally “shattered”, no doubt leading innumerable people to think, either, “I will never vote again” or “I will spoil my vote at the local and EU elections”.

The latter is a wasted vote; not even looked at by candidates.

The ancient Chinese proverb “Revenge is a dish best served cold” provides every dissatisfied elector with the best tool to teach the Tweedledum and Tweedledee a lesson they will never forget.

Bertie’s “oul pencil” used properly on the ballot paper at the May elections will empower you.

The number of candidates on the ballot paper in your constituency is the number of votes you have; grasp this golden opportunity to number every box on the ballot paper, and reserve, with relish, the last four numbers in the order of your choice for the four main parties.

If even 10pc of a constituency did this it would send alarm bells off.

Recall, in the Meath East by-election, how Fine Gael crowed it had a massive win; when in fact more than 50pc of the electorate did not vote.

Put lead in your pencil in May and do your duty by casting your vote. Be what Kenny and Gilmore and their nodding acolytes are not: “The indomitable Irishry” invoked by W B Yeats!

DECLAN FOLEY

BERWICK, AUSTRALIA

DA WHISTLEBLOWER CODE

* Coming soon to a cinema near you. A sort of Irish ‘Da Vinci Code’ spine-chiller. Based on the best-selling novel by Dan Murphy: ‘Da Irish Whistleblower Code.’

It all begins on a busy street near Government Buildings, and a strange, mad monk with long, blond hair is seen rushing into a clandestine meeting beneath the bowels of the building.

Intrigued, Professor Shatterproof follows this mysterious intruder, and discovers a terrible secret, as he observes a coven of hooded men at a strange filling cabinet on top of an altar.

Waiting till they had left, after they had finished whistling a strange chant, he discovers a thrown-away piece of paper on the floor, with encoded names and a map of a maze of underground tunnels.

And so begins a race against time to save the Government from collapse.

Shatterproof has to find the meanings behind the symbols that are dotted around the city. Twists and turns are everywhere. Denial, subterfuge, obfuscation. It’s an epic tale of cover-up.

Who is the whistleblower? What information does that person have? What happens to the whistleblowers, and keepers of the strange secret? All will be revealed in due time.

ANTHONY WOODS

ENNIS, CO CLARE

IRELAND’S RETURN

* So, Stoke City footballer Stephen Ireland is being considered for a return to the Irish International soccer team. Reports suggest assistant Ireland team manager Roy Keane has expressed his approval at a possible return.

On the basis of talent, ability and form, Stephen Ireland would be a most welcome addition to most international football teams, but on the basis of loyalty, honour, moral integrity and values becoming of one who is chosen to represent their national football team, he falls short.

I do not expect Roy Keane to share this view.

TOM COOPER

TEMPLEOGUE, DUBLIN 6W

WISE WORDS

* When things are said to you,

No matter what time of day it is,

No matter how old you are,

No matter where you are,

No matter how long ago it was,

No matter how drunk someone is,

No matter if you know the person or not – it hurts.

And it sticks.

By Elayna Keller, from her first-hand account of being a target of bullies.

We need say no more, only read her wonderful words.

Elayna, of course, won the NNI Press Pass Competition.

BRIAN MCDEVITT

GLENTIES, CO DONEGAL

OUT OF TOUCH

* I am an award II Gaelic Coach and have been training under-age groups for 14 years.

I recently had a preseason session for the coaches and had a question-and-answer session with some of the kids.

I asked were they watching the Dublin-Kerry match a few weeks ago and then realised that it was only on Setanta, now Sky sport.

I cannot believe how out of touch the GAA hierarchy is with the grassroots.

Let them do what they want with Sky but ensure all games are shared between RTE, TV3 and TG4.

KEVIN HEALY

ADDRESS WITH EDITOR

HEALTHCARE CONCERNS

* It is good to see Dr Reilly has outlined his new system.

It is to be hoped that the system will be introduced within five years as foreseen and that time will not be wasted in searching for the perfect system.

Better to start and adapt as necessary rather than procrastinate and delay.

But one initial word of warning. Dr Reilly has estimated that the 40pc who hold medical cards will not be liable to pay any premium and that a further 30pc will have their payments heavily subsidised.

The remaining 30pc can hardly be recognised as universal.

JOHN F JORDAN

KILLINEY, CO DUBLIN

REALITIES OF ARTHRITIS

* Arthritis is a debilitating disability, which affects around 915,000 people.

It is widely believed arthritis is an illness that accompanies old age but in Ireland alone around 1,100 children suffer from arthritis.

People’s perception of arthritis is often associated with pain; while this may be true, it fails to represent an accurate depiction of the daily struggle suffers endure.

Pain is merely a component, which contributes to a larger picture. Unless one suffers with arthritis, they cannot truly comprehend the disability accurately.

Arthritis Ireland organises various events for teenagers who have arthritis. The JA road-trip is a prime example.

The road-trip allows teenagers to discuss their illness and discover different pain-management techniques.

Arthritis Ireland also organises a number of activates and this gives teenagers an opportunity to try things they thought they never could do as a result of arthritis.

Arthritis Ireland runs frequent workshops to demonstrate new ways of dealing with pain.

It also helps people to cope with the problems they may encounter as a result of having arthritis.

Thank you for the time it took to read my piece.

DANNY DE VAAL

AGE 15 ADDRESS WITH EDITOR

ON THE RIGHT TRACK

* “Walking (minus) the line”?

Is the threat of a cut to train services a case of ‘fright at the end of the tunnel’?

TOM GILSENAN

BEAUMONT, D9


Back in hospital again

$
0
0

5 April2014 Back in hospital

I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again.They have to test a new navigational aidPriceless

Mary back in hospital

No Scrabbletoday, Perhaps Marywill win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Margo MacDonald – obituary

Margo MacDonald was the charismatic face of the SNP in the 1970s whose fervent socialism led to splits with her own party

Margo MacDonald

Margo MacDonald was a doughty fighter for independence and a political gadfly who championed a variety of causes Photo: CHRIS WATT

5:46PM BST 04 Apr 2014

Comments66 Comments

Margo MacDonald who has died aged 70, was the larger-than-life face of Scottish nationalism, the winner of a sensational by-election at Govan in 1973, an inaugural member of the Scottish Parliament and the political and marital partner of Jim Sillars, who quit Labour to found his own party before also winning Govan for the SNP.

Margo MacDonald was living proof of the party’s fractiousness. Convinced that nationalism was as much about personal liberty as freedom for the Scottish nation, she twice left the party — under duress in 1982 when its leaders lost patience with her Left-wing 79 Group; and again before the 2003 Holyrood elections, sitting for her final two terms as an Independent.

Margo MacDonald was uncomfortably far to the Left for a party establishment she branded “tartan Tories”, but the SNP found it hard to live without her charisma from the moment in November 1973 when she captured solidly Labour Govan with a majority of 571.

Her tabloid image as a glamorous 29-year-old publican’s wife (her first husband, Peter, was licensee of the Hoolet’s Nest at Blantyre) did her no harm against a lacklustre opponent. But while her fervour and good looks made her a natural for television, she was serious about her politics and resented being called a blonde bombshell.

The inadequacies of Labour’s Harry Selby, a hairdresser, could not alone explain the collapse of its vote. The novelty of a forceful woman candidate in a working-class Glasgow seat was a factor. So, too, was the widespread belief that, while Edward Heath’s government had been disastrous for Clydeside, a tired Labour Party had little to offer.

Yet the result also reflected a growing local militancy stemming from the Upper Clyde Shipbuilders’ work-in, and an upsurge of pressure for independence that caught Labour unawares. The publication in mid-campaign of the Kilbrandon Report recommending a Scottish Assembly, and Labour’s lukewarm response, was just the boost the SNP needed.

Margo MacDonald spent barely two months in the Commons before Heath called — and lost — a snap election. In that time she raised the standard of an independent Scotland drawing strength from North Sea oil revenues, capturing more headlines back home. The February 1974 election was bitter for her, but sweet for her party: boundary changes gave Selby his revenge by 543 votes, but the SNP gained six other seats, causing panic in both main parties.

Labour made a painful U-turn over devolution in time for a further election that October; Margo fought Govan again, but the margin widened. As the SNP’s senior vice-chairman, she urged the party Leftwards and, as Wilson and later James Callaghan saw even their modest devolution proposals hampered by lack of a clear Commons majority, she scorned their “hollow assembly” and upped the pressure for independence.

She tried once more to return to the Commons, in a by-election at Hamilton in June 1978. The omens were good: this was her home town, and the seat Winifred Ewing had captured in 1968 to launch the SNP as a serious force. But a hiding from Labour in the local elections got her campaign off on the wrong foot, the future defence secretary George Robertson proved a tough opponent, and despite her warning that if she lost there would never be a Scottish assembly, Labour doubled its majority. That August she became Scottish director of Shelter.

Labour got its devolution scheme on to the Statute Book, and a referendum was set for March 1979. Despite her reservations, Margo Macdonald campaigned energetically for a “Yes” vote. And when the campaign team was formed in 1978, she and Sillars — then leader of the two-MP Scottish Labour Party — were thrown together.

Margo MacDonald with Jim Sillars after their marriage in 1981 (CAPITAL PRESS)

She had separated from her husband two years before, and Sillars’s own marriage had broken down. Both wanted an independent, socialist Scotland, and their partnership was strengthened by the inconclusive result of the referendum and Sillars’s loss of his seat in the 1979 election (triggered by the passage of the SNP’s consequent no-confidence motion in Callaghan’s government).

Even before the referendum and the SNP’s heavy losses, she had founded the 79 Group within the party, aimed at securing a more socialist programme. This cost her the SNP vice-chairmanship at the 1979 conference, but gained a powerful recruit in Sillars, who joined the party and the Group. They married in 1981.

For a time, Sillars and MacDonald looked to their supporters a “dream ticket” who could lead the SNP Leftwards to victory. But the leadership had had enough; it cracked the whip again, and Margo resigned from the party, blaming Winifred Ewing. Sillars stayed in. He would himself win a by-election at Govan in 1988; his wife did not campaign for him despite her past triumph there, but was with him for the declaration of the result.

Margo MacDonald was back in the SNP by the time Tony Blair’s government delivered a Scottish Parliament. She stood for Edinburgh South in the first Holyrood elections in 1999, but became an MSP by virtue of topping the SNP’s list of candidates for the Lothians. She again enjoyed a bumpy relationship with the party, especially after John Swinney replaced Alex Salmond as its leader. Impatient with his moderation, she was expelled in January 2003.

Re-elected as an Independent that year — she backed the Scottish Socialist Party during the campaign — she joined a non-party group comprising health and senior citizens’ campaigners and defectors from Labour and the SNP. In the 2007 elections, only she among the Independents survived.

Her greatest contribution as an MSP was to leak in 2004 a report on the soaring cost of the new Parliament building. Discontent over the more than 10-fold increase in the original estimate of £40 million came to a head, and her action led to the First Minister, Jack McConnell, setting up an inquiry which pilloried a number of the officials responsible.

In 1996 Margo MacDonald was diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease. Six years later she made her illness public, and demanded the legal right to end her own life. She launched a campaign for assisted dying to be legalised, and cooperated with a BBC documentary exploring both sides of the argument.

She explained on the programme: “The possibility of having the worst form of the disease at the end of life has made me think about unpleasant things. I feel strongly that, in the event of losing my dignity or being faced with the prospect of a painful or protracted death, I should have the right to choose to curtail my own, and my family’s, suffering.”

Margo Aitken was born on April 19 1943 . After attending Hamilton Academy, she trained as a PE teacher at Dunfermline College. Inspired by Winifred Ewing’s victory at Hamilton, she joined the SNP and in 1970 contested Paisley. In 1972, aged 29, she was elected a party vice-chairman; months later she was an MP.

After her break with the SNP she reinvented herself as an Edinburgh-based journalist. In 1985-86 she presented Radio 4’s Sunday Colour Supplement and the consumer programme Face the Facts, and she continued to broadcast frequently.

Margo MacDonald leaves two daughters from her marriage to Peter MacDonald, whom she married in 1965 and divorced in 1980. Jim Sillars also survives her.

Margo MacDonald, born April 19 1943, died April 4 2014

Guardian:

Michael Meacher claims (Letters, 2 April) that our proposals “kick away” free NHS care at the point of service. Quite the opposite: they reinforce this principle. As the Guardian reported on Monday, Solving the NHS Care and Cash Crisis proposes various hypothecated health taxes to tackle the £30bn black hole in the NHS budget. Introducing dedicated health taxes is not a madcap, rightwing idea – the move was actively considered by a previous Labour shadow cabinet. Our proposals would include a £10 a month payment from all non-exempted adults, collected with the council tax, to support individualised health MOTs and continuing personal support for healthy living. People may not like paying more taxes for an effective NHS, but we would argue that Britain has little choice, precisely so we can preserve the principle of free at the point of use and clinical need.
Norman Warner House of Lords
Jack O’Sullivan Oxford

• Every NHS doctor, every day, sees a disproportionate number of patients with illness caused by poverty and the associates of poverty – smoking, obesity, alcohol, drug use, domestic violence. The NHS should be predominantly paid for by those whose privilege is to need it least. Then it will be there for all of us when we need it. This is how tax works.
Dr Helen Holt
Consultant physician, Bournemouth

• Polly Toynbee illustrates this government’s aversion to progressive taxation, regardless of falling revenues and the resulting dereliction of public services. I believe the fairest way would be for pensioners, like me – the people who would benefit most – to pay national insurance. This could also be part of the answer to the problem of social care, which should be incorporated into the NHS.
Trevor Lashley

The prime minister refuses to sack Maria Miller over her claiming of £45,000 in accommodation allowances (Report, 4 April), while at the same time introducing a spare-room tax for the poor. Even worse, the so-called standards committee waters down an independent probe’s criticism of her expenses. The cross-party MPs overruled the key findings, demanding that she should hand back just £5,800 of taxpayers’ money.

The committee’s final report states that even if the commissioner was strictly right about the rules, it was “inappropriate” to apply them. Really? If a welfare benefit claimant had been found guilty of claiming benefits that they were not entitled to, they would be on their way to prison. In Westminster, Maria Miller’s “punishment” was being forced to apologise to the Commons. Not because she defrauded the taxpayer, but because she didn’t cooperate with the independent investigation.

We have been told by David Cameron that his welfare reforms are part of a moral mission. He wants to end the something-for-nothing culture. Hence the food banks, hence the sick and disabled dying when benefits have been withdrawn, hence the spare room tax for the poor; it’s for their own good. Yet he also says Maria Miller shouldn’t have to resign. Morality is always for the little people.
Julie Partridge
London

• Your report suggests the culture secretary did all she could to obstruct parliament’s investigation by “consistently responding with lengthy procedural challenges” and repeatedly failing “to provide information when asked for, or to respond adequately, to the commissioner’s questions”. The committee’s conclusion that Miller “did not pay as close attention to the rules of the house as she should” seems remarkably feeble. Surely a cabinet minister should be expected to set a better example. The lesson for any aspiring criminal seems to be first obstruct all police investigations by any available means and for as long as possible; and, second, if you are charged, get a group of your mates to sit on the jury.
Professor Robert Williams
Durham

• During the 2009 “expenses scandal”, David Cameron insisted that what was at issue was not the money itself: “How much needs to be paid back is not really a legal issue, it’s actually a moral and an ethical issue.” Does a 34-second apology deal with the latter point?
Professor Ralph Negrine
University of Sheffield

• So Denis MacShane loses his seat and gets sent down for 12 grand, while Miller apologises, repays six out of more than 40 grand and stays in the cabinet.
John Smith
Sheffield

Health warnings on air pollution should not be seen as isolated incidents (Editorial, 3 April). In recent years we have seen rates of major respiratory illnesses increase and in London alone an extra 4,000 premature deaths occur each year as a result of poor air quality. The European commission recently launched legal action against the UK for failing to meet mandatory air pollution targets. If we want to avoid dramatic government interventions like banning half of all cars on the road in major cities – which Paris has enacted – we need to adopt a much more proactive approach. Helping people to take simple, practical steps to rethink their travel plans can have a dramatic impact on air pollution.

In partnership with Barts NHS health trust, we are working to improve local air quality, through the development of cleaner air zones to benefit patients and incentives for suppliers and visiting vehicles to switch their engines off and operate cleaner vehicles. These sorts of initiatives are not just necessary for the environment, they will also help all of us to live longer, healthier lives.
Caroline Watson
Partner, Global Action Plan

• It’s easy to play the blame game when it comes to air pollution, but we are much less adept at coming up with answers. Air pollution is one of the most complex challenges we face – it doesn’t respect international or political boundaries. Much of it comes from the way we live our lives, but, above all, it’s usually invisible. So in some ways we should be grateful to the clouds of Saharan dust for reminding us of the importance of the air that we breathe, which most of us take for granted. The media coverage given to the smog is almost unprecedented, but what a tragedy it would be if this dispersed as soon as the dust stopped falling on our cars. I hope instead that it acts as a wake-up call for us all, especially our political leaders, and that healthy air is seen as essential a human right as clean drinking water and enough food for all.
Ruth Chambers
London

• The latest pollution crisis offers a compromise over the global warming debate: take all such measures to reduce CO2 ,N2O emissions that may affect long-term global warming as will also reduce immediate threats to health from pollution. It may be that action on the second will fulfil all the criteria for the first.
DBC Reed
Northampton

• The reduction in pollution following the 1956 Clean Air Act failed to match the positive impact resulting from the switch from toxic “town gas” to North Sea Gas just over a decade later, when “at national level in England and Wales, infant mortality rates fell rapidly from the early 1970s and into the 1980s” (Health Stat Q 2008 Winter;(40):18-29). A similar reduction in infant death rates following a switch to natural gas occurred in Turkey, as reported in January 2013 by Resul Cesur, Erdal Tekin and Aydogan Ulker.
Michael Ryan
Shrewsbury

• The current risks to health identified with the addition of airborne dust to existing pollution levels illustrates only too well the unforeseen consequences of the interventions made by London councils to limit the speed of vehicles to below 30mph. Speed humps, alternating pinch points, chicanes, additional roundabouts and zigzag parking ensure that vehicles have to be driven in lower gear, with frequent stops and starts thus increasing harmful exhaust. Diesel particulates are particularly dangerous and a 30% increase in diesel vehicles over recent years has ensured a rise in pollution, even before the addition of cloud dust.

The supposed safety suggested by these measures are more than offset by the increased health risks for all the population and especially for young undeveloped lungs frequently blasted by exhaust fumes in their outward facing buggies.
Chloe Baveystock
London

• It’s not just Tories in Westminster who fail to understand the pollution crisis (Report, 4 April). Here in Uttlesford our local council is about to approve a development plan that guarantees traffic gridlock in our town. Air quality levels in Saffron Walden already breach EU limits. Perhaps we should all stay indoors for the foreseeable future?
Richard Gilyead
Saffron Walden, Essex

• Lovely photo of the Angel of the North in the smog (3 April). Shame that, as your map shows, we had very low levels of pollution that day. We have had lots of mist – commonly known up here as a sea fret.
Sally Watson
Newcastle upon Tyne

Like Edward Thomas (Letters, 4 April) I am approaching my 70th birthday. Unlike him I grew up in a provincial city in the 50s and 60s where few if any black faces were to be seen. I moved to London over 40 years ago and live in a neighbouring borough to Hackney, where I, my children and my grandchild live, work and play happily and harmoniously in a “melting pot of people of other cultures” and it is really all rather wonderful. And, Edward, I invite you to join me for a coffee, or a pint in Broadway Market, so that you can see for yourself the diversity and vibrancy which exists there 60 years from your recollection of it.
David Harrison
London

• Re your headline (4 April) “Average family £974 worse off in 2015 – Balls”. Please convince me that’s an attribution and not a comment.
John Emms
Huddersfield, West Yorkshire

• After itemising Prince Charles’s many exemptions, privileges and prerogatives, including his right to the assets of anyone who dies intestate in Cornwall, Robert Booth writes (Peer proposes ending prince’s tax privileges, 31 March) that Lord Berkeley’s bill, to be put before the House of Lords and designed to put an end to those arcane anomalies, is “unlikely to become law”. Why not?
Victoria Glendinning
Bruton, Somerset

• I think you’ll find Tipp-Ex (G2, 3 April) was invented in Texas by Bette Nesmith, mum of Mike Nesmith, one-time Monkee.
Alan Fry
London

• If you’re driving around experiencing all these places (Letters, passim), you might want to avoid Carsick in Sheffield.
David Hamer
Sheffield

• I’ve driven through the Shropshire village of Knockin several times. I am still looking in vain for the shop.
Ian Gordon
Folkestone, Kent

• Aware that this posting risks bringing the thread to an end, can I mention that during a tour of rural Burgundy a year or two ago, we had a clear run through Anus, a small hamlet.
Les Farris
South Petherton, Somerset

It was great to read the review of Home (3 April), but Lyn Gardner’s assumption that foyers are so called because they are “just somewhere you pass through” couldn’t be further from the truth. In France, where the foyer movement started, the word has many meanings, including home and hearth, and was intended to signify a home from home for young migrants to the cities after the second world war. In the UK the word has never been understood. I remember, when running the Foyer Federation, being asked by a bemused person whether cinema foyers really needed a federation – and a puzzled conversation about the convention on “voyeurs” taking place in Liverpool. Fortunately the institution is better than its name and about to celebrate its 21st birthday, providing over 10,000 young people a year, like those in Home, with a springboard to develop their talents and rejoin the mainstream.
Carolyn Hayman
London

Independent:

What is all this about winning or losing the debate between Nigel Farage and Nick Clegg? Either you agreed with the one or the other. I doubt if many changed their minds: neither deployed any new arguments. Clegg used logic, Farage emotion.

The use of this debate was twofold. It exposed the arguments, and the “exit poll” gave an idea of how people would vote if there were a referendum today.

The good news for the “ins” like myself is that only about a sixth of the population needs to be convinced. The problem is how the ins are going to speak to the feelings of those who are not convinced by logic.

Venetia Caine, Glastonbury, Somerset

Save at the very end, nobody mentioned the word “war” in the Farage-Clegg debate on the EU. Both Farage and Clegg are too young to have experienced war in Europe.

For over 500 years nations in post-medieval Europe waged war against one another. In the last century two world wars shattered Europe. My mother had her eldest brother killed in the First World War (Ypres) and her youngest brother killed in the Second (Crete). I was born in 1938 and my father, having survived Dunkirk, was absent on active service from 1940 to 1945, so that I did not recognise him when he returned home.

My mother, sister and I slept in the cellar of our house in south-east London for the duration of the war. A good job too because the house opposite us was bombed flat in 1944 by a V2 rocket.

A united Europe (whatever its faults) is far preferable to antagonistic separate nations, and the Ukip isolation policy is simply a false dream based on outdated 19th-century notions.

David Ashton, Shipbourne, Kent

Listening to the televised debate on Wednesday evening, I realised why Nick Clegg has difficulty with a 70-year-old like me who grew up in Hackney in the 1950s. There the local population lived contentedly enough in a monocultural society in a London Cockney setting reflected by the Broadway Market round the corner, a series of cinemas in Mare Street and a straightforward English way of life.

Mr Clegg made great play of how he wants us to live in the present rather than the past. The problem is that the elements he cited were all foisted on us. We never asked for mass immigration. We never asked for multiculturalism. We never asked for diversity. We never asked for political union with 27 other countries of Europe. Mr Clegg necessarily begins from the weakest psychological stance in expecting people to accept situations which were forced on them. That is why his views carried little weight with me.

Edward Thomas, Eastbourne, East Sussex

Cinderella law: will social workers cope?

Frank Furedi (“The Cinderella law: emotional correctness gone mad”, 2 April) points out that every mother or father is  at risk of being labelled an abuser under the proposed “Cinderella law”.

The Government has proposed this new law just when the NSPCC reports that the threshold for intervening in a child’s life is actually being raised because of record reporting of child abuse. But a huge amount of this reporting is already needless. Department for Education figures for 2012-2013 show that, in England, there were 145,700 needless referrals to children’s social services in one year. Child protection is about a child “suffering, or likely to suffer, significant harm”. When so many children are needlessly reported, this does indicate that people already overreact.

So why does the Government want to broaden the definition of child abuse even further, thus creating more cases for an overloaded system? Sixteen children known to Birmingham social services died in a five-year period. A report severely criticised Birmingham social services over the poor quality of referrals, leading to a surge in demand that could not be met.

Detecting child abuse in the community is akin to finding a needle in a haystack for overstretched social workers. So why make the haystack even bigger by creating more cases that will need assessment?

Tristram C Llewellyn Jones, Ramsey, Isle of Man

Consistent, loving care is critical in building the human brain, so it certainly is time that our child-protection laws reflect the long-term mental and physical damage caused by the emotional neglect and abuse of children. The announcement that the Government intends to make the emotional abuse of children a criminal offence is an important step.

Understanding the critical importance of the emotional well-being of children is vital to the well-being of society. There is a raft of evidence to show that when infants receive warm, responsive, consistent, attuned, loving care their brains develop well. They are then able to grow into adults with the capacity for empathy and the facility to become good, caring parents themselves.

Lydia Keyte, Chair, What About The Children? Newbold on Stour, Warwickshire

Frank Furedi claims our Sutton Trust report “Baby Bonds” is driven by “an authoritarian impulse whose main consequence is to diminish parental authority”. In fact, the report is driven by an egalitarian impulse, whose intended consequence is for public policy to better support parents, precisely in order to generate, as Furedi puts it, “more opportunities for children, and indeed parents, to realise their potential.”

Furedi offers no evidence to counter our empirical finding – from a review of over 100 academic studies – that a secure emotional relationship with a parent can have an important influence on children’s life chances, particularly for the most disadvantaged.

Sophie Moullin, Princeton University, Professor Jane Waldfogel, Columbia University, Dr Liz Washbrook, Bristol University

Nasty Party kicks out A-level student

What a PR disaster the removal of the 19-year-old student Yashika Bhageerathi has proved to be! It shows Theresa May in her true colours as a member of the “Nasty Party” who, having failed to meet her targets for immigration, attempts to keep her numbers up by picking on a young, vulnerable girl who came here to avoid abuse. The removal of her alone, without her mother, and a failed attempt to remove her on Mothering Sunday, only added to the disaster.

The Home Office showed a complete lack of common sense and compassion in this case. What difference would it have made if Yashika had been allowed a further six weeks here so she could take her A-levels and return home with a qualification? Instead Britain is once again portrayed as an uncaring nation instead of a just and caring society.

The only people who deserve credit in this sad situation are the head, staff and pupils of the Oasis Academy Hadley in Enfield – they may have failed but they are heroes in my book.

Ken Smith, Hinderclay, Suffolk

Why no auction for Royal Mail?

You conclude (editorial, 2 April) that “Mr Cable was still right to be cautious” over the privatisation of the Royal Mail, on the grounds that privatisations cannot be guaranteed to be successful, and that “the effects of hindsight and ‘froth’ are impossible to judge”.

Maybe so, but it is hard to understand why the Department for Business did not, apparently, even consider the use of a properly designed sealed-bid auction, instead of the conventional book-building exercise. Nor, apparently, did the National Audit Office consider this as  an option.

The Treasury uses such auctions to sell government bonds, Google was floated using one, so why not for the Post Office? At least then everyone would have had a chance at getting some shares, and the selling price would have been more likely to settle at the market clearing price, providing that the auction process was properly designed.

David Harvey, Tynemouth, Tyne & Wear

Abuse of women becomes fashion

Oh dear, here we go again. The editor of Italian Vogue, Franca Sozzani, thinks she is campaigning in some way against the abuse of women by actually showing nicely arranged “fashion” images of pretend victims (The Big Read, 3 April).

This happens again and again in film and media. You are not reflecting the horrors of society, you idiots, you are simply joining in and adding  to them.

Sue Nicholas, Cranleigh, Surrey

The battle of Richard’s bones

If there is doubt (“Car park bones disputed”, 28 March) as to whether the Leicester Greyfriars burial is indeed that of Richard III, or of a contemporary similarly slain in battle, perhaps they should be honourably interred as the Unknown Warrior of the Wars of the Roses.

Peter Forster, London N4

Times:

The Culture Secretary’s “apology” for overclaimed expenses has not defused the row

Sir, On Thursday Maria Miller made what must rank as one of the most disgraceful and contemptible speeches ever heard in the Chamber (“Fury grows as expense row minister clings to job”, Apr 4). That she was not howled down is almost as disgraceful and yet another blot on the collective reputation of our MPs.

Professor Sir Bryan Thwaites

Fishbourne, W Sussex

Sir, It is difficult to know which is more depressing: that a minister, heavily criticised by a Parliamentary committee for her obstructive attitude to its investigation which ordered her to repay overclaimed expenses, should have the gall not to offer her resignation; or that the Prime Minister does not require it.

Robert Rhodes, QC

London WC2

Sir, The Maria Miller scandal shows that party politics and allegiance will always trump truth and justice, and this extends to the highest levels. Is it any wonder that so many of our politicians are held in contempt? It is also a good reason why their ability to influence and control the free press should be strictly limited.

Dr Brian Bunday

Baildon, W Yorks

Sir, The real scandal is that an over-claiming MP can remain on the state’s payroll. In any other walk of life they would now be an
ex-employee.

Roy Hamlin

Bridgnorth, Shropshire

Sir, The decision by the Conservative-dominated Commons Committee on Standards to overturn the ruling of the “independent” Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards regarding Maria Miller is akin to someone found guilty in court having the sentence referred to his or her family for the final resolution.

Douglas Kedge

Sonning Common, Oxon

Sir, It appears that the State has provided £90,000 towards Maria Miller’s £420,000 mortgage, just over 21 per cent of total repayments; her property, purchased for £234,000 in 1995, achieved a capital gain in excess of £1.2 million when sold this year for £1.47 million. Is it mischievous to suggest that this matter might satisfactorily be laid to rest if Mrs Miller considered a donation to good causes equivalent to 21 per cent of her profit — causes that she promotes as the Culture Secretary?

Nick Gandon

Hertford Heath, Herts

Sir, David Cameron even went so far as to claim that Miller “was cleared of the original allegation made against her”. Well, actually no she wasn’t; the independent investigation found her guilty. It was the Standards Committee which labelled the over-claimed expenses an “administrative error”. MPs seem to make the same administrative error over and over again. In other words, they judged her by their own rotten standards.

It is the 450th anniversary of Shakespeare’s birth – it is time to rename his birthday in his honour

Sir, Since this is the 450th anniversary of Shakespeare’s birth, St George’s Day, April 23 — the assumed day of Shakespeare’s birth and the known day of his death — should be renamed as Shakespeare’s Day and declared a public holiday, replacing the May Day Bank Holiday.

We should emulate the Burns
Night tradition with Shakespeare Suppers, in celebration of the Bard and his works. Finally, his plays and poems should be brought into perpetual copyright for the benefit of the nation.The royalties should be used to establish a Shakespeare Fund to support young and emerging artists.

Anthony H. Ratcliffe

London W1

A diverse group of Jews explain their concern at the regulations preventing prisoners from reading books

Sir, We, a diverse group of British Jews, are concerned at regulations that prevent prisoners having books (http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/opinion/letters/article4050474.ece).

Jewish culture, in its many religious and secular incarnations, is united by a deep-rooted conviction in the power of the written word. As the “people of the book”, the life of the Jews has been sustained for millennia by studying Jewish texts and writing new ones. Books are the source of our solace and our redemption.

We are therefore sensitive to any attempt to restrict access to books, whether suffered by Jews or anyone else. In particular, when prisoners have limited access to books, we are concerned that they will be denied the possibilities of self-improvement and self-understanding that reading provides.

We do not dispute the principle that privileges should be earned in prison, but we do not see books as a privilege but as a resource through which prisoners can transform their lives.

Keith Kahn-Harris (editor, The Jewish Quarterly); Stephen Pollard (editor, The Jewish Chronicle); Devorah Baum, Marc Goldberg, David Paul, Marc Michaels, Deborah Kahn-Harris, Rabbi Laura Janner-Klausner, Rabbi Jeremy Gordon, Rabbi Danny Rich, Student Rabbi Robin Ashworth-Steen, Anthony Julius, Shauna Leven, Vicky Prais and Daniel Silverstone, Kevin Sefton, Lawrence Joffe, Edie Friedman

A reader is appalled by the speed with which personal computers become obsolete and have to be wastefully junked

Sir, We are replacing our computer next week because support for its operating system is being withdrawn. We must also replace a four-year-old printer as it is not compatible with the new machine’s operating system. What a waste of raw materials. It is as if the computer industry has not heard of global warming.

Audrey Pawsey

Harpenden, Herts

Maths for apprentices and craftsmen needs to be practical rather than burdened with academic proofs and principles

Sir, Sir John Armitt et al (letter, Apr 1) say maths and English education for apprenticeships must be contextual and practical rather than academic.

I failed the 11+ so my education was biased towards life as an apprentice. School, technical college and polytechnic studies were practical, easy to understand in the context of experience gained in the workplace, and I often put them into practice in day-to-day tasks.

After my apprenticeship and some years as a master craftsman I went to university to read mathematics with computer science. The change was startling: exercises and discussions were based not on practical problems but on first principles and academic proof of theory. This would have been of little use when I was an apprentice or a craftsman, but in my subsequent career as a chartered engineer the academic first principles were invaluable.

Armitt is quite right: educational requirements for an apprenticeship must be contextual and practical, and the current insistence on academic learning for all is misplaced.

John Martin

Swarthmoor, Cumbria

A long-serving teacher finds that students from a religious background have a grasp of basic moral principles

Sir, When I first taught, in the 1970s, I used to ask students to respond to scenarios involving ethical dilemmas. It was the moral reasoning that I was looking for rather than just a response.

When I repeated the exercise in my last year of teaching I was not surprised to find that many students simply could not understand why it might be considered wrong to steal money collected in school for a charity (provided you were smart enough not to get caught); or why it might be considered wrong to bully someone into providing sexual favours by threatening to spread gossip about them; or why on earth anyone would help an old person who had collapsed in the street.

What did give me pause for thought, however, was that students from religious backgrounds — Christian and Muslim, a significant proportion of whom being from ethnic minorities — met incredulity when they were brave enough to suggest that stealing, lying and bullying might be wrong.

When those who deem themselves to be morally and intellectually superior to “religious” people proclaim their superiority they should consider the feelings, values and culture of these lesser beings — who else will clean the Übermenschen’s houses, nanny their children and repair their plumbing?

R. Howgate

Great Kimble, Bucks

Telegraph:

Withy farmers need flood control in Somerset

The recent floods prevented the withy harvest this year

Flexible working: Somerset withies being woven into a willow coffin at Stoke St Gregory  Photo: Matt Cardy/Getty Images

6:58AM BST 04 Apr 2014

Comments11 Comments

SIR – I am with Germaine Greer in supporting Somerset’s withy industry, but that is no excuse not to dredge the River Parrett.

Withies must be cut while the plant is dormant – once they shoot, it’s too late – which means January and February. A flood such as the withy farmers have suffered this year is a disaster, as they simply couldn’t get on to the withy beds to harvest their crops.

I worked as clerk to five of the internal drainage boards that cover much of the affected area. Even then (I retired 14 years ago) my boards were agitating against the deliberate neglect of the River Parrett.

For more than 100 years our forefathers had developed a regime that maintained high water levels in summer and emptied the watercourses in the winter to provide flood storage. That system created the area’s undoubted wildlife interest in the first place. The 2014 floods have done major damage to wildlife habitats.

No amount of dredging would have prevented flooding, but a properly dredged river wouldn’t have taken two months to clear the water.

Alone of the principal Somerset rivers, the Parrett has no tidal sluice. This means that tidal silting is a major problem.

A tidal sluice would be expensive, but nowhere near as expensive as the millions spent on “fashionable” bird reserves – and nowhere near as expensive as clearing up after this winter’s floods.

John Hunt
Curry Rivel, Somerset

SIR – Mary Riddell is right: British justice is indeed under threat.

There are 773 prisoners serving indeterminate sentences who were given minimum sentences of less than two years. So they are not the most serious of offenders. They were sentenced before 2008. Yet they are still in prison more than six years later.

When indeterminate sentences were abolished in 2012, Parliament gave Chris Grayling, the Justice Secretary, the power to secure the early release of these prisoners. But he has declined to exercise that power. Quite apart from the sense of injustice, their release would save the taxpayer £30 million a year. When may we expect him to act?

Lord Lloyd of Berwick
London SW1

Get knotted

SIR – Japanese knotweed is not a frightening weed, and is easier to kill than horsetail.

First remove and burn the dry stalks from last year’s growth. As soon as the new red shoots appear, cut them down. Do not put them in the compost bin. Continue to cut the new shoots every week until the autumn, when they will stop reappearing.

Continue the treatment the following year when there will be far fewer shoots. It could take three years before it is all gone. If the shoots are in tarmac or cracked concrete, it might be easier to use a weedkiller, but you will need to reapply it each time the shoots appear.

S Beswick
Whitehaven, Cumberland

Electronic cigarettes

SIR – I am a 70-year-old retired consultant surgeon who smoked for 50 years until March 14 2013. On that day I smoked 30 cigarettes. The next day I gave up smoking and purchased an electronic cigarette kit online. I have not touched a cigarette since.

I use the lowest nicotine dose of 6mg. I now hardly ever use the device. I have not put on weight and I have saved £5,180 out of taxable pensions.

If only electronic cigarettes had been available years ago.

John Storrs
Canterbury, Kent

Dylan in the South

SIR – In North Wales, Dylan would be pronounced “Dullan”, in South Wales “Dillan”. Since Dylan Thomas lived in South Wales, he would probably have said “Dillan”.

Mike Maloney
Aberystwyth, Cardiganshire

Second thoughts

SIR – Britons suffered a severe jolt last Sunday morning when, by Parliamentary decree, they were obliged to rise an hour early in order to arrive at church on time.

A similar jolt is expected in a few months when we will be forced to wait an extra hour before we can enjoy our morning cups of tea.

All this could be avoided if British software engineers and Swiss watchmakers lengthened the second ever so slightly in the summer months and shortened it in the winter months. There would be no noticeable daily effect.

“Summer seconds” and “winter seconds” would be used for all purposes except for those of a scientific or sporting nature, where “standard” seconds would remain in use.

Jack R Richards
Codicote, Hertfordshire

It’s an ill wind…

SIR – It is unbelievable that on the day that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change announced that climate change is one of the greatest threats to our planet, David Cameron, who once claimed he was going to have “the greenest government ever”, declared that he wanted to stop all onshore wind-farm development.

He may think this move will win votes, but survey after survey, the last as recent as December, show that 64 per cent of people approve of wind farms.

Peter Edwards
Delabole, Cornwall

Buying silence

SIR – Hilda Gaddum asks if any authority has powers to stop annoying cold calls from overseas that fall outside the control of the Telephone Preference Service. I can answer: Yes!

We too were driven to distraction by such calls. The solution was a telephone from BT that blocks all “number withheld” calls, as well as all overseas calls that I have not registered in my “favourites” memory.

It was the best £45 I have ever spent.

Terry Lloyd
Darley Abbey, Derbyshire

Pillar to post

SIR – A photograph (April 2) showed “Britain’s oldest postbox”, from 1855, at Holwell, Dorset. In Guernsey last summer, I saw a pillar-box installed in 1853 on the site designated by Anthony Trollope when he was a postal surveyor.

John Piffe-Phelps
Oswestry, Shropshire

Medieval pest

SIR – Roger Gentry wonders whether dormant Black Death viruses are being unearthed by the Crossrail excavations disturbing burials under Charterhouse Square in London.

I was a medical student at Barts, living in Charterhouse Square in the Fifties. I remember being taught that the Black Death was caused, not by a virus, but by a bacillus Pasteurella pestis, an anaerobic bacterium. I understand this was renamed Yersinia pestis in 1967 after Alexandre Yersin who discovered it in 1894 as the causative agent of bubonic plague.

However, the huge size of rats seen in Birmingham recently (report, April 2) will not encourage complacency.

Dr Wendy Roles
Sunningdale, Berkshire

How to reply when the waiter says Enjoy!

SIR – His Honour Judge Patrickwonders how to reply to a waiter’s annoying injunction: “Enjoy!”

My usual response is simply: “What?” This obviously does sometimes lead to a lengthy discussion, but the point is made and hopefully remembered.

Sarah Allen
Bridgwater, Somerset

SIR – My response is: “Really?” It has the desired effect. The puzzled expression adds something to proceedings especially if the course is not interesting in itself.

Rev Dr Gareth Jones
Chaplain, Cardiff University

SIR – I consider “Enjoy” to be the English equivalent of “Bon appetit”, which I have always found charming, though it doesn’t translate well. The only response I can offer is a polite “Thank you.”

David Barnett
Thetford, Norfolk

SIR – Being ordered to “enjoy” reminds me of the time in a California store in 1983 when I overheard a customer being told by a sales lady to “have a nice day”. His reply was: “No thank you, I have made other arrangements.”

Valerie Harbidge
Cowling, North Yorkshire

SIR – Now Nick Clegg has made it clear that there is no justification for Britain to remain part of this corrupt, anti-democratic organisation, perhaps David Cameron could get on with the referendum before the country consigns him to history.

David Rammell
Everton, Hampshire

SIR – One question put by a member of the audience to Nigel Farage and Nick Clegg during their debate on Wednesday was: “What will the EU be like in 10 years’ time?”

According to the EU’s own statistics, its share of world GDP has already shrunk from 30.9 per cent in 1980 to 18.3 per cent in 2014. By comparison, the share of world GDP in other advanced countries over the same period has declined by only 7.6 per cent, while that of the rest of the world has increased by 20.1 per cent.

This pattern is projected to continue to 2050. By then, the EU’s share of world GDP is forecast to fall by a further 8.4 per cent, that of advanced countries by another 4.6 per cent, but that of the rest of the world to rise by a further 13 per cent.

Thanks to EU restrictions on negotiating our own trade agreements, we have already lost out in world markets. But we could gain a larger share of world GDP in future if we left the club.

Richard Shaw
Dunstable, Bedfordshire

SIR – Do we take it that Ukip and the Lib Dems are the only parties interested in the forthcoming European elections?

Peter Amey
Hoveton, Norfolk

SIR – You can’t help thinking how much better two former Liberal Party leaders, Lord Steel and Lord Ashdown, would have dealt with the inconsistencies and unexpurgated bias spouted by Nigel Farage in his two debates with Nick Clegg.

Despite the audience’s apparent willingness to be swayed by his bellicose and unrealistic views, Mr Farage once again had no original thoughts to offer, and could only try to win support by denigrating all those with whom he disagreed.

Dr Robin J Harman
Farnham, Surrey

SIR – Whatever else Nick Clegg said during his televised debate with Nigel Farage, at least he got one thing correct; his use of the term “human disaster”. A “humanitarian disaster” is a complete contradiction. It is a corruption imported from the American media by lazy and impressionable British journalists during the late Eighties.

Michael R Gordon
Bewdley, Worcestershire

SIR – During the EU debate, Nick Clegg accused Nigel Farage of wanting to turn back the clock and see W G Grace opening the batting for England.

I’m voting Ukip.

Bernard Anghelides
Paddock Wood, Kent

Irish Times:

Sir, – The Government will shortly publish a strategy designed to reactivate the construction sector through easing perceived obstacles to development. Such a move is welcome; there is significant capacity to boost construction to a sustainable level and in the process create jobs and build much needed infrastructure, in particular homes. According to the latest Housing Agency report, we need 80,000 new homes by the end of 2018, half in Dublin.

Many aspects of the construction strategy have been well flagged, including provisions to relax density requirements in urban areas to enable developers to build fewer, larger houses on sites instead of apartments, in order, we are told, to meet demand for family homes.

Taoiseach Enda Kenny, in referring to the construction strategy in the 2014 Programme for Government, says that the plan “will be based on enterprise and high standards, not speculation – we are never going back to the culture that nearly destroyed our country”. One aspect of our culture which has indeed damaged our country is urban sprawl. According to Dublin City Council’s study with DIT and UCD on Demographic Trends in Dublin 2012, “we have an American-type urban and regional settlement pattern, based on low density housing and high car dependency. The 2011 Census confirms that a pattern of population dispersal has continued even during the recession. This presents challenges with regard to provision of infrastructure; provision of social services; complex commuting patterns and accessibility; energy costs.” I am concerned that in the context of the need for new housing development, many voices are clamouring for us to make precisely the mistakes we made in the past through continuing to promote urban sprawl.

The topic is emotive, as evidenced by the reaction to recent comments by the head of the Department of Finance. A broad-ranging talk on construction and property issues – from the need to provide public housing to people who can no longer afford mortgage payments to the professionalisation of apartment block management was reduced in media reports to a reference to three-bedroom semi-detached houses.

It is possible to develop attractive family homes without resorting to the popular but unfortunately unsustainable two-storey house. The problem is that we have failed to convince people of the benefits of higher densities or the positive aspects of apartment living. To do this we need to broaden the discussion to include qualitative issues – not only in relation to the design, construction, management and maintenance of the apartments themselves but to consideration of the neighbourhood as a whole.

Developing homes and neighbourhoods in a sustainable way will pay dividends on many levels, including fairness (more people able to live closer to jobs, amenities and services) and health: the design of buildings and public spaces in cities and towns can lead to positive changes in our lifestyle and ultimately to greater levels of physical activity, which combat the root causes of obesity.

A Government strategy to re-energise the construction sector is welcome – but only if it doesn’t inadvertently perpetuate urban sprawl. Yours, etc,

ALI GREHAN,

Dublin City Architect,

Civic Offices,

Wood Quay,

Dublin 8

Sir, – The Housing Agency’s report projecting housing need over the next five years presents a significant opportunity to break with the mistakes of the past and ensure a considered, evidence-based approach to planning. However it also provokes pressure for a return to laissez faire, developer-led planning that must be resisted.

This year marks the 50th anniversary of the modern Irish planning system, which sought “to make provision, in the interests of the common good, for the proper planning and development of cities, towns and other areas”. The National Planning Conference in Limerick this month marks this anniversary and will ask if 50 years on we have learned to avoid a knee-jerk reaction in the face of the need for new homes.

Serviced urban land remains a scarce resource that needs effective management. To construct places where people want to live, work and build communities, we must think long-term. Large volumes of low-density housing development produced at minimal cost to developers and maximum price to the consumer contributed to the problems of the property boom and often made “places” unsustainable as provision of services to low-density, remote developments became financially impracticable. This legacy must never be repeated.

As Ministers Hogan and O’Sullivan’s foreword to Local Area Plans – Guidelines for Planning Authorities (June 2013) states, we must focus on “settlements and place, rather than just development …We need to plan for communities, not for profit”.

The Housing Agency report lays down a challenge, not just for professional planners, but for all disciplines engaged in place-making. How do we ensure that good quality, affordable, efficient, well-designed houses are built where they should be and that real place-making remains at the forefront of the planning and housing agenda?

The Department has produced a range of guidelines designed to inform planning authorities, An Bord Pleanála, developers and the general public. Today we have a more comprehensive suite of guidance than ever before which demonstrates the aspiration at national level to deliver quality places. Rather than complaining about densities and the planning system we simply must implement these and get on with building high-quality, sustainable places. The days of parachute planning and place-making must be at an end. Yours, etc,

MARY CROWLEY MIPI,

President,

Irish Planning Institute,

Great Strand Street,

Dublin 1

Sir, – I refer to recent statements by Leo Varadkar in relation to the funding of Irish Rail. Mr Varadkar justifies his assertion that rail is inefficient on the basis of the relative numbers carried, compared to Dublin Bus or Luas. This is a shortsighted and simplistic analysis, which ignores the fact that the average rail journey is many multiples of the average Dublin Bus or Luas journey and is thus of more social and economic import.

The economic worth of the railway shouldn’t be casually dismissed – ask the people of Donegal how that region has fared since the destruction of rail infrastructure in the North West. Nor would I be particularly confident that bus-based solutions have the ability to address the transport needs of the Dublin area given that the usage of Dublin Bus services has declined sharply, from 149 million journeys in 2003/4 to 115 million in 2012. Indeed Dublin Bus carries substantially fewer passengers than in the much smaller Dublin of the 1960s while rail usage (excluding Luas) has increased by a factor of four. Indeed significant sections of the rail system are heavily congested, resulting in serious service degradation, particularly along the Dublin/Belfast corridor. Yours, etc,

ANTHONY GRAY ,

Wheaton Hall,

Drogheda,

Co Louth

Sir, – Minister for Transport Leo Varadkar is warning of possible closures on our railway network. However, on the European election campaign, his party colleague Jim Higgins MEP is still supporting the notion that the Western Rail Corridor (WRC) should be extended further. Mr Higgins is well aware that European TEN-T transport policy has made the Western Rail Corridor a non runner for European funding and there is going to be no Dublin money for this scheme.

Mairead McGuinness MEP is backing growing support in the West for the WRC to be converted to a greenway to protect the route until such time as a railway might become possible. Lorraine Higgins, Labour Party MEP candidate, and Luke Ming Flanagan, independent MEP candidate, also support the idea of a greenway.

Galway, Mayo and Sligo county councils, all with Fine Gael majorities, are against this policy, which would provide a huge boost to tourism for relatively little capital outlay. The councils seem to share the view of the three sitting Western MEPs, Jim Higgins, Marian Harkin and Pat the Cope Gallagher, that we apparently still have the money to open old rural railway lines in the West of Ireland and run them at a huge loss. It’s irresponsible politics.

Were the Minister to make it clear to our MEPs and councils that not only are some of our existing rail lines under threat but that there is no chance of more loss-making lines being reopened then perhaps they might throw their support behind a project that has a realistic chance of happening and which would bring jobs to the West. Yours, etc,

BRENDAN QUINN,

Sligo Mayo

Greenway Campaign,

Enniscrone,

Co Sligo

Sir, – Why are the views of philosophers, theologians and sociologists on our society mostly ignored, David Nelson asks (Letters, April 4th). Silly question, easy answer: there is no money in philosophy, theology or sociology. And if there is no money in philosophy, theology or sociology, they’re not worth anything, are they? That’s what kids in Ireland mostly learn, isn’t it? Ignore this message: it was written by a philosopher. In the context of the free market economy, it’s worthless. Yours, etc,

DR GERARD P MONTAGUE,

Zaumberg,

Immenstadt,

Allgäu,

Germany

Sir, – Amid the events commemorating the 100th anniversary of the founding of Cumann na mBan and its role in the struggle for independence, it should not be forgotten that members of that organisation were subsequently committed to the overthrow of the independent Irish state. One of its core activities in the first decade of the Irish Free State was the attempted undermining of the criminal justice system through persistent and co-ordinated jury intimidation.

Many examples of the menacing circulars sent to jurors’ homes and posted in public places survive in the National Archives, National Library and the Dublin Diocesan Archives. This campaign supplemented the activities of those who were willing to attack jurors, such as the men who shot John White in Terenure in 1929. He had been foreman of the jury which had convicted the Republican Con Healy of shooting at members of An Garda Síochána. Indeed, Cumann na mBan referred to the fate of Mr White in one of its leaflets as a warning to other jurors. Yours, etc,

MARK COEN,

Durham Law School,

Stockton Road,

Durham,

United Kingdom

Sir, – Edward Collins (Letters, April 3rd) is under a misapprehension. I did not write in to moan, or to look for sympathy, but to draw attention to the simple fact that up to half of the State’s voters are being ignored by the political system and by the media.

Mr Collins portrays us as diehard conservatives, impotently angry at the loss of our former power and glory. In fact, Mary Stewart has been campaigning tirelessly for years against the death penalty, as well as against abortion, and I was a lifelong supporter of the Labour Party until it adopted pro-abortion policies.

Personally, if it were not for the issue of abortion, I would not bother to write these letters at all. Does anyone seriously think that a Catholic like me would write to The Irish Times expecting “sympathy” for my position?

I was merely pointing out to your readers, and hopefully to politicians, that while there may be consensus in the media about various issues, large numbers of us have different views, and will vote accordingly. I feel that I need to do this because the media, for the most part, are not doing it for me.

Yours, etc,

JIM STACK,

Lismore,

Co Waterford

Sir, – The Government’s white paper on Universal Health Insurance (UHI), published this week is fundamentally flawed.

It will place an immediate financial burden on families, and the only consultation process open to the public is restricted to deliberating on what this “competing insurers” model will look like. Meanwhile, there is no consultation of any kind taking place on any other options, such as those recommended in Dr Jane Pillinger’s 2012 report The Future of Healthcare in Ireland .

That report recommended that the competing insurers model, as proposed by the Minister, should not be adopted before all the options have been evaluated in terms of quality, equity, access to services and medium and long term value for money. The report was ignored by the Minister.

Families will be required by law to have health insurance, but there is a real risk that this will be an impossible financial burden from the very start, particularly for the growing number of people without health insurance who don’t qualify for a medical card.

This group will be required to purchase health insurance for every member of their family. While the Dutch insurance model provided the Minister with his initial inspiration for this UHI scheme, it should be noted that children are actually insured for free under the Dutch model.

The question of cost remains, but it appears that no evaluation of any other funding model has been undertaken. We have been trying to get the message across to the Minister that other options need to be considered, such as the “single-payer” social insurance model used in France, Germany and Nordic countries.

Apart from a cursory late briefing on the day of publication, where questions were not invited from trade unions or patient groups, there has been no engagement with the Minister on these issues.

The experience in other jurisdictions which have similar models of competing insurers, has been a continuing rise in the price of compulsory insurance, coupled with increasing restrictions on the health services covered. They have also experienced rising readmission rates as more people experience complications after they’ve been discharged. This can be attributed to the financial incentives to discharge patients early.

The Minister’s estimate of €900 per individual seems almost optimistic, but if this model is established, the costs are likely to continue to rise. The Minister has also boasted that the scheme will ensure no additional cost burden to the State, which will mean that the only means of raising extra revenue will be through individual insurance premiums.

Finally, if we really want to get the measure of where this scheme is going, it is telling that the €100 charge for emergency departments will remain in place. Yours, etc,

LOUISE O’DONNELL,

National secretary,

Health & Welfare division

IMPACT,

Sir, – Brian McDevitt (Letters, April 2nd) is using out of date and inaccurate figures in his comments on GP incomes. As a general practitioner, I get on average €85.80 per year for a medical card patient under the age of 70.

For this sum, I provide medical cover to my patients for 24 hours a day and 365 days a year. This is before tax, and before paying staff, premises, equipment and computer costs and what is required to ensure out of hours cover etc.

For years my private patients have been subsidising my medical card practice and sustaining the standard of practice that we are trying to provide. This situation has been exacerbated by the 35 per cent cut in medical card fees unilaterally imposed by the Government in the last three years.

The recently appointed professor of general practice in UCC, who has come from the United Kingdom, has been quoted as describing the GP service in this country as “gold dust”. Under current Government proposals it may well become just dust. Yours, etc,

DR EAMONN FALLER,

Crescent Medical Centre,

The Crescent,

Galway

Sir, – Brian McDevitt’s letter reflects the success of the Health Service Executive and the Department of Health in convincing the general public that global payments to a GP practice reflect the remuneration of the doctors involved.

By this logic, the situation is indeed even worse than Mr McDevitt imagines it to be since I can reveal that a certain Dr J Reilly received €13 billion in payments last year, which does seem excessive.

In Dr Reilly’s defence it should be said that this money is used to fund the health service. On a micro level the payments are the global payments to practices which fund nurses, secretaries, heat, light and medical supplies among other things. As these fees have been cut successively in recent years, the private fees that Mr McDevitt refers to are increasingly used to support the provision of services to medical card patients. Although the State has the responsibility to provide services to this group, it does not appear to be willing to adequately fund it. Yours, etc,

SÉAMUS McMENAMIN,

Family Doctor,

Baile Átha Luimnigh,

An Uaimh,

Co Na Mhí

Sir, – Your Irish language columnist Caoimhe Ní Laighin misleadingly states in her article(“Cinniúint na Catalóine”, April 2nd) that there are “77,000 cainteoir ag an nGaeilge”. This is not correct. The number of Irish speakers who claim to use Irish daily “outside the educational system only” should not be equated with the total number of Irish speakers, as your columnist has done. Many Irish speakers living outside Irish-speaking communities do not easily get opportunities on a daily basis to use Irish but they are still Irish-speakers.

In my opinion a better measure of the number of active Irish-speakers is the number of people who claim in census returns to use the language at least weekly outside education. This figure, according to the 2011 census is 188,000 for the 26 counties.

The 2011 census taken in Northern Ireland showed that there were 64,847 people who claimed to be able to understand, read, write and speak Irish. Unfortunately we don’t have figures for daily and weekly users but I would suggest a figure of approximately 16,000 would not be an exaggeration, giving a figure of a little more than 200,000 for the number of people who use Irish on a regular basis within the island of Ireland.

DONNCHA

Ó hÉALLAITHE,

Gaeltaighde,

Indreabhán,

Co na Gaillimhe

Irish Independent:

Published 05 April 2014 02:30 AM

* Leaving my local supermarket some days ago I stopped to put some change on the table for the Kidney Association, a fantastic organisation that has done some great work over the years.

Also in this section

Put lead in your pencil and use your vote

Sky deal is a slap in the face for GAA fans

Coming back from the mother of all mistakes

I never pass its table as, many years ago, a friend of mine who was on the waiting list finally got his new kidney and I saw first-hand what a difference it made to his life.

Unfortunately he has since passed, but it left a lasting impression on my life. I now always carry my organ donor card in my wallet. But, as we all know, we often leave our wallet and driver’s licence behind, which delays any decision regarding organ donation or discussions with next-of-kin.

Investigating the matter further, I discovered that carrying an organ donor card merely indicates your intention to be an donor but does not give permission. Your next-of-kin still need to be contacted first which, understandably for the hospital, can be a very difficult conversation considering the trauma the family is experiencing.

With this in mind, I contacted my local hospital to ask if they had a list of donors which I could add my name too, “unfortunately not” was the reply – no such list exists.

Would it not make more sense to have a list of donors, where you could sign up and complete all the necessary legal forms with the consent of your next-of-kin?

Your name and medical details could be stored on computer, to be accessed only in the event of death, which removes the need to contact grief-stricken families.

Given the power of computers and with time-critical decisions required, it would also mean that your details could be immediately matched to somebody on the waiting list. If there were no suitable matches in Ireland your medical details could be instantly matched to somebody in Europe.

None of this is rocket science and, in this age of computers, carrying a small card that is easily lost or misplaced is obsolete.

I’m sure a properly constructed list, which could run in tandem with donor cards, would lead to more organs becoming available, dealt with in the fastest possible time and with a lot less stress on the donor’s family.

EUGENE MCGUINNESS

CO KILKENNY

PRESIDENTIAL PRECEDENT

* President Michael D Higgins has launched a national debate about values.

Perhaps President Higgins could lead from the front on issues he refers to, such as justice and equality, by reducing his salary to a reasonable level.

Real leadership would be for the President to publicly declare what he accepts as a reasonable salary and pension.

SEAMUS CULLEN

SEACREST, KNOCKNACARRA, CO GALWAY

COURAGE TO RISE AGAIN

* With regard to Brian McDevitt’s letter (Irish Independent, April 4), on NNI Press Pass winner Elayna Keller’s work on bullying, here are some great words of inspiration from Stan Rogers‘s ‘The Mary Ellen Carter’.

“And you, to whom adversity has dealt the final blow. With smiling b****rds lying to you everywhere you go. Turn to, and put out all your strength of arm and heart and brain. And like the Mary Ellen Carter, rise again.”

The great Liam Clancy‘s version is a source of great solace to those who listen to it. Try it.

MARK ROTHWELL,

CASTLECOMER, CO KILKENNY

A FAMINE OF OUR IDEALS

* I don’t feel particularly sorry for TDs involved in scandals. But as we leave all decency behind, the Irish world becomes less and less like the ideal we aimed for in our founding values. Partially, it is the politicians’ greed and indifference that has created this “me fein” attitude.

It was bizarre for me to find anti-Semitism in Australia and the unfounded nature of it, hatred for no reason. Hatred passed on.

Now, there is a certain amount of crying wolf in depicting criticism of Israel’s actions as anti-Semitic. Israel is often regarded as doing the wrong thing. But, as many Israelis acknowledge, they are now protesting with the Palestinians for peace in their mutual homes.

But who are we to be sending Nazi imagery to any Irish person? Is this the country we want? Where we make light of genocide? Us, who survived a famine brought upon us by the notion that we too were “unwanted” and, therefore, also disposable.

You may not like Justice Minister Alan Shatter. You may think he does a bad job. But this? Come on people, we are better than this.

PAULINE BLEACH

WOLLI CREEK, AUSTRALIA

STATE’S LISTENING EAR

* Now that it has been established that recordings of conversations took place in several garda stations and the prison service – most of them illegally – it begs the question as to how many others were also surreptitiously eavesdropped on?

In true GUBU-esque fashion, it would appear, in hindsight, the shenanigans of Sean Doherty and his cronies were boy scout-esque in comparison.

LIAM POWER

SAN PAWL IL-BAHAR, MALTA.

OVER-70S CARD SCANDAL

* The HSE is currently reviewing the medical card entitlements of thousands of over-70s following Finance Minister Michael Noonan’s appalling changes to the income thresholds in Budget 2014 and, in particular, the income thresholds that apply to couples.

The following statistics will demonstrate the unequal and scandalous treatment of couples in this age bracket.

* The single threshold was reduced by €5,200 per annum.

* The threshold for couples was reduced by a staggering €15,600 per annum – that’s €7,800 each.

* The new annual threshold for a single person is €26,000.

* The new annual threshold for a couple is €46,800 – this works out at €23,400 each.

It is extraordinary that no threshold applies to the new GP Visit Card for children under six. So millionaires with children under six will be entitled to it. What a joke.

JOSEPH NAUGHTON

CORBALLY, CO LIMERICK

LOSING TRAIN OF THOUGHT

* I refer to recent statements by Transport Minister Leo Varadkar in relation to the funding of Irish Rail.

Mr Varadkar justifies his assertion that rail is inefficient on the basis of the relative numbers carried compared to Dublin Bus or Luas.

This is a very blinkered, short-sighted and simplistic analysis. It ignores the fact that the average rail journey is many multiples of the average Dublin Bus or Luas journey and is thus of more social and economic importance.

The economic worth of the railway to places like Galway, Killarney or Westport shouldn’t be casually dismissed – ask the people of Donegal how that region has fared since the destruction of rail infrastructure in the north-west.

While Irish Rail may well need to make further savings, it also needs to grow the business and aggressively exploit the substantial improvements in railway infrastructure.

I wouldn’t be particularly confident that bus-based solutions have the ability to address the transport needs of the Dublin area given that the usage of Dublin Bus services has declined sharply from 149 million journeys in 2003/4 to 115 million in 2012.

Indeed, significant sections of the rail system are heavily congested, especially in the Dublin area, resulting in serious service degradation, particularly along the Dublin/Belfast corridor.

ANTHONY GRAY

WHEATON HALL, DROGHEDA, CO LOUTH

Irish Independent



Hospital visit

$
0
0

6April2014 hospital visit

I go all the way around the park listening to the Men from the Ministry: Accidental

Devolution for Birmingham Priceless

Mary back in hospital visit her play Scrabble

Scrabbletoday, Mary wins Perhaps Iwill win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Bob Larbey – obituary

Bob Larbey was a scriptwriter who mined the comic potential of suburbia in The Good Life and Ever Decreasing Circles

Bob Larbey (right) with his writing partner John Esmonde

Bob Larbey (right) with his writing partner John Esmonde

5:46PM BST 04 Apr 2014

Comments12 Comments

Bob Larbey, who has died aged 79, co-wrote with his professional partner John Esmonde some of Britain’s most popular television sitcoms, most memorably The Good Life (1975-78).

Amiable and easy-going, Larbey was at school with Esmonde in south London just after the war. The pair sought escape from their humdrum jobs by spending their evenings and weekends writing comedy scripts. By the early 1960s they had enjoyed modest success with sketches for radio programmes such as I’m Sorry, I’ll Read That Again and, for television, The Dick Emery Show.

Bob Larbey

Their first major television breakthrough, however, came in 1968 with Please, Sir!, a series for ITV set in a tough south London secondary modern school; it would generate a feature film and a television sequel, The Fenn Street Gang. Frank Muir, then head of entertainment at LWT, cast John Alderton as the idealistic young teacher Bernard “Privet” Hedges who struggled to keep the unruly pupils of Class 5C in order.

As Larbey celebrated his 40th birthday, he and Esmonde devised their most popular and successful series, The Good Life. In the first episode, screened in 1975, Tom Good, a draughtsman for a plastics company (played by Richard Briers), himself turned 40, seizing this occasion to drop out of the rat-race by jacking in his job in favour of suburban self-sufficiency with his wife Barbara (Felicity Kendal).

Rather than give up their comfortable, semi-detached home in Surbiton, the Goods turned their garden into a smallholding, with pigs, a goat, chickens and assorted fruit and vegetables.

Richard Briers and Felicity Kendal in The Good Life

Although the couple’s lifestyle baffled and often appalled their social-climbing neighbours, Margo (Penelope Keith) and Jerry Leadbetter (Paul Eddington), the foursome always remained friends, and it was this rapprochement that commended the series to the middle classes, at whom it was poking fun. (Larbey himself confessed that he was too impractical to embrace self-sufficiency, but its general philosophy appealed to him.)

While The Good Life was attracting some 15 million viewers a week on the BBC, Larbey and Esmonde were enjoying further success on ITV with their RAF sitcom Get Some In! (1975-78). Starring Robert Lindsay in his first important television role, and featuring Tony Selby as the drill instructor barking orders at 1950s National Service “erks”, the series drew on the writers’ own experiences (Larbey had been in the Army, and Esmonde in the RAF).

After The Good Life, Larbey and Esmonde wrote three further series for Richard Briers, starting with The Other One (1977-79), in which the central character could not have been more different. Perhaps because Briers was cast as a compulsive and unscrupulous liar, the show failed to generate any of the affection viewers had felt for the wholesome Goods, and it was cancelled after only two series.

Larbey struck out on his own with A Fine Romance (1981-84), starring Judi Dench in her first television sitcom, alongside her real-life husband, Michael Williams. “From first to last,” one critic noted, “Bob Larbey’s scripts were well-written, providing not only laughs but also an underlying intelligence.”

He rejoined Esmonde to create another popular and long-running vehicle for Richard Briers in Ever Decreasing Circles (1984-89), in which the star returned to suburbia as Martin Bryce, an anally-retentive fusspot and do-gooder, with Penelope Wilton as his long-suffering wife, Ann.

Penelope Wilton, Richard Briers and Peter Egan in Ever Decreasing Circles

In Larbey and Esmonde’s last series together, Down To Earth (1995), Briers played Tony Fairfax, an expatriate struggling to adapt after returning to Britain from South America; but once again viewers did not warm to his character, and it ran for just seven episodes.

The youngest son of a carpenter, Robert Edward John Larbey was born on June 24 1934 in Lambeth, south London, and educated at the Henry Thornton School in Clapham, where he was captain of tennis and became friends with John Esmonde, two years his junior.

On leaving school Larbey took a job in an insurance office in Soho, then did National Service with the Army, stationed in Germany with the Education Corps.

When he and Esmonde started writing sketches, working together at nights and weekends, they submitted a few to the BBC, which eventually accepted one for a programme starring the comedian Cyril Fletcher, earning them a joint fee of two guineas. Having saved money from their day jobs, they gave themselves three months to make a go of writing full-time.

Their first radio sitcom was Spare a Copper (1965-66), featuring the Carry On film star Kenneth Connor as a bungling policeman. The pair followed this with two further radio series, You’re Only Old Once (1969), with Clive Dunn as a spry pensioner, and Just Perfick (1969-71), adapted from the Larkin family stories of HE Bates.

Meanwhile, Larbey and Esmonde had established a toehold in television, starting with sketches for The Dick Emery Show in 1963. Their first full-scale television sitcom, Room At The Bottom (1967), for the BBC, was about a gang of factory maintenance men . It made little impact, but the following year the success of Please, Sir! (1968-72) propelled them into the front rank of television comedy writers. Turned down by the BBC, the show was snapped up by ITV, attracting a weekly audience of 20 million viewers .

As their careers prospered, the pair worked business hours in an office in the centre of Dorking, midway between their respective homes, often acting out scenes together and noting down spontaneous bursts of dialogue. Distractions were confined to occasional glances at televised cricket.

In the 1980s they created Brush Strokes (1986-91), in which Karl Howman starred as a womanising painter and decorator, with Gary Waldhorn as his boss. They wrote a second sitcom for Howman called Mulberry (1992-93), in which he played the manservant of a cantankerous old spinster Miss Farnaby (Geraldine McEwan).

Although in The Good Life Larbey helped to make Surbiton synonymous with suburbia, he never visited the town he made famous. “To be honest, we were just looking for something that sounded like suburbia in big capital letters,” he explained. “We just picked it at random.” The series was actually filmed in Northwood, north London.

In 2004, 30 years after its original screening, The Good Life was ranked ninth in a BBC poll of viewers’ favourite sitcoms.

Bob Larbey married Patricia (Trish) Marshall, a script-reader for LWT, who predeceased him in 2006. Their son survives him. John Esmonde died in 2008.

Bob Larbey, born June 24 1934, died March 31 2014

Guardian:

The skyline statement (“London’s skyline is about to be transformed with 230 new towers“, In Focus) coincided with the submission last week of a planning proposal for what would be the tallest residential tower in Camden, north London. This massive development right next to the only green space in Swiss Cottage would dwarf Basil Spence’s adjacent Grade II listed library. Despite residents’ representations, no real changes have been made to the scheme. Indeed, the height of the tower has been increased from 16 to 24 storeys.

The bland and characterless tower would loom, without any relationship, over residential neighbourhoods. Its shocking and profound impact on the surrounding conservation areas has been ignored. No thought has been given to the ways the tower will appear from Primrose Hill, Hampstead Heath and Regent’s Park.

This damage might be justifiable if the development was offering permanent affordable housing for families. Yet of 184 flats, fewer than 14% will be allocated to social housing. The developers’ proposed model of mass private rental has not been tested successfully for five years or more anywhere in London. How can five-year tenancy agreements for small flats built over the most polluted traffic gyratory in Camden, targeted at young professionals and offering no facilities for families, build a sustainable community?

The proposed development hinges on the fact that Camden council recently reclassified Swiss Cottage as a major town centre, without any real consultation with residents. This means that high-rise building can now be encouraged here. The heart is being ripped out of local democracy. Hand in glove with the developers, London’s councils and its mayor are forcing these highly inappropriate developments on communities, irrespective of their vocal opposition.

Sarah Howard Gottlieb

Swiss Cottage Action Group

London NW3

Civic democracy will continue to be powerless as long as a minister, on a whim, can grant planning permission. In Vauxhall, three of the 10 towers about to engulf Vauxhall Cross came into being in this way, despite enormous opposition.

The St George Tower (or Vauxhall Tower) was granted on appeal by John Prescott in 2005, despite advice from his advisers in December 2004 that it “could set a precedent for the indiscriminate scattering of very tall buildings across London”.

The two towers to be built on the Kylun/Wendover site were approved by Eric Pickles in August 2012. He was apparently advised that they “would kick-start the area’s regeneration”. Two years on, the empty site is again for sale.

Pauline Gaunt

London SW8

London’s problem is not its changing skyline or the number of tower blocks springing up. It’s what those tower blocks are being built for that is the real issue.

On Tuesday, Boris Johnson approved two blocks in Islington that the council had turned down because there was insufficient housing for people on low incomes. Using his planning powers, Johnson has now given the go-ahead to the two schemes with the proviso that there should be 30% “affordable units” out of 1,000 homes.

But that is meaningless. The government’s definition of affordable is 80% of market rents, which means that for Islington a two-bedroom flat would let at £22,256 per year, affordable only to the City workers down the road.

This is happening across the capital with developments that will do nothing either to improve London’s housing situation or cater for its citizens.

Architectural fashion changes; Centre Point was once regarded as a blight on the landscape but is now seen as a masterpiece. It is not a skyline commission that is needed, but a housing commission to examine urgently the fundamental issues around homes for Londoners.

Christian Wolmar

(seeking Labour nomination for the 2016 mayoral election)

London N7

Catherine Bennett lashes out against Tony Hall’s new agenda for more arts on BBC (“Why has the BBC gone back in time to define itself?“, Comment). For instance, she doesn’t think there is much relevance in presenting opera from the “subsidised but stratospherically inaccessible Royal Op era House”. Is the ROH really so inaccessible? Despite having the lowest public subsidy – 23% – of any major opera house in Europe, tickets start from £4 and we manage to sell 50% of all tickets for £55 or less.

With 40% of our audience under 45, we have a younger audience than most opera houses in the world and our education work reaches almost 50,000 people each year. We have 27,000 student bookers for discount schemes and our live cinema relays are seen in the UK and globally by hundreds of thousands. Our YouTube channel has hours of insights freely available and there are the free activities, including BP Big Screens around the country.

If the Royal Opera House is so inaccessible, then surely one would think putting more of its work on TV would actually be a rather good idea?

Kasper Holten

Director of opera

Royal Opera House, London WC2

Scottish leaders’ fine record

Alexander Linklater has a very blinkered view of creativity and opportunity in Scotland that sharply contrasts with his pitch that “the union belongs to the Scots, it’s at the heart of our cultural identity“, Comment. He accuses the “popular and effective” SNP Scottish government of having “no record on culture”. Clearly, control of broadcasting is of no consideration in Mr Linklater’s world, so he obviously hasn’t noticed the BBC bias saga or the blind spots in BBC programming and underspend in Scotland.

On traditional arts, our indigenous languages and support for internationalising the very best of Scottish cultural output in all genres that feature in the Edinburgh international festivals the Scottish government is very active with limited resources.

Rob Gibson

Evanton

Ross-shire

The consequence of inaction

Regarding your leader column views on the criteria for making a military intervention (“Our view on foreign intervention is in chaos. We need a solution“, Comment). The decision as whether to make a military intervention should take account of the consequences of not taking action. Doing nothing is a course of action in itself, with possible consequences.

Peter Halsey

Radlett

Herts

Give us proper pensions parity

I was puzzled about the pensions provisions in the recent budget and then I read Michael Freedland’s excellent article (“Sadly, new deal is too late for me (and a million or two others)“, in personal finance.

I agree with Michael and think that these annuity holders should not be excluded from the new deal. They should have a choice too.

If the government built new roads purely for new drivers, while only allowing existing drivers to drive on the old roads, it wouldn’t make sense. If for an illness or condition, the NHS offered treatments and possibly cures only to the newly diagnosed and left existing patients bereft of these it also would not make sense. Pensions should be treated in a similarly fair way.

Clearly, if annuities have been received, then the pension pot is smaller. That can’t change, but they should, from the time of the introduction of the provisions, be able to take the remaining pension pot as cash. That would be fair and equitable.

Barrie Gordon

Cambridge

Don’t dismiss ADHD drugs

There is no doubt that attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), like many other diagnoses, is a syndromal diagnosis and that pathways into ADHD are multiple (“ADHD ‘not a real disease’ says US neuroscientist“, News). Equally, a range of social and psychological interventions are indicated.

However, there is good evidence to show that severe ADHD, or hyperkinetic disorder, has a significant neurophysiological and genetic component and that stimulants are safe and effective treatments, alongside social, educational and psychological interventions. Non-pharmacological interventions are indicated in mild to moderate ADHD but stimulants form the core of the management of severe ADHD. To argue that they are not indicated puts at risk highly vulnerable children and their overburdened families.

Dr Peter Hindley

Chair of the faculty of child and adolescent psychiatry

Royal College of Psychiatrists, London E1

A picture to die for

Robert Stummer’s article (“Message of love hidden in medieval graffiti“, News) provided a gratifying and welcome insight into an otherwise forgotten source of social history: graffiti, especially Lydgate’s rebus, notably: “Farewell Lady Catherine.” He is mistaken in thinking that cater is a term for a die; rather, it is the four of a die roll, clearly depicted in the photograph. We still retain the ace and deuce for one and two, three is trey, four cater, five cinque and six sez.

Ian Russell Lowell

Penzance

Snapshot Val Waters View larger picture

Snapshot … back row, from left to right, Uncle Fred, Val Waters’ grandfather and Uncle Syd; seated, Aunt Elsie, Val’s grandmother and mother.

Snapshot: Our much loved Uncle Fred

This photograph, taken around 1920, is very important to me, as it’s the only one I have of all the members of my Hodges forebears before disaster struck in the form of illness. I was born just too late to remember Uncle Fred, but my childhood was filled with stories about him. He is standing on the left, looking quite young. Next to him is my grandfather and on the right is Uncle Syd. Seated are my favourite aunt, Auntie Elsie, with my grandmother in the middle and then my mother, holding a kitten.

Fred was a naughty little boy, so one Monday morning when she was doing the washing, Grandma was persuaded by a neighbour to give him some drops of Mother Segal’s Soothing Syrup (containing laudanum), but it made him so dopey that she never did it again. When Fred developed heart trouble (no surgery for it in those days), she nursed him so devotedly that she ruined her health and had to rest every afternoon.

As he grew up, Fred became much loved by all the members of the family. He had a good sense of humour, and was popular at school, where he was voted the most public-spirited boy. He and Syd used to go courting two sisters in the next street and their dog fetched the right girl when they called.

However, as Fred was never well enough to hold down a job, there was no engagement. He was a very handsome young man (my mother kept photos of him) and the family were broken-hearted when he died, aged 23.

Elsie would never talk about him. Syd woke one night and heard Fred’s voice saying, “I’m going now, Syd” – at the exact time he died, he discovered later. My grandparents had a tablet erected over his grave and my grandma and cousin used to lay flowers there.

As for the girl he’d courted, when she did get married several years later, she laid her wedding bouquet on his grave, with her husband’s agreement.

The Hodges were a working-class family who worked hard. All four children managed to pass the exam that enabled them to attend the local grammar school, though only my mother chose to stay on in the sixth form and go to university.

I feel very proud of them.

Val Waters

Independent:

Synthetic phonics, far from letting down pupils with dyslexia, is effective for the majority and, coupled with the phonics check, can help to identify those who may be dyslexic or need a different approach (“Dyslexic pupils not helped by reading method”, 30 March).

Structured teaching of lettersound links and how to blend sounds were key components of “dyslexia teaching” long before synthetic phonics became commonplace in schools. We know that many pupils at risk of dyslexia can progress well with a structured phonics programme but would flounder if left to learn more holistically. To read in the broadest sense requires an orchestration of many other skills of which decoding is but one and, for fluent readers, one that they may seldom use; but decoding is a hurdle at which many children have fallen and it is right that early teaching of reading is directed at helping as many children over this hurdle as possible.

Dyslexia Action has supported the use of the phonics check, which involves the ability to read “non words”, as part of a process to identify those who may need a different approach. However, it should not be the only piece of evidence used to examine children’s reading. Neither should it force a straitjacket of prescriptive teaching on to those who have moved on to more advanced stages. Dyslexia Action has been working with the Department for Education to develop information and guidance for teachers on materials and on decisions about their use; more information about this can be found on our website.

Dr John Rack

Director of education and policy Dyslexia Action

Egham, Surrey

In reply to Richard Garner’s personal view regarding synthetic phonics; that is precisely what has happened with my six-year-old cousin. He can read fluently. Or he could. Now he insists on spelling out every word phonetically, even if he knows the word. He seems to think that you have to read like that.

In addition, he is penalised for wanting to read books he enjoys, and his learning has slowed as a result. As a child, I loved books, and would read in my own time for pleasure, even at the age of six. I really believe the key to improving reading is to evoke a passion for books, not turn this generation of children into phonetic robots.

Helen Brown

Sheffield

Joan Smith is right that religion is losing the argument on abortion, contraception and gay marriages (30 March). But if she were to speak to some of the many people, young and old, who worship at one of the newly established non-denominational churches, or, indeed, to a lot of nonconformists, she might be surprised to find that the majority of modern-thinking Christians agree.

Gillian Cook

Market Harborough, Leicestershire

Consumers can indeed play a strategic role by pressing brands to ensure decent treatment for overseas workers (“Cheap products carry a high cost”, 30 March). Thousands who signed our petition on Rana Plaza helped persuade brands to sign the legally binding Bangladesh safety accord. But retailers’ voluntary approach has still left workers toiling long hours for well below a living wage. It is time for government action to end this scandal.

Jeff Powell

Campaigns and policy director

War on Want, London N1

I was alarmed by your report (“Gaia visionary advocates city living”, 30 March) intimating that Chesil Beach had lurched into Devon. Having expended considerable energy climbing to the top of Portland on a clear day, I can assure you that the entire beach is still in Dorset.

Joe Trevett

Society of Dorset Men, Weymouth, Dorset

Columnist Andrew Martin (30 March) refers to “preparing for a dinner party” and what “dinner party hosts are supposed to ask”. Am I alone among your readers in never having been to a dinner party?

Tim Mickleburgh

Grimsby, Lincolnshire

Times:

GPs flooded by patients – and we’re struggling

CAMILLA CAVENDISH needs to spend a day shadowing me to see life from this side of the fence. I have been a GP for 30 years in the same practice and have seen huge changes in the way we operate (“Dr Useless says he’s busy. Fine, I’ll be off to the pharmacist then”, Comment, last week). I did not vote for the 2004 contract, which heralded the inability to close our list, which has nearly doubled over the past five years as disaffected patients from other practices and eastern European land workers flood in. We are unable to attract new doctors so we struggle on — with 35 to 40 patients awaiting the emergency doctor on a Monday morning. This is not medicine but crowd control.
Dr Clive Warren Boston, Lincolnshire

Investment needed
We are grateful to Camilla Cavendish (“Dr Useless says he’s busy. Fine, I’ll be off to the pharmacist then”, Comment, last week) for pointing out the huge asset of the pharmacist in the community and pleased that she found her local pharmacist to be so good.

However, different but complementary services and expertise are already offered by general practitioners and pharmacists to patients in surgeries and pharmacies every day.

Care is becoming more complex with the challenges of an ageing population, more patients presenting with multiple and complex conditions and more patients with mental health problems.

GPs are working record hours in surgery and making up to 60 patient contacts a day. Pharmacists dispense about 1bn prescriptions a year alongside the provision of an increasing range of NHS services.

Treatments are being carried out in general practice that 10 years ago would have been immediately referred to a hospital physician and pharmacists are already carrying out medication reviews, supporting people with long-term conditions to stay well and preventing illness through stop smoking services.

Both our professions would like to see a shift in resources that allows investment in primary care and services that promote wellness, preventing costly and unwanted hospital admissions.

This includes increasing the number of GPs who could provide more appointments and longer appointments for patients. A modest rise of only 1% per year would ease the pressures on other parts of the health service, ensuring that patients get access to their general practice when they need it.

We would like to see the NHS make better use of pharmacists’ skills by enabling patients to share their electronic health record with pharmacists and rewarding pharmacists for the quality of the care delivered, as well as better patient outcomes. The NHS will get the most from medicines when pharmacists are better utilised throughout the health system.

Ultimately, the answer to increasing demand, with scarce resources, when patients rightly expect high-quality care will come from collaborative, not competitive, working between GPs and pharmacists.

Enabling pharmacists and GPs to share the care of our population will only come about if patients and their carers see the benefits of such an arrangement and confidence develops that this provides better, safer care.

Dr Maureen Baker, Chair Royal College of General Practitioners,

Dr David Branford, Chair, English Pharmacy Board, Royal Pharmaceutical Society

Barriers to diagnosis
Not for the first time, GPs are left to shoulder the blame for more failures within the NHS. While I acknowledge that my GP colleagues do need to take some degree of responsibility, a difficult task is made more so by current referral channels.

The two-week-wait system has made no difference to rates of early cancer diagnosis. It only works well where the diagnosis is obvious anyway, such as with breast or skin.

Delays are increased by the barriers put up to GP access to diagnostics such as ultrasound, endoscopy and MRI. GPs can increase rates of early cancer diagnosis but must have the tools to be able to do so.
Dr Peter Holloway GP and Clinical Commissioning Group, Mendlesham, Suffol

Too few radiologists
We share the aspiration of Harpal Kumar (“GPs must end culture of delays”, Focus, last week) to achieve diagnosis of cancer at an earlier and therefore more treatable stage. However, we have reservations about his proposed strategy of carrying out diagnostic tests on more people.

The demand for imaging tests has already far outstripped the ability of NHS radiology departments to cope. With around half the number of radiologists per head of population that other western European nations enjoy, we simply do not have the capacity to interpret significantly larger numbers of scans.

We support the national screening programmes for breast and bowel cancers, which can best be detected by imaging. Earlier diagnosis of other cancers will most reliably be achieved by targeting imaging to people with specific symptom complexes and risk factors. We have been producing guidelines for doctors on the appropriate use of imaging for more than 20 years and we are keen to work with Cancer Research UK, healthcare leaders, Macmillan Cancer Support and other stakeholders to ensure that imaging strategies are designed to promote earlier diagnosis.

If this involves an increase in the number of people undergoing tests, significant further investment in radiologists and radiology services will be required.
Giles Maskell President  Royal College of Radiologists

Smear test delays
In 2003 the age to enter the NHS cervical screening programme was raised from 20 to 25 years as evidence showed that screening in the lower age group had little impact on rates of invasive cancer. Cellular changes related to HPV infection are common in younger women, but largely self-resolve.

If a woman of any age presents to a GP with cervical cancer symptoms, she must be urgently referred to a gynaecologist. A smear test at that stage would introduce further delays, even if the public thinks otherwise.
Dr Sally Wood Ludlow, Shropshire

Mum’s raw deal on pay

I COULD not agree more about women being penalised for part-time working (“Wise up, bosses, and make this mother’s day”, Eleanor Mills, last week). As an accountant I can get £35,000 to £40,000 pro rata working part-time; full-time work pays much more overall.

All of the mums I know are graduates but a very small percentage of them work — it is just not worth it. In Denmark both the mum and dad tend to work part-time. This seems a much more equitable solution.
Gill Crane Alton, Hampshire

Flexible friends
Employers continue to consider flexible working cases on an ad hoc basis. Thus many parents, especially women, are forced to leave work, taking vital skills with them. Family Lives believes that flexible working should be seen as a dynamic policy for all (men, women, old and young) to support staff to combine work, care and family life.
Anastasia de Waal Chairwoman, Family Lives

Dear dad, let’s talk

I felt very sad when I read the Mother’s Day article “Do you get on with your mum? My relationship is complex and messy” (Katie Glass, Magazine, last week), but it appears to have struck a chord with many.

My husband had a very difficult relationship with his dad, and eventually wrote a letter. The result was not an outpouring of anger or regret but a much better relationship — my husband was 59 and his dad 89. Took them a while, but it improved things.
Name and address withheld

NHS faces a weighty issue

As always, Rod Liddle has hit the nail firmly on the head with his take on obesity (“Chew on this insult, lardbucket. It’s for your own good”, Comment, last week). When I was an NHS consultant in Essex, I very politely advised a patient at my pain clinic that she could improve her back pain by losing weight. Her daughter, a hospital administrator, reported me to the authorities for being “disrespectful” to her mother.
Dr Charles Gauci, Gozo, Malta

Gluten-free isn’t a fad for coeliacs
I know Liddle is often tongue-in-cheek and that it is a fad to say you are wheat-intolerant. However, there are people, like my daughter and granddaughter, who have coeliac disease, which means they have to eat gluten-free. Going out for a meal is a nightmare, and imagine telling a child she cannot have an ice cream or chocolate sweets that contain gluten. Not life-threatening, but hard to live with.
Lesley Charnock, Long Crendon, Buckinghamshire

Intolerable string ban

BANNING steel-stringed instruments from prison would be a travesty and a truly cruel punishment for one prisoner I met when I worked in HMP Elmley, Kent (“High security, low voltage as prisons outlaw guitars”, News, last week). Elmley houses not only some of the country’s most dangerous men, but also Sarah Baker, a transgender life-sentenced prisoner, who has now served 26 years.

I knew little about Baker but soon discovered that she was full of remorse for her crimes.  I was left almost speechless by the sincerity of her words. More amazingly, I also heard  that she was a violinist and had been friends with the late, great virtuoso Yehudi Menuhin — had she not been in prison, some people felt that she could have been Britain’s greatest violinist. She used to practise for 14 hours a  day, starting with the “Kreutzer” sonata, and then Bach’s partitas for solo violin, followed by  two violin concertos. She would always end with Paganini’s caprices, which often annoyed her neighbours.

Meeting a transgender violin-playing life-sentenced prisoner was not only one of  the most surreal moments in my life, but also the greatest.
Name and address withheld

Melody maker
I do hope that staff in the 49 establishments to which Billy Bragg donated guitars inspected them to see if any files were enclosed.
Ray Watson, Beckenham, southeast London

Losing our cool

I FAIL to see how warming will improve Britain’s climate (“London a flashpoint for climate change”, News, last week). First, we shall start to lose our traditional crops and livestock. Working in summer will become intolerable and affect productivity.

Finally, the loss of the cool British seaside with its pleasantly tepid waters will be a disaster.There will be nowhere to hide from the beastly sun, while tropical fauna invade our beaches with their foul stings and noisome teeth. I don’t like it, sir.
Quentin Lotte, London SW6

Tax blowing in
Last week we were inundated with warnings about climate change, with reports from the United Nations, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs — and then there were the Sahara sands polluting our air.

In my humble view, it was an orchestrated campaign to alarm us all into a state of acute responsibility — in itself a fine objective. So why do I keep wondering if we are being softened up for a raft of new rules, penalties and taxes?
Allan Falconer Nottingham

Points

Toff luck
In November 1995 I went for a job interview at Carlton Communications (“Toff at the top”, Editorial, March 23). The man who interviewed me was smooth and ambitious. His name was David Cameron. I later got the stock “no, thanks, but we’ll keep your details on file” letter. This surely makes me the only Old Etonian to whom the prime minister hasn’t offered a job.
Boris Starling, Dorset

Desert dreams
Your article “Desert gives up Lawrence’s hideout” (News, March 23) refers to the perfect preservation of a Lawrence guerrilla camp to the east of Aqaba, from which he planned his raids on the Hejaz railway. Many of those attacks took place in Saudi Arabia as the railway line from Damascus approached Medina. When working at the new industrial city of Yanbu on the Red Sea coast, close to where Lawrence stayed at times, I ventured east towards the railway. Finding track remains, I followed it north toward the Jordan border across perfect viaducts, and found well-preserved wrecks of trains (no rust in the desert). Your article and the associated interactive map online recalled happy times in the desert — a privilege.
Clive Peacock Kenilworth, Warwickshire

Germans do remember
Harry Mount says the Germans don’t remember the First World War (“Lying cold and alone: the war dead Germany struggles to remember”, News Review, March 23), but if he visits the cemetery in Cannock, Staffordshire, dedicated to German dead of both world wars, he will find Germans looking at all the graves and spending time in the moving memorial chapel. If we had a joint memorial service for the Great War, the Germans might take part, over here.
Jane Kelly, London W3

Prince of smiles
How I had to smile on reading Prince Andrew extolling the merits of failure, sitting in the palace with his “HRH” teacup (“Failure is good for you — and I should know”, News Review, last week).
Dudley Holley, Southend-on-Sea, Essex

Corrections and clarifications

We have been asked to clarify that if beaches do not pass the EU’s new bathing water directive, signs might have to be erected warning the public about water quality (“Kiss me quick before 45 top beaches close”, News, March 16). However, no beaches would actually close, and people would be free to choose to swim or not.

Complaints about inaccuracies in all sections of The Sunday Times, including online, should be addressed to editor@sunday-times.co.uk or The Editor, The Sunday Times, 3 Thomas More Square, London E98 1ST. In addition, the Press Complaints Commission (complaints@pcc.org.uk or 020 7831 0022) examines formal complaints about the editorial content of UK newspapers and magazines (and their websites)

Birthdays

Rory Bremner, impressionist, 53; Paul Daniels, magician, 76; Myleene Klass, presenter, 36; Ian Paisley, former first minister of Northern Ireland, 88; Anita Pallenberg, model, 70; André Previn, pianist and conductor, 85; Paul Rudd, actor, 45; Dilip Vengsarkar, cricketer, 58; James Watson, co-discoverer of the structure of DNA, 86

Anniversaries

1896 first modern Olympic Games open in Athens; 1917 America declares war on Germany; 1924 first round-the-world flight takes off from Seattle (it takes 175 days); 1944 introduction of PAYE income tax in Britain; 1994 the presidents of Rwanda and Burundi die in a plane crash, sparking the Rwandan genocide

Telegraph:

SIR – Given that Nick Clegg has so dismally failed to put the case for our continued EU membership, and that opinion polls show that the Lib Dems may have no MEPs at all in a few weeks’ time, my question is: what is the policy of the Labour Party on the EU?

I have examined the Labour website. It tells me about Ed Miliband, the shadow cabinet, its MPs and candidates. How strange that it does not even mention the European elections on May 22.

Hugo Jenks
Bath, Somerset

Golden-tongued

SIR – Rear-Admiral Frank Golden valued his dual nationality. He told me that he cherished the memory of the astonishment on the faces of those greeting him when, on an official visit to the Republic of Ireland, he was piped aboard an Irish naval vessel and, in the uniform of a British admiral, answered his welcome in fluent Gaelic.

Christopher Macy
Lincoln

Post earliest of all

SIR – A wooden posting box in Lyme Regis (pictured) lays claim to being the oldest surviving in Britain (Letters, April 4).

It is still set in its original place on the wall of the Old Lyme Guest House, which was, from 1799 to 1853, the post office.

It has a vertical and a horizontal slot, reflecting changing government guidelines.

John Powell
Tavistock, Devon

Too fat to fit

SIR – Why have toothbrush handles become so bulbous that they no longer fit into the receptacles designed for them?

My white bathroom holder has “Toothbrush” in blue letters and four three-quarter-inch holes. The guest room container also sports an oval aperture for the toothpaste, from a pretty rose-covered range of bed linen and accessories sold by Marks & Spencer. No use now. What do I use instead?

Prudence Seddon
Stourton Caundle, Dorset

A better sort of earl

SIR – Two of the Earl of Rosslyn’s forebears would have been particularly delighted by his new appointment as master of the household to the Prince of Wales.

His great-grandfather, the 5th Earl, who gambled away the family fortune in six years and then devised a system to break the bank at Monte Carlo (but failed), was part of the Marlborough House set that fawned on the future Edward VII when he was Prince of Wales. He was tolerated because his sister, the Countess of Warwick, was for a time the Prince’s maitresse-en-titre (later she tried to use her love letters to blackmail the Royal family, but was forgiven).

The new senior courtier’s grandfather, who died in 1929 as Lord Loughborough before inheriting the earldom, tried but failed to win the friendship of the next Prince of Wales, later Edward VIII. “He was sacked from the RN College, Osborne, my first term there in the summer of 1907”, the latter recalled. He was much taken, however, with Lady Loughborough, as was his brother, the future George VI, her lover before his marriage.

In entering the service of Prince Charles and the Duchess of Cornwall, the current Earl has made up for the failings of his predecessors.

Lord Lexden
London SW1

Bad call

SIR – Infuriated at receiving unwanted calls from abroad and from British firms that do not abide by the Telephone Preference Service, I too invested in the BT blocking telephone (Letters, April 4).

It was excellent until I realised that many doctors and hospitals withhold their numbers, and that I was missing vital calls. I had no alternative but to cancel the service.

James Shone
Southwell, Nottinghamshire

Becher’s trick

SIR – Peter Oborne (Comment, April 3) tells that Captain Becher’s party-trick was “leaping on to the mantelpiece from a standing start”.

I have seen it said elsewhere that C B Fry would do the same, but starting with his back to the fireplace.

Is either feat properly attested? Or is either actually much commoner than one supposes?

Lachlan Mackinnon
Ely, Cambridgeshire

Enjoy! We’ll see about that

SIR – The politest reply that I can suggest to a waiter’s “Enjoy” (Letters, April 4) is: “I’ll try”.

Helen Atkin

Lewes, East Sussex

SIR – A late friend of mine was known to respond to instructions by waiters to “Enjoy” by saying wearily: “Enjoy is a transitive verb and requires an object.”

That was usually the end of the matter.

Charles O’Connor
London SW7

SIR – A frequent response by a waiter to any request is “No problem.”

As the politically correct brigade has substituted the word challenge for problem, I say: “You mean no challenge.” Result: incomprehension.

Vincent Howard
Barton Stacey, Hampshire

SIR – Worse is a television interview ending with, “Thanks for your time,” and, “My pleasure.” It makes me cringe.

Malcolm Cross
Plungar, Leicestershire

SIR – Two grizzled New York comedy writers I worked with in Hollywood, on being exhorted to “Have a nice day” by a head waiter, snapped back in unison: “Don’t tell us what to do!”

Lord Grade of Yarmouth
London SW1

SIR – Which particular aspect of the Maria Miller scandalis the most infuriating?

a) Her attempt to screw the maximum out of a sloppy expenses system.

b) The overruling of the conclusions of an independent body, which had spent 14 months reaching its conclusions.

c) The unseemly support shown by colleagues just before her apology in the House of Commons.

d) The backing of the Prime Minister, who values her contribution.

They still don’t get it!

Peter Edwards
Coleford, Gloucestershire

SIR – The House of Commons did itself no service on Thursday in its treatment of Mrs Miller.

When will parliamentarians of both Houses learn that this country craves leadership by example in high places?

Air Commodore Michael Allisstone (retd)

Chichester, West Sussex

SIR – I agree with Peter Oborne (Comment, telegraph.co.uk). Mrs Miller should have been sacked, and even deselected by the party.

How can the public have confidence in Parliament if MPs get away with this kind of action?

Michael Davey
Warminster, Wiltshire

SIR – This can only reinforce the view that collectively politicians are not to be trusted and continue to look after their own.

It’s appalling that, after the uncovering of the expenses scandal by The Daily Telegraph, these so-called “honourable” members can still make life-changing capital gains funded by the public.

John Cooper
Hitchin, Hertfordshire

SIR – The headline on your leading article “Mrs Miller should say sorry to taxpayers” almost certainly reflected the reaction of 99 per cent of the British public to the latest chapter in the seemingly never-ending saga of MPs’ expenses.

So did your following remarks, “Do MPs not know what their main homes look like? This will strike many voters as another example of the political class protecting its own – and apparently undermining their own regulator to boot.” All this hammers one more nail in the coffin of public trust in politics and politicians.

It is almost beyond parody that Maria Miller is the Cabinet minister charged with overseeing politicians’ attempts to force newspapers to sign up to an archaic, post-Leveson Royal Charter form of press regulation that would do more for politicians’ self-interest than the taxpaying public’s right to know.

Hopefully, the public will also take note of the fact that, once again, it took a newspaper to alert the public to Maria Miller’s questionable interpretation of parliamentary expenses; not to mention the clumsy attempts by government officials to lean on the Telegraph, citing the Culture Secretary’s keynote role in the press regulation debate.

Despite the desperate efforts of Maria Miller and the Prime Minister, with his hasty declarations of support and desire to call the matter closed, the aftershocks of MPs spurning the judgment of the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner will reverberate through to next year’s general election. David Cameron’s decision to leave Maria Miller in place is one he could come to rue on polling day.

Paul Connew
St Albans, Hertfordshire

SIR – Why did Maria Miller need a “second home”? There are many trains between Basingstoke and London, and the journey takes less than 90 minutes. The journey from Wimbledon, where her other home was, takes half an hour.

So we taxpayers seem to have paid more than £90,000 to save this MP an hour a day.

Peter Burke
Carnoustie, Angus

Irish Times:

Irish Independent:

Madam – The garda commissioner makes his way up from the rank and file membership as opposed to some countries that operate a cadetship. The skills needed to perform in middle management are not necessarily adequate to fulfil the huge range of responsibilities as commissioner.

Also in this section

We must move from organ donor cards to a list

Put lead in your pencil and use your vote

Sky deal is a slap in the face for GAA fans

If future commissioners are to possess the capabilities to steer the force towards excellence, two criteria must apply. Firstly, there must be a sprinkling of candidates joining from time to time capable of surviving at the various levels and eventually taking on the giant expansion of skills required to perform as head of the force.

Secondly, the promotion system must be capable of identifying, selecting and promoting these members. sergeants, superintendents, chief superintendents and commissioners have a major say and a veto at every stage of promotion of subordinates. The chances of these fulfilling the second criteria are low. The statistical chance of both criteria existing is very remote.

Middle management have plenty to do without the need to be involved in assessing staff for promotion. It is likely that some excellent staff are blocked along the way by managers who are not up to the job themselves or just don’t understand the need for fair objective selection. Simply put, if your chief doesn’t like you, you are not going anywhere. If cadetship is not in the frame, the services of outside help to oversee promotion by continuous assessment, based on ability, will be vital. Nepotism, sporting prowess, and luck are poor alternatives to clarity of thought, training, leadership and skill. Three commissioners forced into involuntary retirement since 1978 prove the need for change.

Val Martin,

Cavan

BEHAN SOLD SHORT ON LITERACY LEGACY

Madam – Having long been familiar with the critical work of Anthony Cronin and his thoughts on the inordinately talented trio of Brendan Behan, Patrick Kavanagh, and Flann O’Brien, I must take issue with some of the points he raises in his interview with Willie Kealy, regarding the literary legacy of Brendan Behan (Sunday Independent, March 23, 2014).

Cronin states in relation to Behan: “… as if there’s a solid achievement to commemorate, which, alas, there isn’t. I wouldn’t think – aside from Borstal Boy, which I think is not even in print at the moment – that there’s not much to rest the reputation of the writer on”. I think Cronin sells Behan the writer very short in this assessment.

In fairness to him, Cronin at least mentions Borstal Boy, although he appears to undermine this mention by surmising that it’s not even in print at this point in time. Woe betide any writer who stakes his or her reputation on the exigencies of the publishing industry. The reputations of writers tend to go in and out of fashion, a point that Cronin himself noted some years ago in relation to the unfairly neglected Aidan Higgins. Borstal Boy itself ranks very highly in the realm of prison autobiography, bearing comparison with Jean Genet‘s The Miracle of the Rose and Our Lady of the Flowers. Indeed, Behan’s work surpasses Genet’s in its sympathy with the human condition and in his refusal to treat his characters as mere puppets and playthings.

Cronin also refers to The Hostage as “a totally different sort of entertainment”. This is a fair enough comment, but what about An Giall (the Irish-language play on which the inferior The Hostage is based and which is far more than an entertainment) and The Quare Fellow – both classics of modern Irish drama? And what about Behan’s fine poems in Irish and his masterpieces of short fiction, After the Wake and The Confirmation Suit? All in all, not an inconsiderable achievement on which to base a literary legacy.

Jim McCarthy,

Sandymount, Dublin 4

POLITICIANS SHOULD SO SOME REAL WORK

Madam – The headline to Eilis O’Hanlon’s article (Sunday Independent, March 30, 2014), – “For our seasoned politicians, ignorance isn’t merely bliss, it’s good business” – angered me. Yes, true, if it’s merely a game of French roulette among themselves, while forgetting they are in charge of running a country.

Good leadership was never so necessary in Ireland as now. Tens of thousands are unemployed, mortgage debt is a disaster and the population is burdened with new schemes and taxes.

Nevertheless, for the past few weeks nothing mattered in Dail Eireann – only problems with whistleblowers and phone tapping. Both are connected with inefficiency at the top and little to do with rank and file. As for ‘whistleblowers’ – they weren’t always known by that name! The only whistleblowers familiar to the general public would be those with the local hunts or refereeing matches. Culture changes – apparently it is now honourable and necessary to have a new professional whistleblowers’ outfit set up to combat wrong-doing in higher places. So be it!

Undoubtedly, the next time-waster in Government will be the local elections, when it would serve the country far better if they got their ‘ear to the ground’, started straightening the economy and created some jobs.

James Gleeson,

Thurles, Co Tipperary

A LITTLE CHARITY WOULDN’T GO AMISS

Madam – For many years, Emer O’Kelly has been one of your finest journalists, not least in respect of her consistent criticism of the Catholic Church’s dreadful behaviour with regard to clerical sex abuse. Many of the latter columns, indeed, were written long before it was fashionable to ask serious questions of the Catholic hierarchy. It was a huge disappointment, therefore, to read her column (Sunday Independent, March 30, 2014), regarding former TD Patrick Nulty. This is a relatively young politician whose career has been abruptly ended and whose misdeeds have been splashed all over the national media. He has also publicly admitted to having a drink problem.

This very public shame, however, was not enough for Ms Kelly, apparently. She doesn’t consider the adjective “inappropriate”, as used in the media, to be sufficient to describe Mr Nulty’s actions. She manages to describe his behaviour as “pathetic”, “inexcusable”, “sleazy”, “exploitative”, “sordid”, “distasteful” and “contemptible”. He is among the “sad, inadequate people” who “indulge in such behaviour”. His career is ruined, and “many people will say, deservedly so”, Ms Kelly among them, clearly.

When I had finished reading Ms Kelly’s column, the phrase “kicking someone when he’s down” sprang to mind.

While Ms Kelly is clearly no fan of the Catholic Church, a little Christianity would have not gone amiss in her column.

Jim Hickey,

Waterford

AMERICANISATION CATCHES ON FAST

Madam –I think Carole Molloy (Sunday Independent, March 30, 2014), is wrong when she suggests your reporters are ‘Americanised’ after spending their gap year in the States. More likely after having been there for a week’s holidays!

Patricia Keeley,

Dublin 6W

NO ‘SOUTHERN IRELAND’ IN ATLAS

Madam – In response to John McClung‘s letter taking offence at Northern Ireland being called “the North” (Sunday Independent, March 23, 2014), and John Brady’s letter in response (Sunday Independent, March 30, 2014), saying that “Ireland” is the name of this country, I was watching the Channel 4 Countdown where actress Maureen Lipman raved about her love of drinking a pint of Murphy’s in Beara in “Southern Ireland” which she repeated several times.

I checked my atlas, and googled it, but could not find “Southern Ireland” anywhere. Also Ireland is not one of the British Isles, the correct term is the British Isles and Ireland.

Pat Kelly,

Blackrock, Cork

TAKE DECISION ON

FLUORIDE MYSELF

Madam – Carol Hunt (Sunday Independent, March 30, 2014), wrote an article entitled ‘Brush up on mind control and methods to medicate’. She stated that the fluoridation of our water system is for our common good and any other opinion is “pure (bull)**it”. I beg to differ, and take extreme offence to her language. I do not want someone else deciding whether I should have fluoride added to my water for my own good. I can make that decision for myself.

Sharon McCarthy,

Tuam, Co Galway

SICK TO THE TEETH OF WATER DEBATE

Madam – It is with complete frustration that I write to you regarding an article by Declan Waugh and the fluoridation of water in Ireland.

He makes endless claims regarding the dangers of fluoride. I am appalled that a national paper is printing this. I hope this is the last we hear of Mr Declan Waugh and his campaign in your paper.

Anita Byrne,

Clonmel, Co Tipperary

WOMEN PASSED OVER FOR YEARS

Madam – The issue of the under-representation of women in the parliaments of what are supposed to be representative democracies is an interesting topic for debate as is highlighted by your two correspondents Robert Sullivan and Hugh Gibney (Sunday Independent, March 30, 2014).

The facts are that we are told that something like five per cent of TDs elected since independence were women and between 80 per cent and 90 per cent of the Dail at the moment are men. That can be accepted as a law of nature or it can be challenged by saying that it is inefficient to marginalise the interests, perspectives and talents of the majority of the population that are women in what is supposed to be a representative democracy.

The recent introduction of the condition that political parties have a minimum quota of women candidates in the next general election before they qualify for public funding has focused the debate.

What is proposed here is an increase in the number of women candidates, not, as stated by Robert Sullivan, ‘forcing us to vote for women’ and ‘sticking’ them into Leinster House. If the women on the ballot paper do not get elected that is the end of the matter.

Hugh Gibney raises the issue of ‘men of superior ability’ being ‘passed over’. The fact is that many more women of superior ability have been passed over throughout the years since independence because they did not even get as far as being considered by what Hugh Gibney himself calls ‘the relevant powers that be’.

A Leavy,

Sutton, Dublin 13

UKRAINE FACES JOB CATASTROPHE

Madam – Dan O’Brien’s article “No Place for Weakness in Face of Grave Danger” is, in my view, ill-informed. I am married to a lady from a former USSR state which is now a full EU member – Latvia.

Russia has no economic interest in taking over Ukraine. Latvia was promised much when it joined the EU. When Russia was forced out of Latvia employers disappeared, and so did jobs and salaries.

They were not replaced with EU or American companies. All State pensions guaranteed by Russia disappeared. The result was economic catastrophe and today I know Latvian shop workers who earn €250 a month. So all young people left and went to Ireland and the UK as their immigration working laws were more lenient than continental Europe.

Most jobs in Ukraine are from small to medium sized local companies. The Ukraine is being sold a pretty picture in much the same way as Latvia was. Their only benefit will be the ability for their younger generations to emigrate and send home some money to their elders.

Damian Moylan,

Longford

PRAGMATIC POLITICS NEEDED

Madam – My thanks to William Barrett (Letters, Sunday Independent, March 30, 2014) for his kind remarks. A seconding of his praise for your efforts towards encouraging a new politics.

As I write, the UN publishes its report on climate change for the benefit of those of us who experienced during the winter no mildly-moist intimations of the mortality of our planet’s doomed ecosphere. The legitimate demands of the Ukraine and the re-emergence of Tsarism have slipped us back into a new cold war, to the delight of the world’s military-industrial complex. We are being urged to solve our ‘energy security’ problems with questionable (but sectionally lucrative), quick-fix ‘solutions’ such as nuclear power and ‘cheap’ shale oil. The virus of endemic insoluble civil war spreads from the Middle East. The EU performs its snail’s-pace minuet towards serious economic, financial and institutional reforms. The success of which are all crucial to the viability of our socio-economic system (or ‘non-system’, if you prefer). But for which there is no political will, let alone zeal, among any of our European non-leaders. The wretched of the earth call out for pathetically small measures towards their subsistence and self-dependence but we cannot and – deliberately – will not hear them through the triple-glaze windows on our hearts.

Grotesquely and almost unbelievably, we can now calculate the day, the month and the year when all life on this planet will no longer be viable.

And yet in this tiny country, our ruling class is preoccupied with a sitcom about who, when, where did or did not get official communications – and process them according to standard or even commonsense procedure.

What is missing from our political equation is a pragmatic social democratic party, aware that the politics, the policies, the decisions, the actions, not ‘just’ of the future but of now, must be European and global.

They must earn the future by displaying a courage and creativity for which they have had too few role-models in the recent past.

Maurice O’Connell,

Tralee, Co Kerry

REDRESS THE DEBT

Madam – Six years after the Irish banking debt hard landing that destroyed the Irish economy, Sarah McCabe (Sunday Independent, March 30, 2014) has reported that Irish banks with recapitalised salaries and pensions for themselves, now require normal protocols in terms of debt collection for the doomed debt ratio products of 2005 to 2008. Normal debt collection protocols would apply to normal valued debt only.

From 2005 to 2008, Irish banks were selling unsustainable debt products, with the purpose of competing for aggressive profit growth.

In 2014, protocols include bonus claw back and redress for customers. Mortgage debt products that were doomed from day one will require special protocols to redress the devaluation of bank customers’ lives.

The correct protocol for Irish banks is to redress all 2005 to 2008 doomed debt ratio products before seeking an abolition of the cap on bankers’ pay.

Irish banks should be banned from declaring profitability before they redress all doomed debt ratio products of 2005 to 2008.

A long term customer- and Irish economy-friendly banking strategy is required to replace today’s aggressive profit growth strategy that ignores the Irish economy. Bank customers are the Irish economy.

Irish banks that cannot redress their doomed debt ratio products will fail the 2014 stress tests. The sustainable and honest financial reporting provided by a longer-term banking strategy is more likely to help a bank pass its stress test.

Honest financial reporting and doing the right thing for their customers may yet save Irish banks.

Mike Flannelly,

Galway


Another hospital visit

$
0
0

7April2014 another hospital visit

I go all the way around the park listening to the Men from the Ministry: rhurbard farmer revolts Priceless

Mary back in hospital visit her play Scrabble she wins but I get closer to winning

Scrabbletoday, Mary wins Perhaps Iwill win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Alan Davie – obituary

Alan Davie was an artist who won the admiration of Rothko and Pollock, and later embraced ‘magic symbolism’

Alan Davie, Scottish artist

Alan Davie in his studio at his home near Hertford Photo: CAMERA PRESS/EAMONN MCCABE

6:39PM BST 06 Apr 2014

CommentsComment

Alan Davie , who has died aged 93, was arguably Scotland’s most respected painter of the post-war era, winning international acclaim from both critics and fellow artists, among them Jackson Pollock, Mark Rothko and David Hockney.

Davie was probably the first British painter to appreciate the significance of American Abstract Expressionism, having seen Pollock’s work in Peggy Guggenheim’s collection in Venice in 1948, an experience that inspired him to paint with more improvisation and on a much larger scale.

But Davie was soon to distance himself from the Abstract Expressionists and develop his own style: “We were just all saying the same thing, that art is spontaneous, so let’s just let the subconscious flow,” he later observed. “I thought if I want to make a big painting without thinking consciously about it, all I have to do is walk around the floor with liquid paint. But there was a problem. I realised that being that free was itself too restricting. You can make lovely messes — like Pollock. But the art’s not saying anything.”

By the early 1960s Davie was drawing increasingly on myth and “magic symbolism”, viewing himself less as an artist than as a medium, or shaman, borrowing signs and symbols from cultures as diverse as the Navajo Indians, the Caribbean islands, Aboriginal Australians, and the Ancient Egyptians, Celts and Picts. “Symbolism,” he once said, “is quite an apparent theme in a lot of my work. I use it to kind of suggest narratives that I have in my head.”

Alan Davie was born at Grangemouth, in the Forth Valley, on September 28 1920, the son of a schoolmaster and amateur artist who encouraged the boy to draw from childhood. Alan was also a talented pianist, and when he saw the jazzman Coleman Hawkins playing in an Edinburgh record shop he took up the saxophone.

From 1938 to 1940 he trained as a painter at Edinburgh College of Art, where his tutor condemned him as arrogant when, in his first life class, he painted the velvet backdrop behind the model yellow instead of its actual brown: “He wanted to boot me out of the college.”

Alan Davie’s ‘Entrance for a Red Temple No 1′, 1960 (TATE GALLERY)

Following wartime service with the Royal Artillery, Davie became a professional saxophonist with an Edinburgh-based swing band which also toured Europe. In addition he wrote poetry, made pots, designed textiles and worked as a jeweller .

In 1947 he married Janet (“Bili”) Gaul, an art student, and the couple travelled across Europe together, arriving in Venice in time for the 1948 Biennale, the first since the war. Davie later recalled: “There were huge exhibitions of Picasso and Paul Klee, and for the first time I saw the work of my American contemporaries – Pollock, Rothko, de Kooning. I started painting again, working on big rolls of paper on the floor in cheap hotel rooms.” Peggy Guggenheim was impressed by what she saw, bought two of his works, and recommended him to the leading London gallery Gimpel Fils.

For the first seven years Davie failed to sell a single painting at the gallery. In the early Fifties he was offered a job teaching jewellery design at the Central School of Art by its principal, William Johnstone, who recorded: “Alan and his wife were living on Poor Relief at William Oley’s artists’ settlement at the Abbey, New Barnet. Nowhere could Alan find work, and he had to walk all the way to Holborn to see me.”

But Davie was making a name for himself abroad, and in 1956 he paid his first visit to New York. This proved to be his making: encouraged by Rothko and Pollock, de Kooning and Franz Kline, in the same year he had his first New York exhibition; it was a sell-out, most of the paintings being bought by major institutions, MoMA among them.

Yet his memories of the visit were not entirely happy: “They were very enthusiastic about my work, which was very strange to me, having come from London where my work was considered rubbish by the critics at that time. Jackson Pollock was very excited about my work. He was a lovely guy, and we stayed the weekend at his house.

Alan Davie’s ‘Birth of Venus’, 1955 (TATE GALLERY)

“But we realised quite quickly he was virtually being killed by his art. He was feted as being the greatest artist alive and there was a lot of jealousy around. We went to several parties and it was pretty horrific. They knew that when he was drunk he would do crazy things, so they would all try to make him drunk to see what happened.” Pollock died in a car crash only few months after he and Davie met.

Davie returned to Britain to take up a fellowship at Leeds University , and an exhibition at the Wakefield Art Gallery transferred to the Whitechapel in London in 1958, launching him as a significant figure in the British avant-garde, a position he shared with William Gear, who was associated with the European COBRA group. David Hockney was among the many young British artists influenced by Davie, whose exotic cloaks and long beard made him something of a shamanic figure .

In the early Sixties, Davie bought a house near Land’s End bringing him into contact with the St Ives group of artists. Some of his paintings featured in Antonioni’s Blow-Up (1966), one of the most successful films of the counterculture era; and in a 1967 monograph, Alan Bowness, future Director of the Tate, described Davie as being “among the major figures in the art of our times”.

Alan Davie with his poodle, Belinda

Davie was appointed CBE in 1972, but although he continued to paint and exhibit, his work — increasingly focused on the mystical and transcendental (he was a follower of Zen Buddhism) — enjoyed less public recognition; he became something of an outsider. There were, however, many retrospectives, including Barbican, New York and Ireland (1993); Chicago (1994); and the Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art in Edinburgh in 2000. His works are held in public collections worldwide, among them the Tate Gallery, the Gulbenkian Foundation and MoMA in New York.

He was elected a Senior Royal Academician in 2012, and a major exhibition of his work opens on April 7 at Tate Britain.

A man of seemingly limitless energy, Davie was an enthusiastic glider pilot and had a passion for driving E-type Jaguars. From the mid-Fifties he and his wife (who died in 2007) lived near Hertford; in 1974 he bought a house on St Lucia in the Caribbean, where he took up underwater swimming and set up the Alan Davie Music Workshop — “There’s a connection,” he once said, “between jazz and what I do with a brush, in that it seems improvised and random.”

In old age, his views on the contemporary art world were trenchant: Damien Hirst was dismissed as “a brilliant businessman”, and Tracey Emin “isn’t an artist either”.

As for his own work, he observed: “I don’t practise painting or drawing as an art, in the sense of artifice, of making an imitation of something. It’s something I do from an inner compulsion, that has to come out.”

Alan Davie, born September 28 1920, died April 5 2014

Guardian:

We welcome the amendment being debated in the House of Lords on Monday that will provide guardians for trafficked children. These vulnerable children have already been subjected to the worst kinds of abuse imaginable, including forced labour, domestic servitude and sexual exploitation. Specialist independent guardians are an essential part of ensuring they receive the highest protection possible to prevent further abuse.

A report last year by the Refugee Council and the Children’s Society, commissioned by the Home Office, found that an inadequate level of protection for trafficked children was being offered by professionals and agencies who were meant to be supporting them. This cannot continue.

Without anyone to speak up for them and their best interests, these child victims are at great risk of going missing from care, and of further abuse and exploitation. These are children alone and scared in a foreign country where they often don’t speak the language and have no understanding of the processes and systems that they must go through. They urgently need a dedicated person who is legally responsible for supporting them in all aspects of their life.

A wide range of international and domestic bodies recommend the introduction of guardians, including the UN committee on the rights of the child and the Council of Europe’s Group of Experts on Action Against Trafficking in Human Beings (Greta).
We commend Baroness Butler-Sloss, Lord McColl of Dulwich, Lord Carlile of Berriew and Baroness Royall of Blaisdon for bringing forward this amendment and for raising this important issue on many previous occasions.

Members of the House of Lords have an opportunity to make a real difference to trafficked children. By supporting this amendment they will help to ensure guardians are provided to give trafficked children a voice in decisions made about them, help keep them safe and support them to recover from the trauma they have suffered.

Wayne Myslik Chief executive, Asylum Aid, Celia Clarke Director, Bail for Immigration Detainees, Puja Darbari UK director of strategy, Barnardos, Bridget Robb Chief executive, British Association of Social Workers, Nola Leach Chief executive, CARE, Paola Uccellari Director, Children’s Rights Alliance for England, Professor Carolyn Hamilton Director of International Programmes and Research, Coram Children’s Legal Centre, Andrew Radford Director, Coram Voice, Dr Helena Kaliniecka Service manager, Dost Centre for Young Refugees & Migrants, Bharti Patel Chief executive, ECPAT UK, Dr Edie Friedman Executive director, Jewish Council for Racial Equality, Baljeet Sandhu Director, Migrant & Refugee Children’s Legal Unit, Vaughan Jones Chief executive, Praxis Community Projects, Heather Knight UK co-ordinator, Stop the Traffik, Matthew Reed Chief executive, The Children’s Society

What a shame that the plug was pulled on accreditation of the heterodox economics course organised by the Manchester University students (Editorial, 3 April). As you point out, insights and breakthroughs in the emergence of an economics fit for the 21st century are coming from many disciplines – anthropology, sociology, psychology, neuroscience, etc – but all too rarely from within economics faculties themselves.

Despite this most recent setback in Manchester, however, the citadels of economics orthodoxy have been breached and a wave of innovative new academic programmes is emerging. These include a postgraduate programme here at Schumacher College that would be recognised not just by the 18th and 19th century moral philosophers that you cite, but also by more recent thinkers following in the footsteps of Rachel Carson and Fritz Schumacher who recognise the economy as being embedded not just within social and political structures but, also and more broadly, within the web of life in which human society is but one thread.
Jonathan Dawson
Head of economics, Schumacher College

• Behind the shield of mathematical formalism, economics has given remarkably little attention to its hidden moral assumptions. Only very recently has the American Economic Association agreed to implement even a very modest ethical code for people submitting papers to its journals. Yet economists have more influence over people’s life chances than all other social scientists. Doctors and engineers have similar influence, and both professions devote attention to morals and ethics. Let us hope that the disruption you predict will lead economists to engage with the ethical duties appropriate for such a discipline.
Professor Robert H. Wade
London School of Economics

Surely the solution to the “Shmita” question (Loose canon, 5 April) would be to do it by rotation farm by farm. Thus the whole country would lie fallow once every seven years as per Biblical injunction; just not all at the same time.
Jeremy Muldowney
Heworth, York

• I am not a member of any political party, but I found the Ed Miliband picture and comment distasteful (Can you make this guy less weird?, G2, 3 April). More Daily Mail/playground bully than what I would expect from a paper I have been reading for over 55 years.
Ann Jones
Market Rasen, Lincolnshire

• Readers setting out to follow your correspondent’s advice (Letters, 4 April) may find that they go hungry both because Chipshop is in Devon, not Cornwall, and because its name has nothing to do with the humble spud, fried or otherwise. It is derived from the tokens with which miners of Devon Great Consols were paid. These could only be redeemed at the mine owner’s (chip) shop.
Angus Doulton
Bere Ferrers, Devon

• When the government eventually legislates that cigarettes should be sold in unbranded packets (Report, 4 April), can we hope that all their policies which have clearly been thrown together on the back of a fag packet will have the space to be better thought through?
Andrew Gosling
Colchester, Essex

• Actually, it was Liquid Paper that Bette Nesmith Graham invented (Letters, 5 April).
Henry Malt
Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire

It is time for MPs’ expenses to be totally overhauled (It would transform politics if MPs actually had to come from their constituencies, Deborah Orr, 5 April). I propose that expenses be tied to the constituency, travel and accommodation costs, and allocated according to the distance of the constituency from parliament, there would be an allowance for office space and staff, again linked to the constituency, as these costs differ around the country. MPs whose constituency is over, say, one and a half hour’s travel time (by public transport) would be allocated sufficient expenses to rent modest accommodation in London. If they choose to have somewhere more comfortable (with a duck house, etc), then that would be funded from their private resources, not the public purse.

Similarly, travel expenses would be second class, with an allowance for a fixed number of journeys to and from the constituency. Should they choose to have a chauffeur-driven limo, the extra cost of that is met from their own pocket; should they choose to travel less often than the allocation, they may pocket some expenses, but they may lose their seat next time round if the constituents feel underrepresented.

If an MP chooses to employ family members, rather than qualified administrators, it will be their business not ours. Once the allowances have been worked out for each constituency, they can be reviewed annually but the time spent doing this would be far less than the time currently spent checking every single item claimed for. Another advantage is that MPs will also be able to keep their spending habits private. Simple but fair.
Liz Taylor
Bristol

•  Deborah Orr and others have commented on possible solutions to our MPs’ regrettable tendency to overclaim expenses. My solution is simple. Every year every MP should be required to make information about the expenses they have claimed to their constituents. Then a public meeting should be called at which any constitution can ask their MP any question they wish regarding their expenses. Any MP who fails to comply without reasonable excuse, to be decided by their constituents, should be required to refund all expenses. Any MP who is found to have given false or misleading information, to be decided by a court of law, should be automatically recalled and a byelection held within three months.
Andrew Tampion
Hinckley, Leicestershire

• How can Iain Duncan Smith justify the bedroom tax where the poor are forced, through lack of appropriate housing, to live in a house with bedrooms they do not need, when government ministers are allowed to use taxpayers’ money to buy houses in the capital which also have an excess of bedrooms they have no need for? The difference here is that the poor do not have a choice and cannot afford to buy a house, whereas the MPs can sell the house bought with the aid of the taxpayer and pocket all the profits accrued.

How simple it is for MPs to get richer in this way, and still be so arrogant when dealing with the needy. It is time they were forced to hand back any profit made to the taxpayer when their second homes in London are sold.
Donald Swarbrick
Patna, Ayrshire

• Actually, Maria Miller saved a lot more than half an hour a day by living in Wimbledon rather than Basingstoke. It’s only 16 minutes from London Waterloo on South West Trains, not the 45 minutes Ms Orr suggests, so that’s a time saving of about an hour and a half a day.
Martin Platt
London

•  Sorry to disagree but I think that Maria Miller is an ideal secretary representing the culture of those who think of themselves as our leaders – the culture of greed, arrogance and complete indifference towards us plebeians (Letters, 5 April).
Stephen Davies
Sandbach, Cheshire

•  Centuries ago all flour had, by law, to be bought from the local mill. It was measured out using a standard container. If the person dispensing the flour held their thumb inside the container, this displaced a small amount which would eventually add up to an unearned profit. The extra portion was known as “the miller’s thumb”.
Roy Harrison
Bristol

Independent:

Your editorial (4 April) on house building is welcome, but I think there is a core problem which is tragic and insoluble. Any party which succeeded in getting enough new housing built, in the right places, to dent prices would be committing political suicide.

Those who vote already own houses and would not take kindly to negative equity. Buy-to-let owners, looking for capital gains, would not like lower prices either.

There are those desperate for lower house prices. But they more often than not do not vote. The moment they become home owners and voters, they too will want house prices propped up.

Britain will never enjoy good-quality housing, affordable by nearly everyone.

Trevor Pateman, Brighton

I agree that “Britain’s building rate is pathetic”, but not that “a solution seems very far off”. Your leader and the speeches of the politicians omit the word “productivity”.

Office blocks use components made off-site on an industrial scale, assembled by crane. Houses are still being constructed brick-upon-brick, using methods unchanged from Roman times. These methods are very labour-intensive, and labour is costly. They are also very slow.

“Prefab” was a derogatory word after the Second World War, but variety can be introduced by using different colours and materials. Town houses using these methods in the early 1960s were built by Wates in Dulwich and Span in Blackheath, south London, usually grouped around a cul-de-sac where children could play.

Someone, such as the Prince of Wales, should offer a prize for the design of a good house, affordable and a pleasure to look at.

William Robert Haines, Shrewsbury

Your suggestion that more homes should be built may seem the obvious answer to the current shortage.

However we need to consider that Britain is a small island which can’t keep expanding to suit demand. There comes a time when we have to say no to more development of green spaces, no to more airports and infrastructure.

The problem is the population. It needs to be limited so that everyone can enjoy living here.

Martyn Pattie, Ongar, Essex

Your leading article of 4 April gives welcome emphasis to the gap between housing supply and demand.

Could someone in the construction industry please give an explanation of why this gap exists when we have capacity to build, healthy customer demand, ample unemployed people, low inflation and a government desperate to get the economy moving. What is the missing piece in the jigsaw? I would love to know.

Oh, and by the way, we are about to demolish four tower blocks in Glasgow which could accommodate four thousand people.

Rodney Freeman, Harkstead,  Suffolk

Why degrees don’t impress employers

In her letter of 2 April, Dr Maria Gee, senior lecturer in accounting at the University of Winchester, berates employers for only employing Russell Group graduates or those with 300+ Ucas points. As a retired lecturer in accounting, I can explain why this is the case.

The reality is that no more than 25 per cent of the population has academic ability, so with more than 40 per cent of the population going to university it should be obvious that many should not be there. What they should be doing is taking advantage of the many talents they have which are just as good as being able to cope with academic theory.

Now universities are under pressure to publish research and award good grades, and the only way they can do this is to dumb everything down. The result is that, outside top universities, a 2:1 degree is a worthless piece of paper. The real problem is that the difference between a top 2:1 (69 per cent but not rounded up to a first) and the bottom 2:1 (59 per cent rounded up) is vast. One student is intelligent, hard-working and highly employable, while the other has probably not learnt how to get out if bed in the morning. Yet they both have the same piece of paper

When universities go back to setting proper standards, then employers will again believe their degrees.

Malcolm Howard, Banstead, Surrey

Leveson charter for a free press

The events in Croydon described by Andy McSmith (“Long arm of the law leaves another journalist hacked off”, 2 April) have nothing to do with Hacked Off, Leveson or the Royal Charter.

In fact the Leveson/Charter system will increase the freedom of journalists to do their job. It reduces the scope for political meddling in self-regulation and frees the press from the “chilling” effect of bullying litigation by the wealthy. The only freedom it seeks to curb is the freedom of papers to mistreat the public without being accountable for it.

Sadly, the big newspaper companies are still  resisting this.

Brian Cathcart, Director, Hacked Off, London SW1

It is obvious that the Maria Miller furore is being stoked by the print media because she is involved in implementing Leveson. It is a blatant attempt by them to sabotage the process. Most worrying is that politicians know this but are still so intimidated by the press that they dare not say so.

Keith Brawn, Portchester, Hampshire

Israel’s right to east Jerusalem

Gordon Broadbent asks (letter, 1 April) why we are applying sanctions against Russia over Crimea but not against Israel for annexing East Jerusalem. The answer is simple: Jerusalem did not previously belong to any sovereign state.

Jerusalem was the capital of the Jewish state of Judea for over 1,000 years until conquered by the Romans, who spitefully renamed their new colony Palestine. It stayed a colony under all successive conquerors until the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. The San Remo Conference of 1920 resolved to give the whole of Palestine back to the Jews and this was ratified by the League of Nations two years later. Britain was awarded the mandate over Palestine, specifically charged to make it into a Jewish homeland with close settlement.

Instead, Britain sheared off 83 per cent of the territory to create the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan, and did everything possible to retain control of the remainder. When, in 1947, the United Nations voted to partition the remainder of Palestine, with Jerusalem “internationalised”, the Jews reluctantly accepted the small consolation of less than 10 per cent of the original Palestine, but the Arabs rejected the plan and five Arab states waged war on the one-day-old Jewish state. Transjordan illegally seized the West Bank and East Jerusalem, throwing out thousands of Jews who had lived there for generations. For the next 19 years, Jordan did not even allow Jews to visit their Holy Sites in Jerusalem  and Hebron.

In annexing East Jerusalem from a regime that had no legal claim over it, Israel was simply regaining its historic rights, in accordance with the League of Nations resolutions. Incidentally, many Arabs who live in East Jerusalem are very happy to be part of a democratic country with full civil rights, rather than being subjected to the tyranny and cronyism of surrounding Middle Eastern countries, or their own Fatah or Hamas.

Alan Halibard, Bet Shemesh, Israel

Gladys, a big name in Bolivia

Linda Grant (“Ask Horace, Cecil, Gertrude or Gladys if there is such a thing as a timeless name”, 5 April) might be reassured to know that linda is in constant use in Latin American Spanish and Portuguese as an adjective agreeing with a feminine noun meaning  “pleasant”, “lovely”.

She would also be interested to know that Gladys is a popular name in Bolivia. There is even a restaurant called Tía Gladys (Aunty Gladys) in one of the main thoroughfares of La Paz.

I would also like to remind Ms Grant that Prince Harry is officially Prince Henry of Wales, but it was announced soon after he was born that he would be known as  Prince Harry.

Rosemary Morlin, Oxford

The name Gertrude “effectively extinct”? (Report, 4 April) Not in this household. Number three dog is called Gertie, or by her full name of Gertrude when she has hidden my shoes again.

Jan Cook, South Nutfield, Surrey

Eat up your nice spinach curry

I was very disappointed in Rosie Millard’s column (2 April), in which she supports all the prejudices encouraged by the food companies to sell junk food to our children. In particular, her jibe about spinach curry was out of place. A curry of chick-peas and spinach (chana saag) is very tasty, readily available in most Indian restaurants and one of my favourites – and I’m anything but vegetarian. There is a recipe that adds tomatoes and that’s three of your daily portions of vegetables, or you could try aloo saag (spinach and potatoes).

John Day, Lyon

Times:

“If Scots vote for independence, it is unthinkable that any Scottish MP should be allowed to vote in the Westminster Parliament”

Sir, You are right (leader, Apr 3) to reject the argument that Scotland should be disenfranchised from the 2015 general election in the event of a vote for independence this year.

However, there is the question of how the subsequent negotiations are dealt with in the UK parliament running up to Mr Salmond’s target date for independence of March 2016 (chosen for his convenience to fit in with the Scottish parliament elections in May 2016).

March 2016 is unrealistic: between this September and then there is a UK general election in May 2015 and it is unlikely that meaningful negotiations can begin until the new government is in power.

Thereafter, negotiations will be complex. The legislation will be necessary at Westminster, which may well be controversial in both Houses, and in the Scottish Parliament. There will also be negotiations with the EU and other international bodies. All this cannot be achieved in an orderly fashion between May 2015 and March 2016.

Surely the sensible answer is to accept that the whole process will take much longer and that Scottish independence day, when Scottish MPs leave Westminster, will coincide with a general election in the rest of the UK. Or an even better answer would be for Scotland to vote No in September.

Peter Mackay

Kincraig by Kingussie, Highland

Sir, For some years English voters have seen Scottish MPs voting at Westminster on issues of purely English interest, while Scotland has its own parliament in which only Scottish MPs may vote. This undemocratic situation was tolerated because English voters believed that Scots favoured the Union with England — a union which has given the Scots such a disproportionate grip on the political, commercial, financial and cultural life of Britain. If Scots vote for independence before the next general election, it is unthinkable that any Scottish MP should be allowed (even in the interregnum) to vote in the Westminster Parliament.

Stephen Porter

London NW6

Sir, With due respect to Alex Massie (Thunderer, Apr 4), there is no reason why the English should try to persuade the Scots to remain in the Union. The onus is on Scotland, which asked for the referendum.

David Harris

London SW13

Sir, You say that “Scottish voters will choose whether they wish to remain part of the UK”. The truth is that voters, irrespective of nationality, ancestry or birth, who reside in Scotland will be casting ballots, whereas Scots who reside in the rest of the UK are denied any say whatsoever. The SNP has long claimed that sovereignty in Scotland lies with the people of Scotland, but the de facto truth is that this plebiscite will be decided only by people in Scotland.

David McKirdy

Mansfield Woodhouse, Notts

Sir, John Stevenson cannot seriously propose denying the voters of Scotland participation in their sovereign parliament in 2015, even if they are going to have a new sovereign parliament of their own in 2016. And as a fellow Scot he should know that patronising advice from south of the border is never welcome and is invariably counter productive.

Mike Gibbons

Cartmel, Cumbria

The unrestricted spread of pornography online is harmful to both young and old. ISPs must act to prevent further damage

Sir, We are all under 30 and we share a deep concern about our generation’s consumption of pornography. There is an online epidemic of hardcore pornography, and even children are largely unprotected from it.

Research and our experience show that pornography is taking a real toll on the mental, emotional and physical health of many of our peers and poses a serious challenge to public health in the UK.

It is very far from the harmless, victimless activity portrayed by the powerful industry. It is warping young people’s views of sex and body image and impeding the formation of healthy relationships.

We urge the government to ensure the main internet service providers (ISPs) complete the introduction of network-level filtering by the end of this year and encourage all remaining ISPs to do the same. If self-regulation does not work, the government must introduce legislation; it must make effective age verification a priority; it should highlight the harmful and potentially addictive nature of pornography; and it should help parents with internet filters and talking to their children about the dangers of online porn.

Jonny Adams; Bethany Becconsall; Kate Massey-Chase; Sarah Percival; Aston Stockdale; Maktuno Suit

The Right Honourable Kim Howells, a former Foreign Minister, responds to Matthew Parris’s accusations levelled at Blair’s government

Sir, I didn’t move in the lofty circles that allowed Matthew Parris access to Tony Blair’s innermost visions of his own destiny (“Afghanistan was a crime. Here are the guilty”, Apr 5). I was but a humble Foreign Minister when British forces were moved from Mazar-i-Sharif in north Afghanistan to Helmand in the south. Matthew is right, though, to question the role of big shots in determining that crucial shift. I remember the horror and irritation on the faces of senior FCO Afghan Desk officials filing into my office when they learnt that, without consulting them, I’d given Defence Secretary John Reid a list of questions that I believed needed answering before our troops marched south.

I’d just returned from Helmand where I’d met some brave US soldiers who, with a small number of recently arrived British forces were (literally) holding the fort at Lashkar Gah. They told me that they were never sure, when out on patrol, who was shooting at them. Bring a good fitter with you, they warned, you don’t want to be trapped out there in the dark. We sent plenty of good fitters but, from the beginning, they and their comrades were forced to fight in Helmand in a campaign that had been planned on the basis of inadequate intelligence-gathering, absurdly optimistic military assumptions and political decisions taken on the advice of generals and career diplomats who were certainly fighting a war, but not necessarily the one we thought we were fighting.

Rt Hon Kim Howells

Pontypridd

The present market forces and tax regime will cause many to be excluded from the housing market for their whole lifetime

Sir, Your reports on surging house prices and Conservative demands for tax breaks (Apr 4) crystallise a worry that is increasingly at the heart of many ageing households.

If house prices continue to rise, and the surge in housebuilding seems unlikely to slow or reverse matters, the present market forces and tax regime will concentrate wealth in fewer and fewer hands as many become excluded from the housing market, forcing more and more into rented accommodation for their lifetime. Where possible, good taxation should be a tolerable incentive for work and investment. Reducing the ability of generations to pass on wealth as housing or business investment is probably one of the biggest disincentives any government can lay on its citizens.

John Garstang

Rampton, Cambridge

“While approximately 7 per cent of primary legislation is enacted in Brussels, the total that comes directly on to the UK statute book is 70 per cent”

Sir, The selective use of statistics in the Clegg-Farage debate did nothing to advance the case for the UK’s continued EU membership. While

approximately 7 per cent of primary legislation is enacted in Brussels, the total that comes directly on to the UK statute book, often by qualified majority, is 70 per cent. What also demeaned the debate was the Deputy Prime Minister’s support for a referendum in the event of further significant transfers of power from Britain to the EU. This would, of course, be unlikely to happen, since any changes could be incorporated in the existing Lisbon Treaty, without the need for a referendum.

John Barker

Prestbury, Cheshire

Les hommes et les femmes de Royal Tunbridge Wells take a more continental approach to culture than their commoner neighbours

Sir, More than 50 years ago, the cinema in Tunbridge Wells advertised the Jacques Tati film Mon Oncle. The following week, the film moved to Tonbridge, where it was advertised as My Uncle. Voilà la différence.

George Welham

Wadhurst, E Sussex

Telegraph:

SIR – I read Sir Roger Bannister’s article on his epic race with great interest as it brought back memories for me. In May 1954 I was a young engineering assistant with the City of Oxford.

On the morning following the race, my colleague and I were summoned to the office of the City Engineer. There he instructed us to leave whatever we were doing, to draw a surveyor’s measuring chain from the store, check its accuracy and then proceed to the Iffley Road running ground. Our task was to measure the track’s inside lane, six inches in from the edge, to check that Sir Roger had run one mile, no more and no less.

I have often wondered what would have happened had we reported it to be a yard short, or whether we would have had the courage to have reported it thus.

Fortunately we were able to confirm the track’s accuracy and report to the City Engineer that Sir Roger had indeed run 1,760 yards in 3 minutes 59.4 seconds.

John Barrell
Andover, Hampshire

SIR – Fining Network Rail £70 million seems an odd way for a government to improve the punctuality of the country’s rail network.

Perhaps finding it extra money to cope with increased passenger numbers would have been a better solution. Another alternative might to renationalise of the whole network. Then the Government would only be able to blame itself.

Duncan Rayner
Sunningdale, Berkshire

SIR – Your leading article indicates that Network Rail is looking for more money for its future plans.

Based on my observation of Network Rail’s work on our local railway, I suggest that close scrutiny of its project management should be undertaken first. I have seen contractors sitting in vans at all times of day, reading papers or fast asleep, while expensively hired equipment lies idle. No private organisation could afford such a poor use of resources.

Ken Himsworth
Saxilby, Lincolnshire

Killing, not helping

SIR – Regarding Lord Falconer’s Bill on assisted dying, Richard Mountford insists that a change in the law is necessary because “assisted dying already takes place” although “the legal system is (rightly) reluctant to prosecute those who help a terminally ill loved one who wishes to end their own life”.

Mr Mountford does not reveal how he knows this, since “people do it secretly”, but even if he is correct, how does he know that such deaths are voluntary? And even if they are, why insist that the answer is killing rather than helping?

Ann Farmer
Woodford Green, Essex

Leaving the EU

SIR – Far from being the only means of leaving the EU, the use of Article 50 would scupper our chances of doing so since we would still be in it, but subject to (supposed) renegotiation. This would allow David Cameron to bamboozle the public for years with fake hopes of a new deal.

The only way out is for Britain to break the relevant treaties and leave. This act would explode the fallacy at the heart of the europhiles’ position, that our departure would leave the EU unchanged. In fact, our leaving would trigger the EU’s collapse.

Neither France nor Germany has the nerve to call an end to the farce but both would be secretly delighted if we took on the job. It is time to show yet again that when Europe needs saving there is only one nation it can look to.

John Sheridan Smith
Southampton

SIR – With regard to Janet Daley’s article on the European Union, public opinion is like the water in a boiler, with the various political parties acting as escape valves to prevent a dangerous build-up of pressure.

The way some europhiles would have it, all of the valves would be permanently shut, all the main parties being unfailingly pro-EU, no matter how high the pressure goes.

The appearance of Ukip might be considered an attempt to bleed off some of the pressure through a new valve. Those who dislike Nigel Farage and Ukip should consider whether the Front National, or Golden Dawn, are more to their taste.

Peter Davey
Bournemouth, Dorset

Competitive power

SIR – The Government still insists that we have a competitive electricity market and yet wind farms were paid a record £8.7 million last month not to generate. The total figure last year for not generating was £32 million which of course, we customers have to bear.

Compare the situation before privatisation. The Central Electricity Generating Board would have just instructed a plant not to run, without making any payments. Lower-cost generation was given priority so power stations competed to get their operating cost down.

John Spiller
Long Ashton, Somerset

Pots and kettles

SIR – John Avlon should not fetishise liberal capitalist democracy. All too often, Western democracies have resorted to rendition, torture, cyber-warfare, assassination, terrorism and war.

They keep the strangest company, from the kleptocratic Saudi regime, which is playing the destructive sectarian card against “apostate” Shi’ites, to Egypt’s military regime, which is issuing death sentences en masse. We’ve got to start practising what we preach. Then we can criticise Vladimir Putin.

Yugo Kovach
Winterborne Houghton, Dorset

Summer Time blues

SIR – British Summer Time was introduced during the First World War to save energy. But this is a fallacy because any energy saved in the light evening will be used in the dark morning.

Any mother can tell you how difficult it is to get a baby to sleep in broad daylight and how impossible it is to get an adolescent up in the dark.

Now we learn (report, March 30) that it also causes a spike in heart attacks. How many more examples of BST’s insidious nature are needed before we return to having GMT all year round?

Frankie Blend
Mere, Wiltshire

Planning inspectors’ subjective decisions

SIR – Monty Taylor appears happy that unelected civil servants – the planning departments of local councils and the Planning Inspectorate – have power to overrule the decisions of local planning committees, when the latter represent the local population likely to be affected by a development.

My understanding is that it is also in the power of the planners to overturn the planning committee’s decisions on points of planning law. This system seems highly undemocratic.

The autocratic power of the planners was brought home to me recently. My planning application received strong support from local residents, local parish council and borough councillors. But the planners did not like our house design. Why should the subjective opinions of planners regarding the aesthetics of a design be given so much more weight than those of local residents, especially when planning departments have pushed through some of the ugliest developments ever built in the past 100 years?

Peter Rusby
Stockbridge, Hampshire

Legal investigation

SIR – Having seen that there is now a call for the rail regulator to be investigated along with the energy regulator, I am wondering whether the outrageous idea that Islamic law should be adopted in this country, shouldn’t result in an investigation being made into the Law Society.

Peter Smith
Middleton, Suffolk

The Scottish play

SIR – Am I the only person other than the “mystery minister” to have listened to the afternoon play on Radio 4 recently which dramatised the meeting between David Cameron and Alex Salmond after a Yes vote in the Scottish referendum?

They eventually agreed that the Scots could keep the pound in return for the UK keeping the Faslane naval base. Will fiction become fact?

Pamela Gibson
Seaford, East Sussex

Call me a nuisance

SIR – I read that the Government intends to implement a Nuisance Calls Action Plan in order to tackle nuisance calls. So many people will ring up the Nuisance Calls Action Plan Centre to complain about nuisance calls that before long they will be the ones getting fined for wasting valuable government time.

Ivor Morgan
Lincoln

SIR – Dr Rowan Williams, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, contends that “The rich West is ruining our planet” (Opinion, March 30).

I suppose the elimination of smallpox, the virtual elimination of polio, the discovery of penicillin, day-patient cataract surgery, mobile phone and web technology which brings instant communication to millions in the developing world (bypassing inefficient infrastructure), and farming techniques which feed billions more than Thomas Malthus envisaged, are all examples of how the rich West is heaping misery upon the poor.

Dr Williams should have a little more faith in human ingenuity.

Steve Willis
Olney, Buckinghamshire

SIR – I was glad to read Dr Williams’s warnings about our responsibility for climate change in your headline last week.

Climate change has an overwhelming scientific consensus behind it, and will threaten the most impoverished citizens of our world in particular in the next century.

Unfortunately, it is still largely business of usual with regard to fossil fuel emissions. Action is drastically and urgently needed.

Graeme Elder
London SW19

SIR – Whose lifestyle does Dr Rowan Williams blame for the climate change that melted the ice from the last Ice Age?

Elizabeth Simpson
Fordington, Dorset

SIR – Water vapour is a greenhouse gas. It drives the natural cycle of evaporation from the oceans and precipitation on land that is essential to our primary food sources. No one should be surprised that an increase in surface temperature will result in greater evaporation, higher volumes of water vapour in the atmosphere and thereby more precipitation and flooding.

Climate change will happen from a variety of natural causes. We should focus our efforts on coping with the consequences rather than futile attempts to stave off the inevitable.

Frank Tomlin
Billericay, Essex

SIR – In writing about the devastating consequences of climate change, Rowan Williams is taking up the scriptural warning that failing to adhere to God’s commandments results in Judgment. The increase in greed, selfishness, debauchery, moral laxity and idol worship has been fuelled by permissive legislation. The Church has largely fallen in step and revised its teaching to become politically correct.

Yes, the burning of fossil fuels may contribute to the global warming crisis, but is it not possible that it is but a symptom of a deeper malady?

John Capel
Reading, Berkshire

SIR – We know that mathematical analysis of unstable processes has no predictive value, and it is folly to base political decisions on computer models valid only for a few days. Keeping the lights on is a first priority, and closing coal and gas power stations is reckless.

If 0.045 per cent of CO2 in the atmosphere is critical, and 0.035 per cent is not, then this will be easily solved by engines running on hydrogen rather than petrol. To do this over two to three decades is manageable, leading to the “hydrogen economy” which could solve energy problems for all time. Let’s get started.

John Evans
Cambridge

SIR – Any report that requires more than 2,000 pages to make its case, deals with matters that are beyond its brief and recommends that substantially more jobs for academics are required is not worth the paper it is written on.

Rather than joining the cacophony of debate on climate change, Dr Williams would do better to focus his efforts and preachings on the solution to many of the world’s problems, including man-made climate change, if it is indeed man-made: slowing the rate of population growth.

James Mattinson
Pathhead, Midlothian

Irish Times:

Sir, – In response to Frank McDonald’s call (Opinion & Analysis, April 4th) may I make the following suggestions, directed at the probem of how to reduce our greenhouse gas production to a level consistent with globally stabilising it.

First, identify the sources of methane and carbon dioxide production in agriculture and research how to reduce them. I suspect these may be artificial fertiliser production, animal feed mix composition, and fossil fuel use in product production and transport, especially bulky intermediate products. This suggests a need to revive mixed farming, with livestock of all kinds, tillage of food and fodder crops, and horticulture, in a large-scale managed system, owned co-operatively. Also to recycle all urban biomass waste back to the soil as fertiliser.

Second, on’t drive to work; live near workplace and all basic retail services. This implies a serious look at urban planning and public transport policies: a city should be seen as an interconnected mesh of local townships. It also implies amending taxation policy: car tax should be totally based on fuel and insurance on mileage; car design should be supportive of long life with occasional use. Note that with current internet technology, a network of rural towns could be equivalent to a city, and probably less energy-intensive.

Third, to facilitate residential mobility the rental market needs to be developed and seen as normal. Current finance policy dealing with the mortgage problem needs to encourage the bank to accept ownership of the house by the bank as cancelling the mortgage, with option to stay on as a tenant, or relocate, without negative equity burden. In this context if would be better if banking were a State-owned public service and owning a managed rental and maintenance service with local government participation.

Fourth, we need to address the problem of how to stabilise the human population on our finite planet, so far a taboo topic it seems. Perhaps via some sort of opt-in licensed skilled professional motherhood, with well-managed large families, with many childless aunts and uncles? All possible alternatives to wars and starvation need to be considered.

I look forward to some of these options emerging as topics for socioeconomic and political analysis in the media and in government. No doubt many others will emerge. Yours, etc,

DR ROY H W JOHNSTON,

Techne Associates,

Dublin 6.

Sir, – Frank McDonald’s excellent article reflecting on the findings of the latest IPCC report on climate change raises the issue of how to increase food production to meet the demands of a rapidly growing population. The idea of matching the demand by increasing beef and dairy output is alarming, given the proven contribution that livestock makes to carbon emissions.

As a non-vegetarian who enjoys eating meat in moderation, I do not necessarily advocate a meatless diet but I am very aware of the consequences, both health and environmental, of our addiction to animal protein. With so much focus at present on obesity and unhealthy eating, perhaps we should look at increasing awareness also of the environmental consequences of our food choices.

It takes about 10kg of feed to produce 1kg of beef and the resultant carbon emissions are the equivalent of driving a family car 170km. This kind of awareness might make people rethink a meat-every-day diet and introduce a greater proportion of non-meat and -dairy dishes into their menu planning. The rise of obesity and heart disease in countries such as Japan, which hitherto has had a low meat and almost zero dairy intake but is now adopting a more westernised diet, also highlights the wisdom of revising our eating habits. Yours, etc,

SALLY SWEENEY,

Carrigavantry,

Co Waterford

Sir, – Shane O’Doherty (Letters, April 4th) asks “would it be possible to measure the impact of suspending scarcely used bus lanes for a few months and allowing rush hour traffic the full road space to flow more quickly“? This is a misunderstanding of the purpose of bus lanes and the workings of traffic flow.

Traffic jams are all ultimately caused by conflicts in traffic flows – for instance, at junctions and roundabouts (and occasionally by accidents along roads). Tailbacks are caused by a traffic conflict ahead, and a lack of capacity at the point of conflict. The purpose of bus lanes is to change the priority of vehicles in reaching the points of conflict – giving a peak bus with 80 passengers priority over a car with an average of perhaps two occupants.

Suspending the operation of bus lanes would do nothing to improve overall traffic flows, as these are governed by the flows across and around junctions and roundabouts. The justification for the provision of bus lanes is that it minimises the average journey time for road users as a whole. Yours, etc,

TIM WILSON,

Watson Park,

Killiney,

Co Dublin

Sir, – I have to point out the folly of Shane O’Doherty’s suggestion (Letters, April 4th ) that bus lanes be opened up to cars at rush hour. The choke points on Dublin’s traffic system are not on the “empty” lengths of bus lane but at the many junctions on its radial routes and the bridges across the rivers and canals, where there is often no bus lane.

All Mr O’Doherty’s suggestion would do is move the queue nearer the junction – it would in no way hasten deliveries, workers or shoppers through the junction. However, it would have a devastating effect on the service speed of bus journeys and the safety of pedal cycle journeys and send many of those users to their own cars, which would in turn further congest the choke points and in the process delay Mr O’Doherty and everyone else even more. Based on Dublin City Council’s annual cordon counts, we must note that cars are 80 per cent of the traffic but carry less than 40 per cent of the passengers. However, I will commend the car for one thing: it is the most efficient system in the world for moving empty seats, as cars are typically 75 per cent empty. Yours, etc,

COLM MOORE,

Kenilworth Square,

Dublin 6

Sir, — George Orwell, in “Politics and the English Language”, identifies “euphemism, question-begging and sheer cloudy vagueness” as three elements of insincere political language.

This rich tradition lives on in labels such as “family values”. Just as forbidding people full closure of unsalvageable relationships in the form of divorce cannot credibly be aligned with “family values”, neither is it very pro-life to uphold restrictive abortion laws which, according to the World Health Organisation, have no effect on abortion rates but do increase maternal mortality rates.

Fact is another much-abused word. Mr Stack speaks of “the simple fact that up to half of the State’s voters are being ignored”. Does he honestly believe that up to half of Ireland would oppose divorce in 2014? Furthermore, the most recent poll in this paper (June 12th, 2013) showed overwhelming support for less restrictive abortion laws.

If “family values voters” wish to see their views validated, they will need to abandon the mainstream media: the consensus Mr Stack identifies therein merely reflects a consensus in the population at large. Yours, etc,

WILSON JOYCE,

Main Street,

Chapelizod,

Dublin 20

Sir, – Jim Stack is of course perfectly entitled to express his views and his belief that they are underrepresented in the media and political life. What is objectionable is the hijacking of the term “family values” for a brand of social conservatism, ie anti-marriage equality, anti-divorce and anti-choice.

Are these views “pro-family“? I would suggest in the case of a loving gay couple or even a heterosexual couple wishing to remarry; or the case of a growing family that has to deal with the terrible dilemma of whether or not to carry a foetus with “a condition not compatible with life” to term, government enforcement of such “family values” would be most definitely “anti-family”. Yours, etc,

NEIL BARRETT ,

Shelford,

Cambridge,

United Kingdom

Sir, – Brian Devitt (Letters, April 2nd) suggests that the average GP earns €250,000 per annum. This is not true. I do not know whether it is the average GMS payment to doctors or not but it is certainly not earnings, which can be defined as wages or profit. Mr Devitt confuses turnover with earnings. A doctor’s expenses include basic costs like rent/mortgage of premises, heat, lighting, general and water rates, insurance – of personnel and premises, computer systems, medical indemnity, as well as the employment of receptionist(s) and nurse(s). The heaviest expenses, particularly for those in single-handed practices, are locum ones.

Every day I go to work I take the complaints and cares of others on my shoulders. I carry oxygen and a defibrillator, morphine and adrenalin. I am prepared to deal with minor headaches and major brain tumours, to try to differentiate between indigestion and heart attacks, to listen to hypochondriacs and the terminally ill, to vaccinate babies and suture lacerations. I drive alone to strange houses in the dark and try to help people in distress. My default setting is being at the service of the public 24/7/365 .

I would like to know exactly how much Mr Devitt thinks I should earn for this work, and these working conditions. Yours, etc,

DR VALERIE COLLINS,

Market Street,

Killorglin,

Sir, – I respectfully disagree with the recent correspondence criticising that traditional bastion of the male wardrobe, the suit. So many of these critics have closed their minds to the garment’s possibilities and have, very probably, never experienced the joy of a handmade suit created just for them.

Unlike both Harry McGee (Fashion, April 2nd) and John Thompson (Letters, April 3rd) I love to wear a well-cut suit and have done so for many years. Indeed, if I may say so, MrMcGee looked far more commanding a presence in the Canali suit he was being persuaded to buy in Brown Thomas than in his uninspiring, if practical, comfortwear.

And surely if one must commute by bicycle (a commendable, even brave, decision!) isn’t it normal practice to travel in one’s cycling gear and change into the suit when one reaches one’s workplace? I have managed for years to travel in complete comfort on public transport and to arrive at work with the degree of sartorial elegance I desire.

A bespoke, hand-tailored suit is something to appreciate and can be described as the creation of a skilled craftsman. Nor need a suit be a symbol of “dull uniformity” as Mr Thompson asserts. Indeed it is a garment which boasts a vast array of possibilities, both in terms of style, material, shade and weight. Materials range from the heavier, such as flannel or serge for the cooler Irish climate, to more breathable varieties such as a cool, lightweight wool or light gabardine which, unlike the linen look Mr McGee complains of, won’t crumple so much.

Pinstripes, rope stripes, subtle plaids and houndstooth make for interesting patterns and a gentleman need not limit himself to the boring palette of navy, dark grey and black. What of light grey in spring or summer or the vast varieties of which blue offers in addition to simple navy? Shades of brown, olive, and tan were also once popular choices, though not so much in recent years, yet these too would be less formal and provide variety and contrast.

Finally, I note that the “suit” which so many Irish men have, inexplicably, adopted as regular daywear in the last decade or so is the last refuge of the sartorially bankrupt: the track suit. Yours, etc,

DAVID MARLBOROUGH,

Rowanbyrn,

Sir, Your supplement (April 4th) on Anglo-Irish relations carries the headline “Normal Relations Finally Restored”, implying that relations between the two countries have been “normal” at some time in the past.

When would you suggest that that was? 1168 perhaps? Yours, etc,

FERGUS CAHILL,

Cuil Ghlas,

Dunboyne,

Co Meath

Irish Independent:

Letters to the Editor – Published 07 April 2014 02:30 AM

* AFTER nearly a thousand years with an axe to grind with perfidious Albion, Michael D has been dispatched to bury the hatchet with Queen Elizabeth. About time, too. The new relationship between our two islands deserves to be defined and the spectacle of a state visit is the appropriate window dressing. When the queen came to call on us, she showed real statecraft, but it was her own quiet dignity and respect for the pain of our shared past that resonated.

Also in this section

Garda cadetship vital

We must move from organ donor cards to a list

Put lead in your pencil and use your vote

She set the bar very high for Michael D, but in his own unique way Michael is also a force to be reckoned with. I, for one, hope that this time he will step away from the academic lectern and speak not in the language of lofty metaphor with allusions to Greek and Roman mythologies, but instead that he will ground his message in the legacies of the ghosts of all the navvies whose hobnailed boots were worn to the heel on the Kilburn Road.

The Irish and English working man have always had a respect for each other.

Let’s not get misty-eyed – there was racism and discrimination – but that is the nature of tuppence ha’penny looking down on tuppence.

The politicians and royalty will set their seal on our new era, but these ties were first made by working men. These days, the Irish in London are more likely to be graduates, and more luck to them.

What matters most of all is that the focus of the future must be on what we have in common rather than the tragedies of the past.

M O’BRIEN

SANDYCOVE, CO DUBLIN

EIRCOM ‘SYSTEMS ERRORS’

* As one of the Eircom customers to be notified by post, last Wednesday, that “due to a systems error” the direct debit had not been taken from my bank account, I was not too sure if the error was mine or the bank’s – but there was no indication that it was the fault of Eircom, and there was no hint of an apology.

I then spent over an hour trying to contact the special unit which had been set up to deal with the problem – and upon reaching person number seven, he was the first to understand what I was talking about.

The best that he could do was suggest I should come to some arrangement with my bank.

When I pointed out that subsequent bills from Eircom carried the usual receipt acknowledgement and, therefore, there was no question of my account having any arrears – his response was that that didn’t matter.

I suggested that Judge Judy would have a different view and that Joe Duffy would probably get about a week out of this. He told me that I still had to pay my bill.

But by going down the direct debit route, isn’t that what I was trying to do in the first place?

Oh, I almost forgot. Eircom did let me know that they would delete the €11.50 fine for nonpayment of the direct debit.

So everything is OK now. . . ?!

RJ HANLY

SCREEN, CO WEXFORD

GAA’S WRONG PRIORITIES

* The recent decision by the GAA to enter into a contract agreement with Sky Broadcasting is a wrong call. There were several options open to the GAA to bring our games to a greater audience. In fact, most Irish people abroad have a number of options available to them to view our games.

This is going to deny many genuine fans here at home the opportunity to see up to 14 matches this season and obviously this is only the beginning.

It also leaves many questions for the future of the national broadcaster, which has a long tradition with the association.

The GAA authorities are losing focus. Too much interest in commercialism!

MARTIN CROWLEY

MIDLETON, CO CORK

HURLING: A WORLD SPORT

* I am an old man, like Simeon was when he held the child Jesus in his arms. Now that hurling will begin to be shown to the outside world via a major international broadcasting company, I, too, can die happy, but hopefully not for some time yet.

JOSEPH MACKEY

GLASSON, ATHLONE

VALUING WHAT WE HAVE

* I was never much of a GAA player – in fact you could call me useless – but when I lived in Boston and then Riyadh, it didn’t really matter, because just taking part in training and organising was enough. The fun and bonding was a great experience, and knowing an Irish community was there in the GAA was a great comfort.

There’s very little left in Ireland that I can say is brilliant, but the rise of the GAA in the last few decades has been one of those fantastic success stories. It has managed to bring the sport into the modern era, make it cool and fashionable, and bring it into the larger towns and cities while still hanging on to its country base, allowing both societies to blend into one. It’s been a remarkable feat – and even more remarkable is that it has been done by local communities run by volunteers.

For some reason, the GAA have now decided that money is their prime objective – not sport, and not the communities that make up this organisation. We have probably one of the most unique voluntary sports organisations in the world and now they have decided to take the first step in destroying this icon.

So they have decided to sell out to Sky. Can they not see and appreciate what we have? If they go ahead with this, it will be the beginning of the end of a wonderful organisation. The people’s organisation – the GAA.

DAVID HENNESSY

RATHNEW, CO WICKLOW

A HUG SOLVES … NOTHING

* So, ‘Disgusting-gate’ is not over yet. It looks like this phone-a-friend story is ‘Shatter-proof’. Now that the commissioner has retired/resigned/ been pushed, it shows that behind each good man is a good woman. The new Interim Commissioner has bravely announced that her force “will embrace whistleblowers”. Ah, sure there’s nothing like a good old hug to put things right.

SEAN KELLY

TRAMORE, CO WATERFORD

NO AWARD FOR ‘THE IFFYS’

* Sitting a collection of Irish provincial film and TV industry egos at round tables and allowing them access to booze before an awards ceremony for their peers, with a crowd constantly and rudely chattering throughout the live presentations, made for truly cringeworthy television. A better name for this embarrassing mediocrity would be ‘the IFFYs’!

K NOLAN

CARRICK-ON-SHANNON, CO LEITRIM

THE WALLS HAVE EARS

* Given the ongoing controversy about garda phone bugging, Liam Power says that it “begs the question as to how many others were also surreptitiously eavesdropped on” (Letters, April 5).

When the technology is there to allow people who have an interest in such things to know what you had for your breakfast, why are we surprised?

In the competitive world of crime prevention, the principle is that the technology is there and it would be incompetent not to use it.

The implication of that fact is that all of us should conduct our affairs in such a way that we could sell the family parrot to the town gossip.

Nowadays the family parrot is everywhere. And even worse, the town gossip is also everywhere.

What Liam Power calls the “GUBU-esque” furore about access to data is, therefore, so 1980s – and ignores the surveillance realities of the 21st Century.

A LEAVY

SUTTON, DUBLIN 13


Hospital

$
0
0

8 April2014 yet another hospital visit

I go all the way around the park listening to the Men from the Ministry: our heroes have to negotiate a treaty for part of the planet Venus Priceless

Mary in hospital visit her play Scrabble I win just for once

Scrabbletoday, I wins

Perhaps Iwill win again tomorrow.

Obituary:

Mickey Rooney – obituary

Mickey Rooney was an icon of American youth and energy who was as prolific in his marriages as he was on screen

Mickey Rooney

Mickey Rooney Photo: REX FEATURES

5:58PM BST 07 Apr 2014

Comments15 Comments

Mickey Rooney, the actor, who has died aged 93, was in the Thirties and for much of the Forties the very image of how Americans liked to think of themselves — brash, energetic and eternally young.

As a child star and later a teenager, he epitomised American get-up-and-go, with a cheeky, cocksure arrogance that won him a wide following, especially in the United States. Though he never got an Oscar for his work, in 1938 he shared a special award with Deanna Durbin “for their significant contribution in bringing to the screen the spirit and personification of youth, and as juvenile players setting a high standard of ability and achievement”. In keeping with their stature, the awards were pint-size Oscars.

GALLERY: Mickey Rooney’s life in pictures

Mickey Rooney in a film still for Not to be Trusted (REX FEATURES)

Diminutive but pugnacious, Rooney managed to look like an adolescent until well into maturity. He was still playing Andy Hardy, the chirpy judge’s son which was his most famous role, until the late Forties, when he was nearly 30.

Like many young players renowned in their teens, however, Rooney found difficulty in landing suitable adult roles. He continued to work and was prolific into, and beyond, his seventies – at the age of 90 he filmed a cameo for The Muppets (2011). But the parts were seldom challenging and many of his films barely received a cinema release even in America.

He became better known for his private life than for his work. A prodigious earner at the peak of his popularity, he amassed some $12 million but kept none of it. Most of it went in back taxes and to pay alimony to his many wives (he had eight, of whom the first, Ava Gardner, was the best known). By 1962, he was forced to file for bankruptcy.

Ava Gardner and Mickey Rooney after their marriage in 1942 (REX FEATURES)

Drink was also a problem, but one to which the solution appeared in remarkable circumstances. As he recounted it, he was dining in a Los Angeles restaurant when up stepped a heavenly messenger with bright golden hair. “God loves you,” the angel said. From that moment Mickey Rooney was a born-again Christian and mended his ways. None of his fellow diners saw the angel.

Mickey Rooney’s real name was Joe Yule Jr. He was born in Brooklyn on September 23 1920, the son of vaudeville performers Joe Yule and Nell Carter, who divorced when he was seven. He joined the act almost from the cradle and, at the age of only 15 months, appeared on stage as a midget, dressed in a tuxedo and sporting a huge rubber cigar. At six, he was a movie actor, making his screen debut (again as a midget) in Not to Be Trusted (1926).

His real screen career began when his mother saw an advertisement placed by the cartoonist Fontaine Fox, who was looking for a child to impersonate his comic strip character Mickey McGuire. Fox took a shine to the boy and he got the job, appearing in some 80 episodes between 1926 and 1932, when the series was wound up. In fact, he was so closely identified with the part that his mother wanted him to adopt the name Mickey McGuire professionally. Fox refused so he became Mickey Rooney instead.

In his early years Rooney worked for a number of studios and was eventually placed under contract by MGM because David O Selznick thought he would be ideal to play Clark Gable as a boy in the film Manhattan Melodrama (1934). MGM guaranteed him 40 weeks’ work a year but reserved the right to loan him out to other studios.

One such arrangement, with Warner Bros, resulted in the best performance of Rooney’s career, as the mischievous Puck in Max Reinhardt’s 1935 production of A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Barely 15 at the time, he was perfect casting — impish and with a gurgling laugh that might be construed as innocent or knowing; it was hard to tell.

At MGM, his career took off in 1937 when he first played Andy Hardy, son of Lionel Barrymore’s Judge Hardy in A Family Affair. Planned only as a programme filler, based on a minor Broadway play, it became an unexpected hit and exhibitors begged MGM for a sequel. In the end, the series ran to 15 episodes over the next 10 years, with one ill-judged afterthought in 1958, Andy Hardy Comes Home. Lewis Stone replaced Barrymore as the judge after the first film.

Judy Garland and Mickey Rooney in Strike up the Band (REX FEATURES)

Rooney appeared in much else besides, often opposite the equally youthful Judy Garland. In such films as Thoroughbreds Don’t Cry (1937); Babes in Arms (1939); Strike Up the Band (1940); Babes on Broadway (1942); and several of the Andy Hardy series, they became the most popular team in movies. He also played a juvenile delinquent opposite Spencer Tracy’s priest in Boys’ Town (1938), and its 1941 sequel Men of Boys’ Town and took the title role in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1939).

The success of these films and especially of the Andy Hardy pictures was good for Rooney’s image but bad for his ego. Increasingly bumptious and swollen-headed, he was the only actor on record to have come to blows with MGM’s feared studio boss Louis B Mayer. Rooney wanted the rights to do the Andy Hardy series on radio as well and lost his temper when Mayer said no. Rooney got a hike in salary out of the fracas, but Andy Hardy was never broadcast.

During the war, Rooney served in the Jeep Theatre, entertaining more than two millin troops, but was unable to recover his popularity in peacetime. Summer Holiday (1948), a musical version of Ah Wilderness!, proved a dismal failure, while nobody had anything good to say of Words and Music (also 1948), in which he played lyricist Lorenz Hart to Tom Drake’s Richard Rodgers. What attracted particular criticism was that the script ignored Hart’s homosexuality, portraying him as a red-blooded American male.

Judy Garland and Mickey Rooney in Babes in Arms (REX FEATURES)

Rooney’s subsequent film career was mostly a catalogue of further disappointments. Especially regrettable was his bucktoothed Japanese photographer in Breakfast at Tiffany’s (1961) and his contribution to Stanley Kramer’s leaden comedy It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World (1963).

Against these and many equally as bad, can be set only occasional high points, such as Baby Face Nelson (1957), in which he was cast against type as a Tommy gun-wielding gangster; Pulp (1972), again as a gangster, this time inviting Michael Caine to write his memoirs, and The Black Stallion (1979), for which he received an Academy Award nomination (but did not win) in his supporting role as a horse trainer.

In 1983 he was presented with a second Oscar honouring his lifetime’s work. By the end of his career he had appeared in several hundred films.

He enjoyed a big stage hit in 1979 with a nostalgic tribute to vaudeville called Sugar Babies opposite the dancer Ann Miller. It ran for five years on and off Broadway but failed to translate successfully to London.

In 2003 Rooney and his eighth wife Jan Chamberlin began an association with Rainbow Puppet Productions, providing voices for some of the company’s films. Four years later, in 2007, Rooney made a debut in British pantomime as Baron Hardup in Cinderella at the Sunderland Empire, a role he reprised in the subsequent two years at Bristol and Milton Keynes.

In 2011, as well as his role in The Muppets, he appeared in an episode of Celebrity Ghost Stories, recalling how his dead father had appeared to him one night at a low point in his career telling him not to give up.

Rooney published two volumes of autobiography, of which the second, Life Is Too Short (1992), was conspicuously ungallant about such former movie queens as Norma Shearer and Betty Grable.

Mickey Rooney married, first, Ava Gardner; secondly Betty Jane Rase; thirdly Martha Vickers; fourthly Elaine Mahnken (all the marriages were dissolved). He married, fifthly, Barbara Thomason (who was shot dead by her lover in what may have been a double suicide pact); sixthly Margie Lang; seventhly Carolyn Hockett (both dissolved); and eighthly Jan Chamberlin, who survives him. He had seven children.

Mickey Rooney, born September 23 1920, died April 6 2014

Guardian:

y Devlin/PA

The communities secretary, Eric Pickles, gave an odd speech at the Conservative conference at the weekend (Report, 7 April). We were told that Britain is a Christian nation, which is true, and “militant atheists” should all “get over it”. Yet he failed to understand what it is that secularists are actually campaigning for. We don’t mind that most people are Christian. We definitely don’t mind Christianity being a part of public discourse. What we object to is Christianity, as a majority opinion, being imposed on everyone else. We believe that everyone should be on a level playing field, regardless of their beliefs, and that the state shouldn’t favour one particular religion.

On the specific example he cites, prayer in council meetings, he completely misses the point. The problem is that it shouldn’t be part of the formal meeting. People have a right to pray wherever and whenever they like, but they don’t have a right to force it on to other people or force it onto the official minutes. If, for example, the majority of people became atheists, we would still have no right to begin any council meeting with an ode to Richard Dawkins.
Christopher Curtis
Milton Keynes

• Giles Fraser (Comment, 7 April) rightly takes Eric Pickles to task for crass Christian flag-waving at the Conservative conference, but then refers to “a handful of middle-class atheists who think that reading half a chapter of The Selfish Gene at university has turned them into zeitgeist-surfing cultural radicals”. Most of the many atheists I know have considered their position very deeply, and have read widely in forming their view. Not all people who call themselves Christian have thought as conscientiously about the belief they hold.
Paul Surman
Oxford

•  If this is a Christian country (which I would like to think it is), why does the current government seem so much to enjoy humiliating the poor, the sick and the unemployed, and driving them into destitution; a very unchristian course of action. No, Eric Pickles, it is not a Christian country.
David Santamaria
Bushey, Hertfordshire

Thank goodness for the perceptively eloquent Ian Jack alerting us to the virtual extinction of our once broad industrial base (Britain’s manufacturing workforce may soon be gone. Will no one act? 5 April). The biggest cause of this is the increasingly open borders which have decimated our domestic manufacturing. In response, the “globalisation is unstoppable” brigade can only babble about “rebalancing” and indulge in delusional ravings about the “march of the makers” pluckily triumphing in export markets. Let’s get real here: this hasn’t, isn’t and can’t happen. The only way to rediversify UK manufacturing is to protect it with a “site-here-to-sell-here” approach. At this point the unimaginative will splutter: “But we are part of a single market of open borders?”

Haven’t they noticed that the socially and politically corrosive free movement of people is being rejected by the majority of Europeans? The result is increasing talk of stopping it by renegotiating the EU treaty. To be logically consistent, we also need to introduce a continent-wide reduction in the flow of money and goods as well. The young struggling to get on the housing ladder are waking up to the disastrous effect of the uncontrolled influx of foreign capital purchasing an estimated 85% of prime London property.

Yet it appears that only the extreme right is willing to make the case that globalisation has to be halted by taking back control of national borders. As a result, the right is expected to romp home in next month’s Euro elections. Isn’t it time that Europe’s left, greens and small-c conservatives, all desirous of sustainable and democratically controlled local economies, united to consider working towards a co-operative grouping of nation states that can at last legislate for a more protected, secure and hopeful future for their citizens.
Colin Hines
Author, Progressive Protectionism

• I was pleased to read UK unemployment was around 1% in the 1950s (What does ‘full employment’ actually mean?, G2, 2 April). But I doubt Beveridge defined it as 3%, when he wanted more jobs than workers because lack of work was more distressing for a worker than lack of an employee was for a business.

And not everyone who wants a job can get one under Nairu [the non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment]. Its pool of people who must live on benefits frightens those in employment enough to curb their pay. Full employment cannot be sustained if businessmen raise prices and depress wages to optimise their company’s profits.
George CA Talbot
Watford, Hertfordshire

• You praise a company that replaced 4,000 workers with 100 and achieved great productivity success (Hints from an old textile town on how to solve Britain’s ‘productivity puzzle’, 1 April). Another word for this is efficiency. But will you next claim the resultant unemployment is the fault of lazy, shiftless benefits cheats? It’s time for all of us to rethink what we mean by productivity and efficiency and take a hard, cold look at who gains from their pursuit. I suggest that inefficiency is more democratic and better for the society as a whole. If it takes more people to produce something, there will be less profit for the wealthy and more work for everyone.
Proctor Taylor
Rushlake Green, East Sussex

I was sad to see Sam Wollaston (TV review, 4 April) considers that “good entertaining television” justifies the showing of yet another programme that reinforces the false view that all our jobless teenagers are workshy, ill-mannered and undeserving, but asserts that “recent arrivals from Eastern Europe are nice and hardworking”. All the teenagers I know fit into the category nice and hardworking, jobless or not. Sam should get out more.
Margaret Hermon
Clitheroe, Lancashire

• The death of an outstanding politician, committed to social welfare, human rights and personal responsibility, should have made the front of every national newspaper. By displacing Margo MacDonald‘s passing to page 12 in favour of Sir Bruce’s “provisional retirement” (Didn’t he do well? Brucie bows out, 5 April), was the Guardian making a bigger political point?
Dr Phil Barker and Poppy Buchanan-Barker
Fife

• It was interesting to read that millionaire wind farm owner Juliet Davenport considers Cornish villagers battered by her company’s PR machine to be “a privileged vocal minority”(Report, 5 April ).
Stuart Mealing
Holsworthy, Devon

• “We want to deliver the wind that’s been built already,” says a government source (Tories plan 2020 ban on onshore windfarms, 5 April). Let’s hope it doesn’t get lost in the post now that the Royal Mail has been privatised.
Peter Bendall
Cambridge

• Your reporter (Dorries goes on Mersey mission as a novelist, 5 April) writes of the “much maligned” saga genre. Maligned by who, I wonder? Guardian journos? Or the thousands of people who enjoy reading them? (And, yes, I am a saga writer).
Annie Murray
Purley on Thames, Berkshire

• This endless cataloguing of town names (Letters, 7 April) in the attempt to raise a laugh has become rather Dull (Perthshire, twinned with Boring, Oregon) and should end forthwith.
Margaret Squires
St Andrews

Congratulations to Sir Richard Thompson, President of the Royal College of Physicians, on his frank diagnosis of the NHS and for telling it as it is (Report, 5 April). His description of overworked clinicians “running around like scalded cats” vividly sums up the sense of pressure doctors are facing in the NHS. And he rightly highlights the fact that the NHS is under-doctored, under-nursed, under-bedded and under-funded.

Like physicians, psychiatrists are under pressure to deliver quality care with a minimum of resources. They witness the distress of patients and carers who are sent long distances to receive care because they are unable to access local services. Children as young as 12 are being left on adult psychiatric wards – which is completely unacceptable. And the decline in old age psychiatry as a result of “ageless services” means older people with mental health issues are not receiving the specialist care they need.

The real risk in all this is finance becoming a bigger driver than care and compassion, which brings us back to what none of us want – a recurrence of what happened at Mid Staffordshire.
Professor Sue Bailey
President, Royal College of Psychiatrists

Independent:

It is time that the issue of MPs’ expenses was resolved. The current situation brings the whole House of Commons into disrepute.

A constituency, probably in outer London, should be selected and a commission established to determine a reasonable level of expenses for the work of the MP of that constituency. A figure should be determined for each other constituency using the first as a baseline. MPs would receive the amount determined for their constituency with no deductions or additions for any reason. The savings in administration would be substantial.

Constituents would decide, ultimately via the ballot box, whether they were receiving value for money. As long as an MP provided a service that satisfied their constituents then how the money was spent would be irrelevant. They could employ anyone, member of their family or not. Erroneous claims could not happen, because there would be no claims.

Phil Smith, Maidenhead, Berkshire

There is a lot of coverage about an individual politician’s expenses. This suits a lot of people who believe politicians are generally corrupt, and distracts attention from our political system itself. People want to scapegoat individuals and focus on personalities. However, our whole political system needs substantial reform.

Our electoral system distorts the outcome of a vote; there is no recall of MPs; we don’t elect our House of Lords and they are unaccountable; we don’t elect our head of state; little has changed since universal suffrage in 1928, and just having the vote isn’t enough. They had the vote in the Soviet Union. Above all, we only have a meaningful vote for our legislature every five years.

Martin Peters, Taunton, Somerset

Andrew Mitchell was jettisoned by the Prime Minister and forced to resign as Chief Whip for allegedly calling a jobsworth policeman at the gates to Downing Street a pleb – an allegation Mr Mitchell has consistently denied. Yet Maria Miller retains Mr Cameron’s “warm support” despite a serious finding of non-cooperation with the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards and the perfunctory apology that she gave to the House of Commons on 3 April. And this is to leave aside the fact that Mrs Miller was required to repay £5,800 admittedly over-claimed by her in respect of mortgage interest on her London home.

Once again the Prime Minister’s judgment is called into question.

David Lamming, Boxford, Suffolk

It is my experience that anyone caught fiddling their state benefits is not only made to repay their ill-gotten gains in full but can be lumbered with a substantial fine to boot.

Mrs Miller, on the other hand, is asked (asked, mind you) to repay £45,000 of our money, only to have it later reduced to a paltry £5,800. But never mind, she has Mr Cameron’s full support, which speaks volumes about his judgement and the character of this government.

David Hooley, Newmarket, Suffolk

You are right to call for an end to MPs policing colleagues’ expenses (editorial, 7 April). But MPs’ expenses are only the latest example of self-regulation failing. Is there any sector where self-regulation is actually effective?

Dr Alex May, Manchester

Visitor let down by British police

I recently graduated from the University of London, and travelled from Hong Kong to attend the ceremony. I was an LLB student, paying more than £20,000 into the UK economy for my course. Happily, they taught me much about the law.  Unfortunately, my visit to London taught me some unwelcome lessons about the English justice system.

I was celebrating my success with a small group of overseas friends in a smart restaurant in Bayswater when my handbag was surreptitiously stolen by two nearby diners. The culprits left behind a mobile phone and there was CCTV operating.

If this had happened in Hong Kong, a posse of policemen would have taken action within minutes of my reporting a crime, in an effort to apprehend the culprit, either on the premises or in the vicinity. But this is London.

In response to my 999 call, I was told that there was no death or injury, so no policemen would be sent. I was shocked to be told that the nearby police stations had all closed for the day, so I would have to make my way to West End Central station to make a report. After a long wait in line, I made my report to one of only two officers on duty there.

They gamely attempted to show interest, but were clearly overworked and dispirited. When I requested a printout of my report for insurance and passport purposes, I was informed that all I could have was a crime reference number.

Some days later, I received an email from the case management unit, claiming they were investigating but effectively closing the case. Without a trace of irony, the email incorporated a mission statement from the Metropolitan Police Service: “Total Policing is the Met’s commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims.”

We have learned that an abiding strength of Hong Kong society is our rule of law, perhaps the greatest legacy bestowed by Great Britain. But now I fear that the rule of law will quickly evaporate if the enforcement agency is abolished.

Becky Kwan, Kowloon, Hong Kong

The revelation by the Metropoliitan Police Federation that there is a “climate of fear” within the Met will come as no surprise to rank-and-file officers.

There has always been a culture of bullying and manipulation of crime figures within the police service. This has been exacerbated in the Met since 2011 and is now endemic. Grillings reminiscent of The Wire and sackings of borough commanders by senior Scotland Yard officers have become common knowledge throughout the force and this target culture works its way down the ranks.

Chris Hobbs, London W7

English tradition of multiculturalism

I was surprised by Edward Thomas’s reminiscences of monocultural Cockney Hackney in the 1950s (letter, 4 April). When I arrived at university in London at that time, one of my first excitements was meeting the very clever, articulate Jewish students from Hackney Grammar School, alma mater of Harold Pinter among others.

A few years later I lived and taught in Hackney and “monocultural” is the last adjective I should have used. Many of my pupils had East European or German surnames, their parents and grandparents having fled Nazi Germany or the earlier generation of Russo-Polish pogroms. My neighbours were Hasidic Jews from Czechoslovakia who spoke Yiddish at home.

I don’t suppose the residents of Hackney “asked for diversity” but they had welcomed the immigrants with generosity and in return got bread and bagels from Grodzinskis even on Christmas Day and wonderful smoked salmon and pickled herrings in the market.

I like to think of this multiculturalism as a part of the “English way of life” recalled by your correspondent.

Jenny Bryer, Birmingham

BBC guidelines on climate science

I disagree with the view that the BBC needs clearer editorial guidelines on the reporting of climate change (“The BBC must not confuse climate change with politics”, editorial, 2 April). The BBC already has editorial guidelines, which are approved by the BBC Trust, alongside a robust complaints process which ensures that concerns about content are dealt with without fear or favour.

In our 2011 impartiality review of the BBC’s coverage of science, the Trust directed the BBC to ensure that equal weight should not be given to well established fact as opposed to personal opinion on this topic. We note that the BBC has said that it seeks to avoid this happening.

Alison Hastings, BBC Trustee, London W1

Cross-channel smog goes both ways

In reports about the pollution cloud which affected parts of the UK last week, and to which continental Europe contributed, why was it never mentioned that, since the prevailing wind here is from the west, usually the reverse happens?

The Low Countries and northern France have no choice but to suffer, sometimes for weeks on end, pollution exported from Britain. I am myself from Lille, in northern France.

Paul Watremez, Bournemouth

Addicted to e-cigarettes?

Does Janet Street-Porter (5 April) have any evidence that e-cigarettes are causing addiction? I understood that such research as is available suggested that, overwhelmingly, they were being used by smokers trying to give up. If so, her remedies would be wholly counterproductive.

Michael Dempsey, London E1

Times:

Sir, The Prime Minister’s wish to retain Maria Miller in his Cabinet and “move on” (Apr 7) demonstrates arrogance and how out of touch he is with the world beyond Westminster. Instead of trying to defend the indefensible he should concentrate on working with Unionists in energising the lacklustre No campaign in the Scotland referendum because unless this referendum is made a political imperative the breakup of the UK and consequential decline in our global standing are at hand.

Professor Cedric D. Bell

Liphook, Hants

Sir, As an expat Scot, living in England, I share your readers’ abhorrence of Miller’s expense claims, of her cronies in Parliament overruling the independent watchdog’s findings and the Prime Minister seeing nothing wrong in it.

I also share the frustration at the lack of a credible alternatives to the three main parties which are alike in their greed and disdain for voters. I am worried about the impact this will have on the Scottish referendum in September. People resident in Scotland do have an alternative (I purposely do not use the word credible) and can show their opprobrium of MPs in Westminster by voting Yes to independence.

I believe that Cameron has just handed a trump card to the SNP.

Bob Raeburn

Froggatt, Derbyshire

Sir, You report that the chairman of the Conservative Party has suggested that it is time to draw a line under the matter of Maria Miller’s expense claims. No, it is time for Maria Miller to go, and if Grant Shapps cannot see that then he too should go. We cannot afford to have people who behave in this dishonest way involved in our Government.

Professor Colin Davidson,

Ardfern, Argyll

Sir, May I ask how many of your readers would be able to claim reimbursement for their parents’ accommodation?

The scrutiny arrangements for MPs’ expenses seem to me badly flawed if MPs can simply ignore the findings at will, and have the Prime Minister endorse their behaviour.

Of course, to retain Ms Miller in charge of arrangements for policing the press does show that Mr Cameron still has a sense of humour.

John Harris

Winchester

Sir, You say (leader, Apr 5) that the Maria Miller saga is not over yet because despite the recent reforms of the allowances system, it is not close to working well.

The Maria Miller saga could not have happened under the new system because we have banned MPs from claiming for mortgage interest payments. The idea of the taxpayer supporting an MP in building a property portfolio was one of the practices from the past most strongly objected to.

You suggest giving MPs a sum of money with no receipts or questions, and so no transparency, as a way of avoiding future scandals.

I would argue that such a solution based on removing transparency doesn’t remove the likelihood of a future scandal, rather it guarantees one.

The reformed system has stopped the egregious practices of the past and saved the taxpayer a huge sum of money — £35m and counting.

The 80 per cent fall in claims at Employment Tribunals masks a vast human tragedy. It is time for a thorough review

Sir, I support Caspar Glyn QC’s call (letter Apr 3) on the Government to urgently review the effect of the introduction of fees for Employment Tribunal claims, which are now down to just a fifth of previous levels.

Employment Tribunals were a practical and cost-effective means of redress for workers denied basic employment rights such as the right to wages due, the minimum wage, minimum holiday and the right not to be dismissed or ill-treated arbitrarily or for discriminatory reasons.

Those most in need of employment protection are often the lowest paid. It is always hard for such workers to get justice, especially in non-unionised workplaces. Now it is even harder for the low paid to bring claims to enforce the law. Within this 4/5 drop in claims there will be a huge number of meritorious claims. Even if the claimant can raise the fee, small claims will not justify that cost given the risk that it will not be recovered.

When pressed on this at a recent Westminster Forum, Jenny Willott, Minister for Employment Relations and Consumer Affairs, did not rule out a review of Employment Tribunal fees but gave no indication of when or how this would take place. If the Government’s stated support for working people is to have any credibility this barrier to justice in the workplace must be removed.

Joy Drummond

Employment Partner

Simpson Millar LLP

London EC1

The Saudi Commission for Tourism and Antiquities clarifies its relationship with the Mayor of Rome

Sir, The Saudi Commission for Tourism and Antiquities (SCTA) has not agreed to fund the restoration of neglected Roman monuments, contrary to your report (Apr 2).

Last year we celebrated 80 years of diplomatic relations between Saudi Arabia and Italy. As part of that an archeology exhibition was held in Rome, and last month the Mayor Rome visited Riyadh at the invitation of the Governor of Riyadh.

SCTA was set up in 2001 with responsibility for the preservation and exploration of the archeology and history of Saudi Arabia — Islamic, pre-Islamic and ancient. It is not within its mandate to fund restoration work in other countries.

Sultan Bin Salman Bin Abdulaziz

Students from private schools are not all ill-mannered – though perhaps behaviour is influenced by geography

Sir, Here in Dulwich, south of the river, we have three independent schools, and my children attend or attended one of them. When meeting their friends, fellow pupils and friends’ siblings and, of course, parents, I have found them to be invariably well mannered, well spoken and well behaved. There are two state schools and, by and large, their pupils, with some exceptions, are also similarly disposed. Perhaps it is the North London air that caused the issues for Mr Steven (letter, Apr 5)?

Neil Jones

London SE24

By what strange accounting is it more cost-effective to throw away perfectly usable, as-new disabled equipment?

Sir, Last week I tried to arrange for some disabled equipment to be collected, ranging from sticks to wheeled walking frames and chairs, all in perfect order and some entirely unused. I was told that the NHS no longer collected such items because they bought them for “buttons”, and cost analysis had shown that it was uneconomic to collect, clean and reallocate them, and I should just take them to the tip. I protested at the waste and was told that at the tip the items would be collected and sent to the third world. Not quite so terrible then. However, at the tip, I was told that no such system was in place, and the whole lot was tossed into skips.

What accounting system could possibly justify such a shocking waste of resources?

Lesley Byers

Bournemouth, Dorset

Telegraph:

SIR – My favourite country pub, The Cock Inn, in Ide Hill, Kent, has a sign outside: “Warm beer, rude staff, grumpy regulars, PROPER PUB.”

I agree with the last statement, but what makes a “proper pub”?

Gordon Hughes
Beckenham, Kent

SIR – The Clegg-Farage debates have proved useful in persuading the vast majority of voters that the sensible strategy is not to follow Nick Clegg’s subordination of British interests to the undemocratic European Union, nor support Nigel Farage in his unsubstantiated view that it is impossible to reform the European vision to everyone’s satisfaction.

Most people would like to stay in the EU providing substantial reform is achieved. The problem with voting Ukip in a general election is that it is unlikely to return one Ukip MP but very likely to attract enough votes to damage severely the prospects of a Conservative majority.

There is growing evidence that David Cameron can achieve significant support from other European leaders in his determination to improve the relationship and return certain powers to the British Parliament that it should never have lost. Only by voting Conservative can we be certain that he will have the opportunity to carry out those negotiations and then be able to present the results to the British electorate in a referendum. If he succeeds, then we will vote Yes. If he fails, we will vote No. The British public will make the decision, but not if Ed Miliband is prime minister.

John Sharp
Great Glen, Leicestershire

Telephone gatekeeper

SIR – Like James Shone, we enjoyed our BT blocking telephone until my husband was in hospital and we found that he could not ring me as the telephone would not accept the withheld number.

We have solved this with a little machine called trueCall. It allows you to register all family and friends on it, and they automatically get through. Anyone else has to say their name, and we press 1 to accept the call or 3 not to. This works perfectly and our evenings are now peaceful.

Helen Penney
Longborough, Gloucestershire

Unimaginable

SIR – I have a friend with no television and no computer. Will he have to pay for a television licence? He is being hounded by the licensing authorities already – they don’t believe that anyone could live without a television. The only fair way to pay is by subscription.

Joan Freeland
Colyton, Devon

The right receptacle

SIR – Prudence Seddon asks what to use now that toothbrush handles have become so bulbous that they no longer fit into the receptacles designed for them. The best toothbrush holder I have had (and still have now, after 30 years) is a stone, James Keiller, Dundee marmalade jar. It is timeless, spacious and easily cleanable.

Sarah E Critchard
Stamford, Lincolnshire

SIR – My electric toothbrush will only stand up on the slight slope on the side of the basin when I display more patience than I can normally summon up in the morning. It’s very annoying. Industrial designers really should take note.

Tony Parrack
London SW20

SIR – I suggest putting fresh flowers in the toothbrush holder and toothbrushes in a small vase.

Alan S Skyrme
Mexico City

Afghan Vietnam

SIR – The admirable Christina Schmid calls Afghanistan “our Vietnam”. In many ways she is right.

Like the Americans, we went in to prevent the expansion of an aggressive totalitarian foe. Like them, we found ourselves fighting an enemy that did not abide by the rules of war, and which hid within the local population. Like them, we found ourselves fighting on behalf of an often ungrateful and corrupt local elite. Like them, we paid a price every time we hurt the innocent, while our opponents killed and intimidated their own people as a matter of policy.

History has unmasked communism for the inhumane evil it is; it will do the same for fundamentalist Islam. Vietnam and Afghanistan were both just causes.

We differ from the American experience in one regard: it has not taken the British people decades to re-learn how to respect their fighting men and women, and their sacrifice, even if they disagree with the politicians who sent our Forces to fight.

I hope that our “Vietnam” experience does not make us forget that we were fighting for a good cause, or make us unprepared or unwilling to do it again.

Victor Launert
Matlock, Derbyshire

‘Dillan and Cathleen’

SIR – Last week, while discussing this year’s centenary of the birth of the writer Laurie Lee with his widow, Kathy, in the Woolpack Inn, Slad, conversation turned to that other poet, Dylan Thomas, and his wife Caitlin.

Kathy and Laurie knew them very well as “Dillan and Cathleen”, and had many interesting drinks with them at the Chelsea Arts Club, the Man in the Moon, the World’s End and other places. Mrs Lee maintains this tradition with a small glass of beer with a tiny bit of gin in the top.

Chas Wright
Uley, Gloucestershire

SIR – In Dylan Thomas: The Collected Letters, Paul Ferris, the volume’s editor, writes “Caitlin – the first syllable is Cat, not Kate”, and Thomas refers to “Darling Caitlin my dear dear Cat” in one letter from 1943.

Dinah Parry
West Hill, Devon

Enjoying life

SIR – Only in Great Britain could the suggestion that we enjoy our food be met with hostility.

Eddie Lewisohn
London N6

Learning through play is best for young children

SIR – The organisers and signatories to the letter headlined “Gradgrind for tiny tots” have abused their academic positions by inventing a position attributed to Sir Michael Wilshaw, the head of Ofsted, and attacking this without waiting to read what he said.

The video posted on your website, and any fair reading of the report itself, show that Sir Michael is advocating precisely the combination of learning and social skills that characterise the best nursery practice. The website of one of the signatories, Victoria Sadler, rated outstanding by Ofsted, is an excellent example of such practice, and Ofsted’s concern is that work of this quality is less often available in poor areas.

Deliberately constructing a view that is at variance with the truth – indeed constructing it before the truth could be known – is an exercise in media manipulation, not a contribution to debate.

I urge readers to read the report on the Ofsted website and judge it on its merits.

John Bald
Independent educational consultant
Linton, Cambridgeshire

SIR – It can take up to seven years for some children to develop the eye movements needed to support reading. Some evidence suggests that children forced into near-point activities too soon develop myopia to accommodate the visual stress.

Research carried out in schools has indicated that up to a third of children may not have all the physical skills in place to support academic learning at the time of school entry, and there is a correlation between immature physical skills and lower educational performance.

The early years are for developing the physical, language and social skills needed for life, not through formal instruction, but by exploration through play.

Sally Goddard Blythe
Director, The Institute for Neuro-Physiological Psychology
Chester

SIR – If two-year olds from poor homes are to be put into nurseries, then mums or dads must be there too. How else can good parenting skills be learnt?

Susan Day
Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands

SIR – Air Commodore Michael Allisstone laments the lack of leadership exhibited by our political class.

Perhaps the example of the Armed Forces could solve the expensive accommodation problem for MPs who do not live a commutable distance from London. (I’m not including Basingstoke in that, by the way: it’s only 50 minutes plus a 10-minute stroll from Waterloo.)

Why don’t we have officers’ mess-style arrangements for MPs, where they can stay in London at short notice for a fair price?

It could be in a renovated military unit: secure, a short ride from Westminster, and funded by all the current second-home claimants. Any spare capacity could be taken up by parliamentary staff.

Harry Roberts
Crondall, Hampshire

SIR – Swedish MPs living more than 31 miles (50 km) from the centre of Stockholm are given a basic, 600 sq ft flat owned by the parliament, which is responsible for repairs and updates. Nearly all Swedish MPs live full-time in their constituencies, and treat the weekly journey to Stockholm as a commute.

James Vaux
Bembridge, Isle of Wight

SIR – Your front-page report on the Culture Secretary Maria Miller’s abuse of expenses and David Cameron’s support for her, demonstrates yet again politicians’ contempt for voters.

Is this really the same man who was “appalled” and “understood public anger” at the abuse of the parliamentary expenses system exposed by the Telegraph in 2009?

I am starting to wonder whether Mr Cameron really wants to win the next election, as he may find the electorate’s memory is better than his.

Angus McPherson
Findon, West Sussex

SIR – As an NHS worker, I am fully aware of how taxpayers’ contributions could be spent more judiciously than on Mrs Miller and her ilk. But this is about more than money.

MPs should lead by example. The ethos of personal gain and get-what-you-can permeates our society. Compensation culture (increasingly prevalent and costly to the NHS) and tax evasion are but two examples. Who can blame the residents of James Turner Street (featured on Benefits Street) for adopting such a policy?

We recently heard of the mutual respect between Tony Benn and Margaret Thatcher: polar in their political views but both principled, committed and honest. If we are to restore public confidence in politics, we urgently need to bring back such a fundamental ideology.

Dr John Trounce
Hove, East Sussex

SIR – Now we know what David Cameron meant by: “We are all in this together.”

Peter Leatherbarrow
Wortwell, Norfolk

Irish Times:

Sir, – Frank McDonald’s article (Opinion & Analysis, April 4th) and your editorial of April 1st are welcome responses to the urgency of the latest report from the IPCC. But the fact remains that the issue of climate change has failed to engage public discourse in the way that it surely ought to have by now.

Arguably the factor that more than any other contributes to this failure is a general misunderstanding of how risk is assessed. For example, the persistent misuse of the term “sceptic” in this context only serves to obscure the reality of the risk inherent in climate change.

Two components come into play with risk assessment: a) the probability of an event occurring and b) the consequences of such an event occurring. An event with a 98 per cent chance of occurring but with minimal consequences would not generally warrant much in the way of preventive measures being adopted. On the other hand a potentially catastrophic outcome with a 2 per cent probability of realisation would warrant more diligent attention. To be clear, risk assessment cannot predict the future: what it does well is identify and model probable outcomes, derived from currently identified trends.

The overwhelming, peer-reviewed, scientific consensus about climate change is a) that it is happening and its temperature-raising component is currently largely driven by human activity and b) that left unchecked, the consequences of this will be catastrophic. “Overwhelming” here is conservatively estimated at 98 per cent on both counts – ie the aggregate level of risk is huge.

So-called sceptics are entitled to disagree with this consensus, but if they are to be true to the sceptical tradition they must surely acknowledge the reality of the identified risk. By flatly denying the validity of current models of future climate – saying, in effect, that the probability of catastrophic outcomes has a 0 per cent chance of occurring – without offering any credible alternative models of future climate, they are in denial and not in any way engaging with the evidence in a way that the term “sceptic” would imply.

A straw increasingly clutched at by denialists as weather events become more unpredictable – as current climate models predict they will – is to seize on cold weather events as evidence against climate change predictions. This would equate to attempting to construct tide tables based on a one-minute study of wave motion: another example of a complex, chaotic phenomenon masking a far simpler underlying trend.

Also the apparent pause in atmospheric heating observed in recent years as the oceans absorb for the time being unexpectedly high levels of energy – incidentally accompanied by growing acidification as more carbon dioxide is absorbed with devastating impacts on marine ecology – has “sceptics” champing at the bit to shout down the overwhelming scientific consensus of the urgent reality of human-driven (aka anthropogenic) climate change. In truth, the risk to the planet is both real and unaffordable, this being the only home we have.

PETER WALSH

Heathervue,

Greystones,

Co Wicklow

Sir, — I have recently immigrated to Ireland, in part to escape from Obamacare, the health system in the United States.

Now I see that Irish Ministers are proposing Universal Health Insurance (UHI) for Ireland. This suffers from the same deficiencies as Obamacare in the US. Indeed the two plans are identical in their core essentials, which require that everyone will be a private patient, everyone will be required to buy health insurance and the government will promise to subsidise insurance for the poor.

This is not the same as single-payer, universal health care. Like Obamacare, the UHI scheme is a gift to private, for-profit insurance companies, providing them with a captive market of customers who will pay to enrich those at the top. And those at the top of insurance companies are not even in the public sector; this is the private sector.

Both America’s Obamacare and Ireland’s proposed UHI are policies to enrich insurance CEOs, by herding the population like sheep into buying from the private sector even when they are unwilling to do so voluntarily. That is the opposite of freedom.

France, Germany and Canada are among the states which have shown that a single-payer model can be a viable solution. Ireland should consider that model, and Irish people should fight for it.

At the end of day, insurance from the private sector is a sociopathic business model, driven by the profit motive, and only two roads lead to increased profits: charge more, and pay out less. That is Ireland’s future if UHI goes ahead. I have seen this movie before, and I can already tell you that in the next act the system deteriorates.

To fight against this loss of freedom and choice, Irish people should fight for single-payer health care.  Yours, etc,

JOHN PATRICK KUSUMI ,

High Street ,

Tuam ,

Co Galway

Sir, – The primary failing of largely empty bus lanes at rush hour is that they force two lanes of cars into one lane where motorists intending to turn left further along must wait an unnecessarily long time to reach the filter, meanwhile clogging up the single lane now allowed to them. This is very evident on the Con Colbert Road on the approach to the junction leading to Conyngham Road and on Wolfe Tone Quay on the approach to the junction leading to Blackhall Place and on the Merrion Road approaching various left turns.

The arbitrary priority given to the – often absent – bus passengers is difficult to justify given that individual motorists going to and coming from work are contributing y more to the national economy through buying cars, paying exorbitant motor tax and insurance, regularly buying petrol or diesel, paying for NCTs and for a range of other motor-related repairs and parts, while bus passenger may contribute nothing toward road use.

With regard to the safety of pedal cyclists in Dublin, it is some years since I have seen any cyclist stop for a red light at any junction, while many of them refuse to sport lights or high visibility vests at night, even during the winter months.

If, as is argued, opening up bus lanes at rush hour is a folly, then let it be proved by a measured study. Yours, etc,

SHANE O’DOHERTY,

Hollybrook Road,

Sir, – The many GPs who have written in to the letters page (in response to Brian Devitt’s letter of April 2nd on their pay) are, to my mind, extremely coy about what they do actually earn. They tell us about their overheads and how hard they work, but that’s all. Why is their remuneration such a secret? Aren’t they virtually public sector workers in that a large proportion of their earnings comes from the public purse? I suggest that the GPs’ own representative organisation tell us straight out what is the average GP’s take home pay and we can judge the fairness or otherwise for ourselves? If it really is as bad as implied, they will earn the sympathy they deserve.

As it is, the rush of Leaving Cert students to enter medical degree courses, all of which are heavily subsidised by me, the taxpayer,would suggest that the returns must be worthwhile.

And could I just mention that everyone in business has to pay rent/mortgage, heat, lighting, general and water rates, staff costs etc, not just GPs? Yours, etc,

ELLEN MacCAFFERTY,

Lansdowne Crescent,

Ballsbridge,

Dublin 4

Sir, – With reference to your front-page article “ ‘Basics of language’ need more attention”, I would like, as a teacher of English over many years, to point out the following. The Junior and Leaving Cert exams, with their attendant pressures, influence teaching heavily, as we know. There has been no requirement in the English exams for students to show understanding of how language actually works and is put together through parsing and analysis. As a result, many students actively resist attempts by teachers of English to tackle sentence structure and word function, knowing these will never be an exam requirement. What understanding they have of the main parts of speech they gain through foreign language learning.

To give parsing and analysis exam status, even for a small percentage of marks, would encourage students to study the structure of language, and, one would hope, write it more correctly. In addition it would give teachers more support in teaching these skills. Yours, etc,

HILDA GERAGHTY,

Corbawn Lane,

Shankill,

Dublin 18

Sir, – I was surprised to see the photograph on your front page (April 5th) of the new Garda Reserve recruits holding aloft the Holy Bible. Is this really the image we wish to portray of the guardians of peace in this country? We are a multicultural society now and not a religious state. Our police force should be upholders of the law of the land and protectors of all members of society. This display is sending out the wrong message.

On the same subject, I am regularly puzzled by the presence of the Christian Bible on the tables at our polling stations during elections. Why not the Koran? The Old Testament? Any other document one can swear on if one is not affiliated to a religion? These trappings convey exclusion rather than inclusion and should no longer have a place in the secular functions of the State. Yours, etc,

HEATHER

ABRAHAMSON,

Roebuck Lawn,

Clonskeagh,

Sir, – I was under the impression that legislation introduced, wisely, by a previous government prevented the littering of our streets with posters tied to lampposts and other street furniture to a short period prior to an election.

It now appears that many candidates for the forthcoming local and European elections are getting around the prohibition by announcing “public meetings”. There is a proliferation of such posters appearing on street furniture over the last month throughout the Dublin area and possibly further afield. They all have one thing in common – the name of the person calling these meetings in large letters, generally with their party affiliation as well. The subject of the meeting is generally in much smaller lettering.

This is quite simply a way of getting names before the public. What are our local authorities doing about this? And will these “poster-pests” be prosecuted? Will the councils take down the posters or compel those breaking the law to do so? I will wait and see. I hope I won’t have to wait until after May 23rd.

ANTHONY KEANE,

Meadow Vale,

Blackrock,

Co Dublin

Sir, – Walking through our capital city today one becomes aware of what seems to me a great anomaly for a republic.

In a week when our President is in some ways closing a circle in our relationship with Britain with his State visit, Dublin’s streets are still teeming with signs of ascendancy and empire. On leaving Leinster House, for instance, a TD will walk down Molesworth Street, a thoroughfare that bears the name of Viscount Richard, whose allegiance was firmly to the kingdom of Great Britain.

Is Little Britain Street, in the north inner city, still a fitting title in a city that has been firmly Irish since 1922? Westmoreland Street? John Fane, once lord lieutenant, was a 10th Earl and a British Tory politician. Grafton, Henry Fitzroy, was the illegitimate son of Charles II and a deputy of William of Orange. His name, because of the street named after him, has lived on through centuries of Anglo-Irish turbulence.

Jervis, Marlborough and Leeson are others whose legacy is set in stone. Are these names essential to our identity, or is it time to take our streets back? Davitt, Stephens and Kickham Street might be more vital to a nation that, population-wise at least, has still not recovered fully from the Famine. Collins has an avenue, but surely he is more important to us than Westmoreland. And who better to kick Grafton into touch than Brian Boru? Yours, etc,

JODY MOYLAN,

The Paddocks,

Clontarf,

Sir, – Today’s (April 7th) tragedy on the Luas Red Line demonstrates the dangers inherent in having so many unguarded junctions on busy city streets between motor vehicles and the massive steel-wheeled trams.

I work in Smithfield, and my colleagues and I regularly witness collisions at the blind junction with Lincoln Lane, where motorists cannot see the tram until they are on top of it. Until the entire street layout can be reorganised and the Luas line properly bridged, there is one cost effective measure that could help to reduce the numbers of injuries and deaths suffered at these junctions.

As a motorist, I hate driving over ramps but I do recognise that they slow cars down, especially those with sharp brick edges. Such ramps should be laid on streets leading to Luas intersections as a matter of urgency. I would also recommend the installation of angled mirrors on the corners of buildings as a further protection for Luas and other drivers, as well as the pedestrians who of course are the most vulnerable of all. Finally, the Jervis intersection must be recognised as too busy with pedestrians and cars, and too narrow, to permit an unguarded crossing.

If retailers oppose the closing of this street to vehicles, they should be required to pay for a full-time crossing guard to police the junction. If these simple measures are not taken soon then more people will die. The authorities need to act now. Yours, etc,

ARTHUR DEENY,

Rock Road,

Sir, – I have been amused by the suggestion that the Government parties’ drop in support in the polls was because the electorate is disappointed with the management of the Department of Justice. Could it be that the electorate is weary of this tedious drama? What was said and when it was said is petty in comparison to real world concerns and given the choice of listening to nothing or hearing more about the gardaí, I’d choose silence. Perhaps if the Government could steer the media to topics we wanted to hear about they would fare better.

S LYDON,

Eagle Valley,

Wilton,

Cork

Sir, – With reference to Fintan O’Toole’s worry (“The Nazi past that causes a cultural problem”, April 5th) that the surreally overrated insights contained in Heidegger’s philosophical work “can’t be dumped”, let me reassure him: they can.

For Heidegger was not only a Nazi in his private views, he was also an inveterate purveyor of empty pretention in his intellectual life. In the opinion of many philosophers (and others), 21st century philosophy would be far better off if it abandoned the very worst of the anti-Enlightenment, nostalgicist pretension that hobbled the discipline during the 20th century, primarily due to the influence of Martin Heidegger. Yours, etc,

JAIME HYLAND,

Kuckhoffstraße,

Berlin

Sir, – I was an academic member of staff in Trinity College Dublin for 33 years before my retirement. The logo and name of the college is a very trivial issue and more substantial matters determine its international reputation.

In fact the argument as outlined in your columns is reminiscent of the debate over how many angels would fit on top of a pinhead.

Not only the logo, but other issues in the antiquated traditions of the college need to addressed. These include the giving of scholarships without a means test and the subsidy of a free meal each evening to fellows and scholars. Yours, etc,

PROF GREGORY J

ATKINS,

Shielbaggan,

New Ross,

Co Wexford

Sir, — Culturally, modern Ireland differs from England about as much as English-speaking Canada from the US: hardly at all. As past differences fade, nostalgic delusions to the contrary seem only to thrive. Yours, etc.

DENIS O’CONNOR,

Front Street East,

Toronto, Ontario

Canada

Irish Independent:

We persist in shutting out the thought that current economic imperatives do not necessarily support social and political conditions conducive to human flourishing.

Also in this section

Let’s remember who of us went to Britain first

Garda cadetship vital

We must move from organ donor cards to a list

Our President’s intention of focusing our minds on the relationship between ethics and the economy could do much to confront the bewildering assumption that the current ordering of the creation and distribution of wealth is self-justifying and does not have to render an account of its workings and their consequences.

This assumption of moral neutrality has created a world where the distribution of wealth is justified only by the efficiency of the systems that create it.

Moral sensitivity does not sit easily with unfettered capitalism, it tends to subvert it. We have colluded in allowing economic activity to develop a life of its own, accountable only to itself.

The Celtic Tiger years in Ireland were an eloquent testament to the absurdity of this position.

The economic life of the country was colonised by dodgy builders and bankers.

The attempt to perpetrate the myth that the economy is the business of politics and therefore does not have to render an account to anybody is beginning to be seen for what it is – an earnest march to nowhere, where politics and big business feed on one another in the thoughtless exploitation of the country’s resources.

Mr Cowen declared, with plausible innocence, that he did not see the financial crash coming. Of course he didn’t, as he took the attitude we all took – we didn’t feel it was our job to look.

Besides, if we are experiencing the bounty of a broken gambling machine, we don’t seek to have it fixed.

We become convinced that the laws of economics are not man-made but part of the nature of the world. Our minds become atrophied and fail to notice the naked structural injustice at the heart of our way of life.

PHILIP O’NEILL, EDITH ROAD, OXFORD

 

THE IRISH UNIFORM

One of the multitude of failures, albeit peripheral, since the foundation of the State is the inability to show any form of national dress/ costume. The wearing of the kilt was tried, but failed.

Irish men, a notoriously disastrous species when it comes to sartorial matters, have not taken up the challenge, unless of course we count the baggy, grey tracksuit that Irish men between the ages of 11 and 55 cling to.

The female Irish dancing costume was the nearest we had till the emergence of rococo curls, spray tans and day-glo/hi-viz dresses.

But there is hope. In recent years, as Ireland has gone from being a country to an economy and our nationality a sellable brand, a national costume of sorts has emerged. It consists of a green rugby shirt, a leprechaun hat with ginger beard attached and a stick-on plastic arse bearing the motto ‘pog mo thoin’.

It started its popular rise during domestic national events but I’ve noticed it has now travelled to Irish events all over the globe, most particularly the St Patrick’s Day parades throughout the world.

Despite initial misgivings, I have to accept that it is now our national dress. I hope that our President dons a full leprechaun outfit during his jolly-up with the British oligarch Elizabeth.

PATRICK COONEY, BEAUMONT, DUBLIN 9

 

TIME FOR REFLECTION

As a student of Irish history, I believe that the visit of President Michael D Higgins will provide a great opportunity to reflect on our history, something that I believe we desperately need.

Napoleon Bonaparte said that “history is a lie agreed upon” and he could well have been describing the history of this country. For far too long now, the view of Ireland’s history has been dominated by the old, and false, mantra that it was 800 years of oppression by Britain. There are so many lies to this that it is hard to know where to start.

The original invaders who came to our shores were not “British”. Britain, as such, did not exist until 1707. Nor were they English-speaking or Protestant. They were French-speaking, Catholic Normans led by the Plantagenets, who were a French dynasty. These people’s primary concern was with maintaining their lands in France. Lands they were able to maintain due in no small part to their invasion and subjugation of England to provide them with valuable resources.

The atrocities committed during this subjugation are well known, particularly the infamous “Harrying of the North”, which devastated the north of England. Let us also remember the fact that the Normans were invited into Ireland by the King of Leinster and supported by local nobles and chiefs.

Next up, the foreign invasions of Ireland. For 700 years, England has been demonised and criticised for invading Ireland and damaging the country. But they were not the only ones to do so. The Scottish did it in the 1300s led by Edward Bruce, brother of Robert the Bruce, to support the war for Scottish independence, not Irish freedom, and numerous atrocities were committed by the Scots. The French, Spanish and Germans followed in their footsteps. Yet we forget these countries’ transgressions against us and continue to solely blame Britain for all our ills.

If ever there was a time for reflection, it is now.

COLIN SMITH, CLARA, CO OFFALY

 

HOLDING HIS HEAD HIGH

This month marks the 20th commemoration of the Rwandan genocide, which resulted in the mass murder of as many as 800,000 ethnic Tutsis by the Hutu majority.

We should constantly remind the UN of its fecklessness in dealing with this preventable atrocity. The charismatic Canadian General Romeo Dallaire had been given the unenviable task of commanding the small UN peacekeeping force that had been in situ in Rwanda since 1993.

Early in 1994, he was aware of arms being massed by the Hutus and warned the UN that murder was being planned on a large scale. His warnings went unheeded. He was given 2,600 ill-equipped soldiers and provided with a UN mandate that did not grant authority to disarm the militias. He argued that if given 5,000 well-equipped soldiers and a mandate that would allow him direct intervention, he could prevent the tragedy that was about to unfold. This fell on deaf ears. When the killing started, he once again pleaded for more troops but instead the UN reduced his forces to a token level.

Against almost insurmountable odds, he managed to save tens of thousands of lives. In the aftermath of the Rwandan carnage, very few in western civilisation could hold their heads high but General Dallaire is one who certainly can.

JOHN BELLEW, PAUGHANSTOWN, DUNLEER, CO LOUTH

 

FEELING SHATTERED

I am shattered reading about Shatter, day in, day out, in your paper, and nothing really changes.

It really is time to move on.

BRIAN MCDEVITT, GLENTIES, CO DONEGAL

 

REMEMBERING ROONEY

The passing of Mickey Rooney brings to mind a quote (along the following lines) attributed to him on the subject of marriage. “If you must get married do so very early in the morning . . . that way, if it doesn’t work out, you may not have wasted a full day.”

TOM GILSENAN, BEAUMONT, D9

 

Write to Letters to the Editor, Irish Independent, 27/32 Talbot Street, Dublin 1, or e-mail them to independent.letters@independent.ie. Name and address must be supplied for verification. Lengthy contributions may be edited.

Irish Independent


Mass visit

$
0
0

9 April2014hospital visit

I go all the way around the park listening to the Men from the Ministry: our heroes have to take care of farming Priceless

Mary in hospital visit her with Astrid, Anna, and Liz

No Scrabbletoday, Perhaps Iwill win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Peaches Geldof – obituary

Peaches Geldof was a celebrity whose ebullience and intelligence were scarred by a tragedy-laced upbringing and drug abuse

Peaches Geldof, daughter of Sir Bob Geldof, dies at the age of 25 in Kent

Peaches Geldof was wild, witty and clever Photo: Getty

9:11PM BST 07 Apr 2014

Comments7 Comments

Peaches Geldof, who has died suddenly aged 25, was a journalist, model and television presenter. But her chief occupation was being Peaches Geldof, daughter of the celebrities Bob Geldof and Paula Yates.

This was by no means an easy task. Her parents divorced when she was seven; her mother, also a television presenter, then began dating the Australian rock singer Michael Hutchence, who was found hanged in 1997. Three years later Paula Yates herself was dead of a heroin overdose.

The daisy-chain of tragedy in which Peaches Geldof found herself enmeshed ensured that she was, even before she turned 12, projected firmly into the public eye. It was a spotlight from which she was never able, or never willing, to withdraw. Indeed, it was typical of her relationship with publicity that she gave interviews – to rail against the media. Recently, with the rise of social media, she became a dedicated user of Twitter and Instagram, showering her hundreds of thousands of followers with personal thoughts and pictures. Her final tweet, written the day before she died, was: “Me and my mum”. It provided a link to a photo of the infant Peaches in Paula Yates’s arms.

Peaches Honeyblossom Geldof was born in London on March 13 1989, the second of three sisters, of whom Fifi Trixibelle was the eldest and Pixie the youngest. She would also gain a half-sister, Tiger-Lily, from her mother’s relationship with Hutchence.

Peaches Geldof on the set of This Morning in 2013

Peaches’s upbringing was marked not just by her parents but also by the family nanny, Anita Debney, who reportedly helped provide a stable environment for the three girls. That stability was fatally undermined when Paula Yates went to live with Hutchence. The stress of the bitter divorce was exacerbated by Paula Yates’s drug taking. Anita Debney was fired, and “family friends” later told newspapers that Peaches “got the worst” of the fall out. “I can’t even begin to describe what that poor girl lived through,” said one, Gerry Agar.

On the day of Paula Yates’s death, Peaches and her siblings moved in with Bob Geldof and his French partner, Jeanne Marine. Living in south-west London, Peaches attended Queen’s College in Harley Street.

But it soon became apparent that she was not going to retreat into a normal, if privileged, adolescence. Instead she began writing a magazine column for Elle Girl; The Telegraph and The Guardian also published articles under her byline which revealed a clever, bombastic teenager with refreshingly unvarnished opinions. “At the prospect of spending time in the country, I shudder,” she wrote in this paper. “This feeling hasn’t grown on me gradually – I’ve always hated it. Not only is it boring but, I also genuinely believe that it slowly drives people insane.” Her media career had begun.

By 2006 her fame was such that she was being interviewed in her own right, offering her thoughts on everything from Jane Austen to Tony Blair – her plummy-toned musings peppered with the refrains “Omigod” and “like”. Even then, however, a large part of the fascination she held for onlookers appeared to be whether or not she would manage to avoid the fate of her mother.

“Some newspapers are saying she’s set on the same trajectory as her mother: hooked on fame, got her tongue pierced, goes to too many parties, blah blah blah. I can’t see it,” wrote Robert Crampton in The Times in 2006. Two years later, Giles Hattersley, in The Sunday Times, was more concerned. “I worry for her,” he wrote. “She missed her childhood and now has to cope with living on her own, dodging paps and having all her mistakes splashed on the front pages – and she is still only 19. On reflection, I don’t think she’s like her mother. But this clever, troubled baby-woman would benefit from having her around.”

The person most aware of this was Peaches Geldof herself, particularly as she began to dabble with drugs – something she was prepared to admit (though she denied taking crack, and said that one story of an “overdose” was “overblown”). Comparisons with her mother were, she said, “lame”, fears for her well-being, misplaced, voyeuristic even. “It’s like people almost wish it would happen. But if my mother died in a car crash, does that mean I would have to run out in front of a car and it would be history repeating itself? If I was photographed by a road, would it be: ‘Peaches Geldof gets too close! She’s following in the path of her mother!’ every time?”

By then her media career had quickly moved from print to the screen, first with a documentary series (Peaches Geldof, Teenage Mind, 2005) and then, three years later, with the reality show Peaches: Disappear Here for MTV. She designed a collection for the fashion label PPQ and signed a lucrative contract to become “the face” of Ultimo underwear. But the deal was scuppered when scurrilous pictures of her and more rumours of drug taking began to circulate on the internet. In 2011 she presented the chat show OMG! with Peaches Geldof on ITV, but it was not a rating success.

Peaches Geldof with her father Bob Geldof in 2009

In September the following year she married Thomas Cohen, a singer with the London band S.C.U.M. — the wedding was held in Davington, Kent, in the church where her parents had married and where mother’s funeral had been held in 2000. Fulfilling a promise made in a Telegraph column to “carry on this ancient tradition of exotic yet pointless names” she named their sons Astala Dylan Willow and Phaedra Bloom Forever. The children’s arrival seemed to mark a new era in her life. “I’m in bed by 8pm nearly every night,” she said in October last year. “This is not what I thought I’d be doing three years ago when I was the poster girl for partying in London.”

It was her second marriage, following her first, brief, union, in August 2008 — at the age of 19 — to Max Drummey, a musician with the American band Chester French. They had known each other for a month and announced their split after nine months.

Peaches Geldof’s evident curiosity stretched far and wide. She declared herself fascinated by “quantum physics” and “wormholes” and “Stephen Hawking’s theories and Richard Dawkins’s theories. I’ve always been really interested in how we came to be and why. Which is how I guess I got involved in spirituality and stuff.”

In 2009 she declared that she was “a Scientologist. I feel like I needed a spiritual path. I felt I was lacking something when I didn’t have a faith.” That November she attended the 25th anniversary of the International Association of Scientologists at Saint Hill Manor in East Grinstead, West Sussex, with 5,000 other Scientologists — reportedly including the actors Tom Cruise and John Travolta.

She later flirted with elements of Judaism and then, last year, waxed lyrical about “a belief system to apply to day-to-day life to attain peacefulness”. The system in question was the Ordo Templi Orientis (OTO) — founded in the early 20th century and indelibly linked to the occultist Aleister Crowley. She had the initials OTO tattooed on her left forearm.

Peaches Geldof seemed to be looking forward to getting old. Or at least older. “I have so much shit put on me,” she said in 2008. “I haven’t felt like I was a teenager since I was 12. I’ve felt like I was 30 since I was 13. I don’t think I had a teenage time. Maybe my twenties will be easier.”

She is survived by her husband and two sons.

Peaches Geldof, born March 13 1989, died April 7 2014

Guardian:

Let me add one more to Larry Elliott’s five warning signs (A corner turned – or just more groupthink?, 7 April). Why have international investors been so keen to acquire UK assets, notably prime property in London? It is because they are confident that UK governments will do whatever it takes to preserve asset values: a collapse in values is the nightmare of any government hoping for re-election. They know too that in quantitative easing our government has a fine instrument for preserving (and boosting) asset values, never mind that it had done precious little for job creation.

But a second-division economy will get away with printing money only for so long as first-division economies are at it too. After that we either carry on printing and watch sterling decline, or stop printing and put our faith in a (miraculous) revival in the balance of payments. At which point investors more interested in dollar value than in the sterling value of their London mansions will head for the exit – a step made all the easier by past removal of all those pesky restrictions on capital movement.

So the sixth warning sign flashes when our slowdown in quantitative easing happens later than in first-division economies.
David Chambers
London

• Larry Elliott’s scepticism about the longevity of the economic recovery might itself have been influenced by the received wisdom it purported to doubt. It puts global warming as a reason for concern, rather than economic growth per se, which is causing “climate change” (a more complex concept than global warming) and other serious environmental degradation.

There is still insufficient attention paid to the fact that we live on a finite planet and that as a result economic growth has to be finite. To get away from this model, one has to look at different paradigms for economics, as well as different measures for assessing how well people are living.

The present system allows the richest nations to fool themselves into thinking that unbridled economic growth can continue, because they can print money, repress interest rates and import resources if theirs become scarce, thus depriving the poorest of basic necessities and social justice. What happens when we can no longer do this? Perhaps the colonisation and exploitation of Mars will keep us topped up?

More “real” realism, please, so that we can explore sustainable long-term alternatives in mainstream economic commentary, rather than confining the environmental discussions to doom and gloom pieces in other parts of the paper.
Dr David Dixon
London

• Articles on economics, as with your leader (A discipline ripe for disruption, 3 April), seldom mention the role of money itself, yet 97% of money in circulation – about £2,200bn – has been created by banks sinking their customers, including the government, into debt (Q1 Bulletin 2014). Banks are reluctant to reveal the interest they receive, but a conservative estimate is 5% on average, indicating that society pays these for-profit companies £110bn a year. Compare this with VAT revenue of £103bn. No wonder personal debt is higher than ever, social services are being cut, and our society inhabits two separate and opposing economic planets.
James Bruges
Bristol

Chris Huhne asserts that wind generation is popular with the British public (The Conservatives’ onshore wind sums are all at sea, 7 April). He omits to say that’s because up to now the British public has been largely unaffected by the development of this fundamentally useless form of electricity generation. However, in the relatively small and thinly populated area of Britain that is the Scottish Borders, many of us have spent much of the past decade fighting windfarm development. Unsuccessfully, it has to be said: in spite of planning policies aimed at preventing undesirable development, some 400 turbines have been built here, and there are many more in the planning pipeline. If those 4,000 turbines across the UK produce about 5% of our total electricity need – when the wind is blowing – be sure there will be a windfarm coming your way quite soon. Let’s see how popular that turns out to be.

Huhne thinks that turbines are “elegant and minimalistic”. Individually on a distant horizon, Mr Huhne, or dozens in vast slabs of metal 70, 80 or more metres high, covering a couple of square miles and in your face on a daily basis? But even if they may be elegant, they certainly are not a solution to a pressing energy need. For every hour a turbine operates it has to be supported by alternative means, just in case the wind doesn’t blow, often when the temperature is at its lowest and our need is greatest. And should it blow too hard, landowners, many of whom don’t live close by and aren’t characterised by Huhne as “venomous nimbies”, can pocket large sums of “compensation” in return for turning them off. So it’s no surprise that here on the A1 at the Scotland-England border, there is a fine panorama of wind turbines 20 miles or more to the north, west and south.
George Russell
Eyemouth, Berwickshire

•  Chris Huhne claims that onshore wind enjoys more than 60% support in polls. May I point out that probably well over 95% of residents live far away from windfarms, and that only a few years ago the percentage of support was far higher. Mr Huhne might do well to consider why protesters against onshore wind appear to be so noisy, as he states. The answer should be perfectly clear to him: while residents affected by close proximity to the HS2 railway line or those affected by close proximity to fracking sites can expect compensation, there is no scheme for those affected by close proximity to wind turbines. Many of these people often live at high altitude in isolated locations, making it vital for such residents to be able to move away in sickness or old age.
Wyck Gerson Lohman
Machynlleth, Powys

• I have some sympathy with the residents of Cornwall who are opposed to the “industrialisation” of their landscape (Turbines plan fans community discord, 5 April), but they continue to enjoy the benefits of industrialisation elsewhere in the UK and the rest of the world. Are they prepared to do without the vast array of consumer goods that are now considered essential for everyday living? Their phones, computers, freezers and vehicles are manufactured somewhere else and travel huge distances to get to them. They must be disposed of somewhere, and the hazardous waste dealt with. Their manufacture, operation and disposal require the expenditure of energy.

We haven’t begun to consider how we can switch from an energy-greedy consumerist existence to something more sustainable, and our government is not giving us any leads on this.
Jill Friedmann
Leicester

•  Everyone, no doubt, will not agree with Chris Huhne that wind turbines are beautiful. But it is undeniable that they are elegant, and a tribute to their brilliant engineer designers and the outstanding skills of the manufacturers. Their design is clearly highly superior to that of the lumpen electricity pylons that lumber across our landscape. However, it is disingenuous to claim they are, like agriculture, just another benign change to the natural climax vegetation of mature forest. Windfarms bring the ethos of the factory to the nature environment and thereby intrude on that soul-healing experience which so many enjoy in getting away from an urban setting. We certainly need windfarms, but out at sea is the ideal place for them.
Jim McCluskey
Twickenham

• Would the government’s decision (Tories plan 2020 ban on onshore windfarms, 5 April) have any connection with the recent news that EDF had had to cut its nuclear output “as the grid was receiving higher wind and solar output from Europe than expected” (Enformable.com, 20 March)? Just in case anyone realises that renewable energy can be very efficient when properly supported?
Pat Sanchez
Littleborough, Lancashire

Tony Blair defends the invasion of Iraq on the grounds that without it “you would have had the so-called Arab spring come to Iraq” (Syria crisis: failure to intervene will have terrible consequences, says Blair, 7 April). Clearly there could be nothing worse than the people of Iraq rebelling against their leaders and deciding their own future.
Given that this interview comes on the same day you publish Blair’s eulogy to the president of Rwanda (Comment, 7 April), perhaps one should not be surprised. Your paper has pointed out (Report, 10 October 2012) that Paul Kagame won the 2010 election with 93% of the vote when three major opposition parties were excluded from the vote, and that two of their leaders were jailed and still languish there. In the same article you reported that “UN monitors accused Kagame of meddling in his mineral-rich neighbour the Democratic Republic of the Congo, supporting a rebellion led by a war crimes suspect and blamed for atrocities including mass rapes.” Then again, holding leaders to account for meddling in other countries’ affairs is probably not something our ex-prime minister would be likely to support.
Declan O’Neill
Oldham

• Kagame’s government has paid for Mr Blair’s African Governance Initiative’s consulting services since 2008, which include Mr Blair’s personal advice to the president. As such, Mr Blair does not write in a personal capacity but rather as a spokesman for Kagame’s government.
Alexandra Reza
St Edmund Hall, Oxford

• Tony Blair’s belief that his views on intervening anywhere might still have any currency shows how very far out of touch he remains with reality.
Mark Lewinski
Swaffham Prior, Cambridgeshire

Archbishop Welby is right to understand that what is said by the Church of England transmits messages (Welby links killings in Africa to gay marriage, 5 April). The prejudice that kills Christians thought to be gay-friendly is the same as that which kills LGBT people themselves in increasing global homophobic crimes from Russia to Nigeria. Whether failing to support gay marriage here because of the risk it places African Christians under is shrewd or simply handing power to the oppressor can be debated. I am convinced that if such support isn’t forthcoming, those who commit acts of anti-Christian violence are likely to find other reasons to do so. However, one urgent move is now essential – to speak out in support of decriminalising homosexuality across the Commonwealth and wider world. To do this in a joint statement with Pope Francis would be a powerful communication of the church’s non-negotiable belief in God-given human dignity and underline the clear distinction between morality and criminality – just as Archbishop Ramsey recognised when he supported decriminalisation in this country. It would also help reduce the abuse and murder of LGBT folk that criminalisation is perceived to legitimate. As Alice Walker wrote, “no person is your friend who demands your silence”.
Canon Mark Oakley
London

• Archbishop Welby thinks we must sacrifice the longings of gay people for their own marriage on the altar of appeasement of certain murderous Nigerians. He, along with his predecessor, is too spineless to stand up for the gay minority, and exposes his church as incapable of living up to the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 1, “all human beings are equal in dignity and rights”, and nothing more than a hotchpotch of amoral stone-age superstition.
Dr Martyn Phipps
Ellesmere Port, Cheshire

• As a gay man I have no objection to straight people seeking to convert, or vice versa (Minister seeks to stop gay conversion therapy, 7 April). It’s as a taxpayer that I agree with Norman Lamb – there is no place for this in the NHS!
David Mungall
London

Edward Thomas remembers Hackney in the 50s as a contented “monocultural society in a cockney setting” (Letters, 4 April). I used to visit my grandparents weekly in Hackney during the late 50s. They and most of their neighbours were of Romanian, Polish, Lithuanian and Russian descent, and many local shops reflected this diversity. Since the early 20th century Hackney has welcomed consecutive waves of immigrants, and everyone seemed perfectly content. Thomas describes life in Hackney as being “a straightforward English way of life”. That’s not how I remember it at all.
Marilyn Finlay
London

•  We know very little about Shakespeare’s life, and his poems have lived on to be reinterpreted by many generations, so do we need to know so much about Ted Hughes’s life (My life of Ted Hughes: the controversy, 5 April)? Leave his life alone. If his poetry is good enough it will live on.
Tristan Moss
Sheffield

• Commenting on his right thumb, broken in eight places, Joe Root (Root signs new Yorkshire deal, Sport, 8 April) is quoted as saying: “You’ve got to take these knocks on the chin and come back.” I wish him success, but trust his batting skills are better than his knowledge of anatomy.
Alan Sykes
Harden

• Looking at the photo of the model of the Battersea power station development (Starchitects’ take on Battersea power station is attacked for ignoring affordable housing needs, 8 April), it occurred to me that in no time another spidery letter will be winging its way to a government department.
David Prothero
Harpenden, Hertfordshire

•  How about the villages of Nasty in Hertfordshire and Ugley in Essex, with the apocryphal headline “Nasty man marries Ugley woman” (Letters, 8 April)?
Jim Waight
Hertford

• I have photographic proof of me looking back in Anger, Bavaria, while on a cycling holiday.
Steve Boardman
Bristol

David Edgar says, too readily, that after the miners’ strike “miners’ wives went back to the kitchens” (Review, 5 April). At Northern College, Barnsley, in 1980, a group of women from Worsbrough established regular short courses for themselves over many years. In 1984 they were part one of the first women’s support groups, published a book on the strike (The Heart and Soul of It, Bannerworks, 1985) and created a theatre group touring the region. After the strike, three of the Worsbrough women, as they became known, progressed via short courses and youth worker training to social work degrees.

For many women in the coalfields, far from their commitment “melting away” as Edgar suggests, this was a period of momentous change, personal and community development, and an essential, perhaps defining, factor in what “David Douglass called ‘values of community, of work, solidarity, of looking after each other’”. The Thurcroft miner was right; something did come out of it.
David Browning
Huddersfield

Polly Toynbee (House building alone won’t end this ladder of insanity, 4 April) is right to turn her fire on the chaotic UK housing market. The absence of definition of affordable housing is the black hole at the heart of every policy to reduce poverty. That failure is destroying the viability of the living wage, and has already destroyed it for the national minimum wage and unemployment benefits in metropolitan areas.

Poverty can only be increased while central government allows the market to extract larger and larger amounts of rent and council tax, by threats of eviction and prison, out of the incomes needed for food, water, fuel, transport, clothes for growing children and other necessities. The poorest tenants in rent arrears will continue to be pushed from pillar to post by demented free market extremists in Westminster.

The Bureau of Investigative Journalism reported in May 2013 that in 2012-13 Haringey had accepted 1,833 households from other London boroughs, 1,200 from Islington, and exported 1,282 out of the borough, 1,147 to Enfield. A total of 19,057 households had moved between boroughs in London. That included the impact of the coalition’s housing allowance caps on housing benefit in 2012-13; since April 2013, the bedroom tax, the £500 overall benefit cap and the council tax have been wreaking additional havoc. This is like pouring households into a giant kitchen mixer and expecting them not to get hurt.
Rev Paul Nicolson
Taxpayers Against Poverty

• Polly Toynbee rightly identifies the house price explosion as a social disaster, but she misses some of its ramifications. She writes that over-60s “see how their children and grandchildren struggle to find anywhere to live”. If over-60s own the house they live in, they might think that their children will at least be able to live in it after them. But this is not the case, in London at any rate: the house-price explosion will have brought the most modest home into the inheritance tax bracket, and the children will have to sell it and be left with too little to buy anything in London.

Anyone who bought a modest home years ago at a reasonable price would be hit by Toynbee’s proposed 1% property tax; 1% of their home’s supposed current market value could be half their current income, forcing them to sell up and move out. Toynbee and others have pointed out that “social cleansing” of poor tenants is in progress in London. Her proposed property tax would amount to social cleansing of owner-occupiers on modest incomes.

It’s generally understood that current house prices hurt the majority of non-owners; it needs to be understood that high market values don’t help the majority of owners who just want to live in their houses, and can hurt some of them very badly.
John Wilson
London

•  As well as the cheap money policies of the Bank of England and state subsidisation of mortgages that Polly Toynbee mentions, restrictive planning laws imposed by the state (including the Green Belt) mean supply is severely unresponsive to new demand in areas where people want to live. The degree of state interference can be seen most clearly in statistics which suggest land values increase up to 250-fold in the south-east when planning permission is granted. It’s therefore baffling to claim housing an example of market failure. Our housing market is as clear example of government failure through misguided state policies as one could get.
Ryan Bourne
Head of public policy, Institute of Economic Affairs

• Anne Perkins is right about the council tax (Time to ditch the unfair council tax, 2 April). Not only is a revaluation of homes long overdue but the huge gains made by those in the most expensive homes – primarily in London – need to be reined in. Many of those homes are paying a fraction of the bills they had under the last year of domestic rates 25 years ago. It was not uncommon then for the most expensive homes in London to pay domestic rates of £10,000 a year; now, depending on which London borough they’re in, they enjoy bills as low as £1,350 a year.

The crude council tax banding system needs replacing with individual valuations to produce a fairer distribution of the council tax burden. Help could be given for those who are asset-rich but income-poor.

When Northern Ireland scrapped the old rates system it opted for a council tax based on property values but, rather than creating a series of price bands, it opted for individual valuations. To prevent punishingly high bills for those in the most expensive homes, it set a ceiling so that no home would be considered to be worth more than £400,000.

Don’t expect any rush, though, to reform the tax in the rest of the UK. For the foreseeable future, council tax reform remains a political no-go area.
John Andrew
Speldhurst, Kent

• John Harris ridicules as outdated left-of-Labour calls for a mass house-building programme to solve the housing crisis (The Tories own the future – the left is trapped in the past, Comment, 3 April). But a new report predicts that London will be “crippled” if there is no solution to housing disaster.

What would Harris offer to the private tenant whose landlord is demanding a rent increase on his one-bedroom flat in Walthamstow from £800 to £1,200?

This is what is old-fashioned, stuck in the pre-council-house past where landlords’ greed was the only factor determining rents. The Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition calls for mass building of council homes, for trade union rates of pay in the jobs created in the building and refurbishment schemes, and for rent control, with rent councils to set the cap. To most people, that’s a programme that addresses the future.
Sarah Sachs-Eldridge
London

• Given the lack of any coherent policies, the only option remaining to pro-Europe, left-thinking individuals would seem to be a cynical exploitation of the house-price bubble: sell up and move to somewhere warm with nice dinners and cheap wine before they bar the doors against us.
Duncan Grimmond
Harrogate

• I wonder how ministers, let alone the MPs on the standards committee, can be trusted to legislate to rebalance the economy away from property values.
Richard Harley
Alresford, Hampshire

The American psyche is a conundrum (What is the point of Obama’s presidency? 28 March). Over the years I have watched the news, open-mouthed, as ordinary Americans protest with banners saying “Get your socialist hands off our bodies”, “No to a minimum wage” and so on. But upon deeper reflection, I suddenly understand: the population, even that vast number at the bottom of the wealth pyramid, have all been brainwashed by the American Dream: that anyone can make it to the top.

Strictly speaking, the Dream is true – witness the election of Obama – and it is an entirely admirable feature of American civilisation that no one is barred from competing (for wealth, fame or political office). But, in reality, millions of people live desperate lives (poverty, violence, drugs etc) with almost zero chance of escape. I say almost, because that is the key – there is a finite, albeit minuscule, chance of bettering yourself, and this phoney hope acts as the suspenders that keep the Emperor Ponzi’s new clothes on (ie keep the US economy going).

It reminds me of a joke told in our family: I say to my husband “Oh, if only I could win the lottery”, and he says “But Darling, you haven’t bought a ticket”, to which I reply “No, but it doesn’t alter my chances much, does it?” Dream on: a civilised society must have mechanisms in place so that people do not have to rely on luck. As we might say to wean someone off gambling – luck is not a strategy.
Jennifer Coopersmith
Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Propaganda on Ukraine

I was dismayed that your usual excellent coverage of the Ukraine troubles was marred by adopting the propaganda language of government spin doctors (28 March): specifically, that the enthusiastic and voluntary secession of Crimea was repeatedly referred to as a Russian “annexation”. I’m sure that the authors of those articles know that the word “annex”, as defined in several respected dictionaries, means the forceful acquisition of another nation’s territory.

It is disingenuous to accuse Russia of pinching Crimea from Ukraine, since it was the Crimeans who freely, and by 96% majority, decided to leave Ukraine and join Russia.

No matter how much the United States and Nato try to justify their cynical sophistry, the reality is that when a population decides by 96% to realign itself, no one – absolutely no one – has the right to try to stop them, no matter what treaties had been signed on their behalf in some distant past.
Sam Nejad
Geraldton, Western Australia

• Putin gave up on the west (28 March) in part because of the incessant, vainglorious push to the east by both Nato and the EU since 1989. It’s time for three strong leaders (Obama, Putin and Merkel) to meet again in Yalta, Crimea and draw yet another borderline from the Baltic to the Black Sea to delimit mutually agreeable spheres of influence. The Shower Curtain?
Douglas Porteous
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Message to adolescent girls

“If you really want to know what adolescent girls need, you should talk to adolescent girls,” runs the take-out of Hadley Freeman’s article (21 March). Yes, as reported on the BBC recently concerning gender inequality in the professions, adolescent girls do indeed have ambitions, to be lawyers, or whatever, but they need to be sexually attractive lawyers at the same time.

In fact, there was some hesitation over whether they would prefer being plain lawyers or attractive waitresses. Tolstoy’s views on gender equality hardly cut much ice nowadays, but his statement that “women will never enjoy equal rights to men as long as men view them as objects of desire” must be regarded as having some contemporary relevance. Being “bossy” doesn’t go well with being sexually attractive (other than appealing to men’s female domination fetishes): hence bossiness is linked to plainness and absence of attraction.

There have been many TV documentaries recently on hard-core subjects, such as alcoholism, drug-addiction and prostitution, presented not by male investigators, but by young, sexually attractive women – physical appearance or age is not an issue with male presenters. Less physically attractive and older women are confined to radio. The message going out to adolescent girls is: Yes, you can have your place equally alongside men, so long as you are young and physically attractive. Bra burning gets you nowhere.
David Bye
Kosd, Hungary

• Hadley Freeman’s article was the most sensible piece I’ve read about women in a long time, especially her advice for schools. For the record, Miss Piggy was one of my childhood heroines too.
Caroline Sandes
London, UK

Arabs in France

Both David Bell (Deeply troubled but not cursed, 21 March) and Andrew Hussey (in his book The French Intifada) seem to forget the hundreds of thousands secular or Christian Arabs living in France: they’re mostly Syrian, Lebanese, Egyptian and indeed north African. They have for decades now adapted and integrated into French life and culture, confidently asserting their place mostly in the middle classes, while in return enriching French society with their rich Middle Eastern background.

There’s definitely no “war” there. As a lot of French people do, let’s not forget that the word Arab is not synonymous with Muslim.
Fares Samara
Kempsey, NSW, Australia

Climbing Mount Everest

Philip Hoare comments on the fact that the people who are determined to climb Mount Everest are seemingly doing so without giving any thought as to why they are doing it or the damage that they are doing to its environment while attempting to do it (28 March).

When I used to climb mountains, if you used devices to enable you to achieve your goal one removed them so as to minimise damage and also so that the next team would have the same challenge. Seemingly these climbers are doing so only to tick off a list of events.

So there should be regulations in place, which one has to sign before one starts, in which waste, debris and aids have to be removed before one leaves. The climbing fraternity should ensure that anyone who intends to climb anywhere should accept their responsibility to maintain any climb for everyone.
Brian Mahood
Hamilton, New Zealand

Compulsory voting is flawed

Edwin Carter presents familiar arguments for compulsory voting (Reply, 4 April) but they are deeply flawed, mainly due to the lack of informed opinion among those who are forced to vote or else face a fine. The real enemy of democracy in Australia is the “donkey voter” who takes no interest in public affairs, doesn’t follow the political news and is probably ill-equipped by education to do so anyway. His – and often her – interests are limited to beer, gambling machines and the footie. They have never had it so good, so why worry?

This is a very elitist view, yet I vote Labor or Green in disgust with the so-called Liberal party’s fascism. Thankfully, these Liberals say they want to uphold free speech.

There was once a cry for “no taxation without representation”. We now have a situation where many people who pay no taxes and have no considered opinions have equal voting rights with those who fund their comfort. Those who pay no taxes should not have the right to vote, let alone be compelled to do so.
Ted Webber
Buderim, Queensland, Australia

Briefly

• In no way do I favour a political merger and acquisition between Canada and the United States (28 March). This idea has been an on-again, off-again fantasy of the United States since the American revolution. It’s a stale idea with little merit.

I would, however, favour the United States and Canadian partnership to build the twice-aborted Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project envisioned by Franklin Roosevelt in 1935. This renewable energy project would do far more good for the people of North America than any permanent political union.
Jeffrey W White
Somerville, Massachusetts, US

• I enjoyed your excellent article from Gary Younge on Tony Benn (21 March). As I read it, I couldn’t help but think of Mahatma Gandhi’s Seven Social Sins (written in 1925): Politics without Principles, Wealth without Work, Commerce without Morality, Pleasure without Conscience, Knowledge without Character, Science without Humanity, Worship without Sacrifice. Benn believed and fought for many of these causes.

To quote Younge: “He stood for something more than office and he didn’t pander”.
Deirdre Lane
White Rock, British Columbia, Canada

• Yes, we have some talented bakers making wonderful bread in France, but there are also quite a few mediocre and even bad ones (28 March). And of those 10bn baguettes, a not insignificant proportion are factory-made, tasteless, woolly white sticks sold plastic-wrapped in supermarkets, unworthy of the term bread. France has its share of junk food and these sticks are in that category.
Patsy Pouvelle
Reims, France

Independent:

The Lib Dem MP Jeremy Browne (8 April) writes: “The task today is to push power, money, information and choice down to the individual citizen, so everyone can enjoy opportunities a fortunate few take for granted.” His solution: give those fortunate few more money!

He does not actually say so but the logic of his argument is that those “fortunate few” earning a minimum of £150,000 a year are so despondent at the burden of taxation that they are at present marking time, working to rule, and therefore need a tax gift to unleash the “individuality, creativity, originality” which only they possess.

This is all in aid of keeping up with an Asia-driven resurgent capitalism. In other words, more growth, more consumption, more pillaging of finite resources, more pollution, global warming, deforestation, acidification of the oceans etc, etc. Or  to put it another way:  “Foot flat to the floor; there’s a bottomless pit  straight ahead.”

Mr Browne wants “a willingness to challenge stale thinking”, but his own thinking is not just stale but fossilised. It is also extremely unjust and dangerous.

Steve Edwards, Wivelsfield Green, East Sussex

Your editorial supporting a reduction in the 45 per cent tax rate (8 April) demonstrates that you just don’t get it. Tax rates should rise with income, until, at the highest level, they do become confiscatory.

Do we wish to live in a fair society? Morality, not economics, should direct our thoughts. No individual is entitled to preposterous wealth when so many go without; to entertain such a philosophy is to encourage an even more unequal society. Advocates of lower taxes are almost always those who already have too much.

Finlay Fraser, Cottingham, East Yorkshire

Wind, solar or biomass?

While Jane Merrick is of course correct that the British weather is variable (3 April), she is wrong to suggest that this means onshore wind farms don’t make sense.

Onshore wind is cheaper per unit of electricity generated than any other source of renewable electricity. It is also cheaper than new nuclear, which, under current government proposals, will receive subsidies for 35 years as well as up to a £10bn loan guarantee from the Treasury.

Electricity from onshore wind soared by 36 per cent last year compared with 2012 and contributed nearly 5 per cent of the UK’s electricity needs. Most polls suggest that 70 per cent of the British public are in favour of onshore wind turbines.

It is important to focus on a range of renewables as we move towards a decarbonised electricity mix, but onshore wind has an important part to play for the foreseeable future.

Nick Molho, Head of Climate and Energy Policy, WWF-UK, Woking, Surrey

Jane Merrick’s views on the inefficiency of onshore wind turbines reflect mine about solar “farms”. As a broad supporter of green initiatives, I naively thought that there was a grand plan to situate solar panels on domestic and commercial roofs, brownfield sites and areas of no agricultural or scenic value, a great way of gaining an extra dividend from these sites. Not so, it seems.

Applications are flooding in, all over the country, to snatch the cash and cover thousands of acres of good-quality agricultural land with solar panels in a modern gold rush. This at a time when we have an increasing population,  a need for land for new housing, land being lost to coastal erosion, and an annual food import bill of some £8bn. And are reliably told that world food production is set to fall.

At least the footprint of a wind turbine is small and sensible things can be done with the surrounding land.

Tim Colyer, Diss, Norfolk

Surely only a political mind could dream up the insanity that is currently encompassing Drax Power Station, North Yorkshire.

You truly have to wonder at the idea that it would be environmentally worthy and economically viable to convert the largest coal-fired power station in Europe to one that burns wood (biomass) – wood chips that need importing over 3,000 miles from the forests of North Carolina.

Common sense makes it obvious that destroying acres of forests, processing them into wood chips then transporting these thousands of miles will not prove environmentally or economically viable.

The wood-fuelled furnaces produce 3 per cent more carbon dioxide than coal, and twice as much in gas emissions. In the longer term, you and I will be paying £105 per MW/hr for Drax’s biomass electricity, compared with the current market cost of just £50 per MW/h.

Drax says it is simply responding to government policy. Only out-of-touch, misinformed and foolish politicians could wreck the environment in the name of saving the planet. Our whole UK energy policy belongs in the madhouse.

Dave Haskell, Penparc, Cardigan

The Great War against German aggression

A new First World War comic-book is designed to combat Michael Gove’s “jingoistic” interpretation (report, 2 April). It is important to remember the stories of those on all sides of the conflict and of the pacifists and the shell-shocked executed as cowards, and to remember the awful loss of life. It is wrong, however, to call Gove’s interpretation “jingoistic”.

Wilhelm II of Germany had imperialist ambitions, and used the conflict in the Balkans as a way to escalate to a full-scale European war. The victors’ peace imposed on Russia at Brest-Litovsk in 1917, where the latter lost Ukraine, Poland, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Belarus, shows this imperialist agenda.

Recent research has revealed that the German “rape of Belgium” in August and September 1914 actually occurred. The German high command ordered systematic atrocities against the Belgians, killing 6,000, destroying 25,000 homes in 837 settlements and displacing up to 1.5 million Belgians (20 per cent of the population). Up to 10,000 workers were forcibly removed from Belgium to build German roads and military facilities. The German army also dismantled Belgian factories, relocating machinery to Germany. Belgium, the sixth largest economy in the world, was reduced to a mere shell of its former self and never fully regained its pre-war economic activity.

The majority of Britons saw the war as a painful but necessary way to stop German aggression.

Harrison Edmonds, Cheadle, Cheshire

Farage’s leap into the unknown

Mary Dejevsky is right (4 April) that the appeal of Nigel Farage is his anti-establishment rhetoric. But he is also a hugely entertaining and persuasive communicator, well able to hold his own in televised debates as well as in front of a packed audience of students at the LSE in January.

He will obviously do well in the European elections, but when it comes to the referendum, voters will not be prepared to take that leap into the unknown and withdraw from the European Union. Better the devil they know.

Stan Labovitch, Windsor

Nightmare of an old folks’ home

Grace Dent’s “dream old-folks’ home” (8 April) sounds like a version of hell to me. The prospect may have been what drove Anne to suicide.

The point about assisted dying is that it provides people with another option. We all have our own views of what constitutes a good quality of life; it’s no one’s business to tell someone else how they should feel.

Susan Alexander, Frampton Cotterell, South Gloucestershire

Killer’s payout for prison attack

The press appears to agree that Levi Bellfield, who is in prison for killing three young women, should not have been allowed to sue the prison service after being attacked in jail. They seem to be ignoring the fact that the relatively small payout amounts to little more than a rare slap on the wrist for the authorities for allowing prisoners to attack each other with weapons.

Have we really degenerated so much that we think being shanked in prison is just fine?

Jim Jepps, London NW1

Royal visits to rich countries

It seems that the royals tend to frequent only the richest Commonwealth countries, such as New  Zealand, Australia and Canada, whenever they make official trips abroad, while the vast majority of poorer Commonwealth countries rarely appear on their schedule. Is there a specific  reason for this that your readers may know about?

Chris Ryecart, Dovercourt, Essex

Parliament must regulate itself

Despite the general disquiet about its handling of Maria Miller’s expenses claims, Parliament, at least the elected part of it, should not concede authority over its members to another body. A future government might stuff any independent oversight authority with its own people to harry independent-minded MPs.

John Hartland, Cambridge

Times:

There are good reasons for paying for the BBC but the TV licence isn’t the best way

Sir, Emma Duncan’s call for the BBC to be funded on a subscription basis risks undermining the corporation as a unique national asset (“The licence fee is stifling the BBC’s creativity”, Apr 7). Its basic requirement has always been to reflect diverse interests and opinions across the country, free of government and commercial control. Also, who is to produce events that demand huge resources such as the general election, the Olympics and other national occasions? Maybe the BBC has grown too large, maybe it has faults in meeting changing expectations and there are difficult issues about how it is financed, but do we want the next Coronation to be sponsored by Tesco? At least we have one institution that appears to work.

Terence Hughes

London SW15

Sir, One reason I’ve been happy to pay the licence fee is to be free from advertising but with recording I can fastforward through the ads at 30 times the speed — very satisfying. TV advertising may be booming but for how long? And how much will my subscription TV cost if advertising fades away? However, competition is a powerful tool and the BBC should be subject to it: yes, kill the licence fee.

Michael Stubbs

Brighton, E Sussex

Sir, I often visit Canada, where the TV is universally unwatchable and gifts of DVDs of BBC programmes are gratefully accepted. I always return feeling proud of our BBC and keen to enjoy the incredible value of my licence fee. Long may it continue.

John Priestley

Shipley, W Yorks

Sir, Emma Duncan weakens her argument by ignoring recent BBC drama successes such as Line of Duty , The Fall and Peaky Blinders , not to mention the entirety of BBC Radio and BBC online content.

Tak-Sang Li

Borehamwood, Herts

Sir, There are many British institutions but few great ones. The BBC has become great in its quintessential presence in British social life and also in its worldwide appeal.

The anachronism of the licence fee, dating from the 1920s when wirelesses were first licensed, based on ownership of the means to receive communications, has no place in this digital age. When technology ownership is ubiquitous, licensing is outdated and wrong. Emma Duncan hits the spot in identifying a complacency within the BBC on two fronts; popularity and creativity. She blames the licence fee for featherbedding the BBC’s structural and artistic deficiencies. However, she does not propose a solution. Might I suggest that just as another great British institution, the Royal Family, has faced changes in its funding and scrutiny from the National Audit Office, the BBC might benefit from appraisal and new funding sources.

Brian East

London W13

Sir, With the overdue recognition of the need to allocate a greater proportion of defence spending to the overseas aid budget can we also ensure that the budget for the BBC’s World Service falls under international development as well? Perhaps then this valuable resource might also receive the funding that it richly deserves.

David Moss

London SW13

The rules which govern the unfair situation of Service widows must the changed

Sir, We appeal to the Prime Minister to bring justice to Service widows who lose their pension on cohabitation or remarriage. This includes most such widows, current and future.

This situation is at odds with the Armed Forces Covenant, which exists to redress disadvantages the Forces community may face in comparison to other citizens; for widows, as a result of Following the Flag, this includes rarely accruing an occupational or full state pension.

Most women affected by the widows’ rules receive pensions of less than £3,000 a year. Many cannot afford this loss, so face a life of enforced solitude. Removing the rule would cost £250,000 a year, much less if the cost of monitoring compliance and tracking down transgressors is taken into account.

The latest rules rectified matters for some widows, but the Treasury has vetoed further change, apparently not accepting the principles underpinning the Covenant.

The new Armed Forces Pension Scheme, due for implementation in April 2015, is a unique opportunity to simplify a complex and unfair system and introduce a common rule for all Service widows from that date, avoiding 40 more years of misery for those affected.

Vice-Admiral Peter Wilkinson

Royal British Legion

Admiral Sir Ian Forbes

Forces Pension Society

Lieutenant-General Sir Andrew Ridgway

Confederation of Service Charities

Air Marshal Sir Christopher Coville

Forces Pension Society

and Kate Adie (Forces Pension Society), Dr Ros Altmann (former government pension adviser); Martin Bell (Forces Pension Society); Admiral Lord Boyce; Marshal of the Royal Air Force Lord Craig of Radley; Sir Nick Harvey, MP; Lord Hutton of Furness (chairman, Independent Public Services
Pensions Commission 2010-11); Joanna Lumley (Forces Pension Society); Group Captain Bill Mahon (ret’d) (RAF Families Federation); General Lord Richards of Herstmonceux;
Kim Richardson (chair Naval Families Federation); Lord Robertson of Port Ellen; Catherine Spencer, Army
Families Federation;
Gisela Stuart, MP

Trust in police and politicians is too important to our democracy to be left to their self-discipline

Sir, Apropos the Police Federation, the Prime Minister has described the police as Britain’s last great unreformed public service (leader, Apr 7), and the Coalition is threatening to reform it should it fail to do so itself. It is true that several serious failures have badly affected the trust hitherto enjoyed by the police. However, public trust in Parliament is also at an all-time low, yet Mr Cameron has set his face against demands to reform a system that allows MPs to have the final say on those accused of abusing their expenses.

Trust in the police and in politicians is too important to be left to self-discipline. The political parties must address this in their manifestos for the next general election with policies upon which voters have a choice.

G. M. Waddington

Detective Superintendent (retired) Messingham, Lincs

The European Azerbaijan Society writes to clarify the status of Nagorno-Karabh, under “illegal occupation”

Sir, You quote Baroness Cox (Apr 5) saying that Nagorno-Karabakh is an Armenian enclave “relocated by Stalin to Azerbaijan”. In fact Nagorno-Karabakh has always been part of Azerbaijan, and legally still is. Four UN Security Council resolutions say so, and not a single country in the world disputes Azerbaijan’s rightful sovereignty, which endures despite Armenia’s illegal military occupation.

Lionel Zetter

The European Azerbaijan Society, London

The debate over Jewish and Muslim methods of slaughtering animals for food involves the problem of mis-stunning

Sir, There is a certain tragic irony when “leading vets” claim to have been misled by faith communities (Apr 5) on the number of animals mis-stunned in the UK. We take no pleasure in having to expound the depth of the problem of mis-stunning, and the apparent determination of animal welfare groups to creatively gloss over the problem makes it all the more troubling. To be clear, the Government’s figures do not show the number of animals mis-stunned every year in UK slaughter houses; they show the number of recorded mis-stuns. To take one example, studies from Europe and the US place the numbers of mis-stunning of poultry each year, in the tens of millions. Defra’s figures for last year recorded just 13 cases. Mis-stunning is not properly recorded in the UK, and that is part of the problem. The real question is why animal welfare groups avoid the problem rather than addressing it urgently and honestly.

Henry Grunwald, QC

London NW5

The cost of childcare proposals in Scotland is likely to be dwarfed by the massive expense of becoming independent

Sir, On the subject of the SNP’s childcare proposals you report the view that “SNP ministers have not put a pricetag on the proposals” (Apr 4). I would suggest that that cost, whatever it might be, would be a drop in the ocean compared to the undeclared, probably unconsidered, cost of reshaping hundreds of institutions, agencies, etc, in fields ranging from issuing driving licences to ambassadorial representation — surely a massive bill to be paid before Scotland can start thinking of financial benefits.

Stuart C. Poole

Edinburgh

Telegraph:

SIR – Prudence Seddon can no longer fit her bulbous toothbrush into the holder. She should push it into the holder with the bristles going in first. I have been doing it for years.

Judith Kent
Holland-on-Sea, Essex

SIR – Because toothbrush manufacturers have changed the contours of their handles, I can no longer find a toothbrush that is comfortable to hold in my right hand and that allows me to change my grip as necessary for the brush head to connect with all teeth from every angle. Several new-design toothbrushes are now languishing unused in the holder.

Erika Sciama
London NW3

SIR – Worse than a sloping basin in the bathroom is a rounded edge to the bath. Where do you put your gin and tonic?

Rev Roger Holmes
York

SIR – Despite the engineering accolades being heaped upon them, building the two new Queen Elizabeth Class aircraft carriers was an expensive mistake.

Access to UK base ports will be limited because of their draught. We will not have sufficient escort vessels to maintain the necessary associated task groups, and the overall logistical support required will place unacceptable demands on our impoverished fleet and support facilities.

Jump jets do not require a platform of 65,000 tons in order to operate effectively. The only justification for a vessel of these proportions is for conventional strike aircraft requiring arrester gear and launch boosters, complete with a fully angled deck, providing interoperability with American navy carriers. Plans to include these features were cancelled due to cost.

The previous, prematurely discarded Invincible Class carriers of 20,000 tons had proven themselves to be highly versatile and cost-effective vessels. Three of these smaller carriers could have been built in individual yards for a similar price.

Cdr D L Deakin RN (retd)
Totland Bay, Isle of Wight

Starting to read early

SIR – Sally Goddard Blythe claims that “It can take up to seven years for some children to develop the eye movements necessary to support reading”, and that a third of the children who enter school “may not have all the physical skills in place to support academic learning”.

This is no more than an updated version of the “reading readiness” excuse that progressive educators have been using to explain away their failures for the last century. Hundreds of schools – many serving disadvantaged families – succeed in teaching all children to read long before their seventh birthday. They do so by teaching the necessary sub-skills, including tracking print from left to right, as opposed to waiting for some mythical developmental milestone to pass.

Delaying reading instruction is the surest way to demoralise children with learning difficulties and to perpetuate educational disadvantage. At most, half an hour per day is needed, leaving plenty of time for “learning through play”.

Prof Tom Burkard
Easton, Norfolk

Co-operative banking

SIR – My somewhat eccentric grandmother had a meeting with her bank manager in the late Sixties. Their business concluded, he politely asked her to let him know if there was anything else he could help her with in the future.

Taking him at his word, my grandmother telephoned a few days later asking him to come to her house and he arrived to find several chicken coops that needed moving.

With admirable sang-froid he rolled up his sleeves and got on with it.

Dominic Weston Smith
Fernham, Oxfordshire

Selling British cars

SIR – Of course car manufacturing in Britain benefits from EU membership.

A survey for the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders states correctly that 49 per cent of UK-produced vehicles by volume are exported to the rest of the single market. But in 2012, the proportion of British car exports going to the rest of the EU by value was only 37 per cent. Between 2007 and 2012, Britain’s car exports to the rest of the world more than doubled from £5.8 billion to £13.4 billion, while over the same period Britain’s car exports to the rest of the EU declined from £8.6 billion to £8 billion.

If Britain left the EU, World Trade Organisation rules would force the EU to tax British car exports at the same 10 per cent tariff rate the Japanese and Americans face, which would be a problem for British car manufacturers. But Britain could replicate most of the benefits of single market membership by negotiating a new inter-governmental customs union-based preferential trade agreement with the EU.

If such an arrangement left them with unimpaired access to British markets, continental exporters would have no moral grounds for objection if such an arrangement left them with unimpaired access to UK markets.

Ronald Stewart-Brown
Trade Policy Research Centre
London SW1

Eva Braun’s ancestry

SIR – It is not the case that “many Ashkenazi Jews in Germany converted to Catholicism”.

The majority of German Jews, especially those in the Prussian provinces, leant towards Protestantism, with many reform communities introducing organs and choirs during the latter part of the 19th century. Thus, they tended to convert to Protestantism, and there were many mixed marriages.

Stephen Cameron Jalil Nicholls
Centre for German-Jewish Studies at the University of Sussex

Frontierswoman

SIR – The man who inadvertently travelled to Spain on his girlfriend’s passport reminded me of the time when my wife passed through, not one or two, but four border controls using her deceased father’s passport.

Only on the final examination was any comment made. The lady looked at my passport, at me, at my father-in-law’s passport and then at my wife. With a look of despair she said, “Thank you, sir,” and returned both to me.

John Pickles
St Peters, Guernsey

Folding business

SIR – Could someone please inform me how to fold a fitted sheet without it looking like a crumpled mess in my linen cupboard? Until I know how to do this I will have to continue using traditional flat sheets.

Caroline Chaffe
Southborough, Kent

Introducing children to the delights of opera

SIR – As a trustee of Operaluna, a charity designed to bring opera to new audiences, I disagree with Rupert Christiansen that, when it comes to the operatic voice, “kids don’t like it, don’t understand or identify with it”. My experience is that high-calibre and enthusiastic operatic performers can harness the imagination of young people.

Our charity facilitates opera workshops for state primary school children in Wiltshire. Many of the young people who participate in these workshops have no experience of opera; they have never been to London, let alone visited the Royal Opera House or English National Opera.

Who knows whether any of the young people who participated in the workshops ran to the library to find out more, as Mr Christiansen did as a boy. But i8f just one of them feels that the experience broadens their horizons and gives them a taste for the sheer joy of music-making, the charity will have done its job.

Laura Ingram Hill
Pewsey, Wiltshire

SIR – We should expose children to opera, alongside many other music genres, because in order to make informed choices and to make sense of what we like and don’t like, we need variety.

We also know that early exposure to music in very young children helps to boost the imagination and improve communication and language skills.

Children who learn a musical instrument are often more advanced in maths and languages, as well as being more organised in their approach to learning. They are also able to engage with others more confidently.

Caroline Crabbe
Chesham, Buckinghamshire

SIR – What would happen if any of us fiddled our expenses at work? Surely a sacking would follow. I will not be voting for a party that condones Maria Miller’s behaviour regarding her expenses claims.

Jan Lindsey-Clark
Hindhead, Surrey

SIR – If ever there were a case for maintaining press freedom, the latest scandal concerning Maria Miller and her expenses must surely fit the bill.

Whatever its flaws, the press represents the last bastion against corrupt government. No wonder those in power are eager to see press freedom curtailed.

Catherine Castree
Fetcham, Surrey

SIR – David Cameron has made much of the fact that a House of Commons Committee on Standards, consisting of “lay” members as well as MPs, has decided not to place serious censure on Maria Miller, meaning she will escape repaying £40,000 in expenses claims. Mr Cameron relies on the fact that nobody will actually read the report.

If you read the report there are constant references to Mrs Miller providing incomplete documentation, not consulting properly on financial matters as advised, and not providing all the information requested. She failed to respond properly to requests for information. This has taken 14 months.

Terry Maunder
Leeds

SIR – Before ministers are appointed to the Cabinet, they should be required to sit a short intelligence test:

1. You have two homes and spend more nights each year in one than the other. Which one is your main home?

2. Can you recognise whether your parents are also living in one of your homes?

Guy Smith
Reigate, Surrey

SIR – What is the point of Mrs Miller resigning? Like previous corrupt ministers – Mandelson, Laws, etc. – she will take the parachute payment and then be quietly reintroduced a few months later.

David Steer
Rockwell Green, Somerset

SIR – Iain Duncan Smith supports Mrs Miller by saying “if we’re not careful we end up with a witch-hunt of somebody”. I would be interested to hear his definition of the difference between a witch-hunt and the pursuit of moral (and lawful) justice.

Stuart Ashton
Whitley Bay, Northumberland

SIR – We are constantly being told that we live in a “compensation culture”, riven by arrogance, greed and self-interest.

On reflection, perhaps Mrs Miller is indeed the best choice for the post of Culture Secretary.

Mick Richards
Llanfair Waterdine, Shropshire

Irish Times:

Sir, – I was born in England to Irish parents who had emigrated in the 1950s, along with so many others, in the hope of a better life. I learned to tie my shoelaces there, went to school, played on the street and made friends. We would visit Ireland on our holidays, so I was giddy with excitement when it was announced that we were selling the house and moving back to the old country. It was time. We were going home. I was nine years old.

My first day in primary school in Drogheda was like a scene from Oliver Twist . I had stepped back 100 years. Nevertheless, children are adaptable and I soon settled in to a new life, new street and new friends.

I was as Irish as anyone, perhaps more so having experienced emigration, but a small part of me was of England. I was of two countries in the same way that we are all of two parents. And my countries were not happy. In fact, they were divorcing, in a bitter, painful and drawn-out way. I remember the hunger strikes as the darkest time. Like a child trying to reconcile his warring parents, I would tell my friends that English people did not wish Ireland ill. And when I emigrated to England in the 1980s, along with so many others, in the hope of a better life, I would explain to my English friends that things happen for a reason in Ireland — that there was a traumatic history that could not be denied.

Roll forward a few years and Queen Elizabeth is wearing green and our President, Michael D Higgins, is standing on red carpet on a State visit to the United Kingdom. My parents have reconciled after so many lost years and are together again. They are talking and laughing and having tea parties in the garden. The family is reborn. Yours, etc,

JAMES COYLE,

Hawthorn Park,

Swords,

Co Dublin

Sir, – Born in England of an Irish family a little over 60 years ago, I, along with many others in the same circumstances, have developed a technique of ignoring as graciously as possible the many slights, and worse, which come with the turf.

It is a sad thing to feel obliged to keep a low profile as regards your heritage, to not know quite where you fit in to the grand scheme of things. From being a bit of a Paddy to the English, to taking stick for my Brit accent in Ireland, I cannot tell you just how good it feels to see the President of Ireland, and as such, the Irish people, being so well and warmly received in London, and rightly so.

Full marks to all who have brought about this momentous change. What great comfort to think that the troubles of centuries could be on the way to becoming a thing of the past, consigned hopefully to history, not to be forgotten, but to be found in a better place.

To be able to celebrate what is great about both countries, their peoples and civilisations – and there is a great deal to celebrate of both nations – is a truly liberating and uplifting moment. I am not overly given to sentimentality, but today I shed a tear of joy and was surprised that it could taste so sweet. A truly great day indeed. Yours, etc,

VINCENT HEARNE,

Bonnaud,

Nabinaud,

France

Sir, – Your correspondent John Rogers (Letters, April 7th) equates commemoration of the upcoming centenaries with the glorification and celebration of blood sacrifices, and refers in a somewhat jocose manner to the events at Gallipoli, the Somme and at the GPO.

While in the past we may have heard phrases such as “our glorious dead” I doubt if those who wish to commemorate the death of an ancestor 100 years after the event are trying to glorify them. They may rather be trying to get some semblance of recognition that they actually did exist and that they did die in the fields of France, Belgium and Gallipoli for causes which at the time were seen and believed to be a matter of world importance.

The problem in Ireland is that these war deaths were overtaken by the events relating to the Irish rebellion and by the time the survivors of this horrific rather than glorious war came home, Ireland had moved on, nationalism had been fanned by the execution of the leaders of the rebellion, and although they were Irish themselves they were treated like pariahs. It became almost shameful to even mention the 40,000 to 50,000 Irishmen who perished.

In even the smallest town in other European countries there are monuments recalling the names of those who died. More than 700 men from Galway died, for example, yet their names are not recalled anywhere in that city. Now, at the centenary of the start of the first World War, there is an opportunity for Galway and every other town in Ireland to correct this continuing slight. For those who lost family, it is not a celebration, but a long overdue commemoration. Yours, etc,

DICK BYRNE,

Craughwell,

Co Galway

Sir, – Once again this weekend I have read (twice) the unchallenged view in the columns of The Irish Times that, this State shamefully ignored or neglected Irish participation in what Gay Byrne continues to call “the Great War”.

This is getting boring. I write as someone who lost a great-uncle in that war and who has visited the Belgian memorials to the dead. Given the way the commemorations have evolved in Britain, does Gay Byrne really believe it was realistic or appropriate for a fledgling state, in the immediate aftermath of the War of independence to have found time to commemorate a war which was largely fought over five miles of muddy ground on the Western Front and which was a complete waste of all of those Irish lives?

It is now almost obligatory to wear a poppy if you wish to appear on British TV during November, and the symbol has been used to justify the illegal war in Iraq and to silence criticism of the presence of British troops in Afghanistan. Quite incredibly, people like Gay Byrne are more concerned with criticising post-independence silence about first World War dead and survivors than with taking the British government of the time to task for encouraging his father, my great-uncle and their comrades to go to death or injury in Gallipoli, the Somme and Messines ridge.

A hundred years on let’s have a proper debate in which iti is legitimate to criticise propaganda. And if we do commemorate, can we not also point out the folly of the whole sorry escapade, bury any talk of noble sacrifice and question why a war to end wars is now used to justify, and silence criticism of, current illegal conflicts? Lest we forget. Yours, etc,

PATRICK DALY,

Rock Street ,

Tralee

Sir, – Ellen MacCafferty (Letters, April 8th) asserts that GPs are “virtually public sector workers”. Really? I am sure doctors around the country are popping corks to hear that they are now entitled to huge pensions, like other public sector workers.

What GPs earn from the GMS is information that is freely available, on a practice-by-practice basis, from the HSE. But Ms MacCafferty would like doctors to publish what they privately earn in nett terms, so that she and people like her can judge what is fair. Why stop there? She might also like to know what cars they drive, where they holiday, where they live and what schools their children attend?

What I would suggest is that she should read, if she is interested, the OECD report 2013 into the remuneration of medical specialists, which ranked Ireland at the bottom of the OECD countries in terms of earnings as a multiple of the average industrial wage.

The idea that the rush of Leaving Certificate students to do medical degrees is proof positive that the earnings “must be worthwhile” is risible, especially in the context of over half of current medical graduates leaving these shores within two years of graduating, presumably for better pay and conditions abroad.

Finally, while it is true that everyone in business has to pay running costs, not everyone has to endure the abuse that GPs do for having the cheek to ask their customers to actually, God forbid, pay for their services. Yours, etc,

TURLOUGH

O’DONNELL FRCSI

Ardilea,

Dublin 14

Sir, – As a practising rural GP, living on a peninsula the size of Louth, I concur with the sentiments of my GP colleague Dr Valerie Collins (Letters, April 7th). Dr Collins’s description of the day-to-day demands on a rural GP is very apt. Couple this with the dictatorial health regime, which refuses to negotiate meaningfully on contract issues, and the result is a disillusioned workforce, which cannot be in the best interest of any of the stakeholders, most importantly our patients. Yours etc,

DR KEITH SWANICK,

Swanick Family Practice,

Belmullet,

Co Mayo

Sir, – According to a recent survey, people perceive that doctors tell the truth 89 per cent of the time, TDs 23 per cent and Ministers 20 per cent. GPs say that their unwell and elderly patients are losing their medical cards to fund the under-sixes. They say GPs are leaving and we will face a manpower crisis in the next five to 10 years. They say we need planning and investment before universal healthcare can work. The Ministers and TDs say they are lying. Are they? Yours, etc,

DR ELUNED LAWLOR,

Loughboy Medical Centre,

Kilkenny

Sir, – Heather Abrahamson (Letters, April 8th) objects to the use of the Christian Bible to swear in new members of the Garda Reserve. Back in 1957 I was commissioned an officer in the FCA. At the ceremony, in Cathal Brugha barracks, there were 25 of us, 24 Catholics and one Jew. The 24 marched up in groups, saluted the flag, bared our heads, took up the Bible and swore the oath of allegiance. The Jewish officer marched up, saluted the flag, left his cap on, took up the Jewish holy book and swore the oath.

I am sure that today the same applies: one can swear on whatever book is holy to the religion of which one is a member, be it the Koran, the Bhagavad Gita or any other. So Ms Abrahamson can rest easy. I do not think that the State is trying to force any particular religion down the throats of anybody. Yours, etc,

BRIAN P Ó CINNÉIDE

Essenwood Road,

Durban,

South Africa

Sir, – What, I wonder, does your front page photograph (April 5th) of the Garda Reserve graduation ceremony say about equality in our 21st century Irish society?

A deserved pat on the back for racial and gender equality, it would seem, and a smack in the face for the non-religious. Yours, etc,

SIOBHÁN WALLS,

Chairperson,

Humanist Association

of Ireland,

Royal Terrace West,

Dún Laoghaire,

Co Dublin

Sir,- Regarding the photograph on Saturday of the new gardaí holding aloft what appeared to be Government-issued Bibles, would it not be more in keeping with modern society and their role in it if they were swearing on the Constitution? Yours, etc,

SEAN DOOCEY,

Ballyoran,

Castlelyons,

Fermoy,

Sir, – Correspondence about our prospective universal health insurance scheme has pointed to its probable non-affordability and negative reference has been made the Netherlands. Has any attention been given to the case of Belgium?

There insurance is provided by several non-profit-making mutual societies ( mutuelles ). Every resident must be insured and has a free choice of mutuelle . The monthly contribution is paid in equal shares by the insured person and his or her employer. It covers the individual and dependents, and is calculated pro rata on the level of earnings. The unwaged have their contribution paid entirely by the state. Thus the system is designed to ensure that the mutual societies have adequate resources.

In operation, the insured person pays directly for treatment and medicines and then claims reimbursement from his mutuelle on the basis of an authenticated receipt. However, through a national institution (the INAMI), encompassing the medical professions, the hospitals, the pharmacies, the mutuelles and the state, precise maximum prices are periodically negotiated and fixed for every known form of treatment or care. Each treatment is accorded a number which has to be inscribed on the receipt given to the patient. A significant point is that those maximum prices ( charges conventionnées ) are much lower than those demanded in Ireland.

The patient has a free choice, at every stage, of GP, specialist or hospital. All are in abundant supply. Perhaps the Belgian system is worth a glance in the current discussion. Yours, etc,

DAVID M NELIGAN,

Silchester Road,

Glenageary,

Co Dublin

Sir, – It is wonderful to hear from TK Whitaker and to remember his many contributions to Ireland (Weekend, April 5th). Long may this 97- year-old enjoy his days salmon-fishing and his couple of pints afterwards.

One of his very important, but less remembered, contributions to the country was to chair the Committee of Inquiry into the Penal System, which reported in 1985. In the light of recent Garda controversy and the promise of an independent Garda authority, it is pertinent to recall how the Whitaker Committee severely criticised the Department of Justice’s stewardship of the prison system and advocated “a separate executive agency or board”, established by statute, to run the prisons. This has never happened, and the Department’s control of the prison system is as strong today as it ever was.

The Whitaker Report also proposed that Ireland have a low prison population, with prison used only “as a last resort”, and it set out clear pathways to achieve this. It also wanted much smaller prisons. Importantly, it stipulated “basic living conditions” which all prisoners should have — yet today’s prisons fall far short of these standards in almost every important respect. It is high time to look again at what the Whitaker Report had to say about our prison system. Yours, etc,

DR KEVIN WARNER,

Kilgarron Hill,

Enniskerry,

Co. Wicklow

Sir, – Your recent report on property tax by Fiach Kelly (April 5th) and the views of commentators that the economy and the housing market are now picking up are a timely warning to all homeowners that the property tax time-bomb is already ticking.

Last year almost 97 per cent of homes were returned to the Revenue Commissioners at values under €500,000. However, the new property boom is on its way and houses valued in May/June 2013 at, for example, €375,000, have now jumped to €500,000 and beyond. Homeowners who have been paying €14 a week will easily qualify to pay more than €20 a week, or €1,000 a year, when the next review comes around. And it will not stop there. There is something patently unfair about a tax on a home that rises dramatically at the whim of the markets.

May I appeal to your homeowning readers to raise this issue with candidates in the local elections? I hope that they will ask candidates what their attitude is to runaway house prices that automatically raise the taxes of homeowners, and ask what their parties propose to do about it. Any solutions offered should be noted, and voters should seek the application of necessary measures soon rather than having to wait for a review some years away. Additionally, homeowners should remember party responses now with an eye to the next general election. Yours, etc,

PEADAR SLATTERY,

Bettyglen,

Sir, – In the late 1970s or early 1980s, Spike Milligan, in his Q series ( Q4 , Q5 , Q6 etc ) of comedy programmes screened on BBC television revealed ( if that is the right word) that life began under the carpet on the fifth floor of Harrods department store in Knightsbridge in London.

That may sound a bit daft but it seems no more bonkers to me than claims by certain boffins that they have detected ripples in space which originated very shortly after the Big Bang went off, over 13 billion years ago. Yours, etc,

EDWARD HANLON,

Loreto Park,

Troys Lane,

Kilkenny

Sir, – Imagine if you will a world where male employees were free to wear both suits and other smart casual attire to work while female employees were required at all times to be dressed formally in business suits. In the interest of equality and political correctness I don’t think such a state of affairs would last too long in the modern world. Yours, etc,

DAVID FLYNN,

Somerton Lodge Mews,

Somerton,

Dún Laoghaire

Sir, – The death of Mickey Rooney brings to mind a quote (along the following lines) attributed to him. “If you must get married, do so very early in the morning … then if it doesn’t work out you may not have wasted the full day. ” Yours, etc,

TOM GILSENAN,

Elm Mount,

Beaumont,

Dublin 9

Irish Independent:

Many moons ago, when I worked in the ESB, we had planned a power switch-out in a rural area of West Limerick. These switch-outs, for maintenance and repairs, were always arranged for weekdays between the hours of 10am and 4pm and the customers would be notified two to three days in advance. This was done to confine disruption to a minimum for the mainly farming community and, as a result, was met with little or no resistance.

Also in this section

Injustice in our way of life

Let’s remember who of us went to Britain first

Garda cadetship vital

However, this particular switch-out, which was arranged for Wednesday, July 29, 1981, was different. When the notification commenced on the Monday, all hell broke loose. The official on the doorstep was met with stern resistance and, a short time later, the phones in the office were hopping. We menfolk scratched our heads and wondered what major event we had missed.

Phonecall after phonecall conveyed the same message and asked the same question – mainly from the womenfolk: “Are you aware that the royal wedding is taking place on Wednesday?” Mna na hEireann would not be excluded from the 750 million viewers who tuned in around the world for the wedding of Prince Charles and Lady Diana.

It came as no surprise to me that, years later, the seeds for this week’s historic Presidential visit to Britain were sown by three women: Mary Robinson, Mary McAleese and Queen Elizabeth.

Therein lies a message for us menfolk!

PAT MCLOUGHLIN

NEWCASTLE WEST, CO LIMERICK

 

TERRIBLE GRIEF FOR BOB

This morning I received a text from a very good schoolmate: “Can there be anything worse than losing a child?” We were both in school with Bob Geldof.

I have admired this man for many years, for both his great goodness to humanity and his great intellect and courage to speak out, with regard to all aspects of life in this country and beyond. No words of mine will help him or his family, but I do pray that the awful passing of his beautiful young daughter Peaches will not destroy this man, as the world would be a poorer place for it.

BRIAN MCDEVITT

GLENTIES, CO DONEGAL

GAA: PLAIN OLD BUSINESS

Recently, I was listening when the usual ‘it’s a disgrace’ brigade on the Joe Duffy show bemoaned the sale of 20 GAA games to Sky Sports for this year’s Championship.

Since the announcement was made, there has been hysteria surrounding this issue because Irish people will have to pay for an expensive Sky package to watch a handful of games.

There seemed to be a cry that the GAA had somehow reduced us all to an inevitable trip to the pub of a Saturday evening or Sunday afternoon to watch our counties. Nonsense!

This deal is a resounding endorsement of our game; one of the biggest sports carriers in the world has come knocking. The sole argument against this move has been money; people won’t be able to afford Sky Sports, they say. They will, however, be able to go to the pub – and the complainers seemed to be leaning toward the pub rather than actually going to the games to support their teams, which would cost roughly the same.

On a broader point, not every GAA game is shown on television at present anyway, but local and national radio keep us up to speed. I have often listened to my county playing on local radio because the game was not offered on television. Your local stations are always going to keep you informed, and the outcry has been nothing short of pure histrionics.

Forget about the GAA’s spin of wanting to bring the sport to the diaspora – this Sky Sports deal is plain old business, and extremely shrewd business too. Sky Sports has grown viewership and interest in the NFL and Super League in Britain, and there is every reason to believe the GAA will see an increase in participation in clubs across Britain as well.

JUSTIN KELLY

EDENDERRY, CO OFFALY

MONEY TALKS LOUDEST

Bruxelles is often regarded as being too directive in matters which could be best handled at national level. But sometimes it does leave margin for manoeuvre.

In dealing with free competition in the broadcast media, member states were allowed designate within reason events of national interest which must remain available on a free-to-air system. The Government nominated the GAA Championships as such an event. This was accepted by the EU.

When the EU was dealing with the preservation of water through the introduction of water charges, the Government argued that we should be exempt from that requirement. It pointed out that with the rainfall we enjoy we would always have adequate supplies, essentially once we reduced the leakages in the system. Again, this was accepted by the EU.

How things change when we look beyond a principle and see a cash cow.

JOHN F JORDAN

KILLINEY, CO DUBLIN

 

OVER-PRODUCTION

I refer to an article on deflation by Professor Stephen Kinsella (April 8).

Deflation has taken hold. There is no alternative in a world that produces too much of practically everything without any controls or restraint except the crude law of the market.

Cutthroat competition drives prices into the ground; survival means pricing the competition out of existence. At best, prices stay static, at worst, they decline to levels that eliminate all profit, precipitating epidemic business failure, which we now experience.

As long as over-production remains, deflation will only get worse. Historically the problem never existed before, except of course in the experience of agriculture in the EEC about 50 years ago – mountains of beef and butter; lakes of milk, wine and olive oil. The Common Agricultural Policy took care of that problem with production quotas and payments to produce less. Not a perfect solution – it broke all freedom-of-trade rules and is considered heresy by economic purists – but it saved farming in Europe. What happened to farming back then has happened to practically all production in the 21st Century.

I listened yesterday to a tirade on food wastage supposedly promoted by supermarkets; the world threw away half the food it produced last year. That is why we had vegetables at five cent just before Christmas – a time when historically prices were increased. They are not increased any more; desperation to sell more is at crisis point. Unregulated over-production breeds such selling mania and deflation.

We need new economic thinking; it is past time that politicians and economists saw the inadequacies of their ideology and faced the realities of the technological 21st Century.

PADRAIC NEARY

TUBBERCURRY, CO SLIGO

 

WE’RE NOT ALL TO BLAME

In his letter of April 8, Philip O’Neill is continuing the promulgation of the ‘we are all to blame’ mantra in relation to the bankrupting of the country.

We are not all to blame. A small number of the most powerful people at the head of the government, financial institutions, etc, made the decisions during the boom which bankrupted the country. The rest of us were simply not told of the risks of the policies pursued during the boom.

Philip O’Neill is wrong, therefore, when he says that “our minds become atrophied and failed to notice”.

The truth is, we were not told, by those whose business it was to do so, until the troika landed.

A LEAVY

SUTTON, DUBLIN 13

Irish Independent


Wendy and Susan

$
0
0

10April2014Wendy and Susan

I go all the way around the park listening to the Men from the Ministry: Can Hyde-Brown pass his exam? Priceless

Mary in hospital visit her with Wendy and Susan

Scrabbletoday, I win just by three points,Perhaps Iwill win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Sir Maurice Drake – obituary

Sir Maurice Drake was a High Court judge who presided over some of the most high-profile libel actions of his time

Sir Maurice Drake

Sir Maurice Drake Photo: PHOTOSHOT

7:10PM BST 09 Apr 2014

Comments1 Comment

Sir Maurice Drake, who has died aged 91, was the High Court’s principal libel judge from 1991 to 1995; earlier he was one of the most fluent and persuasive advocates at the Bar.

Robust and straightforward, Drake was particularly adept at handling difficult criminal cases, and often unusually candid with juries. Concluding his summing up in a murder trial at Reading Crown Court, he said: “Ladies and gentlemen, the facts are for you, the law is for me. But that doesn’t mean I can’t comment on the facts.” He then told them that he thought the defendant was innocent.

Drake was normally more subtle in expressing his opinion, and he very rarely misdirected. He was careful with the detail and expert at summarising it. A passionate believer in the jury system for all the reasons connected with justice, he nevertheless made no secret of the fact that he was also attracted by its theatrical possibilities.

His most dramatic case was probably the Gillian Taylforth libel trial in 1994, which resulted from a story in the Sun describing how the actress had performed an “indecent act” on her fiancé in her Range Rover on a slip-road off the Al.

Gillian Taylforth arriving at court in 1995

Much of the evidence in the case was so fruity that some commentators were asking if it did not undermine the dignity of and respect for the legal system; the propriety of the proceedings was dented by the direct way George Carman put his case (“I suggest, if we go back to basics, that you were giving him a blow job because you had both had a merry day”). But Drake – a man of the world – seemed determined that the jury should get the whole picture.

Among the exhibits he allowed the jury to see was a six-year-old video — showing the EastEnders actress at a party cavorting with a German sausage — used by Carman to rebut her claim that she was not an exhibitionist.

More unusually, Drake permitted the court entourage to troop out to the High Court’s car park, where Miss Taylforth purported to re-enact what she claimed had been an innocent comforting gesture to her sick fiancé. Afterwards, in another vehicle, two Sun feature writers, quite unable to suppress sniggers, simulated the version of events that was ultimately believed by the jury.

Drake attracted publicity of a different nature a year later, this time for taking the unprecedented step of openly discussing the fact that he was a Freemason, and had been since 1948. It was, he said, a chance for indulging in harmless play-acting, good dinners and friendship, rather than secret deals and career advancement.

“An outsider might say it is a lot of grown men behaving like children,” he said. “I can understand that, but it is fun all the same.” He denied any conspiracy: “If I were trying to sentence somebody and they tried to signal me or whatever, I would have to restrain myself from increasing the sentence.”

Frederick Maurice Drake was born on February 15 1923 and educated at St George’s School, Harpenden. During the Second World War he served in Nos 96 and 255 squadrons of the RAF. Short-sighted, he was prevented from becoming a pilot, and trained as a navigator flying in Beaufighters; in 1944, after a number of successes against enemy aircraft, he was awarded a DFC.

On demobilisation in 1945, Drake went up to Exeter College, Oxford; he later read for the Bar and was called by Lincoln’s Inn in 1950.

He joined chambers at 4 Paper Buildings in the Inner Temple, and developed a busy common law practice, dealing with crime, tort, contract and libel, plus a lucrative sideline in licensing – his ability to charm magistrates off their seats made him much in demand by Ladbrokes and others.

Drake’s popularity among solicitors owed much to his advocacy. He was at his best when up against it. He would lean back, smile, and calmly deliver a measured and articulate argument. He had faultless timing in both civil and criminal cases and was a ruthless cross-examiner. He was also an attentive instructor to his many pupils .

Drake’s clients included Mary Whitehouse, awarded damages from Ned Sherrin for his quip that in order to be up late enough to watch Not So Much a Programme, More a Way of Life she must have been “on the streets”. He also acted for the Bay City Roller Les McKeown, jailed for three months after assaulting photographers at a pop concert; and Sir Oswald Mosley, who would regularly consult Drake – who did not share his client’s political sympathies – on various libel suits.

Drake also prosecuted in all three of the so-called “terror pickets” trials at Shrewsbury Crown Court in 1973. The defendants were the ringleaders of 300 flying pickets who had swarmed on to a Shropshire housing site in 1972 “like a hoard of Apache Indians”, according to Drake, chanting: “Kill, kill, kill, capitalist bastards. This is not a strike, it is a revolution.”

The guilty verdicts removed fears that existing laws were not strong enough to deal with terror tactics in strikes. They followed government pressure on chief constables to abandon their reluctance to act in industrial disputes because of anxiety about the political consequences.

Drake was deputy chairman of the Bedfordshire Quarter Sessions from 1966 to 1971; deputy leader of the Midland and Oxford Circuit from 1975 to 1978; and a Recorder of the Crown Court for six years from 1972. He was appointed a Judge of the High Court in 1978, assigned to the Queen’s Bench Division, and from 1979 to 1983 sat as the presiding judge on the Midland and Oxford Circuit.

The Carl Bridgewater murder trial was one of Drake’s first on the bench, and presented him with the difficulty of one of the defendant’s confessing and implicating his three co-defendants, but then declining to give evidence in court. The case later became something of a cause célèbre, and in February 1997 the men’s convictions were overturned after suggestions that the police had fabricated evidence in order to secure the all-important confession. Throughout the long campaign to overturn the verdicts, however, no criticism was made of Drake’s handling of the original trial.

Thereafter, the reputation that Drake built as one of the QBD’s most gifted and reliable trial judges rendered him a natural choice to take over the jury list when Sir Michael Davies retired in 1991.

One of the earliest high-profile libel trials at which Drake presided involved the actor Jason Donovan, awarded £200,000 in 1992 after an article in the Face magazine had alleged he was “queer” and had lied about his sexuality. Drake advised the jury that to call someone “queer” in the 1990s “may not be defamatory” and that the matter was “highly debatable”. But the additional slur that the squeaky-clean Donovan was a hypocrite tilted the verdict the plaintiff’s way.

Jason Donovan, who won £200,000 libel damages in 1992

The dozens of squealing girls who had packed Court 13 were ecstatic. “I am heterosexual,” the actor announced outside the court. A fan shouted: “There is justice! There is justice!”

Other notable protagonists who came before Drake included Teresa Gorman, awarded £150,000 (reduced to £50,000 on appeal) from her aptly named constituent Anthony Mudd, for a slur in a pamphlet around election time; Claire Latimer, the Downing Street caterer who settled her action against the satirical magazine Scallywag over an alleged affair with John Major; David Mellor’s friend Mona Bauwens, who also settled her case against The People; and Richard Branson, who won an apology from British Airways over a dirty tricks campaign.

Drake also presided over the case between Lady Foster (wife of the architect Sir Norman) and Customs officers at Heathrow, over allegations of false imprisonment and “slander by conduct” – being marched through the airport concourse in full view of the public. The jury failed to reach a verdict, the defence counsel having described the plaintiff as “insufferably grand”.

Drake continued to sit on serious criminal cases when required, and sentenced a 15-year-old arsonist to six life sentences after he admitted starting a fire in a department store in which two pensioners died and 82 other shoppers were injured.

The following year, jailing a shoplifter for five years for the manslaughter of his pursuer, Drake said he would be delighted if the outcry surrounding the case resulted in higher sentences for manslaughter – at the time he was constrained by Court of Appeal guidelines.

In another case, Drake turned down the Chelsea footballer Paul Elliot’s claim for damages from the Welsh international Dean Saunders, over an allegedly “over the top” tackle that ended Elliot’s playing career. But he gave short shrift to the suggestion that players in contact sports “consent” to the risk of being seriously injured, saying they had every right to seek redress from the courts.

Drake retired in 1995, but continued to hear occasional cases and interlocutory applications; in 1996 he granted an interim injunction to prevent further publication of photographs taken of Diana, Princess of Wales, by a hidden camera while exercising at the LA Fitness Club.

Drake was variously vice-chairman of the Parole Board from 1985 to 1986, and Nominated Judge for appeals from the Pensions Appeal Tribunal from 1985 to 1995. A keen Liberal, he was also at one time the mayor of St Albans.

He listed his recreations in Who’s Who as music, opera (he sang for the Harpenden Amateur Operatics), gardening, and sea-fishing. Although he hated clubs, he was very clubbable.

Drake was an extremely good-looking man who enjoyed the company of women. But he remained devoted to his wife May (neé Waterfall), whom he married in 1954; they had two sons and three daughters.

Sir Maurice Drake, born February 15 1923, died April 6 2014

Guardian:

Your editorial (Faith in the figures, 9 April) speculates on whether the changes to the national accounts methodology to be applied this autumn amount to coincidence or conspiracy. They are neither. The changes are the result of new international standards which have been discussed and agreed by experts, over many years. In the case of European Union countries such as the UK, both the substance and timing of the changes are specified in European law. The Office for National Statistics has no discretion to vary either.
Joe Grice
Chief economic adviser, Office for National Statistics

• I see the residents of London’s Kensington Park Gardens are protected by armed police officers at each end of the street (No benefits street, G2, 8 April). I wonder how many of the aforementioned residents are actually contributing taxes to pay for policing and any other public services they enjoy.
Margaret Farnworth
Liverpool

• If you’re going to attempt musical analysis (In praise of… The Winner Takes It All, 7 April) it’s always better to actually understand the meaning of the musical terms employed. The predominant piano theme in Abba’s song comprises various descending scales of five notes, not arpeggios. Yours, pedantically.
Bill Hawkes
Canterbury, Kent

• Annie Murray, a “saga writer”, objects to your reporter writing that the saga genre is “much maligned” (Letters, 8 April). I suspect that Snorri Sturluson would be turning in his grave at the usage of “saga” by both of them.
Bruce Holman
Waterlooville, Hampshire

•  Travelling with friends through Wrynose Bottom in Cumbria, I didn’t realise the unpleasant implications until one of the company read the name from the map (Letters, 9 April).
Tim Boardman
Stafford

• It is possible to be smartly dressed in Matching Tye in Essex. I’m still trying to find Handkerchief somewhere close by.
John Hunter
Fulbourn, Cambridgeshire

Former PM Tony Blair. ‘Perhaps the difficulty lies in Blair’s tendency to be self-righteous, in his unwillingness to apologise unequivocally for anything,’ writes Bruce Ross-Smith. Photograph: Stefan Wermuth/Reuters

Zoe Williams’s touching plea to reconfigure the legacy of the former PM (We need to talk about the legacy of Tony Blair, 9 April) only serves to reinforce the widely held view that even the “liberal” media is incapable of offering the radical analysis of our current woeful condition that the times demand. It was Blair’s first lieutenant Peter Mandelson who offered the view he was “intensely relaxed about people getting filthy rich”, and so the deregulation of the City continued apace while the Tory assault upon trade union rights and their ability to protect the wages of the poor went unaddressed. The eroded minimum wage has now become the standard wage for almost all those newly employed in the manual sector (many graduates) and they now have no way to protect themselves. They won’t starve, but their capacity to wrest some just reward from the obscene growth of capital returns for the powerful has been swept away.

The increased investment in public services under Blair was entirely founded upon the naive belief that deregulation of the markets and their introduction into the public sphere would lead to unending growth – no more boom and bust! It was Blair’s mantra that people did not care who provided their services, only that they received them, as though the health professional working to maximise profits for private investors was no different from a public servant. The current Labour party has inherited, and continues, this embrace of the neoliberal agenda and that is why it now seems so irrelevant to that huge section of the populace on the left now effectively disenfranchised.
Tim Towers
Chichester, West Sussex

• As Polly Toynbee has often stressed on these pages, the achievements of Tony Blair‘s New Labour governments were considerable and durable, and Gordon Brown’s three-year administration added to those achievements. Zoe Williams is also right to say we shouldn’t judge Blair only on the basis of his military interventions (etc) and foreign policy. Perhaps the difficulty lies in Blair’s tendency to be self-righteous, in his unwillingness to apologise unequivocally for anything which happened on his watch, in his no doubt unintended habit of speaking in Pharisaical “voices”, both orally and in print. Humility is not Blair’s strong point. It is, however, a virtue.
Bruce Ross-Smith
Oxford

• It is both commendable and accurate for Zoe Williams to insist that the legacy of the Blair years should not be smothered by the war-crime notions of Iraq. Unfortunately, little of great political courage or imagination was done during these years to match the expectation of many of Labour’s grassroots supporters. For these women and men, pride is taken that their party created the NHS, the Open University, national parks, affordable and shame-free social housing, the first arts minister and much more. Civilising ideas were made concrete.

Sadly, New Labour appeared to many to cave in to the hostile media on the one hand and doubtful economism on the other. That’s when “they’re all the same” took hold. The state of the nation today would suggest that a dynamic surge of political courage, imagination and creativity could restore Labour’s magnetism. Without it the future of Britain looks like a tedious shopping mall with “offers that must end” repeated ad nauseam, and with nothing beyond.
Ian Flintoff
Oxford

• Zoe Williams exhorts us to be fair and remember that there was more to Tony Blair than just Iraq. Well, yes: he also tried to turn Britain into an authoritarian state with identity cards, vast government detention powers and mass surveillance. Economically, he renewed the drive for privatisation and commercialisation of public services. Since leaving power he has toured around preaching war against everyone in sight, and earning multimillions from vaguely defined services to various dictators he had got to know.

On Blair’s credit side, Williams mentions the peace process in Northern Ireland, and claims that the present government wouldn’t have done it. But it would. It was caused by the IRA leadership finally accepting after 25 years that they weren’t winning, and any government in London would have welcomed it and responded in the same way.

All Williams can really say is that the national minimum wage dates to his time. But any Labour government at this time would have done it, and the only thing remarkable is how out of character this particular act was to everything else Blair did; it must have been forced on him by overwhelming party pressure. But all right: the national minimum wage. Anything else to be said for him?
Roger Schafir
London

Two hundred years ago slavery was socially acceptable – it was part of life. It was only when it became part of a political agenda that this changed. As you report (8 April) that film director Steve McQueen and others throw their support behind demands for planned anti-slavery laws to be toughened up, Care also demands that the focus goes beyond that of organised criminals and “victims” to the estimated 68 million domestic workers who dwell behind the closed doors of people’s homes.

Globally, one in 13 female wage workers is a domestic worker. More than half have no established working hours or the legal right to a minimum salary and more than a third have no right to maternity leave. All people should be entitled to decent working conditions, and yet paid domestic workers around the world have been historically excluded from these provisions. This exclusion is a breach of their human rights and has left millions working in exploitative conditions, hidden from view and unregulated.

No one is saying we should put an end to this work. Our new report on decent work for domestic workers highlights just how vitally important it is to the economy. States need to enforce the rights of domestic workers and recognise the key role they play in the wider global economy.
John Plastow
Chief executive, Care International UK

• Maybe the reason why the UK’s growth will exceed the rest of Europe (Britain will lead world’s growth, says IMF, 9 April) is that we have a workforce that is very poorly paid – more or less slave labour. Was that in Cameron’s mind when he strenuously bargained away the European social contract some years ago, and is that the reason overseas companies set up operations here?
D Wharton
West Kirby, Wirral

Crucially, the state-run east coast mainline franchise, between London King’s Cross and Scotland, is the only line where the franchise holder, East Coast, has to compete on part of the line with non-franchised private railway companies, known as “open access”.

Research from the Centre for Policy Studies, Rail’s Second Chance: Putting Competition Back on Track, shows east coast mainline passenger journeys increased by 42% at stations that enjoy rail competition, compared with 27% for those without competition; revenue increased by 57% where competition occurs, compared to 48% for those without; and average fares increased by only 11% at those stations with competition, compared to 17% at those stations without. Those open-access companies which compete with East Coast – Grand Central and First Hull Trains – also consistently record the highest passenger satisfaction statistics of UK train companies. They receive no money from the government.

As a result of this competition more passengers have been attracted to the railway overall and, consequently, East Coast has been able to pay a year-on-year increase in its premium to government. But while there is some open-access rail competition on the east coast mainline, the west coast mainline long-distance rail franchise, operated by Virgin, still faces none.

More rail competition is in the interests of the passenger, the taxpayer, the government and the regions, particularly the north. The Labour party should support more open-access rail competition, alongside franchises, and not support a policy that risks delivering a more subsidy-hungry railway.
Tony Lodge
Research fellow, Centre for Policy Studies, and author of Rail’s Second Chance

It is shocking, but perhaps not surprising, to read of the impact of the public-private partnership between the Lesotho government and Netcare on healthcare across Lesotho (Finance deal threatens Lesotho’s hospitals, says Oxfam, 7 April). However, public-private partnership can work in an African healthcare setting, and this has been demonstrated over the last six years by the success of the Health Improvement Project Zanzibar (HIPZ) in transforming services on the island.

Since 2006, an innovative model of collaboration between HIPZ and the Zanzibar government has seen a huge improvement in care at Makunduchi and Kivunge hospitals. This partnership improves healthcare provision without commercial gain for individuals or corporations, or the accruement of debt, with an ultimate aim of long-term sustainability.

The success of this model has required a number of crucial factors: a commitment to fully understand local needs, an open-minded and pragmatic approach by the HIPZ team (recognising the importance of listening to local staff), consistent investment in local staff, and transparent monitoring of outcomes, but with the acceptance that improvement is slow and often difficult to demonstrate in the short term. This largely unknown model of collaboration demonstrates a stark contrast to that seen in Lesotho.
Dr Jon Rees, Mr Ru MacDonagh, Roma Walker, Dr Nick Campain
On behalf of the HIPZ Trustees

• Your article rightly raised concerns about healthcare costs in Lesotho. The World Bank Group is working closely with the government to identify cost-effective solutions to improve health for the people of Lesotho.

We would like to clarify a few key points. The public-private partnership health network – which serves a quarter of the population – accounted for nearly 35% of the total health budget. While this is a significant allocation of the budget, it is about the same percentage spent on the facilities under the old system. Most important, the network is delivering better results.

As the article noted, maternal and infant mortality rates have declined and the quality of care provided has improved at the new health facilities. These important achievements have driven greater-than-expected demand at the network – which includes four primary clinics and the only referral hospital open to all citizens.

We are working in several areas to help the government of Lesotho to further expand access to high-quality health services for women and children, especially those living in remote areas. We welcome the opportunity to work with all stakeholders so that everyone in Lesotho, especially the poorest, is able to access the essential health services they deserve.
Laurence Carter
Director, PPP transaction advisory services, International Finance Corporation

• The letter you published referring to the Tony Blair Africa Governance Initiative (9 April) is misleading. We are an independent UK-registered charity and Mr Blair, as our founder and patron, carries out his work in Rwanda on a pro-bono basis. As such he is well placed to comment on the country – its progress and its challenges. AGI derives no profit from its partnership with the government of Rwanda. A quick look at our website (www.africagovernance.org) will tell you that we work with several African governments to help them drive the development that lifts their people out of poverty.
Nick Thompson
Chief executive, Tony Blair Africa Governance Initiative

Your analysis (A public admission of what many are saying in private, 5 April) repeats the assertion that “ageing alone [is] estimated to add £1bn a year to the NHS‘s costs”, but then adds that “most of us use the NHS mainly in our last two years of life”. Those two years are the same whether one is in one’s 70s, 80s, 90s or beyond. There is no sudden additional burden on the NHS that can justify current handwringing and claims as to its unaffordability. Our “ageing population” is reducible to two causes: adults are living healthier lives for longer and are having fewer children. Most parents take their children to the GP more often than they take themselves, but no one complains that child health is an unsustainable burden on the taxpayer. Please can we have fewer spurious arguments against universal public provision, and less ageism? It’s bad enough being accused of hoovering up all the houses without being forced to apologise for wilfully continuing to breathe.
Dr Anne Summers (aged 70, as it happens)
London

Independent:

The moment I heard David Cameron offer Maria Miller his warm support, I suspected her ministerial career was doomed. There is a long history of prime ministers giving colleagues the kiss of death by publicly supporting them when they are in trouble.

Andy Coulson was a victim of this. There were several examples under Blair. Peter Mandelson and David Blunkett were ministers whom he stood by as they fell from grace.

Prime ministers and their advisers just don’t get the fact that the public expect very high standards of their representatives in Parliament.

John Boaler, Calne, Wiltshire

David Cameron backing Maria Miller because she was doing a good job shows (yet again) his bad judgement. All of his ministers caught out in wrongdoing have been given his full support.

It isn’t just the system that spared Miller that is in need of reform, but the whole of Westminster. The stink of corruption is wafting across the country where national assets such as the Post Office and the NHS are being looted by Tory party friends.

Julie Partridge, London, SE15

Before we fall for the story that Maria Miller has at last done the decent thing, let us note that she has resigned, she says, because her presence has become a “distraction from the vital work of the Government”. So she still lacks the recognition of having behaved badly – just as she failed to realised that to utter the words “I apologise” is not thereby to apologise. Voters take note.

Peter Cave, London W1

I know it’s difficult for us Northerners to appreciate the complexities of living down south, but according to my route planner, the time it takes to get from the train station nearest to Maria Miller’s home in Basingstoke to Westminster is 58 minutes, while the journey from her second home in Wimbledon takes 36 minutes.

A promising career lost, and great expense for the taxpayer, all for the sake of 22 minutes. And she could have done the Independent crossword to fill the time.

Colin Burke, Manchester

When MPs, caught with their hand in the expenses till, are pursued by the media, they regularly bleat “Witch-hunt!” When will they be taken to task for using this inappropriate metaphor? Surely, there were no witches.

Art Tanner, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk

Would Glasgow defy referendum vote?

I would like to draw attention to the possibility of a break-up of Scotland if the referendum results in our leaving the UK.

If there is a small majority for independence in September, I wonder whether Glasgow and the west of Scotland will accept that decision? Perhaps people in the west will want to follow Northern Ireland in staying in the UK. It was recently reported that in a poll of 2,589 Glasgow University students 62 per cent voted no, and 38 per cent voted yes to the referendum question. The pro-independence website Wings over Scotland states that “Glasgow is the heart of Unionist darkness in Scotland”.

Given the rivalry between Glasgow and Edinburgh, it is perhaps inevitable that many Glaswegians see independence as an airy-fairy notion that favours hoity-toity Edinburgh more than down-to-earth, businesslike Glasgow. Independence has already been shown to be potentially bad for business in many ways: for example, shipbuilding could be threatened.

The proximity of the south-west to Northern Ireland means that Unionism resonates much more with people there than those in the east. It is therefore possible that south-west Scotland will fight for the right to remain in the United Kingdom. What will then become of an independent Scotland when an area containing half its population opts to stay in the UK?

If the referendum produces only a narrow majority one way or the other, those on the losing side may have feelings of resentment for years to come.

Alistair J Sinclair, Glasgow

Lord Robertson, the former Secretary General of Nato, has warned that Scottish independence would threaten world stability.

I’m certain that in Kiev, Kharkiv and Donetsk they talk of nothing else than the “cataclysmic” “geo-political” consequences (to use Robertson’s words) of a “yes” vote in Scotland.

Sasha Simic , London N16

‘The train don’t stop here any more’

As quaint as they might be, request stops (“Stop the train, I want to get off”, 9 April) can also be a hazard for the unwary traveller.

Many years ago, one Saturday night, I was travelling back from Bath to Bradford-on-Avon after a few tinctures with an old friend. As a regular commuter on that line, I knew that the next stop after Bath was Bradford.

I may have closed my eyes momentarily, but then the train slowed down and a young lad in the compartment got up in readiness to get off. “Next stop after Bath” I said to myself, and alighted from the train when it stopped.

As the train pulled away I failed to see the lights of the town I expected, and making my way along the platform saw the sign “Avoncliff”. I stumbled in the darkness across the viaduct and groped my way to the Cross Guns public house.

It was like a scene from a gothic novel as I pushed open the door. The few locals huddled over their pints all went silent and looked up at the windswept stranger who entered the bar. I thought an explanation was due: “I’ve just got off the train.”

The landlord looked at me in an old fashioned way. “The train don’t stop at Avoncliff,” he said. The locals joined in: “The train ain’t stopped ’ere for years.”

It had that night. I found out later that it was a request stop.

John E Orton, Bristol

BBC ‘balance’ on climate change

The letter from the BBC Trust member Alison Hastings typifies the complacent approach to climate change adopted by the BBC (8 April).

On the last three occasions that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has produced a major report, BBC News has interviewed Bob Carter, a retired geologist from Australia who belongs to the Non-IPCC, Bjorn Lomborg, a well-known sceptic, Nigel Lawson, who chairs the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), and Richard Tol, an economist affiliated to GWPF.

It is true that Richard Tol contributed to the latest IPCC report, but his submission was the only academic study out of 20 claiming that climate change might be beneficial and was rejected by the IPCC as unduly complacent.

There is not a single reputable scientific journal in the world that disputes the reality of climate change, nor of man’s contribution to it. Yet the BBC seems utterly incapable of moving beyond  the science to the much more urgent question of what needs to be done. It is high time that the BBC ditched its obsession with political balance and started reporting the facts.

Dr Robin Russell-Jones, Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire

Free schools: my revolutionary plan

Why do papers blather on about free schools? Anyone would think they were Westiminster’s way of sidestepping the fact that state schools have been mismanaged.

I think the concept is so fantastically marvellous that I am going to set up a free hospital. I will start with maternity (on the basis that I have had three babies).

I will apply for government funding which they can siphon off from my local health authority. In anticipation of the success of this project I am already converting my leaky garden shed into a birthing pool.

Amanda Baker, Morpeth, Northumberland

No compensation for prisoners

Jim Jepps (letter, 9 April) expresses the sort of liberal viewpoint that is leading to the disintegration of civilised society. Of course it is not “just fine” for one convicted criminal to be “shanked” in prison by another convicted criminal. However, the alleged victim should not be awarded compensation; the perpetrators should be severely punished in a way which would necessitate legislation.

Those tasked with the day-to-day running of the prison service ought not to be held responsible for the actions of the criminals they are detaining.

David Mitchell, Edinburgh

Pickles at prayer

Archie Bland’s suggestion (8 April) that Eric Pickles should don a sandwich board the next time he wants to intervene in an argument about religion and secularism raises an important question. With the pickles in the sandwich will we have cheese or ham, or possibly both?

Peter Clark, Hartford

Times:

The hurdle between low-paid workers and Employment Tribunals has cut appeals by nearly 80%

Sir, Joy Drummond (letter, Apr 8) highlights the government’s pickle over tribunal fees. It has insisted that fees were not introduced to deter potential claimants but rather to recoup the costs of such litigation from those who choose to litigate.

Now that claims have fallen by 79 per cent, a figure that surely cannot just include “frivolous” cases, ministers are hinting at a review. However, if the government continues to insist that fees were introduced simply to recoup costs, there seems little point in changing things. Only if the government now concedes that it sought to remove claims that in its view should never have been brought, can a proper reassessment be made.

Richard M Fox

Chair, Employment Lawyers Association

Sir, Potential claimants to an employment tribunal must now first notify Acas. Acas has a legal obligation to seek a settlement with the employer. Its conciliators, who are not legally trained, cannot give advice on the merits of the claim to either side. Faced with the prospect of large fees, claimants will feel under heavy pressure to accept whatever can be negotiated without regard to the merits of the case.

There is another twist. The exemption scheme for those on benefits or who are on a low income does not extend to those on contribution-based jobseekers allowance, the very allowance that all those who can bring a claim for unfair dismissal will be on since they will have had to have worked for two years to qualify to bring such a claim. It is perhaps no surprise to discover that 97 per cent of claims for fee exemption are being declined.

A system that has served so well those who have been badly treated by their employers and which has had the support of administrations of both colours for many decades has been brought low. It is indeed a scandal

Dr PS Lewis

Adviser in Employment Law, Newmarket and Rural Cambs Citizens Advice Bureaux

Sir, Charging fees to bring employment tribunal claims has certainly allowed a lot of employers to get away with shoddy treatment of their workers, but there is also a sharp fall in spurious claims by ex-employees. I have seen many examples of such claims, and their damaging effect on employers, often small businesses. Before tribunal fees were introduced, many lawyers helped ex-employees bring weak claims knowing that it would be cheaper for the employer to settle than to fight.

Now we have to strike a balance between allowing mistreated staff some redress and helping employers avoid huge legal fees and payouts to employees who don’t fancy working.

James Goldman

London NW4

Even a lapsed Welsh-speaker admits to being foxed by Welsh road signs — so spare a thought for ordinary Angloglots

Sir, The letter from my long-lost cousin Judge/Barnwr Dafydd Hughes (Apr 3) made me wonder how many of the cases before Welsh courts arise because non-Welsh speakers (or lapsed ones like me) have difficulty in quickly interpreting the road signs in the Principality because the same fonts are used for both the English and Welsh versions of place names and warnings.

Gwilym Roberts

Newick, Sussex

One reader reckoned her spaniel met the criteria for school entry. Another wishes her grandson would learn to “stay”

Sir, I have just spluttered over my coffee while reading the letter about the springer spaniel which satisfies the criteria for age 2 school entry. Perhaps we could borrow him to train our 2-year-old grandson who behaves like a very sweet and unruly labrador puppy. “No”, “Stop” and “Stay” would make an excellent start.

Judith Ornstein

Bushey Heath, Herts

Alfred the Gr8? Text-speak is starting to affect the spelling of children’s first names. Who knows where it will end?

Sir, Text-speak (Apr 5) has reached forenames. An acquaintance recently came across “L-a”, pronounced “Ladasha”. What hope is there for old-fashioned ones like Albert and Mabel?

Peter Sergeant

Hathern, Leics

The state visit by the president of Ireland reawakens sharp memories of unfinished business

Sir, I was disappointed at your Peter Brookes cartoon (Apr 9), showing Martin McGuinness walking off the red carpet leaving a trail of red footsteps.

Although Mr McGuinness’s true activities within the IRA are still not clear, the future of Anglo-Irish relationships must involve looking forward and not dwelling on the violence of the past.

This will be extremely difficult for those who suffered directly during the Troubles from the actions of the various paramiltary and military groups. I feel this cartoon to be irresponsible and does not help the reconciliation process. It is likely to aggravate the still on-going tensions.

Tony Pawson

Formby, Liverpool

Sir, I take exception to comments by the former Northern Ireland secretary of state, Peter Hain (Apr 7). To suggest that we should not prosecute terrorists responsible for acts of savagery against police officers and the wider community amounts to a gross betrayal.

Officers in the RUC GC were the same as officers in every other police service in Great Britain — would Mr Hain countenance an amnesty for killers and bombers in his own Welsh constituency if there were a Welsh terrorist equivalent of the Provisional IRA?

No, he wouldn’t, but he persists in relegating Northern Ireland, and its people, showing no sensitivity or genuine acknowledgement of the immense contribution my officer colleagues made to the delivery of a more peaceful region.

As in every corner of the UK, those who donned the uniform to serve their country, and paid the ultimate price, deserve to be honoured and not treated as some cheap political pawns by politicians who’ve lost or mislaid their moral compass; 302 officers were murdered by terrorists — republican and loyalist — during the Troubles, and a staggering 210 deaths are unsolved. Is that a price Mr Hain is prepared for us to pay?

He and Mr Blair embarked on a grubby, secretive and massively offensive Administrative Scheme for “On-the-runs” to give political cover to Sinn Fein.

It has ended poorly, and Mr Hain should be big enough to now acknowledge that he made a dreadful mistake and apologise to the widows and dependants who still grieve the loss of their loved ones.

Terry Spence

Chairman, Police Federation for Northern Ireland

Telegraph:

Plant willow trees to slow the flow of flood water

Willows played an important role in the Somerset Levels.

Taking a punt on the willow: Peter Graham’s oil painting 'Glad green summer’, 1997

Taking a punt on the willow: Peter Graham’s oil painting ‘Glad green summer’, 1997 Photo: Getty Images/The Bridgeman Art Library

6:58AM BST 09 Apr 2014

Comments22 Comments

SIR – The role of willow trees in slowing the pace of drainage into rivers on the Somerset Levels was of paramount importance. But the number of willows has dropped for no apparent reason, and I have heard of no plans to restore these trees. Along with the removal of mud and debris from the rivers, slowing the flow of flood water into the rivers should be a top priority.

Granville Cayley

Angmering, West Sussex

SIR – The Conservative Party is the natural home of working people. Today’s party is the party for everybody in society, from every walk of life. We remember that Conservatives who have done the most for the poorest, from Lord Shaftesbury and Randolph Churchill to Lady Thatcher, didn’t necessarily come from working-class backgrounds. We also remember that Harold Macmillan, the Conservative who appealed most to working-class voters, was by no means working class himself. Social class doesn’t matter, but using power to help working-class people matters a lot. And that’s what Conservatives have done and are doing.

We’re proud to belong to a party that extended the franchise to working-class voters, gave the right to picket and the right to a ballot to trade unionists and was responsible for far-reaching measures to improve the conditions of the poorest.

We’re proud to belong to a party that demolished the slums, built millions of new houses, gave council-house tenants the right to buy their own home and gave millions of citizens the right to participate in a share-owning democracy.

And we’re enormously proud to belong to a party that is lifting the poorest out of tax, cutting fuel duty, increasing the minimum wage, reviving manufacturing, capping payday loans, reducing inequality to its lowest level for almost 30 years, and fighting for full employment. This is a message we must be shouting from the rooftops between now and next May.

David Amess MP (Con)
David Skelton
Director, Renewal
Nigel Adams MP (Con)
Andrew Bingham MP (Con)
Jackie Doyle-Price MP (Con)
Andrew Rosindell MP (Con)
Alec Shelbrooke MP (Con)
Laura Sandys MP (Con)
Paul Maynard MP (Con)
Bob Neill MP (Con)
Neil Carmichael MP (Con)
Mark Prisk MP (Con)
Robert Halfon MP (Con)
Guy Opperman MP (Con)
Mark Harper MP (Con)

London SW1

Election mailshot

SIR – David Cameron has appointed someone to send a letter on his behalf, by Royal Mail, to all small businesses informing them of the National Insurance rebate they will be entitled to. Why does he think this is necessary, as we had received the same information from HM Revenue & Customs by email a month ago?

Such blatant electioneering gives no credit to our intelligence, and bears the hallmark of Gordon Brown telling us how lucky we were to have our taxes paid back to us through government handouts.

Polly Thomas
Tonbridge, Kent

Classical Georgians

SIR – When we lived in Tbilisi, Georgia, we spent many nights at the wonderful opera house and concert halls. The local audience was extremely enthusiastic and there were many shouts of “bravo” at the end of the performance.

Children were taken by their parents and presented bouquets to a large number of performers at the end. Students would buy the cheapest tickets possible, and at the last minute, before the start of the opera or concert, would rush down to the stalls to take up any empty seats.

This is a country where classical music is appreciated by the majority of citizens.

Carol A Parkin
Poole, Dorset

A pie and a pint

SIR – Gordon Hughes asks what makes a “proper pub” (Letters, April 7). Visiting a pub in Yorkshire some years ago, a friend spotted a sign behind the bar: “A pint, a pie and a friendly word.”

Ordering a pie and a pint, which the landlord served with a scowl, my friend said: “What about the friendly word?” – to which the landlord replied, in his thick Yorkshire accent: “Don’t eat t’pie.”

Tony Liddicoat
Ongar, Essex

Re-routing HS2

SIR – Now that it is accepted that the need is for increased HS2 capacity rather than reduced journey time (report, April 7), alternatives to the planned route to the Midlands should be reconsidered, unconstrained by the straight stretches and minimum radius bends dictated by very high speed.

While achieving cost reductions and greater public approval, a more direct route north out of the capital’s suburbs would mitigate damage to the environment and economy of north-west London, particularly during the eight-to-10-year construction period.

Those who invoke the can-do approach of Isambard Kingdom Brunel and Robert Stephenson should remember that those engineering giants had an almost clean slate to work on, with minimal existing infrastructure and barely half the population density of today.

Ian Simcock
East Grinstead, West Sussex

Educating children

SIR – Sending children to school aged two will not give them a better start to their education. The solution lies in our excellent parent and toddler groups. These already operate in most of our towns, cities and villages, and they are generally run by enthusiastic volunteers.

The best groups already encourage parents to engage with their children in craft activities and songs. Why not use this excellent resource to educate parents in how to help their children develop.

Heather Stewart
Worcester

Linen origami

SIR – Caroline Chaffe asks for advice on the best way to fold fitted sheets. Easy. Lay the sheet on the bed, right side downwards. Fold the four elasticated sides inwards until you have an oblong, then bring top to tail and continue folding until you have a neat parcel.

Don’t give up using fitted sheets – the flat sheets never stay in place.

Jennifer Harper-Jones
Farnham, Buckinghamshire

SIR – Nobody will see the fitted sheet in the linen cupboard, nor on the bed if it has been made properly. It is better to relax and enjoy the time saved from the tyranny of hospital corners.

Peter Jones
St Neots, Cambridgeshire

The politics behind man-made global warming

SIR – Charles Moore tells us that “the game is up for climate change believers”. Certainly, the game ought to be up; but there are far too many vested interests at stake for it to be so.

The biggest problem is the credibility of all those leading politicians who swallowed the whole “man-made global warming” nonsense, hook, line and sinker, and who now lack the guts to admit that they may have been wrong. So long as these politicians remain in positions of power, they will carry on with the pretence, oblivious to the harm they are doing to both the most needy of their fellow citizens and the competitiveness of their countries’ industry and commerce.

John Waine
Nuneaton, Warwickshire

SIR – In 2008, Lord Lawson published his monograph An Appeal to Reason — A Cool Look at Global Warming. It contained an impressive analysis of the (then) science and economics and offered an approach for policy makers. The 2014 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report plays down the need for expensive “mitigation” (for example, wind turbines) and embraces resilience and adaptation. This strategy mirrors Lord Lawson’s 2008 analysis.

Dr Tony Parker
Ringmer, East Sussex

SIR – We have had steady warming since the second half of the 19th century. If this was man-made, there would have been marked acceleration in the second half of the 20th century but there was none. In fact, the warming has stalled.

There have been warm periods before: in the Middle Ages, Roman and Minoan times.

Andre Zaluski
Billingham, County Durham

SIR – Charles Moore is right. For the past four billion years, the climate on Earth has been determined by the influence of the sun, which has varied in predictable and unpredictable ways, and continues to do so.

Ashley Catterall
Ross-on-Wye, Herefordshire

SIR – The Conservative Party is mobilising its loyal big guns to move the Maria Miller issue from one of morality to one of reforming an expenses disciplinary system.

Politicians once understood that voters can easily detect the aroma of immorality, but today’s MPs want to get re-elected at any cost. They think we are too stupid to differentiate between inappropriate behaviour and procedural errors.

Michael Nicholson
Dunsfold, Surrey

SIR – I find it impossible to reconcile David Cameron’s dogged support for Maria Miller with his failure to back Andrew Mitchell.

One has apologised, albeit grudgingly, for serious errors involving taxpayers’ money, while the other has yet to be found guilty of anything other than possibly being discourteous to two policemen. It makes no sense.

George Edwards
Swansea, Glamorgan

SIR – While it is admirable to defend one’s chums, Mr Cameron’s stance risks undermining all of George Osborne’s good work on the economy. It is time for Mrs Miller to fall on her sword, and also repay the full amount.

W J Auger
Hopton Wafers, Shropshire

SIR – The Prime Minister may well consider it wise to sack Mrs Miller before she resigns. Otherwise he may have to resign himself so that the Conservatives at least have a slim chance of success at the next election.

Russ Hill
Radstock, Somerset

SIR – The Prime Minister and MPs of all parties have just woken up to a fact that voters have long known: MPs cannot be trusted to stand in judgment on their fellows, particularly when it involves expenses.

As it is difficult to see who would be responsible for appointing completely independent members to a standards committee, it is time voters were given the right to recall their MP, as promised by all three party leaders. Wrongdoers would be judged by their electorate. That would be very democratic and fair.

Michael Edwards
Haslemere, Surrey

SIR – While Maria Miller’s wrongdoing has rightly hit the headlines, the shocking expenses being claimed by MEPs should surely be given more prominence since British taxpayers’ money is also involved.

Such unaccountable largesse serves to illustrate that the only way the EU survives is by keeping everyone involved onside by encouraging greed, thus discouraging criticism. The case against Mrs Miller would almost certainly not have come to public attention had she been an MEP.

David Taylor
Lymington, Hampshire

Irish Times:

Sir, – I echo Vincent Hearne’s sentiments (Letters, April 9th). I moved here from my birthplace in England aged 19. Since then, I have studied and qualified here, work for the Irish health service and have married an Irish man with whom I have two small children.

I am proud of my heritage, love the country I was born in, but also love the country I have called home for 15 years. The relief I felt when Queen Elizabeth visited here with such evident success in 2011 took me by surprise. Similarly yesterday I felt unexpected pride watching our President represent us so well at Windsor.

I may well be seen as a “plastic Paddy” or a “blow-in” for the rest of my days on this island, but that’s OK. Teasing and humour show how our relationship, once volatile, has matured into a mellow easy-going friendship. There are many English people working and living in Ireland, and yesterday our leaders set us a great example of how the diaspora should continue to feel at home on each other’s soil. Yours, etc,

CAROLINE WILLIAMS,

Granite Terrace,

Inchicore,

Dublin 8

Sir, – Reflecting on the state of Anglo-Irish relations in the context of President Higgins’ s State visit to Britain, military historian Tom Burke told a remarkable story on RTÉ’s Morning Ireland yesterday (April 9th).

He pointed out that a brother of one of the signatories of the 1916 Proclamation (Eamonn Ceannt), was killed while fighting in the British army at the Battle of Arras in April 1917. Also that a brother of Michael Malone, one of the leaders of the Volunteers at the Battle of Mount Street Bridge, where 28 British soldiers – and indeed Malone himself – were killed during the Easter Week fighting, had died while serving in the British army in May 1915.

Is there a more revealing and poignant example of the intricate warp and weft of Anglo-Irish relations that is being painstakingly mended by events like this State visit, and that made by Queen Elizabeth to Ireland in 2011? Yours, etc,

STEPHEN O’BYRNES,

Morehampton Road,

Dublin 4

Sir, – The present improved state of relations between Britain and Ireland, so well exemplified in the reciprocal visits of Queen Elizabeth and President Higgins and the presence of Martin McGuinness at the Windsor Castle banquet, suggests that the mass of people on these islands do not live lives of quiet desperation but, rather, lives of desperation for quiet.

To protect and continue this still fragile progress towards political and social quiet the approaching commemoration of 1916 should avoid becoming a glorification of violent revolution and become instead a commemoration of the sacrifice of the lives of both combatants and non-participating civilians and of the economic hardship suffered by all the people of Ireland during and after the succession of conflicts that began with 1916 and continued up to recent times.

 It would be a tragic error if an upsurge of patriotic sentiment should result in new support among the young for the small but dangerous minority who still believe that the Armalite is an essential accompaniment to or substitute for the ballot box.  Yours, etc,

DENIS O’DONOGHUE,

Countess Grove,

Killarney,

Co Kerry

Sir, – How good it is to be alive at this point in history when our President can make a hugely successful visit to our great neighbour and witness the genuine warmth of feeling that now exists between our two countries. But surely a huge opportunity to underline the depth of the mutual appreciation we now have was missed by the failure to make a promise to grant each other 12 points at every future Eurovision Song Contest. Yours, etc,

LIAM RYAN,

Ballina/Killaloe,

Co Tipperary

Sir, – Amidst the clamour and self-congratulation of the various media outlets and diplomats on the occasion of the President’s visit to London and the subsequent “normalisation” of relations between Britain and Ireland, I can’t help noticing the rather large elephant in the room that is the continued British occupation of the northeastern corner of Ireland.

What nation, other than perhaps Vichy France, would resume full normalised relations with a foreign power while it continues to deny that nation’s inhabitants the right to determine their own future? Yours, etc,

CÍAN CARLIN,

Priory Road,

London N8 7EX

A chara, – B’fhéidir go bhfuil an ceart ag Alan Titley (Bileog, 9 Aibreán) go bhfuil clais dhothrasnaithe idir poblacht agus ríocht nach féidir a léim ach ní raibh an chuma sin ar na himeachtaí i gCaisleán Windsor agus na maithe agus na móruaisle ón dá thír ag suí chun boird le chéile.

Is léir gur breá leis na Sasanaigh an mustar is mórdháil agus go bhfuil na hÉireannaigh anois ag sodar ina ndiaidh. Caithfidh mé a admháil gur bhain mé an-spórt as an scléip ar fad. Ní fhéadfaí é seo a shamhlú cúpla bliain ó shin! Cruthaíonn sé arís gurb í an pholaitíocht ealaín na féidearthachta agus gurb iad na Briotanaigh na seanmháistrí san ealaín sin. Is mise,

SÉAN Mag LEANNÁIN

Bánóg Rua,

Cillín Chaoimhín,

Co Chill Mhantáin

Sir, – How long will it be after the presidential party returns home before the revisionists and their fellow travellers start clamouring for us to rejoin the British Commonwealth and wear the poppy each November? Yours, etc,

KEITH NOLAN,

Caldragh,

Carrick-on-Shannon,

Co Leitrim

Sir, What a moving sight it was to see those two old arch-enemies having dinner together: the Provo Martin McGuinness and the Stickie Eamon Gilmore. To think that less than a generation ago they were at one another’s throats. Sweet. Yours, etc,

EOIN DILLON,

Ceannt Fort ,

Mount Brown,

Dublin 8

Sir, – Your Education Correspondent (April 9th) could not have been more ineptly informed about the provost’s response to the discussions on Trinity’s name and coat of arms.

The discussions were initiated by the provost and board on Friday last at an open college meeting. Your paper reported accurately that I spoke in favour of retaining and standardising the coat of arms and the name, Trinity College Dublin, in our documents. Where appropriate we can substitute the frequently used abbreviations, Trinity, or Trinity College or TCD.

Trinity is the essence of our name, as meaningful for us as Imperial, or Harvard, or Cambridge, or Karolinska, or MIT or ETH or Caltech, is for those institutions. The fact that few of your readers have heard of ETH or Caltech (my second alma mater) does not matter to the great Swiss Institute of Technology or to the magical California Institute of Technology. Those who need to know do know, and they know why they know.

I was at the scholars’ dinner on Monday where I heard the best provost’s speech of that annual occasion for more than a decade, for which the provost received warm and prolonged applause. Those of us who were among the strongest critics of the mooted changes stood the longest and applauded most sincerely. In a fine address, after thanking David Berman for his memorial discourse on the philosopher AA Luce, welcoming the scholars of the decade (two from 1944), and congratulating the new scholars and fellows, he spoke at length on the name and coat of arms, saying to us all that he and the board would take stock of the points raised in the discussions. His language was Trinity language and, while I await further developments, I do not expect the board to make changes that will detract in any way from the value and meaning of our coat of arms and our name. I heard no heckling at the dinner – there may have been some banter at the back of the hall but one happy scholar does not make a summer.

We are the University of Dublin and while this legal fact may be valuable in certain circumstances, our task is to enhance the awareness and reputation of Trinity. That reputation depends on many factors, but most of all on our 420-year record, our graduates and on our current staff and students.

More than half of the 14 new fellows are not Irish. Many of our new scholars do not have recognisably Irish names. These academics and their successors, some among the new scholars, are the future of Trinity, and would not have come to Trinity Light. I hope Irish people will be pleased that Trinity ranks overall 30th in the world in the Times Higher Education Top 100 Most International Universities (2014) and overall 61st in the World in Research Influence (Citations) among the Top 200 Universities. A large question is whether the Government will realise and foster the global status and long-term potential of Trinity.

DAVID MCCONNELL,

Professor of Genetics,

Senior Fellow,

Smurfit Institute

of Genetics,

Sir, – As one of the many thousands of Irish people who worked in the British National Health Service I was pleased to read (April 4th) that President Higgins would pay tribute to the contribution made by our fellow nationals to this institution. My mother, aunt and sister worked in Britain as nurses, and my my wife and I as doctors – for over 75 years in total. Certainly the NHS itself has not recognised the contribution of the Irish to keeping afloat what is often an imperfect but nevertheless admirable healthcare system.

The service is certainly the object of regular criticism from patients and staff, but outside observers would be foolish to believe that the British would be willing to give it up for a mixed private/public health service, with all the inherent inefficiencies and conflicts of interests that that involves. The NHS retains the affection and stirs the pride of the nation, as was seen in Danny Boyle’s contribution to the opening of the Olympics in London in 2012.

The experiences of the two world wars produced in Britain a deep desire that things should never be the same again and that housing, education and health to what was called the common man should become priorities. William Beveridge, an economist, whose work led to the foundation of the NHS, urged that when the traditional landmarks of society were being abolished “now is the opportunity for using experience in a clear field”.

Many of the landmarks of Irish society have been abolished in recent times and we have an opportunity to use our experience to also advance in the areas of housing, education and healthcare. Those of us who have worked in a society that allows the patient to see the doctor when he or she is ill know it is more moral than one where the sick patient asks permission to “leave the money in next week”.

This is an example of a relationship that must be redefined by universal values that include good healthcare that is available when citizens believe themselves to be in need. Yours, etc,

TOM O’DOWD MD,

Professor of General

Practice,

Trinity College Dublin

Sir, – Shane O’Doherty (Letters April 4th) belittles cyclists and people like me who commute by public transport on the basis that he, as a car driver, contributes more to the national economy than we do.

The tobacco industry could apply an equally plausible argument, or the arms industry, but that would be to ignore the common good, the health and welfare of our society and, indeed, our appalling legacy of a ruined planet in the name of a spurious concept Mr O’Doherty refers to as “the economy”.

As Colm Moore (Letters, April 7th) points out, typically 75-per-cent-empty cars make up 80 per cent of traffic but carry less than 40 per cent of passengers. Mr O’Doherty lists the plethora of expenses involved in owning a car. Here are some more thoughts he can ponder: as a typical car owner today, he will devote three to four of his 16 waking hours to his car. For his time, he will travel less than 10,000 miles a year and propel himself at an average speed of less than 8 miles an hour — about the same as a bicycle. And he will have to work up to a day and a half each week just to keep his means of transport on the road. Go figure. Yours, etc,

GREGORY ROSENSTOCK,

Seapoint Road,

Bray,

Co Wicklow

Sir, – In response to Shane O’Doherty’s recent campaign (letters, April 3rd and April 8th) to open up bus lanes, it’s a simple formula – regular buses lead to more passengers, lead to fewer cars, lead to less congestion. This is a well-founded scenario with plenty of evidence globally to support it.

Rather than dispensing with bus lanes, a better tack might be pressing Dublin Bus to supply passenger numbers on certain routes in order to justify the level of investment that is required to keep them running. The more serious issue here – and I must admit ignorance – is whether or not Dublin Bus is able to provide a service at an affordable price for those who cannot afford to run a car to and from work. Mass transit systems, given their value to infrastructure, are worth investing in.

Perhaps it’s time to reopen the debate on competition on routes versus investment by the State. Yours, etc,

PATRICK FALVEY,

Glenogle Road,

Edinburgh,

EH3 5HP

Sir, – Irish humanists are offended by the use of the Bible in swearing-in ceremonies, (Siobhán Walls, April 9th). It is understandable that they feel left out, just as religious people feel left out when atheists declare themselves to be the holders of superior special insight into the truth behind the meaning of existence. The only honest thing to swear by is a question mark. Yours , etc,

EUGENE TANNAM,

Monalea Park,

Firhouse,

Dublin 24

Sir, – Sean Doocey (April 9th) believes that “modern society” might be better served if gardaí honoured the Constitution instead of the Bible. If Mr Doocey’s quest is to locate a neutral document, his choice seems misplaced.

After all, the preamble of the Constitution begins “In the name of the Most Holy Trinity, from Whom is all authority …” and proceeds to acknowledge “our obligations to our Divine Lord Jesus Christ”. Strange but true. Yours, etc,

DR SEAN ALEXANDER

SMITH,

Aiken Village,

Sandyford,

Dublin 18

Irish Independent:

Letters to the Editor – Published 10 April 2014 02:30 AM

* Michael Noonan’s statement that fears of a new housing bubble are ‘wildly exaggerated’ must not go unchallenged.

Also in this section

Women laid groundwork for Michael D’s visit

Injustice in our way of life

Let’s remember who of us went to Britain first

Where has he been for the last seven years?

His comments indicate people like him, who have been completely unaffected by the mess his political class created, or the cuts they heaped on the rest of society – the bulk of which have been imposed since 2011 – have learned absolutely nothing and are reverting to type.

Mr Noonan is in his 70s, so he’ll well remember how much his first house cost and how much he was earning at that time.

Then one of his officials needs to tell him how much the average house now costs and how much the average salary is; then add on childcare and travel costs and Mr Noonan will find that, even with two incomes, the figures do not add up. Price inflation is still unsustainable when it exceeds four, five, six times the available salary.

Of course, the reason Mr Noonan prefers to wallow in denial, like those in the Fianna Fail-led government before him, is because if he has to face the reality that property is still overpriced in Ireland, it means that he’ll have to face up to the personal debt timebomb he has been avoiding so carefully since he took office in March 2011.

Ireland is a small country and it is simply astounding that after all this time, there is no agreement between the banking industry and consumer advocate groups on a formula to give debt-laden people a financial review to determine if their debt level is sustainable.

But until then we have Mr Noonan continuing the Ahern, Cowen and Lenihan head-in-the-sand school of economic thought.

A family home should not cost more than three to four times the combined income of those applying for the mortgage and instead of mortgage terms expanding into third and fourth decades, the price of a property in Ireland is still too high.

So what if you aren’t getting enough interest on your savings? Aren’t you lucky you have spare money to save?

So what if you have negative equity?

There are worse things than a hypothetical financial loss.

The real issue Mr Noonan has failed to address is if a person has a sustainable debt burden.

Two people can have the same amount of debt but if their income is vastly different, someone is carrying a heavier debt burden.

This is the elephant in the room this Government refuses to address, but it is preventing the domestic economy recovering.

And we need it to recover so Ireland can build on credible sustainable economic growth, instead of pinning all our hopes on a few US high-tech firms.

DESMOND FITZGERALD

CANARY WHARF, LONDON

VISIT IGNORED CHURCH

* As an Irishman working happily in England for over 40 years as a Catholic priest I am astonished that the state visit of the President of Ireland does not include any acknowledgement of any current Catholic institution.

I have the greatest admiration that the state visit should include Westminster Abbey and Coventry Cathedral but surely an engagement to Westminster Cathedral could have been included.

Many of our finest Catholic churches were built by Irish navvies and by the pennies of the poor. There is something seriously amiss with the Anglo-Irish diplomatic service or with Aras an Uachtarain. I strongly suspect it is the latter.

FR TOM GRUFFERTY

PARISH PRIEST

THE ROYAL SPELL

* RTE’s correspondents covering the visit by President Higgins to the UK seemed to have been very taken by the occasion, their obsequiousness was in abundance. I don’t know how many times I heard how the British are the best at pomp and splendour.

I have seen the French, Italians, Germans, Russians and even the Vatican at the pomp and splendour business and they are also very very good and sometimes better. That’s republics for you!

K NOLAN

CALDRA HOUSE

CARRICK-ON-SHANNON,

CO LEITRIM

THINK OF OUR EMIGRANTS

* It smacks of bread and circuses. An Irish president visits the queen. Our national lack of confidence kicks in.

He brings a virtual cabinet, a Labour minister rides in a horse and coach and RTE give over the station to the visit. BBC gives the visit 15 seconds. One might have thought we reached Mars such is the drooling and mirror reflecting.

It might shock us to know that the last High King of Ireland, Rory O’Connor, visited London. Long before we championed women at the top table, Achill’s Grainne Ui Mhaille visited the court of another Elizabeth and both conversed in Latin.

Between 1957/1965 , my spell in Eachleam national school, Blacksod, Mayo, virtually every child who graduated sixth class took the Mail Boat to Holyhead or the Clyde. Once there, they ‘tattie howked’ (picked potatoes) or laboured on sites.

In this week of faux congratulations of a state visit to a country 40 minutes away by Government jet, lets not forget the poor emigrant who traversed that journey by boat but never came back.

They did this state a greater service often with cash-filled letters home.

JOHN CUFFE

MEATH

GET REAL RUAIRI

* So Ruairi Quinn thinks that students are finished courses by St Patrick’s Day and spend the rest of the year revising. This minister hasn’t a clue what happens in the classroom.

How can he make statements like this and be allowed to get away with it. As a maths teacher at all levels, I can assure you that I will be teaching new topics in maths right up to the day the students leave with little or no time for revision. Mr Quinn has been told repeatedly that there is way too much content in the new Project Maths courses and has refused to listen.

I and most other maths teachers have to take our students for extra classes, at lunchtime or outside school hours, just to get through the course. When will this minister listen to the people “at the coal face”?

NAME AND ADDRESS WITH EDITOR

MAKE ‘NEVER AGAIN’ LAW

* Maybe a few tragic facts and figures taken in isolation from Eamon Meehan’s and Mike Pflanz’s articles re. ‘Twenty years on, from Rwanda‘ (April 7) might bring home the reality of two words ‘Never again’.

For example: “Over the course of 100 days in Rwanda, close to one million people, mostly Tutsi, were murdered – on a scale and at a speed not seen since World War II.”

Jean de Dieu Burakari, a survivor of the eastern Rwanda Rukara church genocide said: “They came every day in the afternoon and killed people.

“I was there for nine days. Bodies were rotting and bursting all around me. I hid beneath a bench at the back and I survived only by God’s grace.”

These terrible atrocities were meticulously planned under the watching eyes of the world, which made a decision not to act.

“Since 1945, from Cambodia to Guatemala, from Darfur to Bosnia, genocides and mass killings have claimed the lives of approximately 70 million people.”

To make ‘never again’ really meaningful, the heads of the world’s major powers should sign an international agreement guaranteeing the observance of these two words, endorsed with the signature of the leaders of the world churches, with a commitment to continue praying.

JAMES GLEESON

THURLES, CO TIPPERARY


Going home?

$
0
0

11April2014Going home

I go all the way around the park listening to the Men from the Ministry: Can our heroes redesign London’s roads? Priceless

Mary in hospital hints about goig home sometime next week

Scrabbletoday, I win and get over 400,Perhaps Marywill win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Perlita Neilson – obituary

Perlita Neilson was an actress who starred as Anne Frank and declined the chance to go to Hollywood

Perlita Nielson, circa 1957

Perlita Nielson, circa 1957 Photo: getty images

6:48PM BST 10 Apr 2014

CommentsComment

Perlita Neilson, who has died aged 80, was one of the few child actresses in theatre to mature gracefully and successfully into an accomplished exponent of the classics.

She came to prominence as an adult in 1956, in two West End productions — as Nina in Michael Macowan’s revival at the Saville of The Seagull; and as the 13-year-old Jewish heroine in The Diary of Anne Frank.

As Nina, she achieved what few actresses manage with conviction: the transformation of a charming, romantic, starry-eyed adolescent into a tragically resigned provincial actress after a failed love affair with a famous novelist.

As the doomed Dutch schoolgirl incarcerated for two years with other Jews during the Second World War, scarcely daring to stir from her Amsterdam attic for fear of betrayal to the Gestapo, Perlita Neilson’s performance at the Phoenix Theatre led to her being invited to star in Hollywood’s film version of the play; she declined the offer, as it would have meant signing a long-term contract that would have kept her away from the stage.

Instead she went on to build a growing reputation in theatrical classics, especially in Shakespeare, Shaw and Oscar Wilde, as well in numerous plays for television.

She was born Margaret Phillipa Sowden on June 11 1933 in Bradford, but spent her early life in Argentina, where her father, Wilson Sowden, worked as an engineer. After her birth, her mother Isabel returned to Buenos Aires, where Margaret attended stage school and appeared aged nine with a variety group of the British Community Players.

She and her mother returned to Britain in 1945, and Margaret made her first foray on to the West End stage at the London Coliseum when she was 14, as Minnie in Annie Get Your Gun. The following year she played Lisa in Peter Pan (Scala) and was then cast as little Anukta in Tolstoy’s The Power of Darkness (Lyric, 1949).

Up to this point it had been “the sheer fun” of being on stage that had appealed to her. It was as the child marquise in Aimée Stuart’s Lace on Her Petticoat (Ambassadors, 1950) that she began to show her true mettle as an actress.

Perlita Neilson as Anne Frank (REX)

Aged 19, Perlita Neilson played in two Arts Theatre productions: Giraudoux’s The Enchanted and Romilly Cavan’s The Sun Room. By now she was attracting some serious critical attention.

During a spell with the Bristol Old Vic (1954-55) she gave what Kenneth Tynan described as a “perfect” performance as the terrified, hysterical servant girl Mary Warren in the British premiere of Arthur Miller’s The Crucible; while her role as Dido in Marching Song, by John Whiting, won praise for its “heart-wringing pathos”.

Other Bristol credits included Hero in Much Ado About Nothing; Perdita and Mamilius in The Winter’s Tale; and Nerissa in The Merchant of Venice.

After her West End triumphs in The Seagull and The Diary of Anne Frank, Perlita Neilson appeared at the Dublin Theatre Festival in The Importance of Being Earnest, then went on to enjoy spells in repertory at Oxford and Nottingham, returning to London as Ellie Dunn in a revival of Shaw’s Heartbreak House (Wyndham’s, 1961), which later toured in Europe.

She continued to appear on the West End stage throughout the 1960s, and in regional rep until the mid-Seventies.

Among her television credits were The Eustace Diamonds (1959); as Harriet Smith in Emma (1960); Maigret (1961); Fall of Eagles (1974); and The Day of the Triffids (1981).

For the last 20 years of her life she lived quietly in a small garden flat in Brighton, where for a time she had worked in a bookshop. Her marriage to the production manager and cinematographer Bruce Sharman was dissolved.

Perlita Neilson, born June 11 1933, died April 7 2014

Guardian:

The parliamentary commissioner for standards does not propose penalties (A mess – and only Ukip, the anti-politics party, will benefit, 9 April), she sets out her investigation and her findings. Her role is to be an investigator, not a judge. Your article also suggests that “the MPs may have taken a dispassionate look at the evidence but they lost sight of the politics”. The committee’s job is to take a dispassionate view of the evidence. We leave the politics to others.
Kevin Barron MP
Chair of the committee on standards 

• If the Office for National Statistics introduces new measures of economic performance next year (Editorial, 9 April), shouldn’t it issue revised statistics on the same basis for the previous five years to enable a fair comparison to be made, rather than allow George Osborne to claim “a strikingly better record than many have expected”?
Jeremy Beecham
Labour, House of Lords

• Didn’t Sajid Javid have a mother (Bus driver’s son the first of 2010 intake to be in cabinet, 10 April)? Or did she drive the bus? Why do journalists so often ignore the fact that two parents contribute to a person’s development, not just one?
Sue Smith
Stourbridge, West Midlands

• Ted Hughes (Letters, 9 April)… wasn’t he the husband of Sylvia Plath?
Vee Singleton
Framlingham, Suffolk

• Your pedantic correspondent (Letters, 10 April) might be able to tell his arpeggios from his descending scales, but can he count? The “predominant piano theme” in Abba’s only memorable song surely contains only four notes not five.
Mike Hine
Kingston on Thames, Surrey

• You have to go to Yorkshire to indulge yourself at the Idle Working Men’s Club (Letters, passim).
Andrew Bailey
Wrexham

• In response to Margaret Squires’ plea for an end to this long-running correspondence about curious place names (Letters, 8 April), I’m sure many Guardian readers live in Hope (Derbyshire).
Ian West
Telford, Shropshire

Let the press utter not one single note of triumphalism, much less a fanfare, over the resignation of the culture secretary, Maria Miller (Report, 10 April). The cabinet minister’s passing is not a victory for the media over Westminster, rather an inevitable consequence of her own actions and the outraged public’s disapproval thereof. Neither must it be used as a justification for what her political colleagues will call a witch-hunt and what journalists will attempt to justify as a dogged pursuit of wrongdoing driven by popular opinion. This was an instance where the press functioned true to its role in our parliamentary democracy: a political misdemeanour was exposed in the public interest and the matter was not allowed to rest until a realistic outcome was achieved. That is all. As generations of reporters might have said to long-gone copytakers: “Ends message. No more to follow.”
David Banks
Editor, Daily Mirror 1992-94

• Is it now time, after yet another case of MPs’ expenses being thrown on to the front pages, that the government buys a house in each constituency so that all MPs have a home to live in while representing their constituents. This will end what seems to be the constant issue of MPs and their housing expenses that makes so many of the public angry.
Tim Battersby
London

• When it comes to cases like Miller, it is surely time to consider again the one demand of the 1838 People’s Charter that has never been implemented, namely the election of parliaments annually. Later 19th-century radicals amended the idea to elections every two or three years, but the institutional framework to hold MPs to account more frequently than the present five-year term would surely allow for much greater accountability of elected representatives.
Keith Flett
London

• Now that it has been revealed that the lay members of the parliamentary standards committee have no voting powers, I think the time has come for these cases to be heard by a different tribunal. My own preference is for a panel of, say, 12 lay members, each of whom has a vote. I believe such a tribunal already exists and could therefore be brought into use quickly and cheaply.
Steve Elliot
London

• Not enough attention has been paid to David Cameron saying in his letter to Miller that “I hope that you will be able to return to serving the government on the frontbench in due course” (Maria Miller’s resignation letter and David Cameron’s reply, 9 April). Miller hasn’t so much resigned as demoted herself temporarily from the cabinet. That isn’t good enough. There is no place for her in parliament – she should resign as an MP, or be thrown out. She should face a criminal investigation, and the full weight of the law if found guilty.
Bianca Todd
Principal speaker, Left Unity

• Like athletes found guilty of using drugs, there should be a specified period during which disgraced ministers cannot return: three to five years would be about right.
Tim Symonds
Burwash, East Sussex

Steve Hewlett (Comment, 7 April) says that news publishers, including the publishers of the Guardian, are considering their options for self-regulation of the press. He writes at length about one proposed regulator, Ipso, which has been created by the publishers of the Mail, Telegraph and the Sun. Ipso is independent of neither press owners nor politicians – who sit on its board – and is effectively a continuation of the discredited PCC.

The alternative regulator, which Hewlett does not name, is Impress, the independent monitor for the press, which was launched in December with the backing of Sir Harold Evans and a range of other distinguished journalists and free speech campaigners.

Guardian readers who would like to encourage their favourite newspaper to join a regulator which is independent of both press owners and politicians may support our crowdfunding campaign at indiegogo.com/projects/the-impress-project-phase-two.
Jonathan Heawood
The Impress project

George Monbiot’s conclusion that corporations “have no right to run our lives” is right, but wishing that “it would be better still if governments and global bodies stopped delegating their powers to corporations” (How have these corporations colonised our public life?, 8 April) is far too meek when standing in the wings is the transatlantic trade and investment partnership, which will give unimagined powers to companies. Rum when, as Monday’s Guardian reported: “The London-York-Edinburgh service is run by Directly Operated Railways, which returns all profits to the state.” I use the line regularly. It’s very good.
David Murray
Wallington, Surrey

• George Monbiot demonstrates how the global giants control politicians; the previous day Gary Younge reported on how “the US supreme court has accelerated the capture of democratic politics by a wealthy elite” (Welcome to the greatest charade that money can buy, 7 April). This guarantees that people like the oil tycoon Koch brothers will control the US politicians who should be opposing climate change. Louis Brandies, the 19th-century jurist, wrote: “We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.” We have the choice, if we recover our voices and votes.
John Airs
Liverpool

• George Monbiot and Gary Younge illustrate how prophetic was the science-fiction novel The Space Merchants by Frederik Pohl and Cyril Kornbluth. Published in 1953, it describes where the trends discussed in the two articles are taking the world. It seemed like fantasy as recently as the 1970s, but it gets more like reality every year.
John Wils

Sergei Lavrov’s article (It’s not Russia that is destabilising Ukraine, 8 April) is a masterpiece of half-truths and disinformation which shows that destabilisation doesn’t always need troops and tanks.

The ousted, corrupt Yanukovych government brought Ukraine to its knees economically and administratively. Lavrov is right on one point: it will take years to make Ukraine a well-run and stable democracy. That task will be made much harder by a Kremlin prepared to destabilise the situation still further, and justify its actions with the mantra of protection of Russian speakers without any regard for the truth.

Lavrov ought to read the latest poll by the International Republican Institute with Gallup. Two-thirds of ethnic Russians in Ukraine do not perceive any threat because of language or ethnicity; more than 80% of Ukrainians do not support Russia sending in its army to protect Russian speakers (and that includes two-thirds of respondents in the south and east), while three-quarters want Ukraine to remain a unitary country (including 60% in the south and east).

The door for negotiations is open, and the possibility of discussions between Ukraine, the EU, US and Russia is welcome, but those negotiations have to be on equal terms. If Russia can stop its economic blackmail of Ukraine, stop its campaign of misinformation and stop its demands on constitutional change, then dialogue will have a chance. If not, then we’ll all be living in the dangerous cold war world of the past.
Iryna Terlecky
Vice-chair, Association of Ukrainians in Great Britain

• Ever since Russian military forces started the aggression on Ukraine, I cannot get rid of the feeling that this isn’t real, this can’t be happening. Russia can’t invade Ukraine. Russia can’t consciously destroy the whole post-war international order. Sergei Lavrov, a diplomat par excellence, can’t insist on Russia’s right to behave internationally like an elephant in a china shop.

Yet it is real and it has happened. Lavrov tries to strike a conciliatory tone, bemoaning Ukraine’s “complex tasks in constructing a sovereign state”. But in the same breath he is blemishing the west for its “unproductive and dangerous line” on Ukraine and praising Russia for its effort in “supporting the independent Ukrainian state” and “promoting early stabilisation”. Now, this latter part really caught my eye.

If “supporting the independent Ukrainian state” means chopping off a chunk of territory, then, yes, Russia did nicely. And if “promoting early stabilisation” means flooding Ukraine with Russian citizens who beat people and tear down Ukrainian flags from administrative buildings, then yes, Russia contributed greatly.

It was pointed out that Russia subsidised Ukraine through low energy prices. It is only a half-truth. Six years ago, it decided to use the energy supply as leverage on Ukraine. Ever since we have been paying more than most European consumers. And now (obviously, as another act of “support”) Russia is about to charge us one and a half times more than the others.

Lavrov’s parallels between war-torn Kosovo and peaceful Crimea are equally misleading. Neither the eastern partnership nor the Nato enlargement was directed against Russia. Neither Russia nor anyone else can lecture Ukraine on what to do with its own constitution.

Let Russia demonstrate its real intention by deeds, not by words.
Volodymyr Khandogiy
Ukraine ambassador to the UK

• Lavrov is right that “de-escalation should begin with rhetoric” and that there is a need to “return to serious common work”. If only such sentiments were true of Russia’s position towards Syria. The conflict may have dropped from the headlines and there is not the same bombastic rhetoric being hit back and forth by Washington and Moscow, but it is a clear case of Russia not following its words with actions. How else can Damascus’s continued non-compliance with the Russian-agreed UN security council resolution demanding aid access to country be explained? Russia has strong relations with the Assad regime and as shown in a new European Council on Foreign Relations report this week has allowed the Central Bank of Syria to open several rouble accounts at Russian banks VTB, VEB, and Gazprombank as well as finalising discussions to allow the Regime to print money there. A clear sign of Lavrov’s willingness to work multilaterally and avoid a return to cold war tensions would be for him to pressure Damascus to allow aid in immediately while working with Kerry to find a date for the next Geneva peace talks.
James Denselow
London

• Lavrov’s extraordinary claim that Russia is not “imposing anything on anyone” in Ukraine comes weeks after his country has illegally annexed Crimea and while he demands constitutional reform to ensure that Ukraine would be subservient to Russia as “non-aligned”. Having picked apart Georgia and Moldova, Russia is now attempting to do the same to Ukraine. Having got away with it twice, the Russians are banking on weak western responses so they can have their way again. Surely the time has come for Nato and the EU to take a much tougher line? Are we really going to abandon Ukraine in the way that Hungary, Czechoslovakia and Poland were abandoned during the cold war?
John Strawson
University of East London

Your recent article (Gay men warned on serious dangers of ‘chemsex’, 9 April) highlights the serious threat to both individual and public health posed by the emergence of “chemsex”. While this impacts overwhelmingly on the gay community and in particular (although not only) in London, it is important to recognise other groups are also affected by the growing use of these drugs (as well as “legal highs”), including young people, students and clubbers, as mentioned in another of your articles on the same day (Steroid users pose new HIV infection threat, experts warn).

The strong association with high-risk sexual behaviour and sexual ill-health, including the transmission of HIV and hepatitis C, has highlighted the need for better links between sexual health and drug services. However, very few integrated services exist, and those that do are now only available to local residents due to recent changes in NHS commissioning. We are concerned that this will severely restrict access to care for these vulnerable groups from all areas of London. We call on local authorities in London to jointly commission fully integrated, London-wide, open access, LGBT-specific (but open to all) sexual health and drug services, and for other local authorities to do likewise in areas where similar problems have been identified.
Dr Ann Sullivan Consultant, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dr Jan Clarke President, British Association for Sexual Health and HIV, Dr David Asboe Chair, British HIV Association, Yusef Azad Director of policy and campaigns, National Aids Trusts, Dr Emma Devitt Consultant, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dr Christopher Hilton Consultant liaison psychiatrist, West London Mental Health Trust/Imperial College London, Dr Alan McOwan Lead clinician, 56 Dean Street, Dr Michael Rayment Consultant, Homerton University Hospital,, London Dr Fiona Burns Consultant, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Dr Christopher Scott Consultant, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dr Alan Winston Reader in HIV medicine, Imperial College London

Independent:

Times:

Sir, We are three war widows. Two of us can retain our war widow’s pension entitlement if we remarry or cohabit and one of us cannot (Forces Pension Society letter, Apr 9 & 10). This is purely a lottery as to when your husband was killed. There is a wrong time to die!

If a serving person was killed before 1973 or after 2005, his widow is free to remarry while retaining her pension. Others, like Squadron Leader Garry Lennox, killed in the first Gulf War, leave widows whose war widow’s pension is paid under the 1973 War Pensions scheme, and is forfeit if they remarry or cohabit.

Surely as we commemorate the start of the First World War we can ensure that all our war widows can keep their pensions for life. We urge the prime minister to do the decent thing by the post-1973 war widows.

Anne Lennox

Fran Hall

Renee Linder

The War Widows Association of Great Britain

Sir, Campaigning for the equitable treatment of service widows is an uphill struggle. My husband, an RN helicopter pilot, was killed on duty in 1966. At that time I had a child of six months and was pregnant with another. Two years later I married another serviceman, a Royal Marine subaltern. The MoD promptly removed my war widow’s pension, leaving him to raise the family without their help. The unfairness of it rankles still, but entreaties over the years have proved fruitless.

Elizabeth Linn

Hurstpierpoint, W Sussex

Sir, It is argued that it is unfair if armed forces widows/widowers lose their pensions upon remarriage or cohabitation. Exactly the same applies to bereavement benefit and so if the rules are changed for armed forces personnel, it should also apply to bereavement benefit for civilians. To do otherwise would be unjust for those who have lost a partner and have children to support, just because their partner was not a member of the armed forces.

I imagine that the principle is that once the widow or widower meets a new partner they no longer need the state’s support. While I question this principle and the difficult position it puts a widow/widower in, should the system be changed for armed forces widows/widowers, it should also change for everyone else.

Peter Causton

Frodsham, Cheshire

Sir, The shabby treatment of service widows is not confined to the rule on co-habitation or remarriage. During my 38 years’ service in the RAF, pensions were a closed book. Officially they were described as generous, giving a pension of half one’s final salary. Service pay was much lower than comparable civilian jobs to fund this pension. In my case my pay was much less than similarly qualified civilian pilots.

The arcane rules governing widows’ pensions were never publicised, so I was not aware that if I should marry after leaving the service my wife would not be entitled to half my pension should I predecease her. Had we married while I was serving, she would be entitled to half my pension for the rest of her life. However, we were married after I left the service, so as a widow she will be entitled to only about one quarter of my pension. The new Armed Forces Pension Scheme would be an ideal opportunity to redress this and other inequities of previous regulations.

AR Bell

Goldsborough, N Yorks

We waste vast quantities of food. With the right health and legal controls one solution is to feed it to pigs

Sir, One way to reduce the shocking amount of waste food discarded by consumers in industrialised nations — highlighted by the House of Lords EU committee — is to remove the ban on feeding waste food (swill) to pigs.

Heating products contaminated with pig diseases such as foot and mouth to 100C for 1 hour will render them safe for feeding to pigs. Leaving responsibility for the heat treatment to farmers is inadequate. In 2001 the failure of one farmer to follow the rules resulted in the FMD epidemic which cost the UK some £10 billion. Strict procedures to ensure that waste food was properly heat treated and handled could, for example, be done at licensed premises under the supervision of local authorities.

In addition to reducing our scandalous waste of food, removing the ban would be a significant financial benefit to pig farmers who no longer have to buy expensive feed, often based on imported grain.

Alex Donaldson

(Head, Pirbright Laboratory, Institute for Animal Health, 1989-2002)

Burpham, Surrey

A reader praises Tony Blair for his willingness to state unpopular truths about western military action in Syria

Sir, Tony Blair was right to criticise Parliament’s failure to approve military action against Syria and to predict catastrophic consequences both for the people of Syria and for the UK (“We’ll pay for staying out of Syria”, Apr 8).

The long-term damage to Britain’s special relationship with the United States is incalculable and while the decision may have been forgiven by the current US administration, this will not have gone unnoticed by
those aspiring to succeed Barack Obama.

Not only has the free world permitted the use of chemical weapons to go unpunished, it is hard not to conclude that such appeasement of the Assad regime has at the very least provided succour to President Putin.

I have always disagreed with his politics but Mr Blair deserves my respect for his courage, foresight and willingness to state unpopular truths.

Philip Duly

Haslemere, Surrey

Some say depression is over-diagnosed among the elderly but Esther Rantzen says it is all too common, and ignored

Sir, The chairman of the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ old age faculty, of which I am a member, is misguided in suggesting that millions of older people are suffering from undiagnosed “depression” (Apr 8).

Depressive disorder is hugely overdiagnosed in all age groups, including the elderly. Yes, many older people have grave problems with illness, disability, bereavement, loss of independence and isolation. Such distress reflects poorly on our society, but it is not a disease to be treated by doctors.

Yet antidepressants are dished out like proverbial Smarties to the elderly. Common side effects including falls, confusion and salt imbalance can occasionally lead to serious ill-health and even death. I seek not to alarm the relatively small number of older people who are truly mentally ill and for whom the benefits of such drugs outweigh the risks, but overtreatment is the true crisis.

Dr Richard Braithwaite

Ryde, Isle of Wight

Sir, Jenni Russell (Apr 10) correctly spotlights the feelings of loneliness and loss that all too often afflict older people. When The Silver Line launched in 2013 we commissioned a survey which found that 2.5 million older people admitted that they often felt lonely, but there is a stigma attached to loneliness which prevents them reaching out for help; 84 per cent don’t confess their feelings even to their family, because they don’t want to be a burden. It’s not just pride, it’s about a national attitude to older people. Some 800 callers a day are using the free, confidential 24-hour telephone line because, as one said, “When I get off the phone, I feel like I belong to the human race.”

Is it not a disgraceful reflection that anyone in the UK should feel they are no longer a part of the human race, simply because they are older?

Esther Rantzen

The economic conditions are right for us to be much more adventurous and high-tech in the way we build our houses

Sir, The rising cost of building sites has pushed the ratio of “site cost” to “fabric cost” from about 1:5 40 years ago to about 3:2 now. This, and the the serious skill shortage highlighted by Mike Bialyj (letter, Apr 7), should be an opportunity to drag house construction out of the past.

Modern industry is an impressive mix of consumerism, technological innovation and highly sophisticated production methods, all applicable to the problem of providing homes — in stark contrast to the conventional brick-built house, a soulless kit of parts, archaic, inflexible, expensive, technically inept, environmentally destructive and aesthetically joyless.

A change of approach must come, sooner or later.

R. Goodall

Bewdley, Worcs

The founder of the Virgin Group reckons his investment in Virgin Galactic will be the best he has ever made

Sir, You spoke of Virgin Galactic being a black hole (Apr 7). Sadly we won’t be travelling that far, but if you mean our finances on Earth, I’m pleased to say it’s anything but a black hole. I believe our investment in Virgin Galactic will prove to be the best I’ve made in 40 years of business.

As to Virgin Atlantic, now the 787s are finally arriving after a three-year delay, it will return to profitability by the end of the financial year as we forecast in our two-year plan.

Virgin Atlantic has a proud tradition of challenging the status quo for the last 30 years, and we look forward to doing the same for the next 30.

Richard Branson

Virgin Group

Telegraph:

SIR – A report was launched last week which calls on the NHS to do more to prevent increasing numbers of people from black and minority ethnic (BME) communities from developing type 2 diabetes. Type 2 diabetes diagnoses in BME groups have increased by 21 per cent in the past three years, compared with 14 per cent in the white population. At the current rate, half of all people from BME groups will have developed diabetes by the time they are 80.

The NHS spends around £8.8 billion a year on treating type 2 diabetes, 80 per cent of which is on avoidable complications. Clinical commissioning groups need to implement strategies to improve outcomes in BME groups, target NHS health checks at people from a younger age in BME groups and improve understanding of diabetes in BME groups. The Government and the NHS need to recognise the severity of the problem, and take action now.

Virendra Sharma MP (Lab)
Chair of the Diabetes in BME Communities Working Group

Professor Wasim Hanif
Professor Diabetes & Endocrinology, Clinical Director, University Hospital Birmingham

Professor Kamlesh Khunti PhD
Professor of Primary Care Diabetes and Vascular Medicine, University of Leicester

Adrian Sanders MP (Lib Dem)
Chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group for Diabetes

Keith Vaz MP (Lab)
Vice Chair, All Party Parliamentary Group for Diabetes

Lord Lyndon Harrison
Vice Chair, All Party Parliamentary Group for Diabetes

David Lammy MP (Lab)

Dr Chris Walton
Chair, Association of British Clinical Diabetologists

Jacqui Stevenson
Acting CEO, African Health Policy Network

Harj Nijjar
Business Unit Director, Janssen

Dr Abdul F Lakhdar
Consultant endocrinologist, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whipps Cross University Hospital

Dr Partha Kar
Clinical Director, Diabetes, Portsmouth hospitals NHS Trust

Professor Sauid Ishaq
Professor of Medicine MD Gastroenterology, The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust

Dr Milan K Piya
NIHR Clinical Lecturer, University of Warwick; and University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust

Professor Guy A Rutter
Head of Section of Cell Biology, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London

John Lehal
Managing Director, Insight Public Affairs

Jenne Patel
Equality and Diversity Manager, Diabetes UK

Professor Kamlesh Khunti PhD
Professor of Primary Care Diabetes and Vascular Medicine, University of Leicester

Dr Stephen Lawrence
GPSI Diabetes, Primary Care Medical Advisor, Diabetes UK/Clinical Diabetes Lead RCGP

Dr Sheldon Steed
Founder, mumoActive Limited

Professor Satyan Rajbhandari
Consultant Physician, Lancashire Teaching Hospital, Honorary Clinical Professor, University of Central Lancashire

Dr Trudi Deakin
Chief Executive, X-PERT Health

Philip Newland-Jones
Advanced Specialist Pharmacist Practitioner for Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

Nina Patel
Diabetes Nurse Consultant, Ealing Hospital NHS Trust

Dr Gary Adams
Associate Professor in Diabetes Health and Therapeutics, University of Nottingham School of Health Sciences

Dr Jyothis T George
Senior Clinical Researcher, University of Oxford

Amanda Cheesley
Long Term Conditions Advisor Royal College of Nursing

Dr Harpal Singh Randeva
Clinical Director Ambulatory Services, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust

Gurdev Singh Deogon
Principle Diabetes Podiatrist, Warwickshire Institute for Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism [WISDEM], UHCW NHS Trust

Dr Albert Persaud
Co-founder and Director, The Centre for Applied Research and Evaluation International Foundation

Rajmohan Thampi
Chair, Diabetes UK Ealing Voluntary Group

Dr Pankaj Sharma
Head, Imperial College Cerebrovascular Research Unit (ICCRU), Imperial College London & Hammersmith Hospitals

Dr Ken Earle
Consultant Endocrinologist, St George’s Hospital Trust

SIR – Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, describes London’s air quality as “intolerable”, and promises that “we can beat it”.

If Mr Johnson really wants autumnal London air to “be alpine in its freshness” or, in spring, “like champagne”, he’s going to need to take the problem much more seriously. His claim to be spearheading a “relentless drive to reduce pollution” is pure fantasy. Mr Johnson’s big idea for action is the ultra-low emission zone, which will take another six years to get started. It’s nowhere near enough.

The Green Party is the only major party taking the issue of air pollution seriously and calling for workable measures, such as a ban on idling for parked cars. We need to cut the amount of traffic on our city centre roads and move towards cleaner transport.

Jean Lambert MEP (Green)
London E17

SIR – One of the most polluted places in Britain, the Euston Road in London, is already four times over the legal limit for nitrogen dioxide levels. These are certain to increase if government plans for HS2 go ahead, making Euston the largest inner-city construction site in Europe. Multiple long-term road closures and a thousand daily lorry journeys for 10 years will add to the number of Londoners killed by Britain’s failure to tackle a major health threat.

Air pollution must not be allowed to get worse before it gets better.

Martin Sheppard
London NW1

Tips on ordering a pint that’s served with a smile

SIR – As the author of How to Open and Run a Successful Bar, I believe that the reason for poor service in many pubs is simple. Customers don’t tip, as they do in America and most European countries, so there is no need for the staff to be polite.

Sadly, the jolly barmaid has become as rare as the whistling errand-boy.

Christopher Egerton-Thomas
Hove, East Sussex

SIR – Gordon Hughes asks what makes a “proper pub”. My local, The Queens Arms, displays a sign outside: “No lager, No children’s room”.

This seems to make the establishment work very well.

Jonathan Hancock
Cowden, Kent

SIR – I went into a “proper pub” some years ago and on ordering drinks at the bar saw a sign that said: “In case of fire, lift this flap”. I couldn’t resist the temptation, and lifted the flap. Underneath it said: “Not now, you idiot, in case of fire!”

On returning to my table, I saw all the locals laughing at me.

Peter Gilbert
Ditton, Surrey

Willow tree hazards

SIR – The slowing of water flow into rivers from the outer edges of the catchments may be a priority, but enhancing the flow out of the rivers into the sea is of even greater importance to the intensely floodable areas surrounding the lower reaches. There, overgrown willow trees on the water’s edge are a serious impediment to flow, and a contributory cause of flooding.

Gloucester, on the lower reaches of the Severn, is a case in point. The trees used to be managed in the days of horse-drawn barges, and the passage of the barges moved the silt. Now, the outfall of Britain’s longest river is becoming choked with silt and overgrown willows. This adds to all the problems of man-made obstructions in the flood plain, including a huge landfill site.

Jeremy Chamberlayne
Gloucester

Confidential banking

SIR – When I was 18, I wanted to buy a new motorcycle. So, accompanied by my father, I made an appointment to see the bank manager regarding a loan.

He told me how much the loan would cost, but then asked me to go away and work out whether I could afford the repayments on my salary. I said, surely he knew how much I was earning as my salary was paid into my account, to which he replied: “Of course I know, but it is confidential, and if I mention it, your father will then know too.”

John Snook
Sheffield, South Yorkshire

Banquet faux pas

SIR – In view of the past troubles, was it tactful of the Queen to include a “bombe glacée” on the menu at her banquet for the Irish president?

John Sorrell
Paris

156 Comments

SIR – I was relieved to hear of Maria Miller’s resignation from the Cabinet, not a moment too soon.

But does this limited action indicate that she considers her behaviour is acceptable fir a backbench MP?

Ray Melvin
Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk

SIR – It speaks volumes for the poor ethics of Mrs Miller that she has resigned because of the “distraction she has caused to the Government” and not because of her deceit which, if undertaken by most other workers, would almost certainly have resulted in dismissal and criminal charges.

Clifford Baxter
Wareham, Dorset

SIR – At last Mrs Miller has resigned, but she must not be allowed to walk away without paying back the £45,000 she owes the taxpayer. She was not found innocent by the law, but by a panel of MPs who may have dodgy expenses as well. The police need to investigate whether a crime has been committed here.

Peter Cresswell
Enniskillen, County Fermanagh

SIR – No doubt we shall be told that it is the expenses system that is the problem, not the dishonesty of MPs. Every one of them should be reminded that the Parliamentary Green Book states: “Parliamentary allowances are designed to ensure that MPs are reimbursed for costs properly incurred in the performance of their duties.”

Edward Huxley
Thorpe, Surrey

SIR – Why all the fuss about Maria Miller? Surely it is the members of the Commons Standards Committee who should all be sacked. It is this committee, with representation from all three main parties, which, by its dismissal of the recommendations from an exhaustive investigation by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, reignited the perception that financial indiscretion by MPs will continually be pushed under the carpet.

R Michael James
Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire

SIR – David Cameron’s biggest weakness? His failure to understand public opinion and take appropriate action. This weakness could cost him the next election.

Captain John Maioha Stewart (retd)
Breisach, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

SIR – Maria Miller may have resigned but, yet again, David Cameron has shown what a weak leader he is, and how out of touch he is with most people in this country. He seems determined to lose the next election by continuing to ignore public opinion.

Michael Slater
Dibden Purlieu, Hampshire

SIR – The continuing distrust of MPs and their expenses, and public fears over attempts to gag journalists following Leveson, have hit a bursting point over Maria Miller’s case, the rights and wrongs of which appear to be immaterial.

I lament the loss of a female member of the Cabinet and a good politician but the fact that a group of MPs can alter by tens of thousands of pounds the verdict of the independent commissioner for standards on expenses, and that an aide is prepared to use a thinly veiled threat about press freedom to deter a journalist’s probing is simply not acceptable.

Maria Miller herself actually played no part in either of these, but she provided the scenario and has to take the rap.

Jane O’Nions
Sevenoaks, Kent

SIR – I reckon this guarantees a record low turnout for the general election.

Paddy Germain
Marden, Kent

SIR – In light of Maria Miller’s resignation, is it not time to re-examine the issue of Government-funded mortgage payments on MPs’ second homes? If the Government refunds an MP’s mortgage payments, the Government, in effect, shares in the equity in their property. And if there’s a capital gain when the property is eventually sold, then surely the Government should recoup a slice of that gain – it shouldn’t all go into the MP’s pocket.

Graham Tillotson
Oxshott, Surrey

SIR – In America, all administration appointees must be approved by Congress. Perhaps we should adopt a new policy here that any individual who has to resign from the Cabinet is no longer allowed to return.

David Bowman
Andover, Hampshire

SIR – Doubtless to counter the bad press over Maria Miller’s expenses, David Amess and 14 other Tory MPs list the achievements of the Conservative Party in giving the poorer members of our society a better life (Letters, April 9).

If they hadn’t given away so much of Britain’s sovereignty to unelected and corrupt foreign bureaucrats in Brussels, they might well have had something to shout about between now and May 22.

Carole Taylor
New Milton, Hampshire

SIR – Search as I might, I could not find in the letter from David Amess (and 14 others) one item in the long list of achievements by Conservatives that is so proudly claimed by the Prime Minister.

Surely, one of the 15 signatories might have suggested the introduction of same-sex marriage in the list.

Arnold Kingston
Four Elms, Kent

SIR – If MPs were all issued a go-anywhere rail card and an Oyster card, there would be no need for travel expenses, and the rail companies could pick up the bill.

Don Edwards
Manningtree, Essex

SIR – The resignation of Mrs Miller is not enough. We want our money back.

Michael Cleary
Bulmer, North Yorkshire

Irish Times:

Sir, – The suggestion by consultancy firm Grant Thornton (“TCD says it will ’act’ on ideas for rebranding”, April 9th) that universities need to become more commercially self-sustaining is a welcome one but does not go far enough. The idea should be extended to secondary and primary schools, which could do much more to bring in income rather than simply relying on the State to fund them, as if education were a public good.

The education of young people, who do not pay any taxes, places an uneconomical burden on the precarious finances of our State. Primary schools could begin by attracting fee-paying international five-year-olds to generate new income. While this might reduce the number of places available to Irish students, the important thing is that profits are made. Educational institutions are, first and foremost, businesses, and their job is to create wealth. If, as this report suggests, they are currently at breaking point due to ever decreasing Government funding, the solution is obvious. Increasing commercialisation will enable the Government to waste less money on this parasitic sector and invest in areas that actually make a return to our economy. Yours, etc,

PROF KEVIN MITCHELL,

PROF AOIFE MCLYSAGHT,

Smurfit Institute of Genetics ,

Trinity College Dublin

Sir, – As a young student at TCD I remember a day in the early 1980s spent discussing history and revolution in Ireland with my father. I, in youthful fervour, had expressed a criticism of pointless violence and professed a lack of support for the 1916 rising and its participants. My father, born when Ireland was under British rule, was not impressed. His retort was this: “You’d not be attending that godless college of yours if there had been no 1916.” It seems Trinity is now about to make his then politically motivated comment the truth by taking the Bible from its logo. There is no incompatibility between Christianity and scholarship, nor should any institution deny its roots. The Emperor’s new clothes only left him naked. Yours, etc,

ISOLDA O’CONNOR,

Kilnaclasha,

Skibbereen

Co Cork

A Chara, – In light of the current discussion regarding the rebranding of Trinity College, your readers might be interested to know that according to the college’s website “The legal name of the College is ‘the Provost, Fellows, Foundation Scholars and the other members of Board, of the College of the Holy and Undivided Trinity of Queen Elizabeth near Dublin’ and should be used on all legal documentation relating to the College.” Le dea-mhéin,

SEÁN Ó RIAIN,

Gort an tSeagail,

Achadh an Iúir ,

Contae an Chábháin

Sir, – It is not surprising that the rebranding of Trinity College Dublin is creating such a lot of heat and noise. After all, the stakes are so low. Yours, etc,

BRIAN AHERN,

Meadow Copse,

Clonsilla,

Dublin 15

Sir, – While atheists are understandably challenged if asked to swear on the Bible, the book, or rather collection of books, is increasingly becoming a problem for Christians too. The Bible contains some of the vilest racist, sexist and homophobic remarks in literature. It is inexplicable that female garda recruits, not to mention gay and lesbian gardaí, could hold this book up as symbolic of the values they intend to uphold. One can only assume they do not know all of what its written in it.

It is time to remove from this book all remarks that give offence to human beings. Just as we have regular constitutional amendments to remove injustices from our legal system, so too we should have regular amendments of all so-called holy books to remove all that is offensive to human beings from their pages.

In the gospel of St Mark (2:27), Jesus is quoted as saying that “the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath.” So too it might be said that the Bible was made for man, not man for the Bible. If there are offensive words within its pages let us have the courage to remove them so that the book might adequately serve us rather than we it. Yours, etc,

DECLAN KELLY,

9 Whitechurch Road,

Rathfarnham,

Dublin 14

Sir, – Sean Alexander Smith (Letters, April 10th) finds it strange but true that the  Holy Trinity and Our Divine Lord Jesus Christ are referred to in the preamble of the Constitution. I don’t find it one bit strange. It simply reflects the religious and cultural heritage of the vast majority of the people of this island, going back to the time of St Patrick.  Understandably, at swearing-in ceremonies the Bible is used. Jewish or Muslim people can use their respective holy books , the Torah or Koran as the case may be. People with no metaphysical beliefs , such as humanists, can make a secular affirmation of allegiance to the State. So I don’t really see what the problem is ? In this pluralistic world there is room for all of us and no one need feel left out. Yours, etc,

JOE MURRAY,

Beggars Bush Court,

Ballsbridge,

Dublin 4

Sir, – I didn’t see any objections to Presidents Barack Obama, Nelson Mandela or Mary Robinson putting their hands on the Bible during their innaguration ceremonies. Neither were there objections to one saying “So help me God”, to another saying “We were born to make manifest the glory of God that is within us” and the latter praying “May God direct me so that my Presidency is one of justice, peace and love.”

So what exactly is the problem with a new garda being allowed to do the same. Surely the New Testament, which Heather Abrahamson (April 8th) wants to exclude, is the great book of inclusion, where enmities and hostilities are broken down (Eph 2:8-18), where equality is proclaimed irrespective of background, culture or gender (Gal 3:28) and the message is one of peace and reconciliation (2 Cor 5:18-19). Have we become so “modern” and “multicultural” that we should take offence at such things and choose to settle for the least common denominator for fear of upsetting the latest fad. Yours, etc,

SEAMUS O’CALLAGHAN,

29 Bullock Park,

Carlow

Sir, – Fingal County Council decided on March 31st not to support the holding of a plebiscite in relation to a directly elected mayor for the Dublin metropolitan area. Most media comment on that decision has been very critical. However, I watched the webcast of the meeting and was struck and indeed impressed by the reasoned and mature approach of all the councillors who spoke, both for and against the plebiscite.

Some of the arguments against the plebiscite rested on the view that a Dublin metropolitan mayor would not be in the interests of Fingal residents. However, it was the logistics and timing of the proposed vote which generated most cross-party support.

I heard Fianna Fáil , Fine Gael, Labour and Socialist Party councillors highlighting what they saw as insufficient detail or clarity in the proposal together with a lack of real public awareness of what was at stake. The conclusion seemed to be that it would be folly to hold a plebiscite as proposed on May 23rd.

In rejecting the plebiscite as framed, I believe Fingal councillors have acted not just in the interests of Fingal residents but also in that of Dublin as a whole. They did not deserve the negative comments made about their decision.

I would recommend anyone interested in the issue to look at the webcast of the meeting, which is available on the Fingal County Council website. Yours, etc.

DANNY O’CONNOR,

Seapark,

Malahide,

Co Dublin

Sir, – With reference to the Fingal councillor who voted against the plebiscite on a directly elected mayor on the basis that, if Dublin had a mayor there would be “no chance of getting a pothole fixed in rural Fingal”, perhaps that is the extent of the issues he faces in his electoral area.

In representing his constituency, how far does a councillor’s responsibility extend? Does it extend to how Dublin as a city region may fare in a competitive global market? Or do double yellow lines in Balbriggan mark the limit? I would have welcomed the plebiscite on a directly elected mayor in May, not least as it might have raised public debate, in Dublin and nationally, about what constitutes appropriate governance for our cities, towns and localities, and indeed our role as an electorate in that governance.

By the way I recently reported a pothole to Dublin City Council, via the council’s website, without resort to councillors or TDs. It was fixed today. Yours, etc,

FINOLA O’DRISCOLL,

Larkfield Gardens,

Kimmage,

Sir, – It is good to hear that a member of the British royal family is to be invited to the ceremonies in 2016. Before dissenting voices make themselves felt, let me recall that French president Jacques Chirac invited German chancellor Gerhard Schröder to the Normandy beaches for the 60th commemorative celebration in 2004. This was in remembrance of a conflict which ultimately led to the end of the second World War, the last of many dreadful conflicts between those traditional enemies France and Germany. In the process of making friends with neighbours, no one was forgetting anything: Chirac recalled, for instance, that the chancellor’s father had been one of the millions killed in the war and Schröder explicitly referred to German atrocities. Seen in the context of the world today, Europe is a small place. Let us greet every step, every gesture, which brings us together. Yours, etc,

GERARD P MONTAGUE,

Zaumberg,

Immenstadt,

Allgäu,

Germany

A Chara,  – The Taoiseach’s use of the term “our authentic historians” (April 10th) in London is interesting given the opinion piece by Roy Foster in your paper on the previous day. Foster writes that British rule in Ireland by the time of the revolution was not oppressive. He seeks to minimise the revolutionary generation’s actions as flowing from mere Anglophobia. I doubt if the new mutually fulfilling relations between our two countries will be “nearly as good as sex”, as Foster appears to think.   Yours, etc,

ANTHONY JORDAN,

Gilford Road,

Dublin 4

A Chara – The word “Our” in the title of the article by Mark Hennessy (“Our special love/hate relationship with Britain”, April 5th) should have alerted me to the fact that this did not concern the likes of me living in South Armagh. The fact that the “hate” part of that relationship – something with which we might have had a possible understanding in these quarters – wasn’t even alluded to, suggested that this was one for those south of the Border.

The reason the term “Éire” grates from the mouth of an Englishman (or a Northern unionist for that matter) is that it is used specifically to refer to the 26-county state and not to the island of Ireland. If you want to call the 26 counties “Ireland” then please be consistent and cut the Six Counties off your tourist maps. And see how you sell that to the Yanks.

Yours, etc,

KIERAN MURPHY,

Dromintee,

Co ArmSir, – One frequently hears and reads of people reaching out for, and seeking basic truths about, the probable order of things. This is normal and good, as we are all spiritual as well as temporal beings. It might however help to use logic in thinking in this spiritual field. For example, our universe is moving (expanding) so it must have had a beginning, and therefore have been created (the “Big Bang”). In this context, arguably the only type of entity which could have created our finite universe is an infinite one. However, we are finite beings and so cannot comprehend the concept of infinity. There is therefore a tendency for people to try to to explain the infinite in temporal terms.

However if there exists an overall infinite universe then as finite beings there is an infinite amount that we cannot and do not know. This wisdom was well expressed in the early 1500s by Michel de Montaigne when he wrote: “All I know is that I know nothing, and I am not even sure about that.” Socrates said much the same thing: “The only true wisdom is knowing that you know nothing.” This wisdom should encourage us to keep open minds on spiritual matters, and as advised by Albert Einstein, continue learning all of our lives, right to the very last day. Yours, etc,

TOM MOLYNEUX,

Ripley Hills.

Bray.

Co Wicklow

Sir, – Edward Hanlon (Letters, April 9th), calls the Big Bang theory “bonkers”. He is limiting himself in his scope, why stop at the Big Bang if you are prepared to deny overwhelming physical evidence and the expert opinion of thousands of scientists? He can use the same method of simple denial to classify our currently accepted “Theory of Gravity” as bonkers, but is he prepared to jump off his house roof to prove his point? Your Etc. Sean McGibbon 10 The Knoll Cashel Downs KIlkenny

Sir, – Shane O’Doherty (April 8th) suggests a study to observe the effects of removing the bus lane. There’s no need. On Conyngham Road in Dublin every morning from eight to nine the rules are simply ignored. From my apartment I have a bird’s eye view of the lead-up to the Chesterfield Avenue/Infirmary Road junction. Motorists turning left queue in single file for the lights in the left lane for 300 metres. The effect is not to speed up their own journeys one iota but merely to impede the progress of several buses, each carrying 50 or more passengers.

The selfishness of the car drivers would be blameworthy even if an advantage were gained. But in fact their actions are not just illegal but futile. Fortunately I have other transport options, namely Luas and bicycle. Many do not. Mr O’Doherty’s dismissal of these people on the basis of taxation is obnoxious. Yours, etc,

PAUL KEAN,

Long Meadows Apartments,

Conyngham Road,

Dublin 8

Sir, – I was dismayed to read Shane O’Doherty’s comments on cyclists’ safety. Not only are his remarks objectionable; they also disregard the observable behavior of motorists in Dublin city. Surely I cannot be the only person to have noticed that the number of drivers who treat red traffic lights and pedestrian crossings with nothing but contempt has reached epidemic proportions? Education and enforcement of the rules of the road for all road users are desperately needed, now more than ever. Yours, etc,

GARRET LEDWITH,

Tudor Road,

Ranelagh,

Dublin 6

Sir, – Much of the debate on Heidegger’s legacy (Fintan O’Toole, April 5th, and Letters, April 8th) rests on a misunderstanding of what it means to interpret a philosophical work. The injunction on the reader is to approach the work thoughtfully and critically.

Heidegger’s major work, Sein und Zeit (1927) – Being and Time in English – is an attempt to see what role time plays in our understanding of being. While it can and should be questioned whether such a project has political implications, insofar as the Enlightenment project of understanding nature mathematically works with a distinction between events that occur in time and the timeless laws that govern them, insofar as philosophical theology traditionally speaks of God’s eternity as distinguished from creation and insofar as Plato distinguished the timeless and the true from the temporal, Heidegger can be seen to be raising an issue of central philosophical significance.

I would suggest that the consideration of the relation between Heidegger’s work and politics and between philosophy and politics more generally is ill-served by thoughtless polemic. Yours, etc,

DR AENGUS DALY,

Carnaper Str,

Wuppertal,

Germany

Irish Independent:

Padraic Neary Tubbercurry, Co Sligo – Published 11 April 2014 02:30 AM

* I refer to an article by Brendan Keenan (April 10), regarding the type of recovery we need. Nobody in good health should want ‘recovery’ unless they erroneously think they are ill. That appears to be where the economic establishment of the world is at the moment: deluded, mistaking the greatest economic success ever for failure.

Also in this section

See no bubble, hear no bubble, speak no bubble

Women laid groundwork for Michael D’s visit

Injustice in our way of life

Economic activity at its most basic is providing the goods and services required by the human race. All through history there has been failure: inability to provide enough, leaving shortfall between what could be produced and what was needed. This gap in supply and demand always meant we needed to produce more, thereby facilitating the need and opportunity for continual economic growth.

As the production process depended substantially on human labour, employment was always guaranteed. At the end of the 20th century, everything changed. The introduction of computerisation enhanced life and was especially successful in commercial matters. Suddenly we could produce practically everything, in abundance, and transport it anywhere in the world at minimal cost.

As the economic diagnosis was wrong in the first place, wrong policies were enacted to rectify the situation. Conversion of debts from private to national incurred public debt that will run for generations. Austerity pushed an enormous number into penury, and policies making those employed work harder, longer and into later retirement are about as wrong it is possible to be in a world where work diminishes by the second.

The real tragedy is that the policies adopted by the Irish and EU Governments have not addressed the real problem at all. Instead of ‘recovery’, we need adaptation. Rather than recover, we need to adapt to the very best economic time that ever existed. The first step is to understand what has really happened: how technological success has transformed economic activity forever. Then we should thank our lucky stars to be living at this time.

SUGGESTION WIDE OF THE MARK

* It was bad enough to hear that the queen of England might help out with the 1916 celebrations – but the suggestion by our esteemed President that we should support the England soccer team in Brazil is out, out, out!

SAME OLD 1840S OPPRESSION

* The 1840s are back again. The international and Wall Street bankers are the absentee landlords, still able to suck the blood of the timid. The havoc they caused in America and beyond was pure evil, yet none of them were ever charged with fraud. Bernie Madoff screwed his own people and was rightfully punished. The land agents of the 1840s are our bankers. The politicians of today are the small farmers of old, who exported their produce while their cousins starved to death. The Garda are no different than their RIC counterparts – all Irishmen, who see injustices every day yet do very little. The lawyers are the Lords, the starving peasantry are the unemployed, and the Catholic Church, and all other churches, are still the same – silent.

This time, we can’t blame the English.

THE HANDSHAKE HORRORS

* During that ‘Irish’ night (before the President’s visit), I saw someone extend his hand to the queen who appeared not to ‘notice’ the gesture. Must be a bit like a western showdown when one meets her highness. . . keeping an eye trained on her ‘gun hand’, waiting for her to make her move?

OUR JOB TO MAKE A BETTER WORLD

* World Health Day on April 7 has passed unnoticed. It is fair to state that the World Health Organisation has been admirable in championing the rights of the marginalised, the disenfranchised, the downtrodden and the poor in societies across the globe. It has had an unparalleled track record in defending those who endure unspeakable torment and ill health; political, sexual, racial and social prejudices; and those who suffer from the ills and dilemmas of contemporary societies in pursuit of health-related millennium development goals.

There have been successes in downgrading several communicable and non-communicable diseases since the advent of the 21st century. However, there are daunting challenges that lie ahead as the world evolves into an increasingly interdependent and unpredictable entity. This demands urgent action to ease the burden of gender inequality, youth unemployment, social and economic disparities, carbon dioxide poisoning and environmental degradation and, most importantly, man’s inhumanity to fellow human beings. This lies outside the purview of the ministries of health and transcends to encompass the realms of education, housing, environment, defence, economy, foreign policy and transportation, to mention just a few.

This demands us to be creative in sparking debates, spurring social change and instigating social dialogue – in summary to work towards the betterment and advancement of the human race.

IT DOESN’T FEEL A YEAR OVER 700

* Amidst the tsunami of verbal diarrhoea we have had to endure from the Irish media during the President’s visit to Britain, one phrase confused me. It was the “800-year relationship” between our islands. Am I right in thinking that “relationship” in journo-speak means “unrelenting brutal colonisation”?

CIVIL WAR POLITICS STILL RAGES

* The letter from Fr Tom Grufferty (April 10) kind of touched a nerve for me. I can also understand where (I think) Fr Tom is coming from insofar as, back then, official Ireland was conspicuous by showing very little interest in our British exiles, other than on St Patrick’s Day.

Such places as the Banba Hall on the Foleshill Road in Coventry were very far from Aras an Uachtarain on a Saturday evening, and reading the ‘Irish Press’ at the back of the church on Sunday morning might be as close to home as one might get for a long time.

Those were the days when, if there was a photo of a politician in the paper, he (for there were no shes) would, most likely, be kissing John Charles McQuaid’s ring.

But all that is in the past and the queen has come to our place and Official Ireland has called over to Windsor and believe it or not, Catholicism is no longer compulsory in either Ireland or Britain – and the job of both heads of state is to represent all citizens in their respective countries.

Earlier, I commented on understanding Fr Tom, but in all this growing up and forgetting the past with the old enemy, we are still fighting the Civil War at home.

Why can’t Fianna Fail and Fine Gael agree to hang the portraits of Dev and Mick side by side in the Taoiseach’s office and not behave like children each time there is a change of government?

Now, about Westminster Abbey!


Busy day

$
0
0

12April2014Busy day

I go all the way around the park listening to the Men from the Ministry: I Hamiliton Jones a spy or is it ballroom dancing? Priceless

Mary in hospital brief visit Peter off for a week

No Scrabbletoday, Perhaps Marywill win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Sue Townsend – obituary

Sue Townsend was the writer whose diaries of spotty teenager Adrian Mole became a publishing sensation

Sue Townsend, author of the Adrian Mole series

Sue Townsend Photo: ROB JUDGES

2:22PM BST 11 Apr 2014

Comments5 Comments

Sue Townsend, who has died aged 68, was the creator of Adrian Mole, the spotty, lovestruck teenager from Ashby-de-la-Zouch whose comic chronicles of myriad anxieties – political, intellectual, social, sexual – proved the publishing phenomenon of the 1980s and were turned into successful television series, starring Gian Sammarco as the title character.

Including various omnibuses, there were eventually nine volumes of Mole’s diaries; the last – The Prostate Years, published in 2009 – documented him battling cancer as a middle-aged man who runs a bookshop. But it was the early books that particularly gripped the reading public, selling millions of copies and transforming Sue Townsend, a self-confessed “Old Labour type”, from a poverty-stricken single mother-of-three into a rich woman.

Sue Townsend’s ‘The Secret Diary of Adrian Mole aged 13 3/4′

The Secret Diary of Adrian Mole, Aged 13¾, as the first volume was titled on publication in 1982, unveiled a boy clear-eyed enough to assess the world around him but powerless to shape his own fate. His pursuit of the treacle-haired, middle-class Pandora is defeated by acne, and his self-declared intellectual inclinations by the fact that “I am not very clever”. His slight teenaged frame carried a large dollop of guilt about the state of the nation itself.

While The Secret Diary was devoured by teenagers looking for fiction that accurately reflected their own experiences, Adrian Mole was also a sufficiently convincing Everyman to appeal to other generations too. On the canvas that he provided, Sue Townsend was able to paint a satirical portrait of the day. Mole, she admitted, “is me. He is all of us, to a greater or lesser degree.”

Susan Lillian Townsend was born on April 2 1946 in Leicester, the eldest child in a working-class family. Her father worked in a factory making jet engines before becoming a postman; her mother was a housewife who also worked in the factory canteen. They were, Sue Townsend later said, “very clever” but “idiosyncratic”, and she did not learn to read until she was eight.

No scholar, Sue failed her 11-plus and left South Wigston High School at 15. But, belatedly, the internal, secret world of books increasingly played a central part in her existence. Having started on Richmal Crompton’s Just William, she quickly graduated to Jane Eyre, and from there to Dostoevsky. “Jane Eyre was the first book I read right through, non-stop,” she said. “It was winter, freezing cold, and I remember seeing this thin light outside and realising it was dawn. I got dressed reading, walked to school reading and finished it in the cloakroom at lunchtime. It was riveting.”

She devoured “all the Russians, then the French, then the Americans. I remember getting in trouble for reading The Grapes of Wrath under my desk in a boring lesson.” Yet her going to university “wasn’t even considered. You went into shoes or hosiery.”

She took on a series of unskilled jobs – on a garage forecourt, in a café making “tropical coffees” – and, at 18, married a sheet-metal worker. By the time she was in her early twenties she had three small children.

Life was hard. “Poverty grinds you down – it just pins you to a certain location,” she said. “There’s no movement – no freedom to move. Being poor with three small children is terrifying. You can’t make any plans. You know you’re not going on holiday, ever. There’s no way you could ever afford driving lessons or a car. And the guilt I used to feel: they had holes in their shoes and at one point I had to send them to school wearing Wellingtons when the sun was shining.”

Sue Townsend (ANDREW FOX)

But to the secret world of books she added, in the small hours of the night when the children were asleep, the secret world of writing. Her efforts accumulated in an empty box under the stairs: “I knew I wasn’t good enough. When you’re reading Updike, how can you be?” But whatever voice, whatever genre, she tried, the results always tended to the comic.

She was 25 when her husband left her, having belatedly discovered the hippie movement. Slaving away to make ends meet, she took on several jobs, one of them helping to run adventure courses for children. On a canoeing course she met Colin Broadway, who would become her second husband.

Her writing began to emerge from the shadows in 1978, when she joined the Writers’ Group at Leicester’s Phoenix Arts Centre. There she produced a play, Womberang, which won her a Thames TV bursary. (There would be several other stage plays, including Bazaar and Rummage (1982) and, in 1989, Disneyland It Ain’t.) It was one Sunday around this period when the character of Adrian Mole “descended” fully formed into her head.

“I was living in a council house at the time,” she recalled, “on my own with three kids and three part-time jobs to keep us going. So Sunday was a total collapse; I was exhausted. My eldest son said: ‘Why can’t we go to safari parks like other families do?’” It was she, said, “that adolescent, self-pitying voice. Mole’s voice. I just heard it.”

Sue Townsend set out to capture the claustrophobia that teenagers feel in the family home, “a brooding and seething: you feel it coming through the floorboards”. Mole’s first incarnation was as Nigel, but Nigel Mole was too similar to another fictional schoolboy, Nigel Molesworth. So she changed the name to Adrian and sent a radio play to John Tydeman, head of drama for Radio 4. Broadcast in January 1982, it was a huge popular success and led to a book contract. Nine months later The Secret Diary was published, and within a month it was top of the bestseller lists; within a year it had sold a million copies.

Gian Sammarco as Adrian Mole in the Thames TV production of ‘The Secret Diary’ (REX)

Her books were adapted into three television series, The Secret Diary Of Adrian Mole, Aged 13¾ and The Growing Pains of Adrian Mole ( Thames Television, both starring Gian Sammarco, 1985-87) and Adrian Mole: the Cappuccino Years (starring Stephen Mangan, BBC One, 2001). The fame and fortune Adrian Mole brought Sue Townsend ultimately allowed her to escape the poverty of her early years. She even bought the pretty Victorian vicarage to which, in her days as a struggling young mother, she had come to pay rent to her landlord.

But she was not able to enjoy her new, comfortable existence for long. In the mid-1980s, when she was still in her 30s, she suffered a heart attack, the first dramatic sign of the debilitating diabetes that would afflict her for the rest of her life. That ill health was compounded, in her last decade and more, by Charcot’s joint – degenerative arthritis, which meant she could not move far without a wheelchair.

She was, by her own admission, “the world’s worst diabetic”, finding the disease hard to manage. Worst of all, however, was the loss of her sight. For someone as passionate about books as Sue Townsend, it was a heavy blow. “Learning to be blind is incredibly hard work,” she told The Observer in 2001. “In my sleep I had a haemorrhage in both eyes and when I woke my eyes were full of this black haze, like thick black smoke. I thought there was a fire. I staggered around, trying to put it out. It wasn’t on the stove, so I thought it was upstairs, and of course I took the black smoke with me, looking for it. It was inside my head. Oh God. So I went to the doctor and said: ‘Am I utterly blind now?’ And he said to me, ‘Yes, you’re quite blind.’ And that was it. All very English. There are no ceremonies for these things.”

She mourned the fact that she would “never see an individual snowdrop again… never see my grandchildren grow and change”. But she remained resolutely upbeat — at least in public, confessing that when it came to bouts of self-pity: “I prefer to do it in private.”

The many interviewers she met recorded the tumbling, throaty laughter that continued to lace her conversation. And the books kept coming too. As well as the periodic arrival of a new volume of Adrian Mole, she wrote six other novels, including The Queen and I (1992), a satire about the Royal family living on a housing estate after a republican uprising. A sequel, Queen Camilla, came out in 2006. Her last book, The Woman Who Went to Bed for a Year, was published in 2012. These she completed by dictating, usually to her son Sean, who in 2009 donated to his mother one of his kidneys .

Last year Sue Townsend suffered a stroke. She had plans for a new volume of Adrian Mole, which she hinted, possibly jokingly, might be “about anarchy, with the ensuing rape and pillage”. Social media was another possibility: “He will be blogging and twittering – but in a quite incompetent way.”

As her health continued to deteriorate, however, Sue Townsend realised that she was unlikely to complete a new volume. This did not dispirit her: “I honestly think of [Adrian Mole] as a character living his own life. He’s doing things that I don’t even know about. And he hasn’t told me; I haven’t been to see him for a while.”

Sue Townsend was awarded two honorary doctorates, including one from the University of Leicester, her home town.

She is survived by her husband and four children.

Sue Townsend, born April 2 1946, died April 10 2014

Guardian:

The issue of non-repayment raised by the Sutton Trust and the Institute for Fiscal Studies is just one of the problems with the student loan system (Report, 10 April). By introducing lower monthly repayments as a sweetener when the £9,000 fees were introduced, the government has in fact created something more burdensome for graduates by locking them into an average of 26 years of debt. Add this to the unsustainable cost of unpaid student loans to the government and the scale of the problem falls into perspective. We are looking at intelligent reforms that address the fundamental problems of the system without radical overhaul. It is highly possible – indeed, there is an international precedent – to design a loan system that reduces the long-term burden of debt for graduates and eliminates the cost to government of non-repayment. Not only would this stop the spiralling cost to government of student loans, but would allow government to invest directly in higher education teaching and learning more strategically.
Libby Hackett
Chief executive, University Alliance

• Supporters of the massive expansion in university education point out that lifetime earnings for graduates are higher than for non-graduates, but this does not prove that the degree was beneficial. Those who qualify for university already, on average, have higher earnings potential than those who do not. In addition, many graduates, particularly from non-Russell Group universities, end up in jobs that may ask for a degree, but only because some employers use a degree as a filtering device. Those same jobs a few decades ago might have been taken by a well-qualified 16-year-old. The desired social and cultural benefits of university education are also minimal for those who attend their local university and have to do long hours of paid work to survive, leaving no time for student societies, student politics or indeed the traditional discussions about the meaning of life.I graduated in 1982 and will no doubt be accused of wishing to deny to others the benefits that I received of going to university. However, most students are not receiving the benefits that existed 32 years ago. Instead they are left with a huge debt.
Richard Mountford
Tonbridge, Kent

When I sell my car I am legally obliged to give the buyer information about it that could adversely affect its value. When I sell my house I have the same legal obligation and I can be held to account if I fail to do so. It seems however that I can sell £500m of drugs to the government with no such responsibility (Report, 11 April).
Patrick Reynolds
Sevenoaks, Kent

• It is notable that the three politicians whom Martin Kettle cites (Comment, 10 April) whose private lives would be unsustainable today – Gladstone, Asquith, and Lloyd George – were all Liberals. Lloyd George was also involved in the sale of honours in the early 1920s with Maundy Gregory, the man who dealt with the business side of it all.
Richard Dargan
Old Coulsdon, Surrey

• Working class solidarity has, as Selina Todd indicates (Comment, 10 April), brought important victories, but not for “ordinary working class” people. It’s about time this lazy and patronising cliche, so beloved of politicians, was abolished. There are no “ordinary people”, only extraordinary individuals, each unique with a story to tell.
Tony Judge
Twickenham, Middlesex

• You illustrate an article which, inter alia, upbraids the political class for patronising the workers with a photo of Blackpool – were you being ironic?
Lou George
Kendal, Cumbria

• No, Adrian Searle, the new Glasgow School of Art building is not opposite the Mackintosh Museum (In at the deep end, 8 April). It’s opposite the Mackintosh-designed art school which 100-plus years on is still GSA’s main building. What were you thinking of?
Jackie Heaton
Glasgow

• Now that Michael D Higgins has given us such a fine example (Report, 8 April), perhaps we should consider combining the posts of poet laureate and head of state. The jobs both require an ability to declaim in public and a sensitive use of language. An election every five years, with candidates required to versify on the hustings would work. Carol Ann Duffy can fill in until the first vote.
Roger Osborne
Scarborough

It is a measure of the disarray of the Better Together campaign that even Menzies Campbell (I’ll vote no in September because I love Scotland, 8 April), who is – in stark contrast to the ludicrous scaremonger Lord Robertson – one of its more sensible supporters, but he still manages to put forward a case that is riddled with errors.

For a start, there’s his contention that Scotland does not suffer a “democratic deficit”. If repeatedly voting for Labour and, more recently, SNP majorities, but, more often than not, finding ourselves governed by Tories at Westminster is not a “democratic deficit”, what is? Once again, Better Together (which is poisoned in Scotland by including the Conservative party) fails to understand the deep anti-Tory anger that fuels the vote for Scottish independence.

Campbell maintains that the British empire came to an end “more peacefully than others”. There are many people around the globe – from the descendants of those massacred at Amritsar, to the Palestinians dispossessed under a blueprint created by the Balfour declaration and the liberation fighters of the Kenyan Mau Mau tortured and castrated by the British army – who must feel relieved that it didn’t end more violently. For a significant minority of people in Scotland (myself included), a yes vote in September’s referendum is also a conscious rejection of the barbaric imperial history of the British state.

Finally, Campbell argues that “Conservatives, Labour and Liberal Democrats publicly acknowledge” that the Scottish parliament should have increased powers, especially economic powers, within the union.

This smacks of shutting the barn door long after the horse has bolted, been caught and turned into dubious hamburgers. It’s now 18 months since David Cameron pointedly refused to allow the “greater powers” option (known as “devolution max”) to appear on the referendum paper. If the obvious majority for devo max turns to a pro-independence majority, the pro-union forces will have no one to blame but themselves.
Mark Brown
Glasgow

• Owen Jones is entirely correct in suggesting that the no campaign on Scottish independence is being deliberately antagonistic to Scots in its campaigning methods (We should not be trying to bully Scots into voting no, 9 April). This is hardly surprising. David Cameron and his fellow Conservatives know full well that a yes vote in the referendum will condemn what remains of the United Kingdom to perpetual Tory governments. Little wonder then that a large amount of threatening reverse psychology is being employed by vociferous elements in the “better together” team, secretly hoping for a “sod you” yes result.
Tim Matthews
Luton, Bedfordshire

• George Robertson, former Nato secretary-general, says Scottish independence would be “cataclysmic”. But Scotland has not even said it would leave Nato, although it could be refused entry if it rejects nuclear weapons. That could be a step forward in world stability in demonstrating that security is not assured by Nato and its nuclear arms. Nuclear arms and the UK’s part of the US Trident nuclear armed submarine fleet based at Faslane are the source of dangers, not deterrence. A nuclear weapons convention that is a global ban is imperative if the world is to be a safer place. Scotland could show the way.
Rae Street
Littleborough, Lancashire

• Lord Robertson’s comments in Washington do the anti-Scottish independence team a disservice. Britain’s status minus Scotland would not be diminished: witness almost a century without the Republic of Ireland. To propose that Whitehall would be unable to fulfill its tasks alongside resolving the separation of an independent Scotland credits that institution with an unbelievable degree of incompetency.
Robert Walker
Kinross, Perth and Kinross

• Re: Lord Robertson is trying to bully Scots into voting no. I’m off to the bookies to put £50 on a yes vote.
Veronica Gordon Smith
Edinburgh

• The headlong dash for Scottish independence may be forced to decelerate once Alex Salmond and his supporters properly reflect on the remarkable force with which the EU, with total IMF support, punishes its smallest members, like Cyprus, when their financial affairs become unsustainable.
Graham Brown
Shrewsbury

You say that Hancock’s Half Hour “is widely regarded as the first British sitcom” (New voices for lost Hancock radio episodes, 8 April), but in fact there were several radio sitcoms before Hancock in 1954. Both Educating Archie with ventriloquist Peter Brough and Archie Andrews, and Life With the Lyons, with Ben Lyon, his wife Bebe Daniels and their children Richard and Barbara, began in 1950. Meet the Huggetts, with Jack Warner and Kathleen Harrison, started in 1952 and A Life of Bliss, with David Tomlinson and later George Cole, aired from 1953. Many of these shows can be heard on BBC Radio 4 Extra, along with other classics such as Beyond Our Ken, Round the Horne, The Goon Show, Take It From Here and, of course, Hancock’s Half Hour, all of which are still funnier than most current radio comedy.
Michael Darvell
Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire

Independent:

You may find this the only  letter you receive that offers support or apology for Maria Miller. She is my constituency MP, a  role I and others can confirm that she carries out assiduously and very effectively, even though I’ve never voted Tory.  It seems she has been crucified by the media for a combination of things: her unfortunate amnesia over expenses claimed under a discredited regime over five years ago; her lack of humility in apologising for something where she felt she’d been found not guilty; and  her failure to implement a post-Leveson regime acceptable to the media.

The vitriol rains down on her. Her crime seems to be weakness and apparent arrogance in taking advantage of an expenses regime that still has a long way to go before it passes reasonable probity tests. However, let’s just consider whether, compared to what should be happening in respect of,  say, the leaders of the Met,  a sense of proportion has  been lost. Or does the media have different standards for those who offend it directly?

Geoff Burnes, Basingstoke

Come on Basingstoke, finish the job: deselect your MP, or even better just vote her out!

Maria Miller will still walk away with a prospective profit of £600,000 to £1m, depending on how much capital gains tax she can get away with, on a taxpayer-financed home for her parents!

Not bad work, even by MPs’ standards.

Dr A D Kitcher, High Wycombe

I can’t say I’ve shed  any tears over the resignation of Maria Miller. With the  opportunistic Nigel Farage hotfooting it to Basingstoke, we now have the even more unpalatable prospect of a Ukip MP here.

Recognising her responsibility for this, many here hope she will quickly resign as our constituency MP too!

Like many before her, Maria Miller has been far from transparent and has gained financially on selling the property at the centre of her expenses scandal. She was grossly over-claiming her expenses. Only when cornered did she eventually resign.

And the Government wonders why the electorate is so disengaged.

Tony Corbin, Basingstoke

The Maria Miller case demonstrates the power wielded by the press and the reluctance of politicians, with the possible exception of David Cameron, to stand up to the perception of public opinion reported by the press, which is often manufactured to sell newspapers and influenced by the style of reporting.

Grant Shapps, on  The Daily Politics, was positively fawning over the rights of a free press and Ian Burrell’s comment (10 April) that Sajid Javid would not want to risk his generally good press “by putting pressure on papers to sign up to the unpopular Royal Charter” says it all about how the press applies its own  pressure on politicians to get what it wants.

Richard Lott, Chepstow

Maria Miller cannot  blame her role in Leveson. Her actions, and those of other MPs in reducing her payback to £5,800 show how out of touch they are with middle England. Their actions simply show greed, followed by arrogance. David Cameron has shown poor leadership.

Dennis Jones, Edgmond, Shropshire

Maria Miller is not redundant, she has a job; she has been demoted. No one but a politician  would get a cheque because they could mistake the need to claim accurately for expenses paid from public funds.

The “redundancy cheque” is as great an insult to the taxpayer as the original fraud. There is no excuse for failing to claim accurately for up-to-date mortgage costs.

Jonathan Devereux, St Albans

Useless flu drugs

Congratulations on the excellent article concerning the fortune squandered by the Government on the ineffective drugs obtained  to combat a predicted  “flu epidemic” (10 April).

I recall unheeded reservations by professionals that the claims made on the performance of the drugs were without adequate testing or substantiated proof. Such a newspaper article is rare and, for me, makes i such a bargain (notwithstanding the price appeal to a Scot).

Robert Gordon Clark, Gorebridge, Midlothian

While the Government is rightly criticised for its naivety in trusting drug companies when purchasing anti-flu drugs, what of the companies themselves?

Jeff Smith, Beeston, Bedfordshire

Online protesters

I sign petitions on Change.org, 38 degrees and Avaaz. I am disabled and could not get to London to march or stand and protest. Online petitions are a boon to people like me who want to be politically active and register opposition to this government but physically cannot do so.

Matthew Norman  (9 April) would do well to remember that we are not all physically able.

Ian Foster, Brentford, Middlesex

Why we got  rid of Saddam

Susan Boldrini (letter, 9 April) asks “what exactly we gained” from intervening in Iraq.

We gained the removal of a genocidal, WMD-ambitious despot who had bombed and invaded his neighbours; repressed, tortured and gassed his opponents; harboured terrorists; sponsored suicide bombers; stoked ethnic hatred and extreme Islamist and anti-Western sentiment; torched oilfields; destroyed marshlands; wrecked his country’s economy; ignored UN resolutions; duped, bribed and expelled weapons inspectors; and provoked sanctions that killed 100,000 innocent Iraqis annually.

We paid a price for our intervention and we would have paid a price for not intervening.

Keith Gilmour, Glasgow

Bird that soared to disaster

On 9 April you carried an interesting snippet about the bar-headed goose, which you state is the world’s highest-flying bird, flying at over  23,000 feet.

However, on 29 November 1973 an aircraft flying over Abidjan, Ivory Coast, suffered a bird strike at 37,000 feet. Upon landing, enough remained of the bird to  identify it as a Ruppell’s vulture (Gyps rueppellii). This has been listed in the Guinness Book of Records as the world’s highest-flying bird, as a result of this incident.

Bill Robinson, Slough

Offshore  island

Andreas Whittam Smith is right (10 April).

Britain outside the EU wouldn’t be a ship of state like the one that traded the world from the 16th century to the 1960s, the British Empire. It would be more like the Isle of Man (chief industries: tourism and nil corporation tax).

Mike Belbin, London SW3

Ofqual has announced tougher new GCSEs and A-levels, but we at the Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) are concerned the changes will do little to alleviate concerns from employers who they say struggle to find young people with the skills they need. It is widely agreed that reform is needed, but we are concerned that this has been rushed through and will not deal with the issues it attempts to solve.

GCSEs and A-levels do not always provide the level of practical experience that employers need. The IET’s most recent Skills and Demand in Industry report showed that 42 per cent of employers told us that they were disappointed with the skills of new employees. Many of the UK’s engineering employers are suffering from engineering skills gaps, shortages and an ageing workforce, which will only get worse in the future when huge numbers of engineers and technicians are forecast to be needed for new infrastructure and energy projects.

One way to address these concerns could be by schools arranging work experience placements for students or by promoting apprenticeships.

It is vital that we encourage more students to study science and engineering as we are facing a skills crisis. But it is also vitally important that young people learn the crucial skills that employers are so desperate for.

Stephanie Fernandes, Institution of Engineering and Technology,  London WC2

Glenys Stacey, chief executive of OfQual, thinks that testing practical knowledge is as good as testing practical skills in science examinations. The first and most obvious point is to pray she never gets her hands on the driving test.

Far more seriously, removing practical skills from the final exam assessment is quite likely to diminish the time devoted to them, because of the time pressures to complete an already over-full curriculum. This is a terrible shame. From my own experience as a teacher, I know that the first question pupils asked coming into a science lesson was, “Is this a practical lesson?” The delight and enthusiasm the practical lessons created was fundamental to the enjoyment, and hence achievement, of the pupils.

Science is about developing a hypothesis in answer to a question, then testing it practically and evaluating the result. To think that it is not necessary to test this skill and include it in the final examination grade is the mark of a scientifically illiterate mind.

Brian Dalton, Sheffield

Schools, taxes and equality

While totally disagreeing with Chris Blackhurst’s support for a flat-rate 27 per cent tax rate – the idea that it would “put all those tax advisers out of business” is preposterous – I wholeheartedly agree with his proposal to end private schools (“What would I do if I were Prime Minister?”, 11 November)

His argument that private education is “unfair and insidious” and is the reason for so much being “wrong with our nation today” is spot-on, but strangely, those are the same points I would use to explain my opposition to flat-rate taxes.

With so much inequality in the country now, and, according to one source, Britain 28th out of 34 in the equality league table, it is essential the rich pay much more in income tax; if Thatcher could live with a top rate of 60 per cent, I am sure the country would welcome it now.

Tax avoidance will continue as long as there is no determination at government level to end it, and as long as perpetrators, when discovered, are allowed to escape punishment and disgrace.

Bernie Evans, Liverpool

I completely agree with Jason Priestly’s letter (11 April) in response to Chris Blackhurst’s article on housing (9 April).

In the same article, Mr Blackhurst described inheritance tax as “the most ludicrous tax there is”, yet in his article of 11 April, on education, he asks: “Why should some children be given a better chance just because their parents are wealthy?” Inheritance tax is one means of redressing such imbalances.

John Armstrong, Southampton

Blakelock: the hunt goes on

After nearly 30 years, the police’s attempt to secure the conviction of Keith Blakelock’s murderer amounts to an attempt to secure another set of wrongful convictions. The police have been convinced of the guilt of everyone that they have prosecuted, including Winston Silcott.

The police’s behaviour in the Blakelock case stands in stark contrast to their inactivity in the 1979 case of Blair Peach. The National Council for Civil Liberties found in its unofficial Committee of Inquiry that he was almost certainly murdered by members of the Special Patrol Group.

Tony Greenstein, Brighton

Congratulations on your headline “No Justice for PC Keith Blakelock” (10 April). This man, while protecting firefighters, was murdered by a mob of sadists. Yet a number of “community leaders” came on television and argued for closure!

The actions of the Metropolitan Police have been abysmal. However, the suggestion that the pursuit of Blakelock’s killers be dropped is appalling.

 What would the reaction have been if a white person had suggested that Stephen Lawrence’s killers should not be pursued because it was too difficult. Correctly they were pursued for years and punished for their evil crime. PC Blakelock’s family deserve a continued search for justice.

Michael Lloyd, London N4

Don’t give in to veiled fanatics

Mary Dejevsky’s article on the Rebekah Dawson case (8 April) leaves me shocked, worried and absolutely livid. Rebekah only proves the point, and justifies our long-held cultural belief, that people who hide their faces are not to be trusted. Clearly it wasn’t just her Islamic modesty at work here. As well as intimidating the witness her husband had previously assaulted, she supports the barbaric slaughter of people on our streets.

My main concern is why our court system is pandering to atavistic customs and bullying fanatics? Anyone who testifies in, or enters, a court of law should show his face. That is English custom and should be English law. You can’t enter a petrol station wearing a crash helmet, so why can you enter a court wearing a full face mask?

When English law conflicts with Sharia law (or indeed any other religious law), or the cultural customs of some Muslims, that’s unfortunate, but the law must prevail. As long as those who genuinely and passionately want to live under Sharia law live in this country, under English law, they must be treated the same as everyone else in the legal system. Anything else is giving in to fanaticism for a quiet life, which never ends well.

Monica Scott, Harrogate, North Yorkshire

Those Smokers are still working

I am absolutely incensed at the comments made by Janet Street-Porter (5 April). How dare she suggest that the “sad clusters” of people gathered outside buildings having a cigarette are wasting time and should have their pay docked?

My husband, now an ex-smoker, JSP will be pleased to hear, would work for approximately two hours then go outside for a cigarette. The time was a welcome break from his computer, the time spent thinking over his next task and often answering queries from those outside doing the same. This time was certainly no more than that spent making coffee, chatting at the photocopier or watercooler. He worked hard, provided a good service to his company and had an exemplary attendance record.

Yes, it is tragic that her sister died from the effects of smoking – so did my first husband – but I have never allowed it to drive me to add to the misery of those in the workplace.

Michelle Webb, Huddersfield, West Yorkshire

Cameron’s gospel for a time of austerity

The gospel according to Cameron’s Big Society: if you can’t pay your rent you will become a refugee in your own country; if you can’t afford to feed your family you will have to beg from a food bank; if you can’t stay out of jail you won’t even have anything to read.

“Unto every one that hath shall be given and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him” – Luke 19.

Think again, Mr Cameron.

Sylvia Hyden, Wolverhampton

A culture of profiteering

Our new Culture Secretary  has praised ticket touts for simply filling a gap in the market – proper entrepreneurs. A bit like pickpockets simply filling a gap in the pocket?

Lorna Roberts, London N2

Historic moments

Moments of the Great War: very good. No need for a book; I am keeping them in a file for my grandchildren.

Sue Richmond-Allen. Malvern,  Worcestershir

Times:

Should science A levels include a practical component? Teachers are divided on the question

Sir, It is outrageous that Ofqual is planning to remove practicals from science exams (“Scientists have lost battle to keep A-level exams practical”, Apr 9). It says it is concerned that practicals can be compromised by students using Twitter. Indeed, assessment of every subject is “compromised” by students using technology; if this was a remotely valid argument of Ofqual’s, we ought to ban paper, books, pens and glasses too (as well as school buildings). The solution is to update the syllabus so that students are taught how to make best use of technology, not to misrepresent it as cheating.

Ofqual also says teachers may be unreliable at assessing practicals. This is thoroughly demeaning, but if so, universities have developed quality controls to assure reliable assessment. If these processes are good enough for degrees, they ought to be good enough for schools. If Ofqual really believes teachers are unreliable, it is more important to face that problem directly rather than running away from it, which is all banning practicals achieves.

Professor Harold Thimbleby

Swansea University

Sir, Those who argue for practical examinations in school science are wrong. In the 1950s/60s I was subjected to A-level practical exams — they were an artificial barrier and I never did well in them, relying on my theory papers to boost my marks. I went on to a satisfying career as a clinical biochemist and later as part of a research team in Oxford investigating insect muscle proteins. Later still I became a chemistry teacher. The problems caused by practical coursework or examination had not gone away. Hours drilling children in how to add marble chips to hydrochloric acid and, worse, in what they should observe, seemed very sterile.

One of my first actions as head of department in an independent school was to abandon GCSEs which had an examined practical component and opt for IGCSEs with the practical aspects examined on the theory paper — this increased the range and amount of practical I taught in my classes, rather than reducing it, to the pupils’ increased enjoyment of the subject.

Joanna L Bell

Chilson, Oxon

Sir, Ofqual has announced tougher new GCSEs and A levels, but we at the Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) are concerned the changes will do little to alleviate concerns of employers who struggle to find young people with the skills they need. It is widely agreed that reform is needed but we are concerned that this has been rushed through and will not deal with the issues it attempts to solve. GCSEs and A levels do not always provide the level of practical experience that employers need. The IET’s recent Skills & Demand in Industry report showed that 42 per cent of employers were
disappointed with the skills of new employees. In addition many engineering employers are suffering from engineering skills gaps, shortages and an ageing workforce, which will only get worse in the future when huge numbers of engineers and technicians are forecast to be needed for new infrastructure and energy projects.

Stephanie Fernandes

Institution of Engineering and Technology

We waste vast quantities of food. With the right health and legal controls one solution is to feed it to pigs

Sir, One way to reduce the shocking amount of waste food discarded by consumers in industrialised nations — highlighted by the House of Lords EU committee — is to remove the ban on feeding waste food (swill) to pigs.

Heating products contaminated with pig diseases such as foot and mouth to 100C for 1 hour will render them safe for feeding to pigs. Leaving responsibility for the heat treatment to farmers is inadequate. In 2001 the failure of one farmer to follow the rules resulted in the FMD epidemic which cost the UK some £10 billion. Strict procedures to ensure that waste food was properly heat treated and handled could, for example, be done at licensed premises under the supervision of local authorities.

In addition to reducing our scandalous waste of food, removing the ban would be a significant financial benefit to pig farmers who no longer have to buy expensive feed, often based on imported grain.

Alex Donaldson

(Head, Pirbright Laboratory, Institute for Animal Health, 1989-2002)

Burpham, Surrey

A reader praises Tony Blair for his willingness to state unpopular truths about western military action in Syria

Sir, Tony Blair was right to criticise Parliament’s failure to approve military action against Syria and to predict catastrophic consequences both for the people of Syria and for the UK (“We’ll pay for staying out of Syria”, Apr 8).

The long-term damage to Britain’s special relationship with the United States is incalculable and while the decision may have been forgiven by the current US administration, this will not have gone unnoticed by
those aspiring to succeed Barack Obama.

Not only has the free world permitted the use of chemical weapons to go unpunished, it is hard not to conclude that such appeasement of the Assad regime has at the very least provided succour to President Putin.

I have always disagreed with his politics but Mr Blair deserves my respect for his courage, foresight and willingness to state unpopular truths.

Philip Duly

Haslemere, Surrey

The economic conditions are right for us to be much more adventurous and high-tech in the way we build our houses

Sir, The rising cost of building sites has pushed the ratio of “site cost” to “fabric cost” from about 1:5 40 years ago to about 3:2 now. This, and the the serious skill shortage highlighted by Mike Bialyj (letter, Apr 7), should be an opportunity to drag house construction out of the past.

Modern industry is an impressive mix of consumerism, technological innovation and highly sophisticated production methods, all applicable to the problem of providing homes — in stark contrast to the conventional brick-built house, a soulless kit of parts, archaic, inflexible, expensive, technically inept, environmentally destructive and aesthetically joyless.

A change of approach must come, sooner or later.

R. Goodall

Bewdley, Worcs

Some say depression is over-diagnosed among the elderly but Esther Rantzen says it is all too common, and ignored

Sir, The chairman of the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ old age faculty, of which I am a member, is misguided in suggesting that millions of older people are suffering from undiagnosed “depression” (Apr 8).

Depressive disorder is hugely overdiagnosed in all age groups, including the elderly. Yes, many older people have grave problems with illness, disability, bereavement, loss of independence and isolation. Such distress reflects poorly on our society, but it is not a disease to be treated by doctors.

Yet antidepressants are dished out like proverbial Smarties to the elderly. Common side effects including falls, confusion and salt imbalance can occasionally lead to serious ill-health and even death. I seek not to alarm the relatively small number of older people who are truly mentally ill and for whom the benefits of such drugs outweigh the risks, but overtreatment is the true crisis.

Dr Richard Braithwaite

Ryde, Isle of Wight

Sir, Jenni Russell (Apr 10) correctly spotlights the feelings of loneliness and loss that all too often afflict older people. When The Silver Line launched in 2013 we commissioned a survey which found that 2.5 million older people admitted that they often felt lonely, but there is a stigma attached to loneliness which prevents them reaching out for help; 84 per cent don’t confess their feelings even to their family, because they don’t want to be a burden. It’s not just pride, it’s about a national attitude to older people. Some 800 callers a day are using the free, confidential 24-hour telephone line because, as one said, “When I get off the phone, I feel like I belong to the human race.”

Is it not a disgraceful reflection that anyone in the UK should feel they are no longer a part of the human race, simply because they are older?

Esther Rantzen

London NW3

The founder of the Virgin Group reckons his investment in Virgin Galactic will be the best he has ever made

Sir, You spoke of Virgin Galactic being a black hole (Apr 7). Sadly we won’t be travelling that far, but if you mean our finances on Earth, I’m pleased to say it’s anything but a black hole. I believe our investment in Virgin Galactic will prove to be the best I’ve made in 40 years of business.

As to Virgin Atlantic, now the 787s are finally arriving after a three-year delay, it will return to profitability by the end of the financial year as we forecast in our two-year plan.

Virgin Atlantic has a proud tradition of challenging the status quo for the last 30 years, and we look forward to doing the same for the next 30.

Richard Branson

Virgin Group

Telegraph:

The ship of the Fens: Ely Cathedral, with its octagonal lantern, looking eastward  Photo: Neil Holmes/Getty Images

6:58AM BST 11 Apr 2014

Comments80 Comments

SIR – One of the great views of the English landscape is that of Ely Cathedral from the Fens, approaching on the A142 coming from Stuntney. There is considerable anxiety that this view will be compromised by the proposed Ely southern bypass.

This development, which has overwhelming local public support, is being opposed by English Heritage.

The Chapter of Ely Cathedral wishes to record publicly that it is totally supportive of the proposals being considered.

Certainly, one particular viewpoint (seen only from the river by a handful of people) will be compromised, but the iconic view from Stuntney that thousands of people see daily will not. The loss of part of the southern view is far outweighed by the community benefit that will result from the alleviation of current traffic congestion at the railway crossing, and by allowing large vehicles to bypass the city.

We wish the Cathedral to be set at the heart of a thriving community. As the population and economy of the local area grow, this development is essential. We urge Cambridgeshire County Council to recommend the proposals, and the Secretary of State to do likewise.

The Very Rev Mark Bonney
Dean, Ely Cathedral

SIR – Fraser Nelson says that “the good British Muslim is truly one amongst us – and proud to be so”. That is right, but it skates over the deeper problem within Islam, which is a single political, religious and legal system, taking its authority solely from the Koran, the Hadith and the Sunna.

Unfortunately, the things Mohammed did and said later in his life – the “Verses of the Sword” – give ample inspiration and justification to the jihadists, and, under the Muslim tenet of “abrogation”, are held to outweigh the earlier “Verses of Peace”.

Since September 11 2001, there have been some 18,000 attacks by Islamists worldwide, killing 206,000 people (45 a day), a majority of them Muslim.

So the question becomes: if Islam is a religion of peace, and if the Jihadists form such a tiny minority, why do the vast majority not get together and issue a fatwa to cast them out of Islam?

Couldn’t they organise a Great Council and decree that the Verses of the Sword are to be taken as referring to the internal struggle between good and evil in each one of us, and that true Islam flows only from the Verses of Peace?

If they don’t, is it because they daren’t?

Lord Pearson of Rannoch
London SW1

Elderly driving

SIR – I recently watched an elderly man park his car, get out, and walk to the local shop. This took a considerable time, as he was severely limited in his physical movements and walked with a stick.

Shouldn’t we consider introducing a test to establish whether the driver of a car is capable of exiting the vehicle in an emergency within 30 seconds? Should this man be involved in an accident, he would compromise the safety of anyone trying to assist him in escaping from the car.

Ian Carter
Lytham St Annes, Lancashire

Size large

SIR – I can’t believe that the Chief Medical Officer thinks size 16 women are overweight or obese. Marilyn Monroe was a size 16.

Those of us treating children with eating disorders have long been campaigning for shops to abandon their anorexic-like mannequins. Well done, Debenhams. Let’s hope fashion magazines soon follow suit.

Dr Dee Dawson
London NW7

Bathroom furniture

SIR – The Rev Roger Holmes asks where he can put his gin and tonic in a bath with a rounded side. He should buy an extendable bath tray, which will balance on any bath surround. This can accommodate not only his G&T, but also other requisites such as rubber ducks and submarines. It is even possible to include a stand for his breviary.

Geoffrey Taylor
Salisbury, Wiltshire

Project midnight

SIR – One day, while I was perusing the parish notice board, a notice caught my attention. It was headed: “You are to be part of a new innovative project”. Oh, I thought, what can this be – super-fast broadband, perhaps?

Reading the fine print, I discovered that the local authority would be turning off the street lights at midnight.

Keith Taylor
Leavenheath, Essex

Police sickness

SIR – The Independent Police Complaints Commission has produced a report detailing how complaints about police officers are distributed around the various forces, an idea I proposed in the Letters page of The Daily Telegraph on July 11, 2013.

How long before we are allowed to see similar tables showing how sickness absence and overtime payments are distributed? The cost to the taxpayer must be massive in delaying the implementation of such an obvious management tool, which allows statistical anomalies to be readily identified and credible explanations quite rightly demanded.

John Kenny
Acle, Norfolk

Papers, papers!

SIR – Those who travel with the wrong passportsshould be reassured. Twenty-five years ago, when I was a medico-legal adviser, I was telephoned by a doctor who had accompanied a party of elderly ladies on a coach trip to Italy.

One of the ladies had died suddenly in Italy. Rather than delay the whole party by reporting her death to the Italian authorities, the doctor propped up the deceased in the coach as if she were asleep. They drove through the night to Calais and crossed the Channel to Dover with only a head count and presentation of the correct number of passports at the borders. I advised the doctor to report to the nearest coroner and heard no more.

Dr Garth Hill
Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire

SIR – Years ago I had a family emergency in Britain and had to rush home. I could not find my passport, so I telephoned the emergency number of the British Consulate in Amsterdam and was politely told to call back the next day (it was a Sunday). About a year later, I related this to the Consul General in Amsterdam, and he informed me: in these situations, don’t bother with the passport, go directly to the airport and fly with British Airways.

Andy Bugden
Bao’an, Shenzhen, China

Fashion babes

SIR – What a relief that, at Prince George’s recent engagement, no baby had the audacity to commit a fashion faux pas by appearing in the same dungarees as him.

Jeremy Dore
Coggeshall, Essex

The danger of paying for good manners in a pub

SIR – I cannot believe that bar staff will be polite only if there is the promise of a tip. Anyone in the service industry should be customer-focused. If they are not, they should work elsewhere.

Chris Yates
Peasedown St John, Somerset

SIR – For 30 years, the Masons Arms at South Leigh, Oxfordshire, bore a sign above the door: “Vegetarians by appointment only”.

The pub’s shabby chic ambience and its grub were outstanding – even the late Michael Winner liked his meal, if not the landlord, Gerry Stonhill, who subsequently revelled in having irritated the film-maker by ignoring his arrival in the car park in favour of another vintage visitor – a classic motorbike.

Robert Warner
West Woodhay, Berkshire

SIR – Gordon Hughes asks what makes a “proper pub”. One feature – as depicted in your photo of the Rovers Return – is that pub-goers drink out of glasses, not bottles.

Malcolm Watson
Welford, Berkshire

SIR – I’m not certain what a “proper pub” is, but I once asked a successful landlord the secret to running a good business. “Get one surrounded by chimney pots, find good staff and pay them well,” was his reply.

Sqn Ldr GA Walsh RAF (retd)
South Rauceby, Lincolnshire

SIR – Regardless of the details of the Miller affair, the greatest fault displayed by David Cameron was his failure to acknowledge that in politics, as in business, “perception is reality”.

The effect of the voters’ perception of a senior minister’s deliberate, inexcusable manipulation of the expenses system far outweighs any background reality.

Politicians are elected, or rejected, largely on the basis of perception and, in the run-up to key elections, Mr Cameron would be well advised to reflect on that.

Graham Hoyle
Baildon, West Yorkshire

SIR – The fallout from the Maria Miller “resignation” leaves us with a quandary. You report that our local MP, Michael Fabricant, has been sacked as a Conservative vice-chairman, for basically doing what most of his constituents would agree with – welcoming her resignation.

Do we now vote for him in the next election? This would, of course, also be supporting a party which has clearly lost touch with the grassroots of this country.

Richard and Cynthia Atwell
Kings Bromley, Staffordshire

SIR – It would be naive to think that a disillusioned public would shrug its collective shoulders and move on from the latest parliamentary outrage in relation to expenses.

As self-regulation is open to abuse, perhaps it’s time to introduce an independent inspectorate with powers of prosecution as in other government departments.

Failure to produce documents could be an offence in itself. Recovery of misused public funds would cover running costs. Desperate times need desperate measures.

Lynne M Collins
Hadleigh, Essex

SIR – Since she resigned, why is a redundancy payment given to Mrs Miller? It would not happen in industry.

This is rubbing salt into the wound for the taxpayer.

Linda Fossey
Shedfield, Hampshire

SIR – How kind of Mrs Miller to donate her severance pay to charity. We taxpayers – whom she has already done out of £40,000 – are again being treated with disdain.

Where on earth does she think this money comes from?

Ron Burton
Loughborough, Leicestershire

SIR – Why are wrongful expenses claims by MPs “mistakes” but wrongful benefit claims classed as crimes?

Roy Parks
Llanymynech, Montgomeryshire

SIR – The headline on your leading article was: “Miller’s exit will allow Tories to move on”. Into the sunset?

Ewen McGee
Bishopbriggs, Lanarkshire

Irish Times:

Sir, – It would be a mistake to view President Higgins’s thoughtful remarks in London – and similar sentiments expressed during the queen’s visit – as signalling something radically new in the “deep and enduring friendship” between Ireland and Britain.

Back in 1965 when the British government returned the remains of Roger Casement, Taoiseach Sean Lemass told TDs this would be “universally welcomed as yet another step towards the establishment of the closest and most friendly relations between the two countries”. Around the same time Britain’s foreign secretary, George Brown, said that in applying to join the Common Market, the UK would support “our friend Ireland” in its parallel application.

Within a few years Bloody Sunday and the Birmingham bombings made it impossible for Irish and British politicians to speak so warmly. The Troubles should now be seen as an aberration in modern relations between the two islands. Yet those emotionally charged decades contributed to a dubious narrative that continues. This depicted the Irish in Britain as suffering discrimination to the same degree as Commonwealth immigrants. Thus it is commonplace for successful Irish people in today’s Britain to assert that their achievements would have been “unthinkable” in earlier years. This is nonsense. By the 1960s 10 per cent of Labour MPs were of Irish origin; Irish shop stewards, according to the Connolly Association at the time, were at the forefront of Britain’s trade unions; among the best-known faces on British television were Eamonn Andrews, Val Doonican and Milo O’Shea. Postwar St Patrick’s Day parades in London and Birmingham (shamrocks and a tricolour presented to the lord mayor) were huge.

Many Irish immigrants, of course, found life tough. And yes, I too know people who claim to have seen the mythical “No Blacks No Dogs No Irish” signs, a phrase coined only in the late 1980s. In fact, you will try in vain to find references to those words in earlier Irish or British sources – mocked-up “images” on the Internet do not count!

Paul Foot’s influential 1965 book Immigration and Race in British Politics explains the reality that anti-immigrant prejudice did not affect the Irish – because they had white skin. The images this week in Windsor were real — streets lined with tricolours and union jacks. Those “most-friendly relations” aspired to by Lemass were set back by the Troubles, but are now happily restored. Yours, etc,

JOHN DRAPER,

Hardwicke Road,

London N13

Sir, – Your correspondent Keith Nolan (Letters, April 10th) makes a very good point, albeit for the wrong reasons. A debate on re entering the Commonwealth should take place based on the commercial realities of today’s business environment and the opportunities for growth that might ensue. I am sure such a debate would be energetic and at times apoplectic particularly when Mr Nolan’ s fellow travellers enter the fray.

Nevertheless the new and more mature Ireland could countenance such a discussion and a possible positive outcome at a future date and on our own terms. His reference to wearing the poppy is quite pathetic in the current climate where both governments, the queen and our own current and past presidents have comprehensively put this issue behind us. The announcement of a prospective royal presence at the 1916 commemorations further cements this position. I would submit that the world your correspondent tries to evoke has been comprehensively consigned, not to history, but to the dustbin, where it belongs. Yours, etc,

DEREK MacHUGH,

Westminster Lawns,

Foxrock,

Dublin 18

Sir, – The State visit , as well as Brian Murphy’s article (April 10th) on President Seán T O’Kelly’s transit through southwest England in 1959, recalls a political anecdote which deserves to be true. In accepting the credentials of the British ambassador, Sir Gilbert Laithwaite, a mischievous Seán T spoke of the historical chains binding “my country to yours”. “Links, sir, links!” hissed a frantic presidential aide. From chains to links is as succinct and appropriate a manner as any to describe the remarkable transformation in British-Irish relationships. Yours, etc,

JOHN A MURPHY,

Rosebank,

Douglas Road,

Cork

Sir, – As a former student and lifelong supporter of President Michael D Higgins I am immensely proud of the success of his imaginative visit to the UK. Perhaps the Saw Doctors should consider revising the lyrics of their song “Michael D. Rockin’ In The Dáil” to “Michael D Rockin’ in the (Albert) Hall”. Yours, etc,

DR EOIN DEVEREUX,

Department of Sociology,

University of Limerick

Sir, – I hope I may be forgiven for placing that powerful phrase of Rudyard Kipling’s in a context he might not have intended – “If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs” – in order to single out one RTÉ commentator, Myles Dungan, for recognising the need to maintain some semblance of national self-respect and dignity by invoking the memory of the executed 1916 leader John MacBride and reminding us that he had previously fought on the anti-imperialist side of the Boer War.

As the band of the British army’s Irish Guards regiment was playing at Windsor Castle, Dungan informed viewers that it had been formed shortly after the South African war, adding “in which war, of course, Irishmen fought on both sides, the Irish Brigade being led by Major John MacBride”. Togha fir! Yours, etc,

MANUS O’RIORDAN,

Finglas Road

Dublin 11

Sir, – If I hear another word about the new relationship between the peoples of these islands, the forging of new links between us, cherishing our shared traditions, respecting our past but building on what has been achieved going forward, not to mention the diaspora, I will slowly but surely go out of my mind. Yours, etc,

DES O’CARROLL,

Monasterboice,

Co Louth

Sir, — Lest any confusion arise from Eamonn McCann’s latest column on Israel, his fifth in six months (“US business support for Israel serves wider agendas”, April 10th) it should be stated that Israel has always regarded the term “disputed territories” as more accurate than the tendentious “occupied territories” when referring to the historic heartland of the Jewish nation, Judea and Samaria (also known inaccurately as “the West Bank”).

The use of “disputed” conveys Israel’s acceptance that two peoples, not one, have just claims on this territory. Israel’s motive in entering the current peace talks, as with the (rejected) offers it made to the Palestinians in three previous rounds of failed peace talks since 2000, was to reach a reality of “two states for two peoples” living side by side in a lasting peace. Sadly, it seems that the refusal of one side to recognise Israel as the national homeland of the Jewish people may have dealt a killer blow to the present talks.

It seems that when accounting for American support for Israel, Mr McCann cannot resist the temptation to resort to well-worn stereotypes of Jewish finance controlling US foreign policy. The terminology has been adjusted slightly, but the classic tropes are there: Governor Christie “kowtowed to Zionism”, servile Republican hopefuls “paraded their wares” for the all-powerful Zionist mogul’s inspection. Yet Mr McCann allows a glimpse of the truth in his last line when he tacitly admits the existence of spontaneous mass pro-Israel sentiment among the US public. Truly, in the venting of unhealthy obsessions, a “very useful issue for some,” to quote Mr McCann, “is Israel”. Yours, etc,

DERMOT MELEADY,

Information Officer,

Embassy of Israel,

A chara, – At his best, Patsy McGarr writes very well. The heading of his article “Survivor’s life should be feted not tarnished” (Rite & Reason, April 8th) is good, whether or not he himself is responsible for it. It deals with the recent death of Christine Buckley.

Sadly, when he chooses to make personal jibes, as he does in that article, his standards plummet. He repeatedly describes as “cuttlefish” those who consider that his writing on the abuse of children seriously lacks balance. In the current winter edition of the Irish quarterly review Studies , he has an article entitled “A Response to Critics of the Murphy Report”. There he names me as one of those who are critical of that report, as he responds to my recent book Unheard Story , on the same topic. I am clearly one of his cuttlefish. He writes: “You have been graceless since she died. You and your cuttlefish friends. Your silence since March 11th has been eloquent.”

Mr McGarry says he has been surprised at the lack of critical reaction following the death of Christine Buckley. He is the one who has now made capital of her death. She deserves more respect.

He seems to find it impossible to conceive that the story might be more complex than a simple narrative. A letter from Reg Gahan in The Irish Times on April 23rd, 1996 pointed out: “We learn from the film [ Dear Daughter ] that Christine passed her Leaving Cert exam while still at Goldenbridge Industrial School (‘orphanage’ is Mr Lentin’s misnomer) and then became a nurse. Mr Lentin … did not quote the part of my letter pointing out that the nuns got no credit for their part in this.”

Not only did the Mercy Sisters continue to support Ms Buckley after normal leaving age; she even returned to Goldenbridge for holidays. Such matters do not mean there was no cruelty, but show that the full story is more complex than the film.

Your then media correspondent, Michael Foley, wrote about the film (March 19th, 1996): “It received wide, uncritical preview coverage. Few questions were asked and little journalistic scepticism shown … Ms Buckley’s story was told in a dramatic way. Journalists usually approach such stories differently, testing allegations. In this case, that was not done. The drama, the reconstructions, the use of actors and the memories of Ms Buckley were never challenged, no alternative explored.”

Mr McGarry accuses his critics: “They’ve been picking at detail in hope of unravelling the lot, while ignoring its truth and the overwhelming evidence.” I know of no one who hopes to unravel the lot. It is not sufficient for Mr McGarry to insult others and accuse them of obfuscation. Good journalism requires that he address the full truth. Is mise,

PÁDRAIG McCARTHY,

Blackthorn Court,

Sandyford,

A chara, – Declan Kelly (Letters, April 11th) calls for “all remarks that give offence to human beings” to be removed from the Bible.

As people seem to be driven to towering heights of indignation by pretty much anything these days, with some even being mightily offended by any reference to the divine, his work would be likely to remain incomplete until the Good Book was reduced to a set of elegant covers with a single blank page between them.

This might be hailed as ideal by a few. It would certainly be totally inoffensive to all but those Christians who consider the Bible to be the revealed word of God. It would also be totally meaningless; as would be any oaths sworn upon it. Is mise,

REVD PATRICK G BURKE,

Castlecomer,

Co Kilkenny

Sir, – It is depressing to read Declan Kelly’s suggestion that the “offensive” words in the Bible should be removed “so that the book might adequately serve us rather than we it”.

It might be unfashionable to admit but the words of the Bible are God-breathed and contain wisdom badly needed in today’s world. It is a book that identifies the avarice, greed and sin within each of us and lights the way to a better life through the grace of a heavenly Father who sent his son to die on a cross for us. Second Corinthians Chapter 4 states “we do not use deception, nor do we distort the word of God” – yet these are the words Mr Kelly wants us to tinker with so that they will suit and serve the values and whims of today’s flawed society. Sounds like a great idea! Yours, etc,

GEOFF SCARGILL,

Loreto Grange,

Bray,

Co Wicklow

Sir, – Swearing on the Christian Bible should provide little difficulty for the vast majority of our population, since the 2011 census of Ireland revealed that 90 per cent of the population describe themselves as Christian (Roman Catholic and Church of Ireland). For those who are atheists or are of a non-Christian faith, our courts offer the alternative of making an affirmation, which is a straightforward solemn declaration to tell the truth. I assume the same solution occurs in other areas of Irish life where oaths are required to be taken. Yours, etc,

JOHN BELLEW,

Dunleer,

Co Louth

Sir, – I swear on my passport that I will not swear on anything other than my passport. Yours, etc,

MICHELE SAVAGE,

Glendale Park,

Dublin 12

Sir, — The latest Irish Times /Ipsos MRBI poll reveals that a majority of Irish people favours parenting by a mother and a father. While this finding should not surprise us, we might still ask if this proves that such an arrangement is superior to every other form of parenting?

Walk into any “family” or “women’s” resource centre around the country and you will be hard-pressed not to find heartbreaking stories (some in public view) of children in the midst of horrendous domestic situations perpetrated by heterosexual couples (some married, some not).

Daddy and mammy to these children are not what the 67 per cent of respondents to this latest poll have in mind when they say “mother and father are extremely capable” of fully meeting a child’s needs.

Yet this form of parenting is the most prevalent and is enshrined in law with the full backing of the State. Other forms of two-person parenting – as in father and father or mother and mother do not (yet) have the same the legal or welfare protection as their heterosexual counterparts.

Therefore while it is highly predictable that the majority would uphold the “traditional” pattern of parenthood by a man and a woman it is by no means certain that these have a monopoly on how best to bring up children. — Yours, etc,

TOM McELLIGOTT,

Tournageehy,

Listowel,

Sir, – Because mankind initiated the concept of time, and having decided that this method of naming, measuring and graduating change and repetition in nature was useful, humanity now assumes there are beginnings and endings to everything.

This concept of certain order and inevitability has instilled, in much of mankind, an inability to accept the unmeasurable and a preference for cold, fixed ideas over the visible and tangible magic of existence, like childhood, music, poetry, theatre, myth and imagination, all best experienced without a calculator or time-piece. Yours, etc,

EUGENE TANNAM,

Monalea Park,

Firhouse,

Sir, – With regard to the irritating overuse of the phrase “in terms of” – an utterly meaningless tag employed to make even the most banal statements sound important – I have a simple request: for the sake of the English language and my sanity (or in terms of both), please, please stop. Yours, etc,

NEIL FORSYTH,

Castlegate House,

Adamstown,

Co Dublin

Irish Independent:

It was the week that Ireland came to London – not that the great metropolis paid much heed, but it was significant all the same.

Also in this section

Letters: What we need is not ‘recovery’, but ideas for a new world

See no bubble, hear no bubble, speak no bubble

Women laid groundwork for Michael D’s visit

President Higgins played a blinder, but Queen Elizabeth won the battle for most impressive head of state. In fairness, HRH did have a head start and was born into pomp and circumstance, whereas Mr Higgins’ path to statesmanship was more colourful and circuitous, but he did well.

While we may scoff at the high hats, the class system and all that goes with the vestiges of imperial power, nobody watching the proceedings could deny that the welcome and friendliness that characterised the week was genuine.

Those who left these shores from the ’50s through to the ’70s – with their cardboard suitcases full of broken dreams and who met a cold indifference or worse, full prejudice, thanks to the IRA campaign – will appreciate the new warmth and openness.

It is all too easy to paper over the pain and bitterness in the relationship between our two islands. Mr Higgins didn’t choose to forget, he suggested we should walk in the steps of history into a newly imagined future.

It is to be hoped the normalisation and real empathy this visit revealed will form a genuine bedrock of co-operation and conciliation. We will definitely be stronger for allowing new light to enter through the old windows. There will be no kowtowing or cultural cringing; no bowing or curtsies; but the journey to where we have come to – with firm handshakes and the ability to look each other straight in the eye – has been long and difficult.

That is why this week was important and, hopefully, marks the beginning of the end.

GR Desmond, London

FINALE A WASTED OPPORTUNITY

I was looking forward to the gala concert at the Royal Albert Hall as the finale of President Higgins’ visit to Britain. How disappointed I was.

With so many stellar musical stars of Irish heritage born and raised in that country, I expected a cavalcade of iconic names: Morrissey, the Gallagher brothers – well maybe one of them – John Lydon or even Paul McCartney. And that’s just in music.

The usual suspects were wheeled out and, excellent contributions from Imelda May and John Sheahan aside, there was little or no contribution from the Irish community in Britain, save for the London Irish Centre Choir at the finale.

In the glittering cavern that is the Royal Albert Hall, Donal Lunny and hisl pals failed to rise to the occasion . Churning out the sort of maudlin, over-earnest stuff that props up ‘Other Voices’.

Much as I like ‘The Auld Triangle’ and ‘The Parting Glass’ they were not worthy anthems to end the night but then, as usual, it all turned into a last orders affair with lots of ‘ya boy ya’s’.

A tragic, wasted opportunity.

Patrick Cooney, Beaumont, Dublin 9

OUR GIANT OF A PRESIDENT

President Michael D Higgins proves the old adage that ‘good things come in small packages’.

Kevin Devitte, Westport, Co Mayo

President Michael D Higgins – small in stature – but a giant of a man.

James Carew, Kilkenny and London

Our President’s highly successful state visit to Britain marks the normalising of relations between us and our near neighbours.

That was the easy bit. Normalising relations between us and our nearest neighbours – the Unionist people – may be a bit more difficult.

For more than 100 years we have threatened to subsume, subjugate or colonise Unionists into a united Ireland.

If we can summon the courage to declare that a united Ireland is off the agenda until a majority of Unionists request it, a new era of friendship between the two tribes who share this island may begin.

Dick Keane, Glenageary, Co Dublin

Let us see if we can write the last chapter of several hundred years of British rule in Ireland.

They got an almost unlimited supply of cheap Irish labour that built the railways that ultimately fuelled their Industrial Revolution, not to mention navvies for road building and farm labourers for their food supply.

Plus an unknown amount of mostly unknown soldiers that supplied a lot of cannon fodder in two world wars, because no other jobs were available.

Not forgetting those nurses and doctors who supplied the backbone for the NHS.

In exchange, we appear to have got a couple of rides in horse-drawn state coaches and chauffeured Rolls-Royce limousines for some pampered and pompous Irish politicians to a few banquets attended by the great and the good of British nobility and holders of system honours.

Lest anyone should accuse me of forgetting the amount of wages all the above earned and sent back to dear old Ireland to support the ones left behind to mismanage the place, you could balance that against the free use of landholdings and chattels that their agents had for a couple of centuries.

It sure beats killing ourselves (and them), of course, but not by much.

I hope nobody is going to claim that the darkest hour is before the dawn…

Liam Power, Malta

BEING CONSOLED BY LORD TEBBIT

In this age of bewildering change, am I the only one who finds consolation in the fact that Lord Tebbit can still give his famous imitation of a semi house-trained polecat?

Donal Kennedy, London

ROME’S BREATHTAKING ARROGANCE

Like many others, I was impressed with Pope Francis when he first stepped on to that balcony in Rome, with his easy manner and casual tone.

Here is a man, I naively thought, from outside the Vatican who can tackle the nest of vipers within and bring some real reform to a discredited institution that is so important to so many people.

His rhetoric promised a new era of transparency and integrity.

Last week, however, I read that Italy’s bishops have adopted a policy – with backing from the Vatican – that states that they are not obliged to inform police officers if they suspect a child has been molested by a predatory cleric.

The arrogance is staggering, coming just weeks after the UN report that condemned the Vatican for its “code of silence” around abusive priests.

How disappointing it is to realise that Pope Francis may be just another politician, kissing babies and pandering to the public with empty rhetoric.

He did, however, get one thing right when he said:

“Inconsistency on the part of pastors and the faithful between what they say and what they do, between word and manner, is undermining the church’s credibility.”

Sean Smith, Navan, Co Meath

Irish Independent



Tidy day

$
0
0

13April2014Tidy day

I go all the way around the park listening to the Men from the Ministry: Our heroes have to sort out a very tricky problem in aviationPriceless

Mary in hospital brief visit Tidy house

No Scrabbletoday, wrong pad Perhaps Marywill win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Richard Hoggart – obituary

Richard Hoggart was a commentator and academic whose Uses of Literacy lamented the impact of mass culture on traditional working-class life

Richard Hoggart

Richard Hoggart Photo: GRANVILLE DAVIES/WRITER PICTURES

2:20PM BST 11 Apr 2014

Comments9 Comments

Richard Hoggart, who has died aged 95, was best known as the author of The Uses of Literacy (1957), a study of working-class culture widely regarded as one of the most influential books of the immediate post-war era, and one which is still quoted and misquoted by commentators anxious to prove the negative effects of mass culture on people’s lives.

In the 1950s it had become fashionable to argue that a newly affluent worker was emerging who was becoming middle-class in lifestyle and political attitudes. Hoggart saw the cultural impact of such developments as almost entirely negative.

Drawing on his own experience as a scholarship boy from a very poor home in Leeds, he described how the old, tightly-knit working-class culture of his boyhood — of stuffy front rooms, allotments, back-to-back housing and charabanc trips — was breaking up in the face of an Americanised mass culture of tabloid newspapers, advertising, jukeboxes and Hollywood. “The hedonistic but passive barbarian who rides in a fifty-horse-power bus for threepence, to see a five-million dollar film for one-and-eightpence, is not simply a social oddity; he is a portent,” Hoggart thundered.

Fifties popular culture, he argued, was “full of corrupt brightness, of improper appeals and moral evasions”, tending towards a view of the world “in which progress is conceived as a seeking of material possessions, equality as a moral levelling and freedom as the ground for endless irresponsible pleasure”.

He particularly disliked “milk bars”, in which he believed he could detect “a sort of spiritual dry-rot amid the odour of boiled milk”. The influence of what he called “the mass publicists” was so all-pervasive that the culture of the people was being destroyed.

Hoggart wrote in the 19th-century tradition of radical idealism, with its strong sense of moral values. He was a tireless enemy of independent broadcasting — and of the public schools, which he saw as perpetuating social privilege.

Yet he was also essentially conservative in his dislike of change; hawkish in foreign affairs; and thoroughly elitist in his disdain for modern mass culture. He believed fervently in the value of great literature : “In a democracy which is highly commercialised you have to give people critical literacy. If you don’t do that, you might as well pack it in.”

He also thoroughly detested the fashion for relativism, which “leads to populism which then leads to levelling and so to reductionism of all kinds, from food to moral judgments”. For Hoggart, those who maintained that the Beatles were as good as Beethoven represented a “loony terminus”.

The Uses of Literacy made Hoggart a highly influential commentator on British culture . He served on government advisory bodies and spent five years working for Unesco. He also founded the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies at Birmingham University, which established Cultural Studies as an academic discipline.

Richard Hoggart (GRANVILLE DAVIES/WRITER PICTURES)

The son of a regular soldier and sometime house painter, Richard Herbert Hoggart was born on September 24 1918 in Potternewton, part of the Chapeltown district of Leeds. Both his parents died when he was young and he was brought up by two aunts and a grandmother.

In 1930 he failed the equivalent of the 11-plus but won a grammar school place at Cockburn High School after his headmaster insisted that the education authorities reread his scholarship essay. He went on to read English at Leeds University, graduating with a First.

During the Second World War, Hoggart was commissioned in the Royal Artillery, serving in North Africa and then in Italy, where he found his true vocation as Staff Captain (Education) teaching current affairs to soldiers awaiting demob. After the war he became a staff tutor in adult education at Hull University, and in 1951 published his first book, a study of W H Auden.

The Uses of Literacy brought Hoggart lasting fame . In 1959 he became a senior lecturer at the University of Leicester.

The following year he gave evidence for the defence at the Lady Chatterley trial, declaring the book to be “highly virtuous if not puritanical”, a judgment that made him nationally known overnight. In his third volume of autobiography, An Imagined Life, Hoggart described his fellow defence witnesses as “like a stage army of earnest Guardian readers” and himself as “cast as the northern working-class provincial now a university teacher; a sort of muted ‘eeh-bah-gum’ figure fit for a short walk-on part in Sons and Lovers”.

In 1962 he was invited to Birmingham University to take a chair in Modern English Literature. He agreed to come on condition he was allowed to start his own postgraduate course. “I invented it on the spot. It was to be in contemporary cultural studies.”

The Birmingham Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, which opened in 1964 with the Marxist Stuart Hall as its deputy director, was to develop some of the interests first explored in The Uses of Literacy.“Of course, you know, Hoggart, your people won’t get jobs,” one colleague remarked. “No one will recognise a subject like that.” Hoggart’s insistence that the study of popular culture should be based on a thorough grounding in literary criticism also met opposition from some of the more radical elements at the university. At one meeting a student announced: “We have no time for the Matthew Arnoldian liberal humanist line of Hoggart.”

In 1970 Hoggart accepted the post of assistant director general of Unesco after one of his colleagues suggested that he should “walk the plank in the service of a valuable idea”. He wrote entertainingly about his years at Unesco in his autobiography, describing the frustrations of working in an agency with grand international ideals whose members insist on thinking nationally.

On his return to Britain, Hoggart moved to Farnham, Surrey, and took up a post as Warden of Goldsmith’s College, University of London, where he remained until his retirement in 1984.

In Speaking to Each Other (1977), Hoggart examined how the tone and manner in which people communicate carry assumptions based on social class and religious and political opinions that are often antipathetic to the person addressed. In Landscape with Figures: Farnham, Portrait of an English Town (1994) he claimed that he could differentiate between an Etonian, a Harrovian and a Wykehamist purely on the basis of their “conversational conventions” casually observed at Farnham station.

In The Way We Live Now (1995), Hoggart suggested that modern dilemmas stem from a long slide towards relativism and from the way in which consumerism rather than “authority” increasingly determines the texture of life.

Hoggart was a member of various committees and quangos, including the Pilkington Committee on broadcasting, which in 1961 predicted that the development of commercial television would have dire social consequences.

He served on the Albemarle committee on youth services; chaired an advisory council for adult and continuing education set up by Shirley Williams in 1977; and was vice-chairman of the Arts Council from 1977 to 1981 . He was also chairman of the New Statesman from 1978 to 1981.

After the 1997 general election he was on the committee set up by Education Secretary David Blunkett in preparation for “The Year of Reading”, though he did not have much time for it : “They were all talking about image and targets and impact and all this stuff. One of them said we should ask the Spice Girls to have ‘Reading Is Good For You’ across their bosoms.”

In addition to his many books on literacy and communication, Hoggart wrote a highly acclaimed autobiographical trilogy: A Local Habitation (1988), A Sort of Clowning (1990) and An Imagined Life (1992).

Among his later publications were First and Last Things (1999); Between Two Worlds (2001); Everyday Language and Everyday Life (2003); and Mass Media in a Mass Society: myth and reality (2004).

Richard Hoggart married, in 1942, Mary France; they had a daughter and two sons, of whom the elder — the political commentator Simon Hoggart — died in January.

Richard Hoggart, born September 24 1918, died April 10 2014

Guardian:

Nick Cohen asks why pedestrians are overlooked when our towns and cities are built (“I love to walk, but why is Britain such a dangerous place for walkers?”, First Person). Part of the answer is that governments have predicted ever-increasing traffic volumes that authorities scrabble to meet. To do this, pedestrian crossings are made scarce and slow. And the easier it is to drive quickly from A to B, the more we want to drive and the harder it is for people to cross roads.

The engineers largely responsible for our roads are given no training in holistic design. It is far more about mathematical traffic models and following often antiquated highway design guidelines. It’s perhaps no coincidence that the UK’s best known creative thinker in road design is not an engineer, but an architect, Ben Hamilton-Baillie.

The cost to human life of the conventional approach has been catastrophic. On roads, we see “slaughter that would be shocking, and even unacceptable if it occurred in war” (to quote Martin Gilbert’s Descent into Barbarism). And our laws are too forgiving of those who kill by car.

Strict driver liability law as exists in most of Europe, where the person operating a dangerous vehicle must take responsibility, would make the road environment less hostile. As with buildings, highways schemes could be subject to a planning process based in part on aesthetics and the impact on the street scene.

Lucy Taussig

Bournemouth

I live beside a rural B road with a blind bend, no pavement and a 30mph limit that most ignore. Almost opposite the bottom of our drive is the start of a public footpath, so when I walk the dogs we have to proceed a few metres along the roadside. Drivers pull out to avoid us, but some sound their horn, offended that they have had to slow down and make way, forgetting that if walkers, riders and carts hadn’t followed this route for centuries beforehand, the B4060 wouldn’t exist for them to enjoy.

Rob Harris

Stinchcombe

Gloucestershire

I expect that it will have come as a surprise to the Ramblers and to many of my professional colleagues that “Britain does not have a ‘walkers lobby’”. Formerly the Ramblers’ Association, the organisation will celebrate 80 years of campaigning, not just for countryside walks, on 1 January 2015.

Sue Rumfitt

Editor, Waymark

The Institute of Public Rights of Way and Access Management

Penrith

I have never understood why compulsory speed awareness classes are not a vital part of the driving test. I would also advocate that our schools teach the effects of the laws of momentum and kinetic energy on human flesh and bone. Hit a pedestrian at 35mph and, ceteris paribus, five out of 10 will be killed. At 30mph, two out of 10 will die, not to mention the injuries. I am a driver, but I am gobsmacked when some of my fellow motorists remark that speed limits and enforcement produce even more fatalities and injuries because of driver impatience and frustration.

On that basis, we should get rid of anything that holds up the speeding driver: zebra crossings, speed cameras, traffic humps, traffic lights and tractors. Just imagine the ensuing anarchy and carnage if drivers could pick their own maximum speed with impunity. There are many causes of accidents but it is impact speed that determines the extent of victims’ injuries and whether they live or die. We can all be blasé about speeding until one of our own is hit by a driver who couldn’t pull up in time because of their illegal or inappropriate speed.

Stephen McBride

Largs

Ayrshire

The report stage of the immigration bill concluded in the House of Lords last Monday. Many members took part in these vitally important debates, showing the upper chamber at its very best. Furthermore, many hundreds voted in some or all of the five divisions. However, we find it surprising that not one of the Ukip-affiliated peers chose to vote – let alone speak – during the passage of the bill. Lord Stevens of Ludgate seemed to be ill – but where was Lord Pearson of Rannoch? Or, indeed, Lord Willoughby De Broke?

There are no Ukip MPs and, as such, the House of Lords is the party’s key avenue by which to hold the government to account. When one considers the attitude of Ukip’s (would-be) parliamentarians to their roles in Westminster and elsewhere, their silence is deafening.

The Rev Lord Roberts of Llandudno; Baroness Afshar; Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth; Lord Carlile of Berriew

Lord Chidgey

The Rt Rev the Lord Eames

Baroness Howarth of Breckland

Lord Maclennan of Rogart

Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames

Baroness Humphreys

Lord Hussain

Lord Jones of Cheltenham

Baroness Meacher

Lord Rana

Lord Rennard

Lord Storey

Lord Tyler

Baroness Warnock

Lord Wigley

Baroness Williams of Crosby

Give Michael Gove a chance

We should expect some free schools to prosper, while others struggle and even fail as this is a necessary process new schools must go through to find their feet (“Revealed: Gove’s bid to limit fallout from failing free schools“, News). Private businesses and newly created state sector services take time to build trust, reputation and brand. Excellence and reliability are not produced instantly but take time. Gove is trying a fresh approach. Our education system is failing to equip many of our children with the necessary skills for the workplace. It is nonsense to attack reforms that have barely been tried.

James Paton

Billericay, Essex

There were always going to be risks when setting up free schools outside the quality assurance procedures of local authorities. Such schools have been promoted as “free” to provide their own distinctive education (albeit within constraints set by the national assessment and inspection regimes). However, they are also “free” to fail and, as state-funded schools, should not be given favoured treatment through “private education advisers”.

Professor Colin Richards

Spark Bridge, Cumbria

Odd ethics, Mr Moore

In the Observer Magazine , Charles Moore used the phrase De mortuis nil nisi bonum – don’t speak ill of the dead. Moore was referring to the polemic that followed the death of Margaret Thatcher. How extraordinary, then, that Moore should have launched into print on 5 March 2010 with an article that effectively accused my great-uncle Michael Foot of being a spy for the Russians. Foot had won considerable damages from News International in 1995 after it printed similar allegations. But on 3 March 2010, Michael Foot died. As everyone knows, the dead can’t sue and just two days later, Moore saw fit to publish his courageous article. So it is clearly OK to speak ill of the dead, as long as they aren’t called Margaret Thatcher.

John Foot

Professor of modern Italian history

Bristol University

True green heroes of Liverpool

Can Lucy Siegle’s Green Crush (Magazine) be serious, featuring Liverpool One? This is a development that has taken over a huge swath of the city centre and turned public streets into private ones. It has forced small, independent shops to close or move. It is a sanitised and soulless temple to the cult of commercialisation. Siegle should have featured Cairns Street market instead, a degenerated but historic area of Liverpool 8 where the few remaining residents grow food and flowers in every space and each month have a market in a great social coming together. Instead, you give game, set and match to the big developers.

Lucy Dossor

Liverpool

Fall-out from Maria Miller case

Sadly, the ramifications of the Maria Miller story are not exhausted by her resignation. Parliamentarians of every party, age and seniority must urgently do whatever can now be done to staunch the toxic effects of this latest fall from grace, which has unleashed a new torrent of public mistrust in us.

The full facts concerning her case, with its confusing judgments, rebuttals and conclusions, need to be made public. She is a public servant claiming public funds and such openness would mitigate the grave doubts presently in the mind of the public as to the rigour and objectivity of the outcome. If Mrs Miller were to be shown to have acted dishonestly the matter should then be passed to the prosecutorial authorities.

I say all this with great reluctance in the real hope that there will be no cause for a referral. But I am more reluctant still to allow the growth of the already widespread public perception that we, the lawmakers, are protected from the full force of the laws we make. Nothing so dangerously and fundamentally undermines our democracy.

Lord Phillips of Sudbury

London SW1

Deserving or damned?

Barbara Ellen (Comment) says liver transplants should be available to everyone, but the number of people who need a transplant is much higher than the livers donated. Dipsomaniacs who demand new livers to ruin should surely go to the back of the queue?

Dr Richard Turner

Harrogate

Independent:

Dr John Rack, using synthetic phonics, please try to say synthetic phonics. You can’t. This proves the inadequacy of your system and adds to the belief that dyslexia labels people based on a shaky scientific concept (Letters, 6 April). The best help to a child’s reading ability would be help, love and support from parents. A system that strives to help weaker readers through making illogical deductions based on words which within them have multiple pronunciations is just ridiculous. Their and there. Her and here. Nor and gnaw.

Simple is better, and a system of reading that exists only because of some poorly defined research conducted years ago will not, and should not, be used to destroy children’s ability to read. It is better to teach children that certain words are read in a certain way because our language is full of illogical exceptions. Learning to read is hard work, much like everything else. Phonics downt maek it eezear. Thanx for yor tiem.

Adam Tunstall

via email

Adam Sherwin’s point regarding the male domination of University Challenge, despite female students outnumbering male students across the sector as a whole, is well worth highlighting (“University Challenge final is a starter for men”, 6 April). However, there is another persistent issue that seems equally inappropriate: namely, the prominence of Oxbridge colleges.

The contest is called University Challenge, so it seems absurdly incestuous when one Oxford college is competing against another Oxford college, given that they are both constituents of a single university. And similarly with Cambridge colleges. What justification can there be for this illogical arrangement? Durham is also a collegiate university, but it only fields a single team. Why should Oxford and Cambridge be treated differently to, say, Durham, Aberdeen or Cardiff? Each of these institutions manages to field a single team for the boat race!

Richard Wilson

Emeritus Professor Richard M S Wilson

Loughborough University

The last thing we need is a quota system for female students on University Challenge. It is the responsibility of each university to select its best team and nothing to do with the BBC or politicians. If University Challenge wants to remain the best quiz show on television, it should not kowtow to political correctness.

Stan Labovitch

Windsor, Berkshire

Labour’s desire to break the white upper-class grip on the Civil Service is to be welcomed, but the roots of this inequality lie in housing, schools, universities and equality of opportunity from an early age (“Labour would fast-track working-class and ethnic minority applicants to top of Civil Service”, 6 April). Labour’s plan will create a coterie of public servants who owe their position to patronage and will further politicise the Civil Service.

Ian McKenzie

via email

What an intolerant rant by Joan Smith in her swipe at Christianity! (“Fed up? Just listen to Fry”, 30 March). Yet for her to be impressed by luvvies espousing the secularist cause seems naive to me. I enjoy Stephen Fry’s performances in shows such as QI but I will not be taking his advice on how to live a happy and fulfilled life. For those greater questions about life and existence, I prefer older and more enduring wisdom than that of luvvies and glitterati and the shallow but fashionable opinions of the fleeting minute.

Gus Logan

North Berwick

Dear, oh dear, oh dear. On reading Archie Bland (6 April), who thinks that the demise of Nuts and the rise of more thoughtful reading shows that young men have increased respect for themselves, I could not help recalling the old sea-dog saying: “There are only two types of men, w****** and liars.”

Simon Ashley

Harwich, Essex

Times:

Self-regulation will not keep MPs’ noses out of trough

IS IT any wonder the public is so disenchanted by the main political parties that they are prepared to vote for the likes of UKIP’s Nigel Farage and his bunch of assorted fruitcakes in the European elections (“‘MPs can’t be trusted on expenses’”, News, last week)?

The UK used to be a beacon for honesty and transparency, but now everybody seems to have their noses in the trough. Self-regulation doesn’t work, as we have seen in the past in the financial services and medical professions.
Nick Simms, London N2

Expenses account
MPs should not be in any doubt that independent oversight of their expenses is essential. In view of the endless stories of corruption and self-interest in British politics, the prime minister and the MPs cannot continue to support the notion that they can be trusted to self-regulate, and all the more so when they impose layer upon layer of regulation and bureaucracy on everyone else.
James Anderson, Geneva

Political clout
As usual, politicians of all parties will be shocked and indignant and make all the right noises over Nero fiddling while the rest of us pay our fair share, but they always have one eye on the revolving door to their future career in the City or the corporate world.
Stan Harper, Kenilworth, Warwickshire

Follow Californian route on diesel curbs

YOU rightly call for a reduction from diesel vehicle emissions, including a wholesale move back to petrol vehicles (“Diesel deadlier than petrol” and

“Diesel fumes harm children’s brains”, News, and “With every desperate breath, children demand we are weaned off diesel”, Comment, last week). Such a move could have significant implications, given the UK’s reliance on diesel vehicles and the amount of greenhouse gas emissions from petrol-powered cars.

An alternative solution — one that could be implemented in a much shorter time frame and with fewer implications — is that Europe adopts California’s diesel emission standards, which are the toughest in the world, measurably more stringent than the standards in Europe and for which a number of European car manufacturers are already developing diesel engines.

Sadly, these very same diesel engines are not currently available in Europe. As emission standards are set in Brussels,
we urge policy makers and regulators to convince European institutions to adopt Californian diesel emission standards.

While car manufacturers are developing solutions to achieve zero vehicle emissions, conventional internal combustion engines are predicted to still account for more than 90% of cars by 2020. Given recent pollution events, change is urgent.
Maeve McLoughlin, Professor Ragnar Lofstedt, King’s Centre for Risk Management, King’s College London

Out of gas
How long will it take the government to have the courage to ensure that no more new diesel vehicles will be made?
Barbara James, Bangor, Gwynedd

Lovelock flying in face of climate science

JAMES LOVELOCK’S Gaia hypothesis has inspired many people to become concerned about the environment. In his book The Revenge of Gaia he writes about catastrophic changes to our climate that will arise from our continuing emissions of carbon dioxide. However, in his interview with Bryan Appleyard (“Gaia’s revenge is on hold”, News Review, last week) he takes a much more sanguine view about climate change. Lovelock’s opinions on this subject sit uncomfortably with modern scientific understanding of the climate system.

It is impossible to assert categorically that  the sort of climate changes envisaged in The Revenge of Gaia either will or will not occur. Rather, climate scientists attempt to estimate the risks of different levels of climate change.

For example, based on the latest projections reported by the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC), if we continue to emit  10gigatons or so of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere each year the probability of reaching a 5C warmer world in the next century is estimated to be about 50%.

The latest IPCC report makes clear the calamitous impacts of such a future. It is for society to judge whether the risks of climate change are large enough to take action to reduce them. Lovelock’s current position implies that these risks have now reduced; climate science suggests not.
Tim Palmer, Director of the Oxford Martin Programme on Modelling and Predicting Climate, University of Oxford, Sir Brian Hoskins Director of the Grantham Institute for Climate Change, Imperial College London, Dame Julia Slingo, Chief Scientist, the Met Office

Diagnosing toothless healthcare regulators

YOU reported that the former surgeon David Jackson had his request to be removed from the medical register granted by

the General Medical Council (“‘Dr Danger left to botch for five years’”, News, March 30). In January Janice Harry, former director of nursing at the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, “agreed” to be struck off the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) register. Both stories display how feeble healthcare regulators are.

The original NMC tribunal into Harry did not strike her off and it was only after the intervention of the Professional Standards Authority that she finally agreed to be removed from the register. Next we will have the Metropolitan police proudly reporting that felons have agreed to desist from further crimes voluntarily as an alternative to prosecution.
Neil Sinclair, Edinburgh

Ill managed
Most doctors and the public would agree that a serious crime committed by a member of the medical profession and proven in a court of law merits consideration of their removal from the medical register (“Watchdog seeks powers to drive out disgraced medics”, News, March 30).

Your article refers to the Mid Staffordshire scandal as an example of “failure in regulation of the medical professions”. While it is true there were many shortcomings in the medical and nursing professions at Mid Staffordshire NHS trust, senior non-medical management was also culpable. Several doctors were investigated but, as far as I am aware, no senior managers involved were formally investigated or disciplined.

Surely it is reasonable to expect of healthcare managers the same rigorous professional standards of care and accountability. When will we have a General Medical Managers Council?
David Ward, Cardiologist, St George’s Hospital, London SW17

Failing the test on teacher support

THE case of assistant head teacher Andrew Moffat may not be an isolated one (“Gay teacher resigns after parent protest”, News, last week). Recent research by the Teacher Support Network revealed that more than one in 10 staff working in education have been discriminated against by parents.

While education department guidelines recommend schools respect parents’ rights to remove their children from lessons that are not aligned with their beliefs, it is important that school leaders find the middle ground. Staff must be supported to teach openly without fear and the whole school community — including parents — must be willing to engage in discussions that encourage equality. Cases such as Moffat’s demonstrate that there is much work to be done to support teachers.
Julian Stanley, Chief Executive, Teacher Support Network, London N5

Points

Kiwi aid
Some of my family live in Christchurch, New Zealand, the city devastated by the earthquake in 2011 (“Happy glampers to leave baby George behind”, News, last week). I hope the touring young royals can see how painfully slow the rebuilding process is. So much aid has been sent all around the world but our great friend and ally through two world wars has been left out.
Christine O’Shea, London SE3

Wrong-headed war
Had we restricted ourselves in Afghanistan to hit-and-run operations to knock out terrorist camps and used the £38bn spent on the war to fund social housing the country would be more peaceful (“So much blood, so little glory”, Focus, last week). Donald Stickland, Nottingham

Living dangerously
The Afghanistan article is an example of what makes The Sunday Times so special. It also highlighted the dangers faced by the journalists and photographers that we take for granted.
Craig Petterson, Bonhill, West Dumbartonshire

Poet cornered
Dylan Thomas’s daughter attended my school, Carmarthen Diocesan High School, for a year and his appearance at the annual fete — long hair and crumpled corduroy jacket — fairly scandalised the other immaculately turned-out parents (including mine) (“Land of my fathers? My fathers can keep it”, Magazine, last week). A few years later our fifth and sixth forms were given a tour of Laugharne, where Thomas had lived, by the church organist. The town was still rather ashamed of the poet — his commercial potential had not yet been recognised — and we were shown an unmarked grave that was “probably” his. My claim to fame is that at the end of the tour our charming guide announced that he was allegedly the original for the character of Organ Morgan in Under Milk Wood.
Louise Izzard, Kidwelly, Carmarthenshire

Sins of the father
My early childhood was punctuated by my father making me feel totally worthless and inadequate (“Fear not, Cinderella, emotional rescue is at hand”, India Knight, Comment, last week). I survived, a shadow flitting across walls and hiding in wardrobes — anything to become invisible to him. Banished to boarding school at 11, I found my friends had loving home lives. I was able to reconstruct my true self, but the damage remains — the scars have never healed.
Name and address withheld

Frequent mistake
Your article “Chinese ship ‘picks up 11th-hour ping’” (News, last week) reports the possible detection of a “ping” from one of the black box recorders on Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 with a frequency of 37.5kHz per second. However, kHz on its own is a measure of frequency — kilocycles per second — so kHz per second is not a frequency, but a rate of change of frequency, as acceleration is a rate of change of speed.
Dr John Thornton, Macclesfield, Cheshire

Not a natural death
My husband and I — both in our fifties — have discussed the possibility of jumping ship when it all gets too tedious. (“Digital age drove auntie to Dignitas”, News, last week). As a coroner’s officer I wonder if there will be inquests in all such assisted deaths, as they certainly won’t be natural.
Lesley Thompson, Wantage, Oxfordshire

Local concerns
Charles Clover (“Loot for landowners, green fields gone. And they call this localism?”, Comment, March 30) is absolutely right. We have several applications on green fields around our town that the locals want to resist but we are unable to refuse. We have sufficient brownfield sites to develop instead but these are just not attractive to the land speculators. MPs in London seem oblivious to the frustration of local people keen to protect the countryside for the future.
Christine Burt, Corsham, Wiltshire

Corrections and clarifications

The founder of the first school of occupational therapy is Dr Elizabeth Casson, not Carson, as stated in the article “TV’s frontline angels” (News, last week).

Complaints about inaccuracies in all sections of The Sunday Times, including online, should be addressed to editor@sunday-times.co.uk or The Editor, The Sunday Times, 3 Thomas More Square, London E98 1ST. In addition, the Press Complaints Commission (complaints@pcc.org.uk or 020 7831 0022) examines formal complaints about the editorial content of UK newspapers and magazines (and their websites)

Birthdays

Peter Davison, actor, 63; Stanley Donen, director and choreographer, 90; Edward Fox, actor, 77; Al Green, singer, 68; Garry Kasparov, chess player, 51; Davis Love III, golfer, 50; Max Mosley, former president of the FIA, governing body of F1, 74; Ron Perlman, actor, 64; Rudi Völler, footballer, 54; Max Weinberg, 63, drummer

Anniversaries

1668 John Dryden becomes poet laureate; 1829 Roman Catholic Relief Act receives royal assent, giving freedom of religion to Catholics; 1964 Sidney Poitier becomes first black man to win best actor Oscar; 1970 “Houston, we’ve had a problem,” says Apollo 13 astronaut Jack Swigert after a liquid oxygen tank bursts

Telegraph:

Afghan girls push wheelbarrows filled with drinking water drawn from a channel in Kandahar  Photo: AFP/Getty Images

6:58AM BST 12 Apr 2014

Comments21 Comments

SIR – The Arghandab river valley has seen British boots on patrol almost every day since we have been in Afghanistan yet, despite our frequent visits to the area, there is still no running water, no electricity, no tarmac road, no health centre, no school; and when I was there last summer, there was plenty of marijuana growing in the fields. The local people pay the Taliban for security.

A principle of counter-insurgency is winning the hearts and minds of the local people. We can’t win their hearts with security, which is readily available from the Taliban, often at less cost.

The Taliban can’t provide decent health care, though; they are strictly against educating females; they have never put tarmac on roads; they have an unproven record in providing utilities. Their reputation for free and fair elections is abysmal.

The Army has succeeded in mentoring the Afghan National Security Forces, but where were the British teachers mentoring Afghan teachers, or British doctors mentoring Afghan medics? We leave behind a brilliant hospital in Camp Bastion, a model not replicated anywhere in Helmand.

Mike Martin is wrong: the Armed Forces have succeeded in providing security in Afghanistan. What a shame we weren’t more ambitious and long-termist in our approach to the bigger picture, though.

Captain Mike Wilmot
London W6

SIR – Ian Carter suggests that because an elderly man is not “capable of exiting a vehicle in an emergency within 30 seconds” he should be banned from driving, lest he “compromise the safety of anyone trying to assist him in escaping from the car”.

This would apply equally if he were a passenger in the same car (or a bus). So clearly he should be kept off the road altogether. Similarly, he should not, according to this logic, be allowed into shops in case he impedes the orderly exit of anyone else in the event of a fire.

Mr Carter may take a different view when he himself finds age making him rather less spry.

Graham Creedy
Uffington, Lincolnshire

SIR – Mr Carter suggests a test for anyone unable to exit a car within 30 seconds. So, testers armed with stop-watches would evaluate the agility of all drivers who are handicapped, overweight, or pregnant?

David Brown
Lavenham, Suffolk

Labour on immigration

SIR – The last Labour administration, as a matter of deliberate social policy, opened Britain’s doors to mass immigration, with one of the consequences being the driving down of wages at the lower end of the pay scales, which, while benefiting the middle classes in many ways, impoverished the indigenous working class.

Any who pointed this out were labelled bigots. Remember Gordon Brown and a certain Rochdale voter.

Now Yvette Cooper attacks the Government for the problem of which both she and her fellow-Cabinet-member husband were so much the instigators. It is a great shame that the laws she now advocates, to prevent business abusing low-wage employment, were not enacted when she and her party were in power.

Michael R Gordon
Bewdley, Worcestershire

Anger in court

SIR – A wise judge rebuked me years ago thus: “Cross-examination is not angry questioning. You are a member of the Bar, not an actor. Behave yourself.”

He was entirely correct. Firm, even forceful, but polite questions are more effective. A great pity that, in the trial of Oscar Pistorius, Gerrie Nel lacks the skill and training to know this; and the judge the authority and experience to enforce it.

Howard Bentham QC
Antrobus, Cheshire

Parachuted presenters

SIR – Why does the BBC deem it necessary to squander licence-payers’ money to parachute Jon Sopel into India to report on that country’s election, when it already has a team of correspondents on the ground who are well-qualified to cover this news?

Bill Hollowell
Orton Waterville, Cambridgeshire

Jim-jam flim-flam

SIR – As long ago as the Seventies, patients admitted into hospital for the first time often asked me what they should take in with them. When I mentioned that some form of nightwear would be required, a good proportion would say: “Better go out and buy some then.” A few even inquired whether the cost would be covered by the NHS.

Dr John Gladstone
Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire

False promises by post

SIR – I agree that David Cameron has wasted an extraordinary amount of taxpayers’ moneysending out letters to employers advising them that they are entitled to up to £2,000, via Employment Allowance, when this information has already been sent out by HMRC.

Even more concerning is that he appears to have sent these letters to all employers, including those whom the Government has seen fit to exclude from the scheme, including families who have to employ carers to support a sick or disabled family member, and branches of charities that support local communities and the vulnerable.

The neediest once again appear to have been excluded from government help. Receiving a letter saying they are eligible when they are not adds salt to the wound.

Pat Bell
Bomere Heath, Shropshire

SIR – Our parish clerk has received a personalised circular letter from the Prime Minister about a “new tax cut for businesses and charities”. In the letter, Mr Cameron urges the council, as an employer of several staff, to apply for a £2,000 Employment Allowance.

Generous, were it not that the HMRC website specifically states that Britain’s 8,500 parish councils are not eligible.

What a waste of postage.

Ivor Davies
Chatham, Kent

Sizing up Marilyn

SIR – Whether or not size 16 is obese, Marilyn Monroe was definitely not a 16 in today’s sizing system. She was more likely the equivalent of today’s size 8.

Ken Cotton
Nocton, Lincolnshire

Not just the ticket

SIR – Buying tickets online for National Gallery exhibitions is now a dismaying experience, though necessary for popular shows. Unfortunately, the process has been sublet to Ticketmaster, which charges not just a £1 booking fee (normal these days), but another £1 fee for a second ticket. Before you’ve finished, you must fight off attempts to sell you cancellation insurance, a hotel room and a restaurant table.

It’s disappointing to find such a grasping organisation teamed up with one of our very best cultural institutions.

Dr Tim Hudson
Chichester, West Sussex

Britain can’t get on its bike without cycle routes

SIR – Lord Coe noted that boosting cycle use would produce huge economic benefits. Those come not only from reduced NHS costs and absenteeism, but also from greater alertness and productivity among employees and school pupils alike, not to mention reduced congestion and more reliable journey times.

Last summer, David Cameron declared his wish to launch a “cycling revolution”. Since then, there have been no significant new announcements on cycling, despite huge cross-party backing for a parliamentary report, Get Britain Cycling, which called for annual spending on cycling of at least £10 per person.

The Dutch spend £24 and, unlike us, they have been investing in cycling for over 40 years. Dutch people of all ages and backgrounds cycle regularly for day-to-day journeys, making 27 per cent of trips by bike. In Britain, it is less than 2 per cent.

Next week, CTC, the national cycling charity, for which I am policy director, will launch a Space for Cycling campaign nationally. We will be calling for new cycle routes and seeking the long-term funding needed to deliver this. That would be a true Olympic legacy.

Roger Geffen
Guildford, Surrey

SIR – The police officer who addressed the press on the steps of the court after the acquittal of Nigel Evans revealed the secret of where the Crown Prosecution Service is going so badly off course. He said: “As always with these cases, this prosecution was victim-led.”

We now know there were no victims and no crime committed. Perhaps if the CPS had focused on a “justice-led” process, I would not be writing this letter now.

Jonathan Fulford
Bosham, West Sussex

SIR – Interviewed on Radio 4’s Today programme, Alison Saunders, the Director of Public Prosecutions, said: “The police only act if they receive a complaint.”

Clearly this was not the case in the trial of Nigel Evans. The police evidently trawled for “victims” who, when presented as witnesses in court, said that in their view no crime had been committed.

Duncan Rayner
Sunningdale, Berkshire

SIR – Nigel Evans left Preston Crown Court a free man, having been found not guilty of sex abuse.

However, the jury’s verdict – and therefore the charter upon which a jury is founded – will be undermined every time Mr Evans is unfairly associated with sexual abuse or the misconduct of those in public office.

In Britain today, most of us welcome greater freedom of information, and it is important that this doctrine is not suspended or excepted to cover up wrongdoing or scandal.

However, it is equally important that protection is afforded, as far as possible, to those who face trial, without jury, in the public domain.

Next year marks the 800th anniversary of Magna Carta. In an age of freedom of information, more needs to be done to protect the identity of those who merely stand accused.

Robert Gardener
London, SW1

SIR – Nigel Evans has been found not guilty of a number of serious charges.

However, he has admitted to indulging in drunken and unseemly behaviour, which surely could be described as bringing the House of Commons into disrepute.

Is it appropriate that people, including David Cameron, should be welcoming his return in such an enthusiastic manner?

Jenefer Mawhinney
Foulden, Berwickshire

SIR – Predictably, the Establishment rushes to protect a serving MP and criticise the CPS in the case of Nigel Evans. However, it is not difficult to imagine what would have happened if he had not been prosecuted and the allegations, whatever their strength, had then surfaced. The CPS would have been criticised for protecting politicians. The CPS appears to be damned if it does and damned if it doesn’t.

John Russell
Plymouth, Devon

Irish Times:

Irish Independent:

Published 13 April 2014 02:30 AM

Madam – The moment when President Higgins and his wife Sabina paused reflectively before the memorial to Lord Mountbatten was both moving and appropriate. The silent tribute will have struck many people as one of the highlights of the long-awaited and highly successful state visit to our nearest neighbour.

Also in this section

Supporting our food producers

Focus on gender misses vital point

A shared bond

I am glad too to see that Martin McGuinness travelled for the occasion, but his presence reminded me of an issue I believe needs to be addressed by the Republican movement.

It is the fact that neither the IRA nor Sinn Fein has formally apologised for the two-and-a-half decades of violence inflicted in the name of a United Ireland. Expressions of “regret” and references to “all sides” having suffered in the “conflict” we have heard countless times. But never an apology.

An apology would not bring back the people killed in horrific circumstances by the IRA and other Republican groups. But I suggest it would contribute enormously towards easing the heartache and loss that loved ones of victims have to cope with every day of their lives. It would help bring the balm of closure to countless human beings on this island whose nearest and dearest were snatched from this world by bomb or bullet.

Such closure must remain far off while the people responsible for taking those precious lives refuse to make it clear that what they did was wrong and should never have happened.

In addition to easing the suffering of the bereaved, such an apology from both Sinn Fein and the IRA would, I suggest, make it easier for the Republican movement to pursue its aim of a United Ireland. I can’t get inside the mind of a Northern Unionist but I imagine I’d be somewhat (if only the tiniest bit) more favourable to the concept of a 32-county Republic if the people advocating it were not still pretending that those two-and-a-half decades of bloody violence were anything other than a litany of cruel and senseless murders that achieved nothing, apart from turning people off a United Ireland.

We’ve had a number of significant high-profile apologies in recent times: to survivors of institutional abuse by the Irish Government, to the victims of Blood Sunday by the British government, for example.

Will Sinn Fein and the IRA now have the decency and courage to apologise for the series of murders and maimings euphemistically referred to as the “Armed Struggle”? They take pride in the Peace Process that ended the campaign of violence and terror. Let them now engage in a healing process and say sorry for the nightmare years.

Patrick Fitzgerald,

Kilkenny

O’Connell deserves credit

Madam – Eoghan Harris (Sunday Independent, April 6, 2014) rightly praises Daniel O’Connell for succeeding in repealing the British law “De Judaismo”, which prescribed a special dress for British Jews. He then neutralises this praise by saying: “But O’Connell’s clean sheet was only because the Jewish community of 200 souls was too small to attract attention.”

However, O’Connell’s record reveals that he was made of sterner stuff than perhaps Eoghan gives him credit for. I believe, had Ireland’s Jewish population been larger, O’Connell would have been more vociferous in his support for them. I base this conviction on his role in the anti-slavery movement in America. O’Connell was one of the most vocal and influential abolitionists in the world at that time. The fact that prominent escaped slave Frederick Douglass came to Ireland to visit him is testament to his pedigree. Although the British government supported abolition, it largely remained silent for fear of falling out with its American cousins. O’Connell had no such qualms and his forthright opinions regularly drew ire from the Southern States. He ignored all warnings that he would lose US support.

In August 1875, celebrations took place to mark the centenary of O’Connell’s birth. Some of the largest gatherings took place in the US, where he was exalted for his role in ending slavery.

John Bellew

Dunleer, Co Louth

 

Donnelly is star Dail performer

Madam – The article by Stephen Donnelly TD (Sunday Independent, April 6, 2014) in last week’s paper about the selling off of family mortgages should be read by everyone. It is so well written and easy to understand. He is the star performer in the current Dail.

Eamonn Kitt,

Tuam, Co Galway

 

Focus on gender misses vital point

Madam – While there is validity in some of what A Leavy says in his letter (Sunday Independent, April 6, 2014), it is clearly impossible to quantify the relative abilities of those men and women who were, or are, passed over for selection as Dail candidates, appointment to office, etc, for various reasons not related to their abilities, so concentrating on the waste of female talent in particular runs the risk of being simplistic.

The percentage of TDs who are female is 15 per cent, but while there is certainly no law of nature that this should remain so, it is equally true that there is no such law that this should be at any other particular level (and the same can be said in relation to men).

A major valid question that arises in relation to all-female quotas is how many female candidates will be chosen primarily for their ability and how many because they have the right connections, or simply to fill the quota. Indeed, this question is the same (except for the last part) as can be asked in relation to male candidates.

Some apparently believe the primary role of female TDs should be to represent the interests of women and see this as a justification for quotas, but this is to ignore the fact that TDs, regardless of their own gender, are elected to represent the interests of all their constituents, and it would make no sense for men in particular to vote for female candidates whose main interest was the advancement of a narrow “women’s issues” agenda.

Besides, it it just as fallacious to imply that male TDs are not capable of adequately representing the interests of women as it would be to suggest that female TDs are incapable of representing the interests of their male constituents.

I believe the introduction of quotas, with its narrow focus on gender, is a simplistic measure which misses the most important point, which is how to ensure that the most able people, irrespective of their gender, or the schools they went to or the clubs they belong to, are selected as candidates (or appointed to office).

This will require changing the political system itself in order to encourage such people to put themselves forward.

Hugh Gibney,

Athboy, Co Meath

 

A shared bond

Madam – In the wake of anti-Semitism directed at Justice Minister Alan Shatter, as described in Carol Hunt’s column (Sunday Independent, April 6, 2014), as a Jew, my intention is not to eliminate it, but to mitigate it. Much of anti-Semitism by pea-brained people today is cloaked in anti-Zionism. Like every nation, the Irish and Jews have saints and scoundrels, but we also share a bond.

While Menachem Begin, leader of the paramilitary Irgun against the British who ruled Palestine and became prime minister of Israel, regarded the Irish War of Independence as a role model, the IRA valued Begin’s book The Revolt as a handbook of guerrilla combat.

The two bestselling novels of the Jewish-American Leon Uris were Exodus, published in 1958, on the creation of the State of Israel, and Trinity, published in 1976, on the Irish fight for freedom. The Irish-American Thomas Cahill wrote How the Irish Saved Civilization in 1995; his next book was The Gifts of the Jews. And last month, Forward, a leading American-Jewish weekly, featured an article, “How the Jews Made America Irish”, on the alliance of prominent Irish and Jews.

Jacob Mendlovic,

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

 

Give ordinary people a voice

Madam – Since members of the Oireachtas have easy access to the media to express their opinions, I do not understand why elected officials, such as Shane Ross, Stephen Donnelly, Willie O’Dea, etc, are given preferential treatment in columns and letters to the editor. Surely such space should be given to ordinary citizens.

Vincent J Lavery,

Irish Free Speech Movement, Dalkey, Co Dublin

Sunday Independent


Under the Weather

$
0
0

14 April2014Under the Weather

I go all the way around the park listening to the Men from the Ministry: Our heroes have to sort out a very tricky problem in putting up a statuePriceless

Mary in hospital brief visit Tidy house

Scrabbletoday, Mary wins by three points Perhaps Marywill win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Jacques le Goff – obituary

Jacques le Goff was a French historian who believed the Middle Ages was a time of progress and purgatory

Jacques le Goff in 1999

Jacques le Goff in 1999 Photo: CORBIS

8:17PM BST 13 Apr 2014

CommentsComment

Jacques le Goff, who has died aged 90, was a veteran of the French Annales, or “New History”, school, and helped to define what was culturally distinctive about the period loosely described as the Middle Ages.

The Annalistes, a group of scholars associated with the journal Annales (other prominent members included Fernand Braudel and Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie), broke away from the traditional historians’ fixation on political, constitutional and military history. Inspired, though not defined, by Marxist historicism, they used techniques of historical anthropology to investigate how ordinary men and women of the past experienced life and conceived their world.

Though he was once described in the press as “the Pope of the Middle Ages”, le Goff challenged the term as implying a transitional rather than a formative period before the “flowering” of the Renaissance and Reformation. For le Goff, the Middle Ages constituted a period of “creativity, innovations and extraordinary progress” which saw a series of “rebirths”, including the epoch of Charlemagne and the 12th-century “Renaissance”. Historians, he argued, had exaggerated the novelty of the 15th and 16th centuries, which did not bring about fundamental transformations to the essential economic, social and political structures — or the mindset — of earlier centuries.

Le Goff was probably best known for The Birth of Purgatory (1981), in which he argued that the idea of a “third place” in the afterlife, along with heaven and hell, came into full bloom as a formal Catholic belief and doctrine rather late — in the 12th century. Established as “an intermediary other world in which some of the dead were subjected to a trial that could be shortened by the prayers, by the spiritual aid of the living”, it took shape in a detailed theology of retribution, sacrifice, penalties, pardons, and spiritual exchange between the dead and the living.

It became the “key component” in the medieval system of ideas (as well as a useful revenue-raiser for the Church), turning people’s earthly existence into a day-to-day spiritual ledger and giving society its meaning.

Jacques le Goff in his study in 1981

Central to le Goff’s thesis was his attribution of the birth of purgatory to social-historical causes. The 12th century, he argued, was a time when the traditional binary feudal social structure — powerful nobles and clergy on the one hand, and the powerless peasantry on the other — was being challenged by a new significant intermediate social group, the mercantile bourgeoisie. While the bourgeoisie did not create purgatory, medieval men and women could think and imagine only in terms of their social and economic structures, and dramatic changes in these structures could not help but be reflected in their thinking about life after death.

But purgatory also chimed with the concerns of the nascent urban culture of the Middle Ages, and allowed the Church to accommodate it. In a later book — Your Money or Your Life: Economy and Religion in the Middle Ages (1988) — le Goff cast purgatory as the Church’s solution to the theological problem of usury.

Before the development of purgatory, a usurer could reach heaven only by making restitution of his sinful gains — something that rarely happened in real life. The advent of purgatory provided another route for men who were playing an increasingly vital role in the new mercantile economy: “The hope of escaping hell, thanks to purgatory, permitted the usurer to propel the economy and society of the 13th century ahead toward capitalism,’’ le Goff argued. Once usurers no longer expected to go straight to hell but to linger in this new place, moneylending acquired redemptive possibilities, and thus a larger measure of respectability.

Purgatory by Hieronymus Bosch

Le Goff’s thesis was controversial, but his approach influenced a new school of social historians, represented in Britain by the medievalist Miri Rubin among others, who, in the jargon, use a “multidisciplinary approach” to investigate how systems of belief interact with and animate social life and literary expression in medieval culture, bringing sources such as cultural imagery, popular writings and anthropological artefacts into new historical play.

Jacques le Goff was born on New Year’s Day 1924 in Toulon. His father, a teacher, was a resolute anti-papist, while his mother was a strict Roman Catholic. Lively family debates about religious doctrine, along with a youthful reading of Ivanhoe, convinced Jacques at an early age that he wanted to be a medievalist. His Leftist political views were shaped during the German occupation of France when, to avoid compulsory labour service, he fled to the Alps and served in what he described as a “pseudo-resistance”, helping to retrieve medicine and weapons dropped by the Allies. However, he was inoculated against more extreme forms of Left-wing doctrine after the war when he travelled to Prague and witnessed the communist takeover of 1948.

In 1950 he qualified as a history teacher and became a teaching assistant in Amiens, but soon gave up and embarked on a one-year’s research studentship at Lincoln College, Oxford. By the end of the decade he had written the first of more than 30 books and was becoming known as a leading member of the Annales School.

Le Goff joined the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS) in Paris in the early Sixties, serving as the director of studies from 1962 and teaching there until the age of 70. In 1972 he succeeded Fernand Braudel as head of the school and editor-in-chief of Annales.

Throughout his life le Goff was a fervent pro-European, a commitment shown in his editorship of a multinational, multi-publisher series The Making of Europe. In his book The Birth of Europe (2005) he argued that Europe first became a self-conscious entity — both in reality and in representation — during the Middle Ages as a western, Christian zone defined against both Asia and the Eastern Church — with feudalism, transnational trading systems and the growth of towns and universities among the factors contributing to the process.

Le Goff rejected the fashionable promotion of Charlemagne as “the father of Europe”, however, pointing out that as Charlemagne fought for a Frankish empire, his true successors were Napoleon and Hitler, not the EU’s founding fathers.

Yet he found many parallels between the preoccupations of medieval Europeans and their modern counterparts — including debates about a single currency: “Despite the prestige and wide use of florins and ducats, the multiplicity of currencies remained one of the hindrances that held back the medieval economy,” he wrote.

In France, le Goff hosted a weekly history programme on France Culture public radio and often took part in topical political debates on television. He served as historical consultant to several films set in the Middle Ages, including the 1986 adaptation of Umberto Eco’s The Name of the Rose (starring Sean Connery) on which he advised on monastic tonsures and the methods used to heat refectories.

His later works included well-reviewed biographies of Louis IX, the only French king to be canonised, and St Francis of Assisi. The Annalistes tended to disapprove of biography as a genre, and le Goff (who preferred to use the term “anti-biography”) focused principally on what an individual’s life — and the myths that grew up around it — could tell us about the medieval mind.

Le Goff won numerous awards and his international standing was reflected in a conference held in his honour at Cambridge in 1994 and in a 2003 exhibition at the National Gallery in Parma entitled “The European Middle Ages of Jacques le Goff”.

He married, in 1962, Hanka Dunin, a Polish child psychiatrist, with whom he had a son and a daughter.

Jacques le Goff, born January 1 1924, died April 1 2014

Guardian:

y

Tomorrow, 14 April, the Metropolitan police and CPS will prosecute five anti-fascists arrested on 1 June 2013 while trying to stop the British National party from marching on the Cenotaph. Police decided the anti-fascist protest was a “threat to public safety” and imposed a dispersal order under section 12 of the Public Order Act 1986; 59 people were arrested. A few months later 286 protesters against the English Defence League, which had declared its intention to march on a park named after Altab Ali, who was murdered in a racist attack, were arrested in Tower Hamlets.

In both cases those arrested were put on bail conditions banning them from attending future anti-fascist protests. Yet of the 345 arrested overall, only seven have been charged. In both cases these tactics appear designed not to safeguard the public, but to gather information on protesters and deter people from joining protest movements. UN special rapporteur Maina Kiai, for example, recently reported that the threshold for using section 12 and 14 was “too low” and presented a threat to the right to protest.

The electoral gains of fascist parties in France and Hungary are a warning of the continuing threat of the far right across Europe. In Britain, protest has played a vital role isolating groups like the BNP and EDL. We are therefore deeply concerned at how the Public Order Act is being used to criminalise protest in general and anti-fascist protest in particular. We support the five anti-fascist protesters and call for a proper accounting of the police tactics, including mass arrests, that have been utilised on these two protests.
Daniel Trilling Author, Bloody Nasty People – The Rise of Britain’s Far Right, Dr Jim Wolfreys Co-author, The Politics of Racism in France, Hannah Dee Defend the Right to Protest, Darcus Howe Broadcaster, Glenroy Watson Black Solidarity Committee, RMT, Zita Holbourne PCS NEC and Black Activists Rising Against Cuts, Brian Richardson Assistant secretary, Unite Against Fascism, Mark Serwotka General secretary, PCS, Billy Hayes General secretary, CWU, Caroline Lucas MP, John McDonnell MP, Nina Power Author, Laurie Penny Journalist, Nadine El-Enany Law lecturer, Birkbeck, University of London, Trenton Oldfield Boat race protester, Susan Matthews Mother of Alfie Meadows

For a generation of victims who were systematically and repeatedly discredited or ignored, the search for justice must begin with reassurance that allegations of sexual abuse – whether historic or current – will be taken seriously. In the aftermath of the Savile debacle, the Crown Prosecution Service cannot be risk-averse when it comes to prosecuting high-profile sex crimes, no matter how complex they are (Tories and CPS at war as Evans cleared of rape, 11 April).

However, the CPS needs to explain why it thinks the majority of these high-profile cases to date have failed to convince juries. What exactly is the CPS expecting juries to adjudicate on? At the same time, all sections of the news media are exploiting and amplifying the sensational details of these cases for commercial and ideological reasons. It is the sensationalised nature of the “trial by media” accompanying these cases that is shredding the reputations of innocent and guilty alike.
Professor Chris Greer and Professor Eugene McLaughlin
Department of sociology, City University London

• Following the acquittal of Nigel Evans on Thursday, numbers of Tory MPs raised concerns about the role of the Crown Prosecution Service. Yet not one had raised similar concerns about the acquittal of Nicholas Jacobs on a charge of murdering PC Keith Blakelock at Broadwater Farm the previous day (Report, 10 April). It may well be that there are issues with the way the CPS is operating. If so, it is not just the cases of well-known white men in suits that need to be looked at.
Keith Flett
London

Ruth Wishart (The art of healing, 12 April) is right to point out the benefits to people’s wellbeing of art and music they see and hear. Even more potent is that which they make: Sound Sense members have demonstrably evidenced the value of, for example, singing for people with Parkinson’s, and music-making for those with dementia. The tragedy is that neither arts nor health funding systems make sustained funding available for such activities. How much better off the residents of even the best care home in Britain (Michele Hanson, 12 April) would be if they could also sing and paint through their days.
Kathryn Deane
Director, Sound Sense, the UK association for community musicians

• As an Englishwoman in Northern Ireland, I have been working as a volunteer with the local credit union for 15 years. We celebrated 50 years of our branch of the Irish League of Credit Unions last year. Your article on credit unions (5 April) had the subtitle “half a century ago this month the UK’s first credit union opened its doors”. It later refers to “the first two credit unions being set up in Britain”. No comment!
Eileen Ward
Portstewart, Co Londonderry

• Michael Darvell (Letters, 12 April) forgets the 20-minute family serial At the Luscombes, which began in 1948. It was created by Denis Constanduros and heard every Saturday evening for 20 years on the BBC West of England Home Service.
Leigh Hatts
London

• Now spring is here, meetings may be less chilly at the Bare Women’s Institute next to Morecambe (Letters, 11 April).
Monica Hemming
Cark-in-Cartmel, Cumbria

Your obituary of Richard Hoggart (10 April) remarked on his decision to become warden of Goldsmiths College that “As a close to a career, it was a diminuendo”. This is to misunderstand both the man and the place. Some people make a point of moving to the most prestigious institution that makes them an offer in the expectation its grandeur will rub off on them. Others improve and expand the place they are in to make it match their ambitions. This was more like Richard Hoggart’s role when I knew him as warden of Goldsmiths in the 1970s and 80s. He expanded the institution out of recognition with the application of his restless energy, intellectual rigour, exceptional contacts and many hours in committee work which is essential but all too often under-appreciated in public life.

I have had no further connection with Goldsmiths except that I spoke at a conference there last week, and I thought of Richard Hoggart: if you seek his monument, look around. Goldsmiths is now a world-class institution that has nurtured the talents of students such as Damien Hirst and Steve McQueen. It can feel proud of itself, and its former warden.
Jad Adams
London

• Congratulations on the late John Ezard’s obituary of Richard Hoggart. Though far from a scholarship boy and privately educated, my life was changed by The Uses of Literacy in 1957. Who can forget some of its chapter mottoes, from Wordsworth, de Tocqueville, Arnold and “Schnozzle” Durante, and the chapter titles Unbending the Springs of Action and Invitations to a Candy-Floss World? For all his achievement and worth, I don’t think Perry Anderson quite fits in the pantheon the obituary suggests.
Nicholas Jacobs
London

• As a new member of the Arts Council in 1978, I attended its annual budget meeting for the first time in 1979. Discussion was held about the amount of grants the council would give to the major national concert orchestras. In the course of the debate I asked if any grants had been given or would be offered to the numerous brass bands in the UK as they were not mentioned in the budget documents.

One member, in a very haughty voice, said, rather like Lady Bracknell’s “A handbag?” comment in The Importance of being Ernest, “we are only concerned with the high arts on this council, Mr Buckle”. I replied: “Brass bands are the high arts for many working people in coal mines, factories etc.” Speaking as a factory member I had remembered many brass band concerts we enjoyed during lunchtimes in the Oxford car factory where I worked for 14 years. Richard Hoggart strongly supported me and after the meeting congratulated me on my comments. We became very close friends after that, so I mourn his passing very deeply and salute his memory.
David Buckle
Radley, Oxfordshire

• I never met Richard Hoggart but his The Uses of Literacy had a profound effect on me. As a student in the late 1950s and early 60s, I felt adrift from family and student life. My parents had not seen the point of going to university and we could not converse about my studies. Yet I did not feel at ease at university. I was nicknamed “Bertie”, that is “Burlington Bertie from Bow”, because of what others regarded – wrongly – as my cockney accent. Hoggart showed me that my experience was not unusual and was common among a new generation able to enter university. He taught me not to abandon my background yet also to make the most of study.
Bob Holman
Glasgow

• Martin Kettle (Report, 11 August) is right to stress the importance and influence of Richard Hoggart’s work, both in his written work and in the many posts he held, including vice-chairmanship of the Arts Council, from which he was sacked by Margaret Thatcher in 1982. For Hoggart, humane reading and humane education and humane culture and society should be open to everyone, and he deeply deplored those who saw themselves as privileged, not least the patrician William Rees-Mogg who, as chairman of the Arts Council, took it for granted that his journeys from London to his Somerset home and back should be provided by an Arts Council-funded chauffeur-driven car. Not something Richard Hoggart would ever have contemplated.
Bruce Ross-Smith
Oxford

• In Richard Hoggart’s obituary, you recall that he wrote of seeing his widowed mother “standing frozen, while tears start slowly down her cheeks because a sixpence has been lost … you do not easily forget”. Reading Polly Toynbee’s article (Duncan Smith’s treatment of the disabled is monstrous, 11 April), it is apparent that IDS has forgotten the effects of poverty, if he ever knew. It seems very little may have changed since the 1920s.
David Verguson
Huddersfield

Independent:

What with the behaviour of MPs, the police, the military and the immigration officers, one wonders what the UK authorities get right. Now they push disgrace to a new level, and without shame.

You report on the sad failure of UK authorities to permit the Jamaican sister of UK citizen Oliver Cameron to enter the UK to give him an urgently needed kidney

To fail to record the correct details of donor and donation (liver instead of kidney) is bad enough but to refuse to allow this brave act of life-saving love is an act of cruelty and a complete disgrace to us all. I pray the Home Secretary will ensure she apologises and enables the donation to take place straight away.

Lest any believe this will be at net cost to the NHS, the expense to the NHS of keeping a patient on dialysis is around £30,000 a year, but only £5,000 a year after successful transplant.

Dr Chris Burns-Cox, Wotton-under-Edge, Gloucestershire

In a moment of honesty, Theresa May once admitted the Tories were the nasty party. In refusing Oliver Cameron’s sister, Keisha Rushton, entrance to the United Kingdom she has displayed not only her party’s cruel nastiness but also its crass stupidity.

If Ms Rushton is allowed to come and donate her kidney, it will cost the taxpayer for the operation probably about £25,000. The average lifetime cost of dialysis within the NHS is of the order of £240,000. In other words, while taking not a shred of thought about Mr Cameron’s actual well-being, the Government could still have made a saving of well over £200,000 simply by being intelligent.

It is also, incidentally, a compelling reason for those in sound health to think seriously about making this safe but life-changing gift, exchanging a month or two of inconvenience for a threatened life transformed.

David McDowall, Richmond, Surrey

Evans case smashes confidence in MPs

Nigel Evans’s sexual proclivities and with whom he practices them are of no interest to anybody, except the parties involved. What is however, of exceptional interest to the majority of “us” – the population of a democracy – is that a senior member of our political establishment, the Deputy Speaker of the House of Commons, can fee-range at “the high water mark of over-friendly, inappropriate behaviour by a drunken man” – I quote from your newspaper (for which I have high regard).

So he’s not actually broken any laws. What he has broken, perhaps smashed, is any confidence we might have in our system of self-regulating the behaviour of our so-called governors.

All the dubious publicity that’s hit him over the past few days he could and should have seen light years in advance; intelligent foresight is clearly not his strong point. His “weeks of hell” are self-inflicted.

Dr Richard Wood, Staithes, North Yorkshire

As soon as the Crown Prosecution Service’s fanatical hounding of suspect celebrity sex offenders encroaches on the hallowed turf of Westminster there are piercing cries of “Foul!”, “Shame!” and “Something must be done!” from the green benches.

If Nigel Evans MP, Deputy Speaker of the House of Commons, had just been plain Nigel Evans, bank clerk, of Clapham, whose happiness, career and reputation had been annihilated by the CPS zealots, not one Honourable Member would have blinked an eyelid.

Adrian Marlowe, The Hague

Sometimes a news story seems to sum up the times we live in. For me, one such was the report that Conservatives held a sex party during a party conference in Manchester. Apparently the scandalous element was that the room where it took place may have been paid for in an irregular manner.

Gordon  Elliot, Burford, Oxfordshire

Blair in frame for battle of Bootle

It was once said of solid working-class Labour communities that if you put a red rosette on a donkey they would vote for it. Yet the poor suffering people of Bootle may soon not even have such a luxury if the incumbent MP Joe Benton steps down. For you report that dark satanic forces are conspiring to foist on the constituency the son of Lucifer, Euan Blair.

Tony Blair dragged our country into five wars in six years and believes even now that we should bomb Syria and Iran. Euan Blair has never condemned his father’s wars, so we have no idea what he maybe capable of.

Joe Benton MP did at least vote against the Iraq war, so please, Joe, don’t step down.

Mark Holt, Liverpool

You report that unnamed sources wish to parachute in Euan Blair to the safe Labour seat of Bootle. Some activists apparently hope thus to put Bootle “on the map”. Have the good people of Bootle checked the body count for the last place that a Blair “put on the map”?

Amanda Baker, Morpeth, Northumberland

Pit town faces a future of despair

It was really good to see a decent report on the threatened closure of two of the three remaining deep-mine pits in the UK (“The Future of Coal”, 5 April).

I live a few minutes drive from Kellingley Colliery and know the neighbouring town, Knottingley, well. If the pit does close it will be a harsh blow to the local economy. Other mining communities provide the evidence. Frickley Colliery sustained the local economy of South Elmsall, but when it closed in the brutal round of pit closures in 1992-93, dereliction, drugs and despair followed.

The decent, hard-working miners employed at Kellingley are victims of a crazy globalised economy where electricity generating companies put profits and the bottom line first, people second.

The UK government could get emergency state aid from Europe, but ideology means they will be uncomfortable doing so. Poland and Spain have drawn on state aid to help as their mining industries contract – the UK government should too.

Forty per cent of electricity in the UK is generated from coal, yet only 4 per cent is from UK mines. It surely makes sense to ensure that this UK source of a secure supply is not only protected but developed alongside clean coal technology and carbon-capture schemes.

Granville Williams, Pontefract, West Yorkshire

The kindness of Richard Hoggart

Many thanks for the excellent obituary of Richard Hoggart (12 April). It must have been hard for this fine old man to be pre-deceased by his son. As a sometime librarian at Goldsmiths’ College may I add an anecdote about the man’s humanity?

As one of working-class origins myself, I arrived at Goldsmiths’ without a degree and always felt the lack. After 10 years’ service I applied for a year’s leave to do an MA but was refused it. Only a personal appeal to Dr Hoggart on the grounds of my original lack of opportunities finally achieved my object and I was granted the leave on half-pay.

Robert Senecal, London WC1

When Richard Hoggart was 90 years old I sent him a piece I had written on life on a council estate in the 1950s called “The Prefab Files”. There was no chance of anyone publishing it, but because of the encouragement Richard gave me I put it on a website.

In his hand-written reply, Richard said he “had found an hour or so” to read it, wished me luck, and gave the addresses of two magazines I could send it to. The card he sent from his home at Mortonsfield in Surrey is a memento to the enduring dedication and helpfulness he showed throughout his life.

Ivor Morgan, Lincoln

Farage’s secret: He’s not a media robot

Penny Little is right that Nigel Farage is refreshing because he talks English (letter, 11 April). His secret is doubtless that he has not had, or has ignored, media training.It is virtually impossible for any mainstream politician to speak without mentioning “hard-working families”. Resigning ministers always talk about “distraction from the business of government”.  These stock phrases are frequently repeated several times, no matter what the question may be.

Don’t media trainers realise that the public become infuriated by these robotic responses?

Rod Auton, Sheffield

Poor creatures snubbed by the BBC

After complaints of sexism, Lord Hall, BBC Director General, acted to increase the number of images of women in the foyer of New Broadcasting House from three to seven. According to your report there are now “seven women alongside 11 men and a Dalek”. One can only conclude that the BBC is now alienist. I expect complaints to follow from Cybermen, Sontarans, Ice Warriors, Silurians etc, given their staggering lack of representation.

Martyn P Jackson, Cramlington, Northumberland

Times:

Sir, I’m saddened to read that Anna Wharton’s attempted home birth was a traumatic experience (Apr 8), but this turn of events should not justify scaremongering and generalisations about misguided yummy mummies and new-age hippies, with no distinction even being made between the risks for first-time mums and subsequent pregnancies.

While accepting that a first-time mother’s home birth is a real step into the unknown, this situation does not demonstrate that all home births are a risky business. For example, after a speedy complication-free first labour in hospital, I was encouraged to opt for a home birth in future, and I went on to have two home births, secure in the knowledge that I would have been blue-lighted to hospital at the first hint of a problem. Just as my experiences are not proof of home birth safety, Wharton’s experience has so many variables attached to it that it really shouldn’t be used as any sort of anti-home birth evidence.

Charlotte Yarker

Moulton, Northants

Sir, Anna Wharton quoted a 2011 study from Oxford that has been debunked by the NHS: the risks to first-time mothers opting for home birth were still very small, and the study included “birth injuries” that are common and non-life threatening.

Wharton suggests that hospital is the only safe choice. The fact is, like all women opting for home birth, she was advised to transfer to hospital as soon as there was any whiff of complication. That’s why home birth is so safe in this country; that’s why her daughter is alive. Home birth saves the NHS money, and for low-risk women, who do not develop complications in labour, they are more likely to avoid unnecessary medical interventions.

Faith McDonald

Edinburgh

Sir, Anna Wharton was monitored while at home by a fully trained midwife who moved her to hospital when it became clear that she needed medical help. Had she already been in hospital she would have received exactly the same care up to that point.

She obviously had an upsetting and difficult birth (as did I, and I was in one of the best maternity hospitals in the UK) but simply being at home for the initial stages of labour did not cause the problems with her birth.

Home birth is a wonderful option for many women, and I hope she has not discouraged anyone. As a regular Mumsnetter and NCT volunteer I can assure her that choice and knowledge are the mainstays of both organisations.

Karen Hillmansen

Sandhills Green, Worcs

Sir, Homebirths may sound most desirable but after my own experiences of giving birth to our three children — very long labour, baby stopped breathing during delivery, baby somersaulted all day resulting in caesarean section — I recommended hospital to my daughters. We now have four lovely grandchildren.

However, without medical intervention, involving three caesareans, for pre-eclampsia, placenta praevia, a baby born with Down’s syndrome and a very unpleasant pregnancy rash, the outcome could have been very, very different.

Sally Stafford

Ugborough, Devon

Loss of widow’s pension on remarriage means some women cannot enjoy the health benefits of companionship

Sir, Further to your letters about the despicable loss of pensions to war and NHS widows who re-marry (Apr 9, 10 & 12), there is a bigger issue here as spouses of all government employees (including teachers and lecturers) lose their pensions if they re-marry.

The teacher’s pension rules on re-marriage changed in 1998 and those who become widows after that date can re-marry and keep their pensions and financial independence.

There is an important health issue here: too many older people live alone and lonely when they could be living in a mutually beneficial relationship, without loss of income, caring for each other.

Demographics and working practices have changed and we can no longer expect or wish our working men and women to look after elderly parents. Care homes have had a bad press, so, Mr Cameron, be compassionate on widows (and widowers) and remove all pension clauses which withdraw government pensions on re-marriage. Surely we have a right not to be penalised for following our hearts?

Angela Ball

Swansea

Sir, I will not have a problem getting equality with my husband’s army pension. He served in Northern Ireland three times, Cyprus during the troubles, the Malay Peninsula and Borneo over 12 years. I will get half of what he gets — nothing.

Pat Short

Godshill, Isle of Wight

Scots have a greater concern for social justice and fairness than Conservative English politicians give them credit for

Sir, As an Englishman living in Scotland, I believe that the focus of the referendum campaign is now on fairness and social justice, rather than on whether or not it is affordable for Scotland to go it alone.

Scotland is a left-of-centre country with only one Tory MP, and measures to make poor and disabled people poorer, while simultaneously making rich people richer are not appreciated.

The so-called bedroom tax, for example, is anathema to most Scots. It is causing hardship because there are no one or two-bedroom properties for people to move to. Such an ill-thought through tax should now be rescinded. If not, David Cameron and George Osborne can expect a Yes vote in the referendum, and it will be largely their fault.

Ralph Ward

Helensburgh, Dunbartonshire.

Medium and small businesses are going to start the huge task of enrolling their employees into pension schemes

Sir, Since October 2012 large employers have enrolled more than three million people into pension saving, often for the first time. From April to July around 25,000 medium-sized employers will start automatic enrolment of their staff, and
hundreds of thousands of small businesses after that.

Finding a workplace pension, communicating the requirements to staff and ensuring the right workers are enrolled are complicated tasks, and may take longer than employers think.

We’ve campaigned to reduce the administrative burdens of automatic enrolment and will work to support our members as they prepare for this challenge. They will also require clear and simple guidance on how to comply from government and the pensions regulator.

Help is available, but the time for small and medium-sized employers to act is now.

Adam Marshall, BCC

Neil Carberry, CBI

Tim Thomas, EEF

Alex Jackman, FPB

Mike Cherry, FSB

Malcolm Small, IoD

The former culture secretary may have blotted her copybook but one reader admires her stance on single-sex marriage

Sir, I shall always be grateful to Maria Miller for steering the Single Sex Marriage Bill through the Commons. I hope her successor will be equally determined when putting in place the arrangements which will enable the tens of thousands of us in civil partnerships to convert to full marriages, should we so wish. A credible explanation for the delay would also be appreciated.

Milo Kerr

Newnham, Glos

Telegraph:

SIR – I was sitting in a Washington, Connecticut, farmhouse eating chickpea salad on the eve of a family funeral the Friday before last, when the iPhone started pinging like a Chinese satellite.

Everyone I have ever known was texting me to tell me that Nigel (the People’s Schnauzer) Farage had blamed me for single-handedly forcing the youth of Britain to waste their time at university.

I cannot, like the eponymous George of the town I was in, tell a lie. I spoke those words in an advertisement for a telephone company. I will die with those words engraved on my dialling digit. “Lipman cut off in her prime!” will headline my obituary.

Having spent so long in politics, Mr Farage finds himself unable to differentiate between fact and fantasy. It was the Blair government which preached “ologies” for every sixth former and, to that end, elevated every technical college to university status – then increased tuition fees. Jonathan Swift, where are you when we need you?

Mr Farage himself, like me, avoided university. It’s not too late for him to enroll in a soft media studies degree and change careers to become a fully-fledged comic.

Since he must be the first senior politician in the history of first world nations to regard education as a bad thing, he is well on the way to a place on Mock the Week.

Maureen Lipman
New York

SIR – I am staggered that Islington council is to investigate itself about the child abuse scandal 30 years ago.

I remember the campaign that the London Evening Standard ran, and the criticism it received from Islington council, led by Margaret Hodge. The Standard revealed that many of the council’s childrens’ homes were staffed by paedophiles, who were protected by Left-wing politicians.

It was bad enough that Mrs. Hodge was Minister for Children in Tony Blair’s government, but for her son-in-law to investigate events that happened during her leadership is beyond belief. It is hardly surprising that she wants the press to be regulated.

Victor Garston
London NW11

Climate change

SIR – Elizabeth Simpson is undoubtedly right to infer that natural climate change alone was to blame for the melting of the ice from the last Ice Age.

However, that does not necessarily mean that man’s modern atmospheric pollution is not contributing to current global warming even though scientists cannot yet prove it beyond doubt. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

Bruce Denness
Whitwell, Isle of Wight

SIR – If Christopher Booker had been with me in Northern India last autumn, he would have experienced the deep concern, expressed by many ordinary people, that climate change is indeed happening at an alarming rate, and is undeniably our fault.

The monsoon in India carried on for an additional month last year, for the first time. What happened this winter in the South-West of England is nothing compared to what other communities across the world are suffering.

Melanie Oxley
London SW4

SIR – Steve Willis misses the point of Dr Rowan Williams’ contention that “the rich West is ruining our planet”.

Criticising Dr Williams, he cites modern inventions that have benefited the human race. But the human race is not the planet. Regardless of all the discoveries, there are too many people and still not enough food.

Chris Harding
Parkstone, Dorset

Farage on the telly

SIR – The format for televised debates between party leaders before the next general election, will not be decided by David Cameron or Ed Miliband, or indeed the people, but by the broadcasters.

Where is the interest in predictable debates between the main party leaders whose policies don’t differ very much?

Articulate views from Nigel Farage against the political consensus are a “must-have” for broadcasters seeking a wide audience.

David Saunders
Sidmouth, Devon

More than a mile

SIR – If John Barrell actually checked the distance that Roger Bannister ran by measuring six inches from the edge of the track, then it was wrong and not in compliance with the rules as they were in 1954. In order to avoid tripping over the raised inside curb, it was deemed that the athlete would run one foot from the curb and 8 inches from the line in all other lanes.

Thus, if the track measured the distance of one lap as 440 yards at six inches in, it would have measured more at 12 inches in, which meant that Bannister ran more than a mile.

Ivor Arnold
Barry, Glamorgan

Mock dogfight

SIR – Your article about Mick Mannock, the flying ace, is accompanied by a well-known photograph of Fokkers and SE5as mixed up in air combat.

This photo was supposedly produced with many others by Wesley Archer of New York, who had flown in the RAF in 1917-18.

The rights to the photographs (supposedly a sensational discovery) were sold in 1932 to the Illustrated London News for a very large sum, and published with an anonymous “war diary” as Death in the Air. But both the photos and the journal were not considered genuine by most wartime pilots.

In 1984 two American researchers from the American National Aerospace Museum investigated the photographs and uncovered a fascinating story, including snapshots of little wooden model aeroplanes being made and arranged for photography.

The photographs were concluded to be one of the great frauds of aviation history.

Mark Ordish
Charlton Marshall, Dorset

Venetian request

SIR – As plenipotentiary minister of foreign affairs of the Republic of Venice, I have been charged with expressing fraternity and friendship to the Italian people and asking the Italian government, as an act of good will, to return the Palazzo Venezia, built five centuries ago in Rome as the Embassy of the Republic of Venice.

This act will be considered the beginning of a good relationship between our states, as they enjoyed in past centuries.

Giovanni dalla Valle
Tonbridge, Kent

Martin McGuinness at the Windsor feast

SIR – It is wonderful news that the Irish president was able to make a state visit to this country, but what a shame for the families of victims of murder by terrorists during the Troubles that the banquet at Windsor Castle, which should have been a joyous occasion to celebrate the new-found friendship between our two countries, was blighted by a spectre at the feast.

If Martin McGuinness had any sense of shame he would have declined his invitation and stayed at home.

Ted Shorter
Hildenborough, Kent

SIR – There is a long line of people regarded at one time as terrorists and subversives by the British government, and then subsequently accepted as legitimate leaders.

Mahatma Gandhi, Jomo Kenyatta, Archbishop Makarios and Kenneth Kaunda come to mind. Perhaps the atrocities committed in Northern Ireland and mainland Britain are too recent and too close to home to allow us to be objective, but history will probably add Mr McGuinness to the list.

John Gibson
Standlake, Oxfordshire

Dawlish restored

SIR – It was wonderful to see the West Country train service restored recently.

I think Isambard Kingdom Brunel would have been pleased to know that we still have some excellent civil and mechanical engineers today.

John Cobb
Glasgow

Symmetrical hours

SIR – Further to Frankie Blend’s remarks on British Summer Time, it was only our lopsided nine to five working day (three hours of morning, five of afternoon) that created the demand for “daylight saving” in the first place.

If standard working hours were symmetrical around noon (ie. eight to four), GMT would automatically “save” daylight equally all the year round.

Year-round GMT would also have the advantage of contravening EU rules – a meritorious action in itself.

Robert Gibson
Windermere, Westmorland

Good for nothing

SIR – When did it become acceptable to use the reply “I’m good, thank you” when asked if you would like another drink?

The first time I heard it I innocently said, “I didn’t ask about your morals, just if you wanted another drink”.

I received a blank look.

Stephen Cole
London W5

SIR – Is it any wonder that the average voter is so disillusioned with politics, when sleaze is obviously alive and thriving within the political arena, as the Maria Miller expenses scandal has proved?

As a lifelong Conservative voter, I find it even more sad that David Cameron is so far removed from everyday life and public opinion that he openly supported someone whose graceless and arrogant “apology” to Parliament rendered the word virtually meaningless.

We need a leader who can differentiate between soundbites and sincerity.

Roger Swain
Farnsfield, Nottinghamshire

Related Articles

SIR – Paying MPs a salary increase via expenses, in the hope that this could mitigate a public outcry, might have seemed a good idea when it was first introduced, but in the end it has been a failure for everyone – not least for the politicians themselves, who have suffered a huge loss of popularity and respect.

It is time to increase all MPs’ salaries adequately and eliminate the expenses system altogether. Give them Oyster cards and rail passes and let them pay their own way for all other expenses. Then they can indulge in as many duck houses as they please.

We need transparency once and for all.

Corina J Poore
London SE14

SIR – Before becoming an MP, Maria Miller was a respectable married woman, with three children, holding down a responsible job, married to a City professional, leading a very comfortable life and representing the very essence of probity.

However, on being elected an MP, she appears to have cast all of this aside by declaring her marital home of some 10 years, where she, her husband, children, cat and even her parents lived, to be her second home for expenses purposes, and her rented Basingstoke cottage, where nobody lived, to be her primary residence.

It would appear that a cloud of venality sinks over the head of so many of our MPs when they are elected, causing them to lose all sense of right and wrong. Then they wonder why the voters are outraged at their actions and greed. Mrs Miller has lost her post and her reputation; Mr Cameron, the voters’ trust; and the Conservatives, possibly, the next election.

Michael Edwards
Haslemere, Surrey

SIR – You report that the energy bill for one year at Maria Miller’s “second home” was £3,700. Had Mrs Miller had a smart meter installed, it would have been possible to determine her usage on a day-by-day, hour-by-hour basis, thus providing more concrete evidence of occupancy.

I am opposed in principle to the roll-out of smart meters because they are a massive cost to the consumer and of benefit to the energy companies alone.

They also now have an unfortunate “Big Brother” undertone. Despite this, they would undoubtedly be useful if installed in the homes (first and second) of all MPs.

J R Ball
Hale, Lancashire

SIR – I was most surprised, during the aftermath of the Maria Miller affair, that the following old parliamentary clichés were not trotted out: that lessons had been learnt from the episode, that we should now draw a line under it, that we should now move on and, in so doing, achieve “closure” on the whole matter. Have these phrases been binned? I pray so.

Ron Kirby
Dorchester, Dorset

SIR – It is a shame that MPs don’t have an easily digestible code of conduct similar to the Army: “selfless commitment” and “integrity” come to mind.

Col S J Oxlade (retd)
Sutton Veny, Wiltshire

SIR – Why do we need a Department of Culture, Media and Sport anyway? Why can’t culture, media and sport just be left to get on with it?

Graham Read
Esher, Surrey

Irish Times:

Sir, – It was uplifting to see how well the heads of state of Ireland and the United Kingdom, respectively, embraced Ireland’s first state visit to the United Kingdom. President of Ireland Michael D Higgins fulfilled his role with statesmanlike aplomb, while Queen Elizabeth demonstrated a generosity of spirit, an emotional intelligence and a willingness to appreciate Irish history.

The visit was, as you pointed out in your editorial (“Sovereign and equal”, April 10th), “first and foremost a proper acknowledgement by the British state of our standing as equals in the community of nations”.

For this we need to be thankful, first and foremost, to the patriots whose vision made sovereign Ireland a reality in 1922, and whose sacrifices (including at Easter 1916, the 98th anniversary of which will be celebrated in a matter of days), lest we forget, made it possible for Ireland today to hold her head high on state visits to other nations.Yours, etc,

JOHN B REID,

Knapton Road,

Monkstown,

Co Dublin

Sir, – John Draper (Letters, April 12th) speaking of the “dubious narrative” of the Irish in Britain suffering discrimination in the 1960s, claimed the “No Blacks No Dogs No Irish” signs were mythical phrases coined only in the late 1980s. Mr Draper also claimed that anti-immigrant prejudice did not affect the Irish “because they had white skin”.

In 1959 I went to Britain to seek work, found it and remained in London for many happy years and never suffered discrimination in the workplace or socially for that matter. However, in terms of sourcing accommodation it was different. Contrary to Mr Draper’s view that racism against the Irish and blacks in the area of renting rooms was fictitious, I know that it was not, as I was a victim. I was refused accommodation despite having “white skin”. This refusal was on the basis of my accent.

It was not unusual to see signs in shop windows advertising rooms to let which read “No Blacks or Irish”. It may not have been a very widespread practice but it certainly was there. Conversely, some rooms to let ads specified a willingness to accept Irish. These were usually, but not always, from Irish landlords. Yours, etc ,

TOM COOPER ,

Templeville Road,

Templeogue,

Dublin 6W

Sir, – Declan Kiberd beautifully sums up our relationship with England by the phrase “the narcissism of small differences”. My father was a raging nationalist. At the same time his parents made huge sacrifices in the early 1950s to get him an education to make him a part of the new independent Ireland. He eventually became a successful businessman in that new Ireland and as a result of that success ended up living in London, listed on the London stock exchange and rubbing shoulders with many a cool dude. He was delighted. He had met the Brits on their own turf, and lo and behold he realised he had more in common with them than he thought.

I reflect on this as I read this article and look at the picture of his first cousin (Garry Hynes) at the banquet in Windsor Castle. Michael Whelan (RIP) wouldn’t you be proud! Yours, etc,

MAEVE MARTIN,

Airmount Cottage,

Clonmel,

CoTipperary

Sir, – Manus O’Riordan (Letters, April 12th) refers to Myles Dungan as saying that the “Irish” Guards were formed shortly after the South African War. In fact they were formed on April 1st, 1900, to commemorate the Irishmen who were mauled by the Boers at Colenso on December 15th, 1899.

In that engagement MacBride’s Irish Brigade fought against them. Some of that brigade fought until the end of the war, on May 31st, 1902 ,and were honoured as “bitter-enders” by their Boer allies by being awarded the Dekoratie voor Troue Diens (Decoration for Faithful Service). Yours, etc.

BRIAN P O CINNEIDE,

Durban,

South Africa

Sir, – I note that Manus O’Riordan (Letters, April 12th), believes John MacBride to have fought on the “anti-imperialist“side in the Boer War. Is this how the Irish left characterises Oom (Uncle) Paul Kruger, his Bible, and the tenets of the Dutch Reformed Chuch ? Perhaps there are other points of confluence. It is well documented that Oom Paul believed the world to be flat. Yours, etc,

ENDA HARDIMAN

Kowloon,

Hong Kong

Sir, — I watched the Ceiliuradh concert at the Royal Albert Hall with great admiration, but find that I am left with a certain regret. I have noted that a whole cohort of Irish musicians were not represented at all – these are the exponents of classical music. Many of these brought great distinction to the British orchestras and opera companies in which they spent their careers, and many others brought back to Ireland their knowledge and expertise. There has been much emphasis during President Higgins’s visit on honouring and remembering those who have forged links between Ireland and Britain. I feel that the cultural links in the field of classical music have been ignored, and a golden opportunity to showcase some of our wonderful opera singers and instrumentalists has been lost. Yours, etc,

GILLIAN SMITH,

Upper Beechwood Avenue,

Ranelagh,

Dublin 6

Sir, Would President Higgins look me in the eye and tell me he will be supporting England in the World Cup? If so, he will be ploughing a lonely furrow. I know of no Irishman (or Welshman or Scot for that matter) who will be doing the same. For goodness sake, even within England there are many who would fail the Tebbit cricket test and secretly want England to fail. They will not be disappointed. England have little chance of progressing to the later stages and absolutely no chance of winning. Many thanks for your support Mr President, but you’re on your own on this one. Yours, etc,

FRANK GREANEY,

Lonsdale Road,

Liverpool L373HF

Sir, – In his response to Eamonn McCann’s column on US support of Israel, Dermot Meleady (April 12th) asserts that the term “occupied territories” is “tendentious” and that “disputed territories” is more appropriate. This again confirms his government’s contempt for the International Court of Justice and the UN, which have stated repeatedly that the West Bank is under illegal occupation.

He then goes on to refer to the previous failed attempts at peace talks, suggesting that the failure was down to Palestinian intransigence with regard to recognition of Israel as the Jewish homeland. He conveniently forgets that one the main reasons for failure is the expanding sprawl of illegal settlements on the West Bank which make the prospect of a two-state solution increasingly untenable.

He tries to sell a fallacy that these talks are between two parties on an equal footing. Tell that to the Palestinian population, who continue to be subjected to evictions, harassment and humiliation. A bit more honesty from Israeli spokespersons could help form the basis for more constructive talks but doublespeak is more their strong point. Yours, etc,

BARRY WALSH,

Linden Avenue,

Blackrock,

Cork

Sir, – Mr Meleady’s reference to “disputed territories” is an unsubtle attempt to suggest some equivalence of claim, where none exists, to the occupied Palestinian lands – lands which are external to Israel’s legal 1967 borders, and which have been occupied by Israel’s military forces.

There is not a single other country in the world – not even the USA – which regards these occupied lands as “disputed”. The unmistakable reality is that these occupied parts of Palestine may only be regarded as “disputed” in the same manner that occupied parts of Czechoslovakia and Poland were “disputed” in 1938/9. Yours, etc.

MAURICE KING,

Ballycocksuist,

Inistioge,

Co. Kilkenny

Sir, – Dermot Meleady claims that Israel “has always regarded the term ‘disputed territories’ as more accurate than the tendentious ‘occupied territories’ when referring to the historic heartland of the Jewish nation, Judea and Samaria (also known inaccurately as ‘the West Bank’)”.

Given its source in the Israeli embassy, that need hardly surprise; but I hope the “paper of record” will not, just yet, accept that the geographical accuracy of appellations be trumped by atavistic tribal/folkloric labels, and resort to using the resurrected biblical propaganda of a partisan faction as its benchmark of what constitutes historical scholarship.

The romantic/sentimental use of “heartland” betrays the origins of this pernicious 19th century ideologising of abstracted ideals of manufactured nationhood, which typically is accompanied by its corrollary, militarism and dispossession of those relegated as extraneous to the imagined and idealised nation. Readers of history for its educational, rather than its selective propaganda functions, will recognise the familiar tragic pattern. The edifice of factoid tendentiousness, I’m afraid, which Mr Meleady erects upon this prefabricated tribal/sectarian ideological confection is worthy of its presumptuous foundations.

He might be better reading his biblical text for its literary wisdom rather than its historical expedience to his political masters’ agendas of hegemonic aggrandisement. Yours, etc,

DAMIEN FLINTER,

Headford,

Co Galway

Sir, – I couldn’t agree more with Tom O’Dowd (Letters, April 10th) on the NHS in Britain. Surely we can try to emulate its achievements. Most Irish health professionals who have worked outside Ireland have chosen to work in that system. Thousands of Irish emigrants and their families have benefited from it. I worked in Britain in the 1980s and I did not have to hesitate before consulting a doctor while there. I knew that no matter what my circumstances I would be seen and treated.

Perhaps we do not need to look to the Netherlands or Belgium or the USA for models of health insurance. Our nearest neighbours have a health service that British people can be justly proud of, despite its critics. Why not forget about making insurance companies rich? Let us fund our universal health care from our tax. Let everybody pay according to their means and let the only criteria for use be medical need. Yours, etc,

PHILIP MORIARTY,

Shanowen Avenue,

Dublin 9

Sir, – I was dismayed to read Garrett Ledwith’s letter (April 11th) and his comments regarding cyclists’ and car drivers’ behaviour in Dublin. Having seen cyclists merrily break red lights while holding just one hand on the handlebar, or cross lanes of traffic by going in between lines of cars while shouting cheerily to their friends, I can only say that Mr Ledwith’s experience does not coincide with mine.

During the above instances the watching motorists were holding their breath and praying nothing was going to happen to the fools. And yes, the motorists were obeying the lights.

Motorists are no saints. They break red lights too, but usually only when it is safe to do so. Motorists have more to lose than cyclists — they pay insurance, road tax and maintenance costs. The Garda usually ticket the motorist, not the cyclist. Cyclists don’t pay the first two and I often wonder when I am driving at night if some of them even buy lamps. Cyclists are of course more vulnerable than motorists to accident and injury but you wouldn’t think so to see some of their behaviour at junctions – or to listen to some of their defenders in the media. Cycling in the cities is a dangerous practice, cycle lanes are not always available — there is a financial crisis after all — and cyclists should keep that in mind.

As for bus lanes, it’s about time Dublin City Council had a proper review of the traffic volume each bus lane has. We have all seen bus lanes with no traffic on them while the adjoining lane was full. The placing of these lanes should also be reconsidered — if there’s a more wasteful bus lane than the one at the junction of George’s Street and Dame Street in Dublin I have yet to see it. Traffic other than buses and taxis are forced into a diversion which must cost them 10-15 minutes extra time at rush hour, thereby increasing pollution and expense for all concerned. Yours, etc,

LIAM COOKE,

Greencastle Avenue,

Coolock,

Dublin 17

Sir, – I was surprised that Rev Patrick Burke (Letters, April 12th) interpreted my suggestion that all remarks that give offence to human beings be removed from the Bible (April 11th) as meaning that this would be likely to lead to my editing the Good Book to the point where nothing remained but “a set of elegant covers with a single blank page between them”.

Witty as this is on a superficial level, it is unworthy of a man of the cloth to suggest that a fellow Christian might want to completely destroy the Bible just because he believed that its many racist, sexist and homophobic remarks be edited out.

Our proposed changes to the Constitution, with a view to removing racism, sexism and homophobia from it, are not likely to leave us with a document of just one blank page between two elegant covers.

Why must religious people always go to extremes? I do not suggest that the baby be thrown out with the bathwater, but rather that the baby be given a good hot shower to remove the dirty fingerprints which some of his handlers have left upon him in their writings. Yours, etc,

DECLAN KELLY,

Whitechurch Road,

Rathfarnham,

Dublin 14

Sir, – How odd that we swear on a book which contains the words, reputed to have been said by Jesus: “You have heard that it was said to those of ancient times, ‘You shall not swear falsely …’ But I say to you, do not swear at all, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God, or by the earth, for it is his footstool, or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. … Let your word be ‘Yes, Yes’ or ‘No, No’; anything more than this comes from the evil one.” (Matthew 5:33-37). Yours, etc,

(REVD) HILARY

WAKEMAN,

Schull,

Co Cork

Sir, – Declan Kelly (April 11th) is right in saying that “the Bible was made for man and not man for the Bible”. But that does not mean we should censor it or remove verses. It is there to help people in their relationships, not to help them to be more religious or to spot the speck in someone else’s eye (Matthew 7:3-5). James describes it as a mirror (James 1:23-25) which shows what is in a person’s own heart. If we are offended it is usually because there is something there we need to get rid of. Yours, etc,

SEAMUS O’CALLATHAN,

Bullock Park,

Carlow

Sir, – May I offer a reply to the question asked in the title of Paddy Agnew’s article (April 12th), “Tainted Saint?”. In his lifetime, Pope John Paul was a tireless disciple of Jesus Christ. For 27 years as pope, he inspired millions with the message of God’s love for humanity and the inherent dignity of the human person.

Every canonised saint was “tainted” by some (or numerous) mistakes, misjudgements or imperfections . The very first pope, Saint Peter, even denied Christ. Someone once described a true saint as “a sinner who never gives up”, not a kind of spiritual superman or superwoman. John Paul was not a perfect human being who never made a mistake. Yet his life of real discipleship shows him to be most worthy of the title saint. Perhaps what is really “tainted” is our limited human judgement. Your, etc,

JOHN GORMLEY,

Ardeevin Avenue,

Lucan,

Co Dublin

Sir, – The blame game has started on the fallout from the Lissadel court case and the enormous legal costs involved, as evidenced by your article in Saturday’s Weekend Review . It needs to be asked if there is a better way of determining whether or not a traditional access route is a public right of way. Two similar court cases have been taken in Glencree, Co Wicklow: again with huge legal costs. Keep Ireland Open believes the only answer is legislation which would provide clear-cut criteria for designation of traditional walkways. A period of years – perhaps seven – of unhindered access should be the criterion. Alternatively, we could adopt the system of Freedom to Roam which obtains in Scotland and the Scandanavian countries.

Ireland is out of line with virtually all European countries in failing to provide certainty about where we can walk. This is major turnoff for our visitors and denies our own people the basic human right of reasonable access to our countryside. Yours, etc,

ROGER GARLAND,

Chairman,

Keep Ireland Open,

Butterfield Drive,

Dublin 14

Sir, – Your writer (“Good Week Bad Week”, April 12th) referred to UK culture secretary Maria Miller’s recent travails and suggested that in Britain wrongly utilised expenses were seen as “career Krypton” . Superman’s home planet was Krypton, yes, but it was the meteoric detritus therefrom, namely Kryptonite, that was the substance that rendered him powerless on planet Earth. As any reader of DC comics (not bought on expenses) knows. Yours, etc,

DON McGUINNESS,

Chelmsford Close,

Ranelagh,

Dublin

Irish Independent:

Letters to the Editor – Published 14 April 2014 02:30 AM

This year is the 100th anniversary of the start of World War I and the rights and wrongs will again be debated. There are thousands of war cemeteries and those who have visited them to pay their respects testify to the humbling feeling on seeing thousands of small white crosses and simple headstones in row upon row. It leaves a strong impression.

Also in this section

Supporting our food producers

Focus on gender misses vital point

A shared bond

There were a huge number of World War I memorials erected through the 1920s and 1930s, with about 176,000 in France. It shows the social and emotional impact of the Great War.

It has been said that one of the striking features of northern France is the number of small and large World War I cemeteries. One of these is dedicated to the Australian soldiers who died at the Battle of Fromelles, and the inscription reads: “In honour of the 410 unknown Australian soldiers here buried, who were among the 1,299 officers, non-commissioned officers and men of the Australian Imperial Force, killed in the attack on Fromelles, July 19 and 20, 1916.”

Cork’s lord mayor, Cllr Catherine Clancy, visited one of the largest cemeteries, Tyne Cot, near Passendale in Belgium, where 11,954 are buried, of whom 8,367 are unknown. She saw a headstone erected by Cork parents to their 20-year-old son. A well-known inscription on another headstone there is to Second Lieutenant Arthur Conway Young and reads, “Sacrificed to the fallacy/That war can end war”.

It was said at its end, in 1918, that it was the war to end all wars. But World War II followed 21 years later, with millions to die once again.

War is never good news and rarely one of glory. I think that the dead soldiers, and civilians too, who lost their lives from many countries in World War I deserve to be remembered on this 100th anniversary, because of the horrors they endured.

They were shot, machine-gunned, bayoneted and gassed to death from poison gas wafting across the fields as well as killed by projectile shells and grenades. It was a sad and horrific waste of lives.

Mary Sullivan, College Road, Cork

VISIT OF THE RISING QUEEN

I still remember that old nursery rhyme about the feline royal visit:

“Pussycat, Pussycat, where have you been.

I’ve been to London to look at the queen.”

Following last week’s presidential visit, perhaps an updated version could read:

“President, president, where have you been.

I’ve been to London to visit the queen.

Not by grubby old mailboat but by government jet.

Got there in jig-time, like a west Clare half-set.

We took amhrans, bodhrans, singers and bands.

Watched McG and HR smile and shake hands.

Tin whistles, banjos, fiddles and flutes.

With Sabina’s new dresses and my tailor-made suits.

So, President please, when will we see the queen.

She’ll be back for ‘The Rising’ in 2016.”

Sean Kelly, Tramore, Co Waterford

FINALE CONCERT PERFECTLY PITCHED

I refer to Patrick Cooney’s letter ‘Finale a wasted opportunity’ (Irish Independent, April 12). Mr Cooney expresses his disappointment in the concert at the Royal Albert Hall to mark the end of President Higgins’s visit to Britain, as he (Mr Cooney) was expecting a cavalcade of iconic stellar musical stars of Irish heritage that were born and raised in the UK. While it sounds very appealing, the event would then have been a concert of rock stars and not a celebration of Irish culture.

The point of the finale, it seemed, was not to celebrate individual stars or celebrities, but rather to exemplify, in a collaborative way, the uniqueness of our Irish culture – to show something of what it is that keeps the spirit of Ireland flowing in the veins of Irish people living outside of Ireland.

The artists who performed at the finale did a sterling job in epitomising our language, music and literature. I believe the tone of the overall concert was pitched perfectly for the occasion.

As they say, it’s impossible to please all the people all of the time.

Rosemary Watters, Greystones, Co Wicklow

MCILROY’S OLYMPIAN BAD LUCK

The luck of the Irish seems to have deserted poor Rory McIlroy ever since he agonised over whether he should represent Ireland or Britain at the next Olympics.

Seamus McLoughlin, Keshcarrigan, Co Leitrim

POOLING OUR HOOP DREAMS

In a recent letter, K Nolan reacted to our President saying that he would support England in the World Cup, with an “out out out”. The fact is that thousands of people here support Arsenal, Liverpool, Manchester United and so on with a passion, but don’t tend to transfer that support to the England side which, invariably, contains players from these and other teams.

Indeed, when Shamrock Rovers take on Liverpool in a forthcoming friendly there will doubtless be a ‘small pocket’ of circa 15,000 urging on the “Pool”, while our League of Ireland sides continue to go through the ‘Hoops’ in an effort to stay afloat.

Tom Gilsenan, Beaumont, Dublin

EU’S LACK OF MORAL COURAGE

It was only a matter of time before Vladimir Putin turned his attention to Ukraine’s gas supply as the next step in his westward-focused ambitions. When he annexed Crimea the best response the West could come up with was to impose token sanctions on a few Russians.

Mr Putin must have been relieved and emboldened by this half-hearted response. Of course, the EU is playing a higher-stakes game than the US due to its overdependence on Russian gas.

In those circumstances some would suggest that the EU is being pragmatic. However, I believe it has betrayed a lack of moral courage within the EU. The West is currently sitting on its hands while unrest is being fermented in the east of Ukraine by an insidious influence and as Russia continues to up the ante with its threat to the gas supply. Time will judge us on how we responded to this developing crisis.

John Bellow, Dunleer, Co Louth

IT’S TIME TO CONSIDER FRACKING

Much has been written over the past weeks on the importance of competitiveness in Irish industry and the public service. Central to this are energy prices. Both domestic and industrial electricity prices in Ireland are among the highest in the EU. Denmark and Germany who have gone furthest in utilising renewables have the highest electricity prices.

The price of energy in the form of gas is three times higher in Europe than in the US today, while electricity is 50pc higher. Shale gas in the United States has transformed both its competitiveness and its confidence.

Europe has more and more green taxes and, apart from France with the lowest electricity prices, only a small amount of electricity is nuclear and there seems to be no great impetus to exploit shale gas. In order to increase competitiveness, it is clear that Europe must go either the nuclear or fracking routes, or ideally both. Time is not on our side.

Michael J Hynes, Knocknacarra, Co Galway

Irish Independent


Much better

$
0
0

15 April2014Much better

I go all the way around the park listening to the Men from the Ministry: Our heroes have accidentally invented a new type of battleshipPriceless

Mary in hospital brief visit get beated at Scrabble

Scrabbletoday, Mary wins by thirty three points Perhaps Marywill win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Molly Lamb Bobak – obituary

Molly Lamb Bobak was a Canadian war artist who captured the dignity of women both on the home-front and with the troops in Europe

Molly Lamb Bobak at work during the war

Molly Lamb Bobak at work during the war

8:08PM BST 13 Apr 2014

CommentsComment

Molly Lamb Bobak, who has died aged 94, was one of the last surviving official war artists to have served in the Allied forces during the Second World War.

A Canadian painter, sketcher and watercolourist, her eye for the dignity and determination displayed by women in the Army allowed her to capture both the uncertainties of life on the home front and the turmoil behind the front lines in Europe.

After the war her talents, and considerable empathy, led to teaching positions in many of Canada’s leading art institutions, while her personal work turned to verdant watercolours, eerie etchings and what would become a celebrated series of oils in which Lowry-like crowds surge ominously.

Molly Lamb (known professionally as Molly Lamb Bobak) was born on February 25 1920 on Lulu Island outside Vancouver, British Columbia, into an unconventional and resolutely artistic household. Her mother, Mary Williams, was housekeeper to Molly’s father, Harold Mortimer-Lamb, an art critic. Molly was brought up living in an extended, yet inclusive, family unit which included Mortimer-Lamb’s wife and their children. Growing up, she was introduced to some of Canada’s most prominent artists — her father was a friend and patron to members of the Group of Seven, a collective of landscape painters who grappled with Canada’s wild vistas, much as the Scottish Colourists and the St Ives set had in Britain.

Molly Lamb studied at the Vancouver School of Art (1938-41) and soon found that she was drawn to the bold tones favoured by Matisse and Cézanne. In 1942 she enlisted in the Canadian Women’s Army Corp (CWAC) but it took three years of service before she was made an official Canadian war artist.

Initially she waited tables in the mess before being sent for basic training in Alberta. “That’s when I started doing my diary, an illustrated diary of what it was like to be in the Canadian Women’s Army Corp,” she recalled in 2012. “Being the first female war artist, there were nine men I think in all the services, I think that was a great thing to have happened to me. I know the Army didn’t want women in it in those days.”

Private Roy, Canadian Women’s Army Corps by Molly Lamb Bobak

One of her earliest works was a caricature in which she portrayed herself striding down a street with a box of Canadian beer jemmied under her army overcoat. In Halifax, Nova Scotia, she produced portraits of volunteers, such as Private Roy, a black woman in the ranks. Once overseas, however, she focused on the trials and tribulations of CWAC troops living and working on the move in Holland, giving a valuable visual account of an often forgotten wartime service.

In London, capturing the victory celebrations, she was placed into a military studio, where she was allotted a workspace with another Canadian war artist, Bruno Bobak.

“I didn’t like that much,” recalled Bruno years later, “so I built a barrier of crates down the middle and told her, ‘I’m painting on my side, you paint on your side’. Well, eventually the wall came down.” The couple married in 1945.

On the couple’s return to Canada, Molly Lamb Bobak would prove to be as comfortable teaching as she was painting. She taught at the Vancouver School of Art (1947-60), the Vancouver Art Gallery (1954-58) and the University of British Columbia (1958-60). In the early Sixties she moved with her family to Fredericton, New Brunswick, where her husband became artist-in-residence at the University of New Brunswick.

She was struck by the elemental charms of the “City of Stately Elms” and Canada’s north-eastern seaboard, particularly in the leaf-strewn autumn. “I moved here from out west, and my mother told me how beautiful it was. But it knocked me out when I first came here. It’s wonderful,” she recalled. New glacial qualities emerged in her compositions (“the clarity of the air and the shadows in winter – and no industry,” said one gallery owner).

The School Yard by Molly Lamb Bobak

The most striking theme to emerge from her post-war painting was a fascination for gatherings. “It’s about the movement of something, like crowds and colour,” she said. Fairgrounds, town hall meetings, ski races and sailing regattas all became stages for a horde of figures. In a vibrant palette of primary colours, they caught the mystery of people moving en masse.

She also painted the orange trees, maples and geraniums — with their intense, hot hues — which surrounded the couple’s yellow 1920s house, a home that one visitor described as “an eccentric haven of olde worlde gentility, a touch of the Brontës on the Rhine”.

Here, Molly and Bruno worked in separate studios at opposite ends of the house. “You invent your own colour over the years and you invent your own space and your own feelings and that’s what makes painters different,” she said of their disparate styles. Molly Lamb Bobak taught at the University of New Brunswick Art Centre (1960-77) and, for the rest of her life, sketched, etched and painted the region’s big skies, snowy streets, colonial residences and river shores.

All the while, she attempted to look beneath the city’s still waters. “It’s the undercover things in Fredericton that make it a very special place,” she noted. “There’s lots going on but it’s all hidden.”

Molly Lamb Bobak was elected to the Royal Canadian Academy of Arts in 1973 and presented, along with husband, with the Order of Canada in 1995.

Her husband died in 2012, and she is survived by their son and daughter.

Molly Lamb Bobak, born February 25 1920, died March 2 2014

Guardian:

The current issue of the London Review of Books carries an important article by Seymour Hersh, based on extensive interviews with intelligence staff, in which he argues powerfully that the chemical weapons attacks in Syria, culminating in that of 21 August in which over 1,000 people died, were carried out not by the government but by the opposition. This is confirmed by analytical tests conducted by Porton Down which showed that the gas used in the attacks could not have come from Syrian government stocks.

Further, Hersh asserts, with evidence, that the gas attacks were carried out by Syrian opposition forces in concert with the Turkish government in order to throw blame on the Assad regime, thus crossing Obama’s “red line” and triggering massive strikes by the US and its allies on Syrian government forces and the country’s infrastructure. This is all the more concerning given the highly dubious nature of many of the opposition forces and their links to extremist factions – the danger, yet again, of our getting into bed with some very unpleasant “friends”.

These are very serious claims and it is surprising that you still make the unqualified statement that “the Assad regime … was suspected of being responsible” (Chemical weapons body not ready to investigate Syrian attack claims, 12 April). At the very least, you should be reporting the doubts about who perpetrated these attacks, given that we could have been very nearly dragged into yet another Middle Eastern war on the back of bogus WMD allegations.
Dr Richard Carter
London

•  Last year you published my letter about how every national newspaper had ignored Seymour Hersh’s exposé of how the Obama administration had “cherry-picked intelligence to justify a strike against Assad” (Letters, 13 December). Confirming Marx’s dictum that “history repeats itself, first as tragedy, then as farce”, Hersh’s new piece in the LRB has once again been blacked out by the press.
Ian Sinclair
London

The suggestion that GCSE results in England will be pegged to the exam results of students in China is misleading (Report, 3 April). It is important that people understand how the new GCSE grading system will work and can have their say on where standards should be set. I urge everyone to take a look at our proposals and let us know their views. We propose matching the new grade 4 to current grade C – to provide a link between old and new – and to align grade 5 to the performance of students in other countries that perform well, where students perform better than our students in international tests. But we are not proposing to hardwire our standards to those in any particular country. Instead, we suggest that we take a broader view, and look at a range of countries that do well. Our research to date suggests this would mean setting the grade 5 boundary in 2017 at about a half to two-thirds of a grade higher than that required for a current grade C.

It seems right to us that our young people should know how their grades compare with those of young people in other countries that are doing well, near and far, but we want to hear what people think.
Glenys Stacey
Chief regulator, Ofqual

Tim Jonze, writing about Dancing Queen in his article on Abba (Thank you for the music, G2, 11 April), refers to the song’s “piano trills (famously ripped off by Elvis Costello for Oliver’s Army)”. It’s unlikely that Mr Costello ripped off the trills in Dancing Queen, because there are no trills in Dancing Queen. There are no trills in Oliver’s Army either. In the Abba song, the piano player plays a downwards glissando in the intro and then has little fills, which are all played in dramatic, noble octaves, reminiscent of Liberace. Not a trill to be heard. Similar octaves do occur in the Costello song.
Steve Beresford
London

• In response to Bill Hawkes (Letters, 10 April) and Mike Hine (Letters, 11 April), here’s a brief analysis of The Winner Takes it All. The “predominant piano theme” is made up of four descents of a G flat major scale from different notes. The first two descents are of five notes and the following two of four notes. May I suggest an editorial, In praise of… the arpeggiated Gimme! Gimme! Gimme!?
Nick Jolliffe
Wrenthorpe, West Yorkshire

•  The descending scale figures in Abba’s song are in both five- and four-note groups. But forget the “bean-counting”. The really affecting moment in the song for me is the little catch in Agnetha’s voice on the words “You’ve come to shake my hand”.
Eric Saltford
Chesterfield, Derbyshire

•  Whether Abba used descending scales, arpeggios or glissandos, could I ask Mike Hine to read Tim Jonze’s G2 article, borrow a copy of Abba Gold, and then tell us if he really believes that Abba wrote only one memorable song?
Dave Garner
Southport, Merseyside

Fiona Millar (School funding – kicked into the long grass again, 8 April) is right to highlight the unfairness of our current funding system for schools. Even allowing for higher area costs and deprivation in London, the gap between most London boroughs and much of the rest of country is far too high, reaching £1,000 per pupil in some cases.

This inequity dates back to the time when local councils set their own funding levels. The disparity only really started to matter 20 years ago when all schools began to be judged against the same national criteria (exam league tables, Ofsted, national curriculum).

Successive governments ducked this issue. John Major’s Conservatives rejected proposals from the Association of School and College Leaders (Secondary Heads Association at that time). In 2002 the Labour government turned down a thoroughly researched proposal for a national fair funding formula, largely because it would have meant being seen to favour the non-Labour parts of the country. This was a great opportunity missed as more money was being put into education at that time and the gap could have been narrowed without those at the top being unduly harmed.

David Laws’ recent announcement of a minor change for 2015-16 falls far short of the major overhaul that is needed, but it is at least the first serious attempt by government to acknowledge the issue and to do something about it. It is to be welcomed as a first step and a model to be refined when the issue is rescued from the long grass.

It is refreshing to hear somebody from a London context admit that resources make a difference. Far too often those of us working outside London are told that “if London can raise standards, so can you”. Of course we can and want to do so, but getting enough resources would help. How about London Challenge funding for all?
Peter Downes
Vice-president, Liberal Democrat Education Association

• While I can only agree with Fiona Millar that more funding for schools is to be welcomed, as a governor of another inner London school I cannot go along so readily with the government’s notion of a “fair” funding formula.

The proposition on which the Department for Education is consulting involves a crude averaging-up which takes no account of the local circumstances on which a needs-based school funding formula should be based. Their proposal benefits rural areas, but not the inner cities. I have no wish to defend the extreme case cited by David Laws of a generously funded Birmingham school with just 3% of children on free school meals, but the multiple disadvantage being tackled by many inner-city schools does need full recognition. Such schools face disproportionate costs if they are to provide a good education for a large number of pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds, or from homes where English is not spoken, and with a high level of family mobility. The multiplier effect of concentrated disadvantage needs to be reflected in any funding formula.

The DfE places undue reliance on postcode-based measures of deprivation. This works well in segregated communities where rich and poor are kept apart in separate postcodes, but in most parts of London we live together as neighbours and our postcode gives little indication of our (lack of) wealth, let alone the education needs of our children. Before they tinker any further with a national funding formula, I would urge the government to commission an independent evidence-based analysis of need and of the efficacy of the indicators on which they propose to rely.
Rob Hull
London

In the midst of continued public hostility to banks in general, it’s worth noting that Lloyds/TSB has wholly funded our work as an independent foundation for 29 years (High time for banks to give something back, 9 April). In that time we have disbursed £330m to more than 42,000 small charitable organisations across England and Wales. This work is largely unheralded, unseen and unrecognised – but last year enabled us to support more than 800 small charities to help a third of a million disadvantaged people achieve positive change in their lives.
Paul Streets
Chief executive, Lloyds Bank Foundation

•  I too experienced months – years – of shock, despair and panic after being unexpectedly dumped at 60, but my experience of online dating was very different from Andrea Gillies’ (How I picked myself up after divorce, Family, 12 April), thanks to Guardian Soulmates. You still have to kiss a lot of frogs before you find a prince, but at least they are leftwing, intellectual, feminist frogs. Find someone who makes you laugh and can complete the cryptic crossword at your pace – or perhaps just a little slower. Job done.
Lindy Hardcastle
Groby, Leicestershire

• ”For Richard Hoggart, humane reading and humane education and humane culture and society should be open to everyone” (Letters, 14 April). Some years ago in Liverpool Reach Out, a project using Open University materials, created a path for adults, mainly working-class women, to get to university. Asked what difference the course was making to their lives, one woman said: “I still read Mills and Boon. But I deconstruct it now.” I guess Hoggart would have been amused. I was.
John Airs
Liverpool

• While former England footballer Danny Mills may be buying into an English Cornish pasty chain (Report, 12 April), the former Irish international Chris Morris actually makes them in Cornwall in his family firm, Morris Cornish Pasties.
Fred Rodgers
London

• The Rough Common Women’s Institute near Canterbury presumably gets on well with the WI at Loose, near Maidstone (Letters, 14 April).
John Hougham
Gravesend

Ian Birrell claims the existence of a ministry of culture does not necessarily reflect the ‘”needs of the nation” (Does British culture really need a minister of fun?, 11 April). I would argue that our standing in the world depends on it.

Virtually every other developed and emerging economy on the planet has a culture ministry, and many governments, including China’s, now place the creative economy, as well as creative education, at the heart of national strategy.

This summer, culture ministers from around the world will meet in Edinburgh for the second time to explore the ways in which we can harness culture to change lives, transform societies, improve well-being and develop economies. The fact that they are coming to the UK to do this shows how this is a conversation that we currently lead.
Graham Sheffield
Director of arts, British Council

•  Ian Birrell reveals that Sajid Javid’s cultural “hinterland” consists largely of Star Trek movies. Leaving aside the inferior quality of the films to the original series, I would suggest that Javid is probably a fan of the Star Trek: Deep Space Nine franchise’s Ferengi race: obsessive free market capitalists who despise culture and emotions other than greed. Coincidentally, they too are entirely bald.
Dr Aidan Byrne
University of Wolverhampton

•  The idea that ministers of culture, health, law, etc should be experts in those areas sounds plausible but doesn’t bear much scrutiny, especially in the case of culture (Unthinkable? Ministers who know their stuff, 12 April). If you want to make a table it’s best to be a carpenter but to run a successful table-making business you need commercial not carpentry skills. Ditto with ministers. A culture secretary needs political and business acumen more than a passion for poetry or theatre and being “knowledgeable about culture” is less important than being a smart political operator. For this reason someone like Sajid Javid, precisely because of his background, is a better choice for culture secretary than, say, Michael Rosen or Mary Beard would be. His role is organisational not educational and if he creates the conditions for better ballet and theatre it doesn’t matter one bit that he personally can’t stand Swan Lake or Last Year in Marienbad.
Anthony Kearney
Lancaster

• The record of Sajid Javid’s predecessors as listed (Writers have no great expectations of Javid, 12 April), in particular the contrast between Tory Jeremy Hunt’s slashing of the arts budget, and the personal, political and financial support for the arts under Labour’s Tessa Jowell and Chris Smith, marks out the fundamental social and political divide between the two parties: ignorance, arrogance, philistinism and hostility to widening participation on the one side; passion for and participation in the arts on the other, and commitment to arts as a human right.
Val Walsh
Liverpool

•  Library users, workers and campaigners across the country will have been amazed by Mark Lawson’s assessment of Ed Vaizey as “a very able minister” (Ejector seat strikes again, G2, 10 April). Under his guidance the aims and values of public library services have been redefined by the DCMS and the Arts Council in such a way that many local authorities are failing to meet the requirements of the 1964 Public Libraries and Museums Act. It is unclear how many of the present ad hoc volunteer arrangements will be sustained and if they are part of a statutory service. Many communities, often those with vulnerable populations, have lost highly valued professionally run services.

The person responsible for drafting the Act, Francis Bennion, has described Mr Vaizey as “disgracefully sloppy” and is of the opinion that severe reductions in public library facilities that were being provided by authorities two or three years ago are “likely to be unlawful”.

In addition, Cilip, the professional body for library and information professionals, has passed a vote of no confidence in the minister.
Bob Usherwood
Emeritus professor, University of Sheffield

• It was right that you included many moving tributes to the late Sue Townsend in Saturday’s Guardian, but a shame that none of them mentioned her tireless campaigning for the public library service. I well remember her passionate speech in defence of libraries at a conference a few years ago. She was particularly incensed that small community libraries, like the one she visited as a child in Leicester, were the target of cuts. As a socialist she understood very well that the closure of libraries is part of a wider assault on the poor, who should learn to make do with bingo and mindless TV instead.
John Clarke
Higham Ferrers, Northamptonshire

Independent:

At last, some reality. A study from the University of East Anglia says that unruly behaviour in schools has been seriously underestimated by official reports. Perhaps this is one of the reasons why we have such a lowly position in the global educational achievement league tables. No matter how inspirational a teacher may be, disruptive elements can create an extremely negative classroom. From my own experience, some people just do not have “it” and seemingly cannot create the correct atmosphere to facilitate learning.

A school must have the correct ethos to support its teachers; this depends in part on the “management team”. Parents also have their part to play in ensuring that the correct example and encouragement is given to their offspring. The size of the school is one of the factors that is often overlooked; a training officer in the Royal Marines once told me that too many of today’s youth could either hide or get lost when they attended schools which were too large.

It is vital that we address these problems to ensure that our youth can compete upon the world stage.

Dr David Bartlett, Ilkley, West Yorkshire

On the sunny horizon of Ofsted-led soaraway school improvement it is rare to find a blemish. So it is with some amazement that we learn from a major study that pupil behaviour may be “worse than thought”.

 Whose thought this may be is not clear, but it surely could not be that of Ofsted by whom the fall of a sparrow in the remotest playground is immediately ticked in a box. I wonder could it be then that the health, mental or otherwise, of teachers is not considered significant?

Martin Murray, London SW23

Chris Blackhurst proposes to abolish public schools (“So if I were Prime Minister, here’s what I’d do”, 11 April). Allow me to paint him a picture.

This concerns a family of six, three sons, three daughters. The boys passed the 11-plus and were sent to the local state grammar school. None of the girls gained a place in selective education and were educated in three different private schools according to their particular gifts.

This family was not wealthy, being basic-rate taxpayers, but they were passionate about securing a happy education for all their children. There were no expensive foreign holidays and few meals out, and many of the children’s clothes were passed on by good friends and handed down. None of this was a hardship because it was a mutual decision to make education the priority and channel family resources completely to that end.

Chris Blackhurst must be aware of the many small private schools that are peopled by families similar to our own. He does all these families a great injustice by characterising them as over-privileged.

Children blossom when their teachers take the trouble to find their talents and celebrate them with genuine interest. Success is narrowly defined if only academic achievement  is lauded.

Banning public schools is an easy political target but does little to address the many inequalities that exist in children’s lives. Far better to address both the size of state school classes and the issue of disruptive behaviour by a small but persistent minority.

If anyone asked me to be Prime Minister my suggestion would be to reduce all state school classes to 20 pupils as a maximum, provide much smaller separate classes for the pupils with behavioural problems and promote a curriculum which has enough flexibility to accommodate both academic and practical education.

A state education would become so attractive that you might find there would be no need to ban public schools.

Francesca Barrow, Rugby, Warwickshire

Kidney donor kept  out of Britain

If a matter of life or death is not “sufficiently exceptional” to allow Keisha Rushton a visa for the UK from Jamaica to be a kidney donor for her brother (report, 12 April), perhaps the Case Referral Unit at the Home Office could give us an example of something that is.

It would seem that either the CRU members are totally brainless, or perhaps this is yet another example of the heartless Tory policy to bully and crush the weak and defenceless and those down on their luck.

Maureen Lewis, Ambleside, Cumbria

Witch-hunter allowed in

The notorious Nigerian witch-hunting pastor Helen Ukpabio recently arrived in London where she has been holding a number of church services to promote the belief in witchcraft and her ability to “deliver” people from this perceived evil.

Since various UN reports have linked her activities to wide-scale abuses of child rights in South-Eastern Nigeria, would it not be reasonable to ask that the Home Secretary considers deporting Mrs Ukpabio from the UK pursuant to section 3(5) of the Immigration Act 1971 on the basis that her presence here is not conducive to the public good?

Gary Foxcroft, Executive Director, Witchcraft and Human Rights Information Network

Kirsty Brimelow QC, Chair, Bar Human Rights Committee of England and Wales

Sir Tim Lankester

Professor Jean La Fontaine

Andrew Copson, International Humanist Ethical Union (IHEU)

Pavan Dhaliwal, British Humanist Association, Lancaster

 

MPs guilty until proven innocent

Andrew Grice (12 April) repeats recent assertions by the Prime Minister that Parliament is honest. I suggest there is a mismatch between the criteria for honesty of those in the orbit of Parliament, like Mr Grice, and those of us outside that orbit.

The Legg report made clear that 52 per cent of MPs were over-claiming expenses, and I would add that the other 48 per cent were letting them do it. David Laws found a lack of frankness about his personal affairs no bar to his return to the Cabinet; Maria Miller, who breached a code of conduct, is to be welcomed back to the Cabinet at the earliest opportunity, and there are MPs whose behaviour has led to them to “stand down at the next election”, but in the meantime they continue to draw the pay and enjoy the perks of being an MP.

One of those perks is a share of the outrageous £7.3m annual subsidy of catering in Parliament. IPSA publishes claims by MPs for £15 to cover “working late” meals that mask a much higher cost to the public.

The lack of accountability  colours my assessment of the honesty of the recent privatisation of Royal Mail: why would I accept that the huge undervaluation was anything other than a scheme to enrich those in the personal networks of some MPs? When it looks like a duck, waddles like a duck and quacks like a duck it is probably a duck. If Mr Grice thinks MPs are honest let’s see and hear the evidence.

Kevin Dobson, Groby, Leicestershire

Deprived of  books in prison

I read with great interest Arifa Akbar’s piece (11 April) about writers’ protest postcards to Chris Grayling, the Justice Secretary, with the names of books they would most like to send to a prisoner if they could.

Having taught literacy in a prison, I know how much books are valued by prisoners, ranging from those who are learning to read to those studying on OU courses. Access to a library is often very limited, and inability to obtain books can be extremely frustrating.

May I suggest that your readers who feel as I do should follow the example of these writers.

Christina Jones, Retford,  Nottinghamshire

Peers won’t  listen to UKIP

It is worrying that their Lordships (letter, 11 April) apparently do not understand why the Ukip-affiliated peers did  not partake in any  debate or vote on the Immigration Bill.

Surely the reason is because they were aware that their contributions would be ignored and their votes would not influence the result of any division. So, quite sensibly, they kept their powder dry.

Surprising that their Lordships felt the need to attempt to make political capital out of such an obvious situation.

C R Atkinson, Honley, West Yorkshire

Holier than Harlow

So there are 632 potholes in Harlow (Andy McSmith’s diary, 11 April). All I can say is, lucky Harlow! My half kilometre long road, used as a rat-run during morning rush hours, has over 200.  Forty-six of them are within 15 metres of my front drive.

H Kilborn, London SE12

Ending it all under bicycle wheels

Howard Jacobson has used his column on 12 April to express again his dislike of cyclists.

In reality, should he choose to seek his end  on a pedestrian crossing, he is far more likely to be obliged by a motorist than a cyclist.

John Armstrong, Southampto

Times:

2014

Sir, You argue (“Crown Prosecution Shambles”, Apr 11) that the CPS is more focused on improving its conviction tally than the “rigorous assessment” of the evidence when deciding whether to prosecute. Equally worrying, the CPS lacks the courage to exercise its discretion not to prosecute, preferring inappropriate cases to go to trial for fear of facing criticism for inertia. Your conclusion that the time for reform has arrived must be correct.

Lord Grabiner, QC
House of Lords

Sir, We are disturbed by calls for a review of CPS handling of sexual offences and for defendants in such cases to be granted anonymity. Such calls are based on the myth that allegations of sexual offences are often made up. In fact, there is strong evidence that only 1 in 10 rape victims report the incident to the police and that false allegations are rare. The Government has already considered, and rejected, a proposal to change the law to give defendants in rape cases anonymity. The current debate sends an extremely negative message to survivors of sexual violence, and tells potential perpetrators that they will not face criminal sanction.

Professor Liz Kelly
Child & Woman Abuse Studies Unit

Holly Dustin
End Violence Against Women Coalition

Lee Eggleston
Rape Crisis England and Wales

Sir, After several failed prosecutions for serious sex offences based on historical evidence it was a surprise to hear the Director of Public Prosecutions, Alison Saunders, speak on the radio without any regret or any intention of reviewing the CPS’s practice.

She stressed the need for the CPS to heed the rights of “victims”, but until a crime has been proved there is no one whom the CPS should regard as a victim, only a complainant, and no crime but only an alleged offence.

For the CPS to bring prosecutions for serious offences on inadequate evidence because of a misplaced zeal to protect “victims” is a serious dereliction of duty on the part of the CPS, a dereliction for which Ms Saunders is answerable. Her present use of the language of “victimhood” is not merely no answer but contains an important part of the explanation for the CPS’s present failures.

His Honour Alan Pardoe, QC
London W2

Sir, Daniel Finkelstein (Apr 12) is spot on in criticising how the CPS (and the police) have assumed a “right” to justify their actions after a trial in which the accused has been acquitted.

This inevitably adds an unwarranted slur on the person or persons who have been acquitted. It is wrong for the parties who have made the case against an accused to have a second opportunity outside the courts to speak out after a trial, whatever the verdict.

Harold Cottam
Dorstone, Herefordshire

Sir, Colonel Bob Stewart, MP, is concerned that his friend Nigel Evans faces financial ruin despite being acquitted (Apr 12). In 2011, Parliament passed legislation to remove the right of a defendant found not guilty at trial to recover his legal costs from the state.

Ken Clarke, MP, QC, championed the legislation, and Stewart voted in favour. Perhaps now that MPs have first-hand knowledge of how grossly unfair this provision is, they will reverse it.

Jon Mack

London EC4

Sir, Alex Salmond was probably right in his speech on Saturday at the
SNP conference that in the event of a Yes vote, talks with Westminster on the transition to independence would begin before the end of September, but this will most probably not produce the result that he is leading Scottish electors to expect.

I’m sure that the other electors of the once United Kingdom who don’t at present have a vote in the threatened divorce, would urge the UK political parties to try everything short of bribery to persuade Scotland to remain in the UK.

However, if this fails, and Scotland votes to leave the union, the same currently disenfranchised electors will surely urge that a strong pragmatic line be taken. Over the years the UK has based many job-creating government admin and call centres in Scotland together with various armed forces establishments; these would need to be quickly folded back to core UK locations which would greatly value the economic gain.

In addition, recent history with Icelandic and Irish financial institutions has shown that to ensure 100 per cent alignment with UK governance, banks and insurance companies need to be based in the same legislative and currency area as the markets they serve.

A rather large void to be filled by fading “Scottish” oil and gas.

John Hitcham

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

Sir, Stuart Poole (letter, Apr 9) quite rightly raises the issue of the costs of Scottish independence. If one were to list all the agencies and institutions alluded to, the extent and the complexity of the reshaping would become very clear. Yet the costs have still to be evaluated.

Those of the Yes persuasion or who may consider voting Yes probably have no idea of what is involved and the time and effort required. It certainly will not happen by March 2016. All the reorganisation will have to be paid for and paid for by the Scottish taxpayer. There will be no Barnett formula and no Westminster subsidies. The reorganisation of each agency is a major project in itself. However, the track record of Scottish politicians, both at the local and national level, in managing major projects has been far from satisfactory. The Scottish Parliament building and the Edinburgh trams project come to mind as clear examples of mismanagement bordering on incompetence. The portents are far from encouraging.

Stuart Smith

Helensburgh, Argyll & Bute

Sir, The letter about staff rooms (Apr 10) reminded me of a message on the wall in the café at the Royal Institution to the effect that “Science may never come up with a better method of communication than the coffee break”.

Martin L Perkins

Orpington, Kent

Sir, Sylvia Cresswell (letter, Apr 12) mentions her early experience of sleeping in an orange box. When Prince Andrew of Greece was exiled in 1922 he, with his wife, their four daughters and baby son, was taken off in the light cruiser Calypso. The ship’s company made a cot from an orange box for the 18-month-old Philippos in which he lay during the ship’s passage down to Brindisi.

Orange boxes and light cruisers have much to recommend them.

Lt-Cdr Lawrie Phillips
Northwood, Middx

Sir, When we lived in Zambia in the 1970s my wife often went to the local auction, since it was the only source of household items. She became intrigued by another customer who bought all the tea chests regardless of their content. Later we discovered that he was the undertaker and he used the plywood to make coffins.

His hearse was a familiar sight — his wife used it to go shopping.

John Adderley
Bramhall, Cheshire

Sir, While driving at a nifty speed on the autostrada outside Florence I was overtaken by a fully laden hearse racing like a bat out of hell.

Professor Dominic Regan
Bath

Sir, One answer to “Daddy, what did you do in the Great War?” (poster, Apr 12) was given by the Scottish miners’ leader Bob Smillie: “I tried to stop the bloody thing, my child.”

Derek Scott
London NW8

Sir, Your poster evoked memories of my brothers and sister before the Second World War, asking our father how many Germans he had killed. His answers were evasive. Like many of his contemporaries who had fought on the Somme, he was reluctant to talk of his wartime experiences.

Anthony Harris
St Albans

Telegraph:

Location, location: a teddy looks out on the estuary at Donegal Bay, north-west Ireland  Photo: Alamy

6:58AM BST 14 Apr 2014

Comments35 Comments

SIR –­ I thought that we were doing quite well when we snapped my daughter’s class teddy, Barnaby, on the Salcombe RNLI lifeboat. Barnaby’s photo album then came around again in perfect time for a skiing holiday in the Alps. There were plenty of great Barnaby “selfie” opportunities there: with the Matterhorn, cable cars, snowmen.

However, when we turned to our page in the album to put in the pictures, we noticed that, the week before, he had been on a research station in the Antarctic. I breathed a sigh of despair, until I learnt that one of the dads has contacts at Nasa.

Jamie Adams
London SW13

SIR – A friend of mine had the good fortune to have his grandson over for the “class teddy” weekend. He took them both to work, and let his grandson help him out.

The following week the child told his playgroup teacher and classmates about the grave they had all dug together.

Kevin Horswill
Banbury, Oxfordshire

SIR – Sixty years ago, I was, I believe, the only soldier in the Army who was born with a club foot. That I was able to achieve this was due to a devoted mother, and a brilliant surgeon, but my experience highlights the importance of only aborting for serious medical and not cosmetic reasons.

Parents should not deny the opportunity of life to a child for trivial reasons.

Ron Giddens
Caterham, Surrey

South African justice

SIR – Howard Bentham QC laments that Gerrie Nel, prosecutor in Oscar Pistorius’s trial, lacks “skill and training” on how to conduct cross-examination politely, and the judge “the authority and experience to enforce it”. But I suspect that Mr Bentham’s experience is chiefly with trial by jury in British courts.

In the Pistorius case, being tried through the South African system, the judge alone will decide the verdict. Everything we have seen on television of Judge Thokozile Masipa’s conduct suggests that she is more than capable of rebuking Mr Nel on the rare occasions when he oversteps the mark; and doubtless also of forming her own authoritative interpretation of what has transpired in her court.

Tom Kirkwood
Morpeth, Northumberland

Waste not, want not

SIR – Food waste has spiralled since the Eighties, following the introduction of various sell-by, display-until and best-before dates which, daily at the stroke of midnight, deem hundreds of tons of edible food to be unfit for human consumption, which then cannot be sold, given away or donated to charity.

Sell-by dates rather than buy-one-get- one-free offers should be investigated, with a view to reducing excessive waste.

David Lear
Barnstaple, North Devon

Adjustable sizes

SIR – Dr Dee Dawson seems to argue that size 16 is normal, and not overweight, mentioning that Marilyn Monroe (right) was a size 16. If I were to creep up to a size 16, I would be considered overweight by my doctor – I am size 10, only 5ft 4in, with a small frame.

I don’t mind if Debenhams dress mannequins in a size 16 as long as they also show them in a size 10. I don’t want to see what something looks like on a big person, as it doesn’t relate to myself.

Marguerite Bowyer
Huntspill, Somerset

SIR – Of course size 16 women are overweight. I wear size 12, and I’m overweight. The size 12 clothes I wear now fit me, while size 12 from years ago don’t even fasten. As I’ve become older, I’ve started to eat too many biscuits and I don’t exercise enough, so I weigh more than I’d like to.

Clothes manufacturers have steadily adjusted their sizing over the years to pamper our vanity.

Sheila Corbishley
Newcastle upon Tyne, Northumberland

Army structure

SIR – Former Army captain Mike Martin’s experiences in Helmand have led him to have interesting proposals as to how the Armed Forces should react to insurgencies, and indeed whether we should regard the Helmand events as insurgencies at all.

My perspective dates from my experience in Army intelligence in Cyprus and Kuwait in the Sixties, and work in the defence industry since. Mr Martin says that we need less firepower, and more focus on intelligence gathering in order to maintain order. Maintaining order by police work requires many experienced, cheap non-commissioned officers who, by means of hours drinking local beverages in the intimate company of the people who live there, will acquire vernacular speech and local knowledge. They will report the facts on the ground to their officers, who may ignore them, perhaps realising that they will in their turn be ignored by the politicians.

At the same time, we must also have powerful and mobile forces to establish order, and we must have a “colonial” police force to maintain order thereafter. And we really do need the political spine to refuse any mission where we are not in control.

James Alford
Weston-super-Mare, Somerset

SIR – What Mike Martin advocates echoes one of Sun Tzu’s principles in The Art of War: “know your enemy”. This the SAS has practised with spectacular success since its inception. When will the generals ever learn?

Flt Lt Roger Small RAF (retd)
Salisbury, Wiltshire

Cosy corners for a pint

SIR – A “proper pub” is one that still retains quiet corners, with separate lounge and public bars. Sadly, far too many fell victim to the inexplicable Eighties fad of knocking down internal walls so as to create a soulless beer barn.

It was this, more than anything else, that has precipitated the decline of the pub.

Mike Bussell
East Chinnock, Somerset

SIR – A proper pub is one that smells of beer, not chips.

Nairn Lawson
Portbury, Somerset

SIR – At a lovely rural Cornish pub, I ordered a pint of local ale, and a gin and tonic for my wife. The barman replied: “We don’t normally do cocktails”.

Mark Willingham
London SE10

It would be cruel to stop elderly people driving

SIR – Ian Carter describes an elderly, lame man who took a long time to get out of his car; he suggests introducing a test to check that the driver can exit a vehicle within 30 seconds. For elderly people, the car may be the only way in which they can get about. Whether or not they can get out of his car in 30 seconds, the vehicle is essential to their lifestyle.

I, too, am in the category of being an elderly driver. Does this mean that if I take, say, 32 seconds to get out of my car I would be forbidden to drive? My wife and I use the car to go to the shops, to church on Sunday and to visit the family. If I was unable to drive, life would be severely restricted for us, and many like us.

Gordon Crowder
Hook, Hampshire

SIR – Government statistics show that older drivers are among the safest. Older people are less likely to take risks, break the speed limit or talk on their mobile phone while driving. Any deterioration of some older people’s physical condition is more than compensated for by their road experience, common sense and careful driving.

Ann Wills
Ruislip, Middlesex

SIR – Surely the time is right for the introduction of mandatory driving tests for elderly people, say more than 75, to see whether they constitute an accident waiting to happen?

Only those who might fail the test would object to such a sensible idea.

Paddy Germain
Tonbridge, Kent

SIR – Your leading article does not mention the fundamental reason why many people like me, a former activist and Conservative voter in every election since 1979, will be voting Ukip for the first time in May’s European elections, and then in the general election. The Conservative Party, under the leadership of David Cameron, is no longer conservative.

It is now a party of uncontrolled, mass immigration into Britain. It is anti-family, believing as it does, in penalising those who wish, by choice, to stay at home and bring up their children. It believes in borrowing money at excessive levels in order to fund a deliberately ballooning overseas aid budget. It no longer advocates the effective security and defence of the realm as it continues to undermine the effectiveness of our Armed Forces. And it seems perfectly happy to build over our beautiful countryside, where once it represented a philosophical position that “conserved what is good”.

The party also refuses to tackle the disgraceful level of tax imposed upon those who save or invest as well as those who wish to pass on their assets to their children and grandchildren. And, on top of all these things, it no longer stands up for British interests in what has become an increasingly corrupt, undemocratic and self-serving European gravy train.

Link these things with Mr Cameron’s inexplicable defence of Maria Miller and his failure to expect higher standards from his ministers, and is it any wonder that people like me are deserting what was once their natural political home?

William Rogers
Kingston upon Thames, Surrey

SIR – I take exception to the Conservative Party slogan: “Vote Farage, get Miliband”. It is reminiscent of the slogan: “A liberal vote is a wasted vote”.

Most people who vote for either Ukip or the Liberals do so because they believe in their policies, and are voting from conviction and not for tactics.

The Conservative Party slogan should read: “Vote Conservative, get another five years of Coalition government”. This would mean no EU referendum, no reform of the European Court of Human Rights and no reform of parliamentary boundaries.

Ian Dodsworth
Carnforth, Lancashire

SIR – Given that Mr Cameron has chosen to describe Ukip as dishonest, perhaps he will let us have a full list of his many promises, since coming to power, that have now been fulfilled.

Jack Brinded
Eastcote, Ruislip

SIR – David Cameron asks: “Is there anyone you would trust less than a group of Ukip MEPs?” Yes. Any front-bench member of any political party.

John Hawker
Carshalton Beeches, Surrey

Irish Times:

Sir, – In his review of my book Myth and the Irish State (April 6th), Prof Diarmuid Ferriter has the better of me when he says I am preoccupied with jargon. “Unhistoricity” – the lack or absence of historical truth – is jargon. Nevertheless, it is jargon indispensable to my analysis of what some Irish historians write.

Your reviewer accuses me of pursuing a “personal vendetta” against other historians and calls me a “conspiracy theorist”. He substantiates neither claim, nor the statement “Regan’s essays are marred by questionable sources”. Irish Historical Studies , Histor y, Journal of British Studies , and the Historical Journal , where many of my book chapters were first published, do not indulge “questionable sources”. A responsible newspaper would require a contributor to validate such a statement before reinforcing it in a subheading.

Prof Ferriter undermines himself with careless mistakes. According to him I accuse some historians “of a deliberately selective use of evidence in writing about the history of the revolutionary period [c 1912-25] as a response to the impact of the Northern Ireland Troubles from the late 1960s”. Introducing the book, I write: “It was partly in response to the IRA’s ‘border campaign’ [1956-62] that the new, embryonic foundation-myth began to emerge”. Continuing, the Troubles were “the occasion for a historiographical turn, not its motivating reason.”

Quoting me again, Ferriter writes that “Michael Collins briefly presided over what ‘closely resembled a military dictatorship’ in April 1922’.” Actually, my references to Collins’s dictatorship, a central theme in the book, date to between July and August 1922 during the civil war.

Ferriter states: “Regan also cites Winston Churchill’s portentous and threatening letters to Michael Collins in April 1922, warning that if Collins did not oust republicans from the Four Courts British force would.” Dated April 12th, 1922, only one such letter from Churchill to Collins is cited in the book. No mention is made in it of the Four Courts occupation, probably because this occupation happened afterwards.

Ferriter accurately reports my view that the late Peter Hart “ignored evidence about the Bandon Valley massacres in April 1922, the killing of 13 Protestant loyalists in west Cork”. However, contrary to Ferriter, I do not assert that Hart ignored a British archival source, the “Record of the Rebellion in Ireland 1920-1 … on the role of [British] army intelligence”. Hart referenced it extensively. Instead, I say Hart selectively quoted from the “Record”, ignoring those sentences contradicting his interpretation of a sectarian massacre.

“Regan sees a deliberate conspiracy,” Ferriter complains, “in the refusal of other historians to refer to a memoir deposited in the UCD archives in 1974 that suggests Collins planned for the IRB to remain active.”

In my discussion nowhere do I describe seeing a “deliberate conspiracy” or a conspiracy of any kind. What I identify is a consensual approach by some historians to specific issues, like Collins’s dictatorship, and the use of sources relating to these. Indeed, Ferriter sees something similar where he writes “numerous scholars felt it vital to define the IRA in 1922 as anti-democratic in order to undermine the Provisional IRA during the Troubles”.

In truth, Ferriter agrees with much of my book. Developed over many years in academic peer-reviewed journals, the force of my argument leaves him little choice. Unable to counter my interpretation, Ferriter therefore denounces me.

Historians are not obliged to submit their research to peer-reviewed journals. In these journals the publication process is arduous, because the evidential bar is set high and precision in using language, alongside evidence, is never optional. If the technical words I use jar on Ferriter partly it is because he has little or no experience of publishing research in journals. More concerned to write and broadcast history for the general public’s consumption, scholarly journals are irrelevant for Ferriter’s purposes.

Reading this letter alongside Ferriter’s review, I suspect your readers will have little difficulty grasping why we need a word like “unhistoricity”. It is indispensable when distinguishing historical research from history written for public consumption that is lacking in historical veracity. As Prof Ferriter partly concedes, not a few historians of the Irish State opted for this latter course. Once liberated from the burden of evidence historians are free to invent anything they wish. Yours, etc,

DR JOHN M REGAN,

Ballaghaderreen,

Co Roscommon

Tue, Apr 15, 2014, 01:55

First published: Tue, Apr 15, 2014, 01:55

Sir, I would like to make three points about the recent presidential visit to Britain.

First, it should be seen as part of a carefully thought out strategy, at work since the inception of the Good Friday agreement: the very visible coming together of “elites” in the hope that subalterns will do likewise. If Peter Robinson, Martin McGuinness, the queen et al can have dinner together without smashing the place up, then perhaps, when a denizen of East Belfast encounters a denizen of West Belfast, they may resist the urge to beat the lard out of one another.

The South’s part in all of this is pretty peripheral: most of us here haven’t had any serious sense of grievance for some time; the release of the Birminghahm Six and the Guildford Four went some way towards atoning for the treatment of the Irish in Britain, who had been targeted by the security services for special treatment.

The difference between Ireland and Britain needs to be addressed. When I came back to Ireland from London nearly 30 years ago, Britain was in industrial spasm as the miners and the Thatcher governemnt fought it out up and down the land; Brixton and Liverpool had been set alight and the Dixon of Dock Green image of the bobby on the beat had been replaced by something that recalled an occupying army. Class war was the defining feature of British public life.

The Ireland I came back to was equally convulsed: men had been starving themselves to death in the H Blocks, people were on the march, and everywhere was overtaken by a grim and desperate anger; nationalism overrode every other political consideration. Or so it seemed. Coming from the class war to this was to be intensely aware of the difference between Ireland and Britain.

The extent to which class war has abated in Britain and nationalism has abated in Ireland is perhaps some indicator of the way the two places have converged, but different they are, and it would be an unwise person who discounted either factor in the political make-up of the respective polities.

Finally, there is the one subject you are never supposed to mention: religion. Roy Foster manages to write a whole article on Anglo-Irish relations and never mention it once. The second half of the nineteenth century saw a massive revival of Protestant confessional bigotry across Britain: Catholics were never going to be given charge of their own affairs; the rising Catholic Irish middle class, who saw themselves as every bit as civilised as their British counterparts, had backed constitutional campaigns for home rule; as Conor Cruise O’Brien said, the war of independence was led by the politically frustrated children of Parnellites. Not to put too fine a point on it: the British had it coming. However, I am told the dessert at Windsor was a bombe suprise : a shared sense of humour goes a long way. Yours, etc,

EOIN DILLON,

Mount Brown,

Dublin 8

Sir,- Declan Kiberd writes about the “narcissism of small differences” affecting the relationship between Britain and Ireland. However, observing the different reactions in either country to the events of last week one cannot but conclude that the aphorism, while a seductive line, has little basis in reality.

The Guardian newspaper gave only basic coverage to President Higgins’s visit, as it would have with the head of state of any country with whom Britain had an insignificant official relationship. RTÉ Radio 1’s World Report cited a local in Windsor who wondered if the tricolours flying in the area represented Mauritius. Conversely The Irish Times had a supplement covering the visit, devoted considerable editorial space to it and regarded the mooted presence of a British royal at the centenary celebrations of the 1916 Rising as important enough to warrant its main front page story.

It appears that – despite the official kind words – beneath the surface one country in this relationship remains at best witheringly aloof while the other betrays a classical post-colonial attitude in its desperation for acceptance as an equal. Unlike your editorial writer (“Sovereign and equal”, April 10th) some of us never needed acknowledgement from Britain that our state was their equal. Surely this is a given that Britain would readily concede without all the rí-rá? After all, is this not the same nation that a century ago went to the Great War to defend the rights of such small nations? Small differences indeed! Yours, etc,

MARTIN RYAN,

Springlawn Close,

Dublin 15

Sir, – Prof Diarmaid Ferrriter, who is a member of the Expert Advisory Group on the centenary commemorations tells us (Apri 14th) that he would be concerned with matters that “might give succour to those who believe the Rising was unnecessary”. It is to be hoped that the other members of this committee have a more balanced view of history and of the diversity of Irish opinion in 1916 and today.

Centenary events always risk becoming celebrations of myth rather than commemorations of complex historical fact. The example of Scotland is interesting. In a different time and place a degree of autonomy there has led to an agreed referendum procedure in relation to independence without a single shot being fired. Yours, etc,

SEÁN Mc DONAGH

Bettyglen,

Raheny,

Dublin 5

Sir, – I would remind John B Reid, who would have us be thankful for the “sacrifices” of the “patriots” of 1922 and 1916 (April 14th), which “made it possible for Ireland today to hold her head high on state visits to other nations” that Mohandas K Gandhi achieved more, for more people, and more quickly, through non-violence than was ever achieved by the violence of all the Irish patriots over many centuries.

Perhaps it was because he came from a non-Abrahamic tradition that Gandhi did not see the need for Padraig Pearse’s much vaunted “blood sacrifice”. I, for one – but I am sure I am not alone – will not be celebrating the 98th anniversary of the death and destruction of 1916. Yours, etc,

TONY McCOY O’GRADY,

Grangebrook Close

Rathfarnham

Dublin 16

Sir, – In his own words, it is indeed hard to know why Fintan O’Toole reckons that Martin Heidegger’s Nazism is “even up for discussion” (Culture Shock, April 5th). The evidence of Heidegger’s notebooks is only the culmination in a very long process of investigation, philosphical as well as historical, into his ugly political affiliations. In 1945, he was investigated by the Bundesrepublik’s Denazification Committee (here Hannah Arendt testified on his behalf and his former friend Karl Jaspers testified against him). In its report, it charged him with being a significant member of the Nazi Party, with introducing the “Fuhrer principle” into Freiburg University during his tenure as rector, engaging in Nazi propaganda, and inciting students against some of their professors.

Nevertheless Heidegger was reintegrated into the German academic system in 1951. The emerging laureate of German philosophy, Jürgen Habermas, responded in 1953, accusing Heidegger of wishing to exculpate himself for his wartime behaviour by arguing that the Nazi period figured as an element in the “history of Being”. In the 1980s, exposes of Heidegger’s Nazi past were published in France and in America. The revelation is old.

The question, surely, is not whether we read Heidegger, but how we read him. Wagner was an anti-Semite, but does this mean that we cease listening to his music? Conrad was an imperialist and perhaps a racist, but does this mean we don’t read Heart of Darkness ? Yeats and Pound had fascist sympathies: does this mean we don’t read these great artists and writers? No: it means that we seek to listen to them or to read them critically, carefully, looking precisely at how such repellent ideas could co-exist with great insight and great aesthetic gifts. Yours, etc,

CONOR McCARTHY,

De Vesci Court,

Dún Laoghaire,

Co Dublin

Sir,  – Martin Heidegger thought that modern human beings had a fundamental problem with technology. Far from controlling it, they were themselves controlled: technology had them in its grip. A good example of human beings in the grip of technology is the Holocaust. Another good example is the atomic bomb. In 1933 Heidegger believed, or let hope convince him, that Nazism had the potential for a human counter-movement. Within a few years he realised he was wrong. By 1941, with the Nazi attack on the Soviet Union, he knew (as his recently published diaries show) that his earlier opinion was the opposite of the truth. The Nazis were taking modern man deeper into the condition of subordination to technology, which in Heidegger’s opinion was most clearly promoted and affirmed in what he saw as contemporary Jewish thinking. If such opinions have to be tainted by association with subsequent projects of mass murder (Fintan O’Toole, April 5th), then we should all be very, very careful what we say on account of what someone in our own cultural sphere may possibly do next year. We might find it preferable to say nothing. Yours, etc,

JOHN MINAHANE,

Bakosova,

Bratislava,

Slovakia

Sir, – Paddy Agnew’s take on John Paul II’s view of liberation theology (“John Paul II: tainted saint?”, April 12th) substantially misrepresented the late pope’s position on this question.

According to Mr Agnew, John Paul regarded liberation theology “as a falsified Christianity that put more emphasis on Marx than on Christ”. This comment has the advantage of a certain simplicity, but it hardly stands up against John Paul’s own remark, made to the Brazilian bishops in 1986: “We are convinced, we and you, that liberation theology is not only timely, but useful and necessary.”

It is true that John Paul occasionally sought to correct aspects of liberation theology, but he did not espouse the simplistic and repressive views attributed to him in Mr Agnew’s article. Yours, etc,

REV CHRIS HAYDEN,

Parochial House,

Coolfancy,

Tinahely,

Co Wicklow

A chara, – I have been asked by a number of people to correct the account given in the article by Ann Marie Hourihane, (“Betty Purcell: war stories form the heart of RTÉ”, April 7th) concerning Charles Haughey and the wind generators on Cape Clear Island.

I recall the relevant events very clearly indeed since they occurred shortly after my arrival as the new manager of the co-op on the island in 1987.

It seems that the former taoiseach was highly impressed by the wind/diesel/battery system on Cape Clear island which had been installed by SMA Regelsystem Gmbh and which he launched, together with the German ambassador, in that year. So impressed indeed that he announced his intention of having a similar system installed in Inishvickillane, a project that was subsequently carried out.

Most certainly no wind turbines were removed from Cape Clear island and the integrated wind/diesel/battery system continued to provide an outstanding service for more than 10 years after that. Sadly, by the time the 33w wind turbines needed replacing due to normal wear and tear, the wind turbine industry had moved on and such small turbines were no longer available.

Similar systems were installed subsequently in various parts of the world and the Cape Clear system is credited with providing the first concrete evidence for the viability of wind energy in Ireland.

In deference to the good names of all concerned, including the ESB, who were responsible for operating the island electricity grid, I can confirm that at no time was the island left with a “a generator that gave only sporadic service”.

I am grateful for the opportunity to put the record straight on this matter. Is mise le meas,

SÉAMUS Ó DRISCEOIL

Oileán Chléire,

Contae Chorcaí

Sir, – Spurred by the recent letter bemoaning the meaningless tag “in terms of”, may I add another phrase to the list of examples of inflated speech? “In relation to” has now reached epidemic proportions. Why the seven syllables of “in relation to”, when the simple word “on” has just one syllable?

So, please, politicians, broadcasters and journalists, let’s hear no more about policy “in relation to” crime; just discuss the policy “on” crime – or whatever the related topic is. Yours, etc,

BRIAN ROGERS,

Castleknock Park,

Dublin 15

Irish Independent:

30 AM

Though I find the services of Holy Week deeply inspiring, I wish we would speak of the death of Christ without the sometimes excessive talk of sacrifice – a kind of discourse that gives the impression that we are serving a very demanding God who wills the sacrifice of his own son as recompense for the sins of mankind.

Also in this section

World War I and the tragic historic waste of lives

Supporting our food producers

Focus on gender misses vital point

This is rooted in the literalist interpretation of original sin. Nobody sensibly believes that there was a historical moment when sin entered our world through an actual offence.

The concept of original sin is absurd if construed in a literal sense, a sense that would imply that God in creating mankind had deliberately created a defective species.

Whatever sin exists must then be the fault of God. As Christopher Hitchens, one of the most articulate atheists used to put it: “It looks as if God created us ill and commands us to get better”.

We are beings in the making, requiring ever-increasing awareness of where we stand in relation to the world and to one another.

Sin is not so much an act of rebellion against God but an indication of the evolutionary journey yet to be undertaken. We offend one another. God cannot be offended.

The most challenging aspect of Easter is the Resurrection. Christ’s overcoming death cannot or need not be construed as the resuscitation of a corpse but the expression of a life and a death that totally transformed the disciples. We are of course left with a thousand questions, not a set of definitive answers – the two key questions being: What do I mean? and How do I know?

A mystery, such as that of the Resurrection, is an invitation to explore not an invitation to darkness and bafflement.

We find its meaning in thoughtful reflection on our own life and death.

Our faith is not a destination reached but a journey we undertake with a confident rhythm animating our step.

Happy Easter to all.

Philip O’Neil

33 Edith Road, Oxford, OX1 4 QB

BAD NIGHT AT THE LOCAL PUB

* I thought that concert from the Albert Hall sounded like a singsong at a bad night in the local pub. By omitting the traditional it failed so miserably to bring the grandeur, the glory and the soul of real Irish music to a much wider audience.

That ‘The Minstrel Boy’ was spoken, not sung, and that ‘The Auld Triangle’ went on forever, and was the highlight, says it all.

The rest was mid-atlantic, discordant and non-Irish.

A Leavy

Shielmartin Drive, Sutton, Dublin 13.

PROUD OF STARS IN ALBERT HALL

* Regarding President Higgins’ concert in the Royal Albert Hall, there were some excellent displays of Irish talent on show.

I thought Glen Hansard did an incredible job. It was brilliant to see John Sheehan and Imelda May, Elvis Costello and all the others.

Other Irish icons, like Christy Moore, Bono and the Edge may have had other things to do but it was all good craic. However, there was real quality and professionalism in display from the Irish stars.

We have lost so many stars to Britain but the concert reminded us that there is plenty to be proud of still, so take a bow one and all.

Ellen Fullam

Stepaside, Co Dublin

CHARITY ENDS AT HOME

* The decision by the rank and file of Amnesty Ireland not to reduce their CEO’s annual salary to that of the average industrial wage, means that I can add yet another “charity” to my evermore growing blacklist of organisations to be shunned.

At this rate, I am going to be reduced to setting up my own charity.

Liam Power

San Pawl Il-Bahar, Malta

PAYNE OF RED CARD INJUSTICE

* Regarding your excellent article on the red card issued to (Ulster rugby player) Jared Payne in Saturday’s Irish Independent.

The rubber-stamping of a two-week ban compounded the original decision.

I do not have the exact wording of the law that allowed this ludicrous decision, but the authorities need to do a bit of “argumentum ad absurdum” before further miscarriages of justice are perpetrated on some innocent players.

Bill Carmody

Oldtown, Hospital, Co Limerick.

PISTORIUS TRIAL A LESSON IN LAW

* The Oscar Pistorius trial, despite becoming a gripping blockbuster for the news media, has highlighted the benefits of South Africa’s legal system.

Presiding Judge Masipa will ultimately decide the outcome of the trial and she will be assisted by two legal experts.

Before the Pistorius case, I was unaware that the last trial by jury in South Africa was held in 1969 when the country was a very different place.

I think that the modern-day online media climate makes it clear that with the prevalence of touch-of-a-button information, jury trials can be really unstable, and that the risk of trial-by-media is at a peak.

In Ireland, if a public figure like this was involved in a murder probe, and this type of coverage was bandied about, a potential juror would numbly consume this damning dynamic of assumed guilt, and carry it with them into the jury room.

In South Africa, the judge and her experts will adjudicate the merits of the prosecution and defence solely on their basis in law; they will not enter judgment in the grip of a modern media malignance.

Justin Kelly

Edenderry, Co Offaly

SINGING PRIEST TIP OF THE ICEBERG

* What a breath of fresh air for the country and for Catholics in Ireland at large to see the YouTube clip of Fr Ray Kelly singing a wedding service to the tune of Jeff Buckley’s version of ‘Hallelujah’. Eleven million hits during the course of a week.

We, in the parish here in Co Kildare are fortunate to have a few priests who take a practical approach to Mass and related religious ceremonies.

One young priest stood out recently when he brought a Sunday Mass forward in a local village so as to accommodate a very important sporting event.

Another parish priest is loved by all as he has cut through the red tape and doom and gloom of mundane homilies whilst at the same time, getting the required basic messages across.

He also involves children in events such as christenings by giving them little chores to attend to such as holding the towel, the oils, lighting candles etc.

Many of us who started our education at the age of four or five, were consistently exposed to the rules and regulations of a now obviously fading Catholic Church.

Yet, in many parishes, they persist in addressing us week in week out with the same old stories.

I’m no longer sure as to the reason why I attend church once a week but the Mass I attend is usually frequented by about 80 people with conservatively 95pc of the congregation being pensioners. However, making Mass more practical can only help the church.

Good on you Fr Ray, you lifted our spirits and we need more like you.

Stephen Talbot

Kildare


Home

$
0
0

16April2014Home

I go all the way around the park listening to the Men from the Ministry: Our heroes meet the Martians Priceless

Mary in hospital brief visit get beat at Scrabble

Scrabbletoday, Mary wins Perhaps Iwill win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Dennis Lindley – obituary

Dennis Lindley was the ‘High Priest of Bayesianism’ who saw in statistics a way of dealing with the uncertainties of everyday life

Dennis Lindley

Dennis Lindley

6:54PM BST 10 Apr 2014

CommentsComment

Dennis Lindley, who has died aged 90, was a statistician who became a leading advocate of a controversial but increasingly popular approach known as Bayesianism.

The Bayesian school takes its name from Thomas Bayes, an 18th-century Presbyterian minister and mathematician who, in a paper entitled An Essay towards solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances, outlined a method to evaluate probability which allowed for adjustments in the light of new evidence.

Bayesian statistical methods start with existing “prior” beliefs, and update these gradually using data to give “posterior” beliefs, according to a standard set of procedures and formulae – in order to provide a basis for inferring probability and making decisions.

Bayesian statistical methods are increasingly (though by no means universally) used, for example, where a policy decision must be made on the basis of a combination of imperfect evidence, or where a problem must be solved on the basis of multiple sources of evidence. Using such data, the Bayesian statistician formulates “probability distributions” to express the uncertainty involved. Bayesian methods have caught on particularly in such fields as market research, in some branches of econometrics and in computer learning and filtering systems, such as those which distinguish between “spam” and “non-spam” emails.

Lindley envisioned the approach as a way of understanding and handling uncertainty in our everyday lives. “There are some things that you know to be true, and others that you know to be false,” he wrote; “yet, despite this extensive knowledge that you have, there remain many things whose truth or falsity is not known to you. We say that you are uncertain about them. You are uncertain, to varying degrees, about everything in the future; much of the past is hidden from you; and there is a lot of the present about which you do not have full information. Uncertainty is everywhere and you cannot escape from it… it is not the uncertainty, but your uncertainty.”

Though Lindley rejected religious metaphors, Bayesianism has often been seen, by its critics, as a quasi-religious movement of which Lindley was sometimes described as the “high priest” in Britain.

In 1967 when he was appointed to the leading chair of statistics at University College London (a one-time bastion of statistical orthodoxy) a colleague commented : “Good Heavens! It’s as though a Jehovah’s Witness has been elected Pope.”

The only child of a builder, Dennis Victor Lindley was born in south London on July 25 1923 and brought up in Surbiton. In an interview in 1994 he recalled that his parents had “little culture” and were “proud of the fact that they had never read a book and they had a low opinion of classical music”. It was only when he went to Tiffin School, Kingston-upon-Thames, that he realised that there “were other things in the world”.

At first Dennis wanted to be an architect and his father made plans for him to leave school and become an apprentice. But war intervened and made it difficult, so he was allowed to stay on and sit for higher level exams. He did so well in mathematics that his teacher managed to persuade his parents that he should try for Cambridge.

During the Blitz Tiffin pupils often had to take refuge in the school shelters. There, since the mathematics teacher could not teach the whole class, he used the time to give his prize pupil individual tuition. Lindley won an exhibition to Trinity College (for which he later gave due credit to Hitler).

He went up to Cambridge in 1941, when the degree course was shortened to two years due to the war. After graduation he joined the Ministry of Supply as a statistician, working on introducing statistical quality control and inspection into arms production.

After the war Lindley spent some time at the National Physical Laboratory before returning to Cambridge for a further year of postgraduate study. From 1948 to 1960 he worked at Cambridge, rising to the position of director of the Statistical Laboratory.

Lindley always worked from first principles – or axioms – and as an undergraduate had been frustrated that the only branch of mathematics in which axiomatic reasoning had been seen as irrelevant was statistics. Students were trained in “frequentist” statistical techniques and methodology, but were not encouraged to examine or test the underlying principles.

On his appointment to an assistant lectureship Lindley decided to try to establish a rigorous axiomatic justification for “frequentism”. It was in the course of this work he began to detect flaws in the classical approach and moved to a Bayesian stance.

In 1960 Lindley was appointed Professor of Statistics at Aberystwyth and seven years later he moved to University College London.

Lindley took early retirement in 1977 and devoted the next 10 years to travelling the world as an “itinerant scholar”.

He published more than 100 significant scholarly articles and several books, including Introduction to Probability and Statistics from a Bayesian Viewpoint (2 volumes, 1965) and Understanding Uncertainty (2006). In 1979 he founded the Valencia International Meetings on Bayesian Statistics, held every four years, and in 2002 was awarded the Royal Statistical Society’s Guy Medal in Gold.

In 1947 he married Joan Armitage, with whom he had a daughter and two sons.

Dennis Lindley, born July 25 1923, died December 15 2013

Guardian:

This Lent we, and thousands of others, made the rise of hunger in the UK the focus of our fasting. It has been a time of sorrowful and deep reflection on a rise we see every day in the numbers visiting food banks in towns and cities across the country.

The Trussell Trust figures, released today, only further illustrate this terrible rise, from 350,000 last year to over 900,000 this year. This figure, shocking as it is, is far from the total number of people going hungry in our country today – from those too ashamed to visit their local food bank to those many families not in crisis but ever more worried about keeping the cupboards full. One in four is cutting portion sizes and half are cutting their household food budgets.

Lent has finally seen the beginning of a real national discussion on what this hunger means, what causes it and how we as a society can begin rising to the challenge of this national crisis.

As we approach Easter the mind turns to the hope of spring, the promise of resurrection and renewal. The hope Easter symbolises this year is a quiet and determined one. The hope that sees more and more people respond to their neighbours’ need, volunteering and supporting their local food bank. The hope that sees politicians from all parties come together with our colleague, the Bishop of Truro, to hear the real stories of UK hunger in a full and independent inquiry.

Hope is not an idle force. Hope drives us to act. It drives us to tackle the growing hunger in our midst. It calls on each of us, and government too, to act to make sure that work pays, that food markets support sustainable and healthy diets, and that the welfare system provides a robust last line of defence against hunger.

The fast is over, the work begins.

We ask that you commit fully to engage with the independent inquiry into the rise of UK hunger, championing its recommendations, and agree to meet representatives of the End Hunger Fast campaign to discuss how we can better work on these urgent issues together.

Yours faithfully,

Barry Morgan, Archbishop of Wales

Andy John, Bangor

Nick Holtam, Salisbury

Alan Wilson, Buckingham

Colin Fletcher, Dorchester

Pete Broadbent, Willesden

John Wraw, Bradwell

Stephen Conway, Ely

Dave Walker, Manchester

Steven Croft, Sheffield

Peter Burrows, Doncaster

Stephen Cottrell, Chelmsford

Andrew Watson, Aston

Gregory Cameron, St Asaph

Martin Warner, Chichester

Jonathan Clark, Croydon

Mark Sowerby, Horsham

Paul Butler, Durham

Christopher Chessun, Southwark

Stephen Patten, Wakefield

Michael Perham, Gloucester

Alan Winton, Thetford

Julian Henderson, Blackburn

Adrian Newman, Stepney

Ian Brackley, Dorking

Chris Edmondson, Bolton

John Holbrook, Brixworth

Alan Smith, St Albans

Trevor Willmott, Canterbury

Peter Hancock, Bath and Wells

Paul Bayes, Hertford

Michael Ipgrave, Woolwich

Paul Williams, Kensington

David Thomson, Huntingdon

Richard Atkinson, Bedford

James Bell, Knaresborough

Richard Inwood, Acting Southwell and Nottingham

Tony Porter, Sherwood

Andrew Proud, Reading

Christopher Coxworth, Coventry

Alastair Redfern, Derby

Geffrey Stafford, Lichfield

Steve Clifford, General Director of the Evangelical Alliance

Clare Wood, General Secretary of Quaker Peace and Social Justice

Ernie Whalley, President of the Baptist Union

Richard Teal, chair of Cumbria Methodist District

Jennifer Hurd, chair of the Wales Methodist Synod

Vernon March, chair of Sheffield Methodist District

Anne Brown, chair of Beds, Essex & Herts Methodist District

Graham Thompson, chair of East Anglia Methodist District

Bruce Thompson, chair of Lincolnshire Methodist District

Stuart Jordan, chair of London Methodist District

Jenny Impey, chair of London Methodist District

David Sinclair, Moderator of Glasgow Presbytery of the Church of Scotland

Richard Church, Moderator of the North West Synod of the United Reformed Church

Roy Lowes, Moderator of the West Midlands Synod of the United Reformed Church

Paul Whittle, Moderator of the Eastern Synod of the United Reformed Church

*Also signed by over 600 other church leaders

Updated , any further signatories will be uploaded to version on the End Hunger Fast website endhungerfast.co.uk

David Laws has noticed the approaching general election (Boost for teachers, 15 April), but his attempt to distance himself from the disastrous education policies of the coalition government is unconvincing. Much more than pre-election posturing is needed. The government should change direction. A responsible government would:

• Champion collaboration between schools based on successful initiatives like the London Challenge, instead of forcing schools to compete against each other.

• Raise training standards for all school staff and provide for continuous professional development, instead of employing more unqualified teachers.

• Commit to the principle that every child is entitled to a good education by ensuring that every school has the same powers, obligations and level of financial support.

• Embrace the principle of inclusion and open all state-funded schools to all students, instead of allowing thousands of English children to be branded 11-plus failures.

• Use highly qualified professionals to set national standards and offer supportive local inspection and advisory services to schools, instead of wasting money on a privatised inspection system.

• Develop a broad and balanced curriculum for all state-funded schools which includes the arts and has space for innovation and creativity.

Rather than the whims and harebrained ideas of Michael Gove and David Laws, we will be campaigning for a fair and inclusive education policy based on evidence, professionalism and a strong sense of responsibility to every child in England.
Melian Mansfield, Chair, Keith Lichman Secretary, Campaign for State Education; John Edmonds Chair, Comprehensive Future; Margaret Jones Director, Information for School and College Governors; Sheila Dore, Chair, Martin Dore General secretary, Socialist Education Association

Congratulations to the Guardian on its Pulitzer prize (Guardian wins Pulitzer prize for surveillance revelations, 15 April). Though it is strange how little prominence BBC News 24 gave to the biggest story in the world. The fact that the BBC and the mainstream corporate media have played ideological favourites on its US coverage shows just how vital was the Guardian’s break from the pack on this issue.
Gavin Lewis
Manchester

• (Note to the NSA, GCHQ, Google, Apple, Verizon et al: chill, the enclosed content is certified terrorism-free.) Congratulations, and thanks, to you both.
Bill Steen Jr
Pittsburgh, USA

• Congratulations to all at the Guardian on the Pulitzer. Can’t wait for the film. All the President’s Men II? Johnny Depp as Alan Rusbridger?
Bob Hargreaves
Bury

• The east coast mainline (Letters, 10 April) shows how a state-run rail company can spur competition. This should be a model for all public utilities: a state-run company in the power, water and banking sectors to encourage competition and provide real cost figures for the running of such utilities to enable fair and reasonable prices to be determined.
Hugh Cooke
Lincoln

• Terry Leahy’s views on the inefficiency of a 50p income tax rate (Report, 11 April) are incoherent. If, as he claims, the yield is lower from a higher rate, then why is that a disincentive for rich people wanting to live and invest in the UK?
John Webb
London

• The suggestion that that the government buys a house in each constituency so that all MPs have a home (Letters, 10 April) is back to front. All MPs should already be resident in their constituencies. What is needed is a high-rise block of flats next to Westminster where MPs can stay when they are away from home.
John Tollick
Pontefract, West Yorkshire

• Not sure if any WI members have joined the recently opened diving club in Muff, Co Donegal (Letters, 15 April).
John Sissons
Ramsey, Isle of Man

Dr Richard Carter has not read Seymour Hersh’s article very carefully (Doubts about Syrian chemical weapons, Letters, 15 April). He asserts it is “based on extensive interviews with intelligence staff” but its principal claims are based on only two sources: unidentified “former” officials. Nor was there any need to “interview” them since their views have been on the internet for months. Carter states that one of Hersh’s claims is based on “analytical tests conducted by Porton Down”. But we have only Hersh’s word for this – he provides no source and Porton Down has not corroborated it. Carter describes Hersh’s claim of Turkish involvement as being offered “with evidence” – but on Turkish facilitation of the attack Hersh offers no evidence. Several blogs provide dismantling of Hersh’s article. The Guardian has an understanding of the evidential criteria required for investigative journalism. Hersh’s work fails on all and deserves to be ignored.
Brian Slocock
Chester

Supporters throw flower petals as Bharatiya Janata party leader Narendra Modi rides in an open jeep on his way to file nomination papers on 9 April 2014 in Vadodra, India. Photograph: Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

Priyamvada Gopal (Modi can’t be shrugged off, 14 April) is indeed right to direct our attention to Narendra Modi and the riots in Gujarat during 2002. The Gujarat riots of 12 years ago were horrible. Yet it is legitimate to ask whether this was the only or even the most horrific episode in recent Indian history, albeit the first one to be recorded on live television. The Delhi massacre of 3,000 Sikhs took place over three days in October 1984 while Rajiv Gandhi was prime minister.

Narasimha Rao, subsequently prime minister, was then the home minister and in charge of the police, who were told not to intervene. No one has been punished for that episode as yet after 30 years. Even prior to that, Sanjay Gandhi, though unelected, unleashed a pogrom of sterilisation on Muslim adults in 1976 as a population control measure to speed up development. This was while Indira Gandhi, his mother, had imposed the Emergency, the sole episode of fascism in India. Muslims resisting sterilisation were fired upon and killed in Delhi. In Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, the killings were so many that the event was called mini-Jallianwala Bagh, recalling the worst atrocity under British rule 95 years ago in Amritsar.

Hindu/Muslim riots are a tragic part of Indian history. There have been 13,000 in the last 50 years, most of them under Congress rule. No one has been punished for these riots with the singular exception of Gujarat, where trials have been held and convictions taken place. The judiciary for once has not been prevented from delivering justice. The cases are still going on and may punish more people.

No head of government – prime minister or chief minister – has ever apologised for riots which have taken place under their watch in the 67 years of independent India’s history. Rajiv Gandhi never apologised, not only for the Delhi riots but also when Muslims were killed by police in Bhagalpur, and many other episodes one could list. There were riots in Mumbai in 1993 in which many Muslims were killed, and the Congress government then in power never took the culprits to court though they were named in the Srikrishna commission report it had received. The leader of the Shiv Sena party (which was active in the killings), Bal Thackeray, received a state funeral when he died recently under the watch of a Congress government.

There are no winners and no sinners in this game. Muslims have suffered under the rule of every party in India. At the root of the problem is the birthmark of India as an independent country, the partition of British-ruled India into India and Pakistan. India has to come to terms with the tragedy of partition. It will do so in its own ways. The Indian electors know all that Priyamvada Gopal tells us. Let them decide what they wish for themselves.
Meghnad Desai
Labour, House of Lords

•  ”Those who despair at the likely outcome [of the current Indian elections] can console themselves with the thought that nobody ever wins completely in India” (Editorial, 14 April). Indeed so. Coalition government has been the rule since the 1980s, and at least two governing coalitions have been headed by Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata party. The first authorised India’s 1998 testing of a nuclear device, possibly the most popular political decision since independence, and the second rewrote a lot of India’s history. Mr Modi, if in a position to form the next government, may champion a similar mix of populism and revisionism. With Gujarat’s capital of Ahmedabad now appearing as “Amdavad” on the road signs, Muslims are already being written out of the map in Modi’s home state.

But history can be re-rewritten and maps reversed. Even the bomb – developed by the Nehru/Gandhi dynasty and to which Pakistan immediately replied with its own tests – may have reduced the risk of every border clash turning into another war. Under the BJP the liberalisation of the economy continued, the inter-city motorway system known as the Golden Quadrilateral was launched and better relations with China were established. More surprisingly, the first symbolic gesture in over a decade to mend (or in this case, open) fences with Pakistan was launched when in 1999 the BJP leader boarded the inaugural run of a Delhi-Lahore bus service. His host, then as now, was Nawaz Sharif. Whatever one thinks of Mr Modi, his party’s record in power is not all bad. Cause for further consolation?
John Keay
Dalmally, Argyll

•  Your editorial rightly expresses concern over the rise of Narendra Modi. However, Indian voters, when it comes to economic issues, do not have much of a choice. India needs economic reforms, for most of its economic problems are structural, not cyclic. Every political party in India, however, is left of the centre; hence reforms take place only by stealth.

Modi is openly right of the centre. Even though his own party is confused on economic issues, his state of Gujarat has registered double-digit economic growth for more than a decade. He may not be the liberal reformer India needs but he is decisive, business-friendly, and gets things done. Surely these qualities are of paramount importance in a country where decision-making has been paralysed for the past five years.
Randhir Singh Bains
Gants Hill, Essex

Far more than salt reduction (Fall in salt consumption has helped cut deaths in UK, researchers claim, 15 April), a leading factor in the decline in deaths from heart disease is the reduction in the consumption of hydrogenated fat (transfats) over the past decade. Just a month ago this plastic-like fat was removed from the US’s “generally recognised as safe” list, and the US government has recommended that the food industry phase it out completely. This has happened after a 75% decline in transfat intake over the past decade, but it is still estimated that the decision will prevent 100,000 premature deaths annually from heart disease. The decline in transfat consumption worldwide had nothing to do with the Food Standards Agency or other government bodies – it was due to relentless campaigning by citizens and a response from the food industry.

In 1993 I launched a marketing campaign to support Whole Earth Superspread, the first transfat-free margarine. For the previous two decades people with high blood pressure had been advised to stop consuming butter and switch to margarine. The leading “heart healthy” margarine at the time contained 21% transfats; normal margarines were 30% or more transfats. Dietitians and margarine manufacturers complained to the Advertising Standards Agency, which blocked my advertising. They continued to recommend switching to margarine. This advice underpinned heart disease and stroke levels.

There has never been an apology from the health authorities who encouraged doctors to promote a toxic food ingredient. The attempt in the British Medical Journal to draw some parallel between reduced heart disease and reduced salt intake obfuscates the real cause of reduced deaths, which arose from reduced transfat consumption, reduced cigarette use and better medical treatments. If we are really to understand how to deal with public health problems we have to begin by admitting our mistakes.
Craig Sams
(Founder of Whole Earth Foods), Hastings

There has been only one Guardian mention, briefly and disparagingly (Obituary, 11 April), of Richard Hoggart’s links with Unesco in the outpourings of tribute. But I know how important these were to him from my experience of working closely together in the 1990s to secure Britain’s return to that organisation after the shameful withdrawal by the Thatcher government in 1985.
He saw its work in promoting education, media freedom and culture as an important extension on the global stage of the ideals and values he championed so eloquently at home. When I last spoke to him, some years ago before dementia set in, he was saddened by the failure of Whitehall policymakers to promote Unesco as a major potential force for securing greater international understanding and peace, rather than as one more UN body to promote aid, and to bring economic benefit to the UK.
John Gordon
Former UK ambassador to Unesco

• In 1980 I was involved in making a television programme about Richard Hoggart for an Open University course. The course began by asking students to reflect on their educational autobiography and that was what Richard did, too, in sequences filmed in Leeds and at Goldsmiths College. A Measured Life was broadcast on BBC2 for several years and prompted correspondence from OU students and the wider viewing public.
One letter from a student thanked Richard for the inspiration he had given her in an appointment to a senior post in a London borough. On the day of the interviews she had gone home to prepare for what she anticipated would be a tough encounter with councillors that evening. She watched the TV programme: “It is no exaggeration to say that this was exactly the inspiration I needed. Your account of your life, problems, educational and professional achievements, described in such an interesting, lucid and informative way, was so encouraging and such a model of clarity, that I felt I might be able to do the impossible, defeat the odds, and achieve this post I so much wanted.” She did. Her letter concluded: “Such is the effect we all have on the lives of one another, often unknowingly.”
Peter Barnes
Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire

• It is high time that Richard Hoggart’s achievement was considered more objectively. However, the cloud of eulogy which has always accompanied him, and has grown thicker since his death, unfortunately prevents that. One has only to compare him with Raymond Williams, his more significant contemporary, to see this. Williams came from the radical section of the working class: Hoggart from the “non-political” queen-and-country section. Hoggart was an uncritical supporter of the cold war; believed that it was more important to spend money on Trident than the arts; wouldn’t have been seen dead on an Aldermaston march; always supported the wars in which the UK was engaged; and while conceding that “all occupations are hateful” considered Israel’s occupation of Palestine “one of the more careful and thoroughly thought out”. The establishment knew Hoggart posed no threat to it. That is why he was offered a knighthood and then a seat in the Lords. Hoggart showed he was a man of honour in refusing them. But Williams would never have been offered them.
Malcolm Pittock
Bolton

Sue Townsend and I were introduced over lunch in a Soho restaurant by the head of drama at Thames Television, Lloyd Shirley, soon after the company acquired the rights to The Secret Diary of Adrian Mole Aged 13¾ to find out if we two would “hit it off” and could develop this wonderfully entertaining book for television. As luck would have it, the opposite backgrounds of a Hungarian refugee TV director and an English housewife turned writer triggered off a similar sense of humour in the visual interpretation of the story and characters.

During the following few months, I spent three days a week in Leicester, where Sue lived with her family. We worked on her script, and she helped me not just to see the characters but to smell them. We visited locations where she thought I might like to film some of the scenes the way she had visualised them. She was the most helpful writer I have had the privilege of working with.

And when I started casting, it was such a joy to listen to her enthusiasm when I was telling her over the telephone the confirmed names of brilliant actors who were going to play her characters, among them Julie Walters, Beryl Reid, Stephen Moore, Bill Fraser, and of course our Adrian (Gian Sammarco) and Pandora (Lindsey Stagg) – she thought how lucky we were to find them.

This happy association continued through the making of The Growing Pains of Adrian Mole. These two series will always be among my favourite productions.

Fracking is a bad option

I am concerned at your editorial suggesting both nuclear and fracking may be alternatives, though unpalatable ones, to forms of fossil fuel-generated power (4 April). The horrors and costs of nuclear aside, fracking is not a sensible option, as it has been shown that gas generation is more greenhouse-gas intensive than the burning of coal.

A lot of energy is expended by extracting gas by fracking, the wells leak insidious greenhouse gases and tonnes of water, and fracking fluids are required in the extraction process that can leak into the environment and pollute water sources. The transportation of gas involves the burning of even more fossil fuels; this is aside from the actual gas generation process itself.

Fracking and gas generation of electricity represent the burning of fossil fuels at a time when we should be urgently cutting back on their use. We need to invest in sustainable, secure and independent energy supplies and more actively encourage reductions in our use of fossil fuels.
Seona Gunn
Deans Marsh, Victoria, Australia

• I wonder how many readers were disappointed and puzzled by the very obvious playing down by the Guardian Weekly of the latest IPCC report on global warming issues (4 April)? Relegated to just two-thirds of a page and a brief editorial, and was absent from the signpost headlines on page one. The now rather tedious Pistorius court case was deemed more significant and given far more prominent attention.

What is happening to the Guardian Weekly’s editorial priorities when this most important update on the potentially catastrophic threat we are all now facing is given such short shrift?
Robert Norton
Sydney, Australia

• With the effects of climate change already being felt across the globe, the best the Guardian can suggest is nuclear and fracking? Now there really is no hope!
Hilary Cadman
Bellingen, NSW, Australia

China’s threat to Russia

In 2011, I spent a month visiting China to see the world’s most populous nation on the march. I had an interesting discussion with a fluently English-speaking graduate student at Shanghai University. We talked about China’s meteoric rise as an economic superpower.

He was very upbeat and told me that China’s rise has been peaceful. When I asked him what did he think about China’s relations with Russia, which was a communist country before, he told me they are very good and getting better. China is already Russia’s biggest trading partner. Then he told me that despite its one-child policy, China is an overpopulated country and needs land to expand, and Russia should sell its vast and largely underpopulated areas in the far east in the same way it sold Alaska to the US in the 19th century. I told him it seems to be good idea, provided Russia agrees to it. He replied it is inevitable as Russia, with a population of only 140 million, simply doesn’t have the manpower to develop the world’s largest landmass.

The student pointed out that in the 19th century, China was forced to cede vast territories to Russia. China has not forgotten this humiliation. By annexing Crimea, Putin has created a precedent for a powerful China to reclaim its vast far eastern territories (21 March).

The European Union can sit back and let Putin go down in its folly. As Napoleon remarked: “Don’t interrupt the enemy when he is making a false move.”
Mahmood Elahi
Ottawa, Canada

The safety of statins

Medical experts clash over statin safety (28 March) provides a valuable public service, and calls for further discussion. Should anti-cholesterol drugs should be used at all?

If cholesterol is toxic to the walls of blood vessels, why does it attack only arteries? And why does it attack the hardest-working arteries (those in the heart) most of all? Veins are attacked only when they are put in the arterial system. I once did an autopsy on a 50-year-old diabetic woman, two of whose leg veins were moved, one year earlier, to her coronary arterial system. The walls of both veins were markedly increased in thickness, leading to her death.

These findings are consistent with the “wear-and-tear” hypothesis of arterial disease, and unrelated to cholesterol. They have serious implications for the way we live, and should lead to shorter working weeks, especially for manual labourers and all who are stressed by work.

As transplantation of veins into the heart was frequent, there must have been many similar autopsy findings. In 40 years I have seen none. On the other hand, soon after the American nutritionist Ancel Keys alleged in 1953 that dietary cholesterol was producing coronary heart disease, anti-cholesterol drugs, of which the statins are the most recent, appeared.

Promotion of anti-cholesterol drugs has been successful. The use of statins makes big bucks for big companies. Is it surprising that, in capitalist society, the theory that makes money for big companies is accepted, while the theory that could benefit workers is ignored? Is this one of Marx’s “contradictions of capitalism”?
Ken Ranney
Peterborough, Ontario, Canada

Chandler remembered

While reading John Banville’s interesting account of his attempt to carry on the Raymond Chandler tradition (11 April), I was reminded of the day when Chandler appeared to be attempting suicide. I worked for 11 years for Hamish Hamilton at 90 Great Russell Street in Bloomsbury, and one morning about 1957, Jamie Hamilton said he had been woken in the night by Chandler, calling from California. Such a call was most unusual in those days and Hamilton was alarmed because it appeared that Chandler was making a sentimental goodbye.

Hamilton decided to contact the nearest police station to Chandler’s home, explained the situation and suggested they send someone to Chandler’s apartment. A few hours later the message came through that Chandler had been discovered standing in the shower with a gun in his hand. Thanks to this intervention, Chandler survived.

A few months later, he came to London and we gave a party for him in the office. He appeared in a suit of electric blue, a brilliant white shirt and a tie no Englishman would have been seen dead wearing. With him was a woman who appeared to be playing the role of nurse and companion, as he was obviously fragile. He charmed the guests, all of whom were delighted to meet the famous creator of Philip Marlowe, who moved around the room with a glass of whisky in his hand from which he was drinking deeply and which his companion was assiduously refilling.

This worried me. I shared my concern with his companion. She replied,” Not to worry, honey. It’s cold tea and he don’t know the difference.”
Ken Wilder
Bowral, NSW, Australia

A breath of fresh air?

Linda Woodhead, professor of the sociology of religion at Lancaster University, is right (A breath of fresh air, 21 March). This pope so far has done nothing but use cheap gestures.

Has he agreed to opening the Vatican’s books on sexual abuse, so that victims can at last see exposure of the crimes committed against them? What about handing over paedophile priests to the law? What about putting the Vatican’s artworks up for auction and using the money to build houses in the poorest parts of the poorest countries? What about standing up for equal respect for people who differ physically?

It takes my breath away to hear Jon O’Brien, chief executive for Catholics for Choice in the US, say “he has brought about real change”. Driving a Ford Focus? Wearing black boots instead of red shoes? This constitutes “real” change?

The suffering of people everywhere because of the church’s ruling on abortion, gay rights and female priests has not been alleviated one tiny bit by this pope’s trivial exercising of his personal preferences.
Susan Grimsdell
Auckland, New Zealand

Briefly

• The Italian court’s decision (28 March) to grant “short-term private interests” an injunction against a law to safeguard Venice’s heritage reflects the damage caused by out-of-control corporate interests. The only democratic measure with the capacity to stand up to democracy’s denigration is a constitutional provision that empowers citizens to say “enough already”, as Swiss voters did in February.
André Carrel
Terrace, British Columbia, Canada

• In his 2010 memoir of the Bush years, Tony Blair melodramatically cast himself as a martyr to hoi polloi – shades of St Sebastian – albeit in “armour which the arrows simply bounced off” (4 April). And he visualised himself “float[ing] above the demonic rabble”, ie the demos, those who bravely tried to forestall his martial ambitions. He aimed “to achieve a kind of weightlessness” – and that he did.
R M Fransson
Denver, Colorado, US

• Diane Francis is welcome to return to her native US any time she likes, but not to take Canada with her, as she seems to want to do (28 March).
Bruce Inksetter
Gatineau, Quebec, Canada

• Middle Earth does not meet Middle English (4 April). In translating Beowulf, written as early as the seventh century, Tolkien would have met Anglo-Saxon. Middle English was the language of Chaucer, used a half-millennium later. Alison Flood’s calling Beowulf an 11th-century poem makes it a very late edition.
Kenneth Rower
Newbury, Vermont

Independent:

Ian Birrell discusses the “dismal offering” of “Mr Clegg’s dwindling band”, and suggests the Liberal Democrats “need to be more than not being somebody else” (14 April). But what?

Such strictures are quite dated. A century ago in The New Machiavelli H G Wells wrote of the Liberals that they can never be “anything but a diversified crowd”, which “has to voice everything that is left out” by Conservatives and Labour. “It is at once the party of the failing and untried… the “Anti” party … a system of hostilities and objections that somehow achieves at times an elusive common soul.”

Liberals have drifted with the tides, from Herbert Spencer’s laissez-faire, through Herbert Asquith’s social welfare, to Herbert Marcuse’s political correctness. Celtic fringes, suburban eccentrics, metrosexual cosmopolitans, they have become a pointless collection of ideological “spotty herberts”. The sooner the Liberal Democrat party is wound up, the better.

David Ashton, Sheringham, Norfolk

Miliband needs to get off the fence

If Ed Miliband would set out Labour policies and defend them, rather than wriggling on the fence, then he would find his personal rating zoom up. This is why Nigel Farage and Alex Salmond are so popular. You may not agree with everything they say, but you know without doubt what their policies are and what they will do if elected.

To win the next election the Labour Party must drop the New Labour concept, as we now all know that this was secret code for “warmongering Conservative”. They should realise that the average Labour voter loathes Tony Blair more than even the Conservatives.

Parachuting Euan Blair into the safe seat of Bootle would be a disaster for Labour, as it would send out the wrong message and would not work anyway. You cannot fool Scousers.

Malcolm Howard, Banstead, Surrey

The Labour leader might command more respect if he were Ed Megaband or Ed Gigaband.

David Ridge, London N19

What an MP learned in court

Nigel Evans now realises the injustice of the Government’s cuts in legal aid. Evans was lucky enough to have £130,000 to pay for high-quality legal representation; presumably he felt the expense was worth it, to improve the chances of acquittal.

So are we really “all equal before the law”? Innocent others, without such wealth, might have ended up being found guilty.

Evans’s change of mind also suggests that parliamentary votes cutting benefits for the poorest, might well have gone the other way had MPs and ministers had direct and vivid experience of poverty and unemployment.

It is easy to judge “objectively” that too much is spent on welfare and legal aid when your own quality of life is unaffected by cuts in such benefits.

Peter Cave, London W1

Having been found not guilty of sexual offences, Nigel Evans MP thinks that the CPS should pay the costs of his defence.

But there seem to have been no substantial issues of fact for the jury to decide; the question was whether Mr Evans’s admitted behaviour amounted to, or fell short of, a criminal offence. This jury found in Mr Evans’s favour; but another jury could well have decided otherwise, in which case Mr Evans would have lost not only his money but also his liberty.

It was because of his own behaviour that he found himself in the dock.

Anthony Bramley-Harker, Watford, Hertfordshire

Practical work in science A-levels

Stephanie Fernandes from the Institution of Engineering and Technology is right when she says that GCSEs and A-levels do not always provide the level of practical experience that employers need (letter, 12 April).

When looking at the science A-levels, we found that the current assessment arrangements do not support the teaching of practical work as they should. That is why we are putting in place new arrangements which place practical skills back at the heart of teaching, where they belong. They will put the focus back on equipping students with the skills they need to progress into education and careers in science and engineering.

The content for the new A-levels, published by the Department for Education, requires students to carry out experimental and investigative activities in a range of contexts, to analyse and interpret data to provide evidence, and to evaluate methodology, evidence and data. They will have to carry out a minimum of 12 experiments over each two-year science course they take.

Some of the practical skills, such as commenting on experimental design and evaluating scientific methods, will then be assessed in the written exams. To get good marks in their A-levels, students will have to show knowledge and understanding of the experiments they have gained through doing them.

The new  A-levels will promote more and better science practical work being carried out, emphasise the vital role of practical skills in teaching and learning the sciences and help students develop the science practical skills that higher education and employers are seeking. We intend to consult on a similar proposition for GCSE sciences in the  near future.

Glenys Stacey, Chief Regulator, Ofqual, Coventry

Allotments in danger

As a former allotment-holder, I was very interested in “The great British rake off” (15 April) but Margaret Willes did not mention the widespread and continuing destruction of allotment sites throughout the country.

I was Secretary of the Parc Beck allotments in Swansea, which were established during the First World War. The site was in the middle of an urban area and was very popular, with a long waiting list, but the allotments were destroyed when the landowner (the local health authority) sold the land for housing development.

Mike Stroud, Swansea

Triumphs of democracy

Millions queue to vote in India; thousands risk assassination to vote in Afghanistan. There must be something in this democracy lark. Why don’t we introduce it here?

Clive Georgeson, Dronfield, Derbyshire

Shale gas gives us time to go green

While one must take note of warnings from the United Nations in respect of global warming, they should not necessarily be interpreted as requiring the immediate cessation of burning fossil fuels, or as having  particular reference to shale oil and shale gas (“Final IPCC report demands green energy drive to avoid catastrophe”, 14 April).

What we do need, and what also was sadly lacking when North Sea oil was discovered, is a plan. In the case of North Sea oil the plan seems to have been to use up the resource and then go back to importing oil and gas.

Shale gas and shale oil offer the country a unique and magnificent opportunity, unlikely to be repeated. Not only will they assist the country towards energy security but also enormously reduce the balance of payments deficit. A plan now would reap huge rewards for the day when even shale gas runs out. A proportion of the profits set aside could be directed, from the outset, towards developing green energy.

Gradually, as shale gas runs down, green energy will be expanding to fill the gap, and there will be a no break. Indeed, we would be less dependent upon fossil fuels over the years as this programme was rolled out.

In this way shale gas can be usefully employed to solve the problems of industry, global warming, and self sufficiency in green energy. Not to mention giving the whole country a kick-start when it is most needed.

Vernon J Yarker, Maldon, Essex

Energy Secretary Ed Davey need not worry about having to persuade other European governments about the need to take Putin’s energy threat seriously (14 April). As it happens, the heads of EU Governments, all of whom met in Brussels last month, unanimously agreed to require the European Commission to report  to them by June on precisely  this topic.

They  asked for  a detailed plan showing how we can minimise the amount of Russian gas Europe need import. Their communiqué states what they believe to be the best, most cost- effective and swiftest way of proceeding. It says unequivocally that, to reduce gas import dependency, “moderating energy demand through enhanced energy efficiency should be the first step; this will also contribute to other energy and climate objectives.”

It is clear where the 28 heads of governments believe the priorities for Europe’s energy security future rationally lie.

Andrew Warren, Director, Association for the Conservation of Energy, London N1

Times:

Teachers’ support organisations are hearing increasing reports of teachers under stress

Sir, Terry Haydn (“Misbehaviour in class ‘is far worse than reported’”, Apr 14) is to be applauded for highlighting the growing lack of discipline in schools. Our teacher support line has received a growing number of complaints about pupil behaviour and its damaging effects on teachers’ well-being and students’ learning. We found that nearly 40 per cent of teachers have considered leaving the profession as a result of poor behaviour, with over 60 per cent suffering anxiety and depression for the same reason.

Unless disruptive behaviour is properly managed, our schools will lose promising staff and teaching standards and results will decline.

We must explore the wider causes of this decline in behaviour, which needs to be addressed by the whole school community, including school leaders, parents and policy makers. More specialised training and robust policies that balance the needs of both teachers and students will be essential, but we must also ensure that the causes of negative behaviour are addressed holistically. Teachers should not be made to feel these wider social problems are theirs to deal with alone.

Julian Stanley

Teacher Support Network

London N5

Sir, You conveyed Professor Haydn’s concern that behaviour in schools is far worse than reported by Ofsted. He speaks of schools having, in effect, to contain bad behaviour rather than reject it, and of cultural factors such as unsupportive parents. He also speaks of instilling a culture “that no child has the right to spoil the learning of others.”

It is one thing to instil a culture that acknowledges rights, in this case a right to learning that is not impeded by the poor behaviour of others, it is another matter to insist on such rights. Highly visible signs in other publicly funded institutions such as hospitals warn that abuse of staff will not be tolerated. What moral authority is there for governments to insist, in effect that parents send children to schools where bad behaviour is tolerated?

The responsibility for seeing that their children receive an effective education rests with parents.

When they fail, other parents will keep their children away if they can. Many who can afford fees resort to independent schools which of course would fail if they did not insist on reasonable standards from all their pupils and their parents.

Tony Blair banned the use of parent interviews in allocating places in state-funded schools despite the claim by the governors of his sons’ school that such interviews were their most important task. This ban should be reversed, and places at state-funded schools should be dependent upon a satisfactory interview with a child’s parents.

Peter Inson

(Head, Twyford CofE HS, 1995-98) Colchester, Essex

Sir, You refer to English schools’ low international ranking for pupil behaviour and suggest it is a main reason for some 40 per cent of new teachers leaving the job within their first five years.

The main motivation for teachers is not the salary but job satisfaction. This has been severely diminished by the poor behaviour that you report on and also by the ever-increasing pressure from government and by being generally kicked around and disparaged since the inception of the “great educational debate” in 1976.

David Cooper-Smith

Bletchley, Bucks

The number of animals being used in scientific research is rising worryingly once more

Sir, Since 1979, April 24 has been World Day for Animals in Laboratories, an occasion for thinking about the millions of animals that live and die for science every year. As alumni and associates of Oxford university, we think of the animals used there — over 180,000 of them in 2013.

The UK law on animals in research has, since 1986, aimed at steadily reducing their numbers, with a “final goal” of none at all (the phrase comes from the EU Directive). At first it was successful, but in this century numbers have been briskly rising.

Since the opening of the new animal-research laboratory at Oxford in 2008, there has been an increase in “procedures” there of about 25 per cent. We are dismayed and mystified by this slighting of a law which, it must be remembered, gives research scientists special privileges and immunities as a quid pro quo.

In 2012 Oxford university was one of the signatories to a “Declaration on Openness on Animal Research”. If it means to redeem its promise, there is much that could be done to make this bad situation at least more intelligible. The university website, for instance, provides too little information and is not kept up to date. There are animal-advocacy groups in the university, junior and senior, which should be given official countenance: why is the new laboratory shown to BBC journalists, but not to them?

Oxford needs to remember that a university should be of all institutions the most reluctant to keep secrets, and the most eager to promote knowledge and informed discussion. It shouldn’t have to make a promise of this at all.

Professor Michael Balls, Professor Stephen RL Clark, Professor Martin Henig, Sir David Madden, Dr Desmond Morris, Dr Katherine Morris, Dr Richard Ryder, Dr Matthew Simpson, Professor Peter Singer Oxford

Some wage slaves are beginning to murmur at the technology which keeps us on the treadmill 24 hours a day

Sir, Further to Kevin Maher (Switching off at 6pm isn’t what I would call working”, Apr 14), there is no turning off our computers so that we can avoid being contacted. To do so is just storing up the inevitable deluge when we turn it back on again. And if you have a smart phone, your boss will track you down. Mine always did: on top of a mountain in Switzerland or walking the hills of Scotland, nowhere is safe. I worked seven days a week, 365 days a year without extra pay because of this.

Rather than working 24/7 without pay shouldn’t we think of ourselves as a business. If your company can say that time is money, shouldn’t we? If you want my time you pay for it.

Edward Williams

Poole

Sir, Can anyone seriously argue that George Osborne should emulate Greece (“A Greek lesson for Britain’s chancellor”, Apr 11)? The austerity measures imposed on Greece have led to an economy shrinking by 25 per cent; an unemployment rate of 27 per cent; and a youth unemployment rate of nearly 60 per cent. This has encouraged the biggest exodus of Greeks in a century. There is a dangerous rise in nationalistic extremism on the right and populist protectionism on the left.

Cuts have reduced the budget deficit at a huge cost to the economy, and Greece has just done its first borrowing again from the markets, but the debt-to-GDP ratio has increased to an unsustainable 175 per cent. This debt will need to be rescheduled, restructured and largely written off for Greece to have any chance of sustained recovery. If I were the UK’s chancellor I would look elsewhere for inspiration.

Vicky Pryce

(author, Greekonomics: The Euro Crisis and Why Politicians Don’t Get It)

London, SW4

A small but grievous editing error attracted several letters of condolence and reproach, this one among them

Sir, I felt very envious when I read (Apr 14) that the sun “shined” on the marathon. It just shone in my part of London.

Huboob Al Mudhaffer

London SW1

Telegraph:

SIR – Four years ago, when we pledged £20 million towards the ArcelorMittal Orbit, we intended it not to end up a relic of the Games, but to come to symbolise tangible improvement in the local area, whose regeneration was part of the Olympic bid.

Yet today many East Londoners will be wondering when they will see the benefits. The area continues to face unemployment, crime, poor education and a lack of dedicated space for people to take part in activities. The talking needs to stop, and the investment and involvement must start.

With this in mind, we’re launching several community initiatives, including educational sponsorships at Birkbeck, University of London’s new Stratford campus and weekly workshops for young people at Theatre Royal Stratford East. The reopening of the Olympic Park was a great start, but we still have a long way to go.

Ian Louden
Head of Brand, ArcelorMittal
London W1

SIR – After a general election that is not based on proportional representation, Ukip will not hold a position of any sort of power, but the votes that have been cast for it are likely to have resulted in a number of marginal seats moving from Conservative to Labour.

It may be that the Tory party is not the Conservative Party of old, but the Labour Party is still the same old Labour Party.

Roger Gentry
Sutton-at-Hone, Kent

SIR – Ian Dodsworth says: “Most people vote for either Ukip or the Liberals because they believe in their policies.” To my knowledge, Ukip has yet to reveal one single policy apart from instant exit from the European Union.

A successful pro-Ukip vote would be a protest vote with perilous consequences for this country.

Doona Turner
Horsham, West Sussex

SIR – I do not agree with the view that to vote Conservative in 2015 would be to vote for another Coalition government.

If a large enough proportion of the electorate, and particularly those in the key marginals, vote Conservative at the next general election, then that party could secure an overall majority; as would have been the case in 2010.

Pamela Westland
Braintree, Essex

Islamist extremism

SIR – No doubt liberals will strongly disagree with Lord Pearson of Rannoch’s letter without answering his basic argument that Islamist extremism is far from being a minority in Islam and the mainstream is doing little about it – and those few who do risk their lives.

Some have considered that better education would cause extremism and fanaticism to fade away, but our university campuses show this has not happened.

Trying to gag people by cries of “Islamophobia” will not make this problem go away. Responding that other religions have had extremists too is no justification.

The key problem is whether the founder of the faith desired followers to be warlike or peaceful. Compare Mohammed’s sayings with Jesus’s.

Colin McGreevy
Liverpool

The sniff test

SIR – I completely agree with David Lear. I don’t use sell-by dates, display-until dates and best-before dates. I use my nose, which is 100 per cent reliable. Anything that doesn’t make it goes in the compost or bio-degrader.

Rod Sanders
Lincoln

Waistcoat etiquette

SIR – Is it not time that the few of us who still wear waistcoats were freed from the convention of leaving the bottom button undone? Apparently the custom dates back to the obesity of George IV, when it was considered a faux pas in court circles to do up a button his portly majesty couldn’t, but I don’t see why this should govern us nowadays.

The undone waistcoat button may look dignified when standing or walking, but once you sit down, the midriff and the bottom end of the tie spill out in a most unflattering and unappealing manner.

Could my fellow waistcoat-wearers agree to button up all the way down?

Sean Lang
Cambridge

Concreting the suburbs

SIR – You report that Nick Clegg wants three new garden cities built between Oxford and Cambridge. Surely it would be better to regenerate existing cities and convert redundant office space into low-cost housing?

We must also halt the concreting-over of what were once the leafy suburbs. Front gardens have been converted to soulless slabs bereft of lawns and flower beds. The younger generation’s obsession with multiple car ownership has made front gardens the preserve of the elderly.

Anthony Rodriguez
Staines-upon-Thames, Middlesex

Cathedral bypass

SIR – The Dean of Ely Cathedral is quite right to champion the Ely southern bypass, which will benefit the town and the cathedral. A possibly more deserving case is Salisbury, which sits astride the A36 Southampton to Bristol trunk road. The bypass here has been on the Department for Transport’s shelf for 10 years or more. Whitehall and Westminster should hang their heads in shame at the continued imposition of traffic on the city’s inhabitants and the cathedral.

John Franklin
Horsley, Surrey

Make your mind up

SIR – My wife and I recently sent out invitations to our daughter’s forthcoming wedding and included a return card and addressed envelope. The card clearly gave the option of “can attend/cannot attend”.

Our problem has not been the lack of replies so much as the significant number of cards returned with neither option selected. Why did they waste the stamp?

Christopher Lucy
Margate, Kent

Slow getaways

SIR – Never mind how long it takes an infirm person to exit a stationary car. By the time my wife has switched the engine and radio off, removed her seat belt, put away her driving glasses, gathered her belongings and opened the door, 30 seconds will have long gone.

It’s the same at parties: although I can thank my hosts, say goodbye to a dozen other folk and be out of the door in two minutes, I know it will be a further 18 before my spouse is close to the threshold.

Robert Warner
West Woodhay, Berkshire

The Navy needs flexibility, not sophistication

SIR – Mark Harland calls for the forward-basing of more major maritime surface units in the Mediterranean as opposed to the deployment of “troops on the ground”.

The Royal Navy has recently spent its money on: six Type 45 destroyers, the most advanced warships we have ever built (over £6.6 billion); seven Astute-class submarines, the most advanced and most powerful submarines ever operated by the Navy (£900 million each); and two Queen Elizabeth-type aircraft carriers, the largest ever built for the Navy (£3.1 billion each).

If the Navy needs more forward platforms it should stop procuring large, expensive, sophisticated ships and acquire smaller, cheaper, more flexible units instead. What cost-effectiveness is there in deploying the most advanced and complex ships in the world against Somali pirates?

Lt Col Paul d’Apice (retd)
Dawlish, Devon

SIR – Our Armed Forces now lack any Long Range Maritime Patrol aircraft and thus, should an aircraft be lost in the North Atlantic, we wouldn’t be able to perform a proper, credible search, unlike the Australians and New Zealanders.

As an island nation dependent on merchant shipping, we also have no aircraft to combat a submarine threat. With Vladimir Putin’s sabre rattling, this threat could reappear. We were nearly starved out of two world wars by the U-boat.

The Royal Navy has been reduced to a few ships and submarines, insufficient to protect the expensive new aircraft carriers or conduct credible anti-submarine operations. Having vandalised the Nimrod fleet, which in any case should have been replaced years ago, the purchase of some Orion P3s, at present doing sterling work in the Indian Ocean, would be a good start.

Wg Cdr R M Trowern RAF (retd)
Longparish, Hampshire

SIR – Politicians traditionally over-promise on the NHS, especially in the run-up to an election. The promise of regular GP visits, longer opening hours and same-day appointments, all funded by the Prime Minister’s £50 million access fund, seems hardly credible when the funding amounts to a mere 87 pence per registered patient per year, and most practices will not receive any of this funding.

There is no spare capacity in general practice. GPs and their teams would somehow cope with care being moved out of hospitals and into surgeries, but the proportion of the NHS budget put into general practice has fallen in the past five years from more than 11 per cent to under 7.5 per cent.

It is time for a realistic offering, and for the Government to put its money where its mouth is.

Dr Peter Swinyard
Chairman, Family Doctor Association
Swindon, Wiltshire

SIR – Your leading article is correct in ascribing the chief reason for the excessive pressure on A&E departments to GPs opting out of weekend and evening on-call duties. This has induced anxiety in many patients, who realise that the day of the personal doctor is over. Couple this with the not-uncommon impression that they are regarded by practice staff as a nuisance, and it is easy to understand how patient’s morale is suffering.

It is not good for the doctors either as they are losing the rewarding positive feedback that results from good doctor–patient relationships. I spent more than 40 enjoyable years as a GP in a practice that thrived because the whole team – doctors, nurses and receptionists – knew that they were there for the benefit of the patients, and this was evident in their attitudes.

The economic difficulties are self-evident, yet in spite of hearing from Jim Gee, a former head of NHS counter-fraud personnel, that fraud and error are costing some £7 billion annually, the NHS security budget has been cut rather than augmented. More understanding of the NHS’s raison d’être, and less incompetent housekeeping, are needed to restore confidence and efficiency in areas that are causing considerable concern.

Dr Neville Davis
Hove, East Sussex

SIR – During a face-to-face appointment, a qualified doctor has the opportunity to observe a patient’s skin, hair, eyes, fingernails, ears and smell. Doctors can gain a lot of information from this meeting. This knowledge would not be available if the appointment was dealt with by email or phone call.

The one-to-one consultation outside of usual opening hours cannot be totally replaced with remote technology. Those surgeries that do not open outside normal working hours need to change so that more patients can be seen in person.

Sue Doughty
Twyford, Berkshire

Irish Times:

Sir, – Please allow me to share the reservations expressed by Prof Diarmaid Ferriter (reported April 14th) about the proposed presence of British royals at the Easter Rising commemorations in 2016, or indeed at any of the subsequent commemorative events. I fail to see how such a presence could be at all appropriate or, if you think about it, anything less than bizarre.

At a history conference on the first World War in UCC last January, I pointed out, in the presence of the British ambassador, that it is not the business of historians to promote “inclusiveness” and reconciliation, essentially political objectives. Where commemorations are concerned, the role of historians is to enlighten students and the interested public about the events in question.

Otherwise, the expert advisory group ( of which I was a member for a brief period) might well reflect whether the Government is genuinely interested in their historical advice or simply requires a respectable academic cover for a political agenda. Yours, etc,

JOHN A MURPHY,

Emeritus Professor

of Irish History,

University College, Cork.

Sir, – Diarmaid Ferriter’s comment – by way of rebuttal to the argument that the 1916 Rising was unnecessary – that there was “no evidence that Britain was prepared to settle its Irish question until it was forced to do it” raises interesting issues, not least what the settlement of the Irish question might be.

The Liberal Party had the opportunity to govern Britain from 1911, though to do so it was forced by its dependence on the votes of the Irish Parliamentary Party to provide for home rule. Implementation of the policy was hindered by unionist opposition in the northeastern portion of Ireland. The precise geographical and temporal extent of that exclusion dominated the politics of these months 100 years ago.

Events intervened. War was declared on Germany. As significant as the 1916 Rising was the parliamentary party’s loss of the balance of power on the formation of a national government in London. The political world of the Irish Parliamentary Party collapsed under the weight of Easter Week. Though the Rising – and particularly the executions – moved public opinion towards republicanism it can, I think, be fairly stated that a Liberal government, relying on Irish votes, and by then already radical on a number of fronts would not have been shy in implementing what would probably have been a mutually acceptable form of home rule (excluding all or a portion of Ulster) to maintain power. Yours, etc,

CONOR NELSON,

Conyngham Road

Dublin 8

Sir, – Diarmaid Ferriter is worried that the presence of representatives of the British royal family at 1916 commemorations might give succour to those who believe the insurrection was unnecessary. In indicating his views on whether or not the rising was “necessary” and on the appropriateness or otherwise of potential guests, isn’t Prof Ferriter going beyond his remit as an historian to give us his personal political views?

When he states that there is “no evidence that Britain was prepared to settle its Irish question until it was forced to do it”, he is of course speaking as a historian; unfortunately, his historical opinions are questionable.

Where is the evidence that Asquith’s administration on the eve of the Easter Rising was preparing to abandon home rule? The Government of Ireland Act had been passed in September 1914 against unionist protests. The Act suspending implementation had effect only for the duration of hostilities. The formation of a coalition in 1915 did little to alter matters: the legislative position of September 1914 was unchanged in April 1916 and John Redmond’s Irish Party was still dominant, retaining the confidence of most nationalists before the rising.   It was the Rising, the executions and conscription which killed home rule;  but Prof Ferriter would do well not to confuse the aftermath of Easter 1916 with the period before that date. Yours, etc,

CDC ARMSTRONG,

Ulidia House,

Belfast BT125JN

Sir, – Liam Cooke (Letters, April 14th) is dismayed by the cyclists he sees around him, sinning merrily and shouting cheerily.

Clearly he would be happier on a bike himself. He says “Motorists have more to lose than cyclists.” No, sorry, I don’t get that. “Cycling in the cities is a dangerous practice” – statistically, not as dangerous as driving, or being driven. Anecdotally (that is to say, in my experience) cycling in Dublin is a lot safer than it was 50 years ago, when few drivers used their indicators or mirrors and lane discipline was non-existent.

“Cycle lanes are not always available” —nor can they ever be universal. Problems arise where cycle lanes suddenly cease, as they must, whatever the budget.

But as Liam and others join us, surely our ubiquity will give us the best protection, while the remaining drivers fume in dismay at our merriment. Yours, etc,

ANDREW ROBINSON,

Marlborough Road,

Dublin 4

Sir, – I must repeat my call for education on the rules of the road. The attitudes expressed by Liam Cooke in response to my letter (April 11th) demonstrate precisely why it is needed. It is hard to know which is more worrying: that Mr Cooke believes motorists can “safely” break red lights or that he thinks a motorist fined for such behaviour has more to lose than a cyclist, who could pay with his life when others fail to obey the law. Yours, etc,

GARRET LEDWITH,

Tudor Road,

Ranelagh,

Dublin 6

Sir, – Cyclists breaking red lights should at least shout a warning. I would suggest something along the lines of “I’m cycling to save the Earth!” Thus elderly or encumbered pedestrians could take evasive action knowing there’s a strong moral reason why they are being terrorised. Yours, etc,

BRIAN AHERN,

Meadow Copse,

Clonsilla,

Dublin 15

Sir, – Were any other readers apart from myself struck by the juxtaposed headlines on page 4 of today’s paper (April 15th)? “Government pushes for leeway on emissions” and “Two decades left to save the world, says Robinson”.

If the agricultural industry has its way and our dairying sector expands when milk quotas are abolished next year, then meeting our obligations in relation to emission targets for 2020 will become an impossibility.

We are an agricultural country and it is a sector that needs to expand but what is required is an incentive to increase tillage and horticulture, fruit and vegetables rather than dairy and livestock. In terms of food security, as well as environment, this would make a lot of sense.

The day will have to come when the quality of our children’s and grandchildren’s future wins out over big bucks. Yours, etc,

SALLY SWEENEY,

Carrigavantry,

Co Waterford

Sir, – So after all the years of telling the world that we need to change our ways to save the planet – by the environmentalists, Greens, hippies , eco-warriors, nature lovers, gardeners etc, Mary Robinson et al decide that it’s now time for us to “decarbonise” and that we only have 20 years to do so. Get a grip people, the truth is that it is already too late, because we will never change our ways and live in harmony with nature as we should and we cannot depend on politicians or corporations to do the right thing. At the end of the day the planet will have the last laugh – and it will be on us. Yours, etc,

JIM CREAGH,

Castlefreke ,

Sir, – Paul Gillespie’s column on the writings of Thomas Piketty (“Inequality grows as world’s rich get much richer”, April 12th, 2014) was both timely and incisive.

It seems that “the average income of working-class Americans around 1920 doubled in real terms by 1955 and tripled by 1970. In the four decades since 1970, there has been almost no improvement on average for the lower 90 per cent of American households. By 2007, the top 1 per cent of households had almost five times the real income they had in 1920; the top 0.1 per cent had about six times; the top 0.01 per cent nearly 10 times. Piketty’s research shows similar tendencies in Europe …”

Well surprise, surprise: isn’t that where we live?

Among US economic writers suggesting that these conditions amount to an emerging oligarchy are Simon Johnson, Paul Krugman and Jeffrey Winters, “who all analyse how the rich have captured the political process, making necessary taxation and redistributive reforms virtually impossible in a dysfunctional Washington”.

Substitute “Ireland” for “Washington” and not many among those struggling to cope here would quibble. The gap between rich and poor has increased, lower-end taxpayers have been hammered, private pension funds have been raided, pensioners have had their waivers and allowances slashed while facing a raft of new taxes without any additional income. Well, those low-income folks did all party, didn’t they? So they had it coming.

Fine Gael gave us exactly what it says on their tin but Labour ought to be ashamed. The successors of James Connolly, while looking to their inflated salaries and pension pots, have spent the past three years making Ireland safe again for this kind of capitalism.Yours, etc,

BERNARD KEOGH,

Dollymount Park,

Clontarf,

Sir, – The comments made by Phil Hogan in a Seanad debate in relation to the impacts of the new building regulations (“New building regulations will exclude non-professionals”, April 11th) are frankly disrespectful and misleading.

I am an architectural technologist with 30 years’ experience in the UK and Ireland. I qualified from a three-year course at DIT Bolton Street in 1982 and after 10 years in practice as a graduate architectural technologist I applied for chartered membership of the professional representative body in the UK, the Chartered Institute of Architectural Technologists (CIAT) and following an interview by an admission panel was admitted. Subsequently I was admitted as an architectural technologist member of the RIAI in 2007, having met their entry criteria and served as the architectural technologist member on RIAI Council between 2009 and 2011. The RIAI represents approximately 230 architectural technologist members.

When the consultations on building control amendments with the Department of the Environment were being conducted with stakeholders, and in spite of a plea by the RIAI architectural technologist committee to RIAI council to support the inclusion of their members, we were refused the institute’s support. The CIAT, which represents approximately 100 chartered members in the Ireland branch, was excluded from access to the stakeholder representation process by Department of the Environment officials.

To be informed now by Mr Hogan that in spite of being deemed to be qualified and competent by the CIAT and the RIAI I am now a “draftsman” and that “the new building regulations will make it more difficult for unqualified people to pass themselves off as construction professionals” is offensive and potentially catastrophic to the livelihoods of many architectural technologists. Where does this leave us and the many students who are at various stages on three-and four-year full-time courses? Yours, etc

BRIAN MAHER MSc

MCIAT MCABE,

Ballacolla Road,

Abbeyleix,

Co Laois

Sir, – Blaise Pascal thought it sensible to believe in the existence of God, as not to believe carried the risk of one being sent to hell. This is known as Pascal’s Wager. There are some who have used this form of decision-making to suggest that we should take steps to avoid the terrible consequences of global warming even if we are unsure as to whether global warming is inevitable. But we can do better than rely on such a wager: the evidence is all too clear and our former president, Mary Robinson, referred today to the report by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as a wake-up call.

Unfortunately there have been many such wake-up calls and governments have in the round ignored them. Perhaps Pascal’s Wager in its simplicity needs to be dusted down, after all, and used as means to force action. Yours, etc,

BILL GRIMSON,

Villiers Road,

Dublin 6

Sir, – Unemployment: Ireland 11.8 per cent; Greece 26.9 per cent. Youth unemployment: Ireland 26 per cent; Greece 58 per cent. Decline in GDP 2009-2014: Ireland 19 per cent; Greece 26 per cent. Riot deaths 2009-2014: Ireland 0; Greece 5. Stick to arts and culture, Fintan. Yours, etc,

PAUL KILCULLEN,

Laurleen,

Stillorgan,

Co Dublin

Sir, – In Monday’s “Weather watch” for Dublin, I read that “a fine is expected as it will be dry and bright etc”. Is it only Dubliners who will have to pay for good weather, and who will be responsible for collection of the fine? I think we need to know. Yours, etc,

DEE NEESON,

Wyvern,

Killiney,

Co Dublin

LETTERSE Property Section Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 23:24:59 +0100

(Sent in by – “aquinn” (ajquinn_at_eircom.net))

Sir,

I see once again excellent properties on the front of this section priced

at some millions.

I guess less than 1% of your readers would be in a position to purchase such.

I am at a loss as to why you feature these.

Are we on the way to more stupidity encouraged by the media?

aj quinn

whitefield

fortmary park

Sir, – To anyone reading about the events in Ukraine over the past months a number of things seem clear. Firstly, the overthrow of the elected government by violent protesters in Kiev was a victory for democracy. Secondly, the rejection by Crimea, after a peaceful referendum, of the new, unelected, government was an attack on democracy, while the protests of Russian-speaking Ukrainians in the east of the country against that unelected government are an affront to democracy. It would appear that elections are not as critical a part of democracy as we once believed. Yours, etc,

DAVE ROBBIE,

Seafield Crescent,

Booterstown,

Co Dublin

Sir, – In your Health Supplement (April 15th) it was reported that “extending free GP care to under-6s will result in only a modest rise in the workload of the average GP” (77 consultations per doctor per year).

In addition to visits, the draft contract for the under-6s stipulates that GPs must undertake significant additional workload which currently is not covered by a medical card. Under the proposed contract GPs would be required to “periodically monitor and record the growth development of all children under the age of two, and the BMI of those aged between the ages of two and six”.

The recording of growth development is currently undertaken by public health nurses. By age two, four measurements will have been taken and recorded. Based on the last census, if GPs take over these assessments it will result in 850,000 additional visits over the first two years.

Only time will tell what the true figure for additional consultation will be as a result of this contract. If however GPs have to carry out these, non-evidence-based, assessments it will result in over 1.5 million additional visits in the first two years. Yours, etc,

Dr REGGIE SPELMAN,

Bridgetown,

Irish Independent:

Published 16 April 2014 02:30 AM

* Nothing beats spelling it out – especially when the ramifications are all-pervasive, and the potential counter-benefits patently ubiquitous.

Also in this section

Letters: Bible is a collection of metaphors, not a book of evidence

World War I and the tragic historic waste of lives

Supporting our food producers

Philip O’Neil (Letters, April 8) sustains his relentless ‘missive-mission’ with another ‘tonic-tablet’ of weathered wisdom.

Hitting the societal nail squarely on the head with a firm evocation of some key home truths permeating in and around the modern penchant for free-market materialism, he lays it clearly on the line.

“Moral sensitivity does not sit easily with unfettered capitalism; it tends to subvert it.” Ne’er a truer sentiment uttered.

Chalk it down, boom it from the mountain-tops, and have it tattooed on every new-born child in the nation.

In many ways, it’s screamingly obvious. How could addiction to profiteering, usury, entrepreneurial overkill and bottom-line corporatism ever offer a template of empathic decency or ethical morality for an egalitarian society. A ‘greed-is-good’ mentality is the only logical outcome for dedication to the false icons of the filthy lucre.

“We have colluded in allowing economic activity to develop a life of its own, accountable only to itself,” Philip O’Neil adroitly states.

We are left, thus, with a ‘pig-in-a-poke’ fallacy of pseudo-aggrandisement debilitating a nation. By omission and/or commission, we all have allowed this to take root, flourish and fester.

It implicates us all. We seem to tolerate the status-quo as something of an inevitability and demur to the gods of a monstrous global failure, ie free-market libertarianism with its in-built survival-of-the-fittest motto.

The planet has only a finite amount of wealth potential, be that energy, food, water or other precious natural resources. Skewed consumption/comfort quotients coupled with a steady ‘diet’ of famines, wars and pestilence ensure that an uneasy, unstable and grossly unfair ‘balance’ prevails.

However, we seem to persist with a corrupted/distorted democratic dynamic, electing inept folk of questionable ability or generosity of spirit who perpetuate a flawed concept on a sadly under-motivated, uninitiated and/or unsuspecting populace.

Jim Cosgrove Lismore, Co Waterford

HACKING AT OUR NATURAL BEAUTY

* The current mindless rage for killing trees in our public spaces is heartbreaking. No prior gesture towards consultancy is given by the nameless folk who authorise such wanton felling.

Trees that graced the city for decades are being cut – witness the recent destruction in Dun Laoghaire’s Peoples’ Park and last week’s uprooting of the flowering magnolias at the entrance to the National Gallery. In this time of austerity, surely the joy and spirit-lift gained from the free enjoyment of natural beauty should be augmented, not lessened.

Jackie O’Brien, Glasthule, Co Dublin

UNLOCKING THE CHAINS OF 1916

* In the Royal Gallery at the Palace of Westminster on April 8, President Higgins said, in his address, that independence for Ireland cast its long shadow across our relations with Britain, causing us, in the words of Irish MP Stephen Gwynn, to “look at each other with doubtful eyes”.

Stephen Gwynn, a grandson of William Smith O’Brien, also said in 1926, that 10 years had been added to the waiting period for Irish political unity and that Ireland would wait forever if it remained chained to the ideal of 1916. The waiting seems now to be over. A champion of Home Rule, Gwynn once described it as a post-dated cheque.

Patrick O’Brien, Phisborough, Dublin 7

TURN OFF THIS DISGUSTING SHOWER

* An old proverb crushed by modernity . “You can’t get water from a stone” they said, but what they didn’t say was water could get cash from the populace.

If I buy petrol, I don’t expect to pay a standing fixed charge equivalent to a third of the purchase. If I buy a pint, I expect to pay for what I get when I buy it. Naturally, those burdened with income tax, LPT, UHC, unemployed children etc, will carry the latest burden in addition to the daily diet of austerity soup.

Once upon a time, governments purportedly represented their populace. This one of ours represents itself, its pals and its backers, and we pick up the tab. Anyone out there with the balls to turn off the tap on this disgusting shower?

John Cuffe, Meath

CHRISTIAN MARKING OF PASSOVER

* The Last Supper of Jesus and His disciples took place on Passover, a holiday of redemption set in place by God, Jesus, or Yeshua – as He would have been called in His lifetime, who instructed His followers to remember His death (not His resurrection) until He come.

Strangely, the church ignores Passover altogether, as most of the early church fathers were extremely anti-Semitic and deemed the feast as ‘too Jewish.’ Instead, the majority of Yeshua’s followers today commemo-rate the event on ‘Maundy Thursday’, although no specific day of the week is mentioned in any of the Gospels for the Last Supper or the Crucifixion.

A Biblical day, however, according to the Book of Genesis and the calendar that Yeshua Himself would have kept, begins in the evening at sunset, the second daylight portion then follows. A day divided at midnight is the invention of man.

This year, Passover fell on April 14, which in the biblical calendar is Nisan 14, and as it begins at sunset, the second daylight part follows the next morning which allowed for the Last Supper and the Crucifixion to both occur on the same day, according to the Genesis ruling. In the Gentile/Christian calendar, this takes two days to commemorate, ie Maundy Thursday and Good Friday due to the midnight time division.

If Yeshua were to come back today, the natural day for commemorating these events would be on the date of Passover itself, not Maundy Thursday. The symbolism of the slaughter of the Passover lamb, the redemptive qualities of the shed blood. Maybe it’s time the church re-examined the status of Passover, also demonstrating that the hierarchy is no longer anti-Jewish and that the holiday has benefits and significance for both Jews and Christians.

Colin Nevin, Bangor, Co Down

LIVELIHOODS SOLD TO HIGHEST BIDDER

* One of the most invidious acts, regrettably among many others, needlessly perpetrated by this Government on Irish citizens, must be the recent sale of the 13,000 mortgages of Irish Nationwide to two American distressed fund companies. These companies bought the mortgages from the special liquidators KPMG at a huge discount of several billion euro, again courtesy of a lazy and uncaring government and, ultimately, the Irish taxpayer.

The most appalling and callous aspect of this deal was that the owners of these mortgages, Irish people in the main, were not afforded an equal opportunity by their government to buy their own loans to ease their distressed financial state; it is almost certain that many of these unfortunates will lose their homes as a result.

The modus operandi of the new owners will be to relentlessly chase the unfortunate mortgagees for the full amount, pocketing huge profits in the process. There will be little or no sympathy from the Government for the dire personal, familial and societal consequences.

What is also disturbing is the almost complete failure of the media to report on the injustice of the matter. Not a peep as usual from the top brass of the trade unions. God be with the days when the Catholic Church would raise its voice.

John Leahy, Wilton Road, Cork

Irish Independent


Quiet day

$
0
0

17April2014Quiet day

I go all the way around the park listening to the Men from the Ministry: Our heroes face a terrible fate Lennox Brown is A1 in healthPriceless

Mary in hospital brief visit get beat at Scrabble

Scrabbletoday, Mary wins Perhaps Iwill win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Lorna Casselton – obituary

Lorna Casselton was Foreign Secretary of the Royal Society and an expert on the reproduction of fungi

Lorna Casselton

Lorna Casselton

6:10PM BST 15 Apr 2014

CommentsComment

Lorna Casselton, who has died aged 75, was one of Britain’s foremost fungal biologists , and well-known throughout the international scientific community in her role as vice-president and Foreign Secretary of the Royal Society from 2006 to 2011.

Her major scientific contribution was to establish how mushroom fungi determine “self from non-self” in order to mate; in particular, she studied Coprinus cinereus. Unlike in animals and plants — where only two sexes (male and female) exist — there can be 10 or even hundreds of different “sexes” of a species of fungi in nature. It posed a problem that had long perplexed scientists: faced with so many choices, how did fungi recognise potential mating partners?

Over a period of more than two decades, Lorna Casselton set about identifying the genes involved in sex determination in the fungi, through painstaking genetic analysis and molecular biology . She was then able to show how their products interact with each other, allowing recognition between sexes and mating to occur.

In recognition of this key discovery she was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1999. She was also honoured by the British Mycological Society, and by similar bodies across the globe.

She was born Lorna Ann Smith on July 18 1938 and educated at Southend High School for Girls before gaining a BSc and a PhD from University College, London. Her lecturing and research career began at Royal Holloway College in London, and she was Professor of Genetics at Queen Mary College, London University, from 1989 to 1991. She was later awarded fellowships by UK Research Councils to allow her to focus on her science.

She relished her role as Foreign Secretary at the Royal Society, visiting 27 countries during her time in post. Colleagues remember fondly her gentle teasing as in 2009 she explained to the then Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, and a room full of conference delegates, that her ancient role had been created in 1723, nearly 60 years before the British government appointed its first Foreign Secretary. She also often shared her amusement at the description of her role in the Society’s Charter of 1663: “to enjoy mutual intelligence and affairs with all manner of strangers and foreigners”.

Early in her career, Casselton had spent time as a visiting lecturer in Nigeria, an experience which led to a lifelong love of Africa. As Foreign Secretary, she led a programme helping academies of science in Ghana, Tanzania and Ethiopia to become more effective in giving science policy advice to their governments, and she is still warmly remembered in all three countries. In 2013 she was elected an honorary fellow of the Ghana Academy of Arts and Sciences. Late in her life Lorna Casselton trained to be a glider pilot. Most people go solo after perhaps 30 launches; she eventually did so after 169, a tribute to her determination if not to her skills in the sky.

She was a Fellow of St Cross College, Oxford, from 1993 to 2003, and Professor of Fungal Genetics at Oxford from 1997 to 2003.

She was appointed CBE in 2012.

She married first, in 1961 (dissolved 1978), Peter Casselton, and is survived by her second husband, William Tollett, a former consultant in the chemical manufacturing industry.

Lorna Casselton, born July 18 1938, died February 14 2014

Guardian:

In responding to our report on the charges paid by Africa‘s diaspora sending money home (Report, 16 April), MoneyGram calls into question our data. The data used in our report is drawn entirely from MoneyGram’s own remittance website. On the day MoneyGram told the Guardian it was charging 5% for remittances to Africa, the actual charge for sending £120 to the region averaged around 12%. The company’s spokesperson apparently forgot to factor in foreign currency conversion charges.

The fees for a group of seven countries that we looked at ranged from a low of 10% for Ethiopia to a high for 14% for Malawi. Contrary to the claims made by the money-transfer industry there is no evidence to support the claim that remittance charges to Africa are falling. As the most recent World Bank remittance survey shows, charges for Africa have risen since 2009 and remain stubbornly locked at twice average levels. This is indefensible.

MoneyGram is, of course, entitled to put its case. But this should not be allowed to hide the costs associated with the lack of competition, restrictive business practices and deeply flawed financial regulation in Africa that we highlight in the report. Back in 2008, the G8 pledged to drive remittance transfer costs down to no more than 5% a year. Progress towards that goal would put another $1.8bn earned by Africa’s diaspora in the hands of family members. This is hard-earned money that could be used for investment in education, health, agriculture and small enterprises. Yet the G8 and G20 have failed to act on the cost-cutting commitment. Surely it’s time for the money-transfer industry and governments to work together to produce a fairer deal for Africa’s diaspora.
Kevin Watkins
Executive director, Overseas Development Institute

How sad Malcolm Pittock feels the need to praise the life and work of Raymond Williams by bringing down Richard Hoggart (Letters, 16 April). Both, albeit in different ways, demonstrated what can be achieved, irrespective of a person’s class and background. I for one am grateful for the inspiration both provided.
Mike Storey
Peterborough

• Tuesday’s Guardian: a celebration of Matisse’s fabulous use of colour described as “rich, marvellous, alive”, complete with lovely front-page example. G2, Wednesday: “Grey matters – why it’s the colour of the decade” and a cover reminiscent of a gravestone. I know which brightened my day.
Ceri Smith
London

• I started reading Grey matters with excitement, thinking at last a reply to the Generation yoof issue and some older folk been given a voice. A grey panther issue of G2 is long overdue. I live in hope.
Fiona Watson
Glasgow

• I have noticed another sign of spring (Letters, 14 April): groups of teenagers in the hills with packs, walking their Duke of Edinburgh practice expeditions. I met seven silver and three gold this morning on the edges of Kinder and the Edale valley. Perhaps like Larkin’s Whitsun wedding couples they are “free at last, and loaded with the sum of all they saw”?
Chris Jeffries
Stockport

• You record six centuries in the cricket scores (Sport, 15 April). Three are for 144 and two are for 139. What are the odds on that? I am trying to get out more.
Richard Grover
Caernarfon, Gwynedd

• The town of Diss (Letters, passim) on the border of Suffolk and Norfolk lends its name to many enterprises. If singing is your thing, you might consider joining the local choir, Disschord.
Sarah Guthrie
Diss, Norfolk

• I stood po-faced to have my picture taken next to the road sign for Pissy-Poville just north-west of Rouen. I didn’t do the other thing.
Baz Juniper
Combwich, Somerset

I am just one 17-year-old. I cannot make a huge difference to our country alone. But my generation collectively could. However, a report by the Electoral Reform Society after the last election showed that only 44% of 18- to 24-year-olds voted. It is the education system that is letting us down. There is hardly any political education in secondary schools; many of my peers can’t name the three main party leaders or give an outline of the ideologies of each party. In time, the young and disaffected of today will become the middle-aged and disaffected of tomorrow. We need to stop this trend before it becomes a crisis spanning across multiple generations. I did a bit of my own research and found that the reason many young adults aren’t voting is because they do not know who to vote for. In an attempt to help my peers, I set up a website, outlining the basic beliefs of each party. votingcounts.org.uk is getting good feedback. My local council have been supportive, helping me organise interviews with councillors and providing me with information to share. Ultimately though, it is the responsibility of our government to make it easier for young adults to get involved. If we want to see more young people voting we need to see an easier registration process and most importantly more political education.
Rachael Farrington

John Harris reckons there’s “fat chance” of moving the British “machinery of government” outside London (When even the bohemians have gone, it’s time to worry, 15 April). But could the coincidence in 2014 of Ukip’s rise and the campaign for Scottish independence suggest that devolution‘s hour has finally come? While new federal solutions to the problems of governing the nation state are being proposed from Donetsk to Dundee, “glocalisation” – the fruitful combination of the local and the global – has never seemed so appealing to those of us living outside the walls of the national capital. A single example from the east Midlands: the forthcoming closure of the country’s last deep coal mine at Thoresby, and the loss of at least 500 jobs, would almost certainly have been better handled had the people of north Nottinghamshire been governed from Brussels instead of London.
Peter Lyth
Southwell, Nottinghamshire

To counter the gravitational pull of London, John Harris floats the possibility of moving the machinery of government elsewhere, only to dismiss it as infeasible. He should think again. As part of a programme for instituting “home rule all round” within a federal UK, the idea makes perfect sense. If England had its own devolved organs of government to match those of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, the House of Lords could be replaced by an elected and geographically constituted federal parliament meeting at Westminster, while the new English parliament had its seat in Manchester or York.
David Purdy
Stirling

• John Harris contends that London’s increasing isolation from the rest of Britain will lead to interesting political consequences. The buy-up of central London properties by foreign nationals must be having an effect on electoral registers. The number of voters in the wealthiest wards will diminish. Eventually the allocation of council seats will have to be adjusted, giving more representation to the wards with larger amounts of social housing, the occupants of which are likely to be on the electoral role. Thus we may yet see Westminster and Kensington & Chelsea Labour-controlled. Interesting indeed.
Michael Sargent
Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire

• We need to hear more voices from within London questioning the damage our blinkered capital city does to its citizens as well as its malign effects on the rest of us. Perhaps the time has come for a remake of the 1949 film Passport to Pimlico, with the rebels opting for independence within the EU rather than reverting to Burgundy.
Geoff Reid
Bradford

•  It was with wry amusement that I read about the disparity in per capita transport funding for London compared to the rest of the UK. In Knutsford we are served by an hourly train service to either Manchester or Chester and bus services are few and far between, making the rest of Cheshire mostly inaccessible. Hearts do not exactly race at the idea that billions will be spent on HS2 passing through Cheshire for quicker journeys from Manchester to London.
Mabel Taylor
Knutsford, Cheshire

The Centre for Policy Studies’ claims for the benefits of on-rail competition (Letters, 10 April) are selective and ignore many downsides. To establish that it was competition that increased business, one would have to show there were no other factors in play. Fares increasing less at stations with competition only proves that the incumbent operator responded to competition (and may well have recouped its losses from elsewhere). The downsides include income extracted from the franchisee, not by competition but as a result of an obsolete revenue-sharing system; the fact that open-access operators do not pay a due share of track costs; the confusing fragmentation of ticketing; and the damage to the coherence and integration of timetables.

All this will be greatly multiplied if open-access operators are allowed to expand their services before we have a transparent and participatory debate about how to best use limited capacity in the public interest (ideally based on the kind of timetable that makes the Swiss Railways so successful – without competition). As for Mr Lodge’s remark that Grand Central receives no money from the government, that may be true of the British government, but at the time it became a subsidiary of the state-owned German Railway, it had debts of £44m.
Jonathan Tyler
Passenger Transport Networks

• The money paid to train operators is not a subsidy but the price of train services bought by the government (Rail shareholders £200m windfall raises questions over sell-off plan, 16 April) and it is quite legitimate for the operators to make a profit on their sales and use it to pay dividend to shareholders. The beneficiaries of public subsidy are not the train operators but passengers, who are able to travel by train for less than they would pay if the government did not pay part of the price on their behalf. There are many questions about funding, but the most fundamental is why passengers should be subsidised by the taxpayer., and that will not receive a satisfactory answer by pretending that buying services is automatically a subsidy to the supplier As your article hints, another important question is how much of the cost of train travel results from Network Rail’s acknowledged inefficiency – comparative studies suggest that it costs twice as much as its continental equivalents.

Neither will understanding of railway finance be helped by repeated claims that the state-owned directly operated railway’s payments to the Treasury are evidence of superior virtue, this sounds like going to the opposite extreme and taxing passengers rather than subsidising them.
John Hall

One thing emerges clearly from the fog surrounding the alleged plot to take over Birmingham schools: the lack of accountability of academies (City steps up ‘Islamist plot’ inquiry in schools, 14 April). In fact, the problem goes deeper than that. The truth is that when things go wrong it is next to impossible to hold anybody to account in any kind of school, whether academies, free schools or community schools. That is why there is a good case for establishing democratic accountability for local education as a whole.

Schools (and colleges, for that matter) – it is worth recalling – are not private property; they are funded by the taxpayer. It is only right that they and other local education institutions should be subject to oversight by democratically elected councillors and the representatives of those who have a legitimate stake in education: parents, students, trade unions, employers, as well as those who work in our schools and colleges. That is why Compass is proposing the creation of local education boards within local councils. These would be analogous to planning committees, able to take an objective view of services and proposals, including those of the local authority itself. The boards would oversee and review the implementation of local education plans and priorities and be able to intervene when there was local concern about the quality of education on offer. Compass fully supports local management of schools and colleges but that needs to be tempered with effective community oversight and an entitlement to redress for parents and students.
Martin Yarnit
Worcester

• Zoe Williams attempts to trace the source of the current situation surrounding schools in Birmingham to the government’s academies programme (Why Birmingham needs bog-standard comps too, 16 April). Ms Williams confidently claims “we already know there are children whose education has been criminally disrupted … all of it traceable to the free school/academisation agenda”. What she leaves out is the fact that issues of alleged extremism have touched many sorts of schools in Birmingham. The city council’s action in halting the appointment of all new governors in the dozens of schools it controls is just one piece of evidence confirming that local authority control is far from the panacea that Ms Williams suggests.

It is clear from her article that Ms Williams does not support schools which strive to differentiate themselves. In fact she goes so far as to state that we should embrace the term “bog-standard”. This government rejects this call to maintain the status quo. It is this attitude that saw our country’s education system stagnate, failing a generation of children. Through our reforms, and thanks to the work of teachers and heads striving to offer children the excellence Ms Williams derides, there are a quarter of a million fewer children being taught in failing secondary schools, compared to 2010. And in the academy schools Ms Williams blames, the improvement is most apparent. The results of pupils in sponsored academies are improving faster than in council-run schools and converter academies outperform those still under local authority control.

The allegations surrounding schools in Birmingham are concerning and require careful investigation. This attempt to use the situation to tarnish the work of academies and free schools is simply wrong.
Elizabeth Truss MP
Education minister

• If anyone doubts the logic of Zoe Williams’ timely defence of bog-standard community schools, which share practice and try to ensure there aren’t huge variations between them, they’d do well to read Margaret Heffernan’s new book, A Bigger Prize, on the advantages of collaboration. She demonstrates convincingly that in all spheres of life, even sport, business, politics, science as well as education, “cheating, corruption, subversion, silence, disenchantment and the unwinding of the social fabric are not perverse but inevitable outcomes of societies captive to the competitive mindset and the ephemeral pleasures of winning”. But try telling that to Michael Gove.
John Airs
Liverpool

• Since 2010, when Michael Gove took office, he has continually denigrated and belitttled the work of local education authorities, as part of the Blob, and sought at every opportunity to reduce their control over local schools. Mr Gove believes that he has the intellect, knowledge and ability to do everything by himself and the result of this vacuum of control and accountability has allowed the situation in Birmingham to develop. I am aware that, as yet, there is no confirmation of this plot but, if it is the case, then Mr Gove has only himself to blame.

In the meantime, he has acted far too late and with a draconian hand to cover his own back. The truth is these schools were left to their own devices and the stabilising influence of the LEA was diminished by the megalomaniac Michael Gove. Let’s hope that salutary lessons are learnt from this sorry saga.
Simon Gosden
Vice principal (retired), Rayleigh, Essex

Independent:

On 10 April you reported David Cameron telling his disciples that “Jesus invented the Big Society 2000 years ago – I just want to see more of it”. A week later, you record the huge rise in people needing help feeding themselves due, in part, to benefit cuts ( “The food poverty scandal that shames Britain”, 16 April).

Mr Cameron and his class want a return to the pre-welfare state wherein the lower orders were only provided for through the exhortation of Christ to follow the seven corporal works of mercy. The rich would feel obliged to charitably donate enough to ensure their entry into the kingdom of heaven, and thus the hungry would be fed, the sick cared for, and the homeless housed through charity alone.

The Prime Minister has stated in the past that the growth of food banks is a sign that the Big Society is working, so we cannot be surprised that the Coalition continues its attack on benefits as it aspires to the days when all that kept the poor from the gutter was the benevolence of Lady Bountiful.

Colin Burke, Manchester

Round-the-clock childcare

Poor Rosie Millard (16 April) was obviously stung by the observations of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers.

Me too! I am astounded by parents (men and women) who wish to abdicate responsibility for bringing up their children to teachers. How long will it be before teachers are obliged to give birth for time-poor, child-indifferent, would-be parents?

Perhaps, rather than constantly scrounging for scarce resources to provide ever more extra-school child care, the Government would be better off devising a child time-share scheme so that wannabe part-time parents, beset by concerns about their career, self-image and lifestyle expectations, could share ownership with others at their convenience.

Gordon Watt, Reading

Other players in the Ukrainian crisis

The Russian leadership seems to have forgotten both history and logic in their statements about the Ukraine. Russia claims that any Ukrainian use of force against internal separatists would be illegal. Are they now admitting their internal war in Chechnya a few years ago was criminal?

Russia talks about the $2bn allegedly owed to Gazprom for gas supplied through the Ukraine, but the vast majority of this debt was accrued under the ousted president Viktor Yanukovych, who is now their guest. They should ask him about that, not the current interim leadership.

Despite stating categorically that Russia has no agents there, they claim that eastern Ukraine is on the brink of civil war – something they could only know with certainty if they are actively engaged.

Peter Slessenger, Reading

The 28 European Union foreign ministers who met in Luxembourg condemned unreservedly the protesters in eastern Ukraine for attacking government buildings and believe Moscow is behind these events (report, 15 April).

It’s a shame that when the Euromaidan protests were doing similar things they kept quiet. It’s also a shame that they say nothing about US State Department official Victoria Nuland’s comments that America had spent $5bn in the Ukraine supposedly supporting democracy?

Who is meddling in Ukraine’s affairs?

Mark Holt, Liverpool

One lesson from the Ukraine troubles is the ineffectiveness of the EU as a force in global politics. Any semblance of a united approach by the EU is shattered by Germany`s gas requirements, French arms exports and Britain`s financial sector, to highlight only three vested interests militating against effective action.

A major argument in favour of Britain’s continuing membership of the EU is that if we left we would lose our status on the world stage. The Ukraine situation indicates this is a chimera.

David Bracey, Chesham Bois, Buckinghamshire

if the NHS needs money, then find it

Free healthcare at the point of use is a principle which any political party worth its salt should be determined to maintain, even if there is a projected budget deficit of £30bn by 2020 (“NHS faces financial crisis in 2015”, 15 April). If more money for the NHS has to be found, so be it, and for any party leader with principle and bottle, it should be imperative to say so. What would the electorate say in answer to this question? “Which of the following is essential: HS2? Trident renewal? A well-funded NHS?”

The King’s Fund director of policy might think there is a problem with more funding because of the “deficit-reduction debate”, but he is correct only if politicians have the wrong priorities.

Bernie Evans, Liverpool

Another rule for the rich?

What more proof is needed that money talks than the concession of anonymity to the train-fare-dodging hedge-fund manager? (James Moore, 15 April.) The ease with which he was able to come up with the £42,550 defrauded from the railway stands in stark contrast to your 14 April report that there are 15 million working-age adults in the UK with no savings whatsoever. I wonder how many of them would have been afforded such latitude, had they been caught.

Jeremy Redman, London SE6

Scottish vote: don’t divorce for a fantasy

Independence movements are usually driven by racial, ethnic or religious persecution and/or feelings of impotence based on a lack of political power. Yet none of the above applies to Scotland and we have produced a steady stream of prime ministers, lord chancellors and movers-and-shakers in every field.

Far from being crushed into uniformity we have our own legal system, our own church and even our own sports teams in many international competitions.

The decision to divorce our partner of 300 years and bin a legacy of shared values, mutual respect, common responsibilities and family ties is cataclysmic. There is gross uncertainty in every aspect of “independence” and to set at risk our children’s future for a Brigadoon fantasy seems to me  entirely wrong.

Dr John Cameron, St Andrews, Fife

Philip Hammond’s claim that independence will put Scottish defence jobs at risk is more than a little hypocritical given the damage done by defence cuts already inflicted by Westminster.

Decisions at Westminster have seen Scotland stripped of military assets and serving personnel handed redundancy notices, with more than 11,000 defence jobs lost in Scotland in the last decade. Yet while these deeply damaging cuts have been imposed, every one of the Westminster parties remains committed to wasting £100bn on replacing Trident.

The first duty of any government is to protect its citizens, but the reality is that, under the Union, Scotland has already been stripped bare of conventional naval capability by cuts.

There are no ocean-going surface vessels based in Scotland and no maritime reconnaissance aircraft – that is an extraordinary and unacceptable gap, which has seen ships dispatched from the south of England to the Moray Firth in response to Russian naval activity.

That gap also means the UK is having to rely on Nato allies to help cover routine maritime patrol duties – a responsibility an independent Scotland will take more seriously.

The only way Scotland will be able adequately to defend itself is through independence, with stronger armed forces north of the border. These forces, co-operating with those from the rest of the UK in areas of mutual interest, will collectively strengthen, not weaken, our impact.

Alex Orr, Edinburgh

Given Matthew Norman’s visceral hatred of all things English, I am surprised he even condescends to live here. But grovelling to Alex Salmond is not the answer to the Scottish independence campaign  (16 April).

If Scotland truly wants independence then bon voyage; an unhappy marriage is a worse solution than a divorce and a clean break. But, like any scheming partner seeking to end a marriage, Salmon wants to cherry-pick what he likes – the pound, an open border, BBC (Scotland), membership of Nato and the EU, defence contracts, the English language (and of course the oil revenues) – and dump what he dislikes – nuclear, the national debt and the English.

As a representative of the injured party in this divorce I see no reason why we should actually assist an independent Scotland with any of Salmond’s likes, and if he won’t take Scotland’s fair share of his dislikes then I see no reason why Westminster should allow the divorce to be made absolute, let alone allow Scotland into Nato or  the EU.

It is a sad fact that, for the moment, England is indisputably Conservative territory, but that will  soon pass if the nasty party is given a free hand to comfort the rich and squeeze the poor.

Roger Chapman, Keighley,  West Yorkshire

Times:

As the politics of the independence referendum heat up, voters are hungry for hard facts

Sir, Alex Salmond describes the No campaign as boring, depressing and laughable. There is nothing laughable about the possibility of losing my British nationality — and purely to fuel the vanity of regional politicians looking for a world role. I don’t know about the Salmonds, but the Grahams have been in Scotland at least for 800 years and British for 300. London is as much ours as any Englishman’s. The empire was ours (my grandparents were married in Bombay in 1872). Fighting to the death in two world wars was ours (we lost four and won one VC). We are the same people, one nation, but in an international world.

Nationalism is so yesterday, Mr Salmond. One of my sons is a farmer in Wales, one works in London. Am I to be alienated from them, for no reason? I have faith in the millions of British Scots who will see that it doesn’t happen.

Antony Graham

Haddington, East Lothian

Sir, As a MacDonald grandson I’m appalled as Alex Salmond reveals his true colours, which are depressing and miserable, of seeking independence based on small-minded bitterness of the past, as opposed to the magnanimous, big picture of working together for the future. Friendships between Scotland and the rest of the UK are being poisoned.

Thomas Peek

London SW11

Sir, Your Scottish edition often carries a headline on the perils of voting for independence. Until recently I thought this was just part of the British media’s campaign against independence but now I wonder why the media continue on the same course despite the barrage of warnings about the thrawn nature of us Scots: and how we so hate being told what’s not good for us, particularly by nosy neighbours?

Do the English want rid of us and are they antagonising us by being even more typically pompous and supercilious?

William Lundy

Ardrossan, Ayrshire

Sir, The Institute of Economic Affairs recently ran a competition that produced an independent, thoughtful and detailed view of the pros, cons, negotiation possibilities and likely outcomes of an EU exit by the UK. It is a pity that voters in Scotland do not have the benefit of a similar document. The most detailed information available is the SNP’s referendum blueprint which has a significant proportion of negotiation positions and politicians’ puff.

Richard Tweed

Croydon, Surrey

Sir, The Yes campaign increasingly seeks to capitalise on perhaps its most legitimate objection to the status quo — the prospect of a Conservative-led government winning the next general election with few if any seats in Scotland.

Why then is Labour not pushing harder to win the hearts and minds of the Scottish people? Senior figures of the Shadow Cabinet should consider vastly increasing their level of visibility and support for Scotland to stay in the union over the coming months.

In doing so Labour could both save the union and increase its chances in next year’s general election. Failing to do so, particularly in light of the Yes campaign’s recent momentum, may see Scotland go independent — and Labour struggle to find any sort of foothold in the UK.

Jamie Barclay

Huntley, Aberdeenshire

Readers are keeping a tally of motherly and grandmotherly services rendered — one day it will pay-back time

Sir, Like Hilary Rafter (letter, Apr 15) I gave my children a chance to pay me back in my decrepitude. My system involved giving them the opportunity of paying me back each “small” loan. Every transaction was on the understanding that in return they would upgrade me from basic old folks home, to luxury ditto and quickly up through the ranks to a suite in their own homes.

Now I am 70 I wonder if they recall our contract.The distant past is catching up with them, and I look forward to a very comfortable old age.

Elizabeth Hawkins

St Lawrence, Isle of Wight

Sir, Every time my three daughters-in-law thank me for stepping into the breach (babysitting, outings for children, turning up hems) I remind them of their future duties (granny sitting, outings, lifts to outpatients).

By the time the youngest grandchild leaves school I shall have attended more than 60 years of school concerts, as parent and grandparent of string players: a tally truly deserving of a substantial reward for endurance.

Sylvia Crookes

Bainbridge, N Yorks

The head of the Highways Agency reckons the introduction of “all-lane running” on the M25 went pretty smoothly

Sir, I wonder if Paul Watters, of the AA, and I were looking at the same M25 on Monday morning (“Hard-shoulder driving begins with ‘an almighty jam’”, Apr 15). I was at our regional control centre at junction 23 of the M25 on Monday morning to see the opening of the upgraded motorway. I watched, with pride, my traffic officers aiding a driver with car trouble.

During this process traffic was stopped for less than a minute and there was no jam of any sort.

If we had widened the motorway in the usual way drivers would be faced with several years of roadworks. Instead drivers already enjoy the benefits of the upgraded M25 between junctions 23 and 25 and the next section of all-lane running opens in Kent and Surrey next month.

Graham Dalton

Highways Agency

Readers are keeping a tally of motherly and grandmotherly services rendered — one day it will pay-back time

Sir, Like Hilary Rafter (letter, Apr 15) I gave my children a chance to pay me back in my decrepitude. My system involved giving them the opportunity of paying me back each “small” loan. Every transaction was on the understanding that in return they would upgrade me from basic old folks home, to luxury ditto and quickly up through the ranks to a suite in their own homes.

Now I am 70 I wonder if they recall our contract.The distant past is catching up with them, and I look forward to a very comfortable old age.

Elizabeth Hawkins

St Lawrence, Isle of Wight

Sir, Every time my three daughters-in-law thank me for stepping into the breach (babysitting, outings for children, turning up hems) I remind them of their future duties (granny sitting, outings, lifts to outpatients).

By the time the youngest grandchild leaves school I shall have attended more than 60 years of school concerts, as parent and grandparent of string players: a tally truly deserving of a substantial reward for endurance.

Sylvia Crookes

Bainbridge, N Yorks

Regardless of the rights and wrongs of the Farage affair, surely the EU should keep its accounts more rigorously

Sir, While it would be nice to have some clarity from Nigel Farage about how his annual hand-out of £15,500 from Brussels is spent (Apr 15), shouldn’t we be concentrating on the source of the problem and not the end product?

The allowance multiplied by the number of MEPs comes to a tidy sum but there are no stipulations about how it is to be spent or receipted. The EU has failed or refuses to publish its balance sheets, and we are pouring our contributions into a black hole.

Bob MacDougall

Kippen, Stirlingshire

Those acquitted of offences should have their expenses paid but only commensurately with barristers’ charges

Sir, I support those campaigning for Nigel Evans’s costs to be paid by the Crown. All those acquitted of offences should have their legal costs paid — but only to the extent that publicly funded criminal barristers would have been paid for the work. The best measure would be to award costs equal to those incurred by the Crown in prosecuting the case.

Public funds should not be used to pay extra for Rolls-Royce defence teams. Justice is for all — not only those who can pay for it.

Dr Michael J Powers, QC

London WC2

Telegraph:

Street light maintenance: dimming schemes are one way of decreasing light pollution  Photo: Alamy

SIR – We do not need to undo “one more certainty of urbanised life” by switching off street lights to save money and cut light pollution.

Councils up and down the country are introducing dimming schemes, in consultation with local communities and police, which still save money and energy and cut light pollution.

We simply need appropriate lighting at the right times in the right places.

Emma Marrington
Campaign to Protect Rural England
London SE1

SIR – I applaud the reduction in unnecessary street lighting, and wonder why should it be blamed for increasing motoring accidents by the AA.

Street lighting has become ubiquitous since I began driving more than 40 years ago, and while the volume of traffic has increased, vehicle lights along with brakes, tyres, etc, have improved.

Inattentive and inconsiderate driving causes accidents, not a lack of street lighting during the hours of darkness.

Adrian Waller
Woodsetts, South Yorkshire

SIR – You are right to warn of another EU threat to national sovereignty arising from European Court of Justice judgments on the Charter of Fundamental Rights. During the passage of the Lisbon Treaty Act 2008, I put down an amendment that: “Notwithstanding any provision of the European Communities Act 1972, nothing in the Charter of Fundamental Rights shall be binding in any legal proceedings in the United Kingdom and shall not form part of the law applicable in any part of the United Kingdom”, because I was not satisfied with the wording of Protocol 30 attached to the Lisbon Treaty. I introduced a provision in a Bill to the same effect in November.

As chairman of the European Scrutiny Committee, I instituted a report last year on this issue, which was published on

April 2 2014, having taken evidence from distinguished jurists, the Secretary of State for Justice and the former attorney-general, Lord Goldsmith, who negotiated the unsatisfactory protocol.

On this evidence, we concluded that there is no opt-out from the Charter of Fundamental Rights, contrary to the assertions of Tony Blair in the House of Commons in June 2007. Furthermore, under the European Communities Act 1972, the European Court judgments that have already been made apply the Charter in the UK within the scope of EU law. As we state in our report, there is “the certainty that the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice will range across an even wider field with increasingly unintended consequences”.

Under sections two and three of the 1972 Act, the charter binds the Supreme Court without further appeal and has precedence over UK national law and can be used to disapply national legislation. The committee concluded that the only effective answer would be for “primary legislation to be introduced by way of an amendment to the European Communities Act 1972 to disapply the Charter from the UK”, in exercise of parliamentary sovereignty to put matters right.

This is not just a threat, as you state it to be; this is already a clear and present fact.

Bill Cash MP (Con)
London SW1

Road to reconciliation

SIR – David Cameron has told his MPs to make Scotland feel wanted. But actions speak louder than words. Successive governments, both Tory and Labour, have refused to connect Scotland to England by a modern road system.

There are no motorway connections to Scotland via the east coast. The Trans-Pennine A66 has yet to be completed as double carriageway.

T C Bell
Penrith, Cumberland

Waste of metal

SIR – The ArcelorMittal Orbit sculpture at the Olympic site in London is a heap of twisted metal that symbolises nothing. The £20 million cost could have been spent on improving local sports amenities.

Kevin Platt
Walsall, Staffordshire

MPs’ open brief

SIR – On the news, I see MPs walk up to Downing Street with a wad of papers under their arms. When I was working, I always carried important matters in a briefcase; it worries me that MPs are not carrying state documents in a secure fashion.

Peter Knight
Sompting, West Sussex

Misinterpreting Islam

SIR – I was horrified at the certainty with which Lord Pearson of Rannoch offered his mistaken musings on Islam. Had he carried out a basic Google search, he would have realised the excessive simplicity of calling Islam “a single political, religious and legal system”.

Far from being monolithic, Islam has 1.6 billion followers, a diversity of political, religious, and legal thought, which underpins myriad cultures from Morocco to Malaysia. The Prophet himself reputedly said: “Difference of opinion in my community is a sign of divine mercy”, accounting for the various Muslim scholarly reactions to events like 9/11, which he discounts out of hand. Even Christianity has only managed two unchallenged “world councils” in its 2000-year history.

Religious fundamentalism in the Middle East stems far more from unemployment, post-colonial tensions, and despotic regimes. Solving these would be a more effective way of fighting extremism.

Tyrone Steele
Pembroke College, Oxford

Charlie Chaplin’s influence

SIR – Robin Ince is right to draw attention to the genius of Charlie Chaplin. At a recent screening of Chaplin’s Modern Times, during the Bradford International Film Festival, I sat next to two girls who laughed a lot. I asked them what it made them think of? “Wallace and Gromit,” they said. And Federico Fellini, I thought, and the Marx Brothers, and Mel Brooks, and Woody Allen, and of course, that Oscar-winning tribute, The Artist.

Chaplin’s films are so embedded in the memory of every film-maker, that their work always stirs memories of the master of screen comedy. What a pity the BBC has not yet honoured the centenary of Chaplin’s film making. Happily, Bradford’s National Media Museum has.

Gillian Reynolds
London W2

Swinging to the bin

SIR – Rod Sanders uses his nose rather than the sell-by-dates to decide whether food is off. I inherited from my mother the ability to test food with a gold ring on the end of a piece of string.

If it goes round it is fine, if it hovers it is undecided and if it swings backwards and forwards it is discarded; the speed of the swing determines the state of the food.

Chris Platford
Malmesbury, Wiltshire

Followers of fashion: how to wear your waistcoat

SIR – Sean Lang is to be applauded for wearing his waistcoat with pride, though he objects to the custom of leaving the bottom button undone.

The received wisdom, as I understand, is that Edward VII began the practice; some claim it was due to his girth, others that it was left undone by accident. Nevertheless, the custom persists to this day.

It is, of course, the personal choice of the wearer how he buttons his waistcoat, though many garments are cut with the intention of the lowest button being left undone. A complaint was also raised that unless this button was fastened, one’s “midriff” was exposed upon sitting. A three‑piece suit should be worn with high‑waisted trousers and braces, thus ensuring this embarrassment never occurs.

Jeremy Goldsmith
Newark-on-Trent, Nottinghamshire

SIR – Changing the etiquette to allow the bottom button on waistcoats to be done up will lead to sartorial anarchy. Next we will see the same happening to the lower button on two-button jackets, which, when some people do it today, lacks any style.

When I was young, I was told that the only bottom button that should be done up was the one on gentlemen’s trouser flies – until zips changed that necessity.

Philip Moger
East Preston, West Sussex

SIR – While I can still get into suits made for me over 50 years ago, tailored as they then were specifically to leave one button on the waistcoat undone, I now, alas, have to leave two.

I doubt that I am alone.

David Whitaker
Alton, Hampshire

SIR – The National Trust again warns that many English councils must accept building on protected countryside. This often arises because the National Planning Policy Framework requires local planning authorities to plan for unattainable 20-year housing targets, based on population growth projections from the Office of National Statistics.

Nationally, despite a record 28 per cent rise in new home registrations last year to 133,670, developers only built 56 per cent of the 240,000 dwellings needed to match population growth.

Local planning authorities have been set up to fail so that, when they don’t meet their targets, unelected planning inspectors have an excuse to permit speculative building on greenfield and flood-prone sites, while allowing developers to avoid brownfield sites.

This could be rectified if Nick Boles, the planning minister, instructed the Planning Inspectorate to allow targets to be adjusted, based on economic growth.

For the moment, local authorities have little influence on where and when houses are built, because they cannot meet the impossible housing targets required by the Planning Inspectorate.

Cllr Roger J Arthur
Horsham, Surrey

SIR – Dame Helen Ghosh of the National Trust is absolutely right about building on greenfield land. Councils have been rushed into producing local plans, many of which have been rejected. This leaves villages open to extensive greenfield development before the plan can be resubmitted. Other poorly prepared plans that have been passed will leave residents suffering their shortcomings for years.

It is time for the Government to call a temporary halt to the process to enable everybody to get their act together.

David Lawrence
Hook, Hampshire

SIR – Planners are incentivised to allow applications, and to disallow appeals. The more approvals they allow, the higher the council tax receipts to sustain their salaries and pensions, holiday entitlement, sickness leave and job security.

Colin Laverick
London WC2

SIR – My heart sank when I read Coulton Booth’s letter outlining his vision for an East-West metropolis straddling the Pennines, stretching all the way from Liverpool to Hull and connected by an eight-lane super highway.

Such a monstrosity would attract development along its length as planning restrictions gave way to market forces. The separate identities that distinguish the communities along the route would disappear under concrete, along with whatever remains of the countryside. What a depressing thought.

David Stewart
London N2

Irish Times:

Sir, – I can’t claim to know whether “occupied” or “disputed” is the right word to describe certain pieces of dusty land in a Middle East desert. To read some of the letters from Palestinian apologists about Israel, you’d be forgiven for thinking that there used to be a state called Palestine, then Israel just decided to invade and has been periodically occupying more and more of it.

Yet isn’t it a fact that the Palestinians already have a state and that it’s called Jordan and it’s interesting there is no pressure from the apologists to make Jordan and Egypt, where most Palestinians live, provide full citizenship to those people and allow them to avail of the rights and responsibility that entails, even if they ultimately wish to live somewhere else?

Is it not also a fact that the reason Israel occupies disputed territory is because each time it has been invaded by Arab armies, it has, to the disappointment of so many on the left, decisively beaten those armies and in those defeats it has left a presence in certain pieces of land to create a buffer zone again further attacks on Israel?

Or have I missed the part where having invaded and occupied Israel, the same Arab countries, who call for death to the Jews, would then live in peace with them? Yours, etc,

DESMOND FitzGERALD,

Canary Wharf,

London

Sir, – I assume that Dermot Meleady (Letters, April 12th) speaks not just on behalf of the Embassy of Israel, Dublin but for the Israeli government. If so, then Irish citizens should be concerned – not just for a peaceful future in the Middle East – but for the continuation of Israel as a functioning democracy.

I have recently read two books which have given me a much wider and deeper insight into the emergence of present-day Israel and its political relationship with the wider world – with the USA in particular. Both are written by committed Jews and are, in the best sense, pro-Israel. One is by an Israeli-born citizen and journalist, Ari Shavit. My Promised Land , published in 2013, is as its jacket states “an authoritative and deeply personal narrative history of the state of Israel”.

The other is The Crisis of Zionism by Peter Beinart, a US journalist and writer. This book details the recent history of the Jewish community in the USA and investigates the close Israel-US political and diplomatic relationship, particularly over the period of office of recent presidents.

On my reading, neither author nor book could be remotely called anti-Israel; however, neither shirks from calling Israel’s presence on and control of the West Bank “an occupation”.

So, could I appeal to Mr Meleady to add to his reading list and, in addition to rereading the biblical texts referred to by Damien Flinter in his letter (April 14th) that he take the time to closely read both books mentioned above. They may change his mind. In any event, both are very well written and engaging as each has a strong personal story to tell.

Le gach dea-mhéin,

PAUL E DONNELLY,

Kingsland Parade,

South Circular Road,

Dublin 8

Sir, – I am amazed how much interest Irish people, and in particular the Irish media, have in the conflict between Palestinians and Israel.

After all, this is a chronic dispute involving a land that is 30 per cent of Ireland’s size and has a total population of 11 million. According to Amnesty International, 27 Palestinians and seven Israelis were killed in 2013 due to violence. This is nothing to compared to the civil war in Syria, where 150.000 people have been killed. Or Iraq, where multiple bombings claimed the lives of 8,000 people in 2013.

Nor does the media seem to be very interested in executions in Iran, where at least 357 people were put to death last year, mostly dissidents. Though a Christian country, Ireland does not seem to be interested either n the plight of Christians in Muslim countries and Christian refugees from Lebanon, Syria, West Bank and Gaza.

But perhaps the interest of Ireland in the Palestinian conflict with Israel serves as a mirror for Ireland itself. Three hundred and fifty years of violence between Catholics and Protestants, 150 years between Arabs and Jews.

The barrier which in Belfast separates Catholic and Protestant areas is similar to the barrier which separates Palestinians from Israel following suicide bombings in which Israeli civilians were victims.

An anti-Semitic rant is published in The Irish Times and the Irish Jewish community accepts the abuse in the same way that it did during the Limerick boycott in 1904. Nothing has changed. Yours, etc,

I BARR MD,

Dakota Circle,

Bloomfield,

Michigan

Sir, – Those outraged by the Israeli presence in the districts of Hebron and Nablus, alias “the West Bank” of the Jordan, would do well to remember that the conflict would never have existed had the Arab parties accepted UN policy that both Jewish and Arab states succeed British (Western) Palestine; if the Arab parties had not junked UN Resolution 181; if the Arab parties had cut their losses with a peace treaty before 1967; if the Arab parties had accepted the 1967 Israeli offer to return to the green line for a peace treaty turning it into a legal frontier and ending the conflict and its claims.

The Palestine lobby should remember that the first Arab reaction to the Oslo attempt to build a peace two decades ago was to default on the commitment to amend their charters to recognise Israel’s right to exist as self-determined, that is to be “as Jewish as England is English” in the words of Chaim Weizmann to the Pell Commission – which allows a lot of civil equality for minorities. Then there were the Hamas bus bombs, now the rockets. They gave the green light to the build-now nationalists. Yours, etc,

FRANK ADAM.

Hartley Avenue,

Prestwich M25 0AT

Greater Manchester

Sir, – Great satire from Damien Flinter (“American support for Israel”, Letters, April 14th) More please. Yours, etc,

MELVYN WILCOX,

Dundanion Road,

Ballintemple, Cork

Sir, – Some of your correspondents have taken issue with Prof Diarmaid Ferriter’s statement that there is “no evidence that Britain was prepared to settle its Irish question until it was forced to do so”. His view, however, concurs with that of Charles Stewart Parnell, the great champion of Irish constitutional agitation for home rule. He is quoted as saying, in relation to the attitude of English politicians towards Ireland, that “they will do what we can make them do”.

Two indecisive general elections in 1910 gave Parnell’s heirs – the Irish Party at Westminster – the balance of power in parliament, and thus enabled them to get home rule for Ireland back on the political agenda for the first time since Gladstone’s fall from power in 1894. The Liberal government in 1910 took up the cause of home rule out of political necessity – and not with any Gladstonian moral purpose. In short, they were forced to do so by parliamentary arithmetic.

However, the threat of armed resistance from Ulster unionists, aided and abetted by the grandees of the Tory party in London, immediately queered the pitch for home rule – and this threat ultimately proved a far greater force in British politics than parliamentary arithmetic. The government was unwilling to coerce Ulster unionists out of the United Kingdom, and in any event the so-called Curragh “mutiny” in March 1914 showed that the army would not obey an order to move against the unionists.

The stalemate which resulted was broken by the start of the Great War in July 1914, and home rule was shelved for the duration of that war. Eventually, the formation of a coalition government comprising both Liberals and Tories – first under Asquith, then under Lloyd George – deprived the Irish Party leaders of their parliamentary leverage and left them without a coherent political strategy to counter the rise of Sinn Féin after the 1916 Rising.

Nationalist Ireland learned from the Ulster unionists that violence would force the British government to respond to its demands, and it acted accordingly. Not for nothing was Eoin Mac Neill’s famous article that led to the creation of the Irish Volunteers entitled “ The North Began ”. The contagion of violence spread from its roots in unionist Ulster to the whole island of Ireland.

Those of us who abhor political violence in all its manifestations should not lose sight of the reasons why nationalist Ireland resorted to it in the years 1916–22 too. Yours, etc,

FELIX M LARKIN,

Vale View Lawn,

Cabinteely,

Dublin 18

Sir, – Your columnist Stephen Collins (April 12th), commenting on the news that a member of the British royal family might be in attendance at the commemorations marking the centenary of the 1916 Rising, displays a deference towards British royalty not seen since former taoiseach John Bruton referred to his meeting with Prince Charles in 1995 as “the happiest day of my life”.

One could be forgiven for thinking that Mr Collins was acting as Ireland’s indigenous public relations officer for the British royal family and not a columnist for the leading national Irish newspaper.

His claim that Queen Elizabeth’s announcement that her family will stand alongside the President at the centenary commemorations of the anniversaries of the events that led to the creation of the Irish Free State will ensure that Sinn Féin will not hijack the event, implicitly implies that British royalty will.

This commemoration, however, has already been hijacked by the State’s decision to invite members of the royal family to the Easter commemorations in advance of consulting with the Government’s own expert advisory group on the centenary. Historian Prof Diarmaid Ferriter (April 14th) said “the State doesn’t own the legacy of 1916. Nobody does except the people.” Such a view, I believe, has almost universal support.

On the 75th anniversary of the Easter Rising in 1991, the Irish Government bowed to pressure from unrepresentative groups who were ideologically opposed to Irish separatism and shamefully ignored the anniversary of the Rising.

If the centenary commemoration is going to be embroiled in controversy over the presence of British royalty, there are those of us who will take it upon themselves to honour those brave women and men of 1916, just as we did for the 75th anniversary. Yours, etc,

TOM COOPER,

Templeville Road,

Templeogue,

Dublin 6W

Sir, – Every year the State sends representatives to the USA, on St Patrick’s Day, in recognition of that country and the Irish contribution to its founding.

The history of the native Americans and their decimation and impoverishment at the hands of the European occupiers, including the Irish, is ignored, along with our involvement in the slave trade, the past screened by tickertape and convenient amnesia. Are we not capable of a similar pretence in Ireland in 2016? Yours, etc,

EUGENE TANNAM,

Monalea Park ,

Firhouse,

Dublin 24

Sir, – My heart leaped with joy at the prospect of David Clinch’s proposal to move the O’Connell street awfulness known as the Spire.

On a recent visit to our lovely capital I passed through the garden which fronts the national museum near Heuston station. There is all its lonely ugliness I spotted the “Floozie in the jacuzzi”. It was a letter campaign to your newpaper, as I recollect, which initiated the popular movement to remove it from general public gaze. It now takes effort to view her tormented countenance.

May I suggest that the Spire be moved to similiar obscurity. Actually a positive outcome would be for it to be used to house some of the underground tunnelling which is proposed for the high tension electric cables. Yours, etc,

SEAN OhOGAIN

Bishopsfurze,

Kilkenny

A chara – As the Spire is not political, religious or military we were spared the usual whining by self-appointed experts telling us who should or shouldn’t be commemorated so as to confirm their own prejudices. Leave it where it is. Is mise,

LOMAN Ó LOINGSIGH

Ellensborough Drive

Kiltipper Road

Dublin 24

Sir, – The spire absolutely must stay as a fitting monument to the hubris of the “happy time”. We need a constant and necessarily obtrusive reminder of our recent national lapse into blind greed and idiocy. Yours, etc,

JOHN O’DWYER,

Two Mile House ,

Naas

Sir, – Vladimir Putin has made remarks on several occasions to the effect that local populations in Ukraine should be allowed to hold a referendum to determine their political future.

He has not, however, made any such offer to people within the Russian Federation. The federation is comprised of 85 federal constituent units ; 22 of these units are referred to as “republics”.

According the the federation’s own 2010 census 10 of the 22 republics have majority non-ethnic Russian populations. One other republic has a non-ethnic Russian plurality of 49.9 per cent.

If Mr Putin would have the people of Ukraine decide on greater local autonomy or possible affiliation with a neighbouring country, should he not first provide such an opportunity to the non-Russian people of the federation? Yours, etc,

DAN DONOVAN,

Shandon Street,

Dungarvan

Sir, – I wish to object, in the strongest terms possible, to your publication of Martyn Turner’s bigoted, nasty and downright disgraceful cartoon (April 16th, 2014). Since the child abuse scandals, the church has put in place child protection guidelines that are far more stringent than in any other organisation in this country. For you to use the sins of the past as a stick to continue to beat the church of the present not only betrays your paper’s anti-Catholic bigotry but is a very cheap shot at an already demoralised clergy. Yours, etc,

FR COLM KENNY,

Ballymun Road,

Dublin 9

Sir, – I am registering my absolute disgust and abhorrence at the cartoon which appears in your paper today . It is offensive in the extreme to every priest in the country and in my view requires an apology at editorial level. Or is there a mentality in the paper that allows open season on priests? Yours, etc,

FR PHILIP CURRAN,

Kilnamanagh-Castleview

Parish

Dublin 24

Sir, – As the engineer in ESB headquarters responsible for offshore island electricity installations in the 1980s, I’d like to endorse Séamus Ó Drisceoil’s comments on the wind generators on Oileán Chléire (Letters, April 15th).

This was a unique demonstration project which was supported by our government through the National Board for Science and Technology (NBST) and the German government through its wind energy research specialists, SMA Regelsystem Gmbh, Kassel. I was delighed to read that the wind generators on the island gave over 10 years of excellent service.

The project was facilitated by the ESB through connection to the existing electricity distribution network on the island and, indeed, its importance at the time was emphasised in a visit there by the then ESB chief executive, Dr Paddy Moriarty. Things have moved on since, with the laying of undersea cables to virtually all of our inhabited offshore islands, incorporating them into the national electricity network. Yours, etc,

RAY TRAVERS BE, MIE,

Brook Court,

Monkstown,

Co Dublin

Sir, – Perhaps an article on Bill Gates’s dress style might be a good follow-up to that on Sheryl Sandberg (April 16th)? I am not sure I have seen one on that subject in your newspaper, but perhaps I have just missed it. Maybe there is a reason “outspoken” Ms Sandberg has never discussed this topic. Probably too busy fighting the battle over the use of certain adjectives for describing women with opinions. Yours, etc,

CIARA GRAYDON,

Meadow Grove,

Dundrum,

Dublin 16

Sir, – Why do we not put the windmills and pylons on the ghost estates? Then we will have managed to co-locate most of our 21st century follies. Yours, etc,

ROBERT DUFFY,

Woodside,

Hacketstown,

Co Carlow

Irish Independent:

* Nothing beats spelling it out – especially when the ramifications are all-pervasive, and the potential counter-benefits patently ubiquitous.

Also in this section

‘What would we do here, if we were a real country?’

Letters: Bible is a collection of metaphors, not a book of evidence

World War I and the tragic historic waste of lives

Philip O’Neil (Letters, April 8) sustains his relentless ‘missive-mission’ with another ‘tonic-tablet’ of weathered wisdom.

Hitting the societal nail squarely on the head with a firm evocation of some key home truths permeating in and around the modern penchant for free-market materialism, he lays it clearly on the line.

“Moral sensitivity does not sit easily with unfettered capitalism; it tends to subvert it.” Ne’er a truer sentiment uttered.

Chalk it down, boom it from the mountain-tops, and have it tattooed on every new-born child in the nation.

In many ways, it’s screamingly obvious. How could addiction to profiteering, usury, entrepreneurial overkill and bottom-line corporatism ever offer a template of empathic decency or ethical morality for an egalitarian society. A ‘greed-is-good’ mentality is the only logical outcome for dedication to the false icons of the filthy lucre.

“We have colluded in allowing economic activity to develop a life of its own, accountable only to itself,” Philip O’Neil adroitly states.

We are left, thus, with a ‘pig-in-a-poke’ fallacy of pseudo-aggrandisement debilitating a nation. By omission and/or commission, we all have allowed this to take root, flourish and fester.

It implicates us all. We seem to tolerate the status-quo as something of an inevitability and demur to the gods of a monstrous global failure, ie free-market libertarianism with its in-built survival-of-the-fittest motto.

The planet has only a finite amount of wealth potential, be that energy, food, water or other precious natural resources. Skewed consumption/comfort quotients coupled with a steady ‘diet’ of famines, wars and pestilence ensure that an uneasy, unstable and grossly unfair ‘balance’ prevails.

However, we seem to persist with a corrupted/distorted democratic dynamic, electing inept folk of questionable ability or generosity of spirit who perpetuate a flawed concept on a sadly under-motivated, uninitiated and/or unsuspecting populace.

Jim Cosgrove Lismore, Co Waterford

HACKING AT OUR NATURAL BEAUTY

* The current mindless rage for killing trees in our public spaces is heartbreaking. No prior gesture towards consultancy is given by the nameless folk who authorise such wanton felling.

Trees that graced the city for decades are being cut – witness the recent destruction in Dun Laoghaire’s Peoples’ Park and last week’s uprooting of the flowering magnolias at the entrance to the National Gallery. In this time of austerity, surely the joy and spirit-lift gained from the free enjoyment of natural beauty should be augmented, not lessened.

Jackie O’Brien, Glasthule, Co Dublin

UNLOCKING THE CHAINS OF 1916

* In the Royal Gallery at the Palace of Westminster on April 8, President Higgins said, in his address, that independence for Ireland cast its long shadow across our relations with Britain, causing us, in the words of Irish MP Stephen Gwynn, to “look at each other with doubtful eyes”.

Stephen Gwynn, a grandson of William Smith O’Brien, also said in 1926, that 10 years had been added to the waiting period for Irish political unity and that Ireland would wait forever if it remained chained to the ideal of 1916. The waiting seems now to be over. A champion of Home Rule, Gwynn once described it as a post-dated cheque.

Patrick O’Brien, Phisborough, Dublin 7

TURN OFF THIS DISGUSTING SHOWER

* An old proverb crushed by modernity . “You can’t get water from a stone” they said, but what they didn’t say was water could get cash from the populace.

If I buy petrol, I don’t expect to pay a standing fixed charge equivalent to a third of the purchase. If I buy a pint, I expect to pay for what I get when I buy it. Naturally, those burdened with income tax, LPT, UHC, unemployed children etc, will carry the latest burden in addition to the daily diet of austerity soup.

Once upon a time, governments purportedly represented their populace. This one of ours represents itself, its pals and its backers, and we pick up the tab. Anyone out there with the balls to turn off the tap on this disgusting shower?

John Cuffe, Meath

CHRISTIAN MARKING OF PASSOVER

* The Last Supper of Jesus and His disciples took place on Passover, a holiday of redemption set in place by God, Jesus, or Yeshua – as He would have been called in His lifetime, who instructed His followers to remember His death (not His resurrection) until He come.

Strangely, the church ignores Passover altogether, as most of the early church fathers were extremely anti-Semitic and deemed the feast as ‘too Jewish.’ Instead, the majority of Yeshua’s followers today commemo-rate the event on ‘Maundy Thursday’, although no specific day of the week is mentioned in any of the Gospels for the Last Supper or the Crucifixion.

A Biblical day, however, according to the Book of Genesis and the calendar that Yeshua Himself would have kept, begins in the evening at sunset, the second daylight portion then follows. A day divided at midnight is the invention of man.

This year, Passover fell on April 14, which in the biblical calendar is Nisan 14, and as it begins at sunset, the second daylight part follows the next morning which allowed for the Last Supper and the Crucifixion to both occur on the same day, according to the Genesis ruling. In the Gentile/Christian calendar, this takes two days to commemorate, ie Maundy Thursday and Good Friday due to the midnight time division.

If Yeshua were to come back today, the natural day for commemorating these events would be on the date of Passover itself, not Maundy Thursday. The symbolism of the slaughter of the Passover lamb, the redemptive qualities of the shed blood. Maybe it’s time the church re-examined the status of Passover, also demonstrating that the hierarchy is no longer anti-Jewish and that the holiday has benefits and significance for both Jews and Christians.

Colin Nevin, Bangor, Co Down

LIVELIHOODS SOLD TO HIGHEST BIDDER

* One of the most invidious acts, regrettably among many others, needlessly perpetrated by this Government on Irish citizens, must be the recent sale of the 13,000 mortgages of Irish Nationwide to two American distressed fund companies. These companies bought the mortgages from the special liquidators KPMG at a huge discount of several billion euro, again courtesy of a lazy and uncaring government and, ultimately, the Irish taxpayer.

The most appalling and callous aspect of this deal was that the owners of these mortgages, Irish people in the main, were not afforded an equal opportunity by their government to buy their own loans to ease their distressed financial state; it is almost certain that many of these unfortunates will lose their homes as a result.

The modus operandi of the new owners will be to relentlessly chase the unfortunate mortgagees for the full amount, pocketing huge profits in the process. There will be little or no sympathy from the Government for the dire personal, familial and societal consequences.

What is also disturbing is the almost complete failure of the media to report on the injustice of the matter. Not a peep as usual from the top brass of the trade unions. God be with the days when the Catholic Church would raise its voice.

John Leahy, Wilton Road, Cork


Viewing all 594 articles
Browse latest View live