Quantcast
Channel:
Viewing all 594 articles
Browse latest View live

Harrogate

$
0
0

8 January 2014 Harrogate

I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. Heather has taken up with Pertwee and someone has sabotarged Troutbridge’s floggle toggle box. Priceless.

Mary to Harrogate the books shops moved! I get my feet done

Scrabbletoday Mary wins and gets just over300, Perhaps Iwill win tomorrow.

 

Obituary:

 

Robert Boscawen, who has died aged 90, was a member of a distinguished Cornish family and served as Conservative MP for Wells, the constituency later renamed Somerset and Frome, from 1970 to 1992. Known for his robust Right-wing views, he was a Government Whip from 1979 to 1988.

He was also the last holder of the Military Cross to sit in the Commons, an award won at Arnhem with the 1st Armoured Battalion, Coldstream Guards. Having already had three tanks “shot out from under him”, he was severely injured in a bloody tank battle and left permanently disfigured by burns.

Robert Thomas Boscawen was born on March 17 1923, the fourth son of the 8th Viscount Falmouth and Mary Margaret Meynell, who was a descendant of Lord Grey of the Reform Bill. Their family roots ran deep in Cornwall, and the name of an 18th-century ancestor, Admiral Sir Edward Boscawen, who was the Member for Truro, is enshrined in the Records of the House of Commons, noting the unanimous vote of thanks accorded him for destroying the French fleet at Lagos Bay in 1759.

Bob grew up at Tregothnan, near Truro, sailing and quickly becoming an excellent shot. He was educated at Eton before, in 1941, within two weeks of leaving school, he joined up at his local recruiting office, in Redruth. He joined the Royal Engineers, which sent him for nine months to Trinity College, Cambridge, where he read Engineering. He then applied to join the Coldstream Guards, with which members of his family had served since 1769 (his eldest brother, Evelyn, had been killed while serving with the 2nd Coldstream Guards Battalion in the withdrawal from Dunkirk).

Bob Boscawen joined the 1st Armoured Battalion of the Guards in 1942 and landed in France shortly after D-Day, when he was troop commander of four Sherman tanks. The fighting was intense, and on several occasions Boscawen, then just 21, was involved in bitter and lengthy exchanges of fire, often witnessing the tanks of comrades bursting into flames.

He was involved in the liberation of Brussels, where he bought a shotgun and (as the partridge season had opened) set out to supplement rations with game birds, all washed down with champagne recovered from the Wehrmacht.

Then on October 2, while supporting the 231st Infantry Brigade of 50th Tyne and Tees Division south of Arnhem, Boscawen’s tanks came under heavy fire. With little support, they stood their ground during a night of intense bombardment, “firing at every muzzle flash”. When dawn broke, it illuminated a scene, as he later wrote, “of scattered death and bits of debris”. He was awarded an MC.

They crossed the Rhine on March 30 1945. Two days later, on Easter Day, his tanks were attempting to capture a bridge over a canal near Enschede. As he later noted in his battle diary, which was published in 2001 as Armoured Guardsman: “I found myself looking down the barrels of four [105mm heavy flak] guns beside the bridge, the place seething with Germans… I saw the shots flying up at me. There was a whoof and the turret was engulfed from below in a whirlwind of flame. I eventually broke free from the flames and stumbled back for some 200 yards to safety. The rest were either trapped or shot down…” His troop had set out after D-Day with 19 men. With casualties duly replaced, 13 of its men were killed and nine wounded before V-E Day.

Almost three years and much surgery in the hands of the celebrated Archibald McIndoe passed before Boscawen could return to anything like normal life. His first step came in 1947, when he volunteered for the British Red Cross Civilian Relief Organisation in Germany, helping to run a rehabilitation centre for the war-wounded and assisting East European refugees.

From 1948 he spent two years with Shell Petroleum as a management trainee before joining the family-owned Cornish china clay business, Goonveen, at Rostowrack. He became a Lloyd’s Underwriter in 1952.

He had joined the Conservative Party while still in the Army and in the Fifties began to take an increasingly active role, winning a reputation as a hard-working and effective campaigner, much in demand as a speaker. He contested Falmouth and Camborne in 1964 and 1966, but was ousted as a candidate a year later after a series of acrimonious rows among his constituency activists over his support for the extreme Right-wing Monday Club. His opponents believed it damaged the Party’s prospects in a seat with a radical tradition.

He spent two years searching for a new seat to contest. He had hoped to continue the family tradition in Cornwall, but had to move to Wells in Somerset for both a safe seat and more sympathetic political ears. There he supported the restoration of capital punishment and drastic cuts in the welfare state and student grants. He was against abortion. But it was the pace of decolonisation that most concerned him, and he became a leading supporter of Ian Smith after Rhodesian UDI. He voted against the imposition of sanctions in defiance of the Party Whip.

He did, however, “reluctantly overcome” his anti-Common Market prejudices, being persuaded by the economic arguments in favour of British entry. While he cautioned pro-marketeers against regarding it as a panacea for Britain’s ills, he warned opponents against being prejudiced by memories of the war: “Parliament should not be guided by the distrust, suspicions and hatreds of past years for decisions affecting our future generations.”

In 1976 Boscawen launched a vituperative attack on plans to increase MPs’ pay, describing the debate as “a disagreeable, disgraceful and miserable occasion”; doing so at a time of economic stringency “brought ignominy” on the whole House, while the inclusion of a notional increase to count towards pension rights was “not just nonsense, but bloody nonsense, immoral and wrong”. He took a particular interest in the National Health Service and sat on its London Executive Council from 1954 to 1965. As an MP he was on the backbenchers’ Health Services Committee and vice-chairman from 1974 to 1979.

In 1979 Boscawen was appointed an assistant Whip and promoted to Lord Commissioner of the Treasury in 1981, then to the two senior Whips offices, Vice Chamberlain of Her Majesty’s Household (1983-86) and Comptroller of the Royal Household until 1988.

When he retired from the Whips office in 1988, Mrs Thatcher paid a glowing tribute to his “truly magnificent service to the country, the government and the Parliamentary party”.

The Trappist life of the Whips office had denied Boscawen the opportunity for eight years to display his skill as an orator and his mastery of invective, but did not interfere with his ceaseless work for his constituents. A much appreciated success was to persuade British Rail to stop London express trains at Castle Cary for the first time for many years. Nor did he forget the interests of his Cornish homeland, and was the driving force behind the creation of the Cornwall Industrial Development Group.

Robert Boscawen was a keen rower and expert yachtsman. He stroked the Trinity boat and rowed in the University trial eights. He was a member of the Royal Yacht Squadron and regularly sailed in international races, including the Fastnet. On one occasion in the 1950s he was joined on the race by an American journalist who recorded how, in a Force Nine gale in the Irish Sea, many of the crew were “too tired to go on” but found that they would “rather drop in our tracks than admit such feelings to Boscawen himself. Such is the stuff of leadership”.

Bob Boscawen married Mary Alice Codrington in 1949. She died last year, and he is survived by their two daughters, and by a son who followed him into the Coldstream Guards.

Robert Boscawen, born March 17 1923, died December 28 2013

 

Guardian:

 

Like so many other Guardian readers, I wanted to express sadness at Simon Hoggart’s untimely death (Original, waspish and witty to the last, 7 January 2014). His parliamentary sketches were beautifully crafted and, in my view, worth the cover the price of the Guardian alone. His humour was always gentle and added to his readers’ understanding of Westminster politics. If ever a journalist encapsulated the values and beliefs of your newspaper, Simon Hoggart was the one.
Matthew Ryder
Buckden St Neots, Cambridgeshire

• I have never read an obituary (7 January) that made me chuckle so much, yet brought such a flood of unanticipated tears. Simon Hoggart enriched our lives in so many ways. When we next travel to France we shall seek out again a restaurant that Simon enthused about and shared with Guardian readers, and raise a glass to his memory. Thank you, Simon, for giving us so much pleasure.
Bob Hargreaves
Summerseat, Bury

• In Jonathan Jones’s article about Picasso (A cut above, G2, 7 January) he says “there were no art galleries in north Wales” when he was growing up. The Royal Cambrian Academy found a home in Conwy in 1885; Oriel Plas Glyn-y-Weddw in Llanbedrog became a public art gallery in 1896; the Mostyn gallery in Llandudno in its present incarnation came into being in the late 1970s. None would have featured Picasso’s work, but still…
Marilyn Davies
Prestatyn, Denbighshire

• The crystallographer Dorothy Hodgkin was not a Quaker (Letters, 7 January). She was highly sympathetic to many Quaker causes, such as a commitment to peace and speaking truth to power. But while her husband Thomas came from a well-known Quaker family, she was descended from a line of high Anglican clerics and professed no religious belief as an adult.
Georgina Ferry
Oxford

• So Eusébio (Obituary, 6 January) was “nullified” by Nobby Stiles in the 1966 World Cup semi-final. In a 10-second clip from that game on the news I saw Stiles commit two tackles on Eusébio that would be straight red cards today. “Kicked off the park” would be more apt.
Billy Morrison
Ayr, Scotland

Michael Gove holds up the show Oh What a Lovely War as an example of a leftwing attempt to peddle unpatriotic myths, and the education department’s defence of its boss implies that this universally acclaimed show “denigrates the patriotism, humour and courage demonstrated by ordinary British soldiers in the first world war” (Baldrick – Your country needs you, G2, 7 January).

This is a calumny of the work of Joan Littlewood, Gerry Raffles and all those artists in Theatre Workshop who created the show at Theatre Royal Stratford East. The opposite is the truth. A vital part of the show’s success lay in the fact that it told the story of the first world war from the point of view of the men in the trenches.

Not long ago the respected playwright Peter Nichols said of its original production in 1963, “Joan Littlewood’s masterpiece remains for me the most compelling theatre experience in my life. The supreme tragic event of our century was told with a gaiety that, by using their own songs, showed what spirit had been crushed out of the glorious dead by four years of Vickers guns, poison gas and shells.”

As for it being part of a leftwing conspiracy, important source material came from the Tory MP Alan Clark’s book, The Donkeys, the title of which came from the phrase describing the soldiers as “lions led by donkeys”.

Princess Margaret attended the original production accompanied by Lord Cobbold, who in his capacity as lord chamberlain was in charge of theatrical censorship. While congratulating the cast, Princess Margaret said to the director, “What you said here tonight, Miss Littlewood, should have been said a long time ago”, and added, “Don’t you agree, Lord Cobbold?” “Yes, ma’am,” he replied, and Joan Littlewood made the aside to a nearby cast member, “That’s our permission”, meaning permission to go ahead with a transfer to the West End, which Lord Cobbold’s department was apparently having doubts about without considerable changes.

It seems Mr Gove now wishes to appoint himself the censor of theatre at the heart of the education system.
Philip Hedley
Co-executor of Joan Littlewood’s estate

• It’s not as though the originators of Oh What a Lovely War were the first to challenge orthodox accounts. If Mr Gove wants to say anything serious about how the war has been perceived he needs also to consider its treatment in interwar films such as Kameradschaft, La Grande Illusion and All Quiet on the Western Front. All were banned by the Nazis. It’s not loyalty to anyone’s country that is threatened by such critiques, but the self-assurance of the powerful who seek to hide the truth from the rank and file.
Ian Jewesbury
London

• Like other readers I very much appreciated Michael Morpurgo‘s call (A year to honour, but not glorify, the Great War’s dead, 2 January). It is not true, however, as he was told, that War Horse is the first play about the war to be performed in Berlin. Sherriff’s Journeys End was performed there in 1929, and reviewed by Erich Kästner under the wry title “Gentlemen Prefer Peace”. The will to reconciliation existed on both sides at that time. But it is generally fair to say that German writings about the war – by authors as different as Ernst Jünger and Arnold Zweig, as well as Remarque – were read with keener interest in English translation around 1930 than the other way round.
David Midgley
Professor of German literature and intellectual history, St John’s College, Cambridge

• Before the battle lines are drawn along political lines of left and right and “right” and “wrong” ways to teach and commemorate the first world war in the forthcoming centenary period (Gove has gone over the top, says Baldrick, 6 January), ministers would do well to remember that ideas about the way the war is taught in the UK context is based on very little evidence and outdated assumptions.

Precisely in response to this issue, academics from the University of Exeter and Northumbria University are leading an Arts and Humanities Research Council-funded project entitled The First World War in the Classroom: Teaching and the Construction of Cultural Memory. Part of its research base is the first ever national survey into the way the war is taught in English literature and history classes across England. The data, gathered alongside focus groups with teachers from a variety of different locations and school types, is currently being analysed and the results will be released in a final report in late spring 2014 available via the project website ww1intheclassroom.exeter.ac.uk and other peer-reviewed publications.

Initial indications suggest that teachers use Blackadder Goes Forth in a very limited way, often as a comedic window into a more complex and nuanced subject. We would therefore urge hesitancy in jumping to conclusions until more data is available, starting with our survey report and various follow-on projects into how the war is taught that we hope will result from our exploratory research. It is only then that we will be able to have a reasoned and informed discussion about the way the war is taught and how this might be improved.
Dr Catriona Pennell University of Exeter, Dr Ann-Marie Einhaus Northumbria University

•  My late father, a veteran of the first world war, saw many comrades die beside him. Like many, he didn’t want to speak about the war but I watched the “over the top” Blackadder episode with him. There was a long silence, then he said “That is one of the greatest tributes to British soldiers I have ever seen.” What emotions, what feelings, what thoughts does Michael Gove wish to censor in us this year so that he can nostalgically wave a few flags?
Graham Mollart
Farnham, Surrey

•  But for the obstructive attitude of the War Office, there would have been more women to honour for their contribution to the British war effort (Letters, 3 January). When the pioneer Scottish woman doctor Elsie Inglis offered her services, she was turned down by the War Office. Undeterred, and with the help of the Scottish Federation of Women’s Suffrage Societies, she organised the Scottish Women’s Hospitals for Foreign Service, whose offers of help were welcomed by Britain’s allies, France and Serbia.

These medical units, staffed entirely by women, saw service in France, Serbia and Russia. Significantly, they were not only staffed by women, but women were in charge – one of whom, Dr Isabel Emslie (who later married my father’s cousin), wrote an account of her experience in command of the unit sent to Serbia (With a Woman’s Unit in Serbia, Salonika and Sebastopol). In contrast to the attitude of the War Office, Britain’s allies recognised the contribution of these amazing women: Elsie Inglis was awarded Serbia’s Order of the White Eagle, the highest Serbian honour. She was the first woman to be so honoured. Isabel Emslie was awarded the Croix de Guerre by the French.

Needless to say, after the war, capable doctors like her struggled to have a medical career and were denied kind of the posts of responsibility which they held in wartime.
Professor Sarah Hutton
Aberystwyth University

 

 

The “clever illusion” of memory offered by the camera is a point well made by David Shariatmadari (Comment, 2 January). It brings to mind the cautionary parable of Socrates in the Phaedrus (274), where he makes the same point about the invention of writing. The Egyptian god of the liberal arts, Theuth, presents his new technique to the king/god, Thamus, with the words: “This invention … will make the Egyptians wiser and will improve their memories; for it is an elixir of memory and wisdom I have discovered.” The king berates him for his misplaced enthusiasm, and replies that, on the contrary, “this invention will produce forgetfulness in the minds of those who learn to use it, for they will not practise their memory … You have invented an elixir not of memory, but of reminding; and you offer your pupils the appearance of wisdom, not true wisdom, for they read many things without instruction and will therefore seem to know many things, when they are for the most part ignorant and hard to get along with, since they are not wise, but only appear wise.”

Like snapshots of times past, I wonder how many written words, cut as aides-memoire from newspapers such as your own, lie, lost and irretrievable, in fathomless desk drawers, their relevance and wisdom long since unremembered and forgotten.
Roger Tarr
Edinburgh

 

 

We are deeply concerned by the decision of the UK embassy in Moscow to refuse to grant a temporary visa for travel to the UK to a Russian journalist in fear for her life.

The journalist (who we cannot name for security reasons) faces an established and credible threat, which is directly connected to the reporting work she undertakes. The journalist writes for one of the few remaining independent newspapers in the Russian Federation, Novaya Gazeta.

Five journalists at the title have been killed as a result of their work since the paper launched in 1993, including the celebrated war reporter Anna Politkovskaya.

Frequently the Russian authorities fail to investigate cases of violence against journalists and bring those responsible to account. Dedicated mechanisms to protect journalists require the co-operation and support of governments that champion free speech.

Temporary refuge removes people from the immediate threat that they face and enables long-term security planning to ensure their safety and allow them to continue doing valuable work.

Article 19 acted as sponsor for the visa application and has written directly to the home secretary to ask that the decision be reviewed.

The UK government has long been a vocal champion for free speech around the world. We now urge them to stand by those who risk their lives to report and facilitate open democratic conversations.
Thomas Hughes
Executive director, Article 19
Jo Glanville
Director, English PEN
Christophe Deloire
Executive director, Reporters Without Borders
Peter Noorlander
Chief executive, Media Legal Defence Initiative
Galina Arapova
Director, Mass Media Defence Centre (Russia)

 

The dysfunctional UK housing sector causes serious economic and social problems (The silent scandal, Money, 4 January). We face a supply shortage resulting in a property bubble, exploitation of renters, and overcrowding and homelessness in parts of the country. Property owning is increasingly out of reach for many and there is a huge intergenerational wealth transfer from younger to older generations. But, as your editorial (4 January) rightly states, this is a problem that can be fixed. Three direct interventions are needed urgently: targeted rent controls, to control rents and price rises caused by buy-to-let investment; a tough consumer protection regime to protect renters; and a major housing investment programme.

One of the perceived problems is how to fund a housing programme on the necessary scale. But, there are a number of viable collective funding models. For example, the government could launch a social housing government bond (gilt) to fund local authority building or renovation programmes. Collective funding models are more cost-effective for society than encouraging private financial institutions which demand a significant risk premium for funding major infrastructure projects – in other words, they charge more and still demand the state (taxpayers) underwrites much of the long-term risk involved.

Collective bonds could also offer a higher interest rate to savers hurt by low rates currently available in the market – a win-win for society.
Mick McAteer
Director, Financial Inclusion Centre

• Your focus on the soaring cost of rent reflects the accounts I’ve heard around Britain about how households are being left in impossible circumstances by the cost of simply putting a roof over their heads. And as you rightly highlight, far too many of those privately rented homes are cold, draughty and poorly maintained.

But you are wrong to say that rent control is not on the national agenda: the London assembly housing committee has recommended it and the Green party’s conference last September overwhelmingly supported a motion calling for “smart” rent controls, which would restrict rises for sitting tenants and be linked to significant increases in security for sitting tenants. We need to build much more council housing, to restore the stocks decimated by right to buy. And we need to ensure private landlords provide houses fit for living in. But above all we need to regard houses as homes, a basic right, not a financial cash cow for the few.
Natalie Bennett
Green party leader

• It is timely to see the article focusing on tenants and rents instead of house prices. There is no widely quoted index showing the increase in private rents over the last 30 years. Clearly neoliberal economics has failed the housing market when 30 years of rapidly rising prices have not generated a consequent increase in the supply of housing. Instead rising house prices have proved to be an efficient engine of inequality, rewarding owners of expensive houses with substantial unmerited windfall gain, while penalising tenants with rent increases. Governments need to intervene to provide a satisfactory supply of new housing and to use controls to limit the rise in house prices to protect tenants not merely to avoid housing bubbles.
Nick Vosper

 

 

In 1983 John Fortune played a barrister in an episode of Granada TV’s Crown Court which I directed. He was defending a policeman accused of corruption. As was usual, there was friendly but fierce competition between the rival legal teams. A “book” was started during rehearsals and the smart money was on an acquittal for John’s client. Nevertheless, the jury (made up of members of the public who were asked to vote “guilty” or “not guilty”) decided to convict.

After the recording, the cast gathered in Granada’s Stables bar before heading back to London. We were celebrating a successful show, but John was noticeably subdued. “What’s the matter, John?” I asked. “I just think I could have done better for him,” he sighed.

 

 

Ed Pilkington (Obama’s bubble continues to deflate, 20 December) and many other commentators express disappointment at Barack Obama’s inability to achieve a swag of reforms in the US and imply, if not state outright, that this indicates indecisiveness at best and weakness or insincerity at worst on his part.

Democratic institutions such as those in the US and most western political systems are designed to prevent maverick leaders from exercising untrammelled power through the checks and balances of the parliamentary system. As long as the parliament does its job properly, this works OK, but if it becomes dysfunctional or corrupted, there is no way that the leader can override it. If subsequent elections fail to produce a government that works any better, radicalisation often occurs and the most extreme form of this is a military coup. This usually leads to even worse consequences, as we have seen in Chile, Greece, Egypt and others over the last century; in fact, the only beneficial military coup in this period was that led by Ataturk almost 100 years ago.

Most of the blame for our current woes is being directed at the leaders in both Australia and US, but I suggest that both our parliamentary systems are in very poor shape and should carry the major responsibility for our problems. Evolution works through both gradual adaptation and through traumatic cataclysm.

Let’s hope we have the sense to develop our institutions of government through the former rather than have to suffer the latter.
David Barker
Bunbury, Western Australia

Dangers of surveillance

Alan Rusbridger’s missive Inside the surveillance state (20 December) fills one with despair for the English-speaking Christian countries that comprise the total surveillance states: namely, the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. It took 800 years from the date of the Magna Carta to the present for democratic principles based on the freedom of the individual to grow and mature among the same people.

It is a great irony that the creators of democracy have become its executioners. Until the collapse of the Soviet Union, visitors to that country came back with scare stories of how the KGB was following them continuously, watching and noting down their utterances and activities. Now our governments have CCTV cameras, telephones, internet and emails to do the same job with meticulous efficiency, without causing us any concern or pain.

When a country loses its self-confidence, no matter how powerful it may be, it resorts to total surveillance, as with the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany in the past. Who thought that surveillance was the harbinger of destruction for those political systems at their height of power?

The total surveillance state that our political leaders have created with the intention of safeguarding our freedom and security brings to mind a verse from the Hindu holy book, the Bhagavad Gita: I have become death, the destroyer of worlds.
Bill Mathew
Melbourne, Australia

Tensions in east Asia

Your coverage of the current situation in the East China Sea (Escalating tensions leave Japan depending on US support more than ever, 6 December, and Unapologetic Japan squares up to China, 13 December) downplays a few important points that may affect the outcome.

First, it is worth remembering that the current escalation really began when Shintaro Ishihara, then governor of Tokyo, now co-leader of the Japan Restoration party, bounced the previous government into buying the Senkakus from their private owner. As such, the current situation is as much down to the behaviour of the slow-witted nationalists now running Japan as it is to Chinese “aggression”.

Second, when China established its Air Defence Identification Zone (ADIZ), all airlines in the region complied with the Chinese demand to file flight plans and to identify all aircraft to Chinese military air traffic control. A week after the ADIZ was imposed, the Japanese government instructed Japan’s major carriers to cease filing flight plans and to tell their pilots to cease identifying their flights to the Chinese authorities. Given the tensions in this region, such action represents the height of irresponsibility, as airline passengers may be used as guinea pigs to test Chinese intentions.

The real risk factor here is conflict starting by accident. The danger is the hot-shot Chinese fighter pilot, a little hung-over, having a bad day, and then sent to intercept an “unidentified” aircraft leaving Japanese airspace. Should such a tragedy befall a Japanese commercial flight in the present era of tension, I have little faith in the Japanese government’s ability, or even intention, to contain the situation.
David Layfield
Okinawa, Japan

Hungarians are not extremists

If András Schiff is that worried about the imminent resurgence of fascism in Hungary (20 December) why doesn’t he come home and get his hands dirty? The answer perhaps, is that there is no prospect of one actually occurring. Yes, there is Jobbik, recently down from 16% to 13% in the Tarki poll, and yes, Jobbik thugs occasionally do nasty, stupid things in public. But one wonders what public soul-searching of the kind Schiff proposes would actually achieve – apart from giving a heady dash of oxygen to the fascists. In fact one could argue that Viktor Orbán’s current policy of letting them self-combust is actually proving quite successful.

Hungary has its problems: near-starvation in some rural areas, little prospect of a quick escape from its economic straitjacket and the absence of a credible opposition. But its long-suffering people are resigned and, some might say, overly tolerant, not extremist.
David North
Nagykovácsi, Hungary

The dilemma of austerity

Austerity is never a popular word and stimulating an economy in recession with easy monetary policy and fiscal deficits is usually good economic policy (US takes a welcome step away from austerity, 20 December). Unfortunately, the resulting increase in the public debt is not always possible because, in many cases, this debt is already considered to be too high by the financial sector. As a result, further borrowing may become impossible or so costly that it becomes too much of a burden, as Greece, Italy and a few other countries have discovered.

Many governments face a dilemma between increasing their deficits to stimulate growth and reducing their debt to avoid the dangerous risk of insolvency. Harry Stein is mistaken when he suggests that the choice is between austerity and economic growth. The reality is that some countries have no choice but to follow austerity.

Stein is right to suggest that tax changes would have been better than sequestration to reduce both government expenses and the public debt, but his claim that sequestration caused terrible damage in 2013 is exaggerated, at least at the global level. The reality is that the US economy has performed better than the year before and unemployment has declined. Admittedly, the recovery has been weaker than in previous cases but the recession was also sharper. In fact, the real surprise has been the very limited impact of these blunt austerity measures on the global US economy in 2013.
Francois P Jeanjean
Ottawa, Canada

Tensions in Singapore

Your report on rioting arising from tension between Singaporeans and migrant workers in the city’s Little India district is a reminder that we need to understand the way in which class and ethnicity interact with one another as part of the social dynamic making Singapore what it is today (13 December).

Beneath the surface of Singapore’s authoritarian democracy is, and always has been, a measure of social tension, which came to the surface [through race riots] in 1964 and which, like the current disturbance, had a class as well as a communal dimension.

It is in large measure in response to this mostly subterranean tension that Singapore’s national unity has always relied on a high degree of state coercion to hold its society together.

That tension, and the state coercion that holds it in check, is reflected in the city’s ill-fated Speakers’ Corner in Hong Lim Park. That spacious and very well-organised speaking venue, modelled on the London equivalent in Hyde Park, has no speakers because its potential orators are too afraid of arrest.

Class and race are, in effect, among the proscribed topics for discussion at this venue because they are, perhaps understandably given what happened in 1964, considered too destabilising.
Terry Hewton
Adelaide, South Australia

Briefly

• The “newly discovered gas” that is more than “7,000 times more powerful than carbon dioxide at warming the Earth” (Dispatches, 20 December) certainly deserves to be monitored closely. It becomes a little less scary, though, when you consider that it is actually a liquid, not a gas: Perfluorotributylamine (PFTBA) has a boiling point of 178C at atmospheric pressure, which should make it relatively easy to contain the substance in a closed system.

Moreover, a rough estimate based on the figure of 7,000 and established chemical calculations leads me to conclude that one gram of PFTBA released into the atmosphere is equivalent in destructive potential to the carbon dioxide that results from burning around 250ml of petrol – or from driving an average car for about 8km.
Egbert von Steuber
Lingen, Germany

• That Claire Armitstead should have characterised Dogmatix as “evil-tempered” may be a bit unfair to the cuddly and mild-mannered mascot (3 January). Only under the influence of a wee drop of potion does he transmogrify to unleash his inner beserker – reminiscent of the Hulk’s rage. And like the latter he swells his girth (or maybe just puffs himself up) and rampages in dogged pursuit of Roman popinjays.
R M Fransson
Denver, Colorado, US

• I enjoyed Ian Jack’s article on the coverage of the (undoubtedly great) man’s death (20 December). I was totally Mandela-ed out of it within 36 hours of his demise, as were quite a few people I commented to on the matter.
Muiris de Bhulbh
Leixlip, Ireland

 

Independent:

 

Tory Education Secretary Michael Gove wants us all to rewrite the history of the First World War. It was a great patriotic war where noble Englishmen fought for the liberal ideals of Britain against the rapacious and evil German expansionist regime.

Of course, these were the liberal ideals where women didn’t get the vote until 1918 (and then only if they were over 30), Irish people were considered as subhuman and black people even worse.

No, it was a war that threw multitudes of misled and desperate young men from all over the world into a mechanised hell of death-machines and mutilation. A politician or historian who tries to rewrite this horror as a victory for anyone is at best misguided, and at worst a psychopath with no empathy for human suffering.

Ronan Breslin

Glasgow

Michael Gove has suggested the centenary of 1914 should be an occasion for recognising the necessary and honourable part Britain played in resisting German militarism. He has been immediately assailed by the Labour Party and the British left in general, as well as the SNP, who are determined to make an ideological argument out of the First World War.

But in spite of the carnage it is difficult to see how we could responsibly or safely have stayed neutral while Germany secured hegemony over the Continent. Britain may have had little sympathy for Serbia or Russia, but the Germans’ decision to implement their vast war plan by invading neutral Belgium was a game-changer.

The idea that Hitler was very bad but the Kaiser a cuddly old duffer is undermined by the harsh terms imposed on a defeated Russia; similar terms were planned for the West. It is argued that German victory would have resulted in a proto-EU, but their 1914 plans show that, save for the Jewish genocide, it would have resembled the Second World War occupation.

Dr John Cameron

St Andrews

While according the greatest respect to everyone who fought in the First World War, in whatever service and for whatever nation, I cannot help feeling that Nigel Farage’s statistic of 47 British divisional generals killed in action during that conflict tends to reinforce rather than mitigate the popular conception of the incompetence of the British leadership.

Surely it is the job of divisional generals to lead their divisions by planning, disposing and commanding. This is not served by placing themselves in situations where they are likely to be killed.

John Kempster

Basildon, Essex

Michael Gove writes an article suggesting that the First World War tactics of blundering ever forwards into the mire, while sustaining massive damage and needless casualties, weren’t all that bad, really. Two days later, George Osborne announces his intention of continuing his economic tactics of blundering ever forwards into the mire, while sustaining massive damage and needless casualties. Are these facts related?

Steve Rudd

Huddersfield,  West Yorkshire

 

Power failures after the floods

I have just come back from St Lucia where, on Christmas Eve, severe floods took several lives, washed away bridges and destroyed the homes of people who possess very little. It was therefore interesting to see people’s reaction here to a rather lesser flooding crisis.

Following extensive storm damage it is surely unreasonable to expect power supplies to be restored in one or two days. The power companies should be honest about the likely timetable, and in the meantime pay more generous compensation of perhaps £50 to £100 a day.

Simon Garratt

Hertford

 

The record levels of profit and the ownership structure of UK Power Networks and similar transnational companies expose the utter futility of the free-marketeers’ insistence that an unregulated economy is the answer to all ills.

The Government continues blindly to sanction the decades-long policy of creating cash cows for the elite out of once-public assets, with no discernible benefit accruing to the nation, its wealth or its workers.

You don’t have to be an ardent leftie to recognise that for a party self-described as conservative this lot conserve very little indeed.

There is now ample reason for a return to a degree of statutory oversight and regulation, particularly in regard to the mix of shell companies, artificially induced debt, profit extraction and asset-stripping that masquerades as modern management.

Christopher Dawes

London W11

Tories prefer cuts to fair taxes

Given that Mr Osborne has declared the need to save £25bn, why is he making so little effort to increase the tax-take from Google, Apple, Starbucks and the rest? The tax not paid by these transnational companies could go a long way to sorting out our problems. I suspect there is a so far undiscussed reason why he won’t initiate the necessary reforms.

A fair tax-take from these and others like them could be achieved by a concerted effort across the whole EU and enforced by the EU. The EU is big enough to scare the pants off these avoiders with threats of punitive damages for non-compliance. Thus they could be brought to the table and made to pay fair taxes. The supposed threat that they could “go elsewhere” is a bit thin, since these companies need Europe just as much as Europe needs them.

Tragically, Mr Osborne’s prejudice, which can’t accept just how useful the EU could be, doesn’t allow such a plan to be considered. Or maybe he just loves these avoiders too much.

Tim Brook

Bristol

When discussing benefit reforms, we need to remember that the £24bn we pay out in housing benefit doesn’t help tenants at all – the money goes straight from their bank accounts to those of their landlords. Maybe we should stop calling it housing benefit and rename it landlord subsidy.

In the 1980s there were very few private landlords, not because rents were low (though they were) but because landlords stood little chance of ever regaining possession of their properties if they let them. The much-needed Assured Shorthold Tenancy legislation changed that, and we now have many small private landlords renting houses out. Tenants can’t afford the high rents demanded, but instead of letting the market set the rents, we give them housing benefit.

But we don’t have to keep rents artificially high with housing benefit. We could agree it is not right for landlords to receive a sum equivalent to a fifth of the total cost of the NHS, and start to think hard about rent controls. Or at least withdraw housing benefit and make the rental market a free market.

Of course estate agents and landlords will protest at the idea – they’d lose money – but there must be a better way to make sure people have a roof over their heads.

Ruth Harrison

Norwich

Where Harris tweed comes from

Professor Guy Woolley chastised Andy McSmith (letter, 28 December) for missing out Hawick as a centre for Harris Tweed production. However, with the Harris Tweed Act 1993, establishing the Harris Tweed Authority as the successor to the Harris Tweed Association, the following definition of genuine Harris Tweed became statutory:

“Harris Tweed means a tweed which has been hand woven by the islanders at their homes in the Outer Hebrides, finished in the islands of Harris, Lewis, North Uist, Benbecula, South Uist and Barra and their several purtenances (The Outer Hebrides) and made from pure virgin wool dyed and spun in the Outer Hebrides.”

Malcolm Macdonald

Stornoway, Isle of Lewis

Martin Amis’s stepmother dies

I wish to add my protest to that of Louisa Young (Letter, 6 January) concerning your headline at the news of Elizabeth Jane Howard’s death: “Writer who inspired Martin Amis dies.”

It is astounding that someone of Howard’s stature should be described in a modern liberal newspaper largely in terms of what men she was married to, slept with or was related to, and by her looks rather than her considerable achievements as a novelist. Perhaps your staff is too preoccupied with the events of 1914?

Amanda Craig

London NW1

A cut above  the rest

I am glad to see that appropriate recognition has at last been given to the contribution of the noble hairdressing profession by way of the New Year Honours list (“Cameron’s hairdresser is appointed MBE”, 7 January). Can I, through your good offices, make an early plea for the inclusion of my own barber –  George, of George’s Barber Shop, Sydenham – in the list for next year? Thanking you in anticipation.

John Cooper

 

 

Times:

 

Sir, As a graduate engineer working on the Crossrail Project, I agree that the time is right to market the dream of modern engineering to young people (Letters Jan 6).

Five years working in civil engineering has provided me with a more varied experience than I could have imagined. I feel immense pride that I have been able to contribute to the inspiring results of teams working on challenging projects in the UK and overseas.

The UK pioneered the construction of underground railways, which has since been developed worldwide. We are proudly delivering the largest civil engineering project in Europe 150 years later, mainly tunnelling based, in an increasingly competitive international marketplace.

Engineering projects are often out of public view or awareness, so more should be done to raise interest in schools and through the media. Engagement and inspiration of the young is certainly the way forward for brand “UK Engineering.” However, a career in engineering demands a sound knowledge of physical principles, so unless there is a universally high standard of science and mathematics teaching in all UK schools, many talented young people may be lost to the profession.

Henry Tayler

London W9

Sir, The stirring letter (Jan 6) crying out for more promotion of engineering degrees overlooks one small detail. Every year more than 20,000 people graduate with engineering degrees in the UK. The signatories of that letter will then automatically refuse to employ roughly one third of them — that is the third of graduates who get 2:2s or 3rd degrees. These several thousand graduates are wasted and end up, like me, going off into something like recruitment advertising, where we find ourselves explaining this to the very same employers who claim there aren’t enough engineering graduates.

Marcus Body

London W1

Sir, I find it a sad commentary that among the seven signatories to the letter on engineering not one is a woman.

Paul Buyers

Wootton, Bedford

Sir, Had he been here to do so, my father Sir Barnes Wallis, one of the foremost British engineers of the 20the century, might well have commented on the letter on the future of engineering. He would certainly agree with the stated need to absorb the young into engineering.

To inspire and encourage, he advocated the lasting benefits of learning by doing: “Try it, experiment, make a mock up, get your hands dirty and risk a failure.” And never think it is too late to try, to invent, to have ideas.

Engineers mature slowly, he said: adding that while mathematicians are not infrequently elected to the Royal Society in their twenties, engineers are more likely to achieve that distinction two decades later.

Mary Stopes-Roe

Birmingham

Sir, Why should we be surprised that “too many 8-to-14-year-olds are left uninterested in the exciting world of modern engineering” when, if the media is to be believed, they can expect to spend their time clearing trees from railway lines and climbing electricity poles in howling gales and pouring rain to repair damaged power lines?

Until the term engineer is given the professional status it deserves, there is little hope of any change.

D. J. S. Pepper

Retired RAF Engineer

Glasserton, Dumfries & Galloway

 

 

No information for the citizens of the UK has been published as to the implications for their future citizenship

Sir, I am a citizen of the UK. The Scottish Government’s proposals for secession therefore threaten my civic status. The same is true of every man, woman and child in the whole UK.

I have now browsed the 650 pages of the Scottish Government’s White Paper Scotland’s Future. It is remarkable for its comprehensive and detailed analysis of the Scottish Government’s proposals. It is remarkable, too, for the fact that it affects every citizen of the UK and not just the people of Scotland as it purports to do.

The issues it raises are therefore of fundamental and inherent importance to the Parliament of the UK, an importance of such historic magnitude as should raise these issues to the very top of our present Parliament’s agenda.

As far as I am aware, however, our Government has given no notice of its intentions in the matter. No Parliamentary time has been allocated for the lengthy debate which the matter deserves. No White Paper has been signalled as a complement to the Scottish Government’s. No information for the citizens of the UK has been published as to the implications for their future citizenship or for their future lives more generally.

In short, the Government could be accused of dereliction of duty in that it is appearing to be ready to accept the possible break-up of the Kingdom the protection and maintenance of which is its most fundamental duty. So what indeed does our Government think, and what does it propose to do? We citizens of the United Kingdom need and deserve an answer.

Professor Sir Bryan Thwaites

Fishbourne, Hants

 

Many mothers nowadays are diagnosed with depression, but, as Esther Walker says, their feelings may be entirely normal

Sir, I agreed with every word of Esther Walker’s article. Even though it’s 33 years since I had my first baby, I can still remember how hard I found the first few weeks, with only my husband to help and with a baby who, like Rosie’s, was awake from 6am to midnight, and crying (both her and me) for most of that time.

Other mothers never mentioned feelings of inadequacy and it was only when I met a couple of like-minded mums, that things started to improve. I’m sure that mothers in the same state nowadays are diagnosed with depression, but as Esther Walker says, this is not the case. The feelings are entirely normal.

My daughter is expecting twins this month and I’ve given her the article to read and digest. Luckily we live near enough to her to be able to give her the help that I didn’t have.

Elizabeth Clarke

Sheffield

Those who move from towns to rural areas should realise that country rights of way are part of our public heritage

Sir, Mark Irving (letter, 6 Jan) is right to stress the importance of legal searches before buying rural properties. Unfortunately, many people buy farmhouses, watermills and old barns for conversion to desirable residences, knowing that there is a right of way on the property and perhaps beside their sitting-room windows.

Having moved in, they set about shifting the path which is not always easy. Often the proximity of an old and attractive building is one of the pleasures of that path, and the law requires that the public enjoyment of the route be taken into account before a diversion is made.

It is, for instance, a pleasure to pass through a farmyard where calves peer round a barn door or by an 18th-century millhouse to which villagers have walked for centuries or a deep-roofed threshing barn that is a listed building.

Nevertheless in my 30 plus years representing the Ramblers and the Open Spaces Society in Oxfordshire I have found, contrary to Mr Pugh’s assertion, that councils usually support the owners. The cost of so doing falls largely on the council and the public: it should be placed squarely on those who have failed to grasp that country rights of way are part of our public heritage, not a suburban inconvenience.

Chris Hall

Turville, Oxon

In 1915 Pte Thomas Hughes of the Durham Light Infantry wrote a letter to his wife, put it in a bottle and dropped it into the sea

Sir, Your report of the finding of a bottle with a letter after 23 years in the North Sea (Jan 4) reminded me of another such message in a bottle.

In 1915, as Pte Thomas Hughes of the Durham Light Infantry was returning to the Western Front, he wrote a letter to his wife, put it in a bottle and dropped it into the sea. Pte Hughes was killed a few days later.

In 1999, 84 years later, the bottle was brought up in a fishing net off the Thames Estuary and after much research returned to Hughes’s daughter, Emily Crowhurst, who was 2 at her father’s death. Mrs Crowhurst was living in New Zealand, and the letter is now in the possession of the Durham Light Infantry.

Brian Turvey

Mansfield

 

 

 

 

Telegraph:

 

 

SIR – With the changes taking place at English Heritage, is it not now time to consider placing our medieval churches in its care?

Medieval churches are the principal historic buildings in most villages and towns. Opening them up to the wider public would generate local tourism and lift the great burden of maintenance costs from the shoulders of small local congregations.

Sundays could still be reserved for Christian services, but on other days churches could be available for hire by the wider community, including as wedding venues for couples not living nearby.

Jayne Tracey
Risby, Suffolk

 

SIR – Charles Moore’s wake-up call in defence of the United Kingdom will have struck a chord with supporters of the Union, whether or not they are entitled to vote.

Exposing the numerous flaws in the independence White Paper and elsewhere is necessary, but fighting rearguard actions is no way to win a campaign: it is perfectly clear which side has been making the running so far and this needs to change before further momentum is gained.

On the optimistic side, there is an assumption in some quarters that supporters of the Union, under the banner of Better Together, are simply keeping their powder dry and awaiting the ‘moment critique’. It is to be hoped that this is the case and that the political, constitutional, economic and many other arguments are being mustered for a timely, co-ordinated and decisive initiative.

Paul Chamberlain
Lowick Green, Lancashire

SIR – I find it very strange that within the United Kingdom an attempt is being made by a limited group of people to determine what will have significant repercussions on the remainder. As all matters pertaining to England in Parliament were debated and voted on by Scottish and English MPs, surely the same situation should apply to Scottish independence?

David Grant
Northallerton, North Yorkshire

SIR – Charles Moore is correct to call for a more serious approach to the Scottish referendum. He is correct, too, in pointing out that timing is everything.

I hope, when the time is right, that a ruling will be made that an independent Scotland will not be able to retain the pound. Evidence from the eurozone shows that no country can be truly independent if it does not control its currency. Surely, Alex Salmond will settle for nothing less?

John Carter
Shortlands, Kent

Ski helmets a must

SIR – My son has been a ski instructor in Canada for the past nine years. He always wears a helmet and would refuse to teach anyone who did not. He also replaces it each year courtesy of his grandmother, his helmet sponsor.

We have skied in Canada since 1996; the children have always worn helmets, but as adults we stood out like sore thumbs last year when we didn’t have helmets. We promptly invested in them.

Alison Cobb
St Albans, Hertfordshire

Excused fish heads

SIR – My granddaughter is studying AS-level biology at a state school in Kent. She is to undertake her first dissection – of a fish head – next week.

Apparently vegetarians are to be excused this exercise, together with students from particular faiths.

Kevin Sanders
Cirencester, Gloucestershire

Back in training

SIR – HIIT (High Intensity Interval Training) sounds great, but is this another catchy acronym targeting the gullible (Letters, January 2)? When I want to get fit, I run backwards.

Reverse running is exercise’s best-kept secret – it’s free, has incredible benefits for the body and mind and, unlike HIIT, you laugh as you do it. Perhaps, if it was called RR, it might catch on?

James Bamber
Tiverton, Devon

Felling Scottish trees

SIR – Millions of trees on the public forest estate, most of them valuable commercial conifers, have been felled by the Scottish government, and its agency, Forestry Commission Scotland, to make way for wind farms.

The Scottish government stands to earn substantial income from wind farm developments on its land, but there is little evidence to suggest that this revenue will be used to plant woodlands in a like-for-like manner. Is this the best way to decarbonise the economy?

The Government must stop squandering this natural resource and focus on increasing woodland cover, which, after all, was one of the founding principles of the Forestry Commission.

David Sulman
Executive Director,
UK Forest Products Association
Stirling

How to defend the Rock

SIR – If elected as Gibraltar’s MEP, I hope that James Cracknell examines the Rock’s continuing status as a colony.

Like France, Spain long since integrated its overseas possessions, including the North African “Gibraltars” of Ceuta and Melilla. The United Nations’ call for an end to colonial practices gives Spain, like Argentina, a small yet permanent piece of high ground for its demand that Britain decolonise. Madrid and Buenos Aires can thus sustain some reasoned hope that the constitutional status of their coveted territories will be revisited at some point, provided they apply enough pressure.

Britain should offer all of its remaining colonies integration, along with as many as possible of the devolved powers that they enjoy today. Such “devolved integration” would end Britain’s long-standing practice of leaving the door on sovereignty permanently ajar.

John Tate
London SW6

Heavy metal ironing

SIR – Kirstie Allsopp enjoys ironing because she finds it immensely therapeutic, and considers it one of the ways in which working mothers unwind. As a relatively domesticated bachelor of mature years, I, too, find ironing therapeutic, especially to loud recorded music, although I cannot say the same of other household chores.

Alan Robertson
Ladybank, Fife

A mnemonic that has entered the language

SIR – Probably the most successful mnemonic to have entered the English language as a word is cabal: a small body of persons engaged in private machinations or intrigue. This derives from the initials of a group of privy counsellors used by Charles II to run the country – Clifford, Ashley, Buckingham, Arlington and Lauderdale. It is thought by some that this was the origin of the Cabinet.

D M Anderson
Ashvale, Lanarkshire

SIR – In the RAF, we were taught a mnemonic to remember the resistor colour code (the numbers zero to nine represented by coloured bands) – Billy Brown revives on your gin but Violet goes wanting (for black, brown, red, orange, yellow, green, blue, violet, grey, white).

We changed it to something more earthy.

Roy Ellis
Shrewsbury, Shropshire

SIR – As a geology student in the Seventies, I was told that “China owls seldom deceive clay pigeons, they just chase each other muttering preposterous puns” was a useful way of remembering the sequence of geological ages (Cambrian, Ordovician, Silurian, Devonian, Carboniferous, Permian, Triassic, Jurassic, Cretaceous, Eocene, Oligocene, Miocene, Pliocene and Pleistocene).

David Dewhirst
Austwick, West Yorkshire

SIR – Teaching physics in Otukpo, Nigeria, I realised the old “Richard Of York” mnemonic for the colours of the spectrum would be meaningless, so I came up with Real Otukpo Yams Grow Best In Villages.

Rev Philip Foster
Hemingford Abbots, Cambridgeshire

SIR – For the seven hills of Rome in clockwise order: “Can Queen Victoria eat cold apple pie?” Capitoline, Quirinal… then I’m lost, though I can still remember the mnemonic 40 years on.

Luke Grant
Pensax, Worcestershire

 

 

SIR – David Cameron expects us to believe that he will protect the state pension with his “triple lock”. But the Government has been manipulating interest rates, and quantitative easing has reduced the current pension’s value by half. The inflation figure is in reality much higher, rather than the 2 to 3 per cent spouted by the Establishment.

Peter Cresswell
Enniskillen, Co Fermanagh

SIR – Successive governments have destroyed our thriving private pensions sector through clumsy regulation, poor supervision and adverse tax changes.

The erratic changes in contributions limits to personal pension plans show how governments have no strategy and fail to understand long-term planning.

Recent attacks on annuity providers are a smokescreen for the Government’s own failings. There are so few annuity providers because the regulatory structure is costly, and businesses have to build in additional margin to allow for unforeseen changes in their capital and operating environment.

Personal pensions are now so damaged that the Government should allow holders complete freedom in their use of their own funds, and adopt a flat tax policy so savings can be made from taxed income.

Andrew Smith
Epping, Essex

SIR – The question of withdrawal of universal state benefits from the rich is being raised again. In view of the complexities in the tax system, applying chiefly to marginal cases, would it not be more effective, and economic, simply to tax all such benefits as income?

V W Hughff
Norwich

SIR – The description “rich”, when applied to pensioners, is as difficult to define as “mansion” is when applied to houses. Yet politicians propose to remove benefits from one and tax the other without any accepted yardstick for either. No benefit limitation or taxation should be accepted without a clear definition of threshold.

Paul Bonner
London SW19

SIR – The Government should phase out winter fuel payments and free bus passes for new pensioners when the new basic state pension rate is introduced. This will prevent existing pensioners being annoyed, and save costly means-testing.

Bob May
Much Wenlock, Shropshire

SIR – David Cameron’s announcement on pensions is welcome, but we await his comments on inheritance tax, which, with the increase in house prices, is affecting an increasing number of senior citizens. This iniquitous tax now includes more ordinary people, whose views are likely to be expressed at the ballot box in 2015.

Eric L Parrish
Pevensey, East Sussex

 

Irish Times:

 

Sir, – Minister for Energy Pat Rabbitte is quoted in Steven Carroll’s report (“Rabbitte accepts consultation over pylon concerns not good enough”, Front Page, January 4th) as criticising both Eirgrid and the Government for failing to consult properly the local communities about the grid-link project to erect pylons and thus ruin our landscape. Mr Rabbitte went on to say that “it is incumbent on those of us involved to . . . get as much community acceptance as we can”.

Does this not imply that instead of placing the concerns of those directly exposed to the implications of such a project as his priority, Mr Rabbitte is in fact approving the scheme on condition that the Government and Eirgrid get as much acceptance from the community “as possible”?

Regardless of whether that level of acceptance is even close to a public majority of the local communities in question? – Yours, etc,

LUKE FitzHERBERT,

Killanne,

Enniscorthy,

Co Wexford.

Sir, – I found your report on the anti-pylon folk a bit distressing. Some heat but no light. The generation and distribution of electricity is a highly technical engineering matter. As is, of course, the exploitation of natural gas resources. Both require highly trained engineers to achieve the desired objectives in a practical and safe manner. A little knowledge acquired on the internet is not enough but is, in fact, more than a little dangerous.

Alison Healy’s report (“Opponents of pylons and wind turbines come together to highlight their concerns”, Home News, January 6th) notes a protest banner with the message “Bury the cable, not the people”. The protesters’ slogan implies that overhead transmission lines kill people: where has this happened? The facts ignored are that buried cables are vastly more expensive than overhead lines and are wildly uneconomic. Why do these people not tell us which countries have pursued their “policies”? As far as I know there is not one noteworthy country which has a 100 per cent cable policy for high-voltage transmission. Not one. – Your, etc,

MICHAEL CUNNINGHAM,

Wyckham Place,

Dundrum,

Dublin 16.

Sir, – After over two decades of exhaustive research in Ireland and elsewhere there is no evidence whatsoever, even at the lowest level, to prove, suggest or imply that pylons damage the health of those living nearby. That the argument around pylons continues, and at such a hysterical, irrational, frivolous and unfounded level, is disappointing. By now people should know better. – Yours, etc,

CHRISTIAN MORRIS,

Claremont Road,

Howth,

Dublin 13.

Sir, – There is one way to solve our need to criss-cross the country with electricity pylons. We could stop flood-lighting our sheds, yards, gardens and the entrances to our houses, and we could stop putting dozens of spotlights on the roofs of our kitchens or sitting rooms. The gnomes in my garden have never once asked to be flood-lit at night. – Yours, etc,

KEN BUGGY,

Ballydubh Upper,

Co Waterford.

 

Sir, – If the Government’s “staunch anti-nuclear stance” (“Government contributing to nuclear fusion reactor development”, Front Page, January 6th) extends to nuclear fusion, then the sun itself is Ireland’s enemy.

Your report is possibly trying to generate a little frisson by blurring the lines between fusion and fission. It is perfectly consistent to be anti-Sellafield and pro-fusion. – Yours, etc,

GERRY CHRISTIE,

Monalee,

Tralee,

Co Kerry.

Sir, – I accept that the development of fusion reactors, which will produce electricity on a commercial scale, involves some as yet not fully resolved challenges and that the time lines for meeting these challenges remains uncertain. However nuclear fusion reactors when they become a commercial reality will be intrinsically safer and cheaper to operate primarily because:

1. The fuel they burn (normally a mixture of two isotopes of hydrogen) is intrinsically safer to handle than uranium and of no interest to terrorists;

2. The quantities and types of radioactive wastes they produce are much smaller in quantity and much less hazardous than those associated with fission reactors;

3. The fusion reaction, which involves the fusion of atoms rather than their fission, is very easily controlled – switching off the electric current that supplies the large magnets that confine the ionised atoms in the fusion process stops the reaction in its tracks.

For this reason most scientists and governments, including, I believe, the Irish Government, are supportive of nuclear fusion research as is being undertaken in Cadarache in France.

Turning briefly to the role of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), while it certainly true that this includes promoting the peaceful development of nuclear energy, it also plays a pivotal role in the inspection of nuclear weapons and potential nuclear weapons manufacturing facilities.

Perhaps less widely known is the role of the IAEA in the safe use of radiation in a wide range of applications, for example in agriculture, industry and medicine and also in upgrading radiation protection standards in these areas, especially in developing countries. I have worked for the IAEA on its radiation protection programme and so consider myself well placed to point this out.

The Government’s contribution to both nuclear fusion research and to the IAEA reflect a maturity and ability to think beyond the Sellafield issue. – Yours, etc,

CHRISTOPHER HONE,

Green Isle Road,

Clondalkin,

Dublin 22.

 

Sir, – I think Daniel Griffin is unduly harsh on Enda Kenny when he asks in his recent letter (January 4th), “How can a Taoiseach who identified many of the flaws of the Seanad during the campaign now preside over that same flawed institution?” In fairness to Mr Kenny, we have to recognise that the man is still reeling following the rejection by the electorate of his proposal to abolish the Seanad. Furthermore, the recently published report of the Referendum Commission on the October ballot has effectively demolished the excuse put forward by the Government for its failure to win a majority in favour of the abolition of the Upper House. Prior to the release of the commission’s report, Ministers and their spokespeople maintained in a series of non-attributable briefings that voters were bewildered by the fact that they were asked to vote on a counter-intuitive basis, ie, vote Yes to abolish the Senate, vote No to retain the Upper House.

It is clear, however, that voter confusion served to depress artificially the majority in favour of the retention of the Seanad. The Referendum’s Commission’s report states that “13% of declared Yes voters actually wanted the Seanad to be retained . . . However 6% who voted No said they actually wanted the Seanad to be abolished”. If the percentages quoted in the previous sentence were applied to the total No vote (634,437) and Yes vote (591,937) recorded in the referendum, we would see a net increase of 38,886 in the number in favour of retaining the Senate. When the latter figure is added to the actual majority of 42,500 recorded on polling day as being in favour of retention, that majority increases to 81,386. It is also worth noting that the total number of votes spoiled on polling day (14,355) clearly had no material impact on the final result.

Adding to Mr Kenny’s post-referendum difficulties, Minister for Children Frances Fitzgerald was reported in a recent edition of your newspaper (Front Page, December 27th) as saying that the campaign to abolish the Senate was “demeaning” and that there was “absolutely no need, ever” to “rubbish” the Upper House and its members, past or present. Your report of December 27th also states that, during the referendum campaign, Ms Fitzgerald, along with other Fine Gael Ministers, backed Mr Kenny’s position that there would be no reform of the Seanad if it was retained. That particular article then goes on to point out that Ms Fitzgerald “now says her position was that there should be reform”.

I am sure that the Taoiseach is, like me, still trying to resolve the difficulty posed by the comments from his Minister for Children.

Precisely how can a member of the Government be against reform of the Upper House in advance of the referendum and in favour of reform afterwards? In addition, did it really take Ms Fitzgerald almost three months from the date on which the referendum was held before she realised that the campaign was “demeaning”? – Yours, etc,

PAUL GULLY,

St Lawrence’s Road,

Clontarf,

Dublin 3.

 

Sir, – Reading of our Taoiseach’s trade mission to Riyadh (“An Irish troika offers words of advice to Kenny on Saudi trip” Home News, January 6th), and the promotion of Ireland by a member of the trade delegation as “not that different” to Saudi Arabia, made my stomach turn.

How much better to highlight the great differences between our countries! Such as the fact that our people can express dissent without fear for their safety. That Irish women do not need male permission to drive, go to school, travel or work. That we are free to protest, assemble and express public dissent at government decisions and policy. That we do not have public executions or punishments.

If we don’t stand for such minimum principles in our business dealings as gender equality, free speech and human rights, then we don’t stand for much. – Yours, etc,

JOANNE DOYLE,

Sallymount Avenue,

Ranelagh,

 

Sir, – The arts community in Limerick quite reasonably imagined that an event called “Limerick City of Culture” would be a celebration of their city through art and culture. What they failed to understand was that, for the board of the event, this was really a “rebranding” exercise, with a few auld plays and jugglers thrown in to take the hard look off it. Provided they didn’t want much of the budget, of course. – Yours, etc,

GERARD LEE ,

St Agnes Park,

Crumlin,

Dublin 12.

Sir, – In light of the recent debacle surrounding the City of Culture, the “Curse of Saint Munchin” comes to mind. The story goes that the workmen employed on the building of the ancient church of St Munchin were one day striving to raise a very heavy block of stone to a certain part of the work. The saint was standing by and called on some of the citizens to help the men to put the stone in the desired position. These citizens refused to lend their aid, and the saint appealed to some strangers who were passing, who readily lent their assistance, whereupon St Munchin fervently thanked them and prayed that the strangers might always prosper in Limerick and the natives be unfortunate and unsuccessful. – Yours, etc,

NOEL NAUGHTON,

Quarry Road,

Thomondgate,

Limerick.

A chara, – Richard Irvine (“An inclusive Ireland can surely find a place for the union flag”, Opinion, January 3rd) makes some unfortunate errors. To suggest that Sinn Féin, and nationalists generally, only started to object to Orange parades and associated symbols in the 1990s is patently ridiculous.

These coat-trailing exercises have been a source of contention since they began.

Current opposition is merely a resurgent nationalist population finding its voice in rejecting situations which have been foisted upon them from since before the Act of Union but especially in the six counties from 1922 to 1972.

I find it interesting that rather than pressing for unionists to accept nationalist parades in majority unionist areas (which would be a true compromise), Mr Irvine suggests that, as usual, it is up to nationalists to capitulate.

His solution regarding flags on public buildings again urges nationalists to yield. It is worth pointing out that the measure to fly the British flag for “only” 18 days a year was simply to bring the North in line with the rest of the UK.

Why not, in the spirit of the Belfast Agreement, fly both flags over public buildings in the North? This is surely the only equitable solution, particularly in Belfast, which is a majority nationalist city! – Is mise,

PAUL LINEHAN,

Thormanby Road,

Howth,

 

Sir, – Prof Pat O’Connor raised the serious omission of a gender profile of those in senior academic and administrative reports (January 2nd) in a recent evaluative report produced by the Higher Education Authority (HEA).

The HEA response (January 4th) is very disappointing – in fact somewhat insulting – given that in the late 1980s the HEA itself under the direction of Michael Gleeson commissioned and published a report on women in academia (or rather the lack of women in higher positions in academia). It does not augur well that after 30 years the HEA has not managed to count the number of men and women in each senior position in all the third-level colleges under its direction.

This is not a new issue for the HEA nor indeed is it “rocket science”, as their response suggests. – Yours, etc,

EVELYN MAHON, FTCD

School of Social Work

and Social Policy,

Trinity College Du

 

 

Sir, – Peadar Mac Maghnais (December 27th) raises an interesting point about our Army’s own usage of its correct and historic title, Óglaigh na hÉireann.

For many years the Department of Defence in collaboration with the officer corps, or in defiance of them, has been busy branding every unit in English.

Soldiers wear jackets bearing the word “Army”. The big drum of the Aer Corps is emblazoned “Irish Air Corps Pipe Band”.

I have seen photos of naval personnel with “Navy” on their baseball-type caps. Most recently, An Fórsa Cosanta Áitiúl (FCA) became the “Army Reserve” and at the same time An Slua Muirí was converted to the “Naval Reserve”.

The present Minister for Defence and the officers of Óglaigh na hÉireann can easily reverse the situation and create a force as proud of its Irish name, in all of its branches, as is An Garda Síochána. – Yours, etc,

PÁDRAIG Ó MATHÚNA,

Baile an Teampaill,

Sir, – James A Quinn says that the whistle was not blown on the reckless abandon of the Celtic Tiger boom because “a culture is almost always stronger than any individual within it”(January 2nd).

John Fagan says that anyone who did attempt to point out that the boom was unsustainable was promptly accused of failing to “put on the green jersey” and told to “stop talking down the economy” (Letters, January 4th).

Is blaming the ordinary individual for being intimidated and not confronting the conventional wisdom of the boom time – that all in the garden was rosy – not missing the point?

Surely the people of influence, who had the information and resources to form and lead public opinion, were the people who should have challenged those in the green jersey brigade?

Surely those who were in positions of power needed to be challenged by those in media and academia who were in a position to do so when the reckless abandon was getting out of hand? – Yours, etc,

ANTHONY LEAVY,

Shielmartin Drive,

Sutton, Dublin 13.

 

 

 

Sir, – Pensions were invented in the time of Bismarck, when the average life expectancy was 58. Thus, very few people were ever expected to qualify for a pension at 65.

In the meantime, average life expectancies keep growing and are currently at 76 for men and 81 for women. Thus, keeping the original differential, men should currently qualify for a pension at 83 and women at 88! – Yours, etc,

CORNELIUS MOLONEY ,

Chelmsford,

Celbridge,

Co Kildare.

 

 

Sir, – Any chance that the Teaching Council might tackle underperforming pupils? – Yours, etc,

AILEEN HOOPER,

Norseman Place,

Stoneybatter, Dublin 7.

 

 

 

Irish Independent:

* There have been a number of letters lamenting the fact that Christmas drags on, and what would tourists make of this, with shops closed and businesses all locked up.

Also in this section

Why Pope is the only hope to save church

Editorial: Pylon problem could be real headache for Kenny

Letters: Why I’ll always regret buying a shotgun

But with everyone so busy the rest of the year, is it so bad to take a break?

Being from Germany originally and neither “foreigner” nor a tourist, I don’t see the point of these letters.

I find it not only nice but necessary to have some days to contemplate and hang out with friends and family after another “Christmas Hyper” this year.

Obviously these authors have a problem and do not feel the same as I. Not to go back to work on December 27 can be, but does not have to be, based on religious motifs.

One letter refers to Dev’s Ireland, which must have been way before my time here. I have worked and lived happily in Co Dublin for 18 years.

It is simply a human thing to chill out.

It seems to me like an unnecessary kind of jealousy to call people “lazy” for taking a rest after Christmas, regardless of working for the public service or private business. I enjoyed the great time off anyway, and will hopefully do the same next year again.

MARKUS LAUER

LUCAN, CO DUBLIN

TURNING VEGETARIAN

* For about six months I had endeavoured to keep to a vegetarian diet. However, at Christmas, I gave way to temptation. On entering a supermarket I saw a package labelled ‘Traditional Irish Ham’. On opening the package at home, I found the ham looked, felt and tasted like rubber.

Perhaps this was a sign that not just I, but my fellow citizens, should make a New Year’s resolution to endeavour to become vegetarians?

TONY MORIARTY

HAROLD’S CROSS, DUBLIN

RABBITS AND HARES

* Barry Clifford’s letter (Irish Independent, January 6) set me thinking about those strange Connemara rabbits who stand up on their hind legs.

I would wager the price of a box of No 4 cartridges that the animal in question was, in fact, a hare.

BERNARD LARKIN

BALLINASLOE, CO GALWAY

RYANAIR’S GOODWILL

* I recently booked return flights to Birmingham with Ryanair at a cost of €70. Moments later, I found out that I should have, in fact, booked return flights to Liverpool. When I requested a change of flights, to my horror the cost of travel increased to €255. Imagine my further dismay when I priced new flights to Liverpool and realised that I could have gotten the same for €60 while leaving my seats on the Birmingham flights empty.

I emailed Ryanair and got a reply stating that they would fully refund €160 to my account in light of my two unfortunate errors of judgment. A huge relief for me and a great show of goodwill on their part.

I recently read in your paper that their charity calendar for this year has so far raised over €100,000 for the Teenage Cancer Trust.

They are not the big, bad wolf that everyone makes them out to be and I think that this story proves that.

SEAN OG WHELAN

GOREY, CO WEXFORD

CHRIST AT CHRISTMAS

* Michael Brennan and John Downing ponder whether President Higgins should have mentioned Christ at Christmas (Irish Independent, January 6) since he already took the oath under the Constitution. There’s not much to ponder.

The preamble to that Constitution observes the important position of Jesus Christ — and for a very good reason. In Ireland’s continuing need for a “moral compass”, who else but Christ can provide a better one?

DAVID WILSON

NATIONAL TEAM LEADER, AGAPE

CLARINDA PARK NORTH, DUN LAOGHAIRE

SAUDI ARABIA CONCERNS

* The recent visit of An Taoiseach to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is, in this letter writer’s humble opinion, an affront to anyone who has concerns regarding basic human rights, democracy and the independence of sovereign nations to conduct their own affairs without outside interference. In November 2013, Amnesty International‘s Middle East and North African director Philip Luther said: “The crackdown on freedom of expression in Saudi Arabia is widening with at least a dozen human rights activists sentenced in 2013 alone.”

PAUL DORAN

DUBLIN 22

WHAT ARE OUR PRIORITIES?

* Less than a week before Christmas, Taoiseach Enda Kenny had sharply disagreed with Tanaiste Eamon Gilmore’s claim that same-sex marriage was the “civil rights issue of the generation”. Nevertheless, the Taoiseach went on to say he would canvass in support of Mr Gilmore’s proposal to hold a referendum on the issue. And that was despite admitting that the burning issue of the day for him was job creation. Where in heaven’s name lie our priorities?

At least we know now, the Taoiseach was honourable in his intentions. He has since been on a five-day trade mission in the Middle East involving more than 80 Irish companies. Hopefully the trip will have a fruitful outcome for potential employment or lay the foundation for future jobs.

JAMES GLEESON

THURLES, CO TIPPERARY

COWEN PORTRAIT

* I have found a solution for Enda Kenny and the Department of the Taoiseach, which has yet to commission an official portrait of former Taoiseach Brian Cowen, something that tradition demands. Why not resurrect the portrait of Mr Cowen that mysteriously appeared on a wall in the National Gallery a few years back? To my eye, it seemed a magnificent piece of work.

JOHN BELLEW

PAUGHANSTOWN, DUNLEER, CO LOUTH

FLOODING SOLUTION

* Not wanting to sound callous but flooding is a perennial issue; could someone not go to Holland and study flood prevention and provide a solution to the problem?

MARK LONERGAN

GLASNEVIN, DUBLIN 11

PYLON PROPOSALS

* Minister Pat Rabbitte’s recent comments that the wind turbine issue and electric pylons are not linked is disingenuous. The massive pylon infrastructure proposed by EirGrid is to facilitate an increase in wind power on to the grid — 70pc of all power on the grid according to gridlink manager John Lowry.

ANDREW DUNCAN

MULLINGAR, CO WESTMEATH

* With our green hills under attack, the following lines came to me:

A Lament

Not far from Yeats’ last Earthly rest

Near beautiful Glencarr

The desecration of hilly crest

Windmills ugly scar

No Yeats to voice a fisted curse

Against this crass betrayal

By those in Power who plead no choice

And squirm in their denial

When we allowed these Philistines

To wave their moneyed hand

They know the price of everything

But not this valued land

How can we lift our heads again

And sing of Ireland’s name

When our poet’s dead and lies beneath

A land of ravished shame.

JOHN-PATRICK BELL

MANORHAMILTON, CO LEITRIM

Irish Independent

 

 



Tumble dryer

$
0
0

9 January 2014 Tumble Dryer

I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. The crew of Troutbridge are being tested to see if they can detect a spy in their midst. Priceless.

Tunble dryer repaired and quote for windows and insulation decisions decisions

Scrabbletoday I winand gets just over300, Perhaps Marywill win tomorrow.

 

Obituary:

 

Marina Ginestà, who has died aged 94, was believed to have been the last surviving French veteran of the Spanish Civil War. As a 17-year-old member of Spain’s Unified Socialist Youth she was immortalised in a photograph taken on the roof of the Hotel Colón in Barcelona in the first flames of the conflict; it was to become one of the most famous photographs of the war.

Widely considered a masterpiece of reportage, the picture was taken on July 21 1936 by the photojournalist Juan Guzmán. In it, the striking Ginestà looks sideways directly into the lens with a wry smile, belying the dramatic events playing out in the city beneath her. A rifle is casually slung over her shoulder, the sleeves of her uniform rolled up in the summer sun, while the wind whips strands of hair over her fine cheekbones.

Marina Ginestà was born on January 29 1919 in Toulouse, France. Her family moved in the early 1930s to Barcelona, where she joined the Unified Socialist Party of Catalonia. In July 1936 she arrived at the Hotel Colón to carry out duties as translator and typist for Mikhail Koltsov, a correspondent for the Soviet newspaper Pravda. As a non-combatant this was the only time Ginestà carried a gun.

On being shown the picture late in life Marina Ginestà recognised the passion and pride she felt for the Republican cause. “It reflects the feeling we had at that moment. Socialism had arrived, the customers of the hotel had left. There was euphoria,” she said wistfully. “We temporarily set ourselves up at the Colón, we ate well, as if the bourgeois life were ours and we had moved up in category very quickly.”

Republican forces were in celebratory mood that day, relaxing in the wake of the failed coup d’etat against the Left-wing Popular Front government. The Colón itself had been the scene of bitter fighting, with Colonel Antonio Escobar Huertas leading his Civil Guard into the hotel and overcoming soldiers loyal to General Franco. Guzmán, a German-born photographer who later took Spanish citizenship, was in the city with the International Brigades, the anti-fascist military unit, and caught the joy of the masses.

The picture would later feature on the jacket of the book Trece Rosas Rojas (The Thirteen Roses, 2004) by Carlos Fonseca, a bestselling account of the execution of 13 young women by a Francoist firing squad during the post-war purges known as the “saca de agosto” – the August round-up.

Yet, even with the picture’s prominence, its subject remained unaware of its existence for most of her life. Nor, indeed, did the public know who the defiant girl on the roof was. It was only in 2006 that a researcher at Agencia Efe, who held Guzmán’s archive of wartime images, tracked her down in France. Guzmán had wrongly catalogued Ginestà under the name Jinesta. It was through the memoirs of Mikhail Koltsov, with whom she appears in another of the agency’s pictures, and investigations at the Spanish Civil War archives in Salamanca, that her identity finally came to light.

 

At the end of the war Marina Ginestà was wounded and, as Spain’s short-lived Second Republic collapsed, she was evacuated to Montpellier to recover. She later fled the city when the Germans invaded France, settling in the Dominican Republic. Further persecution, this time by the Dominican dictator Rafael Trujillo, caused her to leave in 1946, and in 1952 she returned to Barcelona. By the time she was discovered by Efe she was living in Paris as a translator for a Spanish psychoanalyst.

“They say that in the Colón photo I have a captivating look,” she acknowledged in an interview given in her late eighties. “It’s possible, because we were immersed both in the mysticism of the proletarian revolution and the images of Hollywood, of Greta Garbo and Gary Cooper.”

Marina Ginestà married twice, latterly in 1952 to a Belgian diplomat.

Marina Ginestà, born January 29 1919, died January 6 2014

 

Guardian:

 

County councils in the Tory heartlands are slashing subsidies to many bus services. Here in North Yorkshire, vital bus services for the elderly and infirm are under threat. Many passengers say if they lose this vital service they’ll vote Ukip at the election. If you want a real vote winner, Mr Cameron, reinstate half fares for those with passes. This would solve all the problems, no one would object. After all, what good is a bus pass without a bus
Paul Swain
Malton, North Yorkshire

• Strange that the Guardian photographer should demean the subject and Gloria de Piero herself should demean her important role by using such a passive, almost objectified pose (G2, 23 December). Sitting on the table? Turning provocatively towards the camera? Extraordinary, or perhaps not. We have far to go with women and equalities.
Marilyn Taylor
London

• Odd isn’t it that Owen Paterson is keen to use scientific evidence in relation to GM crops but not to badger culling (EU will become farm museum without GM, minister claims, 8 January). Nor presumably to global warming?
Michael Miller
Sheffield

• The unprecedented walkout of lawyers was not, apparently, a strike (Lawyers walk out in protest against legal aid budget cuts, 6 January). Weren’t they breaking the law? If any public sector workers did this without a proper ballot they’d have to face an injunction. One law for the lawyers…
David Prothero
Harpenden, Hertfordshire

• Eusébio wasn’t the only player “kicked off the park” during the 66 World Cup (Letters, 8 January). I well remember seeing his team mates giving Pelé the kicking of a lifetime during the first round match at Goodison Park, effectively ensuring Brazil’s elimination from the tournament.
M Hunt
Meols, Wirral

• As Quakers, Lonsdale, Franklin et al would have spent long periods sitting in silence (Letters, 8 January). Clearly this helped to crystallise their thoughts.
Dick Hughes
Craven Arms, Shropshire

 

 

HG Wells once said that “a newspaper is a device incapable of distinguishing between a bicycle accident and the end of civilisation”. I fear George Monbiot has proved him right. His article (Comment, 7 January) paints an apocalyptic picture of the antisocial behaviour bill as an evil measure to end our right to protest, our freedom of speech and our civil liberties. It is nonsense. If it was in any way true I would be the first to stand up and say so.

Although I have only been involved in the latter stages of the bill (I am not the architect, as George describes me), I’m confident these new powers won’t stop people being able to sing carols or whatever else the scare stories say. That notwithstanding, since I took over the bill I have introduced further safeguards for reassurance. It will help protect vulnerable people in society from antisocial behaviour, which, if allowed to grow out of control, can cause enormous harm to our communities. For too long there has been a broken system for dealing with such behaviour. Labour’s asbos failed, not only because they unnecessarily criminalise young people, but because they do not help address the causes behind the behaviour.

These reforms are the result of an extensive consultation process involving local authorities, social landlords, the judiciary and voluntary sector, and, most importantly, victims and members of the public who’ve told us they want a more measured and effective response. Our introduction of new injunctions to prevent nuisance or annoyance will not criminalise youngsters but address the underlying causes of antisocial behaviour, nipping such behaviour in the bud before it escalates. Use of these new powers will require a long-established test of proportionality, and courts will have to be persuaded of the need to grant these orders. Hardly the end of civilisation, is it?
Norman Baker MP
Crime prevention minister

 

It comes as no surprise that 12,000 cases of cancers in women could be prevented through being more physically active (UK women have high rate of inactivity-linked cancers, 6 January). For years it has been understood that remaining physically active is an integral part of a healthy lifestyle. However, despite this, we continue to see widespread inactivity levels across the UK. Physical activity is arguably one of the most important factors in the prevention and recovery of cancer. Not only can it help to reduce the side-effects of treatment but it also reduces the risk of some cancers recurring and even dying from the disease. It is both a cost-effective and a clinically effective treatment intervention. So why do we continue to neglect what is one of the most simple solutions? We must stop paying lip service to the issue. It is time now for a shift in the way we look at physical activity – the underrated “wonder drug”. Physical activity needs to be completely ingrained in our day-to-day lives.
Jenny Ritchie-Campbell
Director of cancer services innovation, Macmillan Cancer Support

 

Five months after the last election, the coalition government announced its plans to transform higher education which, as Peter Scott points out (Can university courses in celebrity be far off?, 7 January), have corrupted the behaviour of universities. Just like during the build-up to the last election, higher education has been kicked into the long grass by all three main parties. But this time around there is a pressing need for a public debate, which acknowledges the failings of this government’s reforms and discusses ways to address them.

The Lib Dems may be nervous discussing anything to do with higher education ever again, particularly close to an election, and Labour’s brief forays into higher education have been exposed as policy-lite. However, if neither party is prepared to be brave then the Tories will get away with some of the most dangerous changes to our higher education system going unchallenged. As Scott points out, the self-funding higher-education myth has been busted: taxpayers will carry on shouldering a huge chunk of the cost of higher education, as 40% of students will never pay their loans back. The government’s recent decision to offer unlimited public subsidies to private providers, who do not face the same regulatory checks and balances as public institutions, is explosive.

In a stroke, ministers have effectively rigged their quasi-market in favour of those providers with access to the capital markets to fund aggressive expansion. This will place huge pressure on university and college managements to ape private-sector modes of delivery and company forms just to stay alive. The brutal fact is that the closer colleges and universities move to a for-profit model of service delivery, or the more dependent they become on private revenue streams, the greater will be the pressures on quality. Popularity and economy of scale will become the new key criteria for courses to meet. The system is broken and it needs fixing before the next election, not after. Robust regulation of private providers, putting them on a more equal footing with their public counterparts, needs to shoot up the political agenda, before Peter Scott’s feared degrees in celebrity become commonplace.
Sally Hunt
General secretary, University and College Union

 

Rather than being caused by the limitations of the education system, or the absence of role models, the large increase in youth joblessness highlighted by Christina Patterson (Comment, 4 January) is the product of major changes in the economy and occupational structure – changes that have been greatly accentuated by the recession. Just as serious is the situation where, rather than lacking skills, many more young people now find they are underemployed, having ended up in jobs for which they are overqualified, with around 40% of university leavers ending up in non-graduate jobs.

Although now a major international problem, countries such as Germany, for example, have at least been able to limit youth unemployment by continuing to operate national apprenticeship systems which ensure high levels of employability, and which both employers and trade unions are actively involved. This type of system may not be easily implemented here, but new types of economic policies are desperately required if young people are to be prevented from sliding further into despair. Central to this is a recognition that jobs for young people need to be created, rather than being left to market forces. But also that it’s almost as expensive to keep a young person out of work as it is to employ them. Of course, this would require a major redirection and redistribution of resources and the increases in public spending that Labour and the coalition now both reject.

Without a major change in policy direction, however, the excellent work of the Princes Trust will never be enough.
Dr Martin Allen
London

• Christina Patterson illustrates the extent to which the “work programme isn’t working”. But the problem is not so much the programme as the policy. With fewer than one vacancy for every four people unemployed, even if both were well-matched geographically a “success” rate of less than 25% would be possible. As they aren’t, the 10% figure she quotes may be quite a good performance. A policy change that would bring about an improvement is less deflation of economic activity and more reflation. This might seem unnecessary when economic growth seems to be picking up anyway, but if it is just a cyclic rebound it will not be sustained without a change in policy.
Roger Morton
Matlock, Derbyshire

• George Osborne’s proposed cuts of £12bn to the welfare budget should be of no surprise (Report, 7 January). For too long, commentators have accused this government of incompetence. This is only true about presentation and detail. In terms of overall ideology, it has been remarkably successful. It is a staggering achievement to convince people that the world economic crisis caused by the banking industry, hedge-fund expansion and corporate mismanagement at the most powerful financial institutions was the fault of the poor, the unemployed and the disabled.

The very fact that opinion polling shows a relatively narrow gap between Labour and Conservative parties, and the acceptance of the need for further welfare cuts, is proof of the coalition’s success. Postwar history shows that only one other government comes close to such success in implementing an ideological programme: the Attlee government of 1945-51. In that case, it was a benign ideology aimed at ending poverty, deprivation and gross inequality. This government’s ideology is the exact opposite.
Dr Chris Morris
Kidderminster, Worcestershire

 

Your report (Spend more to ease flood misery, says climate chief, 6 January)underestimates what has to be done. In 2013 there were 60 railway landslips a day in February, four times the previous rate of coastal cliff falls, a 5% degradation of agricultural output through unseasonable weather, thousands of homes inundated with sewage and left without electricity for days, damage to business running into millions, coastal and localised flooding, and a colliery spoil tip slid into a railway line, the first such significant failure since Aberfan.

Soon it simply won’t be possible to move engineers and resources around the country to deal rapidly with the level of damage, repair and replacement. Many years of engineering investment are needed just to keep the present infrastructure working, never mind HS2.

Public response to David King’s broadcast was frighteningly negative. No doubt these were the same people who complained that it took hours to get Gatwick operational, days to get the railways working, weeks to restore power everywhere, and castigated the authorities for too little flood defence.
Professor Peter Gardiner
Emeritus professor of civil engineering, University of Brighton

• It is not true to say that 300 flood defence schemes that were ready to go have been halted by spending cuts (Editorial, 8 January). No schemes that were given a commitment to funding have been stopped. In fact, every economically viable project that was put forward for 2013-14 was given the go-ahead.

It is also not true to say that many of the Pitt review recommendations are now on the back burner, or gone altogether. We reported back in January 2012 that the vast majority of the recommendations have been met or are being implemented. The government is on course to invest a record £2.3bn in capital improvement projects over a six-year period.
Dan Rogerson MP
Environment minister

• Last year the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said that, as the planet warms, each degree of warming will increase rainfall intensity by 5%-10%.

Any government with an ounce of sense would listen to these warnings and intensify action on flood defence and other adaptation measures.

Instead, this government has cut spending on flood defences, despite its claims to the contrary (Report, 7 January). It has removed a requirement for local authorities to develop adaptation plans and cut Defra’s adaptation team from 38 people to six. And its planning reforms make building on flood plains more likely, not less.
Andy Atkins
Executive director, Friends of the Earth

•  The answer to increased flooding may be to embrace it. According to the Smithsonian Environmental Research Centre, wetland plants can absorb up to 32% more CO2 than they do at the moment, which means that wetlands can work as a carbon sink, countering climate change.

They also make a physical difference. Here in Norfolk, last month’s tidal surge breached and swept away dunes and tidal defences, while salt marshes held firm, offering the best protection.

Large areas of wetland have over the centuries been drained for agricultural use, so the rainwater they would once have held like a sponge is sent downhill at high speed into towns and cities. With swathes of southern and western Britain lying underwater, isn’t it time to consider restoring our wetlands?
Vicky Warren
Hunstanton, Norfolk

•  The UK needs to accept that flooding is a recurring risk to our communities and make real, proactive change – even if it means tough decisions. We can no longer continue to defend at all costs, there is simply not enough money. However, due to population growth and housing demands, we cannot completely rule out building in the flood plain either. There are some excellent examples emerging of development taking place in areas of potential risk on the basis that investment is made in flood defences – not only for the development in question, but for the wider community as well – but this means that budget and staff cuts at the Environment Agency are of concern.
Ola Holmstrom
Head of water UK, WSP consultancy

•  A coupled Ocean-Atmosphere model is run at the Met Office to provide warnings of coastal floods from high tides and storm surges. In order to validate the model, it is crucial to compare sea level observations from the National Tide Gauge Network with the model predictions. The network’s Bournemouth tide gauge was damaged in an October storm but the Environment Agency has no money to repair it. Any cuts in the EA’s budget will make the situation worse.
Graham Alcock
Auckland, New Zealand

•  The coastline of Lincolnshire is constantly under threat from flooding and, with the county providing over a third of our country’s best arable land, extensive inundation from the sea could put this land out of action for many years, with all that would imply for our food supplies. Yet local taxpayers will have to foot most of the bill for our coastal defences. Surely, all taxpayers, if they really value their home grown fruit and veg, should be expected to contribute towards measures to ensure that we do not have to rely on costly food imports if severe coastal flooding does occur in the future.
Cllr John Marriott
Lincolnshire county council

 

 

Independent:

 

 

 

 

 

There cannot, ever, have been such a clear illustration of the lack of understanding by a government of the environment in its care, as there is in the proposal to allow building on ancient woodland for those prepared to plant 100 trees for each ancient one cut down.

The idea demonstrates, with a clarity that a thousand protests could not, how they have no conception of what a woodland is – other than a collection of trees inconveniently positioned on prime building land. They have no understanding that it is home to billions of invertebrates, birds and animals, that it is a migratory stopover or destination, a pleasant place to walk, and frequently a source of managed timber.

The vacuous idea that a piece of ancient woodland could be replaced by a stand of conifers on some remote moorland – one supposes as part of a tax break – is despicable and motivated by moving money into the pockets of developers.

Vaughan Thomas, Usk, Gwent

I would like to express how deeply unnecessary I find it that ancient woodlands, or other top conservation sites, should be seen as a constraint to our country’s need for new housing developments. There are ample development sites on land that is less environmentally sensitive.

You cannot “offset” an ancient woodland, the value of which lies primarily in its historical development, its store of genetic material and its ecologically complex systems which, most crucially, include the soil and soil organisms, as well as more visible species. Ancient woodlands cannot be bean-counted by the number of trees, which are not a measure of value.

Compulsory biodiversity offsetting, as trailed in the Government’s Green Paper last September, may be a good idea, but it explicitly should not be applied to our most valuable and irreplaceable habitats, including ancient woodlands,  because that is to pretend that losses to development can be made good, which they cannot.

This country is very much able to deliver the required housing provision on land with lower environmental value, and which does not require the loss of a single tree or clod of soil in our vitally important ancient woodlands.

Professor Robert Tregay, Chairman, LDA Design, Peterborough

Is this the greenest government ever? Aside from fracking, which will destroy much of our countryside. Owen Patterson, the Environment Secretary, has announced that he is now minded to destroy our ancient woodlands for housing purposes. Patterson also fought to stop the recent EU ban on pesticides that were killing off our bees.

Ancient trees will be destroyed and wildlife habitats damaged, and the diversity of our forests will be lost for ever. Not to miss out on the action, David Cameron is getting rid of 1,100 flood defence jobs.

It’s all about efficiency savings with these Tories – not cuts. Cameron will simply label the destruction of our ancient forests as a “reform”, akin to the Orwellian Hunt/Lansley NHS reforms. He isn’t serving the crony corporate agenda, or the Tory greed and narrow self interests, he is simply “reforming” our ancient woodlands.

Julie Partridge, London SE15

Where desperate refugees are welcome

In October 2013, we watched 78 men, women and children, fleeing for their lives from Syria, land on a beach in Rhodes.   They were granted asylum, and the traffickers, who were paid $3,000 by each of these desperate people for the short journey from Syria, were arrested and jailed pending prosecution, and had their boat confiscated.

If a cash-strapped country like Greece can open its doors to these poor benighted people, we must all be thoroughly ashamed of our government if it fails to do likewise.

Tonyand Lorna Verso, Kingswood, South Gloucestershire

Given that our government has now shut its doors firmly on taking in any of Syria’s refugees, it is worth revisiting the build-up that almost led us into a war with Syria.

Do we remember the antics of the Foreign Secretary and the Prime Minister baying for air-strikes against Syria?

William Hague announced: “One year ago, 230,000 Syrian refugees. Today two million, half of them children. If we don’t end the conflict, think  what the figure could be next year.”

Our newspapers were filled with horror stories of what was happening to the refugees, of the torture, of dead and dying babies; and we were about to launch a war that would have cost us hundreds of millions of pounds.

But we know now from our government’s actions that they are not in the least interested in Syria’s refugees. The whole endeavour was an utterly shameless smoke-and-mirrors exercise designed to bamboozle the British public into supporting another war. The Government wanted regime change in Syria and would stoop to anything to achieve it.

Mark Holt, Liverpool

What is the sense in war?

I congratulate Ronan Breslin on his superb denunciation (letter, 8 January) of Michael Gove’s nationalistic political posturing.

It was always a safe bet that the Tories would use the centenary of the outbreak of the First World War in such a way, but it is still breathtaking that the first salvo was fired only two days into 2014. Gove seems to forget that he is part of a  generation blessed by never having had to fight a war.

I prefer the words of Harry Patch: “I went back to Ypres to shake the hand of Charles Kuentz, Germany’s only surviving veteran from the war. It was emotional. He is 107. We’ve had 87 years to think what war is. To me, it’s a licence to go out and murder. Why should the British government call me up and take me out to a battlefield to shoot a man I never knew, whose language I couldn’t speak? All those lives lost for a war finished over a table. Now what is the sense in that?”

Alan Pearson, Great Ayton, North Yorkshire

If war is the pursuit of politics by other means, a war generally means some politician has blundered. Our mistake in 1914 was to let the French assume we would come in if Belgium was invaded and to let the Germans think we wouldn’t.

Robert Davies, London SE3

Stick to the drug we know

John Rentoul is right to question the decriminalisation of cannabis in Britain following Colorado’s decision to do so (8 January). Our failure to control its consumption does not mean it should be legalised.

Our national drug, alcohol, although harmful to some, is well understood and plays an important role in society: from the toasting of great events with champagne to the celebration of the Eucharist where red wine represents the blood of Christ. It is unlikely that Western civilisation could have evolved without it.

Cannabis on the other hand is an alien drug which is not fully understood and has no historical equivalents to the gods Dionysus and Bacchus. Better the drug you know.

Stan Labovitch, Windsor

Too few women, too much space

You are so, so right Penny Joseph (letter, 6 January). I too had been noting the lack of women correspondents during the period you mention. However, I have been doing my bit and writing in regularly, but I am usually moaning about the huge amount of blank spaces in the paper as a whole and, in particular, the blank column to the left in the letters page which could contain three or more letters every day!

I have come to accept that the editor doesn’t like letters of constructive criticism in any form so I guess you won’t see this letter either.

Jan Huntingdon, Cricklade, Wiltshire

Anomaly still not rectified

I am amazed that you should print as news on your front page (3 January) the fact that many vice-chancellors of universities take a larger percentage pay rise than their staff. I worked for 36 years in the university sector and recall marching on Parliament under the splendid banner “Rectify the Anomaly!” Some people even call this sort of pay differential “leadership”.

Robin Phillips, Beeston, Nottinghamshire

Mystery of Ferguson’s hat

Fashionistas among readers of your sports pages much appreciated your reporters’ detailed account (8 January) of Sir Alex Ferguson’s headgear at the Sunderland-Manchester United game on Tuesday night.

But when did he change from the black cap (Sam Wallace) to the maroon beret (Ian Herbert)? Or was it the other way round? I think we should be told,

John Hudson, Stroud,  Gloucestershire

 

 

Times:

 

 

It would be better to have memorial services in 2018 to mark the end of the First World War, not to commemorate its start

Sir, My father fought in the Great War, and there must be others like me who have had direct contact with those who survived the war. His view of the war was that it had been a necessary venture. However, each November, come the Earl Haig Fund Appeal as it was then known, his face suffused to the colour of the poppies. He would contribute but would never wear a poppy.

I worry that commemorating the anniversary of the Great War could degenerate into farce. Such commemorations can make light of fearful times when we were all potential targets. It would, I feel, be better to have memorial services in 2018 to mark the end of the Great War, not to commemorate its start.

C. H. Goodwin

Hebden, N Yorks

Sir, No one can doubt the courage and patriotism of those who fought in the First World War. Books such as Birdsong and All Quiet On the Western Front bring the horrors of war and the courage of officers and men into stark relief. Many of us must have wondered how we would have coped. Satire does not diminish the frightfulness of it all but brings contrast, to remind us of the ways in which wars would never be the same again.

I had always assumed that Alan Clark’s description of the generals as “donkeys” (Alice Thomson, Jan 7) referred to their not having realised that mechanisation (notably the machinegun) and power of explosives required new strategies. It does seem astonishing to us now that waves of men in their thousands could, time after time, be sent out of the trenches straight into machinegun fire, hails of high explosive and near certain death.

James Dawson

Cheltenham, Glos

Sir, Of course Blackadder should be shown in history lessons. It brought home to all of us the futility of the war, its horror and appalling loss of human life. Who would not be moved by the final episode of Captain Blackadder and his men going over the top to certain death? The raw emotion and frozen terror in their eyes cannot be replicated in any textbook.

Frank Greaney

Formby, Liverpool

Sir, The fog of war is with us still. In his The Donkeys (1961) Alan Clark quoted the alleged exchange between Ludendorff and Hoffmann about the English soldiers being “lions led by donkeys” — all very quotable except that the exchange never happened. Considerable doubt was cast on the story’s authenticity by a letter from J. C. Sharp which appeared in The Daily Telegraph on July 16, 1963. The story was finally scotched three days later by a follow-up letter from D. G. Libby tracing the true version to page 57 of Francisque Sarcey’s Le Siège de Paris (1871) where the author quoted The Times about the French soldiers who had been completely defeated by the Prussians in 1870: “Vous êtes des lions conduits par des ânes!”

Tony Lawton

Skelton, York

Sir, Something which everybody needs to grasp about the First World War is that it was fought by polities completely different from the ones that exist today, with the possible exception of the US. This country did not wage the war as today’s UK, but fought as the British Empire. Parts of that empire, notably India, had no choice in whether it, too, entered the conflict.

Alarms should have rung last year when President Hollande began to eulogise the victory of “The Republic” over autocratic, imperialist Germany. France was just as much of a colonialist empire as Britain at the time.

All governments and media “historians” should be particularly careful to avoid going on about “sacrifice”, exactly the quasi-religious nonsense that was used to justify the slaughter of conscript armies at the time. Today Britain, France and Germany are three important parliamentary democracies among others in the European Union. It took a lot of violence in the first half of the 20th century to get the political situation we all now enjoy.

Ralph Lloyd-Jones

Nottingham

Sir, Let us not forget that Indians referred to the First World War as the European civil war.

R. Mell

Embsay, N Yorks

 

Simon Hoggart wasn’t the first journalist to transform coverage of Parliament. That honour rests with Bernard Levin

Sir, Your statement that it was Simon Hoggart, Matthew Parris and Frank Johnson who “transformed the coverage of Parliament” (obituary, Jan 6) is unfair to the late Bernard Levin, who wrote a weekly parliamentary sketch in The Spectator under the byline Taper in the early/mid 1960s.

I remember his reference to a Tory backbencher as “Lt-Colonel Sir Walter Bromley-Davenport, to name but a few”. When, many years later, in a piece in The Times he used the same phrasing to describe a lady with a multi-barrelled surname, I wrote to express sadness that the ageing Levin was plagiarising the youthful Taper. His reply, which I have framed, tells me that he had difficulty in deciding whether to be honoured that I had remembered or to murder me in my bed for the embarrassment that I had caused him.

Patrick Arbuthnot

Amersham, Bucks

Henry Ford did not say all history was “bunk”. He said much history was bad history and therefore more or less bunk

Sir, Alice Thomson (Jan 7) repeats the old chestnut that Henry Ford said that “history is bunk”. He said nothing of the sort. What he did say was that much history was bad history, and was therefore more or less bunk. He was not criticising history but the way it was interpreted and taught. He was so concerned that well-based history should be available that he endowed history faculties in a number of US universities. I suspect Ford would have a chuckle over the way history has recorded his comments. It illustrates what he said most wonderfully.

Professor Emeritus Garel Rhys

Cardiff University

 

 

If the Health Secretary has the power to cancel the pensions of doctors, should not doctors have the same power?

Sir, If the Health Secretary has the power to cancel the pensions of doctors whose actions lead to “loss of confidence in the public service” (report, Jan 8), should not doctors have the right to reciprocate?

Dr John Doherty

Stratford-upon-Avon, Warks

 

The pictures of the seafront at Aberystwyth brought back bitter-sweet memories for me; it was there that I found love

Sir, Your pictures of the seafront at Aberystwyth (Jan 7) brought back many memories of chasing the waves along the prom. However, your picture of the shelter collapsing is a sad one for it was in there, 57 years ago, that I received my first kiss from the lady who became my wife.

Bryan Jones

Kingswood, Glos

 

 

 

Telegraph:

 

SIR – Every film and television portrayal of Sherlock Holmes repeats the same mistake in having the number 221B on the front door of the detective’s house.

Residences in Baker Street like Sherlock Holmes’s were originally built as large family houses, but their functions were overtaken by social change in the late Victorian age, and many became economically viable only as sets of rooms let floor by floor. 221B would thus have been the first-floor lodging of Holmes and Watson, 221A the ground-floor set, with the housekeeper, Mrs Hudson, living in the basement. The number of the front door, however, would have been plain old no 221.

Norman White
Venice, Italy

 

SIR – Today the public learns of the deplorable practices that were instrumental in the Government’s decision to reverse its commitment to save thousands of lives through implementing a minimum unit price for alcohol. An investigation conducted by the British Medical Journal shows that ministers met drinks industry representatives to discuss alternative measures to minimum pricing at a time when the principle of this policy was not up for public debate.

This will fuel fears that big business is trumping public health concerns in Westminster. With deaths from liver disease rapidly rising, and teenagers now presenting with advanced liver failure, the Government has a duty to realise its commitment to introduce minimum pricing. This policy is supported by a growing evidence base and has shown remarkable real-life benefits in reducing health and social harms in Canada.

The Prime Minister said, when announcing his proposals to introduce minimum pricing, “the responsibility of being in Government isn’t always about doing the popular thing. It’s about doing the right thing.” We call on Government to stop dancing to the tune of the drinks industry and prioritise public health.

Professor Sir Ian Gilmore
Special Adviser on Alcohol, Royal College of Physicians and Chairman, Alcohol Health Alliance UK
Dr Nick Sheron
Head of Clinical Hepatology, University of Southampton
Professor Mark A Bellis
Alcohol Lead, UK Faculty of Public Health
Katherine Brown
Director, Institute of Alcohol Studies
Eric Appleby
Chief Executive, Alcohol Concern
Dr Peter Rice
Chairman, Scottish Health Action on Alcohol Problems (SHAAP)
Professor Terence Stephenson
Nuffield Professor of Child Health, UCL, and Chair, UK Academy of Medical Royal Colleges
Dr Tom Smith
Chief Executive, British Society of Gastroenterology
Dr John Middleton
Vice President, UK Faculty of Public Health
Professor Linda Bauld
Director, Institute of Social Marketing, University of Stirling and Deputy Director, UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies
Colin Shevills
Director, Balance, the North East Alcohol Office
Dr Evelyn Gillan
Chief Executive, Alcohol Focus Scotland
Professor Jonathan Shepherd
Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Director, Violence Research Group, Cardiff University
Dr Kieran Moriarty
Alcohol Lead, British Society of Gastroenterology
Dr Marsha Y Morgan
Principal Research Fellow & Honorary Consultant Physician, UCL Institute for Liver & Digestive Health, UCL London
Dr J-P van Besouw
President, Royal College of Anaesthetists
Professor Colin Drummond
Chairman, Medical Council on Alcohol
Hazel Parsons
Director, Drink Wise North West
Andrew Langford
Chief Executive, British Liver Trust
Shirley Cramer
Chief Executive, Royal Society for Public Health
Professor Gerard Hastings
Institute of Social Marketing, University of Stirling and The Open University

Flood aid

SIR – When there are disasters abroad, the Government rushes to send aid. Now that we have a similar situation here, we should pay compensation to householders and small businesses that have suffered from the floods. Because of the debt that we inherited from Labour, we cannot increase spending. I suggest we drop the name “overseas aid” and call it “disaster aid”.

The Government should immediately transfer £1 billion from the swollen aid budget, which is increasing by 40 per cent in this Parliament, and use it to pay compensation, and to have a crash programme of coastal and flood defences to protect our people in the future.

John Townend
MP for Bridlington and East Yorkshire (Con), 1979 – 2001

SIR – The recent effects of weather and tides on our coastal areas were exceptional but predictable.

There was a new moon, with the Moon in line with the Sun, which always results in higher than normal tides. The Moon was at “near perigee”, the closest point in its orbit to earth, reinforcing this effect.

These factors alone would have caused exceptionally high tides. The storm surges caused by the high winds were sufficient to wreak havoc along our coasts.

Had these phenomena been reported along with the weather forecasts, victims might have been better prepared.

Martin Mayer
Heskin, Lancashire

Sin-free baptism

SIR – You report that some clergy believe the Church of England should remove references to sin from baptism services because people associate the word with sex and cream cakes rather than religious transgressions.

This is like leaving the study of war out of a history curriculum because it might upset the students.

George Stebbing-Allen
Wigginton, Hertfordshire

Child care crisis

SIR – The toxic Dutch auction between the main political parties on who can make the “best” universal child care offer is catastrophic for our children’s well-being.

Forcing parents back into the workforce will compromise vital early attachment relationships essential for children. Far from attacking family life, we need policies that favour bringing down the cost of living (especially in housing), investing in parenting education and community-based initiatives, implementing family-friendly allowances and tax breaks, and helping employers offer more flexible working milieux.

Ed Miliband wishes to “deal with the cost-of-living crisis”. Driving the parents of young children into the workforce (when unemployment remains stubbornly high) is not in any way “dealing” with the crisis; it is merely reacting to its symptoms.

Dr Richard House
Early Childhood Department, University of Winchester

Cyber-snooping

SIR – Fraser Nelson complains that the Government is infringing on our civil liberties by accessing emails and mobile phone conversations.

There is a war going on: the liberal West is opposed by an enemy, which finds our way of life so unacceptable that it will attack in any way that it can in an effort to destroy our society. The weak point in its strategy is that our enemy (at present) uses a great deal of electronic means of communication, which is simple and speedy.

However, examining these electronic means of communication is one of the reasonably sure ways that our security services can find out what these terrorists are up to and infiltrate their ranks. Through cyber-sleuthing, many attempted attacks have been prevented.

Tony Silverman
Edgware, Middlesex

Food pairing

SIR – In attempting to commit to Dry January, I am able to forsake my regular glass of wine when dining at home or out, but I am at a loss when it comes to finding a suitable substitute that is neither sweet nor fizzy to drink during the meal. Any suggestions?

Sandra Woods
Harrogate, West Yorkshire

 

SIR – Decreasing the motorway speed limit to 60mph in some areas will make long journeys even longer and more tiring. It is also harder to maintain alertness and concentration if driving at a lower speed than is necessary. These two factors will increase the likelihood of road accidents.

Melvyn Owen
Somersham, Huntingdonshire

SIR – Introducing 60mph limits will not only lead to more delays and accidents, but will increase the amount of exhaust pollution in the areas affected.

Those of us who learnt physics at school will be aware of Bernoulli’s equation, in which the density of a fluid is inversely proportional to its average speed.

As frequently demonstrated on sections of the M25 where variable limits are used, the amount of congestion increases when traffic is slowed.

Chas Bazeley
Colchester, Essex

SIR – This is a careful plan to extract yet more money from the motorist in speeding fines under the guise of health and safety.

Barry Purdon
Staines, Middlesex

SIR – If air quality improvement really were the justification for the proposed 60mph motorway speed limit, surely it would be smarter to have variable speed limits based on pollution output, easily monitored by the automatic number plate recognition system.

Gas-guzzling “Chelsea tractors” and dirty diesels could be limited to 50mph, while more environmentally friendly cars could still do the full 70mph.

Graham Hoyle
Baildon, West Yorkshire

SIR – Why does Edmund King, the AA’s president, consider that motorists will be “penalised” by a 60mph limit? Does the AA represent only those drivers who want to drive at high speeds?

Many drivers resent feeling as if they are joining a manic race, and they avoid using motorways whenever possible. Slowing down to reduce pollution will not be such a hardship.

Barbara Davy
Ilkley, West Yorkshire

SIR – Proposals to reduce the speed on British motorways are just another example of EU madness. The EU preaches to member states about environmental issues, but fails to look at its own conduct.

Recently, MEPs received an email from EU bureaucrats, informing them that they would now be turning televisions off in MEPs’ offices between visits to Strasbourg.

As the Strasbourg Parliament is only open one week a month, this meant televisions were being left on for three weeks at a time — and it had taken the EU this long to realise.

Nikki Sinclaire MEP (We Demand a Referendum Party)
Birmingham

 

Irish Times:

 

Sir, – Pat Rabbitte says that the pylon consultations need to improve. Of course he’s right. Now he and the rest of the Government need to do something about it. The Grid Link consultation process only allows “the public” and “stakeholders” to make submissions to EirGrid to help the company to “identify a least-constrained corridor option” that will be one kilometre wide for overhead cables and pylons. Let’s have proper consultations, not just meetings with gridline company consultants.

This “consultation” is just a means of getting soundings from the public about whether they want the gridline over our land, his land, her land or their land. Not in my back yard is the natural response. It’s the proposed method, not the means, that’s creating the problems. There is no consultation on the method. Why not put the cables underground? Why not consider this for at least some of the area? Will the existing electrical gridlines be eliminated and removed when the new ones are installed?

It is the responsibility of our democratically elected Government to take care of public health and to allay people’s fears about proposed national projects. Dismissive statements repeating the EirGrid comments about creating platforms for future jobs are not enough. A €500 million investment covering such a large area is not a very large amount of money. Anglo Irish Bank created much larger jobs platforms for much bigger investors in the Celtic Tiger days.

The people of Ireland are generally interested in “renewable energy” and won’t object to a “secure electricity supply” nor to any suppliers of “platforms for jobs” in the regions. They may even be interested in an electricity “link between either Britain or France”. The public – the people of Ireland – are interested in their health. They are also interested in their families, their future and their environment. These topics were not included for consultation. – Yours, etc,

MICHAEL FINAN,

Glencar,

Co Sligo.

A chara, – At a meeting, many years ago,  to discuss widening of the Dublin to Waterford road at Jerpoint Abbey, the difficulties were listed. With the river in front and the railway line behind, what was to be done? “Knock th’abbey”, suggested some wag. Proposals to criss-cross the country with electricity pylons sound very much like another “knock th’abbey” moment.   – Is mise,

MARY DOYLE,

Jerpoint West,

Thomastown, Co Kilkenny.

Sir, – The Taoiseach’s comments on the necessity of an extensive pylon construction programme are an insult to those who oppose this attempt to destroy the pristine beauty of rural Ireland. Implicitly labelling the said objectors as opponents of job creation is a cynical ploy.

These pylons are an affront to Ireland, a country which has always traded on its clean, green image. For every job the pylons bring, two more will be lost in the tourism and agriculture sector, both of which will be directly affected by their construction. Rural Ireland is not the German Ruhr. It is about time that the perpetrators of such idiotic schemes realised that. – Yours, etc,

MARIAN CONDREN,

The Swan,

Athy,

Co Kildare.

Sir, – What utter fools we would be to rush to deface our exquisite landscape with pylons and wind turbines. When our world collapsed around us it was the beauty of our country which continued to attract income in the form of tourism and to sustain us as individuals with the eternal reassurance of nature. If we ruin it, we have nothing. Our unique and fragile landscape can yield a wholesome and sustainable prosperity; we must treasure and protect it above all. – Yours, etc,

GIA GRIFFITHS,

Salthill,

Galway.

Sir, – Mobile phone masts, wind turbines, nuclear power, oil and gas exploration, incinerators, electricity pylons, etc, etc. Thank God the railways are already here! – Yours, etc,

KEITH NOLAN,

Caldra House,

Carrick-on-Shannon,

Co Leitrim.

 

Sir, – Does Alan Dukes take us all for amadáns? He tells us that people on the IBRC list of “politically exposed” or “high-profile” persons “were treated in the same way as any other bank customer” (“No special deals for listed Anglo borrowers, says Dukes”, Front Page, January 7th ).

We are asked to believe these people were treated differently in order to ensure they were not treated differently. Indeed “any suggestion to the contrary is without foundation”.

Your correspondent then reported, “The board of the IBRC was updated on politically exposed persons at every board meeting and the Minister was notified of any decision that had a public interest dimension”.

There was no mention of even a raised eyebrow. – Yours, etc,

PAT MURPHY,

Rathdown Park,

Greystones,

Sir, – Some additions to Jennifer O’Connell’s list of annoying phrases to be avoided in 2014 (“Ten phrases we could live without”, Life, January 8th): “Lessons will be learned”, “Optics”, “The Exit” and “The Gathering”. – Yours, etc,

Dr JOHN DOHERTY,

Cnoc an Stollaire,

Gaoth Dobhair,

Co Donegal.

Sir, – Allow me to augment Jennifer O’Connell’s list: “the spend” (beloved of Government Ministers); “A disconnect between” (beloved of talking heads); “a rebranding exercise” (beloved of PR people and perhaps some within the Limerick City of Culture board and committee). – Yours, etc,

OLIVER McGRANE,

Marley Avenue,

Rathfarnham,

Dublin 16.

Sir, – “Look-back exercise” (a review); “learnings” (lessons or conclusions); “period of negative growth” (a recession); “significant challenge” (an unmitigated fiasco). – Yours, etc,

PATRICIA O’RIORDAN,

Stamer Street,

Dublin 8.

Sir, – Hey, Jennifer, “lighten up”. “Just saying”, like. – Yours, etc,

ANNE O’CALLAGHAN,

Cathal Brugha Street,

Dublin 1.

 

Sir, – If politicians and bureaucrats wish to use artists – people of creativity, originality and vision – as tools in some fatuous “rebranding” exercise, may I respectfully suggest that they stick to dead ones? – Yours, etc,

MAEVE KENNEDY,

Rathgar Avenue,

Rathgar,

Dublin 6.

Sir, – Fintan O’Toole’s response to the Limerick City of Culture controversy is a good illustration of the type of ivory tower arrogance that often surrounds controversies in the arts world (“Artists insulted in Limerick debacle”, Opinion & Analysis, January 7th).

He says that linking art and culture to branding the place from which they originate is “deeply misconceived” and “an insult to artists”. He goes on to say that artists “question, transform, challenge, disturb, mock, make strange” but do not have “the slightest interest in taking part in a positive branding exercise”.

Pardon me, Mr O’Toole, but if €6 million of public money is to be spent on this project, then we have a right to expect that there is some dividend for the people of Limerick and not just the local arts “luvvies”. It is extraordinarily arrogant of him to suggest that the project should be organised and run by artists, solely for the benefit of these same artists.

If either Mr O’Toole or the artists of Limerick want to keep the world of arts and culture entirely to themselves, then I would respectfully suggest that they seek private sources of funding to do so. – Yours, etc,

THOMAS RYAN, BL

Mount Tallant Avenue,

Harold’s Cross,

Dublin 6W.

Sir, – We should resist the temptation of raining on other people’s parade. This is Limerick’s year and perhaps the parochial Irish media would serve us better by dispatching correspondents to the City of Culture for a year rather than viewing the present juicy spectacle from a distance and with rarefied disdain.

Perhaps Fintan O’Toole should come to Limerick and see what is going on at ground level.

I think his article requires a follow-up from the author, based not on preconceived attitudes and cynicism, but on experiencing the events themselves, rather than damning the project from a safe distance of 120 miles. – Yours, etc,

NEIL O’BRIEN,

Affick,

Tulla ,

Co Clare.

 

Sir, – Una Mullally’s article on the quality of modern buildings in Dublin (“Slamming the door on decent design”, Opinion & Analysis, January 6th) cannot go without some response from an architect. As one who has been involved in designing buildings for 50 years, particularly housing, I feel the need for a riposte.

Before the last two decades, architects had a limited role in designing housing in the capital, as speculative builders, with a few exceptions, did not employ architects. Liam Carroll of Zoe Developments did not employ one until the late-1990s.

The public sector did employ architects and this was reflected in the fact that the Royal Institute of the Architects of Ireland’s housing silver medal was for many years awarded to public housing projects, and from the 1970s Dublin City Council built many attractive schemes of terrace housing in the inner city, following the pattern of previous generations. It was only in the boom years that three private projects in the Dublin Docklands have been awarded successive medals.

It must be admitted that many architects until recent years had not been involved in large-scale housing, which is the most difficult design task for an architect.

This, combined with the lack of experience across the construction industry, resulted in a high percentage of poor design and construction during the boom.

However, there have been some benefits from the boom. Some good projects have been completed and statutory standards have been raised well above those in the UK.

Incidentally, the next phase at Clancy Barracks is all about the preservation and adaptation of the historic buildings.– Yours, etc,

JAMES PIKE, FRIAI,

O’Mahony Pike Architects,

Milltown, Dublin 6.

Sir, – Una Mullally spoke the beams and bolts of my own long-held views regarding the torrent of disastrous builds and deconstructions of the past 60 years in our cities and towns. She rightly pointed out the professional ire to which mere plebs find themselves subjected when daring to discuss building design. If the non-versed (architecturally speaking) can recognise the ugly, poorly crafted and cheap nature of nearly all current builds, then surely our design elite should too. I do not wish to plead for a return to Georgian or even Edwardian pomposity, merely that current public and commercial buildings not stand in sheer defiance of their neighbours’ and ancestors’ charms.

We may well lament the lost architecture and beautification projects, well documented on the excellent Archiseek website, or even the joined-up thinking that our cities’ leaders were once afforded, in an age where the only link between different schemes seems to be either “eclectic” or “incarceratory”, at best. I grant that the some excellent schemes have been initiated, Opera Lane in Cork being a personal favourite. The new quayside Courts of Justice in the capital also deserves an honourable mention. – Yours, etc,

STEPHEN BEHAN,

Cahirdown,

Listowel,

Co Kerry.

 

A chara, – Contrary to your editorial (January 7th), teachers are subject to oversight of their work and face sanctions for non-performance of their duties or for professional misconduct. There is an established legislative basis for this in section 24 of the Education Act, which includes sanctions up to and including dismissal. In 2009 the publication of these revised procedures was reported in your newspaper.

Your editorial says the Department of Education’s chief inspector admitted that under current procedures only two cases had been taken to deal with underperforming teachers. The chief inspector’s most recent report states that disciplinary procedures provide for a staged process whereby boards dissatisfied with a teacher’s work or behaviour can require him or her to bring about improvement. Only if a board remains dissatisfied with the teacher’s work is a review of the teacher’s work by the inspectorate sought, as has happened on two occasions. The procedures are meant to resolve most cases at school level and it is clear this is what happens.

The Teaching Council will soon get from the Minister for Education full legal powers to conduct inquiries into the fitness to teach of any registered teacher and the power to remove teachers from the register and hence from eligibility for employment as a teacher in Ireland. What Ruairí Quinn did last week was simply agree to provide additional but proportionate sanctions to the Teaching Council, something the council itself had requested of him two years ago.

The question your editorial should have addressed is why it took two years to progress such a relatively straightforward request. – Is mise,

SHEILA NUNAN,

General Secretary,

 

 

Sir, – I welcome Sean O’Sullivan’s letter (January 7th) concerning fitness-to-practise inquiries for nurses and midwives.

I am appalled that disciplinary hearings in respect of nurses and doctors have, by law, to be held in public. The mere fact of such an inquiry in respect of a nurse or doctor puts that person in the role of an accused in the public mind and, irrespective of an inquiry’s findings, compromises their professional and personal reputation.

The law underpinning this state of affairs is, to my mind, constitutionally suspect, in that it reeks of unfairness and highlights a lack of natural justice. A nurse or doctor refusing to appear before a disciplinary hearing, unless it were conducted other than in public, might well have such a refusal upheld by the courts, and with unsavoury consequences for the disciplinary body.

The legislation needs to be amended accordingly, and with urgency. – Yours, etc,

MICHAEL REYNOLDS,

Watersville,

Castlebar,

 

Sir, — I refer to David Walsh’s letter (January 3rd) in which he asserts that the TEEU has some questions to answer in relation to our support for the Turn Off the Red Light Campaign and whether we consulted our members on the issue.

The TEEU delegates to the March 2010 Women’s Conference of the Irish Congress of Trade Unions (Ictu) held in Belfast put forward a motion “that the trade union movement should redouble its efforts in winning support for this important campaign, as the human trafficking and the exploitation of adults and children in the sex industry . . . is contrary to basic human rights and is in contravention of ILO [International Labour Organisation] conventions”. The motion was debated and adopted.

The TEEU policy conference held later that year adopted a similar motion, the text of which was circulated in advance to 200 delegates from all facets of Irish society. It was debated in workshops to maximise delegate input.

The TEEU then joined other unions and civil society organisations to seek new laws in Ireland to protect such vulnerable people.

There are currently 66 such organisations affiliated to the Turn Off the Red Light campaign, such as the Dublin Rape Crisis Centre, Macra na Feirme and the Union of Students in Ireland. These can hardly be described as either radical feminist or religious fundamentalist organisations, as characterised by Mr Walsh. – Yours, etc,

EAMON DEVOY,

General Secretary,

TEEU,

Gardiner Row,

 

Sir, – Joanne Doyle (January 8th) criticises the Irish trade mission to Saudi Arabia in a similar manner to previous correspondents critical of Irish connections with Bahrain.

The fact is that we live in a world where others have different values and ways of life.

We are faced with a choice when we don’t agree with others – negotiate with them and try to find common ground or cast them out and refuse to do business with them. – Yours, etc,

SEAN O’SULLIVAN,

Crossabeg,

Co Wexford.

 

 

 

Irish Independent:

 

I wonder where your correspondent S O’Rourke has been for the last 30 years (Letters, January 6). He must have never spoken to any members of the farming community or had to drive from Dublin to Galway before the motorways were completed.

Also in this section

The case for eternal Christmas

Editorial: Pylon problem could be real headache for Kenny

Why Pope is the only hope to save church

This journey can now be completed in two hours –prior to the motorway it could take a half day. Surely he would have seen the signs all over the place stating that this project was being funded by the European Union.

Being members of the EU has made farming viable and sustainable for a large section of the population. It has also been a key factor in our foreign direct investment programme. Irish students can now benefit from the Erasmus programme which gives them a wonderful opportunity to acquire another language and cultural enrichment.

This latter point would obviously not be of much importance to S O’Rourke, given his assertion that he felt more British than European and that English was good enough for him.

Mainly because of this attitude, the possibilities for our unemployed are now largely limited to the Anglo sphere. Irish emigrants, because of our appalling foreign language deficit, must now seek work in Australia or America, thousands of kilometres away, whereas if they had even a modicum of another European language they could find work on the European mainland, which is on average just a two-hour flight away.

Given the almost weekly revelations of scandals in various bodies here, I believe what this country needs is more stringent oversight from Europe, not less.

The departure of the troika was treated with glee in some quarters which I believe to be premature. Already there is an attempt to create or talk up another property boom in some quarters.

This proves that nothing has been learnt.

Directing anger towards Jose Manuel Barroso, like S O’Rourke and other Irish people are doing, is a misplaced reaction to our self-inflicted woes. Nobody was forced by Europe to borrow any money, this borrowing was fuelled by greed.

PAUL CONNOLLY

CO KILDARE

LEADING THE FIELD

* In his football days Jimmy Deenihan was a tight-marking corner back who won five All-Ireland senior medals with his native Kerry. He was also an astute reader of the game who could deliver an effective pass to a team-mate.

In his more recent career as Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, it’s clear Jimmy has lost none of his renowned football skills. First we had news of the resignation of Coimisineir Teanga Sean O Cuirreain, and now we have the resignations of Karl Wallace and Patricia Ryan in the Limerick City of Culture debacle.

Junior minister Dinny McGinley has taken most of the flak for the coimisineir’s departure, while Pat Cox has been the man in the eye of the storm over the Limerick resignations.

The corner back from Kerry, meanwhile, has escaped pretty much unscathed — a lesson here perhaps for more high-profile outfielders on the cabinet team, like Phil Hogan and James O’Reilly?

JOHN GLENNON

CO WICKLOW

RIGHTS OF MAN — AND APE

* Of course it seems like a loaded question, but can a great ape be classed as a legal person? Considering that his closest cousin is the chimpanzee, and we are the closest cousins to them both, there are plans to do just that. In New York (I know, where else?) a group of activists have filed lawsuits to grant them the “right to bodily liberty”.

They also hope the judges will recognise that chimps have a basic legal right not to be imprisoned. Their beef is the imprisonment of four of them in cages across New York state.

The activists also claim that not too long ago slaves were not classed as people but as property, so why not a chimp?

Because they can’t argue for their rights like children, they need representation. This is a very strong point indeed. Spain saw it that way too and passed a resolution in 2008 that deemed the great ape to be considered a legal person.

Of course, there is a deeper issue going on and that is stopping the abuse of all animals. The activists want the chimps restored to a more natural habitat and what we would consider to be a more humane existence.

Animals everywhere have little or no rights, and the sentences handed out to those that abuse them only encourage the abusers.

BARRY CLIFFORD

OUGHTERARD, GALWAY

PROBLEM OF INFALLIBILITY

* Infallibility? Officially, it is an article of Catholic faith that the pope is infallible. My personal faith tells me there are many problems with this.

Most of us do not know what the term ‘infallibility ‘ actually means. I cannot find, in either scripture or tradition, any real proof of it. Christ promised to be with His church till the end of time. Is that not enough for us?

Papal infallibility was forced through the first Vatican Council by a political faction in 1870 — the pope is infallible because Pius IX said so.

My reading of church history tells me that Roman ‘infallibility’ has caused untold dissension and faction-fighting among Christians. Our petty quarrels have scandalised the human race for nearly 2000 years. Surely Christ wants us all to be Christians of one mind and one heart, not just a chosen few self-righteous ‘know-it-alls’. What does Pope Francis think of papal infallibility?

SEAN MCELGUNN

ADDRESS WITH EDITOR

A REPUBLIC IN NAME ONLY

* I refer to the ongoing discussion regarding the President’s omission of ‘Christ’ or ‘Christianity’ in his Christmas message, the resultant disapproval of the head chaplain of the Defence Forces and the subsequent apology to the President from the new Defence Forces Chief of Staff. We were then advised that the President’s spokesperson said it would be inappropriate to ask if he is an atheist, “even though he had to swear a religious oath upon taking office” (Irish Independent, January 6).

I completely understand that the President’s personal beliefs are a source of interest for people, but to pitch his omission of a reference to Christ from his Christmas message as some form of hypocrisy in light of the presidential oath he took back in 2011 is to miss the point.

The main point here is the retention of the incongruities that are the constitutional requirements for presidential, Council of State and judicial candidates to swear oaths “in the presence of Almighty God” in Bunreacht na hEireann.

We cannot in good conscience claim to live in a republic whilst maintaining such overtly religious, exclusionary references in our Constitution. Freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of conscience and freedom of (including from) religion are recognised fundamental rights under Bunreacht na hEireann and cornerstones of any true republic. Yet in order to become President, a member of the Council of State or a judge, candidates who do not have religious beliefs are constitutionally required to perjure themselves.

These requirements are systematic bugs in our constitutional operating system. These anachronisms not only create difficulties for atheists and agnostics, but also for citizens with non-Catholic religious beliefs as well.

If you think the Constitution should be left as is, don’t try to tell me we live in a real Republic.

ROB SADLIER

RATHFARNHAM, DUBLIN 16

Irish Independent

 


Drilling

$
0
0

10 January 2014 Drilling
I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. The crew of Troutbridge are being selected to pick up a spy escaped from Russia.  Priceless.
Drill hole for cable break cable, shareview and 5l liquid soap.
Scrabble today I win    and gets  just  over   300,   Perhaps Mary will win tomorrow.

Obituary:
Joan Thirsk, who has died aged 91, was the leading agricultural historian of her generation and had a huge impact on her field in terms of methodology and research.
Her greatest achievement was to explore and define regional differences in agricultural practice through the careful analysis of documentary sources, in particular probate inventories which provide evidence for crops, animals and equipment. This allowed different farming systems and local social hierarchies to be identified.
She also edited and wrote much of the fourth volume of The Agrarian History of England and Wales series, devoted to the period 1500 to 1640 . In 1974 she was appointed general editor of the series, which she brought to a successful conclusion.
She ranged widely, publishing studies of the introduction of new crops such as woad, saffron, tobacco and liquorice in which she stressed the importance of the English gentry as receptors of new ideas and agents of change. Yet despite her eminence, agricultural history was not her first choice of subject.
Born Irene Joan Watkins on June 19 1922, she grew up in north London. From Camden School for Girls she went up to Westfield College, London, where she read German and French. She was in Switzerland when war was declared, and went on to serve in the ATS in the Intelligence Corps at Bletchley Park, where she was a subaltern. There her interests turned to history. Deciphering codes, as she later explained, was the best possible training for the reading and interpretation of historical documents.
After the war she embarked on a doctorate under the great economic historian RH Tawney, a major influence on her work, on the sales of sequestered Royalist land in the south-east during the Interregnum. After a year at the London School of Economics as an assistant lecturer in Sociology, in 1951 she was appointed Senior Research Fellow in the Department of English Local History at the University of Leicester. There she became a founder member of the British Agricultural History Society and, in 1953, published her influential Fenland Farming in the Sixteenth Century and an important article on the Isle of Axholme .
In these works she outlined many of the methods, approaches and sources which were to have such influence on her profession. In her account, the Lincolnshire fenlands, pre-Vermuyden’s drainage schemes, were shown to have been “poor respecting money, but very happy respecting their mode of existence”. While traditional farming systems may not have been the most economically productive, she argued, they possessed considerable social rationale.
In 1957 she published English Peasant Farming: The Agrarian History of Lincolnshire from Tudor to Recent Times, about a county where she had been briefly evacuated during the war. Later she edited several volumes in the History of Lincolnshire series. The Lincolnshire study was followed by Suffolk Farming in the Nineteenth Century.
Joan Thirsk was a founding member of the journal Past and Present and it was there that she published, among other papers, her researches into The Common Fields (1964) and The Origins of the Common Fields (1966), a reassessment of the rationale of English medieval field systems, showing them to be far more complex and locally varied than previously recognised.
In 1965 she succeeded WH Hoskins as Reader in Economic History at Oxford. She was a Fellow of St Hilda’s College until 1983, when she took early retirement, unhappy with cuts to university research budgets.
Her most influential essays, published in 1984 as The Rural Economy of England, included studies of the family unit, inheritance, rural industry, regional specialisation, Tudor enclosures and the introduction and diffusion of new crops. She was also joint editor of Seventeenth-Century Economic Documents (1972), a collection made originally for her special subject students.
In her introduction to The Rural Economy of England, Joan Thirsk observed that the study of the story of people and communities in local landscapes was one which appealed particularly to women. This perspective was also apparent in her Ford Lectures, published in 1978 as Economic Policy and Projects: The development of a consumer society in Early Modern England, and in articles such as The Fantastical Follies of Fashion (1973). In this she united her own interest in knitting with her rural studies, challenging the notion that knitting did not develop until the 16th century by pointing out that the chain mail of medieval armour was “in fact, a knitted garter stitch”.
She continued to write and research well into her retirement. In 1997 she published Alternative Agriculture: A History from the Black Death to the Present Day, an account of agricultural innovation inspired by a 17th-century inventory which included, in addition to “brass cooking pots, cambric, gold and silver thread, hats, knives, lace, poldaves, ribbons, ruffs, soap and tape”, no fewer than five references to woad. One reviewer described it as “a firebrand of a book”.
Joan Thirsk combined scholarship with a love of domesticity, often treating her students and colleagues to bread and cakes she had baked herself, and sending hand-knitted garments for their newly-born offspring. One of her last projects was research into the history of food and diet.
Joan Thirsk was a fellow of the British Academy and of the Royal Historical Society. She was appointed CBE in 1994.
Her standing was reflected in the publication of two festshrifts in her honour: English Rural Society (1990), edited by John Chartres and David Hey, and People, Landscape and Alternative Agriculture (2004), edited by RW Hoyle, her last research student at Oxford.
She married, in 1945, James Thirsk, whom she had met at Bletchley Park. They had a son and a daughter.
Joan Thirsk, born June 19 1922, died October 3 2013

Guardian:

I was horrified to read the reaction of Richard Howitt MEP to the helicopter crash at Cley (Report, 9 January). The Cley bird reserve is one of the key sites on the north Norfolk coast; one of Europe’s most important sites for the wintering of migrant birds. We should not allow such a sensitive area to be used for military training, particularly in January, when it will have its greatest population of migrant birds from the Arctic.
Ian Dunn
Beckenham, Kent
• Why is it necessary for a US helicopter to carry live ammunition while on a training flight in the UK?
Hilary Morris
Rugby, Warwickshire
• A question for your numerically literate readers. Dr Martin Allen (Letters, 9 January) makes the point that 40% of university graduates are in non-graduate jobs. Meanwhile, Sally Hunt points out (Letters, 9 January) that 40% of students will never pay their loans back. If we are talking about the same 40%, does this mean that universities are offering 66% more places than they should be? Discuss.
George Benn
Romsey, Hampshire
• It may come as a surprise to Guardian readers (US hit by ‘life-threatening’ Arctic weather, 7 January) to learn that there is a country north of the 49th parallel. It’s called Canada and it also has weather.
Dianne Norton
London
• Surfers from Hawaii flying to Spain (Surfer’s 20,000-mile trip – for two waves, 8 January) to sample record waves is an example of “positive feedback”. More carbon dioxide emission from aircraft fuel increases climate change, which increases extreme events, which increases their fun and our distress. Next time they should sail.
Professor John Twidell
Horninghold, Leicestershire
• After being acclaimed as the porn capital of Britain (Pass notes, G2, 9 January), I propose that it be re-named Hardware.
Anthony Tasgal
London

Harry Goldstein’s assertion (Letters, 7 January) that the Palestinians were “offered [a state] in 1947 and refused, preferring to make war on Israel”, must be challenged. The Palestinians were told that 56% of their existing state of Palestine was to be taken away and made into a Jewish state, even though half of the population of the “Jewish” area was Arab. Since the Jews made it clear they wanted even more than the 56% and would take it by force, the Arab armies, far smaller in number and less well-armed than the Jews, moved up to the border of the Jewish state, in an attempt to protect the remaining territory they had been allocated, and stop Israel taking those areas by force. They failed either to stop the Jewish armies or to prevent them expelling Palestinian Arabs from a land in which they had once formed 90% of the population.
Karl Sabbagh
Author of Palestine: A Personal History
• Peaceful co-existence between the Jewish and Palestinian people was never on the agenda of Israel’s early leaders: Ben-Gurion in 1948 was an advocate of what he euphemistically called “compulsory transfer” of Palestinians from their homeland. Little seems to have changed under the current leadership: as if the ethnic cleansing of the 40s and 50s was not sufficient, the separation wall now snakes its way through the occupied territories, severing Palestinian communities from their places of work and their land. It is difficult to imagine how a peace process can survive the insidious effect of continued land confiscation, bypass roads linking settlements, checkpoints, house demolitions. How ironic seem to us today the key words of “co-ordination” and “co-operation” which echo through the Oslo accords of 1993 and 1995.
Charles Milne
Hereford
• The Palestine National Council formally accepted a two-state settlement in 1988, and in 1993 the PLO recognised “the right of the state of Israel to exist in peace and security” within its pre-1967 borders.
Leon Rosselson
London

Fatima Khan’s account of her son Abbas’s torture and death in a Syrian prison (G2, 8 January) made almost unbearable reading, not just for the unimaginable suffering this courageous young doctor endured at the hands of the Syrian regime but also because of the questions it raised about our MPs’ failure to support the Khan family during their terrifying ordeal.
The failure of William Hague to contact the family directly after Abbas’s sudden disappearance in Syria is a terrible obfuscation of duty, but Sayeeda Warsi’s telephone call to his mother in which she asserts that Fatima should be happy that she had returned her call but there was nothing the government could do is staggering in its lack of humanity. It adds grievous insult to injury that a mother going through the turmoil that Fatima was experiencing should have to listen to this response. I feel utterly ashamed of Britain’s handling of this and extend heartfelt condolences to the Khan family.
Cass Witcombe
London

The Electoral Commission report on voting fraud is a cop-out (Voter proof of identity should be mandatory – election watchdog, 8 January). Postal voting is inherently insecure, as the Victorians recognised when they brought in secret voting with the 1872 Ballot Act. Absent voting fraud is more widespread than they or the political establishment are prepared to admit. While it is most prevalent in communities of south Asian origin, it is not confined to them. Stopping party workers from handling postal votes is right, but it will not stop the fraud – who can define which members of extended families or friends of candidates are “party workers”? How many staff in old people’s homes are “party workers”? At the very least, postal votes should again be restricted to people who have sound reasons for not being able to go to the polling station, and proxy votes should be restricted to people who are likely to be out of the country on polling day.What is happening now in too many places (including where I live in east Lancashire) is a travesty of democracy and the proposals by the Electoral Commission do no more than play around the edges.
Tony Greaves
Liberal Democrat, House of Lords
• Your leader (8 January) highlights some of the challenges to democracy arising in a changing and transient society. Even if all the issues surrounding non-registration (especially among the under-25s) and ID were resolved, there remains an underlying question: who should be on the roll in the first place? The validity of the electoral register is fundamental to the integrity of our democratic system, so it is vital that the rationale underpinning its composition is sound.
Currently, citizens of the former empire are entitled to vote in a general election if resident in the UK. This quaint legislation excludes approximately 1.5 million recent economic migrants from the EU, who also, coincidentally, tend to be in the younger age group. Such discrimination would be unacceptable in any other sphere of European influence. Above all, by disenfranchising certain categories in our society, we are limiting that direct accountability which would inhibit the government from continuing to target the least settled and most impoverished in the UK.
Dr Mark Ellis
Huddersfield
• Fraud exists in all electoral systems and the easier it is made to let people vote, the easier does fraud become and, paradoxically, the less fraud is likely to affect the result. The converse also applies. Dealing with this problem by the route of voter ID is technically complex and politically explosive, even with a national ID system, which we do not have. The likely impact is to deter people from voting and so to weaken democracy, as the fewer people vote, the less legitimate is the outcome and the easier it is to fix results, which is what the EC is trying to avoid by suggesting voter ID. Ironic, really. As with many measures to prevent fraud, this one is likely to burden the innocent without touching the corrupt.
The real problem seems to be voter disillusionment with the political parties and the process of government. It is the restoration of faith in our politics that is needed, so that people turn out to vote, thereby reducing the impact of fraud, rather than tinkering about with voter ID which will only tend to make the problem worse.
Roy Boffy
Walsall, West Midlands
• Do you think that by the 2020s, we might decide to abandon marking pieces of paper with a pencil on a string?
Phil Woodford
Twickenham, Middlesex

David Lammy is right to be concerned about police accountability (Suspicion will continue, 8 January). The death of Mark Duggan is one of a number of fatal shootings by police that have raised profound concerns about operational planning and intelligence failings in firearms operations, where the use of lethal force has been disproportionate to the risks posed and where the safety of the public was put at risk. Despite a pattern of cases raising similar issues, the police have hidden behind protracted legal processes, done the bare minimum to co-operate with investigations and refused to admit wrongdoing.
There is widespread frustration, anger and high levels of community consciousness about the lack of accountability after deaths following contact with the police. The misinformation, lies and mistreatment of the Duggan family, and the perception that the police can act with impunity, were at the root of the widespread disturbances around the country that followed his death. Public confidence in the justice system can only be restored if the law is seen to apply equally to all.
Despite more than 1,000 deaths in police custody, or as a result of police shootings, since 1990, and 10 unlawful killing rulings in inquiries or inquests, there have been no successful prosecutions of police officers of which we are aware, either at an individual or corporate level. This finding calls into question whether or not families of those who die following the use of force will ever find justice and accountability in the current system.
Deborah Coles and Helen Shaw
Co-directors, Inquest
• Assistant commissioner Mark Rowley says the officer who killed Mark Duggan had “an honest and reasonable belief” that Duggan was holding a gun when he shot him. The officer may well have had such an honest belief, but it is not so clear that the belief was a reasonable one in the circumstances, and this may explain some of the incomprehension that the verdict has caused. The law in relation to rape was changed 10 years ago to require defendants to establish that their belief in the victim’s consent was held both honestly and reasonably. The law in relation to self-defence in cases of homicide seems in similar need of reform.
In circumstances like the Duggan case, where an officer may have acted on an honest, but not necessarily a reasonable belief, this would mean that the options available would include a verdict of unlawful killing on grounds of manslaughter. That option should be open in cases that raise such public disquiet, where the current verdict of lawful killing appears instead to be provocative.
Peter Gore
Wigan
• You question in your leader (9 January) whether, after numerous failures, the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) is up to its task of delivering proper accountability of the conduct of the police. You may well be right but, if anyone is to achieve it, there is surely no one better qualified than its present chair, Anne Owers, who has been in post for less than two years. She has an unrivalled reputation for independence of mind, having had a distinguished career across the board in running a string of public organisations central to the role of the IPCC – the Joint Council for Welfare of Immigrants followed by the independent human rights body Justice and then as our chief inspector of prisons. She should be charged by the government with recommending the reforms, legislative and otherwise, that she considers are needed to ensure that the public can have complete confidence in the body she chairs.
Benedict Birnberg
London
• As well as very serious issues about policing, Tottenham also has the highest unemployment in London and increasing numbers of people using food banks and night shelters. There is a lack of economic and social justice, and people feel that their voice is not heard. That is one reason why people have rioted, but there are other ways of making the point which have a more lasting impact.
Before Christmas cleaners at Tottenham College, members of the GMB union, won their campaign for the London living wage. Investment in decently paid jobs is one way that the powers that be can show respect for the area and allow people to regain their dignity which, as the shooting of Mark Duggan underlined, too few in high places have given a damn about.
Keith Flett
Secretary, Haringey Trades Union Council
• The verdict in the Mark Duggan inquest illustrates the two-tribes nature of modern Britain. Although a mixed-race jury was expected to show impartiality, the coroner’s instructions so confused it that a perverse contradictory verdict was returned, ie that an unarmed man could somehow be lawfully killed. Meanwhile, mainly white police forces have failed to enforce the law impartially despite several high-profile inquiries which found discriminatory policing following the Brixton and Broadwater Farm riots and the botched Stephen Lawrence investigation. Until the police reform these failures, black and Asian people will continue to suffer second-class human rights.
Bruce Whitehead
South Queensferry, West Lothian
• This week saw the outcome of the inquest into the suicide of David Rathband (Report, 9 January), a police officer who was shot while on duty by Raoul Moat. The lives of David and of his family and friends had been turned upside down. On Wednesday, a jury returned a verdict of lawful killing by a police officer of Mark Duggan. Whether or not a gun was in his hand at the time of being shot, if Duggan possessed an illegal firearm then it wasn’t with the intention of playing Santa Claus. The behaviour of his family and friends on learning the verdict was in stark contrast to the quiet dignity and grace of Doreen Lawrence. Our police force don’t always get it right but the majority of the general public are grateful for the service which they give to us.
Caroline Edwardson
Newcastle upon Tyne
• So anyone suspected of carrying a gun may be shot and killed by armed police? When was this law passed?
Bridget Craig
Ashurst, Hampshire
• In the light of the Mark Duggan inquest verdict, it could be instructive to compare that fatal event to another, more recent London police shooting: the wounding and arrest of the two assailants of Lee Rigby. In both cases, the police had some warning and time to prepare – in the Duggan case hours or maybe even days; in the Rigby case less than half an hour. In the Duggan case there was a single target, compared to two with the Rigby attack, but there were twice as many police at the former than the latter. When confronted by police, Duggan got out of a taxi and stepped onto the pavement, may be armed. In the Rigby case, at least one of the assailants ran full tilt at the police, carrying a gun and a knife while the other was holding a machete. In the Duggan case, police fired twice, hitting Duggan in the arm and chest. In the Rigby case, police fired five or six times, hitting the two assailants in the legs. Any further inquiry by the IPCC or others should concentrate, among other things, on why these two police responses were so significantly different.
John Holme
London
• Whatever the jury’s conclusions in the Mark Duggan inquest, there remains a significant question mark over the training of the gun specialists in the police force. On several occasions in recent years we have seen unarmed people who were shot simply because the officers were informed that, whatever the truth, the person was “armed and dangerous”. This leads to a fear within the wider community that the mere suggestion that somebody has a weapon becomes a de-facto death sentence; the officers involved always being able to claim they were in fear of their life. Do we have to wait until the police find themselves being recruited as accidental assassins in gang turf wars before they reform a “shoot-first, ask-questions-later” training regime obviously more suited to a war zone than a civilian policing situation?
Helen Waldie
Brentwood, Essex
• It is catastrophic that an inquest jury has accepted the “honest belief” defence of the police in the killing of Mr Duggan in 2011. The honest belief defence would not be available to members of the public and the consequence now is that a different law applies to the police and to the rest of us. That is bad for us and for the police, and the government needs to pass legislation quickly to remove the possibility of the honest belief defence being available again to the police.
Stirling Smith
Bolton
• I find it incomprehensible how many people are willing to blindly support the police following this decision. The decision is predicated on the belief that the police are fundamentally honest despite, time after time, being proven to be consummate liars and particularly expert at abusing their power to manipulate the legal and complaints process and otherwise “institutionally corrupt” supported by a “dysfunctional and corrupt” complaints system. I refer people to, inter alia, the findings of parliament’s public administration and home affairs select committees.
The only result of numerous miscarriages of justice and the exposing of systemic and systematic corruption in the police is the police’s ability to be media conscious while becoming more unscrupulous, more deceitful and more corrupt.
Mark Bill
Liverpool

Naomi Wilkinson was a brilliant and individual talent. I first worked with her in 2007, having always remembered her extraordinary design for Happy Birthday, Mister Deka D for Told By an Idiot at the Traverse in Edinburgh in 1999. In the many shows we worked on together, she had a strong sense of needing to create a striking but deceptively simple space for the play; always wanting to support and enhance the text and its messages. This aesthetic and way of working served her well as she moved more into creating designs for contemporary dance.
Her designs for sets and costumes were often bold and provocative – I loved the work she did with Wayne Jordan at the Abbey in Dublin – and she often forced me to think differently and bravely about how a design could work – whether it was a shallow pool full of floating books for Nasty, Brutish and Short at the Traverse in 2008 or the giant staircase that was the backdrop to her design for Peer Gynt at Dundee and the Barbican for the National Theatre of Scotland.
She was inspired by art, experimental artists, sculpture and photography. She was endlessly curious about theatre and the visual arts. She had a huge knowledge of European theatre-makers and was always off to the Barbican to watch shows or to art or photography galleries. Her studio was a beautiful, minimal, calm white space where we spent many hours hunched over model boxes.
Naomi had a strong sense of who she was and what she wanted to do as a designer. She worked only on what she believed in and on projects to which she thought she could bring something. She was an artist, a collaborator, a wonderful friend, and a witty and modest person.

Independent:

Like the riots that followed his shooting, this week’s Mark Duggan verdict has exposed Britain’s deep racial fault lines. While many white people find the level of black fury startling, many in the black population find this incomprehension still more infuriating.
The crux of the Duggan inquest focused on legalistic definitions of “lawful killing” but the anger felt on the streets of Tottenham and beyond flows from a deep sense of injustice fuelled by black Britons’ experience of discrimination.
Stefan Simanowitz
London NW3
Mob rule is never a pleasant sight. It was not pleasant when we saw it on our TV screens in the summer of 2011 and I guess it wasn’t very agreeable for the court staff in the Duggan case .
Anarchy in any society lies just below the surface. All that protects the ordinary citizen are the forces of law and order. These of course include the police and the courts.
For this reason everyone can and should be expected to co-operate with them and offer proper respect. If misdemeanours by these bodies are suspected, they should be properly investigated. Clearly in this case they were, and that, subject to any proper appeal, should be the end of the matter.
Andrew McLuskey
Staines, Middlesex
The Mayor of London has said: “Londoners should feel assured that the police do an incredible job keeping this city safe.”
If one’s safety is dependent on the law sanctioning extra-judicial killings, then how safe are Londoners in reality? How safe were the people of Berlin while being policed by the Gestapo or the Stasi? I would suggest that one’s safety in all those cases is a secondary concern, outweighed by the right not to be killed in cold blood by an unaccountable arm of the state.
Paul Tyler
Canvey Island, Essex
A way to beat climate change
Let’s hope that your article on climate (8 January) doesn’t condemn geo-engineering in principle. Putting reflective particles into the atmosphere is just one idea; there are many others, as described in the Royal Society’s 2009 publication Geo-engineering the Climate.
Probably the best idea is to extract carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere, just as trees and other green plants, do naturally. The fundamental cause of global warming (which in turn is increasing the incidence of violent weather) is the steady accumulation of greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide, in the atmosphere, caused primarily by burning fossil fuels. But if carbon dioxide can be extracted from the atmosphere faster than it is put it, then the quantity in the atmosphere reduces. This will then stabilise the climate.
Developing the technologies for “artificial trees”, and then deploying the results on the required scale, presents a prodigious scientific and engineering challenge. But not an impossible one. It’s just a matter of resourcing and organisation. Do we need even more devastating floods to put this at the top of the Government’s scientific agenda?
Dennis Sherwood
Exton, Rutland
Your report that the Government and shale gas firms are considering increasing payments to communities living near fracking sites (9 January) indicates that the industry is losing the battle at the local level.
People are rightly concerned about the impacts of fracking, while the benefits of shale gas have been greatly exaggerated and experts warn that it won’t lead to cheaper UK fuel bills.
With the urgent need to decarbonise the UK economy, ministers should be investing in clean power and energy efficiency, not dangling financial sweeteners in front of communities to persuade them to accept a risky technology that will keep the nation hooked on climate-changing fossil fuels.
Tony Bosworth
Energy Campaigner
Friends of the Earth
London N1
French day of glory in 1918
Nigel Farage considers that it was the British, led by Field Marshal Douglas Haig, “that defeated the Germans in 1918”, in contrast to the French, who “showed little innovation and made repeated and costly mistakes” (6 January). The supreme allied commander, Generalissimo Ferdinand Foch, is not even deemed worthy of mention. Farage might have been acquitted of chauvinism for this, if it accorded with the facts; but it does not.
The tide of the First World War turned in the second half of July 1918, when hundreds of Renault light tanks, with futuristic swivel turrets, spearheaded a counter attack against the last German offensive near Soissons, at their recently taken Marne bridgehead. The tanks were supported by infantry divisions from Yorkshire, the Scottish Highlands, and the US, who had been seconded to French command, to make good the appalling French losses. Before the battle, it looked like the Germans were about to drive a wedge between the British and French armies and advance on Paris. Afterwards, they never had a victorious day.
David Hamilton
Leith, Edinburgh

Michael Gove should look again at the propaganda posters which appeared everywhere in the early days of the First World War, attempting to shame men into volunteering, and which led to men who were not in uniform being vilified.
Maybe it was the poster “Women of Britain say -GO” which led my young, uneducated, apparently flirtatious, working-class aunt to go up to a man in the street and give him that symbol of cowardice, a white feather. When I asked her years afterwards why she had done it she said that they didn’t know what they were sending men to. After her oldest brother, “Our Jim”, was killed, she certainly did.
And how many children by the end of the  war were unable  to ask the question posed by the little girl in the poster sitting on her father’s knee: “Daddy what did YOU do in the Great War?”
Gillian Spencer
Bolton, Greater Manchester

I’ve no great love for Michael Gove, but views expressed by some of your readers (and Robert Fisk) don’t deserve much respect either. Long on rant and condemnation and very short on what the writers would have done if they’d found themselves in one of the hot seats at the time.
All I can infer from them is that in 1914 they’d have urged the Belgians and French just to hand over their countries promptly to Germany to save all the bother. It would have saved a lot of lives, but do they stand by the consequences?
How easy to jeer and be wise 100 years after the event.
John Tippler
Spalding, Lincolnshire
Having read lots of articles, comments and letters, I’m afraid I still don’t quite understand why Britain so determinedly wants to celebrate the beginning of a world war, and not the end of this particular occasion of death, misery and destruction.
Sonja Karl
Bangor, Gwynedd
Flood of misused language
Why do rivers “burst their banks”?
According to the Oxford Dictionary, the main meaning of the verb “to burst” is “to break suddenly, snap, crack, under violent pressure, strain, or concussion. Chiefly said of things possessing considerable capacity for resistance and breaking with loud noise.” This in no sense describes what happens when a river floods its banks, which is in my view a far better description than “burst”.
If rivers had been bursting at the rate claimed over the past few weeks, surely there would be mud, debris, rubble and the remains of many sheep and cattle splattered all over the West Country towns close to the Severn.
Chris Sexton
Crowthorne, Berkshire
Parts of the Close in Salisbury are flooded, so the Conservative candidate in today’s ward by-election left a pile of his leaflets in the Portaloos.
Ron Johnston
Salisbury
Siren voice from the left
As a Tory voter, I am becoming increasingly alarmed at my constant agreement with the views of Owen Jones. This time it was his criticism of the TV programme Benefits Street. Before that it was Uruguay’s drugs policy. And so on.
Can’t you find a right-wing columnist as articulate as Mr Jones who can persuade me not to question my voting habits? Just, you know, for balance.
Mike Park
London SE9
Cameron crazy about Mandarin
David Cameron comes out with a crackpot idea, children to learn Mandarin (which at the time was politically adroit), and you embellish it (“Pupils set the pace with a love for Mandarin”, 27 December). Are our streets not filled with scores of English-speaking Chinese? And as for denigrating French and German, their literature is far more interesting for the western mind.
Dr E Nigel Wardle

Times:

Sir, There are other factors to support Danny Finkelstein’s call for a separate NHS tax (Opinion, Jan 8). We should use the national insurance system to begin negotiating a new tax contract with voters. Welfare and health bills will increase for the reasons Finkelstein lists. Taxpayers are rightly wary of government taking even more of their earnings and spending the results as it wishes. Hence the need for a new tax contract.
I set out how this might be done in Working Welfare: Contributory Benefits, the Moral Economy and the New Politics (Politeia 2013). Here the main aspects of welfare are given over to a newly created mutual whose boards would set the levels of benefits only after winning approval from members to set the contribution levels.
A similar discipline should be introduced by establishing a NHS mutual. Each year’s negotiations would bring home forcibly that improvements in the health service must be won by increasing productivity, but also, probably, by increasing contributions. The mutual would therefore introduce what is lacking at the moment, namely, a clear link between services provided and the level of contributions required.
Of course Finkelstein is right in outlining Treasury opposition, but it is time we moved beyond this. A mutualisation of welfare would allow a transition to take place from the old command economy, which we have at present, to a new welfare state where the contributors are very much in charge. It would also signal a movement from a something for nothing welfare state, which is increasingly opposed by voters, to one where entitlement is based on past contributions, a clear residency test, and by the functions individuals undertake which the community wishes to reward by membership.
Frank Field, MP
House of Commons
Sir, Danny Finkelstein’s proposal to contain NHS costs repeats a number of myths and overlooks the complexity of health care funding. The claim by Liam Fox that the idea of increasing NHS funding has been tested to destruction cannot be reconciled with the observation that, even now, we still spend much less on health care than many other countries or with our finding that the increased spending by the last government after 1999 was associated with a clear acceleration in the reduction in deaths amenable to health care, the government’s measure of performance. The claim that productivity fell has been rebutted, noting numerous data problems and a failure to include intangible elements of care. Our research shows that judicious health spending can increase economic growth, putting money in pockets of low paid staff.
However, it is the call for a hypothecated tax that is most problematic. The Treasury has long rejected such measures for good reasons. Health spending is counter-cyclical, with need increasing in a downturn just as tax revenues are also falling. And on what should this tax be levied? Will it be income, spending, capital gains, import duties or something else? Will it be levied on individuals or families? Will contribution be linked to entitlement? All of these questions raise major distributional issues. If it was so easy, perhaps this idea might have been implemented before.
Professor Martin Mckee
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Sir, Charles Pugh reports “aggressive and frequently baseless attempts to upgrade walking routes to bridleways” (letter, Jan 6) My experience over 40 years in the north, south and east of England has been very different, and I know of no tribunal against owners in contravention of law.
The maps drawn up after the 1949 Act omitted, or entered as only footpath, many bridleways and old lanes which had been public. We now have only a few more years to try to get the record right. We don’t win them all, but getting a case to public inquiry involves laborious research into use, history and law and we do not waste time on ill-founded claims or routes with no useful purpose.
Once a route is established there is no reason why some element of diversion should not be agreed. I am also a landowner, have kept suckler cattle on land crossed by rights of way and would have been glad of a temporary diversion. And I would willingly agree any reasonable diversion out of farmyards and private gardens, but it is important that the appropriate users are consulted. What I am unwilling to accept is barring of the public from the little old lanes which define the English landscape and connect us with our history.
Elizabeth Kirk
Trustee, Byways and Bridleways Trust, York
Sir, Farmers maintaining footpaths (letter Jan 7)? My experience of well over 40 years is that farmers do the opposite: ploughed footpaths, barbed wire, cattle troughs across paths, bulls frightening walkers, intimidating behaviour. The list is endless.
Peter Barrett
London SW19

Sir, So, NICE, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence advises men with low and medium-risk prostate cancer to wait . . . and sweat (“Men told to wait before prostate treatment”, Jan 8).
Surely it is time for people to be told the likely benefits of a small daily dose of aspirin upon cancer. Over the past seven years evidence of a reduction in incident cancer by low-dose aspirin has accumulated, together with evidence that patients with certain cancers who take aspirin show a reduction in metastatic spread and an increase in survival.
Consistent evidence from long-term follow-up studies of subjects who had been randomly allocated daily aspirin show about a 30 per cent reduction in the total incidence of cancer. This evidence is convincing for all cancer.
In observational studies of patients with cancer who take aspirin additional to conventional therapy, there is evidence of a small reduction in metastatic spread, together with an increase in survival. While evidence on these benefits from randomised trials is awaited, the present evidence is highly suggestive for several of the more common cancers.
Professor Peter Elwood
Cochrane Institute, Cardiff University
Sir, You report on new guidance by NICE concerning more “active surveillance” for prostate cancer. Last year I was successfully treated for this condition. Doctors told me I was at an “intermediate” stage in this disease; neither clearly malignant nor benign cancer. I opted for “active surveillance” and not treatment. However, I found the stress of knowing I had cancer but not having it sorted intolerable. Being told that many people have prostate cancer but will not die of it was entirely unhelpful. So I finally opted for intervention. This was successful and with few side effects. The advice from NICE should not ignore the important element of patient choice and well being. The need for constant tests and the anxiety that it causes should not be underestimated.
Until we get more research and better treatments (well done to The Times for the Christmas appeal for Prostate Cancer UK), a policy of encouraging more “active surveillance” rather than treatment will not work.
Sir Stephen Bubb
London N1

Sir, You reported (“Amid a knot of red tape, the great potash rush is on”, Dec 28) that there is a presumption against development in National Parks. In fact 90 per cent of planning applications in the North York Moors National Park are approved. Really big developments are different and are subject, rightly, to closer scrutiny.
There are considerable technical issues involved in proposing the world’s largest potash mine in an area which supplies drinking water, has narrow country roads, hosts protected wildlife and is also stunningly beautiful. If the National Park is to determine this application we will assess it objectively, on its merits (which are potentially considerable) and with the help of experts.
Jim Bailey
North York Moors National Park Authority

Sir, Apropos the letter from Iain MacMaster (Jan 8), my great-uncle, Maj-Gen Edward Feetham, of the Berkshire Regiment, was one of those 48 generals who perished on the front line in the Great War. His portrait hangs in this house. Soon after he was killed, his widow, Beatrix, wrote to her brother-in-law: “He was very brave in that last horrible attack. To have in fact been leading his men himself and wearing his red cap so that they should see him and they did and his Division saved a very serious situation.”
This is presumably the official version that was given to the family. The records at the Imperial War Museum reveals that “he was hit in the neck and killed by a shell fragment while walking up the main st. of Demuin with his G.S.O.”
Is it fair to ask how accurate is the information that may be given to bereaved families in scenarios of modern warfare and what is best, overall, for society?
Dr Alan Lloyd-Smith
Wittersham, Kent

Telegraph:

SIR – I recently rode through Transylvania dressed as Dracula, on a Ural motorbike with a sidecar made of a real coffin. It seems absurd for Britain to fear a mass influx of benefit scroungers.
Romanians are friendly, hard-working people who seem happy to be living in their beautiful country.
Some of the young people I met expressed an interest in working in Britain to perfect their English and gain career experience, but they were graduates and would benefit any business that took them on.
The Roma represent 3.3 per cent of the population. Those we encountered were friendly and nothing like the pickpocketing Roma plaguing London’s tourist hotspots.
Nick Cunningham
London W3

SIR – Philip Johnston points out how our adversarial justice system can prove brutal for witnesses.
A “Continental inquisitorial approach” would reduce and probably remove the potential for victims of sexual offences to be berated in the witness box by defence counsel. This could have two beneficial effects. First, it could encourage more victims to report these crimes to the police, as they will know that they will not face aggressive cross-examination where their behaviour and character is put under scrutiny rather than that of the accused. Second, it may help raise the woefully low conviction rate for this type of offence.
Niall Garvie
Bromley, Kent
Televised debates
Related Articles
Repairing electronic equipment requires expertise – we cannot all do it
09 Jan 2014
No wonder Romanians haven’t rushed to Britain
09 Jan 2014
SIR – A televised election debate in 2015 would be no more appropriate than it was in 2010. Voters would much rather go along to a hustings of their candidates for Parliament and then make up their minds.
We are a parliamentary democracy, not a presidential system. One can’t be prime minister without being an MP. That equalising element is crucial to British parliamentary democracy.
John Barstow
Fittleworth, West Sussex
SIR – David Cameron must regret agreeing to the three-party election debates in 2010 – especially the “I agree with Nick” one. This probably contributed to the Conservatives’ failure to gain an outright victory.
However, the public will expect a televised debate in 2015 and this should include the leader of Ukip.
Edward Huxley
Thorpe, Surrey
Minimum unit pricing
SIR – Raising the price of alcohol to reduce consumption will affect those who drink responsibly, but will not stop binge drinkers, who will cut budgets elsewhere to sustain their habits.
The solution lies in restoring responsibility to the individual by making him or her pay for A&E and hospital visits, or treatments associated with excessive drinking.
James A Paton
Billericay, Essex
Orwellian SNP
SIR – The Scottish National Party is proposing that every child in Scotland has a state-appointed “guardian” to monitor their “wellbeing” up to the age of 18. Quite what “wellbeing” may be is a subjective matter and may run contrary to what the child’s parents understand by the term.
As the SNP controls every committee in the Scottish Parliament and has an overall majority, this terrifyingly Orwellian Bill is certain to become law.
Is it not time that the House of Lords became involved in reviewing Acts passed by the Scottish Parliament?
A H N Gray
Edinburgh
Cutting prices
SIR – I was shocked by the news that the Prime Minister’s hairdresser has received an MBE, particularly when I heard that he charged £90.
In upmarket Bramhall I get my hair cut for under £10 (pensioners’ rate), while receiving a thorough overview of the world situation and how to solve its problems.
Sid Davies
Bramhall, Cheshire
First World War causes
SIR – Wars do not happen by accident. Someone has to order armies to mobilise and fight. Hence my sympathy with Boris Johnson’s attitude that “Germany started the Great War”.
On the other hand, historical research has undermined his view. Austria-Hungary was determined to start a war (even a world war) and would not accept any compromise with Serbia. Germany did offer her complete support but probably believed that hostilities could be localised, especially if Austria acted quickly. This proved impossible and, in the meantime, Russia decided to back Serbia and mobilised her forces (at first in collusion with the French), thus forcing the Germans to unleash the Schlieffen Plan.
From this point all the worst elements in German militarism became visible. The British who, thanks to the Tories, would have joined the war anyway (whether Belgium had been invaded or not), were arguably deceived by their French and Russian allies. The regicide regime in Serbia had in any case set the whole catastrophe in motion by murdering a peace-loving archduke.
So how do we distribute blame? Had Germany refused Austria support, there would have been no war. Had Austria taken a more level-headed view of her own interests, there would have been no war. Had Russia refused to back Serbia, there might only have been a Balkan war. Had France not backed Russia, there would have been no war. Had the Tories not backed Asquith and Grey, Liberal Britain might have stayed out.
In the end, it looks a little bit like Murder on the Orient Express: everyone contributed to starting the war or making it a world war. Every power rationalised its own interests – and all of them, arguably, got it wrong.
Professor Alan Sked
London School of Economics
Mnemonic myth
SIR – Cabal may well be a useful mnemonic for the names of a council of intriguers who were politically active between 1667-1673, but it is time to lay to rest the hoary myth that the word cabal is derived from this source.
Cabal was a term often applied in the 17th century to describe a group of the king’s closest advisers. It comes from the Hebrew cabbala and, although the coincidence was noted at the time, the initial letters of the surnames concerned did not give rise to the word itself.
Nicholas Young
Ealing, Middlesex
How to quench your thirst during Dry January
SIR – May I suggest to Sandra Woods, who is from the lovely spa town of Harrogate, that during her Dry January she sticks to what the French call Château-la-Pompe, or tap water? After all, Harrogate water is bottled and sold all over the country. How lucky she is to get it free.
Jane O’Nions
Sevenoaks, Kent
SIR – Sandra Woods should try some green tea with her meal. It refreshes the palate in similar fashion to the tannins in wine.
Note that green tea should be made with water at around 85C to prevent bitterness. I prefer a pinch of a loose green tea (such as gunpowder) to a teabag, since teabags contain too much tea for my liking. A splash of cold water added just after boiling helps achieve the right temperature.
Jim Makin
Petersfield, Hampshire
SIR – A squeeze of fresh lime and a few drops of Angostura bitters in a cocktail glass filled with sparkling water on the rocks is a remarkably satisfying alternative when the cravings set in.
Elizabeth Sharp
Faversham, Kent
SIR – Big Tom spiced tomato juice is a splendid replacement for a regular glass of wine with dinner: neither sweet nor fizzy.
Patricia Calder
Carbis Bay, Cornwall
SIR – Ms Woods should try beetroot juice. It looks just like a good red wine in the glass and has health benefits.
Ann Baker
Wilcove, Cornwall
SIR – There is no substitute for wine. Ditch Dry January and sign up to being half-dry forever, simply by not drinking between midnight and midday every day. It works for me.
Nigel Johnson-Hill
South Harting, West Sussex

SIR – Prof David MacKay assumes that everyone knows how to fix a fridge, freezer, microwave, or car. But these pieces of equipment are very sophisticated and, in some cases, require some knowledge of computers. With regard to fridges and freezers, one has to know about coolants, never mind circuitry. My garage has to plug my car into a computer before carrying out mechanical repairs.
David Samuel-Camps
Eastleigh, Hampshire
SIR – Where can we find the experts to repair electrical appliances these days?
I look in vain among the advertisements for plumbers, decorators and other trades.Electricians seem to deal with wiring of premises but not repair of appliances.
Mervyn Bowley
Chester
SIR – My washing machine needs a new bearing, which should cost less than £50 to replace, but the machine is made so that the whole washing drum has to be replaced, costing £180. A new machine, with warranty, costs about £220. Where is the logic in getting my old machine fixed?
Ian Tyler
Marston, Lincolnshire
SIR – Most white goods are designed to last the length of their respective warranties, then to fail. Some appliances are designed not to be taken apart to allow for repair. We, the public, are advised not to attempt to repair electrical or gas appliances.
Ivan Rowland
Belper, Derbyshire
SIR – Over the past 12 months I have been told that my six-year-old washing machine could not be repaired, and neither could my three-month-old combination microwave. What can one do but invest in new equipment?
Pat Sanson
Elton, Cambridgeshire
SIR – Those educated before 1960 were taught how to understand mechanical appliances and how to use tools. Many in those days repaired or rebuilt old cars. The demise of that ethos came when education reduced practical lessons in woodwork and metalwork, and manufacturers built in redundancy to appliances and made DIY repairs difficult and spares expensive.
People under 30 have grown up with a disposable mentality and lack the skills to attempt repairs.
Keith Taylor
Peterchurch, Herefordshire
SIR – We have a 40-year-old freezer, a 35-year-old fridge, a 35-year-old tumble drier, a 30-year-old washing machine and a 30-year-old oven – all in daily use.
They have required little attention and when they have, most spare parts have been available. They do not make them like that today.
Duncan Rayner
Sunningdale, Berkshire

Irish Times:

Sir, – We are just a week into 2014 and already here we have the next assault on the disabled (and now to include elderly people with mobility problems) from this Coalition. You were kind enough to publish my letter (April 12th, 2013) detailing the disgraceful cutting of the overall fund for housing adaptation from €54 million to €35 million for 2013 as announced by Minister for the Environment Phil Hogan at that time. This morning on national radio I heard a Labour Minister of State, Jan O’Sullivan, attempting to spin the allocation of €38 million to the same fund for 2014 as an “increase” in spending in her defence of the latest moving of the goalposts for disabled Irish citizens attempting to access those services which should be theirs as a civil right.
If Ms O’Sullivan thinks that those Irish citizens and voters who are disabled, or care for the disabled or, indeed, who are elderly or have an elderly relative with mobility issues, are naive enough to fall for this kind of crude political guff, she has another think coming. A cut from an already inadequate €53 million to €35 million and then to €38 million is a cut, and a massive cut, pure and simple, and no amount of spin can alter that fact. I suggest all those affected, related to those affected or sympathetic to those affected, make their feelings on this matter clear in the coming local and European elections this year and, indeed, in the national elections in 2016. – Yours, etc,
JONATHAN SHANKEY,
Saint Mary’s Crescent,
Walkinstown,
Dublin 12.
Sir, – I am writing in response to the latest cutbacks to the elderly and disabled (“Grant cuts to make it ‘harder’ for elderly to live at home”, Front Page, January 9th). The cutbacks in funding to local authority housing grants have been announced without any debate and will mean more people being forced against their wishes to access nursing home and hospital accommodation.
This flies in the face of the Government’s desire that people access the health service through primary care services and will end up costing far more money than supporting the elderly and disabled to live in their own homes.
These latest cutbacks follow on from a five-fold increase in medical card charges, cutbacks to home-help support and cutbacks to the medical card scheme itself.
Leaving aside the financial cutbacks, the increased bureaucracy to access State supports such as these is another burden that is becoming even more complicated and difficult to handle. Furthermore, form-filling does not deal adequately with complicated cases, especially family situations.
What is badly needed is the proper planning of resources, so that those that need them most can access them easily. – Yours, etc,
EDWARD MacMANUS,
White’s Road,
Castleknock,
Dublin 15.
Sir, – I was surprised to read that the grant for housing aid for older people has been cut. I thought, as per Wexford County Council’s website, such grants had been suspended “indefinitely”. – Yours, etc,
DEBRA JAMES,
Cummerduff,
Gorey, Co Wexford.
Sir, – I sincerely hope that the wails of the elderly and disabled are not drowned out by the sound of appreciative applause on foot of “Ireland’s successful re-entry into global capital markets”. – Yours, etc,
JD MANGAN,
Stillorgan Road,
Stillorgan,
Co Dublin.

Sir, – The current controversy generated by ex-president Mary McAleese’s comments on her unhappiness at the attitude of “her” church towards homosexual people is being viewed and analysed from the wrong perspective (“McAleese criticises church’s stance on gays”, Front Page, January 8th).
Reasonable and rational people who wish to worship a god may very easily do so without guidance or direction from the Roman Catholic or any other established church.
So rather than expressing displeasure, disappointment or opposition to the teachings and doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church, Mrs McAleese and all thinking people who disagree with it should just leave and live and worship in their own way. If enough people do this then the negative and offensive views of that church will quickly become even more irrelevant than they are already, – Yours, etc,
HUGH PIERCE,
Newtown Road,
Celbridge,
Co Kildare.
Sir, – I was heartened to read Mary McAleese’s comments on the church’s stance on gays. We have made such strides lately on many fronts to come out of the dark ages.
Mrs McAleese was a great president and her stance on this issue is important and welcome. – Yours, etc,
PAT BURKE WALSH,
Ballymoney,
Co Wexford.
Sir, – Mary McAleese’s criticisms of the Catholic Church’s “attitude” towards gay people are misplaced. The church’s attitude towards gay people is the same as its attitude towards all people: they are children of God, blessed with an inherent dignity beyond all measure, and, if they will it, an eternal destiny abiding in God’s love. That is a remarkably affirmative attitude to have of any person (gay or straight) and one, I suggest, unparalleled by any materialist philosophy or secularist ideology.
Our former president also takes exception to the church’s teaching that gay people are “sinners”. Yet sinning is not the preserve of straight people only, the imperfect human condition is a universal reality. The real focus of debate should instead be on specific church teaching concerning sexual ethics. This teaching, only one limb of an entire corpus of ethics on human affairs, judges the morality of various actions and does not distinguish between the dignity of various persons.
Neither gay nor straight persons are predetermined to act with or against any particular aspect of the church’s moral teaching, including sexual ethics.
Whether the church’s sexual (or any other) ethics are reasonable is a distinct matter from the simple fact that it, almost uniquely, teaches as true the equal and inherent dignity of all human beings. The reasonableness or otherwise of the church’s sexual ethics is an important point of debate. But this debate is ill-served by raising extraneous issues such as the number of Catholic clergy who have a homosexual orientation, majority opinion on the matter, or, lest the debate succumb to the fallacy of naturalism, whether homosexual orientation is a matter of genetic predetermination or predisposition. – Yours, etc,
THOMAS FINEGAN,
Willowbrook Park
Celbridge, Co Kildare.

Sir, – Minister for Energy Pat Rabbitte has stated that putting transmission lines underground would cause bills to rise by up to 3 per cent.
On my current electricity bill, the actual cost of electricity is €54.88. But the additional charges (standing charge, public service obligation levy and VAT at 13.5 per cent) add a whopping €37.45, or 69 per cent , to my bill.
In order to alleviate the suggested 3 per cent increase claimed to be necessary to put the transmission lines underground, Mr Rabbitte and all the other Government Ministers and backbenchers should be knocking their heads together to find ways to reduce the current excessive additional charges instead of simply acting as spokesmen for industry. – Yours, etc,
DAVID DORAN
Royal Oak Road,
Bagenalstown,
Co Carlow.
A chara, – There are precedents supporting the routing of electricity transmission underground. The Murraylink is an Australian 180km high-voltage electricity transmission link between Berri in South Australia and Red Cliffs in Victoria which, for environmental protection reasons, is completely underground.
Routing electricity using pylons is quicker and cheaper, but there are no new skills learned in doing so, and environment and scenery are blighted. Whereas there are geological, engineering and cost challenges in routing electricity underground, there are longer-term payoffs in terms of consequently learned engineering expertise which could be marketed abroad, and obviously reduced impacts on environment and scenery.
The question is whether the Government and EirGrid are willing to do what is required to achieve the longer-term payoffs. – Is mise,
NIALL O’DONOGHUE,
Lempaala,
Tampere,
Finland.
Sir, – Ireland has signed and ratified the Aarhus  Convention. Fundamental to this convention is the right of citizens to information and participation in matters relating to their environment. It in the interests of environmental democracy and justice that the plans for the EirGrid system are examined properly with the participation of the local community. – Yours, etc,
JOE MURRAY,
Beggars Bush Court,
Ballsbridge, Dublin 4.

Sir, – The Bileog page provides a great service for struggling Irish speakers like myself who are trying to keep our school knowledge of Irish from rusting over completely.
I was struck by the reference in Deaglán de Bréadún’s article to the Teachers’ Union of Ireland boycott of Israeli academia (“Bagairt an bhaghcait”, Bileog, January 8th).
It seems ironic that the teachers in a country that has struggled for 90 years and largely failed to revive its native language should want to boycott the teachers in a country which has successfully revived its language in the same period.
At the turn of the last century, Hebrew was pretty much a dead language, with its few fluent speakers scattered among the Jewish diaspora and a few in Palestine. But within two generations it had been revived to become the lingua franca of everyday life in Israel.
I am sure the Israeli teachers cannot take all the credit for its revival, no more than the Irish teaching profession should be blamed for the demise of Irish, but I am equally sure that our teachers have a lot to learn from the Israeli experience. Sadly, it now seems that, whatever the secret sauce is, it will remain a mystery to us through our teachers’ boycott. Could our teachers’ union not have found a better way to lend support to the Palestinians? – Yours, etc,
PAUL MILNE,
Dublin Road,
Sutton, Dublin 13.

Sir, – The recent decision to grant planning permission for an enlarged Irish Jewish Museum in the existing small building is as regrettable as it is misguided (“Plans for enlarged Irish Jewish Museum approved”, Home News, December 30th).
This area was the home of Dublin’s Jewish community, but the project, sadly, is not about enhancing what should be a cherished memory. It is a planning debacle that shows exceptional disregard for the local community.
Both Jewish and non-Jewish people, Irish and non-Irish, Dublin and non-Dublin born people have lived together here and shared this part of Dublin 8 for many decades, making it a vibrant part of the city. With suitable larger sites available in the area, there is a dreadful cynicism about the decision to go ahead with such a destructive plan.
Demolishing an old synagogue and most of a terrace, increasing the area six-fold and digging 20 feet into the bedrock of this tiny street shows contempt for both the residents and for the city’s architecture.
To have a Jewish museum of international dimensions in Dublin would be wonderful. It would be a major step forward in recognising and in celebrating Jewish identity in Ireland.
Surely this can be done without destroying a real, living community and tearing apart its streets? – Yours, etc,
Dr JEANNE RIOU,
School of Languages
& Literatur
Sir, – Why all the euphoria about the National Treasury Management Agency’s €3.75 billion bond sale (Front Page, January 8th)? EU banks can borrow from the ECB at 1 per cent and reinvest in Irish government bonds at more than 3 per cent. The fact that the Irish offering was oversubscribed may well be an indicator that the premium was too generous and it was sold too cheaply. We need to get away from misrepresenting our dealings with money lenders as a cause for self-congratulation. These bondholders are much the same cast of kindly characters that we were obliged to repay for their profligate lending to our reckless banks and poorly regulated financial institutions. We have just added another €3.75 billion to the debt burden that our children will be forced to carry. – Yours, etc,
MICHAEL ANDERSON,
Moyclare Close,
Baldoyle, Dublin 13.

Sir, – Dermot Dix in his interview as headmaster of Headfort School (Business, January 8th) states that school facilities include a science lab and that Headfort is thus “one of the few primary schools in Ireland where children do practical science”. In national schools up and down the country children from infants to sixth class are regularly engaging in practical science investigations – mini-beasts are observed, working lighthouses and rockets are constructed, wind speed is recorded, the strength of eggshells is tested. Endless adventures in scientific discovery are organised by energetic and enthusiastic teachers without a lab in sight. This is how young scientists are made. – Yours, etc,
CLARE SHERIDAN,
Ardmore Park,

Sir, – I note that Anglo/IBRC set up lists of certain customers “to ensure that the State-owned bank did not offer nor could be perceived to have offered any of them special treatment” (“No special deals for listed Anglo borrowers, says Dukes”, Front Page, January 7th). However, by setting up the lists, the bank has implicitly given these people special treatment.
There is still a market for the trappings of influence, and people would probably pay for the cachet of being on a list of HPPs (high-profile persons), as certified by a State institution. – Yours, etc,
MIKE NORRIS,
Cabinteely Green,
Dublin 18.

Sir, – It is rare that I agree with views expressed by Gerry Adams TD but his argument that the Oireachtas should abide by normal licensing hours seems irrefutable (“Adams repeats call for Dáil bar regulation”, Home News, January 9th).
Should not those who make the laws also be bound by them?
One could go further and ask why our legislators need access to a steady supply of alcohol in their workplace. Teachers, doctors, dentists, pilots and air traffic controllers, among others, do not have access to alcoholic support during long and arduous working hours.
Admittedly, it may be said that the work of TDs does not involve life-and-death decisions to the same extent as these professions, but can even that argument hold water in the context of, to give one example, the recently debated abortion legislation? – Yours, etc,
EDWARD
MOXON-BROWNE,
Clonfadda,
Killaloe,
Co Clare.

Sir, – I’m afraid Jennifer O’Connell (“Ten phrases we could live without”, Life, January 8th) missed the worst of all: “You know what”. – Yours, etc,
TOM REARDON,
Silverwood Road,
Rathfarnham,
Dublin 14.
Sir, – “Rory McIlroy and Caroline Wozniacki”. – Yours, etc,
OLIVER McGRANE,
Marley Avenue,
Rathfarnham,

Sir, – In relation to articles on maternal sepsis published on January 6th, I wish to clarify that the Rotunda Hospital collects and monitors information and data on maternal and neonatal sepsis. Over the period 2004 to the end of 2012 there were 71 cases of life-threatening maternal sepsis requiring admission to the hospital’s high dependency unit. Data on this topic and others is available in the hospital’s annual clinical report. – Yours, etc,
Dr SAM COULTER-SMITH,
Master,
Rotunda Hospital,
Dublin 1.

Sir, – I see that the criteria for competing to be the next city of culture include an emphasis on a “bottom-up approach which seeks to unite cultural and socio-economic stakeholders” (“Next City of Culture to be ‘informed’ by Limerick experience”, Home News, January 9th). “Bottoms up” to the lucky city in 2018 and whatever you’re havin’ yourself! – Yours, etc,
PATRICK O’BYRNE,
Shandon Crescent,
Phibsborough, Dublin 7.

Irish Independent:

* I write in response to Paul Connolly’s letter (January 9) on the benefits of Europe over the last 30 years. Firstly Ireland joined the EEC on May 10, 1972, which is actually nigh-on 42 years ago.
Also in this section
European project is key to our future
The case for eternal Christmas
Editorial: Pylon problem could be real headache for Kenny
Mr Connolly points to Europe being good for farming. In 1974 the price of cattle completely collapsed and there was no sign of Europe. He contends that farming is now viable for a large section of the population, despite the fact that the number of farmers has nearly halved since the 1970s.
Mr Connolly also points to an Erasmus programme, yet he bemoans the fact that we don’t learn European languages. What is the percentage of all third-level students who have gone on Erasmus?
Emigration? Since we joined the EU we have seen two major phases of emigration in Ireland — the ’80s and now. Yes, the Irish emigrate to the Anglo sphere. What does Mr Connolly suggest; that we emigrate to Spain for work where 350,000 people have emigrated? Should we move to Greece and milk goats? Should we head to Germany, where there’s no minimum wage? Should we emigrate to Portugal, where the markets — apparently the one true barometer in fiscal measurement — say that Ireland’s bonds are a better bet than in Jose Manuel Barroso’s home country?
The rhetoric of Europe is that it provides peace and that war will not break out again within its confines. Where were these great peacemakers during the Troubles?
Where is Europe when it comes to respecting our neutrality with soldiers stationed in Uganda with no UN mandate?
Finally, Mr Connolly points to the Dublin-Galway motorway as a project funded by Europe.
If Mr Connolly took off what may have been his rose-tinted glasses, he may have seen that it was part-funded by Europe.
Mr Connolly might do well to listen to the rhetoric coming out of Europe that claims that the EU is an organisation that is in existence for 40 years.
It couldn’t be, for the Berlin Wall stood for the first 20 of those 40 years.
DERMOT RYAN
ATHENRY, CO GALWAY
ARMY SHOWS COWARDICE
* President Higgins’s Christ-less Christmas address is just one more in a steady stream of his meaningless/ value-free diatribes, as if written by a big brother-inspired committee of PC UN apparatchiks. George Orwell wrote prophetically about such a world in his book ’1984′.
The one redeeming feature of the episode was the initial courage of the Army chaplain in pointing out the absurdity of the speech, undermined by the cowardice of the Defence Forces under fire in issuing a craven apology.
Some secularists are attempting to defend the speech on a spurious appeal to Republican ethics. Nonsense — a republic is defined as a form of government in which power is explicitly vested in the people.
It has nothing to do with imposing secularist dogma, particularly as the majority of the Irish people, 92pc, are Christian. A simple recognition of this in the speech was all that was required, basic good manners really.
ERIC CONWAY
NAVAN, CO MEATH
HIV PUTS LAWS IN CONTEXT
* In the media coverage of Uganda’s new draconian anti-homosexuality laws there has been no mention of the massive and growing HIV/AIDs problem in that country.
Recently, Uganda’s President Museveni publicly took a HIV test to raise awareness of the epidemic among the population. Currently, there are 1.5 million people with HIV in Uganda and one million children orphaned because of AIDs. In all, 7pc of the adult Uganda population are living with HIV.
Like all other African countries, Uganda’s HIV/AIDs epidemic is steadily growing.
How these statistics interplay with the Uganda government’s new laws is a matter for further discussion, but it should at least be addressed as part of the context in which the new legislation is being brought forward.
MARGARET HICKEY
BLARNEY, CO CORK
LOVE THY NEIGHBOUR
* Rob Sadlier is missing something when he says that “we cannot… claim to live in a republic whilst maintaining… overtly religious… references in our Constitution” (Letters, January 9).
Fundamental to a democratic republic is the principle that all citizens are equal. That ideal arises from the religious ethic of love of neighbour. So religious references in our constitution may not be the “incongruities” that Rob Sadlier says.
A LEAVY
SUTTON, DUBLIN 13
FANTASTIC COMPLIMENTS
* All too often it is the hard word that is heard. The following is a brief compilation of some memorable compliments:
“He was my brother; not by blood, but by choice” — Frank Sinatra talking about Dean Martin.
“Meeting Franklin Roosevelt was like opening your first bottle of champagne; knowing him was like drinking it” — Winston Churchill on meeting Roosevelt.
“He was the best ballad singer I ever heard in my life” — Bob Dylan on Liam Clancy of the Clancy Brothers.
“Irish signatures are on our founding documents. Irish blood was spilled on our battlefields. Irish sweat built our great cities.
Our spirit is eternally refreshed by Irish story and Irish song; our public life by the humour and heart and dedication of servants with names like Kennedy and Regan, O’Neill and Moynihan.
So you could say there’s always been a little green behind the red, white and blue behind the American flag” — President Barack O’Bama on the Irish.
BARRY CLIFFORD
CONNEMARA, CO GALWAY
POPE WOULD DISAGREE
* I would like to ask Paddy Power to give odds on whether or not Pope Francis would agree with the ideas in Philip O’Neill’s letter (January 7).
The first big mistake is in thinking that all change comes from the top. I’m sure Pope Francis would be embarrassed to think he was the only hope for the church.
The idea that “all expressions of faith have been taken off course” isn’t based on any evidence whatsoever. Mr O’Neill says, “the country has been in the grip of a very fallible church”, which confuses the doctrine of infallibility. Infallibility doesn’t mean moral perfection, it means guidance in correct teaching, ie doctrine, though I would agree that living according to objective moral norms helps in the reception of faith.
“Christ’s purpose,” he claims with no authoritative sayings of Jesus to back his argument, “was not to create an institution with subservience of its adherents, but to breathe life into the world we all inhabit, releasing the god-given intelligence of humanity.”
I searched Google and I would argue that Mr O’Neill’s reference to Christianity being about “releasing the god-given intelligence of humanity” isn’t mentioned once in scripture or tradition.
Rather Christians are called to faith, which goes beyond reason, but is not and never can be opposed to truth.
Mr O’Neill’s claim that Catholicism could do fine without a “centrally controlling body” is central in his argument.
He even asks why this would not be the case. Nobody would recommend that the State jettisons the Supreme Court and allow each citizen to “thrive on imagination” whilst interpreting the Constitution on an individual basis. It was for similar reasons that Christ started the church, so that it can guide us into the truth.
KEITH KAVANAGH
KNOCK, CO MAYO
Irish Independent


NS&I

$
0
0

11 January 2014 NS&I
I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. The crew of Troutbridge are celebrating the 100th anniversary of Admiral Troutbridge..  Priceless.
Sell Premium bonds to pay for insulation website goes mad and will send me a new password
Scrabble today Mary wins     and gets  well   over   400, nearly 500 in fact   Perhaps I will win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Viktor Sarianidi , who has died aged 84, was a Russian archaeologist who found himself starring in his own Indiana Jones adventure when he unearthed six burial mounds at Tillya Tepe on the plains north of the Turkmenistan mountains in the historical region of Bactria, northern Afghanistan.
The graves — of five women and one man — contained almost 22,000 gold artefacts which had remained undisturbed for more than 2,000 years. Sarianidi made his discovery in 1978 when he was looking for sites from the much earlier Bronze Age.
The identity of the graves’ occupants is disputed. Possibly they were Sakas, a nomadic steppe people known to the ancient Greeks as Scythians, who roamed across huge swathes of Central Asia and had overthrown the Greco-Bactrian empire in the second century BC. In any case, the grave goods testify to the richness of a culture, straddling the Silk Route, which borrowed from the civilisations with which it came into contact, from the Chinese and Indians to the Parthian civilisation of Iran and Greece.
The year 1978 was not the most auspicious for an archaeologist, let alone a Russian archaeologist, to make such a discovery in Afghanistan. The country was sliding towards a civil war sparked by a Soviet-backed communist coup the previous year. In 1979 the Soviet Union would send troops into Afghanistan, initiating a war against the Western-backed Mujahideen which lasted for nine brutal years.
Sarianidi recalled that in the days before the first items were uncovered in late 1978, he and his Afghan workmen had been surprised by a group of armed tribesmen charging towards them on horseback “like sand devils off the desert”. The workmen begged him not to reveal what they had been doing, fearing they might be shot.
Two days later one of the workmen uncovered the 2,000-year-old skeleton of a woman, surrounded by the wealth she was meant to carry with her to the afterlife — crowns, belts, exquisitely moulded robe ornaments, rings and coins. All the artefacts were made of gold, and some were inlaid with precious onyx, turquoise, garnets and lapis lazuli.
In February 1979, as the security situation deteriorated, Sarianidi was forced to leave Afghanistan — but not before he had discovered another five graves containing a staggering quantity of objects, ranging from Parthian coins to clasps decorated with cupids riding dolphins; pendants depicting scenes of war; a statue of the goddess Aphrodite; and, most magnificent of all, a diadem made of five linked trees of gold sheet, hung with dozens of small pendants that shimmered at the slightest vibration.
The objects were placed in paper bags and hastily transferred to the National Museum in Kabul. Sarianidi returned briefly in 1982 to photograph some of them, and in 1985 published a lavishly illustrated book, The Golden Hoard of Bactria. But it was to be another two decades before he saw the treasure again. Meanwhile, a seventh tomb, which he had been forced to abandon, was pillaged.
The discovery made the headlines, but wonder soon gave way to despair as Afghanistan succumbed to Soviet occupation and insurgency, followed by the civil war which ended in the takeover by the Taliban.
During the Soviet occupation, Kabul avoided the destruction unleashed in the countryside, and the treasure remained secure, if rarely seen. But around the time the Russians withdrew in 1988, it disappeared completely from view. There were rumours that it had been spirited away to Moscow, or dispersed and sold by corrupt officials to international art dealers. If any remained, it was later assumed, it had gone the way of other priceless cultural artefacts: destroyed as idolatrous by the Taliban.
The truth was even more extraordinary.
In 1988 staff at the museum decided to transfer much of the collection to the safe-keeping of the then President, Mohammed Najibullah, inside the old royal palace, the Arg (now the Presidential Palace). There it was placed in locked strongboxes and hidden in vaults belonging to Afghanistan’s Central Bank. The multiple keys required to access the vaults and boxes were dispersed among anonymous officials designated as “key-holders”. All agreed to remain silent.
It was not long before Kabul became engulfed in a hurricane of destruction. In 1992 the Najibullah government fell, and an Islamic State of Afghanistan was declared. Kabul became a battlefield, divided between competing militia groups. In 1994 the museum was hit by rocket fire and almost completely destroyed. About 70 per cent of its collections disappeared through looting or destruction.
In 1996 the Taliban took over, and in the years that followed many of the museum staff dispersed, and had to find odd jobs to survive. One senior official sold potatoes in the market. Others fled abroad. There were reports that objects from the museum’s collections were on sale in the souk.
In 2001, following the infamous destruction of the Bamiyan Buddhas, Taliban soldiers ransacked what remained of the museum and its storerooms, smashing anything they considered idolatrous, including 2,500 statues. But there was no sign of the Bactrian gold.
The Taliban made several unsuccessful attempts to penetrate the vault in the Arg palace, but were fobbed off. Remarkably, the key holders kept the secret at great personal risk, even at a time when revealing the whereabouts of the treasure could have bought safe passage for them and their families out of the country. But their silence meant that even after the Taliban were driven from Kabul it seemed to many — Sarianidi included — that the treasure was lost for good.
In 2003, however, President Hamid Karzai announced that several locked museum boxes had been found in a bank vault under the Arg. “We had to go down three elevators under the palace and along a tunnel set with booby traps, then through a door with seven or eight codes all held by different people,” he explained.
Thinking that the boxes might contain the treasure, Fredrik Hiebert, a former student of Sarianidi’s, persuaded National Geographic magazine to send him to Kabul on the off-chance.
There he met the museum’s director, Omara Khan Masoudi, who confirmed that the boxes had been located, though he added that he could not see what was inside as the keys had been lost. But, Masoudi suggested, if Hiebert would agree to prepare a proper inventory of their contents, then he would arrange for the boxes to be opened.
In 2004 Hiebert returned to Kabul with Sarianidi, who had been flown in from Turkmenistan, to watch as a locksmith, armed with a blowtorch and a circular saw, cut open the boxes. The keys had indeed been lost — probably deliberately — but the treasure, still in their bags, appeared to be intact. As the first bag was unwrapped Sarianidi recognised one piece which he had repaired himself a quarter of a century earlier. Afterwards he took Hiebert aside and told him that he had already made an inventory of 22,000 items, in 1978. Now it was Hiebert’s turn. It took a few months; not one item was missing.
After its recovery much of the Bactrian gold circulated the world as part of an extended museum tour. It featured in the British Museum exhibition “Afghanistan: Crossroads of the Ancient World” in 2011, with a share of the proceeds going to the beleaguered National Museum of Kabul.
Viktor Sarianidi was born in Tashkent (now the capital of Uzbekistan) on September 23 1929 to parents of Greek extraction and educated at the state university. He later enrolled at the Institute of Archaeology in Moscow, where he took a Master’s degree in 1961 and later a doctorate. He worked at the Institute throughout his career.
A striking figure who sometimes sported a walrus moustache, Sarianidi worked on many sites in Soviet Central Asia, returning to Moscow only to record his findings and write his books.
In particular he played a major role in broadening understanding of what has become known as the “Oxus Civilisation”, a Bronze Age culture dating to around the time of Stonehenge. His excavations of a series of circular fortified sites in the Dashli area of the Oxus valley revealed that irrigated orchards and fields of barley and wheat had once flourished alongside neatly laid-out towns, revealing a high level of sophistication.
At Gonur Tepe, a Bronze Age site in Turkmenistan, he discovered a palace and temples with fire altars along with evidence of a cult (apparently related to Zoroastrianism) using a drug potion made from poppy, hemp and ephedra.
Viktor Sarianidi’s marriage was dissolved. He is survived by three daughters.
Viktor Sarianidi, born September 23 1929, died December 23 2013

Guardian:
I was glad to see Anne Karpf giving us a positive view of old age, and delighted to see a picture of Maggie Kuhn (Embrace your years, 4 January). I was fortunate to share a house with Maggie, who was an inspiration to me. She had the idea of house-sharing, which should be more widely adopted here. Old people with spare rooms rent them to younger people at a low rate in return for some help with household tasks, which enables them to live independently. It works both ways and young and old learn from each other. My favourite memory of my time with Maggie was going to a piano recital by Mieczyslaw Horzsowski, who was 13 years her senior. It turned out to be his final performance, at the age of 99. If anyone needed proof of the vitality and creativity of old age, that was it.
Rabbi Dr Margaret Jacobi
Birmingham
• 3D printing is now available in over 200 materials, including sugar (boo) and chocolate (hurrah), and now pasta (The shape of things to come, 10 January). While the mind may boggle, think also of the possibilities – school dinners printed with texts, models or formulae for the afternoon lessons, spy thrillers (eat this information), pasta landscapes and mazes to roll the peas round. Perhaps readers can suggest more pasta shapes for special occasions or professions?
Richard Hall
Nottingham
• A country that is prepared to accept “le parking” and “le weekend” for lack of its own terminology, is still compelled by the ancient rules of the Académie to describe the humble spud as “the apple of the earth” (In praise of … the Académie Française, 9 January). Hardly the mark of a sophisticated academy, one might perhaps think.
Colin Newlands
West Malling, Kent
• Does Boris Johnson’s hairdresser deserve a knighthood or an asbo (Michael White’s sketch, 9 January)?
John Doherty
Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire
• Felicity Cloake neglects to mention the Irish version of tattie scones (G2, 9 January): potato bread, aka fadge, a staple of the Irish/Ulster fry. Also delicious filled with apple and called potato apple.
Sharman Finlay
Ballyclare, County Antrim

“It’s a myth that they turned over” (How we made … the Reliant Robin, G2, 7 January). Really? My two-year love affair with a Reliant Robin ended dramatically on a leafy country road in Berkshire one cold winter’s afternoon at the turn of the 1970s when my “plastic pig” suddenly aqua-planed at about 30mph, then somersaulted, ending up in a ditch with me underneath.
My humiliation was complete when another car quickly stopped and I heard the voice of what sounded like a very old lady asking if she could help. More embarrassed than actually injured, I replied “thank you”, at which point she single-handedly managed to flip the three-wheeler back the right way up. When I returned to retrieve the car after briefly popping in for a reviving cuppa with friends nearby, its three wheels had all been nicked.
Quentin Falk
Little Marlow, Buckinghamshire

Emma Freud broaches a topic most of us would rather ignore (How to do a funeral, 4 January). Her guide gives readers some helpful tips on navigating the disorientating reality of funeral planning. For many people, making a funeral meaningful and affordable is one of the most difficult times of their lives. Yet it is made far more traumatic by the cost. At Quaker Social Action our Down to Earth project supports people in funeral poverty who are being plunged into financial difficulty and debt following a death. The severe rise in the cost of dying and the widening gap between costs and available social benefits urgently need addressing. Until then, funeral poverty is set to get far worse.
Heather Kennedy
Funeral poverty officer, Quaker Social Action
• Whether a family is looking for a religious service or a secular ceremony, the role of the minister/officiant is of critical importance. Funeral directors clearly have their role in making practical arrangements, but much more depends on how the minister/officiant liaises with the family over the content of the order of service and conducts it. Few people are confident or emotionally resilient enough to write and deliver a eulogy; they usually need help not only with this, but with other aspects of the service as well. Above all, they instinctively need confidence in someone else who can hold the whole thing together for them.
Rev John Swarbrick
Harrow, Middlesex
• If Emma Freud’s piece had been published a year ago, I would have thought of covering my mother’s coffin with copies of the Guardian. This was the one thing that remained constant in her ever-contracting life: she spent every day reading the paper from cover to cover. But Ms Freud failed to say that you can opt for a funeral with no one officiating, no guests, no eulogy, no programme, just your family remembering whoever has died, for an hour on your own. Emotionally overwhelming, but simple and almost stress-free.
Joanie Speers
London
• There is a DIY option. We organised the funeral of our brother (-in-law) by dealing with the morgue ourselves, buying a cardboard coffin online and decorating it ourselves with our children, writing and printing the order of service, choosing the music on CDs, booking a slot at the crematorium, driving the corpse to the crematorium in our estate car, running the service and, a month later, scattering the ashes and hosting a pub lunch for friends and relatives. It was easier than organising a wedding, and everyone felt involved in giving him an appropriate send-off.
Julia and Stephen Bostock
Crewe, Cheshire

We welcome the announcement of the government’s determination to keep its Care not Custody promise (Hopes mental health nurses in courts will cut reoffending rates, 4 January). However, we note that the initial commitment for delivery of national liaison and diversion services by 2014 will not now be met. For too long people with a mental health need or learning disability, who should be diverted from police stations and courts into treatment or social care, have ended up in prison as a default option, while others are left without the support they need as they continue through the justice process.
High numbers of people in prison have mental health needs, and nearly half of all women in prison and over a fifth of men have attempted suicide at some point in their lives compared with 6% of the general population. The Care not Custody initiative was inspired by the tragic suicide of a young man with schizophrenia in Manchester prison, the son of a WI member.
The Care not Custody Coalition, representing up to 2 million people across the health, social care and justice sectors and wider civic society, was convened in 2011 to support the government in keeping its promise and to hold it to account for effective delivery. While the commitment to fund an extension of liaison and diversion trial sites in police stations and courts and a firm plan to roll out national services by 2017 gives a good foundation for change, this revised timeframe must now be kept.
Marylyn Haines-Evans Public affairs chair, National Federation of Women’s Institutes
Juliet Lyon Director, Prison Reform Trust
Steve Williams Chair, Police Federation of England and Wales
Dr Peter Carter Chief executive and general secretary, Royal College of Nursing
Nicholas Fluck President, The Law Society of England and Wales
Sue Bailey President, Royal College of Psychiatrists
Eoin McLennan-Murray President, Prison Governors Association
Peter McParlin National chairman, Prison Officers Association
Sue Hall Chair, Probation Chiefs Association
Javed Khan Chief executive, Victim Support
Paul Farmer Chief executive, Mind
Laurie Clarke Chief Executive, British Association for Counselling & Psychotherapy
Paul Jenkins Chief executive, Rethink Mental Illness
Sean Duggan Chief executive, Centre for Mental Health
Nigel Lithman Chairman, Criminal Bar Association
Vicki Helyar-Caldwell Director, Criminal Justice Alliance
Sarah Clarke Vice-chair, Training and Accreditation Committee, Advocacy Training Council
Karyn Kirkpatrick Chief executive, Keyring Living Support Network
John Graham Director, Police Foundation
Jackie Russell Director, Women’s Breakout
Chris Bath Chief executive, National Appropriate Adult Network
Rachel Halford Director, Women in Prison
Can modern Britain survive (Comment, 9 January)? The conclusive answer must be no. We are winding up the welfare state, because we have been running the country at a loss for the last 40 years. We cannot produce goods to trade for the commodities we need, so we have been selling off the country to support our standard of living. London is no longer part of Britain. It is increasingly owned by rich foreigners and inhabited by poor foreigners. The overhead of carrying London means our base costs are too high to facilitate balanced trade. London prices Britain out of world markets. The creative energy of England is more concerned with hanging onto its inheritance, than in creating a viable economic environment.
Britain’s politicians just want to get elected, then repeat the trick at the next election. Regional politicians are more concerned with engineering a power base detached from England or London or both, than in running a sustainable economy. English politicians are concerned with driving the inconvenient poor somewhere north of Chipping Norton and forgetting all about them. We haven’t got the will to revive our nation, because so few people want to know. If I’m wrong, where is the motive force pulling the country together?
Martin London
Henllan, Denbighshire
• Martin Kettle says of JB Priestley’s 1934 book English Journey, “someone with real talent should make [the journey] afresh in 2014″. In fact, Beryl Bainbridge made it afresh for BBC Bristol in 1984, to mark the half centenary – with real talent indeed, noting the decay and disparities of the first Thatcher recession. The resulting book is subtitled The Road to Milton Keynes, which Priestley had somehow missed (Beatrix Campbell was doing something similar in 1984, with Wigan Pier Revisited.)
Seven years later Patrick Wright did something similar in A Journey Through Ruins, on the decay and disparities mostly, but not entirely, within London. In 2010 Owen Hatherley produced A Guide to the New Ruins of Great Britain, focused more on architecture, but using it to illustrate the continuing inequalities. You see a theme of titles emerging here. Hatherley’s is the first to cross the borders to Glasgow and Cardiff.
Priestley wondered: “Had we exiled Lancashire and the north-east coast?” A year or so ago newly released government papers showed that simply cutting Liverpool off – to sink or swim – had indeed been suggested in the 1980s. It’s impossible to know whether any of this influenced the 1997 election. It doesn’t seem to have influenced New Labour’s policy-making to any great extent, as they left regeneration to developers and corporations, and even to casinos and 24-hour licenced premises.
It seems New Labour has taken the wind out of the left’s sails. Meanwhile the inequalities grow and are set to be locked in place by perma-austerity. Perhaps a revised English Journey would be a good place to start to acknowledge past failures and to present a radical future manifesto.
Judith Martin
Winchester, Hampshire
• Martin Kettle is one of several southern British commentators who have entered the discussion on the Scottish referendum. He identifies London’s parochial ignorance and lack of interest in any other part of the UK. This gladdens the Yes campaigners in Scotland who can speak of England as that island state within the M25. It suits them to display ignorance of the true nature of Britain. You can only sympathise with those geographically in between who are excluded from the debate. Devolution has worked well in Scotland and Wales. It has given those countries a sense that those who run our education, health, social services etc are closer both physically and emotionally with those to whom the services are provided.
Westminster government is broke and it is time to fix it for all of the UK. Devolution should be offered to all regions in England. After all, federalism works in Germany and the US . Maybe what is needed is a folk group to write a song persuading Northumbrians that “we can still rise now and be a nation again”; and the same again for Wessex and Mercia.
Jerry Williams
Edinburgh

Independent:
The level of misreporting in relation to the UK ISPs’ default on filters is reaching staggering proportions. What a pity it seems the Lib Dems have been taken in by it (“Lib Dems risk ‘pro porn’ label as they oppose internet filters”, 10 January).
Parents like filters, but many found the whole business of setting them up too complicated, so they abandoned the attempt. The new way makes it easier. Thus ISPs are giving parents a real choice, not a theoretical one. It seems to me to be entirely disingenuous for anyone to say they don’t mind parents using filters as long as it’s not too easy for them. If you don’t want to use the filters you can say so with a click of a mouse. What could be simpler?
Last October Ofcom released data showing that 37 per cent of three- to four-year-olds are going online. After the Christmas splurge on new, inexpensive internet-enabled tablets, my guess is that number will be nudging nearer to 50 per cent, and this time next year it will be moving towards the high 80s or 90s. When the Lib Dems say they do not want ISPs to make it easier to use filters, what are they saying to parents? Finger-wagging about always sitting with your child when he or she goes online won’t work. Filters are not perfect but they can help busy parents keep some of the most awful stuff away from their children’s machines. As long as any discovered errors can be quickly rectified, and they can, I don’t see the problem.
The ISPs are planning to spend £25m on a public awareness campaign which, among other things, will explain exactly what filters can do and what they can’t. Everyone should take a breath, and let’s see how this experiment pans out.
John Carr, London NW3, (The writer is a member of the executive board of the UK Council for Child Internet Safety)
Great war generals had to attack
I have little truck with Michael Gove’s comments on the First World War, but feel that many of your letter writers have no real knowledge of the subject. As one of the dwindling number whose fathers fought in that war, I have read much about it.
One correspondent tells us of her aunt “not realising what they were sending men to”; in the first six months, neither did the generals, as the warfare in the trenches was something they had never experienced. Perhaps they should have learnt lessons sooner, but after the slaughter on the Somme they did develop new tactics – tanks, ground-strafing aeroplanes and avoiding mass frontal assaults.
The problem was that the Germans very rarely attacked but sat securely in well-developed defensive positions which we had to attack – otherwise the war would have dragged on indefinitely, with half of France and Belgium occupied and the UK suffering more and more from the U-boat blockade. There was no option but to attack.
If our troops were so badly led, why did they not mutiny like the French and Russians? It was because they were much better treated, with regular periods out of the front line. When America came into the war their generals ignored the lessons ours had learnt and carried out frontal assaults with heavy losses.
Terry Hancock, Cherry Willingham, Lincolnshire
Sean O‘Grady (“Who was to blame for the First World War?” 8 January) is harsh on Sir Edward Grey. It wasn’t him who declared war on Serbia, mobilised armies of millions, or invaded Belgium and France.
If one man can be blamed, look no further than Count Conrad von Hötzendorf, chief of the Austro-Hungarian general staff, who had been desperate to find an excuse to attack Serbia, and who had been assured of German support if Russia came to the aid of her  Serbian client.
Barry Mellor, London N7
TV view of life on benefits
Did Owen Jones actually watch Benefits Street before he wrote his piece (9 January)? The programme he described seemed very unlike the one I watched.
As someone still working in their sixties, I have paid taxes to support the benefits system for over 40 years. Nothing I saw on Benefits Street made me, or seemed designed to make me, regret this use of my money. The inhabitants were not demonised, but were shown as a collection of people with different characters, different lives, different needs. Some were attractive (the man with his 50p business); some were not (the aggressive young shoplifter); but all clearly needed some form of  benefit support.
The “controversy” over the programme seems to have arisen from Twitter and the intervention of smart young journalists down from Oxford and looking for a cause.
Helen Hancock, Birmingham
Wouldn’t it have been interesting to be a fly on the wall in the production meeting for Benefits Street? “OK, we need fighting dogs, people smoking, watching Sky on enormous widescreen televisions” etc, etc.
I can just about remember when Channel 4 made thought-provoking, hard-hitting, intelligent programmes, as was its initial remit. Iain Duncan Smith and friends must be jumping with joy, at such a free party political broadcast for the Conservative Party.
Chris Allcock, Wirksworth, Derbyshire
Owen Jones is absolutely right. The approach of TV to pensioners is more subtle but just as poisonous. Whenever the question of winter fuel allowances or travel passes comes up we get a shot of a group of well-heeled “pensioners” playing golf or bowls before sitting down to refreshments in the clubhouse. Not exactly representative of the average pensioner.
B J Cairns, London N22
Alarming advice for visitors
Last night I was in the departure lounge at Benito Juarez airport waiting for a BA flight to Heathrow when a Mexican on his way by Lufthansa to a Frankfurt trade fair introduced himself. His immediate comment when I said we lived in London was: “How are you dealing with the Muzzies?”
I said mildly that London is perhaps the most cosmopolitan and diverse city in the world, that its many different cultural groups seem to get on pretty well with each other, and that my Muslim acquaintances include a neighbour who is fully involved in mainstream three-party politics.
My new Mexican “friend” then observed that when he was in London a few months ago a policeman took him for an American and advised him very strongly not to visit any of half a dozen named areas in London where he was likely to be killed on the spot, if identified.
Do you suppose Boris, or Theresa, or  Commissioner Hogan-Howe, or even the Border Agency, is responsible for disseminating this kind of helpful advice to selected overseas visitors?
John Mann, London NW2
Celebrity MP in a swimsuit
Your article entitled “MP makes waves with part in Splash!” (9 January) claims that Penny Mordaunt MP is “facing criticism after announcing that she is to strip to her swimsuit and take part in the ITV celebrity diving show”, with the clear implication that she is being criticised for sexualising herself. The report also refers to her (three-year-old) status as “sexiest female parliamentarian”.
However, the only criticism quoted is for allegedly neglecting her constituency by “appearing in an entertainment show”.
Ms Mordaunt is far from being the only female politician to be forced to wear her sexuality like an albatross around her neck, as every single time that Mara Carfagna is mentioned in your paper her name is prefaced with the description “former topless model”.
Eoghan Lavery, Norwich
Met’s history of sick leave
Your report exposing “endemic corruption” at Scotland Yard (10 January) could explain why the Met adopted such an obviously lax approach to the management of sick leave during the 1980s and 1990s.
This failure to control such a drain on resources camouflaged the significant number of flawed officers who should have faced disciplinary charges or more but were allowed to retire on ill-health pensions which entailed lengthy periods of sick leave prior to the retirement.
The Metropolitan Police Commissioner in his 1986 annual report boasted that the 15 days average annual sick leave taken by his officers compared favourably with that of  other forces.
When I recently used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain the latest statistic I was told it was now down to about seven days. The management tools used to achieve this remarkable reduction could probably have been used 20 years ago.
John Kenny, Acle,  Norfolk
A cut above the rest
Does Boris Johnson’s hairdresser deserve a knighthood or an Asbo?
John Doherty, Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire

Times:

Sir, The Health Secretary, when confronted with today’s epidemic of obesity (Jan 7), suggests that the solution is that individuals should engage in “national soul searching” and take more responsibility for their diet. This response is reminiscent of statements made by his former colleagues in relation to tobacco — that if people simply stopped smoking cigarettes then the health-related problems associated with tobacco would go away.
There are many similarities between tobacco consumption and diets characterised by an increase in energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods, high in saturated fat, salt and sugars. Essentially, both have been intensively promoted and marketed by international companies whose goals are profit rather than health. In the case of the food industry, advertising campaigns, many directed at the most vulnerable members of our society — our children and those economically deprived — aim to promote these products, often misguidedly, as healthy (breakfast cereals are a classic example). And their association with national and international sporting events (in the case of sugar-containing drinks and sports supplements) is designed to give these products a health credibility which they do not have.
We can place the responsibility for change in diet and lifestyle on the individual; we can invite the food industry to participate in discussions to improve the content of its processed and packaged foods, which now constitute the major proportion of our diet, and we can invite it to reduce the sugar content of carbonated drinks which has contributed to the obesity epidemic worldwide.
However, the marketing campaigns of the “Big Food” multinational corporations were learnt from the tobacco industry and have been very successful. The obesity epidemic is now spreading rapidly in the low and middle economies, largely as a consequence of “Big Food” increasing its focus on new outlets in the developing world — further extending the huge problems to health and the economy it has caused in Europe and North America.
It has taken 50 years to realise that the only way to control the tobacco industry is legislation over the content and marketing of its products. Will we wait another half century before we legislate over the food industry and its high-pressure marketing of poor-quality nutritional products to our community which, when combined with lack of exercise, is the cause of the worldwide epidemic of obesity and its health and economic consequences?
Professor Peter Sever
Imperial College London

Sir, After your report and letters (Jan 2) it is time to stand back and look at what we may be allowing to be done to this country in the name of development and its presumed role as the solution to our economic woes.
Those aiming to surround Old Oswestry hillfort with a housing development offer the feeble excuse that they are not building on the hill fort itself, while at the same time ignoring the impact on views both to and from the monument. The people of Bath are facing plans to amend green belt land around the city with housing, roads and commercial development which will severely compromise the setting of the best surviving part of the western Wansdyke, another Scheduled Ancient Monument and landscape-scale earthwork.
Against growing threats like these, the number of people employed to examine the impact of development on our heritage is diminishing as local governments cut their conservation, archaeological and museum staff, leaving some regions without cover at all, while those who are left have overwhelming workloads.
At the same time changes to English Heritage appear likely to reduce its influence. As we are only on the edge of economic growth, what other ancient monuments will be threatened as the pace of development picks up?
We need to call a halt and reinstate the ground rules for protection of our Historic Monuments (and greenbelt land) before it’s too late and we need to fight for the jobs of those whose task it is to mitigate the negative effects of economic development.
Our national heritage is not a luxury; in 2013 alone heritage tourism contributed some £26.4 billion to the British economy. Of what lasting value is recovery if we lose some of our most evocative and irreplaceable heritage in the process?
Dr Chris Cumberpatch
Vice-chair, Rescue – The British Archaeological Trust

Sir, Your report (Jan 8) on the behaviour of parents who drive their children to school was very familiar. I have long ceased to be astonished at such parents’ lack of courtesy towards others, and the degree to which they are prepared to endanger others, including their own children.
I work in the London Borough of Barnet, on a road with five schools, three private, within half a mile of each other. At drop-off and pick-up times the road becomes an obstacle course. Traffic jams are frequent, often because the buses which use the road cannot get through. Everyone, school user or not, is inconvenienced. Road traffic act violations are countable in their dozens along the half-mile stretch every day. Two years ago I wrote to the head teachers of all five schools, asking them to take action. None replied, and the chaos continues.
Alec Gallagher
Potton, Beds
Sir, I worry about where my children are, but I do not want to fit them with a GPS tracker (“New smartwatch will let you track your children from afar”, Jan 9). I have just released a film about children’s disappearance from the wild, and a campaign, the Wild Network, to try to reintroduce them. Children’s independent mobility in the UK is vanishing. Twice as many under-11s are accompanied to school by their parents than were 30 years ago. But rather than allowing children new freedoms, the new smartwatch lures parents into a mentality where they must police the ever-shrinking limits of their children’s local geography.
One parent’s wayward child is another’s adventurer in the making.
David Bond
London SE14

Sir, We write to express our utmost concern over the conflict in South Sudan, with over 1,000 people killed and 200,000 displaced. This is in addition to the 228,000 people already living as refugees in South Sudan, having fled from conflict in the Republic of Sudan. There is an urgent need for an end to fighting to prevent further displacement and suffering.
We are encouraged that the two sides to the conflict are meeting in Addis Ababa. However, we are particularly worried that while these events occur in South Sudan, in the Republic of Sudan a systematic campaign of bombardments and other atrocities continues, committed by the government in Khartoum against civilians in South Kordofan, Blue Nile state and Darfur. As the rest of the world turns its attention to South Sudan, the suffering of these people will be forgotten and aid will be diverted or denied.
We are also concerned that the current conflict has been wrongly caricatured as primarily an ethnic dispute between the two main tribal groups, the Dinka and the Nuer. Although tribal identity has been a historic basis for conflict and continues to be a factor in recent violence, the current fighting is not simply based on ethnicity — for example, the General Chief of Staff, who remains loyal to the Dinka President of South Sudan, is a Nuer.
We are concerned that Government of South Sudan parliamentarians have been arrested and although some have been released, others are still in jail.
We therefore strongly urge the immediate release of all politicians not involved in any criminal actions who are currently detained. All parties to the conflict must allow immediate, unhindered access of humanitarian aid to all in need. The leader of the rebellion, Riek Machar, must agree to demobilise all child soldiers who have been fighting alongside his forces, including those in the so-called White Army; all parties must address immediately reports of the use of child soldiers; and the international community must do all in its power to facilitate dialogue and constructive ways forward.
The cessation of hostilities without a comprehensive political solution, and without resolving the root causes of the fratricidal violence and carnage, only sets the stage for an inevitable resumption of fighting with the belligerent forces rested, better organised and better equipped.
We strongly support the peace talks led by the Inter-Governmental Authority on Development to secure an immediate cessation of hostilities. But we also underline that the UK and its partners played a critical role in supporting IGAD to mediate the Comprehensive Peace Agreement that ended the devastating war between Sudan and then-SPLM rebels; without this massive international diplomatic support, political progress would not have been possible. We therefore urge the Prime Minister David Cameron to add his strong support to the ongoing IGAD negotiations.
It would be an unmitigated tragedy for the people of South Sudan if the current violence continues.
Baroness Cox, Lord Alton of Liverpool, Lord Avebury, Sir Peter Bottomley, MP; Lord Chidgey; Nic Dakin, MP; Jeffrey Donaldson, MP; Baroness Kinnock; Lord Lea of Crondall; John Mann, MP; Stephen Mosley, MP; the Earl of Sandwich

Sir, The immigration debate caused me to consider what the immigrant population has contributed to my life directly.
My family has been treated by doctors and nurses from India, Pakistan and the Philippines. I was taken to school by a Jamaican bus driver, have enjoyed food from Indian, Bangladeshi, Chinese and Nepalese restaurants, and had dental treatment from a Russian Jew. Our car has recently been valeted by immigrants from Syria and Albania. Italian café owners have served me coffee and ice cream, and their cousins cut my hair.
All of these immigrants have been hard workers and they have enhanced the life of the South Wales valleys in which they have chosen to settle, as indeed they have nationally.
Roger Bowen
Blaenavon, Gwent

Telegraph:

SIR – Professor Alan Sked summarises the linked, cumulative events that led up to the Great War. The Schlieffen Plan he mentions was developed in 1905 as a means of invading France through Belgium and bypassing the heavily fortified Franco-German border, over which the Prussians invaded in the Franco-Prussian war of 1871.
Schlieffen’s idea was that, by invading far to the west and wheeling south-west of Paris, the right wing of the German army would envelop Paris and bring the war to a speedy conclusion. Apparently Count Schlieffen’s last words on his death-bed in 1913 were: “Keep the right wing strong”.
In the event, the German 1st Army turned eastwards early in support of the 2nd Army, the advance of which was stalled by the French. The exposed German flank gave the French an opportunity to counterattack with British support. The Battle of the Marne brought the German invasion to a halt and led to four years of trench warfare.
The Schlieffen Plan was instrumental in bringing Britain into the war. Had the plan been implemented as intended, it might well have led to the early capitulation of France, as happened more than 25 years later.
Terry Lloyd
Darley Abbey, Derbyshire

SIR – The new director of the Wellcome Trust, Jeremy Farrar, is right to highlight the perils we face if we ignore the emerging public health problem of antibiotic resistance.
Making new medicines is an expensive and risky business. The days of the blockbuster drug are over, and costs of development are escalating. So if we are to continue with a market-driven approach to developing new drugs, investors need a more persuasive investment proposition.
This means that we must either accept higher prices for drugs or re-evaluate our approach to patent protection. A longer patent lifetime would allow investors to generate a return over a longer period and give an incentive to pharmaceutical companies to develop new antibiotics.
Perhaps even more importantly, it could safeguard the pipeline of new affordable medicines for many diseases and establish Britain as the destination of choice for the next generation of drug hunters.
Professor Stephen Caddick
University College London
London WC1
Related Articles
How Britain was drawn into the First World War
10 Jan 2014
Traffic, speed and air
SIR – What the Government is doing is increasing capacity on the M1 by 33 per cent. As part of these improvements we are consulting on introducing a 60mph speed limit on a 35-mile section of the M1, which will enable traffic to run more smoothly.
We have been using variable speed limits to improve traffic flow for many years. They are also an option on the rare occasion that the respiratory health of local people is at risk.
No decision has been taken yet, but it is our responsibility to ensure that air quality standards are met. This consultation will help us establish if variable speed limits are the best way to protect the health of communities near the motorway.
A specific improvement we are making may carry some risks in terms of air quality and if so, we will need to manage them.
Even if it were a completely clear road, a reduction from 70mph to 60mph would add only five minutes to the journey. However, this section is heavily congested and our improvements will dramatically reduce journey times.
Robert Goodwill MP (Con)
Transport Minister
London SW1
Posting nail varnish
SIR – The Civil Aviation Authority and Royal Mail have agreed new procedures that mean customers can post to UK addresses small quantities of toiletry and medicinal aerosols, nail varnishes, perfumes and aftershaves and alcoholic beverages that were previously prohibited in the mail.
Batteries can also be sent in the post but the sender must comply with certain packaging requirements.
David Davies
Head of Protective & Aviation Security, Royal Mail
London EC4
Snips and snippets
SIR – As the owner of a hairdressing salon and leader of a London council, I can claim to hold the keys to both the salon and the top office at the town hall.
The salon is an unrivalled place to hear what residents actually think about issues of the day. You don’t just get hot air under the dryers.
Cllr Susan Hall
Leader, Harrow Council
Harrow, Middlesex
Sino-Japanese relations
SIR – Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s visit to the Yasukuni shrine may not change Japan’s commitment to peace, but Keiichi Hayashi, Japan’s ambassador to Britain, is wrong to assume that all is rosy with Japan’s democracy.
The spat between China and Japan is about Mr Abe’s devious effort to get rid of Japan’s post-war “Peace Constitution”.
Mr Hayashi says Mr Abe firmly upholds Japan’s responsibility for the slaughter that befell Asia and that “the government of Japan has consistently made clear that it squarely faces this history, and expresses deep remorse and heartfelt apology” for it.
In my 22 years in Japan, anything said about the evil done to Asia was grudging and minimal. Japan has been offered many opportunities in the past 40 years to apologise; only one resulted in any true apology, and this extraction was painful.
William Hardwick
Sherborne, Dorset
SIR – Liu Xiaoming, China’s ambassador to Britain, justifies his country’s sabre-rattling in the East China Sea by citing Japan’s failure to acknowledge its war record.
Mr Liu does not mention China’s own appalling post-war human rights record, nor the invasion and continuing brutal occupation of Tibet.
He also does not seem to appreciate the similarity of Japan’s honouring war criminals to China’s celebrating Mao as a national hero, for example by featuring his picture on the country’s bank notes.
John Apperley
St Albans, Hertfordshire
SIR – If Mr Liu wishes China to safeguard regional stability and world peace, a good start would be to advocate the referral of the Diaoyu, or Senkaku, islands dispute to the arbitration of the International Court of Justice, rather than attempting to put daylight between Britain and America, current guarantor of stability in Asia.
Tom Hill
Marlborough, Wiltshire
Hippocratic imperative
SIR – In Hippocrates’ Regimen in Health, he recommends that in winter one should “eat as much as possible… and drink should be wine as undiluted as possible”, since it is important to warm the body. In summer, “drinks should be diluted and as copious as possible”, and meat “boiled”, in order to cool the body. January is not the time for abstinence.
Penny Clive
Swanmore, Hampshire
Memorable names of the 10 little hairy pigs
SIR – Adrian Waller has forgotten what the mnemonic “Very Many Little Hairy Pigs Live In The Torrid Argentine” stands for. It is an aide-memoire for: Valine, Methionine, Lysine, Histidine, Phenylalanine, Leucine, Isoleucine, Threonine, Tryptophan and Arginine. I would not have thought anyone would need a mnemonic for that.
Ron Hunt
Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire
Memorable names of the ten little hairy pigs
SIR – Navigators use mnemonics for help in converting magnetic to true bearings (and vice versa), to ensure the correct sequence of applying corrections for deviation (errors caused by local magnetic forces) and variation (the angular difference between the true and magnetic poles).
From compass reading to true, one corrects as follows: compass deviation magnetic variation true, or CDMVT. This translates: Can Dead Men Vote Twice?
Going from true to magnetic is more interesting: True Virgins Make Dull Companions.
Jim Meacham
Witham-on-the-Hill, Lincolnshire
SIR – At King Edward VII Nautical College in 1950, we were taught: Timid Virgins Make Dull Companions. In the Sixties, I learnt to fly at Suffolk Aero Club in a mixed-sex class, and we concentrated on the unexceptionable mnemonic: Cadbury’s Dairy Milk Very Tasty.
Captain David Ingham
Bentley, Suffolk

SIR – Until I sat on a jury a couple of years ago, I had not appreciated the true value of our jury processes.
The jury members at the Mark Duggan inquest did not ask to be there, but were selected at random. We must assume that, as independent people, the jurors considered the evidence, along with the guidance they would have been given, in a diligent, fair and honest manner. The conclusions and decisions they reached were what they truly believed to be the right ones.
How do those jurors now feel, as pressure groups express disgust at the “awful” conclusions?
We must support those jurors and vigorously defend the jury system that has served our country so well for centuries.
Peter Howard
Norton Lindsey, Warwickshire
SIR – Like the riots that immediately followed his shooting, this week’s inquest verdict on Mark Duggan has exposed Britain’s deep racial fault lines. While many white people find the level of black fury startling, many in the black population find this incomprehension still more infuriating.
The inquest might have focused on legalistic definitions of “lawful killing” but the anger felt on the streets of Tottenham and beyond flows from a deep sense of injustice fuelled by black Britons’ experience of discrimination.
Stefan Simanowitz
London NW3
SIR – Mark Duggan’s aunt claims that the public supports the Duggan family. Count me out, please. The sight of the screeching members of the Duggan family and friends after the jury delivered its verdict was enough to turn anyone’s stomach.
J M T Shaw
Knutsford, Cheshire
SIR – Mob rule is never a pleasant sight. It was not pleasant when we saw it on our television screens in the summer of 2011 and I guess it wasn’t very agreeable for the court staff in the Duggan case on Wednesday.
Anarchy in any society lies just below the surface. All that protects the ordinary citizen from rape, robbery and the rest are the forces of law and order. These of course include the police and the courts.
For this reason everyone can and should be expected to cooperate with them and offer proper respect. If misdemeanours by the forces of law and order are suspected they should be properly investigated. Clearly in this case they were, and that, subject to any proper appeal, should be the end of the matter.
Andrew McLuskey
Stanwell, Middlesex
SIR – Has Mark Duggan’s family given thought to the lives lost as a result of drug dealing?
John Lavender
Port Erin, Isle of Man

Irish Times:

Sir, – We are just a week into 2014 and already here we have the next assault on the disabled (and now to include elderly people with mobility problems) from this Coalition. You were kind enough to publish my letter (April 12th, 2013) detailing the disgraceful cutting of the overall fund for housing adaptation from €54 million to €35 million for 2013 as announced by Minister for the Environment Phil Hogan at that time. This morning on national radio I heard a Labour Minister of State, Jan O’Sullivan, attempting to spin the allocation of €38 million to the same fund for 2014 as an “increase” in spending in her defence of the latest moving of the goalposts for disabled Irish citizens attempting to access those services which should be theirs as a civil right.
If Ms O’Sullivan thinks that those Irish citizens and voters who are disabled, or care for the disabled or, indeed, who are elderly or have an elderly relative with mobility issues, are naive enough to fall for this kind of crude political guff, she has another think coming. A cut from an already inadequate €53 million to €35 million and then to €38 million is a cut, and a massive cut, pure and simple, and no amount of spin can alter that fact. I suggest all those affected, related to those affected or sympathetic to those affected, make their feelings on this matter clear in the coming local and European elections this year and, indeed, in the national elections in 2016. – Yours, etc,
JONATHAN SHANKEY,
Saint Mary’s Crescent,
Walkinstown,
Dublin 12.
Sir, – I am writing in response to the latest cutbacks to the elderly and disabled (“Grant cuts to make it ‘harder’ for elderly to live at home”, Front Page, January 9th). The cutbacks in funding to local authority housing grants have been announced without any debate and will mean more people being forced against their wishes to access nursing home and hospital accommodation.
This flies in the face of the Government’s desire that people access the health service through primary care services and will end up costing far more money than supporting the elderly and disabled to live in their own homes.
These latest cutbacks follow on from a five-fold increase in medical card charges, cutbacks to home-help support and cutbacks to the medical card scheme itself.
Leaving aside the financial cutbacks, the increased bureaucracy to access State supports such as these is another burden that is becoming even more complicated and difficult to handle. Furthermore, form-filling does not deal adequately with complicated cases, especially family situations.
What is badly needed is the proper planning of resources, so that those that need them most can access them easily. – Yours, etc,
EDWARD MacMANUS,
White’s Road,
Castleknock,
Dublin 15.
Sir, – I was surprised to read that the grant for housing aid for older people has been cut. I thought, as per Wexford County Council’s website, such grants had been suspended “indefinitely”. – Yours, etc,
DEBRA JAMES,
Cummerduff,
Gorey, Co Wexford.
Sir, – I sincerely hope that the wails of the elderly and disabled are not drowned out by the sound of appreciative applause on foot of “Ireland’s successful re-entry into global capital markets”. – Yours, etc,
JD MANGAN,
Stillorgan Road,
Stillorgan,
Co Dublin.

Sir, – The current controversy generated by ex-president Mary McAleese’s comments on her unhappiness at the attitude of “her” church towards homosexual people is being viewed and analysed from the wrong perspective (“McAleese criticises church’s stance on gays”, Front Page, January 8th).
Reasonable and rational people who wish to worship a god may very easily do so without guidance or direction from the Roman Catholic or any other established church.
So rather than expressing displeasure, disappointment or opposition to the teachings and doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church, Mrs McAleese and all thinking people who disagree with it should just leave and live and worship in their own way. If enough people do this then the negative and offensive views of that church will quickly become even more irrelevant than they are already, – Yours, etc,
HUGH PIERCE,
Newtown Road,
Celbridge,
Co Kildare.
Sir, – I was heartened to read Mary McAleese’s comments on the church’s stance on gays. We have made such strides lately on many fronts to come out of the dark ages.
Mrs McAleese was a great president and her stance on this issue is important and welcome. – Yours, etc,
PAT BURKE WALSH,
Ballymoney,
Co Wexford.
Sir, – Mary McAleese’s criticisms of the Catholic Church’s “attitude” towards gay people are misplaced. The church’s attitude towards gay people is the same as its attitude towards all people: they are children of God, blessed with an inherent dignity beyond all measure, and, if they will it, an eternal destiny abiding in God’s love. That is a remarkably affirmative attitude to have of any person (gay or straight) and one, I suggest, unparalleled by any materialist philosophy or secularist ideology.
Our former president also takes exception to the church’s teaching that gay people are “sinners”. Yet sinning is not the preserve of straight people only, the imperfect human condition is a universal reality. The real focus of debate should instead be on specific church teaching concerning sexual ethics. This teaching, only one limb of an entire corpus of ethics on human affairs, judges the morality of various actions and does not distinguish between the dignity of various persons.
Neither gay nor straight persons are predetermined to act with or against any particular aspect of the church’s moral teaching, including sexual ethics.
Whether the church’s sexual (or any other) ethics are reasonable is a distinct matter from the simple fact that it, almost uniquely, teaches as true the equal and inherent dignity of all human beings. The reasonableness or otherwise of the church’s sexual ethics is an important point of debate. But this debate is ill-served by raising extraneous issues such as the number of Catholic clergy who have a homosexual orientation, majority opinion on the matter, or, lest the debate succumb to the fallacy of naturalism, whether homosexual orientation is a matter of genetic predetermination or predisposition. – Yours, etc,
THOMAS FINEGAN,
Willowbrook Park
Celbridge, Co Kildare.

Sir, – Minister for Energy Pat Rabbitte has stated that putting transmission lines underground would cause bills to rise by up to 3 per cent.
On my current electricity bill, the actual cost of electricity is €54.88. But the additional charges (standing charge, public service obligation levy and VAT at 13.5 per cent) add a whopping €37.45, or 69 per cent , to my bill.
In order to alleviate the suggested 3 per cent increase claimed to be necessary to put the transmission lines underground, Mr Rabbitte and all the other Government Ministers and backbenchers should be knocking their heads together to find ways to reduce the current excessive additional charges instead of simply acting as spokesmen for industry. – Yours, etc,
DAVID DORAN
Royal Oak Road,
Bagenalstown,
Co Carlow.
A chara, – There are precedents supporting the routing of electricity transmission underground. The Murraylink is an Australian 180km high-voltage electricity transmission link between Berri in South Australia and Red Cliffs in Victoria which, for environmental protection reasons, is completely underground.
Routing electricity using pylons is quicker and cheaper, but there are no new skills learned in doing so, and environment and scenery are blighted. Whereas there are geological, engineering and cost challenges in routing electricity underground, there are longer-term payoffs in terms of consequently learned engineering expertise which could be marketed abroad, and obviously reduced impacts on environment and scenery.
The question is whether the Government and EirGrid are willing to do what is required to achieve the longer-term payoffs. – Is mise,
NIALL O’DONOGHUE,
Lempaala,
Tampere,
Finland.
Sir, – Ireland has signed and ratified the Aarhus  Convention. Fundamental to this convention is the right of citizens to information and participation in matters relating to their environment. It in the interests of environmental democracy and justice that the plans for the EirGrid system are examined properly with the participation of the local community. – Yours, etc,
JOE MURRAY,
Beggars Bush Court,
Ballsbridge, Dublin 4.

Sir, – The Bileog page provides a great service for struggling Irish speakers like myself who are trying to keep our school knowledge of Irish from rusting over completely.
I was struck by the reference in Deaglán de Bréadún’s article to the Teachers’ Union of Ireland boycott of Israeli academia (“Bagairt an bhaghcait”, Bileog, January 8th).
It seems ironic that the teachers in a country that has struggled for 90 years and largely failed to revive its native language should want to boycott the teachers in a country which has successfully revived its language in the same period.
At the turn of the last century, Hebrew was pretty much a dead language, with its few fluent speakers scattered among the Jewish diaspora and a few in Palestine. But within two generations it had been revived to become the lingua franca of everyday life in Israel.
I am sure the Israeli teachers cannot take all the credit for its revival, no more than the Irish teaching profession should be blamed for the demise of Irish, but I am equally sure that our teachers have a lot to learn from the Israeli experience. Sadly, it now seems that, whatever the secret sauce is, it will remain a mystery to us through our teachers’ boycott. Could our teachers’ union not have found a better way to lend support to the Palestinians? – Yours, etc,
PAUL MILNE,
Dublin Road,
Sutton, Dublin 13.

Sir, – The recent decision to grant planning permission for an enlarged Irish Jewish Museum in the existing small building is as regrettable as it is misguided (“Plans for enlarged Irish Jewish Museum approved”, Home News, December 30th).
This area was the home of Dublin’s Jewish community, but the project, sadly, is not about enhancing what should be a cherished memory. It is a planning debacle that shows exceptional disregard for the local community.
Both Jewish and non-Jewish people, Irish and non-Irish, Dublin and non-Dublin born people have lived together here and shared this part of Dublin 8 for many decades, making it a vibrant part of the city. With suitable larger sites available in the area, there is a dreadful cynicism about the decision to go ahead with such a destructive plan.
Demolishing an old synagogue and most of a terrace, increasing the area six-fold and digging 20 feet into the bedrock of this tiny street shows contempt for both the residents and for the city’s architecture.
To have a Jewish museum of international dimensions in Dublin would be wonderful. It would be a major step forward in recognising and in celebrating Jewish identity in Ireland.
Surely this can be done without destroying a real, living community and tearing apart its streets? – Yours, etc,
Dr JEANNE RIOU,
School of Languages
& Literatures,
UCD,
Belfield,
Dublin 4
Sir, – Why all the euphoria about the National Treasury Management Agency’s €3.75 billion bond sale (Front Page, January 8th)? EU banks can borrow from the ECB at 1 per cent and reinvest in Irish government bonds at more than 3 per cent. The fact that the Irish offering was oversubscribed may well be an indicator that the premium was too generous and it was sold too cheaply. We need to get away from misrepresenting our dealings with money lenders as a cause for self-congratulation. These bondholders are much the same cast of kindly characters that we were obliged to repay for their profligate lending to our reckless banks and poorly regulated financial institutions. We have just added another €3.75 billion to the debt burden that our children will be forced to carry. – Yours, etc,
MICHAEL ANDERSON,
Moyclare Close,
Baldoyle, Dublin 13.

Sir, – Dermot Dix in his interview as headmaster of Headfort School (Business, January 8th) states that school facilities include a science lab and that Headfort is thus “one of the few primary schools in Ireland where children do practical science”. In national schools up and down the country children from infants to sixth class are regularly engaging in practical science investigations – mini-beasts are observed, working lighthouses and rockets are constructed, wind speed is recorded, the strength of eggshells is tested. Endless adventures in scientific discovery are organised by energetic and enthusiastic teachers without a lab in sight. This is how young scientists are made. – Yours, etc,
CLARE SHERIDAN,
Ardmore Park,
Bray,

Sir, – I note that Anglo/IBRC set up lists of certain customers “to ensure that the State-owned bank did not offer nor could be perceived to have offered any of them special treatment” (“No special deals for listed Anglo borrowers, says Dukes”, Front Page, January 7th). However, by setting up the lists, the bank has implicitly given these people special treatment.
There is still a market for the trappings of influence, and people would probably pay for the cachet of being on a list of HPPs (high-profile persons), as certified by a State institution. – Yours, etc,
MIKE NORRIS,
Cabinteely Green,
Dublin 18.

Sir, – It is rare that I agree with views expressed by Gerry Adams TD but his argument that the Oireachtas should abide by normal licensing hours seems irrefutable (“Adams repeats call for Dáil bar regulation”, Home News, January 9th).
Should not those who make the laws also be bound by them?
One could go further and ask why our legislators need access to a steady supply of alcohol in their workplace. Teachers, doctors, dentists, pilots and air traffic controllers, among others, do not have access to alcoholic support during long and arduous working hours.
Admittedly, it may be said that the work of TDs does not involve life-and-death decisions to the same extent as these professions, but can even that argument hold water in the context of, to give one example, the recently debated abortion legislation? – Yours, etc,
EDWARD
MOXON-BROWNE,
Clonfadda,
Killaloe,

Sir, – I’m afraid Jennifer O’Connell (“Ten phrases we could live without”, Life, January 8th) missed the worst of all: “You know what”. – Yours, etc,
TOM REARDON,
Silverwood Road,
Rathfarnham,
Dublin 14.
Sir, – “Rory McIlroy and Caroline Wozniacki”. – Yours, etc,
OLIVER McGRANE,
Marley Avenue,
Rathfarnham,
Dublin 16.

Sir, – In relation to articles on maternal sepsis published on January 6th, I wish to clarify that the Rotunda Hospital collects and monitors information and data on maternal and neonatal sepsis. Over the period 2004 to the end of 2012 there were 71 cases of life-threatening maternal sepsis requiring admission to the hospital’s high dependency unit. Data on this topic and others is available in the hospital’s annual clinical report. – Yours, etc,
Dr SAM COULTER-SMITH,
Master,
Rotunda Hospital,
Dublin 1.
Sir, – I see that the criteria for competing to be the next city of culture include an emphasis on a “bottom-up approach which seeks to unite cultural and socio-economic stakeholders” (“Next City of Culture to be ‘informed’ by Limerick experience”, Home News, January 9th). “Bottoms up” to the lucky city in 2018 and whatever you’re havin’ yourself! – Yours, etc,
PATRICK O’BYRNE,
Shandon Crescent,
Phibsborough, Dublin 7.

Irish Independent:

* I write in response to Paul Connolly’s letter (January 9) on the benefits of Europe over the last 30 years. Firstly Ireland joined the EEC on May 10, 1972, which is actually nigh-on 42 years ago.
Also in this section
Letters: To thine own selfie be true
European project is key to our future
The case for eternal Christmas
Mr Connolly points to Europe being good for farming. In 1974 the price of cattle completely collapsed and there was no sign of Europe. He contends that farming is now viable for a large section of the population, despite the fact that the number of farmers has nearly halved since the 1970s.
Mr Connolly also points to an Erasmus programme, yet he bemoans the fact that we don’t learn European languages. What is the percentage of all third-level students who have gone on Erasmus?
Emigration? Since we joined the EU we have seen two major phases of emigration in Ireland — the ’80s and now. Yes, the Irish emigrate to the Anglo sphere. What does Mr Connolly suggest; that we emigrate to Spain for work where 350,000 people have emigrated? Should we move to Greece and milk goats? Should we head to Germany, where there’s no minimum wage? Should we emigrate to Portugal, where the markets — apparently the one true barometer in fiscal measurement — say that Ireland’s bonds are a better bet than in Jose Manuel Barroso’s home country?
The rhetoric of Europe is that it provides peace and that war will not break out again within its confines. Where were these great peacemakers during the Troubles?
Where is Europe when it comes to respecting our neutrality with soldiers stationed in Uganda with no UN mandate?
Finally, Mr Connolly points to the Dublin-Galway motorway as a project funded by Europe.
If Mr Connolly took off what may have been his rose-tinted glasses, he may have seen that it was part-funded by Europe.
Mr Connolly might do well to listen to the rhetoric coming out of Europe that claims that the EU is an organisation that is in existence for 40 years.
It couldn’t be, for the Berlin Wall stood for the first 20 of those 40 years.
DERMOT RYAN
ATHENRY, CO GALWAY
ARMY SHOWS COWARDICE
* President Higgins’s Christ-less Christmas address is just one more in a steady stream of his meaningless/ value-free diatribes, as if written by a big brother-inspired committee of PC UN apparatchiks. George Orwell wrote prophetically about such a world in his book ’1984′.
The one redeeming feature of the episode was the initial courage of the Army chaplain in pointing out the absurdity of the speech, undermined by the cowardice of the Defence Forces under fire in issuing a craven apology.
Some secularists are attempting to defend the speech on a spurious appeal to Republican ethics. Nonsense — a republic is defined as a form of government in which power is explicitly vested in the people.
It has nothing to do with imposing secularist dogma, particularly as the majority of the Irish people, 92pc, are Christian. A simple recognition of this in the speech was all that was required, basic good manners really.
ERIC CONWAY
NAVAN, CO MEATH
HIV PUTS LAWS IN CONTEXT
* In the media coverage of Uganda’s new draconian anti-homosexuality laws there has been no mention of the massive and growing HIV/AIDs problem in that country.
Recently, Uganda’s President Museveni publicly took a HIV test to raise awareness of the epidemic among the population. Currently, there are 1.5 million people with HIV in Uganda and one million children orphaned because of AIDs. In all, 7pc of the adult Uganda population are living with HIV.
Like all other African countries, Uganda’s HIV/AIDs epidemic is steadily growing.
How these statistics interplay with the Uganda government’s new laws is a matter for further discussion, but it should at least be addressed as part of the context in which the new legislation is being brought forward.
MARGARET HICKEY
BLARNEY, CO CORK
LOVE THY NEIGHBOUR
* Rob Sadlier is missing something when he says that “we cannot… claim to live in a republic whilst maintaining… overtly religious… references in our Constitution” (Letters, January 9).
Fundamental to a democratic republic is the principle that all citizens are equal. That ideal arises from the religious ethic of love of neighbour. So religious references in our constitution may not be the “incongruities” that Rob Sadlier says.
A LEAVY
SUTTON, DUBLIN 13
FANTASTIC COMPLIMENTS
* All too often it is the hard word that is heard. The following is a brief compilation of some memorable compliments:
“He was my brother; not by blood, but by choice” — Frank Sinatra talking about Dean Martin.
“Meeting Franklin Roosevelt was like opening your first bottle of champagne; knowing him was like drinking it” — Winston Churchill on meeting Roosevelt.
“He was the best ballad singer I ever heard in my life” — Bob Dylan on Liam Clancy of the Clancy Brothers.
“Irish signatures are on our founding documents. Irish blood was spilled on our battlefields. Irish sweat built our great cities.
Our spirit is eternally refreshed by Irish story and Irish song; our public life by the humour and heart and dedication of servants with names like Kennedy and Regan, O’Neill and Moynihan.
So you could say there’s always been a little green behind the red, white and blue behind the American flag” — President Barack O’Bama on the Irish.
BARRY CLIFFORD
CONNEMARA, CO GALWAY
POPE WOULD DISAGREE
* I would like to ask Paddy Power to give odds on whether or not Pope Francis would agree with the ideas in Philip O’Neill’s letter (January 7).
The first big mistake is in thinking that all change comes from the top. I’m sure Pope Francis would be embarrassed to think he was the only hope for the church.
The idea that “all expressions of faith have been taken off course” isn’t based on any evidence whatsoever. Mr O’Neill says, “the country has been in the grip of a very fallible church”, which confuses the doctrine of infallibility. Infallibility doesn’t mean moral perfection, it means guidance in correct teaching, ie doctrine, though I would agree that living according to objective moral norms helps in the reception of faith.
“Christ’s purpose,” he claims with no authoritative sayings of Jesus to back his argument, “was not to create an institution with subservience of its adherents, but to breathe life into the world we all inhabit, releasing the god-given intelligence of humanity.”
I searched Google and I would argue that Mr O’Neill’s reference to Christianity being about “releasing the god-given intelligence of humanity” isn’t mentioned once in scripture or tradition.
Rather Christians are called to faith, which goes beyond reason, but is not and never can be opposed to truth.
Mr O’Neill’s claim that Catholicism could do fine without a “centrally controlling body” is central in his argument.
He even asks why this would not be the case. Nobody would recommend that the State jettisons the Supreme Court and allow each citizen to “thrive on imagination” whilst interpreting the Constitution on an individual basis. It was for similar reasons that Christ started the church, so that it can guide us into the truth.
KEITH KAVANAGH
KNOCK, CO MAYO
Irish Independent


Shanti

$
0
0

12 January 2014 Shantoi

I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. The crew of Troutbridge are celebrating and Mrs Povey want Henry to be promted to Admiral. Priceless.

Shanti pops round for coffee

Scrabbletoday Mary wins and gets well over300, Perhaps Iwill win tomorrow.

 

Obituary:

 

Cecile Nobrega, who has died aged 94, was the driving force behind the first statue of a black woman to go on permanent display in England.

The Bronze Woman — a 10ft-tall monument to motherhood, showing a black woman holding aloft her baby — was unveiled in October 2008 in Stockwell Memorial Gardens, south London. The original artist was to have been Ian Walters, creator of the statue of Nelson Mandela in London’s Parliament Square, but he died after completing only the clay maquette. The project was taken on and completed by Aleix Barbat, then still a student at the Heatherley School of Fine Art in Chelsea.

Cecile Nobrega — a Guyana-born teacher, poet and playwright — had campaigned for “The Bronze Woman Project” since 1994. Although she did not describe herself as a feminist, she felt that women — particularly women from the underdeveloped world and those descended from the victims of the transatlantic slave trade — received insufficient recognition for their contribution to the family and to society in general.

She launched the project as a charitable organisation and set about raising the money needed, subsequently enlisting the help of an organisation called Olmec, originally set up as a charitable subsidiary of a south London housing association.

The unveiling of the statue, on October 8 2008, came shortly after the 200th anniversary of the abolition of the Slave Trade, and the 60th anniversary of the arrival at Tilbury of the first Caribbean immigrants in the steamship Empire Windrush.

)

Cecile Elise Doreen Burgan was born in Guyana (then a British colony) on June 1 1919 to Canon William Burgan and his wife Imelda; in 1949 the Canon would become the first black man to preach at Westminster Abbey.

At Bishops High School in Guyana, Cecile showed herself a gifted child — she had composed classical music and written poetry from an early age, and later produced a choral work called Twilight which was performed by national choirs in Guyana and Cuba.

In Guyana, she started two schools — a kindergarten and a vocational school for teenage girls. She also wrote plays, one of which, Stabroek Fantasy (also known as Carib Gold), was particularly successful.

In 1969, however, she found herself professionally at odds with the Guyana government and emigrated to Britain, where she retrained as a specialist teacher, working in Hertfordshire and Brent. She was active in the National Union of Teachers and in the Adult Literacy Programme, and campaigned for children with severe learning difficulties.

Her work with the International Alliance of Women (IAW) and the Commonwealth Countries League gave her the opportunity to travel, and it was at IAW conferences in New York, Kenya, Greece, Japan and India that she began to shape the idea for her sculpture The Bronze Woman.

A resident of Lambeth, south London, for her last 22 years, Cecile Nobrega slowed down towards the end of her life, giving up driving, her computer, and playing the piano; but she remained active in her local pensioners’ group and in t’ai chi classes.

Her husband of 52 years, Romeo Nobrega, an accountant, died in 1994, and she is survived by their two sons and one daughter.

Cecile Nobrega, born June 1 1919, died November 19 2013

 

 

Guardian:

 

I have taught English in several state comprehensives, to students of many different abilities and nationalities, for more than 30 years. The most compelling texts were invariably those which emphasised the horror and futility of the first world war. The literature of endurance, heroism and despair has captured the imaginations of students from all cultures and ranges of ability. (“Using history for politicking is tawdry, Mr Gove“, Tristram Hunt, Comment).

I taught Michael Morpurgo’s War Horse to a group of year eight students who had hitherto shown no interest in reading. They were gripped by the intensity of the battle scenes, and the relationship between man and horse. A mixed-ability year seven class impressed Ofsted because all the students were able to reinterpret Dulce et Decorum Est in their own words .

The power of this literature is that it conveys so poignantly the horror, the shocking loss of life, and the anger and frustration of the poets, novelists and dramatists. These great writers have not “belittled Britain”, Mr Gove, they have immortalised the Great War, they have passed on their reflections to all our children. I, and all my colleagues, will continue to do the same.

Tilly Baker

Brighton

So Michael Gove is “using history for politicking” is he? OK by me. The point is only whether what he says is true. It isn’t, of course; but to make the primary complaint that he is using his view of the first world war to make political points is asking us to make history irrelevant to all but academics. Gove’s cheap slurs should not be answered by shallow clichés.

What’s wrong with what Gove says is that he sees Britain’s motives as opposition to German militarism. Britain (with its allies), as militaristic as Germany (with its allies), was being challenged in its bid to carve up the globe.  Its war effort should not have been supported any more than Germany’s.

The dead on the British side consisted no doubt of those hoping to stop the Kaiser crushing what they saw as liberty in Britain and of those wanting to give Britain the unlimited possibility of enriching itself, even if it meant crushing the aspirations of people in the “colonial world”.  There were, I suspect, as many believers in peace as spoilers for a fight.

Andrew Hornung

Chipping Norton

Tristram Hunt is right to expose the cheap shots being made by the education secretary, but to characterise the pre-1914 Germany of Kaiser Wilhelm as fascist is unhelpful for several reasons.

Although roots of fascism can be discerned in the years before 1914 (probably more in Italy and France than Germany), the term was not in use at the time.

Fascist organisations, ideas and terminology were essentially a feature of the war and post-war years. Second, and more importantly, expansionist ideas and fears of socialism do not, in themselves, constitute fascism. Or if they did, Edwardian Britain was also fascistic.

Professor David Taylor

Emeritus Professor of History

University of Huddersfield

As an historian of 11th-century England, I now find myself in a quandary . Is it my patriotic duty to support the English or the Normans?  I trust Mr Gove will issue guidance in due course.

David Roffe

Congleton

Cheshire

 

The lobbying bill, which is reaching the final stages of debate in parliament, represents a threat to democracy and would limit the right of charities and campaigning organisations to speak out on some of the most important issues facing the country and planet ahead of elections.

Ministers announced important changes to the bill last week following overwhelming concern. However, they do not go far enough.

A petition calling for further changes was launched last week and signed by more than 75 charities, campaigning organisations and 70,000 people.

The extraordinary speed and scale of support for the petition, including organisations such as Oxfam, Countryside Alliance, Amnesty International, the Salvation Army and the National Federation of Women’s Institutes, demonstrate the strength of concern that remains.

Lord Harries of Pentregarth

Chair, Commission on Civil Society and Democratic Engagement, London SW1

The evil of buy-to-let

Isn’t it time to recognise the buy-to-let industry as one of the great evils of our age? (Welfare tenants face being cast on to the streets, Barbara Ellen). I can understand, with interest rates being so low, that people might look to purchase two buy-to-let properties as an investment but with a housing shortage it is incredible that a human need such as shelter is being subject to such terrible exploitation.

It is now almost impossible for people born in working-class areas to aspire to own the small terraced houses that their parents or grandparents aspired to get out off.

We understand that a particular strand of Toryism will always look to make profit from human suffering, but it is shocking that under the long years of a supposed Labour government that buy-to-let seemed to be encouraged. I can’t see that profiting from a basic need is any more moral than drug dealing or pimping, and landlords with large buy-to-let portfolios, particularly those wishing to evict families on benefits, should be regarded with the same disdain as bankers.

Michael Dillon 

Sheerness

Kent

Misery from lack of social care

The news that thousands of people were forced to spend the festive season in hospital unnecessarily as a result of inadequate social care is just one side of the coin (“Cuts strand 18,500 in hospital at Christmas“, News). Increasing numbers of older and disabled people are being admitted to hospital in the first place because they did not receive the social care support they needed. In 2013 many disabled people, including the deafblind people who Sense supports, faced huge cuts to their social care, leaving them without the support they desperately need to live full and active lives. Deafblind people without support face increased risk of falls and a range of health problems from arthritis to heart conditions.

The care bill currently progressing through parliament is an incredible opportunity for politicians to finally get social care right in the UK. However, without adequate funding, the bill is built on sand and will not provide the right amount of support for some of the most vulnerable people in society.

Richard Kramer 

Deputy chief executive, Sense

London, N1

Big society needs big help

One category which has some right to sneer at the new concept of a “big society’” is those who have worked to promote it for many years – only we didn’t give it such a grand title.

I started as a fledgling community worker in Port Clarence, mentioned in Danny Kruger’s article (“The big society is not about picking litter: it is meant to be a challenge to the state“, News) 40 years ago. I helped to bring a near-derelict community centre back to life. The community ran it themselves and learnt how to organise, manage and negotiate.

In 1974 I was working for Cleveland county council. Forty years on I am chair of the community association in Hebden Bridge. Here we have, in the last four years, taken over the ownership of the old town hall and added a £3m extension to provide enterprise units and facilities for local community groups. This is a confident, well-educated and well-connected community – we can do big ambitious projects, without much help from outside. Many communities have more in common with Port Clarence, where without intervention, little is likely to happen. Under this government such support has been progressively cut in the mistaken belief that the “big society” will spontaneously arise wherever it is needed most.

Peter Hirst

Hebden Bridge, Yorkshire

 

Sloppy language, chaps

My problem with the Fathers4Justice advert using Kate Winslet is the claim that every child “deserves” their father at Christmas (“Fathers 4 Justice needs a much less crummy strategy“‘ Barbara Ellen, 29 December). What a child does or does not deserve is irrelevant here. The point, I take it, is that every child has a right not to be barred from seeing his or her father. People are too ready to confuse what we have a right to with what we deserve, presumably because the latter sounds much more cuddly and compliments us on being super people, which we may not be.

Paul Brownsey

Glasgow University

 

Independent

 

Ed Miliband’s proposal to interfere in Britain’s labour market is deceptive and dangerous (“We’re too reliant on low-wage labour”, 5 January).

The thrust of his suggestion is that Britain should sign up fully to the European Union’s Agency Workers Directive. He assumes this would create highly-paid jobs for British workers. In truth it would mean fewer jobs all round and a handbrake jammed on our economic recovery.

A flexible and responsive labour market is one of the reasons that we have seen 1.4 million jobs created since May 2010. Imposing the Agency Workers Directive on business, especially small enterprises and seasonal industries, would stop plans for growth and recruitment. A quarter of UK businesses use agency workers and, under Mr Miliband’s plans, a typical small enterprise would have to pay an extra £2,493 a year.

Since the 2008 directive, the EU’s European vacancy monitor has shown a collapse in temporary posts in those countries that adopted it. In France, Germany and the Netherlands, substantial growth in temporary vacancies turned into a fall of one-fifth. In France, vacancies in leading temporary-work agency Randstad fell by more than 20 per cent over two months.

Mr Miliband would take us down the same road for the sake of a quick headline and a wish to appear tough on immigrants.

Anthea McIntyre, MEP

Conservative employment spokesman

Ross-on-Wye

What “skills” is Ed Miliband talking about? The last Labour government aimed to push 50 per cent of the workforce through university and increased spending on secondary education by a huge amount. The result is that there is both under-employment and a skill shortage. Doesn’t this suggest that governments are incompetent at gauging the demands of the labour market?

James Paton

Billericay, Essex

Ed Miliband continues to repeat myths that immigration is a key factor in bringing down standards of living. Have migrants caused the housing bubble that creates sky-high rents and prices out all but the most well-off? Are they responsible for the devastating effects of the government’s austerity policies?

There are millions of us who feel migrants have made a phenomenal contribution to this country, and we are all the worse for the toxic rhetoric and anti-immigrant policies that we see from successive governments.

With the three largest parties manoeuvring to occupy Farage’s anti-immigrant bunker who is going to be left in the fresh air untainted by this dangerous and divisive electoral game?

Jim Jepps

London NW1

I too felt saddened at the story of Father Joseph Williams whose body was found in his car in a supermarket carpark (Janet Street-Porter, 5 January).

But, while I would not wish to deny Janet the opportunity of slagging off the Anglican Church, I understand that Fr Joseph was a Roman Catholic, as is the Bishop (not Archbishop) of Northampton. Neither of them are Anglicans, “namby pamby” or not.

Roger Clarke

Perranarworthal, Truro

Noel Howard-Jones is correct in saying that he had no contact with Anthony Summers concerning Stephen Ward (Letters 29 December). However, as the co-author I did receive a letter in 1987 from Mr Howard-Jones declining to be interviewed. The communication was noted in the 1989 edition of our book, Honeytrap, on page 331.

Stephen Dorril

Holmfirth, West Yorkshire

I enjoyed DJ Taylor’s article about Top of the Pops (5 January). It was a shame therefore that the photo was printed back-to-front, showing the band Slade as being totally left handed.

Peter Henderson

Worthing, West Sussex

Every year is like 1914 somewhere (5 January). We must accept grievances will continue and choose our interventions carefully, rather than fall for that other historical truth beloved by politicians which equates non-intervention in any situation as comparable to the appeasement of Hitler’s ambitions.

Ian McKenzie

Lincoln

 

 

Times:

 

Growing fat on culture of instant gratification

I WORK in the NHS and the alarming trend of increasing patient waistlines has not gone unnoticed by clinical staff or clipboard managers (“Fat is a self-control issue — take it from supersize me”, Comment, last week).

The 1970s Stanford marshmallow experiment that highlights the link between deferred pleasure and higher academic performance and lower levels of aggression could be extrapolated from further. There are many examples where individuals would rather choose quick-fix gains to the detriment of their future. For instance, excessive television-watching, smoking or even our propensity to take out high-interest payday loans.

Perhaps our increased obesity rate is merely a reflection of our emerging culture of instant gratification and consumerism. Unless we address this wider issue, the precious — if not undernourished — NHS budget will continue to be spent on increasing numbers of fat suits and sympathy courses.
Dr David Carruthers Fowey, Cornwall

Big issue
When I recently had an MRI scan I was told the existing machine was being replaced with two much bigger ones (at a cost of £3.1m) as an increasing number of patients were too big to get into the equipment.

Dominic Lawson’s honesty about his chateaubriand and camembert consumption reminds me of my great-aunt Ethel Rudge, who was a cook to many important families and always said: “Show me a fat person and I’ll show you what they eat.” I can’t think fat without thinking Great-Aunt Ethel.
Tim Kenny Cavendish, Suffolk

Sugar caned
Rather belatedly it seems the world’s health professionals have woken up to the fact that sugar is the likely major dietary agent implicated in much chronic disease (“Sweet but deadly”, Focus, December 29). For half a century dental health professionals and scientists have campaigned to mitigate its role in destroying the nation’s teeth through preventive measures and attempts to draw attention to the aggressive promotional activities of the sugar industry.

Fortunately the “magic bullet” of fluoridation of the water supplies and fluoride toothpastes have brought dental caries largely under control except in the most socially deprived communities where the disease is still rife.

Unfortunately no specific intervention therapies are available for the prevention of systemic disorders such as diabetes mellitus.
Martin Downer Emeritus Professor University College London, Shrewsbury

Sweet talk
I am all for reducing obesity and self-inflicted health problems from eating too much sugar, but has any funding been put in to study the side effects of alternative artificial sweeteners that are in thousands of drinks and foods everywhere? I believe there are countries where many sweeteners and flavour enhancers were banned from products years ago.
Felicity Leicester Surbiton, London

School-leavers need to learn basic job skills

WITH regard to Camilla Cavendish’s column “Exams help, but to get a job our youngsters need lessons in grit” (Comment, last week), my own impression from talking to employers is that too many school-leavers lose out because they lack the basics — they do not know how to dress neatly, turn up on time or adopt an appropriate speech register. The question remains why eastern Europeans, among others, so often have the skills and the discipline.
Andrew Hoellering Thorverton, Devon

Starters’ orders
We run the Prince’s Trust team programme and Cavendish’s article will be going up on the wall. Resilience is crucial: many young people we work with give up before they even start. The education system and government agencies are geared around knowledge, with skills in second place and attitude not even on the map, probably because it’s the hardest to measure.
David Wreathall Co-founder, Inner Flame, Swindon

Citizen gain
I took part in a National Citizen Service scheme that helped me through a difficult time. I acquired valuable skills and went on to become an ambassador, with 100 other young people. I gained confidence in following a less conventional route through apprenticeships. Employers have been interested in my development and impressed by my determination to succeed.
Louisa Seers (aged 18)Milton-under-Wychwood, Oxfordshire

No time to lose in fight for Alzheimer’s funding

IN HIS article on dementia AA Gill is right that “we could start by helping others and making sure no one does it fearfully and alone” (“The best treatment for Alzheimer’s is tenderness”, News Review, last week). But there’s more. The government has said it will double its research funding for the disease to £122m by 2025. That’s 11 years from now.

The cure, in Gill’s words, will “probably not [come] in time for those of us who worry about it”. My mother suffered from this ailment and my own view is that the money should be committed now.
Barry Borman Edgware, London

Early call
The NHS stresses the importance of early diagnosis for dementia when mental competence to make decisions usually still exists. Lord Falconer’s assisted dying bill (to be discussed in the House of Lords later this year) should be amended to provide doctor-assisted suicide as a serious option for those who develop this tragic illness.

In Holland, Belgium and Switzerland this medical procedure is possible for competent individuals in the early stages of dementia. Are we so different from them?
Michael Irwin Cranleigh, Surrey

Not guilty
My mother has advanced Alzheimer’s compounded by total deafness and near- blindness. She lives in a care home and I have absolutely no guilt about this: I know I could not look after her at home. The carers are dedicated, and considering they probably get paid a pittance their care is exemplary.

My only guilt is that the care she receives, together with fortified food, has resulted in extending her life — or rather her existence. I have already lost the loving and intelligent mother I knew, and the longer she survives, the harder it is to remember her.
Pauline Roffe Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire

Hidden agenda
I worked in dementia care as a charge nurse for 30 years. If psychiatry is the Cinderella service of the NHS, then dementia care is the Cinderella service of psychiatry. For too long the units treating the condition were hidden away from sight, and indeed my own one was condemned to the basement of the hospital. It is only recently that dementia care has become a target for healthcare provision.
Neil Sinclair Edinburgh

Supporting cast
Congratulations to Gill on a sensitive and poignant article — it should be compulsory reading. Unless we give compassion and support to the sufferers and their families how can we regard ourselves as the so-called civilised world?
Mary Waddington Ross-on-Wye, Herefordshire

Government’s countryside hypocrisy

I AGREE wholeheartedly with Adam Boulton’s article “The PM’s green pledges ebb away even as floods rise” (Comment, last week). How can we possibly claim to take a lead on climate change and environmental issues when the government plans to destroy the countryside for HS2 and lift planning restrictions on the green belt?

I have voted Conservative in the past but will not consider doing so at the next election. I am 58 but for me the countryside is far more important than pensions. The claim that this is the “greenest ever” government is risible.
Cynthia Purkiss Eltham, London

Storm warning
Surely we must now realise that the recent extreme weather conditions here and abroad prove beyond doubt that climate change is not driven by human intervention.

The sight of our feeble attempts to mitigate the effects of these storms shows how utterly useless mankind is in the face of nature in the raw.
Peter Gardner Hydestile, Surrey

Legal protection for farmland

FARMLAND is a food factory, not a playground for townies (“We’re not all poachers, Mr Darcy”, News Review, last week). Paths are usually overgrown because hardly anyone uses them, so changing their routes slightly should hardly be a problem. People who earn their living from the land deserve some legal protection from crop and livestock damage, not to mention fly-tipping, illegal hare-coursing and vandalism.
Tom Armstrong Wooler, Northumberland

Long walk to freedom
Eleanor Mills urged walkers to fight for their “right to roam”. People will still be able to walk in the countryside but landowners will be able to ask for rights of way to be diverted from their homes. This preserves their right to privacy. If Mills wants to “let freedom reign” she should recognise that people should be free from walkers traipsing past their front doors.
William Urukalo (age 16) Knaresborough, North Yorkshire

Points

York history lesson
Your article “Mutiny on the high fees” (News Review, last week) stated that “undergraduates studying history at York last year, for instance, spent just 8% of their course in lectures, seminars and tutorials”. The claim is based on government figures that refer to 2011-12 and the data was not robust in the first year of existence because there was little standardisation. Many institutions included activities that we do not consider to be face-to-face teaching.

The data for this year is more robust. In The Sunday Times University Guide’s top 10 history departments the average number of contact hours per course is 14.9%. York is on 11%, as is Oxford, with both committed to a small- group teaching ethos. I have received no complaints about low contact hours from current students — quite the reverse, in fact. Students mostly complain that our three-hour seminars are too long and the reading required for them too demanding.
Professor Stuart Carroll Department of History, York University

Fashion victim
For 20-odd years I have managed to get my husband into Marks & Spencer once or twice a year to replenish his wardrobe (“Marks & Swagger man”, News, last week). Having seen its new designer range I fear I will never get him in there again. M&S has managed to lose a sizeable number of middle-aged female customers; is it trying to do the same with the men?
Eleanor London Crowthorne, Berkshire

Well spotted
The animal pictured in “Facebook posturing helps nail Mexico’s young drug barons” (World News, last week) is not a leopard — it is a cheetah.
Jackie Murphy London NW11

Border agent
Before the referendum on Scottish independence, is it possible to move the border a few miles south of Manchester (“The Scottish no campaign must stand up and fight”, Letters, last week)? We have as little in common with London as the Scots and we deserve a voice and a vote.
Paul Rutherford Davenport, Greater Manchester

Accentuate the negative
Negative campaigning can work in referendums (“No way to win”, Letters, last week). The NOtoAV campaign (on the alternative vote) was negative and won a resounding victory. David Cameron would be advised to keep his distance from the Better Together campaign, though. He is unpopular in Scotland, where Alistair Darling is more attuned to native sensibilities.
Simon Baker Hereford

Toast of the town
I have to take issue with AA Gill’s article on alcohol abuse in Cleethorpes (“Yet another one for the road”, Magazine, December 29). Yes, people do go out and unfortunately have too much to drink, and sometimes behave badly — but not just in Lincolnshire. We have the largest port complex, process the majority of the UK’s seafood and are leaders in off-shore renewables.
Councillor Chris Shaw Lincolnshire County Council

From Russia with booze
Gill complains that from London it takes longer to get to Grimsby than to fly to Moscow. This is most relevant, as Moscow already has in place “drunk tanks” (vytrezvitel) or “sobering-up stations”. In fact they were introduced in Russia way back in 1902.
Richard Rawles University College London

Birthdays

Kirstie Alley, actress, 63; Anthony Andrews, actor, 66; Michael Aspel, TV presenter, 81; Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon, 50; Melanie Chisholm, singer, 40; Clare Holman, actress, 50; John Lasseter, animator, 57; Pixie Lott, singer, 23; Olivier Martinez, actor, 48; David Mitchell, novelist, 45; Haruki Murakami, novelist, 65; William Nicholson, screenwriter, 66; Des O’Connor, singer, 82

Anniversaries

1866 Royal Aeronautical Society founded; 1895 National Trust founded; 1976 Agatha Christie, novelist, dies; 1991 US Congress authorises use of force to drive Iraq out of Kuwait; 2003 Maurice Gibb, singer, dies; 2004 Queen Mary 2, world’s biggest ocean liner, makes maiden voyage; 2006 more than 340 Islamic pilgrims crushed to death in stampede during a religious ritual in Mecca, Saudi Arabia

Corrections and clarifications

 

 

Telegraph:

 

SIR – When will governments learn that by encouraging parents to go back to work, we are creating a generation of children who will have no real attachment? Children need to have a good attachment to a carer, usually a parent. When this is not available, a child’s developmental prospects go astray.

Families are under enough pressure already without being forced to feel guilty if they prefer to care for their children themselves, at home.

Being a stay-at-home parent used to be seen as the most difficult job in the world. Why has opinion changed? Maybe it is because we no longer value children, but regard them either as mini-adults or as a threat to our economical growth.

Hilary Sharpe
Waddington, Lincoln

 

SIR – The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) is considering limitation of some medical treatments to those judged “a benefit to wider society”. This seems to mean those who are of working age, and it is discriminatory and immoral.

I am 74, volunteer, and pay standard-rate tax on my pension income. My wife is a tax-paying registered nurse who, at 68, still works two days a week in the busy outpatient department of our local hospital.

On what grounds can either of us be judged to be of no benefit to society?

Revd Christopher Roberts
Sutton Coldfield, Warwickshire

SIR – It’s so Nice to know we OAPs no longer bring a benefit to wider society. Is this policy not euthanasia, in all but name?

Brian Strand
Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire

Say ‘Aaah’

SIR – I wonder whether returning to the routine surgical removal of children’s tonsils and adenoids might help reduce the need for antibiotics.

My husband, our eldest daughter and I had our tonsils removed after suffering from repeated throat infections, and the operation prevented recurrence.

Because of a change in medical opinion, my three younger children were not given this procedure, and have all taken many courses of antibiotics over the years.

I’m now worried about my grandson, who has been prescribed antibiotics at the age of just over one year, for tonsillitis.

Sarah Gall
Rochdale, Lancashire

Not that Blackadder

SIR – The name Blackadder is mentioned regularly in reference to aspects of the commemoration of the First World War.

I do not know how such a memorable name came to be used in the television series, but others with military interests may have known of Major General Charles Guinand Blackader, a distinguished soldier who was commissioned into the Leicestershire Regiment in 1888. He served with the regiment for most of his 32-year career, with postings to Bermuda, Nova Scotia, Jamaica, and South Africa, He served in the First World War and was briefly in Ireland, after the Easter Rising.

Many years ago, I had the opportunity to purchase Blackader’s medals but, sadly, they were out of my financial reach. I would like to know where they are now, as they are not in the regimental museum.

Captain R J Allen
Leicester

Dry Jan, but not bitter

SIR – The use of Angostura bitters during Dry January is not permitted in our household, as its label clearly states that it contains 44.7 per cent alcohol by volume. Perhaps, however, there may be a homeopathic effect to be achieved from a relaxing of the rules.

Jean Newlands
Great Wratting, Suffolk

Diet of worms

SIR – I noted this morning while taking out a few dried mealworms to put on the bird table that the packet has a “best before” date on it that will shortly expire.

My husband seems reluctant to test whether the worms are still suitable for consumption. Whose opinion shall I seek?

Bridget Pinchbeck
Chiddingfold, Surrey

Shot dead in Britain

SIR – Your leading articleand Fraser Nelson’s articleput the Mark Duggan inquest into perspective. What were Nick Clegg and David Cameron thinking about when they made their obsequious comments about the family’s loss? We all love our children but they are not all wannabe gangsters.

In Birmingham there are black mothers of murdered children who have been ceaselessly campaigning to get guns, knives and gangs off the streets. These are the people who deserve all our sympathy and the politicians’ help.

Kevin Platt
Walsall, Staffordshire

SIR – Am I alone in thinking that the BBC coverage of the Duggan inquest has been disproportionate, ill-considered, unbalanced and therefore potentially inflammatory?

John Kellie
Pyrford, Surrey

SIR – Mark Duggan’s death did not spark the riots of August 2011. It was the excuse for the looting and anarchy that followed.

Vivien Coombs
Hungerford, Berkshire

SIR – Irrespective of the verdict in the Duggan inquest, it was alarming to hear that jurors were put in fear of their safety afterwards, there was mayhem in court and demonstrators were able to intimidate, jostle and spit at a senior police officer making a statement.

All were unprotected because security seemed to be in the hands of civilian guards. Police are not on duty in many courtrooms these days, leaving a real problem for witnesses and the rule of law.

Philip Moger
East Preston, West Sussex

Ambridge regeneration

SIR – I can cope with the new Tony Archer but could never cope with a new Jill.

Jan Berry
London SE21

In the chair

SIR – Sid Davies says that he receives at the barber’s a thorough overview of the world situation. This should remind us that the real reason the country is in such chaos is that all the people who know how to run it are cutting hair, propping up bars or driving taxi cabs.

Michael Cleary
Bulmer, North Yorkshire

Buy new cars, fridges and washers, but not today

SIR – I never said that British families should stop buying new cars, fridges and washing machines. Today we are often not able to repair goods because spare parts are not easy to source, and because repairing is too expensive.

Consequently we are spending valuable resources making appliances then throwing them away when just one small component fails. To make more efficient use of resources possible, we need to look at the whole system.

The potential transformation of ways that we use and value materials is explored in a wonderful book, available free online: Sustainable Materials: with both eyes open by Julian Allwood and Jon Cullen.

Professor David MacKay
Chief Scientific Adviser, Department for Energy and Climate Change
London SW1

SIR – Duncan Rayner says he does not need to replace his appliances from the Seventies and Eighties. After replacing my 30-year-old fridge, I was surprised to discover that the savings on my electricity bill would pay for the cost of the new fridge within two years.

Richard Renshaw
Little Baddow, Essex

SIR – A mouse has chewed the hose of my dishwasher. A new hose costs £15.99. Call-out and labour for a local repairman would be £65. If I get the manufacturer of the dishwasher to come to repair it, I will have to pay £95.

If we wish to avoid being a throw-away culture, perhaps manufacturing mouse-proof hoses would be a good start.

Penny Elles
Cove, Dumbartonshire

 

SIR – Early last year my son-in-law was head-hunted for a job in northern Italy. He moved there with my daughter and grandchildren.

The question of their having any rights wasn’t even a discussion point. In order to get the same privileges as an Italian citizen they all had to become official Italian residents and, to get this status, my daughter had to go through a wall of bureaucracy.

Legally supported documents had to prove that my son-in-law had a job. The police inspected their house to ensure that they were actually living where they said they were. Their birth certificates and marriage certificates had to be produced, together with official translations. While this was going on, my son-in-law was unable to buy a car and my 10-year-old grandson couldn’t even play matches with the local football team.

After six months they finally achieved Italian residency and at this stage were given the magic identity card. This card can now be produced on a myriad of occasions to give them exactly the same privileges as an Italian citizen.

It seems to me that most other European countries have got this right in extending the same privileges as local citizens’ only to those who show that they have somewhere to live and that they are gainfully employed.

Related Articles

Robert MacLachlan
Malmesbury, Wiltshire

SIR – Viviane Reding, the unelected vice-president of the European Commission, accuses our Prime Minister of “populism” in his expressions of concern about immigration.

If populism means supporting the interests of ordinary people, this is a great compliment to David Cameron’s democratic spirit.

Steve Bodger
Mayfield, East Sussex

SIR – GPs could check patient entitlement to health care, which is based on residency as defined by HM Revenue and Customs, not on nationality, as commonly believed.

To avoid discrimination they would need to do so for all patients registering at a practice. The patients would need to show a passport or other approved identification, and provide a confirmation from HMRC that they have residency rights, and be enabled to confirm the authenticity of these documents. They might need to reconfirm this information at intervals, or when seeking non-GP services too.

I am unaware that HMRC is able to provide this information in real time. Many of my elderly prospective patients lack photo-ID driving licences, or in some cases even passports.

You seem to argue for a national identity scheme by the back door, to replace the old-fashioned trust-based system that currently exists to access GP services. It is arguable, but is this really what you want?

Dr Stephen Baird
Skegness, Lincolnshire

 

 

Irish Times:

 

 

Irish Independent:

* I write in response to Paul Connolly’s letter (January 9) on the benefits of Europe over the last 30 years. Firstly Ireland joined the EEC on May 10, 1972, which is actually nigh-on 42 years ago.

Also in this section

Life is sheer hell at 80

Letters: Broaden debate on suicide

Letters: To thine own selfie be true

Mr Connolly points to Europe being good for farming. In 1974 the price of cattle completely collapsed and there was no sign of Europe. He contends that farming is now viable for a large section of the population, despite the fact that the number of farmers has nearly halved since the 1970s.

Mr Connolly also points to an Erasmus programme, yet he bemoans the fact that we don’t learn European languages. What is the percentage of all third-level students who have gone on Erasmus?

Emigration? Since we joined the EU we have seen two major phases of emigration in Ireland — the ’80s and now. Yes, the Irish emigrate to the Anglo sphere. What does Mr Connolly suggest; that we emigrate to Spain for work where 350,000 people have emigrated? Should we move to Greece and milk goats? Should we head to Germany, where there’s no minimum wage? Should we emigrate to Portugal, where the markets — apparently the one true barometer in fiscal measurement — say that Ireland’s bonds are a better bet than in Jose Manuel Barroso’s home country?

The rhetoric of Europe is that it provides peace and that war will not break out again within its confines. Where were these great peacemakers during the Troubles?

Where is Europe when it comes to respecting our neutrality with soldiers stationed in Uganda with no UN mandate?

Finally, Mr Connolly points to the Dublin-Galway motorway as a project funded by Europe.

If Mr Connolly took off what may have been his rose-tinted glasses, he may have seen that it was part-funded by Europe.

Mr Connolly might do well to listen to the rhetoric coming out of Europe that claims that the EU is an organisation that is in existence for 40 years.

It couldn’t be, for the Berlin Wall stood for the first 20 of those 40 years.

DERMOT RYAN

ATHENRY, CO GALWAY

ARMY SHOWS COWARDICE

* President Higgins’s Christ-less Christmas address is just one more in a steady stream of his meaningless/ value-free diatribes, as if written by a big brother-inspired committee of PC UN apparatchiks. George Orwell wrote prophetically about such a world in his book ’1984′.

The one redeeming feature of the episode was the initial courage of the Army chaplain in pointing out the absurdity of the speech, undermined by the cowardice of the Defence Forces under fire in issuing a craven apology.

Some secularists are attempting to defend the speech on a spurious appeal to Republican ethics. Nonsense — a republic is defined as a form of government in which power is explicitly vested in the people.

It has nothing to do with imposing secularist dogma, particularly as the majority of the Irish people, 92pc, are Christian. A simple recognition of this in the speech was all that was required, basic good manners really.

ERIC CONWAY

NAVAN, CO MEATH

HIV PUTS LAWS IN CONTEXT

* In the media coverage of Uganda’s new draconian anti-homosexuality laws there has been no mention of the massive and growing HIV/AIDs problem in that country.

Recently, Uganda’s President Museveni publicly took a HIV test to raise awareness of the epidemic among the population. Currently, there are 1.5 million people with HIV in Uganda and one million children orphaned because of AIDs. In all, 7pc of the adult Uganda population are living with HIV.

Like all other African countries, Uganda’s HIV/AIDs epidemic is steadily growing.

How these statistics interplay with the Uganda government’s new laws is a matter for further discussion, but it should at least be addressed as part of the context in which the new legislation is being brought forward.

MARGARET HICKEY

BLARNEY, CO CORK

LOVE THY NEIGHBOUR

* Rob Sadlier is missing something when he says that “we cannot… claim to live in a republic whilst maintaining… overtly religious… references in our Constitution” (Letters, January 9).

Fundamental to a democratic republic is the principle that all citizens are equal. That ideal arises from the religious ethic of love of neighbour. So religious references in our constitution may not be the “incongruities” that Rob Sadlier says.

A LEAVY

SUTTON, DUBLIN 13

FANTASTIC COMPLIMENTS

* All too often it is the hard word that is heard. The following is a brief compilation of some memorable compliments:

“He was my brother; not by blood, but by choice” — Frank Sinatra talking about Dean Martin.

“Meeting Franklin Roosevelt was like opening your first bottle of champagne; knowing him was like drinking it” — Winston Churchill on meeting Roosevelt.

“He was the best ballad singer I ever heard in my life” — Bob Dylan on Liam Clancy of the Clancy Brothers.

“Irish signatures are on our founding documents. Irish blood was spilled on our battlefields. Irish sweat built our great cities.

Our spirit is eternally refreshed by Irish story and Irish song; our public life by the humour and heart and dedication of servants with names like Kennedy and Regan, O’Neill and Moynihan.

So you could say there’s always been a little green behind the red, white and blue behind the American flag” — President Barack O’Bama on the Irish.

BARRY CLIFFORD

CONNEMARA, CO GALWAY

POPE WOULD DISAGREE

* I would like to ask Paddy Power to give odds on whether or not Pope Francis would agree with the ideas in Philip O’Neill’s letter (January 7).

The first big mistake is in thinking that all change comes from the top. I’m sure Pope Francis would be embarrassed to think he was the only hope for the church.

The idea that “all expressions of faith have been taken off course” isn’t based on any evidence whatsoever. Mr O’Neill says, “the country has been in the grip of a very fallible church”, which confuses the doctrine of infallibility. Infallibility doesn’t mean moral perfection, it means guidance in correct teaching, ie doctrine, though I would agree that living according to objective moral norms helps in the reception of faith.

“Christ’s purpose,” he claims with no authoritative sayings of Jesus to back his argument, “was not to create an institution with subservience of its adherents, but to breathe life into the world we all inhabit, releasing the god-given intelligence of humanity.”

I searched Google and I would argue that Mr O’Neill’s reference to Christianity being about “releasing the god-given intelligence of humanity” isn’t mentioned once in scripture or tradition.

Rather Christians are called to faith, which goes beyond reason, but is not and never can be opposed to truth.

Mr O’Neill’s claim that Catholicism could do fine without a “centrally controlling body” is central in his argument.

He even asks why this would not be the case. Nobody would recommend that the State jettisons the Supreme Court and allow each citizen to “thrive on imagination” whilst interpreting the Constitution on an individual basis. It was for similar reasons that Christ started the church, so that it can guide us into the truth.

KEITH KAVANAGH

KNOCK, CO MAYO

 

 


Clear Out

$
0
0

13 January 2014 Clear out

I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. They have to test another secret communications device. Captain Povey knows ther every movement but does he? Priceless.

Clean car for tomorrow and clear out attic for Peter Rice

Scrabbletoday Mary wins and gets well over300, Perhaps Iwill win tomorrow.

 

Obituary:

 

Sir John Whitehead, who has died aged 81, was Ambassador to Japan from 1986 to 1992; it was his fourth diplomatic posting to the country, and throughout his career he did much to encourage economic ties between Japan and Britain.

Whitehead had first arrived in Tokyo in 1956, a year after joining the Foreign Office, and by the time he returned to London in 1961 he was proficient in the Japanese language. He was back in Tokyo as First Secretary (Economic) from 1968 to 1971 and later for a four-year posting as Minister (1980–84).

From the outset Whitehead was concerned to penetrate protectionist barriers in Japan, engaging in often complex negotiations with the various Japanese government ministries with the aim of promoting better opportunities for UK exports of goods and services. His task involved not only persuading the Japanese to meet British needs, but also suggesting the direction their nation needed to take if it was to become a key player in a global liberal market.

As Minister in the 1980s, when Margaret Thatcher was in No 10, Whitehead paid particular attention to encouraging Japanese investment in Britain; among the companies which responded positively were Nissan (which opened its car plant in Sunderland in 1986) and the consumer electronics manufacturer Hitachi Maxell.

Although he could be a hard taskmaster, Whitehead was admired by his fellow diplomats as a man of the highest principles who believed strongly in the Foreign Office and in the importance of its work. He had no time for glibness or shoddily-constructed arguments, and was fearless in the defence of his own position when confronted by his political masters.

Whitehead’s proactive inclinations led him beyond the sphere of trade to seek a generally more fruitful relationship between Japan and the UK. During his time as Ambassador, he explored with his hosts the problems surrounding many common social issues, such as health and the plight of the elderly, and began the first tentative exchanges on defence cooperation.

When Whitehead retired in 1992, the President of the Board of Trade, Michael Heseltine, appointed him the Department of Trade and Industry’s adviser on Japan.

John Stainton Whitehead was born on September 20 1932, the only child of schoolteachers in north London. He was still at primary school when his father died, and he went on to Christ’s Hospital, where he was a chorister, chess player and athlete. After National Service with the Army he read French and German at Hertford College, Oxford, then joined the Foreign Office.

Whitehead’s other postings included First Secretary in Washington (1964–67); Head of Personnel Services at the FCO (1973–76); and Counsellor in Bonn (1976–80). From 1984 to 1986 he was Chief Clerk — head of administration — at the FCO, where his first task was to manage the diplomatic fallout after the murder of WPC Yvonne Fletcher; she was shot in St James’s Square by an unidentified gunman in the Libyan embassy on April 17 1984, as a result of which Britain broke off diplomatic relations with Libya.

Whitehead was appointed CMG in 1976; CVO in 1978; KCMG in 1986; and GCMG in 1992.

After retiring from his diplomatic career, he was much in demand among companies which valued his experience of the Far East. He was chairman of Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Trust Bank (Japan) from 1996 to 1999, and a non-executive director of Cadbury Schweppes (1993–2001) and Serco Group (1994–96). He was an adviser to Morgan Grenfell (later Deutsche Morgan Grenfell, Group, 1992–99); Deutsche Asset Management Group (1996–2000); Cable and Wireless (1992–2002); Sanwa Bank (1993–2000); Tokyo Electric Power Co (1993–2002); Inchcape (1992–96); and Guinness (1992–97).

In 2006 Whitehead was appointed Grand Cordon, Order of Rising Sun (Japan), 2006. Two years later he became chairman of the Daiwa Anglo-Japanese Foundation, which promotes closer links between the countries.

Among his interests were classical music. He was a good amateur pianist, and in 2004 he completed a degree in the History of Music from the Open University.

John Whitehead married, in 1964, Carolyn Hilton, with whom he had two sons and two daughters. Devoted to his family, while he was Ambassador in Tokyo he took his children on a specially arranged tour of Japan to instil in them the importance of the relationship between the two countries.

Sir John Whitehead, born September 20 1932, died November 8 2013

 

Guardian:

 

When reading the blog Patients deserve the truth: health screening can do more harm than good (3 January), we were disappointed by the misrepresentation of Breast Cancer Campaign and the comment we gave at the time of the launch of the breast-screening leaflet.

The blog accuses Breast Cancer Campaign of being “nonsensical” and implied that we had said that all women should attend screening when invited. In fact, the blog failed to accurately represent our original comment, which in part stated: “Breast Cancer Campaign encourages all women to be breast aware and attend screening appointments when invited.” In addition, by choosing to quote only a small selection of the comment, the references to over-diagnosis and the potential risks associated with screening were also missed, which misrepresented our balanced message.

It was also disappointing to see the suggestion in the blog of our quote having “marred” the launch of the breast-screening leaflet. It is not clear how this was the case and seems an irrational response to what was a considered message.

As a breast cancer charity, we fully understand the need to clearly present women with the benefits and also the risks of screening, and we aim to offer responsible advice, based on the evidence available. We based our comment in this instance on our reflections of the conclusions of the independent breast screening review which reported in October 2012. The outcome of the review acknowledged the issue of over-diagnosis but also concluded that screening does save lives by helping to detect breast cancers earlier.
Dr Lisa Wilde
Director of research, Breast Cancer Campaign

 

Bernard Porter’s fine review of The History of Oxford University Press (Review, 11 January) surely goes too far in asserting that this 876-page book is “way beyond the means of almost anyone, let alone academics”. Of course the book is not of interest to a large percentage of the population, but calling it expensive is a cheap populist shot. It is less than a ticket to almost any Premier League soccer game or a case of acceptable wine, and would take a lot longer to get through.
Professor Michael Levi
Cardiff

• Saturday started well with Ian Jack’s excellent column (An MBE for hairdressing?, 11 January), as usual observing a current event with wide historical perspective, then summing it up elegantly. Following that, a Dumbarton away win against the Blue Brazil and two Scottish wins in rugby and, seriously, finding the correct wallpaper for our kitchen set a standard, unfeasibly high I suspect, for the rest of 2014.
Gordon Milloy
Dumbarton

• Gosh! The leaps and bounds of technology: 3D printing using pasta (Letters, 11 January). Could this possibly lead to alphabet spaghetti? Now that would be groundbreaking.
Jim Ensom
Manningtree, Essex

•  May I congratulate your subscription department on giving us the first 2014 Christmas offer (page 2, early editions, 10 January).
Ken Neades
Carnoustie, Angus

 

Supporters of civil liberties should think twice about lauding plans for police officers to carry body-worn cameras (Not exactly trigger-happy, but police need to work much harder to build trust, 10 January). Even if we accept that footage will be neither lost nor tampered with, we can be far from sure that it will deliver justice. Indeed, rather than supporting justice, the use of filming by UK police forces has led to abuses of power. Increasingly, joint forward intelligence teams are deployed to capture images of legitimate and law-abiding protesters, which are unjustifiably added to databases. It is noticeable, however, that officers tend to be hypersensitive to having their own pictures taken, often spuriously quoting section 23 of the Terrorism Act. It is tempting to suggest that if the Met is in earnest about improving its reputation, it’s not cameras that are needed but mirrors.
Nigel Rayment
London

• One significant benefit of the police wearing cameras is that finally they can go back to patrolling singly rather than in pairs. The benefits of this are well established: when not distracted by mutual chatting, officers are more observant, less confrontational and more readily engage with the public. Justifiable concerns about how to summon help can be addressed by them wearing a GPS device. If London Transport can know where all its buses are in real time, the Met can do likewise for its foot patrols. I’m sure the Police Federation has a well-rehearsed list of reasons why single patrols are not possible, but the productivity gains are surely too great for vested interests to delay progress. It is a shame that Boris Johnson, having fought so hard for political control of the Met, has not taken the lead in doubling police productivity.
Philip Cunningham
London

• Having been calling for police to wear body-worn cameras for years, I naturally welcome the decision for firearms officers to begin trials, in light of the Mark Duggan shooting (Stop and search could be curtailed after Duggan verdict, 10 January). But most of the tension between the police and some communities comes from day-to-day contact such as stop and search. Therefore we should pilot body-worn cameras on all officers in areas of London where confidence in the police is low. The short-term cost will be more than offset by the proven reduction in the cost of complaints and in improved community relations.
James Cleverly
London assembly member (Con)

• The professionalism and competence of the Met armed response team in the Duggan case stands in sharp contrast to that of the team that responded to the murder of Lee Rigby. The latter had to respond with no notice to unknown assailants who in the event were armed with gun and machete and who immediately attacked the officers. They disarmed their attackers, avoided making martyrs of them and were able to see them receive justice. The former team failed on all these counts. In a pre-planned operation, they succeeded in shooting dead someone who the jury believed was not armed and turned a criminal into a martyr and set off violent disorder on the streets.
John Vincent
Exeter

• The mayor of London’s plan to buy water cannon for the Metropolitan Police is a worrying move that looks as if it is being rushed through; he is planning on purchasing the water cannon in mid-February. This gives very little chance for Londoners to express their views; such a monumental shift in policing needs a proper public debate. A clear case for water cannon to be used on the streets of London has not been made. They are expensive and no substitute for a properly resourced police service. Since 2010, we’ve lost 2,900 police officers and 2,370 PCSOs; that’s nearly 10% and more than 50% lost respectively.

The effectiveness of water cannon in a fast-moving situation is not clear; one of the main issues from the 2011 riots was there weren’t enough police officers deployed quickly enough and the police’s tactics were inadequate. As the deputy mayor for policing and crime at the time of the riots, Kit Malthouse, told the London assembly police and crime committee in February 2012, “[we] fall slightly into the trap of thinking there is a technological solution to these issues, and the truth is water cannon does not stop a riot.”

The proposal to purchase water cannons for the Met Police will be discussed at the London assembly police and crime committee on 30 January.
Joanne McCartney
Chair, London assembly police and crime committee (Lab)

• The Met commissioner seems to be repeating a pledge that used prior to the introduction of the Taser when he says any water cannon weapon would be “rarely used and rarely seen”.
Jake Fagg
Bristol

• Boris Johnson is probably right to think that a large and growing proportion of the population are not happy with the austerity that has been imposed on large sections of society, especially the young unemployed and underemployed people, but water cannon will not wash away the problem. Policies that create large-scale unrest need to be changed before demonstrations become necessary.
Brian Woodward
Kendal

• After being vindicated, Andrew Mitchell observed that if police were willing to lie under oath about a member of the cabinet (Police officer faces prison after lying in Plebgate affair, 11 January), they were even more likely to do so about those from marginalised social groups, who would find it far harder than he did to prove their innocence. Mark Duggan, perhaps?
Jennifer Jenkins
Southampton

 

Independent:

 

 

 

 

 

The now leaked Operation Tiberius report of 2002, describing police corruption (report, 10, 11 January), and the policeman’s confession that he lied in the Mitchell incident of 2012 should come as no surprise. Corruption is endemic in any police force, however hard you try to eradicate it. The essence of policing is control; control means power; and all power tends to corrupt.

The police are often dealing with law-breakers: gangsters, thieves, drug dealers, murderers and fraudsters. This association with the criminal fraternity inevitably brutalises some members of the police force, who often take on the same characteristics as the very people they are trying to bring to heel.

But there is another important element to police corruption. The police commendably want to ensure the criminal gets his just deserts, but despite their genuine belief in a man’s guilt they do not have the requisite evidence. So you make up the evidence; hence a confession obtained by corrupt means. Often more effective is to embellish the truth with a lie, especially if the truth reflects badly on the alleged offender.

Despite his current smirking, Andrew Mitchell has nothing to be proud of. He was a Cabinet minister, yet he admits swearing at the police, at the same time knowingly trying to bicycle from the wrong exit in Downing Street, both pieces of misconduct which conceivably could have involved him in criminal sanctions. So to nail him really properly the police falsely accuse the minister of calling them plebs.

So one lesson is to behave yourself because that keeps you out of trouble; the second and more important lesson is that the police cannot always be trusted.

Our police force plays an essential role in society. You don’t have to like them, and I would be rather surprised if you did. But they do need our respect in order to be effective. This requires the force to be representative of the population at large; to be well trained; to be well paid; to be visible on our streets; and to receive good leadership from their own commanders. None of these criteria seems to be in operation at the present time.

David Ashton, Shipbourne, Kent

So, the “plebgate” policeman lied. If police can act this way to bring down someone as powerful as a Cabinet minister, then just imagine how they sometimes treat ordinary citizens, let alone demonstrators, animal rights and environmental activists, and so on.

Rupert Read, Norwich

The power of a property tycoon

Noting recent statements and the sheer brass neck of landlord Fergus Wilson, I am reminded of Ted Heath’s phrase, “the unacceptable face of capitalism” (“Landlord who wants to put 200 families out on the street”, 11 January).

Militating against David Cameron’s presentation of a genial face of private enterprise is the naked truth of this system where a very rich property tycoon, in pursuit of maximising his considerable wealth, will deprive honest and hard-working citizens of their homes, all with no redress whatsoever.

This is a stark reminder of the power gulf between the haves and the have-nots in our society, which enables Mr Wilson to pry into, judge and change the circumstances of his tenants, without fear of any reciprocal action. His wealth enables him to inflict his prejudices upon decent families, causing them upheaval and anguish. His explanation that it is simple economics underlines the fact that we are not all in this together.

Make no mistake, this is the real face of capitalism.

Howard Pilott, Lewes

Why do we need the people in wigs?

Barristers went on strike over legal aid fees. Can anyone explain why we need legal aid in these days of well-paid, independent judges and randomly selected juries?

If someone is guilty in a criminal case or wrong in a civil case, why should we spend public money trying to help them “prove” they are innocent or right? On the other hand, if they are innocent or right, why can’t they simply tell their own story truthfully in their own words, rather than tell someone with a wig who then at second-hand has to tell the judge and jury or prompt his client with the “right” thing to say?

If there is doubt about the legal technicalities, surely the judge can resolve that to say what actually is the law.

Is the real trouble our point-scoring adversarial system, as also used in Parliament, rather than a pure investigative system to get at the truth?

H Trevor Jones, Guildford

The Government believes that the cost of justice for ordinary citizens, with Legal Aid at £39 a year per head of the population, is too expensive and must be reduced. In comparison, the annual cost per head of the population for the Common Agricultural Policy is £176.

As the first responsibility of any government is the safety of its people, do our current politicians believe that this stops with our police, military and security services? For an ordinary citizen, it is of more immediate importance that they can rely on our elected representatives to ensure that each of us, if having to face a day in court, does so with appropriate legal representation, not depending solely on what an individual defendant or plaintive can, or cannot, afford.

Malcolm MacIintyre-Read, Much Wenlock, Shropshire

‘War on drugs’ is a  war on people

John Rentoul is correct that “the war on drugs” is a cliché (8 January). It is also untrue. The drug laws around the world are a war on people. They make criminals of millions of cannabis users who have usually done little harm to themselves and none to anyone else. Cannabis, like alcohol and any other drug, can be harmful, but making it illegal doesn’t stop many people from using it. It just pushes up the price and means there is no quality control.

People who don’t want to break the law are turning to “legal highs”, some of which are proving to be much more damaging than many illegal drugs, and certainly more harmful than cannabis.

Rentoul is incorrect to say that “advocates of legalising cannabis tend not to propose legalising harder drugs”. If anything, many of them would put legalising the most dangerous drugs first, because they cause the most harm. They want drug use taken out of the criminal justice system and dealt with as a medical and social problem. Only then will we begin to get rid of the criminal dealers and be able to help those afflicted by drugs

Many police officers are probably too busy dealing with drunks and breaking up alcohol-induced fights to worry at all about a few people quietly smoking pot. It will be good when the law is as sensible and discriminating as the police.

Hope Humphreys, Creech St Michael, Somerset

Rogues and vagabonds need funerals

What an outrage! A “quirky vicar” takes the funeral of Ronnie Biggs, and dares to say something nice about him: and this is presented as newsworthy, complete with the usual rent-a-quotes from people who should know better (report, 11 January). I have news for them and you: any one of us would have done the same.

In my 45 years as a priest of the Church of England I have done the funerals of any number of rogues and vagabonds, as well as a few for people who were saints. But the important thing is that I don’t believe I have the right to make a distinction between them. If a family comes to me and asks me to do a funeral for them, I consider it my duty as a priest to do it as best I can without making any judgment: that is God’s job, not mine.

Mr Tomlinson is not “reinventing Christianity” as you put it: he is simply doing what thousands of clergy have been doing for many years without the media noticing it.

John Williams, West Wittering, West Sussex

What about the squeezed middle?

I agree that an increase in the minimum wage will help the low-paid and boost the economy (report, 8 January). But what about those of us who earn above the minimum wage but well below the average wage? In order to make both the low-paid and the rich better off, those of us who are neither continue to see our incomes fall in real terms.

Paul Winter, South shields, Tyne & Wear

An old hippie remembers

Isn’t John Walsh (9 January) showing his age a bit, to remember Joni Mitchell telling an audience “You’re behaving like tourists”. We both must have been at the Isle of Wight Festival together in 1970, although with 500,000 people there, I don’t remember us meeting up.

Peter Gibson, Chipping Norton, Oxfordshire

It’s an honour, Prime Minister

David Cameron’s barber was created an MBE in the honours list. Could he also make Rebekah Brooks’s horse Raisa (the one lent to her by the police) a consul?

Richard Knights, Liverpool

 

 

Times:

 

 

Clearly there are wider issues at play that the profession needs to look at

Sir, Nigel Lithman, QC, chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (letter, Jan 9), bemoaning the lack of income of barristers is nothing new. When I was considering a career at the Bar some 30 years ago I inquired how much I might expect to earn. I was told that there were 20,000 barristers in the country, that there was only enough work for 10,000 barristers and all of that work was done by 5,000 barristers.

It would appear little has changed in the intervening period.

Ian Cherry

Preston, Lancs

Sir, Does the chairman of the Criminal Bar Association really expect us to believe the average earnings of the average barrister are less than those of a bus driver?

Mike O’Malley

Orpington, Kent

Sir, After reading your Law pages (Jan 9) it occurred to me that lawyers should no longer be divided into two tribes, solicitors and barristers, but into those who are concerned with business, and those who are concerned with justice.

If society considers justice as important as business, should not practitioners of each receive the same financial rewards? If so, who is to pay them? Should we not allocate the financial benefit to the UK from lawyers’ business activities to the funding of justice, in all its manifestations, via the mechanics of government?

Arthur Mellor

Retired Solicitor

Bramhall, Cheshire

Sir, Further to Nigel Lithman’s concern about the barrister income figures that I quoted in interviews this week, the Ministry of Justice and Legal Aid Agency (LAA) recently published the full list of fees paid to barristers undertaking work for the state last year (2012/13).

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and LAA paid the average barrister judged to be working full time in criminal law £84,000. We use this figure as it is representative of average incomes for those receiving fees of more than £10,000 a year. This figure, we believe, tells the clearest picture as it’s most likely to portray those working full time for the state. However, if those who work part-time are included, the mean paid-in fees last year was £72,000.

The figure used combined CPS and LAA fees as barristers are able to, and often do, a mix of this work and in some cases take on private work on top of this (not represented in these figures). The public have every right to know about the fees paid to lawyers by the state. It is also worth saying that we are clear that a range of fees are paid to lawyers and that some do earn low amounts.

There have been accusations of “hiding”, that barristers’ take-home pay is lower than the fee income paid. That is nonsense. I can only comment on what is paid out by the LAA and CPS. How the professions ensure that what they are paid in fee income results in the maximum personal income is for them.

We know there are too many lawyers chasing too little work which is impacting on average fee income from the state. Clearly there are wider issues at play that the profession needs to look at.

We have engaged constructively with lawyers for months, and the Justice Secretary and I remain open to sensible suggestions that enable us to make the savings we have no choice but to find.

Shailesh Vara, MP

Legal Aid Minister

 

The UN now supports three quarters of the country’s 20 million population

Sir, This month’s Geneva II conference must focus exclusively on the needs and wishes of the Syrian people, whose call for freedom has been brutally suppressed since 2011. To bring about a just, sustainable resolution to the conflict it must address two fundamental, interlinked issues.

First, it must chart the transition to a Syria free of Assad’s rule. The diplomatic success on removing chemical weapons must not deflect focus from the core challenge: a dictator whose regime continues to kill, maim and drive from their ruined towns countless thousands using conventional weapons.

Secondly, Geneva II must redress the military disadvantage faced by the Free Syrian Army (FSA), which does not receive the funding and weapons which their Islamist and al-Qaeda-linked rivals obtain from extremist networks outside Syria. In return for showing its commitment to a political process and political reform, the Syrian Opposition Coalition must receive more external support for the nascent governance structures, such as a new Ministry of Defence, that it is developing in the areas under its control and for the FSA. If we fail to do this, a combination of Assad and the extremists could annihilate the only opposition who are moderate and favour a peaceful solution.

While diplomats talk, time is running out for Syria’s civilians. The UN now supports three quarters of the country’s 20 million population, including 2.5 million in opposition-controlled areas which are hard to reach, and 2.3 million refugees. According to the World Health Organisation, Syria’s healthcare system has “totally broken down”, and a polio epidemic looms.

With the UN seeking $6.5 billion to alleviate the humanitarian crisis — more than it needs for the rest of the entire world, Geneva II must move us closer to a solution. The international community can do this by bolstering the Syrian Opposition Coalition in creating a secure hub for moderates, capable of defending itself and establishing a democratic, secular and tolerant future for Syria.

Brooks Newmark, MP

Alistair Burt, MP

Sir Malcolm Rifkind, MP

Andrew Mitchell, MP

Sir Richard Ottaway, MP

Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, MP

Bernard Jenkin, MP

Nadhim Zahawi, MP

Robert Halfon, MP

Jeremy Lefroy, MP

Sir Menzies Campbell, QC, MP

Meg Munn, MP

Gisela Stuart, MP

Ben Bradshaw, MP

Frank Field, MP

Sir Tony Cunningham, MP

John Woodcock, MP

 

Three meningitis vaccinations already in the Childhood Immunisation Schedule have been very successful in preventing unnecessary child deaths

Sir, We, 118 doctors, nurses and scientists who deal daily with the consequences of meningitis, urge the Secretary of State for Health, Jeremy Hunt, to make the right decision about a meningococcal B (MenB) vaccine for children in the UK.

The UK has among the worst child health outcomes in Western Europe. Mr Hunt can help to improve this by authorising the introduction of a new vaccine for MenB, the leading cause of bacterial meningitis in the UK. Mainly affecting children, this devastating disease is difficult to diagnose, strikes fast and kills or seriously disables in hours.

Three meningitis vaccinations already in the Childhood Immunisation Schedule have been very successful in preventing unnecessary child deaths and long-term complications. The new MenB vaccine is being considered for use by the NHS. While some further data is still needed, the vaccine is estimated to cover 88 per cent of MenB disease in the UK.

The new MenB vaccine has been made available for use privately for those who can afford it, but it is a cause for concern that, after years of research, a life-saving vaccine which could significantly increase the protection offered to all our children, might simply be shelved.

If this were to happen the negative impact on disease prevention and future vaccine research would be substantial.

We urge the Secretary of State to take the lead and give a clear message that he genuinely supports child health and innovative vaccine development by ensuring that a MenB vaccine for infants and adolescents is introduced as soon as possible.

Dr Simon Nadel, Consultant in Paediatric Intensive Care, St Mary’s Hospital, London

Professor Dlawer Ala’Aldeen, Professor of Clinical Microbiology, University of Nottingham

Dr Tom Allport, Senior Paediatrician, North Bristol NHS Trust

Dr Lorraine Als, Research Associate, Imperial College London

Dr Ed Bache, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Birmingham Children’s Hospital

Dr Paul Baines, PICU Consultant, Alder Hey Children’s Hospital

Dr Nick Beeching, Senior Lecturer in Infectious Diseases and Clinical Director, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine

Dr Sumit Bokhandi, Consultant Paediatrician and Specialty Tutor in Paediatrics, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Dr Jennie Borg, Research Psychologist, University College London

Dr Emma Bould, Consultant Paediatric Intensivist, Royal London Hospital

Professor Philip Butcher, Professor of Molecular Medical Microbiology, St George’s University of London

Professor Enitan Carrol, Chair in Paediatric Infection, University of Liverpool

Dr Bambos Charalambous, Senior Lecturer in Clinical Microbiology, Royal Free & University College Medical School

Dr Beth Cheesebrough, Research Fellow in Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London

Dr Deborah Christie, Consultant Clinical Psychologist, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Dr Stuart Clarke, Reader in Infectious Disease Epidemiology, University of Southampton

Professor Jonathan Cohen, Emeritus Professor, Brighton and Sussex Medical School

Dr Mehrengise Cooper, Consultant Paediatric Intensivist and Paediatric Tutor, Imperial College London

Dr Sian Cooper, Consultant Paediatric Intensivist, Leeds General Infirmary

Dr Aubrey Cunningham, Senior Lecturer in Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London

Dr Andrew Curran, Consultant Paediatric Neurologist, Alder Hey Children’s Hospital

Dr Ffion Davies, Consultant in Emergency Medicine, Leicester Royal Infirmary

Dr Patrick Davies, Clinical Lead, Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Nottingham Children’s Hospital

Dr Naomi Davis, Consultant in Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Manchester Childrens Hospital

Dr Mathew Diggle, Clinical Lead for Molecular Diagnostics, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Dr Garth Dixon, Consultant Paediatric Microbiologist, Great Ormond Street Hospital

Dr Liam Dorris, Paediatric Neuropsychologist, Royal Hospital for Sick Children (Yorkhill)

Dr Nicholas Embleton, Consultant Neonatal Paediatrician, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Ms Sian Falder, Consultant Plastic Surgeon, Alder Hey Children’s Hospital

Dr Helen Fardy, Consultant Paediatrician, University Hospital of Wales

Professor Saul Faust, Honorary Consultant Paediatrician and Director, NIHR Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility

Dr Eva Galiza, Research Fellow, Paediatric Infectious Diseases, St Georges University of London

Professor Elena Garralda, Emeritus Professor of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Imperial College London

Dr Stephen Granier, General Practitioner, Whiteladies Medical Group Bristol

Dr Jim Gray, Consultant Microbiologist, Birmingham Children’s Hospital

Dr Martin Gray, Director PICU, St George’s Hospital London

Professor George Griffin, Professor of Infectious Diseases and Medicine / Honorary Consultant Physician, St George’s University of London/ St George’s Hospital

Dr Scott Hackett, Consultant in Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital

Dr Rosie Hague, Consultant in Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Ms Caroline Haines, Consultant Nurse PICU/HDU, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children

Dr Steven Hancock, Lead Consultant (Paediatrics), Embrace Yorkshire & Humber Infant & Children’s Transport Service

Mr Andrew Harvey, Research Nurse, Bristol Royal Infirmary

Professor Paul Heath, Professor in Paediatric Infectious Diseases /Honorary Consultant in Paediatric Infectious Diseases, St George’s University of London/ St George’s Hospital

Dr Jethro Herberg, Senior Lecturer in Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London

Dr Lee Hudson, Consultant Paediatrician, Great Ormond Street Hospital

Dr Mike Hudson, Honorary Senior Lecturer in the Department of Paediatrics, Imperial College London

Dr Warren Hyer, Consultant Paediatrician and Consultant Paediatric Gastroenterologist, St Mark’s Hospital and Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London

Dr David Inwald, Consultant in Paediatric Critical Care Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital

Dr Hannah Jones, Post Doctoral Researcher, Institute of Child Health, University College London

Dr Laura Jones, Consultant in Paediatric Diseases, Royal Hospital for Sick Children Edinburgh

Professor Beate Kampmann, Professor of Paediatric Infection & Immunity, Imperial College London

Dr George Kassianos, Immunisation Lead, Royal College of General Practitioners

Dr Dominic Kelly, Consultant in Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Disease, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

Dr Julia Kenny, Senior Clinical Research Fellow, Institute of Child Health, University College London

Dr Steve Kerr, Consultant in Paediatric Intensive Care Medicine, Alder Hey Children’s Hospital

Professor Nigel Klein, Consultant in Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Great Ormond Street Hospital

Professor Simon Kroll, Professor of Paediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London

Professor Jai Kulkarni, Consultant in Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital of South Manchester

Professor Harold Lambert, Emeritus Professor of Microbial Diseases, St George’s Hospital London

Dr Nick Lessof, Consultant Paediatrician, Great Ormond Street Hospital

Dr Paula Lister, Paediatric and Neonatal Intensivist, Great Ormond Street Hospital

Dr Hermione Lyall, Consultant in Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London

Dr Nathalie MacDermott, Paediatric Speciality Trainee, Cwm Taf NHS Trust and Honorary Clinical Research Fellow at Imperial College London

Dr Roderick MacFaul, Consultant Paediatrician, Pinderfields General Hospital

Dr Iain MacIntosh, Consultant Paediatric Intensivist & Director PICU, Southampton General Hospital

Mrs Chris Mackerness, Senior Sister, PICU, Great North Children’s Hospital Newcastle

Dr Ian Maconochie, Lead Consultant in Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

Dr Robin Marlow, Research Fellow, University of Bristol

Dr Nuria Martinez-Alier, Paediatric Consultant in Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Evelina London Children’s Hospital

Dr Georgios Mavrogeorgos, Paediatric SHO, St George’s Hospital London

Dr Antoinette McAulay, Consultant Paediatrician, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Dr Jillian McFadzean, Clinical Lead for PICU, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh

Dr Fiona McGill, Clinical Research Fellow, University of Liverpool

Dr Michael McIntyre, Consultant Microbiologist, Wexham Park Hospital

Dr Alison McKendrick, Consultant in Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital of South Manchester

Ms Sheila McQueen, Head of Health, Community and Education Department, Northumbria University

Dr Esse Menson, Consultant in Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Evelina London Children’s Hospital

Dr Benedict Michael, NIHR Doctoral Research Fellow, University of Liverpool

Dr Siraj Misbah, Consultant Clinical Immunologist, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust

Dr Fergal Monsell, Consultant Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgeon, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children

Professor Richard Moxon, Emeritus Professor Paediatrics, University of Oxford

Dr Linda Murdoch, Lead Clinician in Paediatric Intensive Care, St George’s Hospital London

Dr Fiona Neely, Consultant in Health Protection/Public Health

Dr Nelly Ninis, Consultant Paediatrician, St Mary’s Hospital, London

Dr Vas Novelli, Consultant in Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Great Ormond Street Hospital

Dr Ifeanyichukwu Okike, Clinical Research Fellow, St George’s University of London

Professor Mark Pallen, Head of the Division of Microbiology and Infection, Warwick Medical School

Dr Kamal Patel, Consultant Paediatrician in Critical & Emergency Care, Royal Alexandra Children’s Hospital Brighton

Dr Nazima Pathan, University Lecturer and Consultant in Paediatric Intensive Care, University of Cambridge and Addenbrooke’s Hospital

Dr Mark Peters, Consultant Paediatric Intensivist, Great Ormond Street Hospital

Dr Stephen Playfor, Consultant Paediatric Intensivist, Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital

Dr Jane Ratcliffe, Consultant in Paediatric Intensive Care, Alder Hey Children’s Hospital

Dr Martin Richardson, Consultant Paediatrician, Peterborough Hospital

Dr Anna Riddell, Paediatric Service Director, Royal London Hospital

Dr Christine Rollier, Research Associate, University of Oxford

Ms Gael Rolls, Senior Charge Nurse/Critical Care Co-ordinator, Yorkhill Hospital

Dr Robert Ross-Russell, Consultant Paediatrician, Addenbrooke’s Hospital

Dr Manish Sadarangani, Clinical Lecturer in Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, University of Oxford

Dr Tina Sajjanhar, Consultant in Paediatric Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Lewisham

Dr Julian Sandell, Consultant in Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Dr Martin Schweiger, Trustee, Thackray Medical Research Trust

Dr Andrew Seaton, Consultant in Infectious Diseases, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Dr Tim Sell, Clinical Research Fellow, Oxford Vaccine Group

Professor Michael Shields, Professor of Child Health & Consultant Paediatrician, Queen’s University of Belfast & Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children

Dr Delaine Shingadia, Consultant in Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Great Ormond Street Hospital

Dr Matthew Snape, Consultant in General Paediatrics and Vaccinology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

Dr Mark Tighe, Consultant Paediatrician, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Dr Yogi Thakker, Consultant Paediatrician, Milton Keynes Community Health Services

Dr Alistair Thomson, Consultant Paediatrician, Leighton Hospital

Dr Kent Thorburn, Consultant in Paediatric Intensive Care Medicine, Alder Hey Children’s Hospital

Dr Guy Thwaites, Clinical Reader in Infectious Diseases, King’s College London

Dr David Turner, Clinical Associate Professor and Honorary Consultant Microbiologist,

University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Dr Sam Walters, Consultant in Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London

Dr Gabriel Whitlingum, Consultant Paediatrician – Neurodisability, Royal Hampshire County Hospital

Dr Tim Whittington, Consultant Paediatric Intensivist, John Radcliffe Hospital

Dr Ed Wilkins, Clinical Director of Infectious Diseases, North Manchester General Hospital

Dr Andrew Winrow, Consultant Paediatrician, Kingston Hospital

Dr Katie Yallop, Paediatric Registrar, Winchester Hospital

Dr Robert Yates, Consultant in Paediatric Intensive Care, Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital

Research shows that businesses driven by a social mission are far more likely to be led by women than mainstream businesses

Sir, Where the gender gap still exists in the workplace, business must look to the success stories of other emerging markets (“Women work more but pay gap widens”, Jan 9).

Women’s position in the ranks of the UK’s social enterprise sector has never been stronger. Research shows social enterprises — businesses driven by a social mission and that reinvest profits — are far more likely to be led by women than mainstream businesses: 38 per cent of social enterprises have a female leader, compared with 19 per cent of SMEs and 3 per cent of FTSE 100 companies. Some 91 per cent of social enterprises have at least one woman on their leadership team and just 9 per cent have male-only teams –— a striking figure when compared with mainstream SMEs — 49 per cent of which have male-only teams.

There’s still work to be done, but Britain’s social enterprise movement is fast becoming a natural home for the female entrepreneur. There’s a reason the social enterprise sector is outstripping mainstream businesses for growth and optimism and has had such a massive start-up rate in the past two years. If the rest of the business world took note, the potential for women in business could immensely improve.

Celia Richardson

Director of Campaigns

Social Enterprise UK

 

There can be no sensible arguments against making available the results of properly conducted research for open scrutiny

Sir, Matt Ridley falls into his own trap in his Opinion column (Jan 6), though the title “Roll up: cherry pick your research results here” is apposite, because that is exactly what Ridley does with respect to the research evidence for global warming.

There can be no sensible arguments against making available the results of properly conducted research for open scrutiny. The arguments for this have been rehearsed very effectively in health — and, in general, the biomedical research community has accepted these arguments. Indeed UK scientists pioneered the controlled clinical trial and the Cochrane Collaboration led the way in the rigorous meta-analysis of all sources of evidence to reach the most reliable conclusions allowing the implementation of “evidence-based” medicine. The pharmaceutical industry, which can certainly be criticised for past practices in not revealing the results of all clinical studies of new drugs, is now moving towards greater transparency, and drug regulators, such as the EMEA, are rightly pressing hard. Iain Chalmers, Ben Goldacre and others deserve much credit for their campaigning for openness.

The same can be said of the climate science community. Following the controversy over leaked University of East Anglia emails there have been substantial efforts in making source data openly available. It is partly through this openness and replicablility of findings by researchers in different institutes — the Berkeley Earth Island Institute analysis published last year is a case in point — that drew the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to the unassailable conclusion in its most recent report that “warming of the climate system is unequivocal”.

This report was a consensus led by 259 scientists, from 39 countries, which assessed the findings of all of the relevant, peer-reviewed scientific literature published between the previous report in 2007 and March of last year. Would that Matt Ridley applied the same rigour when it comes to evidence about the anthropogenic contribution to climate change. The “hockey stick” graphs, prominent as they were at the time, are just one small part of a massive global research effort that provides consistent and overwhelming evidence.

Sir Mark Walport, Chief Scientific Adviser to HM Government

Professor Stephen Belcher, Head of Met Office Hadley Centre

 

 

Telegraph:

 

SIR – Jeremy Clarkson’s BBC documentary PQ17: An Arctic Convoy Disaster (Mandrake, January 5) did not do justice to the subject.

I was a naval rating on a destroyer escorting several of the convoys. I will never forget the immense seas, the frozen air, and the comradeship on the fo’c’sle. It was like a terrifying game of chess where the pawns carried the cargo, the destroyers were the knights and the king was the German battleship, Tirpitz. No amount of money could ever compensate the Merchant Navy crews. It is a sad truth that much of the munitions cargo was not compatible with Russian equipment.

Mr Clarkson’s account of life on board and the dangers involved was far from adequate — but how would he know?

William Mitchell
London NW1

 

SIR – The continued dumbing down of the once magnificent Radio 3 will not enable it to catch up with Classic FM in audience numbers (Letters, January 5). Classic FM is to be applauded for bringing great music to the awareness of a new listenership.

The novice listener should be able to move on to Radio 3 to broaden their musical experience. The high ideals of the BBC need to be restored as only then can the licence fee be justified. There is no need to compete with Classic FM’s sugary diet.

Richard Lee
Mitcham, Surrey

SIR – Radio 3’s crime, according to Darren Henley (Letters, January 5), is to invade Classic FM’s space with the unfair advantage of the licence fee. If, as Tony Newbery (Letters, January 5) claims, many once-loyal listeners are abandoning Radio 3, then who is the beneficiary if not Classic FM?

For the record, I find the presenters of morning Radio 3 likeable, scholarly and without the patronising tone which has sometimes characterised their Classic FM counterparts.

Brian H Sheridan
Sheffield, South Yorkshire

SIR – Somebody very high up at Radio 3 worships the piano. In at least six years I have yet to hear a Bach keyboard work played other than on a modern grand piano. Fine, but why the aversion to the harpsichord or clavichord?

Romantic organ music, other than the occasional Franck piece, is also a no-go area. Mr Henley is quite right, why are we subsidising this service?

Robert Lightband
Dundee, Angus

SIR – Darren Henley does not mention the Proms and other live events promoted by Radio 3, or its New Generation Artist scheme which has given so many artists, both home-grown and from abroad, the opportunity to develop their careers.

David Muir
Stoke Gifford, Gloucestershire

HS2 integration

SIR – Andrew Gilligan (Gilligan on Sunday, January 5) complains that HS2 services will not be “integrated” with the existing network as its trains will run into the current main station in only two of the seven cities on the new route. But this simply underlines the point that HS2 is needed to create new capacity.

Stations such as Birmingham and Leeds are full, and serious expansion of any rail services would need new infrastructure to be built. Building new stations for HS2 also allows them to be designed to take longer trains than could be accommodated at existing stations.

Mr Gilligan should also note that HS2 trains running beyond the new infrastructure will serve the present-day main station at 21 other towns and cities such as Stafford, Warrington, York and Newcastle. In London, the brand-new Old Oak Common station will link directly into London’s Crossrail, transfoming journeys to Heathrow and to the City or Docklands.

William Barter
Towcester, Northamptonshire

SIR – Simon Hope (Letters, January 5) says that “more than 3,000 miles of motorways and trunk roads constructed since the Sixties amounts to almost 30 times the land-take of the 350-mile HS2 twin-track railway.”

But motorways and trunk roads enable their users to branch off to numerous towns and other destinations at frequent intervals en route.

And how many travellers and tons of freight will be carried daily between London and Birmingham by HS2 compared with the M1/M6?

Richard Shaw
Dunstable, Bedfordshire

Blair the entrepreneur

SIR – Tony Blair seems to have considerable entrepreneurial talents (“Bumper year boosts Blair fortune”, report, January 5).

Yet he showed no such talent in the control of our country’s finances when Prime Minister.

Noel Charles
Silverstone, Northamptonshire

Harmful smacking

SIR – R H Wilshire (Letters, January 5) says “I’m sure that all adults know when physical chastisement is taken to extremes”. Unfortunately this is not true, especially for some people who have been beaten or abused as children.

If an adult is smacked or hit, this is regarded as assault, and legal action is taken. Smacking a child is a violation of trust and is harmful. Most children respond to communication or withdrawal of privileges. Smacking can render a child indifferent or defiant or cause him or her to lose confidence and self-worth.

Maxine Davies
Westbury-on-Trym, Gloucestershire

Teaching Forces

SIR – The new training programme to fast-track service personnel into the classroom (report, January 5) is not the “first” such scheme. After the Second World War, many suitable ex-service personnel attended teacher training colleges for one year, instead of the two that was normal at that time.

This emergency programme produced many excellent teachers. Of those I knew, two became primary school headmasters, one a deputy head.

John B Griffin
Leigh, Lancashire

New Year’s peeve

SIR – George Osborne tells us we must cut costs and lower our deficit. Then we read (The Week that Was, January 5) of a “multi-sensory firework display” to celebrate the New Year, costing £1.83 million and featuring peach-flavoured snow and banana confetti.

This is in a country where more and more people are relying on food banks. We can ill afford such extravagance.

Sian Jones
Tongwynlais, Glamorgan

The raid on pensions began under Brown

SIR – Your front-page report (January 5) rightly calls for an end to the pensions lottery and the murky acts of pensions companies that take excessive fees from funds.

The list of murky acts might also have included the sleight of hand by Gordon Brown when, as Chancellor in 1997, he removed tax relief on dividends earned by our pension funds, even as Tony Blair was preaching to us that we should all take more responsibility for our own retirements and rely less on the state. At a stroke, Mr Brown’s act removed around £5 billion per annum from private pension funds and this annual deficit continues to this day.

Terry Lloyd
Darley Abbey, Derbyshire

Mark Duggan verdict

SIR – It should not be assumed that every Briton of Afro-Carribean descent is enraged by the verdict that the killing of Mark Duggan was lawful. Many will be deeply concerned that gangs of young men carrying guns roam the streets and sometimes kill others. They will be worried by the risks to their children from the drug trade.

In order to create a climate of opinion that inhibits effective policing, the drug dealers are keen to promote the false notion that the police acted wrongly. All law-abiding citizens, whatever their ethnic origin, should support the police in their efforts to get guns and drugs off the streets on our behalf.

Frank Tomlin
Billericay, Essex

Carry on O’Carroll

SIR – Discussing the strange success of Mrs Brown’s Boys, William Langley (News Review, January 5) rightly points out the absence of any wit or subtlety but fails to put his own finger on the single reason for the success of this otherwise bawdy rubbish.

Brendan O’Carroll, in the main role, is a superb comedian. His timing of the verbal jibes and visual gags is quite brilliant. I note that he has been a stand-up comic for about 20 years – enough time to learn the craft.

Modern “alternative” comedians may be able to swear like Mr O’Carroll, but I’ve yet to see one who can match his prodigious talent for making people laugh.

Graham Fisher
Sale, Cheshire

Bunty mutineers

SIR – “You never want to pick a fight with an angry woman called Bunty” (Friends, December 29).

Oh dear – what have we Buntys done to deserve this?

Bunty Leatherdale
Bradford on Avon, Wiltshire

SIR – John Cridland’s enthusiasm for immigration (Business, January 5) overlooks the fact that one man’s cheap supply of labour is another man’s falling standard of living.

Downloading the relevant statistics from the Office of National Statistics website, I have calculated that an index for average real per capita GDP, set at 100 in the year 2000, now stands at 83.4.

This is over a period during which immigration has been massive. Yet there is no evidence on this basis of any benefit to Britain whatsoever. Indeed the reverse is the case.

The Government must stop listening to the partisan arguments of business and look instead to the national interest. The problem is less whether the migrants work or cheat the benefits or tax system so much as the total number of them.

Unless the Government finds a way of limiting immigration before the next election, I may be voting Ukip. It is surely preferable to endure another five years of Labour incompetence than face a future with no hope.

John Poynton
Amersham, Buckinghamshire

SIR – The debates on immigration concentrate almost entirely on economic matters.

Even if it could be indisputably shown that an increase in the number of immigrants would be to our financial advantage, do we want the population to rise to 80, 90 or 100 million?

Do we want new towns to be built in our national parks, housing estates on green belt land and hospitals and prisons in Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty?

Leonard Macauley
Staining, Lancashire

SIR – I suspect that Ed Miliband’s promises to control immigration are pure electioneering. A Labour Government will not control immigration because of pressure from the Left, which sees votes in immigrants.

Mr Miliband was part of the Labour Government that allowed the uncontrolled immigration influx in the first place.

Prof Terry Langford
Milford on Sea, Hampshire

SIR – There are almost a million unemployed young people desperate for jobs in Britain.

The unskilled, low-paid jobs will continue to be filled by economic migrants, until school leavers realise that not all of them can expect to be employed in a well-paid, non-manual job.

We need those who are prepared to undertake such work. Should our education system change to accommodate this or is it too late?

Paul Caruana
Truro, Cornwall

SIR – Anyone who listened to William Hague’s 2001 speech in full (Opinion, January 5), would have known that when he spoke about a “foreign country”, he was talking not about immigration, but about EU interference in British affairs.

Besides being “a practical matter to be managed”, immigration is also an important issue, worthy of serious and honest debate.

Michael Laycock
Harrogate, North Yorkshire

SIR – Any land mass is over-populated when the economic activities of its inhabitants degrade the ecosystem more quickly than it can regenerate.

Economists prefer an increasing population, whereas ecologists argue that the survival of the human race depends on a gradual reduction.

The Government is rightly trying to reduce the financial debt facing future generations. Unfortunately, unless addressed with equal vigour, their environmental and demographic legacy is likely to cause a great deal more problems.

Chris Jones
Croydon, Surrey

SIR – According to Matthew d’Ancona (Opinion, January 5), we poor boobies don’t even know our own minds – we merely “cite this issue [immigration] as an emotive proxy for other anxieties: fear of economic insecurity, of change, of losing out”. That’s that problem solved, then.

Robert Ramage
West Wickham, Kent

 

 

SIR – Pc Keith Wallis’s plea of guilty, in the case affecting Andrew Mitchell, the former chief whip (report, January 11), means he cannot be questioned in the dock as to who, if anyone, urged him to lie; or who cooperated with him in this, or why.

Jan Dow
Exeter, Devon

SIR – Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, said Wallis’s behaviour fell “below the standards expected” of his officers. Shouldn’t that have been “contrary to the standards expected”? They should tell the truth rather than lie.

Richard Cheeseman
Yateley, Hampshire

SIR – Plebgate: at last, a scandal that really involves a gate!

Simon Lovell
Eye, Cambridgeshire

Another other woman

SIR – The French president, you report, contemplates legal action over publicity given to his mistress. I wonder why. An affair that can break an English politician’s career enhances a French politician’s popularity. Many Frenchmen have a wife, an official mistress with an important role in French society, and a genuine love for a platonic relationship.

Lord Sudeley
London NW1

Freeze on consumption

SIR – If Judith Woods wishes to slow down her intake of chocolate bars, then pop them into the freezer. This inhibits instant demolition.

MInd your teeth, though, if you’re a beginner.

Ginny Hudson
Swanmore. Hampshire

Eddy on the Cam

SIR – With the arrival of Prince William, Cambridge University has the grandson of a reigning monarch among its dreaming spires for the second time in its history.

In October 1883, Queen Victoria’s grandson, Prince Albert Victor, known everywhere as Prince Eddy, went into residence at Trinity College, with a don who was a radical MP and an outspoken critic of the monarchy as his neighbour.

“He hardly knows the meaning of the words ‘to read’,” wailed his tutor. After two years the most that could be said for him was that he had “a fair memory for the more picturesque parts” of English history.

It is perhaps not surprising that the university has made no reference to this interesting royal precedent.

Lord Lexden
London SW1

Drunk the year round

SIR – An extremely fine yet undervalued alcohol-free cocktail for Sandra Woods’s Dry January (Letters January 8), which she might like to continue through the wet months ahead, is made by squeezing pink grapefruits to fill a litre jug or so, and macerating overnight with a decent bunch of mint. The ingredients blend harmoniously and the drink improves for several days.

Such a cocktail will be sharper, yet not bitter, using white grapefruits. It is highly favoured by all recovering alcoholics for whom I have catered.

Patrick Williams
London SW4

SIR – I am sick of attending social gatherings and having to justify my not drinking. I am viewed with much suspicion, and do not see why I should have to explain this to someone before I am allowed a drink I would prefer.

Kim Halliday
Newport, Essex

 

 

Irish Times:

Sir, – The fact that the so-called Protection of Life During Pregnancy Act 2013 has come into effect in the absence of clinical guidelines being issued by the Department of Health is profoundly disturbing from a legal and medical perspective (Home News, January 3rd, 2014).

The purpose of this Act, according to the Government, was to eliminate a supposed lacuna in the law which it wrongly claimed had arisen as a result of the decision in X case.

Ironically, instead of removing a gap in the law which did not exist in the first place, the commencement of the Act in the absence of clinical guidelines has created just such a gap, since a pregnant woman is now entitled by statute to an abortion in certain circumstances but medical professionals have no means of ascertaining exactly what these circumstances are.

The fact that no guidelines have been formulated a full five months after the Act was signed can hardly be of great surprise to anyone.

At the Oireachtas Health Committee hearings on abortion, held one year ago this week, the Government was repeatedly warned about the difficulties that would be faced in formulating guidelines to cover the issue of suicidal ideation. Psychiatrists who attended the hearings were unanimously of the view that an abortion is not a treatment for suicidal ideation in a woman, in any circumstances, and therefore it was bound to prove difficult for the Department of Health to produce a set of guidelines which expected doctors to act as if the very opposite were the case.

Unfortunately the Government chose, for political reasons, to completely ignore the evidence from psychiatrists and the ethical conundrum which would arise for doctors as a result of the Act. It will be interesting to see exactly what medico-legal somersaults the Department of Health will seek to perform in order to overcome these enormous difficulties. – Yours, etc,

BARRY WALSH

Brooklawn,

 

 

Sir, – For the record and in response to the letters of Rev Eoin de Bhaldraithe (December 23rd) and Dr Ken Dunn (January 6th), I recognise and understand the injustice of Ne Temere and am also aware that mixed marriages were exempted from Tridentine law (which may well have been to avoid a conflict with civil law). I am also familiar with the McCann case which, as the validity of that marriage was called into question, underpins my argument that Ne Temere was about the validity of all marriages involving Catholics.

That said, I believe that as the same case became heavily politicised it warrants much more robust scholarly research and analysis before any grand claims concerning it can be made. A degree of caution is also required when considering Dr Dunn’s claim that “Ne Temere was applied enthusiastically by both clergy and politicians in Ireland and retrospectively [...] and marriages of long standing were broken up”. For my doctoral research I examined a significant number of lesser-known inter-faith relationship/mixed marriage disputes, many of which came before the Irish courts. I found that Ne Temere was generally not applied retrospectively and that most disputes centred on the issue of the religious upbringing of the children of the marriage rather than on the requirement that a couple should marry before a Catholic priest and two witnesses (Ne Temere). Further, I am not aware of any politicians who applied Ne Temere (the Catholic Church and state were never that close!), though I am aware that many unionist politicians exploited it for political gain particularly in the run-up to the third Home Rule Bill.

Dr Dunn also states that “the upbringing of children was not completely explicit in Ne Temere”. In fact, he should forego the woolly language and acknowledge my fundamental point that there was “no reference in the decree in any shape or form to the religious upbringing of children”.

For anyone interested, my research and analysis of the said inter-faith relationship/mixed marriage disputes will be published in an article entitled “Church and State and Unhappy Marriages” in the scholarly journal New Hibernia Review in 2014. – Yours, etc,

Dr DAVID JAMESON,

York Road,

Dún Laoghaire,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – The extraordinary claims of Dr Ken Dunn, chairman of the  Northern Ireland Mixed Marriage Association, demand explanation and clarification. His claim that the Ne Temere decree “was applied enthusiastically by clergy and politicians in Ireland . . . and marriages of long standing were broken up” is very strange. While there should be no surprise that [Roman Catholic] clergy would apply Ne Temere, there is no comment in favour of Ne Temere in the Dáil record from its creation in 1919 to the present day. Which politicians is he referring to? The only example he gives is from Belfast in 1910 and as far as I remember the British were in charge then. Has he no other example?

His claim that “the net result of [Ne Temere] was the reduction of the Protestant population in the Irish Free State/Republic by 80 per cent” is simply untrue.  As far back as 1973, RE Kennedy showed that the main causes of Protestant decline in Ireland were colonial retreat after independence, economic emigration, war deaths, natural decrease, and of course Ne Temere. – Yours, etc,

BARRY KEANE,

Glendalough Park,

Cork.

Sir, – , Please allow me space to enlighten John Thompson’s understanding of what we “think we are saving” in relation to the planned obliteration of the Moore Street area (January 6th). For a start, according to the National Museum (in a letter to Minister for Arts and Heritage Jimmy Deenihan), “the most important historic site in modern Irish history that if properly and sensitively developed could rank with famous historic sites around the world as Dublin’s historic quarter”.

The only buildings that lie derelict and abandoned are those at 14 to 17 Moore Street designated in 2007 as the 1916 National Monument and under the private ownership of Chartered Land since 2005. All other buildings associated with the retreat from the GPO are occupied and in use today. It is not true to say that they have no architectural features. Numbers 14 to 17 are listed for preservation not only on historical grounds but also because they do contain important 18th-century elements. Incredibly no other building in the area has been internally examined or assessed. The buildings did not simply shelter “some remnants of the rebel’s leadership”. The Moore Street terrace was the last HQ of the 1916 Provisional Government of the Irish Republic. This was the location where six of the leaders – five of whom were signatories to the Proclamation – spent their last hours of freedom before their execution by firing squad. The terrace is their only extant meeting place that has not been altered or destroyed through redevelopment. For some of us this is sacred ground.

The 1916 Proclamation was not drawn up in Conway’s public house. It was, of course, agreed and signed in 21 Henry Street. Conway’s is the location of the signing of documents of a somewhat different nature in recent times – the brown envelope kind. It is listed for preservation – somebody in authority has, it can be said, at the very least, an ironic sense of humour.

I heartily agree that the best tribute to the rebels would be to see that their vision comes to pass. How to best achieve that is the question? Hardly by a dismissal of the past or the planned demolition of our lasting physical links to the event in our history that led to our independence. These historic locations and buildings are not ours to destroy or hand over for private commercial gain. As part of our history and heritage they are held in trust for future generations. We do not argue for a return to the past – we can however plan our future based on our past – our honourable past, that is. – Yours, etc,

JAMES CONNOLLY

HERON,

Concerned Relatives

of the Signatories to

the 1916 Proclamation,

Oxford Road,

 

 

Sir, – The spirit of Pádraig Pearse can be pictured smiling kindly at Richard Irvine pointing out that “an inclusive Ireland must have room for Britishness; it must recognise it, even embrace it . . . and build an Irish identity that can include it,” (Opinion & Analysis, January 3rd). Pearse himself gave de jure status to such an identity, or at least strongly indicated it, when he named Thomas Davis as a father and evangelist of Irish nationality, shortly before the Rising.

In support of O’Connell’s campaign for repeal of the union, Davis put forward his own concept of a new Irish nationality . This was one which “must contain and represent the races of Ireland. It must not be Celtic, it must not be Saxon – it must be Irish.” Of noteworthy significance, especially in relation to the endemic bigoted sectarianism in Northern Ireland, and the unfinished business of the 1916 Rising, is the requirement that it must “not [be] a nationality which would prelude civil war, but [one] which would establish union and external independence”. Does that not imply that creating “internal unions” must be the means to an independent Ireland?

Davis had a dream that internal union might be brought about by love — the only force which, as Martin Luther King later pointed out, “is capable of transforming an enemy into a friend”. Since “cherishing” is akin to “loving”, the resolve that Pearse wrote into the Proclamation for “all the children of the nation” to be cherished equally can be interpreted now as a first step in establishing as de facto the Davis-conceived new inclusive Irish nationality.

What better time to begin that nation-building, and respond to the legacy of Pearse, than this year, 2014, which brings us, on October 24th, the bicentenary of the birth of Thomas Davis. – Yours, etc,

JAMES McGEEVER,

Dublin Road,

 

 

 

Sir, – I wish to add support to your leading article of January 5th calling for action in 2014 on global warming. It is becoming increasingly obvious that we must reduce our carbon emissions by reducing our use of fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas) by replacing them with renewables and nuclear power.

In the Irish situation there is a misconception that renewables, notably wind, will alone solve all our energy problems. This cannot be the case due to wind’s intermittency and to the necessity of providing back-up fossil fuel electricity generators for when the wind fails.

I am delighted to see that the leader suggests that modern nuclear power be considered for Ireland as this is the aim of our advocacy group BENE (Better Environment with Nuclear Energy: see bene.ie). Many professional bodies such as ESB, Eirgrid, Forfás, ICTU and IBEC have expressed the same opinion.

Nuclear power is the only source of low carbon, clean, base¨-load electricity and, we have shown that, using the new small modular reactors (SMRs) it would be a very considerably cheaper option for Ireland than wind turbines, together with their back-up gas-fired electricity generators and grid extensions.

It should be noted that one nuclear plant is equivalent to 1,000 wind turbines, higher than the 120m Dublin spire, and would have a lifetime of 60 years compared to 20-25 years for wind turbines. A nuclear plant could be sited in the place of an existing fossil plant, use the existing grid, and so would not require all the controversial extra pylons necessary with wind generation.

It is about time that a serious cost-benefit analysis of our future energy supply be done and that this include the nuclear option. – Yours, etc,

PHILIP W WALTON,

(Emeritus Professor

of Physics, NUI Galway),

Uggool,

 

Sir, – Why the uproar when Irish Water consultancy fees were announced (Front Page, January 10th)? This company was started from scratch and was delivered within a year. There would probably have been financial penalties imposed on the private companies if deadlines were not met. If it were left to the relevant public sector bodies, would the Government be able to impose such fines? Would they have completed the task in a year? Better that private companies were involved so that an efficient organisation could be created. Who knows what inefficient organisation, with long-term increased cost to the taxpayer, would have resulted instead? – Yours, etc,

ORLA GILHOOLY,

Dollymount Park,

 

 

Sir, – From a practical perspective, wind turbines cannot generate enough energy to reduce global CO2 levels to a meaningful degree. Wind power is by nature intermittent and cannot generate a steady output, necessitating back-up coal and gas power plants that significantly negate any savings in greenhouse gas emissions.

There are also ecological drawbacks to wind turbines, including damage to habitats, wildlife and the aesthetic drawback of the assault upon natural beauty and the pristine landscape.

Wind power in Ireland and Britain is being financed at the cost of consumers, who have not been consulted nor informed about this effective subsidy that is being paid from their taxes and energy bills to support an industry that cannot be cost-efficient. – Yours, etc,

PATRICK L O’BRIEN,

Victoria Cross,

 

Sir, – Thomas O’Connor assures us that “the people will appease their appetite for change at next year’s local and European elections” (January 7th).

I would not hold my breath if I were him. When given an opportunity to get rid of the expensive talking shop for the elite called the Seanad they turned it down.

That has continued a debate on the Seanad that gets more removed from reality by the day. First we have high-profile people, who supported its retention during the referendum, opposing the “reforms” that were part of the retention campaign.

Then we had a Government Minister, who supported the campaign to abolish it, proposing “reform” of an institution that during the campaign was “irreformable”.

Since it just means electing another Dáil, dominated by the same political parties, the widely canvassed election of Seanad members by universal suffrage does not constitute reform.

The choice for “reform” of the Seanad boils down, therefore, to two options. Turn it into another Dáil or leave it as an expensive, powerless talking shop for the elite and their cronies.– Yours, etc,

ANTHONY LEAVY,

Shielmartin Drive,

 

Sir, – Paul Milne repeats a misapprehension that frequently arises in discussions of BDS (boycott, divestment and sanctions) in support of Palestinian rights when he describes it as “ironic that the teachers in a country that has . . . failed to revive its native language should want to boycott the teachers in a country [Israel] which has successfully revived its language” (January 10th ).

Leaving aside the question as to whether the successful revival of Hebrew somehow mitigates the ethnic cleansing and ongoing persecution of Palestinians, the boycott – whether academic, cultural, sporting or economic – is directed at the Israeli state, and not at individuals unless those individuals are explicitly representing that state. Hence, quite simply, nobody advocates a blanket boycott of Israeli teachers. – Yours, etc,

RAYMOND DEANE,

Lower Baggot Street,

Dublin 2 .

 

Sir, – One can only imagine what the recent storms on the west coast would have done to the massive salmon farm planned for Galway Bay and the ecological damage caused by the escapees interbreeding with local salmon stocks. If ever a timely reminder was needed to show the folly and short-sightedness of such a scheme, this was it. – Yours, etc,

MICHAEL WALSH,

Thomastown Road,

Killiney,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – Early in the new year, readers of the English press learned that repartition was no solution to the Northern Ireland problem, thanks to the release of previously classified 1984 British documents.

Cabinet minutes showed that the British government had formally considered repartitioning Northern Ireland before rejecting the idea.

Readers of The Irish Times hardly needed to wait to learn this. On September 18th, 1975, it published a lengthy article by myself and Ian McAllister showing why repartition would create enormous refugee flight and violence.

The article is accessible at  http://www.profrose.eu/publications. – Your, etc,

Prof RICHARD ROSE, FBA

Director,

Centre for the Study

of Public Policy,

University of Strathclyde,

 

 

 

 

 

Irish Independent:

* It is reported that Irish Water is considering billing water charges in apartment blocks via their owners’ management companies (OMCs), with the OMC then responsible for billing the charges on to individual owners.

Also in this section

Life is sheer hell at 80

Letters: Broaden debate on suicide

Letters: To thine own selfie be true

As a managing agent working on behalf of OMCs that represent almost 8,000 houses and apartments in the greater Dublin area, I would strongly oppose water charges being billed through OMCs.

These companies are effectively co-ops which work on behalf of apartment owners that manage the common areas of a development (roofs, gardens, etc). Involving management companies in the collection of water charges would be bad for them (and their members) for several reasons:

{HTML_BULLET} It fundamentally undermines the relationship between an OMC and its members if an OMC effectively has to take on a tax collection function for the State.

{HTML_BULLET} Increasing the annual service charges billed to property owners, is likely to increase the number of owners who do not (or cannot) pay their charges.

{HTML_BULLET} The charges themselves are contentious and it seems Irish Water believes many apartments will be difficult to meter. Any system of “assessed charge” will involve judgment and will inevitably be perceived as unfair by some. It is simply not the role of the OMC to get involved with such matters.

{HTML_BULLET} Administration of water charges (including waivers for vulnerable groups, various payment methods, reducing pressure for those not paying, etc) will be complicated and onerous.

OMCs (with voluntary boards of directors) will generally have neither the time nor the desire to get involved in this work.

Water charges should not be billed through OMCs.

If they are introduced, water charges should be billed to individual households, with the greatest possible use of meters.

FINBAR MCDONNELL

RF PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, DUBLIN 1

BUSY DOING NOTHING

* Frank Kelly‘s comment, “what is retirement but doing nothing?” reminds me of a quote from the late ‘Naked Gun’ actor Leslie Nielsen: “Doing nothing is difficult, you never know when you’re finished.”

TOM GILSENAN

BEAUMONT, DUBLIN 9

HEADS WE LOSE . . .

* I had understood that the main reason for setting up Irish Water was to protect what we are constantly told is a precious resource.

I was, therefore, astonished to learn from your article (Irish Independent January 10) that we consumers could be penalised by Irish Water if we conserve water too zealously. Heads we lose, tails they win!

P DAVIS

DUBLIN 17

IN DEFENCE OF VATICAN II

* Once again, Fr Tony Flannery misrepresents what the Second Vatican Council actually taught. He claims that it “goes so far as to say that unless a teaching is accepted by the consensus of the faithful it cannot be considered a defined teaching” (Irish Independent, January 11). This is completely bogus.

The council teaches that the Pope may define doctrine completely on his own authority, as indeed may a council in union with him. Furthermore, the council defined “the sense of the faithful” as including the Pope and college of bishops, Fr Flannery defines it as excluding them. The council teaches the lay faithful to be guided by the Pope and bishops in matters of faith and morality, Fr Flannery puts it the other way around.

He grants lay people at any stage of the church’s history an effective veto on church teaching. Surely the church cannot simply jettison teachings that have been universally accepted by Catholics down through the centuries, because a proportion of Catholics have rejected these teachings recently?

JOHN MURRAY, PHD (THEOLOGY)

MATER DEI INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION, DUBLIN

BLACK CARD JUST A START

* The black card recently introduced by the GAA is a good idea, as far as it goes. It takes two to tango. But it will not change the ethos of GAA games. One has only to look at rugby to see the glaring difference. It is the attitude that must change.

For example, why are GAA players allowed to throw the ball away instead of handing it civilly to the opponent for a free? Multiplying rules will not change attitudes. The answer is simple: move the ball forward 10, 20, even 30 metres, for every show of bad manners. Granted, the game was far rougher and dirtier long ago, with far fewer rules. Now it is nastier, with far too many rules. No referee can be expected to get it right until the rules are reduced, and made clearer and simpler.

SEAN MCELGUNN

ADDRESS WITH EDITOR

WEATHER PREACHING

* I was pleasantly surprised to find that the bulk of your editorial (Irish Independent, January 6) explored the practical ways in which the misery and destruction caused by recent storms could be alleviated.

I would urge you to further explore how best to deal with other weather extremes.

Practical help and advice makes a great deal more sense to me than grandiose preaching on the evils of CO2 and the wickedness of mankind in supposedly causing every extreme weather event under the sun.

The history of science has many examples of the majority being wrong — for instance, the science of plate tectonics/continental drift, which was derided by scientists when it first appeared but is now universally accepted.

RUAIRI WELDON

ADDRESS WITH EDITOR

MEANS-TESTING RETIREES

* Re: ‘Secret cuts for OAPs and disabled’ (Irish Independent, January 9) — here’s another little nugget you might want to add. In an earlier article, ‘Retirees turning 65 must wait an extra year for pension’ (Irish Independent, December 21, 2013) we were told that, “People affected from January may be able to get jobseekers’ benefit or jobseekers’ allowance. These payments are €180 a week, less than the state pension of €230 a week.”

What they neglected to let us know was that these payments would be means-tested! I checked this out myself at our local Department of Social Protection office.

What next . . . blood?

S MONAGHAN

KNOCKNAREA, CO SLIGO

MARITIME MEMORIES

* Thirty years ago, Ireland saw the demise of a great shipping company, Irish Shipping Ltd. It was set up in 1941 to bring much-needed supplies to this country during World War II. Its unreliable, leaky old ships battled their way through mountainous waves in the North Atlantic, sometimes in convoy, sometimes on their own, and a few didn’t make it.

Now, a new book has been published about this great shipping firm. Called ‘Irish Shipping Ltd — A Fleet History’, it is written by four proud Wexford men (with input from a ship’s captain) and will be of enormous interest to those who sailed with ISL, or even to those who would have loved to. For more details, contact leocoy61@gmail.com.

GERRY MCGOVERN

DUBLIN 15

TV3 NOT IN THE PINK

* TV3 opposing a UTV Irish licence is akin to a potato planter objecting to Kerr’s Pink!

K NOLAN

CARRICK-ON-SHANNON, CO LEITRIM

Irish Independent

 

 


MOT

$
0
0

14 January 2014 Clear out

I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. They have to celebrate Admiral Troutbrdge’s anniversary whats happened to the silver tea service? Priceless.

MOT back later in the week, Peter Rice, ipage email

Scrabbletoday Mary wins and gets over400, Perhaps Iwill win tomorrow.

 

Obituary:

Alexandra Bastedo, who has died of cancer aged 67, was a British actress and sex symbol of the 1960s and 1970s and won acclaim in her home country as the female lead of ITV’s occult detective series The Champions; but it was in Spain and South America that she had her greatest cult following, known to her fans simply as “la Bastedo”.

By 1967 Alexandra Bastedo was already familiar to continental drivers as the face of Shell’s advertising campaign, her image appearing on roadside hoardings throughout Europe. Minor roles in the spy thriller The Liquidator (1965) and in the original film of Casino Royale (1967) served to raise her profile still further, and in 1968 she was offered the part of codebreaker Sharron Macready in The Champions .

Rescued by Tibetan monks following a near-fatal plane crash, Agent Macready and her colleagues Craig Stirling (Stuart Damon) and Richard Barrett (William Gaunt) are bestowed with both precognitive abilities and enhanced physical strength, transforming them, as the introductory voice-over for each episode proclaimed, into “champions of law, order and justice”.

Though critics were largely scornful of everything from the premise to the production values , there was little doubt that Alexandra Bastedo, with her beauty and youthful other-worldliness, was well cast in the role of superheroine. The Champions ran for 30 episodes, and its influence can be detected in the numerous superhero adventures that followed on American television, such as ABC’s The Six Million Dollar Man .

Just 21 years old at the time of her big break, Alexandra Bastedo initially found the media attention that The Champions proved rather daunting. “I’d led a sheltered life and was still quite naive,” she confessed in a 2011 interview. “An American Indian wrote to me saying he’d leave me his tepee in his will, and a sailor asked if I would post a pair of my high-heeled shoes.” As her international audience expanded there came further opportunities, and by the mid-1980s she was fluent in three languages, with 12 Spanish, American and South American film titles to her credit, as well as a role as compère, alongside Peter Marshall, for the Miss World and Miss United Kingdom competitions.

Among her more famous admirers were David Frost, Omar Sharif and Steve McQueen; though she entered briefly into relationships with the Frost and Sharif she was distinctly less impressed with McQueen, whom, she recalled, propositioned her with the line: “My wife doesn’t understand me.” In the case of Omar Sharif the liaison lasted only a few weeks, being curtailed by the actor’s bridge-playing habit, his unruly hours, and his incurable tendency to accept telephone numbers from other women.

The daughter of a Canadian businessman, Alexandra Bastedo was born in East Sussex on March 9 1946 and grew up in Brighton, where her childhood ambition was to become a vet. At 16, however, she entered a “teenage diplomat” competition organised by London Evening News, beating 4, 000 finalists to a role in a comedy thriller, 13 Frightened Girls! (1963) Despite subsequent offers from Hollywood agents – and interest from Alfred Hitchcock – she returned home to finish her education, before the contracts with Shell and ITV intervened to preclude her university career.

Happily married and semi-retired from acting by the close of the 1980s, Alexandra Bastedo moved to Chichester with her husband, the theatrical producer and artistic director Patrick Garland. There she returned to her initial vocation in animal welfare as president of her local branch of the RSPCA, before departing to found the Alexandra Bastedo Champions (ABC) Animal Sanctuary near Pulborough, West Sussex. By the turn of the century the ABC Sanctuary housed over 180 abandoned animals, including pigs, rabbits, ferrets, ducks, hens, geese and turkeys.

In later life she made a brief return to acting as part of her fundraising efforts on the sanctuary’s behalf, with a cameo role in Batman Begins (2005) and a memorable turn in EastEnders and as Penny Caspar-Morse, a former 1960s model known as “the Stick”, alongside Joanna Lumley in Absolutely Fabulous.

Her husband, Patrick Garland, whom she married in 1980, predeceased her in May last year.

Alexandra Bastedo, born March 9 1946, died January 12 2014

 

 

Guardian:

Ariel Sharon (Obituary, 13 January) was a man of his time, specifically the years of ideological ferment that followed the collapse of Keynesianism in the 1970s. Like Thatcher, he broke the mould and replaced it with one of his own models that is now left to a younger, more financially constrained, generation to clear up. Thatcher unleashed a debt bubble; Sharon gave birth to Likud and the intensification of the settlement project. Thatcher’s iterations were based on the assumption that “there is no such thing as society”; Sharon’s were based on the default that “there is no such thing as a Palestinian”. Incompetent Keynesian elites were replaced with ideologically sound alternative incompetents. Both models are now irrevocably broken and contaminate the political debate in their respective countries, leaving those behind with far reduced strategic depth.
Cathal Rabbitte
Zollikon, Switzerland

•  The apotheosis of Ariel Sharon’s career was surely when foreign journalists, myself included, diplomats and other observers entered the Sabra and Chatila Palestinian refugee camps of West Beirut on 18 September 1982, to discover the slaughter of innocents, Palestinian and Lebanese families. Christian militiamen from the Lebanese forces had carried out the task. But we all knew that had not Israeli forces been holding the ring round the camps for three days of siege the killers would never have dared enter; that the Israelis must have permitted – it later turned out, organised – the incursion; and that Sharon’s lethal hand was on this operation as surely as it had been on the invasion of Lebanon he launched three months earlier.

It was no surprise: this was the leader of the Israeli army special reprisal unit 101 which had, in 1953, blown up 45 Palestinian homes in the West Bank village of Qibya with the families trapped inside them, killing 69 people, mostly women and children. No evidence was found that any Palestinian incursions into Israel had originated in Qibya.

More recently, Sharon helped rekindle the violence in occupied Jerusalem and the occupied Palestinian Territories in 2000, going on to subdue the largely civilian population with weapons of war: aircraft, tanks and artillery.

Much will be made of the “man of peace” who withdrew the Israeli settlers and army from Gaza in 2005, but this only aimed at freezing any hopes of a Palestinian-Israeli settlement, left Gaza a besieged and even more vulnerable and impoverished entity than it had been before, and cleared the way for Israel to concentrate on acquiring and populating the lands it has always coveted, those between the Mediterranean and the river Jordan.
Tim Llewellyn
Former BBC Middle East correspondent

• Your obituary writer’s comment that Sharon felt at peace only on his farm in the Negev overlooks the fact that until 1948 this land belonged to the Abuelaish family, one member of which, Dr Izzeldin Abuelaish, wrote a book in 2011, described by the Guardian as “an impresssive statement of triumph over adversity”. Its title, I Shall Not Hate, is testimony to a lifetime devoted to reconciliation, which stands in stark contrast to the philosophy of the man who removed him from his family property.
Roger Symon
Cheltenham

 

NHS policy is healthcare on the basis of need. So, in what way can the elderly possibly “take up a disproportionate percentage of the NHS budget” (We’re all in this together, 10 January)? Linking proportionality, age and healthcare indicates a view that the old get more than they deserve – rather than what they require and are entitled to – at the expense of younger people. Such a position does nothing for solidarity between the generations.
Dr Pauline Wilson
Abingdon, Oxfordshire

• Your article on personal health budgets (Society, 8 January) fails to mention how the Dutch, who pioneered such schemes, have scaled them back radically in the light of experience, including exploitation of individuals with budgets. However, the real concern is that, in time, the government will extend them to create a voucher system, whereby each person is given a fixed budget to spend with a purchasing organisation (in effect, an insurer), with direct payment needed outside what this budget can buy.
Professor Martin McKee
European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition

• Your recent articles about personal health budgets and the “overwhelming” cost of caring for people with long-term chronic diseases (Reports, 4 January) highlight two issues: first, medicines are not the best treatment for many diseases and, second, how can we make individual tailormade solutions equitable.

The example of Stephen and his family in the personal budgets piece beautifully illustrates the first point. In Brighton, we have recently founded a new type of integrated NHS GP health centre, part charity funded. We offer alternative therapies and groups such as acupuncture, singing, massage and nutrition, an approach that has been effective for many patients. We have, however, come under vitriolic criticism for our approach, and I hope that articles like this will help to support a broader attitude to health and the relief of sickness.
Dr Laura Marshall-Andrews
GP partner, Brighton health and wellbeing centre

 

 

As a serving headteacher of a comprehensive school, I am in awe at Tristram Hunt‘s relentless drive to hold to account the current secretary of state for education (Labour: teachers must have skills or face the sack, 11 January). Licensed teachers – excellent! So they will have to show they meet the right standards so we can be “just like lawyers” (by which I assume he means “proper professionals”). Presumably, up to now we headteachers have been relaxing in the warm bath of mediocrity, happily flirting with the rubber duck of “unionised restrictive practices” and nonchalantly watching the soap suds of “standards” ebb away on their relentless “race to the bottom”.

Or perhaps this Gospel-according-to-Gove could itself be tackled? Tackling poor teaching – yes, we do that, Mr Hunt. Assessing colleagues regularly to ensure that bad teachers cannot find refuge in this noble profession? Er, yes, rather more, in fact, than most other education systems in the world where there really are “restrictive practices”. A Royal College of teaching? Hopefully more than a gold-encrusted rehash of the General Teaching Council (may it rest in peace).

After several years of easy caricatures of schools and teachers, I wonder whether Her Majesty’s loyal opposition could offer the country a little bit of a new script on education without worrying about Daily Mail readers?
Simon Uttley
Headmaster, Saint John Bosco College, London

• Surely relicensing could be extended to Ofsted inspectors whose judgments on teaching skills often have significant consequences. They, too, could be asked to demonstrate the skills they so often find absent in schools. For example, they could be asked to deliver lessons to a middle-ability year 9 group in “a school in need of improvement”. They could be given two days’ warning. It need not necessarily take place on a Friday afternoon or in the week before Christmas.
Jack Schofield
Oldham

• As well as being a shrewd political move, Tristram Hunt’s proposal to license teachers is a welcome development although, as ever, the devil will be in the detail. This will be particularly so in relation to the standards by which teachers are to be assessed. Many of the current ones can be interpreted in a variety of ways and, if adopted unchanged by Hunt, could result in a welter of litigation in employment tribunals.
Professor Colin Richards
Spark Bridge, Cumbria

• It should be taken for granted that teachers, along with any other workers, should keep up to date. The objectionable thing here is the spin – it’s all about getting rid of poor teachers, not a positive message of continuing professional development. And having initiated the destruction of the support networks called good local education authorities, Labour is not in a good place to start handing out pearls of trite wisdom.

The key problem is that English education is elitist and exclusive by design. It has failure built in to its genes. Its success is judged by measures which simply don’t fit the majority of its students.

It is fundamental reform that is needed, creating a system that allows the skills and talents of all our young people to develop and be recognised, not tinkering about with structures or making grandiose statements about commonsense issues.
Roy Boffy
Former senior adviser for further education, Dudley LEA

• Even Michael Gove eventually rejected the idea of licensing teachers on the grounds that it would add to an already overburdened administrative system in schools. Only a privately educated Labour spokesperson for education could succeed in providing teachers with one reason for agreeing with the worst education secretary in modern times! Presumably Hunt has accepted hook, line and sinker the coalition propaganda about state education, promulgated yet again in another TV series (TV review, 10 January), which clearly is set to ignore the best aspects of comprehensive schooling, and focus instead on trainee teachers’ failure to discipline challenging behaviour effectively. Exciting television viewing, perhaps, but hardly a reliable source of evidence for a trained historian?
Bernie Evans
Liverpool

 

 

The very first things that were learnt from Blackadder in 1983 (Pay attention now, Mr Gove, 7 January) were that Richard II did not have a hunchback or a withered arm, nor did he murder his young nephews. The first two have since been proved beyond any doubt since discovery of his skeleton in 2012; the third still awaits firm evidence – firmer, that is, than the flimsy “evidence” so far offered for the original accusation. So delighted were we Ricardians with this mainstream myth-busting that the streets of Middleham during the 500th anniversary celebrations of Richard’s coronation cleared as we all watched the following episodes.
Carol Fellingham Webb
Keighley

• I was an original member of Joan Littlewood’s Oh What a Lovely War company, so Professor David Midgley (Letters, 8 January) may like to know that Oh What a Lovely War in 1964 played East and West Berlin and then Dresden. It received enthusiastic reviews.
Murray Melvin
Theatre Royal Stratford

• Colin Newlands thinks the French are daft for calling a potato an “apple of the earth” (Letters, 11 January), so I wonder what he would make of the Faroese, who call a potato an “epli” (literally, “apple”) and an apple a “súrepli” – etymologically, a sour apple, but to the Faroese a sour potato.
Harry D. Watson
Edinburgh

• The lamb in your picture of the pope (11 January) looks suspiciously like a very young goat kid. It has hair rather than wool, and the horn bud is clearly visible by its left ear above the eye.
Dr Philippa Edwin
Craven Arms, Shropshire

• Interesting to see that David Cameron’s barber was awarded an MBE in the honours list. Could he also make Rebekah Brook’s horse Raisa (the one lent to her by the police) a consul?
Richard Knights
Liverpool

•  Appropriate currency units for an independent Scotland (Notes andqueries, 9 January)? Surely the poond, comprising 1,745 bawbees.
Colin Shone
Menai Bridge,Anglesey

 

 

 

Your report that Archbishop Vincent Nichols is soon to become a cardinal gave the impression that his support for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered Catholics came to an end with the last of the Soho Masses a year ago (Archbishop of Westminster named in pope’s first batch of new cardinals, 13 January). This is not the case. The LGBT Catholic community meets twice monthly, less than a mile from Soho in the Jesuit Church in Farm Street, Mayfair. We are integrating successfully into parish life there. As a sign of his support for our mission of providing pastoral care, the archbishop attended our council meeting before Christmas. By doing so, he follows his predecessors, Cardinal Basil Hume and Cardinal Cormac Murphy O’Connor, leaders whose approach to the place of the LGBT community in the life of the church was consistently more nuanced and conciliatory than the often fierce language of “disorder” that emanated from Rome.
Mark Dowd
Chair, LGBT Catholics Westminster

 

 

We have been deeply upset and angered by the coverage of the Syrian conflict brought into our living rooms by the world’s media. The scale and gravity of the humanitarian crisis unfolding in the region is difficult to comprehend.

The government’s response so far has given us cause for great pride; the aid the UK has given to the region has been unquestionably generous. But it is not enough.

Along with the Refugee Council, we are asking David Cameron for two things: first, to reunite war-torn families by making it possible for Syrians trapped in the region, but with family and friends in the UK, to be assisted to enter the country; second, as a matter of urgency, to answer the call by UNHCR, the refugee agency, to support the countries bordering Syria by establishing a substantial and co-ordinated resettlement programme in the UK to help the most vulnerable.

International consensus is growing that we need to do more to help people fleeing the violence inside Syria to reach safety. UNHCR has called for western countries to take 30,000 of the most vulnerable refugees, and so far 18 countries have responded by pledging resettlement places for Syrian refugees. We’re ashamed that Britain isn’t one of them.

Now is the time to play our part in delivering a global solution so that those who are most vulnerable can find safety outside the region.

On behalf of those Syrians in the UK desperately anxious about the safety of their loved ones, we are asking David Cameron to help, as a father, as a humanitarian and as a world leader.
Emma Thompson Refugee Council patron, Dame Vivienne Westwood, Juliet Stevenson, Grayson Perry, Michael Palin, Colin and Livia Firth

 

 

 

Although Paul Goggins was not convinced by the detail of the Marriage (Same-Sex Couples) Act 2013, he supported civil partnerships legislation and voted consistently for progressive LGBT rights legislation.

When he foresaw religiously controversial aspects arising, he was always prompt to seek advice, and find ways through, which would enable him and other Catholic MPs to vote in favour. He applied his principles of social justice to this area of political policy, finding no conflict between his support for LGBT people and his Catholic faith. Indeed, he said once that he gave such support because of, and not in spite of, his theological and social justice beliefs.

Independent:

 

Anyone who cares about river flooding should be concerned about the Environment Agency’s reported plan (13 January), to cut back even further on lock-keepers and other staff with direct local knowledge of our rivers.

For 20 years we have lived next to a lock on the Thames and in times of floods have repeatedly seen the close co-ordination between lock-keepers working the weirs along their reach, helping each other to manhandle malfunctioning gates and calling in the boat crews to remove trees and boats blocking flow. It’s sobering to see the benefits of extensive dredging or clearing of channels quickly undone by a simple boat or tree blocking a weir.

It is hard to understand how the further reduction of experience, local knowledge and close personal relations will improve flood control.  Neither a regional lock-keeper responsible for several locks nor a firm contracted to manage several sites – both ideas under consideration – will have the knowledge or, crucially, the commitment to “their” reach and community to do what it takes, even if the road conditions allow them to make their rounds.

According to the data kindly provided by the EA’s website, in both the 2007 and January 2014 floods, the local staff took emergency steps which resulted in the quick lowering of the river at and below Oxford.

The EA may be able to automate some of what a lock-keeper does on a sunny day but not what he and his mates do in the middle of a rainy night to temporarily rectify some remote manager’s cock-up.

No matter how much the EA runs down its river staff, a country with so many rivers is going to need a range of river-specific skills. The EA, in conjunction with river users and related businesses, instead ought to be ensuring that training, apprenticeships and qualifications are available so that these skills are preserved. A period of global warming is hardly the time to run down river-related staff, or to disregard the experience of the few who remain.

Andrew Shacknove

Katrina Robinson

Oxford

I write to express my deep concern about the mismanagement of the Somerset Levels by the Environment Agency. This has resulted in the worst floods that the region has experienced in living memory.

We were told last winter that it was a once-in-a-hundred-years event. So why are we experiencing a sombre sense of déjà vu? For two years running valuable agricultural land is unusable, homes and businesses are flooded, a large proportion of the road network is impassable and the community here are feeling increasingly beleaguered, abandoned and frustrated.

 The crux of the problem is the River Parrett. This river, along with the Tone, Axe and Brue, takes all of the water from Somerset out to sea. Since the disbandment of the National Rivers Authority there has been little or no work maintaining this essential infrastructure.

The answer to this problem is clear: admit fault, dredge the river and consult with local farmers and landowners who have the knowledge and experience to help. We did not have this problem when the rivers were dredged.

R Horsington Graham

Westonzoyland, Somerset

Rivers “burst their banks” for the sake of alliteration (letter, 10 January). What I don’t understand is why we “burst into tears”. Tears come out of watery eyes. Is it possible to burst “into” anything?

Emilie Lamplough

Trowbridge, Wiltshire

Secrets of the Presidental allure

Why does Yasmin Alibhai-Brown make herself appear so shallow in posing the question, “How does a man who has so few obvious physical attributes become such an object of passionate desire?”, to François Hollande?

She sees a “dull, bespectacled, balding bloke”. But why does she not acknowledge that France’s President may also be intelligent, kind and caring, and that this may be why he is apparently attractive to women. Does he have to be a “demon lover”, or use “new face products”? Surely the professionally brilliant women in his life would see through such a façade in an instant.

Publish a similar article with reversed gender stereotypes, and await the inevitable, and justified, storm of protest!

Roger Blassberg

St Albans, Hertfordshire

Sweeteners for fracking

The effort being put into promoting fracking is yet another example of how the Government can be so easily bamboozled into believing that sourcing energy from fossil fuels is the simple answer to their prayers in aid of keeping the lights on.

The reality is that fracking will lay waste to vast tracts of land and if energy is extracted successfully not only will it not lower our fuel bills by one penny, it will greatly increase our carbon emissions in the longer term.

Although ministers will argue that green energy sources are being researched and promoted, the emphasis being placed on fossil fuel sources, and of late fracking in particular, far outweighs everything else and has stultified any potential strategic initiatives on how the long-term energy needs of the country might be met.

Peter Coghlan

Broadstone, Dorset

The Government now wants to sweet-talk local communities into allowing fracking in their areas. The extent of each well is said to be just two hectares. No mention is made of the access roads.

The Wall Street analyst Deborah Rodgers says that in 2012 Texas received $3.6bn in revenue from on- and off-shore operations, but is expected to need $4bn to repair road damage caused by on-shore extraction alone. Arkansas has received since 2009 $182m and needs $450m to be spent on roads. Pennsylvania in 2012 received $1.3bn and is estimated to need $7bn for repairs. These are knowns which the Government does not want us to know.

Canon Christopher Hall

Deddington, Oxfordshire

It is the blandness of the Government’s fracking bribes to communities that staggers me most. Offering communities the right to keep 100 per cent of the business rates paid by licensed exploiters, in exchange for the pillaging of people’s lives and landscapes, lacks any moral compass.

Our addiction to fossil fuels has to be broken, not nurtured. It damages the present and scars the future, in ways our children will pay heavily for.

Alan Simpson

Nottingham

Child benefit for EU migrants

In the light of the proposals to restrict the right of EU migrants to send child benefit to their home countries, I am reminded of what happened in Germany in the 1970s.

As the recession bit, the government there wished to encourage its non-EU labour migrants, mainly from Turkey, Yugoslavia and southern Europe, to return home. A policy was introduced to pay child benefit only for the children of migrants living with them in Germany.

One consequence was that many migrants  brought their families over to join them.

Professor John Salt

Migration Research Unit

Department of Geography

University College London

Healthy demand for physiotherapists

Nigel Farage’s entertaining account of his physiotherapy (13 January) unfortunately included a misleading statement about the employment prospects for new members of the profession.

For a brief time in the last decade there was a shortage of jobs, but with rising patient demand from an ageing population and increasing numbers of people with long-term conditions, this was urgently addressed. Following extensive campaigning by the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, the employment record for new graduates is now very good.

In recent years the employment opportunities for physiotherapists have continued to expand in the NHS and in the private and voluntary sectors. This reflects – as Mr Farage’s piece showed – that physiotherapists are playing a key role in getting people back to work and in many cases, preventing the need for any sickness absence in the first place.

We wish him well in his recovery.

Phil Gray

Chief Executive

Chartered Society of Physiotherapy

London WC1

Stay awake at the  back of the class

Thank you for Peter Gray’s excellent piece (13 January) arguing that children need less school, less homework, and more time for unstructured play, in order to grow up psychologically healthy and creative.

For headteachers worried that such an approach would ruin their test scores and prejudice their position in the league tables, the solution is reported elsewhere in the same edition: give every child a double espresso at the end of each lesson. It will boost their memory for what they have learned (and keep them awake in the next lesson).

Nigel Halliday

Liss, Hampshir

 

 

Times:

 

 

The idea that all teachers should have fixed-term renewable licences is attractive but raises big questions

Sir, The reason the General Teaching Council for England struck off so few teachers for incompetence was not because the “educational establishment” was protecting its own (“Labour will tell teachers to improve or face sack”, Jan 11). More than 90 per cent of referrals to GTCE were for misconduct, not incompetence.

This was because if it launched competence procedures against teachers, school managements would embark on a tortuous and time-consuming process and also lay themselves open to awkward questions about their fairness.

The idea that all teachers should have fixed-term renewable licences is attractive but raises big questions. At what cost in bureaucracy, time and money would more than 100,000 teachers be road-tested each year by Tristram Hunt’s proposed Royal College of Teaching? By what criteria would it be shown beyond doubt that a teacher was irredeemably “poor”, let alone “bad”? Your leader writer’s notion that teacher unions are “unlikely to be best pleased” by licensing is naive. Protecting individuals is their raison d’être.

Andy Connell

(former member, GTCE)

Appleby-in-Westmorland

Sir, The Shadow Education Secretary’s proposal that teachers should be subject to regular assessment is attractive but the detail raises many questions. It is suggested that classroom assessment should at least partly be carried out by colleagues from other schools. I have sober memories of the time when CSE examination coursework was moderated in this way. The treatment of a school’s submission often depended significantly on the rigour or otherwise of the other school.

Assessments every five years may weed out the appalling teachers, but these are few. The main problem is the barely satisfactory teacher. There are many of these, and extra training will make little difference in most cases. If they are all struck off, there will be a staffing crisis.

Douglas Kedge

Sonning Common, Oxon

Sir, There has been a sad decline in many areas of the teaching profession. Though there are many good teachers in our classrooms, there has been a lowering of standards as regards language and shabby dress. You teach by example not only academically. A lot of improvement is needed if the teaching profession is to be respected

Marjorie Cunningham

Frocester, Glos

Sir, Mr Hunt adds that teachers should have the same professional standing as lawyers and doctors. I am sure that a large cohort of the teaching profession would seriously consider this package if teachers’ salaries were commensurate with these other professions.

Andrew Morris

(President, Music Masters’ and Mistresses’ Association, 1996-97)

Cambridge

Sir, Your headline “Labour will tell teachers to improve or face sack” expresses a noble aim which is probably unattainable. Where will the high-quality candidates be found to replace all these sacked teachers? Can we realistically expect to find a supply of enthusiastic, dedicated, academically well-qualified people to fill all half a million teaching posts in England and Wales ?

David Cooper-Smith

Bletchley, Bucks

 

2014

Of 75 speakers in the House of Lords Emergency Debate on August 29, more than 10 to 1 argued against military action in Syria

Sir, Since there tends to be little coverage in the press (even in your newspaper) of debates on Syria in the House of Lords, as opposed to coverage of the subject in the House of Commons (eg, the letter in your pages Jan 13), it may be worth pointing out to your readers that, of 75 speakers in the House of Lords Emergency Debate on August 29, more than 10 to 1 argued against military action in Syria.

In a more recent House of Lords debate on humanitarian aid on Jan 9, I have argued that our priority now, and that of the European Union, should be to give every support to the Secretary General of the United Nations and to Ambassador Lakhdar Brahimi at the forthcoming Geneva Conference to work for a ceasefire between the warring parties to enable at least some of the Syrian refugees to return safely to their homes.

Lord Wright of Richmond

House of Lords

 

The UK uses a system in which metadata is “held privately for the government to query when necessary for national security purposes”

Sir, David Davis, MP in his article on “state snooping” (Jan 13) is misinformed when he suggests that “British citizens have a much poorer standard of privacy than Americans”.

He, correctly, states that the panel advising President Obama has recommended that US Government storage of bulk telephony metadata should be ended. He fails to point out that the panel recommends that there should be “a transition to a system in which such metadata is held privately for the government to query when necessary for national security purposes”. That is, precisely, the system that exists in the United Kingdom today.

Mr Davis is, however, correct in saying that we must not be complacent about the balance between security and privacy in this internet age. That is why the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament has begun an unprecedented and detailed enquiry into just these matters as they affect the UK.

We have invited written submissions and will, in due course, take oral evidence from the public as well as the intelligence agencies. We hope Mr Davis will contribute his views.

Sir Malcolm Rifkind

Chairman, Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament

There may be a large volume of evidence for the dangers of smoking, but some observers bemoan the lack of scientific accuracy

Sir, Further to your report “Hockney draws support for smokers” (Jan 11) I am not a “pro-smoking campaigner”. I campaign for scientific accuracy — and that is the problem with anti-smoking efforts. Most of their “facts” are no such thing. There is no hard scientific evidence for the lethality of second-hand smoke, and smokers seem to cost society less in lifetime health expense than non-smokers. Smoking is risky, but anti-smoking is more religion than science.

John Staddon

York

Sir, I admire David Hockney’s art but am distressed by his logic. He should consider Godwin’s Law, which states that a person who thinks he has made a point by linking his opponent with Hitler has lost the argument.

In noting that Hitler was a “great anti-smoker” Hockney has given us a perfect example of Godwin’s Law. Evidence, tons and tons of it, has shown that smoking is a danger to health. Hitler’s views are irrelevant.

Jean Elliott

Upminster, Essex

 

Many names on these monuments are illegible, so that relations would find it difficult to identify the name they were seeking

Sir, It is right that many war grave headstones are to be replaced after years of exposure to the elements (report, Jan 13). I wonder if, at the same time, it might be possible to renovate some of the inscriptions on larger monuments commemorating those with no known grave? When visiting the Somme memorial at Thiepval some years ago, I was saddened to see that many names had become illegible, particularly those high up, so that relations would have found it difficult or impossible to identify the name they were seeking.

Pam Stockwell

South Croydon, Surrey

 

It seems that no matter what you buy these days, the seller will find a new way of imposing an extra fee – and a new word for it too

Sir, I have just come across a new weasel word. On a form to renew my membership of Warwickshire County Cricket Club, for £180, I encountered “fulfilment charge £5”. This was to cover the sending of my membership card with “other enclosures”.

Michael H. Perkins

Hockley Heath, W Midlands

 

 

 

Telegraph:

SIR – We are concerned about Channel 4’s Benefits Street series. It purports to reveal “the reality of a life on benefits”, but ignores the reality that the vast majority of people who need support from benefits do so because they are either working but receiving a low wage, have an illness or disability, or have lost their job.

The Who Benefits? campaign – a coalition of more than 100 charities and community groups – is calling on Channel 4, as a public service broadcaster, to review how this damaging and grossly unbalanced programme came to be shown.

By focusing on an unrepresentative minority, Channel 4 is reinforcing harmful stereotypes where the most extreme examples are presented as the norm. Such portrayals skew the public debate about benefits and cause distress for many of the millions of people who need this support.

In their race to win ratings, broadcasters must not lose sight of their duty to deliver quality, responsible programming.

Matthew Reed
Chief Executive, The Children’s Society

Leslie Morphy
Chief Executive, Crisis

Fiona Weir
Chief Executive, Gingerbread

Paul Farmer
Chief Executive, Mind

Commissar Hunt’s plan to license teachers

SIR – In hard-line communist countries (such as Romania), people needed a licence for almost any task, from painting the front door to putting fuel into a car. No one checked their ability, just that they had read the state regulations.

Now Tristram Hunt, the shadow education secretary (report, January 11), seems to think that if teachers can tick a number of (procedures over substance) boxes, drawn up by politicians, our children will be better educated.

Brian Christley
Abergele. Conwy

SIR – Socrates thought it would be valuable if pupils knew what “goodness” was. Admitting to ignorance of the answer, he spent time trying to find out from the class. But he left pupils more baffled at the end of the lesson than at the start. Though he did not deploy resources – no handouts, reading lists or visual aids (if occasionally drawing in the sand) – he did rely on labour-intensive small-group discussion. But at least he refused to be paid.

Just the sort of nuisance Mr Hunt’s licensing scheme will finally do away with.

Jeannie Cohen

Peter Jones
Friends of Classics
London NW6

SIR – As head teacher of a comprehensive school, I am in awe at the latest offering from Tristram Hunt. Presumably, up to now we head teachers have relaxed in the warm bath of mediocrity, flirting with the rubber duck of “unionised restrictive practices” and nonchalantly watching the soap suds of “standards” ebb away on a relentless “race to the bottom”.

Tackling poor teaching — yes we do that, Mr Hunt. Assessing colleagues to ensure that bad teachers cannot find refuge in this noble profession? Yes, rather more than most educational systems in the world, which do have “restrictive practices”.

After years of easy caricatures of teachers, I wonder whether the Loyal Opposition could offer a new script.

Simon Uttley
Headmaster, Saint John Bosco College
London SW19

 

 

SIR – George Osborne and Nick Boles will go down in history as the destroyers of beautiful England. Forced planning for housing on irreplaceable countryside (even Areas of Outstanding Beauty and National Parks) and the joining up of urban sprawl all over the Green Belts show that the Government doesn’t listen to the people.

It seems to me, as a retired architect, that the only ones to be heard are developers with nothing but personal profit in mind. What is being built is badly designed, with hopelessly minimal space, and a disgrace to the country that built the fine terraces and squares of London.

Can nothing be done to save this country? The Conservatives are destroying what they promised to preserve. Labour and Lib-Dems have just the same attitude.

I have been a true blue all my life, but not any more! The only hope is to pray that the developers go bankrupt so the horrors never get built, but then we will all be penniless.

Jennifer Habib
Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire

SIR – I despair! How on earth are the Conservatives ever to rid themselves of the Nasty Party sobriquet?

No sooner did Nadhim Zahawi, the Conservative MP for Stratford-upon-Avon, warn about the impact of current planning policies on the countryside, than “sources close to David Cameron” suggested he retract his criticisms or quit – presumably from his post on the No10 policy board.

Promotion would be more appropriate. Thousands of Tory supporters are, at this very moment, cheering Mr Zahawi for raising the one issue likely to damage Conservative electoral prospects more than immigration or even Europe.

Communities are plagued by developers gaining planning permission for speculative developments, not to benefit the community but to profit the landowner and builder. “Presumption in favour of development” is a loophole in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) that allows unfettered development in a way not envisaged under the localism agenda.

Alan Brien
Storrington, West Sussex

SIR – Mr Zahawi could not be more right when he says that planning regulations are causing pain across the country. Our community of 72 dwellings in an ancient village on the edge of the Mendip Hills is desperate to prevent the inappropriate development of 19 houses, an increase of more than 25 per cent, by Gillian, Lady Rees-Mogg, the mother of our MP, Jacob.

Nick Boles comment that “people will feel that beautiful new housing is a friend” is absurd in the extreme. He obviously can’t get out much, certainly not into rural Somerset.

Graham Sage
Hinton Blewett

SIR – Mr Zahawi is perfectly correct in his concerns. The NPPF is being used as a blunt tool to overcome all objections with the ill defined term “sustainable”.

Here in County Durham we have a site outside the village limits, subject to flooding, with no natural access, no employment and no secondary school but described as “sustainable” for 400 houses under the NPPF.

The maintenance cost of the site will exceed any income from council tax.

Michael J Meadowcroft
Langley Park, Co Durham

SIR – Should Mr Zahawi be forced to retract or resign, I shall consider joining the ABC (Anyone But Cameron) Club.

John Plummer
Ampthill, Bedfordshire

SIR – It is disappointing to read that the Government has put the brakes on ideas for the construction of new garden cities in England. Building attractive new communities with a broad mix of housing and back-up services is precisely what Inna Ali and I urged in Simplified Planning, our report for the Centre for Policy Studies.

We recommended that a procedure of tender should be adopted whereby all development proposals would be judged, first on their quality and acceptability, and then, in a second stage, a short list of the best could be drawn up and their backers invited to submit competitive bids for permission to develop land.

Enough procrastination: it’s time to get on with building some new garden cities offering housing people want to live in. Doing nothing will simply drive up the cost of housing and prolong the agony for many young families who cannot find an affordable or pleasant place to live.

Keith Boyfield
London SW1

 

 

Irish Times:

 

Sir, – Seventy years ago Jean Giraudoux wrote, “Water, gentlemen, is the only substance from which the earth can conceal nothing. It sucks out its innermost secrets . . .” And, in the case of Irish Water, it refuses to divulge those secrets. – Yours, etc,

MATTIE LENNON,

Lacken, Blessington,

Co Wicklow.

A chara, – The shambles of the €50 million consultancy fees paid out by Irish Water, and the lack of transparency with regard to the details, reminds one of the transfer of waste collection services in Dublin to private business, and the lack of detail that was given to the paying public on that occasion also. – Yours, etc,

SIMON O’CONNOR,

Lismore Road,

Crumlin, Dublin 12.

Sir, – The floodgates are now open on Irish Water and the consultancy fees paid to date. Might this give new meaning to the term “Watergate”? – Yours, etc,

CLARE BALFE,

Innisfallen Parade, Dublin 7.

Sir, – No transparency at Irish Water! An Irish problem to an Irish solution? – Yours, etc,

DERMOT FAGAN,

Llewellyn Grove,

Dublin 16.

Sir, – Irish Water urgently needs to act to counter the negative publicity that has surrounded the company in recent weeks. I suggest they hire a top PR consultancy firm to handle the matter. – Yours, etc,

DAVE ROBBIE,

Seafield Crescent,

Booterstown, Co Dublin.

Sir, – Whatever the merits of Irish Water pouring large sums of the public’s money into consultancy firms (who knows, Irish Water may learn something), I am mystified by the knee-jerk mindset of every Irish semi-State body or quango to insist it plonk its corporate headquarters in the most over-crowded centre of the most over-populated location in the country.

Regardless of office rental rates, traffic, travel and parking considerations, nothing would suit Irish Water but Talbot Street (one assumes there was nothing more suitable available in the less unfashionable arrondissements on the southside). Why this obsession with Dublin and its crammed city centre? Presumably, all Irish Water needs as a perfectly suitable headquarters is a location with good telecommunications and internet connections, both of which are readily available in every county in the State. It’s not as if this body needs a prominent storefront to attract its customers: they are going to be driven, willingly or otherwise, into Irish Water’s waiting arms.

Years ago, Fianna Fáil made a dog’s dinner of decentralisation by trying to uproot long-settled families and scattering them to the four corners. Here we have a new organisation that could be easily located in any one of the country’s towns or cities and could recruit its employees either locally or from a pool who knew in advance they were going to work in that location.

But no. Dublin it must be. And the centre of Dublin at that. Cork, Westport or Galway may be perfectly suitable for international corporations such as Pfizer, Allergen and Boston Scientific, but when it comes to any Irish semi-State organisations the default setting is D1 or D2. I would like someone from Irish Water to explain why. – Yours, etc,

LIAM STENSON,

Seacrest,

Knocknacarra, Galway.

Sir, – So, apart from spending €50 million on consultants, the Irish Water management feel relaxed enough about spending public money to provide a gym for themselves (Home News, January 11th). Nice to see they have their priorities right in carving out office space and fitting out a gym at a time when vicious cuts are made in public services to the old, the sick and the needy. No doubt they paid a consultant to advise on the gym.

The other issue here is that local gym owners are now in competition with another gym actually funded by their own taxes. There are plenty of gyms in the centre of Dublin and fees are at an all-time low because gym-owners are under pressure. It’s ridiculous that public money should be used for this purpose.

Finally, the gym issue should make people wonder what else they are lavishing public money on. – Yours, etc,

C CARROLL,

Herbert Lane,

Dublin 2.

Sir, –   I would like to offer my consultancy services to the new Irish Water, for a reduced fee of €5 million. It goes like this:   The ESB has a meter in my house, a meter reader calls, reads the meter, brings it back to the office staff who send me a bill.   Bord Gáis has a meter in my house – a new pilot electronic one – the meter-reader stands outside my house, presses his handheld electronic reader and gets the reading. He returns it to the office staff who send me a bill.

The new Irish Water needs to install a meter in my house (or outside it), hire a meter-reader who will return the reading to his office staff, who should send me a bill.   I still think that my fee of €5 million is too high – for the blindingly obvious task. – Yours, etc,

JIM COOKE,

Marley Avenue,

Rathfarnham Dublin 16.

A chara, – Money down the drain. – Is mise,

CATHAL NUGENT,

The Waterfront,

Loughrea, Co Galway.

Sir, – Might I offer some free consultancy to Irish Water?

It appears Irish Water is to start operations with almost 4,800 staff, 4,300 from the local authorities plus new hires of 500. All to service 1.6 million homes.

Perhaps they should reconsider. Scottish Water, with 2.4 million homes, gets by with 3,400 employees.

Does the management of Irish Water need a consultant to work out that something is wrong? Irish Water is proposing to start life with almost 50 per cent too many employees!

I’m more than happy to prove further consultancy services, but somehow I feel my offer will not be taken up. – Yours, etc,

TONY SMYTH

Upper Newcastle,

Galway.

Sir, – The Government should have introduced an “air-breathing” tax instead of a water usage charge. There would be no need for meters, no need for consultants and no way of avoiding breathing air! – Yours, etc,

PETER LYNCH,

Cremorne,

Knocklyon,

Dublin 16.

Sir, – Has the Government washed its hands of the taxpayers’ €50 million? – Yours, etc,

OLIVER DUFFY,

Fremont Drive,

Melburn Estate,

Bishopstown, Cork.

A chara, – Runaway train for some, gravy train for others. Nothing has changed! – Yours, etc,

LIAM McGOWAN,

Woodland,

Letterkenny, Co Donegal.

Sir, – It was the will of the troika that we should pay for our water, a commodity we have in abundance. Will they now insist that the Greeks pay for their sunshine which they have in abundance? – Yours, etc,

PETER MOONEY,

Quarry Road, Cabra,

Dublin 7.

   

Sir, – The importance of the digitisation of Ireland’s Memorial Records of the first World War is somewhat overstated (Home News, January 11th).

The volumes of names have been available for many years on Ancestry’s genealogy website, and on CD from Trinity College’s Eneclann. It can therefore hardly be described as a “new archive” as your article states.

Another issue is the fact that the original 1923 project’s methodology included the assumption that all men in Irish regiments were Irishmen. In reality, especially as the war went on, a huge percentage of “Irish” regiments were made up of non-Irish soldiers. A cursory examination of the “Place of Birth” information in the records will confirm this.

If this is an indication of the level of Government engagement in the commemoration of the Irish dead of the Great War, I am deeply saddened.

This exercise is a cut-and-paste copy of an already flawed set of documents, dressed up and wheeled out to provide a photo opportunity for politicians who have no real interest in investing any money or resources into compiling a properly accurate memorial list of Irishmen who never came home.

Our dead of the Great War deserve better than this. – Yours, etc,

DAVID POWER,

The Drive,

Grange Manor,

Lucan, Co Dublin.

Sir, – Anyone who reads the gospels will see that Jesus Christ loved sinners (Matthew 9:13), spent his time eating and interacting with them (Mark 2:15) and gave his life on their behalf (Romans 5:8).

He commended a man who called himself a sinner (Luke 18:13-14) and instructed his followers to love their enemies and pray for those who persecuted them (Matthew 5:44)

So why do Mary McAleese, and others, have a problem with something Jesus clearly said and did and with the word “sinner” being used?

Perhaps it is because they do not understand how, by having faith, a person is forgiven, can break free from condemnation (Romans 8:1-4), win their struggle with sin (Acts 13:38-39) and have a new life (1 Corinthians 6:9-11). Perhaps it’s frustration born out of a lack of hope and a lack of answers. – Yours, etc,

SEAMUS O’CALLAGHAN,

Bullock Park,Carlow.

A chara, – Fionola Meredith’s article had me laughing into my chai latte. I hadn’t realised it was open season on other people’s spiritual practices. Spiritual practices are meaningful to practitioners and often baffling and amusing to the outsider.

I would posit cleansing my toxic soul with a dose of Deepak is as effective as sitting in a dark, little box and cleaning my soul by “confessing” to a man who has had a holy spirit invoked into him. What is modern-day Christianity to many practitioners but a pinch of Buddhism here (“Be nice to others!”), some mysticism there (the concept of the Trinity is a bit mystical) and the odd archangel. Let he who is without sin . . . – Is mise,

ÉILIS Ní FHARRACHAIR,

Harold’s Cross Road,

Dublin 6W.

Sir, – Fionola Meredith (Opinion, January 13th) notes that December 25th is the birthday of Jesus Christ. If we look at the evidence that’s highly unlikely. Mary and Joseph came to register for a Roman census, which didn’t take place in winter, and the shepherds were guarding their flocks in the fields at night, which would not happen in winter either. Since Elizabeth was in her sixth month of pregnancy with John the Baptist when Christ was conceived and Zacharias, was a priest serving in the Jerusalem temple during the course of Abijah, which was mid-June of that year, we can date Christ’s likely date of birth as late September. Pull that zip over your chakras. – Yours, etc,

DAVID WILKINS,

Vevay Road,

Bray,

Co Wicklow.

Sir, – Ross Maguire (Opinion, January 11th) correctly highlights Irish difficulties in appreciating the value of failure. Yet while it is certainly true that we have a legacy that breeds conservatism and risk aversion, it is equally true that recent events have prompted worthy scepticism of excessive carefree behaviour.

Where Maguire’s argument falls short is in failing to distinguish between what might be called destructive failure and constructive failure.

Destructive failure is founded upon greed, arrogance, and recklessness of the Celtic tiger ilk. By contrast, constructive failure is a legitimate failure associated with authentic and well-intentioned efforts at value creation. Whereas destructive failures are value dissipating and deserve the full wrath of traditional criticism, constructive failures merit greater recognition and encouragement as the foundations for future success. Ultimately, the true challenge is not simply to appreciate failure, but to learn from it. – Yours, etc,

BRIAN HARNEY,

Business School,

Dublin City University,

Dublin 9.

Sir, – How disheartening it is, as a teacher of 37 years, to see the power of the Teaching Council to discipline under-performing teachers being editorially commented on (January 7th), while the actual performance of teachers in substantially raising literacy and numeracy levels in DEIS schools, as recently measured by the Educational Research Centre, was editorially ignored. – Yours, etc,

DER FITZGIBBON,

Scoil Íosagáin,

Farranree,

 

   

A chara, – Prompted by spiralling costs at the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), Nick Armstrong (January 11th) questions the rationale for investing in nuclear fusion. It should be remembered that we live in an epoch where electromagnetic forces, governing all of chemistry, are much weaker than the more mysterious nuclear force, binding nuclei together.

So, by rejigging the nuclei rather than the electrons in atoms, one stands to get more energy out. Ultimately, nuclear fusion is a smarter way to produce energy; it necessitates less interference by us, ie fewer artificial reactions, and will hopefully lead long-term to a smaller environmental footprint. – Is mise,

Dr EOIN O COLGAIN,

CN Yang Institute for

Theoretical Physics,

State University of New

York, Stony Brook,

Sir, – If anyone else attempts the physical impossibility of “reverting” to me (an unpleasant outcome for both), I will make sure that “in pulverem revertentur”! – Yours, etc,

LIAM McMULLIN,

Donamon, Co Roscommon.

Sir, – Not exactly a phrase, I concede, but has anyone noticed that in the “recent past”, almost everyone interviewed by the media, starts every sentence with “I suppose”. I find it extremely irritating. – Yours, etc,

GERALDINE AHERNE,

Rowan Park Avenue,

Blackrock, Co Dublin.

Sir, – Sale time used to be but twice a year. Please, no more “When these half price . . . are gone their definitely gone”. – Yours, etc,

ANGELA NOLAN,

Cedar Park,

The Donahies, Dublin 13.

Sir, – “Various different”. – Yours, etc,

MICHAEL O’DWYER,

Rail Park,

Maynooth, Co Kildare.

Sir , – “Personally, this is a humbling moment for me” – as used by newly appointed cardinals, bishops, Oscar starlets, and the like. “Bring it on!” might be more honest. Also, “Yours faithfully” – as used by crawlers who want their silly letters to appear. – Yours, etc,

EDDIE FINNEGAN,

Wightman Road,

London, England.

Sir, – We should absolutely ban the absolute overuse of “absolute”. And that’s the absolute end of this absolutely ridiculous conversation. – Yours, etc,

JOHN ROGERS,

Ballydorey,

Rathowen, Co Westmeath.

Sir, – “Phrases we could live without” is a phrase we could live without. Please do not start a long litany of such phrases in your Letters page as some of these letters could be seen as a cheap shot at getting published. Oops, is that irony raising its smiling head!? Shame on me. – Yours, etc,

Dr JAMES FINNEGAN,

Woodland,

Letterkenny, Co Donegal.

 

 

   

Sir, – In relation to the appalling killing of Tom O’Gorman (Home News, January 13th), I commend your decision not to disclose the more graphic elements of this tragic event.

It is a sad indictment of the society in which we live that other Irish publications failed to follow suit. – Yours, etc,

FRANK BYRNE,

Cormac Terrace,

Terenure,

Dublin 6W.

 

Sir, – Now that young Limerick scientists have shown that horsemeat on the whole is healthier than beef (Home News, January 10th), should we be thanking those who surreptitiously put horsemeat into the food chain for improving the national diet? – Yours, etc,

BRIAN HODKINSON,

Brook Road,

Reboge,

Limerick.

 

A chara, – No surprise that the first erroneous black card (Sport, January 10th) was given to a Mr White, who also got a yellow, leaving the referee red-faced, the Louth manager feeling blue and the rest of us tickled pink. – Is mise,

LOMAN O LOINGSIGH,

Kiltipper Road,

Dublin 24.

 

 

 

Irish Independent:

 

One hundred years ago this month, Henry Ford created the consumer society. He had already started to put humanity on wheels and to perfect assembly-line production but his decision to pay Ford workers $5 per day changed the world of economics forever.

Also in this section

Letters: Building managers and water charges

Life is sheer hell at 80

Letters: Broaden debate on suicide

Prior to his revolutionary decision, automotive workers were paid less than $2.50 per day but were still probably the best paid of any industry in the US.

His decision was met with consternation and incredulity in commercial circles; it was thought his impulsive lunacy would destroy industry and the only hope was that he would become bankrupt before the silly idea caught on.

Exactly the opposite happened and his inspired decision turned him into the richest man in industry and created the world of full and plenty we now enjoy.

He turned his workers into customers; workers could aspire to living standards that, until that time, had been the exclusive privilege of the wealthy.

Henry Ford had a pathological dislike and mistrust of accountants, economists and stock speculators. On return from a world trip, he discovered his son Edsel had constructed a building in his absence to accommodate accountants needed by the company to keep its financial affairs in order.

The very next day, Henry began demolition of the accountancy block, and from then until he retired, “bean counters” in Ford dressed as assembly workers, and rushed on to assembly lines whenever Mr Ford walked through the works.

We desperately need a Henry Ford in 2014 to demolish the “bean counter” edifice, which is undoing the consumer society that he created.

Ford’s “assembly line” has achieved perfection; all his ambitions have been spectacularly achieved. Such production power no longer needs or can facilitate “growth”, which is the “holy grail” of the economic hierarchy.

In his absence, “bean counters” have taken over the planet and are undoing the consumer society he initiated.

PADRAIC NEARY

TUBBERCURRY, CO SLIGO

SAYING SORRY

* As I drive past the Church of Christ the King and the Presbyterian Church opposite each other on the Scroggy Road, Limavady, on a regular basis, my mind never fails to recall the courage of the Reverend David Armstrong, who walked across that road on a Christmas morning to wish Catholics a Holy Christmas and got run out of town for doing so.

In many ways, history hasn’t moved on from there, and no amount of selective interviews about the past will address the need to say ‘sorry’ for what was done to fan the flames and prevent genuine reconciliation and lasting peace among our people, Catholic and Protestant.

Rev Armstrong’s call for Dr Paisley to apologise for his role in the past is perfectly understandable given the personal suffering of his family, but it is also understandable because an opportunity was lost to reconcile our communities then, but is still as relevant today as it was in the past.

As one who has had the privilege of getting to know Rev Armstrong and his family, my hope for the future rests with people like him who know from their personal experience that there is no alternative to addressing the wrongs of the past and being prepared to say sorry for the dreadful words and deeds that contributed to the conflict.

There have been so many talks over the years designed to move the political process forward, but the absence of the word ‘sorry’ is sadly missing and, until people have the courage to use it, it seems that there will simply be more talks about talks.

JOHN DALLAT, MLA

KILLREA, CO DERRY

CAUSES OF CRIME

* There is nothing that does more for one’s political credibility than regular declarations of the intention to be tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime. The difficulty here is that we can identify cases of crime but the causes of crime systematically elude us.

There is a growing acknowledgement that crime is mainly fuelled by the continued existence of social exclusion.

There is a real tension between criminal justice and social justice. We seem to be trapped in the assumption that poverty is the price we must pay for economic progress.

One of the defining features of our time is the influence of the press on how we think, particularly about crime. Morally, the press has a right to print what it ought to print and we have the right to think what we ought to think.

Sadly, however, there are aspects of the press that leave much to be desired. One tactic used by the tabloids is the amplification of outrage, stirring up some very basic instincts.

This happens most vividly when reporting crimes of violence. The perpetrator becomes a ‘beast’ who is not sent to prison but ‘caged’.

As long as we see the criminal as some kind of aberrant beast and not one of us, we will be less and less inclined to deal with the causes of crime.

PHILIP O’NEILL

EDITH ROAD, OXFORD

ENTREPRENEUR STRATEGY

* According to the Irish Independent (January 13), the latest report commissioned by the Government directed at entrepreneurs ‘to create jobs and attract business’ has been devised by ‘experts’ and is ‘radical’.

It apparently recommends that taxes be slashed and a plethora of other welfare inducements be introduced that are intended, inter alia, ‘to keep wealthy Irish in the country’, in addition to the abundantly generous incentives already available.

The fundamental issue with Irish entrepreneurs, with some notable exceptions, is that they have a large appetite for grants, subsidies and tax breaks, but little capacity to deliver on promises, and they account for only 8pc of the nation’s exports of goods and services.

Public policy is pockmarked by verbosity, plans, policies, press releases and speculation. The core of a strategy published in May 1999, for example, forecast that locally controlled Irish businesses would double their sales over 10 years, from €25bn in 1999 to €51bn in 2009.

This strategy was never fulfilled, despite the State paying over €4bn in grants to local businesses since 1999.

Why should the 2014 report not be treated as just another exercise in sophism that will lead to nothing of fundamental and far-reaching significance?

Have we not reached an era of delivery and self-sufficiency by entrepreneurs, rather than the milestone of one more committee report regurgitating the same themes and issues and demanding more inducements, as if these were a magic potion that actually worked in practice?

MYLES DUFFY

BELLEVUE AVENUE, GLENAGEARY, CO DUBLIN

GOOD HEAVENS

l Billy Keane raises some questions regarding exactly what becomes of the ‘waste’ as toilets are flushed in planes (January 13).

Perhaps those who proclaim: “It’s piddling rain” have the answer?

TOM GILSENAN

BEAUMONT, DUBLIN 9

Irish Independent

 


Premium Bonds

$
0
0

15 January 2014 Premium bonds
I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. Pertwee has to smuggle a relative back to England from Tangiers, as a Naval officer.  Priceless.
Peter finishes bit of work and I sell my premium bonds
Scrabble today I wins     and gets  just   over   300,  Perhaps Mary will win tomorrow.

Obituary:
Peter Geach, who has died aged 97, was a formidable logician and happened to be married to one of the 20th century’s leading English-language philosophers, Elizabeth Anscombe.
In a way this meant he was overshadowed. He did, though, have a strong philosophical life of his own, and without the thousands of hours of discussion that Elizabeth Anscombe had with him, her philosophy would not have attained the eminence it did.
Peter Geach always had sharp teeth in an argument and, the harder the opposition, the harder he bit. His father was a philosopher who never took up a paid position, and, under his influence, Peter admired in his youth JME McTaggart, the Edwardian Hegelian who espoused most positions that Geach came to reject: atheism, reincarnation, determinism, the unreality of time.
Geach admired the “irresistible force of reasoning” that he found in McTaggart. “Under God, I owe my very self to McTaggart,” he once wrote, “for it was knowledge of his philosophy that kept alight in me a longing for the infinite and eternal that was not to be quenched by the noisy winds of the world.”
Even after decades, Geach still thought it important to publish an introduction to McTaggart’s philosophy, Truth, Love, and Immortality (1979). Geach found his own feet while arguing against his master. Thus, in response to McTaggart’s argument that it was impossible to believe in a solitary God, Geach showed how McTaggart’s demands for a deity were fulfilled only by the Holy Trinity of orthodox Christianity.
Related Articles
Professor G E M Anscombe
06 Jan 2001
Professor Philippa Foot
05 Oct 2010
Professor Antony Flew
13 Apr 2010
Leszek Kolakowski
20 Jul 2009
In the philosophy of religion, Geach contributed to a better understanding of existence, or the act of being. An important distinction he made was between the ideas “there is a God” and “God is, or lives”. In the latter sense God is identical with his being. Geach’s thinking on this question is touched on in God and the Soul (1969) and Providence and Evil (1977).
In ethics, Elizabeth Anscombe made a celebrated rejection of a kind of utilitarianism that she named consequentialism. Since many modern ethicists rejected a divine system of laws, she proposed a system of morals based on virtues. Some of Geach’s own ideas on virtue ethics were given in The Virtues (1977), based on his Stanton Lectures of 1973.
There were some surprises. “We ought, I think, to judge about Cannabis indica much as we judge about alcohol,” he said in one lecture. “Cannabis indica appears to be less mentally disturbing than alcohol, less productive of damaging accidents like car crashes, and very much less addictive.”
In his paper “Good and Evil”, published in the journal Analysis in 1956, Geach had shown how the meaning of the word “good” depended on the substantive that it qualified: a good apple being very different from a good knife. It was an influential insight, taken up by Philippa Foot among others.
Unlike the dense, unsignposted prose of Anscombe, Geach’s style was a pleasure to read. In their joint volume Three Philosophers (1961), Anscombe contributed a penetrating analysis of Aristotle that was a hard slog for readers, and Geach two sections: one on Aquinas that was both clear and full of new insights, and one on Frege in which the chief obstacle for the general reader was the mathematical language of the philosopher’s logic. It was largely through Geach, whose lectures on Frege were encouraged by Wittgenstein in 1950, that the importance of Frege’s philosophy was realised in Britain.
Geach’s style was described by the philosopher Jenny Teichman as “deliberately outrageous”. Having sharpened his wits on philosophers as formidable as Hume or Russell, he could seem fiercer than an Old Testament prophet and did not fear to give hard knocks to living philosophers. Yet some of Geach’s phrases became the common coin of philosophers, such as a “Cambridge change”. This is the notion suggested by Bertrand Russell’s thought: that Socrates changes if something can be predicated of him that could not be predicated before. Thus if Socrates’s son grows bigger than him, it becomes true to say Socrates is shorter than his son, and so Socrates would have changed. But this is not a real change, only a “Cambridge change”.
Geach’s interest in the thought of both Wittgenstein and Aquinas made him an honorary founder of the philosophical school that called itself “analytical Thomism”. But while Geach was a philosopher and Catholic, his philosophy went wherever the force of logic demanded, rather than being tailored to a religious conclusion. “To me it appears blasphemous to say God is ‘above’ logic,” he wrote. “Logic is not partisan, and knows nothing but to strike straight; but the sword is invincible, bearing the Maker’s name.”
Peter Thomas Geach was born in London on March 29 1916, the son of George Hender Geach, the principal of a training college in India, and Eleonora Sgonina, the daughter of Polish emigrants. He went to live with his Polish grandparents in Cardiff, his mother having separated from his father when he was four.
He was sent to Llandaff Cathedral School, and then Clifton College, before going up to Balliol College, Oxford, gaining a first in Greats in 1938.
He was to spend the years 1945 to 1951 in philosophical research in Cambridge, and the next 15 years at Birmingham University, before being appointed Professor of Logic at Leeds in 1966, retiring in 1981. From 1971 to 1974 he gave the Stanton Lectures in the philosophy of religion at Cambridge.
The year 1938 had seen him received into the Catholic Church. It was also the year he met Elizabeth Anscombe, who had independently become a Catholic. Once she had taken her finals, they married, on Boxing Day 1941, and decided that she should keep her maiden name. With her, Geach had seven children, four of them girls.
Most of the apocryphal stories in academe about the children had some basis in reality: how they would at a tender age cook alarming meals for their parents and guests; how they would appear clothed strangely, or not at all, in the middle of some seminar; how one child, on being told that if her teddy was not in the drawing room it must be in her bedroom, retorted: “But that doesn’t follow.”
The “Geachcombes”, though each sometimes holding a post elsewhere, shuttled between Oxford and Cambridge, where Geach got to know Wittgenstein. Wittgenstein lodged with them (in Oxford) towards the end of his life.
Together, Geach and Anscombe translated Descartes’s Philosophical Writings (1954). In the Fifties, while Elizabeth Anscombe was doing the work that became her dense, short and influential book Intention (1957), Geach also turned his attention to the philosophy of mind in Mental Acts (1957).
Peter Geach listed his recreations as “reading stories of detection, mystery and horror; collecting and annotating old bad logic texts”.
Elizabeth Anscombe died in 2001; Peter Geach is survived by his children.
Peter Geach, born March 29 1916, died December 21 2013

Guardian:

Too often, the debate about “Europe” is based on emotional and ideological arguments, with all sides – from those who want more EU integration and those who want less – trading in hyperbole rather than engaging with substantive issues of policy.
Of course we need to co-operate across borders in Europe. The question, as ever, is how. How do we square the need for cross-border action with democratic accountability? How do we live up to the promise to make decisions as close as possible to citizens? How do we make Europe really work for growth and jobs at a time when global competition is stiffening?
Today, we are joining hundreds of parliamentarians and opinion-formers from across Europe at a unique conference in London organised by the thinktank Open Europe and the Fresh Start Project, dedicated to one question: how can we achieve EU reform? While our proposed solutions may differ, we agree on one thing: the status quo in Europe is not an option. If the EU is to thrive, it needs to embrace a series of bold reforms. Some of these will involve EU action, but where democratic and economic factors so dictate, this may also mean “less Europe”.
We want to replace the emotional point-scoring with a policy-based discussion about how to achieve a Europe that works better for both democracy and growth.
Gustav Blix Swedish MP (Moderate party); ranking member, committee on European Union affairs (Sweden)
Klaus Peter Willsch German MP (CDU); member, committee for economy and energy, Germany; Deputy head of the committtee on education, research and technology (Germany)
Angieszka Pomaska Polish MP (Civic Platform); Chair of the EU affairs committee in the Polish parliament (Poland)
Eva Kjer Hansen Chair of the European affairs committee (Liberal party), Danish parliament (Denmark)
Andrea Leadsom MP for South Northamptonshire (Con); co-founder, Fresh Start Project; member of No 10 policy board (UK)
Dr Reinhold Lopatka Spokesperson for foreign and European affairs, Austrian People’s party (OeVP); former secretary of state for European and international affairs (Austria)

Many will be surprised and alarmed by the warning from the Commons foreign affairs select committee that BBC World Service broadcasting is in danger of suffering creeping commercialisation (Report, 10 January). For more than 70 years, the World Service successfully fought for its credibility with sceptical or openly hostile international audiences by demonstrating its independence from any kind of governmental control. Now that hard-won independence is, it seems, being put at risk by a facile “rush to commercialism”. What is more disturbing is that this policy is being introduced without detailed proposals or any public discussion; that BBC management which undertook to protect World Service independence and integrity when it assumed full financial responsibility for the WS is walking away from that commitment; that what is left of independent World Service management connives at policies that threaten to undermine WS credibility; and that the BBC Trust stands idly by as a precious part of the institution for which it is responsible faces radical undermining. The select committee, having valuably identified the risks and dangers to a major British institution, should now press the case for detailed examination of the future of the BBC World Service before real and irretrievable damage is done.
John Tusa
London

Thanks to Julie Myerson for her article (Death in hospital need not be a medicalised trauma, 13 January). While one reason I buy the Guardian is for its coverage of the NHS, I have for a long time had a sense of disquiet that the stories are so biased towards the bad news (good news is no news?). While we need to shout loud about the problems of the NHS, we also need to continually celebrate its successes. Not doing so seems to me to be, ironically, preparing the country for letting the NHS, depicted as useless and malfunctioning, slip away to open private hands. As someone who works for the NHS, I would also point out that we need to see a reflection of the service we give as worthwhile, even excellent at times, to help us continue to strive to be the best that we can be, especially since our managers seem hellbent on thoroughly demoralising us at times. The NHS will survive only if the public can value what it does well alongside campaigning for better when it does not deliver.
Suzanne McCall
Luton, Bedfordshire
•  I was moved by Julie Myerson’s elegant article about her mother-in-law’s death. I know exactly what she means. In 2007, my mother suffered a cerebral haemorrhage which left her in a coma. The consultant at St Richard’s hospital, Chichester, suggested that we “let nature take its course”, to which we agreed. Unlike Julie’s mother-in-law, my mother was able to die at home, with the hospital arranging everything. She lasted two more weeks, with a team of nurses coming in three times a day and a person sitting with her through the night, allowing members of the family to visit her whenever they wished. My brother and I were with our mother at the moment of death. It was profoundly moving. Sad though it was, it felt like an extraordinary privilege to see someone slip from life to death. Seeing our mother die peacefully in her own home made her dying seem like the natural event it was. I thank the NHS for making that possible.
Emma Dally
London
•  Julie Myerson writes movingly of the natural death of her mother-in-law. The staff communication and decision-making sounded sensitive and experienced. However, non-medical intervention can be an umbrella to hide bad practice under, and that is the danger. My 94-year-old mother was in her local hospital in Scotland, after a fall. They found tumours in her chest and though she expected to get home after pain control, someone somewhere decided she wasn’t worth the bother when she got a bladder infection after three days. No treatment meant that we found her in agony, alone, with no nursing care. The doctor refused to attend as it was a bank holiday and when we begged for help he prescribed morphine by phone until, after hours of pain, the last dose killed her quickly. Apparently this is all acceptable for an old person because someone had decided it was time she was dispatched and she was denied the natural death that Julie’s mother-in-law had.
Allowing nature to take its course where enlightenment and knowledge prevail is the ideal. But where ignorance and callousness prevail it becomes a very distorted and harrowing experience that haunts loved ones evermore.
Andrene Messersmith
Innellan, Argyll
• It was the image used by Julie Myerson that drew my attention. Death is “oddly akin to a birth”. My father John Hughes (Obituary, 2 January) died on 1 November. Previously a principal at Ruskin College, he sadly developed dementia and spent years in an increasingly locked-in state. I had taken a break from his bedside when my sister called. He was on no drugs and the nurses at the nursing home were fine about leaving us alone. We both strangely – or maybe not – seemed to know exactly what to do. We talked gently, stroked his head and hands, told him we loved him but we were ready for him to go. We reminded him of his wonderful contribution to people’s lives and said he deserved a rest now. It came into my mind that I felt like some sort of midwife helping him on. He died so peacefully. It was amazing to be at a “normal” death. I have been at two deathbeds where drugs were quite rightly involved so this was very special. We should talk about death more and enable people to feel they can help people they love die so peacefully.
Katherine Hughes
Oxford

Your superficial but abusive piece on me (Pass notes, G2, 16 December) accused me of likening Mandela to Hitler. I would never dream of comparing a white Austrian fascist with a black African communist. I merely pointed out that Mandela’s legacy (whether intended or not) is a murderous one. The article further accused me of being “extreme rightwing”, when my track record on exposing European fascism, antisemitism and EU corporatist imperialism is a matter of record – praised by, among others, east European socialists, British communists and leading Labour party figures.
Rodney Atkinson
Author, Fascist Europe Rising and Europe’s Full Circle
• If Michele Hanson “forgot the dandelions for Daughter’s tortoise which I had especially … picked” (Still here, G2, 14 Jnauary) I feel seriously concerned for the tortoise. First, surely the creature should be hibernating, and, second, there certainly are no dandelions growing in our garden in winter. Perhaps things are different in the balmy south.
Anne Liddon (@AnneLiddon)
Tynemouth
• O happy days. Dartford station did not have a newsagent for five and a half months, but four short weeks after a letter to the Guardian (17 December 2013) it reopened and I can at last buy the paper on my way to work. More power to the letters page!
Carol Gould
Dartford, Kent
• I have to wonder how the Académie would translate the variety of fadge known as potato apple (Letters, 11 January). I’m sure they’d insist on a ridiculous “pommes de terre de pommes” when “pompom de terre” would be delicious.
Steve Illingworth
Haworth, West Yorkshire
• I see (photo, Page 1, and The sweet scent of success, page 7, 13 January) that Vivienne Westwood was wearing a “pinstripe head wrap”. Round our way we call it a “woolly hat”.
Sally Cheseldine
Edinburgh
• Thank you for restoring sport to a daily pullout section. My wife is very happy. Therefore I am too.
Ron Page
Thursford, Norfolk
Chris Deerin (For us Scots the moral duty is clear: stay British, 14 January), newly repatriated to Scotland, has some way to go, I fear, before his metropolitan mindset is recalibrated. What he characterises as Better Together “identifying the risks associated with independence” is more readily recognised north of Berwick as the self-described “project fear” that has promised all but the killing of the firstborn in a new Scottish state.
I recommend as a primer Aditya Chakrabortty’s G2 column the same day, which explains in dispiriting detail how “Great” Britain squandered its oil bonanza while Norway prudently used its to build up reserves. As Chakrabortty muses, if Scotland had held on to these revenues “the question today would not be how it could manage solo, but how London would fare without its bankrollers north of Hadrian’s Wall”.
But for many of us the arguments for voting yes are not fiscal but moral. To reverse the mean-spirited, devastating impact of Iain Duncan Smith’s “reforms”, to hold fast against the Govification of education, to protect the NHS. To build an economy based on sustainable growth and employment rather than another housing bubble.
And, not least, to protect our European credentials and reject racism thinly disguised as migration control.
As countless small nations have proved, internationalism and social justice are not the sole prerogative of large powers. Recent history would suggest rather the reverse.
Ruth Wishart
Kilcreggan, Argyll
•  If there is a case to be made for the union, Chris Deerin’s is not it. He says that in September we might “choose to leave to set up a separate country”. We are a separate country, it’s just that we have chosen to be in a union with another one. He delights in the number of Scots who have “senior positions” in England (I suspect he really means London) but I am unsure as to how this has ever benefited the people who actually work and live in Scotland. As for Scots having “a moral code conferred on them by history”, this seems to be some quasi-mythical notion that might explain much about the misdeeds of empire, not to mention recent catastrophes in Afghanistan and Iraq. A large part of the impetus for Scottish independence comes from a desire to break free from the nostalgic, top-down, grandiose vision of many unionists, north and south of the border. Many in the yes camp prefer to look forward to Scotland as a small, social-democratic, progressive north European nation free of any delusion about being a world power.
Tom McFadyen
Kirkintilloch, East Dunbartonshire
•  Speaking as a Scot with a vote in the referendum, I do recognise that I have a “moral role” to play but not the one conferred by Chris Deerin’s magical-thinking tour of Britain’s history. My moral dilemma lies in the thought that voting for independence might leave progressive forces south of the Tweed stuck in the electoral mud. If I vote no, it won’t be to offer moral support to some fantasy retelling of history, it will be because I don’t feel good about deserting my pals south of the border.
Alistair Richardson
Stirling

Commander Neil Basu refers to the “intolerable” delay, for the family and his officers, before the inquest jury reached its conclusion on the death of Mark Duggan (Officer who shot Duggan can return to armed duties, 13 January). There were many reasons for this – not least the complexity of this case, two associated criminal trials and our own finite resources. We agree that such delays add to the stress and anxiety for all concerned.
But a key feature of this investigation was the fact that the firearms officers refused to answer questions at interview. Following a protracted exchange of written questions and answers, it was nearly a year before we were able to get answers to all our questions, and even then we were not able to probe those answers verbally.
The law has now changed and we can compel officers to come in for interview. However, they can and still do refuse to answer questions verbally at interview.
Families and friends of those who die during police contact find it inexplicable that officers present at someone’s death do not fully co-operate with subsequent investigations – so do we. It means that the inquest is the first time they have to account properly for their actions and have their evidence probed and tested.
Following the comments made recently by the commissioner of the Metropolitan police, I hope that Commander Basu’s officers will now not only attend interviews, but also answer questions, if required, in our continuing investigation into Mark Duggan’s death, and any future tragic deaths.
Anne Owers
Chair of the Independent Police Complaints Commission
• Officer V53 made a catastrophic mistake that resulted in the untimely and unnecessary death of an unarmed man. That mistake must destroy confidence in V53′s competence to carry out armed police duties. Commander Basu’s suggestion that he would welcome V53 back to armed duties is not just an insult to the Duggan family but shows contempt for all Londoners. It elevates strict principle above good management and public safety, and is symptomatic of the Metropolitan police senior management’s inward-looking approach.
Alan Twite
London

One of Simon Hoggart’s typically idiosyncratic comments, when chairing the Guardian’s fringe meeting at Liberal Democratic conferences, was to tell the audience, “Do not switch off your mobile phone – it might be someone important!” It had, of course, the desired effect.

In the late 1960s, the serious media couldn’t get enough of news from the fledgling Child Poverty Action Group – even if it came from branch level. So, if we volunteers in CPAG’s Manchester branch issued a press release of what a visiting speaker was going to say, come Friday evening in a city-centre pub, we’d be disappointed not to see a couple of paragraphs in Saturday’s Guardian.
One evening, though, a cub reporter turned up to hear the speaker, introduced himself as Simon Hoggart, stayed on for a drink and accepted a lift home from me. I doubtless continued to bombard him, en route to south Didsbury, with more details of CPAG’s message, while not passing up the chance to enthuse about The Uses of Literacy and what a fan I was of his dad. But I became a fan for life, that evening, of the son who’d bothered to come to the pub, even though he had our release.
And not just a fan of his Guardian columns. My copy of his America: A User’s Guide is heavily annotated, picking out aphorisms such as the two I’ve so often repeated to US students – his observation that British English has become “a dialect of the principal tongue, American English” and his description of American football as “random violence interrupted by committee meetings”.

Why voters are apathetic
I am now 89 and in my youth I worked first for the Liberals as agent and then as constituency organiser for my local Labour party. I have also been a county council Labour candidate in a very Conservative constituency. I have voted whenever my vote was called for, but I do not think I will vote again.
I am not surprised that Britain’s young are “apathetic and disaffected”; I certainly am (3 January). Our electoral system is so manifestly unfair. In most constituencies more votes are cast against the winning candidate than for. Over the whole country, more votes are cast against the winning party than for it. You don’t have to be a genius to work that out. The second choice, the Alternative Vote, is the next worst option. To say that various forms of proportional representation are too complicated for the average voter would be laughable were it not so insulting.
I also find that many people do not “use” their MPs. If you, want an answer to your burning question or complaint, it is no good writing to the PM or the papers or demonstrating in the streets: you have to write directly to your constituency representative, who has to answer personally. Your MP’s name can easily be found on the internet. I just wish that members of Parliament were swamped by letters complaining about the present state of affairs.
Katherine Du Plat-Taylor
Mold, UK
• In your story about young voters’ apathy, the environment is dismissed as a single issue to substitute for real politics. But the environment is where we live and to ignore its importance is to have no view of the future. This is not just about polar bear preservation or what’s happening to the climate and why. It’s about using things up faster than they can be replaced. Try looking round your house at all the things made of plastic, looking at your fossil-fuel use in the car and at home, looking at how much of your food is bought on international markets, and picture life when these things are unavailable. With a limited supply and growing demand we can’t reasonably expect business as usual.
Until there are commercially viable, renewable substitutes for everything from aluminium to drinking water, or we’ve colonised a couple more planets, our natural resources are surely our priority. Of course other issues matter, but what use is an economic or political plan that ignores our physical environment?
Short-termism is fine for politicians seeking a final term in office or for the Deck Chair Rearranging Committee of the Titanic. For the rest of us, I think it’s reasonable to keep an eye on where we are heading.
David Roman
Newport, UK
Fighting climate change
The feature Tax on meat “will cut methane buildup” (3 January) raises a number of issues, not least the increasing environmental and health consequences of our worldwide dependence on pasture-fed animals.
Australia is a unique position to provide a partial solution: effective kangaroo harvesting. The various species of kangaroo provide a source of protein that is largely ignored. Combined kangaroo populations are estimated as between 15 million and 50 million in currently harvested areas alone. Surely we can learn from the Aboriginal population to manage the almost inexhaustible population of these producers of both meat and a range of other valuable by-products, provided we can overcome our white-fella mindset of exclusive ownership and fencing of pasture.
Kangaroo meat for human consumption, managed and harvested under Federal rather than, as at present, State regulation, can provide us at the very least with a healthy temporary buffer against further global clearance of forests and land degradation, until that happy day arrives, if it ever does, when the majority of the world becomes largely or totally vegetarian.
Noel Bird
Boreen Point, Queensland, Australia
• Sadly, vegetarian advocacy is not encouraged by the data on the greenhouse gas impacts of cattle and sheep burps. Cheese, milk and yoghurt would surely also be guilty, while eggs, pork, fowl and fish are exonerated.
What would an effective and acceptable anti-greenhouse emissions diet look like? Perhaps:
a) Egg and bacon for breakfast instead of beef sausages.
b) Chicken schnitzel or ham sandwich instead of lamb chops for lunch.
c) Roast turkey instead of roast lamb for dinner.
We could keep roast beef as a special treat for Christmas.
Perhaps this is a case for a technical fix. Preliminary research suggests adding garlic to cattle feed can help. In Argentina they are seeking ways to capture the burped methane to use for fuel.
Constance Lever-Tracy
Eden Hills, South Australia
• Colin Horgan’s column (3 January) on the parallels between Steven Harper’s government in Canada and Tony Abbott’s in Australia increases my alarm for the future of our warming world. However, when Horgan writes that “Abbott’s government killed the Australian carbon tax” he is perhaps not aware that although this was a major item in his policy platform in the recent federal election, Abbott has been unable to implement it because he does not have the numbers in the senate to repeal the legislation at least until July, and possibly not even then.
Abbott is an obscurantist who heads a Jesuit-trained mafia. He has no use for science, and failed to appoint a minister for science. He clearly thinks that God will look after us without our help.
Ted Webber
Buderim, Queensland, Australia
Can we be too clever?
Julian Baggini (3 January) suggests that being too intelligent, or too clever, can be a disadvantage. He gives as examples that of being unable to benefit from cognitive therapy and the suffering resultant on the consequences of a preference for complex rather than simple explanations. Baggini’s hypothesis seems to be but another aspect of Oliver Burkeman’s discussion later in the same paper.
Burkeman argues that such personality characteristics as laziness and lack of willpower are possibly not the fault of the individual possessing them but rather should be seen as analogous to physical limitations such as being born with, or somehow acquiring, poor eyesight.
If this is right, does it mean that any consistently performed behaviour that may lead to the impoverishment of the individual concerned, ought also to be regarded as a form of social or psychological malfunction? Could it be that such traits as honesty, generosity, sympathy and altruism, which frequently have the effect of reducing that individual’s survival resources (and that could be described as irrational behaviours, or even forms of self-harm), should be seen in a different light? Perhaps a case could be made for anyone suffering from these unfortunate tendencies to be acknowledged, shown understanding and kindness and compensated by the society.
David Drury
Driffield, UK
Banning sexism for children
Three cheers: they are taking down the boys and girls signs in some toy departments (Banning toy sexism won’t end stereotypes, 3 January). Now can we please address the majority of children’s books that have male protagonists? I used to change he to she when reading to my sons, sometimes drawing long hair on truck drivers so that they would believe me. Now I have to do it with my granddaughters, but it gets harder when they can read: “That says he, not she”.
Why should boys have all the adventures? It is obvious that male is still the default preferred position. Isn’t this too just acculturation?
I Strewe
Bronte, NSW, Australia
The Bob Geldof of her day
Your report Jenny Lind sings for Royal Infirmary, dated 20th December 1848 (reprinted 20 December) was fulsome about the quality of Miss Lind’s singing and mentioned that about 1,000 people attended, with all the guinea tickets “purchased with marvellous avidity”.
However, the report, or perhaps the excerpt you reprinted, failed to connect with the headline about the Royal Infirmary. Your readers may be interested in a few of the facts about the Schwabes, old friends of Miss Lind, who promoted the concert.
Julia Schwabe, my great-greatgrandmother, could be seen as a precursor of Bob Geldof, mobilising the most popular musicians of the day to raise money for philanthropic causes. It was she, backed by her husband Salis, founder of English Calico and a friend of radicals Richard Cobden and John Bright, who led a major programme of charitable fund-raising for the Manchester Royal Infirmary.
The successful Jenny Lind concert of 20 December is a good example, but perhaps even better known is their concert on 29 August the same year, where Frederick Chopin was the star attraction in a medley of singing and instrumental music. Over 1,200 people attended it, by far the largest concert Chopin ever played for, and the Royal Infirmary was the beneficiary.
Chopin stayed with the Schwabes for around a week at their home just outside Manchester. Their only regret was that they could not persuade him to remain a week longer, since they were expecting the arrival of Jenny Lind, for whom Chopin had great respect.
Nicolas Maclean
London, UK
King William’s Quiz annoys
The annual King William’s College Quiz (20 December) annoys me more with each episode – and the most recent is definitely the worst. The quiz is mostly an obsequious homage to arcane literature and now irrelevant historical events. It comes from the days when cryptic crosswords were full of clues with obscure references to Shakespeare or classical Greek quotations. The Times and Guardian crosswords no longer assume that almost their readers took a first in Greats at Oxford, but the King William’s Quiz remains steadfastly, and ridiculously, embedded in the cigars-and-port world of the English upper class.
The worst feature of the KWQ is that it asks barely a single question whose answer would be important for the modern world. It is a parody of the world of the 19th-century academic, who has no interest in the future of humanity and is only concerned with the trivialities of the past. The KWQ no longer sits comfortably in the Guardian.
Charles Watson
Fremantle, Western Australia
Briefly
So Nelson Mandela was Never a revolutionary (13 December). I doubt that I’m alone in allocating that one to my rewriting history file.
Howard Millbank
Bristol, UK

Independent:

Are your readers aware that from 1 April this year their GP records will be automatically uplifted by NHS England to be made available to agencies such as care planners, drug companies, and private health care providers?
This is under the  care.data programme, and while much of the information will be anonymised, significant levels of it will be “pseudonymised”: data such as sex, date of birth and NHS number will be available, thus rendering that person fairly easily identifiable. Patients have a right to opt out of this, but the default position will see their GP records shared around by NHS England. How much do you trust them with your data?
They have belatedly and begrudgingly set up an information campaign to inform the public. Anybody seen it? Thought not.
GPs have been instructed that they face prosecution if they put a blanket block on their computer systems to deny this access and, bizarrely, according to the Information Commissioner’s Office, also face legal action should a patient complain that they were unaware of the scheme.
While much of this data is extremely valuable in healthcare planning – and the excellent work of Professor Hippisley-Cox and her team in Nottingham illustrates this – I fail to see why the data needs such a high level of identifiability. I have already had a few patients expressing concern and fully sympathise with them.
I would urge patients to make themselves aware of this unauthorised use of their personal data, and GPs to continue to ensure their patients’ confidentiality is suitably protected.
Dr Kevan Tucker, Barrowford, Lancashire

The ‘stony-hearted beast’ is right
Fergus Wilson, referred to by you as a “stony-hearted beast” (11 January), is doing the right thing by terminating the tenancies of tenants in arrears.
As the proportion of his tenants in arrears has increased from 8 per cent to 50 per cent since the Department for Work and Pensions opted to pay benefits to tenants rather than direct to landlords, why should Mr Wilson take the pain from this change? He is completely right not to accept the council’s offer to pay extra to cover the arrears. Whether one agrees or not with the DWP change to Universal Credit, council managers have no right to allocate funds, presumably without consulting ratepayers, to cover a problem arising from a change in government policy.
Also, it’s a pity your reporter did not challenge the statement from the DWP spokesman that “landlords always complain about direct payments”. Really? I’d be a lot happier if all my debtors were backed by an organisation with the resources of the Government.
Michael Garrett, Gringley-on-the-Hill, Nottinghamshire
Howard Pilott (letter, 13 January) is incorrect in blaming landlord Fergus Wilson and “the unacceptable face of capitalism” for the plight of the 200 tenants at risk of losing their homes. As ever the fault lies with the Government (or possibly even the EU).
Until recently housing benefit could be paid directly to the landlord, thus ensuring security for both parties. Now, unless there are exceptional circumstances, it must be given to the tenants. Inevitably, as many warned, giving large sums of money to people who do not have very much means that sometimes not all of it will reach its intended destination.
If it’s not broken. . . .
Mary Lees, Littlehampton, West Sussex
Fences can save wildlife
It is important to make the distinction between mountain forest fences and those in open wooded savannah when discussing the effectiveness of wildlife fences and protected areas in Kenya (Dr Bill Adams, 11 January).
The place where fences are undoubtedly effective is around mountain forests such as the Aberdares, which is protected by a 400km electrified fence built by Rhino Ark with the support of the Kenya Wildlife Service, Kenya Forest Service and the local communities. There are approximately 2,000 elephants in the Aberdares. The fence has all but eliminated wildlife crop destruction, provided safer living conditions for local communities and greater security for wildlife, increased farmer land values by up to 300 per cent and improved forest cover, as highlighted in an independent study commissioned by Rhino Ark together with the United Nations Environment Programme and others.
This fence, like the two that Rhino Ark is currently building around Mount Kenya and Mau Eburu, is aligned on the border between dense forests and highly populated settlements. Most of the wildlife corridors around the mountain forests were closed long ago by these densely populated areas. The fences do not interfere with wildlife corridors but prevent elephants from marauding in the surrounding farmlands to access crops.
When used properly electrified fences are a vital tool in protecting Kenya’s natural ecosystem and wildlife, including elephants, as well as reducing human-wildlife conflict.
Christian Lambrechts, Executive Director, Rhino Ark Charitable Trust, Nairobi, Blackadder and the futility of war
David Cameron and Boris Johnson both feel they have to come to the rescue of Michael Gove following his pronouncements about Blackadder being used in schools to create a biased view of the First World War. Have any of them actually taught? All excellent teachers will naturally expose their pupils to many different points of view, and by doing this will be giving them a base for unbiased opinion.
By exposing young people to all interpretations you are engaging them to examine all the evidence, search for the truth and make considered judgements.
Blackadder is a parody of what happened and can be likened to the poetry of Sassoon and Owen. The final episode of the programme is very powerful in depicting the futility of the battles, as are the rows and rows of graves in France and Belgium, to which many schools take their pupils to feel the empathy about the losses of the time.
We no longer have a British Empire and should no longer be teaching as if we did. It is about time teachers were allowed to get on with teaching without unfounded criticisms.
Alison Sherratt, President, Association of Teachers and Lecturers, London W14
Only a week into its centenary year, it seems the First World War is “the hottest political issue of the day” (“Who was to blame  for the First World War?” 8 January). Sean O’Grady’s article gives food for thought, and that is what we need, rather than anyone’s propaganda.
The best way to honour the war’s many victims is surely to understand better why and how it happened, with a view to driving future wars off the political agenda.
The last thing we need is left- and right-wing academics, firmly entrenched in their positions, firing destructive salvoes at each other across a barren intellectual no-man’s-land.
Sue Gilmurray, Ely, Cambridgeshire
Prosecuting rape cases
There is no evidence to suggest that the reduction in offices co-located by police and CPS is the reason for the drop in referrals of cases of rape, child abuse and domestic violence (“Closure of joint law offices ‘letting down victims’ ”, 13 January). CPS lawyers still work very closely with police colleagues on these and other serious and complex cases, including face-to-face meetings where these are appropriate.
Dedicated specialist units handling rape and other serious sexual offences have recently been rolled out across all CPS areas in England and Wales, and the specially trained prosecutors within them are able to provide a better service than ever before to the police in terms of expertise and advice.
Peter Lewis, Chief Executive, Crown Prosecution Service, London SE1
President in bike leathers
So Grace Dent (14 January) believes that the crash helmet and biker leathers François Hollande wore when visiting the actress Julie Gayet constitute a “well-established mid-life crisis uniform”?
As a 58-year-old biker I’d like to know what “uniform” Ms Dent suggests I and other male motorcyclists of my generation should wear in order to protect ourselves when dodging motorists?
Oh and crash helmets are compulsory, Grace, regardless of a motorcyclist’s age.
Tom Coleman, Harrow, Middlesex
François Hollande left his partner of more than 30 years, the mother of his children, for Trierweiler. If she had even half a brain you’d think she’d have realised that loyalty is not one of Hollande’s strong points. I have no sympathy for the stupid woman.
Sara Neill, Tunbridge Wells, Kent

Times:

Sir, Changes in smoking behaviour came about more as a result of legislation against it and its promotion and education of children than by pictures of diseased lungs. The sectors of the food industry that produce and promote high-fat and high-sugar foods should be treated in much the same way as the tobacco companies. Both, after all, deal in substances that have very deleterious effects on health. Making these foods very expensive or unavailable, along with education, will have an effect though it will probably take as long as it has taken to reduce smoking. What is needed is an effective strategy not more useless tactics.
John Gaskin
York
Sir, There are no fat children in my school photographs from the 1950s. Everyone in the class has a pinched expression and knobbly knees, though I was never underfed and recall eating plenty of the stodgy foods that these days we are told to avoid: streaky bacon on doorsteps of white bread, pies, fried potatoes and treacle puddings.
Visiting my home village recently, I noticed that the streets no longer echoed to the sound of children walking or cycling to and from school, nor did I hear them playing in the yard at morning and afternoon breaks; the tracks on the common land have returned to grass through lack of use.
Perhaps it needs the cold eye of an actuary to compare the fatalities that would ensue from greater numbers of children walking or cycling to school with those caused by obesity; to set the grazed knees and broken collar bones that would doubtless result from playing British Bulldog and other boisterous, playground games with the long term effects of sitting in classrooms at break times, grazing on crisps and sugary foods.
John Anslow
Walton le Dale, Lancs
Sir, Food producers’ claims that some breakfast goods are beneficial are disingenuous. My supermarket has “healthy cereals” in one aisle and “children’s cereals” in another.
Alison Blenkinsop
Aldershot, Hants
Sir, Once again the food industry is being blamed for obesity. Rarely in the debate is there mention of restaurants or the many televised cooking programmes where copious quantities of “unhealthy” ingredients are used. The media almost ignores the increasingly transparent labelling which helps consumers to make their choices or the simple contribution to reducing overweight — exercise. Everyone wants to reduce obesity so let there be a balanced debate which recognises that everyone has a role to play — manufacturers, retailers, restaurants, schools and parents.
Jeremy Preston
Croughton, Northants
Sir, In order to avoid the deadly impasse that occurred in the battle over smoking, it would be sensible to focus support, governmental and consumer-led, on fresh locally sourced food sold in local markets. As in France, these should be more widespread and frequent than “farmer’s markets” tend to be.
It will be a quicker, more effective way of improving the nation’s health than waiting for governments to dither over legislation in the face of lobbying from the multinational food industry.
Bernard Kingston
Biddenden, Kent

A community pharmacy can be a dispenser of health and a gateway for managing good health. It is part of the solution to our A&E crisis
Sir, The notion of an NHS mutual is gaining momentum (letters, Jan 3, 10). If the NHS is to remain accessible to everyone, everyone must play their part in addressing the unsustainable demand on general practice and A&E departments. We must think and act differently.
A campaign, Dispensing Health, launches today to challenge traditional views of community pharmacy as simply dispensers of medicine. Pharmacy is the third largest health profession after medicine and nursing. 13,000 community pharmacies act as a health hubs on UK high streets, providing rapid access to a health professional. Yet less than half of us know that pharmacists can advise on treating common ailments which costs the NHS £2 billion every year.
We want people, politicians and health professionals to understand that community pharmacy can be a dispenser of health, as well as of medicines; that it is a gateway for managing good health, that it is part of the solution to our A&E crisis, and that it should be actively promoted as the first place of advice and treatment for common ailments. The NHS depends on community pharmacy, and it depends on people changing their behaviours for its very survival.
Professor Rob Darracott, Pharmacy Voice; Dr Charles Alessi, NAPC; Dr Michael Dixon, NHS Alliance; Sue Sharpe, PSNC; Dr Maureen Baker, RCGP; Dr David Branford, Royal Pharmaceutical Society

Let us not be backward thinking. Instead, let 2014 mark the beginning of a creative British involvement in a revivified EU
Sir, Have the disconcerted Conservative MPs (report, Jan 13) grasped, I wonder, that the year 2013 has been a turning point in Britain’s relations with its EU partners?
As a consequence of the stance of the British government, and of the immense width and depth of constructive public discussion in this country, the UK has become de facto the EU’s principal think tank. The mutual benefit which patience and a ready ear can yield in this transformed situation needs no emphasis.
Forget about backward-looking, unilateral withdrawal in a huff. Let 2014 mark the beginning of a creative British involvement in a revivified EU, grounded in the realities of 21st century global interdependence.
Sir Peter Marshall
London W11

Theories that are put forward to explain the death of many historical figures can almost never be validated
Sir, Not another vain attempt to diagnose the cause of death of an historical figure (“Alexander the drunk was just too much of a seasoned campaigner”, Jan 13). Alexander’s symptoms, as reported, would equally fit a death from malaria or septicaemia, and perhaps be more plausible than an obscure form of poisoning. Whatever theories are put forward to explain his death — or indeed any other figure from the past — can almost never be validated; this may explain why Mozart has around 150 causes of death attributed to him.
Such theorising is futile and best avoided.
Professor Tony Waldron
University College London

When talking about living on welfare, it is useful to look at the facts about payments and standards of living
Sir, Philip Collins is right (“Living on benefits has no drama just crisis”, Jan 13). Benefits Street fails to be a programme about welfare. It shows the consequent crises but not the underlying arithmetic. A 55-year-old in Tottenham is receiving £71.70 a week JSA and is looking for work. Haringey Council demanded £24 a week rent for his spare bedroom, and then threatened him with eviction. It then imposed £5 council tax a week, . He is left with £42.70 a week while the Rowntree research tells us he needs £50 a week for a healthy diet. Increases in that meagre JSA are frozen at 1 per cent while the prices of necessities escalate. His position is unsustainable; real scrounging does a lot better than that.
The Rev Paul Nicolson
Taxpayers Against Poverty

Telegraph:

46 Comments
SIR – Dalbor Sudwell wonders whether the week is being de-Christianised because Sunday is not being recognised as the first day of the week.
The etymology of the English names of the days of the week shows that they are named after the moon, the Norse god Tyr, the Germanic god Woden, the Norse gods Thor and Freya, the Roman god Saturn and finally the Sun.
In France, Italy and Spain, the days of the week are named after the Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Venus, Saturn and the Sun. Only in Spanish is there a reference to the Sabbath with sabado for Saturday, the Jewish holy day.
Therefore, it is specious to suggest that the week is Christian.
Andrew Holgate
Woodley, Cheshire

SIR – I have experienced many episodes of poor touchline behaviour from parents, and occasionally I have seen coaches try to bully their players into doing what they want them to do.
As a referee and prep school teacher, I used to hold lessons to explain the laws of rugby for parents. It was nearly always mothers who attended. One Saturday, there was a visiting parent who was giving me quite a lot of abuse from the touchline. After half time he went quiet. One of the mothers had explained to him that the law he was yelling about had been changed at the start of the season.
On another occasion, as the team were leaving the field, I overheard a father remark to his son: “Why didn’t you get stuck in and tackle properly?” His son’s reply was: “You can play next week and see if you can do better.”
Young children only need praise and encouragement, and they will achieve.
Tony Carroll
Giggleswick, North Yorkshire
Related Articles
David Cameron should have started to renegotiate Britain’s EU position
14 Jan 2014
The week was never Christian in the first place
14 Jan 2014
Doctors saying sorry
SIR – Jeremy Hunt, the Health Secretary, is to be congratulated for his desire for the NHS to say sorry when things go wrong. Perhaps he can show leadership by apologising for his Government’s pointless and expensive management reorganisation of the service.
Dr Robert Walker
Great Clifton, Cumberland
SIR – The Health Secretary wants doctors and nurses to say sorry when things go wrong. He might also encourage the health professionals by saying thank you for the occasions when things go right.
Revd Peter Phillips
Swansea, Glamorgan
Stable relationship
SIR – How very lucky we are in this country to live in a monarchy where our head of state is quite happy to have a string of racehorses, whereas France’s equivalent allegedly has a string of mistresses.
David Scott
Corfe Castle, Dorset
Mouse damage
SIR – Once Penny Elles has had her mouse-gnawed dishwasher repaired, she might consider buying an ultrasonic rodent repeller. They plug into any socket and cost next nothing to run.
Finally, I have no more mice.
Nick Edge
Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire
SIR – We bought a Zanussi dishwasher in 1977 and after one year a mouse chewed a large hole in the bifurcated hose at the base of the wash chamber.
With the imminent arrival of a German family for a two-week stay, I went to the local garage and bought a motorcycle puncture repair kit, and made what I thought would be a temporary repair. The machine has been trouble-free ever since.
Laurie Walpole
Middlesbrough, North Yorkshire
Potty parents
SIR – The extent of entitlement exercised by parents of toddlers reached a new low yesterday. As I had breakfast in a local cafe, a mother at the next table put her child on a potty – right next to me. Am I alone in thinking that this was really a step too far?
Jacqueline Heywood
Oxted, Surrey
Living on benefits
SIR – At Channel Four, we take criticism seriously, especially from those helping vulnerable and minority communities. However, the letter from various charities criticising Benefits Street is based on one programme, when it is a five-part series made over 12 months.
Different types of claimants live on the street: people suffering drug or alcohol addiction, victims of domestic abuse and people struggling to find work. All are represented in the series. Last night’s episode, focusing on Romanian immigrants, has already attracted sympathetic comments. The series has also already introduced the “50p man”, an entrepreneur who was offered two jobs following transmission, among other locals committed to doing public good.
The series honestly reflects what happened over 12 months. While much is inspiring, some bits are uncomfortable to watch. I dispute that those featured represent “harmful stereotypes”. Living in an area of sustained unemployment, they need “support from benefits” as much as anyone. By watching the whole series, a complex portrait emerges of a community feeling the effects of benefit cuts, but one where neighbourliness and family are key, and where the frustrated appetite for work is as evident as a dependency on benefits.
Nick Mirsky
Head of Documentaries, Channel Four
London SW1
Opening the flood gates
SIR – At the upper reaches of the River Ray, the sluice gates have for once not been closed, reducing flooding and allowing water to flow freely down to the Thames towards Oxford at a much greater rate.
Developers who are appealing against a refusal to build on the marshes and flood plain at the edge of our village must be delighted; those further down the Thames, in Oxford, Reading and Marlow, less so.
Mark Longworth
Ambrosden, Oxfordshire
Password plea
SIR – We need passwords for everything. They are becoming more and more complex, requiring up to eight characters, alphanumeric combinations, or answers to “secret questions” such as the name of one’s primary school (I attended four).
We are told not to use the same password twice, or to write them down. How are we supposed to remember them?
Ann Ball
Lingfield, Surrey
Housing shortage dictates rural planning policy
SIR – I was dismayed to read “not in my back yard” letters about planning in rural areas. House prices have risen out of reach of most young people because of the shortage of houses being built – driven by our invitation to millions of people to migrate to this country.
Not everyone can live on a redeveloped factory site or redundant railway siding. Wokingham, where I live, is doing more than its share. The countryside has to shoulder some of the burden too.
Elizabeth Spooner
Wokingham, Berkshire
SIR – The Liberal Democrats have been criticising the Tories for suppressing a plan to build two new garden cities because it would alienate their supporters.
At least the Tories have finally woken up to the danger. They have already done an immense amount of damage to their mainstay supporters in the “shire” counties with the National Planning Policy Framework and the way it is being interpreted. The offending phrase “the assumption of sustainability” seems to mean that Defra can do what it likes.
Doug Pennifold
Burgess Hill, West Sussex
SIR – There seems to be a tendency in some Government circles to view the countryside as one vast potential building site, rather than as the precious and diminishing resource that it is.
We need to stop the pursuit of endless growth and realise that a rapidly increasing population on an overcrowded island will lead to the destruction of the countryside if allowed to continue unchecked.
The Government should drop its promotion of grandiose schemes such as HS2, another London airport, and the building of new towns and cities, and instead work towards a sustainable economy based on a steady or reducing population.
Peter Graystone
Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire

SIR – “Reforming the EU will always be a case of working within the limits of the possible” (leading article, January 13).Indeed. Furthermore, no reasonable person expects that it will be easy. However, the Prime Minister’s credibility on the matter is not helped by two facts.
First, his only firm pledge – to renegotiate and then hold a referendum before the end of 2017– is dependent on his being in office after May 2015. How might the game change if, once again, he is forced into coalition with Nick Clegg (or, worse, Vince Cable) as the price for staying in No 10?
Secondly, such negotiations will not happen overnight. The EU doesn’t work that way. So, if Mr Cameron really is sincere, why hasn’t he started the process now? No wonder so many of his own backbenchers, reflecting the mood of many core Tory voters, feel the need to keep the pressure on him.
John Waine
Nuneaton, Warwickshire
SIR – Boris Johnson is correct: other members of the EU will do nothing for Britain until faced with some gunboat diplomacy. Tony Blair thought that with lots of charm he could regain something by giving back part of Britain’s rebate, but got little in return.
Related Articles
The week was never Christian in the first place
14 Jan 2014
It’s time to teach hysterical parents the rules of sport
14 Jan 2014
That is why we need an early referendum before the next general election: so that the British government can speak from a position of strength, with the will of the British electorate behind it.
L A Lawrence
Devizes, Wiltshire
SIR – The brouhaha over Europe and sovereignty seems to be gathering pace, yet both commissioners and governments seem less and less inclined to listen to and trust the people. In Britain, the question is not so much “Why trust the people?” but “Why trust the politicians?”
I voted “No” in the 1975 referendum, the result of which has seen four decades of EU federalism. If there is a referendum in 2017, many, like me, will have already voted with their feet.
Chris Watson
Lumut, Perak, Malaysia
SIR – It is not just Ed Miliband, but all our so-called leaders who are terrified of giving the public their say. Everyone knows that renegotiation is impossible without withdrawal; and will a Tory victory actually give us a referendum? Fat chance.
J D Mortimer
Great Harwood, Lancashire
SIR – David Cameron shot himself in the foot by declaring his support for remaining in the EU. He will have no chance of obtaining any favourable concessions unless there is a clear demonstration that the country really is prepared to consider withdrawal if our national sovereignty is not reinstated. A huge Ukip majority in the European elections would achieve this.
Michael Austin
Abingdon, Oxfordshire

Irish Times:

Sir, – Is Fintan O’Toole (Opinion, January 14th) not being rather churlish when he mentions the previous form, displayed by executives in Irish Water, on consultant spending? About €100 million was spent by some of these executives on an incinerator which never materialised, while only €50 million was spent on consultants for water that continues to be delivered. While the incinerator burnt €100 million with no outcome, it is yet to be ascertained if Irish Water allowed €50 million to run down the plug hole. We should live in hope! – Yours, etc,
JOHN O’CONNELL,
Loughnagin,
Letterkenny, Co Donegal.
Sir, – One of the sadder aspects of the controversy about consultancy inputs to the fledgling Irish Water is that, apart from anything that Bord Gáis was to bring to the table, the water sector is one area where there is virtually unlimited indigenous professional experience and skill over several generations. The depth of knowledge and experience among central and local authority civil engineers and technicians is impressive enough, but Ireland also has an unequalled international reputation in water engineering through firms like Mahon & McPhillips and Harper & Fay from the 1960s onwards and their successor operations today, as well as control and instrumentation contractors such as Kentz, and metering system suppliers such as CSL. Much of that international effort was pioneered from Kilkenny, Minister for Environment Phil Hogan’s base, and where John Tierney once served in a senior local authority position. Water therefore is one area where you would imagine the creation of a national operating entity would be relatively easy and inexpensive to do. – Yours, etc,
DENIS BERGIN,
Schoolhouse Road,
Mount Pleasant,
South Carolina, US.
Sir, – The recent revelations concerning consultants’ fees paid by Irish Water of €50 million is an interesting one. On the one hand we have local property tax which initially was to go towards funding local authorities, now going almost entirely to capitalise Irish Water. No doubt this will allow this essential public resource then to be sold off to a private consortium in the short term. On the other hand we have local authorities who will now be strapped for cash to do essential repairs and maintenance of the infrastructure to which they are responsible.
The cost of a proper independent building inspectorate for the average house in the UK is €370 per dwelling (£300). This cost is almost self-funding and comes at minimal extra cost to the UK taxpayer. Given the recent figures for house completions in Ireland for 2013 at 7,500 this would suggest that the €50 million spent on consultants by Irish Water would fund 18 years’ worth of inspections by local authorities in a new comprehensive building control regime. That’s 100 per cent independent building control inspections for every house in Ireland for free for nearly two decades. I wonder which is better value?
The recent calls by construction industry stakeholders for postponement and amendment of the Building Control (Amendment) Regulations SI80 appear to be badly timed. Major stakeholder and consumer groups have stressed the industry is not ready and have called for a comprehensive system of local authority (or licensed inspectors) similar to that in the UK. One hundred per cent independent inspections for all buildings completed in the State would give complete consumer protection and finally independently regulate the construction sector.
The Government response has been lack of funds – we don’t have them and we must do more with less. This would not appear to be the case however. – Yours, etc,
MAOILIOSA MEL
REYNOLDS,
Sandycove Road,
Sandycove, Co Dublin.
Sir,  – I’m delighted that the press, radio and TV are on to exposing the outrageous behaviour at Irish Water. In media terms, it’s one of the biggest leaks we’ve ever had.  – Yours, etc,
PADRAIG S DOYLE,
Pine Valley Avenue,
Rathfarnham, Dublin 16.
Sir, – On the one hand it is staggering to think that Ministers of the calibre of Phil Hogan and Fergus O’Dowd, could be so vague and poorly informed about the consultancy costs involved in Irish Water. On the other hand it is not in the least bit surprising. The pressure on Ministers to be present at events, clinics, funerals and local meetings in their constituencies, means that even with competent advisers and staff, they cannot humanly master their briefs. Until there is a distinct separation between the roles and responsibilities of Ministers and TDs, I fear Ireland will continue to repeat the mistakes of the past. Political reform matters and every effort needs to be made to persuade voters and political movements to earnestly usher in a new era of politics.
I am a grassroots priest, who works with, meets and admires the energy, efforts and commitment of politicians. I am pro-politician, but frustrated with our antiquated political structures that foster repeated cycles of mistakes, discourage some excellent people from running for office, exclude impressive talent, and place heavy hurdles in the way of non-typical candidates, diminishing their electoral chances. Political reform is an imperative now. – Yours, etc,
GERRY O’CONNOR,
Elmdale Park,
Cherry Orchard,
Dublin 10.
Sir, – Will Irish Water now hire a consultant to consult on consultants’ consultations? – Yours, etc,
KEVIN DEVITTE,
Mill Street,
Westport, Co Mayo.
Sir, – What I utterly fail to understand is how it comes about that presumably competent people are appointed to various positions in public and semi-public organisations, such as Irish Water, at comfortable salaries, but then, when any decision has to be made or anything specific has to be done, consultants have to be called in, at enormous salaries, to tell them what to do and how to do it. But then what do I know? I am only a professor of Greek. – Yours, etc,
JOHN DILLON,
Thormanby Road,
Baily,
Howth, Co Dublin.
Sir, – Perhaps they’re installing a system that will turn it into wine? –
Yours, etc,
GERARD LEE,
St Agnes Park,

Sir, – We welcome the news and that work on the new Immigration Residence and Protection Bill is at an advanced stage (Home News, January 7th) and the earlier announcement (November 15th, 2013) that new procedures have been introduced to speed up the processing of applications for asylum. The situation up to now, whereby asylum seekers have had to wait for years to have a decision on their applications, has been totally unacceptable.
The direct provision system, originally intended to accommodate asylum-seekers for a maximum of six months, has become in effect an inhumane imprisonment. This, coupled with the fact asylum-seekers may not work or receive training, has been soul- destroying, and there is good evidence that their mental and physical health has suffered. The forced inactivity, together with the complete uncertainty about their future, is cruel, completely undermining and disheartening .
We urge that asylum-seekers, whose waiting period for a decision on their application is longer than six months, should be given the right to work and to receive training, and that provision to this effect should be included in the new Bill. – Yours, etc,
MÁIRE MULCAHY,
On behalf of the Faith in
Action Group,
Dennehys Cross Parish,
Model Farm Road,
Sir, – David Power (January 14th) mentions the question of non-Irish men and women serving in Irish regiments in the first World War.  I wonder if I can mention the other side of the coin, and that is the question of Irishmen and women serving in non-Irish forces?
My father and his brother (my uncle) grew up in Rathmullen, Co Donegal, the sons of the then Church of Ireland Rector, Rev William Battersby Lloyd of Co Roscommon. They both emigrated to Canada as teenagers, and later enlisted with Canadian Regiments.  My uncle was killed near Vimy Ridge in February 1917.  I am not sure how far the digitisation of Ireland’s Memorial Records reflects this. There must be many others in a similar position.
Thanks to Paddy Harte, one time TD in Donegal, my uncle’s name is recorded in a memorial book in that part of the world, and I hope Mr Harte’s good work will be reflected in the latest digitisation.
My father went on to serve in the Home Guard during the second World War. At least 100,000 of his fellow countrymen and women served (and many died) in non-Irish forces in the cause of the freedoms of the governments and people of our two islands. But that’s another story. – Yours, etc,
GAVIN LLOYD,
Merton Road,
Ambrosden,
Bicester,

Sir, – I applaud Mary McAleese (Front page, January 8th) in campaigning for gay rights generally and within the Catholic Church. Like her predecessor Mary Robinson, she is using her post-presidency influence for the good of humanity by trying to influence international human rights towards more evolved human ethical positions, including gay rights. She is uniquely positioned to do so, with her academic legal career preceding her presidency, and also in terms of influencing the church, her continuing attachment to the church while working for change.
The Catholic Church has a huge demographic spread, and is an influential ethical presence for members of the church in many societies that are rampantly homophobic in both policy and in practice. Therefore, the church can be, if it so chooses, an enormous power for good, in the change towards full human rights, including marriage equality and the resulting societal change for gay people around the world.
To her critics, including Breda O’Brien (Opinion, January 11th), I ask, how could this possibly be a bad thing? When government, or faith institutions, lead the way with evolved humane policies, and enforce these policies properly, then societies start to become better places for all members of society to live. Pope Francis has stunned the world with his new approach and concerns for the poor. Those of us who wish him well hope that he will also lead change in these other important areas of human growth. – Yours, etc,
CYNTHIA CARROLL,
Portryan,
Newport,
Co Tipperary.
Sir, – Both Thomas Finegan (January 10th) and Breda O’Brien (Opinion, January 11th) have brought clarity to the issues arising from Mary McAleese’s remarks in Edinburgh, about homosexuality and church teaching.
The church unequivocally proclaims the message of the Gospel to every human being who, though wounded by and infected with sin, is infinitely loved by God. The primary call of the Gospel is to repent, to turn away from the disorder of sin: “for all have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God” (Romans 3:23).
We must, therefore, reorder our lives, with the help of Divine Grace, towards the true origin and end of our existence – God our Creator, Who loves and saves us.
The church does not and never will follow the world in defining people as “gay” or “straight”: “Do not copy the behaviour and customs of this world, but let God transform you into a new person by changing the way you think. Then you will learn to know God’s will for you, which is good and pleasing and perfect” (Romans 12:2).
Human beings, all of us, have an inclination towards selfishness (the essence of sin) and all without exception have the obligation, helped by God, to overcome this disordered inclination and so be brought to Eternal Salvation. When we fail, as everyone does, there is the medicine of the Sacrament of Reconciliation, where God’s patience and compassion is inexhaustible.
Mary McAleese, for whom I have the greatest admiration, is very unjust to our Holy Father Emeritus, Pope Benedict XVI. She should know better than to take such cheap shots at him.
Furthermore, the scandal given by Cardinal Keith O’Brien was not on account of his perceived sexuality but sexual misconduct, ie abuse of power and position, on his part, with junior clergy including a seminarian (seminarians being young adults, non-ordained, vulnerable in the ecclesiastical system as it was and, hopefully, is no longer). Cardinal O’Brien has admitted that his behaviour “fell far short’ of what is expected of him and subsequently resigned. – Yours, etc,
Fr PATRICK
McCAFFERTY,
Chaplaincy Team, Ulster
Hospital,
Glen Road, ]

Sir, – With reference to Joe Humphreys’s column (Arts & Ideas, January 10th) on the unthinkable great idea that “the mind arises solely from the activity of the brain”, may I suggest this “great” idea is “unthinkable” because it is wrong.
Dr Kevin Mitchell, the interviewee who promotes this great idea, suffers from the narrow vision that seems typical of many brain scientists.
He reminds me of the unfortunate scientist, Dr Hfuhruhurr, played by Steve Martin in the film The Man with Two Brains, who falls in love with a female brain kept “alive” in a jar. The film is labelled as a science fiction comedy, for of course we all appreciate that a brain cannot function in isolation from a living body. Yet Dr Mitchell says “mental states arise from brain states” and that “we don’t actually need anything else in our overall theory of how they emerge except brain states”.
He cites the reality that when the brain dies or is damaged the mind dies or is damaged. This is incontrovertible, but what it tells us is that the brain is necessary to the functioning of the mind, or the processes we call the mind. The brain is necessary but it is not sufficient, many more factors come into play. The mind, and its qualities such as the sense of self and consciousness, emerges from complex interactions of the brain with the body, the material world and the socio-cultural world of relationships and meanings.
Until neuroscientists such as Dr Mitchell realise this and broaden their perspective they will make no progress whatsoever in understanding the mind and they will soon come to a full stop in their understanding of the brain. Much remains to be discovered. The alternative to Dr Mitchell’s brand of neuroscience is not religion or poetry, as the article suggests, but better science. – Yours, etc,
SHEILA GREENE,
Professor Emeritus,
School of Psychology,

Sir, – “A job of work” and “A raft of measures”. – Yours, etc,
MICK FLYNN,
Viewmount Park,
Waterford.
Sir, – Even more irritating than “phrases we can live without” are well-known phrases which seem to have a new meaning. For example? It is almost de rigueur for guests on a TV or radio programme to begin with the phrase “Thank you for having me on”; to which I am tempted to reply, “I’m not having you on, I’m quite serious!” Or Kathryn Thomas urging the audience to “give it up” for Finbarr Furey. The only time I ever gave it up was for Lent. – Yours, etc,
BRENDAN CASSERLY,
Waterfall, Nr Cork.

Sir, – How disheartening it is to see that a teacher of 37 years (Der Fitzgibbon, January 14th) would expect that teachers performing their job should be the subject of editorial comment. Surely it’s not so uncommon that it needs national recognition? – Yours, etc,
DOMHNALL O’NEILL,
Ardmore Park,
Bray,
Co Wicklow.

Sir, – What a lovely photograph of Pope Francis addressing the ambassadors about war and peace (World News, January 14th). But sadly there is only one woman in the front row. War is obviously men’s talk. – Yours, etc,
COLM HOLMES,
Avoca Avenue,
Blackrock,
Co Dublin.

Sir, – Fionola Meredith’s merry little romp through some of the wilder shores of New Ageism (Opinion, January 13th) only serves to show one thing: any belief system, reduced to its mechanics, can be made to sound ridiculous. Christianity would be no exception. – Yours, etc,
JOSEPH WOOD,
Shamrock Avenue,
Douglas, Cork.

Irish Independent:

Congratulations on your recent award for being the best finance minister in Europe and for exiting the bailout. I wonder did you manage to celebrate somehow? Did you go out for a meal, even a couple of drinks, did your people give you cards and gifts perhaps? Did you as a work team toast yourselves for such huge success?
I wonder because all of the above are the things that are very difficult for me and my family right now. I am a working person with a young family, and I really want to tell you how it is for those of us who have managed to maintain employment throughout the downturn.
Both my husband and I have worked continuously throughout the recession, religiously paying our bills and striving to keep on top of our financial affairs, constantly aware that there was no job security anymore and it could be us on the dole queue just the same as the other unfortunate workers whose jobs were there one minute and gone the next.
And here we are, the recession is apparently officially over, we own our own house, we are both still in employment and we should be comfortable now, shouldn’t we?
We are constantly hearing about the most vulnerable in society, the most disadvantaged and how we all need to take a hit to protect the most vulnerable. However, what your government is not managing to comprehend is that we, the working people, have become the people who find it incredibly difficult to put food on the table, who are being bombarded by bills, taxes, charges, reminders and final reminders, who cannot manage a night out once in a while, who have had to explain to our families that we are having difficulties stretching to buy Christmas presents, who panic when a wedding invitation arrives through the letterbox, and lie that we cannot get out of work commitments on that day rather than admit that attending would mean we could not stretch to feed our young families for the month.
Bills come in expecting immediate payment but with monthly paydays come delays in what you can pay, and when. We simply cannot pay bills with no money.
Minister Noonan, your government expects us to pay water charges for this year, you also expect us to pay double the amount of property tax.
What exactly do you expect us to pay that with?
NAME AND ADDRESS WITH EDITOR
FRENCH GROWTH
* This morning (January 14) I was able to start the day with an enormous laugh after hearing one of the presenters on BBC Radio 4′s ‘Today’ programme announce that President Hollande would be giving a press conference later in the afternoon on the state of the French economy, where — according to the presenter — “there is growth, but it is tiny”.
Mon dieu — I just wonder if the women in his life also think the same way. I mean about the economy of course.
IVOR SHORTS
RATHFARNHAM, DUBLIN 16
SLAVE TO THE BIBLE
* Tony Flannery (Irish Independent, January 11) would suggest that in the Catholic community there are two ways of interpreting the Bible, the traditional “word of God” way and interpretation “within the social and cultural milieu of its time . . . and understood through the very different circumstances of each age”.
This latter view, however, suggests that truth is relative. That truth for one age need not be truth for another age.
It must be difficult indeed for people of faith to come to terms with this. One example in particular is that of the condoning of slavery in the Bible. We now accept the enslavement of one human by another to be morally repugnant, yet it is condoned in the Bible, both in the old and new testaments.
Exodus 20:20-21 says: “Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property.”
Ephesians 6:5 adds: “Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ.”
And Peter 2:18 says: “Slaves, in reverent fear of God, submit yourselves to your masters, not only to those who are good and considerate, but also to those who are harsh.”
Since we know and accept that slavery is immoral now, then slavery was also immoral in the past. There can be no justification for slavery and no matter how the “communities of faith” look at Bible passages condoning slavery — either as the immutable word of God or as a “cultural milieu of its time” — it is wrong.
If their holy book got something as simple as human slavery wrong then that discounts their holy book as a source of truth whichever way you interpret it.
MICHAEL MARTIN
DUBLIN 15
GREAT WAR WAS A FRAUD
* Graham Clifford (Irish Independent January 11) believes the 200,000 Irishmen, of whom 49,000 “died so brutally in the squalor and filth of a most senseless war, deserve to be remembered”.
Dublin Memorials to World War I exceed 200, which includes the 60- acre war memorial gardens at Islandbridge, the scale of which dwarfs any memorial dedicated to the struggle for independence. There are 19 World War I memorials in Cork city and county. In Kerry there are six memorials and there are also now memorials in France and Belgium.
The graves of over 3,000 war dead from World Wars I and II are tended to by the Office of Public Works.
Officially, Britain’s war aims included securing the freedom of small nations. Egged on by certain Irish political leaders, some people foolishly believed this British imperialist war propaganda. But in 1919, Ireland got, not freedom, but the Black and Tans.
The Irish who joined the British army in order to serve their country were cruelly duped by this deliberate imperialist lie, for which no apology has ever been given.
For Ireland, the “Great War” was a great fraud.
PAT MALONEY
ROMAN STREET, CORK CITY
EURO HAS TORN US APART
* As European Central Bank member Yves Mersch unveiled the new €10 bank note he said: “The single currency has helped to bring millions of Europeans together, in all our diversity.”
I would make the case that the single currency has actually driven a wedge between fellow Europeans. Cheap credit that resulted from the introduction of the euro led many countries, like lemmings, over an economic cliff. The resulting solidarity could be seen nightly on our TV screens as Greek and Spanish protesters burned effigies of Angela Merkel, while after a quick perusal of the comments section of almost any German broadsheet you will find less than flattering remarks about the bailout countries.
I would go so far as to say the euro has caused the most divisions in Europe since World War II.
JOHN BELLEW
PAUGHANSTOWN, DUNLEER, CO LOUTH
LEAKY EXPLANATIONS
* A total €50m in one year is €1m per week in round figures. This is €200,000 per working day. With this amount one could employ over 100 top-flight consultants, working full time, flat out, every minute of each working day for a year.
Where did Irish Water unearth so many top consultants?
TED O’KEEFFE
RANELAGH, D6
* Will Irish Water now hire a consultant to consult on consultants’ consultations?
KEVIN DEVITTE
MILL STREET, WESTPORT, CO MAYO
Irish Independent



Clearing out

$
0
0

16 January 2014 Clearing

I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. Pertwee has to smuggle a relative back to England from Tangiers, as a Naval officer. But his lover wants him back, or dead. Priceless.

Start to clear out attic for insulation

Scrabbletoday I winand gets just over300, Perhaps Mary will win tomorrow.

 

Obituary:

 

Dale Mortensen, who has died aged 74, shared the 2010 Nobel Prize in Economics, with Peter Diamond and Christopher Pissarides, for their work on so-called “search markets”, where buyers and sellers have difficulty finding each other, in particular the labour market.

According to classical economic theory, “goods” like labour and housing are simply “commodities” like any other in markets in which prices are set so that buyers and sellers always find each other and all resources are fully utilised. The idea of market clearance works well in the case of standardised commodities such as wheat or sugar. But anyone who has looked for employment or searched for a new house (or indeed a spouse) will know that many markets do not work like that.

The perfect job or house (or spouse) may be out there, waiting; but unless you can get to hear about it/him/her and can summon up the energy to act, then the link-up may never be made. The net result is what economists call market inefficiencies, or “frictions”, that can stall the housing market, cause unemployment to remain higher than it should – and disappoint the lonely heart. These frictions explain, for example, why unemployment and job vacancies may exist simultaneously.

Mortensen, a professor at Northwestern University, Illinois, and his co-prize-winners constructed models to explain how frictions exist, very often due to regulation and policy that prevent willing “buyers” and “sellers” coming together in a market-clearing equilibrium. They illuminated the trade-offs that governments have to consider in constructing the optimum set of policies to address the problem of unemployment.

In the 1990s Mortensen estimated that limiting benefits paid to the unemployed in America to three months, rather than the then current six, would shave 1.25 percentage points off the unemployment rate. He also observed that the comparative ease with which American employers could hire and fire had meant that, while jobs might not last as long on average in the United States as in Europe, periods of unemployment tend to be shorter. In Europe, employment protection rules had made layoffs expensive and difficult, sharply reducing the incentive to hire.

On the other hand, he observed that while flexible labour markets held great advantages in a modern economy, there were downsides to the US approach. During economic downturns, America had higher rates of unemployment than it would otherwise have had if it were more like Germany where, rather than laying off workers, employers are encouraged to share the pain by getting their workforces to work shorter hours. This was an approach which allowed companies to scale up faster in an economic upswing, helped to maintain skills and social and professional networks, and avoided the demotivating effects of unemployment. In a temporary downturn, Mortenson felt, the German model might be the better one.

Similar conflicts arise when shaping unemployment benefits. Though workers may feel less incentive to look for a job with the safety net of unemployment benefit, when times are good and jobs are plentiful unemployment benefit gives the worker more time to make a better job match. In his most influential paper, “Job Creation and Job Destruction in the Theory of Unemployment”, co-written with Christopher Pissarides, Mortensen found that the optimal job search takes between six and eight months.

The Diamond-Mortensen-Pissarides (DMP) model, as it has come to be known, is a tool which is now frequently used to estimate how unemployment benefits, interest rates, the efficiency of employment agencies and other factors can affect the labour market. The last Labour government’s New Deal for Young People, a programme of carrots and sticks to get 18 to 24 year-olds back on the job market after long spells of unemployment, was based on work using the DMP approach.

Indeed, the model has applications in any market where there are “search frictions” . For example, researchers in Denmark have used it to analyse the trade-offs which people make when negotiating the marriage market.

One recent paper has shown that young people choose to live in cities to avoid the “search frictions” of looking for a suitable partner in a rural area. To enjoy the opportunity to meet people of similar educational attainment and interests, young people are willing to pay a premium in terms of higher housing prices. Once married, the benefits from meeting more potential partners vanish and married couples often move out of the city. Attractive single people, they found, benefited most from a dense market and were therefore more likely to move to the city than their less attractive peers.

The son of a forester, Dale Thomas Mortensen was born on February 2 1939 in Enterprise, Oregon, and took a degree in Economics from Willamette University, followed by a doctorate from what is now Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh. In 1965 he joined the Economics faculty at Northwestern University, where he became a professor.

Dale Mortensen is survived by his wife, Beverly, and by their son and daughter.

Dale Mortensen, born February 2 1939, died January 9 2014

 

 

Guardian:

 

The government’s gagging bill (Report, 10 January) is a cynical and malicious piece of legislation that must be stopped at all costs. It represents an attempt to stamp out the anti-austerity voice as government cuts continue to make life a struggle for millions in Britain. Yet there is cause for optimism. While the passage of the gagging bill into law would undoubtedly suppress charities and campaigners, it could only do that for so long. Trying to stop campaign activities in the information age is like trying to pin the tail on the donkey blindfold – and without a donkey. Campaigns are fertile, mobile and bottom-up: stamping out one form of action will just see other vibrant and creative forms emerge. This coalition government is not just mean, it’s out of touch.
Jenny Jones
Green, House of Lords

• Chris Riddell thinks the white rabbit is wearing a frockcoat (My hero: Sir John Tenniel, 11 January). Really? The Chambers Dictionary says a frockcoat is “a long-skirted double-breasted coat for men”. I’d say the white rabbit is wearing a sports jacket of the kind certain gentlemen wore when they did their shooting and fishing. However, I do know people who think a sports jacket is the top half of a tracksuit.
Angela Grills
Glossop, Derbyshire

• You say the costs of learning to drive and insuring a car are “blamed” for the decline in young people learning to drive (Switch to buses and trains, 11 January). In this time of climate change, surely “blamed” should have read “thanked”?
Hazel Pennington
Bath

• Normally, Michael Rosen makes me laugh; his letters to Michael Gove are principled, often trenchant, but above all amusing. His bedroom-tax piece (A levy on grief, 15 January) moved me to tears.
Brian Boyd
East Kilbride, South Lanarkshire

• Pensioners are not “recipients of nigh-on 50% of the welfare budget” (Benefits Street and the real problems of breadline Britain, 13 January); they are in receipt of pensions for which they have paid.
Christine Gibson
London

• After Benefits Street, I can’t wait for the next TV series, Tax Dodgers’ Avenue.
Katy McAuley
Heywood, Lancashire

 

 

David McKie’s fine obituary of Simon Hoggart (7 January) states that, after the Guardian‘s owner bought the Observer, the new regime “contrived to lose the seasoned columnist Alan Watkins”. In fact, after I was appointed editor of the Sunday newspaper following the takeover, Mr Watkins sent me a hand-written note saying he had been approached to join the Independent on Sunday and would go unless he received a 30% pay increase. Since I was under instructions from the Guardian board to reduce editorial spending, I told him I could not give him any more money. Thereupon, he left, picking up a handsome payoff from the previous owners and telling the Evening Standard that he had gone because “the barbarians” had taken over the Observer. The contriving was his not mine, but, as in tThe Man who shot Liberty Valance, the legend gets printed.
Jonathan Fenby
London

• What a lovely tribute to Simon Hoggart by his daughter Amy (11 January). I shall miss his witty column in the Saturday Guardian as I also miss Araucaria’s crosswords. A sad loss.
Wendy Bell

 

Your story on academy trusts (Revealed: cash bonanza for academy firms, 13 January) failed to make clear that local authority-maintained schools are just as able to enter these kinds of relationships with private firms and always have been. The difference is that academies and academy trusts are far more transparent and subject to far tighter financial controls and scrutiny than local authority schools. Indeed, all this information is publicly available because we require academy trusts’ accounts to be published online and to include any transactions of the sort featured in your article. This is not the case for local authority schools.

The rules academies must abide by are clear: no individual or organisation with a governing relationship to an academy can make a profit; any goods or services delivered by these parties to these academies must be done so transparently and at no more than cost; and proportionate and fair procurement processes must always be followed. As charities, academies are required to adhere to accounting standards. These require the full disclosure of related party transactions and auditors check those disclosures.

Far from being complacent, this government has gone even further, making sure that academy governors, directors and trustees cannot hold profitable contracts with their own academies – something that does not automatically apply to governors in local authority schools.
Peter Lauener
Chief executive, Education Funding Agency

•  Is that the sound of pigeons coming home to roost? Michael Gove’s mad school reforms are providing open season for opportunists keen to make a fast buck out of state education. Since schools were floated free from democratically elected local education authorities, a number of individual headteachers and governors have been involved in scandals involving public money and cronyism. Now we see this opportunism on a much larger scale, with taxpayers’ money being used to line the pockets of commercial organisations.
Dr Robin Richmond
Bromyard, Herefordshire

 

Councils struggling, in the face of government cuts, to deal with floods made worse by climate change, will be delighted to hear of sweeteners for fracking, causing more, er, climate change (Cameron dangles cash incentive for councils in push to expand fracking, 14 January).
Professor Andrew Dobson
Keele University

• “Fracking has real potential to drive energy bills down,” George Osborne proclaims (Anti-fracking protests fail to halt interest in shale gas, 13 January). It is true that the glut of gas produced by fracking in the US has reduced prices – but so low that it has become unprofitable in most areas to drill new fracking wells, which suffer very high costs per drilling operation. Gas production from all but the Marcellus field has fallen and rigs have been transferred to more profitable oil rather than gas production. If fracking proceeds here in the UK, it will only be worthwhile if energy bills stay high. A fall in the price of gas would make fracking unsustainable.

What nobody in the UK seems to be aware of is that the average fracking well has a very short production life. After three or four years, flows of oil or gas from a well dwindle to a dribble. Osborne will find that the lifetime of the gas-producing areas he imagines will be pumping out all that cheap energy will in fact be less than a decade. By the end of the short gas boom he dreams of, half the English countryside will be a pin cushion of rusting rigs and we will be back to importing gas from abroad.
Michael Ghirelli
Hillesden, Buckinghamshire

• Andrew Austin of frackers IGas is quoted: “If you use [shale gas] locally, you’re supporting decarbonising, you’re displacing coal and you’re supporting renewables.” I appreciate that shale gas produces slightly less CO2 per watt generated than does coal, but that hardly qualifies as “decarbonising”. “Renewable”? Is Austin seriously suggesting that the Earth is laying down hydrocarbons faster than we are extracting them?
Rob Tresidder
Wirksworth, Derbyshire

• Given the success of Norway in creating its sovereign wealth fund from the revenue from its oil and gas fields (G2, 14 January), is there any remote chance our government could do something similar with the revenues from fracking?
David Lund
Winscombe, Somerset

• Barbara Keeley is right to assert that 100% business-rates relief for fracking “muddies the water” (Report, 14 January). So does fracking.
Jeremy Beecham
Labour, House of Lords

• The unease about fracking might be reduced if operators were made financially liable for any consequential damage, as was the case with coal extraction. The divided opinions might then become a matter for markets to resolve by agreeing rates for liability insurance.
Mike Brown
Newcastle upon Tyne

• You reported that fracking in America generated 280bn US gallons of toxic waste water last year – enough to flood all of Washington DC beneath a 22ft-deep toxic lagoon. Do you think the coalition government knows this? Do you think it cares?
Alec Murdoch
Edinburgh

Congratulations on giving George Monbiot a full page to address one of the most important issues of our time (Drowning in money: the pig-headed policies that make flooding inevitable, 14 January). Just when the country is beset with problems of flooding, and fears that they will become more frequent and more intense in the future, an ecological approach to water management is long overdue. Utilising the way that nature moderates rainwater runoff into watercourses, and the natural way those watercourses then carry the water to the sea, is the effective way to avoid flooding when there is “too much rain” and avoid droughts when there is “too little rain”.

What’s needed is enlightened policy to address flooding at source rather than the current dislocated policies that cause and exacerbate the problem. And we should also address why we allow rainwater runoff to overload our urban sewerage systems – which is why Thames Water says we need a multibillion-pound supersewer – rather than soaking away naturally.
John Stone
Thames Ditton, Surrey

• George Monbiot is right; Owen Paterson is wrong. But he is wrong because he is busily executing the policies of the European parliament. UK elections to that are due in May. Surely the important thing to do is to get all our MEPs enthused upon correcting the situation. European farmers form a powerful body, and it will not be realistic to try to annul the CAP. Efforts should be directed towards paying farmers, including UK ones, to carry out sensible, and not disastrous, land strategies.
Bill Millar
Didcot, Oxfordshire

• George Monbiot failed to mention one increasingly important factor – the building of windfarms in upland areas. Wind turbines need to be anchored and, to do this, holes need to be dug and filled with concrete. Similarly, hard standings for construction equipment and access roads need to be built. Trees which obstruct wind flow have to be removed. All of these reduce the land’s natural ability to absorb water and increase runoff. Here in mid-Wales, in the uplands where the rivers Severn and Wye and their tributaries rise, there are many existing windfarms and proposals for many more. There is a public inquiry running into five such windfarms with proposals for 165 turbines, with a maximum height of 137 metres, and there are plans for others following in their wake. It is possible that there may eventually be 800 wind turbines in the area.

The building of just one of the windfarms subject to the public inquiry will involve the felling of 1,742 hectares of forest. All will involve the stripping of ancient peat bog, which traps water and carbon, and its replacement with concrete (each wind turbine needs foundations the size of an Olympic swimming pool). The building of concrete foundations for the pylons to take the meagre amount of electricity generated to the national grid will exacerbate the problems. Without doubt, this is being driven by government policy – and not just land management policy. Windfarm developers would not be interested in concreting our uplands without the prospect of subsidies for their electricity generation.
David Ward
Meifod, Powys

• George Monbiot needs to pause to think, and read a bit more widely. There is no evidence that the small-scale Pontbren results showing the influence of farming and land use practices on flooding can be replicated at a large catchment scale. Pour water on to a small plot and it may sink in; 100mm of rain over the whole of the Severn catchment will saturate it and mostly run off downstream (to Tewkesbury and Gloucester). Restoring rivers to their previous wild state may help those downstream of the effort, but can exacerbate flood risk upstream, and, anyway, only influences the smaller events. Flooding may be inevitable, and is a serious concern, but let’s analyse it more intelligently.
Professor Edmund Penning-Rowsell
Pro-vice-chancellor, Middlesex University

• George Monbiot makes a good case for preventing rivers filling so quickly, and slowing their progress to built-up areas. Once water reaches the lower levels of the river Parrett in Somerset, however, it becomes a special case as it flows along a built-up duct, with overspill levels down its path. It is not a natural river and the science of the construction of the moors and pumping stations rely on the river emptying into the sea, not remaining trapped in its duct, unable to move. It is a man-made system which has worked well for 50 years and needs to maintained. We now have a situation of overspill sitting in houses where it’s impossible to pump it back into the river as it is too full and can’t empty. Surely Mr Monbiot would allow the last 10 miles of our river to be dredged? This water does actually need to escape to the sea.
Roderic Baillie-Grohman
Thorney, Somerset

• Owen Paterson might like to reflect on the 5,000-year-old story of the Prince of Chong. Commissioned by Emperor Yao to resolve the Great Flood that ravaged his territory, the prince built dams, dykes and embankments to control and contain the water within the rivers. Despite the utter failure of this approach, the prince blindly persisted, eventually earning himself banishment and – some accounts say – execution. It was his son, Yu the Great, who succeeded in taming the flood by dredging rivers and cutting channels to allow the excess waters to flood agricultural land and spare the cities.
Peter Deadman
Hove, East Sussex

• Government reintroduction of the European beaver would recruit a useful ally. Beavers are well known for their ecological role in flood mitigation, through their generally benign dam-building activities.
Patrick Stirling-Aird
Dunblane, Perthshire

• Challenges associated with fracking and flooding point to two interesting elements in the political geography of things environmental. One, they appear to be of particular concern when they arise in the south-east of England. Two, their resolution requires degrees of collaboration and joined-up thinking, and a key role for government working in the collective interest, that border on the impossible.
Joe Morris
Emeritus professor, Cranfield University

 

 

 

Independent:

 

 

 

 

 

In your article “Race hate – a crime the police will not solve” (13 January), Fiyaz Mughal asks what police and crime commissioner or chief constable would want to see an increase in reported hate crime.

The answer is that here, in the West Midlands, we want to see hate crime reporting increase, and we have made this a priority. This effort to increase hate crime reporting has been a consistent feature of our plans. We’re sure many police and crime commissioners and chief constables feel the same way, exactly as Assistant Chief Constable Drew Harris said.

We have introduced new protocols for more accurate hate crime recording and supported the development of third-party reporting centres where victims can come forward without having to visit a police station, as well as an online hate crime reporting website called True Vision.

Improved training for contact and visitor-handling staff is in place that includes involvement from disability and transgender reference groups. This will be rolled out across the force so that staff are better able to identify vulnerable community members, recognise when a hate crime has taken place, ensure an effective investigation, and seek enhanced sentencing where appropriate, working with the Crown Prosecution Service.

We are also working with the seven local authorities in our area, and developing hate crime reference groups. We acknowledge that hate crimes are under-reported and want to give our communities the confidence to know that they can come forward, that they will be heard, and that they will get a thorough and effective response.

West Midlands Police is committed to encouraging the increased reporting of any type of hate crime, including that which is racially or religiously motivated. As a result, we are seeing increases in reported hate crime and we want to see this continue so we can get a proper understanding of the true level of hate crime – and with this knowledge take the right steps to drive it down.

Bob Jones, West Midlands Police and Crime Commissioner, Chris Sims, Chief Constable, West Midlands Police

As well as the under-reporting of race hate crimes, of equal concern is the apparent willingness of the police and some local authorities to “overlook” inconvenient increases in such crimes.

In Hammersmith and Fulham the local Refugee Forum has raised regularly the issue that race and religious hate crime has been on the increase (up 27.5 per cent at one point last year according to the Metropolitan Police’s own statistics).

These figures emerged when the local authority and the police were publicly congratulating themselves on a decrease in burglaries, car thefts and street crime. They left out mention of significant increases in religious and race hate crimes.

Despite letters from us and articles in the local press pointing out the discrepancy, neither the council nor the police have yet responded with an explanation or clarification, or to take up an offer to work with the refugee and migrant community to tackle this worrying issue.

Phillip Cooper, Hammersmith and Fulham Refugee Forum, London SW6

Time for our leaders to get fit

At the start of the year, people look in the mirror and resolve to get fit. Might one hope that David Cameron and Nick Clegg have carried out a similar evaluation and will strive to become “fit for purpose” in 2014? I think it highly unlikely.

One can too easily imagine that when they examine themselves in the “mirror” of  Westminster, they rather like the image that is reflected back, distorted as it is by the accretion of power, privilege and patronage.

Stuart Fretwell, Portland, Dorset

Hollande’s diversions good for France

Better for President Hollande to be allowed his diversions – instead of screwing the French economy full-time.

Dr John Doherty, Vienna

François Hollande has conducted his affairs (excuse the pun) in a deplorable way, but it seems par for the course for him. His running of France is surely questionable, though – how does he have the time?

Judi Martin, Maryculter, Aberdeenshire

The British should be allowed to do things their own way, without being dictated to by the Europeans. The French should not be allowed to do things their own way, and British hacks should dictate their social mores.

Rod Chapman, Sarlat, France 

Fracking bribe jeopardises fair planning process

The Prime Minister’s promise of a substantial financial reward for planning authorities that grant permission to fracking applications is deplorable, regardless of one’s views on fracking itself. It is nothing less than a bribe.

Councillors who sit on local planning committees often have to take unpopular decisions and rarely manage to please everybody. We can only function effectively if we are seen to judge each application solely on its planning merits, fairly and openly, and without threat or inducement.

The Prime Minister’s proposal would corrupt the whole planning process and fatally undermine public confidence in the capacity of planning authorities to reach an unbiased conclusion at any level.

My council – which has had its funding reduced by half in the past few years – will shortly debate a motion to condemn this attempt to bribe it and demand its immediate withdrawal. I am proposing this as leader of my council’s Liberal Democrat group and it is seconded by a senior Conservative colleague on our planning committee.

It is our response to national politicians of all parties who seem to regard us as “useful idiots”.

Councillor David Milsted, North Dorset District Council, Gillingham, Dorset

Your article “Fracking industry watchdog has only six full-time staff” (14 January) reports concerns regarding the Environment Agency’s capacity for regulating a future shale gas industry.

The UK shale gas industry is, at the moment, very small: only consisting of one well that has been fractured to extract shale gas, plus several new exploratory activities.

Existing UK regulation contains the necessary elements to manage the risks associated with these small-scale activities. However, if, as David Cameron has promised, the Government is “going all out for shale”, then it must address how the risks  might scale up and how to manage them.

The Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering concluded that it is possible to manage the health, safety and environmental risks associated with shale gas exploration in the UK, as long as best practices are implemented and enforced through regulation.

The UK’s regulators should determine their requirements to regulate a shale gas industry should it develop nationwide. The Government accepted all our recommendations and must prepare to scale up the resources needed for proper regulation if the industry is to grow.

Professor Robert Mair, Chair of the joint Royal Academy of Engineering/Royal Society report ‘Shale Gas Extraction in the UK’, London SW1

It’s wonderful news that David Cameron should declare his Government is “going all out for shale”. I assume his enthusiasm will be illustrated by his welcoming the drilling rigs to West Oxfordshire with open arms. How refreshing it will be to see the usual “not in my backyard” syndrome replaced by a “use my back garden” approach.

One assumes that all his Cabinet colleagues will lead from the front by having drilling equipment on their properties. With such a positive display of community spirit, it is no wonder that our parliamentary system is the envy of the world.

Dr David Bartlett, Ilkley, West Yorkshire

We face blatant bribery of local authorities to accept fracking projects. But probably of more immediate concern to householders in areas awarded fracking permission is the attitude of the insurers. It is known that insurers dislike the risks of possible subsidence, such as already found in locations previously used for coal mining.

What a godsend this will be for them to hike up their premiums for otherwise secure properties, based simply on the possibility of an eventual settling of the land levels as the fracking methods alter the underlying geology.

Never mind. More insurance profits mean (in theory) more taxes for the Treasury. Who could object to that? Not the Etonians who have so successfully immigrated into our political interests.

Malcolm MacIntyre-Read, Much Wenlock, Shropshire

I wonder how many of those investors who will benefit financially from fracking  in our small island, might own a highly desirable property in France, where fracking is banned?

I McIlraith, Cumbernauld,  North Lanarkshire

 

 

Times:

 

Sir, The Prime Minister’s promise of a financial reward for planning authorities that permit fracking is deplorable, regardless of one’s views on fracking (“Lancashire demands bigger cut of fracking profits”, Jan 14). It is nothing less than a bribe, as surely as if (say) Tesco offered the promise of 1 per cent of its annual sales in return for permission for a superstore.

Councillors who sit on planning committees often take unpopular decisions and rarely manage to please everybody. We can function effectively only if we are seen to judge each application solely on its planning merits, fairly and openly, and without threat or inducement to reach a decision. The Prime Minister’s proposal would corrupt the planning process and fatally undermine public confidence in the capacity of planning authorities to reach an unbiased conclusion.

Cllr David Milsted

North Dorset District Council

Sir, It is understandable that councils are wary about government inducements to allow fracking. In the US each well fracked requires about 6 million gallons of water, which has to be tankered in, and produces 3 million gallons of waste which has to be tankered out. The cost of improving and repairing roads is considerable. For example Arkansas has received $182 million in revenues from shale gas extraction since 2009 but needs to spend an extra $450 million to repair its roads. Pennsylvania had $1.3 billion in revenue in 2012 but has a road repair bill of $7 billion. Such costs outweigh government sweeteners.

Dr Robin Russell-Jones

Stoke Poges, Bucks

Sir, The fracking industry has arisen from human ingenuity and our luck in having the natural resource present beneath a large part of the UK. Since the industry requires no artificial subsidies and will, apparently, produce thousands of jobs as well as tens of thousands more in support roles, it also represents the best opportunity to rebalance the economy and remedy the damage of the past 30 years at no cost to the government.

Since the country’s finances will immediately benefit from increased employment taxation and lower unemployment and welfare benefits, it makes no sense for the Treasury to take 62 per cent of revenues in taxation unless George Osborne wishes to kill off the best opportunity to re-engineer the British economy before it is born.

Nick Winstone-Cooper

Laleston, South Wales

Sir, Far from being a “naked attempt by the Government to bribe hard-pressed councils”, as Greenpeace claims (Jan 13), the decision that local authorities will be allowed to keep all of the business rates raised from sites drilling for shale gas is a triumph for localism, for energy security and for evidence-based science.

Dr John Hayward

Barton, Cambs

Sir, So Lancashire is demanding a bigger share of the profits from the shale gas industry. The 1 per cent on offer is no better than the derisory 50p a tonne paid by opencast coal miners as a community bribe for years of noise, pollution and disruption. This often amounts to little more than providing a children’s play area and a few road improvements to allow them to move their lorries. Scant recompense for local residents compared to the profits of the companies and their shareholders.

A 10 per cent share of revenues for local communities is needed for all forms of fossil fuel extraction.

John Gregory

Hilltop Action Group

Old Tupton, Derbyshire

 

 

Students are best placed to judge the performance of their teachers so give them the power to do so

Sir, Those best placed to determine a teacher’s performance (letters, Jan 14) are not other teachers, governors or parents. They are the students.

In universities students complete a questionnaire about the performance of lecturers. The questionnaire is anonymous, administered by another staff member and processed centrally. The lecturer is sent summary statistics which can be used when applying for promotions. There is no reason why the same could not be introduced in schools, perhaps for
A level or GCSE classes.

While some may be alarmed at the prospect of students having this power, I have found that they take it seriously and I have always valued knowing how my students perceive my teaching performance.

While there will always be mavericks who relish the opportunity to stick the boot in, the fact that it is administered to the entire class means that, over time, a clearer picture can be obtained than from websites like Rate My Teachers which tend to attract only the disgruntled.

Professor Roger Anderson

University of Ulster

 

MPs who signed the “Time Running Out” letter are seeking a non-violent solution in Syria

Sir, You imply (“We have to help Syria rebels, MPs tell Cameron”, Jan 13) that those MPs who signed the “Time Running Out” letter all want to arm the Syrian rebels. In fact they called for strengthening the hands of those attending the Geneva II conference.

This would help the agreeing of ceasefires and the ending of sieges. It also means finding non-violent political solutions to the present impasse. Such is the most likely path towards “a democratic, secular and tolerant future for Syria”.

It would also be good if the religious leaders inside Syria would unite to give a lead to the politicians.

Lord Hylton

House of Lords

 

The day I that was taken into care turned out to be the luckiest day of my long life

Sir, Sir Martin Narey is right (Jan 13) that the birth parents are often not best suited to care for a child.

I was taken into care at 6 and after four years in children’s homes and with foster parents I was fortunate to be fostered with a family that changed my life. At 16 I returned to my mother and saw the life I would have lived if I had not been removed. As soon as I was able I joined the Armed Forces in order to escape.

When I look back over 70 years I consider the day I was taken into care to be the luckiest day of my life.

John Trott

Barwell, Leics

 

Godwin’s law asserts that eventually in every online discussion someone will make a comparison to Hitler

Sir, Jean Elliott writes that by noting that Hitler was a “great anti-smoker” Hockney gave an example of Godwin’s Law’ (letter, Jan 13). In fact Godwin’s law asserts that eventually in every online discussion, regardless of the topic, someone will make a comparison to Hitler. It is actually an example of “Reductio ad Hitlerum”, a term coined in 1951 by Leo Strauss who maintained that a view is not refuted by the fact that it happens to be have been shared by Hitler.

Kay Bagon

Radlett, Herts

 

 

Canny pensioners are unlikely to pay for over-the-counter medication which is free on prescription

Sir, I don’t think the government will get very far in persuading people to take minor ailments to their local pharmacy rather than their GP (Jan 15). Many GP appointments are taken up by children and the over-60s, neither of whom pay prescription charges. While a visit to the GP remains free, you will not persuade our canny pensioners to pay for over-the-counter medication which they can get free from the doctor.

Susan Kelly

London W5

 

Telegraph:

 

SIR – Mikhail Kalashnikov, the inventor of the AK-47, is not the only person to feel guilt about his creation. The dilemma of the arms manufacturer is illustrated in George Bernard Shaw’s Major Barbara, where the dividing line between good and evil is a perennial anxiety.

Sir Bernard Lovell, the great physicist and astronomer, was much troubled that the radar systems he invented brought death and destruction to the people of Germany. He found great comfort in the knowledge that they saved more lives than they destroyed, and hastened the end of the war. The device he created to detect U-boats in 1943 had a major impact on the Allied victory and helped to ensure the safe passage of troops from America in time for D-Day.

John Bromley-Davenport
Malpas, Cheshire

 

SIR – David Cameron is offering money to councils that agree to fracking wells in their wards.

Applications will need to cover a range of issues such as environmental impact and traffic implications. How can a council be expected to make a decision based on planning policies if it has a financial interest in the outcome?

Selby Martin
Shrewsbury, Shropshire

SIR – If fracking does produce lower energy prices, I hope anti-fracking councils will accept a surcharge on their bills.

For them to benefit from an industry that they have forced to locate elsewhere would be hypocritical and unjust.

Don Jackson
Tadcaster, West Yorkshire

SIR – Allowing local councils to benefit from fracking will not persuade anyone to accept exploration on their doorstep.

Instead, households should receive an annual untaxed income direct from the fracking companies. This way, new householders benefit for as long as they are inconvenienced. It could also become a selling point for those wishing to move.

Fracking money should be kept away from all forms of government and paid straight to those who are affected.

Hugo Brown
Stoke Lyne, Oxfordshire

SIR – I wonder if the promised bonanza on shale gas will be of the same benefit to the British public as North Sea oil? We were led to believe that natural gas and petrol would become plentiful and cheap.

John Dorricott
Barton on Sea, Hampshire

SIR – Leaving aside the red herrings of earthquakes and water contamination, a fracking operation to produce as much gas as, say, Morecambe Bay offshore field (around 7 per cent of British demand), and based upon current published delivery rates from the US, will require more than 400 wells spread over thousands of acres.

Each wellhead will have glycol injection facilities and there will be miles of surface-laid gathering pipes and treatment facilities as large as medium-sized oil refineries. Where is it all going to fit?

Vernon T Evenson
Didcot, Oxfordshire

SIR – Why do we need a French oil company, Total, to carry out fracking in Britain? As with EDF Energy, which operates British nuclear power stations, the profits will return to France.

David May
Dronfield Woodhouse, Derbyshire

SIR – The Gainsborough Trough is an interesting location for David Cameron to show his support for fracking (report, January 14). Wasn’t there a significant earthquake there just a few years ago?

Jenny Furness
Doncaster, West Yorkshire

SIR – William Hague, the Foreign Secretary, implies that the proposals by the 95 Conservative MPs to veto EU laws are not realistic, while Chris Grayling, the Justice Secretary, suggests that they are not workable.

What is unrealistic and unworkable, not to mention undemocratic, is to have laws imposed upon British voters which they do not want, passed by majority vote behind closed doors. These include laws to regulate the City of London, which will stop British businesses from generating employment, economic growth and the taxes flowing from them for the provision of public services.

We should be governed by our own laws, enforceable by our own judges and passed at Westminster by the elected representatives of the British people.

Bill Cash MP (Con)
London SW1

Related Articles

Danger on the ward

SIR – After the preventable death of a 57-year-old woman at Basildon Hospital where a single doctor was left alone to care for 130 patients, the Essex Coroner called for a ban on junior doctors working unsupervised at night.

She did not point out the underlying cause of this dangerous situation, replicated throughout Britain, which is the implementation of the European Working Time Directive and the present junior doctors’ contract of employment. Where there used to be teams of doctors available on call, there is now a single very stretched individual working exhausting shifts.

The only solution is to restore continuity of care to patients by bringing back on-call teams of doctors, even if those doctors spend a few more hours in the hospital working in a less intense and safer manner.

John Black
President, Royal College of Surgeons, 2008-2011
Great Malvern, Worcestershire

Rural blight

SIR – Weobley was The Daily Telegraph National Village of the Year in 1999. Under the former Herefordshire Development Plan we were to expect 60 new properties in the village by 2031. Development under this plan was very carefully controlled by rules governing green belt conservation and design compatibility.

But since the recent removal of those rules, plans are under consideration for building 63 new homes in our beautiful village next year, very closely packed together, and apparently with the full consent of our local planning department.

R E Best
Weobley, Herefordshire

Choosy trains

SIR – Luca Cordero di Montezemolo’s NTV high-speed trains were not prohibited from stopping at Roma Termini station. RFI, the company in charge of the infrastructure, informed NTV about available tracks at Roma Termini, but NTV preferred Roma Tiburtina and Roma Ostiense stations.

Federico Fabretti
Ferrovie dello Stato Italiane
Rome

Late for the diary

SIR – Your report on “household clutter” (January 13) was quite timely. I had just found, at the bottom of a drawer, an unopened handkerchief and diary set, dated 1988.

Phillip Crossland
Driffield, East Yorkshire

Child benefit restriction

SIR – It is deplorable for Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister, to denigrate Iain Duncan Smith’s proposal to limit benefit payments to two offspring as “Chinese”.

“Chinese” implies banning. Mr Duncan Smith is merely proposing that state funding should be restricted to two children. Thereafter any further offspring are a personal choice that the state should not have to subsidise.

It’s a shame that a leading politician cannot see the difference.

Charles Holden
Lymington, Hampshire

Romance that lasts

SIR – I am delighted that Richard Dorment should dub the artist John Craxton “Britain’s Last Romantic”. There have been so few Last Romantics lately, I was beginning to fear that we might really have seen the last of them.

W B Yeats was apparently the very first Last Romantic. But by 1948, according to the title of his official biography, Sir John Martin-Harvey was the Last Romantic. Then followed, according to the titles of their own biographies, Max Eastman (1978) and Queen Marie of Romania (1985). Next there was the 1985 television film Vladimir Horowitz: the Last Romantic and novels called The Last Romantics by Ruth Harris (1980) and Caroline Seebohm (1986).

The Barbican Gallery held a “Last Romantics” exhibition in 1989. In 1992 the BBC showed a film about the Cambridge dons F R Leavis and Sir Arthur Quiller-Couch, claiming they were the Last Romantics. A 1995 biography declared the novelist Henry Williamson to be the Last Romantic. A 2007 film about a frustrated composer was called Last of the Romantics.

There is also a pop group called The Last Romantics. I don’t doubt there will be some more Last Romantics along soon.

Graham Chainey
Brighton, East Sussex

Memorable passwords

SIR – Useful passwords can be created by choosing the initial characters of memorable quotations, with nouns in upper case. Thus, “To be or not to be, that is the question” becomes 2bon2btitQ. Provided the quotation is not too obvious, you can write down your passwords as Shakespeare, Keats, Betjeman and so on.

Adrian Williams
Oxford

Too many graduates to fill jobs that need a degree

SIR – Ed Miliband, the Labour leader, asserts that many graduates have been “forced” to take work that used to be done by people who hadn’t gone to university. Surely, this is because the majority of so-called graduate jobs do not actually require a degree to do them.

The previous government’s target of getting 50 per cent of young people into university was flawed, as nowhere near that number of jobs require a degree-level education. The sea of new graduates means that many employers advertise as graduate jobs things that used to be done by school-leavers with A-levels; and jobs that once required GCSEs or O-levels now require A-levels.

Mr Miliband’s point that many graduates who start in low-paid work never move up the ladder is not surprising if the graduate has a degree, say, in “Abuse Studies with Dance” from Manchester Metropolitan.

David Pearson
Salisbury, Wiltshire

SIR – The increasing importance of internships to graduate employment prospects shows just how valuable the contribution of business can be in helping young people acquire the skills and knowledge required to succeed in the professional world.

Universities should be exploring ways to encourage business to be part of the higher education world, and businesses should see this as part of their wider role in society – something that benefits them and something that makes a contribution to the development of young people on whom the future depends.

Many businesses are keen to contribute, but flexibility is needed so that education and training can be managed alongside business demands. Any opportunities must be fairly shared among students, not just snapped up by the more privileged.

Roxanne Stockwell
Principal, Pearson College
London WC2

 

 

 

Irish Times:

 

 

Sir, – I was greatly relieved to learn that Phil Hogan does not micro-manage Irish Water (Home News, January 15th). – Yours, etc,

PAT Mc GLYNN,

Grange Park,

Baldoyle, Dublin 13.

Sir, – It would appear that Minister for the Environment Phil Hogan’s definition of “micro” in terms of project management is under €200 million. It would be interesting to know at what level a project becomes “macro” and attracting of his attention. – Yours, etc,

DONAL MORRISSY,

Ballyvaughan Co Clare.

Sir, – Labels on bottled water proudly declare “0 calories”. As every schoolboy/girl knows, a calorie is a unit of measurement for energy. Why is it that the Energy Regulator is involved in setting a rate for what is currently being called a “scarce resource”? Water is available in vast quantities year round in this country yet, though vital to sustain life, our clowns in Leinster House seem determined to trick the citizens into believing it’s an energy and a scarce one too!

Hands up anyone who’s surprised at the latest round of “let’s fool the people again”! Please, a Thaoisigh, stop this juggernaut of Irish Water immediately before it runs away with us all; give the local authorities the money instead and make them get on with their job of providing the basic necessity for life to our impoverished people. Even juggernauts are capable of executing a U-turn. – Yours, etc,

LAURENCE HOGAN,

Braemor Grove,

Churchtown, Dublin 14.

Sir, – Thank you, Fintan O’Toole (Opinion, January 14th) for making it all clear. The Irish miracle is turning water into, not wine, but gravy. I am tempted to invoke Jesus! – Yours, etc,

DAVID BEST,

Leinster Road West,

Rathmines, Dublin 6.

Sir, – The water meter will be for the greater part redundant once I start collecting the rain water from the roof. With last year’s average rainfall of more than 1200mm it would be unsustainable for this quango Irish Water to exist – if everyone joined the club. – Yours, etc,

IAN HESTER,

Four Mile House,

Roscommon.

Sir, – In view of recent events, could we request that board members of Irish Water are formally prohibited from topping up their tanks? Thanks. – Yours, etc,

JOHN KIRWAN,

Georgian Village,

Castleknock, Dublin 15.

Sir, – The Minister knew the “ballpark” figures but was not aware of the minutiae. €50 million is some minutiae. Oh and poor Fergus O’ Dowd only heard   about the €50 million on the radio. Are they both in need of a consultant? – Yours, etc,

PAUL KAVANAGH,

Croydon Park Avenue,

Marino,

Dublin 3.

Sir, – It seems to be a tradition that each political party in government bequeaths us a bloated, unfit for purpose, money-guzzling quango, stuffed with insiders. Fianna Fáil gave us Fás; the PDs lumbered us with the HSE; and now Fine Gael has contributed An Bórd Uisce – or whatever it’s called – which rather appropriately has begun to soak up the taxpayers’ money even before it came into existence. – Yours, etc,

ADRIAN J ENGLISH,

Kilcolman Court,

Glenageary,

Co Dublin.

Sir, – The high set-up costs of the so-called “Irish Water”, and the lack of State oversight, are just signs of things to come, if we continue on this route.

This process was initiated as a commitment in the EU-IMF bailout programme. Why did the troika insist on water charges in Ireland? This was not to save water or to save money for the Irish citizens, but to lead to a sell-off to the highest bidder.

 

Water is an increasingly competitive global business, with a few major players (in particular those based in France, Germany and England). The IMF, ECB and EC were acting in the interests of this “industry”; the IMF has pursued similar water sell-offs around the world.

The start of the process is to condition people into the idea that we should pay for our water through a separate agency. How many TDs have told us recently that “people elsewhere in the EU pay for their water”, while ignoring the fact that we already pay for our water through our taxes?

Also, those European companies where water is already privatised, do not present a good argument for a move away from State control of this national asset. For example, in Britain, privatisation has led to little improvement in infrastructure and no significant decrease in water wastage, but with considerably increased costs for the citizens.

We are now spending a vast amount of our money to sell off our own resource. The same money would be better used to upgrade our infrastructure, for all our benefit. It is time to say stop. – Yours, etc,

ROY PALMER,

Moycullen,

Co Galway.

Sir, – It appears there’s a drip-drip approach to revelations concerning the workings of Irish Water. – Yours, etc,

FIONNUALA WALSH,

St Mary’s Terrace,

Galway.

Sir, – Regarding Phil Hogan’s recent statements: first, micro-managing is getting involved in day-to-day company decisions. Studying and understanding company accounts, investments and major expenditure is not micro-managing but what a responsible majority shareholder does.

Second, regulators have to authorise all expenditure which the regulated companies pass on to their customers. Given that the regulator must be already familiar with Irish Water’s accounts, asking the regulator to examine the expenditure is not a meaningful action by Mr Hogan but buck-passing and procrastinating.

Third, in a radio interview, the only concrete explanation offered by John Tierney for the €50 million spent on consultancy was the need for a customer system and an asset management system. These IT tools are used by utilities all over the developed world since the 1980s or 1990s. Vendors sell their products off the shelf after some customisation to adapt them to the customer’s concrete requirements. The need for any great amount of advance consultancy for this purpose needs a lot more explanation than has been given.

The new practice of privatising companies, heretofore considered natural monopolies, has led to a whole army of regulators and consultants, the result of which has been to push up prices, reduce services, create a new caste of very well paid managers and eliminate political responsibility because ministers can point to regulators as the decision-makers.

Paraphrasing the musical signature of the Dad’s Army series, whom do you think you’re kidding Mr Hogan? – Yours, etc,

JOE MARSÁ,

Sandycove Road,

Sandycove, Co Dublin.

Sir, – Why don’t Enda Kenny and Eamon Gilmore declare Phil Hogan to be a member of Fianna Fáil so that they, as usual, can say it’s all its fault? – Yours, etc,

DAVID MURNANE,

Dunshaughlin, Co Meath.

Sir, – In relation to Irish Water, Minister of the Environment Phil Hogan states quite correctly that one can’t make omelettes without breaking eggs. But one does not have to shell out €50 million to do so successfully. – Yours, etc,

BRENDAN O’DONOGHUE,

Straboe,

Killerig, Carlow.

 

 

Sir, – Prof Sheila Greene (January 15th) raises a common objection to the idea that mental experience arises solely from the activity of the brain. That is that such a theory ignores the “complex interactions of the brain with the body, the material world and the socio-cultural world of relationships and meanings”.

Of course it does no such thing – on the contrary, it absolutely embraces the complexity of embodied agents acting and interacting in a dynamic environment.

All that information is necessarily processed by the brain – how else could we know we are having a social interaction? Where else would our memories of past experiences be stored?

At any point, the current play of such interactions is represented in the current state of activity of the brain and interpreted in the context of the history of all such experiences, written in changes to brain circuits accumulated over a lifetime. – Yours, etc,

KEVIN MITCHELL,

Associate Professor of

Genetics and

Sir, – You refer to the recent killing in Castleknock as a “chess murder”, and quote, without comment, a “passerby” as saying that chess is “a very intense game” that “brings out the worst in people”, as if she was somehow an expert on the subject (Home News, January 13th).

No one knows what triggered this horrific event, but it is certain that it could not have been playing chess. Chess is played by millions of people around the world every day, in a friendly and peaceful way. Anybody who isn’t sure of the simple rules (simpler than, say, golf) can look them up on the internet in two seconds, without the need to lose their temper, let alone kill.

Studies have consistently shown that playing chess has a calming effect, and also teaches patience and enhances self-esteem. It has therefore been used beneficially in many countries, including Ireland, in prisons and young offenders’ institutions as a means of rehabilitation. If more people played chess there would be a lot less violence in the world. – Yours, etc,

PETE MORRISS,

Chairperson,

& UNA O’BOYLE, PRO,

The Irish Chess Union

C/o Oughterard,

 

Sir, – I wish to comment on the issue of the proposed Eirgrid overhead power lines and pylons. I am a founding member of Child, which was established in 1998 to help obtain the best possible treatment for children with leukaemia.

In 2005 a study carried out by the UK National Radiological Protection Board showed that children born close to high voltage overhead power lines, have an increased risk of developing leukaemia. – Yours, etc,

PETER PEARSON EVANS,

Ballymacahara,

Ashford, Co Wicklow.

 

 

Sir, – Ariel Sharon was not the bloodthirsty tyrant suggested (Denis Staunton, Opinion, January 13th). He was the personification of ancient Israel. He might well have stepped straight out of the pages of the Book of Judges, a warrior hero raised up to defend Israel and deliver peace to the land. – Yours, etc,

ENA KEYE,

Wasdale Park,

 

Sir, – Laurence Cleary vents a tirade against the international Palestinian-led Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, and the Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign in particular (January 11th). He asserts that boycotts of Israel do nothing to achieve a “lasting Middle Eastern settlement”, yet fails to mention anything about a just peace. This is important because the current Israeli government, according to its economy minister Naftali Bennett, will “never accept an agreement based on the 1967 lines”, hence seems to regard military occupation as a “lasting settlement” in itself. This is a view reinforced by the words of Moshe Ya’alon, former chief of staff of the military and current defence minister who in 2012 said, “the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a problem with no solution . . . we can live like this for another 100 years”.

Indeed, it appears that at present one of the only things having any effect on this outlook is the BDS campaign – with Israeli politicians including finance minister Yair Lapid, justice minister Tzipi Livni and Jewish Home party chairperson Ayelet Shaked all warning in recent weeks of the growing international movement that aims to help secure Palestinian rights and freedom.

Mr Cleary questions “whether a boycott of Israel is an expression of support for Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank”. It is more than this: it is a response to a call for BDS from more than 200 Palestinian civil society groups issued in 2005. As such, it is an entirely separate issue from “a campaign to support Palestinian goods”, the latter being tactic which on its own will do nothing to end Israeli military occupation and apartheid.

Finally, Mr Cleary asserts, “Israeli universities are the most liberal aspect of Israel society”. Even if true, this is not saying much; the same Haifa University Mr Cleary attended for two months recently awarded the Israeli embassy in Ireland a prize for its online propaganda activities. This embassy’s undiplomatic defamation of human rights activists, be they Palestinian, international or even Israeli, has made headlines the world over. In November 2012, when Israel was bombing Gaza, killing over 160 people (including 30 children), the authorities at Haifa banned all protests from campus and declared their support for the Israeli military, but not before allowing a pro-war rally, which was attended by the university president, to take place and at which could be heard chants of “Death to the Arabs.” Liberal indeed. – Yours, etc,

MARTIN QUIGLEY,

Chairperson,

Ireland-Palestine Solidarity

Campaign,

Capel Street,

 

Sir, – I wish to withdraw my previous arguments against preservation of the 1916 buildings on Moore Street (Letters, January 6th). Having reviewed the plans put forward by the save 16 Moore Street campaign and given the matter further consideration, I find myself persuaded of the rightness of their cause.

Hopefully some compromise can be reached whereby the planned museum can proceed in tandem with the very necessary and long delayed commercial development and renewal of the surrounding area. – Yours, etc,

JOHN THOMPSON,

Shamrock Street,

Phibsboro, Dublin 7.

 

Sir, – May I remind Fionola Meredith (“New age rubbish posing as an accessible alternative to old-school religion”, Opinion, January 13th) that there has not yet been a new age inquisition, or a new age crusade; new age spirituality has never burned people at the stake in the name of God, and it does not peddle guilt and shame to its practitioners.

Furthermore, it treats men and women as equals and has never posed a threat to the safety of children. For the many people who have who have lost faith and interest in “old-time religion”, it provides a spiritual path which harms no one and provides a sense of connection with spirit and the companionship of like-minded souls.

Fionola Meredith’s notion that spirituality must be hard work is strange in any age. As for intellectual rigor, the response of the church to many valid questions has always been “It’s a mystery!”. If working with angels, crystals, fairies, energy or anything else provides peace of mind and comfort to those who practise it Meredith is hardly in a position to call it “rubbish”. And the angels have often found me a parking place! – Yours, etc,

CARMEL A LARKIN,

Baltyboys,

Blessington, Co Wicklow.

 

Sir, – Fr Patrick McCafferty (January 15th) states, “The church unequivocally proclaims the message of the Gospel ” and goes on to quote twice from Romans in support of his argument concerning homosexuality and church teaching. As he is no doubt aware, Romans is not, in fact, a gospel. Why is it that the opponents of gay rights generally quote St Paul rather than Jesus? Could it be because Jesus never actually condemned homosexuality, and indeed healed the centurion’s sick pais (male servant/lover)? – Yours, etc,

FRANK SCHNITTGER,

Red Lane,

Blessington, Co Wicklow.

 

Sir, – I know another phrase we could lose, so I do. – Yours, etc,

BRIAN O’BRIEN,

Rathbeg,

Kinsale, Co Cork.

Sir, – Could people please stop “taking to Twitter”? Likewise, “Facebook” is not a verb, and the concept of something “going viral”  shouldn’t be greeted with enthusiasm. – Yours, etc,

NIALL McARDLE,

Wellington Street,

Eganville, Ontario, Canada.

 

 

 

Irish Independent:

 

*The meek shall finally inherit the earth. Maybe?

Also in this section

So how do we pay these new bills, Mr Noonan?

Let’s adopt Ford’s attitude to ‘bean counters’

Letters: Building managers and water charges

Let me tell you if I was a dog my tail would be wagging so fast that I could take off.

The reason for my unbounded joy is the news that Jean Claude Trichet has said that the bank guarantee was the right thing to do. Both leaders of the IMF mission to Ireland have come out and said it was wrong. The people of Ireland voted for our current Government when they said it was wrong. So only the ECB claims it was the correct thing to do.

Perhaps Mr Trichet has spent too long in the circles of European banking to understand our laws or, perhaps more importantly, our very fibre. To put it simply for him or any of his many servants that peruse these pages: in Ireland if three men meet on the street and one insists that they all attend a hostelry for the purpose of raising a glass to Diageo, then the man that invites the other two in is left with the bill. And even if he doesn’t have the money on him, the bar-owner will allow him to put it on the tab.

I now look forward expectantly to Mr Trichet graciously finally accepting the tab on behalf of the ECB

As an ardent opponent of the current political system, but not the people, I would like to congratulate all members of the House past and present for sticking to our Irish guns and for not being rude even while a Frenchman tried to run up a tab on us.

Apologies for losing faith — I’m beginning to feel like Doubting Thomas when he was presented with the undeniable truth of a deep wound.

I am also looking forward to the scars of austerity finally disappearing.

Congratulations to all the citizens of Ireland for keeping a cool head when all about them, myself included, were losing theirs.

Will it not be great to get back that which should never have been stolen in the first place: our country, our freedom.

DERMOT RYAN

ATTYMON ATHENRY CO GALWAY

BY ANY OTHER NAME . . .

* Irish households will have a standing charge levied upon them for water charges, whether they use a drop of water or not. Should households attempt to conserve water or minimise usage then Irish Water will apparently have the power to increase the cost of water. Should households overuse water during a long dry period, Irish Water will again have the power to increase charges.

This ridiculous situation exposes the fallacy that water charges would be introduced to encourage the conservation of a scarce resource. I suspect Irish Water is nothing but a vehicle to facilitate the future privatisation of water provision in this country.

SIMON O’CONNOR

DUBLIN 12

DISGUSTING SMOKERS

* Despite all the advertisements about the dangers of smoking, there appears to be as many people as ever indulging in the unhealthy habit.

I recently did a little bit of simple arithmetic and came to the conclusion that smoking 20 cigarettes a day costs around €3,000 a year. Some people obviously spend more on the weed. It is sometimes said that former puffers can be the worst when it comes to criticising smokers but, speaking as one who is over 30 years off them, I find the practice quite disgusting.

I know it can be difficult to give them up and this person holds amusing memories of throwing a packet in the river while out walking the dog in an attempt to kick the habit only to return to the town and purchase 20 more.

This is not meant as a political address, but a lot of people are indebted to Micheal Martin for the initiative of nearly a decade ago.

BILL MCMAHON

NAVAN, CO MEATH

SEANAD REFORM

* Seanad reform might not be the sexiest topic but its abolition would be shortsighted.

However, I find it difficult to understand why advocates of Seanad abolition do not want to strengthen, reconfigure or reform it.

We need to stop focusing on the past; mindlessly focusing on what the Seanad HAS been and start considering what the Seanad COULD be.

The time to act and introduce reforming legislation is now — undeniably the Seanad is broke but it is far from beyond repair.

The Zappone-Quinn Bill provides a workable and tenable draft Seanad Reform Bill, which only requires minor tweaks to radically reform the Seanad.

With the passing of this Bill, the current Seanad will be transformed from an exclusive, anachronistic and unrepresentative House into a dynamic, cost-effective, gender-equal, functional and modern Lower House.

Seanad Reform will enhance the prospects of people with particularly valued expertise being able to make a contribution to the work of Seanad Eireann.

CAROLINE BERGIN CROSS

TREASURER, LAWYERS FOR SEANAD REFORM

SHAMEFUL, NASTY GAA

lThe black cards will not faze the blackguards. Nobody talks about changing attitudes. GAA football is saturated with a shameful nasty, niggling, bad-tempered culture. Why are these childish bully-boy antics tolerated without question? One example out of many — throwing the ball away. Answer: move the ball forward for every misdemeanour. We have too many rules but no manners.

SEAN MCELGUNN

ADDRESS WITH EDITOR

EENY, MEENY POLITICIANS

* Let’s face it . . .

All those Jews, Christians, Satanists and Muslims can’t all be right; let’s see if we cannot solve the problem once and for all by using a tried and tested algorithm — eeny, meeny, miny, moe etc.

The same simple formula can also be used to sort out the chaff from the wheat in other instances too, including our political parties.

LIAM POWER

SAN PAWL IL-BAHAR, MALTA.

HEALTH RISK FROM PYLONS

* With such widespread and continuous exposure of the population, even small risks to health from the proposed pylons may have a large impact on the population. Children are particularly vulnerable as their nervous and other physiological systems are still developing and they have a longer lifetime exposure. It is therefore of paramount importance that the risks to health are accurately known. It is clear that they are not. There are many methodological problems inherent in identifying adverse health effects from this type of radiation. In particular, there are great difficulties in assessing exposure, and individuals are not generally aware of the levels to which they are exposed. Two straightforward precautionary measures may be proposed.

Firstly, that data on exposure to non-ionizing radiation be included on all new entrants in the National Cancer Register. And a decision on the proposed pylons should be deferred until we know the risks. There is an onus on public health professionals to take the lead.

DR ELIZABETH CULLEN

IRISH DOCTORS’ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION

UGLY, USELESS EYESORE

* It is reported that a Dublin City council committee is to discuss the possibility of renaming the Millennium Spire after Nelson Mandela. Considering they wouldn’t or couldn’t name a new Liffey bridge in honour of the late and much deserving Tony Gregory because he wasn’t dead long enough — this is just another futile exercise in political correctness. If they really want to honour Mr Mandela and the citizens of Dublin, they should have this ugly and useless eyesore removed as soon as possible.

K NOLAN

CARRICK-ON-SHANNON, CO LEITRIM

Irish Independent

 

 

 


Bone marrow

$
0
0

17 January 2014 Bone sample

I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. Troutbridge is bombed by the mafia but survives because Leslie Zags instead of zigs Priceless.

Start to clear out attic for insulation, Mary bone marrow sample, cart still not ready tomorrow?

Scrabbletoday I winand gets just over300, Perhaps Mary will win tomorrow.

 

Obituary:

Roger Lloyd-Pack, the actor, who has died aged 69, will forever be associated with the slow-witted Peckham road sweeper Trigger, whom he played in the much-loved television series Only Fools and Horses.

As one of the regulars at the Nag’s Head pub, Trigger provided an immeasurably dim foil to the wit and wisdom of wheeler-dealer Del Boy (David Jason), used-car salesman Boycie (John Challis), landlord Mike (Kenneth MacDonald) and Del Boy’s younger brother, Rodney (Nicholas Lyndhurst).

The character was involved both in one of the series’ best running jokes, and its greatest slapstick moment. In the latter, he accompanies Del Boy on a mission to pick up a couple of “modern euro-birds”, only for Del Boy to fall through the bar after a waiter, unnoticed, lifts the hatch. In the former, Trigger persistently refers to Rodney as “Dave”. Even on the announcement of Rodney’s engagement, to Cassandra, Trigger raises a glass “to Cassandra and Dave”. When she discloses that she is pregnant, he suggests that the couple call the baby “Rodney, after Dave”.

Born with what he described as “an old man’s face”, Lloyd-Pack had to wait until his 40s to find success as an actor; once he found it with Trigger, however, the role would not leave him be. Such was his identification with the road-sweeper that passers-by, even policemen, would shout out “Wotcher Trig?” at him in the street. In conversation, he said, strangers assumed he was very thick. He described the role as “like an albatross in one way. If something becomes mega, like Fools, you’ve had it. I’ll never escape Trigger, I’ve learnt to live with that.”

But the role (which he nearly abandoned after two series, until his agent told he would be “mad”) provided him with a measure of financial security and also ensured that he did not have to worry about finding work again. Though he never subsequently secured the golden roles of Lear or Shylock, to which he aspired, he was sought after for smaller, plum Shakespearean parts, such as Buckingham (in Richard III) or Sir Andrew Aguecheek (in Twelfth Night).

e Harry Potter franchise. Acting, he said, was “a silly job, in a way, especially when you get older. It’s just dressing up, playing at being someone else. It’s rather lovely, too, but it’s hardly life and death.

Roger Lloyd-Pack was born on February 8 1944 in north London. His father, Charles Pack, had grown up a working-class lad in the East End before turning to acting and, in the 1930s, adding Lloyd to his surname. Roger’s mother, Ulrike, was an Austrian-Jewish emigrée who had fled the Nazis.

Roger was educated at St David’s (“a snobby little prep school run by a sadistic couple”) and Bedales, where he “coasted”. He did not shine at Geography (securing just nine per cent in his O-level), but did begin acting, eventually auditioning for Rada. After training there, however, he found jobs hard to come by.

In part he put this down to his looks. “It took a while for all my features to fall into place,” he said. “I didn’t come into my own as an actor until I was 40. I was not easy to cast.” He found bit parts in series such as The Avengers, The Protectors and Dixon of Dock Green, but spent much of his time drifting in rep – waiting, with increasingly little confidence, for his big break.

In the mid-1970s his career got a boost when the director Bill Gaskill invited him to join the Joint Stock Theatre Company, which pioneered the idea of using collaborative workshops to inspire new material from playwrights such as David Hare and Caryl Churchill. But it was not until 1981, with the advent of Only Fools and Horses, that he secured his future as an actor. He was signed up after being spotted by the series’ producer, Ray Butt, while in a play alongside Billy Murray, who was being considered for the Del Boy role.

The series ran for a decade, with the character of Trigger appearing in nearly every episode and acquiring something approaching cult status, notably for moments of inadvertent wisdom that pierced the fog of idiocy. On one occasion, Trigger prompts a philosophical debate by revealing that he has used the same broom to sweep streets for 20 years. When asked his secret, he reveals that he has lovingly maintained it, replacing the head 17 times and the handle 14 times.

In interviews Lloyd-Pack was frank, sometimes disarmingly so, about the nature of his/Trigger’s rather peculiar brand of celebrity. He was also frank about the travails of his personal life, in particular the mental health difficulties faced by his eldest daughter, Emily.

Emily Lloyd, who was born when Lloyd-Pack was 26, was catapulted to Hollywood stardom while still in her teens after appearing in the film Wish You Were Here (1987). A decade in Hollywood followed, but she was increasingly afflicted by mental health problems. In an interview last year, Lloyd-Pack said that watching his daughter struggle with her condition was “absolutely heart-rending and painful”.

He was also forthright about the possibility that, having left his first marriage, to the actress Sheila Ball, when Emily was only two, he had somehow contributed to his daughter’s later difficulties. “I feel very sad about that,” he said. “It’s one of those things where you can’t have a second chance. Forming good, trusting relationships with your children involves being with them when they’re very small and holding them. You can’t replace it. The thing you most want in your life when you’re little is for both your parents to love each other. If not, it can be the beginning of all your problems.”

Roger Lloyd-Pack, who died of cancer, was also clear-sighted about death, upon which, he said, even before his diagnosis, he reflected every day. A keen cyclist, recycler, and campaigner for Left-wing causes, he revealed he would like to buried in “a cardboard coffin”. As for his obituaries: “I don’t really care what [they] say, so long as they are fair. I know I will be best remembered for Trigger in Only Fools and Horses, but I hope all my other work will be acknowledged, too.”

His television credits included Spyder’s Web; Moving; The Bill; The Old Guys; and The Vicar of Dibley. Film credits included The Naked Civil Servant; 1984; Wilt; Interview with the Vampire; Vanity Fair; Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire; and Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy.

In 2000 he was appearing in the hit play Art, a three-hander in which his character, after some vacillating, gets married in a ceremony witnessed by the other two characters. During the run Lloyd-Pack decided to marry his partner of 25 years, Jehane Markham, with whom he had three sons. His co-stars, Nigel Havers and Barry Foster, acted as witnesses. Lloyd-Pack said he could not resist the temptation to play a central role as life imitated Art.

Roger Lloyd-Pack, born February 8 1944, died January 15 2014

 

 

 

Guardian:

 

 

Tom Rosenthal was author or co-author of 10 books and monographs, on Paula Rego, LS Lowry, Josef Albers and Sidney Nolan, among others, and last year his On Art and Artists: Selected Essays was published, bearing out his friend Anthony Rudolf‘s point that: “Tom is one of the great publishers of the age, and a very good writer too.”

This comment comes from Life in Books: Friends of Tom Rosenthal Celebrate his Seventieth Birthday (2005), published in a limited edition of 300 by Rudolf’s extraordinary Menard Press. The book’s 39 contributors included Joan Bakewell, John Banville, William Boyd, David Cairns, Günter Grass, David Lodge, Nicholas Mosley, Peter Porter, Brian Rix, Salman Rushdie, Ben Schott, Clive Sinclair, David Thomson, Anthony Thwaite, Gore Vidal and David Whitaker.

As Rudolf explained in his publisher’s note, Rosenthal conveniently went to New York at the very moment Rego’s pastel portrait of him needed to be secretly removed from his study wall to be prepared for the frontispiece of Life in Books, a beautifully produced book which is rare and wonderful to behold.

You are right to highlight how the delay in the inquest on Mark Duggan has put strain on his family and has created anxiety about whether relatives of the many black people who have died while in police custody, or at the hands of the police, have access to justice or even basic information about the circumstances of their loved ones’ death. I would just like to tell your readers about the case of Philmore Mills, who was ill in a hospital lung ward. His behaviour became extremely erratic, nurses in fear called the police who detained him and while he was restrained he died. That happened about 12 weeks after Mark Duggan was shot and yet the inquest is not due until 1 April. The family does not know whether it will get legal aid for representation. One of my Conservative colleagues last month described in the Commons his shame that for the past 30 years we have allowed so many deaths in custody of African Caribbean men to go unaddressed. It’s time to remedy this injustice.
Fiona Mactaggart MP
Lab, Slough

 

The most troubling aspect of Avi Shlaim’s one-dimensional piece on former PM Ariel Sharon (Comment. 13 January) is his claim that the goal of the Gaza disengagement was “preventing the establishment of a Palestinian state”. In an Orwellian turn of events, we are expected to believe that the relinquishing of Israel‘s control over Gaza was in fact carried out with the aim of harming the Palestinian national cause. A reality check is in order here: Israel did not install the Hamas terror group in Gaza, nor did it bring over thousands of rockets from Iran and proceed to fire them at its towns and cities. Gaza represents a tragic missed opportunity for the Palestinians to have presented their ability to live side by side with Israel in peace, one that still resonates as an alarming reminder of the challenges faced by Israel in the current peace negotiations.
Yiftah Curiel
Embassy of Israel

• Your editorial (13 January) claims Ariel Sharon believed terror could only be defeated with bullets and bombs. But his policy of disengagement, not only withdrawing from Gaza, but also by building the barrier that has successfully prevented terrorist attacks, gives the lie to this simplistic conclusion and shows his creativity in devising pragmatic nonviolent solutions to Palestinian intransigence and murder. He was no saint, but he was the only politician in the Middle East who successfully managed to reduce conflict by two separate practical initiatives. If only Netanyahu and Abbas were so creative.
Arnold Zermansky
Leeds

• Your pieces on Ariel Sharon would not be out of place in an Arab newspaper. Ariel Sharon was a soldier and his military achievements were legendary. The large battles against regular armies that he commanded in the 1956 Suez campaign, the 1967 Six Day War, and the 1973 Yom Kippur War are still taught in military academies around the world for their tactical brilliance. Countries under threat need good soldiers. The problem for many critics of Sharon is that he was a better, more daring and more successful military leader than his enemies.
Diane Saunders
Leeds

 

In his 2011 book To End All Wars – the only recent account of the first world war to foreground the anti-war movement – Adam Hochschild asks: “If we were allowed to magically roll back history to the start of the 20th century and undo one – and only one – event, is there any doubt that it would be the war that broke out in 1914?” Perhaps, then, we should pay heed to the actions of those who tried to stop the first world war and resist its barbarism (Echoes of 1914: are today’s conflicts a case of history repeating itself?, 16 January).

Today we will be launching a year-long project to celebrate these people – English and German, men and women, socialists and feminists, conscientious objectors and soldiers – with a talk by Adam Hochschild and the unveiling of the first of 10 new posters. Over the next four years, as we mourn the dead, let us also learn from those who, in the words of Bertrand Russell – himself imprisoned for six months for opposing the war – “were not swept off their feet …[and] stood firm”.
Emily Johns
Gabriel Carlyle
Peace News

• Stuart Jeffries is wrong to assume it is only those on the right of the political spectrum who believe the sacrifice of so many lives in the first world war was justified (G2, 7 January). Many on the left, myself included, believe that to be the case as well, because it maintained the international rule of law. In 1914, German militarists brutally and illegally invaded the sovereign country of Belgium, in much the same way as the Nazis invaded Poland in 1939. Over 600 Belgian civilians in Dinant were massacred in 1914. In the German colony of South West Africa they committed genocide against the Herero people and systematically murdered 80% of their population. Many socialists outraged by the atrocities volunteered to fight in 1914, including Clement Attlee. He left his job as a lecturer at the London School of Economics and applied for a commission as soon as war broke out, and was subsequently badly wounded in the siege of Kut in Mesopotamia. When he recovered from his wounds, he was sent to fight on the western front in 1918.Furthermore, the leading British war ace Edward Mannock was a committed socialist and believed the war against the Germans and Turks was justified.
Leslie Oldfield
Buxton, Derbyshire

• Your editorial (16 January) misrepresents the impact of the first British trench memoirs, novels and plays that began to appear a decade after the end of the war. For a start, these can’t be simply labelled as exercises in portraying the war “as a futile exercise”. The most famous of the plays, for example, Sherriff’s Journey’s End, is most certainly not an anti-war play. Second, it is all too easy with hindsight to overstate the contemporary effect of the war books of the late 1920s and early 30s. The appeal of Blunden, Sassoon, Owen et al was limited on their first appearance to a comparatively small, largely middle-class readership.

Most people, including ex-servicemen, continued to read popular literature that portrayed the war as justified and which commemorated “the Glorious Dead” in terms of heroic sacrifice. It was only in the early 60s that the works which we now categorise as the canon of Great War literature, with their emphasis on the pity, as well as the futility, of the war, began to dictate the prevailing mood in interpretation of the conflict. Vera Brittain’s Testament of Youth, first published in 1933, sold just 120,000 copies up to 1939. In the 35 years since its republication by Virago in 1978, it has sold close to 2m copies in this country alone.
Mark Bostridge
London

 

Fergus and Judith Wilson are free with figures about the indebtedness of their buy-to-let empire, and indignant about tenants’ reliance on the state (Why my housing benefit tenants had to go, 11 January). Reading between the lines, I would say that taxpayers, hard-working or not, would be subsidising their mortgage interest tax relief to the tune of somewhere between £2.4m and £4m a year. One hates to spoil a good party, but phasing out this aspect of the private landlords’ welfare state would save £2bn a year, bring house prices within reach of many more buyers, reduce housing benefit spending (removing a double subsidy), reduce personal debt, anxiety and depression, and consequent NHS spending. Rushing this would have a cold turkey effect, with a lot of winners and losers among tenants, so it would have to be managed alongside investment of the savings to increase the provision of genuinely affordable housing, perhaps with the help of some compulsory purchase. I don’t see why private landlords should get off scot free in the midst of a fabricated moral panic about benefit recipients.
Steve Griffiths
Ludlow, Shropshire

• Your story (Benefit chaos ‘will spark new housing crisis’, 11 January) alleged that there is confusion over how housing benefit will be paid under universal credit. To be clear, under the existing system, over two thirds of housing benefit claimants receive payments directly and manage them well, and this will continue with universal credit. Significantly, the protection that is in place for landlords and tenants against arrears will actually be stronger under universal credit. Currently, if tenants fall into arrears for eight weeks, housing benefit payments are switched from tenants to landlords. Earlier intervention will be easier under the new system, as decisions over whether to pay tenants directly will be taken with landlords at the start of claims and can come under review when four weeks’ rent goes unpaid. Paying housing costs to claimants helps people move more smoothly into work and off benefits, so that having to start managing rent is not a barrier to employment. Since these changes were introduced in 2008, there has been no fall in the number of claimants living in the private sector. We are working closely with landlord groups and councils to ensure all landlords are informed about the latest welfare reforms. As universal credit continues to roll out gradually, we have time to make sure tenants and landlords are ready for these vital changes.
David Freud
Minister for welfare reform

• Polly Toynbee (Rachmanism is back. But where is Labour’s outrage? 14 January) understates perhaps the worst iniquity in the coalition’s housing policy: the enforced conversion of social housing away from “social rent” to their new concept of “affordable rent”. Social rent is controlled by a government formula, and is roughly 50% of market rent, whereas affordable rent can be up to 80% of the assessed market value. In order to get Homes and Communities Agency (ie government) funding towards building new homes, registered providers of social housing have to adopt the higher affordable rent model, and also they have to agree to convert the majority of their existing housing stock to this model as homes become vacant.

The other major impact is that whereas social rent tenancies are for life, the new affordable ones will be fixed-term tenancies for as little as two years. There are 1.7 million families on housing waiting lists – this figure actually grew by 700,000 during the Labour government. I worry they are expecting to pay a rent similar to what their friends and relatives are paying. Families may not be able to afford this new higher level of rent, potentially costing thousands a year more which would eat up most of the increase from any switch to the living wage – and so remain in inadequate, overcrowded housing. However, the government has just finished consulting on another aspect of their housing policy – raising even social rents by 1% a year above inflation.
Rob Boden
Kendal, Cumbria

• Increasing numbers of people have no option but to pay more than half their income on somewhere to live. It is simply not like this is in other comparable countries. We have yet to realise the potential of co-operative and mutual housing, which accounts for just 0.6% of the UK’s housing supply, compared with 18% in Sweden, 15% in Norway and 8% in Austria. Such housing solutions offer people affordable shelter – especially elderly and younger people and those in lower income brackets. They can give previously excluded people a genuine stake in the housing market. The UK has solid foundations on which to grow the co-operative and mutual housing sector to support those facing a cost of living crisis. The next government needs to grasp this important opportunity to turn the tide on what is becoming a toxic housing market.
Ed Mayo Co-operatives UK, Bob Taylor Knowsley Housing Trust (First Ark Group), Alastair Wilson School for Social Entrepreneurs, Derek Walker Wales Co-operative Centre, Peter Holbrook Social Enterprise UK, Simon Denny Director of Enterprise, Development and Social Impact, University of Northampton

Ed Miliband‘s plans for the political realignment of the middle class may well founder on the issue of home ownership, which you identify (Editorial, 15 January) as the key to middle-class self-identification. With house (basically land) prices so high, Labour’s only recourse would be to its old post-war model of the development corporation, compulsorily purchasing land at agricultural prices and retaining any planning uplift while developing houses for sale or rent, preferably on garden city (and village) principles. Ideally a revived middle class could benefit from increased job mobility via a computerised letting service and move first into high-spec rented property then, after saving a deposit from the affordable rent, buy a house, as of old. A land value tax would be necessary to cap any current land value inflation, so maintaining the house price stability achieved.
DBC Reed
Northampton

 

Robert Gates says that Britain’s defence budget cuts will preclude our joining the US in foreign conflicts such as Iraq and Afghanistan (Report, 16 January); apparently, he thinks this will persuade us to reverse the cuts.
Peter McCourt
Nottingham

• While queueing in my local Barclays, I passed the time watching the BBC lunchtime news with subtitling displayed on the bank’s giant TV screens. During the item about bankers’ bonuses, the subtitling said that concern was still being expressed about the size of bankers’ penises. Very apposite, I thought.
Hilary Veale
Weymouth, Dorset

• Come on, Guardian, if you’re going to quote Collins, the birders’ bible, get it right (In praise of … the red-necked phalarope, 10 January). Both phalaropes, grey and red-necked, have role reversal breeding patterns. You clearly didn’t check with Stephen Moss first.
Sue Leyland
Hunmanby, North Yorkshire

• I am concerned that Zoe Williams (Life without sugar, G2, 14 January) may have become a young earth creationist, indicated by her statement that many [Paleolithic] ancestors were cut off in their prime by dinosaurs. Any ancestors cut off in their prime by dinosaurs were certainly not human or even humanoid.
John Bryant
Exeter, Devon

• Most mornings my wife and I feel increasingly behind the times and out of touch with the world as we read the news. It was reassuring then to see your report on the unfortunate archduke (16 January) and to know the Guardian understands our plight. We do wonder though what the consequences may be.
Ken Wales
Preston

• Now we’ve got the sports section back, can we have sports letters again (Letters, 15 January)? Think what we’ve missed since this noble column was axed: Ashes won and handed back faster than Jelena Jankovic jumped off her chair, Suárez adding bite to the Liverpool attack, Djokovic becoming Murray mince… let’s do it!
David Feintuck
Lewes, East Sussex

 

Independent:

 

 

 

 

 

I have worked as a criminal barrister since 2007. I am 31 years old, state-school educated and from a single-parent family. I became a legal aid criminal barrister because I was committed to representing those who could not afford to pay for a lawyer.

I had to take out a loan to pay for my legal education. I knew this was a risk because I was not going to become a well-paid commercial lawyer, but I was prepared to take that risk because justice for all matters to me.

Even though I have a very busy practice, it has been a constant struggle: I work extremely long hours; I sometimes earn as little as £50 per day; I struggle to pay my rent and expenses each month, and I remain in debt.

If the Government cuts legal aid fees any further I will not be able to sustain myself. Simon Hughes is calling for those from “poorer backgrounds” to consider a career in law (“Legal profession must do more to reflect modern Britain”, 13 January). But the reforms of this government to legal aid will mean that those from less privileged backgrounds, like myself, will have to find another career.

This is a great shame and will reverse changes in the make-up of the profession. However, it is my clients I am most concerned about. I will be able to get another job, but they may not be able to get another lawyer.

Eleanor Hutchison

Temple, London EC4

 

We work with the NHS

In response to your News in Brief item regarding the Care Quality Commission (“Inspectors are pointed to private healthcare firm”, 13 January), we have a proud commitment to complementing the NHS rather than seeking to replace its services – always asking our members to seek help via the NHS first before approaching Benenden Health.

Benenden Health, founded in 1905, is a mutual, not-for-profit organisation with a UK-wide membership of over 900,000. Rather than an insurance company, we are a provider of discretionary healthcare services in return for a flat-rate membership fee. Our direct involvement in the NHS has existed in other ways since its foundation midway through the 20th century.

We would happily confirm that our involvement with the Care Quality Commission forms part of our business-to-business operations, and that membership of Benenden Health is down to employees’ personal decisions and not funded through the Care Quality Commission. We refute any suggestion that our brand contributes to any detrimental impact on the NHS as this would run contrary to our core values.

Marc Bell

Chief Executive, Benenden Health, York

 

Sherlock kills a blackmailer

Although one cannot but agree with the general sentiment regarding vigilantism expressed by John Rentoul in his piece (14 January) about the final episode of Sherlock, he should remember that the writers did not stray as far as he thinks from the morality found in Conan-Doyle’s original story.

In “The Adventure of Charles Augustus Milverton”, written in 1904, Holmes and Watson break into the blackmailer’s house, empty his safe of documents and then witness from behind a curtain Milverton being shot dead and mutilated by one of his female victims.

So far from trying to prevent the murder and the killer’s escape, Holmes and Watson flee the scene without reporting it. In fact there is satisfaction that justice had been done even if from outside the law.

At least the TV incarnation of Holmes was prepared, rightly or wrongly, to do the deed himself and to take the consequences.

Philip Brindle

Bedford

 

Tenants on benefits

Michael Garret (letter, 15 January) defends Fergus Wilson on the grounds that landlords should be able to terminate the tenancies of those who are in arrears. Perhaps he should re-read your article, whose point was that he is terminating many tenants who are not in arrears, on the grounds that, being on benefits, they one day might be. Not at all the same thing.

David Watson

Reading

 

Fracking: don’t  take the Money

Step 1: Cut local authority funding year after year until, even after cutting many services and thousands of jobs, it is impossible to balance budgets.

Step 2: Offer to give authorities some money if they are prepared to risk severe environmental damage.

Step 3: When some authorities give in to this bribe and agree to fracking, take back the money you gave them in more cuts the following year.

Moral: Never exchange for cash anything that you can’t easily replace. Cash can easily be taken back. Once you have wrecked the environment it is too late to wish you hadn’t.

John Illingworth

Nottingham

 

Sex, lies and being a President

Someone may be good at chess, yet bad at football, and a President of France may be good at “presiding”, yet bad at running romance.

Some assume, it seems, that if dishonesty occurs in one segment of a person’s life, it corrupts all other segments; but why think that? Just as people may appreciate opera’s aesthetic value yet not painting’s, so some may value honesty in affairs of the state, yet succumb to dishonesty in affairs of the heart. After all, numerous people lie when they say that they have read the terms and conditions, yet tell the truth when asked the way to the station.

Peter Cave

London W1

 

Uphill battle against abortion of girls

Congratulations on a brilliant piece of journalism, tackling the taboo subject of female foetus abortions (“The lost girls”, 15 January). I have been chair of a women’s group for 12 years and we have campaigned on this issue. However I am saddened to say our message has fallen on deaf ears.

Religious and political bodies pay lip-service to equality but adopt practices which are against women. Traditions have been revived such as Lohri, celebrated for a boy’s birth or wedding, Rakhri, where sister ties a thread around brother’s wrist asking him for protection, and Karva Chauth Varat, where a wife fasts all day praying for her husband’s long life. The community have made the girl a burden to bear but forgotten that from a woman sons and kings are born, a saying of Guru Nanak, founder of the Sikh religion.

Not all in the Asian community are the same; the majority love their daughters, but a minority still pray for baby boys in some of our Gurdwaras, which are complicit in this practice, as income derives from donations from parents celebrating boy births. No amount of education will make these people change their attitudes.

Rest in peace the souls of those girls aborted. Families and communities who condone such violence against unborn women will never thrive. In their old age when their boys dump them, they will wish they had a daughter to care for them.

Please continue with your campaign to stop this nefarious practice of gender-selective abortions.

Cllr Balvinder Kaur Saund

Chair, Sikh Women’s Alliance, Ilford, Essex

News that female foeticide has reached the UK’s shores is a shocking indictment of how widespread this malign practice has become.

In India, there are a staggering seven million more boys than girls aged under six, according to the 2011 census, and the gap is growing. The national figure has fallen to an alarming 914 girls for every 1,000 boys. In some states such as Punjab that ratio is as low as 846 girls to 1,000 boys, as parents mistakenly see boys as a faster route out of poverty.

Despite the Indian government enacting a law against using ultrasound technology for sex-selective abortions, the practice continues and is believed to result in more than 500,000 female foetuses being terminated every year.

Yet, as your story illustrates, this is not confined to India, and any decline in the relative number of girls needs to be halted, as it risks undermining economic and social achievements.

Plan’s “Let Girls be Born” initiative in India galvanises action to tackle the country’s disturbing sex ratio. Yet this is now a global problem and must be tackled on the international stage.

Tanya Barron

Chief Executive, Plan UK

London EC1

An aspect of prenatal sex selection and the resulting imbalance of the genders which has not been sufficiently discussed is the long-term impact on the security of women and the happiness of men.

If there are in extreme cases as many as 140 men for every 100 women, then roughly one in four or five men is unlikely to find a life-partner. It has already been seen in China that this can result in oppression and violence, including kidnap and forced marriage. The idea that scarcity of women puts power in female hands is a misconception. It also means that many men will lead unhappy, frustrated and empty lives, and will be unable to have children.

Catherine Rose

Olney, Buckinghamshir

 

 

Times:

 

Sir, I often ask a pharmacist for advice as it is difficult to book an appointment on my GP’s computerised system (“Seeing the pharmacist not the GP ‘key to survival of health service’ ”, Jan 15). It is simpler to wait at the local walk-in centre until someone is available. This service is excellent. What happened to the simple system of turning up at the GPs, taking a token and waiting one’s turn? It saved frustration and took the stress off harassed staff.

William R. Cowap

Walton-on-Thames, Surrey

Sir, The first attendance of a patient with a new illness is usually for a minor complaint, as serious illnesses tend to be admitted directly to hospital. By carrying out a brief physical examination the GP can often separate the trivial from something more significant. Pharmacists will not be in a position to examine their clients in the same way. Surely it would be better for GPs to continue their traditional role of diagnosis, and for pharmacists to take over some of the routines of preventative medicine (as some already do), which can sometimes distract from the problem that the patient is trying to present to the doctor.

Dr Anthony Daniel

Sevenoaks, Kent

Sir, I am no stranger to the NHS (I had a very public battle for Herceptin some years ago and became a governor for the Royal Devon & Exeter NHS FT) so I was interested in the call for greater use of high street pharmacists for advice and treatment of minor ailments.

The NHS actively promotes visits to pharmacists as a first port of call, but I think there are two reasons for people’s reluctance to consult their pharmacist. There is a certain amount of protectionism by GPs defending their own position, and there is reluctance by pharmacists to engage with customers, except at a superficial level. There is also misunderstanding among patients about free prescriptions versus the cost of over-the-counter remedies.

What is needed is an increased promotion of a service that already exists, and a greater level of public acceptance. Certainly in France the pharmacist is the first port of call, and they offer the bonus of a free mycological identification service.

Linda Piggott-Vijeh

Combe St Nicholas, Somerset

Sir, It is simplistic to suggest that the pressure on GPs will fall if patients call at the pharmacy first. If my experience in ophthalmology is anything to go by, the opposite will happen. NHS hospital eye clinics are inundated with referrals from the optometry practices of patients because they are not seeing the doctors in the first place. One reassuring consultation with a GP can eliminate the need for multiple visits elsewhere.

Nikhil Kaushik

Consultant Ophthalmic Surgeon

Wrexham

Sir, One way to reduce the demands on GPs is to abolish the monopoly of allowing only GPs to issue prescriptions. My local chemist is perfectly qualified to issue a prescription for a minor illness without troubling a doctor. This happens to good effect in other countries. Also there is the ludicrous situation with a repeat perscription which has to taken to the surgery to be signed before it can be taken to the pharmacy to be dispensed.

John Crossthwaite

Ramsbottom, Lancs

 

Parliament needs the power to disapply EU legislation when necessary and in the national interest

Sir, You are right to argue for “a reasoned debate on Europe and a chance to renegotiate” (leader, Jan 14) but our letter to the Prime Minister is far from “unrealistic”. All we propose is to amend our domestic legislation, to provide Parliament with a reserve power to disapply EU legislation when necessary and in the national interest. It does not require any treaty change or the permission of our EU partners.

Parliament’s application of EU Law in the UK is voluntary. This would merely place our Parliament in a similar position to the German Supreme Court at Karlsruhe, which reserves the right to decide whether or not EU obligations conform with the German Basic Law.

Bernard Jenkin, MP

House of Commons

 

We, the residents of James Turner Street, want to tell the true story of our community

Sir, On Jan 6 Channel 4 achieved its best ratings in a year with the first episode of Benefits Street. The TV series claims to depict life on James Turner Street in Winson Green, Birmingham. As residents of James Turner Street and the surrounding communities, we believe that the portrayal of our street in the first episodes is not fair or accurate. We believe there should be a national discussion about whether this type of programme, which is clearly created for entertainment, can be anything but damaging to local communities.

Most residents did not take part in filming, and those who feature in the series did so in the belief that they were helping to make a documentary on community spirit.

Our chief concern is the negative legacy of this story that our community — particularly our children — will be left to live with for many years to come. While we agree with Daniel Finkelstein (Opinion, Jan 15) that “showing a few people’s lives doesn’t tell the whole story of the welfare state”, we are concerned that he fails to grasp that neither does it tell the whole story about James Turner Street or the Winson Green community.

After a public meeting we have decided to form a community action forum to promote community spirit, help one another, celebrate the great things about our area and tell a truer and hopeful story of our street.

Emma Johnson

Steve Chalke

On behalf of attendees at a public meeting, Birmingham, Jan 15

 

 

The debate over global warming and the significance of hockey-stick graphs

Sir, Professor Keith Briffa (letter, Jan 15) says he was “reprocessing” a data set rather than ignoring it because it gave less of an uptick in temperatures in later decades than the small sample of Siberian larch trees he published. This does not contradict the discovery of Stephen McIntyre, of Climate Audit, which I reported, that a larger tree-ring chronology from the same Yamal region did not have a hockey-stick shape. The existence of this unreported adverse result was revealed by Freedom of Information requests.

In 2013 Briffa and his co-authors published a re-stated version of their Yamal chronology with a diminished hockey-stick blade. As McIntyre told me: “This re-statement implicitly conceded the validity of the earlier criticism.”

Briffa claims that his research was validated by the inquiry chaired by Sir Muir Russell, but that inquiry did not explore, let alone endorse, the specific data sets in question.

Sir Mark Walport and Professor Stephen Belcher (letter, Jan 13) also criticised my article (“Roll up: cherry-pick your research results here” Jan 6). They state that global warming is unequivocal, which I agree it is, over a 30-50 year period and slower than forecast by models. But this is a straw man. “Unequivocal” is not the same as “Unprecedented”, which was the claim made by the hockey-stick graphs and the word I carefully used in my article.

Matt Ridley

House of Lords

 

Times reader rises to the challenge of tracking down a rhyme for Damascus

Sir, “Good luck finding a rhyme for Damascus” (Diary Jan 15)? You only had to ask us.

Dan O’Callaghan

London N6

 

Last week, in a ward for the elderly, we heard nurses refer to patients by their bed numbers

Sir, I wish the “Face to a Name” campaign every success (“The picture that changed how my Mum was treated”, Jan 11). As we endeavoured to secure appropriate treatment for our 95-year-old mother last week in an NHS hospital, it was distressing to hear staff refer to patients by their bed numbers. Without a persistent, well-informed and proactive family, we wonder what the outcome to her stay would have been.

Melinda Sutherland

Grimsby, Lincs

 

 

 

Telegraph:

SIR – Call the Midwife does more than “spare the blushes” of viewers (report, January 14). It may have helped to inspire an increase of 6,000 students applying for midwifery courses last year.

It seems that even unborn babies will have cause to be grateful to the BBC drama if it has helped to deliver an answer to the chronic shortage of midwives, which puts the lives of mothers and babies at risk.

Peter Saunders
Salisbury, Wiltshire

 

SIR – Recently, the House of Commons voted against an all-party amendment to introduce a levy on the insurance industry to fund research into mesothelioma, the deadly asbestos-related cancer. This is regrettable and short-sighted.

Britain has the highest rate of mesothelioma in the world and, over the next three decades, it is likely to kill more than 50,000 people unless new treatments are found. Yet funding for research still lags shamefully behind that invested in cancers of comparable mortality, such as skin cancer and myeloma.

That the insurance industry helps redress this funding shortfall through a modest ongoing contribution is fair, given that resultant medical advances are likely to occasion smaller compensation pay-outs for patients exposed to asbestos in the workplace. The industry has accepted this, making the failure by insurers and government to agree a framework enabling a sustained contribution even more frustrating.

In the current climate, exploring new ways to finance medical research is vital. We hope that today’s Lords debate on mesothelioma research funding will prove more productive in negotiating this impasse than previous, thwarted efforts.

Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench)
Lord Avebury (Lib Dem)
Lord Browne of Ladyton (Lab)
Conor Burns MP (Con)
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Tracey Crouch MP (Con)
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (Crossbench)
Kate Green MP (Lab)
Lord Monks (Lab)
Lord Walton of Detchant (Crossbench)
Admiral Lord West of Spithead (Lab)
Lord Wigley (Plaid Cymru)
Dr Sarah Wollaston MP (Con)
London SW1

Childless marriage

SIR – My husband and I have been happily married since 1972. Our marriage, unexpectedly, has been childless.

Society’s attitude towards childless couples is often manifested by accusations of selfishness: we are perceived as being unprepared to share our lives, time, money and material possessions with a family. Quite often, we spend too much time trying to convince others that we are, in fact, normal people. The more we try, the more sceptically we are dealt with.

Childlessness is seen as unnatural, but we are quite happy without children.

Maureen Varndell
Storrington, West Sussex

Jobs in transit

SIR – Steve Odell, Ford’s European chief executive, has issued veiled threats about the risks to Britain of leaving the EU. This is the same company that, in 2012, grabbed £80 million of EU funding to develop a van factory in Turkey, thus allowing it to close the successful Transit plant in Southampton.

And Turkey isn’t even in the EU.

Graham Hoyle
Shipley, West Yorkshire

Raising your voice?

SIR – You report that raised intonation at the end of a sentence may have originated in New Zealand, not Australia. I believe it was from Norfolk.

The Singing Postman’s song My Little Nicotine Girl included the phrase – which ended with the rising inflection – “Hev yew gotta loight boy? Hev yew gotta loight?”

A J Kay
Buxton, Derbyshire

Scottish debt default

SIR – Should an independent Scotland default on its debt, it would find it impossible to borrow on the markets at a sustainable rate, if at all.

Having stepped in to pick up the pieces, the remainder of the United Kingdom would then have the right to recover the amounts that it had guaranteed and paid out. This might necessitate trade barriers and a tax for crossing the border. In other words, default is not a realistic option and will not reduce the amount of debt outstanding.

As an ex-economist for the Royal Bank of Scotland, Alex Salmond will know that if the markets thought Scotland was a good economic bet, this situation would not have occurred. The monetary experts know deep down that Scotland will fail economically if it goes its own way.

Harry L Barker
North Berwick, East Lothian

SIR – If Britain has to underwrite Scotland’s share of the national debt, an independent Scotland should be forced to offer its revenues from North Sea oil as security for such a guarantee.

Michael Staples
Seaford, East Sussex

Biblical weekends

SIR – Andrew Holgate may be interested to know that in France, Italy and Spain the first day of the week is called the Lord’s Day (dimanche, domenica, domingo) and Saturday the Sabbath (samedi, sabato, sábado).

Greece is even more biblical: Kyriaki (the Lord’s Day) follows Savato (Sabbath), which in turn follows Paraskevi, the (Jewish) day of preparation for the Sabbath.

Thomas Cooper
Llandudoch, Pembrokeshire

Legally rodent

SIR – When a mouse chewed through our dishwasher pipe, which was covered by our household appliance policy, the company concerned sought to avoid its liability by pointing to a clause in the policy that excluded liability for damage caused by “act of another”.

I had to persuade them that a mouse was not another legal person for these purposes. I intend to incorporate this example into an examination question on exemption clauses for law students.

Professor Richard Taylor
Lancashire Law School
Preston, Lancashire

Keeping track of passwords with cryptic clues

SIR – Ignoring all advice to the contrary, I write my passwords in the back of my bedside diary. Next to them, I enter the organisations to which they apply, disguised in highly personal crossword clues. My daughters mock this idiosyncratic method, allowing me on occasion to indulge in a spot of Schadenfreude when one of their passwords vanishes from their memory banks.

All I have to do now is ensure that I never mislay my diary.

John Fowler
Harrow, Middlesex

SIR – Several of my passwords are numbers from cars I no longer own.

Keith Macpherson
Houston, Renfrewshire

SIR – Ready-made, unique yet memorable passwords are available in the form of old London phone numbers (such as CROydon2381), car registration numbers and postcodes. Note the owner of a number, postcode or a car type as an aide memoire and you have a secure means of logging on that can include symbols or spaces (Paul = 16:EX215RH or Hillman = EUU 619J) to suit the required length.

Adrian Lawrence
Christchurch, Dorset

SIR – I make a note of all my passwords on a spreadsheet and then protect this with a single password – so there is just one to remember.

Alan Pengilley
Wetherby, West Yorkshire

 

SIR – Ed Miliband, the Labour leader, asks for middle-class votes, but offers nothing in return (Comment, January 14).

It is socialism that has undermined middle-class wealth by penalising savings and applying discriminatory taxes.

Deliberate currency debasement is at the root of price inflation, yet there is no mention of monetary policy to deal with this issue. Instead, he has proposed controls on energy prices, which will merely lead to the withdrawal of services. And his talk of rising consumer prices exhibits ignorance of their monetary cause.

The answer is simple: radically cut government spending, which is the engine of wealth destruction, and allow us to keep our own earnings and capital.

Alasdair Macleod
Sidmouth, Devon

SIR – Ed Miliband would have us believe that the oppression of the middle classes magically started on the first day of the Coalition. He conveniently forgets the previous 12 years, when education was dumbed down, family life was attacked, our institutions, such as the BBC, became more politicised, and the national debt soared.

Is Mr Miliband saying he’s going to form a “New” New Labour to clear up the mess that the first one created?

Phil Granger
West Malling, Kent

SIR – Will Ed Miliband reverse Gordon Brown’s decision to rob our pension funds through the removal of the dividend tax credit?

Roderic Mather
Skipton, North Yorkshire

SIR – In these hard times, the priority needs to be with the lower paid. Labour’s preoccupation with the middle class and its vanities resulted in Gordon Brown’s abolition of the 10p rate, which affected the lower paid. The Conservatives have rectified this with the higher tax threshold for the lower paid, and are talking about expanding on this concession.

And Labour’s talk about bashing the banks can only harm investment in new jobs, further affecting working people.

John Barstow
Pulborough, West Sussex

SIR – The middle classes do not need to be saved, and certainly not by Ed Miliband.

They will carry on doing what they have always done: working hard, caring for their families, achieving knowledge and skills through education and training, avoiding debt – and seeing through a politician’s change of direction because he perceives it is of electoral advantage to him.

Dr K J Briggs
Malmesbury, Wiltshire

SIR – Mr Miliband only managed to mention “the cost-of-living crisis” four times and “crisis in living standards” once in his article. He really must try harder.

Ray Powell
Nottingham

 

 

 

Irish Times:

 

 

Sir, – If the 300 staff of Irish Water receive an average bonus of €7,000, or 10 per cent per year (Home News, January 16th) then they will have an average gross wage of €70,000. This compares favourably (for Irish Water staff) with the average wage in Ireland in 2011 of €50,764 according to OECD statistics. From the same statistics source, the average wage in Germany in 2011 was €41,170. – Yours, etc,

NOEL Mc BRIDE

Neckarstrasse,

Karlsruhe, Germany.

Sir, – The Celtic Tiger must be back on its feet when the expending of €86 million on “consultants”, is considered “micro” by the responsible Minister. There must be something in his water! – Yours, etc,

HUGH DOYLE,

Lagore Road,

Dunshaughlin, Co Meath.

Sir, – These people are spending money like water! – Yours, etc,

JOE O’ROURKE,

Woodpark,

Ballinteer, Dublin 16.

Sir, – The only question that needs to be asked in this affair is why were people who did not know what to do appointed to set the company up in the first place? – Yours, etc,

DAVID FITZGERALD,

Kulmakatu,

Iisalmi, Finland.

Sir, – I admit to being a little swamped among the flood of charges flowing against Irish Water. If I had access to its newly purchased geographic information system perhaps I might find my way to safety. Then again, I could contact the Ordnance Survey Ireland (OSI) for access to the most recent and advanced geographic information system technology. The OSI supplies GIS expertise to Bord Gáis. Why does Irish Water need its own system? As preparation for privatisation or simply because it knew it had the money to spend? – Yours, etc,

ALAN COUNIHAN,

Johnswell,

Co Kilkenny.

Sir, – In The Irish Times on January 15th: Crisis in secure care provision for children” (Page 5); HSE “cannot afford to meet some priorities” (Page 9); and “Hogan says he did not know how much Irish Water spent” (Front Page).

When is the next election? – Yours, etc,

JENNY Mc GEEVER,

North King Street, Dublin 7.

Sir, – The flat rate fees (Home News, January 6th) for Irish Water in its first year seem high (Home News, January 15th), one can only hope the installation of a money meter will encourage a more economical use of this precious resource. – Yours, etc,

JOJO BOYLE,

Rue Victoria,

Longueuil,

Quebec, Canada.

Sir, – Since the executive and board of Irish Water are confident it was not profligate in its spending to date, perhaps it might invite Comptroller and Auditor General to review all transactions, and thus clear the air? – Yours, etc,

D O’SHEA,

Pinecroft Grange, Cork.

 

Sir, – I would have to disagree with Fr Patrick McCafferty’s assertion that the primary call of the Gospel is to “repent” (January 15th). He declares every human being is “infected” and that we need to turn away from the “disorder” of sin. This is medieval.

The medicalisation, the pathologising of all human beings as “disordered” is not my understanding of Jesus’s message.

I understand Jesus came on Earth to tell us precisely the opposite: that He loves us all regardless; that his love is boundless, that love matters. To tell us we are all to “love one another” and his concentration on love was exemplified in many situations where he denounced the Pharisees from judgmental ideology. Yes, he talks about sin, but his actions and message were focused on loving, not sin per se.

The Catholic Church’s pathology is the concentration on “the disorder of sin” in all of us, at the expense of concentrating on the love for all of us that God has.

The other pathologies of the Catholic Church are: the judgmental, misogynist and patriarchal clericalism that is so common; and failure to love a large majority of human beings outside its perceived “without sin” cohort of Catholics.

The Pharisees still exist within our clergy and hierarchy, and this is a gross distortion of Jesus’s true call to all of us: love. – Yours, etc,

Dr MARGARET KENNEDY,

Redford Park,

Greystones, Co Wicklow.

Sir, – In a letter dense with biblical citations, Seamus O’Callaghan (January 14th) announces himself as understanding of “sinners”. I have taken his words and sentiments to heart. I in turn wish to announce myself understanding of his sin of defining a sector of society as “sinners” without having provided any argument or justification. Now we can both feel accepting and forbearing while simultaneously retaining our existing beliefs and animadversions. Surely a perfect “win-win” state of affairs? – Yours, etc,

NEIL JOHNSTON

Broomfield Wood,

Malahide,

Co Dublin.

 

Sir, – As an Irish writer, I would call upon Aosdána, the Irish Writers’ Union and Poetry Ireland to make a statement denouncing the current jailing in Limerick Prison of Aosdána member and playwright, 79-year-old Margaretta D’Arcy (Home News, January 16th).

I am aware that many Irish poets, for instance, have a fondness for Russian poets imprisoned in the old Soviet state for various political reasons and feel certain that they will have no difficulty protesting against the imprisonment of an Irish poet who opposes the use of Shannon Airport by the US military, and the consequent destruction of Irish neutrality. – Yours, etc,

FRED JOHNSTON,

Circular Road, Galway.

Sir, – I am appalled to learn that our Irish “justice” system has seen fit to jail writer, theatrical personality, and well-known anti-war activist Margaretta D’Arcy now in her 80th year and having treatment for cancer. She is a woman of great integrity whose crime was to have trespassed on a runway at Shannon, in protest against Irish government complicity in the devastating wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere, not to mention the nefarious rendition flights which are known to have used Shannon.

She was sentenced to three months in jail, but bravely refused to sign an undertaking not to break the law for two years, which would have led to her prison term being quashed.

Margaretta D’Arcy should be nominated for a Nobel and a Lenin Peace Prize for her courageous stand against war and the killing of human beings. What kind of a country have we become? There is certainly something very rotten in the state of Ireland. – Yours, etc,

GEAROID KILGALLEN,

Crosthwaite Park South,

Dún Laoghaire, Co Dublin.

Sir, – The arrest and imprisonment of Margaretta D’Arcy shows just how low our justice system can go and just how in thrall we are to the policies of others. Shame! Shame! Shame! – Yours, etc,

JOHN MacKENNA,

Royal Oak Close,

Royal Oak,

Co Carlow.

Sir, – So Dr Ian Paisley (Home News, January 10th) acknowledges there were breaches of civil rights in Northern Ireland. It is a step further than any unionist leader has ever gone. Mandela did not live and die in vain. – Yours, etc,

EITHNE REID

O’DOHERTY,

Law Library,

Sir, – Perhaps The Irish Times could find a better description than “Pro-EU” for the protesters in Kiev (World News January 13th). Some of those who have taken to the Maidan in the Ukrainian capital undoubtedly favour the European Union but a very numerous, active and vociferous group does not.

Members of the All Ukrainian Union Svoboda have been to the fore in the demonstrations. Svoboda, through the Alliance of European National Movements, is linked to the British National Party, the far-right Hungarian group Jobbik, the French National Front, the Italian neo-fascist organisation Fiamma Tricolore and other far-right movements within the EU.

The Alliance’s aim, shared by Svoboda, is to dismantle the EU and replace it with a “Confederation of Sovereign States.” Pro-EU it most certainly is not. – Yours, etc,

SEAMUS MARTIN,

Raymond Street,

Dublin 8.

 

 

Sir, – Susan McKay’s article (Opinion, January 14th) was full of sweeping generalisations about pro-union people In Northern Ireland. The Haass talks and the subsequent proposals were complex and there were a number of reasons no agreement was reached.

For instance, the issue of flying flags was fudged, in the final document. That was an abject failure, as the basis for any agreement on flags must be an acceptance of Northern Ireland’s constitutional status as part of the United Kingdom. The Union Flag should be flown on designated days on council buildings across Northern Ireland, yet nationalist parties refused to consider moving on this issue, despite accepting such an arrangement for Belfast.

Neither did the provisions on “the past” specify that signatories have to accept the basic principle that all illegal acts during the Troubles – whether the Dublin and Monaghan bombings, the Bloody Sunday shootings, Bloody Friday or the ambush of soldiers at Warrenpoint – were wrong and unjustified.

There is potential to reach an agreement across all the issues which the Haass talks tackled and the political parties, on either side of the constitutional question, should not pander to extreme elements in our society. It isn’t helpful, though, to heap the blame for the failure of the process on just one part of the community in Northern Ireland, without serious reflection on the complicated arguments around the proposals.

It is important to remember that pro-Union people in Ireland have made a huge contribution to all aspects of life on this island and beyond. There is nothing constructive or helpful about demonising “the other”, however frustrated we all might be about a lack of progress on the thornier issues in Northern Ireland.

TREVOR RINGLAND,

Co-Chair NI Conservatives,

High Street,

Bangor.

 

 

 

Sir, – It is good to see a new political party “The National Independent Party” being formed. However one of its main policies “it . . . opposes economic migration” (Marie O’Halloran, Home News, January 15th) could cause some problems.

In order not to be accused of hypocrisy any such policy must apply to incoming and outgoing migration. While the number of incoming economic migrants to Ireland is relatively small, the number of Irish who migrated from Ireland is huge, with some 70y million people internationally claiming Irish ancestry. A further complication is that during the last ice age, there were no humans living in Ireland. That means that the ancestors of all persons now living in Ireland were migrants into Ireland for mainly economic reasons.

One of the party spokespersons, Martin Critten is “originally from the north of England”. Perhaps he is an economic migrant. Methinks they will have to think it out again. – Yours, etc,

EDWARD HORGAN,

Newtown,

Castletroy,

 

Sir, – As a consultant editor to The Church of Ireland, An Illustrated History, I feel I must respond to the criticism of it by Dr Robert MacCarthy (Rite & Reason, January 7th). Dr MacCarthy draws attention to some errors and omissions.

This book involved the very ambitious aim of providing information on all the parish churches and cathedrals of the Church of Ireland in one volume. As the numbers involved run to many hundreds of buildings, it is inevitable some mistakes would occur and I am happy to accept corrections. Dr MacCarthy acknowledges the book is “a splendidly designed and illustrated evocation of the Church of Ireland, past and present”. But adds, “It is not a history”. What does this mean? It is correct to say it is not a conventional narrative history. There are already a number of good narrative histories of the Church of Ireland. This volume is something more. The book, which runs to 400 pages, with more than 1,000 illustrations, includes an introductory historical account of the church by Dr Kenneth Milne, followed by essays by experts on subjects such church archives and stained glass. These are followed by chapters on every diocese or united dioceses, with a historical introduction on each, followed by brief entries on the history of every parish church and cathedral. No previous history of the church has ever attempted such an ambitious, countrywide historical survey.

Dr MacCarthy claims the falling number of members of the Church of Ireland indicates the church is “approaching dissolution”. It is true that since disestablishment the number of members of the Church of Ireland has fallen considerably in the South (although not in the North). At the same time, as he acknowledges, recent southern census returns indicate an increase in church numbers. Dr MacCarthy is dismissive of this fact, arguing there has been a rise in non-attendance.

Perhaps Dr MacCarthy should look more closely at what the evidence from this volume reveals. These hundreds of beautiful and well-maintained churches are indicative of the commitment and witness of large numbers of dedicated and faithful parishioners. This book contains evidence of growth and vitality at both diocesan and parish level. The Church of Ireland, like all churches, faces new challenges in the 21st century. The evidence from the church’s history, which involved great challenges in the past, gives one reason for hope. The evidence from the present also gives one assurance and confidence for the future. – Yours, etc,

Prof Emeritus BRIAN M

WALKER,

Ballylesson, Belfast.

 

rSir, – Quite apart from the merits or demerits of the new testing methods proposed for third-year secondary school students, why is it deemed necessary to change the name (Breaking News, January 15th)?

Some years ago the Intermediate Certificate became the Junior Certificate and it is now proposed to call it the Junior Cycle Certificate Award. The government department with overall responsibility has changed its name on a number of occasions, usually on the pretext of reform. Does proposed reform always require a name change or have we learned nothing from the HSE? – Yours, etc,

LOUIS O’FLAHERTY,

Lorcan Drive,

Santry, Dublin 9.

 

Sir, – Congratulations, your Front page cartoon (Martyn Turner, January 15th) must surely be one of the best ever. – Yours, etc,

ALAN WHELAN,

Beaufort,

Co Kerry

Sir, – Pace Colm Holmes (January 15th), perhaps the message to be taken from the photograph of the Pope’s addressing the ambassadors is not that war is men’s talk but that diplomacy is men’s business! – Yours, etc,

NATHANIEL HEALY,

Newcastle House,

 

Sir, – In legislating for surrogacy, and for other forms of assisted reproduction, and for adoption, I think we could not go far wrong if we keep to one central guiding principle: knowledge of identity is crucial. – Yours, etc,

LINDA KEOHANE,

Furbo, Co Galway.

A chara, – “You can’t make an omelette without breaking eggs”. – Is mise,

JOE STAUNTON,

College Green,

Ennis, Co Clare.

Sir, – The one that is partly to blame for the financial mess: “‘I can do it for cash”. – Yours, etc,

CLAIRE KENNEDY,

Bushypark,

Galway.

Sir, – “But I did the dishwasher yesterday!” – Yours, etc,

MICHELE SAVAGE,

Glendale Park, Dublin 12.

Sir, – In terms of. – Yours, etc,

FRANK CHEATLE,

Westtown,

Tramore, Co Waterford.

Sir, – Yours, etc,

TONY DAVIS,

Hazel Avenue,

Kilmacud, Co Dublin.

Sir, – “Irish water”. – Yours, etc,

HELEN NOONAN,

Northbrook Avenue,

Ranelagh, Dublin 6.

 

 

 

 

Irish Independent:

 

* People who hold the view that our so-called republic is by majority homogenous in its religious beliefs, often postulate that the apparatus of the State should reflect the beliefs of the majority, hence the retention of religious oaths and other religious references in our Constitution.

Also in this section

Letters: Accept the bank guarantee tab, Mr Trichet

So how do we pay these new bills, Mr Noonan?

Let’s adopt Ford’s attitude to ‘bean counters’

Two points on this: firstly, what about the rights of minorities and the fundamental rights of individuals?

Secondly, a question to advocates of majoritarianism in this context: I assume then that you would be consistent in your beliefs and, looking beyond our putatively homogenous little Ireland, would endorse religious majoritarianism when it comes to other states, for example in countries in the Middle East and North Africa?

State-sponsored prejudices against Christian minorities and the subjugation of their beliefs are major issues in these regions. In Saudi Arabia, private Christian prayer is against the law. In the Gaza Strip, half of the Palestinian Christian population has fled since Hamas seized power in 2007 and Gazan law forbids public displays of crucifixes.

Reports from the UK’s Foreign & Commonwealth Office and New York-based International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran cite evidence of “systematic persecution and prosecution” of Protestants and Christian converts in Iran.

The injustices suffered by Coptic Christians in Egypt are well documented. But should a state not be free to actively discriminate in favour of the majority when it comes to religion?

The point is that secularism, rather than preventing religious freedom, allows religious freedom for all (including freedom from religion).

It prevents any religion from dominating any other and prevents state sponsorship of any such domination.

This is applied on an objective, equal and mutual basis and is designed as a bulwark against religious prejudice and the suppression of religious practice.

ROB SADLIER

RATHFARNHAM, DUBLIN 16

HOW DO THEY SLEEP?

* Appearing before the Public Accounts Committee, former chief executive of the CRC Brian Conlan said: “It is inaccurate to suggest that money donated by the public was transferred directly into salaries of senior executives.” He then went on to say: “The CRC pools all its revenue from many sources each year into one fund and applies them jointly to the central overheads which includes some salary allowances.”

When you circumvent the obfuscation and read between the lines, it is clear from his second sentence that public donations were used to top-up executive salaries.

Whether it was direct or indirect use of public donations is moving away from the salient point that executives did in fact benefit financially from the public’s goodwill.

You can only imagine the repulsion I then felt when it was reported that former CEO Paul Kiely received a golden handshake to the tune of over €700,000, paid for in full from charitable donations. How these people can sleep easy in their beds at night is beyond me.

JOHN BELLEW

DUNLEER, CO LOUTH

RECIPE FOR DISASTER

* Dear Mr Hogan,

Your analogy of making an omelette and breaking eggs is so simplistic. Please remember you are responsible for our eggs. How you keep them, and use them. When you drop them, you are responsible to clean them up. That is your job.

It seems you have given an expensive basket of eggs to others and given up on the responsibility of looking after it. You don’t even know how many eggs were broken…

Your job is to control all of this, that is what you are paid for. You have failed! The only recipe you have here is a recipe for disaster.

ANNRAOI BLANEY

CO DUBLIN

* Surely a bonus is an award for achievement — over and above a recognised standard.

And these Irish Water awards should only be made retrospectively, and not to everyone in the audience. And, even at that, bonus schemes should be self- financing and not paid from borrowings.

But what would politicians know about that sort of economics — didn’t Mr Hogan cover that by exempting himself from any responsibility for micro-economics. His comment that you have to break eggs to make an omelette said it all. But €50m, that’s some omelette.

RJ HANLY

SCREEN, CO WEXFORD

* Environment Minister Phil Hogan confirms he did not personally know about the massive spend on consultancy by Irish Water.

If this is the case, Mr Hogan, please do the decent thing and hand the job over to someone who has an interest in how taxpayers’ money is spent.

SEAMUS MCLOUGHLIN

KESHCARRIGAN, CO LEITRIM

* For nigh on three years Enda Kenny has been blathering about making “Ireland the best little country in which to do business”.

Perchance then Uisce Eire is proof of his wish when a new company can “do” what it wants with taxpayer-owned assets.

The more things change in the Republic of Ireland the more they remain the same. Not even GUBU could describe this most inane Government ever to preside in Ireland.

DECLAN FOLEY

BERWICK, AUSTRALIA

* Have a look under the garden. Perhaps you have a hidden spring down there? If you have, Eureka! Sell your find to the Government at an astronomical price.

It doesn’t mind. It will simply pass it on to the consumer. Forget oil … Water is the new oil.

Why not sub-contract your water out? Instead of car boot sales, we can have water boot markets.

Just bottle the tap water, and start selling it on Sundays to those who can’t afford to have water in their houses!

Label it ‘Resurrection Water’.

ANTHONY WOODS

ENNIS, CO CLARE

INCENTIVE TO TENDER

* It doesn’t make sense in a small country like ours, desperate to create more jobs, that Ireland should be top of the list of countries most likely to award contracts to foreign companies. (Irish Independent Business, December 30, 2013).

This is despite the vibrant up-and-running image Jobs Minister Richard Bruton likes to portray.

Around 28pc of the €12bn worth of contracts awarded by state bodies in 2013 were captured by companies based outside Ireland.

In the literal sense this is a huge ‘unnecessary import’ for the Exchequer to carry. Such a high level of business being won by firms abroad, according to Tony Corrigan of Tender-Scout, means Irish businesses are missing out on €3.5bn of contracts.

Tendering for work from state bodies costs a minimum of €4,500 for a contract of €25,000 or more. Surely the Government could make it less expensive and offer Irish companies some incentive to tender?

My advice is that Irish companies keep an open eye. When opportunity knocks, throw your hat in the ring. Its sheer negligence to allow the stable door swing open so freely.

JAMES GLEESON,

THURLES, CO TIPPERARY

DOES ONE GO ‘DUTCH’?

* Does one go ‘Dutch’ on a date with Hollande?

TOM GILSENAN

BEAUMONT D9

BELIEVING IN PRESIDENT

* Perhaps it never entered the heads of his detractors, but President Higgins, all praise to him, could have been aiming his Christmas message towards deserving atheists like my good self.

ROBERT SULLIVAN

BANTRY, CO CORK

Irish Independent

 


Car at Last

$
0
0

18 January 2014 Car at Last
I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. Captain Povey is trying divide and rule  Priceless.
Start to clear out attic for insulation, pick up car, fine but v expensive, and order Thermoblok
Scrabble today Mary win    and gets  over   300,  Perhaps I will win tomorrow.

Obituary:
Kate Losinska , who has died aged 89, was a scourge of Left-wing extremism in the trade unions, fighting and ultimately winning a desperate battle for control of the Civil and Public Services Association, the largest Civil Service union, of which she was three times president.
Her marriage to the Polish air ace Stanislaw Losinski made her a staunch opponent of communism, but within the CPSA she faced the Trotskyist Militant Tendency. Militant was disrupting the social security computer centre on Tyneside, and aimed to paralyse Whitehall.
CPSA members (more than 200,000 at its peak) were junior civil servants, relatively few of whom could earn promotion, and thus prey to malcontents. But in Kate Losinska the militants had met their match.
A determined redhead from Croydon who had joined the civil service at 17, she pulled together a coalition to fend them off and — after Militant captured the CPSA’s 37-strong executive — to force them out again. When in 1988 she engineered a clean sweep of the executive’s Militant majority, she declared: “Now I can retire with a glow in my heart.”
For much of her presidency, she had an ally in Alistair Graham, the union’s general secretary, who was forced out in 1986 after what she called “a long-running campaign of political spite”. Militant tried everything to stop her; the Conservative MP Julian Lewis told the Commons she had been “attacked, beaten and tripped downstairs”.
A member of the TUC general council until Militant blocked her renomination, she had no truck with fellow-travelling colleagues. When Arthur Scargill, visiting Russia in 1983, praised the Soviet way of life, she erupted: “If he had been a Russian in Britain and had gone home after saying similar things, he would have been put in a psychiatric hospital.”
Scargill was her bête noir after he attacked the free Polish trade union, Solidarity. Kate Losinska chaired the Solidarnosc Foundation, and after the fall of communism was appointed Knight Commander of the Order of Polonia Restituta. (Her husband, serving with the Polish Air Force, then in bombers with No 301 Squadron, was awarded Poland’s highest military decoration and a DFC).
Kate Losinska had an autocratic streak which led dissident Right-wingers to form a rival slate in the 1986 CPSA elections; the weakened executive fell next year to Militant. Embarrassingly for some, she chaired the Trade Union Committee for European and Transatlantic Understanding, funded by the US Congress and Nato.
She was born Kathleen Mary Conway on October 5 1922 in Croydon; her father was a soldier. From Selhurst Grammar School she entered the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys .
After 40 years as a civil servant and union member, she was elected CPSA president in 1979, and the next year chaired the Council of Civil Service Unions, negotiating for 750,000 staff. At the end of her first three-year term she stepped down to vice-president, being succeeded by Kevin Roddy, prime mover of the disruption in Newcastle. In 1983 she returned, defeating Roddy. Her priority was to block, with Graham, moves to affiliate the traditionally non-partisan CPSA to the Labour Party.
However, Kate Losinska supported strikes against Margaret Thatcher’s barring of the unions from GCHQ, and blamed Tory policies for the narrowness of her re-election in 1984, complaining that they “give moderation a bad name”.
She struggled to contain an executive which had to be stopped by Treasury legal action from becoming the first union to call out its members without a ballot, after one was required by law. Recaptured by Militant in 1987, the executive began appointing the Tendency’s activists as full-time officials at the most vulnerable sites: the DHSS and Department of Employment.
In the run-up to the 1987 general election CPSA members voted by 56-44 per cent to hold strikes over pay. She supported their protest, so was furious when the far Left used the occasion to undermine Graham’s successor, John Ellis. The executive cut Ellis’s salary and took back his union car before she and Ellis regained full control.
In retirement, Kate Losinska saw the CPSA merge with two other unions to form the Public & Commercial Services Union (PCS), under firmly Left-wing leadership. In recent years she lived in Co Limerick.
She was appointed OBE in 1986.
Kate Conway married Stanislaw Losinski in 1942; he died in 2002, and she is survived by their son.
Kate Losinska. Born October 5 1924, died October 16 2013

Guardian:

I suggest you start a column “Sorry to see you go”, to complement your “Good to meet you”. I’m 74 years old, and the sole carer for my disabled daughter, who is 49. I’ve bought the Guardian since my student days in Manchester in the late 1950s. My politics have always been left-of-centre, based on Christian principles. I’ve always voted Labour. I spent 20 years working in industry as a metallurgist, then a further 10 years as a schoolteacher, before ill-health forced my early retirement. Last Saturday my Guardian cost me £2.50, an increase of almost 9%. For my cash, I got glossy travel brochures I don’t want or need, a travel section I discard, and a daft new magazine, Do Something. Your Consumer champions column (which I follow closely) suggests Sky subscribers are unlikely to be Guardian readers. I’m not a Sky customer, but I’m beginning to get the message I’m no longer part of your target readership. Where I go to, if I leave your paper, is problematic.
J Spencer
Warrington, Cheshire

A letter from the embassy of Israel (17 January) gives us “a reality check” about the Palestinian cause with the observation that Israel did not “bring over thousands of rockets from Iran and proceed to fire them at its towns and cities”. Quite so: Israel brought its weapons over from the US – Phantoms, F-15s F-16s and Apache helicopters and other state-of-the-art weapons, which have killed far greater numbers of Palestinian non-combatants. “Reality check” indeed.
Kevin Bannon
London
• I wonder if Mr Gates would be so keen on us maintaining a full-spectrum defence capability (Letters, 17 January) if we started using it without US permission. If I recall correctly, the last time we did that was the Suez fiasco by the Eden government (also stuffed with old Etonians).
Jim Pettman
Port de Castelfranc, Anglars-Juillac, France
• Thanks for the front page photo of Kate Moss (17 January). Should she disappear, I’ll now be able to recognise her; I doubt I could do the same for the missing little boy’s tiny picture on an inside page.
Pete Bibby
Sheffield
• If you insist on identifying Stephen Kinnock by reference to his family ties (Pass notes, G2, 16 January), it would be refreshing to find an acknowledgment that his mother has status as a prominent public figure, as well as his father and spouse.
Estella Baker
Leicester
• I am concerned John Bryant has misinterpreted Zoe Williams (Letters, 17 January), and suspect he does not have young children to entertain. As any aficionado of the oeuvre could tell him, her cry of “Dinosaurs!” is a Peppa Pig reference.
Dan Adler
Farnham, Surrey
• Our Japonica is in flower while the burn burst its banks and took a new course through the library (Letters, 15 January). Certainly a record for us.
Pamela Strachan
Broughton, Peeblesshire
• Two bumblebees on my cyclamen this morning. Bless their hearts, if I may say so.
Ann Hawker
London

The suggestion that Home Office officials are rewarded for ensuring failed asylum seekers lose tribunal cases is a cause for concern (Report, 15 January). While it is the job of immigration staff to defend decisions in such situations, rewards for meeting quotas could lead to the Home Office delaying cases it fears it will lose. This amounts to toying with the lives of people who have suffered at the hands of oppressive regimes, conflict and political persecution. There can be no fairness in a system that operates like this. The British Red Cross supports more than 10,000 refugees and asylum seekers every year and we see many people driven to destitution by a failing system that is no longer fit for purpose. While the Home Office’s approach to tribunal cases is worrying, the most important part of the process is that the right decisions are made first time, and that asylum seekers in need of protection do not have to go through the gruelling appeals process in the first place.
Nick Scott-Flynn
Head of refugee support, British Red Cross
• The UK has a proud history of granting refuge to those who need it. Claims are carefully considered before a decision is made. Your article seems to make the assumption that every claim for asylum is genuine – sadly this is not the case. Every year we receive numerous cases that are not – and it is right that we reject these claims. Where we are confident that an initial decision is correct, we make no apologies for pursuing the case at appeal.
Asylum cases are complex. Sometimes new evidence comes to light which changes a decision and in these cases we do withdraw. But we make every effort to ensure the right decision is made in the first instance. The public expects us to contest cases which are not genuine and it is not unreasonable to expect our presenting officers to win 70% of these cases. This provides an incentive for staff to ensure only high-quality, defendable decisions go before the courts – which is better for both the claimant and the taxpayer. No caseworker is incentivised to refuse asylum claims and all cases are considered on their individual merits.
Mark Harper
Immigration minister
• Solicitors at my firm spend every day at immigration detention centres representing asylum seekers in the most difficult circumstances. The asylum seekers are detained as soon as they claim asylum. Their case hurtles through the “fast-track” asylum system: interviewed, two days later a decision, two days to lodge an appeal, normally heard within four days. The claimant/appellant has no time to prepare or gather evidence. Her or his solicitor has to ask for permission to see the claimant and there are very limited facilities for such legal visits. All the chips are stacked against the asylum seeker. It is surprising and worrying that, despite all those disadvantages, 30% are granted asylum or win their asylum appeals. It is shocking that Home Office caseworkers, many of whom I have high regard for, are compelled to meet targets by bonus schemes and threats to their jobs.
David Enright
London

Zoe Williams says that if you place religious belief on the human rights agenda then you have to allow atheism equal weight (Comment, 15 January). It would be better to simply place “religious belief or non-belief” on the agenda. This is because the term “atheist” is freighted with much excess baggage as in the Northern Irish joke: “But are you a Catholic atheist or a Protestant atheist?” What if the asylum seeker in question had pleaded his agnosticism or secularism or humanism? I gave up my belief in pixies and Father Christmas some time ago but that does not make me a positive non-believer in them, possibly with an axe to grind. They are simply not part of my worldview and nor is belief in a deity. The US is by far the most religious western country and yet it maintains a strict separation of church and state where public education is concerned. I wish we did the same.
Some stridently pro-atheism books have appeared in recent years but this can lead to polarisation. The best book I have come across is The Book of Atheist Spirituality by the French philosopher André Comte-Sponville. It is a gentle, good-humoured book which points out that a number of eastern religions have spiritual beliefs without requiring the existence of deity or deities.
Zoe Williams laments that atheists do not organise, but nor do Santa deniers. I belonged to a humanitarian group set up by religious people because what the group did was needed and had nothing directly to do with religion. We can work together for the common good while maintaining diametrically opposed views, we don’t need to set up atheist alternatives to everything. This does not stop us from fighting for a totally secular education system (and for the abolition of private education) with whatever appropriate pressure groups.
Joseph Cocker
Leominster, Herefordshire
• Perhaps in order to get more attention from “people of faith”, we atheists need a version of atheism that is clearly a rational development and improvement over traditional faiths. The traditional God needs to be cut in half. On the one hand, there is the God of cosmic power, Einstein’s God, the underlying unity in the physical universe that determines all that goes on, omnipotent, eternal, omnipresent, but an It, so such that we can forgive it all the terrible things It does. On the other hand, there is the God of cosmic value, all that is of value associated with our human world and the world of sentient life more generally. Having cut the traditional God in two in this way, the problem then is to see how the two halves can be put together again. That is our fundamental problem, of thought and life: How can all that is of value associated with our human world exist and best flourish embedded as it is in the physical universe?
Nicholas Maxwell
Emeritus reader, department of science and technology studies, University College London
• It narks me too that the voice of active unbelievers is treated as irrelevant. Recently, apropos of what I don’t remember, a woman I know looked me in the eye and said: “We are all God’s children.” I was dying to say, “I wouldn’t presume to tell you you’re a grown-up and you should take responsibility for yourself”, for fear I might seem rude. Therein lies the rub. Atheists don’t want that weird certainty over the big questions and answers. I really don’t give a toss what happened before the big bang. My own preoccupation is how on earth we are going to take care of our planet because, sure as anything, God is not a bit bothered about our potential destruction of it. Being an atheist is about taking responsibility for our own actions, putting our raison d’être inside not outside. We have every right to have the same courtesy extended to us as I extend to people of faith.
Judy Marsh
Nottingham
• Zoe Williams’ quote from Richard Dawkins, “there is no such thing as a Muslim baby”, is reminiscent of the words of Lalon Shah (1774-1890), a Bengali mystic, philosopher and songwriter who rejected all distinctions of caste and creed and wrote in a song well-known to many Bengali people: “Do you bear the sign of caste or creed when you come into this world or when you leave it?”
Val Harding
London
We note that the internal review conducted by the Liberal Democrats did not “clear” or “exonerate” Lord Rennard in any sense; indeed the statement cites “evidence of behaviour which violated the personal space and autonomy of the complainants” (Report, 17 January). We deeply regret the failure of Lord Rennard to acknowledge the distress caused to the women involved and his failure to issue an apology at the earliest opportunity following the publication of an internal party investigation into allegations of sexual harassment. We believe that until he apologises and acknowledges the distress that his actions have caused, regardless of intent, he should never have had the Liberal Democrat whip restored and should be barred from any party body or involvement in any party activity that might facilitate a repeat of this situation. No apology; no whip. We note with deep regret the failure of senior members of the parliamentary party to denounce in the strongest possible terms Lord Rennard’s behaviour; the reports of which are described as “credible” by the investigating QC. It is deeply troubling that demands by the leadership for an apology were not clearly linked to sanctions that would include, at a minimum, withdrawal of the party whip. We do recognise that our party’s processes will not currently allow for action to be taken without a criminal-level burden of proof. We are committed to pursuing the vital work to secure improvements to protect our members, and anticipate the full support of our party leadership and the newly appointed pastoral care officer in doing so. We will not rest until our party is a safe space for all, free from sexual harassment and assault, without exception. With this in mind we as members will continue to put pressure on the whips office in the House of Lords with a view to reversing the inappropriate decision to restore Lord Rennard to the Liberal Democrat group.
Naomi Smith Social Liberal Forum, Linda Jack Liberal Left, Caron Lindsay Treasurer, Scottish party James Shaddock Rock The Boat founder, Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera Lib Dem English party diversity champion, Katherine Bavage, Leeds North West, member of Lib Dem Women, James King Co-finance officer, Iain Donaldson Chair, Manchester Gorton Liberal Democrats, Stephen Glenn Northern Ireland, LGBT+ Liberal Democrats Executive, Elizabeth Jewkes City of Chester, member of Lib Dem Women, Timothy J Oliver Hull & Hessle, Angharad B Jones Rhondda Cynon Taff, RCT Lib Dems Membership Officer, Kurt Jewkes City of Chester, Craig O’Donnell Chair of London Liberal Youth, Hywel Morgan Calderdale, Chris Nelson Kettering & Wellingborough (2010 parliamentary candidate, Kettering), Liam Pennington Preston, Cllr Lloyd Harris Regional treasurer, East of England, Deputy leader Dacorum Council Group, Cllr Gareth Aubrey Cardiff and Vale, James King Southport, Liberal Youth Co-Finance Officer, Robin McGhee Bristol, Liberal Youth Co-Finance Officer, Cllr Mark Mills Oxford East, Allan Heron Paisley and Renfrewshire, Callum Leslie Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath, Edinburgh Liberal Youth Treasurer, Scottish conference committee, George Potter Guildford, Guildford Secretary, Linden Parker South Norfolk, Liberal Youth Non-Portfolio Officer, Hannah Bettsworth Edinburgh South, Edinburgh Liberal Youth President, Scottish Women Lib Dems Executive Member, Jack Carr Aberdeenshire West, President, St Andrews University Liberal Democrats, David Evans Aberdeenshire  East, Andrew Page Inverclyde, Zoe O’Connell Cambridge, LGBT+ Liberal Democrats Executive, Ruaraidh Dobson Glasgow North (2010 Candidate Paisley & Renfrewshire North), Euan Davidson President ,Aberdeen University Liberal Democrats, Scottish Conference Committee, Aberdeen Central, South and North Kincardine, Jonathan Wharrad Congleton, Chair, University of Birmingham Liberal Democrats, Samuel Rees (East Dunbartonshire, former IR Cymru Officer) Hywel Owen Davies Preseli-Pembrokeshire, Jezz Palmer Winchester, Jennie Rigg, Chair, Calderdale Liberal Democrats, Euan Cameron Islington Borough, Siobhan Mathers Edinburgh North & Leith, Richard Symonds Tower Hamlets Liberal Democrats, Michael Wilson Stirling Liberal Democrats, James Harrison Edinburgh North and Leith, Callum Morton, Sutton Liberal Democrats, Tommy Long Maidstone Lib Dems Data Officer, Liberal Reform Board Member, Amy Dalrymple Edinburgh North and Leith, Natalie Jester Bristol South, Maria Pretzler Swansea and Gower, Member of the Welsh Policy Committee, Sophie Bridger Chair of Glasgow North Lib Dems, Geoff Payne Hackney LP, Ben Lloyd Cardiff Central (resident in Belfast), Paul Pettinger Westminster Borough and Liberal Youth Vice President, Paul Halliday Newport Party Chair, Amanda Durley Dartford and Gravesham, Daniel Jones Northampton, former Chair Northamptonshire Liberal Youth, East Midlands executive member, Natasha Chapman Lincoln, Chair of Lincoln Liberal Youth, Social Liberal Forum Council Member, Alisdair Calder McGregor Prospective Parliamentary Candidate for the Constituency of Calder Valley (Calderdale Local Party), Robbie Simpson North Glasgow, Liberal Youth Scotland Treasurer, Cllr Robin Popley Chair of Loughborough Liberal Democrats and Shepshed TC, Cllr Henry Vann Bedford Borough, Secretary North Bedfordshire Liberal Democrats, Andrew Crofts Vice Chair of Liberal Youth Saint Albans, Naomi Smith, Co Chair, Social Liberal Forum, Daniel Gale Nottingham, Jonathan Brown Chichester, Member of Ethnic Minority Liberal Democrats, Lib Dem Women & Social Liberal Forum, James Blanchard Huddersfield, GLD Exec, Chris Keating Streatham, Grace Goodlad, Bromley Borough, Norman Fraser Glasgow North, Organiser, Social Liberal Forum (Scotland), Morgan Griffith-David Cardiff and the Vale, Liberal Youth Policy Officer, Peter Brooks Islington, Jessica Rees Swansea, Sanjay Samani Angus North & Mearns, Dr Mohsin Khan Oxford East (Secretary, Oxford East, Policy Chair, South Central Region), Holly Matthies Manchester Gorton (Secretary LGBT+ Lib Dems), Andrew Hickey Manchester Gorton (Member of Social Liberal Forum, LGBT+ Liberal Democrats, Humanist & Secular Liberal Democrats), Duncan Stott Oxford East, Benjamin Krishna Cambridge, Lee Thacker Pontypridd, Rhondda Cynon Taff, Sebastian Bench General Secretary University of Nottingham Liberal Youth, Michael Carchrie Campbell Northern Ireland Liberal Democrats (Member of LGBT+, Social LIberal Forum, Lib Dem Lawyers Association, Liberal Youth), Neil Monnery Southend, Data Officer, Matthew Wilkes North Bristol Liberal Democrats, David Freeborn Oxford East, Adam Bernard Harrow West, Andrew Hinton Data Officer, Shrewsbury & Atcham, Joshua Dixon Chair of Hillingdon Liberal Democrats (Social Liberal Forum Membership Development Officer), Sandra Taylor Altrincham and Sale West, James Brough Calderdale Liberal Democrats, member LGBT+, Harry Matthews Sheffield, Rob Blackie Former London Assembly candidate, member of London Region Executive, Dulwich & West Norwood, Alex Wasyliw Party member, South Cambs, Daisy Benson local councillor and former parliamentary candidate, Reading, Richard Morgan-Ash Hackney, Ryan Cullen Lincoln, Peter Bancroft Westminster, Steven Haynes Liberal Youth Vice Chair, David Franklin, Leeds North East, University of Birmingham Liberal Democrats, Jon Neal former Parliamentary Candidate, Haltemprice & Howden, party trainer and mentor, Cllr Harry Hayfield Lib Dem representative on Llansantffraed Community Council, Ceredigion, WalesMag, Andrew A Kierig, Lib Dems in Brussels and Europe, ALDE Associate, Jennifer Warren Romsey and Southampton North, Duncan Borrowman Bromley Borough, former member federal executive, former national campaigns officer, former parliamentary candidate Old Bexley and Sidcup, former London assembly candidate, Penny Goodman Leeds North West, Secretary of Liberal Democrats for Electoral Reform, Laura Gordon Tonbridge Liberal Youth

Independent:

The Chief Inspector of schools, Sir Michael Wilshaw, says it is a scandal that 40 per cent of teachers leave the profession within five years, and claims this is because they have been inadequately prepared to deal with unruly pupils. I would be interested to know what research this is based on.
In fact, teachers leave the profession for a variety of reasons. Since 1992 one of the main reasons has been Ofsted: an organisation which places schools and teachers under intense pressure. Since 2010 the stress of constant inspection has been intensified by ever-shifting goalposts. What was deemed “good” a few years ago is no longer acceptable.
So how does Sir Michael intend to tackle the problem of teachers leaving? Why, he plans “a tough new inspection regime.”
John Cosgrove
Reading

I see that ashen-faced Ofsted supremo Sir Michael Wilshaw has announced yet another tough new inspection regime. He wants to find out whether the training of new teachers has been adequate. Given that 40 per cent are baling out within five years of qualifying I think we can guess the answer.
It is shocking, nonetheless, to hear him say that the dropout rate is to do with ill-discipline in the classroom. He is dead right, of course, but I thought it had long been decided that discipline was a dirty word and that if teachers could only be entertaining enough their pupils would, well, you know, just give up being naughty and, like, learn. Isn’t that what our student teachers are taught?
Martin Murray
London SW2
My daughter, who is a teacher in a secondary school in London, would be writing this herself, but she doesn’t have time. The reason that four out of 10 teachers quit the profession is because of the workload, not inadequate training. My daughter has a full working day, with a full working evening to follow, much of which is spent in unnecessary detailed planning, and marking. The weekend is the same.
When will the Government recognise that something is going wrong? When five, six, or seven out of 10 graduates leave?
Janette Davies
Bath

The ‘blame’ for conceiving a girl
Having read your leading article (16 January) about sex-selective abortion, I am in full agreement that education is a very important part of any solution to the problem. One vital fact should not be overlooked: it is the male gamete that determines the gender of the child.
No woman ought to feel guilty because her child is a girl, but if she can be sure, through education, that only the father is biologically responsible for this fact, she can be released in her own mind from any sense of guilt. She can also feel more powerful to oppose abortion. This might influence any misled female relatives and gain support from them.
P Atyeo
Church Hanborough, Oxfordshire

If you are concerned about discrimination against girls and women, what would you do? Would you work to ensure that girls had equal access to education, training and jobs; equal pay; equal rights in marriage; equal rights in inheritance; and access to justice, support and redress if they are sexually abused or raped or beaten up?
Or would you investigate every women of Asian descent to find out whether they may ever have had an abortion because the foetus was female, and investigate all the doctors who provide abortions to find out if they have ever allowed Asian women to have such an abortion, and prosecute them all?
Which would be more effective in combating discrimination? The former, of course.
Why is it, then, that The  Daily Telegraph, Jeremy Hunt, the Tory Secretary of State for Health, and now The Independent, surprisingly, in the name of opposition to gender discrimination, appear to be pursuing the latter course?
Their stance supports foetal rights. That is, it supports the right of a fetus to be born if it is female. This raises the question: can you support the right of even one foetus to be born, and still support women’s right to have an abortion?
Marge Berer
Editor, Reproductive Health Matters, London NW5
Fighting within our means
Mary Dejevsky (17 January)  says that the UK should live and fight within its means and that Cameron and Co are trying to do this, despite what former US Secretary of State Robert Gates has to say (as an aside from touting his new book over here).
If so, why are we building two huge aircraft carriers? They will cost over £7bn, and that does not include the cost of the aircraft to go on top of them. We could be living in a Britain of a century ago – big poverty at home, big warships at sea.
Vaughan Grylls
London WC1

In the context of Britain’s military funding crisis and American worries about whether we can pull our weight, I am reminded that in 1588 we saw off the Spanish armada with a fleet of 197 ships, only 34 of which belonged to the Royal Navy while 163 were privately owned.
Perhaps the current Queen Elizabeth should take a leaf out of her illustrious namesake’s book, and hand the lion’s share of the defence of her realm over to private enterprise. After all, entrepreneurs are now running everything else. Who wouldn’t like to see Sir Richard Branson launch his own aircraft carrier?
Paul Dunwell
Bedford
Where is the new Robert Mark?
Sir Robert Mark, on taking over as Commissioner of the Met over 40 years ago, famously said: “The test of a good police force is that it catches more criminals than it employs… the Met is currently failing that test.”  Mark confronted corruption head on. It appears, however, that after his retirement the cancer returned.
Is there another Robert Mark capable of the radical surgery necessary to delivering a reliable police force? No one doubts the honesty of many police officers of all ranks, but the exposure of police corruption over the past years, that has culminated in your publishing of parts of the in-depth internal enquiry named Operation Tiberius, is evidence that the scale of the problem goes far beyond “a few rotten apples”, and is bolstered by a supremely arrogant Police Federation.
Clearly, the direct impact an infiltrated criminal justice system has on the public makes institutional failures in this area the most alarming.
Serena Wylde
London SW15

The claim that secret networks of Freemasons have been used by organised crime gangs to corrupt the criminal justice system is an allegation that United Grand Lodge of England completely refutes (“Revealed: how gangs used the Freemasons to corrupt police”, 13 January).
The story refers to historic inquiries – Operation Tiberius and Project Riverside – which, we understand, closed years ago, and neither the police nor the Serious Organised Crime Agency has ever contacted us with regard to any inquiries concerning these operations. United Grand Lodge of England has not seen copies of the reports to which your report refers.
United Grand Lodge of England welcomes and strongly urges total transparency in every aspect of such investigations and we would eagerly assist the relevant authorities with any inquiries if we are approached or if we know of any way that we can voluntarily do so. Criminal activity is completely unacceptable within the organisation and totally alien to our values and any member found to be involved would instantly be removed.
Mike Baker
Director of Communications, The United Grand Lodge of England, London WC2
Catastrophe in Syria
The report of starvation in the Syrian refugee camp in Yarmouk (17 January) was harrowing. According to the piece, “Pro-Assad Palestinian factions blame the presence of 2,500 rebel fighters in the camp for the length of the siege.” Presumably, these “fighters” are Sunnis.
While the West beats itself up over this catastrophe, the wealthy Middle Eastern powers have remained silent. Shouldn’t they take some responsibility? Why have they not been invited to take part in the Geneva talks?
John Gordon
Twickenham, Middlesex
British art goes abroad
“Premium Bacon, but will anyone pay £30m to bring it home?” asks your headline (16 January), on the forthcoming sale of a Francis Bacon painting.
Must British art be only for the British? If Turner had not bequeathed the bulk of his work to the nation he would be better known and respected abroad than he is, and British art would have greater universal consequence than it does.
Peter Forster
London N4
Sinister precedent
Political scientists have a label for the overlap Owen Jones (16 January) suggests between socialism and Ukippery. They call it National Socialism.
Philip Goldenberg
Woking, Surre

Times:

It has been one year since the horsemeat scandal — and still there are daily revelations of consumer saftey violations
Sir, The first anniversary of the horsemeat scandal in the UK brings no cause for celebration. There are daily revelations of consumer safety violations and of the wanton abuse of live animals caught up in absurdly long supply chains that meander across Europe. The situation invites interference at every stage and features rotting carcases, widespread adulteration of animal products, and horse posturing as beef, pork and lamb, often destined for the most vulnerable.
Government action in response to these egregious abuses has been muted, its only ongoing step the Elliott review, whose narrowly drawn remit is to address “consumer confidence in the authenticity of all food products”.
The danger is overemphasis on effects rather than causes. Thus while a dedicated food crime unit is overdue to tackle individual cases of fraud, trust will not be restored until the wider issues are rigorously addressed: convoluted trans-European supply chains, the activities of the food processing companies, ongoing entrenchment of power with the big retailers, the continuing failure of regulators and supermarkets to detect repeated instances of food adulteration, and the lack of vigilance as to animal welfare in food production.
The Defra Secretary, Owen Paterson, claims that “the UK food industry already has robust procedures to ensure they deliver high-quality food to consumers”. This sits uneasily with our recent food crises, such as salmonella in eggs, BSE, foot and mouth disease, unlawful antibiotics in meat and honey, chemical contaminants in fish and horsemeat.
The situation reflects successive governments’ inability to keep pace with rapid changes in food production, ever greater industrialisation and globalisation of food production and the shift of power to the large vested interests.
The new austerity has depleted Defra (the body charged with controlling food supply chains) and has hit an already diminished Food Standards Agency and the ability of local authorities too to meet their food safety and hygiene responsibilities when pitched against the heavily resourced vested interests.
In 2013 I chaired an independent review commissioned by the RSPCA into Freedom Food, the leading farmed-animal welfare assurance scheme. The former Defra Secretary, Caroline Spelman, and Professor David Main served on my panel. Evidence came from every interest and shade of opinion. The recommendations of the McNair Report reinforce my view that a new openness and transparency by retailers to consumers is central to restoring public confidence.
Root-and-branch reform of our regulatory system is required to deliver traceability, accountability and intelligible labelling and proper standards of welfare for farmed animals. Authoritative research consistently links animal wellbeing to meat of a higher nutritional quality.
Recent polls by Populus show that more than three quarters of us would gain confidence in the food chain if farmed animal welfare standards improved.
A new political will is needed to build a robust, durable and properly funded food regulatory system committed to recovering consumer safety and demonstrating proper standards of animal welfare.
Duncan McNair
Chairman, McNair Inquiry and Report (rspca.org.uk)

Most serving and retired police officers will not be surprised by the fact that crime statistics are unreliable
Sir, The revelation that crime statistics are unreliable (Jan 16) will not surprise most serving and retired police officers. I suspect that only politicians and, possibly, a very few senior police officers have any faith in them at all.
Little has changed since I joined the service in 1966: robbery recorded as theft, burglary as criminal damage, theft as lost property, and many crimes not recorded at all.
I was always gently amused when officers, usually the CID, would persuade some hapless individual to “cough” to all sorts of offences (which he generally had not committed) in return for the promise of a word in the right ear, to ensure that the sentence for whatever offence he had committed would be less than he might otherwise expect. This sometimes resulted in more crimes apparently being detected in the sub-division than had actually occurred.
The Rev B. H. Stevens
Great Billing, Northants

We are told how to be slimmer and healthier to improve our lives — but what about thinking of others to make us happy
Sir, Your quick-fix list “How to be happier in 2014” (Jan 17) highlights a sickness in our society. Advised from every quarter how to be slimmer, fitter, healthier, we seem to have turned in on ourselves. What happened to service to and consideration for our fellow men? “Volunteer” appears at a humble 19th place on your list.
Anthea Richardson
London, SW19

Is it fair to fine parents £1,000 if they want to take their children out of school during term for a holiday?
Sir, The £1,000 fine on parents from Telford who took their children out of school for a short holiday in September is a disgrace (Thunderer, Jan 17).
It is reported that the holiday was booked before the recent change in the regulations and the father’s job meant he couldn’t take leave last summer. Not everyone can take their holiday when schools are closed. There will be thousands of families in the same position who are now faced with a choice between a holiday at peak times that they can’t afford or no holiday at all. The law on school attendance was never intended to be used in situations like this where just a few isolated days are involved.
As a former Education Welfare Team Leader, I think this is petty and unreasonable when so many more children are genuinely missing school to a greater extent.
Ben Whitney
Wolverhampton
Sir, As a retired teacher who has spent a lifetime of having to take holidays in the allotted school breaks, I would urge any parents thinking of taking their holidays in term time to ask themselves how they would feel if their children came home and said they would not be having any maths lessons for the next two weeks because the teacher had taken a holiday.
Multiply that by any number of other subjects and see what their reaction would be.
Roger Cleland
Lymm, Cheshire

4

The residents of James Turner Street have been filmed for almost two years — and they want the broadcasting to continue
Sir, Your letter about Benefits Street (Jan 17) does not represent the views of all the residents on James Turner Street. The team from Love Productions have been on James Turner Street for nearly two years and have daily contact with the contributors. Many of them are asking us to keep broadcasting the series because forthcoming episodes continue to show strong friendships and community spirit during difficult times. We are proud of the series, which provides a broad-ranging portrait of the street and includes positive stories from those who work, from those striving to get work and from residents who support one another through the challenges they face.
The series does not set out to reflect the experiences of every person who receives benefits but it has triggered a national debate about welfare at a time when welfare reforms are being proposed. In response to this we have commissioned a live studio debate which will air directly after the final episode to provide a forum in which these issues can be raised and discussed. All views across the political spectrum will be represented.
Nick Mirsky
Head of Documentaries, Channel 4
Sir, Daniel Finkelstein (Jan 15) is right to suggest Benefits Street poses a serious challenge to people of all political persuasions but not for the reasons he advances. You cannot divide society into those who work and those who receive benefits. Two thirds of poor children live in working families, so many hardworking parents are taxpayers and benefit recipients — for example, relying on tax credits to boost meagre earnings.
The simple truth is nearly everyone who receives benefits — whether they have lost their job, are in low pay, ill or disabled, retired or caring for a loved one — has worked, is working or will soon work. The challenge to politicians is to remember that those on benefits are people like us, not a group of people with values different from everyone else.
Alison Garnham
Child Poverty Action Group

Telegraph:

SIR – Richard Dorment lists the artistic delights available to those who live in the capital and the South East, but has little to offer those of us who live elsewhere, unless you happen to be in Bath or Glasgow.
Jesse Norman is right: regional arts deserve more funding.
Betty Fox
Aldridge, Staffordshire

SIR – In the report of the outcome of the investigation into claims that Lord Rennard, who oversees the Liberal Democrats’s policy, had repeatedly harassed female activists, it was stated that no disciplinary action would be taken as it would not be possible to prove the allegations “beyond reasonable doubt”.
This phrase is only appropriate where criminal prosecutions are being considered. In civil matters, such as disciplinary cases, the lower burden of proof is acceptable, ie “on the balance of probabilities”.
I must conclude that if the Liberal Democrat Party disciplinary rules only accept the higher standard of burden of proof, then there is something seriously amiss. Either the inquiry was inadequate, or the party’s standards are incorrect – or both.
David Newman
Keighley, West Yorkshire
Related Articles
Why should the South East get all the best art?
17 Jan 2014
Teacher training
SIR – Sir Michael Wilshaw, the head of Ofsted, claims that two fifths of newly-qualified teachers leave the profession within five years.
He understates the problem: in recent years, up to 40 per cent of trainee teachers have either dropped out before qualifying or failed to find a post.
The School Direct programme should substantially reduce the waste of taxpayers’ money: aspiring teachers must convince a school to put them on the payroll. If they can’t deliver lessons and control pupils, the school is lumbered with a useless trainee.
Likewise, the Teach First programme insists that candidates deliver a practice lesson during the selection process – and 70 per cent are rejected. Their trainees take up a salaried post soon after acceptance.
Teacher training colleges, on the other hand, have a strong incentive to fill places on conventional teacher training programmes even if it means taking a chance on a trainee with questionable potential.
In any case, the value of teacher training has been called into question by three major American studies which found that children taught by uncertified teachers performed just as well as those taught by fully qualified teachers.
Ministers ought to be considering whether the time has come to abolish the Bachelor of Education and the Post Graduate Certificate in Education.
Professor Tom Burkard
Easton, Norfolk
Musical mice
SIR – I’m surprised Richard Taylor’s insurance company didn’t invoke the “vermin exclusion” clause. This is what was quoted to us when, after Christmas, our new piano was visited by a mouse with a weak bladder and sharp teeth. (Have you any idea how much there is inside a piano to interest a mouse?)
We got no payout, and over £300 of work was needed, but at least our children were exonerated; we had blamed them for the scattered nutshells.
Lesley Bright
Haywards Heath, West Sussex
Rear-view running
SIR – James Bamber advocates “reverse running”. This intrigued me. Is it not dangerous? Where do you do it? Do you need mirrors on your arms? I have trouble running forwards. What happens when you come to a hill?
We need more information.
Kevin Platt
Walsall, Staffordshire
Sharing NHS data
SIR – As every household in the country receives a letter from the NHS about the Government’s intention to join up patient records, these plans have been greeted with applause and some criticism. As three of the leading health research foundations in Britain, we are firmly in the applause camp. This NHS data will, for the first time, bring together information on GP care with other sources of data about patient care for the whole country. This will enable patients to be better informed about their care and will allow for more effective research and health service planning.
Our work informing policy and practice relies on rigorously anonymised data. This allows us to assess future demand on the health service, track the progress and success of particular initiatives, and provide national policy makers, local services and commissioners with evidence on how to spend NHS money to improve healthcare, leading to better services and outcomes for patients.
All patient records are subject to strict measures to protect individual identities. Their use is subject to stringent legal and ethical regulation.
An enormous asset of the NHS is data collection on all patients, cradle to grave. This data should be shared far more to improve care and health for us all.
Andy McKeon
Chief Executive, Nuffield Trust
Chris Ham
Chief Executive, The King’s Fund
Dr Jennifer Dixon
Chief Executive, The Health Foundation
London W1
Clocking out
SIR – Why is it only hospital doctors who appear to have been adversely affected by the implementation of the European Working Time Directive? Other professions do not seem to have been seriously affected by this legislation. Can someone explain why this should be?
R N Thomas
Norwich
Reusable diary
SIR – Phillip Crossland’s finding of his unused 1988 diary was more timely than he perhaps realises.
If he keeps it for two more years, he will be able to use it in 2016, when the calendar will be identical.
The handkerchiefs he can use straight away.
Janet Brennan
Totnes, Devon
Practical tips for remembering your Pin
SIR – When memorising a Pin, I find it easier to remember the diagram created by joining up the numbers rather than trying to recall the actual figures in their right order. Drawing the “pattern” of a new Pin several times helps to fix it in my mind.
Richard Shaw
Dunstable, Bedfordshire
SIR – I use my Army numbers, which, as any old soldiers will tell you, are never forgotten. I had an eight-digit number as a recruit and six figures on commissioning.
Anyone who goes to the trouble of researching these numbers should note that I use a combination of the two.
Michael Clemson
Horsmonden, Kent
SIR – With the increasing need for various credit cards I find that a simple, practical way to remember a credit card’s Pin is to use four of the numbers on the card.
They are in front of you each time the card is used, and as long as you remember which ones they are (for example, first four or last four) it avoids having one pin for all cards.
When I was working in a bank in the Eighties, a customer complained bitterly after our banking hall was redecorated.
It transpired that he had written his pin on the wall next to the cash machine and it had been covered up with paint. His view was that his number was no use to anyone so long as he had the card.
Sid Brittin
Staines upon Thames, Surrey

SIR – Peter Oborne’s reference to Robert Boscawen’s loyalty begs the question of whether Boscawen believed that the leaders he followed shared his own principles, even if these same principles led them to different conclusions.
My perception of the Cameron-Osborne leadership is that their predominant principle is ensuring the survival of their respective positions. In that regard, even as a Conservative, I owe them no loyalty whatsover.
Michael Finley
Eastbourne, East Sussex
SIR – Peter Oborne correctly identifies disloyalty as a threat to the Conservatives’ long-term future. Moreover, an obsession with Europe – rated the least important subject to voters in a poll this week – could yet cost the party the next election.
Some Conservative MPs continue to operate under the misapprehension that Ukip’s support derives overwhelmingly from concern about the European Union, despite polling evidence showing the party has become a repository for the “stop the world, I want to get off” protest vote that in previous decades went to the Liberals.
Related Articles
Britain should be able to veto European law
17 Jan 2014
Lib Dem Party rules on Lord Rennard
17 Jan 2014
Why should the South East get all the best art?
17 Jan 2014
General elections are primarily decided by relatively small numbers of non-political floating voters who support the party and leader they most trust to protect themselves and their families from the inevitable swings of the economic cycle. Falling unemployment, stable prices, rising incomes, targeted tax cuts and Thatcherite property-owning aspiration will deliver the Conservatives an overall majority in May 2015; not another debate about Europe.
Philip Duly
Haslemere, Surrey
SIR – While I agree with Peter Oborne that, on balance over the past 200 years, the Conservative Party has been a force for good, it has no God-given right to demand loyalty from its backbenchers when they collectively, and fundamentally, disagree with direction the leadership is taking.
David Cameron’s leadership of the Conservative Party has been a disaster. A significant proportion of what should be Conservative voters do not like Mr Cameron and do not trust him on most issues, particularly on the European Union.
Loyalty is earned through consistent values, trust and integrity, qualities I do not associate with the current Prime Minister.
Howard M Tolman
Epping, Essex
SIR – Peter Oborne has a strange conception of loyalty. What is at stake is loyalty to the principles of conservatism.
Surely defence of the realm – in particular its borders – must be high on the list of these principles. This paramount principle is obviously called into question by our membership of the European Union, which aims to remove all borders in order to create a United States of Europe.
Ron Forrest
Lower Milton, Somerset

Irish Times:

Sir, – The Skinnader clans in Monaghan commend The Irish Times for the recent coverage of our distant relative, Margaret Skinnider (Front page and Supplement, January 17th), whom we claim as our own in the absence of any accurate records to confirm lineage. Having been refused a pension, she is most likely “turning in her grave”, given the present CRC pension debacle; and even though she finally received a pension, it wasn’t as easy a process for her as it was for Paul Kiely.
This is not the type of society she fought for; “Give the money back”, I hear her say. – Yours, etc,
PAUL SKINNADER,
Burnside Road,
Ramelton, Co Donegal.
A chara, – I have been following the story of the CRC and the top-ups for its executives.
I am the mother of a severely disabled man who has been bed-bound for the past year partly because there is no money to purchase a new wheelchair for him. He is on an emergency list for a wheelchair, but we are told that due to lack of funds he will have to wait.
I feel sick I am so upset. – Is mise,
ANNE RYNNE,
Miltown Malbay, Co Clare.
Sir, – Here is an irony that anyone thinking of donating to the Central Remedial Clinic might care to consider: There was probably never a safer time to do so and be sure that the money would go where intended! – Yours, etc,
MJ ROSS-MacDONALD,
Birr, Offaly.
Sir, – Perhaps a spokesman for the Government would explain why it is the HSE that is conducting an investigation into the goings-on in the CRC.
Surely the CRC (and similar bodies) would not be necessary were the services it provides made available by the State/HSE in the first instance.
As a closely related party, the HSE should have no function in conducting an inquiry into the CRC: its antics to date in drip-feeding information at stages when it would gain maximum media exposure is not an ethical or effective way of going about an investigation into a very sensitive matter of huge concern to CRC patients and donors alike.
The investigation should be entrusted to an independent investigator/forensic accountant appointed by the Government, who would be charged with bringing it to a conclusion within very tight timelines.
This would at least contain as far as possible the damage to the charity sector which will only be exacerbated if the HSE is allowed carry on as it has to date – with what must be in its eyes a most welcome deflection from its own shortcomings in the provision of a decent health service. – Yours, etc,
JOE SINGLETON,
St Peter’s Place,
Arklow, Co Wicklow.
A chara, – There is little reference to the elephant in the room when it comes to all the current depressing CRC revelations. That elephant in the room is the Fianna Fáil party. As stated in The Irish Times (Health, November 29th), a number of CRC board members were associated with Bertie Ahern and indeed Paul Kiely was a key member of Ahern’s “Drumcondra Mafia”. The ongoing revelations concerning the CRC should be a prompt reminder to all: we are still paying for what Fianna Fáil’s “cute hoor” politics did and is still doing to this country. Lest we forget and all that. – Is mise,
EF FANNING,
Whitehall Road,
Churchtown, Dublin 14.
Sir, – While I wouldn’t touch Fianna Fáil with a 10-foot pole (or polling card), Taoiseach Enda Kenny’s suggestion that the appalling revelations of the Central Remedial Clinic’s mismanagement of both charitable and public funds are somehow “indicative of a time in Irish politics” that he hoped was long gone” (Home News, January 17th) strikes me as an utter nonsense, seeing that former CEO Paul Kiely resigned in July of last year, and his successor Brian Conlan only last month. The entire travesty beggars belief, if not satire, and Jonathan Swift must be spinning in his grave. – Yours, etc,
ANTHONY GLAVIN
Iveragh Road, Dublin 9.
Sir, – Lady Valerie Goulding must be spinning in her grave. – Yours, etc,
TERRY MOYLAN,
Bluebell Road, Dublin 12.
Sir, – There is no evidence of an independent review and approval process at the Central Remedial Clinic in the determination of the outrageous scale of remuneration, termination and pension arrangements with its former chief executive, or the source of cash to pay these, contrary to basic standards of acceptable institutional governance.
American public charities and private foundations must provide, through Form 990, detailed information about their governance, income and expenses to the Internal Revenue Service in order to maintain tax-exempt status. This information is published on the website of each filing charity and is relied on by some donors and some members of the public as the primary, or sole source, of credible information about a particular charity. Should Irish charities be obliged follow a similar procedure with the Revenue Commissioners and publish tax returns?
The Irish not-for-profit sector claims annual revenues of the order of €5.7 billion, of which 65 per cent is spent on salaries, according to remarks made by Minister for the Environment Phil Hogan in July 2012. Only an estimated €500 million of this revenue was provided through public donations and philanthropy at that time and the bulk of this was from two private foundations, one of which has ceased operations. The State has an overwhelming responsibility to demand high standards of governance from those obtaining taxpayers’ money, as well as donations from the public.
The capacity of the charity sector to redeem public trust, reputation and public voluntary donations will be hugely influenced by their credibility and integrity, expressed through the calibre, competence and independence of their leadership and the standard of transparency and accountability to which they subscribe. – Yours, etc,
MYLES DUFFY,
Bellevue Avenue,
Glenageary, Co Dublin.

Sir, – Margaretta D’Arcy, aged 79 and seriously ill, has been jailed for refusing to promise she will not again protest against the use of Shannon Airport by foreign soldiers in transit to and from a war zone. The history of successive Irish governments in facilitating these transits teaches us that her protest in the past was ineffective, in practical if not in moral terms, and that any likely protest she may make in the future is unlikely to succeed in actively impeding this activity. It cannot be imagined, therefore, she is or will be in a position to cause material danger to anyone.
Nevertheless, she hopes, if her health permits, she may yet be in a position to make her heartfelt moral protest again. In asking her to undertake not to do so, the court in effect asked her to stifle her personal moral outrage, to deny herself the expression of her examined and considered conscience. The State will attempt to justify her imprisonment on the cold, technical grounds that she refused to give an undertaking required by the court. I am appalled that the court required this undertaking in the first place, and sickened that the ordinary human discretion which justice requires of the law was not subsequently exercised in her case. As the decision to imprison Ms D’Arcy was taken by organs of the State, it is not possible to view her incarceration as other than a political act.
All of which said, it is also the case that Ms D’Arcy is one of a growing number of senior citizens being imprisoned for offences technical in nature (such as failing to purchase a TV licence) which nevertheless can hardly be considered, by a reasonable person, serious enough to warrant the severity of imprisonment.
The Prison Service has the discretion to release Ms D’Arcy and many other senior citizens on a number of grounds, human compassion being one, common sense another.
The service should exercise the available power of discretion immediately, but I think it unlikely it will feel confident in doing so without a directive from the Minister for Justice. Alan Shatter, a lawyer himself and a servant of our Republic, should be keenly aware of the humane distinction between law and justice. I look forward to an immediate practical demonstration that he does, in fact, understand and value this vital distinction. – Yours, etc,
THEO DORGAN,
Moyclare Park, Dublin 13.
Sir, – Keep Margaretta D’Arcy in jail and her indomitable spirit before the public to remind us of the price demanded from all those awkward witnesses for social justice and human rights. – Yours, etc,
LELIA DOOLAN,
Kilcolgan, Co Galway.
A chara,   – As Irish artists we are deeply disturbed and outraged at the jailing of artist Margaretta D’Arcy for protesting against the use of Shannon Airport by US warplanes. This grossly inappropriate and shameful treatment of a 79-year-old woman (who has cancer) is made all the more shocking when we consider the State has refused to jail any of the politicians or bankers responsible for the near collapse of the State, yet seeks to jail an elderly artist for standing up for integrity and human rights.
We declare ourselves in complete solidarity with her actions, applaud her bravery in a time of tremendous cowardice, and call for her immediate release. – Yours, etc,
DYLAN TIGHE,
DONAL O’KELLY, OLWEN
FOUÉRÉ, MICHAEL
HARDING, JIMMY FAY &
GER RYAN (On behalf of
240 Irish artists),
C/o Mespil Apartments,
Dublin 4.
Sir, – Margaretta D’Arcy is not in jail for her political beliefs. She is in jail because she broke the law. The particular law she broke has nothing to do with her political beliefs. Granted, she is an elderly woman and I wouldn’t expect or indeed condone her incarceration for very long. However, I must put this question to your outraged correspondents. If she weren’t put in jail for breaking the law, law passed by the democratic will of the Irish people, would this not be a gross injustice to the rest of us? – Yours, etc,
CONAN KENNEDY,
Gore Street,
Killala, Co Mayo.
Sir, – In 2003, I attended anti-war demonstrations in Dublin, Cork and Shannon alongside senior Labour Party figures. Up to 100,000 people marched through Dublin, and tens of thousands mobilised elsewhere across the island. Apart from opposing the planned US invasion of Iraq, we were united in rejecting the use of Shannon Airport by the US war machine. What a difference a decade makes! Several of those senior Labour Party figures are now in government and presiding over the continued misuse of Shannon by the US military. Their volte-face on Irish, ahem, “neutrality” was made plain on Wednesday with the jailing of 79-year-old writer and anti-war activist Margaretta D’Arcy, who is in poor health.
There has been much talk about “economic treason” and outrage against bankers, property developers and politicians who laid our economy low. How many were sent to prison? Yet anti-war activists are jailed for standing by principles once shared by those now in the leadership of the Labour Party. They should hang their heads in shame! Ms D’Arcy is a brave and principled lady. She should be released immediately with a formal apology from the Minister for Justice. – Yours, etc,
FINTAN LANE,
Lennox Place,
Dublin 8.
Sir, – Margaretta D’Arcy’s gravest crime (Home News, January 16th) is her refusal to swear a false oath, while crossing her fingers behind her back. People such as Ms D’Arcy belong in prison, as did Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr and Nelson Mandela. Like these great moral leaders, her uncompromising refusal to trim her sails to the prevailing winds of expediency, and her insistence on acting in accordance with the principles of justice and honesty, have marked her out as a troublemaker who has to be defeated and crushed.
Simply put, Ms D’Arcy had to be incarcerated; how else could the two-faced dishonesty that is our State’s position on neutrality be upheld? – Yours, etc,
CORMAC Mc MAHON,
Tweed Street, Highett,
Victoria,
Australia.
Sir, – Tom O’Gorman is a tremendous loss to the intellectual fabric of our country (Home News, January 14th). He was a highly educated, religious, peaceful and very good-humoured man who did crucial work for, among others, the Iona Institute and the Pro-Life Campaign, behind the scenes and never sought the limelight.
I first encountered Tom O’Gorman when I entered UCD as a student; Tom had graduated by that stage, but he returned often for pro-life events in the university and I was privileged to call him an acquaintance. Ireland is a poorer place since he was killed. May others be inspired, by his good work, to take up his baton. – Yours, etc,
JOHN B REID,
Knapton Road,
Monkstown, Co Dublin.

Sir, – “Swing around into compliance”. – Yours, etc,
MICHAEL CULLEN,
Albert Park,
Sandycove, Co Dublin.
A chara, – “When you were in government.” – Is mise,
CAITRIONA McCLEAN,
Weston Avenue,
Lucan, Co Dublin.
Sir, – Best practice. – Yours, etc,
PATRICK O’BYRNE,
Shandon Crescent,
Phibsborough, Dublin 7.
Sir, – Am I the only one . . . hoping this correspondence ends soon? – Yours, etc,
CHRISTIE COLHOUN,
Cennick Grove,
Gracehill,
Ballymena.
Sir, – An Aussie import, now an epidemic: “No worries”. Somehow it doesn’t sound right without the Aussie accent! – Yours, etc,
MICHAEL ROONEY,
Hillcrest Court,
Knocknacarra,
Galway.

Irish Independent:
* What is it about governments and their highly paid advisers that any new semi-state project, big or small, has first to be submitted to a consultancy firm (at enormous expense) to test its feasibility (a PR term now beaten to death)?
Also in this section
Letters: Only secularism truly allows religious freedom
Letters: Accept the bank guarantee tab, Mr Trichet
So how do we pay these new bills, Mr Noonan?
It baffles me that these backroom geniuses who are regularly headhunted for their skills are so afraid of their shadow, or is it their jobs, that they pass the buck to a consultancy who apparently can charge any fee they like without question and let the taxpayer pay for it.
This latest fee of €50m (and mounting by the hour) ‘to advise’ on a new water scheme is beyond comprehension and an enigma. The original Enigma machine will have to be taken out of the mothballs to decipher all the arithmetical progressions and blacked-out secrets that are emerging.
One wonders where this fairly recent phenomenon began whereby consultancies set themselves up as miracle workers who charge millions of euro for their expertise and get away with it.
Up until now, questions have never been asked, or answers given, about how they arrive at such costs; all very secret and kept under the radar.
Are they some infallible lot sent by God from Mount Sinai to redeem broken-down economies? What is it about the information given that makes it so ‘commercially sensitive’ and shrouded in mystery.
These geniuses weren’t around in Ken Whitaker’s day, yet denied of their priceless knowledge and expertise, he, together with a small band of good men and patriotic workers, got this country out of the doldrums in the 1960s and turned it into a thriving economy in less than a decade. I’m sure there were numerous problems along the way, but I can recall little about large consultancy fees and automatic bonuses.
With the ousting of the old regime and the arrival of the new broom, the public were promised wasteful spending and bad management would be brought to a hurried end. On Enda’s watch, all this would cease.
Today, however, those at newly formed Irish Water, hardly out of the womb, are being guaranteed their bonuses. How about that for arrogance?
The old ways are alive and well and thriving like a newborn calf, while ministers smile glibly and pray, God make me pure, but not just yet.
All we hear from them is blather and gibberish. One could go on and on. The old maxim still holds good: the more things change, the more they remain the same.
CHRISTY WYNNE
BOYLE
GOULDING BETRAYED
* How the wonderful Lady Valerie Goulding, founder of the Central Remedial Clinic in 1951, has been betrayed by all that is taking place.
It is an absolute disgrace that her life’s work which she put into the CRC, seeking nothing for herself except to serve, has become a byword for greed by those who followed on.
You have disgraced yourselves again, Ireland.
ROBERT SULLIVAN
BANTRY, CO CORK
* There are two parts to the dismay people feel as yet more revelations of greed are revealed.
The first part is why so many people, at all levels of the public sector, are so economical with information about how much their remuneration is costing the taxpayer. It’s hard to know whether the public sector is the victim of venal people or whether it has been contaminated by standards of behaviour by some politicians over the last 30 years.
But the second and most important part is the nauseating hypocrisy of those at the very top of the public sector now wringing their hands about how ‘shocked’ they are. When this Government took office, it would seem it did not carry out an audit of every single layer of government to include every single contract across the public sector, and that there is still no central HR database for the public sector where every contract is collated and reviewed to ensure it meets the required standard.
So when we get hot under the collar about the allowances and pensions paid to former charity heads, hospital administrators or consultants, and wonder how this can happen five years into a depression, we should remember the high rates of pay and expenses of our political leaders who have oversight responsibility. Their renumeration is amongst the highest in Europe.
Why doesn’t the media focus on the tax-free unverified expenses and allowances of all the sanctimonious TDs and senators who now think they can sit in judgment of others?
DESMOND FITZGERALD
CANARY WHARF, LONDON
* A recent survey of 40 charities in Ireland showed us that most of the CEOs are paid over €100,000 a year.
May I ask, what in God’s name do they do to justify earning €2,000 a week? This is a disgrace and hard for the generous people of this country to stomach. We really do tolerate too much of this dreadful nonsense. It’s time to stand up and be counted.
BRIAN MC DEVITT
GLENTIES, CO DONEGAL
* Charity begins at home . . . now it’s going to stay there!
K NOLAN
CALDRAGH, CARRICK-ON-SHANNON, CO LEITRIM
* Now we know it wasn’t out of shame or principle that the CRC board resigned en masse last December. Their secretive and repulsive actions have come to light. However, the Perseverance, Action and Competence of the PAC has done a great service in exposing many ugly skeletons in the CRC boardroom cupboard and clearly more to come!
LARRY SHERIN
FOXROCK, DUBLIN 18
CAT CONUNDRUM
* Andrew Lloyd Webber was inspired by them, but I am distracted by a plague of cats. Felines are fine if they keep their distance, but they have become predators of the small birds that nest in my back garden.
Their gruesome handiwork may be natural, as they are hunters by inclination, but it is deeply distressing to behold. Besides, the birds are entitled to sanctuary.
I was hoping one of your readers might have some advice on how to keep these malevolent moggies at bay. I may yet resort to a drone unless a more humane solution is suggested.
C O BRIEN
GREYSTONES CO WICKLOW
H2 WOE IS DROP IN OCEAN
* As the revelations regarding Irish Water unfolds by the day, and staggering amounts of money are drained away, it appears that the Government should have left control of water services with local authorities.
Unlike Wellington Quay (aptly named) and the North Quay in Drogheda, Minister Fergus O’Dowd had little difficulty wading into the issue and stated that “Freedom of Information will apply retrospectively” to Irish Water.
Brilliant! So, O’Dowd hopes that the issue will become stagnant over time, and that our interest will simply evaporate.
But I suppose that this PR disaster is just another drop in the ocean for the Government.
Puns relating to water have run their course and I realise that readers’ patience is not infinite. So I’ll get to the point, The Narrow Water Bridge connecting Down to the said minister’s constituency, Louth, is in limbo because of a shortfall of €18m. This money could not be found, but €50m could be siphoned away merely for consultants.
ALAN CASSIDY
TULLYALLEN, DROGHEDA
TEXT MYOPIA
* Could the myopia of British and American foreign policy be caused by reading 200 million texts a day?
DR JOHN DOHERTY
CNOC AN STOLLAIRE, GAOTH DOBHAIR, CO DONEGAL
Irish Independent

18 January 2014 Car at Last

I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. Captain Povey is trying divide and rule Priceless.

Start to clear out attic for insulation, pick up car, fine but v expensive, and order Thermoblok

Scrabbletoday Mary winand gets over300, Perhaps Iwill win tomorrow.

 

Obituary:

Kate Losinska , who has died aged 89, was a scourge of Left-wing extremism in the trade unions, fighting and ultimately winning a desperate battle for control of the Civil and Public Services Association, the largest Civil Service union, of which she was three times president.

Her marriage to the Polish air ace Stanislaw Losinski made her a staunch opponent of communism, but within the CPSA she faced the Trotskyist Militant Tendency. Militant was disrupting the social security computer centre on Tyneside, and aimed to paralyse Whitehall.

CPSA members (more than 200,000 at its peak) were junior civil servants, relatively few of whom could earn promotion, and thus prey to malcontents. But in Kate Losinska the militants had met their match.

A determined redhead from Croydon who had joined the civil service at 17, she pulled together a coalition to fend them off and — after Militant captured the CPSA’s 37-strong executive — to force them out again. When in 1988 she engineered a clean sweep of the executive’s Militant majority, she declared: “Now I can retire with a glow in my heart.”

For much of her presidency, she had an ally in Alistair Graham, the union’s general secretary, who was forced out in 1986 after what she called “a long-running campaign of political spite”. Militant tried everything to stop her; the Conservative MP Julian Lewis told the Commons she had been “attacked, beaten and tripped downstairs”.

A member of the TUC general council until Militant blocked her renomination, she had no truck with fellow-travelling colleagues. When Arthur Scargill, visiting Russia in 1983, praised the Soviet way of life, she erupted: “If he had been a Russian in Britain and had gone home after saying similar things, he would have been put in a psychiatric hospital.”

Scargill was her bête noir after he attacked the free Polish trade union, Solidarity. Kate Losinska chaired the Solidarnosc Foundation, and after the fall of communism was appointed Knight Commander of the Order of Polonia Restituta. (Her husband, serving with the Polish Air Force, then in bombers with No 301 Squadron, was awarded Poland’s highest military decoration and a DFC).

Kate Losinska had an autocratic streak which led dissident Right-wingers to form a rival slate in the 1986 CPSA elections; the weakened executive fell next year to Militant. Embarrassingly for some, she chaired the Trade Union Committee for European and Transatlantic Understanding, funded by the US Congress and Nato.

She was born Kathleen Mary Conway on October 5 1922 in Croydon; her father was a soldier. From Selhurst Grammar School she entered the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys .

After 40 years as a civil servant and union member, she was elected CPSA president in 1979, and the next year chaired the Council of Civil Service Unions, negotiating for 750,000 staff. At the end of her first three-year term she stepped down to vice-president, being succeeded by Kevin Roddy, prime mover of the disruption in Newcastle. In 1983 she returned, defeating Roddy. Her priority was to block, with Graham, moves to affiliate the traditionally non-partisan CPSA to the Labour Party.

However, Kate Losinska supported strikes against Margaret Thatcher’s barring of the unions from GCHQ, and blamed Tory policies for the narrowness of her re-election in 1984, complaining that they “give moderation a bad name”.

She struggled to contain an executive which had to be stopped by Treasury legal action from becoming the first union to call out its members without a ballot, after one was required by law. Recaptured by Militant in 1987, the executive began appointing the Tendency’s activists as full-time officials at the most vulnerable sites: the DHSS and Department of Employment.

In the run-up to the 1987 general election CPSA members voted by 56-44 per cent to hold strikes over pay. She supported their protest, so was furious when the far Left used the occasion to undermine Graham’s successor, John Ellis. The executive cut Ellis’s salary and took back his union car before she and Ellis regained full control.

In retirement, Kate Losinska saw the CPSA merge with two other unions to form the Public & Commercial Services Union (PCS), under firmly Left-wing leadership. In recent years she lived in Co Limerick.

She was appointed OBE in 1986.

Kate Conway married Stanislaw Losinski in 1942; he died in 2002, and she is survived by their son.

Kate Losinska. Born October 5 1924, died October 16 2013

 

 

 

Guardian:

I suggest you start a column “Sorry to see you go”, to complement your “Good to meet you“. I’m 74 years old, and the sole carer for my disabled daughter, who is 49. I’ve bought the Guardian since my student days in Manchester in the late 1950s. My politics have always been left-of-centre, based on Christian principles. I’ve always voted Labour. I spent 20 years working in industry as a metallurgist, then a further 10 years as a schoolteacher, before ill-health forced my early retirement. Last Saturday my Guardian cost me £2.50, an increase of almost 9%. For my cash, I got glossy travel brochures I don’t want or need, a travel section I discard, and a daft new magazine, Do Something. Your Consumer champions column (which I follow closely) suggests Sky subscribers are unlikely to be Guardian readers. I’m not a Sky customer, but I’m beginning to get the message I’m no longer part of your target readership. Where I go to, if I leave your paper, is problematic.
J Spencer
Warrington, Cheshire

 

A letter from the embassy of Israel (17 January) gives us “a reality check” about the Palestinian cause with the observation that Israel did not “bring over thousands of rockets from Iran and proceed to fire them at its towns and cities”. Quite so: Israel brought its weapons over from the US – Phantoms, F-15s F-16s and Apache helicopters and other state-of-the-art weapons, which have killed far greater numbers of Palestinian non-combatants. “Reality check” indeed.
Kevin Bannon
London

• I wonder if Mr Gates would be so keen on us maintaining a full-spectrum defence capability (Letters, 17 January) if we started using it without US permission. If I recall correctly, the last time we did that was the Suez fiasco by the Eden government (also stuffed with old Etonians).
Jim Pettman
Port de Castelfranc, Anglars-Juillac, France

• Thanks for the front page photo of Kate Moss (17 January). Should she disappear, I’ll now be able to recognise her; I doubt I could do the same for the missing little boy’s tiny picture on an inside page.
Pete Bibby
Sheffield

• If you insist on identifying Stephen Kinnock by reference to his family ties (Pass notes, G2, 16 January), it would be refreshing to find an acknowledgment that his mother has status as a prominent public figure, as well as his father and spouse.
Estella Baker
Leicester

• I am concerned John Bryant has misinterpreted Zoe Williams (Letters, 17 January), and suspect he does not have young children to entertain. As any aficionado of the oeuvre could tell him, her cry of “Dinosaurs!” is a Peppa Pig reference.
Dan Adler
Farnham, Surrey

• Our Japonica is in flower while the burn burst its banks and took a new course through the library (Letters, 15 January). Certainly a record for us.
Pamela Strachan
Broughton, Peeblesshire

• Two bumblebees on my cyclamen this morning. Bless their hearts, if I may say so.
Ann Hawker
London

 

The suggestion that Home Office officials are rewarded for ensuring failed asylum seekers lose tribunal cases is a cause for concern (Report, 15 January). While it is the job of immigration staff to defend decisions in such situations, rewards for meeting quotas could lead to the Home Office delaying cases it fears it will lose. This amounts to toying with the lives of people who have suffered at the hands of oppressive regimes, conflict and political persecution. There can be no fairness in a system that operates like this. The British Red Cross supports more than 10,000 refugees and asylum seekers every year and we see many people driven to destitution by a failing system that is no longer fit for purpose. While the Home Office’s approach to tribunal cases is worrying, the most important part of the process is that the right decisions are made first time, and that asylum seekers in need of protection do not have to go through the gruelling appeals process in the first place.
Nick Scott-Flynn
Head of refugee support, British Red Cross

• The UK has a proud history of granting refuge to those who need it. Claims are carefully considered before a decision is made. Your article seems to make the assumption that every claim for asylum is genuine – sadly this is not the case. Every year we receive numerous cases that are not – and it is right that we reject these claims. Where we are confident that an initial decision is correct, we make no apologies for pursuing the case at appeal.

Asylum cases are complex. Sometimes new evidence comes to light which changes a decision and in these cases we do withdraw. But we make every effort to ensure the right decision is made in the first instance. The public expects us to contest cases which are not genuine and it is not unreasonable to expect our presenting officers to win 70% of these cases. This provides an incentive for staff to ensure only high-quality, defendable decisions go before the courts – which is better for both the claimant and the taxpayer. No caseworker is incentivised to refuse asylum claims and all cases are considered on their individual merits.
Mark Harper
Immigration minister

• Solicitors at my firm spend every day at immigration detention centres representing asylum seekers in the most difficult circumstances. The asylum seekers are detained as soon as they claim asylum. Their case hurtles through the “fast-track” asylum system: interviewed, two days later a decision, two days to lodge an appeal, normally heard within four days. The claimant/appellant has no time to prepare or gather evidence. Her or his solicitor has to ask for permission to see the claimant and there are very limited facilities for such legal visits. All the chips are stacked against the asylum seeker. It is surprising and worrying that, despite all those disadvantages, 30% are granted asylum or win their asylum appeals. It is shocking that Home Office caseworkers, many of whom I have high regard for, are compelled to meet targets by bonus schemes and threats to their jobs.
David Enright
London

 

 

Zoe Williams says that if you place religious belief on the human rights agenda then you have to allow atheism equal weight (Comment, 15 January). It would be better to simply place “religious belief or non-belief” on the agenda. This is because the term “atheist” is freighted with much excess baggage as in the Northern Irish joke: “But are you a Catholic atheist or a Protestant atheist?” What if the asylum seeker in question had pleaded his agnosticism or secularism or humanism? I gave up my belief in pixies and Father Christmas some time ago but that does not make me a positive non-believer in them, possibly with an axe to grind. They are simply not part of my worldview and nor is belief in a deity. The US is by far the most religious western country and yet it maintains a strict separation of church and state where public education is concerned. I wish we did the same.

Some stridently pro-atheism books have appeared in recent years but this can lead to polarisation. The best book I have come across is The Book of Atheist Spirituality by the French philosopher André Comte-Sponville. It is a gentle, good-humoured book which points out that a number of eastern religions have spiritual beliefs without requiring the existence of deity or deities.

Zoe Williams laments that atheists do not organise, but nor do Santa deniers. I belonged to a humanitarian group set up by religious people because what the group did was needed and had nothing directly to do with religion. We can work together for the common good while maintaining diametrically opposed views, we don’t need to set up atheist alternatives to everything. This does not stop us from fighting for a totally secular education system (and for the abolition of private education) with whatever appropriate pressure groups.
Joseph Cocker
Leominster, Herefordshire

• Perhaps in order to get more attention from “people of faith”, we atheists need a version of atheism that is clearly a rational development and improvement over traditional faiths. The traditional God needs to be cut in half. On the one hand, there is the God of cosmic power, Einstein’s God, the underlying unity in the physical universe that determines all that goes on, omnipotent, eternal, omnipresent, but an It, so such that we can forgive it all the terrible things It does. On the other hand, there is the God of cosmic value, all that is of value associated with our human world and the world of sentient life more generally. Having cut the traditional God in two in this way, the problem then is to see how the two halves can be put together again. That is our fundamental problem, of thought and life: How can all that is of value associated with our human world exist and best flourish embedded as it is in the physical universe?
Nicholas Maxwell
Emeritus reader, department of science and technology studies, University College London

• It narks me too that the voice of active unbelievers is treated as irrelevant. Recently, apropos of what I don’t remember, a woman I know looked me in the eye and said: “We are all God’s children.” I was dying to say, “I wouldn’t presume to tell you you’re a grown-up and you should take responsibility for yourself”, for fear I might seem rude. Therein lies the rub. Atheists don’t want that weird certainty over the big questions and answers. I really don’t give a toss what happened before the big bang. My own preoccupation is how on earth we are going to take care of our planet because, sure as anything, God is not a bit bothered about our potential destruction of it. Being an atheist is about taking responsibility for our own actions, putting our raison d’être inside not outside. We have every right to have the same courtesy extended to us as I extend to people of faith.
Judy Marsh
Nottingham

• Zoe Williams’ quote from Richard Dawkins, “there is no such thing as a Muslim baby”, is reminiscent of the words of Lalon Shah (1774-1890), a Bengali mystic, philosopher and songwriter who rejected all distinctions of caste and creed and wrote in a song well-known to many Bengali people: “Do you bear the sign of caste or creed when you come into this world or when you leave it?”
Val Harding
London

We note that the internal review conducted by the Liberal Democrats did not “clear” or “exonerate” Lord Rennard in any sense; indeed the statement cites “evidence of behaviour which violated the personal space and autonomy of the complainants” (Report, 17 January). We deeply regret the failure of Lord Rennard to acknowledge the distress caused to the women involved and his failure to issue an apology at the earliest opportunity following the publication of an internal party investigation into allegations of sexual harassment. We believe that until he apologises and acknowledges the distress that his actions have caused, regardless of intent, he should never have had the Liberal Democrat whip restored and should be barred from any party body or involvement in any party activity that might facilitate a repeat of this situation. No apology; no whip. We note with deep regret the failure of senior members of the parliamentary party to denounce in the strongest possible terms Lord Rennard’s behaviour; the reports of which are described as “credible” by the investigating QC. It is deeply troubling that demands by the leadership for an apology were not clearly linked to sanctions that would include, at a minimum, withdrawal of the party whip. We do recognise that our party’s processes will not currently allow for action to be taken without a criminal-level burden of proof. We are committed to pursuing the vital work to secure improvements to protect our members, and anticipate the full support of our party leadership and the newly appointed pastoral care officer in doing so. We will not rest until our party is a safe space for all, free from sexual harassment and assault, without exception. With this in mind we as members will continue to put pressure on the whips office in the House of Lords with a view to reversing the inappropriate decision to restore Lord Rennard to the Liberal Democrat group.
Naomi Smith Social Liberal Forum, Linda Jack Liberal Left, Caron Lindsay Treasurer, Scottish party James Shaddock Rock The Boat founder, Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera Lib Dem English party diversity champion, Katherine Bavage, Leeds North West, member of Lib Dem Women, James King Co-finance officer, Iain Donaldson Chair, Manchester Gorton Liberal Democrats, Stephen Glenn Northern Ireland, LGBT+ Liberal Democrats Executive, Elizabeth Jewkes City of Chester, member of Lib Dem Women, Timothy J Oliver Hull & Hessle, Angharad B Jones Rhondda Cynon Taff, RCT Lib Dems Membership Officer, Kurt Jewkes City of Chester, Craig O’Donnell Chair of London Liberal Youth, Hywel Morgan Calderdale, Chris Nelson Kettering & Wellingborough (2010 parliamentary candidate, Kettering), Liam Pennington Preston, Cllr Lloyd Harris Regional treasurer, East of England, Deputy leader Dacorum Council Group, Cllr Gareth Aubrey Cardiff and Vale, James King Southport, Liberal Youth Co-Finance Officer, Robin McGhee Bristol, Liberal Youth Co-Finance Officer, Cllr Mark Mills Oxford East, Allan Heron Paisley and Renfrewshire, Callum Leslie Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath, Edinburgh Liberal Youth Treasurer, Scottish conference committee, George Potter Guildford, Guildford Secretary, Linden Parker South Norfolk, Liberal Youth Non-Portfolio Officer, Hannah Bettsworth Edinburgh South, Edinburgh Liberal Youth President, Scottish Women Lib Dems Executive Member, Jack Carr Aberdeenshire West, President, St Andrews University Liberal Democrats, David Evans Aberdeenshire  East, Andrew Page Inverclyde, Zoe O’Connell Cambridge, LGBT+ Liberal Democrats Executive, Ruaraidh Dobson Glasgow North (2010 Candidate Paisley & Renfrewshire North), Euan Davidson President ,Aberdeen University Liberal Democrats, Scottish Conference Committee, Aberdeen Central, South and North Kincardine, Jonathan Wharrad Congleton, Chair, University of Birmingham Liberal Democrats, Samuel Rees (East Dunbartonshire, former IR Cymru Officer) Hywel Owen Davies Preseli-Pembrokeshire, Jezz Palmer Winchester, Jennie Rigg, Chair, Calderdale Liberal Democrats, Euan Cameron Islington Borough, Siobhan Mathers Edinburgh North & Leith, Richard Symonds Tower Hamlets Liberal Democrats, Michael Wilson Stirling Liberal Democrats, James Harrison Edinburgh North and Leith, Callum Morton, Sutton Liberal Democrats, Tommy Long Maidstone Lib Dems Data Officer, Liberal Reform Board Member, Amy Dalrymple Edinburgh North and Leith, Natalie Jester Bristol South, Maria Pretzler Swansea and Gower, Member of the Welsh Policy Committee, Sophie Bridger Chair of Glasgow North Lib Dems, Geoff Payne Hackney LP, Ben Lloyd Cardiff Central (resident in Belfast), Paul Pettinger Westminster Borough and Liberal Youth Vice President, Paul Halliday Newport Party Chair, Amanda Durley Dartford and Gravesham, Daniel Jones Northampton, former Chair Northamptonshire Liberal Youth, East Midlands executive member, Natasha Chapman Lincoln, Chair of Lincoln Liberal Youth, Social Liberal Forum Council Member, Alisdair Calder McGregor Prospective Parliamentary Candidate for the Constituency of Calder Valley (Calderdale Local Party), Robbie Simpson North Glasgow, Liberal Youth Scotland Treasurer, Cllr Robin Popley Chair of Loughborough Liberal Democrats and Shepshed TC, Cllr Henry Vann Bedford Borough, Secretary North Bedfordshire Liberal Democrats, Andrew Crofts Vice Chair of Liberal Youth Saint Albans, Naomi Smith, Co Chair, Social Liberal Forum, Daniel Gale Nottingham, Jonathan Brown Chichester, Member of Ethnic Minority Liberal Democrats, Lib Dem Women & Social Liberal Forum, James Blanchard Huddersfield, GLD Exec, Chris Keating Streatham, Grace Goodlad, Bromley Borough, Norman Fraser Glasgow North, Organiser, Social Liberal Forum (Scotland), Morgan Griffith-David Cardiff and the Vale, Liberal Youth Policy Officer, Peter Brooks Islington, Jessica Rees Swansea, Sanjay Samani Angus North & Mearns, Dr Mohsin Khan Oxford East (Secretary, Oxford East, Policy Chair, South Central Region), Holly Matthies Manchester Gorton (Secretary LGBT+ Lib Dems), Andrew Hickey Manchester Gorton (Member of Social Liberal Forum, LGBT+ Liberal Democrats, Humanist & Secular Liberal Democrats), Duncan Stott Oxford East, Benjamin Krishna Cambridge, Lee Thacker Pontypridd, Rhondda Cynon Taff, Sebastian Bench General Secretary University of Nottingham Liberal Youth, Michael Carchrie Campbell Northern Ireland Liberal Democrats (Member of LGBT+, Social LIberal Forum, Lib Dem Lawyers Association, Liberal Youth), Neil Monnery Southend, Data Officer, Matthew Wilkes North Bristol Liberal Democrats, David Freeborn Oxford East, Adam Bernard Harrow West, Andrew Hinton Data Officer, Shrewsbury & Atcham, Joshua Dixon Chair of Hillingdon Liberal Democrats (Social Liberal Forum Membership Development Officer), Sandra Taylor Altrincham and Sale West, James Brough Calderdale Liberal Democrats, member LGBT+, Harry Matthews Sheffield, Rob Blackie Former London Assembly candidate, member of London Region Executive, Dulwich & West Norwood, Alex Wasyliw Party member, South Cambs, Daisy Benson local councillor and former parliamentary candidate, Reading, Richard Morgan-Ash Hackney, Ryan Cullen Lincoln, Peter Bancroft Westminster, Steven Haynes Liberal Youth Vice Chair, David Franklin, Leeds North East, University of Birmingham Liberal Democrats, Jon Neal former Parliamentary Candidate, Haltemprice & Howden, party trainer and mentor, Cllr Harry Hayfield Lib Dem representative on Llansantffraed Community Council, Ceredigion, WalesMag, Andrew A Kierig, Lib Dems in Brussels and Europe, ALDE Associate, Jennifer Warren Romsey and Southampton North, Duncan Borrowman Bromley Borough, former member federal executive, former national campaigns officer, former parliamentary candidate Old Bexley and Sidcup, former London assembly candidate, Penny Goodman Leeds North West, Secretary of Liberal Democrats for Electoral Reform, Laura Gordon Tonbridge Liberal Youth

 

 

Independent:

 

The Chief Inspector of schools, Sir Michael Wilshaw, says it is a scandal that 40 per cent of teachers leave the profession within five years, and claims this is because they have been inadequately prepared to deal with unruly pupils. I would be interested to know what research this is based on.

In fact, teachers leave the profession for a variety of reasons. Since 1992 one of the main reasons has been Ofsted: an organisation which places schools and teachers under intense pressure. Since 2010 the stress of constant inspection has been intensified by ever-shifting goalposts. What was deemed “good” a few years ago is no longer acceptable.

So how does Sir Michael intend to tackle the problem of teachers leaving? Why, he plans “a tough new inspection regime.”

John Cosgrove

Reading

 

I see that ashen-faced Ofsted supremo Sir Michael Wilshaw has announced yet another tough new inspection regime. He wants to find out whether the training of new teachers has been adequate. Given that 40 per cent are baling out within five years of qualifying I think we can guess the answer.

It is shocking, nonetheless, to hear him say that the dropout rate is to do with ill-discipline in the classroom. He is dead right, of course, but I thought it had long been decided that discipline was a dirty word and that if teachers could only be entertaining enough their pupils would, well, you know, just give up being naughty and, like, learn. Isn’t that what our student teachers are taught?

Martin Murray

London SW2

My daughter, who is a teacher in a secondary school in London, would be writing this herself, but she doesn’t have time. The reason that four out of 10 teachers quit the profession is because of the workload, not inadequate training. My daughter has a full working day, with a full working evening to follow, much of which is spent in unnecessary detailed planning, and marking. The weekend is the same.

When will the Government recognise that something is going wrong? When five, six, or seven out of 10 graduates leave?

Janette Davies   

Bath

 

The ‘blame’ for conceiving a girl

Having read your leading article (16 January) about sex-selective abortion, I am in full agreement that education is a very important part of any solution to the problem. One vital fact should not be overlooked: it is the male gamete that determines the gender of the child.

No woman ought to feel guilty because her child is a girl, but if she can be sure, through education, that only the father is biologically responsible for this fact, she can be released in her own mind from any sense of guilt. She can also feel more powerful to oppose abortion. This might influence any misled female relatives and gain support from them.

P Atyeo

Church Hanborough, Oxfordshire

 

If you are concerned about discrimination against girls and women, what would you do? Would you work to ensure that girls had equal access to education, training and jobs; equal pay; equal rights in marriage; equal rights in inheritance; and access to justice, support and redress if they are sexually abused or raped or beaten up?

Or would you investigate every women of Asian descent to find out whether they may ever have had an abortion because the foetus was female, and investigate all the doctors who provide abortions to find out if they have ever allowed Asian women to have such an abortion, and prosecute them all?

Which would be more effective in combating discrimination? The former, of course.

Why is it, then, that The  Daily Telegraph, Jeremy Hunt, the Tory Secretary of State for Health, and now The Independent, surprisingly, in the name of opposition to gender discrimination, appear to be pursuing the latter course?

Their stance supports foetal rights. That is, it supports the right of a fetus to be born if it is female. This raises the question: can you support the right of even one foetus to be born, and still support women’s right to have an abortion?

Marge Berer

Editor, Reproductive Health Matters, London NW5

Fighting within our means

Mary Dejevsky (17 January)  says that the UK should live and fight within its means and that Cameron and Co are trying to do this, despite what former US Secretary of State Robert Gates has to say (as an aside from touting his new book over here).

If so, why are we building two huge aircraft carriers? They will cost over £7bn, and that does not include the cost of the aircraft to go on top of them. We could be living in a Britain of a century ago – big poverty at home, big warships at sea.

Vaughan Grylls

London WC1

 

In the context of Britain’s military funding crisis and American worries about whether we can pull our weight, I am reminded that in 1588 we saw off the Spanish armada with a fleet of 197 ships, only 34 of which belonged to the Royal Navy while 163 were privately owned.

Perhaps the current Queen Elizabeth should take a leaf out of her illustrious namesake’s book, and hand the lion’s share of the defence of her realm over to private enterprise. After all, entrepreneurs are now running everything else. Who wouldn’t like to see Sir Richard Branson launch his own aircraft carrier?

Paul Dunwell

Bedford

Where is the new Robert Mark?

Sir Robert Mark, on taking over as Commissioner of the Met over 40 years ago, famously said: “The test of a good police force is that it catches more criminals than it employs… the Met is currently failing that test.”  Mark confronted corruption head on. It appears, however, that after his retirement the cancer returned.

Is there another Robert Mark capable of the radical surgery necessary to delivering a reliable police force? No one doubts the honesty of many police officers of all ranks, but the exposure of police corruption over the past years, that has culminated in your publishing of parts of the in-depth internal enquiry named Operation Tiberius, is evidence that the scale of the problem goes far beyond “a few rotten apples”, and is bolstered by a supremely arrogant Police Federation.

Clearly, the direct impact an infiltrated criminal justice system has on the public makes institutional failures in this area the most alarming.

Serena Wylde

London SW15

 

The claim that secret networks of Freemasons have been used by organised crime gangs to corrupt the criminal justice system is an allegation that United Grand Lodge of England completely refutes (“Revealed: how gangs used the Freemasons to corrupt police”, 13 January).

The story refers to historic inquiries – Operation Tiberius and Project Riverside – which, we understand, closed years ago, and neither the police nor the Serious Organised Crime Agency has ever contacted us with regard to any inquiries concerning these operations. United Grand Lodge of England has not seen copies of the reports to which your report refers.

United Grand Lodge of England welcomes and strongly urges total transparency in every aspect of such investigations and we would eagerly assist the relevant authorities with any inquiries if we are approached or if we know of any way that we can voluntarily do so. Criminal activity is completely unacceptable within the organisation and totally alien to our values and any member found to be involved would instantly be removed.

Mike Baker

Director of Communications, The United Grand Lodge of England, London WC2

Catastrophe in Syria

The report of starvation in the Syrian refugee camp in Yarmouk (17 January) was harrowing. According to the piece, “Pro-Assad Palestinian factions blame the presence of 2,500 rebel fighters in the camp for the length of the siege.” Presumably, these “fighters” are Sunnis.

While the West beats itself up over this catastrophe, the wealthy Middle Eastern powers have remained silent. Shouldn’t they take some responsibility? Why have they not been invited to take part in the Geneva talks?

John Gordon

Twickenham, Middlesex

British art goes abroad

“Premium Bacon, but will anyone pay £30m to bring it home?” asks your headline (16 January), on the forthcoming sale of a Francis Bacon painting.

Must British art be only for the British? If Turner had not bequeathed the bulk of his work to the nation he would be better known and respected abroad than he is, and British art would have greater universal consequence than it does.

Peter Forster

London N4

Sinister precedent

Political scientists have a label for the overlap Owen Jones (16 January) suggests between socialism and Ukippery. They call it National Socialism.

Philip Goldenberg

Woking, Surre

 

 

Times:

 

It has been one year since the horsemeat scandal — and still there are daily revelations of consumer saftey violations

Sir, The first anniversary of the horsemeat scandal in the UK brings no cause for celebration. There are daily revelations of consumer safety violations and of the wanton abuse of live animals caught up in absurdly long supply chains that meander across Europe. The situation invites interference at every stage and features rotting carcases, widespread adulteration of animal products, and horse posturing as beef, pork and lamb, often destined for the most vulnerable.

Government action in response to these egregious abuses has been muted, its only ongoing step the Elliott review, whose narrowly drawn remit is to address “consumer confidence in the authenticity of all food products”.

The danger is overemphasis on effects rather than causes. Thus while a dedicated food crime unit is overdue to tackle individual cases of fraud, trust will not be restored until the wider issues are rigorously addressed: convoluted trans-European supply chains, the activities of the food processing companies, ongoing entrenchment of power with the big retailers, the continuing failure of regulators and supermarkets to detect repeated instances of food adulteration, and the lack of vigilance as to animal welfare in food production.

The Defra Secretary, Owen Paterson, claims that “the UK food industry already has robust procedures to ensure they deliver high-quality food to consumers”. This sits uneasily with our recent food crises, such as salmonella in eggs, BSE, foot and mouth disease, unlawful antibiotics in meat and honey, chemical contaminants in fish and horsemeat.

The situation reflects successive governments’ inability to keep pace with rapid changes in food production, ever greater industrialisation and globalisation of food production and the shift of power to the large vested interests.

The new austerity has depleted Defra (the body charged with controlling food supply chains) and has hit an already diminished Food Standards Agency and the ability of local authorities too to meet their food safety and hygiene responsibilities when pitched against the heavily resourced vested interests.

In 2013 I chaired an independent review commissioned by the RSPCA into Freedom Food, the leading farmed-animal welfare assurance scheme. The former Defra Secretary, Caroline Spelman, and Professor David Main served on my panel. Evidence came from every interest and shade of opinion. The recommendations of the McNair Report reinforce my view that a new openness and transparency by retailers to consumers is central to restoring public confidence.

Root-and-branch reform of our regulatory system is required to deliver traceability, accountability and intelligible labelling and proper standards of welfare for farmed animals. Authoritative research consistently links animal wellbeing to meat of a higher nutritional quality.

Recent polls by Populus show that more than three quarters of us would gain confidence in the food chain if farmed animal welfare standards improved.

A new political will is needed to build a robust, durable and properly funded food regulatory system committed to recovering consumer safety and demonstrating proper standards of animal welfare.

Duncan McNair

Chairman, McNair Inquiry and Report (rspca.org.uk)

 

 

Most serving and retired police officers will not be surprised by the fact that crime statistics are unreliable

Sir, The revelation that crime statistics are unreliable (Jan 16) will not surprise most serving and retired police officers. I suspect that only politicians and, possibly, a very few senior police officers have any faith in them at all.

Little has changed since I joined the service in 1966: robbery recorded as theft, burglary as criminal damage, theft as lost property, and many crimes not recorded at all.

I was always gently amused when officers, usually the CID, would persuade some hapless individual to “cough” to all sorts of offences (which he generally had not committed) in return for the promise of a word in the right ear, to ensure that the sentence for whatever offence he had committed would be less than he might otherwise expect. This sometimes resulted in more crimes apparently being detected in the sub-division than had actually occurred.

The Rev B. H. Stevens
Great Billing, Northants

 

 

We are told how to be slimmer and healthier to improve our lives — but what about thinking of others to make us happy

Sir, Your quick-fix list “How to be happier in 2014” (Jan 17) highlights a sickness in our society. Advised from every quarter how to be slimmer, fitter, healthier, we seem to have turned in on ourselves. What happened to service to and consideration for our fellow men? “Volunteer” appears at a humble 19th place on your list.

Anthea Richardson
London, SW19

 

Is it fair to fine parents £1,000 if they want to take their children out of school during term for a holiday?

Sir, The £1,000 fine on parents from Telford who took their children out of school for a short holiday in September is a disgrace (Thunderer, Jan 17).

It is reported that the holiday was booked before the recent change in the regulations and the father’s job meant he couldn’t take leave last summer. Not everyone can take their holiday when schools are closed. There will be thousands of families in the same position who are now faced with a choice between a holiday at peak times that they can’t afford or no holiday at all. The law on school attendance was never intended to be used in situations like this where just a few isolated days are involved.

As a former Education Welfare Team Leader, I think this is petty and unreasonable when so many more children are genuinely missing school to a greater extent.

Ben Whitney
Wolverhampton

Sir, As a retired teacher who has spent a lifetime of having to take holidays in the allotted school breaks, I would urge any parents thinking of taking their holidays in term time to ask themselves how they would feel if their children came home and said they would not be having any maths lessons for the next two weeks because the teacher had taken a holiday.

Multiply that by any number of other subjects and see what their reaction would be.

Roger Cleland
Lymm, Cheshire

 

4

The residents of James Turner Street have been filmed for almost two years — and they want the broadcasting to continue

Sir, Your letter about Benefits Street (Jan 17) does not represent the views of all the residents on James Turner Street. The team from Love Productions have been on James Turner Street for nearly two years and have daily contact with the contributors. Many of them are asking us to keep broadcasting the series because forthcoming episodes continue to show strong friendships and community spirit during difficult times. We are proud of the series, which provides a broad-ranging portrait of the street and includes positive stories from those who work, from those striving to get work and from residents who support one another through the challenges they face.

The series does not set out to reflect the experiences of every person who receives benefits but it has triggered a national debate about welfare at a time when welfare reforms are being proposed. In response to this we have commissioned a live studio debate which will air directly after the final episode to provide a forum in which these issues can be raised and discussed. All views across the political spectrum will be represented.

Nick Mirsky
Head of Documentaries, Channel 4

Sir, Daniel Finkelstein (Jan 15) is right to suggest Benefits Street poses a serious challenge to people of all political persuasions but not for the reasons he advances. You cannot divide society into those who work and those who receive benefits. Two thirds of poor children live in working families, so many hardworking parents are taxpayers and benefit recipients — for example, relying on tax credits to boost meagre earnings.

The simple truth is nearly everyone who receives benefits — whether they have lost their job, are in low pay, ill or disabled, retired or caring for a loved one — has worked, is working or will soon work. The challenge to politicians is to remember that those on benefits are people like us, not a group of people with values different from everyone else.

Alison Garnham
Child Poverty Action Group

 

 

Telegraph:

 

 

SIR – Richard Dorment lists the artistic delights available to those who live in the capital and the South East, but has little to offer those of us who live elsewhere, unless you happen to be in Bath or Glasgow.

Jesse Norman is right: regional arts deserve more funding.

Betty Fox
Aldridge, Staffordshire

 

SIR – In the report of the outcome of the investigation into claims that Lord Rennard, who oversees the Liberal Democrats’s policy, had repeatedly harassed female activists, it was stated that no disciplinary action would be taken as it would not be possible to prove the allegations “beyond reasonable doubt”.

This phrase is only appropriate where criminal prosecutions are being considered. In civil matters, such as disciplinary cases, the lower burden of proof is acceptable, ie “on the balance of probabilities”.

I must conclude that if the Liberal Democrat Party disciplinary rules only accept the higher standard of burden of proof, then there is something seriously amiss. Either the inquiry was inadequate, or the party’s standards are incorrect – or both.

David Newman
Keighley, West Yorkshire

Teacher training

SIR – Sir Michael Wilshaw, the head of Ofsted, claims that two fifths of newly-qualified teachers leave the profession within five years.

He understates the problem: in recent years, up to 40 per cent of trainee teachers have either dropped out before qualifying or failed to find a post.

The School Direct programme should substantially reduce the waste of taxpayers’ money: aspiring teachers must convince a school to put them on the payroll. If they can’t deliver lessons and control pupils, the school is lumbered with a useless trainee.

Likewise, the Teach First programme insists that candidates deliver a practice lesson during the selection process – and 70 per cent are rejected. Their trainees take up a salaried post soon after acceptance.

Teacher training colleges, on the other hand, have a strong incentive to fill places on conventional teacher training programmes even if it means taking a chance on a trainee with questionable potential.

In any case, the value of teacher training has been called into question by three major American studies which found that children taught by uncertified teachers performed just as well as those taught by fully qualified teachers.

Ministers ought to be considering whether the time has come to abolish the Bachelor of Education and the Post Graduate Certificate in Education.

Professor Tom Burkard
Easton, Norfolk

Musical mice

SIR – I’m surprised Richard Taylor’s insurance company didn’t invoke the “vermin exclusion” clause. This is what was quoted to us when, after Christmas, our new piano was visited by a mouse with a weak bladder and sharp teeth. (Have you any idea how much there is inside a piano to interest a mouse?)

We got no payout, and over £300 of work was needed, but at least our children were exonerated; we had blamed them for the scattered nutshells.

Lesley Bright
Haywards Heath, West Sussex

Rear-view running

SIR – James Bamber advocates “reverse running”. This intrigued me. Is it not dangerous? Where do you do it? Do you need mirrors on your arms? I have trouble running forwards. What happens when you come to a hill?

We need more information.

Kevin Platt
Walsall, Staffordshire

Sharing NHS data

SIR – As every household in the country receives a letter from the NHS about the Government’s intention to join up patient records, these plans have been greeted with applause and some criticism. As three of the leading health research foundations in Britain, we are firmly in the applause camp. This NHS data will, for the first time, bring together information on GP care with other sources of data about patient care for the whole country. This will enable patients to be better informed about their care and will allow for more effective research and health service planning.

Our work informing policy and practice relies on rigorously anonymised data. This allows us to assess future demand on the health service, track the progress and success of particular initiatives, and provide national policy makers, local services and commissioners with evidence on how to spend NHS money to improve healthcare, leading to better services and outcomes for patients.

All patient records are subject to strict measures to protect individual identities. Their use is subject to stringent legal and ethical regulation.

An enormous asset of the NHS is data collection on all patients, cradle to grave. This data should be shared far more to improve care and health for us all.

Andy McKeon
Chief Executive, Nuffield Trust
Chris Ham
Chief Executive, The King’s Fund
Dr Jennifer Dixon
Chief Executive, The Health Foundation
London W1

Clocking out

SIR – Why is it only hospital doctors who appear to have been adversely affected by the implementation of the European Working Time Directive? Other professions do not seem to have been seriously affected by this legislation. Can someone explain why this should be?

R N Thomas
Norwich

Reusable diary

SIR Phillip Crossland’s finding of his unused 1988 diary was more timely than he perhaps realises.

If he keeps it for two more years, he will be able to use it in 2016, when the calendar will be identical.

The handkerchiefs he can use straight away.

Janet Brennan
Totnes, Devon

Practical tips for remembering your Pin

SIR – When memorising a Pin, I find it easier to remember the diagram created by joining up the numbers rather than trying to recall the actual figures in their right order. Drawing the “pattern” of a new Pin several times helps to fix it in my mind.

Richard Shaw
Dunstable, Bedfordshire

SIR – I use my Army numbers, which, as any old soldiers will tell you, are never forgotten. I had an eight-digit number as a recruit and six figures on commissioning.

Anyone who goes to the trouble of researching these numbers should note that I use a combination of the two.

Michael Clemson
Horsmonden, Kent

SIR – With the increasing need for various credit cards I find that a simple, practical way to remember a credit card’s Pin is to use four of the numbers on the card.

They are in front of you each time the card is used, and as long as you remember which ones they are (for example, first four or last four) it avoids having one pin for all cards.

When I was working in a bank in the Eighties, a customer complained bitterly after our banking hall was redecorated.

It transpired that he had written his pin on the wall next to the cash machine and it had been covered up with paint. His view was that his number was no use to anyone so long as he had the card.

Sid Brittin
Staines upon Thames, Surrey

 

SIR – Peter Oborne’s reference to Robert Boscawen’s loyalty begs the question of whether Boscawen believed that the leaders he followed shared his own principles, even if these same principles led them to different conclusions.

My perception of the Cameron-Osborne leadership is that their predominant principle is ensuring the survival of their respective positions. In that regard, even as a Conservative, I owe them no loyalty whatsover.

Michael Finley
Eastbourne, East Sussex

SIR – Peter Oborne correctly identifies disloyalty as a threat to the Conservatives’ long-term future. Moreover, an obsession with Europe – rated the least important subject to voters in a poll this week – could yet cost the party the next election.

Some Conservative MPs continue to operate under the misapprehension that Ukip’s support derives overwhelmingly from concern about the European Union, despite polling evidence showing the party has become a repository for the “stop the world, I want to get off” protest vote that in previous decades went to the Liberals.

General elections are primarily decided by relatively small numbers of non-political floating voters who support the party and leader they most trust to protect themselves and their families from the inevitable swings of the economic cycle. Falling unemployment, stable prices, rising incomes, targeted tax cuts and Thatcherite property-owning aspiration will deliver the Conservatives an overall majority in May 2015; not another debate about Europe.

Philip Duly
Haslemere, Surrey

SIR – While I agree with Peter Oborne that, on balance over the past 200 years, the Conservative Party has been a force for good, it has no God-given right to demand loyalty from its backbenchers when they collectively, and fundamentally, disagree with direction the leadership is taking.

David Cameron’s leadership of the Conservative Party has been a disaster. A significant proportion of what should be Conservative voters do not like Mr Cameron and do not trust him on most issues, particularly on the European Union.

Loyalty is earned through consistent values, trust and integrity, qualities I do not associate with the current Prime Minister.

Howard M Tolman
Epping, Essex

SIR – Peter Oborne has a strange conception of loyalty. What is at stake is loyalty to the principles of conservatism.

Surely defence of the realm – in particular its borders – must be high on the list of these principles. This paramount principle is obviously called into question by our membership of the European Union, which aims to remove all borders in order to create a United States of Europe.

Ron Forrest
Lower Milton, Somerset

 

 

Irish Times:

 

Sir, – The Skinnader clans in Monaghan commend The Irish Times for the recent coverage of our distant relative, Margaret Skinnider (Front page and Supplement, January 17th), whom we claim as our own in the absence of any accurate records to confirm lineage. Having been refused a pension, she is most likely “turning in her grave”, given the present CRC pension debacle; and even though she finally received a pension, it wasn’t as easy a process for her as it was for Paul Kiely.

This is not the type of society she fought for; “Give the money back”, I hear her say. – Yours, etc,

PAUL SKINNADER,

Burnside Road,

Ramelton, Co Donegal.

A chara, – I have been following the story of the CRC and the top-ups for its executives.

I am the mother of a severely disabled man who has been bed-bound for the past year partly because there is no money to purchase a new wheelchair for him. He is on an emergency list for a wheelchair, but we are told that due to lack of funds he will have to wait.

I feel sick I am so upset. – Is mise,

ANNE RYNNE,

Miltown Malbay, Co Clare.

Sir, – Here is an irony that anyone thinking of donating to the Central Remedial Clinic might care to consider: There was probably never a safer time to do so and be sure that the money would go where intended! – Yours, etc,

MJ ROSS-MacDONALD,

Birr, Offaly.

Sir, – Perhaps a spokesman for the Government would explain why it is the HSE that is conducting an investigation into the goings-on in the CRC.

Surely the CRC (and similar bodies) would not be necessary were the services it provides made available by the State/HSE in the first instance.

As a closely related party, the HSE should have no function in conducting an inquiry into the CRC: its antics to date in drip-feeding information at stages when it would gain maximum media exposure is not an ethical or effective way of going about an investigation into a very sensitive matter of huge concern to CRC patients and donors alike.

The investigation should be entrusted to an independent investigator/forensic accountant appointed by the Government, who would be charged with bringing it to a conclusion within very tight timelines.

This would at least contain as far as possible the damage to the charity sector which will only be exacerbated if the HSE is allowed carry on as it has to date – with what must be in its eyes a most welcome deflection from its own shortcomings in the provision of a decent health service. – Yours, etc,

JOE SINGLETON,

St Peter’s Place,

Arklow, Co Wicklow.

A chara, – There is little reference to the elephant in the room when it comes to all the current depressing CRC revelations. That elephant in the room is the Fianna Fáil party. As stated in The Irish Times (Health, November 29th), a number of CRC board members were associated with Bertie Ahern and indeed Paul Kiely was a key member of Ahern’s “Drumcondra Mafia”. The ongoing revelations concerning the CRC should be a prompt reminder to all: we are still paying for what Fianna Fáil’s “cute hoor” politics did and is still doing to this country. Lest we forget and all that. – Is mise,

EF FANNING,

Whitehall Road,

Churchtown, Dublin 14.

Sir, – While I wouldn’t touch Fianna Fáil with a 10-foot pole (or polling card), Taoiseach Enda Kenny’s suggestion that the appalling revelations of the Central Remedial Clinic’s mismanagement of both charitable and public funds are somehow “indicative of a time in Irish politics” that he hoped was long gone” (Home News, January 17th) strikes me as an utter nonsense, seeing that former CEO Paul Kiely resigned in July of last year, and his successor Brian Conlan only last month. The entire travesty beggars belief, if not satire, and Jonathan Swift must be spinning in his grave. – Yours, etc,

ANTHONY GLAVIN

Iveragh Road, Dublin 9.

Sir, – Lady Valerie Goulding must be spinning in her grave. – Yours, etc,

TERRY MOYLAN,

Bluebell Road, Dublin 12.

Sir, – There is no evidence of an independent review and approval process at the Central Remedial Clinic in the determination of the outrageous scale of remuneration, termination and pension arrangements with its former chief executive, or the source of cash to pay these, contrary to basic standards of acceptable institutional governance.

American public charities and private foundations must provide, through Form 990, detailed information about their governance, income and expenses to the Internal Revenue Service in order to maintain tax-exempt status. This information is published on the website of each filing charity and is relied on by some donors and some members of the public as the primary, or sole source, of credible information about a particular charity. Should Irish charities be obliged follow a similar procedure with the Revenue Commissioners and publish tax returns?

The Irish not-for-profit sector claims annual revenues of the order of €5.7 billion, of which 65 per cent is spent on salaries, according to remarks made by Minister for the Environment Phil Hogan in July 2012. Only an estimated €500 million of this revenue was provided through public donations and philanthropy at that time and the bulk of this was from two private foundations, one of which has ceased operations. The State has an overwhelming responsibility to demand high standards of governance from those obtaining taxpayers’ money, as well as donations from the public.

The capacity of the charity sector to redeem public trust, reputation and public voluntary donations will be hugely influenced by their credibility and integrity, expressed through the calibre, competence and independence of their leadership and the standard of transparency and accountability to which they subscribe. – Yours, etc,

MYLES DUFFY,

Bellevue Avenue,

Glenageary, Co Dublin.

 

 

Sir, – Margaretta D’Arcy, aged 79 and seriously ill, has been jailed for refusing to promise she will not again protest against the use of Shannon Airport by foreign soldiers in transit to and from a war zone. The history of successive Irish governments in facilitating these transits teaches us that her protest in the past was ineffective, in practical if not in moral terms, and that any likely protest she may make in the future is unlikely to succeed in actively impeding this activity. It cannot be imagined, therefore, she is or will be in a position to cause material danger to anyone.

Nevertheless, she hopes, if her health permits, she may yet be in a position to make her heartfelt moral protest again. In asking her to undertake not to do so, the court in effect asked her to stifle her personal moral outrage, to deny herself the expression of her examined and considered conscience. The State will attempt to justify her imprisonment on the cold, technical grounds that she refused to give an undertaking required by the court. I am appalled that the court required this undertaking in the first place, and sickened that the ordinary human discretion which justice requires of the law was not subsequently exercised in her case. As the decision to imprison Ms D’Arcy was taken by organs of the State, it is not possible to view her incarceration as other than a political act.

All of which said, it is also the case that Ms D’Arcy is one of a growing number of senior citizens being imprisoned for offences technical in nature (such as failing to purchase a TV licence) which nevertheless can hardly be considered, by a reasonable person, serious enough to warrant the severity of imprisonment.

The Prison Service has the discretion to release Ms D’Arcy and many other senior citizens on a number of grounds, human compassion being one, common sense another.

The service should exercise the available power of discretion immediately, but I think it unlikely it will feel confident in doing so without a directive from the Minister for Justice. Alan Shatter, a lawyer himself and a servant of our Republic, should be keenly aware of the humane distinction between law and justice. I look forward to an immediate practical demonstration that he does, in fact, understand and value this vital distinction. – Yours, etc,

THEO DORGAN,

Moyclare Park, Dublin 13.

Sir, – Keep Margaretta D’Arcy in jail and her indomitable spirit before the public to remind us of the price demanded from all those awkward witnesses for social justice and human rights. – Yours, etc,

LELIA DOOLAN,

Kilcolgan, Co Galway.

A chara,   – As Irish artists we are deeply disturbed and outraged at the jailing of artist Margaretta D’Arcy for protesting against the use of Shannon Airport by US warplanes. This grossly inappropriate and shameful treatment of a 79-year-old woman (who has cancer) is made all the more shocking when we consider the State has refused to jail any of the politicians or bankers responsible for the near collapse of the State, yet seeks to jail an elderly artist for standing up for integrity and human rights.

We declare ourselves in complete solidarity with her actions, applaud her bravery in a time of tremendous cowardice, and call for her immediate release. – Yours, etc,

DYLAN TIGHE,

DONAL O’KELLY, OLWEN

FOUÉRÉ, MICHAEL

HARDING, JIMMY FAY &

GER RYAN (On behalf of

240 Irish artists),

C/o Mespil Apartments,

Dublin 4.

Sir, – Margaretta D’Arcy is not in jail for her political beliefs. She is in jail because she broke the law. The particular law she broke has nothing to do with her political beliefs. Granted, she is an elderly woman and I wouldn’t expect or indeed condone her incarceration for very long. However, I must put this question to your outraged correspondents. If she weren’t put in jail for breaking the law, law passed by the democratic will of the Irish people, would this not be a gross injustice to the rest of us? – Yours, etc,

CONAN KENNEDY,

Gore Street,

Killala, Co Mayo.

Sir, – In 2003, I attended anti-war demonstrations in Dublin, Cork and Shannon alongside senior Labour Party figures. Up to 100,000 people marched through Dublin, and tens of thousands mobilised elsewhere across the island. Apart from opposing the planned US invasion of Iraq, we were united in rejecting the use of Shannon Airport by the US war machine. What a difference a decade makes! Several of those senior Labour Party figures are now in government and presiding over the continued misuse of Shannon by the US military. Their volte-face on Irish, ahem, “neutrality” was made plain on Wednesday with the jailing of 79-year-old writer and anti-war activist Margaretta D’Arcy, who is in poor health.

There has been much talk about “economic treason” and outrage against bankers, property developers and politicians who laid our economy low. How many were sent to prison? Yet anti-war activists are jailed for standing by principles once shared by those now in the leadership of the Labour Party. They should hang their heads in shame! Ms D’Arcy is a brave and principled lady. She should be released immediately with a formal apology from the Minister for Justice. – Yours, etc,

FINTAN LANE,

Lennox Place,

Dublin 8.

Sir, – Margaretta D’Arcy’s gravest crime (Home News, January 16th) is her refusal to swear a false oath, while crossing her fingers behind her back. People such as Ms D’Arcy belong in prison, as did Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr and Nelson Mandela. Like these great moral leaders, her uncompromising refusal to trim her sails to the prevailing winds of expediency, and her insistence on acting in accordance with the principles of justice and honesty, have marked her out as a troublemaker who has to be defeated and crushed.

Simply put, Ms D’Arcy had to be incarcerated; how else could the two-faced dishonesty that is our State’s position on neutrality be upheld? – Yours, etc,

CORMAC Mc MAHON,

Tweed Street, Highett,

Victoria,

Australia.

Sir, – Tom O’Gorman is a tremendous loss to the intellectual fabric of our country (Home News, January 14th). He was a highly educated, religious, peaceful and very good-humoured man who did crucial work for, among others, the Iona Institute and the Pro-Life Campaign, behind the scenes and never sought the limelight.

I first encountered Tom O’Gorman when I entered UCD as a student; Tom had graduated by that stage, but he returned often for pro-life events in the university and I was privileged to call him an acquaintance. Ireland is a poorer place since he was killed. May others be inspired, by his good work, to take up his baton. – Yours, etc,

JOHN B REID,

Knapton Road,

Monkstown, Co Dublin.

 

 

Sir, – “Swing around into compliance”. – Yours, etc,

MICHAEL CULLEN,

Albert Park,

Sandycove, Co Dublin.

A chara, – “When you were in government.” – Is mise,

CAITRIONA McCLEAN,

Weston Avenue,

Lucan, Co Dublin.

Sir, – Best practice. – Yours, etc,

PATRICK O’BYRNE,

Shandon Crescent,

Phibsborough, Dublin 7.

Sir, – Am I the only one . . . hoping this correspondence ends soon? – Yours, etc,

CHRISTIE COLHOUN,

Cennick Grove,

Gracehill,

Ballymena.

Sir, – An Aussie import, now an epidemic: “No worries”. Somehow it doesn’t sound right without the Aussie accent! – Yours, etc,

MICHAEL ROONEY,

Hillcrest Court,

Knocknacarra,

Galway.

 

Irish Independent:

* What is it about governments and their highly paid advisers that any new semi-state project, big or small, has first to be submitted to a consultancy firm (at enormous expense) to test its feasibility (a PR term now beaten to death)?

Also in this section

Letters: Only secularism truly allows religious freedom

Letters: Accept the bank guarantee tab, Mr Trichet

So how do we pay these new bills, Mr Noonan?

It baffles me that these backroom geniuses who are regularly headhunted for their skills are so afraid of their shadow, or is it their jobs, that they pass the buck to a consultancy who apparently can charge any fee they like without question and let the taxpayer pay for it.

This latest fee of €50m (and mounting by the hour) ‘to advise’ on a new water scheme is beyond comprehension and an enigma. The original Enigma machine will have to be taken out of the mothballs to decipher all the arithmetical progressions and blacked-out secrets that are emerging.

One wonders where this fairly recent phenomenon began whereby consultancies set themselves up as miracle workers who charge millions of euro for their expertise and get away with it.

Up until now, questions have never been asked, or answers given, about how they arrive at such costs; all very secret and kept under the radar.

Are they some infallible lot sent by God from Mount Sinai to redeem broken-down economies? What is it about the information given that makes it so ‘commercially sensitive’ and shrouded in mystery.

These geniuses weren’t around in Ken Whitaker’s day, yet denied of their priceless knowledge and expertise, he, together with a small band of good men and patriotic workers, got this country out of the doldrums in the 1960s and turned it into a thriving economy in less than a decade. I’m sure there were numerous problems along the way, but I can recall little about large consultancy fees and automatic bonuses.

With the ousting of the old regime and the arrival of the new broom, the public were promised wasteful spending and bad management would be brought to a hurried end. On Enda’s watch, all this would cease.

Today, however, those at newly formed Irish Water, hardly out of the womb, are being guaranteed their bonuses. How about that for arrogance?

The old ways are alive and well and thriving like a newborn calf, while ministers smile glibly and pray, God make me pure, but not just yet.

All we hear from them is blather and gibberish. One could go on and on. The old maxim still holds good: the more things change, the more they remain the same.

CHRISTY WYNNE

BOYLE

GOULDING BETRAYED

* How the wonderful Lady Valerie Goulding, founder of the Central Remedial Clinic in 1951, has been betrayed by all that is taking place.

It is an absolute disgrace that her life’s work which she put into the CRC, seeking nothing for herself except to serve, has become a byword for greed by those who followed on.

You have disgraced yourselves again, Ireland.

ROBERT SULLIVAN

BANTRY, CO CORK

* There are two parts to the dismay people feel as yet more revelations of greed are revealed.

The first part is why so many people, at all levels of the public sector, are so economical with information about how much their remuneration is costing the taxpayer. It’s hard to know whether the public sector is the victim of venal people or whether it has been contaminated by standards of behaviour by some politicians over the last 30 years.

But the second and most important part is the nauseating hypocrisy of those at the very top of the public sector now wringing their hands about how ‘shocked’ they are. When this Government took office, it would seem it did not carry out an audit of every single layer of government to include every single contract across the public sector, and that there is still no central HR database for the public sector where every contract is collated and reviewed to ensure it meets the required standard.

So when we get hot under the collar about the allowances and pensions paid to former charity heads, hospital administrators or consultants, and wonder how this can happen five years into a depression, we should remember the high rates of pay and expenses of our political leaders who have oversight responsibility. Their renumeration is amongst the highest in Europe.

Why doesn’t the media focus on the tax-free unverified expenses and allowances of all the sanctimonious TDs and senators who now think they can sit in judgment of others?

DESMOND FITZGERALD

CANARY WHARF, LONDON

* A recent survey of 40 charities in Ireland showed us that most of the CEOs are paid over €100,000 a year.

May I ask, what in God’s name do they do to justify earning €2,000 a week? This is a disgrace and hard for the generous people of this country to stomach. We really do tolerate too much of this dreadful nonsense. It’s time to stand up and be counted.

BRIAN MC DEVITT

GLENTIES, CO DONEGAL

* Charity begins at home . . . now it’s going to stay there!

K NOLAN

CALDRAGH, CARRICK-ON-SHANNON, CO LEITRIM

* Now we know it wasn’t out of shame or principle that the CRC board resigned en masse last December. Their secretive and repulsive actions have come to light. However, the Perseverance, Action and Competence of the PAC has done a great service in exposing many ugly skeletons in the CRC boardroom cupboard and clearly more to come!

LARRY SHERIN

FOXROCK, DUBLIN 18

CAT CONUNDRUM

* Andrew Lloyd Webber was inspired by them, but I am distracted by a plague of cats. Felines are fine if they keep their distance, but they have become predators of the small birds that nest in my back garden.

Their gruesome handiwork may be natural, as they are hunters by inclination, but it is deeply distressing to behold. Besides, the birds are entitled to sanctuary.

I was hoping one of your readers might have some advice on how to keep these malevolent moggies at bay. I may yet resort to a drone unless a more humane solution is suggested.

C O BRIEN

GREYSTONES CO WICKLOW

H2 WOE IS DROP IN OCEAN

* As the revelations regarding Irish Water unfolds by the day, and staggering amounts of money are drained away, it appears that the Government should have left control of water services with local authorities.

Unlike Wellington Quay (aptly named) and the North Quay in Drogheda, Minister Fergus O’Dowd had little difficulty wading into the issue and stated that “Freedom of Information will apply retrospectively” to Irish Water.

Brilliant! So, O’Dowd hopes that the issue will become stagnant over time, and that our interest will simply evaporate.

But I suppose that this PR disaster is just another drop in the ocean for the Government.

Puns relating to water have run their course and I realise that readers’ patience is not infinite. So I’ll get to the point, The Narrow Water Bridge connecting Down to the said minister’s constituency, Louth, is in limbo because of a shortfall of €18m. This money could not be found, but €50m could be siphoned away merely for consultants.

ALAN CASSIDY

TULLYALLEN, DROGHEDA

TEXT MYOPIA

* Could the myopia of British and American foreign policy be caused by reading 200 million texts a day?

DR JOHN DOHERTY

CNOC AN STOLLAIRE, GAOTH DOBHAIR, CO DONEGAL

Irish Independent

 

 


Still clearing out

$
0
0

19 January 2014 Still clearing out
I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. Captain Povey ihas a bad cold and Commander Murray is put in charge.
Start to clear out attic for insulation
Scrabble today Mary wins   and gets  over   300,  Perhaps I will win tomorrow.

Obituary:

The Lord McAlpine of West Green, who has died aged 71, was an early supporter and confidant of Margaret Thatcher and as Conservative Party treasurer in the 1980s was probably the most successful fundraiser the party ever had; late in his life he was wrongly accused of paedophilia, in a scandal that ultimately led to the resignation of the BBC Director General, George Entwistle.
The false allegations of child abuse began to swirl around McAlpine in 2012, following an edition of Newsnight which claimed to expose “a senior Tory”. Lord McAlpine was swiftly “identified” on social media as the Tory in question, only for the whole story to be equally swiftly debunked.
Among those who mistakenly linked him to the scandal was Sally Bercow, the wife of the Speaker of the Commons, John Bercow, who wrote on her Twitter account: “Why is Lord McAlpine trending? *Innocent face*”
McAlpine received significant damages, including from Mrs Bercow – which he gave to charity – though the self-inflicted damage at the BBC was far greater.
The affair had threatened to wreck the career of one of the great Conservative figures of the last generation. Yet this was a career in the world of politics rather a career as a politician. For, despite his undoubted influence and absolute loyalty to Mrs Thatcher, McAlpine – by nature a dilettante – did not become a significant political figure.
Indeed, the columnist Alan Watkins once described him as being “fundamentally anti-Conservative”. This seemed an eccentric judgment in the 1980s, when McAlpine placed his liver and waistline (and eventually his heart, which underwent two rounds of multiple bypass surgery) at the service of the party in a ceaseless round of lunches and champagne receptions designed to persuade corporate plutocrats to part with their cash. During the Thatcher years an invitation to his lavish parties at the annual Conservative Party conference was a sign of high political favour.
Yet though he served as deputy chairman of the Conservative Party from 1979 to 1983 and treasurer from 1975 to 1990, McAlpine was never really “into” politics. At heart he was an 18th-century amateur, a collector of art and of garden implements, of wooden statues, stuffed birds, old cushions, Turkish carpets, gossip — and people.
He enjoyed fund-raising for the Conservative party, and his personal devotion to the woman he called “the most magnificent” Margaret Thatcher was absolute. But politics per se never really engaged his attention. His personal credo, expressed in such works as Letters to a Young Politician from his Uncle (1995), seemed to be a mish-mash of ideas derived from the Right (the destruction of the EU), the Left (huge public subsidies for motor manufacturers to develop the electric engine), and soggy liberalism (the decriminalisation of all drugs).
He was mischievously fascinated by the mechanisms of power (among other things he penned a tongue-in-cheek updating of Machiavelli’s The Prince), and relished the gossip and intrigue of high politics. But he was impatient with the democratic arts of negotiation and compromise and a low boredom threshold coupled with a subversive streak made him disdainful of the sort of party loyalist on whom all political leaders must rely. One of his damning judgments was simply: “He causes no trouble.”
When Mrs Thatcher fell he remained loyal, continuing to address her as “Prime Minister” and scorning her assassins as a bunch of pygmies and worse. There was never any doubt that whoever succeeded her would fail to match up and he made no attempt to make the transition to John Major — whom he once described as “hanging around like a pair of curtains” — or to disguise his contempt for the new consensual political style. He once compared the Major cabinet to pig farmers on an Irish ferry: “One moves to the right-hand side of the boat, they all move, then fearing the ferry will capsize, they all move back again with much the same result.”
His animus against those who had “betrayed” his leader led him in the 1990s to turn on his old party and to campaign for its defeat, lobbing journalistic salvoes at Major and anyone else suspected of playing a part in his heroine’s downfall. The party, he declared, could do with a “good scrub with a hard brush” (a term in opposition). So there was no surprise when in 1996, six months before the Labour landslide of 1997, McAlpine announced his defection to Sir James Goldsmith’s Referendum Party.
A third child and second of three sons of Lord McAlpine of Moffat, and a great-grandson of “Concrete Bob” McAlpine, who built the West Highland Railway and founded the family construction company, Robert Alistair McAlpine was born by caesarean section on May 14 1942 at the Dorchester Hotel, which his family built and owned; as a baby he received his first bottle via room service. His mother Molly was a powerful woman who smoked cigars and believed that the only real education was to be had in travel. This was just as well since, being dyslexic (a condition only diagnosed when he was in his twenties), young Alistair did badly at school, leaving Stowe aged 16 with just three O-levels.
Following family tradition he started work as a timekeeper on McAlpine’s South Bank site in London. Working long hours and being covered in dust meant that he was never invited to Society balls, but in any case he preferred the company of Irish navvies and the Bohemian friends he met in Soho pubs.
McAlpine started making serious money on his own account at 22 when he learned that the government of Western Australia was about to privatise road-building. He flew out immediately, concluded that road-building prospects were poor, but decided to go into hotels instead. After building various properties in Perth, he moved up to Broome, an old pearl-fishing station on the north-west coast, and started developing it as a holiday resort, complete with zoo, cinema and international airport.
As a child McAlpine had a cupboard of curiosities including a snake in a bottle, a wartime lemon and a piece of Zeppelin. In adulthood he indulged his collecting obsession by developing a taste in modern art and sculpture. Encouraged by a friend, the art dealer Leslie Waddington, he acquired a knack for spotting talented artists — for instance the abstract expressionist Mark Rothko — well before they became famous. He therefore was able to buy their works before they became prohibitively expensive. Apart from fine art, the objects of his desires included police truncheons, snowdrops, rare breeds of chicken, Renaissance tapestries, curiosities such as five-legged lambs in formaldehyde, shells and ties. In the 1980s staff at Central Office would recall one of his secretaries telephoning customs trying to get one of his acquisitions released: “No, it’s not Lord McAlpine’s penis. It’s a dinosaur penis.”
As a collector McAlpine seemed to buy more for the pleasure of having things pass through his hands than of owning them permanently. When his interests changed he gave things away or sold them; the Tate and other galleries were among the beneficiaries. In the late 1980s he had a shop in Cork Street where he sold everything from busts of Roman emperors to prehistoric artifacts.
In the 1970s McAlpine was a fervent believer in the Common Market and was treasurer of the “Britain in Europe” campaign for the 1975 referendum. But he was not then active politically and at one stage members of Harold Wilson’s kitchen cabinet even thought of offering him a job as a Labour Party fund-raiser.
Everything changed in 1975 after he met Margaret Thatcher, who had recently supplanted Ted Heath as leader of the Conservative Party, over dinner. They hit it off immediately. He admired her forceful radicalism; she appreciated his garrulous charm and air of business efficiency. “I told him he would have to give up his German Mercedes for a British Jaguar,” she wrote in her memoirs, “and he immediately complied.” He complied also with her request that he become the party’s (unpaid) treasurer.
The appointment of a 32-year old millionaire with unconventional tastes did not go down well with some of the more dignified members of the party’s treasurers’ department, who were soon shunted aside. Yet McAlpine did not spend much time at Central Office itself, being much more effective outside it. “I used to lurk,” he explained. “I lurked all over London where rich people went.”
At his office in London journalists were regaled with gossip and generous lashings of Chateau Latour, and he became a favourite of even such papers as the Independent and the Guardian. Rotund in loud but well-cut Savile Row suits and bilious pink and green Garrick Club ties, he would lunch prospective donors (and journalists) at the Club. Money was never discussed directly but the follow-up letters left recipients in little doubt about what was expected – and the funds poured in. In 1975, the year before McAlpine arrived, the Conservatives raised about £1.5m. By the time of the 1979 election, it was £4m, and by 1990 at least £9m. In between McAlpine was thought to have raised about £100m.
During the 1980s McAlpine’s country home, West Green, a handsome 18th-century house near Basingstoke, Hampshire, became the venue for lavish dinners (often cooked by the host himself) at which prominent Tories would rub shoulders with artists, dealers, writers, Bohemians and even stalwart socialists.
He was sometimes criticised for the secrecy of Conservative finances and his willingness to accept donations from rich foreign businessmen such as the Hong Kong millionaire Li Ka Shing, Mohamed Fayed and Asil Nadir. But there was never a serious whiff of scandal. In 1993, after Nadir had fled to northern Cyprus to escape prosecution for fraud, he claimed he would reveal favours promised by McAlpine in return for his cash. McAlpine challenged him to do so; he never did.
McAlpine was deputy chairman of the party from 1979 to 1983. His raffish, anarchic streak meant that he liked Cecil Parkinson but loathed Parkinson’s successor John Gummer, whom he considered sanctimonious and dull. Such was his influence with Margaret Thatcher that he was said to have engineered Gummer’s rapid replacement by Norman Tebbit.
In 1984, on Margaret Thatcher’s recommendation, he was created a life peer. That year, when the IRA blew up the Grand Hotel, Brighton, during the Conservative conference, McAlpine was staying in the suite above the Prime Minister’s. Woken by the explosion but otherwise unhurt, he immediately set to work to address the practicalities of the situation and, as stunned survivors wandered around in their nightclothes, he called the top brass of Marks & Spencer and got them to open their Brighton store early so that people could be properly dressed for the conference that day. His Hampshire home became a refuge for several shell-shocked survivors.
In 1987 McAlpine had to have a major coronary bypass operation and in 1990 he gave up the treasurer’s job. His name was on IRA lists and, ostensibly for reasons of safety and tax, he decided to move to Monte Carlo and Venice. He took almost nothing with him from Britain, having put all his English possessions up for sale at Sotheby’s so as to start afresh.
Although McAlpine ascribed his decision to leave Britain as a matter of personal whim, there were also financial considerations. In 1989, after an Australian pilot’s strike lasting six months, his Australian tourism venture, in which he had invested £250 million, collapsed, costing him much of his personal fortune. In June 1990, shortly after he and his family had moved out, West Green was blown up by the IRA.
When Margaret Thatcher was challenged at the end of that year, he watched with horror as her leadership campaign unravelled. After her defeat he lent her a house on College Green where the atmosphere of Downing Street was for a while religiously preserved.
In the 1990s he turned to writing and was the author of some dozen books ranging from two volumes of memoirs to a guide to the world’s museums and a guide to happiness to mischievous political parodies. He also wrote a regular column in The World of Interiors and contributed widely to national newspapers.
Having defected to James Goldsmith’s Referendum Party in 1996, following Goldsmith’s death in 1997 McAlpine became its leader. He sat as an Independent Conservative for some time in the House of Lords before rejoining the Conservatives.
McAlpine’s love for the arts was not limited to collecting: he was a member of the Arts Council, chairman of the Theatre Investment Fund, trustee of the Royal Opera House and a director of the Institute for Contemporary Arts.
Yet he himself admitted that there was truth in the accusation of dilettantism that was often levelled against him. This applied not only to possessions but to his relationships, as major changes in his life sometimes entailed equally dramatic changes in his domestic arrangements.
When his first marriage, to Sarah Baron, collapsed shortly after he became treasurer of the Conservative Party, his disabled mother hit him over the head with her walking stick. For years, his two daughters from the marriage never spoke to him.
In 1980 he married, secondly, his political secretary Romilly Hobbs, who became a glamorous and popular hostess during the Thatcher years, bore him another daughter and nursed him through two triple bypass operations.
The second of these, in 1999, nearly killed McAlpine and he spent a month in a coma on a life-support machine. He experienced a deathbed conversion to Roman Catholicism, emerged declaring that he felt “more casual about life” and, months later, left the family home. After an acrimonious divorce from Romilly on the grounds of his adultery, in 2002 he married Athena Malpas, a glamorous brunette three decades his junior.
McAlpine’s account of his marital inconstancy was chillingly casual: “I keep changing my life, houses and relationships. I reinvent myself every few years. My first marriage lasted 15 years and this one [to Romilly] 20. It’s hardly into bed and out the other side. There was a great deal of love. But there comes a point when life is just a habit, and I’m rather against habits. I just didn’t want to carry on.” To his credit, though, he never tried to square his behaviour with his new-found faith.
Lord McAlpine is survived by his third wife and by the three daughters of his earlier marriages.
* Lord McAlpine, born May 14 1942, died January 17 2014

Guardian:

It wasn’t only the gracious mansions that were built on the profits of slavery (“How gracious mansions hide a dark history of Britain’s links to slavery”, In Focus).
In 1984, Peter Fryer published Staying Power, a ground-breaking history of the black presence in Britain. This book analysed the way in which those with interests in slavery contributed to the developments of banking and to the demands out of which the Industrial Revolution of the 18th century grew. Ships needed financing. The British leg of the trade to Africa carried textiles, iron rings, chains, muskets, tobacco, beer. And this was not a shrinking market.
Judy Palfreman
Coventry
In Bristol, the defeat of the reform bill in 1831 led to riots in Queen Square. The square is not far from Welsh Back, where slate and coal was unloaded.
Shareholders in these industries would have followed the example of the plantation owners and bought an elegant Georgian house in Queen Square.
The fusion of income streams from exploitation at home and abroad kept the capitalist show on the road.
Ivor Morgan
Lincoln
Jamie Doward’s excellent article on slavery’s absence in the public understanding of the history of Britain called to mind a visit some 20 years ago to the University of Louisiana.
A large exhibition on the subject of Louisiana’s economic development featured a section devoted to agriculture, including the extensive cotton crop, which it managed to cover without any reference to the fact that the workers were slaves.
There was, as I recollect, no reference to slavery at all in the exhibition. It had been airbrushed out.
If it was possible to do that in the US, in a former slave state, how much easier has it been here where slaves existed only in faraway colonies?
My education in the 50s, both at school and at home, told me much about the empire and its glories. It told me nothing of the shameful trade upon which it was built.
Dick Russell
Beenham
Berkshire
As Jamie Doward notes, Britain is self-servingly one-eyed in focusing largely on its role in the abolition of the slave trade. Our country’s long history of profiting from it is conveniently swept under the carpet.
A key objective of the 2007 bicentenary should have been the erection of prominent monuments to the Unknown Slave, at least in London, Bristol, Liverpool and Glasgow, which all made enormous profits from slavery.
It was an opportunity missed. Perhaps the education secretary, Michael Gove, could take the initiative to help remedy the omission.
Graham Thomas
St Albans
Hertfordshire
Being from Bristol and maybe being presumptuous enough to speak for fellow Bristolians, I think most are acutely aware of the city’s link to the slave trade. It is not a proud history, clearly.
I do however resent the implication that the subject is actively avoided or that people are apathetic to it. The choice to focus on slavery in the US is one of mass appeal, required to make a Hollywood movie.
M Konig
Posted online

Nick Cohen (“Osborne says there are no easy answers”, Comment) highlights major injustices arising from George Osborne’s economic policies. But pitching “the old” against “the young” is unhelpful. “Triple-locked” pensions look cheap set besides declining income from annuities and savings, increased energy bills and the rising cost of personal health and social care. Not all of “the old” are protected by gains in property values: around 40% of those 60 and over have no or minimal housing wealth; a quarter of the houses occupied by older people actually fail the decent homes standard. And the “weight of austerity” to which Cohen refers remains especially important for the estimated two million people who are 60 and over and living on or below the poverty line. Social and economic inequalities influence the old as much as the young and young middle aged. Indeed, from the trends that Cohen describes, this pattern looks set to increase as a result of the divisions created by coalition policies.
Professor Chris Phillipson
School of Social Sciences
University of Manchester
Yes to a free and just Scotland
I’m surprised that Alistair Darling didn’t take the opportunity to spell out what he believes are the benefits of being “better together” in his interview (New Review). Instead, he reverted to attacking the tactics of the yes campaign and the Scottish government’s white paper. As as English expat of nearly 25 years standing, I will be voting yes in September with my head much more than my heart. In an independent Scotland, there will be no more demonising of the poor, the vulnerable and immigrants. There will be no nuclear weapons and billions wasted upon their replacement. There will be no unelected second chamber. There will be the promotion of social responsibility and social justice.
I wonder if Darling has read the white paper. It acknowledges from the start that there will have to be negotiations with the Westminster government, the EU and others in the 18 months following a yes vote. The paper is also full of figures, if he cares to look.
Hugh Jones
Dunblane
A warning you can’t sweeten
As the GP member of the committee on medical aspects of food and nutrition policy that in 1994 recommended, as you say, reduction in salt intake, I remember the disbelief at government rejection of this important step (“Sugar: the lobbying menace that is making us ill”, leader).
You also refer to the protracted battle with the tobacco industry and there is an interesting analogy in the relationship between food and smoking and their relevance to health. Although, as you say, it took about 30 years to convince government of the scientific evidence of harm, the tasks of tackling the tobacco industry and persuading government were a bit easier. With food, the relationship is much more complex. But as a GP for many years, now retired, I am only too aware of the harm to health and wellbeing of an unhealthy diet.
Professor Godfrey Fowler
Emeritus professor of general practice
University of Oxford
Ipso fails independence test
Peter Preston defends the Ipso self-regulation system proposed by the big newspaper companies to replace the failed Press Complaints Commission (PCC) and disputes my suggestion that its appointments procedures are unsatisfactory (“There’s no hope if Hacked Off can only harangue us”, Media). There is a simple way of resolving this disagreement, because a test exists to determine whether a press self-regulator meets adequate standards of independence and effectiveness: does it satisfy the criteria set out by Lord Justice Leveson after his painstaking public inquiry?
These criteria, which are incorporated in the royal charter on press self-regulation granted last year, carefully safeguard freedom of expression while also ensuring that for the first time the public should have impartial and accessible means of redress when things go wrong. If Mr Preston believes Ipso would be independent and effective, and if he wants the public to be satisfied of this, then he should encourage the big newspaper companies to ensure that it meets the criteria.
Sadly, at present, not only does Ipso fall far short of passing this test, but those behind it have no intention of even submitting it to the scrupulously independent body now being set up under the charter to administer the test.
Brian Cathcart
Executive director, Hacked Off,
London SW1
On borrowed time
I would like to endorse every word of Catherine Bennett’s article (“Need advice at your local library? Look under A for amateur”, Comment). I do not write for any of my fellow volunteers. All of us are aware that the work we have committed to was previously done by those who had trained for that profession. Equally, we are aware that we will not provide as good a service as before. We also know that to do nothing will mean the loss of a valuable local resource. So we do not see ourselves as replacements but as a necessary interim measure until normal service can be resumed.
John Poucher
Stonesfield, Oxon

Independent:

I was saddened to read about Joan Smith’s recent experience and that she feels the needs of NHS healthcare professionals are put above patients’ needs (“It’s not difficult. Sick people need doctors”, 12 January).
Even though NHS doctors are confronted with an increasingly challenging and high-pressured environment, our priority is to provide the best possible care. A key blocker is the funding problems that the NHS is facing.
GPs are seeing more people than ever – an estimated  340 million consultations a year. All NHS services are under enormous pressure from a combination of rising demand, falling resources and staff shortages in key specialties. There is little evidence to suggest that problems with GP access are increasing pressure on emergency care.
Joan Smith is right that the government must implement a more robust out-of-hours system. Although four out of 10 GPs continue to work in out-of-hours care, the resources available to the service have remained static for many years despite increases in demand. A system-wide approach is needed, looking at everything from NHS 111 to community care services.
The BMA shares Joan Smith’s concerns that when she called NHS 111 she “got an ‘adviser’… who appeared to be reading from a script.” We have repeatedly warned that removing doctors and nurses from the frontline risked turning the service into nothing more than a call centre. The Government needs to improve the service by making it more clinician-led.
Joan Smith’s aunt’s care was not good enough. We should do better, but we need the Government to stop cutting and allocate sufficient resources to ensure that we really can provide the best care for our patients.
Dr Mark Porter
Chairman, British Medical Association
London WC1
Brian Paddick (“We mustn’t forget what plebgate is really about”, 12 January) suggests that the false claims made by PC Keith Wallis were politically motivated; but that our trust in the police should not be unduly shaken. How can it not be?
We regarded the policeman as likely to be more honest and honourable than the politician. How wrong we were! By playing down the importance of  “plebgate”, Brian Paddick – an ex-Met officer himself – illustrates just how oblivious the police sometimes are to the high standards of conduct expected of them; and how the spectacle of fellow officers closing ranks to protect their own, further damages their standing in our eyes.
John Boaler
Calne, Wiltshire
It is extraordinary that in the coverage of the death of Ariel Sharon (Special report,  12 January) there was no reference to the wars of 1967 and 1973 when Sharon’s military leadership contributed to the salvation of Israel.
Charles Foster
Chalfont St Peter, Buckinghamshire
I’m sure many of us can agree with the thrust of Sarah Hughes’ piece (“Finally, television dramas that know when to stop”, Arts & Books, 12 January) that too many TV dramas overstay their welcome. But when she says that we, the viewers, should “stop demanding” that every series has a sequel, I feel she should be directing her remarks to those who commission and buy programmes. No, this is all about ratings, marketing and advertising space. Downton Abbey action figure anyone?
Geoff Hulme
Altrincham, Cheshire
I agree with your editorial (“A small triumph for democracy”, 12 January). But I feel select committees need to go further. If they brought in members of the public, who worked within the field the committee was discussing, it is more likely they would get a realistic picture of what is happening on the ground. This would allow select committees to hear the voice of the people.
Kartar Uppal
West Bromwich, West Midlands
Katy Guest (“I’m no toff, but I’d prefer a pro-Oxbridge bias”, 12 January) is right to argue that there’s nothing wrong with a pro-Oxbridge bias when it comes to recruitment. However, it is objectionable to see so many from the top public schools being favoured – it is this that concerns we meritocrats.
Tim Mickleburgh
Grimsby, Lincolnshire
Have your say

Times:

CAMILLA CAVENDISH’S column “After a terrible week for the police, it’s time for a drastic solution” (Comment last week) starts by saying: “If we can’t trust the police, who can we trust?”
I would say: “If we can’t trust our elected politicians, who can we trust?” Our police need no lessons from those who govern this country, with their expenses scandals, lies and cover-ups over the years.
Andrew Mitchell behaved inappropriately towards the officers on the gate and has admitted to swearing. We will probably never get to the bottom of this incident but it is not as clear-cut as Cavendish describes it. She should not jump on the anti-police bandwagon — the service remains the finest in the world, with the highest standards of professionalism, training and integrity.
Nigel Cross, Westbury, Wiltshire
New York attitude
Cavendish sings the praises of Bill Bratton, New York’s recently appointed police commissioner. Let’s get things into perspective: New York is an extremely violent city compared with London, with police carrying weapons at all times.
A friend of mine — a retired officer — worked in Spanish Harlem and had a gun in a shoulder holster, one on the rear of his belt and another strapped to his ankle. Would Cavendish really prefer to live in this environment?
The column suggests the Metropolitan police should be taken over by Bratton, who has no knowledge of the workings of the British police. Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe, the Met commissioner, is one of our most respected officers and is well capable of surpassing Bratton. Let him get on with the job.
Bruce Duncan, Glasgow
Searching questions
I find it disappointing that Cavendish has repeated the ill-informed notion that police officers can stop and search people “without justification”. The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 requires me as a serving officer to have reasonable grounds to suspect that I will find stolen or prohibited articles before I can search anyone.
I also have to explain to every person I search who I am, why I am searching them and what I am looking for. If individuals and communities feel alienated by stop-and- search, that suggests issues with the way officers are conducting and explaining the searches as opposed to issues with stop-and-search legislation itself.
Chris Millar, Gateshead, Tyne and Wear
Hooked on classics
Mitchell has strongly rejected the claim made by PC Toby Rowland that he had called him a pleb. There are many terms of abuse commonly used today but pleb is certainly not one of them and would probably only be employed by someone who has studied the classics. If Mitchell’s denial is correct, this would presumably be Rowland or one of his colleagues.
John MacGillivray, Dundee

Unworkable benefits ban on migrants
IT WOULD not be practicable to deny benefits to EU migrants for the length of time proposed by the work and pensions secretary (“Ban migrant welfare for two years — Duncan Smith”, News, last week).
This could increase poverty, deprivation and homelessness in those cases where migrants come to Britain in good faith but find, possibly through no fault of their own, that the job they came for did not work out. After all, employers can fire a new member of staff within a probationary period.
We would face considerable social problems in such cases. Not being able to claim benefits for two years would leave the migrant impoverished until another job came along, or UK taxpayers would have to pay the repatriation costs to send them back to their own country.
Elizabeth Oakley, Dursley, Gloucestershire
Give and take
As recent research has shown, immigrants put 34% more into this country in taxes than they take out in benefits, and the Office for Budget Responsibility has announced that if all immigrants left the country, over the next five years public sector debt would increase by £18bn.
It is a disgrace that in the past three years under Iain Duncan Smith the number of people having to go to food banks just to survive has risen from 61,000 to more than 346,000, that homelessness is increasing hugely, that the disabled are being forced from their homes and that in many circumstances the poor will no longer receive legal aid.
We are supposedly a First World country in the 21st century, and yet the poverty and starvation is like something you might see in the Third World. I’m ashamed we are letting this happen.
Bethany Tye, Barnsley, South Yorkshire
Welfare states
I would recommend a central EU benefit fund managed by the existing EU purse holders. From its allocation each country would pay benefits to those who emigrate from it. The level of benefit would be commensurate with the nation from which the migrant originates, thereby reducing the temptation to move because of welfare alone.
Douglas Vallgren, Norwich, Norfolk
Same old song
This issue may not be as modern as everyone assumes. My father has a record by Billy Williams from the early 1900s called Wake Up, John Bull!. The song includes phrases such as, “Close your open door, the same as they do on the foreign shore.”
Elaine Grainger, Stroud, Gloucestershire
Plan of attack
I presume if Labour retains a comfortable opinion poll lead over the Conservatives, we can expect more attacks on migrants from Tory cabinet ministers all faithfully and prominently reported.
David Middlemiss, Beverley, East Yorkshire
False picture
I was disappointed with the photograph (from the TV series Benefits Street) accompanying Eleanor Mills’s article “Slowly driving a nation back to work” (News Review, last week) and its caption: “Ministers want to change the lives of dependants…” The Romanians pictured were living in squalid conditions and working 12 hours a day. They were virtually slaves who had to give up their pay to their “contact”. After complaining to the police — whose hands were tied — they had to flee for fear of reprisals. Not one of them was claiming benefits.
Linda Davidson, Leominster, Herefordshire

United nations of caring nurses
SOME head nurses have remarked that Portuguese, Spanish and Filipino nurses who are working in the NHS because of a shortage of their British counterparts are more caring, especially to elderly patients (“NHS’s foreign nurses ‘best at caring’”, News, last week). In my experience, nurses from all countries are caring, though no profession is perfect.
I am a graduate nurse and love my job and I love looking after patients. I am definitely not one of those graduates who you report are “too posh to wash”. I consider it a privilege to be able to use my knowledge and skills to help people at difficult times in their lives, whether I am having difficult conversations about how and where they will die, and what they wish for their loved ones, or helping them onto the commode if this is what they need. This variety is what caring is all about. No one goes into the profession for the money or the status; we enter it to help people and to make a difference.
I am fed up with being called lazy and uncaring. Nurses who are trying as hard as they can are being systematically demoralised. We need to be telling people what is being done to our NHS by this government, because we want the best care for our patients. Nurses need to fight back against the dismantling of the NHS.
Karen Chilver, Palliative care community nurse specialist

Points

Happy flyer
We regular Ryanair travellers know the service on offer (“Cabin pressure”, Magazine, last week). The airline provides cheap travel to places we’d never visit if it didn’t exist. I stand in queues with people of every shape, size, nationality and IQ level you could imagine. We’ve all managed to print off our boarding passes. We’ve all turned up with the correct-sized hand luggage. So we spend a couple of hours in a seat with a rake you can’t adjust? Gosh, my house is full of those. There’s too much noise to sleep? You’d have to have really pushed the boat out the night before to be that desperate for a nap on a two-hour flight. And we’re sold overpriced food and drink? Well, only if we buy it. Lynn Barber is lucky she can afford to sneer at this kind of travel. In the meantime, I’m looking forward to visiting a friend in France on Ryanair.
Juliet Bothams, Alton, Hampshire
Dickensian childhood
Like the former Labour home secretary Alan Johnson I had a troubled childhood and found David Copperfield a source of comfort and inspiration (“David Copperfield saved me as a boy, says Alan Johnson”, News, last week). In the early 1960s, aged nine, I was in the care of a Birmingham city council children’s home. At times I found the environment lonely and intimidating and the regime frightening. One of the female members of staff — Mrs Turner — became my Clara Peggotty. Mrs Turner exuded warmth and would read David Copperfield to me, which left me spellbound. I have loved the works of Dickens ever since.
Peter Henrick, Birmingham
Vital lesson
I was astonished and shocked by Camilla Long’s review of 12 Years a Slave (“Nasty, brutish, for far too long”, Culture, last week). Films are not just about entertainment; very often they inform and educate, and this movie totally exposes us to the realities of human bondage. It is the Schindler’s List of slavery and should be sent to every educational establishment across the land.
David Weale, London
Korea opportunity
With more than 200,000 people incarcerated in its gulags, North Korea is no laughing matter (“Teletubbies on stand-by to soften up hardline North Korea”, News, last week). Instead of trying to sell programmes such as Teletubbies to Pyongyang, the foreign secretary, William Hague, would be much better advised to support an extension of BBC World Service programming to the Korean peninsula. We should be promoting Britain’s cherished belief in democracy and human rights, and never miss an opportunity to underline the gravity of the suffering inflicted by this regime on its own people.
Lord Alton of Liverpool, Chairman of the all-party parliamentary group on North Korea, House of Lords
Open country
Eleanor Mills is to be applauded for her bold and insightful article defending free access to the countryside for ordinary people (“We’re not all poachers, Mr Darcy”, News Review, January 5). We believe the government needs to promote outdoor recreation and the many benefits associated with it, be they social, economic or in relation to wellbeing. A healthy, accessible countryside means healthy people.
Nick Kurth CBE, British Mountaineering Council
Hit the bottle
Sugar is the latest item we take into our bodies that has become a scapegoat because of possible ill effects on health (“‘Five-a-day’ foods packed with sugar”, News, last week). But one commonly used liquid seems to have little opposition — alcohol. Consider some of the negatives: it causes liver disease, has well-recognised short-term effects on the brain that might well turn into long- term degradation, is linked to obesity and is a big contributor to road accidents. With such a record it would seem to merit some firm action, but the state cannot even commit itself to price control.
Roy Burrell, Kenilworth, Warwickshire

Birthdays
Julian Barnes, novelist, 68; Martin Bashir, journalist, 51; Jenson Button, Formula One driver, 34; Larry Clark, film director, 71; Michael Crawford, actor, 72; Stefan Edberg, tennis player, 48; Richard Lester, film director, 82; Dolly Parton, singer, 68; Sir Simon Rattle, conductor, 59; Cindy Sherman, photographer, 60; Steve Staunton, footballer, 45; Dennis Taylor, snooker player, 65; Caron Wheeler, singer, 51

Anniversaries
1661 rebel Thomas Venner hanged, drawn and quartered; 1813 birth of Sir Henry Bessemer, inventor of a process for turning molten pig iron into steel; 1839 birth of Paul Cézanne, painter; 1915 first Zeppelin raid on Britain during First World War kills four in Norfolk; 1966 Indira Gandhi becomes first female prime minister of India; 1983 Nazi war criminal Klaus Barbie arrested in Bolivia

Telegraph:

SIR – You express annoyance with people who “begin every explanation with the word so”.
Be thankful that you don’t understand Danish. In recent years, everyone in Denmark has acquired the verbal tic of starting every answer with Ja, men… which translates as Yes, but… This drives me up the wall when I watch Danish television news: “So what’s the outlook for the weather then, Yvonne?” “Yes, but it’s going to be warm and sunny.” Everywhere, it’s the same thing: “How old is this building?” “Yes, but it’s 200 years old.”
Like all such mannerisms, it will die out eventually. In the meantime, holidaying in Denmark takes on a slightly surreal quality if you understand the language.
Nils Erik Grande
Oslo, Norway

SIR – We in the Syrian Opposition Coalition are grateful that Daniel Hannan and other conservative parliamentarians visited a refugee camp in Turkey, and that they are shining a light on the continuing suffering of Syrian civilians due to the barbarity of the Assad regime.
However, we disagree with Mr Hannan’s conclusion that “there are things beyond our control, problems without solutions”.
In the last few weeks, the Free Syrian Army has been clearing the al-Qaeda affiliated Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant from northern Syrian towns.
We are establishing governmental structures in the areas we control, including a ministry of defence, which aims to professionalise our armed forces under a sustainable structure.
Assad’s preferred narrative that it is a choice between him and the extremists is as untrue as it is devious. It is important that it does not take root in the West. We regret that the West chose not to punish militarily Assad’s use of weapons of mass destruction and has, until now, refrained from providing our armed forces with the arms necessary to challenge the regime. Had a no-fly zone been imposed, Assad would not be able to bomb civilians with barrel bombs, killing more than 500 people in the last few weeks alone.
Related Articles
Rotten speech in the state of modern Denmark
18 Jan 2014
Our growing unity and success on the ground necessitates greater outside military, practical and diplomatic support, in order to continue our fight to uphold the legitimate rights of Syrians to enjoy peace, democracy and religious tolerance.
Monzer Akbik
Chief of Staff to Ahmad Jarba, President of the Syrian Opposition Coalition
Playing like a girl
SIR – Elizabeth Truss, the education minister, has warned that girls could be put off careers in science and maths by gender-specific toys. Does she not realise that children have the ability to make choices themselves?
I have four daughters. As young people they wanted and had (as far as finances would allow) the toys they asked for. There were things that some would say were aimed at boys, and some at girls. My daughters didn’t see gender specificity attached to these toys. Incidentally, one of them now drives double-decker buses.
Colin Jamieson
Horncastle, Lincolnshire
Belly-dancing tax
SIR – Having read of the belly dancer’s twists and turns with HMRC, I observe that the taxman continues to dance in mysterious ways.
The disputed tax of £50,000 is small beer compared with what major corporations repeatedly avoid paying.
HMRC needs to stop picking over the bones of small businesses and concentrate where there are truly rich pickings to be had. We will all benefit and be better able to afford Audrey Cheruvier’s entertainment, be it sport or dance.
Graham R Brown
Ampthill, Bedfordshire
For the record
SIR – I would be happy to share NHS data as long as it is correct.
By chance I came into possession of a list of my “problems” (fortunately few) held on my doctor’s database and found that my daughter wasn’t born on the day I actually had her and that I had had a forceps delivery 12 years later, when I know I was on the beach.
Sally Browne
Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex
Lord Rennard
SIR – The internal review conducted by the Liberal Democrats did not “clear” or “exonerate” Lord Rennard in any sense; indeed the statement cites “evidence of behaviour which violated the personal space and autonomy of the complainants”.
We deeply Lord Rennard’s failure to issue an apology at the earliest opportunity following the publication of an internal party investigation into allegations of sexual harassment.
We believe that until he apologises and acknowledges the distress that his actions have caused, regardless of intent, he should never have had the Liberal Democrat whip restored and should be barred from any party body or involvement in any party activity that might facilitate a repeat of this situation. No apology; no whip.
We note also with deep regret the failure of senior members of the Liberal Democrat parliamentary party to denounce in the strongest possible terms Lord Rennard’s behaviour.
We will not rest until our party is a safe space for all free from sexual harassment and assault, without exception. With this in mind we as members will continue to put pressure on the whips office in the House of Lords with a view to reversing the inappropriate decision to restore Lord Rennard to the Liberal Democrat group.
We invite the leadership to meet with action the needs identified in this letter.
Katherine Bavage, Leeds North West, Member of Lib Dem Women
Iain Donaldson, Chair, Manchester Gorton Liberal Democrats
Stephen Glenn, Northern Ireland, LGBT+ Liberal Democrats Executive
Elizabeth Jewkes, City of Chester, member of Lib Dem Women
Timothy J. Oliver, Hull & Hessle
Angharad B.Jones, Rhondda Cynon Taff, RCT Lib Dems Membership Officer
Kurt Jewkes, City of Chester
Craig O’Donnell ,Chair of London Liberal Youth
Hywel Morgan, Calderdale
Chris Nelson, Kettering & Wellingborough (2010 parliamentary candidate, Kettering)
Liam Pennington, Preston
Cllr Lloyd Harris, Regional Treasurer East of England, Deputy Leader Dacorum Council Group
Cllr Gareth Aubrey, Cardiff and Vale
James King, Southport, Liberal Youth Co-Finance Officer
Robin McGhee, Bristol, Liberal Youth Co-Finance Officer
Cllr Mark Mills, Oxford East
Allan Heron, Paisley and Renfrewshire
Callum Leslie, Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath, Edinburgh Liberal Youth Treasurer, Scottish conference committee
George Potter, Guildford, Guildford Secretary
Linden Parker, South Norfolk, Liberal Youth Non-Portfolio Officer
Hannah Bettsworth, Edinburgh South, Edinburgh Liberal Youth President, Scottish Women Lib Dems Executive Member
Jack Carr, Aberdeenshire West, President, St Andrews University Liberal Democrats
David Evans, Aberdeenshire East
Andrew Page, Inverclyde
Zoe O’Connell, Cambridge, LGBT+ Liberal Democrats Executive
Ruaraidh Dobson, Glasgow North (2010 Candidate Paisley & Renfrewshire North)
Euan Davidson, President Aberdeen University Liberal Democrats, Scottish Conference Committee, Aberdeen Central, South and North Kincardine
Jonathan Wharrad, Congleton, Chair University of Birmingham Liberal Democrats
Samuel Rees (East Dunbartonshire, former IR Cymru Officer)
Hywel Owen Davies, Preseli-Pembrokeshire
Jezz Palmer, Winchester
Jennie Rigg: chair, Calderdale Liberal Democrats; member LGBT+ Liberal Democrats
Euan Cameron, Islington Borough
Siobhan Mathers, Edinburgh North & Leith
Richard Symonds, Tower Hamlets Liberal Democrats
Michael Wilson, Stirling Liberal Democrats
James Harrison, Edinburgh North and Leith
Callum Morton, Sutton Liberal Democrats
Tommy Long, Maidstone Lib Dems Data Officer, Liberal Reform Board Member
Amy Dalrymple, Edinburgh North and Leith
Natalie Jester, Bristol South
Maria Pretzler, Swansea and Gower, Member of the Welsh Policy Committee.
Sophie Bridger, Chair of Glasgow North Lib Dems
Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera, Liberal Democrat English Party Diversity Champion, Ethnic Minority Liberal Democrat (EMLD) – Vice Chair, Liberal Democrat South Central Region Executive – Diversity Officer, Newbury Town Council – Councillor for Victoria Ward & Deputy Leader, Newbury Constituency – Executive, Newbury Branch – Chair
Geoff Payne, Hackney LP
Ben Lloyd, Cardiff Central (resident in Belfast)
Paul Pettinger, Westminster Borough and Liberal Youth Vice President
Paul Halliday, Newport Party Chair
Amanda Durley, Dartford and Gravesham
Daniel Jones, Northampton, former Chair Northamptonshire Liberal Youth, East Midlands executive member
Natasha Chapman, Lincoln, Chair of Lincoln Liberal Youth,Social Liberal Forum Council Member
Alisdair Calder McGregor, Prospective Parliamentary Candidatefor the Constituency of Calder Valley (Calderdale Local Party)
Robbie Simpson, North Glasgow, Liberal Youth Scotland Treasurer
Cllr Robin Popley, Chair of Loughborough Liberal Democrats and Shepshed TC.
Cllr Henry Vann, Bedford Borough, Secretary North Bedfordshire Liberal Democrats
Andrew Crofts, Vice Chair of Liberal Youth Saint Albans
Naomi Smith, Co Chair, Social Liberal Forum.
Daniel Gale, Nottingham
Jonathan Brown, Chichester, Member of Ethnic Minority Liberal Democrats, Lib Dem Women & Social Liberal Forum.
James Blanchard, Huddersfield, GLD Exec
Chris Keating, Streatham
Grace Goodlad, Bromley Borough
Norman Fraser, Glasgow North, Organiser, Social Liberal Forum (Scotland)
Morgan Griffith-David, Cardiff and the Vale, Liberal Youth Policy Officer.
Peter Brooks, Islington
Jessica Rees, Swansea
Sanjay Samani, Angus North & Mearns
Dr Mohsin Khan, Oxford East (Secretary, Oxford East. Policy Chair, South Central Region)
Holly Matthies, Manchester Gorton, (Secretary LGBT+ Lib Dems)
Andrew Hickey, Manchester Gorton, (Member of Social Liberal Forum, LGBT+ Liberal Democrats, Humanist & Secular Liberal Democrats)
Duncan Stott, Oxford East
Benjamin Krishna, Cambridge
Lee Thacker, Pontypridd, Rhondda Cynon Taff
Sebastian Bench, General Secretary University of Nottingham Liberal Youth
Michael Carchrie Campbell, Northern Ireland Liberal Democrats (Member of LGBT+, Social LIberal Forum, Lib Dem Lawyers Association, Liberal Youth)
Neil Monnery, Southend, Data Officer
Matthew Wilkes, North Bristol Liberal Democrats
David Freeborn, Oxford East
Adam Bernard, Harrow West
Andrew Hinton, Data Officer, Shrewsbury & Atcham
Joshua Dixon, Chair of Hillingdon Liberal Democrats (Social Liberal Forum Membership Development Officer)
Sandra Taylor, Altrincham and Sale West
James Brough. Calderdale Liberal Democrats. Member LGBT+
Harry Matthews, Sheffield
Rob Blackie, Former London Assembly candidate, member of London Region Executive, Dulwich & West Norwood
Alex Wasyliw, Party member, South Cambs
Daisy Benson, local councillor and former parliamentary candidate, Reading.
Richard Morgan-Ash, Hackney
Ryan Cullen, Lincoln
Peter Bancroft, Westminster
Linda Jack, Chair Liberal Left
James Shaddock, Portsmouth, Rock The Boat founder
Steven Haynes, South West Birmingham, Liberal Youth Vice Chair
David Franklin, Leeds North East, University of Birmingham Liberal Democrats
Jon Neal, former Parliamentary Candidate, Haltemprice & Howden, party trainer and mentor
Cllr. Harry Hayfield, Lib Dem representative on Llansantffraed Community Council, Ceredigion, Wales
Mag. Andrew A. Kierig, Lib Dems in Brussels and Europe, ALDE Associate
Jennifer Warren, Romsey and Southampton North
Duncan Borrowman, Bromley Borough. Former member Federal Executive, former National Campaigns Officer, former Parliamentary
candidate Old Bexley and Sidcup, former London Assembly candidate.
Penny Goodman, Leeds North West, Secretary of Liberal Democrats for Electoral Reform
Caron lindsay, Member, Federal Executive and Treasurer, Scottish Party
Laura Gordon, Tonbridge and Malling Alix Mortimer, Lewisham
Jon Massey, Bristol North
Laurence Cox, Member of Harrow LB local party
Kat Dadswell, Member of Liverpool LP
Louise Shaw, Member of Hazel Grove Local Party, Liberal Reform Board Member
George Carpenter, Nottingham Liberal Democrats
William Hobhouse, Heywood and Middleton, Liberal Reform Board Member
Alexis McGeadie (East Dunbartonshire and Argyll and Bute)
Cath Smith, member Newcastle
Mark Blackburn, Westminster Borough, Exec Director Social Liberal Forum
Rochelle Harris, Member of Maidstone LD Party
Richard Gadsden, Manchester Central, former Parliamentary candidate, Worsley and Eccles South, Secretary Manchester City Party.
Tom Lister, Birmingham Yardley
Layla Moran, Parliamentary Candidate, Oxford West and Abingdon
Stephen Morgan, Birmingham Yardley
Michael Wilson, Twickenham & Richmond
Mary Reid, Kingston Borough, Social Liberal
Marie Jenkins, Newton Abbot, Lib Dem Women member, Leadership Programme member (plus former Campaigns Officer)
and 118 other Liberal Democrat party members; see telegraph.co.uk/letters
Labrador shampoo
SIR – Our dog, Bailey, is a cross between a rottweiler and a doberman, but looks like a labrador. She often returns home from a wet country walk caked in mud but, within an hour or two of simply lying in her bed doing nothing, her coat appears to be clean. Apparently labradors produce a self‑cleaning substance for their fur. Is this true? What is it? We have christened it labrolin, and there is a fortune to be made if someone can find a way to bottle it.
Bob Ellis
Worthing, West Sussex
Lingering romance
SIR – To remember passwords I simply use nicknames for old girlfriends, plus where or when I met them. Perhaps I am the “Last Romantic”.
Richard Froggatt
Belfast
Cyclists should not transfer risk to pedestrians
SIR – A transport minister has urged police not to fine cyclists riding on pavements to “escape dangerous sections of road”.
Why can cyclists not wheel their machines on the pavements, and so avoid transferring risk to pedestrians?
C K Robinson
London SE10
SIR – While the transport minister is in an asking mood, perhaps he could please ask motorists to stop parking on pavements.
Mike Nichols
Earls Barton, Northamptonshire
SIR – Were cycling invented today, it would not be allowed on the roads for health and safety reasons. It would make sense for cycling on the pavements – either shared paths or separate paths – to become more mainstream and regulated. It happens in cities all over the world, particularly where there are footpaths on both sides. Pavement paths work in Bristol, if they are properly signposted, because pedestrians are now aware that the paths are shared.
Richard Owsley
Bristol
SIR – Rather than fine cyclists for riding on the pavement, the police should be given the power to fine them for riding on the road where a cycle path has been provided. Cyclists clog up Surrey roads daily, while the council-built cycle paths remain empty.
Anthony Merryweather
Old Woking, Surrey
SIR – Reverse running was obviously meant to be a joke. More seriously, sideways walking should be promoted. This would make it easier to pass other pedestrians, and to jump into the road to avoid mobility scooters and the ever-increasing number of cyclists.
Wallace Bowden
Denmead, Hampshire

Irish Times:

IrishMadam –If I didn’t know that my poor Mam is dead and gone I would have thought it was her sending in that letter. (Sunday Independent, Jan 12, 2014). It must be like that in a lot of Irish homes, forgetting about your elderly loved ones who were once young, beautiful and full of life, just like the selfish people who are ignoring them now.
Also in this section
Cheap drink comes at a cost
Letters: Disagreeing with Donal on suicide
Letters: Hurtful writing
My heart goes out to that lady. She really must be feeling low to try and reach out to someone who will perhaps just read what she’s going through.
I believe we all should stop for a moment, pick up the phone and just ask: ‘Mam or Dad, how are you?’
Is that too much to ask?
We have all lost our way, given the enormous stress we are under trying to survive, but at the end of the day, what really matters is your family ok: end of story! Do not forget where you came from.
That lady and all other ageing folk who toiled for years trying to rear us and guide us on the straight and narrow deserve better. And lady, I hope you take comfort that even though I don’t know you, you remind me of my poor Mam, who felt the exact same about some of her family. I miss her so much.
Name and address with Editor
DISGRACEFUL WAY ELDERLY ARE TREATED
Madam — Having read the letter of the week (Sunday Independent, January 12, 2014), it distressed me so much it compelled me to write. The poor lady who wrote it, how absolutely and utterly miserable her life must be, and what a disgraceful way for her seven children to treat her. She mentions her husband’s jealous streak, so I can only assume that this poor lady is completely isolated as she was not allowed to have any sort of life outside her home.
It unfortunately is not the only case I have heard of whereby people just get on with their own lives and are not only able to conveniently forget about elderly parents and relations but to cut off their contact with grandchildren, who should be allowed to bring such joy and happiness into their lives.
How anyone can turn their back on the mother who gave birth to them, who looked after them, reared them, nursed them when sick and in some cases went without so that their children could have something, is just beyond comprehension. How these same children can call themselves human beings is a mystery to me. They should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.
The Irish nation has always been known for their hospitality, the ‘Land of a Thousand Welcomes’. Have we evolved from this to such an extent that we now neglect our own, that we discard our elderly parents like last week’s rubbish once they are no longer of use to us or when the cash flow has dried up?
We would do well to remember that we owe these people our lives — without them we wouldn’t be here — and treat them accordingly.
Edel Cregan,
Longwood, Co Meath
STAR LETTER JUST A BIG LONG MOAN
Madam — Your letter of the week (Sunday Independent, January 12, 2014), is nothing short of one big moan.
It is said, ‘when you are right and everybody else is wrong, chances are it’s you who is wrong’. Also ‘to have a friend you must be a friend’.
Anna Lyons,
Dublin 14
LEVEL OF DESPAIR WAS PALPABLE
Madam — What an incredibly distressing Letter of the Week, “Life is sheer hell at 80″ (Sunday Independent, January 12, 2014). The level of hurt and despair was very upsetting to read. It seems unbelievable in this day and age that someone who has lived that long has literally no one to turn to — and the sad thing is that I’m sure she is not the only one out there with that horrendous sense of isolation.
I would also wonder how many people out there are reading it and a tiny part of their mind is wondering could it be their mother writing it.
In today’s hectic world it is so easy to keep putting on the long finger that phone call or visit home which can mean a huge amount.
Likewise it is too easy for the grandchildren to accept the yearly birthday card with cash as their due and not make the thank you call or visit.
I think that with the recession and with longer working hours and more financial worries we have probably all become more complacent about the things that matter most and have let family responsibilities slide. I personally think it is a lot more important to spend even a small amount of time with the living and not just turn out in great numbers at the funeral of a family member.
To the lady who wrote the letter I would say it is never too late to change your life. If your health permits it, use the free travel to go out and make some day trips, watch out for coffee mornings in your local church hall or whatever. Make it a point to go out of the house every day even if it is only going to buy milk. The change of scene and fresh air really will help. Make it a point to speak to the shopkeeper and to the person you are standing beside at the bus stop. In a lot of cases, they are probably lonely too.
I would also let your family know how isolated and lonely you are… for in today’s busy world they may not be aware of it. I sincerely hope 2014 will be a better one for you.
Mary Quinn,
Dun Laoghaire
REAL VICTIMS DON’T WRITE LIKE THIS
Madam — I am saddened you gave “Life is sheer hell at 80″ the ‘Letter of the Week’ award (Sunday Independent, January 12, 2014). The tone of the letter was that of a person who acts the victim. This lady is also steeped in anger.
I would bet her husband and children are the real victims. Is it any wonder they avoid her? No doubt she has hurt them all so much they have no choice but to stay away.
What upsets me is that she has fooled you with her ‘poor me’ talk. How many other people does she fool with her sob stories? I would love to hear from her children and husband what she is really like to be around.
Real victims do not write letters like that.
Dr Annette Hunter,
Letterkenny, Co Donegal
GRIMY MEMORIES OF DUBLIN 1941
Madam — This year there is a lot of remembrance concerning World War I. This revived my memory of the 1941 bombing of Dublin. Living in Henrietta Street, I remember sheltering with my grandparents in the top flat during the bombing of North Circular Road.
It was also wonderful to see the same building (untouched since we left in 1941) used in a recent episode of Ripper Street. The nearby Kings Inn has also been used and we had many happy days with our picnic (bread, maybe jam) in there collecting caterpillars on the rough grass area. I stood outside the building in May last year wishing to look inside so it was good fortune to be watching that episode. I also visited the Kings Inn and walked around the parkland at the back. Nobody ever bothered us in there and we roamed around the outside grounds and considered it as part of our playground.
James Joyce, in Dubliners — A Little Cloud, refers to Henrietta Street and the horde of grimy children that populated that street. In 1941 I am sure we were less grimy. Maybe not.
Tom Cullen,
Argyll, Scotland
HARRIS STILL HAS ONE EYE ON LENS
Madam –In your letters page (Sunday Independent, January 12, 2014) I referred to Eoghan Harris as a “former documentary-maker”. In the same paper Eoghan referred to himself as a “sometimes documentary producer”. Perhaps I was presumptuous, as I discern this to mean the warhorse hasn’t hung up his camera lens just yet.
John Bellew,
Dunleer, Co Louth
SAVE PYLON COST BY BURYING CABLES
Madam — Brendan O’Connor’s front-page article (Sunday Independent, January 12, 2014), mentions Enda Kenny’s comment that if we want jobs we need to have pylons.
The Taoiseach comes from Mayo and I doubt very much if there is any chance of any of the new pylons going through Mayo territory.
We have come a long way from overhead power cables in this country and the use of pylons would be a huge backward step, not to mention a huge blot on the landscape.
And, by the way, where are the jobs that go with the manufacture of 750 pylons going to be created?
Not in Ireland surely.
Pylons have traditionally been imported from Italy and Spain in the past. Are we going to break ranks and put all the engineering workshops and steelworkers back into meaningful manufacturing jobs?
If the cables go underground, as they should, the money saved on the pylons would stay in the country to generate more jobs.
Is there any joined up thinking in this country?
Walter McCutcheon,
Limerick
LYRIC IS THERE TO SOOTHE LISTENERS
Madam — With regard to Michael Dryhurst’s letter, concerning Lyric FM, (Sunday Independent, January 12, 2014), I couldn’t agree more about Motor Mouth M…y in the morning. He just doesn’t know when to stop. It’s the same when he does the Eurovision Song Contest. I must admit I do find Gay interesting, but the whole point of listening to Lyric FM is to be soothed and transported to another world. The presenter I like is Aedin Gormley. She has a lovely tone, and knows that people usually tune in to hear the beautiful music. Less talk please.
Roisin Steed,
Galway
ENCYCLICALS MAKE FOR GOOD READING
Madam — I read Barry Egan (Sunday Independent, January 12, 2014) and it reminded me of the question in the Catechism: ‘What is Presumption?’
Answer: ‘It is the foolish expectation of salvation, without making the necessary and proper use of the means to obtain it.’
I am reading the Encyclical ‘Lumen Fidei’ of the Supreme Pontiff Francis. We should also read the other encyclical letters of the previous Popes.
Myra Smith (Mrs), Longford
Disagreeing with Donal on suicide
Madam — For too long the points the late Donal Walsh made in relation to suicide have gone unchallenged. It is not appropriate to speak ill of the dead but it is equally not inappropriate to disagree with the views that they had expressed. The views that Donal Walsh expressed and in particular his views on those who commit suicide should not be seen as acceptable. There was an inference that those who battle depression and succumb to suicide do so out of an element of choice; this cannot be further from the truth, and sadly was never opposed.
I know many who fight against depression and the last thing I would like to see is that devalued by allowing such an inference. I do not believe that anybody who succumbs to suicide does so without enduring a great level of pain or consideration for the pain that it will cause. The battle against depression is a silent one and is often hidden, unlike a physical illness, but that should not devalue the veracity of mental illness, which this debate and media coverage has done. The effect that Donal Walsh had was to galvanise the issue and make it relevant, but elements of his views towards blame should not be accepted. Those who suffer from this illness should not be subject to critical judgment just because the battle and the scars that come with their fight cannot be seen.
Sean Cassidy,
Dublin 20
Brendan O’Connor: In fairness to Donal Walsh he was always at pains to say that he was not referring to people who suffered from mental illness.
IT’S GOOD TO READ ANTONIA AGAIN
Madam — Great to see the photogenic Antonia Leslie writing again. Hope she will do so regularly from now on.
Eddie Walsh,
Nottingham, England
HURTFUL WRITING
Madam — I was personally delighted with our former president’s comments on the church’s attitude to gay people.
I was encouraged, hopeful and glad to hear from such a respected person, words that might lighten the burden of our many young gay people.
Having, as a retired school principal, witnessed first hand the bullying that most young gay teenagers have to endure in our schools, I said to my heterosexual self, “Well done Mary”.
Then, Madam, on reading Emer O’Kelly’s ‘You’re still on a ticket to hell if you have gay sex’ (Sunday Independent, January 12, 2014), I was so taken aback that I must have read it 10 times before putting pen to paper to your good self.
Writing of the sin and the sinner, Ms Kelly uses the dreadful and highly emotive sin of child rape to further her sin/sinner argument.
How devious and dangerous that is. She may as well have stood outside a gay pub and pointed out the gay patrons to the gay bashers.
This was a piece of very hurtful and potentially life-threatening journalism.
Pat Burke Walsh,
Wexford
HAD ENOUGH OF THIS ‘GOOD NEWS’
Madam — Colm McCarthy is right when he points out that in a country in which government spending outpaced government revenue by almost €1bn per month last year, “the sale of yet more government debt is a funny kind of good news story” (Sunday Independent, January 12, 2014).
Since the consequence of all the unwarranted good news in the recent past was a bankrupt country, one would have thought that the people heard far too much good news during the boom.
Judging from their public pronouncements lately, I am not sure anyone in politics, media or academia is listening to the warnings of Mr McCarthy and his likes.
A Leavy,
Sutton, Dublin 13
Independent:


Still still clearing out

$
0
0

20 January 2014 Still still clearing out

I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. They have to deliver the Tood Huinter Browns to some remote location ans Leslie has gotten them lost.

Clearing out attic for insulation

Scrabbletoday Mary winsand gets over400, Perhaps Iwill win tomorrow.

 

Obituary:

 

Sir Christopher Chataway , who has died aged 82, was the athlete who paced Roger Bannister to the first sub-four minute mile, finishing second himself. He later served in the governments of Harold Macmillan, Lord Home and Edward Heath; was a pioneer of commercial broadcasting; and served as chairman of the Civil Aviation Authority.

Although “built all wrong for running” and fond of a post-race cigar, Chataway was a world-class competitor from the half-mile to the half-marathon, with a fearsome final kick. He broke the world 5,000 metres record; competed in the 1952 and 1956 Olympics; and in 1955 broke the four-minute barrier himself, finishing second to Laszlo Tabori at White City in 3 min 59.8 sec.

A “really fast mile” had been promised when the Amateur Athletics Association met Oxford University at Iffley Road on the blustery afternoon of May 6 1954 as Bannister, a medical student, set out to beat his British record of 4 mins 3.6 sec.

With Chris Brasher, Chataway set a cracking pace, recording 4 mins 7.2 sec. Bannister excelled with laps of 57.5 sec, 60.7, 62.3 and a final 58.9. As he collapsed through the tape, three timekeepers certified the result, then Norris McWhirter took the loud-hailer. Cheers drowned him out as he gave the time as “Three…”. Bannister had shattered Gunder Haegg’s world record by two seconds with a run of 3 mins 59.4.

For Chataway, the bridge from athletics to politics was television. The reader of ITN’s first bulletin on October 11 1955, he was one of a cluster of contemporaries who became household names: Robin Day (with whom he shared ITN’s debut), Ludovic Kennedy and Geoffrey Johnson Smith. Setting up commercial radio as Minister for Posts and Telecommunications, he would spend 12 years with the medium as chairman of LBC.

He was in the vanguard of social reform, co-sponsoring Humphry Berkeley’s Bill to legalise homosexuality and telling for the Ayes in the 1964 vote to end capital punishment. As leader of the Inner London Education Committee, he upset grassroots Tories by letting comprehensive plans for seven boroughs go ahead, before securing a reprieve from the Labour government for 44 grammar schools.

Pro-European and very much a Heath man, Chataway left Parliament in 1974 , moving effortlessly into the boardroom before his appointment by John Major to head the CAA. He remained an athlete at heart, querying Harold Wilson’s creation of a Sports Council, opposing Mrs Thatcher’s efforts to force a boycott of the 1980 Moscow Olympics and chairing the Commonwealth Games Council and UK Athletics. Taking up running again after stopping smoking, he turned in a 5 mins 48 sec mile at the age of 64.

With three friends, Chataway was prime mover of World Refugee Year, which raised £9 million in Britain alone and brought him the 1960 Nansen Medal. He was an early chairman of Oxfam, and went on to chair Action Aid and the Bletchley Park Trust.

Christopher John Chataway was born in Chelsea on January 31 1931, spending his childhood in Sudan, where his father was in the political service. At Sherborne he excelled at rugby, boxing and gymnastics and did not win a race until he was 16. He caught up fast, finishing second in the Public Schools’ championships despite losing a shoe, and in 1950, running for the Army, clipping 2.4 seconds off the Inter-Service mile record to 4 mins 15.6 sec.

Reading PPE at Magdalen College, Oxford, Chataway won a cross-country Blue in his first term. Early in 1952 he cut Bannister’s Oxford mile record to 4 mins 10.2 sec; that July he knocked five seconds off the British all-comers’ two-mile record.

In the 1952 Helsinki Olympics he tripped going for the lead in the 5,000 metres, recovering to finish fifth, 12 seconds behind Emil Zatopek. In his last year at Oxford, in the Varsity match, he cut his best for the mile to 4 mins 8.4 sec, then the third fastest by a Briton. In May 1953 Bannister set his record of 4 mins 3.6 sec, paced by Chataway.

Chataway joined Guinness as a transport executive, but continued to run. Gordon Pirie and Australia’s John Landy had talked of breaking four minutes, but the barrier stood until that day at Iffley Road. At White City in July, two months after he had helped Bannister make athletics history, Chataway and his fellow Briton Fred Green broke Gunder Haegg’s world three-mile record, with a time of 13 mins 32.2 sec.

Then, on October 13, again at White City, Chataway captured the world 5,000 metres record, beating Russia’s Vladimir Kuts in 13 mins 51.6 sec. Although Kuts regained his record 10 days later, the Soviet authorities made Chataway a Master of Sport. The drama of this clash — millions had followed the race on television to see the Briton win in the last few strides — made him the BBC’s first Sporting Personality of the Year, ahead of Bannister. After running his only sub-four minute mile, on July 30 1955 Chataway broke his own world three-mile record by nine seconds.

Before the 1956 Melbourne Olympics, Chataway set a personal best for the 880 yards of 1 min 53.3 sec. He should have taken on Kuts and Zatopek in London, but the Russians withdrew after their team-mate Nina Ponomareva was caught allegedly shoplifting hats in Selfridges. Melbourne was a disappointment, Chataway fading in the final stages of the 5,000 metres, and he retired from the track.

Chataway joined ITN two months before ITV went live . He excelled, but wanted to do more reporting — and in 1956 he moved to the BBC as an interviewer with Panorama.

In 1958 he was elected to London County Council, and in 1959, at 28, won Lewisham North from Labour by 4,613 votes. He played himself in slowly at Westminster, supporting the Rev David Sheppard’s refusal to play cricket against South Africa and probing an alleged “colour bar” at a dance hall in Catford. He wrote on athletics for The Sunday Telegraph and continued to broadcast.

Early in 1961 Richard Wood, Minister of Power, made Chataway his PPS, and the following year Macmillan brought him into his government as Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Education. His priority was doubling the number of trainee teachers.

Chataway held Lewisham North in 1964 by just 343 votes. In opposition he remained an education spokesman until the incoming Edward Heath moved him to overseas development.

Defeated in the Labour landslide of 1966, he rejoined the BBC, presenting Horizon. But he had to limit his broadcasting when, the following April, he became leader of Ilea’s education committee; his personal assistant was Jeffrey Archer. Seeking another seat, Chataway was defeated for the Reigate nomination in 1968 by Geoffrey Howe . But early in 1969 he was selected for Chichester, which he won in a May by-election, his majority of 26,087 making it the Tories’ safest seat. That October he rejoined the front bench as environment spokesman.

After winning the June 1970 election, Heath made Chataway, not yet 40, Minister for Posts and Telecommunications . He came under immediate pressure from Mary Whitehouse to “clean up” programmes, and from colleagues to stop jamming pirate stations such as Radio Caroline and to legalise commercial radio.

His 1971 White Paper, and subsequent Sound Broadcasting Bill, created an Independent Broadcasting Authority and up to 60 local commercial radio stations, with the BBC limited to its existing 20. He resisted pressure for breakfast television and a fourth channel.

In April 1972 Heath promoted him to the new sub-Cabinet post of Minister for Industrial Development. Chataway spent much time brokering the survival of lame ducks: the collapsed Upper Clyde Shipyards under new ownership, Cammell Laird, Rootes Motors (under Chrysler), BSA and International Computers.

On deciding to leave Parliament in late 1974, Chataway went into merchant banking with Orion, where he was a managing director until 1988, heading mergers and acquisitions. He joined the boards of BET, Fisons, Allied Investments and Macquarie Securities, and later chaired British Telecommunications Systems, United Medical Enterprises (his share options made him £360,000 on privatisation), Kitcat & Allen and Isola 2000.

When bidding opened for a breakfast television franchise in 1980, Chataway chaired the unsuccessful AM Television, backed by Pearson. From 1981 to 1993 he was chairman of LBC, the London news radio station set up under his legislation.

In 1991 Chataway took the chair at the CAA. His greatest challenge was bringing on stream the computerised NERC air traffic control centre near Southampton. He defended BAA’s monopoly control of London’s three main airports, but rebuked the government for allowing British Airways to take over Dan-Air, and accused BA and Virgin of price-fixing, while trying to resolve their public feud over “dirty tricks”.

He was knighted in 1995, and retired the following year .

Christopher Chataway married first, in 1959 (dissolved 1975), Anna Lett, with whom he had two sons and a daughter . He married secondly, in 1976, Carola Walker, with whom he had two sons.

Sir Christopher Chataway, born January 31 1931, died January 19 2014

 

Guardian:

 

 

To be sure banking still needs fixing, but why must that automatically mean grovelling at the altar of competition (Miliband vows bank reform not retribution, 18 January)? Labour faced down the EU competition/state-aid police once before when Gordon Brown, in extremis, forced them to allow the Lloyds/HBOS deal. The same crisis is far from over, so Miliband must be bold enough to do so again, and enable the creation of the bank we actually need – a national, stripped-down, utility, Mittelstand bank, carved from the bones of RBS (which we already own), regionally organised, with cast-iron regulation, pay linked to middling civil service grades, and draconian and easily enforceable penalties for dodgy dealings.

It’s competition that brought the whole thing down: traders competing to do the biggest deal and net the biggest bonus, high-street banks competing to sell us the most worthless products at the biggest profit margins. Simply admitting new entrants to such a dysfunctional “market” on the basis of a mandated minimum market share risks moving from too-big-to-fail to too-small-to-succeed without addressing the problems with the underlying culture of the industry. Just as with buses, trains, utilities and healthcare, we don’t need competition, we just need one bank that does it right.
Root Cartwright
Radlett, Hertfordshire

• The banks have recapitalised using money provided through quantitative easing (QE), which they are sitting on and not lending to small businesses. They also have any savings up to £85,000 guaranteed by the government. We badly need investment in small businesses to provide local jobs for our children and grandchildren. Why not take the QE money from the banks and set up regional banks, funded from this money and operated for the public via our post offices? Any savings in these new banks would be 100% guaranteed by the government, while it would remove the easing and savings guarantee from banks that insist on paying divisive salaries and bonuses.

This should lead to a significant shift of funds into the new banks, while private banks would have to insure or build more capital to offer the same security. No doubt private banks would offer welcome higher rates, but at a higher risk, to keep their savers. The above would offer a social solution for banking in the interests of the general public, while at the same time allowing the private banks to operate in the market (under regulation) but without taxpayer support. Surely this is how capitalism is supposed to work.
David Walker
Dudley, West Midlands

• Labour’s contrition over their past relationship with the banks (Editorial, 16 January) should be limited to an admission of naivety. If, like many customers, they trusted the banks then that trust was, and continues to be, blatantly abused. Going into the next election as a consumer champion would be no bad thing, with the Conservatives locked into market dogma. However, the strategy for fixing broken markets should be consistently applied: financial transparency, separation of retail operations, and that no business should be too big to fail. Forcing the sale of bank branches would not change the fundamental problems of the financial sector. As with TSB, it would just cause inconvenience for customers.
Richard Gilyead
Saffron Walden, Essex

• Polly Toynbee states (Comment, 17 January) that no one expects unwarranted bank bonus payments to be clawed back under new legislation. Throughout the PPI scandal I have yet to read of any commission paid back by those who benefited from mis-selling. And who, in the end, pays the fines imposed on banks, power firms etc? We customers do when they’re included in the costs of services we need.
Gren Gaskell
Malvern, Worcestershire

Thank you, Michael Rosen (A levy on grief, 15 January) for describing so poignantly how the absence of a dear one is felt in the empty room. Space is rationed and proscribed, always by those who have plenty. Enough space to store belongings, develop a hobby, study in peace, have someone to stay – could members of the current cabinet imagine life without this?
Hazel Imbert
Worthing, West Sussex

• Can I in Tottenham have some of the Guardian magic which restored the newsagent to Dartford station (Letters, 15 January)? Our newsagent has burnt down with a week’s worth of our vouchers inside. None of the other newsagents here delivers or will take vouchers. That only leaves Sainsbury’s Local, the opening of which I opposed because of the detriment to small businesses.
Carol Sykes
London

• Jon Savage says “without financial power or overt political affiliations, young people are too often ignored” (Comment, 18 January). At what age does this end? I’m 58 and I still feel I’m being ignored.
Petar Bavelja
Sheffield

• As any true fan of Peppa Pig will tell you (Letters, 18 January), it is Peppa’s little brother George who is the budding palaeontologist. And “dine-saw” is just about all he ever says.
Stephen J Hackett
Salisbury, Wiltshire

• There may not be dandelions growing in Tynemouth (Letters, 15 January) but there are a little further south in Durham. I also picked two blackberries yesterday, a bit sharp, but edible.
Alan Pearson
Durham

• To quote François Villon: “Mais où sont les neiges d’antan.” More to the point, where are the snowdrops this year?
E Shannon
Westleton, Suffolk

 

The ghost of Rwanda hangs over the Central African Republic (CAR), and again the UN warns of the danger of genocide (Report, 16 January). However, it is significant that EU ambassadors unanimously proposed last week in Brussels that urgent consideration be given to the proposal made by Cathy Ashton that there should be a rapid deployment of a battalion-size force to back up the African and French peacekeepers in their efforts to restore security in the CAR. According to them, there is a “pressing need” to restore security in order to “avoid the CAR sliding towards complete state failure … and large-scale massacres”.

The force would have the status of a common security and defence policy, modelled on Eufor RD Congo in 2006, which used EU member state soldiers under the command of a senior EU member state military official. This proposal would be likely to prepare the way for a better-equipped and effective UN force able to back up the African Union mission.

While the majority of EU member states, including the UK, do not have a direct interest in the CAR, or in taking action, the alternative is unthinkable. Fire support, intelligence, medical support and transport, including helicopters, would make a big difference. I very much hope that on Monday at the EU foreign affairs council in Brussels, William Hague will respond positively before the terrible predictions of genocide are realised.
Glenys Kinnock
House of Lords

Chris Grayling’s announcement that a 320-bed “secure college” is be built adjacent to the existing young offender institution at Glen Parva in Leicestershire is a serious step backwards, all the more saddening given the progress made in recent years to dramatically bring down the number of children and young people in custody from over 3,000 to fewer than 1,300 (Report, 17 January). This will not be the rehabilitative, educational “pathfinder” it is said to be. It is for children the “Titan” equivalent of the 2,000-bed prison the government plans for adults near Wrexham. Economies of scale are fine for the production of nails; they don’t work for seriously troubled adolescents. What are needed are relatively expensive, small, local, intimate units closely linked to the community agencies with whom troubled children and their families dealt prior to their custody and with whom they will have to relate on release. Large, misleadingly cheap, geographically distant institutions will, despite the best efforts of their teaching staff, fit the description the minister wants to put on the tin: colleges – but of crime. The likely outcome will be the displacement and closure of the local authority secure units. It is dispiriting to find the Youth Justice Board, now firmly back within the Ministry of Justice, endorsing the plan.
Rod Morgan
Former chairman, Youth Justice Board

• It is outrageous that at a time of swingeing cuts to other services for children and young people, the government proposes spending millions on a new 320-bed child prison. This flies in the face of evidence which indicates that where children have to be detained, small local units with a social care and therapeutic regime are most effective. While education is an important component in helping children who are in the criminal justice system, it is counterproductive to suggest that locking up even more of them is the way to ensure rehabilitation. The average time spent in custody is 11 weeks, and children who end up in custody have a myriad of needs which are unmet before and after their sentences. Providing education in a “fortified school” for a short period and, for many children, at a great distance from their home and community, will not deal with the impoverished lives, mental health and learning difficulties and lack of opportunities that most of them will return to. It will neither protect the public nor help children to stay out of trouble.
Pam Hibbert
Chair of Trustees, National Association for Youth Justice

 

 

 

Independent:

To offer or conduct psychotherapy or counselling with the express aim of altering sexual orientation is profoundly unethical (“The woman who thinks Tom Daley’s gay because his Dad died”, 17 January).

The UK Council for Psychotherapy (UKCP) and all other leading therapy organisations have spoken out against this practice, including the Association of Christian Counsellors.

While UKCP agrees with the good intentions behind Geraint Davies’s Bill, we don’t necessarily need more legislation to ban gay conversion therapy.

The voluntary professional bodies have already issued guidance to their registrants. We would welcome the statutory regulators (the Health and Care Professions Council which covers arts therapists and psychologists, and the General Medical Council which covers doctors) rising to the challenge and following suit.

People who are struggling with conflicting feelings about relationships and sexual attractions need support, whatever their sexuality.

They need confidence that the therapist whom they see abides by a robust ethical code.

UKCP is calling for clear professional guidelines and high-quality public information, and is working with professional partners and the Department of Health to deliver both.

David Pink

Chief Executive,

UK Council for Psychotherapy,

London EC1

Dr Mike Davidson of the Core Issues Trust was reported as saying: “On what grounds should a married man with children be forbidden the opportunity to reduce unwanted same-sex attraction in order to hold his family together?”

Surely it’s unrealistic to see feelings in terms of “unwanted” or “wanted”? Our feelings are part of the raw material that makes us. They offer information in regard to ourselves and the world, and as such signal a potential.

I support Geraint Davies’s Bill. Any counsellor or psychotherapist who attempted to eradicate “unwanted” feelings  would be failing to recognise that human processes are not the same as medical ones.

Sexuality is more  complex and interesting than that.

Chris Payne

Registered with the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy  and the UK Council for Psychotherapy,

London NW1

 

The media and  teenage suicide

Emily Dugan’s article “The tragedy of Tallulah: how a secret online identity took over a girl’s life” (18 January) seemed to jump on the bandwagon of accounting for teenage suicide by headlining the use of Internet sites by teenagers.

She is perhaps unaware that one person committing suicide often leads to others they know – or who hear of it – being more likely to kill themselves.

As the parent of a 16-year-old who knew Tallulah, I was horrified to open the paper and find the glamorous photograph – first used, irresponsibly, in another paper the day after Tallulah’s death.

Journalists should think very hard about how such issues are explored in order to prevent other young people looking at this image and thinking they, too, could receive such attention after their deaths and have their photograph in the national news. All forms of media can be dangerous to vulnerable people, not just the Internet.

Loraine Hancock

London W9

 

Lost girls: Think of a mother’s dilemma

There has been a great deal of outrage expressed about the “lost girls” who may have been aborted, and the need to stop people learning the gender of their babies until after the abortion time limit has passed. However, there has been little concern expressed for the woman who is in the position of being pregnant with a daughter not wanted by the father, as well as possibly by the mother herself and her extended family.

How will it help these mothers to force them either to seek an illegal abortion at an unregulated clinic or to carry to term an unwanted child?

And what kind of life will these unwanted daughters live, with fathers who wish they had never been born, and mothers who are ashamed of having produced them?

We allow women to terminate pregnancies of up to 24 weeks on the basis that, until it is viable, a foetus is a part of the mother’s body and not a separate human being. If that is the case, a mother’s reasons for requesting a termination before 24 weeks should not matter.

Of course, doctors do not want to be a part of forcing an abortion on someone. But isn’t it patronising to assume that a woman cannot make a rational decision to terminate a baby, sad though the prospect is, rather than bring a daughter into a family where she isn’t welcome?

It is terrible that women are being coerced into abortions by husbands and families. But the root of the problem is entrenched sexism, which needs to be tackled with education and community outreach, not by restricting mothers’ options.

Ellen Purton

Twickenham

Why would it be “draconian”, as Dr Sarah Wollaston argues (“Britain to act on illegal gender selection”, 16 January), to withhold gender information totally from expectant parents? Why is it necessary for any expectant parent to know the gender of their unborn child?

Just because something is possible doesn’t mean it is the right thing to do. In fact, it could be regarded as unnatural. Countless generations of humans have managed perfectly well without this foreknowledge. The element of surprise through not knowing can add to the pleasure of the birth event.

Refusal by the medical profession to reveal the gender of the foetus would certainly put paid to much of the selection.

Iain Smith

Rugby, Warwickshire

 

I have just listened to the news with its litany of rape, sexual assault and generally unacceptable behaviour by a wide variety of men and boys. I also felt horror at The Independent’s revelation of the rate of abortion of female foetuses in certain areas of the world and the fear that it is even happening in this country.

It all adds up to make me feel extremely depressed at the state of our society. Misogyny seems to be everywhere and the casual “use” of women so widespread that many men don’t even recognise it.

Where have we gone wrong that our men are so dysfunctional and have such a distorted idea of the way they should relate to women? Do they not realise that women are people – as they themselves are – and not simply commodities?

Angela Peyton

Beyton. Suffolk

 

British spirit is a thing of the past

I read that the Royal Mail suspended deliveries to two villages near Swansea after a postman complained that paths were slippery and dangerous because of rain.

However, a resident is reported to have said that the condition of the paths was no worse than in other winters; and a neighbour said it was absolutely fine with a pair of wellies.

There was a time when the Royal Mail was proud that, whatever the weather, the mail was delivered.

During the freezing winter of 1947, a train delivering coal to a town on the east coast became frozen solid. But the railway staff knew that the town was almost out of coal, and despite the perishing cold and incredible discomfort, they managed to start the train, and the vital fuel arrived in time.

Where is the British spirit and pride these days in overcoming all difficulties to finish the job?

Perhaps we should be grateful that a different generation was around during the Second World War and that the health and safety brigade had not yet appeared on the scene.

Colin Bower

Sherwood, Nottingham

I understood that the Government privatised the Royal Mail in the best interests of both the business and its customers.

Recently, a notice has been pinned to our local postbox stating that to achieve business efficiencies the collection time on Saturdays is being brought forward by half an hour.

For many years we have received our mail between 9.30am and 11am. We have noticed since New Year that deliveries have gone back to between 1pm and 2.30pm.

Today, our post included a letter from the local sorting office saying that in the interests of efficiencies, rounds had been reorganised and the delivery “window” extended. As a customer, am I missing something?

Roy Baker

Marston Green,  West Midlands

 

Humane approach to lethal injection

Between reading your accounts on 17 and 18 January of the clumsy execution of Dennis McGuire in Ohio, I had to have an elderly and sick cat put down.

The process was entirely peaceful. A first injection sent the animal gently to sleep, and a second injection finished him off, with no distress whatsoever being caused. Have the authorities in Ohio and other American states that use lethal injection missed something?

D W Budworth

London W

 

 

 

Times:

 

Sir, George Osborne’s suggestion that the time is ripe for an above-inflation increase in the national minimum wage is economically prudent and politically astute (Jan 17). Opponents may claim that employment prospects of the lowest paid will be adversely affected but the independent Institute for Social & Economic Research (ISER) report published in February 2012 found no evidence of significant adverse impacts on pre-recession employment arising from the minimum wage.

The return of strong economic growth and the rapidly improving jobs market supports the timing of the Chancellor’s statement which is one of the most significant Conservative policy reversals of David Cameron’s leadership. The lingering public perception that the party is hostile to the poor is now firmly contradicted by the huge increase in personal allowances focused exclusively on basic rate taxpayers, the freeze in fuel duty and council tax and the belated admission that the party was wrong to oppose the introduction of the minimum wage in the 1990s.

Philip Duly

Haslemere, Surrey

Sir, You assert that people on the minimum wage earn just over £12,000 a year. This is incorrect. The majority of those on this hourly rate are working part-time; many are students. The minimum wage is an ineffective anti-poverty instrument which does little for working families. A significant rise in the rate will, however, close off entry-level jobs for many young people. We already have a million under-25s looking for work — Mr Osborne’s generosity with other people’s money will do little for them.

Professor J. R. Shackleton

University of Buckingham

Sir, You say “there is no better welfare policy than better pay”. Surely the best answer is to align the proposed national minimum wage with the income tax personal allowance. For a 37-hour week at £7 per hour this would amount to a £13,468 annual tax threshold so that no one on the minimum wage pays income tax.

Derek Edwards

Brentwood Essex

Sir, A rise in the minimum wage will in the first instance attract even more migrants from within the EU. As for policing it, this will prove in the longer run to be a mug’s game. Better to acknowledge that a living wage and mass immigration are mutually exclusive. Curtail immigration and the market will automatically raise unskilled wages.

There will, of course, be a transfer of purchasing power from the majority “haves” to the minority “have-nots” as menial jobs that cannot be outsourced abroad become more costly. This is a small price to pay for all who espouse One Nation cohesiveness.

Only a “penny wise and pound foolish” society would import cheap labour with the aim of driving unskilled pay below a living wage. Not being able to control migrants from within the EU is tantamount to importing cheap labour.

Yugo Kovach

Winterborne Houghton, Dorset

 

 

A retired Colonel contacts the Times to offer up his own experience of titular misunderstanding

Sir, Colonel Dewar (letter, Jan 18) should be so lucky! I have been addressed in correspondence by the abbreviated title Colon.David Cooper, Colonel (retd) Sidmouth, Devon

 

As the “disease of kings” becomes more prevalant, Times readers write in to share anecdotes and home remedies

Sir, It is said that Judge Jeffries was suffering from gout when he made the long journey from London to Dorchester in a poorly sprung coach over roads that were even more potholed than they are today (“UK gout epidemic is no laughing matter”, Jan 16). The upshot was the “Hanging Assizes”.Robin HughesEast Ogwell, Devon

Sir, I suffered five bouts of gout during the course of 2012. Through 2013 I daily took a couple of teaspoons of Montmorency cherry juice (available at a fairly large price from your pharmacist). I had no recurrence of gout in 2013. Can there really be a connection?Shirley ThurstonHampton Hill, Middx

 

Reward systems with a high-bonus element lead to employees performing in a manner that is penny wise but pound foolish

Sir, The growth of the bonus culture in banking and in financial service industries has spread worldwide and is proving difficult to control and even harder to reverse (report, Jan 15).

Reward systems with a high bonus element are pernicious: they distort performance towards narrow and short-term objectives, they exhibit upward creep under competitive pressures, and they are perceived as unfair by those not eligible. They are popular only to those who receive them and they are sustained by fallacious arguments about attracting good people but they are most attractive to the avaricious.

I worked for many years in industrial operations management where our research indicated that bonus payments, or payment by results, works best for simple manual work. Here it is easy to relate earnings to tons of material moved or packed, and where proportional reward can be paid in relation to effort expended. In more complex roles, the direct relationship between effort and output is hard to define, and bonuses linked to specific business targets leads to distorted or selfish behaviour which diverges from the wider and longer term aims of the organisation.

The only way out of the present contentious and pernicious bonus culture in the banks, which has now run way out of control, is to bring it to an end. Governments and shareholders should work together to encourage distaste for these bad reward systems.

Arthur Dicken

Prestbury, Cheshire

 

It is wrong for banks to pay out huge bonuses when a fifth of renters are borrowing simply to meet housing costs

Sir, News of RBS proposals to pay some staff bonuses twice the size of their banking salary contrasts sharply with Shelter’s survey finding that a fifth of those in rented accommodation are borrowing simply to meet housing costs. No government should tolerate such active polarisation of UK society: any acquiescence of politicians to payment of these ridiculously inflated sums is socially irresponsible and unacceptable.

Robert Gower

Egleton, Rutland

 

The head of Ofsted has a habit of using anecdotes and personal opinion as if they were of equal value to inspection evidence

Sir, Sir Michael Wilshaw, the head of Ofsted, says trainee teachers have been sent into schools without proper guidance on professional behaviour or dress (Jan 16).

Sir Michael had no experience as an inspector before his appointment but this is no excuse for his tendency to use anecdotes and personal opinion as if they were of equal value to inspection evidence when he is speaking as the Chief Inspector.

He also suggested that weaknesses in training led to teachers leaving the profession early because they found pupils’ bad behaviour too challenging. As we are in the second year of a three-year programme of inspections of initial teacher training providers, in which inspectors are charged with checking on trainees’ preparation to meet the professional standards, including managing pupils’ behaviour, we might expect Sir Michael to refer to the inspection reports that led him to this conclusion. There are, after all, a large number of inspection reports from last year available on the Ofsted web-site. I can find nothing in these reports that would lead an impartial reader to think that there were weaknesses in the training provided by schools and their Higher Education Institution partners to help trainees manage pupils’ behaviour. Perhaps the contradiction between the inspection evidence and Sir Michael’s anecdotal evidence is the reason he is willing to ignore his own inspectors’ conclusions.

Norman Blackett

(former HMI) Malvern, Worcs

Sir, Michael Wilshaw is shocked that 40 per cent of new teachers leave within five years. Many others are leaving and this is probably due to exhaustion. Heads believe that a 9am to 3pm working day with eight lessons, a short morning break, a short lunch and no afternoon break is acceptable.

Finland, a top performer internationally, has the same working day but with five lessons, each with a 15-minute break, and a lunch hour.

The breaks are used to track pupils and to mark work produced in class. Finnish teachers have job satisfaction, have no inspections, and pupils have 1 hour of homework per week. Our school system needs a rethink.

Ken Rotheram

Maryport, Cumbria

 

 

Telegraph:

 

SIR – Congratulations to Alan Titchmarsh for his article about manners (Life, January 12).

The demise of good manners is a sad reflection of poor parental care in today’s society.

When an elderly gentleman, passing me in the park the other day, raised his hat and said “Good morning, madam,” I was so delighted I had to run after him and tell him he had made my day.

Jo Swindells
Hereford

SIR – Why have the manners and morals of our country changed so much for the worse?

Of course we must progress, but not to the detriment of a civilised society. Sadly, I feel we are all on a slippery slope to losing these things completely.

Anna Nicholas
Tutshill, Gloucestershire

SIR – Children need to be taught table manners and not to eat in front of the television. Saying “please” and “thank you” costs nothing but means so much.

I am always delighted when a gentleman opens a door for me or offers me a seat. I hope these things do not disappear.

Mo Sparrow
Morchard Bishop, Devon

SIR – As teachers, we led many school outings together. We never had any discipline problems. Boys always wore uniform on journeys and when we stayed in hotels on skiing trips in the Cairngorms they changed into their grey suits for the evening meal.

Table manners were most important. Once, in Holland, a small boy was seen watching our boys having a meal. When we asked why he was there, he said that he was the manager’s son and had been sent to observe the English schoolboys’ manners.

Michael and Christine Johnson
Birmingham

 

SIR – The wind energy industry’s claim that “the UK is the windiest country in Europe” is misleading (“Britons pay more for wind farms”, January 12).

Scotland is the windiest country in Europe. Most of onshore England has modest wind speeds, and too many English turbine developments underperform as a result. Seeing static turbines in fine landscapes or close to residential areas fuels public opposition to them.

Permitting wind energy developments where wind speeds are low should cease forthwith. Ed Davey should stop telling us not to worry because we only pay for the electricity they produce. All this does is demonstrate that subsidies are too high.

Professor Michael Jefferson
Melchbourne, Bedfordshire

SIR – Support paid for onshore wind in Britain is lower than in many other countries, such as Poland, Brazil, Italy and Japan.

To establish a secure and affordable electricity supply, we need government support to develop renewables. The amount required is falling as costs fall. Onshore wind is currently one of the cheapest large-scale renewable technologies, and we cut support rates by 10 per cent in April 2013, in line with falling costs. Support will be cut more in the future.

We are also looking to move to “competitive allocation” sooner than previously announced. This means onshore wind will have to compete on cost in order to be considered for a contract.

Wind is a vital contributor to our energy supply and met 6.6 per cent of our electricity needs last year.

Edward Davey
Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change
London SW1

SIR – As the warmists blame the storms and floods on climate change, perhaps we should look back a few years to when chaos theory was popular, and it was suggested that the flapping of a butterfly’s wings could cause a hurricane on the other side of the world.

If this is the case, one wonders what the turbulence from the thousands of turbines will do to the world’s weather.

Brian Clarke
Wivenhoe, Essex

Sexualised society

SIR – I was struck by the contrast between the First World War letters and the article by Hannah Betts on misogyny in Stella last week (January 12).

Those tender love letters were written under harrowing conditions by young men and women reared in a God-fearing culture in which most tried to live by the Ten Commandments and the Golden Rule. I wonder how many young people today even know what these are.

Young men now are being raised on hardcore pornography. Alas, not even the most energetic placard-waving feminist can overcome this.

Barbara Fisher
North Marston, Buckinghamshire

SIR – For several decades, young women have been subjected to propaganda in magazines and films, which seeks to persuade them that, unless they have casual sex with every male who shows interest, there is something wrong with them.

When I was a youth, a kiss and a cuddle was the limit of a young man’s expectation. Teenage pregnancies were unheard of.

Frank Tomlin
Billericay, Essex

Policing the world

SIR – We would save huge sums of money and many lives if we refrained from joining in every foreign war (report, January 12).

We should still maintain a powerful enough Army to defend ourselves or overseas interests such as the Falklands. Other countries can take their turn to act as the world’s police force.

Michael Faunce-Brown
South Ferring, West Sussex

Angel of Woolwich

SIR – Why did the New Year Honours List fail to recognise Ingrid Loyau-Kennett, the gallant woman who got off a bus in order to help the fusilier Lee Rigby? She found herself confronting a blood-stained murderer holding a meat cleaver, and held him in conversation for 10 minutes until the police arrived.

George Crosses have been awarded for less.

Godfrey Dann
East Grinstead, East Sussex

Bankers’ bonuses

SIR – I would be prepared to accept that bankers in the banks bailed out by the state should be given bonuses.

However, they should only be paid when the bank is returned to the private sector and at a profit to the state. This would certainly exercise their minds.

John Spiller
Long Ashton, Somerset

Affair and square

SIR – It is surprising that France’s first lady should be hospitalised due to shock over her partner’s alleged affair, when she herself allegedly continued an affair with Monsieur Hollande for some four years while he was with Ségolène Royale.

Narguesse Stevens
Newton Abbott, Devon

 

 

SIR – The attempt by 95 Conservative MPs to strengthen the Prime Minister’s hand in his negotiations for treaty change was bold, but doomed to fail (“95 Tory MPs call for EU law veto”, report January 12).

Unfortunately, José Manuel Barroso and his colleagues seem intent on cocking a snook at David Cameron’s reasonable aspirations to renegotiate our EU membership and refuse to take them seriously.

As things stand, the only way is Ukip, for the European elections at least. A large number of Ukip votes could hope to stop the juggernaut in its tracks, and lead to a sensible negotiation being pursued.

Alec Ellis
Liverpool

SIR – If the EU is confirmed by a referendum to be a permanent feature of our lives, I would recommend that we go the whole hog and rid ourselves of the 650 MPs and 780 peers who are now functionless, and spend their time bickering at Prime Minister’s Questions and clocking in and out in order to have lunch.

They have failed to maintain our independence or keep us safe from foreign powers.

Peter Griffith
Malvern, Worcestershire

SIR – Anyone standing for Parliament should be expected to study the 1972 European Communities Act and the Hansard debates relating to it, and then be tested on it.

Our MPs would then realise that calling for a “pick and mix” EU is not an option. Their predecessors voted for Parliament, and all future British governments, to be subservient to the foreign power then known as the Common Market, now the European Union, with all its laws having priority over all British law. The only way of vetoing EU laws would be to repeal the 1972 Act, thus taking Britain out of the EU. Talking about vetoing EU laws is like whistling in the wind.

Derek Bennett
Walsall, Staffordshire

SIR – Perhaps the 95 Tory rebels were exercising loyalty to the people who should matter most to them – their constituents.

A prime minister can be replaced. Most of the 95 MPs’ constituents could not be dispatched so speedily.

Chris Keats
Christchurch, Dorset

SIR – The late Professor Kenneth Minogue once said that “an ideological movement is a collection of people, many of whom could hardly bake a cake, fix a car, sustain a friendship or a marriage, or even do a quadratic equation, yet they believe they know how to rule the world”.

Isn’t this an excellent summary of the ideologically driven European federalists, whose project is in free-fall, and yet still they dogmatically pursue their ends while insisting that the crisis is over?

James Adam Paton
Billericay, Essex

SIR – Would the 95 Conservative MPs who want the power to veto EU laws be happy at the prospect of other countries being able to veto laws that were clearly in Britain’s interests?

Alan Pavelin
Chislehurst, Kent

SIR – Surely, if all the MEPs who disagree with their monthly decamping to Strasbourg stayed in Brussels and got on with their paperwork for four days, it would embarrass the EU into taking action? Perhaps not.

William T Nuttall
Rossendale, Lancashire

SIR – If a man couldn’t decide which of two cities, 300 miles apart, to live in, and his solution was to live for a month in each and go to and fro 12 times a year at great expense, he would rightly be regarded as mad.

Yet this is what is costing the EU £93 million a year.

David Cook
Cottingham, East Yorkshire

SIR – The Tories said: “There is no question of any erosion of essential national sovereignty” while Labour’s slogan was: “In Europe, not run by Europe”.

Both very similar, and equally untrue.

Robert Edwards
Hornchurch, Essex

 

Irish Times:

 

Sir, – Your Editorial (January 13th) highlighted the continuing crisis in relation to ongoing overcrowding in hospitals, particularly in our emergency departments (ED).

The sad reality is that seven years after being described as a national emergency by the then Minister for Health, there is still no end in sight to this problem.

The fundamental problem with overcrowding stems from a reduction in bed numbers at a time of increasing population. The IMO believes that the problems in EDs will not be solved until this Government addresses the issue of integrated health care and bed capacity. It is the lack of vision and resources that cause the problems in EDs all over the country and it must be recognised that emergency departments represent just one of the many pressure points in the system.

The Special Delivery Unit (SDU) theoretically looks at the total picture of a hospital but the reality is that so much more needs to be done – where are the long stay units for elderly and high dependency patients? Where are the so-called community services? Where are the beds in the hospital when at any given time wards are closed for budgetary reasons further reducing capacity?

It is not acceptable to blame the crisis on the season of the year or the ageing of the population – the sad but true fact is that our health services are starved of resources and cannot deliver the quality of care required for patients. – Yours, etc,

Dr MATTHEW SADLIER,

President,

Irish Medical Organisation,

Fitzwilliam Place,

 

Sir, – Last October I filled out the annual statistical census in my school. One of the easiest sections was a straight Yes/No answer to the question, “Does your school operate a book rental scheme?”. With justifiable pride I clicked “Yes”. With an average donation per child of €60,with parents most generously sending in all their children’s used books in order to create a stockpile and with a committee of staff and parents giving up to two weeks of their summer holidays, we ensured that every child in our school was part of our new book rental scheme. Click “Yes” for a job well done!

What would have happened had I clicked “No”? What if the parents had not donated €20,000 as well as their used books to provide the initial outlay? What if the staff had not given their time along with the PA volunteers to put the scheme into effect? Simple. The school would have received €150 per capita over the next three years (approximately €50,000) to introduce a book rental scheme.

Minister of Education and Skills, Ruairí Quinn has decided to reward the no-clicking schools with a €15 million grant (Home News, January 9th). Damned if you do, damned lucky if you don’t. – Yours, etc,

PETER GUNNING,

Principal, Scartleigh NS,

Saleen,

Midleton, Cork.

 

Sir, – Reporting on the Government-backed launch of an online version of Ireland’s Memorial Records, Stephen Collins (Home News, January 11th) repeated the official statistic that “49,000 men from the island of Ireland” died in the 1914-18 war. This figure is simply untrue.

In 1979, I began a thorough examination of the Memorial Records, which had originally been compiled by Eva Bernard 60 years before. I found that some 11,007 of the 49,400 dead had not been born in Ireland, and that 7,245 were without a listed birthplace. However, no simple conclusions may be drawn from these raw figures. Willie Redmond, for example, who emphatically was Irish, was born in Liverpool, and Lord Kitchener, who emphatically wasn’t, was born in Co Kerry. Similarly, neither the English John Kipling, son of the poet, killed in action with the Irish Guards in 1915, nor the Irish Tom Kettle, killed in action with the Royal Dublin Fusiliers in 1916, are accorded a birthplace. What muddies the waters considerably is that the Memorial Records also include men from Britain who either served in Irish regiments, or enlisted in British service battalions with the parenthetic (Irish) attached. No authentic Irish connection was required for such enlistment.

Other listings defy analysis, such as those of Demosthenes Guilgaud, died of a heart attack in Canada, in 1919, William Jennings Bryan, died in Colorado Springs 1916, and Richard Smythe, drowned in Jaffa Bay 1919.

Overall, I found that some 31,000 of the dead were born in Ireland, and I concluded that some 35,000 could properly be considered Irish. Other analyses, notably Pat Casey’s, generally – if not in detail – concur with my far lower estimate than the “official” figures. I published my findings in a long article in The Irish Times on November 11th, 1980. Yet, more than 33 years later, the utterly inaccurate figure of circa 49,000 is still being cited. Perhaps one reason for this is that anyone doing a search in The Irish Times online archives for material on the Great War will not find my analysis: page 10 for November 11th, 1980, which contained that article is – quite uniquely in my very extensive experience of the archives – missing in its entirety. How very curious.

The official recycling of statistical falsehood as historical fact comes hard upon the widespread allegation last month that Major Willie Redmond asked not to be buried in a British military cemetery in 1917, in protest at the execution of the 1916 leaders. This utter falsehood, with its calumnious implication that he did not wish to be buried with the men he so gallantly led into battle, has no documentary basis whatever – yet it has now found its way into Wikipedia, with RTÉ News being cited as a reputable source. Innocent students interested in the Irish involvement in the 1914-18 war are now being systematically misled by publicly-funded institutions into believing complete fabrications.

This follows the deplorably one-sided commemorations of the 1913 industrial disputes, tendentiously and inaccurately named “The Lockout”. These differing examples suggest that an officially-supported fiction masquerading as history remains, as always, the Irish narrative of choice. In which case, God help us all come 2016. – Yours, etc,

KEVIN MYERS,

Ballymore Eustace,

Co Kildare.

Editor’s note: Due to a technical error, the page referred to above did not go online. This is being rectified.

 

 

Sir, – Is it not time the European Union considered abolishing the European Parliament?

I doubt if even 1 per cent of the Irish electorate can point to any achievement of the European Parliament. The democratic element in the union is already provided by the Council of Ministers where democratically elected government representatives have much stronger credentials for representing the local electorate. It is time we stopped pretending the EU is a state. It is a multi-lateral international organisation that plays a very important role in citizens’ lives, but is not a national state.

The European Parliament is an expensive charade which does little for the good governance of Ireland, but has been established to provide hefty salaries to “has been” national politicians. It is time to abolish it. It makes the Irish Senate actually look good. – Yours, etc,

JOE CONROY,

Eglington Road,

Brampton,

Toronto,

 

Sir, – You have published three interesting figures recently.

The first was that our agricultural exports were worth almost €10 billion last year, a great achievement by that industry.

The second was that the interest paid on our national debt was €8.1 billion ( almost all paid to holders outside the Irish jurisdiction and therefore a total loss to Ireland Inc) which largely wiped out the benefits of the above.

The third is that we Irish have approximately €90 billion worth of savings, most of which is held outside Ireland. The Post Office, our banks and prize bonds pay a derisory rate of interest which does not match inflation, why doesn’t the State offer to pay us the 3.53 per cent it is paying international lenders and thereby ensure we fund our own deficits and the interest paid remains in our economy? – Yours, etc,

DONALD PRATT,

Avoca Handweavers,

Kilmacanogue,

 

Sir, – When my late father David Faiers married Peggy Tansey (my mother) in Haddington Road Roman Catholic church on August 29th, 1953, there were no guests and just two witnesses.

The marriage ceremony was conducted at a side altar and there was no Mass, candles, nor flowers. There was however a dispensation from Pope Pius XII. My father had to sign an agreement to have all children of the marriage raised in the Roman Catholic faith. This was, he contended throughout his life over many a glass of Bushmills whiskey, a form of ethnic cleansing .

By profession he was a marvellous sports journalist, but according to his neighbours he was the “black Prod” on the avenue. I was baptised a Roman Catholic and I practise very hard at being a good Christian. I suspect that inside me there is a “raging Protestant” trying to emerge. – Yours, etc,

HELGA FAIERS,

Kildavin,

Bunclody,

 

Sir, – If, in his answer to Prof Sheila Greene (January 15th), Prof Kevin Mitchell (January 16th) had stuck with “mental states arise from brain states” and that such brain states incorporate all the complexity of past experiences, I would be happy to declare him the winner in this exchange.

However, he exposes a narr owness in neuroscience by say ing that past experiences are “written in changes to brain circuits”. Since there is much about matter and consciousness and how they interact that we do not understand, such an assumption is just an unproven theory. So, for the time being, we might be wise to stick with the view of that other Trinity College academic, George Berkeley, who said: “What is mind? No matter. What is matter? Never mind.” – Yours, etc,

TONY CAREY,

Glencree Road,

Enniskerry,

Sir, – I gladly noted Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council’s decision to drop its plans for an €800,000 refurbishment of its chamber (Home News, January 11th).

The plan, which was to allow extra seating for the increased number of councillors to be elected next May, was expensive and unnecessary. People want to see money being spent on their local services, not on plush new surroundings for the council.

A focus on providing social housing, more community grants and improved library and educational services is where this vital funding is needed. This extravagant refurbishment was never essential. If we learn anything from the past, surely it is to first think of the most cost-effective way to deliver a solution. – Yours, etc,

DEIRDRE KINGSTON,

Merrion Grove,

Booterstown,

 

Sir, – Emmet Malone’s excellent article on the links between Ireland and Everton FC (Sport, January 15th) omits mention of perhaps the most remarkable connection, the signing in 1939 by Sligo Rovers of the legendary ex-Everton forward Dixie Dean.

Dean’s 60 goals for Everton in 1927-28 stands as the record for most scored in a season in the top tier of English football. His prolific strike rate continued with Rovers and helped the club reach the FAI Cup final, and secure runner-up spot in the league in 1939. – Yours, etc,

DAVID ROUSE,

Royal Canal Park,

Ratoath Road, Dublin 15.

 

 

 

Sir, – Eamonn’s McCann’s article (Opinion, January 16th) lacked one important thing – namely, facts, to support his thesis.  At no point does McCann provide any evidence that the biblical quotes he provides, or any part of the Bible, had any impact on Ariel Sharon’s political ideology.  Rather than facts, McCann merely writes his personal suppositions of Sharon’s belief system.  Moreover, he makes false historical claims.

For instance, he stated that Sharon wanted to ethnically cleanse the Palestinians from Israel yet the only mass cleansing under Sharon’s leadership is when he forcibly removed the Jewish community of Gaza.  Taken in sum, it appears that McCann’s goal is not to educate the readership of The Irish Times but to teach them to demonise religion. – Yours, etc,

JASON LEVINSON,

Beechnut Street,

Houston,

Texas, US.

Sir, – I’m scratching my head at Ena Keye’s evaluation (January 16th) and wondering has s/he perhaps confused this Sabra and Shatila iconic “. . . warrior hero raised up to defend Israel and deliver peace to the land . . .” with a certain biological detergent of similar appellation and coincidental white-washing reputation? – Yours, etc,

DAMIEN FLINTER,

Castleview Estate,

Headford,

Co Galway.

Sir, – Eamonn McCann’s latest piece of anti-Israeli agitprop (“Paisley and Sharon driven by ideology of biblical destiny”, Opinion, January 16th) claims that both Ian Paisley and Ariel Sharon based their ideologies “on books of the Bible”. Unfortunately, because Sharon was not religious McCann has to pepper his references to him with phrases like “. . . will have been mindful of” and “. . . will have believed”.

The simple fact is that Ariel Sharon supported, for example, settlement building not as a result of some biblical command but rather as a means to make Israel secure. Ariel Sharon had many faults, but religiosity was not one of them. – Yours, etc,

KARL MARTIN,

Bayside Walk,

Bayside, Dublin 13.

 

 

Sir, – Cutting through the verbiage, the justifications and the slippery self-righteousness of those who constitute themselves as cheery advocates of the bonus culture, it might be timely to resurrect what the economist JK Galbraith wrote in his 2004 book, The Economics of Innocent Fraud, when he commented, “Performance-related pay is called salary. Bonuses should be beneath the dignity of professionals, as bribes should be beneath the dignity of commerce”. – Yours, etc,

CIARAN COSGROVE,

Hillcourt Road,

Glenageary, Co Dublin.

Sir, – It is time for the annual State ceremony to mark the founding of Dáil Éireann on January 21st, 1919 to be given more emphasis and publicity. I would suggest an Army presence on Dawson Street, Dublin, to mark the turning of the sovereign seal ceremony in the Mansion House.

Traffic could be diverted from the top of Dawson Street for about an hour and the ceremony relayed outside on speakers. Schools could be given a brief talk on this most important event, including a copy of the chief justice’s annual reading. – Yours, etc,

DA HURLEY,

Frenchpark,

Co Roscommon.

 

Sir, – Martyn Turner’s cartoon “The 7 wages of MANagement” (Opinion, January 17th) is slightly misleading as the sack of money for the pension should be at least three times the size of the others.– Yours, etc,

MICHAEL STOREY,

Glencar, Co Sligo.

 

Sir, – “Roadmap”, especially when applied to anything maritime, such as the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy (European Commission, some 10 years ago). – Yours, etc,

UNA O’DWYER,

Nutley Park,

Dublin 4.

 

 

 

Irish Independent:

 

* Another week, another government scandal — be it Irish Water revealed to be splurging tens of millions of euro on consultants without the minister in charge seemingly being aware, or more details leaking out about how leeches on the board of the CRC considered themselves more worthy recipients of charitable donations than the people the CRC was established to help.

Also in this section

Cheap drink comes at a cost

Letters: Disagreeing with Donal on suicide

Letters: Just ask ‘how are you?’

Something is seriously wrong with the country’s governance. Politicians, civil servants and people in semi-state bodies are too commonly putting self-interest before public service.

They should be open, direct and fully accountable to the public for their actions and their custodianship of billions of euro worth of public assets.

Instead when forced out of their bunkers into the glare of public scrutiny, they all too often hide behind excuses of data protection and commercial confidentiality, and heavily redact (ie, censor) any documents squeezed out of them under freedom of information laws. So much for democracy.

A key function for elected representatives should be to hold government to account, but instead too many members of the Oireachtas are more concerned with preventing public scrutiny of government actions for political reasons.

This state of affairs is likely to continue until TDs and senators are given broader powers to question decision-takers and hold them fully accountable for their actions. Why not give Oireachtas committees the responsibility for deciding the variable pay/bonuses of senior decision-takers? Additionally, our highly restrictive freedom of information laws should be brought in line with those of other EU countries.

It’s often said that a country gets the government it deserves. The problem is that Ireland deserves and needs a much better government than it has got.

ROGER BLACKBURN

NAUL, CO DUBLIN

PAISLEY‘S SUNNY MOOD

* It’s hard to believe that Ian Paisley is now saying that he was aware of the injustices that stirred the civil rights protesters into action half a century ago.

It really can only be explained in the context of him becoming a happier man in recent years.

He was clearly a deeply unhappy man at the beginning of the Troubles, demonstrating great bitterness and anger at Catholics, Nationalists and the Catholic Church. He was also pretty hard on mainstream unionists.

This serves to explain well the power of moods in our lives. This unhappy man had to be right every time, to suppress and intimidate his opponents and know everything there is to know about everything.

A happier Paisley, with his memories of sitting in government with Sinn Fein and regularly making Martin McGuinness laugh, is much more at ease with himself. He has nothing to prove, conquered many of his demons and can speak his mind without being concerned about incurring the wrath of friend or foe.

Truth becomes more important than anything else and incurring the wrath of those in the DUP who have, as yet, not found happiness and, because of this, persist in telling the tribal account of recent history, is not a particular concern.

I hope more politicians find happiness, for it is a powerful mood for progress. We might even hear Gerry Adams say that things aren’t as bad as he’s been telling us they were.

JOHN O’CONNELL

DERRY

MINISTER’S BIG IDEAS

* Environment Minister Phil Hogan seems to think that this Irish Water scheme is really the equivalent of the electrification of the country (by German engineers) in the 1920s, when really it is no more than a metering system.

Little wonder, then, that the consultants hired by Irish Water were able to sell their expensive expertise without the minister apparently being aware.

RICHARD DOWLING

MOUNTRATH, CO LAOIS

HOLIDAY SUGGESTIONS

* You know Christmas is long gone when we are bombarded with holiday ads. Many of them offering trips to places I never heard of and have no wish to be in. I have never been in ‘Cahoots’ as you can’t get there alone ; you must be with someone. I’ve never been in ‘Cognito’ as nobody would recognise me. However, I have been in ‘Sane’. It has no airport, as you must be driven there. I’ve also been in ‘Doubt’; sad place, won’t go back. I was also in ‘Flexible’, but only when I was cranky.

A while ago, I was in ‘Denial’ where I met a lot of quango bosses and ‘top-up’ CEOs. My doctor says when I get much older, I’ll be in ‘Continent’. I still don’t know the place, but I’m told it’s wet and damp. On second thoughts, maybe I’ll just head for ‘Lisdoon’ in September. I met her sister there last year: ‘Nothindoin’.

SEAN KELLY

TRAMORE, WATERFORD

CHARITIES IN WITCH-HUNT

* Of late, your paper’s letters section has been filled with people bemoaning the wages earned by individuals working in the charity sector in Ireland. This has been prompted not only by the CRC scandal, but also by your paper’s surveys into how charitable donations are spent in this country.

I would like to raise a number of concerns I have regarding the logic that is applied by those who are taking part in what can only be described as a witch-hunt of those working in the charitable sector in Ireland today.

Despite what many people like to believe, the charitable sector is in constant competition with the private sector. This is because, as every economics’ student knows, consumers have a limited amount of resources. They shall spend these resources as they see fit, and the private sector, through marketing, attempts to influence their economic decisions.

Now I would like to ask you this — if the charitable sector is competing with the private sector for limited resources (donations), yet is vilified for hiring the most capable staff it can because they demand a respectable wage, how can it possibly manage to actually tackle the massive issues that it sets out to fix?

DARAGH MANGAN

CARRIGRUE, CO WATERFORD

INCONVENIENT ELECTIONS

* I wish to register, on behalf of my generation, my disgust at the choice of May 22 as the date for the upcoming local and European Elections.

The Council of the European Union has confirmed that the European Parliamentary elections will be held between May 22-25. However, given this scope, our Government has decided that Thursday is their day. This proves to be of significant inconvenience to working people (especially commuters) and of devastating inconvenience to the student population of Ireland.

ALAN J. MCKENNA

KILKENNY CITY

BRAVE SHANNON ACTIVIST

* The writer, activist and citizen Margaretta D’Arcy has taken a brave stance against the use of Shannon Airport by US military flights. She is to be applauded for this selfless action. Her refusal to rule out further protest has put her, knowingly, on the wrong side of the law.

The issue now is to get her out and home, but also to see that the publicity that has followed her sacrifice (for such it is, despite our cynical times) is used to bring pressure on a government that allows this ‘grey area’ in Irish neutrality to persist.

PAT BORAN

BALDOYLE, DUBLIN 13

Irish Independent

 


Windows

$
0
0

21 January 2014 Windows

 

I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. Heather has broken off her engagement to Leslie and started one with Pertwee. Priceless.

 

Peter Rice arrives to put in upstairs windows, order Thermabloc Amelia turns up to pick up cd holders, and Book Green deal the KWh

 

Scrabbletoday Mary winsand gets over400, Perhaps Iwill win tomorrow.

 

 

Obituary:

 

 

Chuck Smith, who has died aged 86, was a Christian fundamentalist pastor whose appeal to disillusioned hippies of the Haight Ashbury era fuelled the rise of the “Jesus movement” of the 1970s and inspired the introduction of religious worship into pop culture.

 

When Smith became pastor of the tiny non-denominational Calvary Chapel in Costa Mesa, Orange County, California, in 1965, his congregation numbered about 25. Two years later, 400 miles up the coast in San Francisco, tens of thousands of young people descended on the Haight Ashbury district to “turn on, tune in and drop out”.

But, as the 1967 “Summer of Love” gave way to winter, many of the Haight Ashbury hippies hitchhiked south to warmer climes with several groups setting up makeshift communes on the beaches of Orange County. When Smith and his wife Kay toured the area they were shocked by the sight of miserable-looking youths, dishevelled and unwashed, huddling together on the sand or spaced out on drugs.

Not long afterwards, a boyfriend of their daughter’s who had been picking up some of the hitchhikers and preaching a personal relationship with Jesus Christ as the means to salvation, began bringing some of his more promising candidates for conversion to the Smiths’ home, where he performed baptisms in a pool in their backyard.

Feeling that they were in danger of becoming a hippie commune, Smith rented a house for the stragglers that became so overcrowded that he soon expanded it into a network of “Jesus houses”, including a hotel where he baptised 65 youths in a fishpond the first two weeks it was open.

Smith recalled the first time some of his new converts turned up at his chapel during a service: “First I heard bells tinkling. Then here came 15 kids, most of them with these tiny strings of bells tied around their ankles… and flowers in their hair. They swayed barefoot up the aisles and sat right down there on the floor in front of the pulpit, even though there were still pew seats to be had. You could almost hear an audible gasp from the rest of the congregation. But they had such love that they captivated everybody’s heart.”

A couple of weeks later, a small group approached Smith and asked if they could play some rock music at one of the services. “Love Song”, as the group became known, played their first concert on a Monday night, missing the Sunday service because one of the guitar players had spent the weekend in jail on charges of marijuana possession. Before long Smith was carrying out mass baptisms — sometimes 500 at a time — in the Pacific Ocean at Pirates Cove in Corona del Mar.

Eventually Calvary Chapel grew into an empire of some 2,000 independent congregations, while Smith’s own chapel, where the flock grew to more than 10,000, became one of the best-attended churches in America.

 

But Smith’s influence went far wider. In 1971, to promote the bands who played in his church, he founded a company, Maranatha! Music, which went on to play a powerful role in spreading the popularity of “Jesus rock” — also known as “praise and worship” — in mainstream churches more widely. Meanwhile, out of the ranks of hippies, beach bums and druggies whom he converted emerged a cadre of idealistic youths, known disparagingly as “Jesus freaks”, who went on to fill the ranks of the “Jesus movement” of the 1970s and establish what has been called a “new paradigm” of independent mega-churches.

 

But if Papa Chuck, as he was known to his followers, replaced pipe organs with electric guitars, preached in Hawaiian shirts and jettisoned traditional church symbols and rituals, theologically he was about as far removed from the hippie counterculture ethos as it was possible to be. He preached damnation for the unsaved; the wickedness of homosexuality as “the final affront against God”; and had a habit of finding signs of divine wrath and impending Armageddon in everything from earthquakes to terrorist outrages (the September 11 attacks were, in his view, an indication of God’s displeasure with America’s acceptance of homosexuality and abortion).

 

In particular he was a powerful exponent of the “Rapture”, the notion that God’s chosen few will be whisked off to His side when He destroys the world to punish it for its sinful ways. When Smith predicted that “the Lord is coming for His church before the end of 1981”, many of his followers congregated on New Year’s Eve expecting to be beamed up out of their pews at any moment. Though New Year’s Day 1982 dawned without incident, Smith remained unperturbed and continued to announce the imminence of the Rapture with cast-iron confidence: “Every year I believe this could be the year. We’re one year closer than we were.”

 

He had never, he said, known a moment of doubt.

 

Charles Ward Smith was born in Ventura, California, on June 25 1927, to “Bible quoting Christian” parents. Originally he had wanted to become a doctor, but at the age of 17, at a Christian summer camp, he came to the conclusion that “being a doctor would help people in the here and now, but becoming a pastor could help people in this life and afterward.”

 

After training at the Bible college of the Foursquare Church, a Pentecostal denomination, Smith served as a Pentecostal pastor in various communities before leaving to set up his own church in the early 1960s and moving to Calvary Chapel in 1965.

 

 

In the late 1980s, by which time many of his ex-hippie followers were approaching middle age, Smith decided to reach out to a new generation of young people and in 1990, he co-founded the “Harvest Crusade”, a non-profit ministry which has become an international movement.

 

If Smith appeared a warm, avuncular figure to his followers, there was not much room in his theology for human frailty. In one of his books he championed “the ideal of a biblical man who is strong and not vacillating or weak” and denounced “the new touchy-feely man”. This approach led to differences with his son Chuck Jr, who was, at one time, seen as his likely successor, but who had developed a more open-minded, questioning approach to faith. In 2006 Smith was instrumental in removing Chuck Jr from ministry in the Calvary Chapel movement, subsequently issuing a memo denouncing tolerance for homosexuality and “the soft peddling of hell as the destiny of those who reject the salvation offered through Jesus Christ”.

 

Chuck Smith is survived by his wife and by his two sons and two daughters.

 

Chuck Smith, born June 25 1927, died October 3 2013

 

 

Guardian:

 

 

My grandfather, Claud Mullins, was a Metropolitan police magistrate during the 30s and 40s. One of his battles was to improve the police use of language in court, which he found ludicrously pompous (In praise of… euphemisms, 20 January). Policemen never took someone anywhere but “conveyed” him; they never watched anyone but “kept observation on him”; they never helped but “rendered assistance”; they never came out from but “emerged”; they never found out but “ascertained”. During the war, with so much bomb damage, gaps in fences were described as “apertures”. One policeman wanted to explain that a motorcycle’s handbrake was not working and said: “No braking power was transmitted.”

 

I’m not sure how effective my grandfather’s efforts were to make the police use plain English, but the officers in his court were just using language to make their work seem grander than it was, not to conceal the truth.
Emma Dally
London

•  You reported without comment the euphemistic reference by the chief inspector of constabulary, Tom Winsor, to members of certain Midlands communities as having been “born under other skies” (Report, theguardian.com, 18 January). What, pace John Cooper Clarke, extra-celestial, not like us?
Austen Lynch
Garstang, Lancashire

•  I have always admired Pooh-Bah’s explanation of his evidence in the Mikado as “merely corroborative detail intended to give artistic verisimilitude to a bald and unconvincing narrative”. It worked for him.
Nicolas Wadsworth
Broadstone, Dorset

•  It’s unfair to Winston Churchill to include his “terminological inexactitude” in your leader on euphemisms. Parliamentary rules would not allow him to call his opponent a liar.
Roderick White
London

 

 

 

I am writing in response to an editorial published in your newspaper on the occasion of Nelson Mandela’s death (5 December). The article drew comparisons between Mandela, Nehru, Aung Sang Suu Kyi and me. Such comparisons belying a hegemonic mindset demonstrate a lack of understanding of the reality of those faced with struggling for freedom.

In describing me as “feared and worshipped”, I detect hostility towards those who are forced to rely on their self-belief in their struggle against slavery, massacres and policies of denial. Since I have been imprisoned under conditions of solitary confinement on an island for the last 14 years, it is difficult to see how I can be credibly described as a source of fear for anyone except perhaps my captors.

Such a description belittles the four decades of struggle for freedom of the 40 million Kurds who see me as representing their will and have placed their trust in my efforts to reach a peaceful and democratic solution to the Kurdish question. In that respect, I can say in all modesty that Dear Madiba and I have more parallels than contrasts. He managed to bring an end to the apartheid regime as a leader in whom the South African people had placed their complete faith in his commitment to peace. He has become a shining star for the peoples of Africa. Our historical mission is to ensure the ever brilliance of this star for the peoples of the Middle East.

Negotiation and struggle are both important processes in determining the future of peoples’ movements. It is not those who are feared but rather those who have the confidence of their people that can lead those processes.
Abdullah Öcalan
The prison island of Imrali

 

 

John Harris (What can private schools teach the state sector?, 20 January) maintains that a private school education would have little benefit for high-achieving pupils whose parents cannot afford the fees. In fact, our research has shown that those educated at the best independent day schools not only gain disproportionate access to leading universities, including Oxbridge, but also provide the majority of places in the professions, including the law, politics, the City and the civil service.

 

The Sutton Trust’s Open Access proposals, based on a successful pilot in Liverpool, would open up 100 leading independent day schools to all students on the basis of ability rather than their ability to pay, and in doing so open up the professions. There would be needs-blind admissions, so that those from low-income families pay no fees and those from middle-income families contribute on a sliding scale. Participating schools would receive the same state funding as other neighbouring schools. Unlike Dr Anthony Seldon’s proposals, there would no question of levying charges on parents who choose to remain in the state system. At the same time, we believe fairer admissions to the most academically successful comprehensives and improved outreach at grammar schools are also critical to increasing social mobility.

Until those from low- and middle-income families get the chance to maximise their potential, Britain will remain trapped in a system where power is the preserve of those with privilege.
Conor Ryan
Director of research and communications, The Sutton Trust

•  Anthony Seldon’s proposal that rich parents of children at popular state schools should be charged fees of up to £20,000 would in effect privatise a chunk of state education. The next stage need only be a system of vouchers for parents to “spend” at the remaining schools, and a fully privatised three-tier class-based system will have been achieved. Back to the 50s, with added profit!
Mike Hine
Kingston upon Thames

• So, according to Ofqual, practical work in science is integral to assessing students at GCSE but not at A-level, where they can be assessed in a final exam (Report, 18 January). Meanwhile, in geography, Ofqual is proposing the opposite, bringing back fieldwork assessment at A-level but abandoning such assessment at GCSE. Has Ofqual lost touch with reality?
Dr John Hopkin
Birmingham

 

The lessons of the Food Standards Agency salt campaign are worth recalling more accurately if effective measures to tackle obesity are to be considered. Jeff Rooker (Letters, 13 January) is correct to say it was voluntary and that industry co-operated, but omits to say why that was the case. The FSA systematically published surveys of salt in processed foods that received widespread media coverage making clear the potential adverse health impacts of too much salt in the diet. This transparency allowed consumers to make their own choices, forcing retailers and manufacturers to respond. They were held to account for verifiable changes in the composition of their foods. Some changed willingly, others reluctantly joined as it had become a competitive issue. At that time the memories of BSE and industry capture were still fresh and the FSA was a genuinely independent regulator that put consumers first and took action based on scientific evidence. In 2010 responsibility for nutrition and labelling was transferred to government departments. In the much-hyped bonfire of the quangos, a policy that consumers should be protected by an agency independent of government and sectoral interests also went up in flames.
Neil Martinson
Director of communications, FSA, 2000-06

 

 

 

My mother, the anti-war activist and writer Margaretta D’Arcy, is serving a three-month sentence in Limerick prison for trying to stop the violation of Irish neutrality by US military planes, which stop over at Shannon airport on the way to and from the war in Afghanistan. She took peaceful direct action to stop crime being committed by lying down on the runway of the airport. Margaretta, the widow of playwright John Arden, is 79 and undergoing treatment for cancer. Imprisoning her for an act of conscience is inhumane. I call upon the Irish government to release her immediately and for the British government to use its influence to secure her release. To keep her spirits up while she remains in prison, I urge readers to send cards c/o Limerick Prison, Mulgrave Street, Limerick, Ireland.
Jake Arden
London

•  So Total, unable to frack in France, invests £48m, a trivial amount of cash for a fossil fuel giant, in the UK and gets the government to replace its jobs forecast for the industry with one emailed to it by the UK Onshore Operators Group (Report, 18 January)? When the prime minister says the government is “for shale”, it’s hard not to think he means “for sale”. I suppose they all are, but few come so cheaply.
Martin Porter
Glossop, Derbyshire

• If E Shannon (Letters, 20 January) read as far as the obituaries in the same edition, it would have become clear that the answer to the question “where are the snowdrops this year?” is that Alistair McAlpine had collected them.
Roy Kettle
Hitchin

• After three recent appearances (In praise of…, 10 January; Country diary, 17 January; Letters, 17 January) I assume phalaropes will soon be a solution in the cryptic crossword?
Lesley Kant
Norwich

• In 1986 we saw Roger Lloyd Pack (Obituary, 17 January) as Mandelstam in Dusty Hughes’ Futurists. We were overjoyed to find that our tickets for the National’s Cottesloe theatre were categorised “unrestricted left”. Sounds like something Roger would have appreciated.
Mary Pimm and Nik Wood
London

 

 

 

 

Most historians would question the claim that the Habsburgs should not be blamed for causing the first world war (Report, 16 January). In 1914, certainly, each European state including Britain embarked on war to protect its vital interests. It is also true that the Habsburg archduke Franz Ferdinand was usually a peacemaker and, had he lived, would have argued against war with Serbia in July 1914. However, most of the Habsburg elite in Vienna – following Emperor Franz Joseph’s mindset – were determined to crush “the Serbian snake”, and knew this risked provoking war. They took that risk and therefore bear a large portion of blame for events spiralling out of control. The elitism of Austria-Hungary’s rulers and their paranoia about the Balkans has always been a key factor in explaining why the Great War finally occurred.
Mark Cornwall
Professor of modern European history, University of Southampton

 

 

We Labour women always knew that we had someone to thank for the leak that child benefit was under threat; we now know it was Malcolm Wicks (Mystery of whistleblower who saved child benefit is solved after 38 years, 20 January). We were told at the time that it was because the union men did not like their women having independent money. The leak resulted in a lobby of parliament by women from all over the UK, many of us active members of the Labour party. I had written ahead to warn my MP, Tony Benn, that I would be coming to parliament to join a major lobby to retain child benefit and ensure it was paid to whoever had the care of children. When Tony came out, he spotted me, placed me by the turnstiles and asked me to confirm which women were part of the lobby to the security. I let them all in!

 

Subsequently the lobby outside the main chamber filled up with women, all calling their MPs out right in the middle of a three-line whip. Michael Cocks, the chief whip at the time, had his staff running ragged trying to bring MPs back to vote. In the end he had the main ringleaders (me included) into his office in an effort to try to calm things down. We pointed out that we women were not just members of the party to make tea but were major contributors to its working. The message got through to the party and the whole idea was dropped. Thank you, Malcolm, on behalf of all women, then and now.
Cllr Jenny Smith
Southmead Ward Bristol; formerly chair of the Bristol Labour women’s council

 

•  How we could do with a civil servant of Mr Wicks’s courage right now. It would be strangely appropriate for the long-suppressed Defra report on emergency food provision to be leaked to Frank Field as chair of the all-party parliamentary group on hunger and poverty. Surely then even Iain Duncan Smith and Lord Freud would not be to continue to deny the links between food bank usage and welfare reform.
Richard Bridge (@richardbridge7)
York

 

• Malcolm Wicks may have felt justified in leaking cabinet minutes about child benefit in 1976 (‘I took what I regarded as an ethical decision’, 20 January) but he should have had the courage to identify himself as the leaker, knowing that others would be wrongly suspected. I had been Frank Field’s predecessor as director of Child Poverty Action Group and, at the time of the leak, was a special adviser to the social services secretary David Ennals. Unsurprisingly I was identified in the press (notably the Sun) as a prime suspect and, until now, my name has never been cleared.
Tony Lynes
London

 

•  The photograph of the Labour government’s front and backbenches of November 1976 is worth careful examination. First, count the women – just three of more than 50 MPs and ministers. One is Barbara Castle, recently sacked by Jim Callaghan. But who is sitting next to her? Is it a youthful Roy Jenkins or just a Roy Jenkins lookalike? There is only one woman on the frontbench, Shirley Williams. But who is third woman, sitting on the first row of backbenches?

 

Next, sitting on the frontbench below the gangway is Harold Wilson, accompanied by a very youthful Dennis Skinner. Then comes a gap where normally the leader of the house sits. So where is that great parliamentarian, Michael Foot? This photograph alone was worth the price of the Guardian.
Pete Browning
Kingsclere, Hampshire

 

•  It is interesting to note in the 1976 picture of parliament who is seated next to whom. I reckon that is Dennis Skinner next to former prime minister Harold Wilson, probably musing over whatever happened to “Old” Labour. John Smith in the second row, and three women; Shirley Williams on the frontbench, Barbara Castle three rows back, and on the second row I’m guessing is Margaret Jay.
Rick Hall
Nottingham

 

•  Your photo reminds us that, whatever people may have thought of Harold Wilson, he, who won four elections, did not consider himself so grand that he could no longer continue as an MP after resigning as PM.
Mark Knight

 

 

 

Independent:

 

 

I fully agree with Dr Peter Gray (“Give childhood back to children”, 13 January) in his comments about the need and right for children to have their childhood, and his view that many useful life skills are learnt outside the classroom.

 

He mentions Michael Gove’s desire to see UK educational standards equal China’s. I have two objections to this. First, if standards did improve to such an extent, that would simply push the bar up in the competition for all the top jobs. Secondly, as a Beijing-based teacher myself, I question the means by which such high standards would be achieved.

 

Many Chinese students are under a lot of pressure to achieve the top grades. A number of students at my school suffer a draconian study regime at the hands of the Tiger Mother and/or the Wolf Father, parents who force their children to study long hours at home and take extra classes to improve their grades, and who won’t accept anything from their children but A-grades and being top of the class.

 

At least one student has complained that all this extra study hasn’t improved her grades – just left her with no time to herself, something she hates. The same would apply anywhere. If the ability isn’t there (and some people are more able than others), then all the extra study in the world isn’t going to change that.

 

King Edward VII was an example. His childhood was ruined by such a regime imposed by parents who branded him as lazy and stupid, when he simply just wasn’t a natural scholar. All the extra study sent him off the rails somewhat when he got to university and he didn’t complete his degree, I think, so fat lot of good all that extra study was for him.

 

The above said, the idyllic childhood that Dr Gray advocates is unlikely to happen, while the media and other parties exaggerate the dangers of playing outside. Traffic is heavier than it used to be, but the other dangers, such as paedophiles, are no greater now than they used to be.

 

Steven Crake

 

Beijing

 

No wonder our children are suffering from “toxic stress” (report, 20 January). We know that animals in a zoo suffer from “toxic stress” if they are confined to their houses without having the freedom to move around and exercise outside. They are therefore given this opportunity.

 

Contrast this with our children, the vast majority of whom are kept indoors because on the street outside priority is given to the motor car. This is not the fault of parents but of successive governments, who have ignored the freedom to play out in the street as enjoyed by countless previous generations.

 

Rob Wheway

 

Director, Children’s Play Advisory Service, Coventry

 

A Power grab by global corporations

 

Oliver Wright and Nigel Morris are quite right that the EU-US trade deal threatens to give global corporations massive power over the laws of this country if it includes, as expected, an investor-state dispute settlement process (“British sovereignty ‘at risk’ from EU-US trade deal”, 14 January).

 

In fact, it is more correct to think of the deal as a charter for corporate rights, rather than a “free-trade treaty”. It threatens to lock in market principles to public services such as the NHS, begin a “race to the bottom” in terms of health and safety standards, undermine post-financial-crisis economic regulation, and reinforce inequality within Europe.

 

The deal, a core priority of the Cameron government, is one of several far-reaching “trade” and investment treaties currently being negotiated. Together with the Trans-Pacific Partnership and Trade in Services Agreement, they represent the biggest power grab by global corporations for a decade.

 

Whether you’re interested in public services, health and safety standards, labour rights or simply democracy, there’s more than enough reason to oppose this offensive.

 

Nick Dearden

 

Director, World Development Movement,

 

London SW9

 

It was good to see The Independent give front-page coverage to negotiations for an EU-US free trade agreement, especially as this highlighted the threat to national sovereignty posed by the investor state dispute settlement mechanism (ISDS), currently included in the treaty.

 

What was not touched on was a further threat to sovereignty from an additional proposal within the agreement. This is for a new Regulatory Co-operation Council that, for the foreseeable future, will give extensive powers to corporations to alter new or prospective parliamentary legislation or judicial rulings where these conflict with their corporate interests.

 

So while it may or may not be the case, as a Department of Business spokesperson is quoted as saying, that “investment protection provisions do not limit the ability of states to make or repeal any law or regulation”, it seems that the Regulatory Cooperation Council will do just that.

 

Jan Savage

 

London E1

 

Fracking crosses climate threshold

 

Peter Lilley has stated that those who oppose fracking may be concerned about the burning of fossil fuels, but that they have “failed to make a convincing case” (BBC Radio Five Live, 13 January). Actually it is not the anti-fracking protestors that need to make the case, since this has already been done in the five reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

 

Furthermore, virtually every government world-wide has accepted that levels of CO2 in the atmosphere must not exceed 450 parts per million (ppm) if we are to avoid runaway climate change. Since it is currently 400 ppm and increasing by 2-3 ppm per annum, we only have 20 years before we exceed the 450 ppm threshold.

 

So in reality it is Peter Lilley, George Osborne and David Cameron who are required to justify their reckless support for  a technology that will make the UK dependent on fossil fuel extraction for the next 30 years and longer.

 

Dr Robin Russell-Jones

 

Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire

 

Floating islands for everyone

 

Thank you for taking the time to explore and report about the Seasteading Institute (27 December). However, I’m not clear how you construed that the first settlement was for very rich libertarians.

 

Purchasing a unit at €5,500 a square metre is not only for “very wealthy” people. That’s lower than the average price for housing in London. Although our founders are from the libertarian persuasion, our movement is much larger than this and our goal is to make seasteading a technology available to anyone who wishes to pursue a new form of governance. We are not all “right-wing” and nor do we want to pay others to do our “dirty work”.

 

You chose not to write anything about our vision of enriching the poor by creating new spaces that welcomed immigrants where they could start fresh new lives; you didn’t write about how we hope experimenting with new systems of governance will help existing nations choose better policies after witnessing them tested on a seastead; you didn’t write anything about how we want to peacefully create new nations as a solution to the political bottleneck of nearly all established nations. I invite your readers to learn more about our initiative and to read my full response to The Independent’s article at www.seasteading.org.

 

Randolph Hencken

 

Executive Director, The Seasteading Institute,  San Francisco

 

My days of freedom

 

From time to time I take a mini-break.

 

I travel by public transport (the avoiding the motorway cameras), paying for my ticket with cash. I keep my mobile phone switched off. I pay for my accommodation, meals,  and all other purchases  with the cash I withdrew from my local cashpoint before setting out.

 

I return feeling refreshed and also a little triumphant, secure in the knowledge that I have just been to, say, Cornwall and back, and neither GCHQ nor the NSA know a thing about it. It may be a very small victory, but it pleases me. Am I disgraceful to value my personal freedom so?

 

Bob Gilmurray

 

Ely,  Cambridgeshire

 

Mantel backs the Duchess

 

It was good to read of Hilary Mantel’s forthcoming novel (“Mantel turns to Thatcher for inspiration”, 17 January), but for the finishing paragraph. Hilary Mantel did not “attack” the Duchess of Cambridge in her lecture last year.

 

She was in fact attacking the perception of the Duchess which has been set up in the tabloid press. She was supportive of the Royal Family – ending her lecture with: “Don’t do to this young woman what you did to Diana.”

 

Elspeth Allison

 

Leicester

 

Further divine intervention

 

Outside my window this morning, there was a most beautiful rainbow. God is obviously pleased with the Ukip councillor who spoke out about the connection of the storms and floods to gay marriage.

 

H N Stanley

 

Cheltenham

 

 

 

Times:

 

 

Sir, In your response to Lord Ashdown’s warning about the loss of trust in our institutions (leader, Jan 3), you urge politicians to “promise less but deliver more”. If they are to regain the trust of most people, politicians must first regain their respect. A good place to start would be the weekly Prime Minister’s Questions, which is all that most people ever see of Parliament in action. The conduct of nearly everyone involved is simply appalling and this a major factor in people’s — and especially young people’s — disenchantment with our democratic processes.

 

No school head — and I write as a former secondary headmaster — would permit for a moment such conduct in a mock election. If MPs show scant respect for each other they can hardly be surprised if the electorate has little for them.

 

Is it too much to ask that the Leader of the Opposition should put genuine questions, that the Prime Minister should actually answer the question asked, that they both refrain from cheap jibes and that all in the chamber refrain from the various puerile noises with which they endeavour to interrupt opposing members?

 

PMQs is just about the worst advertisement for our democracy and does incalculable damage to the reputation of Parliament. Party leaders, MPs and the Speaker are grossly irresponsible in allowing the sessions to proceed in such a fashion. An appropriate new year resolution for all of them would be to seek to restore the dignity of Parliament, starting with PMQs.

 

David Terry

 

Droitwich, Worcs

 

Sir, Shouting and point-scoring do indeed ensure that what happens in Prime Minister’s Questions in the House of Commons lacks any sense of views being exchanged or questions being fairly put and sensibly answered and smacks of behaviour that would not be tolerated in a primary school during break time (leader, Jan 16). This is because it is patently obvious that the whole raison d’être of the occasion is the automatic loud gladiatorial denigration by each side of anything the other side has to say.

 

Tony Phillips

 

Chalfont St Giles, Bucks

 

Sir, At PMQs it is largely the fault of the BBC that we are subjected to the deafening (and childish) roars of members. The BBC, and indeed all broadcasters of programmes with live audiences, seem to delight in keeping their microphones of audience noise at full pelt while the poor chairmen or speakers find their introductions made totally unintelligible to listeners. There once was a time when someone actually balanced the various microphone outputs so that we could hear what everyone said. Bring back that day.

 

Jim Mann Taylor

 

Westbury-on-Severn, Glos

 

Sir, Question Time in the Commons is not a time for nursery games. Cannot Mr Speaker exert his authority to control this hooliganism?

 

Ronald Brown

 

Chichester

 

Sir, George Osborne’s suggestion that the time is ripe for an above-inflation increase in the national minimum wage is economically prudent and politically astute (Jan 17). Opponents may claim that employment prospects of the lowest paid will be adversely affected but the independent Institute for Social & Economic Research (ISER) report published in February 2012 found no evidence of significant adverse impacts on pre-recession employment arising from the minimum wage.

 

The return of strong economic growth and the rapidly improving jobs market supports the timing of the Chancellor’s statement which is one of the most significant Conservative policy reversals of David Cameron’s leadership. The lingering public perception that the party is hostile to the poor is now firmly contradicted by the huge increase in personal allowances focused exclusively on basic rate taxpayers, the freeze in fuel duty and council tax and the belated admission that the party was wrong to oppose the introduction of the minimum wage in the 1990s.

 

Philip Duly

 

Haslemere, Surrey

 

Sir, You assert that people on the minimum wage earn just over £12,000 a year. This is incorrect. The majority of those on this hourly rate are working part-time; many are students. The minimum wage is an ineffective anti-poverty instrument which does little for working families. A significant rise in the rate will, however, close off entry-level jobs for many young people. We already have a million under-25s looking for work — Mr Osborne’s generosity with other people’s money will do little for them.

 

Professor J. R. Shackleton

 

University of Buckingham

 

Sir, You say “there is no better welfare policy than better pay”. Surely the best answer is to align the proposed national minimum wage with the income tax personal allowance. For a 37-hour week at £7 per hour this would amount to a £13,468 annual tax threshold so that no one on the minimum wage pays income tax.

 

Derek Edwards

 

Brentwood Essex

 

Sir, A rise in the minimum wage will in the first instance attract even more migrants from within the EU. As for policing it, this will prove in the longer run to be a mug’s game. Better to acknowledge that a living wage and mass immigration are mutually exclusive. Curtail immigration and the market will automatically raise unskilled wages.

 

There will, of course, be a transfer of purchasing power from the majority “haves” to the minority “have-nots” as menial jobs that cannot be outsourced abroad become more costly. This is a small price to pay for all who espouse One Nation cohesiveness.

 

Only a “penny wise and pound foolish” society would import cheap labour with the aim of driving unskilled pay below a living wage. Not being able to control migrants from within the EU is tantamount to importing cheap labour.

 

Yugo Kovach

 

Winterborne Houghton, Dorset

 

 

 

 

The Syrian peace talks need to focus on the plight of children caught up in the conflict

Sir, With the parties in Syria’s conflict meeting in Switzerland tomorrow, we believe the time has come to urgently focus on the plight of children. Children are being targeted in this conflict, in the shelling of residential areas and attacks on schools and hospitals. More than 11,000 Syrian children have already died. More than 4 million children have been forced to flee their homes, including over a million who have fled the country altogether. Many are traumatised, hungry and in urgent need of shelter and protection. Scandalously, aid cannot reach the children who need it the most. Hundreds of thousands of children are trapped in conflict zones and are receiving little or no humanitarian assistance at all.

As the parties to the conflict arrive in Geneva, we urgently call on them not to target children, and to commit to the following three points: do not prevent life-saving aid from reaching children; do not target, or allow military use of, schools or health facilities; and do not use explosive weapons in populated areas.

Every child in Syria who is hurt, or killed, or loses a loved one, represents yet another failure by the international community. We hereby commit to becoming champions for Syria’s children, speaking out for their rights at every opportunity. An entire generation is being lost to violence. All of us bear a responsibility to save these children.

Desmond Tutu; Anthony Lake, Unicef; Antonio Gutteres, UN High Commissioner for Refugees; Valerie Amos, UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs; Kristalina Georgieva, European Commissioner; Margaret Chan, WHO; Ertharin Cousin, World Food Programme; Leila Zerrougui, Special Representative for the UN Secretary General; Mark Malloch Brown, former UN Deputy Secretary General; Jan Egeland, Norwegian Refugee Council; Louise Arbour, International Crisis Group; David Miliband, International Rescue Committee; Justin Forsyth, Save the Children; Winnie Byanyima, Oxfam International; Kevin Jenkins, World Vision International

 

 

 

The boarding school isolation that made it possible for abuse to be perpetrated simply does not exist any more

Sir, One big difference between boarding school life today and in the past is the technology. Nearly every student in a UK boarding school has a smartphone, and all have access to computers. Most children, British or international, keep in daily contact with their parents by phone, Skype or other means. Therefore the closed communities that were yesterday’s boarding schools, within which it was possible for abuse to be perpetrated, simply do not exist any more.

Boarding schools are no longer isolated from the outside world; children and their parents are no longer separated in any meaningful sense. To ignore this factor is to collude in scaremongering.

Caroline Nixon

Chairman, British Association of International School and Colleges

 

 

Wales and Scotland have set up high street optometrists as the first port of call for NHS patients with urgent eye problems

Sir, The letter (Jan 17) from Nikhil Kaushik, consultant ophthalmic surgeon, prompts me to point out that Wales and Scotland have successfully set up high street optometrists as the first port of call for NHS patients with urgent eye problems.

Optometrists have the expertise and specialist equipment rarely found in GP surgeries to treat eye complaints safely and effectively. Patients like having a local service offering timely and convenient appointments. And it reduces pressure on A&E and GP surgeries.

In the rest of the UK though there is a postcode lottery. The NHS in England and Northern Ireland and their patients would benefit from a universal service.

Dr Kamlesh Chauhan

The College of Optometrists, London

 

 

 

 

Until bankers recapture the motive of working in every customer’s best interest, there will be no behaviour change

Sir, Mr Dicken (letter, Jan 20) is right to talk at length of the bonus culture being pernicious and of the behaviour being selfish. Yet a simple and vital element is missing from the argument, and that is of working in every customer’s best interest. Until all work, be it financial services or not, recaptures this motive of doing level best for he who ultimately pays the wage, there will be no turnaround in behaviour — management or individual.

Selfishness takes so many forms that this rudimentary principle can easily be lost in elaborate discussion of the organisational problems.

Keith Robinson

Littlewick Green, Berks

Sirs, The current bonus culture in the financial and banking industries should be converted into a share culture.

Performance rewards would be in the shape of an immediate share allocation or option for future purchase. A minimum period of ownership would introduced to ensure that the share bonuses were in the company’s and customers long-term best interest and not subject to actions for instant and individual employee gratification.

Robert E. Collett

Freshwater, Isle of Wight

Sir, You report (Jan 16) the Governor of the Bank of England as having in one sentence three times used the word “compensation” in the context of bankers’ pay.

If even Mr Carney does not consider as “pay” the money that bankers receive for their work, perhaps we should all have much more sympathy for bankers in their difficult and, obviously, distressing work. Maybe their bonuses should be increased rather than reduced?

Robert Rhodes, QC

London, WC2

 

 

 

What better year than 2014 to address the sad neglect of Commonwealth War Graves in Britain

Sir, On the subject of restoring war graves overseas (letter, Jan 14), we have the same problem at home. At the Commonwealth War Graves cemetery in Brookwood, Surrey, where thousands of servicemen rest, the grounds are sadly neglected. They deserve better, and what better time could there be than in 2014.

F. Vickers

Woking, Surrey

 

 

 

Telegraph:

 

 

SIR – I was interested to read the growing problems that the northern Rhubarb Triangle is having.

 

Rhubarb was first recorded growing in England by the botanist William Coys, in one of his walled gardens at Stubbers, his home in Upminster, Essex.

He grew more than 340 hitherto unknown plants in his walled gardens, all brought to him by Elizabethan explorers of the day, particularly from the newly explored Americas. In 1580, it was not confidently known whether rhubarb was edible and, as we now know, the leaves are poisonous.

Veronica Smith
Stow Maries, Essex

SIR – Before your readers who suffer from any of the ailments — such as gout and constipation — listed by Michael Leapman start adding to the shortage of rhubarb, they should know that it was the peeled roots, not the stalks, that gave the plant its medicinal reputation.

John Goulding
Potters Bar, Hertfordshire

SIR – I would advise Mr Leapman to visit his rhubarb patch before March. I had my buckets in place over pink shoots before I read last week’s article and am not living in the balmiest of locations.

J M Clarkson
Edinburgh

 

 

 

of young people I hear saying they are going into teaching because they can’t think what else to do. As the mother of a recently qualified teacher who is passionate about her job and works extremely long hours in order to bring the very best of her efforts to her class, I think it should be made more difficult to become a teacher, not easier. Then we may get the teachers our children deserve and need.

 

Anne Penney
Fetcham, Surrey

 

SIR – As a retired headteacher who spent my whole career teaching in the tougher areas of London, I can tell you exactly why teachers leave the profession in large numbers: disruptive pupils and endless paperwork. No teacher should have to tolerate poor behaviour in class and his time should be spent teaching, not doing endless preparation and form filling.

 

Trevor Lashbrook
Bude, Cornwall

 

Trivialising abortion

 

 

SIR – How can destruction of a foetus be “downgraded to a trivial procedure”? What about the consequences? Each one is a huge decision.

 

Richard Parkhouse
Llanfairfechan, Caernarfonshire

 

SIR – I am a practising Christian, and have listened to the arguments for and against abortion. Now, yet another “clarification” is being given by the Department of Health.

 

No one can believe that this is what David Steel envisaged when he introduced his Bill in 1967. His concerns were for the tragic cases of pregnant women dying at the hands of back-street abortionists.

 

As a country, we need to demonstrate compassion for those women whose lives do not allow for a baby to be born into it. However, where possible, both the father and mother should be present and agree that their actions have led to this outcome. To ignore the father’s role is wrong.

 

Geraldine Lee
Aylsham, Norfolk

 

Full service

 

SIR – My watch recently stopped working. The digital display correctly showed the time, but the analogue hands would not move, suggesting that I needed more than a new battery, so I went into the town centre to look for possible replacements.

 

One of the local jewellers had the ideal model, but he would not sell it to me until he had had a good look at my watch to see if he could get it going.

 

A day later, he telephoned to say that he had not succeeded, as the motor that drives the hands had failed. He had telephoned the manufacturer, which no longer made spares for that model.

 

I will be returning to his shop to buy the replacement. I could get it cheaper online, but none of the internet providers would have thought of mending my old watch.

 

Paul Newton
Whitnash, Warwickshire

 

Day of rest

 

SIR – A friend has a number of hens and, over a period of two years’ careful monitoring of the number of eggs laid, it has become apparent that far fewer eggs are laid on a Sunday than any other day. Is there a reason for this? Could it have anything to do with the European work time directive?

 

James Lonsdale
Lostock, Lancashire

 

Fracking areas

 

SIR – Because offshore platforms are extremely expensive to construct and install, the offshore oil industry is expert at achieving large outputs from small areas. That expertise is reproducible onshore.

 

On land, Wytch Farm (for which I was once responsible) accesses an oil and gas field some 30 miles across (measured at the surface) from a wellsite area only some two or three football pitches in area, and it is well hidden in the environment.

 

Incidentally, one point missing from all the current arguments about who should get what share of the income from shale gas is that there hasn’t been any yet, and the earliest is probably two years away.

 

Dr Harold Hughes
Kingston upon Thames, Surrey

 

SIR – Manorial rights do not apply to rights for extraction of gas or oil, including shale gas. Rather, the right to extract petroleum is vested in the Crown.

 

The Government issues petroleum licences and companies wishing to carry out exploration or production under these licences have to meet a series of stringent regulations and secure landowners’ permission.

 

Britain has more than 50 years’ experience of successfully regulating the onshore oil and gas industry. We have been clear that shale gas fracking must be done in a safe and environmentally sound way and with the support of communities.

 

Michael Fallon MP (Con)
Energy Minister
London SW1

 

Moving on

 

SIR – In a news story, you report the actor Roger Lloyd-Pack as having died, in his obituary as having died, but in the leading article as having passed away.

 

In the Deaths column where, arguably, because of its heading neither term is required, it seems that people are increasingly passing away, rather than dying. The relative number of either as published in the Deaths column makes an interesting subject on which to bet.

 

Norman Hudson
Upper Wardington, Oxfordshire

 

January jelly

 

SIR – We usually find frog spawn in our pond on Valentine’s Day. This year it appeared on January 15.

 

Any earlier sightings?

 

Glynn Walker
Winsford, Cheshire

 

De-centralise arts funding to avoid London bias

 

SIR – Jesse Norman fails to take into account the extent to which the arts funding cuts of recent years have increased the disparity in support between London and the rest of the country. The cuts — and not just in the arts — are a significant aspect of a continuing disempowerment of the regions. Cuts to local authority funding have prompted predictions, such as that made by a 2013 Joseph Rowntree Foundation study, that local councils may cease funding the arts altogether by 2015.

 

Moreover, further centralisation of the decision-making process is an inevitable result of cutbacks in the administration of core funding.

 

The result of this is a greater bias towards the most prestigious London-based institutions, which are themselves struggling to maintain standards. In the long term, more real political power needs to be allowed at regional level.

 

Most immediately, the cuts must be reversed so that local communities have the funds available to make considered decisions about their arts future.

 

Earl of Clancarty
London SW1

 

SIR – I can never understand why visitors to Britain are not charged entry to our museums. When we travel abroad, we are certainly charged entry fees to museums.

 

Ken Sharpe
Hereford

 

 

SIR – The proposal to build a garden city at Yalding in rural Kent is yet another act of supreme folly by this Government, which seems determined to destroy its support in the Home Counties by covering vast swathes of our countryside with wind farms, solar panels and housing.

 

Building a new town in this area between Maidstone and the Medway towns would not only create a huge conurbation in the heart of the countryside, but would also destroy for ever valuable agricultural and recreational land on London’s doorstep. And that is before we even consider the ludicrous idea by the Mayor of London to build a new hub airport in the Thames estuary, with an associated need for tens of thousands of additional homes to accommodate its employees and their families.

Kent is one of the most overcrowded counties in England, with a population rapidly approaching two million and diminishing green space. It has several motorways, a high-speed rail system, busy ports and nuclear power stations. We in Kent have more than done our bit for the country, and it should now to be the turn of other, less populated and built-up areas in England to make some sacrifices.

Ted Shorter
Tonbridge, Kent

SIR – The supposed plan to build a new garden city at Yalding is an intriguing prospect. In the light of recent events, perhaps a marina with houseboats might be more appropriate.

Norman Sherry
East Grinstead, West Sussex

SIR – What a telling juxtaposition of Nick Clegg’s article (Garden cities are the answer to a problem we can’t ignore) and news that English farmland far outperformed gold over the past year. To me there’s an obvious correlation: Government planning policies (especially the National Planning Policy Framework) are directly responsible for demand from developers for land – to build us out of austerity – which seems to have little to do with Government’s alleged commitment to “sustainable development”.

It is also clear that, when push comes to shove, central power trumps local power.

James Derounian
University of Gloucestershire

SIR – There is a housing crisis because the Labour government’s policy of mass immigration, and because being in the European Union apparently means we have no control over our own borders. Net immigration for the year ending in June was 182,000. Assuming that is mainly young people who will have children, the effect on the population total is probably double that figure. Instead of forcing us to take immigrants, the EU should be looking to encourage people to set up businesses in underpopulated areas – like Romania.

Richard Munday
Kenilworth, Warwickshire

 

 

Irish Times:

 

 

 

   

 

Sir, – A child waiting for a wheelchair is a human rights issue. Tom Clonan describes the impact on his son Eoghan of sitting in a wheelchair that is too small for him (“I defy the board of the CRC to explain its obscene behaviour to my son”, Home News, January 18th). He describes his legs curling back, increasing his risk of leg contractures.

 

Sitting in a wheelchair that is too small can have major consequences on children’s development, not only impacting on their limbs, but also leaving them at risk of chest infections and pressure ulcers. Being squashed in a wheelchair can affect individuals’ feeling of safety, their mental health, their ability to concentrate and communicate and to actively participate in play, school and employment.

 

Unfortunately Eoghan’s story is not uncommon. Anne Rynne (Letters, January 18th) writes about her adult son, left lying in bed for a year.

 

There are approximately 40,000 individuals in the Republic who use wheelchairs and without this essential equipment they cannot survive. A wheelchair enables a person to sit up and be mobile; it is an essential primary need. It becomes part of a person’s skin, their legs, In research I have conducted, one person has described when the wheelchair is not right or when it breaks down as “like cutting my two legs off”.

 

While wheelchair services in Ireland have grown over the years, they lack regulation and are without specific government policy to ensure timely and appropriate delivery.

 

I would like to think if anything happened to me, my child, my family or my friends that I could pick up the phone and know I could get a wheelchair without waiting 12 months.

 

This human rights issue is relevant to the whole of society, and a national review of wheelchair services is called for. – Yours, etc,

 

ROSEMARY JOAN

 

GOWRAN PhD,

 

Kilrush Road,

 

Ennis, Co Clare.

 

 

Sir, – The issues raised regarding funding relating to travel expenses at CRC do not apply to me (Home News, January 16th).

 

I am a frontline staff member working for the Central Remedial Clinic. I am passionate about my work and care very much about the rights of children and adults with special needs, so much so that I completed a master’s outside work hours and research to benefit CRC service users with minimal monetary recognition from the CRC.

 

When requesting some remuneration for travel expenses related to presenting research at an international conference I was informed that due to budgetary constraints there would be no monetary support other than the conference registration fee. I accepted this as I was proud to represent the CRC, which as a day-to-day organisation is a great one, due to excellent frontline staff and the service users that never cease to inspire and amaze me.

 

  CRC frontline staff, like those in most other public sector organisations experience similar difficulties when it comes to acquiring time and monetary support for expenses related to continuing professional and service development and should therefore not be tarnished with the same brush. – Yours, etc,

 

DEIRDRE O’ DONOGHUE,

 

Old County Glen,

 

Crumlin, Dublin 12.

 

Sir, – Numerous commentators have called on Paul Kiely to repay some, or all, of his €740,000 pension package (Home News, January 18th). These calls are, I believe, misplaced. If money should be repaid then it is the members of the board of the CRC, who authorised the payment, who should make the repayment. This would act as a deterrent to other boards to act in such a cavalier manner with other people’s money. – Yours, etc,

 

PADRAIG KIRWAN,

 

Clogga,

 

Mooncoin, Co Kilkenny.

 

Sir, – How come the fundraising departments in the CRC have so much money in their accounts? Why was this money not used to enable their service users have what they need (eg wheelchairs and physiotherapy)? Is this not the reason we donate to charities – to make the life of their service users somewhat more bearable? – Yours, etc,

 

NIAMH LENNON,

 

Frankfort Park,

 

Dundrum, Dublin 14.

 

Sir, – Is it ironic that a substantial amount of the questioning and condemning of management’s recent and past behaviour at the Central Remedial Clinic is being done by people in both politics and the media who have themselves secured very generous remuneration packages over the years? – Yours, etc,

 

JOSEPH MACKEY,

 

West Glasson,

 

Athlone, Co Westmeath.

 

Sir, – Your item on the charities controversy (Home News, January 18th) reports the Minister for Health as saying that the Government would use all available options open to it, including corporate enforcement and the Garda and the civil courts to try and get the money (Paul Kiely’s retirement package ) back.

 

Hopefully they won’t have to resort to such drastic measure to repatriate the €120,000 or so that his colleague the Minister for Finance would have received via the Revenue Commissioners as their cut from the taxable portion of Mr Kiely’s lump-sum. – Yours, etc,

 

JOE SINGLETON,

 

St Peter’s Place,

 

Arklow,

 

Co Wicklow.

 

Sir, – Congratulations to Patrick Freyne for his wonderful report on 24 hours on O’Connell Street (Weekend Review, January 18th). It was enlightening, funny, nostalgic, wise, and ultimately heartbreaking. – Yours, etc,

 

NIALL McARDLE,

 

Wellington Street,

 

Eganville,

 

 

Sir, – I have loved and admired 79-year-old Margaretta D’Arcy for 40 years. I do not plead for mercy for her. The moment she gets out, she will be back on her justifiable protest. The Government has a problem on its hands, (as now, do I, at 69, yet again. In this case, a joyful one.) We pensioners have not gone away , you know. – Yours, etc,

 

NELL Mc CAFFERTY,

 

Rugby Road, Dublin 6.

 

Sir, – I join with my fellow artists in calling for the release, on compassionate grounds, of our colleague, Margaretta D’Arcy, from Limerick prison.

 

Surely, by refusing to discontinue her anti-war activism, she is doing precisely that which is required of her by the court – undertaking to keep the peace? – Yours, etc,

 

MARY FitzGERALD,

 

The Crescent,

 

Monkstown, Co Dublin.

 

Sir, – In expressing his acute indignation at the imprisonment of Margaretta D’Arcy (January 18th), Theo Dorgan makes some extraordinary comments.

 

He notes that “as the decision to imprison Ms. D’Arcy was taken by organs of the State, it is not possible to view her incarceration as other than a political act”.

 

To my knowledge, the decision to send Ms.D’Arcy to jail was taken by a judge in a republic which operates a classic separation of powers between the political and judicial systems. Despite all of our failings as a State, that separation remains intact.

 

Mr Dorgan further notes the jailing of elderly people for “offences technical in nature (such as failing to purchase a TV licence)”. Failure to purchase a TV licence is not a technical offence, it is an offence proper.

 

Ms D’Arcy is free to protest about whatever she wishes to as much as she likes. She may not do so, however, having trespassed on the tarmac of an airport. She was given a reasonable option to avoid prison which she declined. Her peacenik and artistic pals should calm down. The rest of us will at least be spared her letters to The Irish Times for a while.

 

I wish her well personally. – yours, etc,

 

PD DOYLE,

 

Clontarf Road, Dublin 3.

 

 

Sir, – What an astonishing photograph gracing Frank Miller’s article on bygone Dublin (Culture, January 17th). “Cyclists waiting for a green light”. . .The past is a different place. – Yours, etc,

 

PAUDY Mc CAUGHEY,

 

Meadow Close,

 

Churchtown, Dublin 16.

 

 

 

   

 

Sir, – Congratulations to both contributors for their evocative deliberations on brain/mind connectivity (Letters, January 15th & 16th). Would it be a fair analogy to say that the brain is hard wired while the mind is wireless? Just a thought? – Yours, etc,

 

NIALL GINTY,

 

The Demesne,

 

Killester, Dublin 5.

 

 

Sir, – I wish to congratulate your newspaper on its extensive coverage of the Military Service Pensions Collection, which in turn reflects the excellent work undertaken by Comdt Patrick Brennan’s team at the Military Archives over the past eight years to make this wonderful resource available to the public in such an easily accessible format.

 

The initial refusal of an Army Pension to Margaret Skinnider, an opponent of the Anglo-Irish Treaty (Home News, January 17th), is worthy of contrast with the award of a Military Service Pension to the pro-Treaty Dr Brigid Lyons. While members of Cumann na mBan were not eligible for pensions under the 1924 Military Service Pensions Act, Lyons was deemed to have given service in the Irish Volunteers and also fulfilled the criterion of serving in the Irish Army during the Civil War. A question arose over her eligibility on account of her gender, but the then attorney general, John A Costello, considered the term “person” in the legislation to be covered by the Interpretation Act of 1923 and thus to include women.

 

Stephen Collins makes an important point about the monetary value of the pensions, though it should be noted that until 1953 pensioners who were in receipt of other remuneration from the State had their pensions reduced proportionate to their other State income, so government ministers were unlikely to receive the full value of the nominal pension awarded. In such cases the motivation for applying was recognition; applications were made initially for Certificates of Military Service, and when these were granted a pension could be applied for.

 

There was significant political opposition to the inclusion of the Connaught Rangers mutineers in this post-revolutionary compensation process, with a sceptical (and no doubt parsimonious) Ernest Blythe declaring that their “patriotism was an afterthought”. The fact that many of the Connaughts covered by the legislation enlisted voluntarily in the British army after the conscription crisis of April 1918 was reflected in the decision only to award them smaller one-off gratuities rather than pensions. – Is mise,

 

Dr MARIE COLEMAN,

 

School of History &

 

Anthropology,

 

Queen’s University Belfast.

 

Sir, – Even in the 21st century I find it almost unfathomable that a civil servant in Dublin in the 1930s could come to the view that a woman volunteer who was shot three times by a British soldier while on service in the St Stephen’s Green garrison in 1916 could be refused a pension because he (and it would have been a he) deemed the law only was “applicable to soldiers as generally understood in the masculine sense” (Home News, January 17th).

 

Margaret Skinnider, who was my aunt, and our family were very close in Dublin. She was very proud of her service in 1916, and later in the Black and Tan war and in the Civil War. I don’t recall her making any mention of the pension refusal. Her indignation would have been immense. I suppose Countess Markievicz was dealt with in a similar fashion. – Yours, etc,

 

FERGAN O’SULLIVAN,

 

Pacific Highway,

 

Artarmon,

 

New South Wales,

 

Australia.

 

 

 

Sir, – The three-day Theatre of Memory symposium which His Excellency President Michael D Higgins inspired and which he opened at the Abbey Theatre last week was a diverse, provocative, stimulating interrogation of things that matter and should matter to us as a nation. One could not have asked for 32 better contributors, nor for a better-organised and more smoothly-run event.

 

And yet The Irish Times deliberately attempted to throw a hand grenade in the works with its timed front page and full-page reductionist “rate my theatre” pieces (Main paper & Weekend Review, January 18th).

 

Every National Theatre strives to be world class and with this in mind it is admirable that the Abbey, in conjunction with the Arts Council, set in motion an evaluation and assessment of its recent productions.

 

What I object to is the publication of a report, accessed through Freedom of Information, that is clearly not yet signed off on nor yet delivered to the Abbey. This was shoddy opportunism. – Yours, etc,

 

NIALL MacMONAGLE,

 

Prince Arthur Terrace,

 

Leinster Square, Dublin 6.

 

Sir, – Fintan O’Toole’s report on the Abbey Theatre’s “world-class” standing made sad reading for us in Limerick (Front page & Weekend Review, January 18th). Indignation is rife here over the miserable €7.1 million the Government toss to our internationally-renowned National Theatre. The Abbey’s commissioning of daring modern work by fresh young voices doesn’t come cheap, and we are ready to support the Abbey till our noses bleed.

 

The Dublin media should get down here to gauge the level of support for our National Theatre. No birthday candle is extinguished without a wish for the Abbey to come down and grace Limerick with one of its exquisite triumphs; the Limerick air at New Year crackled again with fresh resolutions to travel up to the Abbey, if there is anything on.

 

In short, Limerick wishes the Abbey all the very best for a speedy return to its rightful world standing – no matter the cost. And we live in hope that one day soon, the Abbey will meet its stated aim to “actively engage with” us, and tour a production of a modern Irish play, in Ireland. It can’t be that hard. – Yours, etc,

 

DAVE BURNS

 

Ballysimon, Co Limerick.

 

Religion is not merely a sociological phenomenon which can lend itself to curious study, and reducing any religion to that narrow focus is to disrespect the truth claims of religion. I believe we have every right to be proud of the fact that our Constitution, written in the context of the darkening clouds of totalitarianism which were to engulf Europe in the horror of the second World War and all that it involved recognised religious freedom and the right of a free conscience.

 

Ireland must have appeared as a beacon of hope to those in Europe caught in destruction of a civilisation which owed its strength to its Christian roots.

 

The expressed intolerance by various government ministers to the religion of the vast majority is in sharp contrast to the more liberal drafters of the 1937 Constitution. Mr Cox may be surprised that at the Catholic secondary school that I attended in the 1950s there was a large minority, about 10 per cent, in final year who were Buddhists from Asia studying for Matriculation.

 

Time and space was made available to them for their religious practices and we were encouraged to respect their loyalty to their religion. That was an example (which was common) of religious tolerance. – Yours, etc,

 

COLM de BARRA,

 

Ballintlea North,

 

Sixmilebridge,

 

Co Clare.

 

 

 

Sir, – “We are where we are”, going forward of course. – Yours, etc,

 

JIM ROCHE,

 

Rutledge Terrace,

 

Dublin 8.

 

Sir, – Listen. – Yours, etc,

 

PAT WHELAN,

 

Millmount Avenue,

 

Mullingar,

 

Co Westmeath.

 

A chara, – A phrase trotted out on the news on every conceivable occasion by the “authorities” after an event with serious consequences: “Lessons will be learnt”. It wouldn’t be so bad if they were. – Is mise,

 

RODGER GERMANY,

 

Sutton in the Isle,

 

Ely,

 

Cambridgeshire,

 

England.

 

Sir, – “Swing by” ; unless, improbably, chariots are involved. – Yours, etc,

 

PAUL D’ALTON,

 

Carrickbrennan Road,

 

Monkstown,

 

Co Dublin.

 

Sir, – After nearly two weeks of contributions for the above perhaps it’s nearly time for “end game”. – Yours, etc,

 

DEREK PEYTON,

 

Killincarrig,

 

Greystones,

 

CoWicklow.

 

 

 

Irish Independent:

 

 

State should not be let off hook for charities

 

Also in this section

 

We deserve much better governance than this

 

Cheap drink comes at a cost

 

Letters: Disagreeing with Donal on suicide

 

Irish citizens with a disability have for decades been relying on charity to obtain or supplement vital services.

 

Over time we have created a charity culture where numerous regulated and unregulated charities have emerged to bridge the gap, leaving the State off the hook.

 

People with a disability are therefore regarded by society as charity cases who rely on the generosity of those around them.

 

Their families, who are very busy caring for their son or daughter, take to the streets to shake buckets and organise quiz nights and marathons to fundraise.

 

What a kick in the teeth for the unfortunate families of clients of the Central Remedial Clinic to discover where their very hard-earned fundraising cash has gone.

 

As a parent of a child with a moderate learning disability who is in the educational system but not receiving state services, I am uncomfortable on many levels with fundraising.

 

I feel we are missing the bigger picture: should the need for these charities exist?

 

We are all equal citizens of Ireland entitled to equity and for all our basic needs to be met by the State, regardless of our physical or intellectual disability, in order to live full lives with dignity and without having to rely on charity of any kind.

 

The State’s money should be spent on frontline staff such as teachers, special needs assistants, care workers and therapists who do great and meaningful work.

 

We need to change our disabled citizens’ status as charity cases to equal citizens with equal rights.

 

FIONA FLINN DEVEREUX

 

NEWCASTLE, CO WICKLOW

 

SENSE OF ENTITLEMENT

 

* Really, nobody should be surprised by the salary revelations emanating from the Central Remedial Clinic and Irish Water controversies.

 

This sense of entitlement is, of course, a top-down national disease, and is endemic in politics, business, trade unions and some professions.

 

The unspoken truth is that we have a President, who is a socialist and humanitarian, who feels entitled to a salary of circa a quarter of a million euro per annum plus hugely generous expenses and allowances.

 

We have two ex-presidents, happy to take pensions of more than €100,000 per annum.

 

The Taoiseach, who presides over a bankrupt little country, is quite content to be among the highest-paid leaders in the world, as are his colleagues in cabinet who are the envy of their peers in Europe.

 

We are blessed to have five ex-taoisigh, four of whom are festooned with pensions and perks of around €140,000 each, as well as myriads of ex-politicians and senior civil servants on equally grotesque lifelong pensions, not to mention the CRC-scale golden handouts received on exiting the stage.

 

This unfounded, innate sense of self-worth and entitlement, we should never forget, is funded by impoverished and ultra-compliant Paddy, who unfortunately has long ago lost his sense of outrage or self-esteem.

 

What’s happening at the CRC is the tip of the iceberg and we all know that this cancer can only be stamped out by political leadership, courage and example. We were promised as much in 2011.

 

Sadly, neither of the government parties or Fianna Fail, as permanent self-interested beneficiaries of the party system, have ever shown any inclination to stop the tide and are less likely to do so in the future.

 

We have, however, a glorious opportunity to declare our disgust at the forthcoming elections.

 

JOHN LEAHY

 

CORK

 

WAVES OF DISAPPROVAL

 

* News that delegates from the new super-quango Irish Water were sent on a laughing mission to Croke Park for a morale-boosting €6,000 exercise has all the hallmarks of Walter Mitty at his finest.

 

However, next time just get them to look at us muggins paying for all this malarkey! That will have them in hysterics for free!

 

ANTHONY WOODS

 

ENNIS, CO CLARE

 

* Are there no ethical standards left in this country or have we become an institutionalised nation of greed? Charity chief executives topping up goes beyond belief. People with disabilities are the most vulnerable in our society. It is our moral duty to support and protect these people, especially given our history of past institutions of care. Has this country learned nothing? How many CRC service users suffered cutbacks during this financial abuse?

 

Irish carers have been providing the Government with free services for years. Put us and our people with disabilities in charge of our own resources within our own communities. We don’t want overpriced institutionalised care. Enough is enough.

 

N DEMPSEY

 

CARBURY, CO KILDARE

 

NAME CHANGE?

 

* With American politics having The Tea Party, could our Reform Alliance become known as The Cocktail Reception?

 

K NOLAN

 

CALDRAGH, CARRICK-ON-SHANNON, CO LEITRIM

 

PUT THINKING CAPS ON

 

* Over the past few months I’ve grown tired of politicians saying that we need to copy the Swedish economic model. Or that the Swiss health system is fantastic and we should replicate it..

 

I ask, why can’t Irish politicians come up with some of their own original ideas, instead of belatedly following our European neighbours. Surely, we can be the trendsetters.

 

CHRIS CALLAGHAN

 

RAMELTON, CO DONEGAL

 

SALARY DISPARITY

 

* I read with incredulity, Daragh Mangan’s self-assured letter (Irish Independent, January 20) in which he supported huge salaries being paid to executives in the employ of charitable organisations.

 

He seems bewildered that a charity should be “vilified for hiring the most capable staff it can because they demand a respectable wage”.

 

I am not sure what Mr Mangan’s idea of a “respectable wage” is, but I would wager it is quite different to my notion of what constitutes one.

 

Nowhere in his letter does he mention the morality of executives receiving large salaries, while at the same time charities, to stay afloat, rely on the goodwill of our citizens, many of whom themselves are struggling financially.

 

JOHN BELLEW

 

DUNLEER, CO LOUTH

 

LIFT LANGUAGE BARRIER

 

* Language matters. It forms our thoughts and shapes our lives.

 

The Irish language, because of exclusion from public life, has gone from being the majority language in the early 1800s to being a minority language today. This was the greatest social change in Irish history.

 

Imagine had England been conquered and its language replaced by Spanish, French or German. Imagine an English population unable to read Shakespeare except in translation and cut off from their own history. Imagine the effect this would have on the psyche, confidence and sense of self of any people.

 

Our English-only mentality costs us export markets and jobs. The Danes learnt English without abandoning Danish and have a stronger economy than us.

 

Speaking Irish makes Ireland sound and feel like a regular European country.

 

It will recover our intellectual and cultural sovereignty and contribute to an inclusive Irish identity beyond colour or creed.

 

DáITHí MAC CáRTHAIGH BL

 

BAILE ÁTHA CLIATH 7

 

Irish Independent

 

 


Liz and Anna

$
0
0

22 January 2014 Liz and Anna
I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. Leslie has to pass a navigation test, but the examiner is an old flame of Mrs Poveys. Priceless.
Liz and Anna come for lunch, not a success, get lots of books, Peter Rice finished the windows.
Scrabble today I wins   and gets  over   400,  Perhaps Mary will win tomorrow.

Obituary:
The Reverend Professor Ernest Nicholson, who has died aged 75, was a leading scholar of the Old Testament and served from 1990 to 2003 as Provost of Oriel College, Oxford.
An Ulsterman by birth, Nicholson made substantial contributions to the study of the Pentateuch (the five books of Moses comprising Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy) . One of his main preoccupations was the concept of the “covenant” which he saw as central to the development of what is distinctive in the faith of Israel.
In a major survey, God and His People; Covenant and Theology in the Old Testament (1986), Nicholson concluded that: “on the whole … it is fair to regard ‘covenant’ as a theological theory about God’s relationship with Israel … Thus understood, ‘covenant’ is the central expression of the distinctive faith of Israel as ‘the people of Yahweh’, the children of God by adoption and free decision rather than by nature or necessity.”
His biblical scholarship and his expertise in Latin, Hebrew and Semitic languages brought Nicholson international renown and he travelled all over the world. Yet he was always happy to admit that as a boy he had failed his 11-plus, using the experience to encourage young people that anything could be achieved through hard work and application.
The son of a farmer, Ernest Wilson Nicholson was born into a Protestant family at Portadown, Co Armagh, on September 26 1938. After his disastrous 11-plus , he was educated at the town’s technical school.
Related Articles
Father Jerome Murphy-O’Connor
15 Nov 2013
Obituary: Professor John Strugnell
02 Jan 2008
Canon John Fenton
08 Jan 2009
Professor Martin Hengel
12 Jul 2009
He spent four years there but wanted to enter the Church and eventually mastered enough Latin to move to the grammar school, Portadown College. From there, Nicholson went up to Trinity College, Dublin, where he studied Theology and was greatly influenced by the Hebrew scholar Jacob Weingreen.
Nicholson went on to Glasgow University, where he took a PhD under CJ Mullo Weir. His thesis, on the literary history of the book of Deuteronomy, accepted the widely-held belief that the core of the book could be identified with the “book of the law” which was discovered in the Jerusalem temple in 621 BC and which influenced King Josiah’s reformation of worship in Judah. It was published in revised form (in 1967) as his first book, Deuteronomy and Tradition.
In 1962 Nicholson had returned to Trinity College as a lecturer in Hebrew and Semitics. In 1967 he moved to Cambridge as University Lecturer in Divinity with a fellowship at University (now Wolfson) College. After his ordination in Ely Cathedral in 1969, he became Chaplain, and later Dean, of Pembroke College. In Preaching to the Exiles (1971), he traced the history of the “Deuteronomic” tradition from its beginnings to the Babylonian Exile.
Nicholson moved to Oxford in 1979 to take up the post of Professor of the Interpretation of Holy Scripture, with a fellowship at Oriel. As well as serving as college Provost he was Pro-Vice-Chancellor of the university from 1993 to 2003.
As Provost of Oriel, Nicholson was known for his kindliness towards all members of his college, while his concern for student welfare was reflected in his appointment as chairman of a university committee on student health. A dignified man who valued tradition, he was an assiduous fundraiser and it was his idea to produce an official history of the college. The book, a substantial collaborative effort, edited by Jeremy Catto, was published in November last year.
At Cambridge, Nicholson had begun to turn his mind to wider issues concerning the origins of Biblical traditions in such works as Exodus and Sinai in History and Tradition (1973). At Oxford, in addition to God and His People (1986), he published The Pentateuch in the Twentieth Century: The Legacy of Julius Wellhausen (1998).
Ernest Nicholson was a Fellow of the British Academy, which awarded him its Burkitt Medal for Biblical Studies in 2009.
He married, in 1962, Hazel Jackson, who survives him with their three daughters. A son predeceased him.
The Reverend Professor Ernest Nicholson, born September 26 1938, died December 22 2013

Guardian:

I was one of a group of women who gave evidence to the parliamentary select committee considering transferring child benefit from mothers to fathers (Letters, 21 January). As far as I am aware, there was no meaningful number of male trade unionists who had their beady eyes on the money. The proposal to transfer the money from purse to wallet was merely made to streamline and simplify the benefits and tax systems. The consequences of this – that a far smaller proportion of the money would find its way to supporting children – had simply been overlooked. We drew the committee’s attention to this and its members accepted the argument, and we won the day. It was a good victory, but there’s no need to cloud the picture with imaginary male villains.
Ruth Grimsley
Sheffield
• I was working in the private office of the Department of Health and Social Security at the time. David Ennals had just become secretary of state and was on a canal holiday when the leak came to light. He didn’t want to cancel his holiday, but it was a big issue and he wanted to be kept informed. This was in the days before mobile phones, so we had to arrange to call a telephone box alongside the canal at a given time. A man I didn’t know answered the phone. After a little confusion I asked if there was anyone nearby who appeared to be waiting. “Well,” he said, “there’s a man reading the Daily Telegraph.” “That’ll be him,” I said, “can you hand him the phone.” We never did establish what a Labour secretary of state was doing reading the Daily Telegraph.
Alan Healey
Milson, Shropshire

An alternative version to the origins of Babes in the Wood (Country diary, 20 January) comes in the book The Dark River: the Irwell by Cyril Bracegirdle. In this the legend was inspired by an incident which took place at Agecroft Hall in the Irwell Valley in the reign of Edward III. “Pining of grief for the death of her lord in the French wars, Lady Joan de Langley had left her young son in wardship to her late husband’s patron John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster. On the morning of the Feast of Ascension, in 1374, the villainous Robert de Holland ‘with many others assembled with him, armed in breastplate and with swords, and bows and arrows, by force took possession of the said lordship of the duke’.” Exactly how the noble duke was occupying himself while this dastardly business was taking place is not recorded. But it appears that the young Langley and his sister escaped to the shelter of the forest which then covered the slopes of the Irwell Valley, where they were cared for by loyal retainers until Lancaster rescued them. Agecroft Hall was shipped lock, stock and barrel to Richmond, Virginia.
Albert Beckett
Oswaldtwistle, Lancashire

We understand from the chancellor’s autumn statement that the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills faces additional cuts of £305m over the next two years. Reports suggest the Treasury is seeking to achieve this by abolishing the student opportunity fund, administered by the Higher Education Funding Council for England. This fund aims to support the less privileged into university study and the threat of its abolition will fill many with horror. But the flipside is that it appears to be either this or further cuts to the adult budget for further education.
So, for every pound of the HE opportunity fund not cut, a pound will have to be found from money to support adults gaining skills in FE. Put starkly, the country faces a choice between enabling the less privileged to access college or to access university (Education, 21 January). Universities have a loud voice – but what of England’s more than 350 further education colleges? The 157 Group represents 30 of the largest, and our members alone train over 300,000 adults each year and contribute over £16.5bn to the UK economy. Tuition fees for a typical full-time programme in FE are about half what a university would charge, so saving the FE budget could benefit twice as many people. Many FE colleges offer degree-level programmes, so it would be possible for more to achieve to this level if the FE budget were retained. And the focus of FE on the vocational – and on skills – would seem to be more in keeping with our growing economic needs.
As Vince Cable said in 2012: “In our popular culture today, the contestants on Masterchef or Great British Bake Off receive infinitely greater exposure than the teams on University Challenge. We rightly admire craft and skill as much as – if not more than – knowledge.” To invest in skills is to invest in further education. If a stark choice has to be made, then preserving the chance for more to access high-quality vocational education at their local FE college seems to be self-evidently the right choice.
Lynne Sedgmore
Executive director, 157 Group

In your report (18 January) on the possibility of the Church of England appointing a woman bishop by Christmas you say of the main candidates: “Faull is the least controversial candidate. Osborne produced a report friendly to gay clergy 20 years ago that frightened conservatives, and Winkett has been accused of antisemitism after an art installation at her church represented the Israeli separation wall around Bethlehem.”
This unsourced statement about Rev Lucy Winkett is below-the-belt journalism. The Guardian was one of few mainstream news outlets to give the Bethlehem Unwrapped event any coverage, so one would think it would avoid repeating such antisemitic innuendo.
This kind of statement is damaging to the reputation of Lucy Winkett and a slur on the congregation, which is fully supportive of the event that took place at St James’s church over the 12 days of Christmas. It devalues the real antisemitism which is still a phenomenon in post-Holocaust Europe. St James’s has a long-standing and honourable public record of opposition to racism, religious intolerance and injustice in any form, and staunchly defends the right of the state of Israel to exist with secure borders.
Tom Cook
Deputy church warden, St James’s church, Piccadilly
• The Anglican church supported the Bethlehem Unwrapped festival, which was organised and celebrated in response to an appeal from the Holy Land Trust and other Christian and Jewish and Israeli organisations which work for reconciliation. Its purpose was to draw attention to the immense difficulties for all those living either side of the Bethlehem separation wall. The message of the festival and of the replica wall was “build bridges not walls”. Messages on the wall were encouraged and when I attended the last-night concert a part of the wall was ceremoniously transformed into a bridge. It was inspiring and moving,
I understand there was harsh criticism from some Israelis and from Christian Zionists, but that there was much more support from many Jewish visitors and, as would be expected, from organisations such as Israelis Against Demolition and other Palestinian, Israeli and Jewish organisations working for reconciliation.
Leah Hoskin
London
• The decision by Lucy Winkett and Justin Butcher (creative director of the festival) to hold it at St James’s was an act of remarkable moral courage, for which they should be congratulated, not vilified. The festival was, explicitly, to support the people of Palestine and Israel, as an act of solidarity for a just and sustainable solution for both communities.
Mary Stewart
London
• So the C of E “can now move on to arguing about gay clergy and the blessing of gay marriage”, topics of little interest to most people, but which are so much easier for synod to get steamed up about than really important issues such as poverty and inequality. Feeding the hungry, caring for the poor, giving a voice to the voiceless – these should be the priorities of those who claim to follow the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth. When they are, then perhaps the church will regain some relevance.
Christine Yates
Giggleswick, North Yorkshire

I was delighted to read that the Sutton Trust intended its Open Access proposals to open up access to the top independent schools “to all students” only to have my happiness confounded immediately on the next line on discovering this access was to be “on the basis of ability” (Letters, 21 January). So, not so much an exercise in open access as creaming off the state schools to cement the existing grossly unequal system. Some reform!
Roy Boffy
Walsall
•  The one principled defence corporate tax-avoiders offered was that it is for companies to minimise their tax bills within the rules and for governments to change the rules if the outcome is unacceptable. It now seems (Tech firms make last-minute bid to halt tax clampdown, 20 January) that they abandoned that minor peak in the moral high ground just as soon as governments responded to their invitation.
Brian Rutherford
Canterbury, Kent
•  The psychoanalyst Donald Winnicott, one of the most influential psychoanalysts after Freud, saw that the impulse to steal is connected to the impulse to love, the need to have something felt to be good (Thieves smash urn holding Freud’s ashes, 16 January). Since the thief wanted literally to have psychoanalysis, let him be given it. Of all the groups to provoke, has he not managed to select the one most able to offer him understanding and reparation?
Robert Adès
London
• Regarding dandelions and snowdrops (Letters, 20 January), les perce-neiges de cette année sont dans nos jardin, en County Durham, aujourd’hui.
Avril Hannon
Mordon, County Durham
•  Four hundred letters a day from the wide, wide world and you choose to give us mind-numbing news from a few back gardens. Who the hell does the choosing? Please fire them.
Roy Arnold
Tenterden, Kent
•  On 20 January, I observed daffodils flowering on the south-facing garden outside St Nicholas of Myra church in Brighton. I also saw a bee inspecting flowers in a window box in a nearby street.
James Birkett
Brighton

Enough of this “we’re all victims” hand-wringing (Why make such a fuss? Here’s why, Lord Rennard, 21 January). I worked for the Liberal party in the House of Commons from 1976 until 1987, and it may surprise some that neither my female colleagues nor I put up with constant manhandling because we were either too ambitious for political advancement or too stupid to recognise it as sexual harassment. It simply didn’t happen. Of course there was the occasional hand on knee or hug from a male MP or member of staff. If it was unwelcome, it was dealt with firmly at the time and there the matter ended, with no tears and no years of depression or counselling required for either party.
Perhaps it is a generational issue, but I resent being made a victim by Polly Toynbee and those Liberal Democrat activists who seem to have allowed a few embarrassing incidents to blight their lives and the lives of others, and with a few facile generalisations have also managed (perhaps inadvertently) to tarnish the reputations of those women who have had political success.
By screaming “sexual harassment” at the slightest touch, they trivialise the real humiliation and violence suffered by too many women every day. By depicting women as too fragile to deal with the occasional clumsy approach without the intervention of a more powerful male, they undermine our achievements in the workplace and beyond.
Jackie Winter
Address supplied
•  Workplace harassment needs to be handled according to the problem. If a place of work has a sensitive enough policy with trained mediators/counsellors to implement the policy and deal with the issue at a very early stage then the rarely successful “costly employment tribunal cases” Polly Toynbee refers to can be avoided. A method that lets a person know their behaviour is unacceptable is often the first step. The four Lib Dem women would sit in a room, with a friend if necessary, and tell Lord Rennard how they felt when he did what he did. He could also have a friend with him. Being publicly confronted in this way allows him to hear the impact of his behaviour and is a first stage. It is vital to support and empower the “victims” and turn them into “survivors” who can learn how to deal with the problem if it ever happens again.
If the behaviour does not stop, then the matter can be taken further to disciplinary level. Sometimes, several meetings with either side or with both sides is required. With 20-plus years’ experience of dealing with staff (colleagues and managers) and student problems, from teenage cyberbullying to thoughtless management groping, I found that the “perpetrator” rarely uses the words “I’m sorry” but will often respond positively to the question “Can you understand and acknowledge why your behaviour is not acceptable?” A suitable remedy can usually be found but may not be enshrined in policy.
Developing a trustworthy outsider status to encourage people to come forward (even if they only think it is a “trivial” matter), to manage the whole process and support both sides, means people may be able to get back to their work and their lives. Agreement to address harassment and bullying must be verbalised from the top management and “collusion” with one’s fellow managers is not acceptable. Talking to the “perpetrators” about their behaviour sometimes worked. Initially being accused of being a “persecuting witch” by one senior manager was only helpful in that it made me more determined to put the item on the agenda, assist those affected by it and wherever possible reduce the impact on them. At least the perpetrators knew I was “watching” them and sometimes that really was enough to stop the behaviour.
Carole Moss
Former equality manager and head of student services at Bradford College
• I would have more time for the views of Lord Rennard’s “friends” (Rennard threatens legal action after Lib Dem suspension, 21 January) if any of them were female; certainly none have raised their head above the parapet. Is this not just the equivalent of the Conservative Bullingdon Club transferred to the Liberal Democrats?
Maureen Panton
Malvern, Worcestershire
•  ”[T]he portly peer … this physically unprepossessing man”? Had similarly unflattering and irrelevant remarks been made about the physical appearance of a woman, Ms Toynbee would doubtless be incandescent. Surely what’s unacceptable for the goose is also unacceptable for the gander.
Peter Wrigley
Birstall, Yorkshire

Margaret Drabble is half-right (10 January). Advances in science are indeed keeping too many of us alive too long. What is the point of more and more years contemplating our slippers in the residential home?
But we are not helpless in the hands of the doctors. You don’t have to take the pills or sign the form for a surgical intervention, or call the ambulance, or even go to see the doctor in the first place. You can say no. You can make a living will that is legally binding on the medical profession, indicating your wish not to receive certain types of treatment or resuscitation. More control over our own destiny is possible than Drabble allows.
She also underestimates the dangers of legalised euthanasia. Medical professionals are legally obliged to act in “the best interests of the patient”, but families are not. If euthanasia were legal, many vulnerable and suggestible old and sick people would come under pressure from the relatives to take the pill that Drabble recommends. After all, granny is using up her life’s savings in the Home, and we were counting on the old girl’s money, weren’t we? Or we simply want it now, not to wait until she’s gone. So, “You’re not very happy here are you, gran? Why don’t you ask the doctor for that nice little pill?” And so on.
I may want to have more say in when I go, but I don’t want others deciding it for me, neither doctors nor those closest to me.
Martin Down
Witney, UK
• Excellent article by Margaret Drabble. The only point missing is the fact that other countries are once again ahead of the sclerotic UK. Leaving aside the well-known case of Switzerland, all three Benelux countries have legislated to allow, subject to appropriate safeguards, voluntary euthanasia and assisted suicide for patients with an incurable illness that is causing them unbearable suffering.
Moreover, three US states (Oregon, Vermont and Washington) have legalised medically assisted suicide. These governments have recognised that the right to self-determination includes the right of the individual to decide the time and manner of his or her death. When will Britain follow their enlightened example and allow the same freedom to its citizens?
Nicholas Argyris
Forres, UK
• My mother-in-law, who lives in the Midlands, is certainly a good example of Ivan Illich’s theory that doctors may do more harm than good. Now in her 97th year, she has refused to see a doctor since she was 50. Not only that, she has taken no medicine, apart from one acetaminophen some years ago (which she quickly judged did more harm than good).
She undoubtedly has good genes and has been fortunate in avoiding the maladies that have afflicted her siblings, but that is not to say that she has not suffered from some others. We believe that she probably has osteoporosis, observing that she is now much shorter than she used to be. She has had various chest ailments that have, presumably, lasted longer that they would have had she taken antibiotics. She fell and, by her own judgment, probably broke some ribs, yet steadfastly refused to see a doctor, claiming that he would not be able to do anything anyway. Her big fear is that someone will take her to a doctor and that he or she will find something wrong with her, a fear that is undoubtedly justified.
In the meantime, she continues to live entirely independently, walking to the shops (with no aid), cleaning her house more thoroughly than most people, doing some gardening and competing the daily crossword without the aid of reading glasses. Long may she stay away from doctors!
Avril Taylor
Dundas, Ontario, Canada
• I heartily concur with most of Margaret Drabble’s comments on attitudes to the elderly and most of these comments apply equally to pensioners in New Zealand. Particularly one can’t help wondering whether those newspaper columnists and others who accuse us of being The Selfish Generation will decline to receive the pensions and bus passes – “the well-earned consolations of age” – when their turn comes. It inevitably will.
Kitty Monk
Auckland, New Zealand
Fracking ruins our home
Suzanne Goldenberg’s article on fracking (10 January) is welcome. Perhaps you will follow it with a semi-covert-ops journalistic safari into the wilds of the all-new American gold rush. Send some roughneck reporter to the bars frequented by the Joes and Josies in the field. How is it on the ground inside the perimeter fence on the driller’s payroll?
Fracking is to the average citizen of any modern civilisation as global opium production is to the junkies of this world. The primates of the Earth may be, well, primitive, but they are healthier animals by far with a much clearer view of the difference between the natural order in all its wondrous, terrible majesty and our relentless, grievous disturbance thereof.
The whaling magnates of yore and the fracking executives, board-members and so on of today are the same as ever: the same sorts who keep us sheep warm and direct-wired into their age-old system of rampant, ever-escalating desecration of the only place any of us has to live.
Jonathan Vanderels
Shaftsbury, Vermont, US
Vestiges of colonialism
It was bizarre to read that those celebrating the reinstatement of the law against same-sex relationships in India claim that such relations are a disease imported from the west, when the law in question (section 377 of the penal code) was imposed by the western colonial rulers of India a century and a half ago (20 December). The same “blame the west” nonsense is being perpetuated by the Ugandan government (3 January) in extending a colonial era law to oppress homosexuals, using the same colonialist rationale (“against the order of nature”).
My Indian and Ugandan homosexual friends are trapped in a dreadful catch-22, where even to speak out against these oppressive laws could render them liable to persecution and violence from the state, and from those who feel empowered by its bigotry. From the safety of living in an ex-colony that decriminalised homosexual relationships 28 years ago, I therefore feel impelled to point out that such laws are from a very bad bygone era of colonialism, when racial discrimination and persecution were also condoned by the state. The sooner they go the way of other discriminatory laws, the better it will be for India, Uganda and all other ex-colonies.
Christine Dann
Port Levy, New Zealand
Do not fire unless you’re sure
In Why the US drone programme is horrifying by Heather Linebaugh (3 January), she writes: “The video provided by a drone is far from clear enough to detect someone carrying a weapon, even on a clear day.”
There is a simple solution to the problem: if you are not 100% sure whether the target is an armed terrorist, don’t fire. Stationed far away from the combat zone, UAV troops enjoy the luxury of time and energy to study the pictures of their targets for extended periods: they should not push the button unless they are fully satisfied that their targets are armed insurgents and not women and children.
Since the aerial bombardment introduced by the German Zeppelin attack on London in the first world war, civilian casualties have become an inevitable part of modern warfare. Only drones provide an opportunity to avoid such civilian casualties.
UAV troops should be advised only to fire when they are sure about their targets. As they don’t face any danger faced by pilots of bombers, UAV operators can take time to ensure that they are not attacking any civilian targets. In fact, drones can be used effectively against armed groups if proper steps are taken to avert civilian casualties.
Mahmood Elahi
Ottawa, Canada
Briefly
• Regarding your article In praise of … crystallography (10 January): the real discoverer of DNA was Rosalind Franklin and it was done in the rather primitive x-ray laboratory at King’s College London. I was studying crystallography in King’s geology department and used to visit Rosalind with my samples for analysis, but she wouldn’t let me stay long because of leakage of x-rays. This Englishwoman told me she was working out the structure of this new material sent to her from a New Zealander and an American at Cambridge, but died soon after from radiation poisoning. I think the Guardian should also remember this most important scientist.
Tony Taylor
Manly, NSW, Australia
• I always look forward to Oliver Burkeman’s column, but to hear that laziness is not one’s own fault was music to my ears (3 January). But I would go further: laziness is not a fault at all. We lazy people are the only ones with the time to savour, to contemplate, to ponder over and to reflect upon the hard work of others. For that alone, surely we are worth our own weight in couch potato.
Moreover, think of the resources we are not using up, the environment we are not polluting, the money we are leaving others to make, the competitions we are letting others win. Where would the rest of you be without us?
If Burkeman does set up a campaign for the rights of the lazy, I dare say I would lift a finger to press “like”.
Julie Telford
St Louis, France
• The celebrities whom we admire for their remarkable ability to remain young and fit (10 January) do not tell us about the time and money they spend to hire the best trainers, cosmeticians and surgeons; that such expensive image maintenance is a thankless and endlessly time-consuming pursuit leading to mixed results; and finally, and most discouragingly, that it is subject to relentless public scrutiny and criticism – in short, plain hard work.
Richard Orlando
Westmount, Quebec, Canada

Independent:

What a Lib Dem own goal! Molehills and mountains, storms and teacups come to mind. My more than 40 years of a career in a mainly male environment taught me that:
a) There always are and always will be unpleasant, arrogant or inadequate men who will “try it on”. (We’re not talking about illegal offences here.)
b) The problem is invariably solved by a slap on the wrist of the offending hand, a shoe heel brought smartly down on the male foot, or a sweetly but loudly voiced, “Please keep your hands to yourself.”
If these delicate women lack self-reliance they should stop whingeing, gather up their smelling salts and retire to their ladies’ boudoirs. If their life skills are so weak then these sensitive flowers have no place in politics or business; they only impede the advance of genuinely capable women. Not to mention the harm they do to their party.
This country has big issues to face. This pantomime is not one of them. Weakness, embarrassment and time-wasting all round, Lib Dems.
Barbara Sanders, London SW20
Either we have the rule of law in this country or we don’t. If we do, then we are going to have to start taking the presumption of innocence a lot more seriously than is currently the case in relation to Lord Rennard.
The overwhelming majority of press comment, including Joan Smith’s comment piece (21 January), has been based on the assumption that the allegations against Lord Rennard are true. I don’t know if they are, but then neither does she. What I do know is that the case was looked into over a long period of time by the Metropolitan Police, who concluded that there was insufficient evidence to proceed, and that that was also the conclusion of the independent inquiry into the matter, carried out by Alistair Webster QC, which put the likelihood of success in court at below 50 per cent. Had the case gone to court it would seem that both the police and the inquiry would expect Lord Rennard to be acquitted.
The only regimes which have allowed suspicion or unproven allegation to be the basis for condemning the accused have been dictatorships and tyrannies. The secrecy and lack of due process which has characterised the Liberal Democrats’ handling of the case may invite uncomfortable comparisons with such oppressive regimes, but I would have hoped that an independently minded newspaper would have had more respect for the rights of the accused.
Sean Lang, Sawston, Cambridgeshire
How to defuse the current emotions threatening the Lib Dems? The matter has been brought into the open and aired publicly. The Lib Dem rules need reviewing and tightening. The women involved seemed to have some catharsis. Lord Reynard remains adamantly opined that he did nothing wrong. Yet he is denied the key report requiring him to apologise. As Lord Carlile, his legal adviser, said, this is contrary to natural justice. Of course this is unfair and unreasonable. He must see what is being said of him.
Maybe it is time for quiet reflection or some long walks alone. The Lib Dem opposition in the Lords has been the only real bulwark to the worst excesses of right-wing Toryism. Allowing this festering boil to further damage the Lib Dems is pointless and dangerous.
Justice has been done as far as it can be; attentions are better focused now on the Tories’ naked politics to win power in 2015 with such cheap point-scoring as a £7 minimum wage while reducing higher rate tax from 50p to 45p – which gives £100,000 earners a mere £3,000 or so for doing nothing.
End of story? I hope so.
Keith W D Jago, Brighton
Thatcher house and Tory values
The revelation that Baroness Thatcher’s home in Chester Square, London, will be placed on the open market (“Yours for £12m”, 18 January) alluded to the claim that the property was owned by an offshore trust registered in the British Virgin Islands, thus avoiding inheritance tax. Surely this is not the same “blessed Margaret” who preached Victorian values, saying that the Victorian era was the era of “selflessness and benefaction”.
How is it that someone who may have deliberately avoided paying money into the state coffers should be rewarded with a title, a pension and a state funeral? No wonder that there are feelings of disaffection and incredulity among many hard-working and hard-taxed sections of the public.
It is about time that the Government made attempts to improve social cohesion by introducing measures to prevent tax avoidance, to complement the measures being taken to lower the benefit budget.
Dr David Bartlett , Ilkley, West Yorkshire
Is anybody surprised to read that Margaret Thatcher’s house in Chester Square “being registered in the British Virgin Islands, was effectively outside the will” and she “may have legally avoided millions in inheritance tax by keeping a chunk of her fortune off-shore”?
It emphasises that “We are all in it together” is no more than a cynical rendering of her saying that “there is no such thing as society”. It remains a grab-what-you-can society and, I suspect, it always will be under the Tories.
Charles Bidwell, Oxford
No scope for today’s working-class heroes
It’s not just “vanishing acting opportunities” that Stephen McGann should be highlighting (“Estate kids like me aren’t getting chances, says actor”, 21 January). Class divisions are ever greater and the odds are stacked against a child becoming successful in any career without the background of privilege.
People with a private education make up the majority of the Commons front benches, clog up the music charts and run corporations. Decades ago, it did seem possible that talent and hard work led to fame and fortune.
Have the working classes lost all aspiration to follow their dreams or is it that the old school tie network is now a necessity for success? We need more working-class heroes.
Angela Elliott, Hundleby, Lincolnshire
Whether compulsory or not, it does make sense for job seekers to have to study basic skills in maths and English if they don’t already have the appropriate certificates. But with no new jobs being created and graduates unable to get work, let no one think that what the Labour spokeswoman is saying will have a positive effect in getting people back into employment.
Tim Mickleburgh, Grimsby
When you really need a lawyer
H Trevor Jones (letter, 13 January) asks why we still need legal aid when we have independent judges and randomly selected juries. There are several reasons.
First, article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights requires that a person accused of a crime be given access to legal representation.
Second, without legal training a person will not be able to subpoena witnesses, question witnesses, or know which questions or evidence is not admissible. Thus “simply tell their own story truthfully” isn’t enough to ensure that an innocent person will be found innocent, especially when a witness is falsely testifying against them or the police are trying to frame them.
Third, it has been demonstrated in the USA that if people get poor legal representation they are substantially more likely to be imprisoned, even if they’re innocent. After being exonerated they will be eligible for a substantial amount of compensation. Failing to give people proper legal representation has a great financial and human cost.
Thomas Wiggins, Wokingham, Berkshire
Bumps and scrapes of childhood
A very moving letter (21 January) from Stephen Crake in Beijing. Of course there are dangers in allowing children to play in the street or even in the fields and woods. I remember childhood playfellows suffering broken bones and proudly showing off black eyes.
But I am sure they, and I, would have preferred this to being confined to the house all day long. Bring back the skipping ropes, the cookers, even the whips and tops, allow children to climb trees, and let them take some risks.
Bill Fletcher, Cirencester, Gloucestershire
Well-watered garden
If Eric Pickles and the Conservatives are planning to site one of their “garden cities” at Yalding, Kent (news, 20 January) it is likely to contain an extremely big water feature.
Shane Malhotra, Maidstone, Kent
No way off the grid
Seems churlish to rain on Bob Gilmurray’s freedom parade (letter, 21 January) but there is no escape. On his travels he has appeared on probably hundreds of CCTV cameras.
Trevor Beaumont , Huddersfield, West Yorkshire

Times:

Sir, This disclosure of abuse in schools is welcome, for boarding schools are very “closed worlds” and children as young as 7 are still being sent into the care of strangers solely because it is “the done thing”. Abusers can find it easy to groom children who are very lonely and vulnerable as they move into the strange life of an institution.
Paedophiles often blame the children. Of course they can be condemned whatever their age, as all abusers have always known the damage they cause. This is why they work in a dark world of secrecy, lies or threats to silence their victims.
Andrew Norfolk (report, Jan 20) is absolutely right in saying that no one can be confident that abuse does not exist today. Two things would help reduce the risk.
Firstly, schools need to be truly open and honest about the nature of abuse instead of repeating that it is a thing of the past and all boarding is now safe. It is not, and some in authority collude in the abuse as they silently let known paedophile teachers move to other schools without telling the police.
Secondly, the government has to take this issue seriously. There is no such thing as “mild paedophilia”. Urgent action is needed to change the law, making it mandatory to report all abuse.
Margaret Laughton
Boarding Concern
Sir, Your report on child abuse raises important issues, and no one involved in education would wish to ignore, still less condone past incidents. However, it does seem spiteful to put on an interactive map schools where teachers were acquitted, or where no case was found to answer. A zealous attitude of “no smoke without fire” risks undermining trust in such reports. Not all those accused of a crime are guilty.
Chris Ramsey
Headmaster, The King’s School
Chester
Sir, You imply that schools are to blame if the abuse does not lead to prosecution for many years. I’ve twice taught in schools where such a case occurred. In both the school acted promptly when the abuse came to light. In neither was there enough evidence for prosecution though both tried to have the perpetrator included on the sex offenders list. One attempt failed for want of evidence, though the headmaster took the risk, when later he learned that the man was applying at another school, of warning its head. Schools are natural targets for paedophiles, boarding schools offer more opportunities and victims often can’t speak about the abuse for years. For most of your 130 you list only one offender. In how many of those cases do the victims blame the school?
Tom McIntyre
Frome, Somerset
Sir, All criminal acts within schools are deplorable. Modern communications do indeed render children less vulnerable to such abuse (letter, Jan 21). Far more significantly, however, extensive legal, regulatory and educational safeguards are now required, including rigorous inspection.
The events of the past cannot, alas, be undone. But the concerns and actions of the present will continue to ensure ever safer and more rewarding educational experiences in the UK schools of the future.
Dr Tim Hands
Chairman, Headmasters’ and Headmistresses’ Conference

oluntary organisations to speak out, on behalf of millions of supporters, on causes that matter to the British public is at risk.
The Lobbying Bill was intended to restrict the use of “big money” in our politics. Instead it is going to restrict the activities of campaigning and voluntary organisations that have never been a threat to democracy. In fact, organisations like our own play an essential part in public debate — without us, would we have seen civil partnerships, child labour laws or the recent restrictions on smoking?
Peers have done their best to reduce the impact of this misguided legislation by removing the need to count the cost of charity and campaigning groups’ staff as election-related expenditure. Today we need MPs to preserve the changes made in the Upper House. If MPs reverse these changes, it will not only be the voluntary sector that suffers, but public debate and society as a whole.
Rose Caldwell
Concern Worldwide UK
Simon Gillespie
British Heart Foundation
Jana Osborne
National Federation Women’s Institutes
Joan Edwards
The Wildlife Trusts
Sir Barney White-Spunner
Countryside Alliance
Joe Duckworth
League Against Cruel Sports
Mark Goldring
Oxfam
Mark Lister
Progressio
Andy Atkins
Friends of the Earth

Sir, Shirley Thurston (letter, Jan 20) is correct in that there is a connection between cherry juice and gout, but she could save herself a lot of money. The NHS guidelines on gout point out that taking vitamin C can reduce the risk of gout. I take 1g a day and have not had an attack for 18 months. My GP pooh-poohed the very idea.
Dr Philip Pugh
Chandler’s Ford, Hants

Sir, Your report (Jan 20) that the British are no longer the “happy breed” we once were but are now only “rather happy” and less cheerful than others worldwide. And small wonder; I find it increasingly depressing that so many of our great institutions are lately under critical scrutiny. I am thinking particularly of the BBC, the NHS, the Police Federation, the high street banks, and the House of Lords. When will we once again become “this scepter’d isle” full of cheerful people?
B. Jackson
Harrow, Middx

Telegraph:

SIR – I agree with Paul Newton (Letters, January 20) that small shops that make the effort deserve our custom, even if a chain store or the web offers the cheapest option.
When I took my old watch to that rarest of things, a watch-repairers, in central London, the man at his bench opened it up and took a good look with his glass.
After a few deft movements, he closed it and handed it back to me, saying: “It was some dust that was making it go fast.” When I asked how much I owed him, he said: “No charge.” I felt like dropping some money through his letter box after closing time.
After all, if reliable independent traders don’t earn our support, they’ll eventually have to shut up shop.
Fiona Johnson
Mitcham, Surrey

SIR – Jesse Norman, the Conservative MP, rightly raises the importance of funding arts and culture outside London. But the proportion of Arts Council money spent outside London has not been “falling for decades” – rather, the reverse is true.
His own party introduced the National Lottery 20 years ago. This transformed the funding of regional arts, and greatly increased overall investment. Sixty per cent of Lottery funding through the Arts Council has been spent outside London since 1992, but in the last three years that has risen above 70 per cent. The trend is clear.
The Arts Council only accounts for a small part of funding since the bulk is committed directly by the Government to the national museums, or by local authorities around the country. Having said that, this is a necessary debate to have. Arts and cultural organisations outside London face two disadvantages: the historic difficulty of fundraising beyond the capital, and ongoing reductions in local authority arts budgets.
So, although the Arts Council only accounts for an element of arts funding, we will work, with our partners, to help ensure a healthy cultural life for all of England.
Sir Peter Bazalgette
Chairman, Arts Council England
London SW1
Related Articles
Ofsted should focus on motivating and retaining teachers, not paperwork
21 Jan 2014
Appreciating the skills of independent traders
21 Jan 2014
Talk about welfare
SIR – David Cameron and Iain Duncan Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary, have a brilliant idea to force integration of welfare recipients by abolishing interpreters and foreign language pamphlets in welfare offices. But how will this ever work?
How about introducing a free national educational programme? It could involve English volunteers, who would not need much training. This could blow some fresh air into foreign-speaking communities and encourage residents to become English-speaking Britons.
Dr Christopher Everett
Alton, Hampshire
The ones that got away
SIR – I simply do not have enough old girlfriends to cope with the amount of passwords I now use, so I wonder if I could use the nicknames of those that I wish had been my girlfriends?
That would be more than sufficient.
Robert Miller
Cromer, Norfolk
Reverse running risks
SIR – Reverse running is indeed dangerous (Letters, January 17).
At 15, I was Leicestershire’s county champion runner, and had the chance of winning the junior Victor Ludorum trophy at my school’s sports day. My main competitor was a superb athlete, and, in a silly moment of bravado, I boasted that I could run faster backwards than he could forwards. I set off reverse running so quickly I did not notice the cricket sight screen behind me. I hit this with such force that I spiralled through the slats, and lay stunned, bruised and covered in horrendous splinters. A trip to the hospital ensued, and I missed the sports day.
My rival duly won the trophy.
David Fisher
Leicester
SIR – As cadets in the Forties, we did backwards running as part of our training programme. It is an excellent exercise, but I had to give it up some time ago.
Christopher Cox
Warnham, West Sussex
Minimum wage rise
SIR – George Osborne’s plans to raise the minimum wage are questionable. I left school with average GCSEs, and got my first job, part-time in a clothes shop, at £2.70 an hour. This proved a strong enough motivation for me to do better. After 15 years my hourly rate stood at £21.55, a 698 per cent increase, at an average of 46 per cent a year. Even then, £2.70 wasn’t much. Overtime was vital and helped me learn skills. Now I find myself interviewing applicants for weekend jobs, but cannot give them the overtime I used to get.
There are two big effects of the national minimum wage on fashion retail. First, since a pound buys fewer hours of work, there are fewer staff to serve customers. This can be partly offset, if managers increase productivity and each employee’s skills. But in retail it’s more about the number of staff available to serve the customers and replenish the missing sizes on the sales floor.
Secondly, there is less encouragement for employees to progress. Take someone who started in October 2008 on £5.73 an hour, who performed well and gained supervisory experience. His performance-linked pay might have risen by 1 or 2 per cent a year, and he might now earn just over the current minimum wage of £6.31. Yet if that person had done no more than the basics, he would still receive the minimum wage now.
With the minimum wage, how can a business employ the number of heads it needs in order to operate? Where is the motivation for employees to progress?
John Rowland
Chorley, Lancashire
Natural shampoo
SIR – It’s not just dogs that possess a self-cleaning ability. When left to its own devices, human hair cleanses itself without the need for shampoo.
Hugh Beynon
Penybanc, Carmarthenshire
Egging them on
SIR – A simple explanation for the lower rate of egg-laying on a Sunday recorded by James Lonsdale’s friends is that their chickens are not released from the henhouse as early that day.
Less light equals fewer eggs. If I need eggs from my brace of magnificent old girls, I have to get up with the lark to give them their breakfast of porridge and sweetcorn.
Nicola Beresford
Marnhull, Dorset
NHS data sharing will exclude the patient
SIR – Last week’s letter from the health foundations omitted the fact that the one key person who is not permitted access to view their own NHS data online is the patient. I have opted out of the Summary Care Record and Connecting Care Record schemes until this somewhat major omission is corrected.
Dave Winter
Chipping Sodbury, Gloucestershire
SIR – On the face of it, sharing NHS data is a good idea. But if a patient doesn’t want their information to be available to outside organisations they have to opt out at their surgery, thus taking up more GPs’ time with paperwork.
I have no objections to my data being used for research and have in the past given my permission for such use. But I strongly object to my records being available without my consent, and possibly for a fee. Each individual’s NHS number will be visible, meaning they can ultimately be identified. It will not be long before someone outside the NHS works out how to match NHS numbers to individuals.
We still do not have a secure, integrated NHS system whereby records can be accessed by all relevant NHS staff. This should be a priority.
Grizelda Hargreaves
Market Bosworth, Leicestershire
SIR – Sadly, GP records have been hopelessly corrupted due to the reckless stupidity of the last government, not least in allowing all and sundry to add data.
I am a retired GP, but my former practice has identified more than 800 errors entered by Child Health, after discovering children weighing several tons and boys who had apparently had caesarean sections. Unfortunately, most of the bogus information is not so easily found. Furthermore, GPs cannot remove data inserted by others, even when it is clearly false.
Dr P R Outen
Brentwood, Essex

SIR – Sir Michael Wilshaw, the head of Ofsted, is concerned that two fifths of teachers drop out of the profession within five years.
I once asked an Ofsted inspector if she thought she might strike terror into the hearts of the teachers she inspected. Her reply: “They have nothing to fear as long as the paperwork is in place.” There was little regard for what makes a good teacher – the ability to enthuse and impart knowledge to pupils, combined with a love of the subject.
Kate Forrester
Great Malvern, Worcestershire
SIR – Our granddaughters both love and respect their teachers. And our daughter, a teacher, recently had her lesson described as “fantastic” by an Ofsted inspector. So the teacher training system is not completely broken. But perhaps it is time for Ofsted to learn how to motivate, instead of generally criticising its workforce.
Related Articles
Funding art in the provinces
21 Jan 2014
William Wade
Sheffield, South Yorkshire
SIR – Nowadays, it is common for children starting school to be unable to speak, understand the simplest of instructions, exercise self-control or manage their own hygiene. Their first years of school are wasted in learning social skills and behavioural norms that should have been acquired at home. Actual applied learning gets pushed out of reach for many children. Even the most dedicated teachers become dispirited when large parts of their days are spent teaching these basic things instead of their subjects. No wonder so many quit to find a more satisfying job.
Schools are always blamed for poor standards. Yet, over a year, school takes up a fairly small percentage of a child’s time. The environment with the most influence on a child’s development is the home.
Cherry Crawford
Hadleigh, Suffolk
SIR – Your leading article raises an important question: why are so many teachers dropping out?
There is a great deal of support for teachers in the first year of training, but it significantly reduces as soon as they qualify. This disparity is undoubtedly a central factor. Our teacher support line is inundated with calls from teachers in the middle of their training who feel they were ill informed about the reality of the classroom. Many feel they lack the support when they need it most.
To retain the best and most promising new teachers, Ofsted must ensure that teachers are supported for the duration of their career.
Julian Stanley
Chief Executive, Teacher Support Network
London N5
SIR – If licensing teachers is a good idea to raise educational standards (report, January 11), why don’t we license MPs, police, civil servants, bankers and so on to raise their sometimes woeful standards?
Brian Farmer
Chelmsford, Essex

Irish Times:

Sir, – What exactly is the public to make of the widespread reporting of the visit of a private citizen to a prisoner in Limerick jail (Home News, January 21st)?
The fact Sabina Higgins is wife of the President does not make her private visit to a friend a matter of public interest or concern. She is not a public office holder.
By reporting this matter so widely, including on the 9pm television news, the media runs the risk of blurring the clear lines between the President and the judiciary.
If this had not been a private visit the public could interpret it as being a commentary on the trial and sentencing of Ms Higgins’s friend.
The media should speedily clarify. – Yours, etc,
DFM DUFFY,
Holmwood,
Cabinteely,
Dublin 18.
Sir, – How fitting that Ireland’s first lady, Sabina Higgins, chose to visit Margaretta D’Arcy in a show of solidarity with this wonderful woman of courage, conviction and conscience.
In its latest statistics, Shannon Airport proudly announced an increased 1.4 million passengers transiting last year, but one wonders just how many of them were in fact US soldiers on their way to or from war?
We need to wake up and reclaim Shannon Airport as the civilian airport it claims to be.
Shannon belongs to us, not the US. – Yours, etc,
ANNE CLINTON,
Lisnagry,
Co Limerick.
Sir, – I am rather perplexed at the decision of Sabina Higgins to visit jailed protester Margaretta D’Arcy in prison.
What sort of message does this send out – especially given that I have not read of the first lady visiting other prisoners?
While no one likes to see a person of any age in prison, it might be no harm to look at the facts. Ms D’Arcy was convicted before the properly constituted courts of this land for intrusion at Shannon Airport, she received a suspended sentence for so doing, but has refused to enter into a bond giving effect to the suspended sentence. She has therefore, her release in her own hands.
While I am sure there are mechanisms on humanitarian grounds for releasing a person detained, those salient facts must not be lost sight of. We have separation of powers here, and the advocates of such separation are often the first to shout when such an independent body makes a ruling not of their liking and call on politicians to intervene.
The courts here are still thankfully one of our few institutions still untainted, and if we do not respect their decisions and independence, then we have nowhere left to turn. – Yours, etc,
BRENDAN CAFFERTY,
Ballina,
Co Mayo.
Sir, – I do not understand why the President did not accompany his wife on her visit to Margaretta D’Arcy – was he not a supporter of her cause in 2003? Perhaps he was otherwise engaged.
I accept that Ms D’Arcy has broken the law and is therefore entitled to be committed to jail. What I cannot understand is how a woman of 79 years, seriously ill with cancer, can jump an almost endless queue of people who have broken the law and should be in jail – but are not and never will be. – Yours, etc,
FRED J FITZSIMONS,
Drumbracken,
Carrickmacross,
Co Monaghan.
Sir, – We in the Irish Workers Group would like to add our voice to those calling for the unconditional release of Margeratta D’Arcy from Limerick prison. This demand will not be easily conceded as it challenges the courts.
We need a mass struggle centred in the trade unions and the USI to win it.
To this end, we must begin a mass struggle of civil disobedience for Ms D’Arcy’s release, and the unconditional dropping of all charges against her.
The Galway Alliance Against War and the local Shannon Watch groups should set the ball rolling. – Yours, etc,
ANDY JOHNSTON,
Monivea Road,
Galway.
Sir, – Margaretta D’Arcy was sentenced by an Irish court to three months in Limerick prison for refusing to renounce in writing her political protest at the administratively condoned use of Shannon Airport for foreign military and extra-judicial operations.
The use of the Irish prison system to extract a written self-denunciation from an elderly artist who has devoted many decades to the promotion of human rights and the practice of principled dissidence, however unpopular the cause or uncomfortable the truth, is a national scandal. Had it been perpetrated in another jurisdiction, it would have been denounced for the grotesque misuse of power that it is. Ireland’s standing in the world has, in the past, been based on the ability to speak the truth on oppression and injustice to more powerful actors.
The State’s treatment of Margaretta D’Arcy suggests that this standing is now just another casualty of war. – Yours, etc,
SARAH BUGGY, AILEEN DILLANE, JACK FENNELL, JOACHIM
FISCHER, MICHAEL G KELLY, CARMEN
KUHLING, TOM MOYLAN & DEIRDRE
NÍ CHUANACHÁIN,
Ralahine Centre for Utopian
Studies,
University of Limerick,
Plassey,
Co Limerick.
Sir, – It’s sad to report, but I’m not at all surprised by the jailing of a 79-year-old artist and anti-war activist. In a State that has completely lost its moral core it’s almost inevitable that those who tenaciously pursue their principles and speaks out against the hypocrisy of power will find themselves silenced.
If Ireland is to find its way out of the present morass it will need more citizens like Margaretta D’Arcy, armed like her with a strong moral compass, and not the self-serving crew who currently helm this sorry ship of State. – Yours, etc,
ROBERT BALLAGH,
Arbour Hill, Dublin 7.

Sir, – Yesterday (Tuesday), demolition of a building of great significance in the human, medical and architectural history of Ireland commenced.
Ffrench-Mullen House (1944) on Charlemont Street was an offshoot of St Ultan’s, the hospital for children under two years old, the first of its kind in these islands, which was founded by Dr Kathleen Lynn with her lifelong friend and co-worker, Madeleine ffrench-Mullen. Kathleen Lynn, doctor, feminist, revolutionary, public representative and community benefactor, commissioned Michael Scott, now considered the most important Irish architect of the 20th century, to design this small block of flats/apartments and the design, which had survived remarkably intact, was worthy of being highlighted in an episode of Poirot!
Dr Kathleen Lynn, Madeleine ffrench-Mullen, Michael Scott and the extensive group around them deserve celebration and gratitude for their contribution to the human and artistic history of this country. Instead this monument to them is being removed.
It is difficult to understand why we lack European-style city designers who are able to integrate older buildings into their plans rather than demolishing them.
By Thursday one building with something of the Bauhaus, of medical and social innovation and reminders that good things were done in bad times will be gone. – Yours, etc,
HONOR O BROLCHAIN,
Emorville Avenue,
Dublin 8.

Sir, – So Angela Kerins, chief executive of Rehab, doesn’t want to disclose her salary because 60 per cent of its activities are “in the commercial arena” and only 40 per cent of Rehab is funded from public funds and fundraising (John McManus, Business, January 20th). Fine, so let her tell us what 40 per cent of her package is and we’ll work out the rest for ourselves. – Yours, etc,
CLIVE CARROLL,
Herbert Lane,
Dublin 2.

Sir, – Your newspaper reports Rev Ian Paisley’s reaction to news of Tony Blair’s imminent conversion to Catholicism was to call him a “fool” (Front Page, January 20th).
Presumably Rev Paisley has read the Bible. In light of his admonishing of the former British prime minister, he might reflect on the Gospel of Matthew 5:22, “But I tell you that anyone who is angry with a brother or sister will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to a brother or sister, ‘Raca’, is answerable to the court. And anyone who says, ‘You fool!’ will be in danger of the fire of hell.” – Yours, etc,
ROBERT MANSON,
Windgates House,
Celbridge,

Sir, – Having worked in the Academy system in the UK, I have experienced teacher-assessment first hand. In spite of claims to a holistic or student-centred approach, teachers and students were presented and assessed in terms of results. Consequently the pressure on teachers to attain results led to “pro-active” marking.
I now teach in Ireland and find that the Junior and Leaving Certificates, while cumbersome and costly, do provide transparency, accountability and, above all, equality. Both exams, however, dominate teaching and learning in Irish schools. They restrict more innovative teaching and limit learning outside of curriculums that one can pick and choose from in order to maximise points.
Some of proposed changes are to be welcomed. We need to move to a formative form of assessment that would maintain the virtues of our current system. A formal approach to continual assessment is a positive move. Nevertheless, that teachers would assess their own students would impinge upon the integrity of any such assessment.
That those who seek to implement the Junior Cycle Student Award do not seem to understand the consequences that such an approach to assessment would have is worrying for all concerned. – Is mise,
NIALL COOPER,
The Ridgeway,
Bishopstown,

Sir, – This inaugural symposium at the Abbey Theatre (Home News, January 18th) addressed the role of theatre in evoking memory where it is associated with individual or collective trauma. The context was the upcoming commemorations of the 1914 war, 1916 Rising, etc. From the opening scintillating speech by President Michael D Higgins to a host of outstanding talks and interviews, it was, first to last, a seminal event.
The President was followed by Mannix Flynn, who immediately attacked the self-indulgence of cultural elite prematurely turning the testimonies contained in the Ryan Report into “a night out” . This reality check and a thoughtful presentation by Carl O’Brien on how a new group of people, immigrants, are being traumatised today, hidden away as they are in camps for years as our Kafkaesque judiciary recycles their applications for asylum, brutally closed off any propensity toward sepia-tinted centenary remembrances.
One would hope that The Irish Times will do justice to the event with a proper of series of analyses. Joyce was invoked for his discussion of catharsis in Greek tragedy in Portrait of the Artist, but it is notable that we tend to prefer to concentrate on the pity aspect with its empathy, ignoring its twin, the terror aspect, which also needs to be faced if the cause of trauma is to be fully apprehended and healed. In so doing we militate against gestating another cycle of harm when awakening old, or in rendering recent, trauma. – Yours, etc,
TONY DOLAN,
Milesian Avenue,

Sir, – I see from your Stories from the Rising supplement (January 17th) that the patriots of 1916-1923 were just as preoccupied with their pensions as today’s politicians and charity bosses. – Yours, etc,
JOHN F HYLAND,
George’s Street,
Dún Laoghaire,
Co Dublin.
Sir, – I must take exception, in the otherwise excellent coverage in The Irish Times of the release of the Military Service Pension Records, to the claims that a document contained in the Pension Records archive is the “only eyewitness account” of the burial of the leaders of the Easter Rising (Ronan McGreevy, Home News, January 18th).
A letter written in 1932 in which a civil servant received information over a decade earlier from an unidentified sergeant major who claims to have been on duty when the graves were prepared can hardly be classified “an eyewitness account”.
The Letters of 1916 project, on the other hand, does indeed have an eyewitness account, written by an Irish soldier serving in the British army, who was on duty in Arbour Hill when the leaders were executed. He was one of a small number of soldiers assigned to bury the bodies.
The letter, written by Private Herbert Shekleton (originally from Kingscourt) who was serving with the Royal Dublin Fusiliers, to his mother on May 5th, 1916 begins: “It seems as if I had a terrible nightmare so terrible & strange things I have been through since I wrote you before Easter”. Private Shekleton met his own untimely death the following year in Arras.
This letter, along with hundreds of others, are available at letters1916.ie for transcribing. The project is gathering letters related to Ireland written between November 1915 and October 1916. This wholly new archive, which has been generously funded by the Department of Arts, Culture, and the Gaeltacht and Trinity College Dublin, will change our understanding of this critical period in Irish history through the unmediated voices of the people who lived through it. – Yours, etc,
SUSAN SCHREIBMAN,
PhD, Trinity Long Room
Hub, Ass Prof in Digital
Humanities,
School of English,
Trinity College Dublin,
Dublin 2.
Sir, – The publication of the Military Service Pensions Collection is to be welcomed (Home News, January 17th). Perhaps that great mystery of Irish history can now be resolved: who was actually in the GPO in 1916. – Yours, etc,
BRENDAN O’BRIEN,
Delwood Grove,
Castleknock,
Dublin 15.

Sir, – In light of reports that the Government is about to re-open the Irish Embassy to the Vatican (Breaking News, January 21st), can we now expect on grounds of fairness to all our new citizens that embassies will be established in other holy cities? Surely our Muslim population can expect the same facilities in Mecca, Sikhs in Amritsar, Latterday Saints in Salt Lake City, etc? The principle is the same. – Yours, etc,
A JONES,
Mullagh,
Co Cavan.

Sir, – It is a funny world, with Louise Phelan of PayPal, calling for deeper Government spending cuts in order to pay for tax cuts for higher paid workers (Business + Your Money, January 21st).
Was it not the higher paid executives who brought Ireland to its knees? Now it is the mostly lower paid workers who are paying for their unbridled greed.
The “plutocrats [are] on the attack” (Paul Krugman, Business, January 1st), blaming the lesser paid for higher taxes. The basic question should be asked: do these people deserve to be paid so well? As Krugman writes, we have “the myth of the deserving rich” versus the undeserving lower paid. – Yours, etc,
JOHN KEANE,
Hanover Square, Dublin 8.

Sir, – Where on earth did the phrase “happy out” come from? Please, no more.
– Yours, etc,
ALAN KEEGAN,
Howth Road,
Raheny, Dublin 5.
Sir, – If I see, hear or read, once more, the phrase “If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys” used to justify the existence of yet another stupid, arrogant, wasteful, incompetent fool, who passes for a public-body CEO, politician or senior civil servant, I will put my fist through the television, radio or newspaper that has spewed it out. – Yours, etc,
JESSICA FREED,
Crumlin Road, Dublin 12.
Sir, – “They scored at just the right time”! Is there a wrong time? – Yours, etc,
BRIAN Mc KENNA,
Howth Road, Dublin 5.
Sir, – I don’t believe the dogs in the street know all that much. – Yours, etc,
JONATHON ROTH,
Clancys Strand, Limerick.
Sir, – “The real economy.” – Yours, etc,
JOHN O’BYRNE,
Mount Argus Court,
Harold’s Cross, Dublin 6W.
Sir, – “Is there no end in sight?” “Oh please.” – Yours, etc,
JOHN GLEESON,
Lucan Road,
Chapelizod, Dublin 20.

Irish Independent:

Like everything else in this country, the people controlling the Central Remedial Clinic were allowed free rein – their salaries tied to the runaway public service pay – without any monitoring or accountability by successive administrations.
Also in this section
Letters to the Editor
We deserve much better governance than this
Cheap drink comes at a cost
After all, these people, with their sense of entitlement, probably thought what’s good enough for their political masters was good enough for them – all feeding at the trough of public funds. No wonder the country is in such a state of shambles.
There is more of the same to come, I feel, but it will take the Public Accounts Committee time to uncover some of the other unsavoury aspects of many organisations.
Vulnerable people have been exploited. Remember what Kieran Mulvey, the head of the Labour Relations Commission, said last year about sheltered workshops where people were on endless training receiving a minimum allowance and the money going who knows where?
Once again no accountability – a word these people do not apparently understand.
The same thing comes up over and over again, yet no lessons are learned. One would think lessons would have been learned after the FAS fiasco; a state body that ran amok with taxpayers’ money.
We have the HSE, still top-heavy with management but short on clinical staff to provide services to people with disabilities. Why is this still happening? Why is it more important to have layers of management than physiotherapists, occupational therapists, psychologists etc?
Power without responsibility and accountability is totally unacceptable, particularly when public money is involved.
How did we get to the point in this country where salaries and pensions of CEOs and managers, paid out of public funds, are deemed more important than the needs of those they purport to represent or provide services for?
MARY FARRELL
ENFIELD, CO MEATH
DON’T FEEL GUILTY
* Why are we being preached to about the Central Remedial Clinic (CRC)?
Ever since the revelations that donated money was being used for top-line bonuses at the CRC, there have been many commentators preaching about the good work done by its frontline services.
We also heard of the diminished funds raised at Christmas for the clinic and, as sad as it is for the frontline providers, we don’t need a lecture about the need for donations.
The fact that the services have to do without is not our fault, and potential donators refraining from doing so is perfectly understandable.
If you heard that such payments were being made to high-end officials in a foreign nation we were sending aid to, the country would be in uproar to get the Government to withhold funding. And wouldn’t that be a fair assessment by the Irish people?
We are all aware of the hard work being done by charity providers, but when our money goes to the payment of a CEO we are all entitled to hold on to it and shouldn’t be made to feel guilty about it. When the money goes solely to the frontline, we will all donate to the frontline.
JUSTIN KELLY
EDENDERRY, CO OFFALY
THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE
* Irish Independent columnist Ian O’Doherty is adamant that paranormal phenomena don’t exist, that there is no life after death, and that all mediums are either frauds or deluded.
He has written several pieces in which he expresses an intense dislike of religious belief or belief in paranormal activity of any kind.
He is entitled to his opinion. I agree with him, up to a point, about mediums who seek to “prey upon the vulnerable”. I also have no time for those “phone a psychic” services that are so blatantly open to abuse.
But I cannot agree that all mediums are frauds or suffering from delusion, any more than I would state that all accountants, solicitors, doctors and plumbers are chancers or not what they claim to be.
Throughout history there have been outstanding mediums whose credibility was rock solid. People like Leonora Piper, the 19th Century US woman whose abilities were exhaustively tested by scientists and never discredited; the Englishman Leslie Flint, who became one of the “most tested” mediums of all time, allowing himself to be studied in “laboratory-like” conditions and still demonstrated his prowess in communicating with the “other world”.
Near-death experiences are worthy of consideration, too – especially the ones where the patients describe “leaving their bodies” and can describe parts of the hospital they have not seen, or those in which the brain was declared “dead” during the experience.
The universe is a very big place and quantum physics is finding out all sorts of new interesting things about it every day that defy previous notions and theories about what’s really out there. There’s a lot of dark matter in space that we know next to nothing about.
I don’t expect Mr O’Doherty to abandon his position on religion and the paranormal, but he might at least keep his mind open to the possibility that there may be something awaiting us after death besides a hole in the ground.
KAY NOONAN
CO WATERFORD
END FG MUSICAL CHAIRS
Isn’t it marvellous? Senior Fine Gael strategists reckon John O’Mahony would make a better candidate for MEP than Jim Higgins.
Fair enough, but wait a minute, isn’t Mr O’Mahony a TD? As recently as 2011 didn’t he ask the voters to give him a five-year contract to represent them in Dail Eireann? So why should they now facilitate him in walking out on that contract just to suit himself or his party?
Obviously, they shouldn’t but, with breathtaking arrogance, Fine Gael mentors assume they would. Why? Because they always have in the past. Enough! Time to call a halt to this game of musical chairs played by political parties with our seats! Time to make it clear that, irrespective of party loyalties, we will not vote for sitting members of the Oireachtas as MEPs or vice versa.
BRENDAN CASSERLY
WATERFALL, CO CORK
PAY THAT’S ‘RESPECTABLE’
With regard to Daragh Mangan’s letter ‘Charities in witch-hunt’ (Irish Independent, January 20), neither my letter (January 18) nor any letter for that matter in your paper, referred to wages earned by staff working in the charity sector.
These wonderful people should demand and deserve their “respectable wage”. But please don’t tell me that the various CEOs of these charities can justify earning €2,000 a week? A respectable wage? I think not.
BRIAN MC DEVITT
GLENTIES, CO DONEGAL
A FUNNY AXE TO GRIND
Brendan O’Carroll’s account of his mother buying a fridge and later discovering it had to be plugged in (innocent days some of us can indeed remember!) reminded me of the man who brought a chainsaw back to the hardware shop.
His complaint was that it took him half a day to cut down a small tree in his back garden. The counter assistant, in order to check the saw, started it up . . . “My God what’s that dreadful noise?” exclaimed the customer.
TOM GILSENAN
BEAUMONT, DUBLIN 9



Astrid and Michael

$
0
0

23 January 2014 Astrid and Michael
I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. Captain Povey has to test a new navigation system on Troutbridge. Priceless.
Go and see Astrid and Michael, Peter Rice finished the windows. Clear half of attic no Thermabloc no boxes
Scrabble today Mary wins   and gets  over   400,  Perhaps I will win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Tom Rosenthal, who has died aged 78, was one of the most eminent publishers of his generation, successively directing the fortunes of Secker & Warburg, William Heinemann and André Deutsch.
He was also an art historian, broadcaster, bibliophile, opera buff, literary critic, and all-round cultural connoisseur. Moreover, he looked the part, his cigars, red shirts, yellow polka dot bow-ties, imperious beard and high brow (in both senses of the term) giving him an unmistakable profile on the intellectual scene.
Although his final years were dogged by ill health, Rosenthal was active to the end. In 1997 he founded the Bridgewater Press with his friend Rick Gekoski, the rare book dealer; it published limited editions by authors such as William Boyd and Ian McEwan. And in his seventieth year he gained a PhD on the strength of his books about Jack Yeats, Sidney Nolan, Paula Rego and Josef Albers. These works were based on personal knowledge as well as scholarship. When a Kokoschka expert on the Cambridge examination board asked him the source of a quotation, he replied: “The artist.”
Thomas Gabriel Rosenthal was born in London on July 16 1935. His parents, Erwin and Elisabeth Rosenthal (née Marx), were refugees from Nazi Germany. They first settled in Manchester, but Tom and his sister Miriam (who went on to an award-winning career as an editor of children’s books) spent their adolescence in Cambridge, where his father became a Fellow of Pembroke College and a Reader in Oriental Studies – he spent 30 years completing his edition of Averroes’ commentary on Plato’s Republic.
Tom attended the Perse School, where he excelled at English and drama. He was early bitten by the collecting bug, accumulating a hoard of matchbox labels and bicycling from Cambridge to London to attend meetings of the Phillumenists’ Society. During his National Service he gained a commission in the Royal Artillery. The Army helped to make him, as he sardonically put it, “a sort of crypto-Englishman who can pass for white, but at heart, deep down, I have always known myself to be nothing other than a German-Jewish intellectual.”
Related Articles
Leo Cooper
02 Dec 2013
Nick Robinson
23 Sep 2013
James Hale
25 Aug 2003
Rosenthal had won an Exhibition to Pembroke College, where he read History and English. But he devoted much of his time to the theatre, touring with the Pembroke Players and becoming secretary to the Cambridge Amateur Dramatic Club. After university, in 1959, he joined Thames & Hudson.
This firm had been founded by Walter Neurath, who created the template for finely designed, well-printed and colourful art books that is taken for granted today. Doing everything from selling to commissioning, Rosenthal quickly mastered the technical, commercial and editorial processes. His most signal achievement was to carry out complicated negotiations with Trinity College, Dublin, which resulted in the publication of a beautiful and affordable edition of The Book of Kells.
In 1961 Rosenthal became chairman of the Society of Young Publishers. He wrote readers’ guides to art history and modern American fiction. He did much occasional journalism, notably as art critic of The Listener from 1963 to 1966. He contributed to the BBC Third Programme, conducting a particularly revealing interview with LS Lowry, whose work he championed in the face of metropolitan condescension.
He also bought one of Lowry’s paintings, soon becoming, he confessed, “a pathological, wholly insane collector of books and pictures whose house is more like a museum than a family home”. In 1971, seeking further scope for his energies and ambitions, he moved to Secker & Warburg as managing director.
Booming in his Soho office, expansive over Garrick lunches, hospitable at home in Primrose Hill, Rosenthal acted as impresario to a glittering array of authors. Many were new recruits, most became friends: Malcolm Bradbury, David Lodge, Tom Sharpe, Melvyn Bragg, John Banville, David Cairns, Nicholas Mosley, Saul Bellow, Carlos Fuentes, Günter Grass, JM Coetzee, Umberto Eco, Italo Calvino.
There were major coups, such as the publication of a one-volume edition of The Lisle Letters, a unique tapestry of Tudor England. There were dramatic moments as Rosenthal personally auctioned the paperback rights of Piers Paul Read’s Alive, or fended off Sonia Orwell’s demand for the pulping of all 20,000 copies of Bernard Crick’s biography of her late husband. And there were stimulating initiatives: with advice from Anthony Thwaite, Rosenthal began a new poetry list, launching the career of, among others, James Fenton.
In 1980 Rosenthal’s success at Secker was rewarded by promotion to the chairmanship of the Heinemann publishing group, of which it was a part. This was an unhappy translation since he was saddled with onerous corporate responsibilities and, as he came to realise, the whole concept of big business was inimical to him. He resigned in 1984 and teamed up with another small publisher, André Deutsch. However, Deutsch evidently wanted to retain a degree of control after selling out to Rosenthal in 1987 and they parted on unfriendly terms.
Rosenthal faced overwhelming difficulties. The firm was undercapitalised, it lacked a paperback arm, and trading conditions were adverse. He did score some triumphs, weaning Gore Vidal away from Heinemann and publishing Penelope Lively’s Booker Prize-winning novel Moon Tiger. And Private Eye paid a backhanded tribute to his standing in the publishing world by making him a character in its strip cartoon “Snipcock and Tweed”. In 1998, however, he had to sell the business.
For more than a decade Rosenthal endured what his doctor called “multiple morbidities”. With his fondness for black humour, he liked the phrase, replying to inquiries about his health with (at first) “Mustn’t grumble” and (latterly) “Don’t ask”. He continued to indulge his passions to the last, enjoying meals, watching cricket, attending operas, reading books. A month before his death, in a moving ceremony, he donated his 2,000 art books to Pembroke College library.
He is survived by his wife, Ann Warnford-Davis (née Shire), a distinguished literary agent, and his two sons, Adam, a surgeon specialising in gynaecological oncology, and Daniel, author of the 50th-anniversary history of the National Theatre.
Tom Rosenthal, born July 16 1935, died January 3 2014

Guardian:

The shooting of Cambodian garment factory workers on strike over low wages (Retailers tackle Cambodian PM over shootings, 21 January) is yet another example of the impact that making our clothes can have on people far away. It’s right that clothing brands call for an investigation. But there are many problems linked to the making of our everyday products, from unfair pay and dangerous working conditions to environmental destruction. To help prevent these, a range of solutions is needed.
A first step is greater transparency about the impacts companies have. It’s disappointing, therefore, that the UK government is trying to water down proposed new EU rules requiring all large companies to report on these impacts. The fact that only 6% of large EU companies report annually on these issues shows the voluntary approach isn’t working. The government says it is committed to greater corporate transparency. Vince Cable has the opportunity to show this by supporting strong EU regulation to ensure all large companies – both listed and unlisted – are required to report on their full supply chains, in compliance with the UN guiding principles on business and human rights.
Peter Frankental Economic relations programme director, Amnesty International
Neil Thorns Director of advocacy, Cafod
Kitty Ari Acting director of policy and advocacy, Christian Aid
Marilyn Croser Coordinator, Core Coalition
Andy Atkins Executive director, Friends of the Earth
Philippa Bonella Head of communications and education, SCIAF
Catherine Howarth CEO, Share Action
Nicola Smith Head, economic and social affairs department, TUC
Trevor Hutchings Director, UK and EU advocacy, WWF-UK
• At first I was cheered to read that “dozens of the world’s biggest clothing brands … have demanded Cambodia’s PM explain the use of ‘deadly force’ against striking miners” and that they’re demanding thorough investigation. Great, they wanted the workers’ pay increased and their conditions improved too, I thought. Alas not, it turned out; all they were worried about was industrial unrest damaging their confidence in Cambodia as a “stable sourcing location” with cheap labour costs. No change there then.
Robert Sanderson
Managing director, Nottingham Theatre Royal & Royal Concert Hall

The decision of Brighton council to hold a referendum on whether to increase council tax to pay for essential services is a bold commitment to democracy and equality (Report, 17 January). Everyone is feeling squeezed as a result of the Tories’ draconian cuts to local government and public services, but a political contest over which party will manage austerity more effectively won’t change the terms of debate. Money raised collectively, spent collectively and targeted where there is the most need is as essential in Brighton as it is across the UK. A “good politics” must also be measured in other ways than just the cost of living – in solidarity to protect public services and in the vibrancy of the public realm, where democratic power trumps consumer power. As belief in politics withers, here is an example of a local council trusting the people to make a big decision. They should be applauded.
Professor Ruth Lister Chair of Compass MC
Neal Lawson Chair, Compass
John Hilary Executive director, War On Want
Professor Richard Sennett LSE
David Arnold Brighton Labour party member and trade unionist
Heather Wakefield Unison
Anthony Barnett Open Democracy
Linda Jack Liberal Left
Indra Adnan Soft Power Network/The Downing Street Network
Dr David McCoy Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry and chair of Medact
Lynsey Hanley Journalist
David Walker Author
Stuart White Jesus College, Oxford
Guy Standing Soas
Andrew Simms NEF
Brendan Martin Public World
Professor John Weeks University of London

Warwick Mansell (Report, 21 January) shows how the disappearance of pupils from school rolls affects GCSE performance. Two academy providers cited “turbulence” or “transience” by way of explanation. While it is true that residential movement can reduce a school’s roll, it is often the case that those moving on – recent arrivals from overseas or children in homeless family accommodation, for example – are replaced by others. If such children are not being offered places in schools in key stage four, what’s happening to them?
Dr Janet Dobson
Migration research unit, UCL
• The Lib Dems have voted for the bedroom tax, other welfare cuts, tax cuts for millionaires, tripling of university fees, the badger cull, and privatisation of the NHS. And they believe it’s Lord Rennard who has brought them into disrepute (Report, 22 January)?
Christopher Clayton
Waverton, Cheshire
• Not only is Emer O’Toole’s article (20 January) arguing that women should stop shaving the hair on their legs and under their arms illustrated with a picture of hairless legs, but on the same page there are two photographs of men with shaved faces. What conclusions should we draw from this?
Carolyn Beckingham
Lewes, East Sussex
• Given that the CIES report recognises that the major football leagues are now made up largely of expat players (Report, Sport, 22 January), should the World Cup be revised from a country-based competition to an inter-league competition?
David Lund
Winscombe, Somerset
• Becks teams up with Del Boy (Report, 21 January). I see that the BBC has found the new Trigger.
Chris Maher
Blackwood, Gwent
• Firing the letters editor seems a bit harsh (Letters, 21 January). Might not gardening leave be more appropriate?
Pete Bibby
Sheffield
• Brief letters with their quirky items and occasional chains of absurd responses are a daily delight. Long may they continue.
Terry Vincent
Pierrelatte, France

Your report (Patient records to be sold from NHS database, 20 January) is yet another example of the betrayal by this government of the values of the NHS. Andrew Lansley said there would be “No decision about me without me” when the health and social care bill was going through parliament, yet the leaflet assumes consent for patient records to be uploaded unless one writes to one’s GP to object to this. The government’s record with regard to keeping information confidential is not good and the previous attempt to put all records online so as to improve patient care failed lamentably. It would be much cheaper for patients to ask their GP to email them the relevant information about their history and treatment which could then be downloaded on to a memory stick and kept in one’s wallet, handbag or on a keyring, so the information is available in the case of an emergency admission to hospital.
The leaflet describes the benefits to research and the possibility of planning services better, but the removal of strategic health authorities that used to plan services regionally, and the general administrative chaos and lack of clear lines of responsibility in the new system, cannot be remedied by collecting masses of data from individual GP records. Ramesh Randeep is quite correct in his analysis of the situation, which is all about the “NHS being open for business”.
Wendy Savage
President, Keep Our NHS Public
• Your article had some omissions. No information can be released unless an independent advisory group that advises the Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) agrees that the release of it would directly benefit patient care. Once it is established that this is the case, and the example of insurance companies wanting to calculate premiums would clearly not meet this criterion, a contract is signed. Breaking it would mean fines or criminal sanctions from the Information Commissioner’s Office if any identifiable information was either leaked or used by the company. Patients and their carers should know that no data will be made available for the purposes of selling or administering any kind of insurance, as this would break these strict rules. The data will be issued on a cost recovery basis and not “sold”.
Your readers should be reassured to know that the HSCIC board last week agreed that a report detailing who we give data to and the grounds on which it has been released, will be made public on the website every quarter. We are committed to the public understanding what is being done with their information as well as to people realising they have a right to object, if they feel uncomfortable with the process. I hope your article helps encourage an intelligent, grown-up debate about this significant change that could have a tremendous positive impact on both medical research and health service planning.
Kingsley Manning
Chair, HSCIC
• Alice Bell (No debate on this data, 20 January) leaves out the key critical website. The Big Opt Out campaigners have since 1996 fought to protect the confidentiality of medical records against successive governments’ plans to put every NHS patient’s medical record in a central data bank – without either the patients’ knowledge or consent. The highly successful campaign website has both information and advice how not to have one’s medical record automatically included. There are medical matters many might wish to keep confidential, such as mental health, abortion, cancer etc which might affect their employment or insurability. Far from there being no debate, the Big Opt Out, together with strong pressure coming from the medical profession, was successful.
We are told we can opt out but of what of is unclear. The argument our GP, dentist or hospital can share our computerised medical records to improve patient care sounds reasonable. But little is being said about the fact that the central data bank is designed purely as a resource to sell to researchers. It will make no direct contribution to patient care. So patients get nothing in return for the government pretty much appropriating our data.
Nor do we get any say in what kind of research projects are to be given access to our data. We are to be reassured they will have an ethics advisory body but all the legislation specifies is that they must be qualified researchers. Again, although the legislation trumpets the anonymised and pseudo-anonymised data, this reassurance is spoilt by that section in the legislation which says researchers can under certain conditions have access to our personal identities. There is still time to checkout the Big Opt Out site and decide whether you want to stay in or opt out.
Hilary Rose
London
• Your article highlights the use of our personal medical information for research purposes, with the NHS number as a key “patient identifier” to link different NHS sources to the same patient. Currently, HIV services are almost alone in not always using the NHS number because of the additional confidentiality concerns for a stigmatised condition. But that means people with HIV lose out on the significant benefits for research into how well the NHS across its different services is meeting their needs. HIV clinics need to use the NHS number consistently if we are to identify effectively any areas where NHS treatment and care can be improved. But individuals with HIV should also have a right to opt out of such data collection for research purposes if they are unhappy about it. The right to opt out of such research use of one’s data is not always enshrined in law – it needs to be, urgently.
Yusef Azad
National Aids Trust
• The Department of Health’s glossy leaflet sets great store by the assertion that data will not contain information which will identify patients but, in its concluding paragraphs, it states that patients who do not want information that identifies them to be shared outside their practice should [opt out]. So is it saying that the data be unidentifiable – or not? The DoH will de facto get its way because most people will not be bothered even to read the leaflet. Those who do and decide to opt out will put a further strain on hard-pressed GP practices through the increased bureaucracy involved.
Brian Saperia
London

I had the luck to have two books published by Tom Rosenthal. He combined the sharpest of editorial eyes and a penetrating critical intelligence with warm encouragement and support. Working with him, I got to know and love an exceptional personality. But, as I discovered, beneath his powerful, confident manner, inside that noble head (like a Spanish grandee of the 17th century) and behind the rich, sonorous voice that his friend Rik Gekoski likened to “the voice God would use if he had sufficient self-confidence”, lay a vulnerable soul.
Though very much a secular Jew, Tom was intensely conscious of his heritage. Once, when we were discussing Saul Bellow’s Herzog, he told me how keenly he, a proud Jewish father himself, felt for Herzog when, compelled to watch from outside, through a window, he sees someone else putting his young daughter to bed. Tom remained acutely sensitive to the slights, and worse, of casual antisemitism: as when a gentile friend innocently wondered why “you people are so keen on cricket”. For once, Tom recalled, he found the elusive esprit de l’escalier: “I suppose it’s because we’re all so desperate to win the approval of you people.”

British scholars are concerned about reports (19 October 2013; 14 January 2014) that contrary to the 1958 Public Records Act the government has retained 1.2m Foreign and Commonwealth Office files, going back to the Crimean war. They are evidently held at the ironically named HMG Communications Centre at Hanslope Park. Efforts to oblige the government to be clear on what files it holds and on plans to release them have not been successful.
While the GCHQ story tells us that the government has wholly unexpected capacities to unearth information about its own citizens, the right of citizens to investigate UK foreign and colonial policy over the last 150 years and more is clearly being denied. Those of us who work on the history of some other countries are used to government obstruction when it comes to researching official papers, but the UK is supposed to be a free society. The writing of full and impartial accounts of the cold war, Britain’s colonial past, and other key subjects depends on access to all the available records.
As fellows of the British Academy, we call upon the foreign secretary to issue a statement about the government’s plans to release these documents to the National Archives, and for a mechanism to be established to include professional historians and archivists in the process of declassification. We have today written to him, offering to meet and discuss this further.
Professor Iain McLean
British Academy vice-president
Professor Sir Adam Roberts
British Academy past president
Professor Maxine Berg
Professor Archie Brown
Professor Peter Clarke
Dr John Darwin
Professor Marianne Elliott
Professor Sir Richard Evans
Professor Cécile Fabre
Professor Rosemary Foot
Professor Roy Foster
Professor Conor Gearty
Professor Robert Gildea
Professor Ruth Harris
Dr Sudhir Hazareesingh
Professor Geoffrey Hosking
Professor Ian Kershaw
Professor Shula Marks
Professor David Marquand
Dr Ross McKibbin
Professor Lyndal Roper
Professor Alan Ryan
Professor Robert Service
Professor Gareth Stedman Jones
Professor Carolyn Steedman
Professor Megan Vaughan
Professor Jeremy Waldron
• So the Foreign Office is yet another institution that no longer can be trusted (Slave trade files among huge cache of illegally held papers, 21 January). We are now told that a vast archive exists that hitherto had not been disclosed, which contains – well, we don’t know, do we? We know it contains papers that date as far back as British involvement in the slave trade and, more recently, on the Kenya Mau Mau emergency. What else might it contain? I have been struggling for years to get information on my father, Uszer Frucht, who was a Jewish communist immigrant and who was deported at the end of the war. I was told a file had been held on him but it had been destroyed. Might his file be in the Hanslope Park archive? Why the culture of secrecy in British officialdom?  Who is being protected? Surely we, as British citizens, have a right to know.
Professor Gaby Weiner
Lewes, East Sussex

Independent:

Leaving to one side Lord Rennard’s guilt or innocence, in all the opinions aired the fundamental point raised by the Rennard affair seems in danger of being missed.
Yes of course those women alleging his inappropriate conduct could have administered a slap on the wrist or a smartly aimed heel, but why should they have to do this, or even find themselves in this position in the first place?
I worked for many years in a large multi-national and in all that time it was always abundantly clear to all employees that each should be treated with respect, irrespective of race, gender and more recently, of sexual orientation. While this was reinforced by HR policies and a well-developed grievance and disciplinary procedure, it was, and this is the crucial point, embedded in the organisation’s culture. The sort of behaviour alleged would not have been tolerated, and had it occurred would have been dealt with.
The real issue is that respectful behaviour must become similarly embedded in the culture of Parliament and the political parties, so that all those entering either House are placed in no doubt that inappropriate behaviour is not acceptable and will not be tolerated.
Why on earth, in the 21st century, can Parliament not simply follow the example set by large businesses by being absolutely clear on the behaviour expected, and why cannot the political parties adopt and embed the culture and supporting processes found to be so effective by large corporations?
Mark Albrow, Hampton, Middlesex
Barbara Sanders is missing two key points in her critique of the women who complained about Lord Rennard (letter, 22 January).
First, there is the crucial question of power. Chris Rennard was their boss, a person with influence over the careers of the young women concerned. Second, there is no justification for anyone, male or female, to assume that invasion of personal space is acceptable. It isn’t. An assumption that a man may do this to a woman, wittingly or otherwise, without causing offence still is far too widespread.
I expect that few women who have worked for over 40 years in mixed environments have avoided the unwanted pat, “footsie” or over-close thigh, often from people senior to us, usually when we were young and unable to deal directly with the offender. Congratulations are due to those who in a meeting or other formal space have been brave enough to clearly ask the offender to stop, or who have dealt with their boss via a slap or stiletto. A rare breed in my experience; the rest of womanhood has come to rely on good employment practice to deal with their situation.
Sadly, it transpires that the Liberal Democrats have no such practice and their Byzantine constitution has ensured that the Rennard saga is a complete mess.
Paula Jones, London SW20
Hungarian far right not welcome here
I read with dismay that the Hungarian Jobbik party intends to visit England shortly. As a British citizen who lived in Budapest for nearly 10 years, I am appalled to think that this government is going to allow this group to speak in the UK.
Jobbik appeals to Hungary’s poorly educated young nationalists, who have been taught that Hungary has been treated badly by the rest of Europe and that by following Nazi ideals of persecution of minorities it will be able to regain its (perceived) status in the world.
I lived 50 metres from Heroes Square (Budapest’s Trafalgar Square) and was disgusted to see members of Jobbik being allowed to rally in the national square, whilst burning effigies of Jews and chanting anti-semitic filth. The Hungarian police, who have many Jobbik supporters within their ranks, are always present and are very often seen singing along and joining in the rally.
People are housebound during these rallies and gypsies (Roma) dare not be seen on the streets at risk of their lives. I have seen first-hand how the Roma are treated in Hungary and how Jobbik supporters are allowed to desecrate Jewish cemeteries for fun.
In any other EU country Jobbik’s conduct would result in arrest and prosecution. We would be doing a service for the rest of Europe if we banned Jobbik from entering the country, encouraging other decent, right-minded countries to do the same.
Paul Stanford, Devizes, Wiltshire
Storm warning for Nigel Farage
Most of us are aware that the evidence for man-made climate change and the need for world leaders to address the problem with urgency are compelling. Though we cannot yet be certain, this climate change could be largely responsible for the weather patterns that have subjected us in the UK to all the floods, along with the current blistering heat in Australia.
In his column on 20 January Nigel Farage states that he thinks “the floods were caused by the weather and not by gay people, man-made climate change, or an increase in the consumption of hollandaise sauce in Bedfordshire”. It seems worrying that the leader of a political party with surging popularity has not only dismissed man-made climate change as having any influence but also lumped it together with two utter absurdities.
Mark Burrows, Weymouth
Nigel Farage has announced that women who take time off to have babies are worth less than the rest of us. Let us hope that Farage, who has declared his commitment to weeding Ukip of barmy crackpots and real extremists, in the wake of one his followers blaming bad weather on gay marriage and others of his flock demonstrating the ugliest of racist views, will now throw himself out of the party.
Christian Vassie, York
I write concerning the response by Nigel Farage to Owen Jones (20 January). He states that rail privatisation occurred as a result of an EU directive.
This is quite wrong, as I assume the directive referred to is 91/440, which merely required the separation of railway accounts relating to operation and infrastructure. The Conservative government of the time used this as a model for the privatisation of British Rail, but such privatisation was not required by the EU.
If privatisation of railways was required by the EU, why have other countries not privatised their railways?
Chris Hall, Derby
I cannot allow Nigel Farage’s claims to go unchallenged (20 January). I have not gone. I remain a member of UKIP, I spend Sunday mornings on candidate training for the 2015 elections, I continue to put financial resources into the Yorkshire region, and I have persuaded scores of my personal friends who are in regional executive positions within UKIP to remain at their posts regardless of the poor quality of national leadership. The cause is more important than anything else.
I resigned the whip permanently in despair. My first resignation was in February 2013, which I withdrew under pressure from the Yorkshire membership.
All this Mr Farage would know if he ever left the Home Counties or allowed the North of England to be represented on the governing body.
Godfrey Bloom MEP, Wressle, East Riding of Yorkshire
Refugee crisis on Syria’s borders
With my own country of Lebanon on a knife-edge as a side-effect of the war in Syria, I agree with you that “it is always better to be talking than not, however far away a solution may be” (editorial, 22 January).
Agencies like mine are at breaking point dealing with the refugee crisis on our border, despite the generous support of our British colleagues at Cafod. If all Geneva achieves is a recognition by all sides of their obligations to allow safe passage of humanitarian aid, that will be huge progress. We can only pray for more than that.
Father Simon Faddoul, President, Caritas Lebanon, Beirut
Our NHS is in  good health
I’m tired of all the NHS-bashing that’s going on (“NHS staff morale falls to new low ”, 22 January).
I live in Northumberland, and it is, I believe, one of the top five NHS trusts. We are extremely fortunate to live here. Our GPs are caring and hard-working, our hospitals are wonderful, clean, efficient, with competent, caring, cheerful nurses, doctors and surgeons. My husband and I are pensioners, and we are very well taken care of by our GPs at the Haltwhistle Medical Practice.
If the rest of the country came up to the standards we experience there would be none of this constant carping at the NHS.
Vivienne Rendall, Melkridge, Northumberland
Tell me if I’m still alive
Chris Maume tells of people whose obituaries were published when they were alive (“Living dead”, 21 January). In old age the actor A E Matthews used on waking to read the day’s obituaries. If he wasn’t there he’d roll over and go to sleep again.
Robert Davies, London SE3

Times:
I write this at my wife’s bedside as she dies of pancreatic cancer. We came into hospital a fortnight ago. She has been under palliative care since then, and unconscious for the past week. Her death is as inevitable as night follows day. No treatment, save pain relief, is being given. She has received no nourishment for 14 days and no water other than drops in the mouth for seven of those. Yet still her body will not shut down. I know my wife would have been horrified at the prospect of dying in this manner. She is receiving exceptional love and care from this, our local NHS hospital, and we are assured that the syringe driver is keeping her pain free. But when you look into her ever-open eyes you see a pleading look. How sure can we be that she is not suffering enormous mental anguish? Not administering nourishment and fluid intravenously is simply euthanasia in slow motion. We love her enormously and will be desperate when she passes, but after this harrowing experience that our children and I are going through, there is for me, no contest; if death is inevitable, then it is only humane to shorten the process. I think we must follow the Belgian and Dutch models. It would be up to doctors, clergy and politicians to find acceptable common ground over the necessary safeguards.
Edward Frewin
Watchet, Somerset
Sir, Peter Franklin’s argument against a change in the law on assisted dying conflates assisted dying (the right to a prescription which the terminally ill, competent person can take to end their life) with voluntary euthanasia (both terminally ill and non-terminal but incurably ill patients’ lives can be directly ended by doctors). The Benelux euthanasia laws are often incorrectly cited as an example of a slippery slope in action. However, both the Belgians and Dutch deliberately and from the beginning created laws with the specific intention of allowing non-terminally ill people to be directly helped to die. This doesn’t confirm the slippery slope, but rather confirms that the law you enact is the law you get. The assisted dying law I propose is similar to the laws working effectively in the US states of Oregon and Washington, where eligibility has never been extended beyond terminal illness, nor has there been pressure for such a change.
It is a feature of this debate that opponents rarely argue against the change in the law actually proposed (for terminally ill, mentally competent adults), but for a law which isn’t proposed. The answer to such concerns is not to turn a blind eye to the suffering of some dying people, but rather to achieve a consensus on a safeguarded law. Those opposed to a change in the law have every right to raise their concerns. But in doing so they also have a responsibility to either explain why some dying people should have to suffer against their wishes at the end of life or alternatively they should set out their own safeguarded law.
Lord Falconer of Thoroton
House of Lords
Sir, It is depressingly defeatist to assert that assisted euthanasia should not be legalised on the grounds that one of the most sophisticated legislatures in the world is incapable of devising a means of ensuring that the necessary safeguards are enforced. It is nothing less than the wilful abnegation of the responsibility to allow the ending of intolerable suffering and it is as cowardly as it is inhumane.
Tony Phillips
Chalfont St Giles, Bucks

Sir, As Derwent May says, not everyone welcomes muntjac deer (Nature Notes, Jan 21). My golden retriever once grabbed an unwary male muntjac.
After a tussle the dog needed 35 stitches to slash wounds inflicted by its tusks and spiky antlers.
M. I. L. Roberts
St Nicholas at Wade, Kent

Sir, Neither Julian Brazier, in his article about Army Reserves (Jan 18), nor former US Secretary of Defence Gates, last week expressing concerns about Britain’s forces, mentioned land-based aircraft. Both make clear the Royal Navy is the UK’s strategic priority; CDS, and General Richards before him, expressed similar views.
Forces’ websites are telling. Royal Navy, Royal Marines and Army pages highlight operational business. The RAF spotlights the Second World War, aircraft displays, sport, much less operations.
This RAF modesty is right. It has 220 combat jets, 650 support aircraft and 36,000 personnel yet, after withdrawal from Afghanistan this year, just four jets, a few other aircraft and 1,000 airmen will be overseas. The bulk of the £7bn-a-year RAF will be home, facing no air threat, our islands safeguarded by Nato in Europe and an expanse of ocean, yet those 220 Typhoon and Tornado jets cost £20bn.
Defence experts here, and across the Atlantic, argue that independent air forces are no longer necessary or affordable. Land-based combat jets have limited roles, flying mostly supporting operations on land and sea. Huge cost and manpower savings would follow transferring essential frontline land-based aircraft to Navy and Army control. The RAF owns 80 per cent of UK military aircraft assets — reorganisation is overdue.
Lester May
(Lieutenant Commander RN ret’d)
London NW1

Sir, Public discontent over MPs can only be heightened by the stark contrast between the disappointingly empty chamber for the vast majority of debates and the overcrowded attendance at the largely irrelevant PMQs. If MPs really think that there is anything to be learnt from PMQs, they are surely mistaken. Indeed, it seems to me that they seem to treat the occasion, not as a serious discussion, but as an entertainment. Therefore, why not treat it as a private matter and stop televising, broadcasting or reporting it?
Richard Warnock
Melton, Suffolk

Sir, I thought that Judge Jeffreys (letters, Jan 20) suffered from “the stone” — kidney or bladder stones. I can testify to the debilitating agonies caused by such stones. If he was suffering from gout as well, one can only wonder at his self-restraint at the Bloody Assizes of 1685.
Andrew McConaghy
Balsall Common, W Midlands
Sir, I was taught that Judge Jeffreys suffered from a pharyngeal pouch, and it was the constant regurgitation of decomposing food that led to his bad temper and severe punishments.
John Hines
Consultant Urological Surgeon
Loughton, Essex

Telegraph:
SIR – As a nutritionist, I was irritated to read your report (January 16) about a head teacher banning parents from putting fruit juice in their children’s lunch boxes. Head teachers are exceeding their authority if they seek to impose their own health-promotion hobby horse on parents. Do they have the right to inspect sandwiches to ensure that they are made with wholemeal bread (high in fibre), or to check that fillings do not include cheese (high in saturated fat) or ham (high in salt)?
It is difficult to provide a packed lunch acceptable to a child that does not break some modern dietary taboo. Priorities in health promotion change; it is not long ago that fruit juice would have been considered a healthy choice. Parents should be advised on a reasonable total diet for their children rather than be subject to arbitrary bans imposed on individual foods by head teachers.
Dr Geoffrey P Webb
London E15
SIR – I find it frustrating that nearly every council-run leisure centre I have visited has vending machines packed full of junk food including crisps, chocolate and sugary drinks. It seems ludicrous to have these machines in a place where the Government is encouraging people to take exercise.
Surely the nation’s health is more important than extra cash from lucrative vending machines? Healthy snack bars should be on offer instead.
Grania Maynard
Aldsworth, Gloucestershire

SIR – Boris Johnson is correct – there is no need for new towns when so much of London, and other towns and cities, is available for house building. I am thinking, in particular, of shopping areas where empty properties reflect the economic downturn and the impact of the internet.
In Bromley, the largest of the London boroughs, a long stretch of the high street could be redeveloped to become apartments intended for those trying to get on to the property ladder. Such properties would be within easy walking distance of shops, restaurants, the cinema and theatre and a railway station. Those businesses in that area that are managing to survive could be offered incentives to move into the busier, pedestrianised, part of town.
John Carter
Shortlands, Kent
SIR – While politicians continue to debate Government plans to build two new garden cities, in Scotland we are looking to deliver a new, sustainable co-operative settlement called Owenstown, in South Lanarkshire.
Related Articles
The Lib Dems’ failure to act decisively has damaged the party’s credibility
22 Jan 2014
Schools do not have the authority to ban juice
22 Jan 2014
Owenstown is not being delivered by property developers intent on making a profit. Instead, all surplus funds will be reinvested in the community. In addition, the initiative does not require any public-sector support and, already, a database of residents and businesses demonstrates a substantial demand from people who wish to live and work in the new settlement.
Bill Nicol
Lanark
Why pubs close
SIR – Peter Oborne blames Labour’s smoking ban for pub closures. While this may have contributed, it is by no means the main reason. The landlady at my local tells me that, not only does she have to pay more than £1,000 a week in rent, but the pricing structure of the owning chain means she has to charge 50p a pint more than her neighbour for the excellent ale brewed just two miles up the road.
She has ceased stocking these ales as she is regularly blamed for profiteering; her neighbouring owner-occupier’s pub is doing well.
Adrian Waller
Woodsetts, South Yorkshire
Crumbling tradition
SIR – In the small burgh of Darvel in Ayrshire, it was common up until the early Seventies for newlyweds to be given a root of rhubarb as a wedding present. That was before wedding lists were commonplace.
John F Crawford
Lytham, Lancashire
No running joke
SIR – Here, in Lincoln, we have the aptly named Steep Hill. My knees are not as young as they were, and do not enjoy going down steep slopes in the conventional manner. So I walk down the hill backwards. I get some funny looks, but my knees don’t mind.
Derek Wellman
Lincoln
Family dialogue
SIR – As it is not unusual to have very extended families, we have been searching for a term to describe the non-blood, same generation relationship of my grandson to his half-brother’s half-brother. My son has come up with the suggestion of siblink.
Roger Hart
London NW1
German energy
SIR – Bruno Waterfield is right to draw attention to Germany’s disastrous energy policies. These are causing electricity bills to rise, spreading fuel poverty and threatening to cripple German industry. They will not even reduce CO2 emissions. The fossil fuel power stations needed for back-up when wind and solar power are off-line are so inefficient when used intermittently that emissions will keep rising.
We can only watch with dismay as Nick Clegg and David Cameron press on with similar policies here and Ed Miliband, who introduced them, tries to lay the blame for rising prices on the “big six” rather than own up to his own folly.
David Watt
Brentwood, Essex
Protecting patients
SIR – You report that mistakes are made in a fifth of disciplinary cases against doctors. In our recent audit of the General Medical Council’s fitness to practise cases, we found technical errors in 22 of the 100 cases audited, but we did not judge in any of them that the GMC had failed to protect the public. It is not possible to conclude that “thousands of doctors” are unsafe. The GMC does have improvements to make, but this was a positive audit and we are confident that the GMC will make the necessary changes.
Harry Cayton
Chief Executive, Professional Standards Authority
London SW1
Permanent pupils
SIR – Rachel Reeves, the shadow work and pensions secretary, believes all jobseekers who lack basic skills should be forced into training courses.
Will these courses be provided by the educational establishment that failed to teach them basic skills during their 13 years of state education, creating illiteracy rates not seen since the 1870s?
David Paul
St Mary Cray, Kent
Can’t keep watch
SIR – My watch stopped recently, thanks to a flat battery. A replacement battery was twice as expensive as a new – but identical – watch, which included a working battery.
John Sully
Forest Row, East Sussex
Support for women considering an abortion
SIR – It is worrying that our society, which has become so risk-averse in recent years, should consider it unnecessary to have proper checks and protection in place to safeguard women considering abortion.
As a counsellor trained and experienced in dealing with cases of post-abortion stress, I am aware of the risks these women and girls face. I have worked with women who have suffered guilt, nightmares, grief, regret, relationship breakdown or depression. In some cases, they have turned to alcohol, drugs, self-harm or even attempted suicide.
There is a high risk that the decision to terminate has not been freely made by the woman herself, but under pressure from her partner or family. She is likely to be vulnerable and confused, and will benefit hugely from time to discuss her wishes with an impartial professional. The Government has already decided that she can manage perfectly well without counselling, and now it seems that a doctor’s input is also unnecessary.
This decision is one of the few life choices that you can’t change your mind about. Surely those considering it deserve all the support and protection available.
Hazel Sewell
Preston, Lancashire

SIR – The Liberal Democrats have failed to deal with the Lord Rennard allegations in a swift and decisive manner. Sexual harassment occurred frequently in organisations in the past and probably continues today, to a lesser extent.
It is normally dealt with in a manner that does not threaten the credibility of the organisation involved. The fact that the Lib Dems have allowed it to dominate the news is a reflection of the party’s incompetence.
Oliver Pugh
Kinver, Staffordshire
SIR – The attack on Lord Rennard by Nick Clegg and his cohort is nothing to do with what is right and what is wrong. They think that they can get more votes by attacking him than they can by supporting him.
Related Articles
Schools do not have the authority to ban juice
22 Jan 2014
Redevelop high streets to solve housing shortage
22 Jan 2014
Raymond Whittle
Marlborough, Wiltshire
SIR – This sanctimoniousness on the part of the Lib Dems is distasteful. Nick Clegg prefers to join the witch hunt within his party rather than act honourably.
The correct thing for him to do would be to say that neither the police nor his own appointed QC have found sufficient evidence to take matters further. But I fear he is too weak and too smug for that.
Brian Clarke
London W6
SIR – For an apology to be meaningful, it must be made voluntarily by a person who has acknowledged wrongdoing. It is wrong of Nick Clegg to try to force an apology from Lord Rennard.
Clifford Baxter
Wareham, Dorset
SIR – Who is more disreputable? Someone who refuses to apologise for something he says he didn’t do, or someone who ignores the evidence and caves in to the prejudices of a baying mob?
K J Phair
Felixstowe, Suffolk
SIR – A relatively straightforward procedural change could well prevent the Liberal Democrats embroiling themselves in a similar future fiasco, in which one of their members is found not guilty of allegations against him according to the criminal standard of proof, yet is still expected to offer an apology for his actions.
They should amend their rules so that allegations of misconduct in internal disciplinary hearings are determined according to the less onerous civil standard of proof: ie, based on all the evidence, is the alleged event or behaviour more likely than not to have taken place? This is used in many professional regulatory bodies.
Philip Jewell
Barnstaple, Devon
SIR – Nick Clegg is gathering a huge female vote in standing by his firm principles on the dignity of women and their right to be unmolested at work.
Susan Munday
Durham

Irish Times:

Sir, – The news that the Government has decided to reopen the embassy to the Vatican (Home News, January 22nd) gave my heart a lift. Two years ago I was dismayed when it was closed but now applaud the courage to seem to do a U-turn.
It is sensible when one makes a wrong turn to recognise it and go back to re- consider. For those in the public eye, that does take courage and I welcome and encourage more of it . – Yours, etc,
BRENDA McGANN,
Carrickbrennan Lawn,
Monkstown, Co Dublin.
Sir, – If there’s a job going for one single diplomat to represent us at the reopened Vatican embassy, I would like Marie Collins to be considered for the post. – Yours, etc,
KEN Mc CUE,
Coleraine Street,
Dublin 7.
Sir, – Now that the Irish embassy to the Holy See is to be reopened, a very suitably qualified candidate for the post would be our former president Mary McAleese, who is currently studying in Rome.
I’m sure the reformist Pope Francis and herself could spend many hours in theological discussion and structural reform in the church over a glass of Chianti in the new austere Irish Ambassador’s residence. – Yours, etc,
BRENDAN BUTLER,
The Moorings,
Malahide,
Co Dublin.
Sir, – A Jones (January 22nd) feels we should open embassies in other cities that are holy to religions other than Catholicism, First off the embassy is to the Holy See not the Vatican. The Holy See is the sovereign entity that represents the Catholic Church and is separate from the Vatican City State. Secondly Mecca, Amritsar and Salt Lake City are not separate sovereign entities and are in countries with which we have diplomatic relations. The examples given by A Jones are spurious. – Yours, etc,
PAUL WILLIAMS,
Circular Road,
Kilkee, Co Clare.
Sir, – Following reports that the Irish embassy to the Vatican is to be reopened, A Jones asks whether we can expect embassies to be established in other holy cities.
Unlike Mecca, Amritsar and Salt Lake City, the Vatican City is a sovereign state. Ireland has embassies in Riyadh, New Delhi and Washington DC to handle any affairs involving the three holy cities mentioned. – Yours, etc,
MICK FLYNN,
Viewmount Park,
Waterford.
Sir, – Charlie Flanagan of Fine Gael tells us that it was always the case that the question of our Vatican embassy stood to be reviewed once we had an economic upturn. Great!
Could he now tell us what other harsh decisions, mainly in health and welfare, taken because of the economic situation, will now be reversed? Pope Francis would certainly rate these as of more urgency in terms of benefiting from any upturn. – Yours, etc,
JOHN F JORDAN,
Flower Grove,
Killiney, Co Dublin.
Sir, – I welcome the Government’s decision to open the Irish embassy in the Vatican again. I am sure it makes sense in terms of having a relationship with an influential state, but one can’t help feeling the Government’s decision was based on advise from spin-doctors regarding what is the most populist decision, given the presence of the respected new pope, Francis. One wonders if deflecting from the political meeting of the Reform Alliance this week was a consideration too. Heaven forbid members of the public would get excited at the thought of a new politic, of open honest dialogue with values at its core. – Yours, etc,
FRANK BROWNE,
Ballyroan Park,
Templeogue, Dublin 16.
Sir, – I couldn’t help but smile as I read Fiach Kelly’s article (“Gilmore links Pope Francis to Vatican embassy decision”, Home News, January 22nd). It tells us the Government’s very welcome decision to reopen an Irish Embassy to the Vatican was taken because of “the Holy See’s renewed focus on tackling ‘hunger and world poverty’ under Francis”. Are we to read into this that our Tánaiste has been touched by the “Francis effect” or even had a Damascene conversion to the faith? Might we look forward to our Tánaiste regularly visiting some of: the one in five Irish children that go to school or bed hungry; the estimated 5,000 homeless people in Ireland; or the 16 per cent of the Irish population that lives on an income which is less than the official poverty line (of €210 per adult per week).
Can we expect the Tánaiste to seriously address the issues of domestic poverty and hunger? And in the meantime, as a stark reminder of the reality of the society we live in and as a cry for social justice, should we not advance the year on the banner that drapes Dublin’s Liberty Hall (ie “Dublin 1913, Thousands lived in poverty, trapped by low pay and few jobs”) to 2014 and change “lived” to the present tense? – Yours, etc,
PAUL CASEY,
The Rise,
Glasnevin, Dublin 9.

Sir, – The longest word in the English language, writes Patsy McGarry (In a Word, Time Out, January 20th) is antidisestablishmentarianism, unrivalled. It has 28 letters. But it does not appear in my admittedly ancient Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (1955). What does appear is the word that used to delight us as children: floccinaucinihilipilification. It has 29 letters. Dating from 1741, it means the action or habit of estimating as worthless. – Yours, etc,
HILARY WAKEMAN,
Skeagh,
Schull, Co Cork.

Sir, – Minister for Justice Alan Shatter complained in the Dáil on Tuesday that the State expended more than €17.3 million in security costs at Shannon between 2004 to 2013 because of opposition to the US military presence at the airport.
There is, of course, an obvious solution that would save the State these utterly wasted millions and, simultaneously, would ensure the speedy release of the indomitable Margaretta D’Arcy from Limerick Prison. Ask the US war machine to remove itself from Shannon Airport and restore the facility to civilian use only. – Yours, etc,
FINTAN LANE,
Lennox Place,
Portobello, Dublin 8.
Sir, – Whether or not he likes it, President Higgins and his family no longer have the luxury or the freedom to do as they want. With great privilege comes at least some responsibility. Sabina Higgins, as a private citizen, is free to visit whoever she likes in prison. Like Caesar’s wife, as the spouse of the President her choices may need to be more circumspect.
Her husband has sworn to uphold the Constitution and the separation of powers which recognise the independence of the judiciary. Under Article 13.6 of the Constitution he also carries the responsibility of exercising the right to pardon, commute or remit punishments imposed by any court exercising criminal jurisdiction. The President must, like the Chief Justice who swears to do so, exercise the office “without fear or favour, affection or ill-will towards any man” (or woman). It is therefore important that the Office of the President should always be seen to accord the highest of respect to the judicial system and never to knowingly undermine the authority of its judges or the decisions of the courts.
If anyone connected with the President’s household does wish to visit a prisoner he or she should do so with the utmost discretion? One presumes that Ms Higgins did not use the office to effect special facilities or privileges when visiting Limerick prison or use taxpayer funds to book, travel or be accompanied on such a visit. It may be too egalitarian to expect that she was accorded the same level of courtesy and respect that prison officers usually give to those visiting their friends and family in the bleak and terrifying confines of our State prisons. – Yours, etc,
MICHAEL ANDERSON,
Moyclare Close,
Baldoyle,
Dublin 13.

Sir, – Ronan McGreevy (Home News, January 18th), quotes from a written copybook account kept by Edward Keogh of his time in the Irish Citizen Army, the 1916 Rising and War of Independence. The copybook has been kept by his son, Liam Keogh for more than 50 years.
I, my sister and two brothers are children of Seán Forde who joined Fianna Éireann in 1912, transferred to the Volunteers in 1914, and fought at the Magazine Fort (Phoenix Park) and in the Church Street Area in 1916. He was active throughout the war of Independence and the Civil War.
My father, like many veterans, did not leave us any written account of his experiences. I have been researching his history, as best I can, for the last number of years. While having received, a number of years ago, from the Department of Defence, a photocopy of his Pension Application which set out for us, for the first time, his involvement in chronological order, the Military Service Collection files released last week by Military Archives are already proving a great source of new information for us. They (along with witness statement files previously released) help us relate and put in perspective the memories and stories we heard.
Ronan McGreevy states that Liam Keogh (95) is one of the last surviving children of Easter Rising veterans. I assume that at 64, I am one of the youngest. The family and folk memories of these few remaining people, who knew the veterans intimately, provide the last opportunity to record a personal and human aspect to their deeds and lives.
Now, as the centenary is upon us, I for one, have a have a much more questioning approach than I had, say, 50 years ago. The files have helped humanise rather than lionise. Now, as I relate the stories and the man to the history, I better appreciate the uncertainties and nightmares suffered and yet, despite what may be my uncertainties, I have greater pride than ever in my father.
While we attend yearly, the Easter Sunday commemorations, the Arbour Hill Mass and the National Day of Commemoration, neither my siblings nor I received an invitation or even a notification of the recent Garden of Remembrance commemoration of the centenary of the founding of the Volunteers.
With the benefit of history and hindsight, only now available with the release of the files, is there anyone out there who might undertake to record the memories? – Yours, etc,
KIERAN FORDE,
Calverstown,
Kilcullen,

Sir, – Fiach Mac Conghail, the Abbey Theatre’s director, and Niall MacMonagle can be proud of their contribution to theatre and writing respectively. But in their complaints (Home News, January 21st & Letters, January 21st) about Fintan O’Toole’s report (Front page & Weekend Review, January 18th) detailing external reservations about the theatre’s performance, they show a sad misunderstanding of a journalist’s job.
Fintan O’Toole is not obliged to, and indeed should not, be expected to wait until the Abbey has prepared its particular spin on the assessors’ opinions. Citizens who book the seats, taxpayers who subvent the Abbey, and indeed Irish Times readers are entitled to such information when it emerges, just as Mr Mac Conghail has a right of reply and comment.
There are still too many people, Government, utilities, charities among them, who don’t like releasing information, except of course on their own terms. – Yours, etc,
PAUL MURRAY,
Templeville Drive,
Templeogue, Dublin 6W.

Sir, – The Theatre of Memory symposium at the Abbey Theatre has received a warm response from the participants, admired for addressing themes that “should matter to us as a nation” (Niall McMonagle, January 20th) – memory, trauma, imagination, migrations. But what constitutes “us”?
Why were the keynote speakers, to a man, Irish born and bred? How was it that there were no contributions by resident populations not of Irish origin? Central Europeans and Nigerians, for example, have come here from cultures rich in experiment with memory and theatre.
Why did the symposium not offer any international point of view on how theatre might now impact on “us as a nation”? No speaker, of the 32, was a practitioner with experience of managing theatre overseas. Why does the Abbey not invite conflict and welcome the stranger’s gaze? – Yours, etc,
KEVIN BARRY,
Professor Emeritus,
School of Humanites,

A chara, – Contrary to Joe Conroy’s claim that the European Parliament is of no use and nobody can point to any its achievements (January 20th), the European Parliament is necessary. It adds more democracy to the EU as it is the only elected body of the EU. Along with that, it is jointly responsible with the Council of Ministers for decision-making in the EU. The president of the European Commission cannot be appointed without its approval.
The European Parliament has passed legislation to bring down the price of mobile telephone prices when roaming. It has worked to toughen the rules about selling cigarettes in order to discourage younger people from taking up smoking. More recently, the civil liberties’ committee of the parliament issued a report on American and British electronic surveillance, declaring it illegal and it now wants the EU to better protect its citizens data and privacy. These are only some of the actions of the European Parliament that prove it is beneficial to the citizens of the EU.
The European Parliament elected in May will have even more power. Mr Conroy is correct that the EU “is a multilateral international organisation that plays a very important role in citizens’ lives”. It is often the European Parliament that ensures that the EU plays such a role. – Is mise,
SEANÁN Ó COISTÍN,
Rue William Turner,
Bonnevoie,
Sir, – Fintan O’Toole’s article (Opinion, January 22nd) highlighting the sense of entitlement prevalent in Ireland is apt in the week that our alleged betters meet for their annual global review at Davos.
O’Toole highlights how we allow our elected officials perpetuate a sense of entitlement among the professional and business elite in this country. It seems our political class quickly forgets its mandate and seeks to be validated by a self-appointed elite. This week the global corporate elite invites political leaders to Davos for discussion on the theme “The Reshaping of the World: Consequences for Society, Politics and Business”. Here it will listen while political leaders and celebrities highlight their concerns regarding inequality and look at options to reduce the income gap between rich and poor.
However, rather than our elected leaders outlining to business leaders how society will be organised and wealth distributed, they will wait to hear the wisdom of this unelected group on how they should legislate to minimise impact on the status quo while providing some minimal conciliatory gesture to societal concerns.
The issue that Fintan O’Toole has highlighted is not local, it merely reflects a global culture of deference by elected politicians to the business and professional class. – Yours,etc,
BARRY WALSH,
Linden Avenue,

Sir, – “It could be worse”. No, it couldn’t! – Yours, etc,
MARY WILKINSON,
Boleybeg, Galway.
A chara, – With respect, I didn’t interrupt you. – Is mise,
SEAN O DIOMASAIGH,
Kiltale,
Dunsany, Co Meath.
A chara, – Cheers. – Yours, etc,
NC Ní MHAOLCATHA,
Ascaill Bhaile na Fuinseoige,
Cnoc Liamhna,
Baile Átha Cliath 16.
Sir, – OMG, OMG. – Yours, etc,
DAVID GREHAN,
Hollywood Drive,
Goatstown, Dublin 14.
Sir, – I am unable to comment at this stage due to possible pending legal action. – Yours, etc,
PETER CONNAUGHTON,
Newtown Road, Wexford.
Sir, – We seem to have allowed ourselves to lie outright to those around us with statements such as “I’ll be with you in two seconds”. Now, however, it often includes the word “literally”. So although you could still be left waiting for minutes or hours, you are told, “I’ll be with you in two seconds, literally”.
This advance in phrases we live with makes me sick literally! – Yours, etc,
PETER HORSMAN,
Templerainey Mill,
Arklow,
Co Wicklow.

Irish Independent:

* It is heartbreaking to learn that only €9,000 out of €4m raised by Rehab lottery cards was actually used to help those who need it most.
Also in this section
CRC pay scandal endemic of way country is run
Letters to the Editor
We deserve much better governance than this
That desperately needed money was diverted from patients is a national shame.
It begs the question: are decency and fair play dead and buried in Irish life?
Those of us lucky enough to be in full health and able to go about our lives independently cannot truly appreciate the personal heroics demanded by people with disabilities in getting through the day.
The spirit and courage demanded to meet the daily struggle to survive cannot be grasped by those of us who take walking, talking, hearing, and seeing for granted.
But there are people who do recognise this unequal battle, they supported Rehab and gave whatever they could afford to help.
This generosity is the dynamic that keeps the wheels of the charity sector turning.
Revelations about the €742,000 CRC payout to Paul Kiely, and now the bombshell from Rehab, totally undermine the trust that is the oxygen of the charity sector.
How could this happen? How could anyone think that siphoning money away from the vulnerable is justified at any level?
This appaling vista has opened up at the heart of the caring community. The collateral damage, or blowback, from this scandal is that the phenomenal people who work at the interface with people who need them are also tainted.
This, of course, is monstrously unjust.
Their compassion and kindness is the glue that keeps the system together, but they have been betrayed as much as the clients of Rehab and the CRC.
If we can not be trusted as a society to take care of the vulnerable, then what hope is there for us?
TG GAVIN
DALKEY, CO DUBLIN
MEDICINE SHOW
* If Bono’s daughter pretends her father is a doctor should my daughters pretend I am a pop singer with the answer to all the world’s problems?
DR JOHN DOHERTY
CNOC AN STOLLAIRE, CO DONEGAL
RELIGION AND POLITICS
* You can’t reform politics without re-examining the values on which you are going to base your work. And politics is compromise, so if you’re going to work with allies you need to agree a reasonable overlap of values to which you all assent. What values would an informed Christian conscience include?
Surely, at the least:
* Ask “how much is enough?” What should be the ratio of CEO salary to the average worker’s (in the public, private and voluntary sectors)?
* Our national well-being would improve with some thoughtful giving – from targeted social welfare through to fulfilling our international aid obligations.
* Guard human dignity. Policy-making should enshrine the best of measures to protect those whose dignity is most at risk.
* Practise authenticity. This may be the value that the public craves the most. They want leaders who lead by example (like Jesus did) – and who can blame them.
Authenticity is first forged in the crucible of private life. It requires personal commitment from a leader and also an understanding of forgiveness.
DAVID WILSON
DUN LAOGHAIRE
CELTIC TIGER REVISITED
* It would appear that the people of Ireland have been less than fair or just to those responsible for the progress made during the Celtic-Tiger era. These achievements dramatically improved the socio-economic, social and cultural infrastructure of our country and most political parties supported the positive developments of the Celtic Tiger.
We have failed to acknowledge publicly our indebtedness to those involved and tended to demonise developers and builders as a category. It is time to portray a more balanced assessment of probably the greatest period of development since the foundation of the State.
This is not to deny that aberrations, serious excesses and omissions took place.
Of course, it is right and proper to have mistakes and excesses investigated in a thorough and fair manner.
But the emphasis being reiterated publicly, day in day out, reveals an obsession with the deviant without fair acknowledgement of the positive overall outcome which, in my opinion, greatly outweighs the negative aspects of this period.
Some of the many significant achievements of the Celtic-Tiger period are as follows: the renewal of our housing stock; the building of the major roads and infrastructure; the construction of major sewage and water schemes; the building and expansion of schools, colleges and universities; the construction of factories and office blocks; the improvement of sports facilities and community services. And thanks to social partnership (in part), we achieved nearly 20 years of industrial peace.
MICHAEL MAC GREIL, SJ
CATHAIR NA MART, CO MHAIGHEO
ROME ALONE
* The Government intends to open a ‘scaled down’ diplomatic mission to the Holy See to ‘save money’.
The rationale cited for closure was never terribly convincing, especially after the total failure of diplomacy to produce the collaboration of the Holy See with major state investigations into child sex abuse by hundreds of priests.
We have a new Pope who is acclaimed by the flock and he is busily overhauling Vatican bureaucracy. But what strategic influence could Ireland possibly derive by transferring the role of Ambassador to the Holy See from the personal mandate of the highly experienced and distinguished Secretary-General of the Department of Foreign Affairs to a more junior and less experienced diplomat, expected to operate alone in a system governed through status, rank and rigid boundaries of hierarchy?
MYLES DUFFY
GLENAGEARY, CO DUBLIN
ENTITLED TO WHAT?
* Lest we forget, while being appalled at the pension of ex-CRC boss Paul Kiely, all the bloated pensions paid to young and retired ex-Taoisigh, ex-ministers, ex-TDs and ex-senior servants are paid from taxes. Where did this sense of entitlement start?
BRENDAN WRIGHT
LUCAN, CO DUBLIN
CHARITY REFORM OVERDUE
* It is disappointing that it has taken the CRC scandal to finally create the political will to appoint a charity regulator. Given the lack of transparency in so many sectors of society, it would be appropriate to appoint a regulator that is fully independent and to ensure that they are chosen through a fair, open and transparent process.
In recent years a €300m annual lottery fund for charities has often been used as a discretionary fund for politicians. An independent regulator can ensure oversight of this important fund and demonstrate that the Government is prepared to walk the talk when it comes to transparency and reform.
Whatever the course of action, a regulator must be appointed with urgency before any further damage is done to the charity sector.
RUAIRí MCKIERNAN
CLONTARF, DUBLIN 3
MORE PRAYERS ANSWERED
* Charlie Flanagan of Fine Gael tells us that it was always the case that the question of our Vatican Embassy stood to be reviewed once we had an economic up-turn. Could he now tell us what other harsh decisions, mainly in health and welfare and taken because of the economic situation, will now be reversed?
JOHN F JORDAN
KILLINEY, CO DUBLIN
Irish Independent


Tip

$
0
0

24 January 2014 Tip
I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. A spy has been planted on Troutbridge to see if any of the crew are suitable to join Intelligence Priceless.
Go to the Tip, M&S, Post Office no boxes no Thermabloc
Scrabble today no-one wins  game collapses ha;f way thrpugh  Perhaps I will win tomorrow.

Obituary:

Halet Çambel, who has died aged 97, was an Olympic fencer and the first Muslim woman to compete in the Games; while she failed to take home a medal from the Berlin Olympics in 1936 she won international acclaim by refusing to meet Hitler. Post-war, she became a renowned archaeologist.
The 20-year-old Halet Çambel represented Turkey in the women’s individual foil event. She already held reservations about attending the Nazi-run Games, and an introduction to the Führer was a compromise too far. “Our assigned German official asked us to meet Hitler. We actually would not have come to Germany at all if it were down to us, as we did not approve of Hitler’s regime,” she recalled late in life. “We firmly rejected her offer.”
Halet Çambel was born on August 27 1916 in Berlin, the granddaughter of Ibrahim Hakki Pasha, the Ottoman Ambassador to Germany. Her father, Hasan Cemil Çambel, was the embassy’s military attaché and a close associate of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, founder of the Turkish Republic.
As she grew up in Berlin with her three siblings, her parents became concerned by her frailty (she suffered with typhoid and hepatitis). “They always looked at me as if my days were numbered,” she remembered. “They would dress me up in layers of jumpers and woolly socks. As I was not happy with this, without my family knowing, I removed these heavy clothes at school and decided to increase my strength. And I also began to exercise. The German books I read contained stories about knights. I was very impressed by them, this is why I took up fencing.”
In the mid-1920s the family resettled in Istanbul, where, prior to the founding of the Republic, Halet Çambel was “shocked by the black shrouded women who came and visited us at home”. Part of Ataturk’s legacy was to expand the rights and possibilities of women. Participation in sport contributed to this emancipation.
Related Articles
Kinmont Hoitsma
03 Jan 2014
Professor Mick Aston
25 Jun 2013
Viktor Sarianidi
10 Jan 2014
Carla Grissmann
08 Apr 2011
Bill Hoskyns
18 Aug 2013
She acknowledged the amateurism of her country’s Olympic bid. “We did not prepare,” she said. “Everybody would train in their own spare time.” After an unhelpful spell with a Hungarian coach in Budapest, she arrived in Berlin. She was present when a furious Hitler stormed out of the Olympic Stadium after America’s black athlete Jesse Owens won the 100m sprint.
On her return from the Games she met Nail Çakırhan, a Communist poet and later a celebrated architect. As her family were unimpressed by Çakırhan’s Marxist beliefs, the couple wed in secret. She went on to read Archaeology (along with the Hittite, Assyrian, and Hebrew languages) at the Sorbonne in Paris before gaining a doctorate at the University of Istanbul in 1940. In the immediate wake of the Second World War she studied with the German professor Helmuth Bossert, and in 1947 assisted on his excavation of the 8th-century Hittite fortress city of Karatepe in the Taurus Mountains of southern Turkey.
Karatepe was to be her life’s work: for more than five decades she spent six months each year at the site. It was there that she helped to develop a greater understanding of Hittite hieroglyphics, the indigenous logographic script native to central Anatolia, and build ties between Turkish academics and the German archaeological community (Çambel was to become a member of the German Archaeology Institute).
A good-looking woman, she maintained a no-nonsense approach on her pioneering digs in south-east Anatolia. “Halet was always respected by the farmers,” said the Danish-German ethnologist Ulla Johansen. “She wore practical trousers and simple, high-buttoned blouses, completely covering her upper arms and a man’s cap on her short cut hair.”
In 1960 Halet Çambel became professor of Prehistoric Archaeology at Istanbul University, where she later founded a chair dedicated to the field. In 2004 she received the Prince Claus Award, the Dutch prize in recognition of a progressive approach to culture .
Her husband died in October 2008.
Halet Çambel, born August 27 1916, died January 12 2014

Guardian:

Conor Ryan neither addresses the fundamental unfairness in the status quo nor shows that the teaching in private schools is better than that in the state sector (Letters, 21 January).
First, he ignores the evidence that the disproportionate success of privately educated children in obtaining both university places and a foot on the ladder of prestigious careers is due to universities not being very good at assessing potential – slightly changing the make-up of the group who “benefit” from this situation would not give us more equality of opportunity. Second, and in common with Anthony Seldon, he concerns himself only with the most able children in the state sector. Even if it were the case that there is a small supply of superior education available, why should that resource go to these children rather than others, particularly since there is no explanation of how the children left behind would benefit? Third, he fails to state how he would bring about fairer access to oversubscribed state schools: this could be achieved very simply by determining admission to them through a lottery.
Anyone who sets foot in state schools regularly knows that inspirational and heroic work is happening in them every day. It is not state schools which are the obstacle to equality of opportunity, but the lack of political will to remove the unfair advantages enjoyed by the children of the privileged.
Jane Duffield-Bish
Norwich
• It was disappointing to read such negative views about the links between independent and state schools (What can the independent sector teach the state sector?, 20 January). I attended recently an inspiring conference organised by the Department for Education and the Sutton Trust for state and independent school leaders to celebrate the impact on pupils’ learning made by so many of our cross sector partnerships. The examples of effective co-operation between our two education sectors are legion; take just three from around the country. The Southwark Schools Learning Partnership, the Dorchester Area Schools Partnership and the City of York Independent State Schools Partnership bring together each year hundreds of pupils and teachers. In schools across the UK we share everything from the study of languages, mathematics and science to the experience of community music, playing sport and the organising of joint school trips. Such opportunities open up young minds and dissolve differences of wealth and background.
John Harris would have been wiser if he had considered what independent and maintained schools can teach each other; investigating that challenge is proving to be fascinating, often humbling and, not least, great fun.
Julian Thould
Head, King Edward VI School, Southampton
• In this area, the local authority recently closed a successful comprehensive school because of concern about falling secondary school rolls. This week, two local independent day schools have each announced an application for free school status with active encouragement from the New Schools Network. The latest, announcing its move from “fee to free” makes much of widening accessibility but says 96% of current parents would keep their children at the school. It seems this may be less about opening access, as advocated by the Sutton Trust, and more about propping up a struggling business model. It would be interesting to hear from Mr Gove and the New Schools Network how much this local example is reflected in applications for free school status from other parts of the country.
John Murphy
Crosby, Merseyside

The shocking accounts of torture and killings this week are depressingly similar to earlier reports compiled by Amnesty International (Evidence of killings in Syria could be ‘tip of the iceberg’, 22 January). Overall, a grim picture is emerging of the Syrian security forces – and their proxies – committing crimes against humanity on a staggering scale. There is little doubt that various forces opposed to the Damascus government have also kidnapped, tortured and killed detainees on their own side.
The Geneva II talks must prioritise the alleviation of grievous suffering among Syria’s civilians, but they must not ignore the mounting evidence of systematic crimes. It should be made clear to all parties that there will be no “immunity from prosecution” at some later date. Syria’s human rights abusers must be put on notice that they will be held to account for their terrible crimes.
Kristyan Benedict
Syria campaign manager, Amnesty International

It is good news indicators are starting to show improvement in the economy (Report, 23 January), though it’s difficult to see which of the current government policies is driving this. Am I the only one reminded that, for hundreds of years, doctors prescribed bleeding as a treatment for many diseases and were also quick to accept responsibility for recoveries?
Michael Baron
Edinburgh
• The Cambridge City Foodbank has launched a pilot scheme to put up to £60 on the fuel cards of people sent to us through the CAB. The scheme is funded by local pensioners who donate winter fuel allowances which they feel they can live without. We are fortunate in that the city has probably more than the average number of well-off pensioners but the idea could be applied elsewhere.
Evvy Edwards
Cambridge City Foodbank
• The apparently mystery women (Letters, 21 January) on the Labour benches of 1976 is, of course, the very smart Judith Hart, minister for overseas development. Now, what did I have for breakfast… ?
Stephen Rafferty
Buckland Brewer, Devon
• I wonder what Emma Dally’s grandfather would have made of the Irish policeman I met just outside Wicklow when my bicycle had punctured (Letters, 21 January). “Are you in hardship there?” he enquired. “And do you have the necessary implements?”
Keith Graham
Bristol
• They escape from the Benedictines only to end up with the Dominicans (Runaway school pupils found at hotel, 21 January).
Tom Scanlon
Little Neston, Wirral
• For some of us, our back gardens keep us sane (Letters, 23 January); it is the news about Syria, banking, poverty and child abuse that numbs our minds.
Jen Fitton
Oban, Argyll
• Surely brief letters are as welcome as the news that a female bullfinch is picking at blackthorn buds in Oxen Wood (Country diary, 23 January).
John Bailey
St Albans, Hertfordshire

24 January is is the Day of the Endangered Lawyer, a day when lawyers in Britain should take a moment to consider some of the dangerous environments fellow advocates are working in across the world. This is the third year this international day of awareness has been organised so that we can reflect on the physical threats and persecution colleagues face. This year the spotlight will shine on Colombia, a country where 1,440 incidents have been recorded of lawyers being threatened, injured or otherwise put at risk. Most alarming is that 400 lawyers have been killed since 1991 for the legitimate work they carry out.
On 24 January, as a representative for the Law Society and its support for endangered lawyers, I will be discussing the perilous situations Colombian lawyers work under with Rommel Durán Castellanos, a human rights and environmental rights lawyer and lecturer. Only last month he was shot at while working with vulnerable clients in the Pitalito region of south-east Colombia.
The risks are all too familiar to Rommel, who since 2007 has been defending marginalised communities and victims of human rights abuses and conducting grassroots training workshops on human rights and protection mechanisms. In particular, he represents victims of extrajudicial executions in the north-east of Colombia and other regions of the country, and victims of crimes such as enforced disappearance, torture and killings, perpetrated by state agents and paramilitary groups. For his efforts he has been subjected to a campaign of threats, attacks and stigma. Rommel’s experiences can put into sharp relief the cases most lawyers are presented with.
The Day of the Endangered Lawyer does not stand to present a point of comparison but rather to spur the international legal community into a refreshed state of awareness and action.
Professor Sara Chandler
Chair of the Law Society Human Rights Committee

The problem with the battle against climate change is not that “extremists” in the UK oppose fracking, or even that the government supports it (‘Far-left extremists’ accused of harming global warming fight, 21 January). The problem is that global greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise.
As Caroline Lucas MP points out in your report, “up to 80% of known fossil fuel reserves must remain in the ground if we are to have any hope of avoiding dangerous levels of climate change.” But the reality is that they are not going to do so. The world’s governments talk about cutting emissions, but in fact they continue to seek economic growth at all costs.
We have to accept that the battle to cut greenhouse gas emissions by enough to prevent runaway climate change has been lost. Therefore, the strategy now has to be to deal with the emissions by investing in carbon scrubbing, geoengineering and reforestation. This could be funded by the tens of billions of pounds per year that would be raised if the major nations, including the UK, could agree on a financial transactions tax. Otherwise, we face disaster.
Richard Mountford
Tonbridge, Kent
• Lord Deben’s plea for a rational debate on tackling climate change isn’t particularly helped by his labelling of opponents of fracking as extremists and “close to Trotskyism”. Following hard on the heels of David Cameron calling opponents irrational and “religious in their opposition”, it seems that there is an orchestrated campaign to pillory anyone who questions the desperate push to expand fracking.
The climate change case against greater long-term use of gas is simple. The Committee on Climate Change has set a target for the average emissions from electricity generation to be 50 grammes of CO2 per kilowatt hour by 2030. Gas (from whatever source) produces nearly 10 times that amount.
The government and Lord Deben could also listen to those it normally trusts. BP reports that shale gas expansion will not stop a major rise in greenhouse gas emissions and Brewin Dolphin says shale gas will not reduce gas prices (Report, 16 January). So why is the government so obsessed about promoting fracking while simultaneously blocking the setting of a binding EU-wide renewables target which would provide a clear focus for decarbonisation? Is it too much to ask for a grown-up debate, without the brickbats?
John Rigby
Exeter
• The appointment of Lord Deben, fracking champion, as chair of the Committee on Climate Change is one in a long line of cynical appointments to ensure that action is given low priority. Climate change sceptic Peter Lilley, vice-chair of an oil and gas company, was appointed in October 2012 to the select committee, following the appointment of Owen Paterson, another climate sceptic, as environment secretary, and John Hayes, who opposes wind farms, as energy minister. Richard Benyon and Lord de Mauley, neither with impressive environmental credentials, to the Department for the Environment. And there are more.
This lengthening line of such appointments points up Cameron’s lie that his is “the greenest government ever”.
David Murray
Wallington, Surrey
• Your article (Big Six energy provider RWE halves investment in renewables, 17 January) paints a distorted picture of investment in the UK. While individual companies may make commercial decisions to reduce their involvement, other companies are lining up to take their place, competing for contracts and helping to renew our energy infrastructure.
Since 2010 we have seen record levels of investment: £31bn from private sector companies in UK renewable projects – the most resilient such market in Europe. Over the same period we have nearly doubled the amount of electricity generated from that source. Our Energy Act provides the certainty and political commitment that investors need, which is why Ernst & Young ranks the UK as the fourth best place in the world to invest in renewable energy – and the first for offshore wind.
Edward Davey
Secretary of state for energy and climate change
• According to BP (Report, 16 January), the expected rise in greenhouse gases over the next two decades will put “hopes of curtailing dangerous climate change beyond reach”, despite any move from coal to gas. There are two dangers: a temperature rise this century sufficient to ensure widespread crop failures and famine; and ocean acidification so severe as to disrupt the whole marine food chain.
So, what can we do to avoid such catastrophes? There is a growing realisation among scientists that the only way is to lower the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in a report recently leaked to Reuters and the New York Times, recognises the possible necessity of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) on a very large scale, tantamount to geoengineering. Fortunately, nature has provided excellent means to do this, using trees, plants and algae. Forests can be managed such that the carbon in the wood is not returned to the atmosphere. Plants can be heated pyrolytically to produce “biochar”, a special type of charcoal suitable for soil improvement. And photosynthesising algae can absorb carbon dioxide, purify water and become part of an aquatic food chain. Thus, while we reduce greenhouse gas levels in the atmosphere we can be growing more food.
This is a win-win situation. Yet the government has done nothing to promote CDR. The debate over shale gas pales into insignificance.
John Nissen
Bath
• Did John Gummer really say “All of us who are environmentalists … who are sensible” or are you having a laugh?
Marion Worth
Newport, Gwent

Independent:

As Syrian diplomats squabble in Geneva this week, those trapped inside Syria and at the borders are in desperate need of humanitarian assistance and protection.
In the refugee settlements I visited last week in the Middle East, a largely hidden and seemingly unrelenting cycle of violence has taken hold. In the camps in Lebanon and Jordan, scores of women and girls are beaten and humiliated as a direct result of the stress and despair of displacement.
Teenage girls there are vulnerable to sexual harassment and, in an attempt to protect them, they can be pushed into marriage, often to much older men, consigning them to the extreme risks posed by pregnancy in bodies so young. As one doctor asked me, how can it ever be OK for a 13-year-old to miscarry, and then to fall pregnant again?
They cannot wait any longer for the political settlement needed to end the unacceptable, shocking cycle of violence that has gripped their homeland. For the sake of all Syrians we hope talking in Geneva brings relief, if not peace.
Leigh Daynes, Executive Director, Doctors of the World UK, London E14
Outside Liverpool Street station in London is a statue reminding us of the Kindertransport scheme which rescued thousands of mainly Jewish children from Nazi-occupied areas of Europe on the eve of the Second World War.
Ten thousand were resettled in the UK. Surely something like that could be arranged for the most needy of the Syrian refugee children, especially those who have been orphaned. The people want to help.
Elizabeth Morley, Aberystwyth
Behind the fall in unemployment
When hearing Mssrs Cameron, Osborne et al trumpeting a record fall in the unemployment rate to 7.1 per cent, let’s remember there are still 2.3 million unemployed, struggling to make ends meet, even on the official figures.
And, lest we forget, many so-called “employed” are in fact under-employed, being trapped in zero-hour jobs or self-employed with a very small, erratic income. And, of course, some people, so discouraged, appear in no official figures at all.
Mind you, there are the lucky few who are unemployed, with no need to work, having got something for nothing – no, I don’t mean those on benefits, but those who have benefited from inherited wealth.
Peter Cave, London W1
So we have just seen the second biggest drop in unemployment on record. I blame all these EU immigrants, coming here and taking our jobs and … Oh, hang on a minute …
Francis Kirkham, Crediton, Devon
Rennard: time to make peace
Chris Rennard should realise that what to him may have been a gesture of friendship could have been deeply unpleasant to the recipient. He should not allow his intransigence to damage the future of the party he has done so much to build.
Representatives of the parties concerned should get round a table with a neutral mediator to thrash out an acceptable form of words with which Chris could apologise without prejudicing his position in any possible (but unlikely) legal proceedings.
Andrew Sturgis, Walton-on-Thames, Surrey
Dear Lord Rennard,
As a fellow liberal, and fellow bloke in his mid-50s, I would like to offer another view to help staunch the hurtful and misleading bile that has been flooding on to our newspaper pages recently.
We all have our way of expressing understanding and comradeship. Yours is allegedly of the more tactile variety. No doubt you make no distinction between old and young, male and female, attractive and plain; there will therefore no doubt be a number of older women and male colleagues able to vouch for your tendency to place a compassionate hand on the leg, or run a caring hand up the back from time to time.
Any unpleasant rumours that you are a philandering and lecherous slimeball would then be scotched once and for all.
David Scott, Horsham, West Sussex
Having worked in mixed offices for many years, starting in the Sixties, I know that some men don’t know how to behave.
One man in particular was a real pest until I elbowed him sharply in the ribs after he’d crept up behind me and flipped my bra strap. How was I to know he was nursing two broken ribs following a car accident? He never did it again to me or anyone else.
Sue Thomas, Bowness on Windermere, Cumbria
Children in a toxic world
It really shouldn’t come as any surprise that young people’s lives and mental health are being substantially compromised because of the demands of modern life (“Mental health risk to children trapped in ‘toxic climate’ of dieting, pornography and school stress”, 20 January).
Sue Palmer and I composed two open press letters on this issue back in 2006 and 2007, signed by several hundred expert authorities from across the globe. But still, after all our campaigning, articles and books – still, hardly anything has changed. This is an appalling indictment of the toxic world that we adults are creating for our children. Effort must be focused upon those areas where we can make a difference.
Most notably, if the will is there, governments have the ability to rein back the noxious “audit and accountability culture” that has engulfed our schools since the 1990s, in which we are examining and testing our children to death – and in some tragic cases, quite literally.
Parents also need to view themselves as the proactive creators of modern culture, and not its hapless victims, especially in relation to the rampant technologisation of human communication, which should have absolutely no place in early and middle childhood.
The Save Childhood movement and its “Too Much Too Soon” campaign are just two examples of emerging cultural initiatives which are challenging these trends, and which all concerned citizens can throw their weight behind, if we’re really serious about genuine grassroots change on this vital question.
Dr Richard House, Senior Lecturer in Early Childhood Studies, University of Winchester
What’s so special about dolphins?
I read your piece on the 200 dolphins trapped in a bay to be killed by Japanese hunters (21 January) and agree that this is a shocking practice. But why do we mostly focus on the cute and the dramatic, such as dolphin culls and racehorse injury, when far worse and much more routine suffering is commonplace in many areas of our consumer society?
For example industrial-scale fishing decimates stocks and nets all kinds of species besides the target fish, with those animals sometimes spending hours (or days) in nets before they finally die.
Next there is the rubbish and the toxins that our throw-away, industrialised society emits to the sea, with us now discovering that microscopic, indestructible particles of plastic have spread throughout the whole of the oceans.
And then the rearing of animals to supply us with cheap meat normally involves them spending their short lives tethered in cubicles, being given feed from dubious sources (such as rainforests felled to allow industrial cattle-feed production) and being filled with antibiotics to ensure that they survive in this inhumane and unhealthy environment.
So, yes, the treatment of these dolphins is brutal but spare a thought for the life of that cow or that pig next time you head for the discounted meat department in your supermarket.
Alan Mitcham, Cologne, Germany
They are still watching you
I can sympathise with Bob Gilmurray’s desire (letter, 21 January) to have the occasional day free from the prying eyes and ears of various national spying agencies. However he is sadly mistaken in his belief that by simply switching off his phone he can avoid their glare.
Most modern mobile phones continue to relay signals to the telecom providers allowing the spy agencies to detect the location of the phone even when the device is turned off. One way to avoid this unwanted intrusion is to remove the battery and sim when travelling, or better still bin the phone altogether.
Cían Carlin, London N8
Enter Lloyd-Pack, stage left
Way back in 1986 we saw Roger Lloyd-Pack (Obituary, 17 January) as Mandelstam, with Jack Shepherd as Gumilyov, in Dusty Hughes’ Futurists. As good an example of TV stars doing serious and challenging theatre work as you could wish to see.
But we were overjoyed to find that the tickets we’d bought for the National’s Cottesloe theatre were categorised “unrestricted left”. Sounds like something Roger would have appreciated.
Mary Pimm and Nik Wood, London E9

Times:

‘Where it is difficult for the mentally and physically healthy to find work, it is nigh on impossible for the long-term mentally ill’
Sir, It was revealing to read Caitlin Moran on Benefits Street and then Dr Mark Porter on bias over mental health (Times2, Jan 21). I am a retired GP with a lower middle-class upbringing but my wife comes from a working-class background tainted by mental issues affecting her mother. She overcame this to become a teacher. We lived in north Nottinghamshire, where I worked for 30 years. I witnessed the effects on the area and people caused by pit closures and industrial decline.
There are many people living on benefits in the area and the causes are complex, but having the rug pulled out from under working communities means they have to find a new identity as non-working ones. This is compounded by mental health issues, resulting from being unable to find work, and poor physical health, partly as a result of previous employment.
Where it is difficult for the mentally and physically healthy to find work, it is nigh on impossible for the long-term mentally ill. One of my sons has a long-term mental illness and finds this so. He comes from a relatively advantaged background but has been pulled down by his illness.
I welcome Caitlin Moran’s and Mark Porter’s articles and commend Nick Clegg’s proposals in this area. I would wish that certain journalists and politicians would be humble enough to acknowledge that most of them really have no idea how the other half lives.
Derek Hughes
Kibworth, Leics
Sir, Over the past 40 years the UK has led the way in the development of specialist mental health services for older people. Mental illness affects about 10 per cent of older people and we are concerned that the UK is beginning to dismantle these services and move the care of older people with mental illness into “ageless” (or age-inclusive or age-blind) services, where an 18-year-old and 80-year-old may be treated in the same service. A recent survey found that around 10 per cent of respondents had already undergone significant merger into ageless adult services and a similar number reported this was imminent.
The reasons for this change are unclear — it may simply be an attempt to save money — but there is no evidence to support the move to age inclusive mental health services. In fact a recent survey showed ageless services are detrimental to patient care.
Old-age mental health services are not just about managing dementia — around 40 per cent of patients in older adults services have illnesses other than dementia (such as depression, schizophrenia or anxiety). We therefore believe that specialism of old-age psychiatry — with a specifically trained, skilled workforce for older people with mental illness — should be the vehicle for the provision of age-appropriate non-discriminatory services to all our older population.
We call upon health providers in the UK to halt to the development of “ageless” mental health services, and ensure old-age services are protected.
Dr James Warner, Royal College of Psychiatrists; Dr Nori Graham, Alzheimer’s Disease International; Professor Carlos Augusto de Mendonça Lima, European Association of Psychiatry ; Professor Henry Brodaty, International Psychogeriatric Association; Professor Gabriela Stoppe, Chair of the Section of Old Age Psychiatry of the World Psychiatric Association, Switzerland; Professor Luis Agüera-Ortiz, President of the Spanish Association of Psychogeriatrics, Spain; Professor Dame Sue Bailey, President, Royal College of Psychiatrists, UK; Professor R.C. Baldwin, Consultant Old Age Psychiatrist & Honorary Professor of Psychiatry, UK; Professor Yoram Barak, Director of Abarbanel Mental Health Centre, Israel; Professor Vincent Camus, Past president, Section of Old Age Psychiatry, World Psychiatric Association, France; Dr Peter Carter, Chief Executive and General Secretary of the Royal College of Nursing, UK; Dr Jane Casey, Bi-national Chair, Faculty of Psychiatry of Old Age Psychiatry, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, Australia; Professor Helen Chiu, President, Hong Kong Psychogeriatric Association, Hong Kong; Professor Edmond Chiu, University of Melbourne, Australia; Professor Knut Engedal, University of Oslo, Norway; Professor Lia Fernandes MD, PhD, APG Past President, Portugal; Professor Horacio Firmino, President of European Association of Geriatric Psychiatry, Portugal; Professor Vinod Gangolli, Dean of Academics, Masina Hospital, Byculla, Mumbai, India; Dr George Grossberg, Past-President, American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, Past-President, International Psychogeriatric Association, US; Lars Gustafson, Professor Emeritus, Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Professor Dr Hans Gutzmann, President of The Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gerontopsychiatrie und –Psychotherapie (DGGPP), Germany; Dr Cécile Hanon, Chair of the Committee of Education European Psychiatric Association, France; Professor Reinhard Heun, Professor of Psychiatry, UK; Professor Ralf Ihl, Professor of Psychiatry, University of Duesseldorf, Germany; Professor Aleksandra Milićević Kalašić, Co-Chair Old Age Psychiatry Section, World Psychiatric Association, Serbia; Professsor Paul Knight, President, British Geriatric Society, London, UK; Professor Vladimirs Kuznecovs, Head of LPA Geriatric Section, Latvia; Professor Jerzey Leszek, Founder President of Polish Geriatric Psychiatry Association, Poland; Professor Gabriel Ivbijaro, President Elect World Federation for Mental Health, UK; Dr Manuel Martin-Carrasco, Coordinator, Working Group on Dementia, Spanish Society of Psychiatry, Spain; Professor Antonio Palha; Past President of Portuguese Society of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Portugal; Dr Carmelle Peisah, University of New South Wales, Australia; Dr Felix CV Potocnik, Head of Special Interest Group in Old Age Psychiatry, South African Society of Psychiatrists, South Africa; Dr Joel Sadavoy, Founding President of the Canadian Academy of Geriatric Psychiatry, Canada; Dr Duarte dos Santos Falcao, President, Portuguese Gerontopsychoiatry Association, Portugal; Dr Nicoleta Tataru, President of Romanian Association of Geriatric Psychiatry, Romania; Marco Trabucchi, President, Associazione Italiana di Psicogeriatria, Italy; Professor Catalina Tudose, President of Romanian Alzheimer’s Society, Romania; Professor Franz Verrey , Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Professor Armin von Gunten, Vice-President, Swiss Society for Old-Age Psychiatry, Switzerland

Sir, Andrew Dow (letter, Jan 21) says that Richard L. Edgeworth invented carriage springs in 1768. He did have letters about carriage improvements published as early as 1764, when he was 20, but his essay on springs was not published by the Royal Irish Academy until 1788.
We should also be thankful for Obadiah Elliot’s 1804 patent for mounting carriages on to elliptical springs fixed to the axle. Back in Judge Jeffreys’ time, carriages were suspended on leather braces attached to extensions of the curved frame timbers under the bodies. The resulting motion would probably have aggravated gout even more than the iron-shod wheels on potholes.
Patrick F. Wallace
Director Emeritus, National Museum of Ireland, Dublin

‘The proposal is to shorten the period for the dioceses to respond from six months to just over three months, not cut it out altogether’
Sir, The legislation to enable women to become bishops in the Church of England will need to be approved by a majority of the 44 diocesan synods before proceeding to final approval stage in the General Synod. Your report (Jan 18) says that “Synod members are to be asked to vote for a move that would cut out [diocesan] approval”, but the proposal is to shorten the period for the dioceses to respond from six months to just over three months, not cut it out altogether. My concern is that such a truncated period would make proper consideration of the revised proposals difficult, if not impossible.
David Lamming
Boxford, Suffolk

Keeping the many war graves in tip-top condition is a huge job and the Commonwealth War Graves Commission should be applauded
Sir, The Commonwealth War Graves (CWG) cemetery at Brookwood is not neglected (letter, Jan 21). It is cared for in the same way as all CWG cemeteries worldwide. The cemetery on the other side of the road that runs through the centre is a disgrace but not the military one. I have visited many CWG sites in France and Belgium, and they are places of beauty. Keeping them in good condition is a huge job, and the CWG should be commended.
Brian Dugan
Hazlemere, Bucks
Sir, My cousin, a Hurricane pilot, was shot down in France in May 1940, and it took me 68 years to find his grave. It was in a village, Chuffilly-Roche, in the Ardennes. As he crashed near by, the village refused to have him moved to a large CWG cemetery. Within days of our visit the Commission had cleaned “la tombe”. The Mayor said, “He fought for us.”
J. M. Carder
Sqn Ldr (ret’d)
Anstruther, Fife

Sir, Your military types (letters, Jan 18-23) got off lightly — their titles may have been mangled but their gender was unaffected.
Aged 12 and arriving for a piano examination I was greeted with “Oh, I was expecting a girl!”
Nicholas Eleanor
Oulston, N Yorks
Sir, Those Service chaps are lucky. When I was a patient in a military hospital, the name above my bed was not mine. I was known as “W/O”, (ie, wife of) and then my husband’s rank and name.
Sue Rigg
W/O Wg Cdr (Ret’d)
Porlock, Somerset
Sir, In the 1950s and 1960s my parents used to let caravans in Great Yarmouth in the summer and my father advertised in newspapers in the North of England. He frequently received letters addressed to:
Mr S. A. E. Please, Seaside Caravans.
Marilyn Healy
Perth
Sir, When I was a primary school teacher with a responsibility for environmental studies I received a letter addressed to “The Teacher with Responsibility for Saving the Planet”.
Elizabeth Simms
Kirkby Stephen, Cumbria
Sir, Further to “The academic who wants to autocorrect our sense of humour” (Jan 22), if I am not careful with predictive text, my signature comes out as Alien Template.
Aline Templeton
Edinburgh

Telegraph:

SIR – Much more funding is needed to support museums and galleries across Britain, but we should recognise the important role already being played by some of the larger institutions in support of the smaller. The British Museum, Tate, V&A and the National Gallery no longer see themselves as carers solely of their own collections. Frequent loans of works of art and the sharing of curatorial expertise are now commonplace, and some spectacular exhibition initiatives are spreading the cultural wealth to all quarters of Britain.
Artist Rooms, for example – a sequence of touring exhibitions drawing on the important collection of post-war and contemporary art part-gifted by Anthony d’Offay to the Tate and the National Galleries of Scotland – is now in its sixth year, so far having reached 2.4 million visitors in more than 60 museums outside the national capitals. The launch last week of Jeremy Deller’s English Magic exhibition at the William Morris Gallery (pictured) is the start of the first-ever national tour of a show originally commissioned by the British Council for the Venice Biennale.
Stephen Deuchar
Director, Art Fund
London SW7
SIR – We need a reappraisal of the funding available to support medium and small museums; the flight from local authority control to trust status merely moved the funding problem from A to B.
My trust, which opened the Museum of Carpet in 2012, the only museum devoted to the carpet trade in England, faces a black hole in 2015, and we are not alone.
Charles E Talbot
Chairman, Carpet Museum Trust
Kidderminster, Worcestershire

SIR – You report not only that patients are not receiving drugs that have been approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice), but also that many of those patients have not been informed that they should have received them.
The first duty of a doctor is to give his true opinion on diagnosis and the best treatment, taking into account the features of the individual patient. If he is constrained in giving that opinion by pressures or bans on the prescription he advocates, then he is surely negligent, unless he informs the patient of his true opinion and explains why he is unable to prescribe.
Patients do not necessarily trust the NHS. Where a doctor is prevented from giving the correct treatment by his trust, he should be required to inform a body remote from both the trust and the patient.
This principle should apply not only to drugs, but also to other treatments approved by Nice (such as surgical procedures). All that is needed is an edict from the Department of Health, and NHS trusts would soon fall into line or suffer the financial effects of being sued. This would be expensive, but at least it would be moral.
John Weston Underwood FRCS
Tregoose, Cornwall

Motorway drinking
SIR – The decision to let Wetherspoon’s sell alcohol at motorway service stations is insane. After drinking too much at a pub, you can walk home or take a taxi; you have no such choice on a motorway, where you have no choice of driving slowly either.
Drinkers won’t drink “responsibly”, especially if young and macho. When tired from driving, alcohol is a great solace and temptation. This decision will open the floodgates for other motorway outlets to secure this lucrative trade.
Wendy Buonaventura
Bristol
Roosevelt no racist
SIR – Tim Stanley writes that Theodore Roosevelt was a racist. But, famously, he was the first president to invite a black man, Booker T Washington, to dine alone with him and his young family at the White House, at huge political risk – hardly the actions of a racist in 1904.
William J Mitchell
London SW11
Watery extremes
SIR – While many parts of the South East remain under floodwater, I have just had a water meter compulsorily fitted under the Government’s water shortage measures.
Lovat Timbrell
Brighton, East Sussex
A happy electorate
SIR – Dave is looking after the toffs and the bankers, Ed is looking after the middle class, and George is looking after the low-paid. Eureka!
If we elect a Tory/Labour Coalition, we will all be better off.
John Trott
Penperlleni, Monmouthshire
Dangerous driving
SIR – Yesterday I narrowly missed a pothole in a speed bump. Is this a first?
Peter Scott
New Milton, Hampshire
Impact of migrants
SIR – It is heartening to see any politician being brave enough to speak out against the political anti-migrant consensus. There are legitimate debates to be had about the social impact of migrants, but the overall debate is distorted in Britain.
The public overestimates the number of migrants (at up to a third of the population, rather than the reality of 13 per cent), ignores the advantages they bring (cheaper products, smaller deficit and national debt, delicious food), and overestimates their costs (they don’t cause unemployment and cut wages only very slightly).
Ben Southwood
Head of Macroeconomic Policy
Adam Smith Institute
London SW1
Running away in style
SIR – I was mightily relieved to hear that the two Stonyhurst runaways had been found safely. I ran away from Stonyhurst 40 years ago, and still feel uneasy at the raw terror my parents must have suffered in the two hours before I arrived at their front door.
These recent escapees seem to have rather more panache than I could summon. They paid for their journey by credit card, whereas mine was financed by cashing in my £5 Christmas savings. They flew to the Dominican Republic, whereas I took a train to Northampton.
David Hargreaves
London SW1
Shampoo-free house
SIR – My husband has not used shampoo or any products on his full head of hair for 15 years. Apart from on my visits to the hairdresser every six weeks, neither have I. We both have normal, naturally clean and manageable hair and less clutter in the bathroom.
Jenny O’Donnell
Penwortham, Lancashire
Ferocious socks
SIR – Now that manufacturers have perfected the production of seamless shorts – witness the shudder-inducing Lycra garments worn by cyclists everywhere – could they please turn their attention to designing seamless socks? Mine saw away at my feet ferociously.
Hugh Bebb
Sunbury-on-Thames, Middlesex
Archaeological value of ancient woodland
SIR – Owen Paterson, the Environment Secretary, has proposed to “offset” the loss of ancient woodland to development by planting more trees elsewhere. The Woodland Trust rightly highlights the unique ecosystems and rare species found in such rich woodland habitats which, once lost, can never be replaced.
As archaeologists, we are concerned about the potential loss to our heritage should such proposals be entertained. Ancient woodlands, dating back to well before the use of deep ploughing, are not only an important indicator of past land use and economies, but also preserve a wealth of archaeological remains lying undisturbed beneath their protective cover.
Such immensely valuable environmental and educational resources should not be squandered in the manner suggested by the Environment Secretary.
Jo Caruth
Secretary, Rescue: The British Archaeological Trust
Hertford

SIR – Joan Bakewell says that it was “just what men did in my day” in relation to the Lord Rennard scandal. That may have been the case in the world of television, where celebrities accused of inappropriate behaviour with women were employed. It was not how men behaved in productive, responsible and well-managed industries.
I was a manager for 50 years, in both the public and private sectors; only once did I come across improper behaviour. The perpetrator was reported and dismissed under prevailing employment rules.
Brian J Singleton
Baslow, Derbyshire
SIR – Joan Bakewell suggests that women of my generation, who were working in the Sixties, were tolerant of groping because it was “just what men did”. That is not true.
Related Articles
Banned cures: the drugs you can’t get on the NHS
23 Jan 2014
London museums build a national art network
23 Jan 2014
If ever a man fondled me in the workplace, I would protest loudly to his face. I found such behaviour lacking in respect, demeaning and stressful. My friends and I knew which men were gropers, and we avoided them.
Sue Davies
Farnham, Hampshire
SIR – I agreed with every word that Joan Bakewell wrote until she invited us to think about reversing the roles of men and women: how a man would react if a woman forced her attentions on him and touched him inappropriately. I fear he would return the touching with interest.
Andrew Papworth
Billericay, Essex
SIR – Whatever the rights and wrongs regarding Lord Rennard’s case, as men and women are equal members of society, surely all men should ensure that their conduct does not cause distress to women.
They should take care to do nothing that could be interpreted as invasion of a woman’s personal space.
Valerie Crews
Beckenham, Kent
SIR – Dan Hodges (Comment, January 22) makes an excellent case for concluding that the Lib Dems are not a credible political organisation. Irrespective of the details of the Lord Rennard case, the endless fence-sitting by the party, and total absence of decisive action by Nick Clegg, all point to dithering on a grand scale. While this may be viewed as part and parcel of the democratic process, to many it just seems incompetent.
Frankie Heywood
Brentwood, Essex
SIR – Nick Clegg has failed to show leadership over the recent crisis. David Cameron does not display a better example with his excuses over welfare issues, immigration and Europe.
Compare this with Nigel Farage, the Ukip leader. There is no confusion over what he stands for. Like it or not, he shows leadership, and many respond well to this.
Philip Congdon
La Bastide d’Engras, Gard, France

Irish Times:

Sir, – Good to see that Eamon Gilmore has parsed Evangelii Gaudium with a gimlet eye and concluded that Pope Francis’s challenge to global capitalism means that even a modest embassy to the Holy See will now make a miraculously economic return.
I trust that on his next visit to Freetown to upgrade the Irish Aid office to embassy status, Mr Gilmore will remember to pack at least five dozen copies of Francis’s Exhortation for the enlightenment of all Sierra Leone’s government ministers. Time, after all, for Ireland to pick on a country her own size and with similar inequities. – Yours, etc,
EDDIE FINNEGAN,
Wightman Road,
London, England.
Sir, – Perhaps your correspondent, A Jones, (January 22nd) has a point when arguing for the establishment of embassies on the grounds of fairness in other holy cities. However, diplomatic relations between Ireland and the Vatican have surely a pre-eminent claim, as it is almost 400 years (1618) since Luke Wadding OFM, of Waterford, arrived in Rome via Lisbon and Madrid and represented the Irish cause so well in Rome that he was considered by many to be Ireland’s first ambassador to the Holy See. No doubt, Eamon Gilmore was acutely aware of the proximity of this centenary when he took the enlightened decision to re-open the Vatican embassy. – Yours, etc,
GABRIEL MARTIN,
Leinster Park,
Maynooth, Co Kildare.
Sir, – Water is a good beverage when taken in the right spirit. Minister for the Environment Phil Hogan is a must for the vacant post in the reopened Vatican embassy because he has almost performed the miracle of “walking” on water and those of us who drink it. – Yours, etc,
T McELLIGOTT,
Fortfield,
Raheen,
Limerick.
Sir, – It appears that the Government has moved quickly to create a new role for the outspoken Fr Tony Flannery by deciding to reopen the Irish Embassy to the Vatican. You report that the new embassy will be staffed by one diplomat and will be based in a “modest” office. Fr Flannery, who is already well versed in the ways of the Vatican, is clearly suitably qualified for the job. – Yours, etc,
CIARÁN FEIGHERY,
Luttrellstown Road,
Clonsilla,

Sir, – PD Doyle’s letter (January 21st) on the case of Margaretta D’Arcy in general comprises fair comment. The sole lapse is a gratuitous swipe at “her peacenik and artistic pals”. Why the ad hominem allusion?
Your correspondent moreover may erroneously envisage no further published letters from Ms D’Arcy herself. The latter leads from the front.
A final reflection. Winston Churchill pointed to courage as the first of human qualities because it guarantees all the others. – Yours, etc,
JA BARNWELL,
St Patrick’s Road, Dublin 9.
Sir, – I am dismayed by the jailing of cancer sufferer Margaretta D’Arcy, but further dismayed by the response by the artistic community. It must be remembered that she was jailed not because she is an artist, and therefore her being one is unimportant to the issue at hand. But this response strikes a deeper note. It smacks of tribalism and an implicit message that artists have special rights. And it is these same two ideas – tribalism and a special right – that must be present in the minds of those who carry out human rights abuse, many having passed through Shannon Airport on their way to Abu Ghraib or Guantánamo Bay. – Yours, etc,
DONAL Mac ERLAINE,
Synge Street, Dublin 8.
Sir, – My admiration for Margaretta D’Arcy for putting principle first and for Sabina Higgins for putting friendship first. – Yours, etc,
BARRY CASSIN,
Salmon,
Balbriggan, Co Dublin.
Sir, – The incarceration of Margaretta D’Arcy is a further stain on Ireland’s shameful abandonment of our neutrality. While US war planes transit through Shannon to commit war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan, they remain uninspected and facilitated by the Irish State. Meanwhile a 79-year-old peace activist is imprisoned for protesting this. I have stood on the roundabout at Shannon airport many Sundays with Ms D’Arcy and others demonstrating against the use of a supposed civilian airport to wage war, and while we are surrounded by gardaí there, the US military is allowed to act with impunity. Indeed it is astonishing that Margaretta D’Arcy’s actions are deemed illegal while wheelbarrows of evidence of human rights violations linked to aircraft at Shannon Airport and provided to the Garda by Shannonwatch have been ignored. – Yours, etc,
ZOE LAWLOR ,
Dooradoyle Park,
Dooradoyle,
Limerick.
Sir, – I respectfully have to disagree with Michael Anderson (January 23rd). I think the President should visit people in prison, including people who are not his friends. That would be to act “without fear or favour, affection or ill-will towards any man” or, as he adds, woman. It would also embody the ethos of the by-implication Christian God that he asks in his oath of office to “direct and sustain” him. – Yours, etc,
GRAHAM FINLAY
Inchicore Terrace North,
Inchicore,
Dublin 8.
Sir, – I am very concerned with aspects of the Public Accounts Committee inquiry relating to the CRC. The inquiry is, supposedly, independent to produce a fair and reliable (as to the truth) outcome, its procedures and the conduct of its members must reflect those aims. PAC’s job is to conduct the investigation in a quasi-judicial manner.
Yet, and alarmingly, PAC’s members are being interviewed on a daily basis by journalists and are widely quoted on TV and in newspapers. They freely express both personal and committee views, concerns and conclusions, generally laced with allegations of wrong doing against individuals called to appear before them, and long before their investigations are complete.
Is it any wonder that the notion of our TDs and Senators being capable of conducting an independent and fair inquiry has been rubbished by the courts (the Abbeylara case), and, more tellingly, by the public (the unsuccessful referendum). – Yours, etc,
ADRIAN FITZPATRICK,
Killashee,
Naas,
Co Kildare.

Sir, – The announcement that the Government is going ahead with the long overdue appointment of a regulator of charities is to be welcomed. It will be interesting to see if the position will be openly advertised, or, as in the case of the recent appointment of a new Ombudsman, will recruitment be via “expressions of interest”. – Yours, etc,
EDEL FOLEY,
Vernon Rise,
Clontarf, Dublin 3.

Sir, – In response to Robert Manson (January 22nd), the moment Tony Blair told Dr Ian Paisley that he was converting to Romanism, Blair was no longer his brother and so Dr Paisley was not out of order to refer to him as “fool”. – Yours, etc,
WILLIAM JONES DAVIES,
Cois Carraig,
Clarina Village,
Co Limerick.

Sir, – It dismays me that our shepherds have been so silent for the many years when the sins of greed and corruption have been so obvious and prevalent in our society and country.  Greed and corruption have brought about misery and suffering for great numbers of people.  Oh for Jeremiah or Isaiah to cry out and speak for the God of justice! Thank God for Pope Francis. – Yours, etc,
(Fr) CON McGILLICUDDY,
Sacred Heart Residence,
Sybil Hill Road,
Raheny,
Dublin 5.

Sir, – Garry Hynes has interesting points to make about the Arts Council’s funding of theatre in Ireland (Arts & Ideas, January 23rd). However, her specific comments on our National Theatre under the stewardship of Fiach Mac Conghail seem curiously lacking in internal logic. On the one hand, he is complimented for having brought a “measure of financial stability” to the theatre, during a period of severe cutbacks in State funding. She then goes on to criticise the effective closing of the Peacock stage and the absence of any regular national tours or performances at international venues and festivals. She also suggests that an artistic director should be appointed, in tandem with the current executive-producer position held by Mac Conghail. Meeting her criticisms would self-obviously cost a lot more money. I’m at a loss (and presumably so would be the Abbey). – Yours, etc,
AODH Ó DOMHNAILL.
Green Road,
Blackrock, Co Dublin.

Sir, – Regarding Una Mullally’s suggestion to setup a “homophobia watchdog”, (Opinion, January 20th) it would be interesting to know if she perhaps envisages a panel of self-appointed moral guardians who will be tasked with asking public figures questions along the lines of “Are you now, or have you ever been an opponent of same-sex marriage?”. – Yours, etc,
RYAN CONNOLLY,
Beechwood Road,
Ranelagh,
Dublin 6.

Sir, – I was moved and saddened by Helga Faiers’s letter (January 20th). The church of the past has a lot to answer for. It was a time when relations between the churches were at an all-time low. Resulting from the legacy of the reformation, the churches had gone their antagonistic and separate ways.
Now, however, when inter-church relations are warmer the practices around mixed marriage are much more positive. First, the question of the baptism of any children to a mixed marriage is much more nuanced. The rights and preferences of each party must be taken into account in the context of the overall good of the marriage.
Second, it is not uncommon for the minister for the non-Catholic party to be the sole officiator in his/her church with the full blessing of the Catholic authorities.
We have come a long way since the bad old days, circa 1953. – Yours, etc,
Fr EDWARD DOWNES CC,
The Presbytery,
Valleymount, Co Wicklow.

Sir, – I was intrigued by the Revenue Commissioners’ benign attitude towards those holding Vodafone shares (Business, January 21st). However, one can only sympathise with the former Eircom shareholders and wish them all the best.
Contrast this with the tremendous life-changing losses suffered by many pensioners. On the advice of the great and the good, including all governments, young adults were advised to be prudent and invest in pensions to provide for their own self-sufficiency.
Many pensioners have suffered the loss of at least two-thirds of their expected retirement nest egg. In many cases this has amounted to a small mortgage. However, these unfortunates are still taxed to the hilt on the paltry remains of their expected pensions and they have no time left to recover.
This type of attitude is hardly an encouragement to the younger generation to invest in pensions in order to be self-sufficient and look forward to a retirement without relying on the State.
Government and the pension industry need to start talking to each other and arrive at some sort of agreement that provides a little more security for investors in pensions. – Yours, etc,
PETER SEAVER,
Upper Outrath, Kilkenny.

Sir, – Barbara Ennis, principal of the all-girls (and fee-paying) Alexandra College, advocates single sex education (Education, January 21st).
Part of her justification for this segregation is her view that Irish-produced television dramas, such as Love/Hate, do not include strong female characters and we “have to look beyond our own screens to Scandinavia and New Zealand” to see women who are represented as equal to men.
Perhaps the fact that schools in Scandinavia (and perhaps New Zealand too) tend to be co-educational (and non-fee paying) is a help in this regard? – Yours, etc,
SÉ d’ALTON,
Palmerston Road,

Sir, – Surely there is a simple solution to the current controversy over pylons? Let us redesign them to make them less intrusive in the countryside. Surely it is not beyond the imagination of our engineers, architects and industrial designers to come up with a more elegant solution. We would still have the cables but it is the pylons which are ugly. Perhaps The Irish Times should run a competition? – Yours, etc,
GERRY BROUDER,
Oakley Park,
Blackrock, Co Dublin.

Sir, – I cannot believe that when talking in the Dáil about his engineer acquaintance, Enda Kenny recognised that “travel and subsistence” in the public service is de facto an income. (Miriam Lord, January 22nd). It is not even meant to cover one’s living costs as in “all found”. If diligently set by the management and an honest return is made by the claimant then no profit or loss should occur. I’m afraid that Mr Kenny just touched on another little irregularity built into our public service. Another little “perk”. – Yours, etc,
BRIAN GILLEN,
Beach Drive, Dublin 4.

Sir, – You are in a queue. Your call will be answered shortly. – Yours, etc,
MARILYNN HEARNE,
Priest’s Road,
Tramore, Co Waterford.
Sir, – Will we get a receipt? Will we f**k.
A lot done more to do. – Yours, etc,
PETER A CURTIN,
Pine Valley Grove, Dublin 16.
Sir, – I nominate “From the get-go”. – Yours, etc,
J BROSNAN,
Circular Road,
Ennis, Co Clare
Sir, – Another infuriating phrase is “Your loved ones” applied to family. It seems to suggest only your family are to be “loved”. Sometimes this is clearly not the case.
Also “You know”, used frequently during interviews. – Yours, etc,
MORNA LYNN & SONIA
KELLY ,
Cloonagh,
Westport, Co Mayo.
Sir, – Now that we know what phrases we should avoid, perhaps language will be “restored to its former glory”? – Yours, etc,
MARY DAVIES,
Beechfield Haven,
Shankill, Co Dublin.
Sir, – Callers to radio talk shows: “As I was telling your researcher . . .” – Yours, etc,
PETER McCARTHY,
Burgage Manor,
Blessington, Co Wicklow.
Sir, – In fairness, in the changing economic landscape it is very difficult to step up to the plate, put all the ducks in a row, read from the same hymnsheet and build a bridge to get over. – Yours, etc,
MOIRA CARDIFF,
Hampton Cove,
Balbriggan, Co Dublin.
Sir, – I do feel this particular correspondence has gone on quite long enough. “You know yourself”. – Yours, etc,
STANLEY BELFORD,
Merville Road,

Sir, – May I suggest Barney Curley (“Bookies take hit in ‘weapons grade coup’ on race track” World News, January 23rd) to run the Rehab Lottery Company? – Yours, etc,
KEVIN DEVITTE,
Mill Street,
Westport, Co Mayo.

Irish Independent:

* I sometimes wonder how it was that I was born, raised and educated in Ireland, yet have acquired a completely different mentality, in all issues of ethics and transparency, to those people all across the public service to whom we pander by facilitating their denial over the fact that the public has the right to know every single detail about their salaries, their pensions, their expenses and all the finer financial points of their organisations’ accounts, be it a government department, a quango, a hospital or a charity.
Also in this section
Greatest crime is the betrayal of trust
CRC pay scandal endemic of way country is run
Letters to the Editor
These organisations wouldn’t exist without the funding they receive from the Irish public and should be answerable to them.
It simply beggars belief that nearly three years after the democratic ‘revolution’ Enda Kenny and his government keep talking about, he can maintain a straight face and claim to be ‘shocked’ at recent revelations.
Can it really be true that he still hasn’t asked his officials to get a breakdown of the salary, expenses and pensions of every single charity, hospital, semi-state and quango? Every time a further revelation is made is he going to claim to be shocked?
But the real elephant in the room is that the ethos which the head of Rehab uses to justify her refusal to reveal her full remuneration stems from the top down, where the President and Taoiseach themselves refuse to verify the expenses they claim.
DESMOND FITZGERALD
CANARY WHARF, LONDON
THIS IS NO FREE MARKET
* A supposedly modern country surely adheres to the concept of the ‘free market’, where those invisible scales set a price the market can bear.
However, when that delicate balance is interfered with by those with vested interests who have the ear of the relevant ministers, we have distortion.
We now find that that overburdened ass, the tax serf, has been subsidising various other lotteries which supposedly lost out to the National Lottery.
In addition, at Rehab the State pumped in €126m between 2010 and 2012 but the CEO refuses to divulge the salary and expenses she receives.
We permit private companies to toll our roads, then make up the difference if they fail to hit the mother lode of gold. Similarly, Irish Water is guaranteed a gold flow in order to cover profits and bonuses.
Hopefully, Madam Merkel at head office and our supreme Dail in the Bundestag will call in the merchants and tell them to stop acting the clown and try and adhere to even the basics of what a free market actually entails.
JOHN CUFFE
CO MEATH
‘GRABBING IT ALL’ PARTY
* I’m thinking of setting up a new political party for the forthcoming European and local elections. It will be called GAP (Grab All Party).
We’re going to guarantee all bondholders, property developers, exorbitant bank debts, pensions, bonuses, top-ups and consultant fees.
We’re going to build a wind turbine outside Leinster House to catch that blast of wind and hot air that emanates from that national treasure.
Please wish us well in our new venture (mind the gap).
NOEL CUNNINGHAM
ADDRESS WITH EDITOR
WHAT DO WE BELIEVE IN?
* Although I agree with Ian Doherty on a number of points he makes pertaining to the First Lady of Ireland visiting an activist friend in Limerick jail, I feel his black and white argument avoids the uncomfortable grey matter in the middle.
I think we need to ask ourselves what do we believe in? I don’t have to agree with Ms D’Arcy’s activity to respect her willingness to go to prison for her beliefs.
The recent history of Ireland has seen large chunks of public money being given to the already wealthy and the Irish people are left feeling helpless and powerless in the face of this abomination.
Where we once had empathy and an inherent knowledge of right and wrong, we now have legal documents and contracts. Is it any wonder so many people in the country are suffering with mental problems?
DARREN WILLIAMS
BLACKGLEN ROAD, DUBLIN 18
IF YOU PAY PEANUTS…
* My letter, ‘Charities in witch-hunt’ (Irish Independent, January 20), has been heavily criticised in your letters section, largely due to my use of the term ‘respectable wage’ when discussing the salaries demanded by those in the non-profit sector.
My use of the term ‘respectable’, was, in my opinion, justified, when one considers that there are over 25,000 individuals in Ireland currently earning over €2,000 per week, most of whom, I imagine, are doing work of much less societal benefit then the CEOs of non-profit organisations.
I was by no means saying that all salaries in the non-profit sector are justified. But to attract the best and brightest to an industry that is in desperate need of innovation, a monetary incentive must by offered.
DARAGH MANGAN
CARRIGRUE, CO WATERFORD
CLASS OF POLITICAL DRUIDS
* Politics has always been subject to being trapped in a time-warp of power and money first and people and fairness last.
If we assume that before money was invented bartering was the human form of trade. it’s quite clear that some must have had more sheep and cattle than others, with which to influence the local political druid.
Thus if we fast track 6,000 years to present-day politics, what has changed? Nothing. Politicians pretend to be the voice of the people, especially at elections.
And the sheeple continue to give away more of their rights, as they continue to be treated like cattle fodder, by voting for the same genetic, political druids that have been in place ever since the dawn of man.
ANTHONY WOODS
ENNIS, CO CLARE
WORK IS ITS OWN REWARD
* Why do people who are already reasonably well paid also expect a bonus as a further reward? One would expect that any person doing any job would perform it to the best of their ability – this way lies job satisfaction and a degree of happiness.
However, international research has shown that when the focus of the worker is centred on the reward – which tends to happen if a bonus is on offer – rather than on the work itself, then the quality of the work actually deteriorates.
Not only that, but short-term goals come to be preferred while the greater good of the business suffers. Witness the recent bank debacles.
It is then with some dismay that I learned of recent proposals by the Government to introduce bonuses to civil servants, teachers and nurses.
Those already doing their best cannot improve, but their work may suffer if their focus shifts to the reward rather than the work, while less dedicated ones will certainly disimprove as they become even more disgruntled.
WILLIAM J SILKE
GRATTAN ROAD, CO GALWAY
GILMORE LETS TRUTH SLIP
* Eamon Gilmore tells us that reopening the Irish embassy to the Vatican is in “response to the new papacy”.
This unmistakably implies that the closing of the embassy only a couple of years ago had somehow to do with the “old papacy”, with a perceived character of the church under that leadership.
But that is precisely what was – with pathetically obvious disingenuousness – persistently denied by Mr Gilmore and others as a motive for closing the embassy at the time, when supposed economic considerations were substituted for the true motivation.
JAMES N O’SULLIVAN
KILLARNEY, CO KERRY
Irish Independent


To the Tip again

$
0
0

24 January 2014 Tip again
I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. A customs office has come aboard, will he find any smuggle? Priceless.
Go to the Tip, Co op, Post Office no boxes no Thermabloc
Scrabble today Mary wins  but gets under 400, Perhaps I will win tomorrow.

Obituary:
Avril James, who has died aged 86, was a leading London fashion model in the 1950s, working for many of the famous haute couture designers of the post-war era, including Hardy Amies and Norman Hartnell; she once earned a tabloid headline as “The girl who said No to Dior”.
Unlike most models of the day, Avril Humphries (as she was then) was a provincial working-class girl who had hauled herself out of the drudgery of a typing pool by sheer perseverance, dreaming of a career on the catwalk and bombarding London fashion houses with letters pleading for work.
She was 5ft 9in tall, slim but not skinny, with pale skin, green eyes and a 34-24-34 figure. This proved to be an ideal look, and though she had no experience, she was seized on by “Mr Michael” (the Irish designer Michael Donellan) of Lachasse in Mayfair. He styled Avril with short hair and big doe eyes, and passed on the essential tips of the modelling trade, one of which was: “Shoulders back and ‘fanny forward’” — a modelling term, she explained. “You have to makes clothes follow a line properly.” Soon she was one of the best-known faces in British fashion.
The daughter of a London fireman, Avril Humphries was born on January 7 1927 in Kilburn, north-west London, but when she was 12 the family moved to the village of Roxton in Bedfordshire.
Leaving the village school at 14, she did war work on the land with the local women, cutting sugar beet with a machete, and a year later moved to Bedford, eight miles away, to work as a shop assistant selling ribbons. At 16 she took a job in the booking office at Sandy railway station and, when she was 17, applied to join the Wrens – only to be told that she was already doing important war work.
After the war she worked in the typing pool at British Rail headquarters opposite Marylebone station, from where she wrote to Hardy Amies and Norman Hartnell asking for work. A firm in Grosvenor Square gave her a trial, but her big chance came when Lachasse in Mayfair advertised for a “house model”.
She modelled for the Queen Mother, Princess Elizabeth (as she then was), and an unsmiling Princess Margaret (“don’t talk — keep five feet away” was the instruction), who chose a white fox fur (“it did not suit her, I thought”) . The film star Zsa Zsa Gabor struggled to squeeze into a tailored suit that Avril had modelled for her, dismissing her with a filthy look.
When Donellan opened his own salon, Michael of Carlos Place, in 1952, Avril James went with him, by then being generally recognised as “his muse”. But at the age of 27 she decided to go freelance, modelling also for John Cavanagh and London Dior. At a show for Elizabeth Taylor, a diamond-draped Avril wore a dress of sparkling blue silk with a long train and an ostrich plume in her hair.
Avril Humphries often modelled for Dior in London and Dublin, and after one big show was asked to work for the fashion house in Paris. Although honoured, she was unable to go because of prior commitments. When the papers got hold of the story, her photograph appeared in one tabloid under the headline: “The girl who said ‘No’ to Dior”.
In her early 40s, she gave up modelling and took a job at G Ricordi and Co, an Italian company with an office in Chesham, which owned the copyright to the works of Verdi, Puccini, Bellini and other composers.
She eventually became assistant to the head of the firm, David Halliday, and remained for 22 years. One of her abiding memories was of visiting Ricordi’s underground vaults in Milan, touching Verdi’s death mask and handling Puccini’s autographed score of La Bohème on which, in the final passage when Mimi is dying, the composer had drawn a human skull and in the margin written the single word “tranquillo” (peace).
She retired in 1995. Reflecting on her time as a haute couture model, she remembered how she would make the best of any garment. Skinny modern models, she said, made her cringe — “bones everywhere”.
Having batted away many invitations from men, Avril Humphries married, in 1954, Anthony James, a chemist whom she supported through her modelling while he studied for his PhD. They divorced in 1984. Their son and daughter survive her.
Avril James, born January 7 1927, died December 3 2013

Guardian:

So, “Facebook could die out” (Report, 23 January). Many of us might welcome this but it’s unlikely. Two engineers, John Cannarella and Joshua Spechler, predict this on the basis of declining searches for “Facebook” in Google and link this to a disease model of how innovations spread. For Facebook, a key question relates to “network advantage” – the attractions of the service given that so many others use it. Facebook has a lot going for it here. The disease model can be questioned; it’s been popular ever since the father of research on word of mouth, Gabriel Tarde, wrote of “contagion sociale” in the 19th century. More recently, Malcolm Gladwell (in The Tipping Point) related shifts in fashion to epidemics. This inadequate account covers the way in which one convert conscripts new buyers (passes on the disease) but doesn’t deal with the way in which conversation begets more conversation among existing users and thus increases conscription. I do not think social scientists have made great progress in this field but, if engineers want to help us, they need a better model than disease.
Robert East
Kingston Business School

I’m delighted to know that David Cameron enjoyed our film (Shortcuts, G2, 21 January). However, I was surprised that Stuart Heritage completely missed the most likely reason. He lists a great many funny bits leading to the film’s climax, but he omits the penultimate revelation that Fiona’s father, the king (John Cleese), has been living in denial of his true identity – namely, that of a frog (turned prince). It is, in fact, the king’s fear of being exposed that has set in motion all the difficulties of the major characters. The cathartic moment, in which the king realises he’s OK and lovable just as he is, was wonderful for the film-makers to discover, and has been wonderful for worldwide audiences ever since (and the king doesn’t die… he merely “croaks”). Perhaps, like most of us, Mr Cameron just wishes he could be loved like that – warts and all?
By the way, I was equally surprised (and saddened) that in your “details” page regarding the film, you don’t mention any screenwriters. I would expect that an organisation so largely composed of journalists might more greatly value the contributions of fellow scribes.
David N Weiss
A Shrek 2 co-writer, Los Angeles

Jonathan Jones (A pastiche that begged to be misunderstood, G2, 22 January) mentions Allen Jones’s 1960s sculptures of women in leather bondage gear upended to represent chairs. He says that “Jones’s art … reflects the attitudes of the time”. No. It reflects the attitudes of some men at the time. Plenty of female artists were making different kinds of art then. Plenty of women thought Jones’s art dramatised deep anxiety about female power.
Michele Roberts
London
• Has Sir Nicholas invented the Serota, the triple mixed metaphor? “It marks a new chapter for Tate but is also a great springboard from which other things will grow” (Report, 21 January).
David Bernstein
London
• Jeremy Hunt’s reorganisation of care for hospital patients (Report, 23 January) – aimed at having a named consultant with an overview of the whole case, accountable for the entire in-patient care and someone who makes sure there is a proper handover to a specific GP on discharge – is just what we had when I qualified as a doctor in 1971.
Dr John Doherty
Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire
• Your article (The beautiful delusion, 24 January) has one big error. As any real United fan knows, the Premier League was won a few days earlier, May Day Monday, without kicking a ball, when their only possible challengers, Aston Villa, lost to Oldham. Alex Ferguson was not watching the game. He was playing golf and was on the 18th green when a man came over and said “Excuse me, Mr Ferguson. You are the champions.”
Michael Adams (A fan since 1945)
Woolston, Cheshire
• Keith Graham (Letters, 24 January) would appear to have had an encounter with the ghost of Flann O’Brien’s The Third Policeman.
Tom Locke
Burntisland, Fife
• With apologies to Roy Arnold (Letters, 22 January) I am delighted to report seeing a single yellow crocus in my, east-facing, front garden this lunchtime.
Rob Parrish
Starcross, Devon

You do my heart good, Seumas Milne (70 years of foreign troops? We should close the bases, 23 January). Someone has noticed they are still here, and so are we who live beyond the fences. The people of East Anglia have grown used to their neighbours, living amiably enough with them and tolerating the inconveniences that pervade daily life. The great majority of East Anglians claim to understand the need for the presence of the visiting forces, a view that perhaps fails to take into account the major changes the world has seen. The myth persists that the local economies depend on the bases despite the fact that this has not been the case for many a long year.
Very occasionally the temperature is raised, an example being in the aftermath of the Libyan bombings in 1986. The bombers that took part in that raid flew from Lakenheath, which as well as being a USAF base is an English village. The village quite reasonably felt reprisals were likely and reacted vociferously. The Americans retreated; it is now rare to find them involved in community activities. All shops in three towns and all the villages traded in both UK and US currencies. This has now stopped. The forces rely entirely on their own resources for all goods and services. Little America (or Instant Sunshine as it is known to US forces) is as distant from the locals as the US mainland. But they are digging in. Housing outside the base has been abandoned in favour of new homes safe inside. From where I stand, just this side of the border, I see no sign of a retreat.
So many people, including my late husband, Cyril, and the legendary John Bugg, spent many years trying to show how futile this presence had become. I suppose we must believe that the weapons have gone, and that RAF (one lone squadron leader) Lakenheath is now a training facility. This must be a very expensive way to fund training and the noise is not abated. I have a dream for that vast space: what a perfect place for a wind farm and a new incinerator. Now, that would benefit the local economy and allow us to listen to the Archers.
Pam Brown
Lakenheath, Suffolk
• The freeing of brownfield land on this scale and with good communications and utility services should be the catalyst for at least six new towns, with some of the social housing our people need so much. One assumes that the MoD still owns these areas – that they have not been sold to foreign owners and leased back – so development should be for the public good in many ways. So what are we waiting for? The idea could be sold to the US as a cash saving for them and might even appeal to the Republicans.
Andrew Carmichael
Preston
• Seumas Milne mentions the 1958 US-UK Mutual Defence Agreement, which facilitates the co-operation on which the UK’s nuclear weapons programme depends and was last renewed for 10 years in 2004. Co-operation is not merely one-way: the US military outsources work to the UK’s Atomic Weapons Establishment, currently operated by a consortium of Serco, Jacobs Engineering and Lockheed Martin, the latter two being US companies. There is a strong legal argument that the MDA breaches the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, which prohibits exchanges of nuclear weapons technology between states. It would be interesting to know what plans the government have to debate, announce or even celebrate the renewal of the MDA this year.
Patrick Keiller
Oxford
• Seumas Milne’s well-reasoned piece raises the issue of the sovereign base areas on Cyprus. All his arguments apply with equal force to this remnant of British imperialism in the Mediterranean. The precise role of the SBAs has long been public knowledge and the fact that they are largely concerned with gathering signals intelligence can no longer justify their retention in the 21st century, particularly in the light of recent revelations about the mass eavesdropping activities of the NSA and GCHQ. It is surely time for a public debate that could lead to their closure, a prospect that would have wide support in Cyprus.
John Berry
Bridgwater, Somerset
• There also needs to be a hard look at the Nato, that is US, nuclear armed bases across Europe, which are also part of the US global military empire. There are five nuclear armed bases in non-nuclear countries: Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Turkey. The host countries, in times of conflict, can take control of the nuclear armed planes; their pilots are trained to do this. Further, the states, including the UK, are tied into Nato’s nuclear policies which still, unbelievably, include the first use of nuclear weapons. So, effectively, not only the UK but the whole of Europe is part of the US offensive posture. As if there was not enough killing power stationed in Europe, the US is developing new, faster aircraft which could be configured for Europe – part of the Pentagon’s prompt global strike programme.
Maybe getting rid of Nato bases is “political science fiction”, as Seumas says in the Ecuadorian context. But to achieve any moves towards a more stable world, there should be questions asked in the UK and Europe on Nato: its domination by the Pentagon, its global reach and its dangerous nuclear policies.
Rae Street
Littleborough, Lancashire
• The total subservience of the UK to the US is reflected in the confidential cost-sharing agreement, signed in the 70s, that applies to all US bases and provides a multi-million pound subsidy. The bases are run as dollar economies with goods flown in that are free of customs and excise duty and VAT. US armed forces personnel pay no UK income tax, a privilege that extends to US employees of private contractors, some on six-figure salaries. There would be a concerted campaign to keep the bases open on the grounds that they generate jobs in their local areas, but the evidence is that alternative uses subsequent to base closures provide a broader range of skilled manufacturing and service jobs that more than compensates.
Steve Schofield
Bradford

One of the bastions of democracy – the right to protest – weakened (Chief constables to ask May to approve use of water cannon, 23 January). Police state grows. But there is much to protest: Commons approves gagging orders to restrict charities and unions; still 7% unemployed; government wobbly on renewable energy but keen on fracking; 10,000 US military in bases masquerading as British air bases; extreme poverty needing food banks; bedroom tax; NHS being slowly privatised; schools bedevilled by aberrant Secretary of State and bullying chief inspector; little curb on greedy CEOs and bankers; signs of negative campaigning and dirty tricks by Tories at next election; racism in some police forces over stop and search. Guardian letters are too mild a protest. It is street marches (hopefully non-violent) that catch the media and, if strong enough, could inhibit the policies of a government dominated by the rich and obsessed with free-market forces that make the rich richer and the poor poorer.
Professor Michael Bassey
Newark, Nottinghamshire
• The Acpo briefing paper for water cannon confirms two things: first, that water cannon would be useless in situations like the riots; second, that if the police do get hold of this weapon it is likely to be used against large political protests. Both are strong arguments against buying them.
The mayor has promised water cannon would only be deployed in limited circumstances, but it will be an operational matter for the Met police to decide whether to use them. But this is an indiscriminate weapon that risks injuring innocent protesters and bystanders, and ratcheting up tense situations rather than containing them. People in this country have a legal right to protest and should be able to do so without the fear that such weaponry could be used against them. The mayor must drop this idea and focus on policing by consent.
Jenny Jones
Green party group, London Assembly

Independent:

I am astonished at your ecstatic response to the school league tables and Michael Gove’s “reforms” (editorial, 24 January). Surely you are aware of the cost of these results?
Borderline English and maths pupils are targeted and subjected to intensive tutoring to obtain the desired C grade, often withdrawn from other subjects. Weaker candidates pursue easier options to achieve the desired 5 “C” grades. It is known for these subjects to be taught by teachers’ assistants in small groups.
In your bog-standard comprehensive the C grade is the focus for everyone, regardless of ability. The real meaning of education is lost. There is no time for it.
Carole Lewis, Solihull, West Midlands
It is unfortunate that in your editorial you placed such a strong emphasis on comparing the improvement in the number of students who achieved the English Baccalaureate in 2013 as against 2012.
It was not until September 2010 that the current Secretary of State introduced, as a measure of a school’s success, the notion of the English Baccalaureate. He did this with little or no prior warning and at a point when curriculum planning, staffing decisions and option choices for the 2012 examination cohort had already been made. Indeed, the 2012 GCSE cohort had already started their courses.
It is therefore no surprise that more students achieved the English Baccalaureate in 2013. For the 2013 GCSE examination cohort schools knew this was one of the minister’s chosen measures and they had the time to adjust their curriculum, option choices and staffing structures to reflect this. As a result more students, totally unsurprisingly, achieved this new measure.
Pete Crockett , Royal Wootton Bassett, Wiltshire
Your editorial praising Michael Gove left me highly bemused. I notice nothing in my daughter’s school of his work.
However, could recent success be due to the long hard work of the last Labour government on “education, education, education”? The pupils who took GCSEs in 2013 were born in 1997 and started school in 2001, two Labour landslide years. Concentration on early years, literacy and class sizes may now be paying off.
The fantastic equipment I see in my daughter’s school and investment in school buildings all came from the Labour government. My own school career coincided with Thatcher’s reign, during which my schools were never refurbished.
Success must be welcomed, but your analysis is unfortunately shallow. The reasons may be more complex.
James Dawson, London N11
Before your adulation of Michael Gove reaches ridiculous heights, there are some serious concerns, not the least of which is his profligacy with public money.
In 2011 he announced with due modesty his “Troops for Teachers” scheme. After much probing by me, and nefarious evasive tactics by the DfE, I have at last managed to find out the true cost of this venture. In all 135 service personnel are in training to become teachers at an expense of some £10m, an average of £75,000 per trainee.
In addition, a Wolverhampton free school with 20 pupils – yes, that’s right, 20 – is in line for a £1.6m extension.
Doubtless Mr Gove would label me as a “Marxist enemy of promise” but there are real concerns that ordinary schools are losing out in his ideological crusade for the few and damn the rest.
Simon G Gosden, Rayleigh,  Essex
After Rennard, bring in some rules
Of course any woman with any gumption, when faced with sexual harassment, can cope by bringing a “shoe heel smartly down on a male foot” (letter, 22 January). But why should a woman need to?
The Lib Dem lords have much better things to argue about than sexual behaviour. However a short search through the annals of political history will show that sexual behaviour has led to more political scandals and downfalls than any more useful behaviour.
So hasn’t the time come for all politicians of all parties to co-operate in developing a code of behaviour, backed by a punitive system that does not tolerate any abuse of positions of power?
April Beynon , Mumbles, Swansea
I was delighted to read my cousin Andrew Sturgis’ letter (24 January). It demonstrates that the pros and cons of the Rennard saga are not necessarily a generational problem, as some people think. Andrew is 96.
I hope he will get his grandson, Danny Alexander, to persuade his Cabinet colleagues to “get round a table” and heed his grandad’s sound, solid sense.
Robin Grey QC, London EC4
Steve Richards (22 January) seems to think that an “outdated” attitude on Chris Rennard’s part is, to some extent, the reason for his downfall. Is this an outdated attitude to women or is it to sexual harassment in the workplace?
He writes as if Chris Rennard is in his late eighties and came through the Second World War, and is now a confused old man, but he is 53 years old, plenty young enough to have learned during the 1980s and 90s that you don’t treat women in the workplace as fantasy fodder.
Lin Hawkins, Ashcott, Somerset
Contrived furore over girl abortions
Your report “The lost girls: Illegal abortion widely used by some UK ethnic groups to avoid daughters” (15 January) purports to show a higher male to female sex ratio in some ethnic groups in the UK.
However it is an assumption that this results from illegal abortion, as the census figures do not address abortion statistics. In my 25 years of medical practice in Tower Hamlets, where latterly 50 per cent of births were to women from Bangladesh and about 10 per cent from India, I only had one request for a termination of pregnancy on grounds of foetal gender. The woman was white and did not want a boy.
It is perverse to say that there is a debate about whether a woman should be given the results of a test on her own body. GMC guidance emphasises the importance of full communication with patients. The whole furore is a contrived situation by those who disapprove of abortion in general.
We accept that globally there is a problem, but the way to tackle this is to improve the status of women in society, not restrict women’s access to abortion or test results.
Wendy Savage, London N1
There is a bigger picture behind the controversy over abortion of female foetuses. Why, apart from rare cases of serious inherited illness affecting only one sex, should anyone want or need to know the sex of their unborn child?
When I was pregnant some years ago, there seemed to be no need to know the sex of the baby inside me. The unborn infant knew perfectly well who and what it was. Why should I intrude?
I wonder why we are so eager to know the sex? Is it our desire for knowledge and control in life, our unwillingness to accept uncertainties? Knowing the baby’s sex before birth means that we are constructing a gendered image of who the baby will be: at the extreme, future England footballer versus pretty little girl to buy clothes for.
Knowing the baby’s sex means you know what colour to paint the nursery – but isn’t the whole blue/pink thing a bit weird and stereotyped?
Shayne Mitchell, Cambridge
Plenty of sources for omega-3
It seems ridiculous to genetically engineer plants in order to produce omega-3 oil (report, 24 January) when plants already exist that produce it naturally.
Flax, or linseed, contains high levels of omega-3, as does rapeseed oil, hemp, walnuts and a range of other edible plants. People like me who eat a plant-based diet manage to obtain enough of this important nutrient from these sources, so why the need to grow potentially dangerous GM crops or, for that matter, eat fish which suffer and die in huge numbers?
Ben Martin, Maidstone, Kent
Poor timing by the chancellor
For many years I ran a small export-oriented knitwear manufacturing business. During this time, we saw bank base rate rise to 18 per cent and the exchange rate to $2.30 to the pound. But we survived.
As I near retirement and look to generate an income from my hard-earned savings, we are told the economy will grind to a halt if base rates rise above 0.5 per cent. Am I missing something?
Sue Holder, Aberaeron, Ceredigion
Economic crisis? Blame Canada
Canada has banned Marmite, Irn Bru and Penguin biscuits from sale.  Yet in Britain, the Bank of England is run by a Canadian and our National Lottery’s profits go to fund Canadian teachers’ pensions. Perhaps we could have our revenge by banning maple syrup?
Anthony Rodriguez, Staines, Middlesex

Times:

Successful MP mothers should explain how they have surmounted the difficulties involved when they are working many miles from home
Sir, I don’t know why four female Conservative MPs are leaving at the next election but if I was one of their constituents who had voted for them, I would feel sorely short changed (“Situations Vacant”, leader, Jan 22).
I attended the Women to Win meetings in 2005 to elect more Conservative women to Parliament and would love to have had the opportunity to be considered, but I stood aside for more experienced women. Lorraine Fullbrook MP was one of the motivational speakers, and it saddens me that with the other three female MPs, she is quitting at the next election.
I regret that I didn’t put myself forward and had I been elected would have felt honour bound to serve my constituents until or whenever they voted me out. I would not have walked away.
It does a disservice to women who may consider applying in the future by questioning their staying power and it plays into the hands of some selection committees which still believe men are a safer bet.
Susan Joyson
Weybridge
Sir, The steady loss of good women MPs is not surprising. Because men can have both children and a full-time career it is now accepted that women too can have children and a career. But this equation disregards the children, who fall into a vacuum between their parents’ careers.
The only solution is to provide a mother substitute, either a grandmother or a first-class nanny. Otherwise the children will suffer. Prospective parents must face this situation; if not, the children they voluntarily bring into the world will be neglected.
Perhaps successful MP mothers would explain how they have surmounted the difficulties involved when they are working many miles from their own homes.
Celia Batersby
Macclesfield
Sir, Regarding Lucy Fisher’s report (“Cameron to lose another female MP”, Jan 21), I would simply like to express my approval of David Cameron’s statement that there are “not nearly enough” female Tory MPs.
Being a female 15-year-old with a particular interest in politics and supporting the Conservative Party, certainly puts me in a minority in my age group. I believe there are not enough young people (especially women) interested in politics. The government should do more to make politics more appealing and understandable to younger generations.
The Conservative Party has only 49 women out of a total of 303 MPs — which is only 16 per cent. This is a shocking statistic. Although I don’t believe that any direct gender discrimination still exists, I think women should not be put off pursuing careers in politics because of the traditional view that it is a “man’s game”.
Alice Wright
Oakham, Rutland

There are qualifications and qualifications, and some are favoured more than others in an ever more competitive job market
Sir, Rosemary Bennett’s article on “men still living with parents” (Jan 22) falls just short of highlighting the main reason to why my demographic struggles in the job market: bachelors’ degrees. Those with “postgraduate qualifications” are seen as clever and more qualified than graduates with bachelors, obviously, and are, thus, more employable; “internships” focus on a vocational job or specific skills for a job and so are more employable.
I was one of the last in the bracket of Blair’s approach to education, being 18 in 2008. I am sure he was worried about the waning job market 10-15 years down the line and shoved us all into a university.
Why should I put more money into a postgrad to become employable? I need a job to fund it.
Stephen Percival
Liverpool

Healthy women going into hospital with or without their partners need to be listened to and supported in how they want their baby to be born
Sir, Many women who choose to give birth at home do so because they wish to avoid the over-medicalisation of childbirth common in our NHS hospitals today where obstetrics is still a male-dominated profession.
The headline of your report (Jan 23) — “Home births are ethical equivalent of driving without seatbelts” — reeks of scaremongering, and the article itself reveals that research into the safety or otherwise of home births is in fact inconclusive.
While the comments by Elizabeth Duff, from the NCT, in the same report are correct, Professor Savulescu and Dr de Crespigny are also right to suggest that childbirth in hospital should be more “appealing”.
There needs to be more flexibility in the medical approach to childbirth in hospitals; healthy labouring women going into hospital with or without their partners need to be listened to and supported in how they want their baby to be born. This will require a considerable injection of cash from the government for more midwives.
Our first grandchild was born at home with two midwives in attendance throughout and without any medical intervention or drugs in a very safe relaxed and loving atmosphere. Our daughter is now pregnant again and she and her husband are being well supported by their midwifery team in planning a second home birth.
Rachel Adams
Chichester

Muntjac deer are not native to the UK. They breed at all times and eat English bluebells, as well as being dangerous to dogs
Sir, Muntjac (letter, Jan 23) are the only deer species that eat our native English bluebells, which are difficult to protect. Muntjac breed at all times and are not a native species. Despite their small size they are dangerous to dogs, and I have known them rip open a dog’s underside. They are wary, and if you see one there are probably many more about. They do, however, make good eating and are best trapped in fox wires and then shot. I realise that will offend some people but I believe that we need to keep a balance so that one species does not overcome another, flora or fauna.
Julian Pilcher
Steventon, Hants
Sir, If the Independent Panel on Forestry’s recommendation to plant more trees is to succeed, the culling of muntjac and other deer is a
matter that cannot be ignored (letter Jan 23).
The effect of grazing by deer on the understory of existing trees also damages habitat vital to birds such as warblers, and the Environmental Audit Committee has recently undertaken an inquiry into preventing the spread of invasive alien species.
Some measures, ie, culling, may be unpalatable to some, but if we wish to plant more trees and prevent damage to other wildlife, some tough choices lie ahead.
Rob Yorke
Abergavenny, Monmouthsire

The high-pitched song of the goldcrest gets harder to hear as one gets older — although goldfinches and blackbirds are still audible
Sir, John Brehcist is lucky to have heard a goldcrest singing (letter, Jan 23) — its high-pitched song is hard to detect as one gets older. Last year I found that although I could see the tiny bird singing I couldn’t hear its song, which has a frequency of 7KHz and above.
Checking my hearing with an online hearing test I was alarmed to find that I couldn’t even hear 1KHz, before observing that the speakers were not switched on. However, I have heard blackbirds, song thrushes, coal tits and goldfinches this week.
Kay Bagon
Radlett, Herts

Telegraph:
SIR – Hugh Bebb suffers when the seams of his socks “saw away” at his feet. He can have the most comfortable socks in the world if he knits them himself. All he needs are 100 grams of wool and a set of four double-ended needles.
Using an auto heel and kitchener stitch for the toe graft will make smooth and warm winter socks.
Silky smooth bamboo yarn will make delightful summer socks.
Elisabeth Jordan
Gretton, Northamptonshire
SIR – Never mind seamless socks, how about larger socks for ladies? Men can choose their sock size, but we get just one size, which is hopeless if you take larger than a size 7 shoe.
Pat Tricker
Knutsford, Cheshire

SIR – Over the past several years, whenever my GP has said that I needed to see a specialist, I have not immediately been given an appointment. Instead, at some stage several weeks down the line, I have received a phone call informing me that a clinic appointment has been “arranged” on the following day. I had the choice of attending at that time or losing the appointment.
I presume that an enormous tranche of well-paid managers is required to produce the waiting-time figures.
David Stapleton
Bedford
SIR – My father recently had to cancel and rebook a hospital appointment.
Instead of sending him a single letter confirming the cancellation and new date, he received from the NHS two identical letters confirming cancellation, and two identical letters confirming the date of the new appointment. All four letters were sent separately, using first class post.
The same thing happened to my mother last week.
Debbie Stewart
Upminster, Essex
SIR – We often hear about rights, but what about responsibilities?
Patients, have a responsibility to the surgeries, clinics, hospitals and all associated medical and admin staff to attend their appointments.
Failure to attend should be added to records and used when looking at priorities for future bookings.
Mark Sorge
Bransgore, Hampshire
Scandinavian lorries
SIR – The EU is currently looking at legislation, part of which will formalise an existing agreement between some Scandinavian countries to operate “mega trucks” between their borders, as they have done for years. These kinds of trucks may be suitable for Sweden and Finland’s roads, but they are not for ours. That is why the Government has absolutely no intention of allowing HGVs of these lengths on Britain’s roads.
Stephen Hammond
Transport Minister
London SW1
Supermarket cartel
SIR – My local supermarket proudly proclaims that it compares its prices with other traders in the area. This doesn’t help me if they all put their prices up by the same amount. I thought price fixing was illegal in this country.
Tony Rogers
Reading, Berkshire.
Taboo text
SIR – Many years ago I submitted a report about a local dignitary who, in protest against the unauthorised addition of fluoride to the local water supply, “turned off her taps and opened a borehole in her garden”.
A possible libel action was avoided when I corrected the spell-checked version, which had given her garden a brothel.
Robert Vincent
Wildhern, Hampshire
Icy cold light of day
SIR – Could someone please explain to me why, unlike fridges, freezers are never fitted with a light that comes on when the door is opened?
Anthony J Burnet
East Saltoun, East Lothian
Save AS-level exams
SIR – Cambridge has, for the second time, spoken out against plans to decouple the AS-level and A-level. This is unprecedented lobbying by one of our most eminent universities and a move we wholeheartedly support.
The AS-level in its current form has done more for social mobility than the linear A-level ever did. It gives young people from all backgrounds a vital staging post on their way to A-level and it is abundantly clear that universities value it as an indication of recent and future academic achievement.
Removal of the AS will disadvantage young people, particularly as it will happen simultaneously with challenging reforms to GCSE. Those students affected will be under the pressure of uncertainty for up to four years. There will also be confusion among universities, employers and parents.
We call on the Government to reconsider its plans to remove the AS from the A-level qualification. At the very least we must delay and reconfigure changes in order to minimise confusion and potential disaster for thousands of young people.
Alice Phillips
President, Girls’ Schools Association
Ian Bauckham
President, Association of School & College Leaders
Dr Tim Hands
Chairman, the Headmasters’ and Headmistresses’ Conference
Embracing aliens
SIR – If you are a non-native grey squirrel, threatening red squirrels, broadleaved woodland and songbirds, and you get injured, Natural England will issue a licence for your release. If you are a cat driving the native Scottish wildcat to extinction, you are likely to be taken in.
A ruddy duck, looking to mate with a white-headed duck, will be hunted to extinction at a cost of £2,400 per bird. Are our priorities wrong?
Nick Forde
Trustee, SongBird Survival
London SW4
Street wise
SIR – Cambridge councillors want to remove punctuation from street names. Sandwich in Kent has a street called No Name Street. I live near a street in the Royal Arsenal called No. 1 Street. Without the full stop after No., the meaning of the name would be changed.
Robert Walters
London SE18
The irrepressibly backwards-running dog judge
SIR – Tom Raper (1816-1893) and his brother George were early cricketers and reputed to be two of the fastest runners in the country. George was so good that he was heavily handicapped in a foot race against Alfred Mynn, the 20-stone England cricketer, which the latter only just won.
Tom’s youngest son, my grandfather James, clocked up 10.2 seconds in the 100 yards, running for Darlington Harriers. Tom’s eldest son, also called George, was Britain’s greatest dog judge in Victorian times, and an inveterate sporting gambler who took wagers wherever he went.
As recorded in an obituary in Our Dogs magazine in 1919, at the end of big dog shows he would issue an open challenge: “One of his take downs is to race backwards, and many a dog man has lost his wager by taking on Irrepressible George, as he is often designated, they of course running the race forwards.”
Geoff Milburn
Glossop, Derbyshire
SIR – When retreating it is wise to keep an eye on your opponent. Running backwards helps enormously, especially in rugby, football and hockey. It was a crucial part of our training regime, increasing dexterity of foot, balance and awareness.
Alex Smith
Orford, Suffolk
SIR – Try running backwards for 30 seconds, taking note of how your body moves; then run forwards, keeping the same style. This drill demonstrates perfectly the basis of the pose method of running, designed to maximise efficiency and minimise injury.
I was taught it 15 years ago and still do the drills. I have had no injuries from running, apart from stiffness, even when I ran the London marathon. I still enjoy weekly pose training in my running group, and I am 70.
Mary Sutherland
London SE23

SIR – Once again an industry chief executive, this time from BAE Systems, recommends that Britain should stay in the EU. This time, it was not a threat to shut down operations, like that issued by the chief executive of Ford CEO recently, but merely a desire to “maintain stability”. That is not perhaps a phrase that one would associate with the present EU.
It seems that the arguments put forward by those against Britain leaving the EU (who include the three main party leaders) are just as speculative as the doom that was once forecast by similar captains of industry if Britain failed to join EMU.
David Taylor
Lymington, Hampshire
SIR – Ford warned it would reassess its presence in Britain if the country left the European Union. This highlights the crucial relationship between the EU and the United Kingdom.
It is imperative that we retain our access to the single market if we are to secure Britain’s economic future. George Osborne, the Chancellor, is right to call for reform of the EU – preserving an institution in aspic is never the best way to ensure it remains relevant – but the EU remains Britain’s largest market.
Related Articles
NHS waiting times
24 Jan 2014
If you want comfy socks, knit them yourself
24 Jan 2014
In a CBI survey, 80 per cent of British businesses said leaving the EU would harm them: we must heed Ford’s warning.
Mark Boleat
Policy Chairman, City of London Corporation
London EC2
SIR – Ford left Southampton for Turkey aided and abetted by EU cash.
Ford is selling more cars in Britain because our economy is stronger than the eurozone’s. Most car manufacturers in Britain are exporting more cars outside the eurozone, and therefore would not want to leave Britain, in which they have invested heavily in plant and employees.
A British exit would mean a free trade agreement under World Trade Organisation rules, which could be set up in days. Europe trades more with us – we have had a trade deficit since joining the EEC in 1974. Neither Germany nor France would wish to impose trade sanctions on the export of their cars to Britain.
Janice Atkinson
UK Independence Party candidate, European elections
Chislehurst, Kent
SIR – Notwithstanding Britain’s membership of the EU, Ford has been pulling out of Britain for many years.
During the Seventies, Ford employed vastly more people in Britain than today. It assembled many thousands of cars, vans and trucks. Now it assembles none. All its vehicles sold in Britain today are imported.
Against that background the statement by the chief executive of Ford of Europe that Britain’s membership (or exit) of the EU will influence the size of Ford’s presence here is unconvincing.
Frank Tomlin
Billericay, Essex

Irish Times:

Sir, – I was shocked to hear the Garda Commissioner, Martin Callinan say 10,000 fixed charge penalty points are terminated every year and this helped build a positive relationship with the public (Breaking News, January 23rd).
Surely he is missing the point? I lived in London in the 1990s and one day received a £50 on-the-spot fine and three points on my licence for what I thought was a relatively minor traffic offence. There were no discussions or excuses accepted and I paid the fine. However, I learned my lesson and I never offended again. This zero tolerance approach seems to work, with fatalities on UK roads being far fewer than in Ireland.
And isn’t that the point? It’s not just about building positive relationships, it’s about saving lives. Letting us off offences means only one thing – that we will repeat the offence because we know “someone” who will sort it out.
When gardaí issue penalty points they are doing their job and trying to stop the current carnage on our roads. Whingeing and asking them to undo their work is disrespectful, unacceptable and a crime in itself.
The biggest favour the gardaí can do for those who request their penalty points to be quashed is to say No. It’s especially hard to do knowing that at any point their decision could be undermined and overturned. The message Commissioner Callinan should drive through his organisation is: no exceptions! – Yours, etc,
MARY CLARKE
Kincora Park,
Clontarf, Dublin 3.
Sir, – It might be relevant to note a few facts regarding the allegations of corrupt cancellation of motoring offences.
1. Certain members of the Garda are entitled to cancel certain offences for due cause. 2. Only the officer receiving an allegedly corrupt payment and the person making the payment can be certain corruption took place. 3. While any one Garda officer might suspect a few offences were cancelled without proper reason, he/she can only be arguing from “the particular to the general” that widespread cancellation is happening and that the cancellations are corrupt. 4. There are established facts of motoring offences brought by the Garda before the courts which are effectively being dismissed by the courts and without even the due imposition of penalty points on the culprit’s licence. To me, this is a far greater scandal than some unproven allegations which are causing Shane Ross to become incoherent with indignation. – Yours, etc,
EAMONN PURCELL,
Albert College Lawn,
Glasnevin,
Dublin 9.
Sir, – What was “disgusting” at the meeting of the Public Accounts Committee on Thursday afternoon last was Garda Commissioner Martin Callinan’s attitude to and remarks about whistleblowers – the arrogance was terrifying and one hopes he will, indeed, “consider [his] position”. – Yours, etc,
GEOFF SPRATT,
Old Blackrock Road,

A chara, – Fintan Lane (January 23rd) suggests we should ask the”‘US war machine” to remove itself from Shannon Airport as an obvious solution to Minister for Justice Alan Shatter’s complaint that the State expended more than €17.3 million in security costs at Shannon between 2004 and 2013 because of opposition to US military presence at the airport.
€17.3 million is not the only cost to the State that has been incurred by the US military presence in Shannon. Figures from the Department of Transport in 2011 revealed €25 million had been paid over the previous 10 years to the Irish Aviation Authority to cover the costs of foreign military aircraft in Irish airspace.
The reason military flights are exempt from charges was explained by security analyst Tom Clonan ( “€10,000 per day for US military overflights has not really registered on the taxpayers’ radar”, June 25th, 2005). Ireland has a reciprocal arrangement with the US and some other countries to exempt military aircraft from charges for communication and navigation services. However, as Mr Clonan noted, “We do not enjoy much by way of reciprocity as the government jet is Ireland’s only military aircraft to enter foreign airspace”.
Austria is a neutral state and, like Ireland, a member of Nato’s Partnership for Peace. Unlike Ireland, Austria does not exempt foreign military aircraft passing through its airspace from air traffic control charges.
By so generously facilitating the use of Shannon Airport to US military aircraft, Irish taxpayers have been, effectively, subsidising the so-called “war on terror”.
People who, like Margaretta D’Arcy, have been bravely protesting at Shannon against the military use of the airport, deserve all our support. – Is mise,
MARY McCARRICK,
Treasurer, Irish Campaign
for Nuclear Disarmament,
PO Box 6327, Dublin 6.

Sir, – I have the utmost respect for John Waters, but on this occasion (Opinion, January 24th) I disagree with him. Yes, we have, as a nation, handed over an awful lot of sovereignty to others, but we still have meaningful political choices to make, and it matters whom we elect to government.
Should the TDs and senators of the Reform Alliance form an actual political party, then I would warmly welcome this. Not because I expect radical policies from them – Irish politics, since the foundation of the State, has largely been middle of the road – but because they have given me reason to trust that, if elected, they will keep their election promises. – Yours, etc,
JIM STACK,
Lismore, Co Waterford.
Sir, – Does anyone see the irony in the fact that Reform Alliance came into existence as a result of their opposition to reform? – Yours, etc,
MARTIN DOLAN,
Rochestown Avenue,
Dún Laoghaire, Co Dublin.

Sir, – The members of One Step Forward (a Limerick-based support group for the parents of children with cerebral palsy) welcome the resignations the CEO and board of directors of the Central Remedial Clinic (CRC) last month. In recent years parents of children with special needs have been repeatedly told that funding for essential equipment, including wheelchairs, adapted buggies and other mobility aids, is not available due to HSE funding cuts. Many children with special needs have to wait for up to 12 or 18 months to receive essential equipment.
At the same time, over the past year, the respite care grant has been cut; medical card applications on behalf of children with special needs have been delayed (and very often denied) and now, in recent weeks, we learn that funds raised in good faith to support the work of CRC, and to help fulfil the equipment needs of our children were, in effect, taken to pay top-ups on the already excessive salaries of senior executives of the organisation.
Despite this, the Public Accounts Committee has not made any attempt to recoup the funds which were used for top-up pensions to those concerned. According to some reports a figure in the millions has been siphoned off to pay top-ups to the salaries of CRC executives. The Public Accounts Committee knows who received these top-ups and should recoup the funds as soon as possible. As parents of the intended beneficiaries of this funding, we request that those involved return these funds without delay. – Yours, etc,
GERALDINE
MONAGHAN,
On behalf of One Step
Forward members,
Sir, – As a female candidate for Fine Gael in the upcoming local elections, I recognise the importance of addressing the gender balance in politics (“Shortage of women candidates for elections”, January 24th).
Groups such as Women for Politics have been instrumental in highlighting the barriers often encountered when entering political life. Simple measures that will make it easier for women to balance work and family commitments are crucial to changing the political culture in a country where just 15 per cent of Ireland’s TDs are women – a figure that has changed just 1 per cent in the past 20 years.
I hope the debate over equality in politics and also in the workplace will continue in your publication, the Dáil and elsewhere – and help foster an atmosphere where more women candidates seek the opportunity to stand for election in the future. Most important, however, is that voters have a selection of strong, capable candidates – no matter their gender.
The article stated that Fine Gael does not yet have any female candidates in several Dublin wards, including Stillorgan and Rathfarnham. This is not correct. I am standing for Fine Gael in the Stillorgan ward of Dún Laoghaire Rathdown County Council, while Fine Gael is also running female candidates in Dundrum (ex-INO President Madeline Spiers), in Glencullen (Aileen Eglinton) and Rathfarnham (Anne-Marie Dermody). – Yours, etc,
JOSEPHA MADIGAN,
Stillorgan Ward
Female Candidate

Sir, – Whether Frank Flannery billed the Rehab charity in 2011 and 2012 using a company that was dissolved in January 2009 is beside the point (Home News, January 23rd). Surely the issue that should be addressed is the propriety of a board director appointed to a non-remunerative position having a beneficial interest in the charity’s business. – Yours, etc,
JOSEPH DOYLE,
Smithstown,
Thomastown, Co Kilkenny.

Sir, – The dead hand of inactivity, which is frequently adopted by public servants unable to make a decision. – Yours, etc,
JOE TIERNAN,
Deerpark Road,
Castleknock, Dublin 15.
Sir, – Glass half full or half empty? (Preview of This Weekend Irish Times, January 24th). – Yours, etc,
PATRICIA O KEEFFE,
Sycamore Avenue,
Kingswood Heights,
Dublin 24.
Sir, – The grammatically incorrect use of the word “presently”. . .
“Presently” describes something will happen shortly eg “he will be along presently” whereas it is habitually used incorrectly as in “talks are ongoing presently” to describe something which is happening currently or at present.
“Rant over!” which come to think of it is another PWCLW. – Yours, etc,
KIERAN McHUGH,
Woodcliff,
Howth, Dublin 13.

Sir, – Credit and commiserations to Hilary Wakeman for lexical research on limited resources (January 23rd), but I’m afraid I must vent my habitually annoying floccinaucinihilipilificatiousness. I trust the editorial word mint will not find my logomachistic coinage semantically counterfeit. – Yours, etc,
D FLINTER,
Castleview Estate,
Headford,

Sir, – Eamonn McCann (Opinion, January 23d) in his exploration of the nebulous status of the Vatican/Holy See, neglected to mention another oddity. Why doesn’t the Vatican (or is it the Holy See), a sovereign state, represented at the United Nations, have a football team?
After all, other European micro-states – Liechtenstein, the Faroe Islands, Andorra, and San Marino (like the Vatican City, also surrounded by Italian territory) – have international football teams. Sure, it only has a population of circa 800 from which to select a team, and the “granny rule” might prove to be a problem (or would it?), but that could be offset by its network of clergy worldwide and judicious use of FIFA’s residency rules. And we know that it has had some good players in the past; Pope John Paul II was known to have been handy between the sticks. His successor, Benedict XVI is a Bayern Munich supporter, and the current pope, Francis, like all Argentinians, is football mad.
Apparently the Vatican is one of seven sovereign states who are not full FIFA members. Another is Monaco, against whom the Vatican fielded a team twice, in 2001 and 2011, losing both. But were they “internationals”? – Yours, etc,
TOMMY GRAHAM,
Editor, History Ireland,
Palmerston Place, Dublin 7.

A chara, – I refer to Martyn Turner’s cartoon “The Seven Wages of Man-agement” (Opinion January 17th) and OECD figures quoted by Noel Mc Bride (Letters, January 17th) which put average pay in Ireland at just over €50,000 a year, an average arrived at from a wide range of pay.
While differences in pay reflect different responsibilities at work, there is less justification for such wide differences in pensions. Increased life expectancy is also changing the ratio between years at work and years in retirement, to the detriment of the public purse. To paraphrase De Valera’s “No man is worth more than a thousand a year”, if public pensions were capped at €1,000 a week, it would equal average pay in Ireland, not bad for no work responsibilities at all. – Is mise,
ÉILIS Ní ANLUAIN-QUILL,
An Pháirc Thiar,
Bré,

A chara, – As I entered the doorway going to Mass last Sunday I was accosted by two people pushing Fine Gael election literature for the May elections. Talk about Christmas ads in September.
I beg politicians and their supporters of all parties, and of none, please refrain from all forms of canvassing until at least May 1st, and I beg all forms of media to refrain from reporting any such canvassing until the same date.
Am I alone in thinking that canvassing inside the church doors in January for elections not due until May, is a bit much? – Is mise,
SEAN O KIERSEY,
Kill Abbey,
Deansgrange,
Blackrock, Co Dublin.

Irish Independent:
* In the grand tradition of our republican ideals as a nation the scandal of “top-ups” is currently being vented and, as ever, there is more heat than light. The sense of being shocked and horrified that is being voiced in the media and in the public sphere in general will be, I am afraid, subject to Mary Harney’s shrewd encomium that “the people have short memories”.
Also in this section
We fund the salaries, so we have a right to know
Greatest crime is the betrayal of trust
CRC pay scandal endemic of way country is run
The same shock and horror was expressed at the publication of the many reports dealing with child abuse scandals, and mental reservations, and the consequences for the role of the church in the public sector were negligible.
There was shock and horror that we had to bail out the banks and the bondholders; but we were told that now that we own the banks things would be different and there would be caps on salaries and bonuses. As we have seen, the cap has been thrown to the wind, while the banks remain bullish and conveniently forget how badly they managed their own debt.
The shock and awe that we all felt at the bailout, the bank crash, the economic downturn and the austerity Budgets and the general lack of accountability brought about the “democratic revolution” whereby a new broom would sweep clean. And the result was . . . austerity Budgets and a general lack of accountability because things had to remain the same and the rhetoric of our democratic revolutionaries was contextualised in the phrase “that’s what you tend to do in elections”.
So, here we are again, as shock and horror is expressed at the top-ups of charity, hospital and HSE bosses, not to mention the €50m spent on consultants by Irish Water, and the refusal of the CEO of Rehab to reveal her salary. My guess is that when she does so, we will be – yes, you guessed it – shocked and horrified.
So in the spirit of cooling down the heat, dispensing with shock and horror, and perhaps injecting some light, can I make a suggestion for the future?
Any institution that is in receipt of state funding should have a salary cap by law. The joke that people should collect for charity to pay top-ups for inefficient CEOs and board members is no longer funny.
Any monies received, from whatever source, above this cap should be taxed at 95pc. This would apply across the board to all semi-private agencies, universities, charities, semi-state bodies, and semi-nationalised banks – any system in receipt of public money. Any agency that did not like this could just stop taking state money in any form.
I can already hear the squeals of outrage and would respond with the following: if it is unconstitutional let it be tested in the courts; and if found to be unconstitutional, let it be put to a referendum and make it constitutional.
This would ensure that the shock and horror response would be replaced by a sense of social and civic responsibility; it would also ensure that perhaps, just perhaps, the tiny seeds of a real democratic revolution would begin to emerge.
DR EUGENE O’BRIEN
MARY IMMACULATE COLLEGE, LIMERICK
THUMBS UP TO ‘AMBER’
* What a wonderfully thought-provoking and sad ending to ‘Amber’. I admit to being critical of some of the quality of the drama over the first three nights, but the extremely clever ending, which has the whole nation talking, made up for any negative criticisms one might have.
It really brought home the reality to us all, how devastating it would be, if a loved one went missing forever with no closure.
Congratulations to all involved.
BRIAN MCDEVITT
GLENTIES, CO DONEGAL
GIVE GEORGE THE HOOK
* As a Connacht supporter and season ticket holder I take serious issue with George Hook’s article that Connacht now deserve to have the plug pulled.
I was in Hendon last Saturday and it was not pretty, but to get to Dublin and read this made my blood boil.
Ireland has won two Grand Slams, 10 Triple Crowns, and never reached the last eight in the World Cup. Maybe we are giving all the money to the wrong team.
We are a small enclave and I say the only country with historical and identifiable regions so it’s disband all or none.
PAT LYNCH
ROS CAOIN, GALWAY
ZERO TOLERANCE
* I spoke with a retired, eminent solicitor a number of weeks ago regarding another despicable attack on an elderly person in our community. His reply really made me think. He said there was no surer sign of failure of a government than when people are afraid in their own homes.
The five-second news blitz and useless politicians offering condemnation will pass until the next atrocity.
Criminals with scores of previous convictions are released time and time again.
The system in our country is protecting the criminal, not the victims.
This is the view of 99pc of the decent law-abiding population. As usual the public are miles ahead of the politicians.
With elections coming up, why can’t someone have the guts to stand on a platform of zero tolerance towards thuggish behaviour.
There should be mandatory sentencing with five years for a first offence, 10 years for a second, and 20 for a third with no remission.
New York mayor Rudy Giuliani turned one of the most violent cities in America around with a zero tolerance policy.
We need a new party to crush the cowards and put them where they belong – behind bars for a very long time.
PETER MONAHAN
DROGHEDA, CO MEATH
PRO BONO
* Was Bono’s attendance at the World Economic Forum in Davos done on a pro-bono basis?
JOHN BELLEW
DUNLEER, CO LOUTH
HEAD IN CLOUDS
* Kay Noonan writes, (Letters, January 22) that there must be another world after this life?
The only part of us that lives after death is our genes which we pass on to the next generation. We humans reproduce exactly like our four-legged cousins, the ones that we kill and hang up in butchers’ shops and eat for Sunday lunch.
There was life on earth billions of years before man stood up on his hind legs, and who then went on to invent God, or gods.
God exists not in heaven but in the mind of man; the near-death experience that some have is nothing more than a chemical reaction in the brain.
And those who claim to predict the future are hoaxers who make lots of money from the gullibility of the unwary, of which there are so many.
Millions of people have been persuaded by hoaxers with fertile minds that a conspiracy existed in relation to the JFK shooting but to this day not one of those smart people has been able to produce one scrap of evidence to back their case.
And they’ve been flogging this particular dead horse now for more than 50 years.
I’m not at all surprised that religion has such a strong hold on the masses. They need to believe. There’s a craving to believe, even to believe the unbelievable.
PADDY O’BRIEN
BALBRIGGAN, CO DUBLIN
Irish Independent


Drain

$
0
0

26 January 2014 Drain

I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. Apertwee is taking Johnson out on the town on Johnson’s money. Priceless.

Drain man comes unblocked but will have to get it fixed permanently and ring Yorkshire Water Monday no boxes no Thermabloc

Scrabbletoday Iwinbut gets under 400, Perhaps Mary will win tomorrow.

 

Obituary:

Brian Dowling, who has died aged 87, was a monocled roisterer and journalist who worked alongside Picture Post photographer Bert Hardy.

While Hardy captured many evocative images of 1950s Britain, Dowling chose the subjects, arranged poses and researched locations. And it was Dowling who, with his eye for pretty girls, arranged Hardy’s celebrated “Blackpool Belles” photograph. Later Dowling became a publicist with the Rank Organisation and a pioneering public relations man in the City, known as much for his wry conviviality as for any strict devotion to commerce.

Frank Brian Dowling was born on June 14 1926 at Bromley, Kent. His father, also Frank, was an originator of newspaper cartoon strips who edited the monthly humour magazine Lilliput and later had a brief stint running Picture Post.

Dowling the younger, who had started teaching himself Greek at the age of nine, was educated at Tonbridge and won a scholarship to Christ’s College, Cambridge. He joined the RAF as a Cambridge cadet pilot in 1944, showing aptitude for flying his Tiger Moth upside down.

Being held in place only by a couple of shoulder straps lent “an added frisson to inverted formation flying”. Posted to a camp in Torquay, the cadets befriended Devonian girls, or as Dowling put it, “there was evidence that the groundsheet, a bulky item in the kit we had to carry, had its uses”.

At the end of war in Europe, Dowling remustered to personnel selection and found himself at Sallufa in Egypt’s Suez Canal Zone. It was there that, for the only time in his RAF career, he scented a whiff of cordite – on a crocodile shoot during which he and his unit expended hundreds of rounds. Not one crocodile was punctured.

Dowling returned to university, but was rusticated from Christ’s for declaiming Aeschylus from the clock tower at two in the morning. He had achieved a First in Classics in the initial part of his Tripos but left Cambridge with a Third in Moral Sciences. There were, he declared, “only two degrees worth having – an effortless First and an effortless Third, and I got ’em both”.

His first job, acquired through nepotism, was as a staff reporter on Picture Post, the mass circulation photojournalism magazine which employed writers such as MacDonald Hastings, Fyfe Robertson and JB Priestley. Office minnow Dowling was assigned to animal stories. When a baby elephant visited the library of the Royal Geographical Society, Dowling’s headline and caption ran: “Dumbo meets the Fellows – a day one elephant will never forget”. His superiors were rather impressed.

The first duty of a Picture Post writer was to support his photographer, and Dowling became the “blunt nib” of Bert Hardy. The camera maestro warmed to his raffish young colleague, and the two covered the port harvest in the Douro, ship launches in Liverpool, the night scenes of Paris’s red-light area Pigalle, and the streets around Piccadilly in fogbound London. That essay caught an essence of post-war London and won Hardy the Encyclopaedia Britannica prize in 1953. Dowling’s substantial contribution to the project went unheralded.

Dowling left Fleet Street in 1957 to write a television documentary series, The Way We Live, for a subsidiary of the Rank Organisation. His arrival coincided with an assertion, from Rank’s domineering chairman John Davis, that television was the enemy and that documentaries were a waste of money. This did not stop Rank two years later buying a stake in Southern Television and starting a documentary series called Look at Life.

Dowling’s sardonic manner niggled Davis, as did his habit of always wearing a carnation buttonhole (a habit Davis liked to consider his own). Dowling’s sartorial flair – occasional tweeds, brass-buttoned waistcoats, a pipe and even a monocle – made the cigar-chewing Davis twitch with irritation. Dowling found an ally in Theo Cowan, Rank’s chief publicist and creator of the Rank charm school. Cowan gave Dowling a job in publicity, where among other things he organised Pinewood Studios’ 25th birthday party. He became a drinking buddy of Rank stars such as Dirk Bogarde, Donald Sinden, Peter Finch and Stanley Baker — but Cowan, perhaps advisedly, kept Dowling away from Rank’s starlets.

Within two years Dowling was head of Rank’s public and press relations. But there were no tall poppies in the Rank Group’s London headquarters – Davis would hack them down before they could become a threat. By 1963 the chairman was sending Dowling memos typed in capital letters to express his extreme disagreement on certain matters. At a monthly meeting of executives, Davis barked: “The trouble with you, Dowling, is you’re too much of a gentleman.” He followed this the next day by remarking: “Your time is short.”

When Davis complained about Dowling smoking his “infernal” pipe at a divisional board meeting, his target responded by attending the next such meeting with a lit Monte Cristo No 5 – the very type of Havana that Davis smoked. Aware that his Rank career was near its demise, Dowling resigned. Davis was enraged: he liked to sack people.

Dowling set up on his own, becoming one of the first City corporate relations consultants. His clients included Kleinwort Benson (which he advised for 30 years), Scandinavian Bank and the Banque Nationale de Paris. Friends were never convinced that he was a capitalist. Dowling was certainly appalled (yet fascinated) when, standing at the bar of the Garrick club one evening in 1969, he fell into conversation with Judge Melford Stevenson. Dowling inquired: “Had a good day?” Stevenson, who had just sentenced the Kray brothers, took a drag on his gin and mixed and replied: “I’ll say so. Those bastards only spoke two words of truth in the whole trial. One was that their defending counsel was a slob. The other was that I was totally biased against them.”

Dowling never wore a wristwatch and never drove a car, though for some years after leaving the RAF he continued to fly Tiger Moths as a reservist. He wore a black or brown Coke hat to town and a Panama in benign weather. In middle age he turned from croquet to real tennis, playing at Lord’s with his Savile club friend Sir Ralph Richardson. His preferred breakfast tipple, after a night on the toot, was a half bottle of champagne.

On a trip to Australia he once spent the morning flying over Sydney harbour in a Tiger Moth, took an afternoon sail in a Hobart racer and spent the evening watching The Marriage of Figaro at the Opera House – all, he was happy to say, at clients’ expense. Though his career had been closely linked with advertising, he grew to hate its consumerist ethos, to the point that he refused to watch commercial television. Well into his 80s, while riding on his tricycle, he was run over by a bus. His words of fury at the bus driver were said to have left some of the female passengers in a state of advanced shock.

Dowling served on the council of Counsel and Care for the Elderly for more than 30 years, also acting as the charity’s deputy chairman and chairman.

He married his wife Eileen, a former searchlight operator in the London Blitz, in 1951. She predeceased him, and he is survived by their three children.

Brian Dowling, born June 14 1926, died December 31 2013

 

 

Guardian:

 

 

Will Hutton is right to identify economic inequality as the cause of so many societal ills (“We are scared to face the real issue – it’s all about inequality“, Comment). Our sluggish, low-pay economy, high levels of poverty, the housing crisis, our obesity epidemic and welfare bill are all driven by the UK’s extraordinary levels of inequality. More importantly, he is also right that this is an issue that needs to be addressed publicly.

Politicians on all sides have looked at the problems of low wages at the bottom and excessive pay at the top, but few have been prepared to tie the two together. This reluctance to talk honestly and openly about inequality helps no one. Voters of all persuasions are increasingly concerned at the huge gap between the rich and the rest. In fact, the last British Social Attitudes survey found over 80% felt the income gap was too large and nearly seven in 10 believed it was the role of government to reduce income differences between the rich and poor.

Duncan Exley

The Equality Trust

London SE1

Will Hutton makes some valid points in his analysis of inequality but fails to provide any solution other than suggesting that politicians must rebuild the institutions they have so carelessly trashed. To confront inequality head on, we need to reform a tax system that punishes effort and enterprise but rewards unproductive speculation and unearned income. We need to ease the crippling burden of taxes on wages, purchases and buildings and instead collect the unimproved site value of land. At the very least, this reform would encourage the development of vacant and underused sites for the thousands of new houses urgently required to provide a basic human need. Collecting land location value would also be a fair way to redistribute wealth and start to redress inequality.

Michael J Hawes

Newark-on-Trent

Nottinghamshire

How does any government start to put growing inequality into reverse? One answer is to reverse the decisions in the 1980s to deregulate lending, abolish rent controls and allow the free flow of cash in and out of the UK. The result is a chaotic housing market sucking billions of personal income away from the shops, building and maintaining infrastructure and from investment in companies that create jobs. International speculation in UK land and homes is forcing house prices and rents upwards. Meanwhile, landlords, who treated housing benefit like a cash cow for decades, continue to profit from a housing market in short supply while the poorest tenants are punished with three caps on the housing benefit.

High rents, now unpaid by housing benefit, are enforced against the tenants’ incomes, which were entirely available for food, utilities, transport and clothes up to April 2013; since then, council tax, plus court and bailiff costs has begun to wreak havoc in the tenants’ lives. Reversing inequality requires statutory minimum incomes in work and unemployment, after rent and council tax have been paid, to be enough to ensure a healthy life, and to diminish the billions paid by taxpayers to the NHS to treat poverty-related physical and mental ill health, and to the schools to cope with poverty-related educational underachievement.

The Reverend Paul Nicolson

Taxpayers Against Poverty

London N17

Labour at least needs to accept the implications of Will Hutton’s article, spelling out so clearly the economic damage of the diabolical rush to extreme inequality. For a long time, the moral and social implications have been pretty obvious, underlined in 2009 by the publication of Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett’s The Spirit Level . That was opposed by many including Kristian Niemietz of the Institute of Economic Affairs, who speculated: “The next big battle for a free society will be fought against the new anti-wealth egalitarianism.”

David Charles-Edwards

Rugby

Warwickshire

 

The article “Mariana Popa was killed working as a prostitute. Are the police to blame?“, News) is a turning point in getting senior officers such as Chris Armitt to admit that criminalisation puts women at risk: “It would be good to allow a small group of women to work together, otherwise… they are working away from other human support.” It has taken 40 years of campaigning to get this truth out. From the trial of Peter Sutcliffe, who murdered 13 women, many of them sex workers, to the Ipswich murders in 2006, we have complained that the police hound rather than protect sex workers.

Ms Popa was Romanian. The 2012 police raids in Mayfair targeted Thai and Romanian women, the swoops in Harrow Roma brothels. The Soho raids last December, under the guise of freeing trafficking victims, dragged handcuffed eastern European mothers in their underwear on to the streets.

Is it surprising, then, if violent men target a woman such as Mariana Popa? Yes, the police are to blame. And so are feminist politicians, who lead calls for further criminalisation. Having refused to listen to sex workers, will they listen to Chris Armitt?

Niki Adams

English Collective of Prostitutes

London NW5

My report, Shadow City, found that police received £500m to tackle trafficking prior to the Olympics. They found no more trafficking cases than the year before – four – but did raid a huge number of brothels. This meant sex workers were displaced and became more vulnerable to violence. The laws on prostitution need to change. Until they do, we need to change dramatically how we police sex workers.

Andrew Boff

Conservative Londonwide Assembly member, leader of GLA Conservatives

London SE1

Don’t ruin another London gem

The threat of “development” to the Cork Street area of London’s West End is cultural vandalism (“Art galleries forced out of historic London home“, News). The proposed plans will probably go a long way to ruining the character of an area that attracts tourists to galleries that show a wide range of artworks. Many tenants will be forced to move by high rents and it will lose much of the atmosphere that made it attractive in the first place.

Shirley Hughes

London W11

Have a little grace, Mr Kureishi

Hanif Kureishi states in Robert McCrum’s fascinating article about him that after the publication of The Buddha of Suburbia he was “a little overwhelmed at the number of cheques that turned up at my council flat” (“Every 10 years you become someone else“, New Review). Hanif was not in a council flat but a flat provided for him by the W14 Housing Co-operative (of which I was then chairman) on the grounds that he was near broke and close to eviction. Now it’s my turn to be “overwhelmed” to read he was knee-deep in cheques at the time. The W14 Co-operative in those days had its own drama group, which encouraged him to put on one of his earliest plays, The King and Me, about Elvis Presley and the experiences of accompanying me while I canvassed for the Labour party on the Fulham council estates. One man I remember told us to stay at the door as his dog was trained to go for “coolies”. It must certainly have inspired his later film London Kills Me. It would be nice if for once in his many press interviews Hanif acknowledged the help he obtained from the Co-op in that crucial period of his career.

Colin Lovelace (Dr)

Anglet

France

Frightening face of fracking

In the excellent article by Paul Stevens (“Fracking has conquered America. Here’s why it can’t happen in Britain“, In Focus), the answer to “Is it bad for the environment?” uses the words “providing the process is well regulated”. There are no regulations in place that deal with the fracking part of the total process. The new Office of Unconventional Gas and Oil has no staff with any engineering expertise.

All the indications are that the government has no intention of dealing with these issues. Lancashire county council, the planning authority for fracking, has to find savings of £300m. Council tax from fracking is estimated at £1.7m. Policing costs for Salford already exceed £300,000. Fracking has been done once in the UK – at Preese Hall in Fylde. The returned water has between 1.4 and nine times the level of radioactivity permitted. There are processes for removing this radioactivity. Such treatment is likely to be costly.

Mike Turner

CEng FIMMM

Lytham St Annes

Give us a fair cop

You note the extreme rarity on screen of strong female characters such as Saga Noren driving fast cars (“The car’s the star in Nordic noir as fans elevate The Bridge‘s Porsche to cult status“, News). Equally innovative is the mix of serial-killer suspense and humour, although Noren does not mean to bemuse her conventionally less direct colleagues. With most humour, on and off screen, still performed by men, we await a confident female cop who does irony and jokes.

Joseph Palley

Richmond

Surrey

 

Up until, say, the age of 10, if we were going anywhere special, my father would part my hair for me, in a small ritual that gave me pleasure. He would take the comb, wetted with water by my mother, who would flick it first to dry it a little, the drops making a tiny spatter on the terracotta tiles of the kitchen floor. He would stand above me, so much bigger than I was then, and comb my hair, scraping it across the scalp to either side of my head, so that I could feel the points of the comb, but not hard enough to hurt. The sensation, and his brief concentration on me, always gave me an intense physical pleasure.

My favourite part was a ritual within the ritual. “Is my parting straight?” I would ask. “It’s as crooked as a dog’s hind leg,” my father would say, scraping a straighter line – always the mathematician – across the left side of my scalp from back to front. I would get a tiny Mexican wave of goose pimples. Then my father would say, “Bah!” in dismissal of further effort, put the comb down and sometimes walk away, the steel segs on his heels clicking on the tiled floor.

My mother’s notation on the back of this snapshot, taken half a century ago, tells me the scene is at Sleights, on the Yorkshire coast. We would be on an outing from Whitby, perennial favourite for our summer holiday.

I wear a child’s parody of a man’s suit, short trousers reaching almost to the bony cups of my knees, the tweedy jacket with its lumpy leather buttons like miniature conkers. Like one of the Bash Street Kids, my socks rumple down towards my sandals, while at the other end, my outstretched left arm rests along the top bar of the gate, as I wear NHS Milky Bar Kid glasses and a serious expression. My hair is pasted flat as polish, and I remember now the pleasure of the familiar ritual with my father.

I look pleasingly ridiculous, a child clothed and coiffed from a different era, but the pleasure of that ritual haunts me like a tiny, friendly ghost, and I wish I had the magic to conjure it into being.

Michael A Young

 

 

Independent:

 

 

 

Times:

 

Women’s body clocks set off the alarm bells in men

CAMILLA CAVENDISH misses the male perspective completely in her article “Women’s body clocks are ticking but it’s men who dare not check the time” (Comment, last week). Most men would tell you — if they dared — that it’s much less a case of their not wanting to “take responsibility” and “shoulder more of the parenting” than of not wanting to see their sex lives go up the Swanee, possibly for years to come, after child No 1.

Sadly or otherwise, most men’s libidos remain the same when they become fathers. Also overlooked is the fact that many men are wary about having children because they see other men faring badly in the family courts.
Nic Penrake, London

Arrested development
Cavendish’s article resonated with me. I am 32 this year, have a successful career, own a flat and have a busy social life. People are shocked when I say I would love to settle down and start a family — but it’s what we were put on the planet to do. My career gives me a focus in the absence of having a man in my life but I’m certainly not a power-hungry businesswoman.

I recently had to finish a six-month relationship with a 35-year-old man because he refused to grow up. We were great together, and I thought I’d found Mr Right, but he didn’t want to settle down. I gave him an ultimatum and he chose to run. Men are holding us back from being able to have babies.
Name withheld, London E3

Absent fathers
Could it be that men are reluctant to become fathers because they know that if the relationship finishes they’ll probably end up estranged from their children, considering the family courts’ tendency to give custody to mothers on a more or less automatic basis? Or that an unmarried father has no parental rights unless the child’s (unmarried) mother includes him on the birth certificate, which she isn’t obliged to do?

Any man entering fatherhood today runs the risk of having his children taken from him by a system that still encourages women to see children as their personal property, and men as little more than sperm banks and cash dispensers.

Perhaps if the law encouraged women to see parenthood as entering into a long-term, equal partnership, more men would  take part.
Paul Stephens, Bath

Apron strings attached
I don’t think it is surprising that men are as selfish as women in wanting their own agenda. Today it is hard enough to get men out of their mothers’ grasp, with those aged between 30 and 40 still living at home, getting their laundry done and their food provided while hardly ever doing the washing-up. How can modern women compete with all those things?
Ian Tinn, Slough, Berkshire

Celebrities not to blame for our lack of faith in politics

DAVID BLUNKETT is rather shrill in the article “Celebrity cynics ‘put young off politics’” (News, last week). There are deeper reasons why people of all ages abandon politics: the adversarial nature of exchanges in Westminster; the proliferation of (unelected) special advisers who shamelessly spin to party advantage; MPs’ expenses and pensions perks; and the fact that our political masters rarely use state education or public services.
Andrew Cobb, Bath

Vote of no confidence
Blunkett is typical of the out-of-touch and arrogant thinking of our political class. He may blame a fall in numbers among young voters on the cynical views of the likes of Russell Brand and Will Self, but he needs to lay the blame a little nearer to home.
Steve Whyley, York

Self unaware
So the self-publicists Brand and Self are putting young people off politics? Really?As the parent of two — both of voting age — I can tell you that they view Brand as an unfunny poseur and they don’t know who Self is. The lacklustre efforts of political parties to engage young people is to blame. Accusing “celebrities” insults the intelligence of young people.
Gerald Hope, Glasgow

State schools reap rewards of middle-class pupils

ANTHONY SELDON has overlooked one important fact in recommending that middle-class parents above a certain income should pay for state schooling (“Head wants £20,000 state school fees”, News, last week). It is to a large extent the presence of middle- class children in state schools and the involvement of their parents that has driven up standards in some areas.

A better way to raise funds for state education and to tackle the stalling social mobility is to impose a hefty tax on private schools. The money raised could be used to train and employ more teachers and to bring down class sizes in state schools.
Marianna Wells, Twickenham, London

Tax returns
Seldon believes that wealthier parents should pay for their children to attend some state schools. I have good news for him. The UK has an apparatus in place that forces the better-off to pay more for education, irrespective of where their children are educated, and that also allows the poorest families to pay nothing. It’s called income tax.
David Solomon, St Albans, Hertfordshire

Human life before wildlife

WHAT option is open to food producers other than intensification when the majority of the population has been screaming for cheap food (“Goodbye birds. Goodbye butterflies. Hello . . . farmageddon”, Focus, last week)? If animals and crops were reared and grown traditionally there would not be enough food for the growing population and it would be too expensive. It is sad that butterflies and bees have declined in numbers but it is human beings versus wildlife.
Doreen Kettlewell, Bicester, Oxfordshire

Hedge fund
Isabel Oakeshott cannot have visited East Yorkshire. In the past 15 years many miles of hedges and thousands of trees have been planted. In fact, planning permission is needed to remove a hedge. My farm has many hedges, some new but mostly old. A Royal Society for the Protection of Birds survey identified more than 50 avian species. As for intensive farming, small-scale is not viable unless for a niche market. Food at a low cost is all that matters to most people.
Fred Henley, Seaton Ross, East Yorkshire

Food for thought on sugar and diets

READERS might be forgiven for thinking sugar had replaced the saturated fat/ cholesterol duo as the greatest threat to health since the Black Death (“Sugar watchdog works for Coca-Cola”, News, last week). The lack of consensus in the scientific community contributes to public confusion over what constitutes a healthy diet.

What sugar does, especially in large amounts, is to predispose body organs to store rather than to burn fat. The effects of sugar on fat storage are mediated in part by stimulation of insulin release from the pancreas and partly by conversion of sugar into a chemical within body cells that prevents the entry of fat into mitochondria, those parts of the cell responsible for removal of fat by oxidation to produce energy. These mechanisms reinforce each other to enhance fat storage.

The extent to which these processes occur may be attenuated by slow intake of dietary calories. The leisurely consumption of meals is partly a cultural issue and may partly explain the beneficial effects of a so-called Mediterranean diet.

As AA Gill pointed out in his article “My 10 rules for surviving the hungry games”, (News Review, January 12), maybe the relationship between diet and health concerns not so much what you eat but how you eat it.
Geoffrey Gibbons, Emeritus Professor of Human Metabolism, University of Oxford

Unhealthy option
Atticus reports (last week) that “drastic measures” are being adopted in relation to the size of MPs and peers, with sugary snacks being removed from vending machines. It seems these are to be replaced with dried fruits (up to 75% sugars), nuts (up to 75% fats), seeds (up to 50% fats) and fruit juices (up to 18% sugars). Is this more political fudge?
Charles Quekett, Clynderwen, Pembrokeshire

Points

NHS expansion
Dr David Carruthers writes that he and his colleagues in the NHS have noticed the increasing waistlines of patients (“Growing fat on culture of instant gratification”, Letters, January 12). What I have found more noticeable is the obesity of many nurses. Peter Wareham, Coventry

Israel and beyond
Ari Shavit’s article on the state of Israel (“Young, sexy and encircled by threat”, News Review, last week) featured a picture of two young Israeli women. It is worth reflecting that the same faces can be found in Lebanon and across the Arab world. Young, highly educated people who have the same aspirations, love the same food and music and want the same positive future as the Israelis described. Sadly for both Israel and its neighbours the future is being defined by a mixture of religious zeal, failed revolutions and the old and unattractive politicians who have dominated the region.
Anthony Dell, Tunbridge Wells, Kent

Thatcher in brief
Tanya Gold accuses Meryl Streep of being susceptible to professional dishonesty for her screen portrayal of Margaret Thatcher in The Iron Lady as “nice” and says that “possibly her only redeeming feature was her reluctance to be liked” (“The truth gets trampled in Hollywood’s red carpet stampede”, Speakeasy, January 12). I briefed the prime minister during the Falklands War on a number of occasions. In spite of all the pressures on her she probed anything that appeared flaky, and was calm and courteous, always thanking and encouraging people of whatever rank for their efforts.
David Brice, Retired Commodore, Royal Navy

Legacy of abuse 
I read with pain and regret your compassionate article “20 private schools face ruinous child sex abuse claims” (News, January 12). My now deceased husband was abused by his choirmaster/Cub Scout leader for many years and at the time was not believed, even by his devout mother. This wonderful man was a good father and gentle, kind and loving husband. He suffered for almost 79 years.
Elise Page, Billingshurst, West Sussex

Corrections and clarifications

Our article “How I Made It: Jonathan Short, founder of ECO plastics” (Business, December 15) stated incorrectly that the company ECO Plastics made a profit of £7m in 2012. ECO Plastics made a loss that year. We apologise for the mistake.

Birthdays

Anita Baker, singer, 56; Ellen DeGeneres, comedian, 56; Scott Glenn, actor, 73; Kim Hughes, cricketer, 60; Joan Leslie, actress, 89; Jose Mourinho, football manager, 51; Anders Fogh Rasmussen, secretary-general of Nato, 61; Andrew Ridgeley, singer, 51; David Strathairn, actor, 65; Eddie Van Halen, musician, 59

Anniversaries

1871 Rugby Football Union founded; 1885 Charles Gordon, governor-general of Sudan, killed by rebels in Khartoum; 1908 Britain’s first Scout troop registers, in Glasgow; 1950 India becomes a republic; 1982 UK unemployment tops 3m for first time since 1930s; 2001 earthquake in Gujarat, India, kills 20,000

 

Telegraph:

 

SIR – Joseph Mallord William Turner is another artist whose paintings can be dated by forensic astronomy techniques, as a number of them include the Sun, Moon and other heavenly bodies, most notably his Moonlight, a Study at Millbank.

In that painting he included Jupiter as well as the full moon. This has enabled me to determine that it was painted at 8.35pm GMT on August 19 1796, from a point nearly opposite to the present Battersea Power Station.

Mark Edwards
Binley Woods, Warwickshire

 

SIR – We need to be told why the Church Commissioners have decided to move the Bishop of Bath and Wells to an alternative house outside Wells at considerable expense.

How many of the Church Commissioners know Wells and, if they do, how did they come to this extraordinary, and perverse, decision which has no obvious merit?

The Bishop’s Palace, with surrounding gardens and moat, are a unique part of our national heritage, and should never become, collectively, an ancient monument.

Can this most unfortunate decision be reversed before it is too late?

Lt Col Richard Jackson
Sherborne, Dorset

Apostrophe Street

SIR – Cambridge City Council’s decision to abolish apostrophes on street signs is disingenuous and unnecessary. Contrary to its claims, there is no Whitehall diktat demanding the abolition of the English apostrophe.

The National Land and Property Gazetteer, overseen by local government, does not force councils to remove them either. Councils can continue to use apostrophes and punctuation as part of the official street name.

Numerous Acts of Parliament have required the consent of local people before a street name could be changed. For example, extant legislation from 1907 clearly states that councils cannot change a formal street name without the consent of two thirds of the street’s ratepayers.

If an apostrophe is good enough for Her Majesty’s Government, so should it be for Cambridge City Council.

I would encourage residents to defend their traditional street names.

Eric Pickles MP (Con)
Secretary of State for Communities
London SW1

Cooked crime figures

SIR – Crime, in the areas measured, is clearly falling. Most police forces now produce accurate crime figures. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary has been chasing this for the past three years, and forces are inspected in great detail to ensure their figures are accurate. The situation is now very much better.

What I find somewhat ironic is that the senior retired police officers who are now saying the public cannot trust the figures are the very police officers who were in charge when some forces, including theirs, were not providing accurate figures.

Anthony Stansfeld

Police and Crime Commissioner for the Thames Valley

Kidlington, Oxfordshire

Cocktails for cows

SIR – Some years ago I typed a research paper on mastitis in cows. The spell checker decided a better option would be martinis.

Lynne Rogers

Woodley, Berkshire

SIR – My mother is hard of hearing, and usually has the television subtitles activated. On New Year’s Eve, the BBC was explaining that Big Ben was the name of the bell housed in St Stephen’s tower.

It had recently, in honour of the Queen’s Jubilee, the subtitles said, been renamed Elizabeth Taylor. So Big Ben, more correctly called Elizabeth Taylor, they said, would chime in the New Year.

Greg Morris
London SE4

American way of death

SIR – The execution of Edgar Tamayo in Texas (telegraph.co.uk, January 23) took place despite calls for delay, from both John Kerry, the American secretary of state, and the Mexican government, because of potential irregularities at the time of his arrest. The world has witnessed yet another inhumane execution to which we would not subject even our pets.

Earlier in the week, you reported that “pharmaceutical companies which oppose the death penalty have stopped producing the necessary chemicals for lethal injections, making it increasingly hard to source the required drugs”.

With the drugs that he was given, Edgar Tamayo took 18 minutes to die; Dennis McGuire in Ohio last week took 26 minutes and was gasping and snorting as he died.

These acts are a crime against humanity and amount to torture. The governors of both Texas and Ohio should be indicted and sent for trial at the International Criminal Court in The Hague.

Lt Col Richard King-Evans
Hambye, Manche, France

Naming Zara’s baby

SIR – I thought Mia was a combination of Mi from Mike and the final a from Zara.

Felicity Thomson
Symington, Ayrshire

Smoother socks

SIR – With regard to the query about seamless socks, my advice would be to wear ordinary socks inside out; this is sensible advice we give for preventing foot ulcers in diabetics.

Dr David Evans
Oakford, Ceredigion

Frozen light

SIR – Anthony J Burnet asks why freezers don’t have lights. My Electrolux chest freezer has a light; the freezer part of my fridge freezer does not. I have no explanation.

R J Russell
Denver, Norfolk

SIR – Our freezer has a light that comes on when the door is opened. However, its usefulness is questionable because when the freezer is fully loaded, the light only illuminates items at the front of the unit, leaving everything else in darkness.

Bill Hollowell
Orton, Cambridgeshire

Inaccuracies in the film ‘Zulu’ keep on coming

SIR – Perhaps the soldier who had the most successful post-Zulu War career was Colour Sergeant Frank Bourne. But his portrayal in Zulu by Nigel Green was unrealistic.

The real Frank Bourne, known as “The Kid”, was born in 1854, enlisted in 1872, and was promoted to colour sergeant after just six years. Rorke’s Drift was his first action. Therefore, he would not have been entitled to wear the Abyssinian medal or the African General Service medal as worn by Nigel Green in the film. Neither was Bourne a tall man: he was only 5ft 6in.

He was awarded the Distinguished Conduct Medal for his actions at Rorke’s Drift, was commissioned in 1890 and retired to the Reserve in 1907. Bourne volunteered for service in 1914, and in 1918 was awarded the OBE and granted the rank of honorary lieutenant colonel.

All those awarded the Victoria Cross deserved them. The defence of Rorke’s Drift may have been a cul-de-sac in the Zulu War, but the bravery shown must be considered separately from the illegality of the Zulu War itself.

I have always felt that, had Zulu portrayed the characters as they actually were, it would have been a better film.

Dr John Black
Bristol

SIR – Will Heaven lists Zulu’s inaccuracies. At the time of the battle, the regiment was still English (the 2nd Warwickshires). Two years later the regiment, which was based in Brecon, became Welsh. Half of the company in the battle was English, largely from Birmingham and the West Country. The regimental song was not Men of Harlech but The Warwickshire Lad.

Ian Dodd
Craven Arms, Shropshire

SIR – Last year I was told my medical data would be sharedthroughout the NHS unless I opted out. Concerned about the data’s accuracy, I asked to see a copy, even digitally.

The reply was that I should make an official request on a WMG form (whatever that is). If my request was accepted, and if I paid £10, I could call into the surgery to inspect the data. Any copies would be charged at 50p a page up to a maximum of £50.

I decided it was easier to opt out.

John Curran
Bristol

SIR – The Government’s Troubled Families programme (established in 2012, after the 2011 summer riots) can also use NHS patient data.

“Troubled families are those that have problems and cause problems to the community around them, putting high costs on the public sector,” it says. This is a highly politicised and contentious definition, ill-defined and not fixed.

The Troubled Families programme means that information about patients is not only shared across the health and care system – other departments within local authorities and their external partners are also participants.

Further, each local authority works with the Troubled Families team, based in the Department for Communities and Local Government, and other government departments (to have access, for example, to benefit records).

There is an urgent need, therefore, for more clarity on the information-sharing arrangements for the Troubled Families programme.

Dr Alex May
Manchester

SIR – I recently had a semi-emergency in which no fewer than six different NHS operatives all had to ask exactly the same questions about my history (ambulance crew, A&E reception staff, on-duty doctor, ward sister, and on transfer to another hospital). This was because they had no access to my records or could not locate my notes.

So the more there are joined-up NHS patient records, the more efficient patient care will become.

Lyndon Yorke
Booker Common, Buckinghamshire

SIR – As a long-term patient of St Thomas’s and Guy’s hospitals, I was invited last week to sign up to their scheme to allow access for research purposes to the various bits and pieces they have removed from me over the years.

However, I was disappointed to learn that the scheme would not allow their collaborating with other hospitals where I have been a patient, such as the Royal Marsden. Likewise, Guy’s could not have access to any material of mine stored at the Royal Marsden.

John Reber
Farnborough, Kent

 

 

 

Irish Times:

Irish Independent:

 

Madam – Whether one agrees with her views or actions, I think Margaretta D’Arcy deserves credit for having the courage to go to jail for a cause she believes in. There aren’t too many people who would consciously choose prison over freedom. Her situation reminds me of a scene in the film Airplane, where all sorts of suspicious looking characters, including some carrying machine-guns and grenades, are allowed to board a plane by the security men, who then proceed to wrestle an unarmed frail elderly lady to the floor to “frisk” her.

Also in this section

The more things in this country change . . .

We fund the salaries, so we have a right to know

Greatest crime is the betrayal of trust

The analogy is all the more apt given the cause Margaretta was espousing.

Responding to a Dail question on her jailing, Justice Minister Alan Shatter declared, “Nobody is above the rule of law.”

If Margaretta had been well in with the elite wheelers and dealers who wrecked the country and laid waste to our economy she’d have been far less likely to spend even an hour behind bars.

No prison food for the jokers who know how to play the legal system to evade justice or for those who came perilously close to wiping Ireland Inc off the face of the Earth.

It will be a long time before you see any of those high- fliers doing time.

But Margaretta had to be jailed. God Almighty, sure society needs to be protected from a 79-year-old woman who suffers from cancer and Parkinson’s when she breaks the law. Life as we know it might come to an end in Ireland; crumble to dust, if rebellious pensioners were not reined in. Thus it was that Margaretta had to face the full rigour of the law and pay her debt to society.

‘Justice is blind’ goes the old adage, and everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. Methinks she might be only blind in one eye.

John Fitzgerald,

Callan, Co Kilkenny

Tell grumpy gran to throw a party

Madam – Re: your recent prize-winning letter about the woman of 80 who says she is in hell, I’d like to ask that woman, does she ever look at the television, at the pictures in war-torn countries of very elderly men and women, carrying all their worldly goods in a little bit of cloth, heading God knows where and to what. To think that a woman has a husband and seven children and numerous grandchildren and she has to pass days without speaking to anyone is ludicrous. To say that they don’t speak to her is nonsense. How else do they have access to her money? It has never been a better time to be 80 in Ireland. I know, because I am also 80, as are all my friends. There are so many groups to join and activities to share, but this woman sounds very grumpy and spoilt.

Tell her to have a party. Invite all her family. Tell her to put a smile on her face and a peg on her tongue, and they will all have a great day.

Name and address with Editor

MOTHER WREAKED EMOTIONAL HAVOC

Madam – My mother is in her 70s now and is a self-obsessed, manipulative bully, who over the years has wreaked emotional and psychological havoc on her family. Her “children” (now in our 40s) have decided to go down the route of ‘no contact’ to protect ourselves and our families from her evil.

It both annoys and upsets me to hear people say “but she’s your mother…”.I would give anything to have a close, loving relationship with my mother. Having tried and tried, I know now that this will never happen. She will never change, so I am the one who must make changes in my life to protect myself.

So to you whose life is sheer hell at 80 I say, “you made your bed, now lie on it”.

Name and address with Editor

‘ADOPTING’ LONELY

ELDERLY PEOPLE

Madam – What a sad letter from the lady of 80 who is not in touch with her family. I am sure the country is full of lonely neglected people. Maybe this woman and people like her can be adopted by others. Nursing homes which cost over €1,000 a week are full of elders that could be in their own homes. My father died in 1971. Everyone minded the old and the young then. Not anymore. Kids are in creches, elders are in homes, I am waiting for the backlash.

Name and address with Editor

SEARCHING FOR A SURROGATE GRAN

Madam – I was really saddened by the old lady whose letter featured here on January 12.

I am a 38-year-old woman, married with two little girls.

I was blessed enough to have fantastic grandparents, especially two grandmothers whom I adored and really miss.

I have no relationship with my parents but my mother-in-law and father-in-law are special, loving people in my life.

Mad as this might sound, I really miss my grandmothers and have often longed for a sort of “adopted” grandmother! I have often thought of contacting ALONE to inquire about visiting someone but as often happens with the best intentions, I never followed through.

Name and address with Editor

OLD AGE DOESN’T MEAN USELESS

Madam – I am a 66-year-old, retired teacher. Months ago I volunteered for three different organisations, which I shall not name. I have not heard from two of them.

The third wrote to me recently to say they had no position to offer. I had applied for an admin post advertised at the time in their organisation. There was no mention of it, strangely, as if it had not existed. Long delays in dealing with volunteering opportunities seem to be the rule, for some reason. The unemployed and retired must wonder what is one to do to feel useful.

I understand there are issues such as garda vetting (it seems to take forever), but there must be a better way to utilise members of society who want to contribute. Old age need not mean useless.

Michael Power,

Castleknock, Dublin 15

Joe Citizen’s view ignored

Madam – Gene Kerrigan’s insightful article (Sunday Independent, January 12, 2014) explains how our politicians have developed a soothing public language of deception that is concealing what he calls a rotten system.

The article clearly explains why we no longer have what we traditionally called ‘political parties’ that work for the good of the people.

Instead of Fine Gael, Fianna Fail and the Labour Party they have all become the ‘party of big business’ with a perpetual veto over public policy and the wishes of the average citizen.

The purpose of government in Ireland and across the global western world is to keep wealthy people happy – to create the optimum conditions for them to make maximum profits when times are good and mop up their debts when the economy goes pear-shaped.

The great seduction for the public is the eternal hope that when the economy is working well there will be a trickle-down effect for everyone.

What we fail to realise is that economic growth, austerity, abject poverty and large-scale unemployment are all currently working hand in glove together across Europe and the globe. There will be no trickle-down effect. Irish people are beginning to discover that the will of the people is the last thing on the minds of this Government as well as on the last government.

This begs the question: who do you think you are fooling? It may be some of the Irish people some of the time, but it will no longer be all the people all the time.

Geraldine Mooney Simmie,

Faculty of Education and Health Sciences,

University of Limerick

KERRIGAN, AGAIN, HITS NAIL ON HEAD

Madam – Gene Kerrigan’s article, ‘Elites making a killing at expense of State’ (Sunday Independent, January 19, 2014), is one of the best ever printed in the Sunday Independent and a good reminder of why the paper keeps its appeal.

More, please.

Christian Morris,

Howth, Dublin 13

BERATING SUICIDAL ISN’T VERY HELPFUL

Madam – I do agree that we need a more informed debate on suicide but John Masterson’s article in last week’s paper on the subject won’t help, in my opinion.

He expressed the view that suicide was not so prevalent in the past and that our current more “compassionate” attitude has an unexpected side-effect – making suicide more acceptable. He also seemed to think that Donal Walsh had part of the answer.

In the past many suicides were covered up both by the family and the State, due to the horrific stigma that came with it. So we don’t know the true figures from the past.

It’s possible that there is a little truth to what he says about they removal of the sin and crime element causing an increase but he’s not seriously suggesting we go back to those days, is he? Is it better that people are living in terrible pain rather than being dead? Isn’t that the point Marie Fleming was trying to make? Serious mental illness can be every bit as bad as a serious, painful, life-threatening physical illness. The big difference is the pain can’t be seen.

We are far from having a compassionate attitude to people who are suicidal. The widespread approval of the comments made by Donal Walsh about “these people who choose to take their own life” displays a lack of real understanding towards suicidal people. He seemed to think that suicidal people chose suicide even though there is effective help available. I am not blaming Donal Walsh. He was expressing the anger and lack of understanding of many people.

Ninety per cent of people who commit suicide are mentally ill. The current view that people commit suicide because of common problems like bullying or financial issues isn’t true. Many mentally ill people have trouble seeking help because they feel it’s a weakness. Yet most do seek help when their situation becomes distressing.

Telling off the mentally ill or making suicide a crime or a sin isn’t going to help.

Mary McDonnell,

Youghal, Co Cork

DONAL IGNITED SUICIDE DEBATE

Madam – According to Sean Cassidy in ‘Disagreeing with Donal on suicide,’ (Letters, Sunday Independent, January 19, 2014) “there was an inference that those who battle depression and succumb to suicide do so out of choice,” in Donal Walsh’s message.

I have re-read Donal Walsh’s letter which initially brought him to national prominence and it is obvious from that letter he is speaking primarily about young people who take their lives. To quote: “yet still I hear of young people committing suicide and I’m sorry but it makes me feel nothing but anger. I feel angry that these people chose to take their lives, to ruin their families and to leave behind a mess that no one can clean up”. On re-watching the Saturday Night Show the same message comes across.

Donal Walsh spoke of an anger he felt. This was not meant in any way as a judgment on someone who takes their own life.

He was simply verbalising a feeling. I myself experience anger when I hear of people taking their lives. Despite this anger, I have the utmost empathy for people who take this tragic step.

Donal did use the word “chose” but he also stated: “I have nothing against people with mental illness.”

It’s unfortunate that Mr Cassidy feels as he does about Donal Walsh’s message but Donal started a conversation on this topic and has brought it much-needed attention. In fact it could be argued that he was the catalyst for other people speaking out. A conversation that was started by a boy dying way before his time enables Mr Cassidy and others to bring attention to this area.

Thomas Roddy,

Galway

CUT PUB PRICES TO WOO BACK YOUTH

Madam – I wish to let Padraig Cribben, Chief of the Vintners’ Federation of Ireland, (Letters, Sunday Independent January 19, 2014) know the main reason why young people are not going to the pubs anymore.

May I say a big percentage of our young are responsible people and avail of the cheap drink for sale in supermarkets and go straight to the nightclubs. There is a reason for everything. They feel they are not getting value in the pubs and are probably right. Take down your prices, Mr Cribben and young people might start going to the pub again.

Even for myself I also feel the value is not there anymore. Value is everything today.

Christy Martin,

Mullingar, Co Westmeath

‘TOP CAT’ ROSS SLAYS FAT CATS

Madam – I felt in praise of Shane Ross and his wonderful work on the Public Accounts Committee, I had to compare him to an old cartoon character I used to watch as a child: “Shane Ross is Top Cat, the indisputable leader of the gang. He can trap all the rats on the board of CRC,

and send shivers down the spines of several more. He’s the boss, he’s the pip, He’s the championship, He’s the most tip top… Top Cat.”

Colette Lavelle,

Westport,Co Mayo

GAY PRIEST HAS NOTHING TO FEAR

Madam – I don’t get it, I just don’t get it. Your correspondent, Carol Hunt, quotes a so-called gay priest as saying: “I live in constant fear of being found out or being outed.”

Now, if he’s a priest he has taken vows of chastity and celibacy. If he is faithful to his vows then he is not engaging in any form of sexual activity, so what is there to find out?

Thomas Martin,

Clondalkin, Dublin 22

LYRIC DUO ISN’T MUSIC TO OUR EARS

Madam – Recent letters about Lyric FM complain about the amount of talking in many of the programmes.

I agree, and the problem is getting worse. The main culprits, I would suggest, are Gaybo and Lorcan Murray, with the former mixing inane comments, delivered in an inane voice, with a few interesting items and some good jazz.

We enjoy Lorcan to an extent, but not the tedious emails and texts from listeners who appear to believe that we care about what they are doing (sipping cold wine as the husband mows the lawns on his ride-on mower) while they listen. Not all is bad however – presenters such as Liz Nolan and Niall Carroll, to mention but two, are always worth listening to.

Phil Baker,

Celbridge, Co Kildare

SICK OF BAD PRESS ABOUT ‘THE WEZZ’

Madam – Thank you, Julia Molony, for your article commending ‘The Wezz’, (Sunday Independent, January 12, 2014). I am so sick of the bad press this place seems to attract. A number of my nieces and nephews have frequented ‘The Wezz’ over the years and loved it. It’s a rite of passage for teenagers this side of the city, as are similar venues all over the country. My sisters and brothers have dropped their kids off there and waited for them outside and have never seen anything suspect.

In fact, they have always found the security spot on. My brother-in-law one night decided to get petrol in the garage across the road and texted his daughter to meet him there. One of the bouncers insisted on accompanying her until she was safely in her father’s car. Two of my nieces attend ‘Back to Wezz’ every year and love meeting up with old friends.

If the girls are dangling their underwear there like bracelets, which I highly doubt – no one I know has ever actually seen such a spectacle – then they’re doing it all over the country.

The teenagers in Wezz are no different to their counterparts nationwide. I have nieces and nephews in Dublin and in Cork and they are all the exact same – lovely, caring, conscientious young people.

Frances Browner,

Greystones, Co Wicklow

Irish Independent

 


Drained

$
0
0

27 January 2014 Drained

I go all the way around the park listening to the Navy Lark. Our heroes are in trouble, again. A Wren offices inspects the wardroom and it just will not do, Pertwee offers to refurbish, at a price!

Drain still unblocked but will have to get it fixed permanently and ring Yorkshire Water Monday no boxes no Thermabloc

Scrabbletoday Marywins but gets under 400, Perhaps Iwill win tomorrow.

 

Obituary:

Sir Nicholas Browne, who has died aged 66, made his mark as a diplomat in the difficult arena of Iran, where he served twice as chargé d’affaires, then as Ambassador (from 1999 to 2002); he was also the author of a highly influential internal report investigating why Britain had failed to anticipate the fall of the Shah in 1979.

When the Shah was toppled by supporters of the 77-year-old Shia cleric Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in January 1979, Western governments were taken by surprise, and the then Foreign Secretary, David Owen, commissioned a Foreign and Commonwealth Office report on British policy towards Iran in the years leading up to the revolution. How, he wanted to know, had Britain failed to predict the event; and might a different policy have saved the regime?

The task was given to the then 33-year-old Nicholas Browne, who had served in the Tehran embassy for four years in the early 1970s and was now on loan to the Cabinet Office. He spent the next year preparing his 90-page report, which was labelled “secret and confidential” and only released 30 years later.

Browne did not pull his punches as he described the “failure” of the British embassy in Tehran: “The conclusion that the embassy drew from their analysis [of the Shah’s position] consistently proved to be too optimistic.” It had “overstated the personal popularity of the Shah… knew too little about the activities of Khomeini’s followers… saw no need to report on the financial activities of leading Iranians… [and] failed to foresee that the pace of events would become so fast”.

He also singled out for criticism Sir Anthony Parsons, Ambassador to Iran from 1974 to 1979, saying that he had been woefully uninformed: he did not know that the Shah was terminally ill with cancer, and had not sufficiently pursued contacts with opposition groups (in particular, supporters of Khomeini). Consequently he had “underestimated the attractions of [Khomeini’s] simple and consistent message that the Shah must be overthrown”. Parsons later accepted that he had been at fault.

It is possible that the embassy had been inhibited by Britain’s reputation for interference in Iranian affairs — a reputation which Browne acknowledged in his report. It dated back to at least 1953, when Iran’s elected Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh was overthrown in a coup in which many Iranians suspected the American and British intelligence services of having been involved.

In the course of his work Browne trawled through thousands of diplomatic cables, and concluded that British policy in Iran had been anything but sophisticated — according to one diplomat who read the report: “More often than not, the sense you get is that it was the Shah who was running rings round the British, not the other way round.”

More to the point, however, was Browne’s suggestion that British policy in the 1970s had been driven by economic problems which encouraged export sales – particularly arms – to the Iranians. So anxious was London to court the Shah that diplomats showed him the draft of a ministerial answer in the House of Commons on torture in Iran “in case he should object to it”.

It was, Browne said, only four months before the Shah fell and fled into exile that Parsons spoke to him frankly about the political dangers he faced. Browne observed: “By then, most of the damage had been done.”

His report has proved highly influential, and has been studied by a generation of diplomats posted to the Middle East. They are now expected to extend their contacts beyond the elites to include both the wider society and opposition movements, and to be aware of the dangers in allowing potential arms exports to drive policy at the expense of crucial political judgments.

Browne’s experience of Iran had begun with his posting as Third Secretary in Tehran from 1971 to 1974. He would return there in 1989, nearly a decade after submitting his report. His arrival, however, coincided with the furore over Salman’s Rushdie’s novel The Satanic Verses (1988), which provoked angry protests across the Islamic world. Ayatollah Khomeini was quoted as offering a $1 million reward to anyone who killed Rushdie — the reward to be tripled if the killer was Iranian — and in February 1989 thousands of demonstrators gathered to throw stones at the British Embassy.

Browne was in place for only five weeks before Tehran broke off diplomatic relations, and ties between the two countries were restored only in October the following year, by which time Browne was beginning a four-year posting as Counsellor (Press and Public Affairs) in Washington, and head of British Information Services in New York.

Relations between Britain and Iran improved after the election in 1997 of the reformist President Mohammad Khatami; and when Labour came to power under Tony Blair, his Foreign Secretary Robin Cook embarked on a policy of “constructive engagement” with countries such as Iran and Libya.

Browne was appointed chargé d’affaires in Tehran in 1997, after a spell as head of the Middle East Department in London. By now steeped in the history and culture of Iran, he formed a good relationship with Khatami, who once remarked that Browne spoke Persian “like a nightingale”. Two years later, following the New York agreement between Robin Cook and the Iranian Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi which resolved the Salman Rushdie issue, diplomatic relations were upgraded and Browne became Ambassador.

He trod a difficult path with characteristic aplomb, in 2000 having to deal with Iranian accusations that Britain was harbouring an anti-regime terrorist group, while for their part the British raised concerns about Iran’s human rights record and its uncompromising attitude to Israel.

There were also complaints by the Iranians about what they saw as unflattering comments in the British press about Ayatollah Khomeini — comments for which Browne expressed his regret.

But there were also areas of progress: Iran agreed to disavow the fatwa against Salman Rushdie; the foreign minister, Kamal Kharazi, visited Britain; and the two countries signed an agreement on limiting drug trafficking. After 9/11 Browne was instrumental in forging a serious dialogue with Iran over Afghanistan, the high point of Western/Iranian cooperation.

Browne’s exit from Tehran after four years, however, saw a revival of old tensions. His chosen successor, David (now Sir David) Reddaway, was rejected by the Iranians, who claimed that he was a “spy”. The Foreign Office refused to budge, and there was a stand-off of several months before London appointed Sir Richard Dalton, formerly Ambassador in Libya.

By now Browne was suffering from the early stages of Parkinson’s disease. He spent a year as Senior Director (Civil) at the Royal College of Defence Studies, and ended his career as Ambassador to Denmark (2003–06).

He was appointed CMG in 1999 and KBE in 2002.

One of four boys, Nicholas Walker Browne was born at West Malling, Kent, on December 17 1947; his father was an Army officer and worked for the Intelligence services.

From Cheltenham College, Nicholas won an open scholarship to University College, Oxford, where he read History and captained the college rugby team — despite being 6ft 2in tall, he proved a deft hooker, able to get the ball back from seemingly impossible positions. He joined the Foreign Office immediately after graduating.

Throughout his career Browne was noted for the succinctness of his dispatches. He was also popular with his colleagues, who relished his keen wit, sense of humour and love of parties.

Among his other postings, he served as First Secretary and Head of Chancery in Salisbury (now Harare) in 1980–81, and, from 1984 to 1989, as First Secretary (Environment) at the British embassy to the EU in Brussels.

Nicholas Browne married, in 1969, Diana Aldwinckle, whom he met when they were fellow undergraduates at Oxford and with whom he had two sons and two daughters; one of his sons, Jeremy Browne, is Lib Dem MP for Taunton Deane and served as a junior minister in the FCO under William Hague.

Sir Nicholas Browne, born December 17 1947, died January 13 2014

Guardian:

 

Your editorial (Federation bitter, 20 January) rightly describes the findings of the independent review of the Police Federation as “devastating”. However, it underestimates just how radical – and necessary – the recommended reforms are.

You ask if using the service of former Home Office permanent secretary David Normington was “ineptitude or proof that the federation was willing to change”. We knew when we asked Normington to carry out the review that he would deliver an in-depth report and would not be frightened to come up with radical solutions. That is what is needed if we are to deliver root-and-branch change across the organisation, however uncomfortable that may be. We have a responsibility to our members and the public to take up the reform challenge.

We are at a turning point in our history. Instead of operating as 47 separate organisations, we need to act as one. Our structure, which has barely changed since 1919, must be comprehensively reformed. Our operations must be professionalised, with a proper executive team and finance director, and strengthened financial accountability. And we must once more embody the highest standards and greatest of integrity. This is what the public rightly expect of the police.

The decisions we make moving forward are our opportunity to start to build a federation of the future, a federation that we can all be justly proud of, that has clear purpose and direction, is accountable and transparent.

Far from being a “top-down reform”, these proposals will be democratically debated by our membership. But my message as chairman is clear: the status quo is not an option. The federation either reforms, or faces abolition.
Steve Williams
Chairman, Police Federation of England and Wales

 

 

Simon Jenkins’ scepticism is very welcome when exposing the follies of big business and government (The truth is that we are all living on Benefits Street, 22 January). However, when scepticism becomes the dominant ethos of government in the form of public choice theory it is less welcome. This theory states that public servants are only in it for themselves and the only way to put this selfishness to good purpose is to harness it to the profit motive through the market. Good service is guaranteed because the service users are now customers and if they don’t get good service, they will go elsewhere and jobs will be lost. Everybody knows that the NHS puts patients last and consultants don’t do operations on Friday afternoons because they want at early start to the weekend.

This unhealthy scepticism has given rise to a crisis of indecision in government, which has in part given rise to the debt crisis. If civil servants can’t be trusted, it’s best to have as few of them as possible or call in for-profit concerns to advise on policy-making. Before even a rail has been laid, HS2 has cost £250m in consultancy fees (Report, 26 November 2013). This philosophy has led to the destruction of the tax revenue services (too many expensive self-serving bureaucrats) to such an extent that the UK is following Greece into a situation whereincreasingly large numbers of individuals and business corporations are ceasing to pay taxes, adding to the public debt crisis.

May I suggest a little more high-mindedness in public service might be needed to resolve our current problems.
Derrick Joad
Leeds

•  It’s a bit rich for Iain Duncan Smith to blame Labour for high income inequality when the rise in inequality from its lowest-ever level in 1976 was kickstarted by the Conservative’s tax cuts for the rich under Margaret Thatcher, and is being sharply exacerbated by current government policies (Benefits Street reveals ‘ghetto reality’, says Duncan Smith, 23 January). Between 1979 and 2009 the UK Gini index of inequality has risen from 26 to 40, climbing towards that of the US, on 44 (Sweden’s is 25).

To me, Benefits Street shows disadvantaged people struggling in adverse circumstances. Our situation in life is indeed partly a product of genes, upbringing, and personal choice and effort, but is largely shaped by influences not of our making, such as parental, social and economic circumstances. This is why social mobility lessens as inequality increases. Cutting Sure Start, youth centres and libraries doesn’t help, does it?

Politicians should look at the bigger picture and take decisions that will ensure the best long-term outcomes for our country, not try to fool us and score cheap political points.
Michael Miller
Sheffield

• Jack Monroe is right about MPs and lords receiving substantial benefits (It’s time to focus on the real Benefits Street, 22 January). Last week I addressed a meeting in the House of Lords attended by a number of MPs and Lords. I spoke about a project in Easterhouse, Glasgow and they were interested, sympathetic and supportive. But none took up my call to live in a deprived area. This is the only way to understand the real benefits residents. For instance, parents who deny themselves food to ensure that their children do not go hungry, who rarely buy clothes for themselves so that their children can be dressed well for school, who never go on holiday so that their youngsters can pay the cost of going to the camp run by our project. In short, the opposite of what is portrayed on TV.
Bob Holman
Glasgow

• Like Deborah Orr (Benefits Street has caused controversy, but let’s hope it has a worthwhile legacy, 25 January), I watched Benefits Street as a result of the media controversy and I have come to similar but more critical conclusions.

I wish that Orr had been more analytical: to give an example, she comments on one of the men on the street finding but not keeping a job. This cried out for questioning. Who set up him up for a “job” in which he would inevitably fail? (Charitable fund-raising in that area with his lack of skills defies belief!) The result is that he will be even more demoralised, and those who already believe that he is part of a benefit-dependent culture will have their beliefs reinforced.
Dr DJ Rowe
Newcastle upon Tyne

• I have sympathy with almost all of the points Simon Jenkins makes. But what would the British economy and British society look like if the so-called “benefits” he identifies were not in place? Cue for a follow-up article?
Professor Roy Lowe
Birmingham

 

Discussing Miranda Carter’s article (Racist, but important, Review, 25 January) with friends who are both proudly British and acknowledge their Indian, Pakistani and African origins, we were all struck by the same thought. The ignorance of Britain’s colonial past and related literature lies to a great extent with the poor teaching of history and geography in our schools.

As a black Briton, I know my parents were born in a colony. I was raised on stories of how my relatives volunteered to fight in the second world war, choosing to fight for their colonial oppressor who, they believed, offered them more freedom than German domination. It was this fight for freedom that directly led to a turbocharging of the decolonisation movement across Asia and Africa.

I know my Asante ancestors were involved in the slave trade that began with the Arabs and included the Portuguese, Dutch, Danish and British. A trade that financed the Georgian beauty of Bristol, Liverpool and Glasgow. A trade ended in the Atlantic by Britain.

To understand who we are as 21st-century Britons of all colours and why the Commonwealth matters, a thorough understanding of the broad sweep of our history – from colonialism to the Commonwealth – would be a good start.

The wider ignorance discussed in Miranda Carter’s article reflects mainstream education’s failure to teach the truths told to black and brown children by aged relatives. And, yes, that would involve reading imperial literature and placing it in its proper context.
John Armah
London

• A pity that Miranda Carter’s piece on empire adventure stories did not find space to mention Joseph Conrad as partial corrective.
Andrew Hornung
Church Enstone, Oxfordshire

 

Your sports supplement on 24 January showed welcome signs that you take women’s sport seriously (Sean Ingle; Tennis; Women’s Ashes; Alpine skiing). However, you did not even publish the result of the previous day’s women’s World Indoor Bowls championship. An 18-year-old from Suffolk wins a world title and is totally ignored! Do you not think some readers might be interested in keeping up with the wider world of sport, rather than endless articles about what football’s Premier League managers have said about their rivals’ clubs? Send somebody to Stowmarket high school to interview world champion Katherine Rednall and give her the credit she is due.
Tim Vick
Woodbridge, Suffolk

• Not only does your review of Blurred Lines (24 January) not name a single actor in the all-woman cast, no one in the photo is named either. Given that the play is about gender equality and the review mentions how rare it is to see an all-female cast in our male-dominated theatre, for goodness sake give the women some credit!
Trudie Goodwin
London

• Surely the reason tenants might be reluctant to occupy the Shard (Report, 25 January) in these post-World Trade Centre years might be explained in cliches such as “sitting duck” and “accident waiting to happen”.
Ian Anderson

Bristol

• Ahhh … Shardenfreude …
Sue Lamble
London

 

 

Independent:

 

The tone of your editorial (24 January) about Michael Gove’s education reforms brought me to tears. I’m retiring (a few months early) in July and can’t wait to get out. I shall miss the students and the daily immersion in my subject – English – but I shan’t miss the constant barrage of criticism which has brought morale to an all-time low.

Your criticism that we have accepted or promoted mediocrity cannot go unchallenged. Results have not “risen” because of Gove’s reforms, but because teachers in many schools are driven, by leaders fearful of Ofsted, to aiding pupils beyond what would once have been acceptable.

School leaders can’t afford to let their figures drop, so students are coached, pushed and tutored to a ridiculous extent, with teachers working far harder than the students to achieve results.

One consequence has been many young people who are unable and unwilling to work for themselves, because they’ve never learned the skills or the need – they can’t be allowed to achieve what their own efforts would see them achieve. And yes, I do know of schools where teachers cheat too – again, with coercion or complicity from leaders.

The school at which I work became an academy simply because of money. And the majority of schools which converted did so  for the same reason: budgets would be cut if they stayed with the local education authority.

And where did much of this money go? To lawyers who set up the new contracts, and on rebranding and marketing. In addition, staggering sums (tens of thousands of pounds) were spent entering students as many times as possible for exams, to get grades up.

But you can’t blame the teachers for this – it has been driven by league tables and by school leaders desperate to push up grades. It has never been driven by a desire to do better for children.

Your editorial lauds the EBacc – but at what cost has this been achieved? Other subjects have been marginalised because they don’t “count”.

Many newly qualified teachers are swallowed up by schools that are driving to become “outstanding” and are driven mercilessly to achieve this aim. Then they leave, burned out and demoralised.

I love my students and I love my subject. My results are good. Many of my students choose to study the subject at A-level because, I’m told, I’ve inspired them to do so.

I’m a good teacher. And I’m going because I’ve had enough of the exhaustion and the morale bashing.

On the day after my students finished a 2,000-word essay comparing the whole of Romeo and Juliet with 16 (quality) poems thematically linked with it, Gove was on TV telling the country that children would “no longer” be able to leave school without being able to write at length and without studying a whole Shakespeare play.

I’m sad and bitter and feeling very fortunate  that I’ll be going this summer. Please, don’t lament teachers’ low morale in an editorial that contributes to it.

Lorna Gale

Knowle, Solihull, West Midlands

It seems you have given Michael Gove an A grade for his EBacc exam scheme, when he has made some elementary mistakes in  his history.

The baccalaureat was brought in by the French under Napoleon as a school-leaving exam to fit young people for higher education, life and work in a democratic society. It has always included philosophy, maths and science and now extends to take in technology and vocational subjects such as business studies and agriculture.

It is most unlikely that the French government or other European or international Bacc users  will accept Gove’s version  as equivalent to their  own or as a key to their higher education.

So your leader writer should revise their eulogy thus: “Well done, Michael, you have shown promise. But you should now aim higher for the next two years and rename your EBacc as a PreBacc – and also include philosophy and the performing arts.”

George Low

Hampton Hill, London

 

Headline statistics reveal very little of the true picture in our schools.

The desire to bring up compassionate young adults who are capable of thinking and who have a sense of perspective has been sacrificed. In its place are a testing game, near-constant change for minimal benefit, rampant careerism, and damaging levels of insecurity and pressure. This has been true for years, but is more so than ever under Michael Gove.

State education remains primarily a political football, rather than a vehicle for public good. Experienced teachers are increasingly seen as an irrelevance and children are being brought up to see passing exams as the sole purpose of school.

These long-term cultural failures will prove far more significant than Gove’s claimed success.

Chris Sloggett

Teacher, London N6

Congratulations to the vice chancellor

I am pleased to see that  the vice chancellor of Sheffield University has secured himself a good salary increase (“£105,000 pay rise for leading university boss”, 25 January) to bring his pay up to  nearly treble that paid to the Prime Minister.

I’m sure students at the university are pleased their tuition fees are being put to such good use and will not in any way resent paying back their £27,000 debts, plus interest, over the next 30 years, or the Coalition’s help in his achieving such a package. An excellent result for all concerned.

Paul Ives

Sanderstead, Croydon

Extended families could be our future

Hamish McRae (22 January) writes that inequality is changing. In developing countries, the employed are getting less poor. In developed countries, the employed are getting more poor. He also raises the probability that technology will eliminate more middle-management jobs, particularly in the West. He wonders if there can be a natural conclusion to these developments.

In Britain, a sensible solution could be that we give up the expectation of every generation owning an individual property. We probably need to revert to living in supportive, three-generation family groups, where each individual has a role in maintaining the family unit. Unfunded pension costs, child care, care of the elderly and irregular employment can better be managed in extended family groups.

Martin London

Henllan, Denbighshire

Hunger for food, not democracy

The best help that the EU can give to Ukraine is to say that it is not welcome, since few of the rebels believe  in democracy.

Rioting and armed revolt are attempts by force to gain food and the luxuries that other people have. I suggest that anti-government feelings in Libya, Egypt and Syria are more due to dear food caused by the great growths in population than to a wish for democracy.

D Williamson

Seaton, Cumbria

church must speak out against barbarism As a matter of urgency, the Most Reverend Justin Welby and other Christian leaders in the UK must speak out against the worsening holocaust  against gay people in Nigeria. Silence is the voice of complicity, and complicity with such barbarism will discredit  the church forever.

Dr Daniel Emlyn-Jones

Oxford

Worst combination of greed and red tape

We are living in worryingly ingenious times. Example: I have just paid £50 to a large profit-making corporation, subcontracted by the local council, for them to issue me with a certificate, in order for them to collect my non-clinical refuse.

They know that my clinical waste is disposed of by another (non-commercial) agency. Because I am a GP, I am posed certain questions to certify my good citizenship and thus guarantee public safety: I must answer that I will not put such things as used dressings, sharp surgical instruments, excised body parts, unwanted organs, bodily fluids or dead babies in the general waste.

They will not collect my waste without their (my) certificate, which I can only purchase from them. They do not check the accuracy of my answers. This is a brilliant conflation of venal, opportunistic, corporate capitalism and leaden, vacuous, officious bureaucracy: it exemplifies much that is most specious, profligate and foolish in our commercially injected welfare services.

Whatever happened to medical office effluent before such corporate safeguards were there to protect us, and certificates issued to “prove” it?

Dr David Zigmond

London N8

Hail, King Alex of Scotland

Alex Salmond’s outrage that anyone should dare ask him to provide details of how he personally spends taxpayers’ money indicates his new self-image. In his own mind, perhaps he has become, with the thistle and the deep-fried Mars bar, a Scottish icon, and, like his “auld ally” Louis XIV, truly believes: “L’Ecosse, c’est moi.”

Dr John Cameron

St Andrews, Fife

 

 

Times:

 

 

The House at second reading must instruct the Select Committee to hear petitions which seek to challenge the principle of the Bill

Sir, The Supreme Court judges who ruled this week that the hybrid Bill process for approving HS2 is an adequate way of assessing and debating Europe’s biggest infrastructure project are supreme optimists.

The public inquiry into building a fifth terminal at Heathrow lasted four and a half years. This drew criticism, but the eventual decision was accepted by all sides because the process was seen to be fair. There were hundreds of issues considered by a truly independent, non-political panel and all were thoroughly examined. Not a stone was left unturned.

The HS2 project is far larger than Terminal 5. Its proposed construction raises thousands of minor and major issues, ranging from diverting paths for children going to school to potentially distrupting part of London’s water supply; from fast trains killing birds and other wildlife to the demolition of listed buildings.

There is no way a group of MPs on a Select Committee can hope to properly examine all the issues. The pressure on time will ensure that many contentious aspects will be simply ignored.

With all three chief political parties currently supporting HS2, let’s not pretend that the Hybrid Bill process is going to be independent or thorough. It will get the job done, but it will leave thousands dissatisfied and frustrated.

Peter Brown

High Wycombe, Bucks

Sir, The Government has repeatedly said that HS2 is needed in the national interest. The only defensible way to put that claim to the test is for the House at second reading to instruct the Select Committee to hear petitions which seek to challenge the principle of the Bill, notwithstanding its hybrid character. See Lord Reed’s speech in the recent Supreme Court High Speed 2 Action Alliance case [2014]UKSC3 at paragraph 58.

The unconvincing procedural distinctions between a private and hybrid Bill cannot justify the immunity from challenge to its principle which a hybrid Bill traditionally enjoys. In particular, the fact that the Bill will have been considered at second reading does not remotely replicate the kind of scrutiny to which a private Bill is subjected in committee.

Select committees are expected to, and in my experience invariably do, act judicially. In effect, a full-blown court case takes place. If the HS2 Bill’s principle is not examined in detail, the business case for the Bill, its environmental consequences and the existence of possibly better alternatives will all (scandalously) be, to the extent that consideration of these matters may threaten its principle, outside the committee’s remit. Given the importance and huge cost of the project it may be anticipated that if the Bill is railroaded into law in such circumstances, opponents will be legitimately aggrieved and even supporters anxious that justice had not been done. If on the other hand the Government’s case for the Bill prevails before the Select Committee, despite permitted challenges to the its principle, no one will have any legitimate ground of complaint when it passes into law.

George Laurence, QC

London WC2

 

‘We still lack a universally agreed framework avoiding the undesirable endemic shortcomings now tainting abortion’

Sir, Peter Franklin’s views are useful (Opinion, Jan 20), but his reference to the Abortion Act is insufficient. From its operations over some 50 years we can learn much about possible legislation for assisted suicide (AS), if not that of the infirm — which will surely follow, thereby avoiding Lord Falconer’s narrow legalistic proposals, which inadequately address the medical subtleties.

Abortion practice has taught us that social trends change over time; that medical and pharmaceutical advances threaten legal provision and that there is serious disquiet about its abuse and easy manipulability. True, any law is what we get, but are Falconer’s provisions adequate, given the wilful behaviour that inevitably attempts to bypass what is legislated?

Legalising assisted deaths requires formal surveillance, overseen by legally informed persons with direct access to DPP and police, avoiding posthumous interrogation; employing expert clinicians to review cases — thereby possibly changing subjects’ minds, especially where depression exists; and permitting statistical analysis. All this should be completed up front, excluding the vagaries of Falconer’s two doctors and definitions of “terminal within six months”. If current AS law is changed, there will be no deterrence, whistle-blowing or reassurance for likely victims.

We still lack a universally agreed framework avoiding the undesirable endemic shortcomings now tainting abortion. Mere legal change, still lacking majority acceptance and stringent oversight, is unacceptable. I am not necessarily against AS, but let us not sleep-walk ourselves into something that fails to accommodate our desires, aims, and instincts.

Michael N. Marsh, FRCP

Wolfson College, Oxford

 

It seems there have been many blind law professors — this reader writes to nominate his tutor at Balliol

Sir, May I put in a word for Sir Theodore Tylor, my blind law tutor at Balliol from 1946 to 1948, who was a close friend of Professor Rupert Cross (letters, Jan 24 and 25). A single man, Theo said that Rupert was lucky to be married, because his wife could read the latest law reports to him in bed.

Adrian Hamilton, QC

London W14

 

Recent suggestions for paid-for education would result in the Victorian stigma of the ‘charity child’ returning to our schools

Sir, Anthony Seldon (letter, Jan 24) is proposing social engineering on a massive scale, which would leave countless parents dissatisfied while leaving the very well off free to use the independent sector. Worse, the drafting of the less advantaged into “successful” schools would more or less restore the “charity child” stigma so often the theme of Victorian fiction.

Richard Merwood

Salisbury

 

 

On Holocaust Day we should all take time to reflect on the slaughter of a people whose only ‘crime’ was the fact of their birth

Sir, Jenni Frazer’s article (Faith, Jan 25) about the Torah scrolls saved from destruction is moving. My synagogue, Radlett & Bushey Reform in Hertfordshire, has one. A colleague and I took it a while back to the town from which it came — Ceske Budejovice in the Czech Republic.

The town council decided to mount an exhibition to honour the memory of the Jews of the town taken away by the Nazis, and our scroll formed a centrepiece. At a short public service of remembrance, passers-by stopped to ask questions and some, reading our list of families taken away to all but certain death, recognised grimfacedly names of some who had been neighbours. The town was eager to acknowledge the loss of its Jewish citizens. Today, Holocaust Memorial Day, is an apposite time for us all to do the same by remembering the slaughter of a people whose “crime” was to be born into the wrong religion or tribe.

Barry Hyman

Bushey Heath, Herts

 

Telegraph:

 

SIR – Further to the complaints about the dumbing down of Radio 3, an even more disastrous process has taken place in the case of Radio 2.

Once a haven of light music, popular classics, operetta, military and brass bands, and often featuring works by composers such as Eric Coates, Ernest Tomlinson, Ronald Binge and the peerless Robert Farnon, it has been dismantled by recent controllers and replaced by a much brassier product, with phone-ins and chat, where brash presenters are more important that their programmes.

Once much-loved, it is now a no-go area for the more mature listener.

Tony Phillips
Creigiau, Glamorgan

SIR – As well as Bach’s Toccata in D minor and Widor’s Toccata (Letters, January 19), Classic FM plays two other organ pieces: the third movement of Saint-Saëns Symphony No. 3 and the second movement from Handel’s 13th Organ Concerto. I wish John Suchet and his colleagues would play more of the vast repertoire of the “King of Instruments”.

Perhaps if all lovers of organ music were to make their views known to the bosses at Classic FM, we might manage to hear a greater variety.

Guy Slatter
Liskeard, Cornwall

SIR – It seems to me that several times a week, when I happen to be within earshot of Classic FM, Rimsky-Korsakov’s “Scheherazade” is being played.

I emailed Classic FM some time ago for an explanation but did not receive a reply. With such a huge choice of music available, why does it happen? Yes, it’s a nice piece of music, but so what?

Peter McPherson
Merriott, Somerset

 

SIR – The news that the Serious Fraud Office has been given additional funding by the Treasury to pursue its investigation into bribery allegations against Rolls-Royce raises a number of interesting points about how companies and governments should cooperate to combat corruption.

The dearth of corporate prosecutions since the UK Bribery Act came into force in 2011 and the SFO’s request to the Treasury suggest that the SFO is insufficiently resourced to deal with the complexity of international corruption.

Considering the huge amounts that are presumably lost to the Treasury through fraud, or that could be recovered through successful prosecutions, it would make sense to review the level of funding for this important government department.

At the same time, the SFO needs to do its bit to stimulate an environment which brings it cases, rather than having to go out and discover them. One way to do this is to encourage companies to self-report voluntarily. It may sound counterintuitive, but a co-operative relationship between the public prosecutor and the business world could encourage companies to come forward when they suspect wrongdoing by their employees or distributors.

Such a relationship could include policies such as leniency in recognition of “adequate procedures” or reduced penalties in exchange for cooperation with the authorities.

Brook Horowitz
Co-ordinator of the B20 Task Force on Transparency and Anti-corruption, 2013
London W1

Moving Archers

SIR – I was deeply moved by Peggy Woolley’s poignant farewell to her husband, Jack, in The Archers.

Peggy’s quiet dignity and courage in coping with Jack’s Alzheimer’s contrasted with the antics of some of the show’s younger, dysfunctional characters.

Peter Myers
Oldmeldrum, Aberdeenshire

Inflexible pews

SIR – The worshippers at All Saints Church, Evesham, (report, January 19) are not alone in resisting the modernisers who want to replace the pews with comfortable seating. At All Saints Church, Marazion, we are faced with a similar problem.

Quite apart from the cost, we are a Grade II-listed Victorian Church. We do not want a “flexible multifunction space”!

Trevor Reid
Marazion, Cornwall

EU negotiation should be for Britain to exit

SIR – Alec Ellis is right that a large Ukip vote in May could lead to sensible negotiation. However, this could never halt the EU juggernaut.

For the euro to survive, the eurozone nations have no option but to federate; that is the purpose for which the currency was invented. Then, as George Osborne, the Chancellor, admits, a eurozone bloc vote under qualified majority voting would pose a huge threat to Britain, and in particular to the City of London.

However, no amount of “sensible negotiation” would solve the problems inherent in two-tier membership, so its sole aim should be to agree mutually acceptable terms for a British exit: free trade as a member of Efta, but without the political control.

Roger Smith
Meppershall, Bedfordshire

SIR – If the Government took the action described in the letter from 95 Conservative MPs,it could mean that a referendum on remaining in the EU would no longer be necessary.

Legislation needs to be passed to restrict the application of EU laws to Britain until each law has been approved by Parliament.

Soon Commissioner Viviane Reding will be claiming that picking and choosing which legislation becomes British law is, in her words, “non-negotiable”. Then let Brussels try to expel Britain from the EU. It may succeed, saving us from having to run a referendum.

N J Mustoe
Thurleigh, Bedfordshire

SIR – As Foreign Secretary, William Hague must demand that Britons have votes of equal value to other EU member nations in the forthcoming European elections.

Why should the British electorate be allocated 73 members, when the 15 smallest countries, with a combined population of two million less than Britain, are allocated 173 members?

John Riddington
Broadstone, Dorset

Renewable targets

SIR – It is good news that the legally binding renewable energy targets are to be ditched by the European Commission. The 10 years it has taken to come to this momentous decision highlights the dreadful inefficiency of the EU structure.

It was obvious from the start that subsidies would cost billions, funds that would inevitably be diverted from being spent on efficient companies’ products.

B J Colby
Portishead, Somerset

SIR – Extremely high wind speeds are not necessarily needed for a wind turbine to be economic.

Sites with slower wind speeds can still produce significant power, and can be economically advantageous in other ways – they tend to be cheaper and easier to develop. In addition, turbines can be produced which are best designed for low wind conditions to maximise power.

There is a huge amount of wind power potential in England.In all cases, developers only get paid for the power they produce, and the downward trajectory of onshore wind subsidy levels shows they are careful to choose economically efficient sites.

Jennifer Webber
Director of External Affairs, RenewableUK
London SW1

Lib Dem principles

SIR – The saga of the Right Honourable Lord Rennard, against whom allegations of sexual harassment are deemed “broadly credible” without meeting the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt, bestows little credit on the Liberal Democrats’ apparatus.

Perhaps just as discreditable is his vaunted success in improving the Lib Dems’ election results through by tailoring their message differently to different constituencies, heedless of self-contradiction and regardless of principle. This is consistent with their leader’s cynical willingness to work with either of the main parties as long as his party can continue to wield the balance of power.

Dugald Barr
London W8

House price illusion

SIR – You report that “house price rises in the South East are dragging up values across the country, acting as an engine of wealth”. But this is only an illusion of wealth.

How could a return to rampant property inflation, where in order to buy a house people must borrow money which doesn’t exist, and which they can ill afford to repay, possibly help us out of the mess that we are in?

Mike Bussell
East Chinnock, Somerset

Fenced-off Lakes

SIR – I was disconcerted to read of Ed Vaizey declaring that the Lake District should join Stonehenge as a World Heritage Site.

Does this mean it will be fenced off, with a visitor site five miles away, with pictures of the site instead of the real thing?

John Sutherland
Uxbridge, Middlesex

 

SIR – I was interested to read the letters on the demise of good manners.

I taught both of my daughters to say please and thank you. But when my eldest worked in a council nursery she was told not to encourage the children to say please and thank you because it was very “middle-class”. Now she works in a private school where children and staff are expected to use these words.

I worked as a hospital secretary for 20 years and always held doors open for people, male or female, young or old, as they did for me, especially when we were carrying equipment, patients’ notes, or just a cup of coffee. Class, gender or age didn’t come into it.

Mary Hogg
Sheffield, South Yorkshire

SIR – I worked as a supervisor for the North Wales probation service at a youth hostel with two young offenders. At the end of each day I would thank the hostel warden for his hospitality and the refreshments he had provided. The offenders heard me repeat the same message each day.

On the final day of the programme I heard the two men thank the warden. That was the best reward I could have had. It is never too late to learn good manners.

John Chamberlain
Bangor, Caernarfonshire

SIR – So many things in our society seem to have been discarded – dressing smartly (why do so many people look so scruffy these days?) letter writing, speaking clearly, table manners and, above all, a sense of morality.

Monica Smith
Hitchin, Hertfordshire

SIR – At school in the Sixties, if you were seen eating in the street in school uniform even after the end of the school day, this was reported and you were spoken to the next day.

The same applied if you were not wearing school uniform correctly: top button done up and tie in place as well as the hideous beret positioned appropriately. It wasn’t worth breaking the rules.

Ginny Hudson
Swanmore, Hampshire

SIR – We went on a Rhine cruise in 2012 and the crew were mostly Bulgarian. They were charming, efficient, spoke better English and had better manners than many English people.

Roger Fairclough
South Nutfield, Surrey

SIR – My own particular bugbear concerns the many people who no longer cover their mouths when yawning. A gaping chasm is not an attractive feature by any standards.

David Stevens
Christchurch, Dorset

SIR – I am always surprised by the number of people who cough and sneeze on buses and trains, and spread their germs in other public places.

The coughers and sneezers also attend church, where they infect all and sundry, especially when shaking hands with others as a “sign of peace”.

Ron Kirby
Dorchester, Dorset

SIR – I take my dog for a walk every day on the local heath and say “Good morning” to all the people I meet.

They all reply, but the conventional response is gradually being superseded by the greeting “Hi”. All is not lost, but it’s not the same.

Colin Jarrett
Ipswich, Suffolk

SIR – When a new colleague joined our company in 1952, his employer observed that he did not wear a hat, and posed the question, “And what do you take off when you meet a lady of your acquaintance in the street?”

Simon Edsor
London SW1

SIR – Good manners are all very well but recently it came as a shock when I was offered a seat on the tube for the first time and realised I must look much older than I thought.

My husband’s moment of truth came at a dinner party when the host’s son addressed him as “Sir” – it quite spoilt his evening!

Gillian S S Lambert
Tadworth, Surrey

 

 

Irish Times:

 

Sir, – The Junior Cycle Student Award is being introduced from next year (Education, January 21st), but does it really address the education system’s problems? In our schools we prepare students for exams when we should be preparing them for life. We are taught only what is necessary to achieve a good grade and nothing else.

I am a fifth year student and many of my teachers are passionate about their subjects, however the rigid structure of the Leaving Cert prevents them from transferring their enthusiasm to their pupils. Learning should be an enjoyable, enriching experience, not the daily drain that students endure today.

The education system in Finland is a prime example of what Ireland could do to change. Children do not begin education until the age of seven and there are no standardised tests until the age of 16. Teachers are picked from the top 10 per cent of graduates and it is a requirement that they possess a master’s degree in education. The implementation of the system has had proven results, with Finnish children coming at the top or very close to the top in the core subjects in international rankings.

I realise fully how fortunate we are in this country to even have the chance to attend school. However, I find it troubling that young, intelligent people in my year are frustrated and impatient for the next two years of their lives to be completed so they can escape their daily hell.

The JCSA may help change this for the junior cycle in the future, but it makes no difference to the outdated senior cycle. We should not be content with a flawed system. We are given a great opportunity to be in second-level education so why don’t we perfect the experience? – Yours, etc,

IAN SMITH,

Orlagh Wood,

 

Sir, – With the reopening of the embassy to the Holy See, John F Jordan (January 23rd) asks whether harsh decisions in relation to health and welfare will also be reversed.

In order to provide excellent health, social protection, education and other services we are working to fix what was our broken economy. This can’t be done at the click of a finger. The Irish people have borne considerable hardship, as alluded to by Mr Jordan. In implementing difficult measures the Coalition has tried to distribute the burden evenly. And I believe when our economy does fully recover, which it will, that the dividends have to be distributed fairly also.

On that front, we are delivering on our promises to the public. We said we would focus on job creation – 58,000 jobs were created last year; we committed to the restoration of our economic sovereignty – we exited the bailout in December; and said that we would grow our economy and reduce our deficit. Our economy is growing again slowly but steadily and our deficit, while still too high, is far more manageable than the horrendous deficit we inherited.

Continued progress in these core economic areas will provide the bedrock on which our public services will be based. That is why we are so focused on getting these basics right. We are working to reform and run more efficiently our health service, the social welfare system and other public services that Mr Jordan refers to.

In time, as our economy improves and more jobs are created, we will be able to increase investment in these services in a sustainable manner. While it is a scandal that we were ever in this situation to begin with, I firmly believe our strategy for recovery is working and that we are making very encouraging progress towards economic recovery. – Yours, etc,

CHARLIE FLANAGAN TD,

Chairman of Fine Gael

Parliamentary Party,

Leinster House,

 

Sir, – In response to Bill Reidy’s call for more performance-management for teachers (Change One Thing, Education, January 21st), it is important to emphasise that teachers are already subject to multiple levels of accountability. Second-level schools are subject to four different methods of inspection and teachers are also subject to the Teaching Council’s code of professional conduct.

Mr Reidy quotes OECD research from 2008 on teacher appraisals in his opening paragraph. A more recent finding from the same body’s Government At A Glance report last year shows that out of 34 countries surveyed, Ireland enjoys the highest level of public satisfaction with the education system and schools with a ranking of 82 per cent compared to the OECD average of 66 per cent.

December’s Pisa comparisons also endorse the high levels of quality in the Irish education system despite deep and damaging cuts in teacher numbers and attacks on programmes that help the most vulnerable students.

These international findings are echoed by the recent Chief Inspector’s Report which shows that 87 per cent of parents are happy with the teaching standards in second-level schools. In addition, Irish teachers engage in both formal and countless informal meetings with parents. Furthermore, there is a time honoured tradition of collegial accountability in the profession which also ensures that teachers work to the very highest standards. – Yours, etc,

GERARD P

CRAUGHWELL,

President,

Teachers’ Union of Ireland,

 

Sir, – I wish to thank you for your “Stories of the Rising” supplement (January 17th). It was wonderful to get an insight into the ordinary participants and their contribution to the independence struggle.

I was particularly impressed by the image of the captured prisoners in Stafford Prison. Looking at their faces and reading about them reminded me of one of the only references to the regular volunteers.

It was during a radio interview about the volunteers some time ago on RTÉ, when Roddy Doyle referred to the “smelly cyclists who cycled into town all the way from Kimmage with a gun under their great coat in the month of April, can you imagine the smell off them”.

Well I’m glad the archives of the Bureau of Military History gives us the opportunity to learn more about the “smelly cyclists”. – Yours, etc,

PHILIP TOBIN,

Whitecliff,

Rathfarnham, Dublin 16.

Sir, – Stephen Collins (Heritage, January 17th) writes that famous revolutionary and statesman Frank Aiken was in receipt of the top rate military service pension of £350 a year on top of his ministerial and TD’s salary. But it is important to note, as the recent releases show, that Aiken originally applied for his pension in 1936 only to withdraw his application in 1942. Although his service record in the evolutionary period warranted the top rate of pension, he did not reapply until 1955 – after Fianna Fáil had lost power to the second Inter-party government. – Yours, etc,

Dr BRYCE EVANS,

Liverpool Hope University,

Co-editor,

Frank Aiken: Nationalist

and Internationalist (IAP,

2014),

Hope park,

Liverpool,

 

 

Sir, – According to Mary Mitchell-O’Connor “It has . . . been proven that more time spent by young children on physical activity has a positive impact on weight” (Opinion, January 20th). One can only hope this startling revelation was not gleaned from another expensive consultant’s report – although, in a country where Anglo Irish Bank’s auditors are now working for Nama (Fintan O’Toole, Opinion, January 21st), anything seems possible! – Yours, etc,

FINBAR O’CONNOR,

Claude Road,

Drumcondra,

 

Sir, – A simple corporate governance test for any board: chairman to board, “Would we be happy to see this decision on the front page of The Irish Times?”. – Yours, etc,

ALAN McCARTHY,

Belgrave Road,

Dublin 6.

 

 

Sir, – I share Kevin Myers’s concern about the commonly accepted estimate of 49,000 Irish casualties in the first World War (January 20th).

The real problem with this statistic is that includes only military deaths and excludes civilian deaths.

It is perhaps no coincidence that civilian deaths of past and current wars are not included in these kinds of “memorial rolls”. We do not have “a tomb of the unknown baby”. There are no parades, no monuments, no online projects to commemorate the innocent victims of wars.

Who profits? Perhaps the only “memorial roll” truly worthy of the war dead is the one that we write in our hearts that simply says: “No more war . . . Neither for the kingdom of Christ, nor for all the kingdoms of the world” . – Yours, etc,

DERMOT A QUIRK,

(A Quaker),

Churchtown,

Sir, – Una Mullally (Opinion, January 20th) states without any equivocation: “Teachings of the Catholic Church on homosexuality are homophobic”.

In my dictionary the definition of “homophobic” is a “hatred or fear of homosexuals”. Is this the level of opinion and analysis now being offered on this topic? Has Ms Mullally read any literature giving the Catholic point of view? I would recommend the 2003 publication by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the faith entitled, “Unions between homosexual persons”. Some of the headings are as follows:

Position on the problems of homosexual unions.

Arguments from reason against legal recognition of homosexual unions:

From the order of right reason; from the biological and anthropological order; from the social order, from the legal order.

The new American bible in its introduction to St Paul’s letter to the church in Corinth points out that the city was a melting pot full of devotees of various pagan cults and marked by a measure of moral depravity not unusual in a great seaport. Therefore the following admonition should come as no surprise: “Do you not know that the unjust will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither fornicators nor idolaters nor adulterers nor boy prostitutes nor practising homosexuals nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God.” (1 Cor 6.9).

Later in the same letter, St Paul offers “a still more excellent way” or following the Christian gospel: “Love is patient, love is kind. It is not jealous, it is not pompous, it is not inflated, it is not rude, it does not seek its own interests, it is not quick tempered, it does not brood over injury, it does not rejoice over wrongdoings but rejoices with the truth. It bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things”. (1 Cor 13.4-7).

It is Catholic teaching that men and women with homosexual tendencies “must be accepted with respect, compassion and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided.”

Teachings of the Catholic Church are homophobic, according to Una Mullally? Properly understood and put into practice I hope not. – Yours, etc,

GERRY GLENNON,

Auburn Road,

Dún Laoghaire,

 

Sir, – Una Mullally (Opinion, January 20th) states without any equivocation: “Teachings of the Catholic Church on homosexuality are homophobic”.

In my dictionary the definition of “homophobic” is a “hatred or fear of homosexuals”. Is this the level of opinion and analysis now being offered on this topic? Has Ms Mullally read any literature giving the Catholic point of view? I would recommend the 2003 publication by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the faith entitled, “Unions between homosexual persons”. Some of the headings are as follows:

Position on the problems of homosexual unions.

Arguments from reason against legal recognition of homosexual unions:

From the order of right reason; from the biological and anthropological order; from the social order, from the legal order.

The new American bible in its introduction to St Paul’s letter to the church in Corinth points out that the city was a melting pot full of devotees of various pagan cults and marked by a measure of moral depravity not unusual in a great seaport. Therefore the following admonition should come as no surprise: “Do you not know that the unjust will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither fornicators nor idolaters nor adulterers nor boy prostitutes nor practising homosexuals nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God.” (1 Cor 6.9).

Later in the same letter, St Paul offers “a still more excellent way” or following the Christian gospel: “Love is patient, love is kind. It is not jealous, it is not pompous, it is not inflated, it is not rude, it does not seek its own interests, it is not quick tempered, it does not brood over injury, it does not rejoice over wrongdoings but rejoices with the truth. It bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things”. (1 Cor 13.4-7).

It is Catholic teaching that men and women with homosexual tendencies “must be accepted with respect, compassion and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided.”

Teachings of the Catholic Church are homophobic, according to Una Mullally? Properly understood and put into practice I hope not. – Yours, etc,

GERRY GLENNON,

Auburn Road,

 

Sir, – I am working on a photo book about the women of the Irish revolution, in an attempt to acknowledge many of the lesser-known female participants who were involved in the 1913-23 events. 

I hope to include women from throughout the country who had a direct role to play, whether fighting, carrying out intelligence work, first-aid, or transporting arms; and also mothers, daughters, sisters, wives, girlfriends, or fiancées of men who were active, as these women suffered just as much if they had been fighting themselves. Theirs is a story that needs to be told.

I would be most grateful if readers who have such stories and photographs of female relatives would contact me.  Full credit for use of the photographs would be acknowledged and copyright of the photographs would rest with the owner. I do not need original photographs: scans of images (email to editorial@mercierpress.ie) would be great. – Yours, etc,

LIZ GILLIS,

C/o Mercier Press,

Unit 3b, Oak House,

Bessboro Road,

 

 

Sir, – William Reville (Science, January 16th) criticises materialism as excluding, without evidence, the possibility of the supernatural. The problem with this is that “the supernatural” taken as a phenomenon is a nonsense. If the supernatural has effects on the material world, then it matters and is subject to material observation and investigation. If it has no effect on the material world and is not subject to material observation and investigation, then it is not a phenomenon, but an idea, a figment of the imagination.

Figments of the imagination are nonetheless important. They have social, emotional, aesthetic and intellectual benefits, which Prof Reville clearly enjoys (and more power to him). If we are to properly understand the role of religion it is as shared mental imagery, that affects how we feel about the world and how we behave, and not as a description of reality. – Yours, etc,

Dr BRENDAN HALPIN,

Dept of Sociology,

University of Limerick,

Castletroy, Co Limerick.

Sir, – One isn’t commonly in like mind with Prof William Reville in terms of what makes us tick, in particular in a moral setting; however, an exception to the rule is his recent observation along the lines that philosophy is failing us as vis-a-vis a meaningful interface with science (Science, January 16th).

Might he, therefore, use his not insignificant position, in the order of things, to espouse the introduction of philosophy into the schools’ curriculum at the earliest opportunity? Among the merits of this enlightened position for our young citizens, is, first, an awareness that they are not born in sin, they are inherently good; second, that an inquiring and questioning mind, especially in formative years, will stand them in good stead. – Yours, etc,

OWEN MORTON,

Chemin des deux Chapelles,

Magagnosc de Grasse,

France.

 

 

Sir, – I for one will be very pleased if I never again see “I for one . . .” on your Letters page. – Yours, etc,

JOSEPH RYAN,

Whitethorn Road,

Clonskeagh,

Dublin 14.

Sir, – We can do without hearing or reading “in terms of” (regarding), “impact” (effect), “impact on” (affect), “untruth” (lie), “lengthy” (long), and most annoying of all “coalition” instead of “government”, unless its composition is relevant. – Yours, etc,

DON O’GRADY,

Foxborough Downs,

Lucan, Co Dublin.

Sir, – When greeted with the phrase “Pleased to meet you”, my grandfather, a clergyman and a scholar, used to respond by saying “Glad to have you know me.” – Yours, etc,

DUDLEY SMITH,

Avondale Square,

Dunboyne, Co Meath.

 

 

 

Irish Independent:

 

 


Viewing all 594 articles
Browse latest View live